File size: 11,095 Bytes
d74a438 ce0094f 3c17cc3 ce0094f 3c17cc3 ce0094f 3c17cc3 ce0094f 3c17cc3 ce0094f 3c17cc3 ce0094f 3c17cc3 ce0094f e8e249a 3c17cc3 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 |
---
license: openrail
widget:
- text: I am totally a human, trust me bro.
example_title: default
- text: >-
In Finnish folklore, all places and things, and also human beings, have a
haltija (a genius, guardian spirit) of their own. One such haltija is called
etiäinen—an image, doppelgänger, or just an impression that goes ahead of a
person, doing things the person in question later does. For example, people
waiting at home might hear the door close or even see a shadow or a
silhouette, only to realize that no one has yet arrived. Etiäinen can also
refer to some kind of a feeling that something is going to happen. Sometimes
it could, for example, warn of a bad year coming. In modern Finnish, the
term has detached from its shamanistic origins and refers to premonition.
Unlike clairvoyance, divination, and similar practices, etiäiset (plural)
are spontaneous and can't be induced. Quite the opposite, they may be
unwanted and cause anxiety, like ghosts. Etiäiset need not be too dramatic
and may concern everyday events, although ones related to e.g. deaths are
common. As these phenomena are still reported today, they can be considered
a living tradition, as a way to explain the psychological experience of
premonition.
example_title: real wikipedia
- text: >-
In Finnish folklore, all places and things, animate or inanimate, have a
spirit or "etiäinen" that lives there. Etiäinen can manifest in many forms,
but is usually described as a kind, elderly woman with white hair. She is
the guardian of natural places and often helps people in need. Etiäinen has
been a part of Finnish culture for centuries and is still widely believed in
today. Folklorists study etiäinen to understand Finnish traditions and how
they have changed over time.
example_title: generated wikipedia
- text: >-
This paper presents a novel framework for sparsity-certifying graph
decompositions, which are important tools in various areas of computer
science, including algorithm design, complexity theory, and optimization.
Our approach is based on the concept of "cut sparsifiers," which are sparse
graphs that preserve the cut structure of the original graph up to a certain
error bound. We show that cut sparsifiers can be efficiently constructed
using a combination of spectral techniques and random sampling, and we use
them to develop new algorithms for decomposing graphs into sparse subgraphs.
example_title: from ChatGPT
- text: >-
Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and
benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning
on a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this
method still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or
tens of thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a
new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions -
something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we
show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic,
few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior
state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an
autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, 10x more than any
previous non-sparse language model, and test its performance in the few-shot
setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is applied without any gradient updates or
fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot demonstrations specified purely via
text interaction with the model. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many
NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks, as
well as several tasks that require on-the-fly reasoning or domain
adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a novel word in a sentence, or
performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time, we also identify some
datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles, as well as some
datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to training on
large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples of news
articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from articles
written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding and
of GPT-3 in general.
example_title: GPT-3 paper
datasets:
- NicolaiSivesind/human-vs-machine
- gfissore/arxiv-abstracts-2021
language:
- en
pipeline_tag: text-classification
tags:
- mgt-detection
- ai-detection
---
Machine-generated text-detection by fine-tuning of language models
===
This project is related to a bachelor's thesis with the title "*Turning Poachers into Gamekeepers: Detecting Machine-Generated Text in Academia using Large Language Models*" (not yet published) written by *Nicolai Thorer Sivesind* and *Andreas Bentzen Winje* at the *Department of Computer Science* at the *Norwegian University of Science and Technology*.
It contains text classification models trained to distinguish human-written text from text generated by language models like ChatGPT and GPT-3. The best models were able to achieve an accuracy of 100% on real and *GPT-3*-generated wikipedia articles (4500 samples), and an accuracy of 98.4% on real and *ChatGPT*-generated research abstracts (3000 samples).
The dataset card for the dataset that was created in relation to this project can be found [here](https://huggingface.co/datasets/NicolaiSivesind/human-vs-machine).
**NOTE**: the hosted inference on this site only works for the RoBERTa-models, and not for the Bloomz-models. The Bloomz-models otherwise can produce wrong predictions when not explicitly providing the attention mask from the tokenizer to the model for inference. To be sure, the [pipeline](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main_classes/pipelines)-library seems to produce the most consistent results.
## Fine-tuned detectors
This project includes 12 fine-tuned models based on the RoBERTa-base model, and three sizes of the bloomz-models.
| Base-model | RoBERTa-base | Bloomz-560m | Bloomz-1b7 | Bloomz-3b |
|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Wiki | [roberta-wiki](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/roberta-academic-detector) | [Bloomz-560m-wiki](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/bloomz-560m-wiki-detector) | [Bloomz-1b7-wiki](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/bloomz-1b7-wiki-detector) | [Bloomz-3b-wiki](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/bloomz-3b-wiki-detector) |
| Academic | [roberta-academic](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/roberta-wiki-detector) | [Bloomz-560m-academic](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/bloomz-560m-academic-detector) | [Bloomz-1b7-academic](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/bloomz-1b7-academic-detector) | [Bloomz-3b-academic](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/bloomz-3b-academic-detector) |
| Mixed | [roberta-mixed](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/roberta-mixed-detector) | [Bloomz-560m-mixed](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/bloomz-560m-mixed-detector) | [Bloomz-1b7-mixed](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/bloomz-1b7-mixed-detector) | [Bloomz-3b-mixed](https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/bloomz-3b-mixed-detector) |
### Datasets
The models were trained on selections from the [GPT-wiki-intros]() and [ChatGPT-Research-Abstracts](), and are separated into three types, **wiki**-detectors, **academic**-detectors and **mixed**-detectors, respectively.
- **Wiki-detectors**:
- Trained on 30'000 datapoints (10%) of GPT-wiki-intros.
- Best model (in-domain) is Bloomz-3b-wiki, with an accuracy of 100%.
- **Academic-detectors**:
- Trained on 20'000 datapoints (100%) of ChatGPT-Research-Abstracts.
- Best model (in-domain) is Bloomz-3b-academic, with an accuracy of 98.4%
- **Mixed-detectors**:
- Trained on 15'000 datapoints (5%) of GPT-wiki-intros and 10'000 datapoints (50%) of ChatGPT-Research-Abstracts.
- Best model (in-domain) is RoBERTa-mixed, with an F1-score of 99.3%.
### Hyperparameters
All models were trained using the same hyperparameters:
```python
{
"num_train_epochs": 1,
"adam_beta1": 0.9,
"adam_beta2": 0.999,
"batch_size": 8,
"adam_epsilon": 1e-08
"optim": "adamw_torch" # the optimizer (AdamW)
"learning_rate": 5e-05, # (LR)
"lr_scheduler_type": "linear", # scheduler type for LR
"seed": 42, # seed for PyTorch RNG-generator.
}
```
### Metrics
Metrics can be found at https://wandb.ai/idatt2900-072/IDATT2900-072.
In-domain performance of wiki-detectors:
| Base model | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score |
|-------------|----------|-----------|--------|----------|
| Bloomz-560m | 0.973 | *1.000 | 0.945 | 0.972 |
| Bloomz-1b7 | 0.972 | *1.000 | 0.945 | 0.972 |
| Bloomz-3b | *1.000 | *1.000 | *1.000 | *1.000 |
| RoBERTa | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.997 | 0.998 |
In-domain peformance of academic-detectors:
| Base model | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score |
|-------------|----------|-----------|--------|----------|
| Bloomz-560m | 0.964 | 0.963 | 0.965 | 0.964 |
| Bloomz-1b7 | 0.946 | 0.941 | 0.951 | 0.946 |
| Bloomz-3b | *0.984 | *0.983 | 0.985 | *0.984 |
| RoBERTa | 0.982 | 0.968 | *0.997 | 0.982 |
F1-scores of the mixed-detectors on all three datasets:
| Base model | Mixed | Wiki | CRA |
|-------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Bloomz-560m | 0.948 | 0.972 | *0.848 |
| Bloomz-1b7 | 0.929 | 0.964 | 0.816 |
| Bloomz-3b | 0.988 | 0.996 | 0.772 |
| RoBERTa | *0.993 | *0.997 | 0.829 |
## Credits
- [GPT-wiki-intro](https://huggingface.co/datasets/aadityaubhat/GPT-wiki-intro), by Aaditya Bhat
- [arxiv-abstracts-2021](https://huggingface.co/datasets/gfissore/arxiv-abstracts-2021), by Giancarlo
- [Bloomz](bigscience/bloomz), by BigScience
- [RoBERTa](https://huggingface.co/roberta-base), by Liu et. al.
## Citation
Please use the following citation:
```
@misc {sivesind_2023,
author = { {Nicolai Thorer Sivesind} and {Andreas Bentzen Winje} },
title = { Machine-generated text-detection by fine-tuning of language models },
url = { https://huggingface.co/andreas122001/roberta-academic-detector }
year = 2023,
publisher = { Hugging Face }
}
``` |