File size: 10,994 Bytes
21f2c74 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 |
---
inference: false
license: mit
language:
- en
metrics:
- exact_match
- f1
- bertscore
pipeline_tag: text-classification
---
# QA-Evaluation-Metrics
[![PyPI version qa-metrics](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/qa-metrics.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/qa-metrics/)
[![Colab](https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg)](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/17b7vrZqH0Yun2AJaOXydYZxr3cw20Ga6?usp=sharing)
QA-Evaluation-Metrics is a fast and lightweight Python package for evaluating question-answering models and prompting of black-box and open-source large language models. It provides various basic and efficient metrics to assess the performance of QA models.
### Updates
- Uopdated to version 0.2.8
- Supports prompting OPENAI GPT-series models and Claude Series models now. (Assuimg OPENAI version > 1.0)
- Supports prompting various open source models such as LLaMA-2-70B-chat, LLaVA-1.5 etc by calling API from [deepinfra](https://deepinfra.com/models).
## Installation
* Python version >= 3.6
* openai version >= 1.0
To install the package, run the following command:
```bash
pip install qa-metrics
```
## Usage/Logistics
The python package currently provides six QA evaluation methods.
- Given a set of gold answers, a candidate answer to be evaluated, and a question (if applicable), the evaluation returns True if the candidate answer matches any one of the gold answer, False otherwise.
- Different evaluation methods have distinct strictness of evaluating the correctness of a candidate answer. Some have higher correlation with human judgments than others.
- Normalized Exact Match and Question/Answer type Evaluation are the most efficient method. They are suitable for short-form QA datasets such as NQ-OPEN, Hotpot QA, TriviaQA, SQuAD, etc.
- Question/Answer Type Evaluation and Transformer Neural evaluations are cost free and suitable for short-form and longer-form QA datasets. They have higher correlation with human judgments than exact match and F1 score when the length of the gold and candidate answers become long.
- Black-box LLM evaluations are closest to human evaluations, and they are not cost-free.
## Normalized Exact Match
#### `em_match`
Returns a boolean indicating whether there are any exact normalized matches between gold and candidate answers.
**Parameters**
- `reference_answer` (list of str): A list of gold (correct) answers to the question.
- `candidate_answer` (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated.
**Returns**
- `boolean`: A boolean True/False signifying matches between reference or candidate answers.
```python
from qa_metrics.em import em_match
reference_answer = ["The Frog Prince", "The Princess and the Frog"]
candidate_answer = "The movie \"The Princess and the Frog\" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm's \"Iron Henry\""
match_result = em_match(reference_answer, candidate_answer)
print("Exact Match: ", match_result)
'''
Exact Match: False
'''
```
## F1 Score
#### `f1_score_with_precision_recall`
Calculates F1 score, precision, and recall between a reference and a candidate answer.
**Parameters**
- `reference_answer` (str): A gold (correct) answers to the question.
- `candidate_answer` (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated.
**Returns**
- `dictionary`: A dictionary containing the F1 score, precision, and recall between a gold and candidate answer.
```python
from qa_metrics.f1 import f1_match,f1_score_with_precision_recall
f1_stats = f1_score_with_precision_recall(reference_answer[0], candidate_answer)
print("F1 stats: ", f1_stats)
'''
F1 stats: {'f1': 0.25, 'precision': 0.6666666666666666, 'recall': 0.15384615384615385}
'''
match_result = f1_match(reference_answer, candidate_answer, threshold=0.5)
print("F1 Match: ", match_result)
'''
F1 Match: False
'''
```
## Efficient and Robust Question/Answer Type Evaluation
#### 1. `get_highest_score`
Returns the gold answer and candidate answer pair that has the highest matching score. This function is useful for evaluating the closest match to a given candidate response based on a list of reference answers.
**Parameters**
- `reference_answer` (list of str): A list of gold (correct) answers to the question.
- `candidate_answer` (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated.
- `question` (str): The question for which the answers are being evaluated.
**Returns**
- `dictionary`: A dictionary containing the gold answer and candidate answer that have the highest matching score.
#### 2. `get_scores`
Returns all the gold answer and candidate answer pairs' matching scores.
**Parameters**
- `reference_answer` (list of str): A list of gold (correct) answers to the question.
- `candidate_answer` (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated.
- `question` (str): The question for which the answers are being evaluated.
**Returns**
- `dictionary`: A dictionary containing gold answers and the candidate answer's matching score.
#### 3. `evaluate`
Returns True if the candidate answer is a match of any of the gold answers.
**Parameters**
- `reference_answer` (list of str): A list of gold (correct) answers to the question.
- `candidate_answer` (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated.
- `question` (str): The question for which the answers are being evaluated.
**Returns**
- `boolean`: A boolean True/False signifying matches between reference or candidate answers.
```python
from qa_metrics.pedant import PEDANT
question = "Which movie is loosley based off the Brother Grimm's Iron Henry?"
pedant = PEDANT()
scores = pedant.get_scores(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)
max_pair, highest_scores = pedant.get_highest_score(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)
match_result = pedant.evaluate(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)
print("Max Pair: %s; Highest Score: %s" % (max_pair, highest_scores))
print("Score: %s; PANDA Match: %s" % (scores, match_result))
'''
Max Pair: ('the princess and the frog', 'The movie "The Princess and the Frog" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm\'s "Iron Henry"'); Highest Score: 0.854451712151719
Score: {'the frog prince': {'The movie "The Princess and the Frog" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm\'s "Iron Henry"': 0.7131625951317375}, 'the princess and the frog': {'The movie "The Princess and the Frog" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm\'s "Iron Henry"': 0.854451712151719}}; PANDA Match: True
'''
```
```python
print(pedant.get_score(reference_answer[1], candidate_answer, question))
'''
0.7122460127464126
'''
```
## Transformer Neural Evaluation
Our fine-tuned BERT model is on 🤗 [Huggingface](https://huggingface.co/Zongxia/answer_equivalence_bert?text=The+goal+of+life+is+%5BMASK%5D.). Our Package also supports downloading and matching directly. [distilroberta](https://huggingface.co/Zongxia/answer_equivalence_distilroberta), [distilbert](https://huggingface.co/Zongxia/answer_equivalence_distilbert), [roberta](https://huggingface.co/Zongxia/answer_equivalence_roberta), and [roberta-large](https://huggingface.co/Zongxia/answer_equivalence_roberta-large) are also supported now! 🔥🔥🔥
#### `transformer_match`
Returns True if the candidate answer is a match of any of the gold answers.
**Parameters**
- `reference_answer` (list of str): A list of gold (correct) answers to the question.
- `candidate_answer` (str): The answer provided by a candidate that needs to be evaluated.
- `question` (str): The question for which the answers are being evaluated.
**Returns**
- `boolean`: A boolean True/False signifying matches between reference or candidate answers.
```python
from qa_metrics.transformerMatcher import TransformerMatcher
question = "Which movie is loosley based off the Brother Grimm's Iron Henry?"
# Supported models: roberta-large, roberta, bert, distilbert, distilroberta
tm = TransformerMatcher("roberta-large")
scores = tm.get_scores(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)
match_result = tm.transformer_match(reference_answer, candidate_answer, question)
print("Score: %s; bert Match: %s" % (scores, match_result))
'''
Score: {'The Frog Prince': {'The movie "The Princess and the Frog" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm\'s "Iron Henry"': 0.6934309}, 'The Princess and the Frog': {'The movie "The Princess and the Frog" is loosely based off the Brother Grimm\'s "Iron Henry"': 0.7400551}}; TM Match: True
'''
```
## Prompting LLM For Evaluation
Note: The prompting function can be used for any prompting purposes.
###### OpenAI
```python
from qa_metrics.prompt_llm import CloseLLM
model = CloseLLM()
model.set_openai_api_key(YOUR_OPENAI_KEY)
prompt = 'question: What is the Capital of France?\nreference: Paris\ncandidate: The capital is Paris\nIs the candidate answer correct based on the question and reference answer? Please only output correct or incorrect.'
model.prompt_gpt(prompt=prompt, model_engine='gpt-3.5-turbo', temperature=0.1, max_tokens=10)
'''
'correct'
'''
```
###### Anthropic
```python
model = CloseLLM()
model.set_anthropic_api_key(YOUR_Anthropic_KEY)
model.prompt_claude(prompt=prompt, model_engine='claude-v1', anthropic_version="2023-06-01", max_tokens_to_sample=100, temperature=0.7)
'''
'correct'
'''
```
###### deepinfra (See below for descriptions of more models)
```python
from qa_metrics.prompt_open_llm import OpenLLM
model = OpenLLM()
model.set_deepinfra_key(YOUR_DEEPINFRA_KEY)
model.prompt(message=prompt, model_engine='mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1', temperature=0.1, max_tokens=10)
'''
'correct'
'''
```
If you find this repo avialable, please cite our paper:
```bibtex
@misc{li2024panda,
title={PANDA (Pedantic ANswer-correctness Determination and Adjudication):Improving Automatic Evaluation for Question Answering and Text Generation},
author={Zongxia Li and Ishani Mondal and Yijun Liang and Huy Nghiem and Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber},
year={2024},
eprint={2402.11161},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}
```
## Updates
- [01/24/24] 🔥 The full paper is uploaded and can be accessed [here](https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11161). The dataset is expanded and leaderboard is updated.
- Our Training Dataset is adapted and augmented from [Bulian et al](https://github.com/google-research-datasets/answer-equivalence-dataset). Our [dataset repo](https://github.com/zli12321/Answer_Equivalence_Dataset.git) includes the augmented training set and QA evaluation testing sets discussed in our paper.
- Now our model supports [distilroberta](https://huggingface.co/Zongxia/answer_equivalence_distilroberta), [distilbert](https://huggingface.co/Zongxia/answer_equivalence_distilbert), a smaller and more robust matching model than Bert!
## License
This project is licensed under the [MIT License](LICENSE.md) - see the LICENSE file for details.
## Contact
For any additional questions or comments, please contact [[email protected]]. |