Time	tested	health	books
	
that	have	been	selling	all	over	the	world	from	hundreds	of	book	stores	were	all	at
	
once	declared	to	be	the	cause	of	the	fraud	order. And,	although	the	other	stores
	
would	continue	to	sell	them,	HEALTH	RESEARCH	was	to	be	denied	mail
	delivery	and	completely	put	out	of	business,	for	selling	these	same	books. Dr.	Wilborn	had	heard	about	some	of	the	questionable	fraud	order	cases,	so	years
	
ago	before	investing	in	this	expensive	book	business	he	checked	with	the	post
	
office	authorities	and	had	one	of	the	postal	inspectors	examine	all	his	stock	of
	
books	to	be	sure	they	met	with	the	legal	specifications. The	books	were	declared
	
to	be	in	order	so	when	the	fraud	charges	came	he	knew	it	did	not	originate	in	the
	
post	office	department	The	postal	authorities	refused	to	give	the	names	of	the
	
attackers	who	were	seeking	to	destroy	the	Health	Business,	so	in	concealing	the
	
criminals	the	postal	authorities	become	parties	to	the	crime. Excerpts	from	the	fraud	complaint	are	as	follows:
	
"POST	OFFICE	DEPARTMENT
	
OFFICE	OF	THE	CHIEF	HEARING	EXAMINER
	
WASHINGTON,	D.C.
May	11,	1955	(delivered	May	14,	1955)
	
“In	the	matter	of	the	complaint	that	HEALTH	RESEARCH,	Dr.	R.	G.	Wilborn
	
(D.C.)	and	(partner)	are	engaged	in	conducting	an	unlawful	enterprise	through
	
the	mails...The	Undersigned,	(William	C.	O’Brian)	Assistant	Solicitor,	Fraud
	
Division,	Post	Office	Dept. alleges	that	the	respondents	are	now	and	have	been
	
obtaining	remittance	of	money	through	the	mails	for	various	books	and
	
pamphlets	entitled:
	
	
"Common	sense	about	Cancer",	"The	Grape	Cure",	"Attacking	and	Arresting
	
Arthritis",	"Health	for	All",	"Getting	Well",	"Is	Cancer	Curable"	"The	Prostate
	
Gland’	‘Perfect	Health",	"Tuberculosis,	Its	Cause	and	Cure",	"Tumors",	and
	
"Back	to	Eden". by	means	of	false	and	fraudulent	pretenses,	representations	and
	
promises	as	hereinafter	set	forth. "That	the	Publication	entitled	"Health	for	All"	contains	information	and
	
instructions	the	following	of	which	will	effectively	treat	and	cure	such
	
conditions	and	diseases	as	sinusitis,	bronchial	asthma,	goiter,	colitis,	peptic	ulcer,
	
diabetes	mellitus,	arthritis,	rheumatism,	high	blood	pressure	and	infantile
	
paralysis." The	complaint	goes	on	telling	what	the	books	promise	in	the	way	of	healing. The
	
fact	that	hundreds	of	people	have	been	healed	of	these	diseases	by	following
	these	instructions	doesn’t	concern	the	medically	dominated	Post	Office	Fraud
	
Department. The	medical	profession	has	no	cure	for	any	of	these	diseases	and,
	
like	the	dog	in	the	manger	they	intend	to	prevent	anyone	else	from	curing	them
	
either,	or	even	from	having	the	right	to	choose	their	reading	matter	that	will
	
teach	them	how	to	do	it	themselves. These	books	are	also	barred	from	tax
	
supported	public	libraries	so	the	people	are	at	the	mercy	of	the	disease	producing
	
medical	business	unless	they	rise	up	and	throw	off	the	yoke	of	medical
	
oppression. BACK	TO	EDEN	and	the	GRAPE	CURE	were	barred	once	before	but	were
	
reinstated	because	there	were	no	legal	grounds	for	the	action	and	someone	had
	
enough	money	to	fight	for	them. HEALTH	RESEARCH	had	sold	500	copies	of	Back	to	Eden	at	$7.00	per	copy
	
with	a	money	back	guarantee	and	the	letters	flowed	in	from	the	satisfied
	
customers	who	had	been	healed	or	helped	by	its	information. Yet,	the	selling	of
	
this	book	was	one	or	the	reasons	why	Health	Research	was	being	prosecuted. Medically	operated	organizations	and	money	making	schemes	such	as	the	cancer
	
fund	raising	organizations,	March	of	Dimes	money	making	racket,	vaccination
	
campaigns. etc.,	are	allowed	to	make	untrue	and	impossible	claims	and	promises
	
and	accept	fabulous	sums	of	money	year	after	year	without	ever	performing	the
	
benefits	or	fulfilling	their	promises,	yet	they	are	never	barred	from	the	mails	no
	
matter	how	brazenly	fraudulent	they	are. If	even	half	of	the	money,	that	is
	
filched	from	the	public	by	these	organizations,	were	put	into	the	hands	of	some
	
responsible	organization	like	Dr.	Shelton’s	Hygienic	Society	and	used	for	public
	
health	education	purposes,	the	present	disease	crisis	of	this	country	could	soon
	
be	brought	under	control. Dr.	Wilborn	knew	he	would	not	get	a	fair	trial	by	jury	if	he	tried	to	fight	the	case
	
in	Washington	so	he	waged	a	campaign	from	his	office	in	California	and	hired	a
	
good	lawyer	who	knew	the	post	office	"setup",	(Attorney	James	B.	Gooding,	of
	
Washington	D.C.)	to	fight	the	case	from	there. When	Dr.	Wilborn’s	letters	(about
	
the	fraud	complaint)	reached	the	hands	of	his	large	mailing	list,	a	barrage	of
	
letters	flew	to	Washington	(Congress	and	Senate)	asking	for	an	investigation	of
	
the	corrupt,	medically	contaminated	Post	Office	Fraud	Department. Racketeers
	
don’t	like	to	be	investigated	so	the	"under	cover	boys"	in	the	Post	Office
	
modified	their	charges	immediately	and	admitted	that	the	books	were	not
	
fraudulent	and	were	no	longer	under	attack. However,	they	still	held	the	whip
	lash	over	the	head	of	HEALTH	RESEARCH	if	its	advertising	suggested	cure	in
	
any	way,	shape	or	form. The	medicos	still	insist	that	the	word	cure	is	their
	
private	property	just	the	same	as	they	have	tried	to	"corner"	the	whole	healing
	
business. The	Health	Research	Case	brought	into	view	a	number	of	other	submerged
	
cases. One	contact	who	had	been	barred	from	the	mails	wrote	to	Dr.	Wilborn	as
	
follows:
	
	
To	give	you	an	idea	of	what	smaller	businesses	are	up	against	in	the	Food	and
	
Drug	Administration-Post	Office	combination	of	the	Medical	Trust,	let	it	be
	
remembered	that	any	company	can	be	put	under	fraud	order	without	due	process
	
of	law—just	upon	the	opinion	of	any	lawyer	in	the	Post	Office	Department. The
	
fraud	law	was	written	in	1874	and	needs	re-writing	to	bring	about	justice. We	are
	
still	working	with	the	authorities	in	Washington	to	get	this	done. Once	a	fraud	smear	is	issued,	then	supposedly	due	process	of	law	can	be	carried
	
on	for	its	removal. Actually,	however,	the	setup	is	extremely	corrupt. It	is	so
	
corrupt	that	the	Head	Trial	Examiner	of	the	Post	Office	"blew	his	top"	about	two
	
years	ago	and	sent	an	eleven	page	report	to	both	the	Senate	and	the	House
	
Judiciary	Committees. He	then	transferred	to	the	Federal	Power	Commission. His	report	was	a	protest	against	pressures	constantly	brought	to	bear	to	have	him
	
violate	the	Administrative	Procedures	Act	which	guarantees	fair	hearings	to
	
citizens,	in	theory	at	least,	and	forbids	any	private	contact	with	Examiners	or
	
Judges	to	influence	decisions. After	his	departure,	more	crooked	decisions
	
occurred. A	fraud	order	is	supposed	to	be	based	on	legitimate	complaints. When	Dr.
	
Wilborn’s	customers	wrote	to	the	Fraud	Department	for	the	complaints	or	for
	
any	statements	he	had	made	in	his	advertising	that	could	be	considered
	
fraudulent,	the	officials	in	the	Post	Office	Department	wrote:
	
This	office	does	not	make	a	general	distribution	of	the	specification	of	charges
	
issued	in	these	fraud	order	cases	and,	therefore	your	request	for	such	a	copy
	
must	be	denied." When	Dr.	Wilborn’s	customers	asked	for	the	names	of	his	accusers,	the	post
	
office	refused	to	reveal	their	names. If	a	charge	is	serious	enough	to	ruin	a
	
person’s	business,	reputation	and	life	work,	is	it	asking	too	much	to	know	who
	
his	attackers	are	so	he	can	meet	them	in	fair	fight?——————————
	
WHERE	CRIME	PAYS
	
We	like	to	believe	that	crime	doesn’t	pay. But	we	see	the	constant	multiplication
	
of	deaths	from	unnecessary	operations	and	medically	poisoned	patients	where
	
the	doctor	"buries	his	mistakes"	and	then	collects	a	small	fortune	from	the
	
survivors. We	see	the	multimillion	dollar	"take"	from	the	vaccination	campaigns
	
conducted	at	least	twice	a	year	in	all	American	cities. We	see	health	businesses
	
and	writers	ruined	by	unjust	and	dishonest	fraud	orders,	in	which	they	have	no
	
chance	of	winning	unless	they	can	afford	a	Supreme	Court	case,	and	few	health
	
idealists	are	wealthy	enough	to	buy	justice	at	such	a	price. Liberty	and	protection
	
in	a	free	country	should	be	the	right	of	the	poor	as	well	as	the	rich. We	are
	
wondering	when	we	will	be	released	from	this	curse	of	medical	domination—
where	crime	pays. CHAPTER	10
THE	HIDDEN	DANGERS	IN	POLIO
	
VACCINE
The	following	is	a	sample	of	the	propaganda	that	is	frequently	seen	in	the
	
magazines	and	newspapers	and	all	channels	of	national	advertising:
	
GET	POLIO	VACCINATION	NOW
To	Protect	Your	Child	This	Summer
	
Your	boy	or	girl	will	have	the	best	chance	for	protection	before	polio	hits	again,
	
if	vaccine	is	given	now. The	Salk	vaccine	strikingly	reduced	paralytic	polio
	
among	those	who	received	it	in	1955	and	it	will	protect	many	thousands	in	1956,
	
if	it	is	used	in	time. To	make	a	real	dent	in	polio	in	1956,	vaccinations	must	be	stepped	up
	
immediately. Success	will	depend	on	how	many	children	receive	at	least	two
	
vaccine	shots	before	the	next	polio	season	begins. See	your	doctor	or	public
	
health	officer	NOW	for	advice	about	when	and	where	to	obtain	vaccine. ——————
	
This	is	what	the	people	are	told. Let’s	uncover	the	facts	and	see	what	actually
	
happens	when	polio	vaccine	is	used. "Salk	vaccine	is	hard	to	make	and	no	batch	can	ever	be	proved	safe	before	it	is
	
given	to	children." This	is	an	admission	that	was	made	by	Dr.	Scheele,	(Surgeon
	
General)	before	the	Atlantic	City	Convention	of	the	American	Association	in
	
1955. (Reported	in	New	York	Times,	June	8,	1955.) Being	fully	aware	of	the	hazardous	aspects	of	the	polio	vaccine,	Dr.	Scheele
	
announced	that	it	was	the	intention	of	the	U.S.	Government	to	inoculate	57
	
million	people	before	August	1955. (Report	from	the	Lancet,	June	4,	1955)
	
SAFETY	PROMISED	WITHOUT	INVESTIGATION	OR	PROOF
	
$9,000,000	of	public	funds	were	gambled	on	this	financially	promising	but
	highly	questionable	venture	before	it	was	even	declared	safe	and	usable. Later,
	
when	the	over	dramatized	announcement	was	made	that	it	was	"safe"	there	was
	
still	no	scientific	evidence	or	factual	proof	of	its	safety. The	promoters	of	this
	
inflated	vaccine	"scheme"	expected	a	5	billion	dollar	profit	in	the	first	year	of
	
operation. (Direct	quotations	supporting	this	statement	are	given	under	the	topic
	
heading,	THE	MONEY	MOTIVE,	at	the	end	of	the	chapter.) Even	after	the	vaccine	had	killed	7	people	and	the	number	was	mounting	every
	
day,	the	propaganda	committee	put	words	into	the	mouths	of	important
	
government	officials,	still	insisting	that	the	vaccine	was	"safe"	and	must	be
	
continued. The	Cutter	laboratory	was	used	as	the	"scape	goat"	until	the	many	disasters	from
	
the	other	laboratories	could	no	longer	be	concealed. Then	instead	of	abandoning
	
the	whole	"deadly	mess",	the	Cutter	laboratory	was	declared	in	good	standing
	
again	and	allowed	to	continue—not	because	its	vaccine	was	any	safer,	but
	
because	the	vaccine	from	the	rest	of	them	was	just	as	deadly,	and	none	of	them
	
intended	to	stop	or	lose	any	profits. Any	doctor,	scientist	or	authority	on	the	subject	of	vaccine	knows	that	these
	
substances	are	"highly	toxic"	(poison),	therefore,	no	vaccine	can	be	made	safe. Current	magazine	articles	have	described	in	detail,	the	composition	of	the	Salk
	
vaccine	so	it	will	not	be	repeated	here	except	to	say	that	the	decomposed	kidney
	
tissues	and	pus	from	a	diseased	animal	combined	with	the	two	poison	drugs
	
cannot	be	injected	into	the	living	bloodstream	without	harmful	effects. The
	
records	of	the	experiments	on	children	show	that	more	of	the	vaccinated	people
	
died	or	contracted	polio	than	did	the	unvaccinated. The	fact	that	all	the
	
vaccinated	people	did	not	die	does	not	mean	that	they	were	not	harmed. No	one
	
knows	yet,	what	the	future	results	will	be. James	McIntosh,	Professor	of	Pathology	at	London	University,	in	an	address
	
before	the	Royal	Society	of	Medicine,	October	19,	1926,	stated:
	
"Scientifically	it	cannot	be	disputed	that	every	point	of	view	the	injection	of
	
virus	capable	of	multiplying	in	the	body	of	the	individual	is	bad. When
	
multiplication	of	the	virus	occurs,	then	there	is	no	possibility	of	estimating	the
	
dose	to	which	the	patient	has	been	subjected. Thus	the	effect	cannot	be
	
controlled,	and	in	susceptible	individuals	this	may	lead	to	unforeseen	results." Data	from	the	bleedings	performed	five	months	after	inoculation	of	Salk
	vaccine,	indicated	that	the	immunity	(if	any)	did	not	last	long. Dr.	Salk	is
	
reported	to	have	said	that	"children	vaccinated	last	year	should	be	given	booster
	
inoculations	this	year." An	editorial	in	the	Lancet	(weekly	Medical	Journal	April
	
23,	1955)	comments:
	
	
"If	it	is	found	that,	contrary	to	Salk’s	hopes	antibody	levels	cannot	be	maintained
	
without	a	succession	of	booster	doses,	then	a	serious	problem	will	arise. Will	it
	
be	necessary	to	give	injections	every	year;	and,	if	so,	for	how	long	would	they	be
	
given? If	injections	are	given	regularly	for	several	years	to	millions	of	children
	
the	risk	of	allergic	reactions	to	monkey	kidney	tissue	will	become	increasingly
	
grave." (Emphasis	mine,	McBean)
	
Dr.	Ritchie	Russell	of	the	Department	of	Neurology,	Radcliffe	Infirmary	Oxford,
	
said,	"When	poliomyelitis	is	precipitated	by	inoculation	the	natural	defences	of
	
the	nervous	system	seem	to	be	ineffective,	and	nearly	all	such	illnesses	develop
	
into	a	paralytic	form	of	the	disease	affecting	especially	the	limb	used	for	the
	
injection." (Lancet,	May	21,	1955,	p.	1071)
	
The	Manchester	Guardian	(April	15,	1955)	stated,	"One	of	Britain’s	greatest
	
physiologists	said	today	that	if	it	means	that	a	child	should	be	re-inoculated	at
	
frequent	intervals	with	a	preparation	derived	from	monkey	kidneys	it	is
	
terrifying	in	its	possibilities. Among	them	is	the	risk	of	the	child’s	developing
	
sensitivity	to	some	of	the	ingredients	of	the	vaccine." The	editor	of	the	Lancet
	
(June	11,	1955,	p.	1207)	emphasized	this	further	when	he	wrote:
	
	
"In	addition	to	the	possibility	of	producing	the	very	disease	the	vaccine	is	used
	
to	prevent,	‘there	is	a	risk,	of	unknown	dimensions,	that	repeated	injection	of	a
	
vaccine	prepared	from	monkey	kidney	may	eventually	sensitize	the	child	in
	
some	harmful	way’." BRITISH	PAPERS	WARN	AGAINST	SALK	VACCINE
	
In	April,	1955	after	the	"big	Salk	campaign"	had	been	launched	in	the	United
	
States,	the	Government	and	all	officials	and	agencies	concerned	announced	to
	
the	world	that	"the	war	against	polio	was	almost	certainly	at	an	end." The	other	countries	are	a	little	more	conservative	and	a	little	less	willing	to	be
	
"taken	in"	by	the	sales	propaganda	of	the	Salk	promoters. The	general	sentiment
	
of	our	foreign	neighbors	was	expressed	by	Dr.	A.	M.	Payne	when	he	declared:
		
"Poliomyelitis	is	not	beaten. We	do	not	know	how	long	the	effect	lasts...we	do
	
not	know	if	it	will	be	effective	under	other	conditions	than	those	in	which	it	was
	
used;	we	do	not	know	how	best	to	use	it. We	do	know	that	there	are	many
	
(unsolved)	intricate	problems	in	the	manufacture	of	this	vaccine." (Manchester
	
Guardian,	April	14,	1955)
	
"LONDON,	April	22,	1955,	Reuters. The	British	Medical	Journal	today	warned
	
physicians	against	over	enthusiastic	acceptance	of	the	Salk	anti-polio	vaccine
	
citing	‘the	possibility	of	toxic	effects’." On	this	same	point	the	Lancet	said	it	would	be	"very	reluctant	to	see	the	vaccine
	
used	on	a	large	scale	in	Britain	without	further	tests." It	also	warned,	"the
	
possibility	of	toxic	effects	from	repeated	injections	with	monkey	tissues	must	be
	
considered." Caution	was	cast	to	the	winds	in	this	country	and	our	U.S.	Government	and
	
medical	profession	had	no	hesitancy	in	using	the	unproved	vaccine	and	repeating
	
their	blundering	tests	on	millions	of	human	beings	even	after	the	large	number	of
	
deaths	and	paralysis	had	proved	it	to	be	not	only	a	failure	but	a	dangerous	killer. Most	of	the	experiments	were	made	on	children	too	small	to	fight	back. A	PARTIAL	LIST	OF	DEATHS	FROM	SALK	VACCINE
	
-Susan	Pierce	(age	7),	Pocatello,	Idaho,	died	April	27,	1955
-Ronald	Fitzgerald	(age	4),	Oakland,	Calif.,	died	April	27,	1955
-Allen	Davis	Jr.	(age	2),	New	Orleans,	La.,	died	May	4,	1955
-Janet	Kincaid	(age	7),	Moscow,	Idaho,	died	May	1,	1955
-Danny	Eggers	(age	6),	Idaho	Falls,	Idaho,	died	May	10,	1955
	
HOW	SAFE	IS	SAFE? 1.Are	the	men	who	set	themselves	up	as	authorities	on	polio	really	qualified	to
	
decide	the	issues	of	life	and	death? 2. Have	the	self-styled	medical	"experts"	been	infallible	enough	in	their	past
	
decisions	to	be	trusted	with	the	precious	lives	of	our	children	and	our	future
	
generations? 3. Have	the	more	effective	drugless	methods	of	prevention	and	treatment	of
	
polio	been	investigated	and	tested? These	are	some	of	the	questions	that	people	are	asking	and	to	which	they	have	a
	
right	to	expect	satisfactory	answers. SALK	"SPEAKS	UP"	IN	LIFE	MAGAZINE
	
In	an	article	titled	TRACKING	THE	KILLER,	in	LIFE	magazine	Dr.	Salk	was
	
asked	if	his	monkey	vaccine	was	safe. To	this	query	he	replied:
	
"There	is	no	question	of	‘how	safe	is	it?’	It	is	safe,	and	it	can’t	be	safer	than
	
safe’." Many	people	would	seriously	like	to	believe	this	statement	but	available
	
scientific	facts	condemn	it	and	hold	it	up	to	ridicule. Shortly	after	the	Salk	vaccination	program	was	swung	into	action,	the	American
	
Public	Health	Service	(June	23,	1955)	Announced	that	there	had	been	"168
	
confirmed	cases	of	poliomyelitis	among	the	vaccinated,	with	six	deaths...How
	
many	vaccinated	children	will	eventually	be	reported	as	developing	the	disease
	
is	as	yet	unknown. "The	interval	between	inoculation	and	the	first	sign	of	paralysis	ranged	from	5	to
	
20	days	and	in	a	large	proportion	of	cases	it	started	in	the	limb	on	which	the
	
injection	had	been	given. Another	feature	of	the	tragedy	was	that	the	numbers
	
developing	polio	were	far	greater	than	would	have	been	expected	had	no
	
inoculations	been	given. In	fact	in	the	state	of	Idaho,	according	to	a	statement	by
	
Dr.	Carl	Eklund,	one	of	the	Government’s	chief	virus	authorities,	polio	struck
	
only	vaccinated	children	in	areas	where	there	had	been	no	cases	of	polio	since
	
the	preceding	autumn;	in	9	out	of	10	cases	the	paralysis	occurred	in	the	arms	in
	
which	the	vaccine	had	been	injected." (News	Chronicle,	May	6,	1955)
	
According	to	the	Daily	Telegraph	(June	18,	1955)	Mr.	Peterson,	State	Health
	
Director	of	Idaho,	stopped	further	inoculations	and	stated:
	
	
"We	have	lost	confidence	in	the	Salk	Vaccine." He	also	stated	that	he	"holds	the
	
vaccine,	together	with	the	instructions	for	its	manufacture,	directly	responsible
	
for	the	outbreak	of	polio	and	the	deaths	that	had	occurred." The	serum	makers	were	gambling	for	big	stakes	and	decided	that	the	"show	must
	
go	on"	in	spite	of	death	and	disaster. The	condemned	Cutter	laboratory	had	over
	
a	million	dollars	worth	of	deadly	vaccine	on	hand	and	the	disasters	had	caused
	
its	stock	to	drop	from	$15.50	to	$8.75	per	share,	(according	to	Time,	June	20,
	
1955). The	other	5	laboratories	with	their	$8,000,000	supply	of	"Salk	liability"
	
were	involved	also	because	deaths	and	disease	were	being	reported	from	their
	
vaccines	every	day. Then	suddenly	the	deaths	from	Salk	vaccine	ceased	to	be
	
reported. In	a	letter	published	in	Defender	Magazine,	the	writer	stated:
	
	
"I	am	informed	by	someone	who	works	in	a	newspaper	office	that	much	of	the
	
bad	news	concerning	the	results	of	the	Salk	Program	is	being	censored	and
	
deleted	out	of	the	news	to	keep	people	complacent	and	acquiescent." SOME	COUNTRIES	REJECT	VACCINES
	
In	Australia	when	a	few	children	died	as	a	result	of	smallpox	vaccinations	the
	
government	abolished	compulsory	vaccination	in	that	country	and	smallpox
	
suddenly	declined	to	the	vanishing	point. Australia	had	only	three	cases	of
	
smallpox	in	15	years	as	compared	with	Japan’s	record	of	165,774	cases	and
	
28,979	deaths	from	this	cause	in	only	7	years	(1886-1892)	under	compulsory
	
vaccination	and	revaccination. In	Austria,	where	Bela	Schick	invented	the	Schick	test	for	diphtheria,	it	killed
	
several	children	and	the	rulers	there	declared	it	to	be	too	dangerous	and
	
prohibited	its	use	in	that	country. Apparently	Mr.	Schick	was	not	concerned	with
	
such	trivialities	as	death	and	disease;	he	was	out	to	make	money. Most	of	the
	
European	countries	didn’t	trust	him	and	rejected	his	poisons,	so	he	brought	it	to
	
America	where	he	knew	the	unscrupulous	medical	and	drug	trusts	dominate	the
	
healing	field. Here	he	found	a	ready	market. A	lush	harvest	was	promised	and
	
the	customary	pressure	technique	was	turned	on	and	the	exploitable	public	was
	
again	used	and	abused. So	we	have	seen	with	the	passing	of	years,	that	the
	
Schick	test	and	diphtheria	antitoxin	continue	to	take	their	toll	of	lives	while	our
	
elected	officers	and	public	protectors	look	the	other	way. To	show	how	death,	disease	and	failure	of	vaccination	is	ignored	in	this	country,
	
in	favor	of	fabulous	profits	for	a	few,	let	us	recall	one	of	the	many	disasters	that
	
bear	this	out:
	In	Dallas,	Texas,	10	children	died	as	a	direct	result	of	the	"safe"	diphtheria
	
antitoxin	shots. For	every	one	who	died,	hundreds	suffered	from	the	various
	
vaccine	diseases,	many	of	which	left	permanent	disabilities. This	is	not	a	special
	
case;	it	is	typical	of	all	vaccinations. But	most	parents	do	not	sue	and	the	other
	
cases	never	reach	public	notice. But	these	Texas	parents	were	not	to	be	"put	off"
	
by	medical	excuses. Numerous	damage	suits	were	brought	against	the	doctors
	
and	the	serum	manufacturer,	H.	K.	Mulford	Co. The	doctors	succeeded	in
	
evading	the	issue	by	claiming	that	it	was	a	bad	batch	of	serum. (All	serum	is	bad
	
that	doesn’t	stop	them). The	Mulford	Co.	insisted	that	it	was	not	a	bad	batch	of
	
serum	but	was	just	the	same	as	all	their	serum	and	this	lot	(series	A	377061)	had
	
been	re-tested	and	passed	satisfactorily	all	the	tests	and	requirements	conforming
	
to	the	laboratory	of	the	Public	Health	Service	at	Washington	D.C. The	complaints	of	the	parents	were	that	"the	diphtheria	antitoxin	sold	by	the
	
Mulford	Co.,	was	unfit,	poisonous,	dangerous	and	deadly." The	doctors	and
	
serum	company	displayed	great	dexterity	in	juggling	terms,	inventing	excuses
	
and	denying	guilt	but	the	children	were	still	just	as	dead	as	a	result	of	shots	from
	
the	"whitewashed"	serum	as	if	they	had	been	shot	with	bullets,	and	it	was
	
irrefutably	proved	in	court	that	the	vaccine	serum	killed	them. Damages
	
aggregating	$78,000	were	paid	to	the	parents	of	the	dead	children,	by	the
	
Mulford	Co. The	Mulford	Co.	wishing	to	continue	in	the	same	blood	poisoning
	
business	and	also	wishing	to	dodge	public	disapproval,	had	its	attorneys	specify
	
that	"the	judgement	shall	fall,	not	on	the	Mulford	Co.	but	on	Mr.	Pierce	Russell,
	
the	Mulford	distributor." He	was,	probably,	the	least	guilty	of	any	of	them
	
because	he	could	not	have	contaminated	the	sealed	ampules	of	vaccines. However,	his	employer,	undoubtedly	made	it	worth	his	while—financially...to
	
take	the	blame. In	this	type	of	"white	collar"	murder,	(the	legally	proved),	guilty
	
parties	are	not	reprimanded	or	even	asked	to	cease	and	desist"	from	a
	
continuance	of	the	crimes. ALL	VACCINES	CAN	CAUSE	POLIO
	
"Mrs.	Helen	B.	Covington,	of	Kensington,	Pa.	filed	a	$150,000	suit	in	the	United
	
States	District	Court,	against	Wyeth	Inc.	Philadelphia	drug	manufacturer,
	
charging	that	an	anti-rabies	vaccine	had	produced	paralysis"	(The	Truth	Teller	p
	
26,	Aug	1947). Dr	William	F	Koch	(MD,	PhD)	stated	that	"THE	INJECTION	OF	ANY
	
SERUM,	VACCINE,	OR	EVEN	PENICILLIN,	HAS	SHOWN	A	VERY
	MARKED	INCREASE	IN	THE	INCIDENCE	OF	POLIO,	AT	LEAST	400%. STATISTICS	ON	THIS	ARE	SO	CONCLUSIVE,	NO	ONE	CAN	DENY	IT." The	United	States	Public	Health	Bureau	is	extremely	reticent	about	reporting
	
diseases	caused	by	vaccination	but	the	report	from	1922	to	1931	admitted	that
	
there	had	been	85	cases	of	post	vaccinal	encephalitis,	which	DeKruif	states	"is
	
the	twin	of	infantile	paralysis." In	St.	Louis	(1933)	after	a	typhoid	vaccination	campaign	there	was	an	outbreak
	
of	encephalitis	(a	form	of	polio)	in	which	over	100	died. It	was	reported	that	the
	
disease	developed	about	10	days	after	vaccination	and	in	each	case	vaccinia	was
	
indicated	in	the	brain	upon	postmortem. In	1926	two	prominent	English	Professors	of	Pathology,	Doctors	Turnbull	and
	
McIntosh	reported	a	number	of	cases	of	encephalitis	lethargica	(sleeping
	
sickness—a	form	of	polio)	following	vaccination. This	led	to	the	appointment	of
	
two—commissions	of	the	British	Ministry	of	Health,	to	investigate	the	situation. Their	reports	published	in	1928	revealed	that	there	had	been	231	cases	and	91
	
deaths	from	this	cause	(post	vaccinal	encephalitis)	in	England	and	Wales. According	to	a	report	in	the	Hobart	(Tasmania)	"Mercury,"	(April	111950),
	
"Combined	injections	for	diphtheria	and	whooping	cough	may	cause	severe
	
cases	of	infantile	paralysis." It	stated	that	a	St.	Pancras,	London	medical	officer
	
found	40	cases	and	that	a	British	Health	Ministry	doctor	reported	65	cases	where
	
paralysis	occurred	two	weeks	after	vaccine	injections,	and	in	49	of	these,	the
	
paralysis	was	confined	to	the	limb	in	which	the	injection	had	been	given. Two	of
	
the	cases	followed	the	injection	of	penicillin. Dr.	J.	K.	Marlin,	from	the	Guy
	
Hospital	reported	80	cases	where	children	developed	infantile	paralysis	soon
	
after	having	been	vaccinated. "Mercury"	stated	that	"the	doctors	realizing	the
	
danger	of	their	findings	to	the	government’s	diphtheria	immunization	campaign,
	
withheld	publications	until	some	of	the	cases	could	be	followed	up	over	a	period
	
of	many	months. Some	of	the	children	recovered	after	a	year	or	more. Others	are
	
still	paralyzed	.”
	
After	the	many	months	of	observation	of	these	disasters	of	vaccination	the
	
London	County	Council	finally	banned	the	use	of	the	combined	diphtheria	and
	
whooping	cough	injections	in	the	clinics	during	the	months	when	infantile
	
paralysis	was	most	prevalent. Isn’t	it	appalling	that	the	governments	and	the	serum	promoters	see	and	know
	
that	vaccination	causes	paralysis	yet	they	curtail	it	only	during	the	months	when
	
polio	is	most	prevalent. They	still	insist	on	having	the	revenue	from	the	deadly
	
practice	the	rest	of	the	time	regardless	of	the	consequences. If	they	would	care	to
	
observe	the	"polio	season"	they	would	see	that	it	is	only	at	the	times	when	it	is
	
created	by	the	doctors	with	their	poisoned	needles	and	the	people	with	their
	
excessive	eating	of	sugar	products	and	other	devitalizing	and	semi-poisoned
	
foods. Dr.	L.	C.	Appel	writes:
	
	
"The	fact	that	vaccination	is	either	the	(a)	adding	of	a	disease	to	a	body	already
	
weighted	with	disease,	or	else,	(b)	the	giving	of	a	disease	to	a	perfectly	healthy
	
body,	is	the	medical	reason	why	some	of	us	(medical	doctors)	oppose
	
vaccination	and	urge	its	abolition. A	perfectly	healthy	body	is	proof	against
	
natural	disease;	a	diseased	or	unhealthy	body	is	handicapped	by	being	given
	
another	(inoculated)	disease. A	diseased	or	unhealthy	body	can	never	be
	
rendered	healthy	by	inoculation	or	vaccination." Dr.	Harry	R.	Baybee	said:
	
"My	honest	opinion	is	that	vaccination	is	the	cause	of	more	disease	and	suffering
	
than	anything	I	could	name." Dr.	F.	H.	Haines	voiced	his	views	on	vaccination	as	follows:
	
"It	is	impossible	to	say	what	remote	after	effects	may	be	caused	by	the
	
introduction	of	alien	substances	into	the	bloodstream. Many	nervous	and	other
	
disorders	of	unknown	origin	are	too	often	met	with. Products	which	alter
	
metabolism,	change	the	nature	of	fundamental	secretions,	cause	profound
	
change	in	the	fluids	of	the	body,	allergy	and	anaphylaxis,	are	the	negation	of
	
nature’s	own	methods,	and	must	be	viewed	with	grave	misgivings	and	cautious
	
suspicion." ("The	Truth	About	Vaccination,"	by	Lily	Loat)
In	an	article	in	Archives	of	Disease	in	Childhood,	(March,	1950)	Dr.	3. K.
	
Martin,	of	England,	gives	details	of	"17	cases	of	poliomyelitis	which	followed
	
28	days	or	less	after	inoculation." Analysis	of	the	cases	showed	that	8	of	them
	
had	been	inoculated	with	A.P.T. Two	had	other	injections	against	diphtheria,	2
	
had	penicillin	injections,	5	had	combined	diphtheria	and	whooping	cough
	
inoculations	and	1	had	whooping	cough	inoculations	alone. Not	long	after	these	cases	had	been	published	it	encouraged	other	doctors	to
	
bring	their	findings	out	in	the	open	and	several	other	medical	journals	in
	
Australia	and	England	published	articles	which	reported	numerous	cases	of
	
paralysis	following	vaccination. Two	investigators,	Dr.	McCloskey,	in	Australia
	
and	Dr.	Geffen	in	London	both	observed	that	"the	point	that	struck	them	was	that
	
the	paralysis	started	in	the	limb	in	which	the	injection	had	been	made." (Details	of	these	findings	are	reported	in	the	Lancet	(London)	for	April	8,	1950
	
and	The	Medical	Officer,	for	April	8,	1950.) Two	British	statisticians	were	asked	to	investigate	whether	or	not	there	appeared
	
to	have	been	any	"Appreciable	risk	of	poliomyelitis	following	within	a	month	of
	
inoculation	during	the	1948	outbreak	of	polio." The	investigators,	Dr.	A.
	
Bradford	Hill	and	Dr. I.	Knowelden,	of	the	London	School	of	Hygiene	and
	
Tropical	Medicine,	reported:
	
"The	statistics	collected	in	this	inquiry	reveal	clearly	an	association	between
	
recent	injections	and	paralysis...We	must	conclude	that	in	the	1949	epidemic	of
	
poliomyelitis	in	this	country,	cases	of	paralysis	were	occurring	which	were
	
associated	with	inoculation	procedures	carried	out	within	the	month	preceding
	
the	record	date	of	onset	of	the	illness." (Reported	in	the	British	Medical	Journal,
	
July	1,	1950)
	
Although	the	British	government,	under	the	pressure	of	Socialism	has	been
	
forced	to	make	many	concessions	in	favor	of	the	common	people	such	as
	
abolishing	compulsory	vaccination,	making	investigations	that	revealed	the
	
fallacy	of	many	medical	practices	etc. Mr.	Bevin,	speaking	in	behalf	of	the
	
medical	fraternity	in	the	House	of	Commons	on	November	24,	1947	still	tried	to
	
protect	the	medical	rackets	when	he	stated:
	
"As	I	am	advised,	there	are	no	medical	grounds	for	attributing	to	vaccination	or
	
diphtheria	immunization	any	connection	with	polio"	(infantile	paralysis). The	investigations	of	the	Ministry	of	Health	were	not	in	agreement	with	this
	
stand	as	is	seen	in	its	statement	that	"in	the	last	few	years	there	is	evidence	that
	
occasionally	followed	vaccination." A	report	in	the	Lancet	(April	8,	1950)	stated	that	Dr.	McClosky	of	Melbourne
	had	inquired	into	340	cases	of	poliomyelitis	which	occurred	in	Victoria	(from
	
January	to	August,	1949)	and	found	that	31	of	them	had	occurred	in	children
	
who	had	received	diphtheria	or	whooping	cough	(pertussis)	vaccine,	or	both,
	
within	three	months	of	the	onset	of	the	disease. Of	the	31	cases,	30	of	them
	
suffered	severe	paralysis	which	was	most	pronounced	in	the	limb	in	which	the
	
injection	was	given. The	Medical	Officer	(April	8,	1950)	reported	the	findings	of	Dr.	D.	H.	Geffen
	
who	stated	that	in	the	first	four	months	of	that	year,	in	St.	Pancras,	London,	30
	
children	under	five	developed	infantile	paralysis	within	four	weeks	of	being
	
immunized	against	diphtheria	or	whooping	cough	(or	both)	"the	paralysis
	
affecting,	in	particular,	the	limb	of	injection. In	7	other	recently	vaccinated	cases,
	
paralysis	occurred	but	not	in	the	limb	that	had	received	the	injection. Dr.	Arthur	Gale	of	the	Health	Ministry	reported	(in	the	Daily	Express	for	April
	
10,	1950)	that	he	had	observed	65	cases	mainly	from	the	Midlands’	in	which
	
paralysis	developed	about	two	weeks	after	an	injection;	and	in	49	of	these,
	
paralysis	was	confined	to	the	limb	in	which	the	injection	had	been	given. The	report	of	the	Government	investigation	(British	Medical	Journal,	July	1,
	
1950)	conducted	by	Dr.	A	Bradford	Hill	and	3. Knowelden	revealed	that	there
	
were	410	cases	of	infantile	paralysis	among	children	under	five	years. Of	these
	
249	had	been	inoculated	at	the	same	time. Of	41	cases	it	was	not	known	if	they
	
had	been	vaccinated	or	not. Of	35	cases	in	which	poliomyelitis	developed	within
	
a	month	of	inoculation,	the	limb	that	had	received	the	vaccine	was	paralyzed. This	was	usually	the	left	arm. The	British	Medical	Journal	(July	29,	1950)	reported	112	cases	of	paralysis
	
admitted	to	the	Park	Hospital,	London	during	1947-1949	in	which	14	were
	
paralyzed	in	the	limb	"which	had	received	one	or	more	of	a	course	of
	
immunizing	injections	within	the	previous	two	months. The	interval	between	the
	
last	injection	and	the	onset	of	paralysis	in	the	majority	of	cases	was	between	9
	
and	14	days. The	paralysis	followed	(A.P.T.) combined	pertussis	(whooping
	
cough)	and	diphtheria	prophylactic	in	nine	cases,	pertussis	vaccine	alone	in	one
	
case,	and	diphtheria	prophylactic	alone	in	four	cases. The	paralysis,	whether	of
	
arm	or	leg,	conformed	in	general	to	a	uniform	pattern. It	was	not	associated	in
	
time	or	place	with	any	particular	clinic	or	technique." In	all	14	cases,	paralysis	occurred	in	the	injected	limb;	in	12	cases	it	was	the	arm
	and	in	2	cases,	the	leg. This	outbreak	of	polio	followed	an	intensive
	
immunization	campaign	during	that	time	(1947-1949). The	serum	makers	probably	had	a	surplus	of	vaccine	to	sell,	as	is	the	case	in	this
	
country	(United	States)	when	the	scare	campaigns	are	engineered	and	the
	
gullible	people	are	stampeded	into	the	vaccination	centers	to	be	"shot." In	Los	Angeles	(1946)	after	the	largest	smallpox	vaccination	campaign	in	the
	
history	of	the	city,	an	epidemic	of	polio	broke	out	within	two	weeks	after	the
	
"shots"	and	by	the	end	of	the	summer	there	were	26	deaths	from	this	cause	and
	
1,900	reported	cases. The	County	Epidemiologist	estimated	that	there	were—
about	15	times	as	many	unreported	cases	which	would	bring	the	count	up	to
	
28,000	cases. The	report	for	the	entire	United	States	for	1951	was	only	28,395. An	average	vaccination	campaign	nets	the	doctors	about	$2,000,000	so	this	one
	
must	have	been	tremendous	in	profits. The	amount	of	the	"take"	has	never	been
	
revealed. This	Polio	epidemic	triggered	off	a	"bigger	than	ever"	March	of	Dimes
	
campaign	and	the	people	were	‘bled"	again	for	money	to	support	the	medical
	
racket	that	creates	more	disease	in	order	to	scare	the	people	into	more	donations
	
and	so	the	vicious	circle	continues. POLIO	FROM	VACCINATION	IN	OTHER	COUNTRIES
	
England,	Australia	and	United	States	are	not	the	only	countries	that	have	found
	
that	vaccination	causes	polio	and	its	variations	such	as	encephalitis,	meningitis,
	
and	certain	other	diseases. In	The	New	York	State	Journal	of	Medicine,	(May	15,	1926)	reports	were	given
	
of	post	vaccinal	encephalitis	in	several	other	countries. In	a	brief	of	an	article	by
	
Dr.	W.	F.	Winkler,	of	the	University	Clinic	of	Rostock,	Germany	it	says:
	
	
"Quite	recently	isolated	cases	of	cerebral	symptoms,	suggesting	encephalitis,
	
following	vaccination	have	been	reported	from	Holland,	Czechoslovakia,	and
	
Germany	and	from	Switzerland	there	have	been	reported	two	cases	of	serious
	
meningitis." The	(Aug.	27,	1928)	Report	of	the	League	of	Nations	tells	of	139	cases	and	41
	
deaths. "This	resulted	in	Holland	stopping	compulsory	vaccination	during	1928-
1929. The	total	number	of	vaccinations	in	Holland	in	the	first	half	of	1928	was
	
less	than	one-third	of	those	for	the	first	half	of	1927	and	the	deaths	from
	encephalitis	were	reduced	to	less	than	one-third." —Vaccine	and	Serum	Evils,
	
Shelton,	p.	15
	
Germany	modified	her	compulsory	vaccination	law,	as	a	result	of	the	increased
	
number	of	polio	cases	that	developed	from	vaccination. The	International	News
	
Service,	(Feb.	27,	1930)	states:
	
	
"The	change	of	attitude	of	some	medical	experts	towards	vaccination	in	favor	of
	
a	less	rigid	enforcement	of	the	law	has	been	brought	about	mainly	through	a
	
considerable	number	of	post	vaccinal	diseases	observed	in	Holland	and	England
	
and	in	sporadic	cases	in	Germany." Dr.	Carl	Leiner,	of	Vienna	reported	cases	of	encephalitis	and	meningitis
	
developing	9	to	15	days	after	vaccination. He	admitted	"that	in	a	generalized
	
infection,	like	generalized	vaccinia,	there	may	be	intracranial	complications." In
	
autopsies,	Dr.	Lucksch	was	able	to	show	beyond	doubt	that	"death	had	been	due
	
to	encephalitis." Dr.	Bastianse,	of	the	Hague,	reported	34	similar	cases	which
	
occurred	in	Holland	during	18	months	(1924-25)	with	a	death	rate	of	40%. The
	
Netherlands,	France	and	other	countries	have	also	reported	cases	of	this	kind. In	an	article	in	The	Journal	of	the	American	Medical	Association,	(July	3,	1926,
	
p. 45.) on	"NERVOUS	DISTURBANCES	AND	SMALLPOX
	
VACCINATION,"	is	stated,	"In	regions	in	which	there	is	no	organized
	
vaccination	of	the	population,	general	paralysis	is	rare. In	patients	with	general
	
paralysis,	he	(Dr.	Daraskwiewiez)	has	never	seen	smallpox	scars,	but	smallpox
	
vaccination	scars	were	always	present." Various	physicians	agreed	that,	"It	is
	
impossible	to	deny	a	connection	between	vaccination	and	the	encephalitis	which
	
follows	it." (emphasis	supplied)
	
In	England	(1923-1925)	an	intensive	vaccination	campaign	was	carried	out
	
which	caused	a	steady	increase	in	the	cases	of	Encephalitis-Lethargica	and
	
similar	diseases	until	in	1924	there	were	6,296	reported	cases	with	un-estimated
	
thousands	of	unreported	cases. Liverpool	was	at	least	50%	better	vaccinated	than
	
the	rest	of	England	and	had	about	100%	more	encephalitis. The	physicians	tried
	
to	direct	blame	away	from	vaccination	by	claiming	that	the	diseases	were	due	to
	
"latent	infection,"	"inherited	weakness,"	or	"special	susceptibility." POLIO	NOT	CAUSED	BY	LIVING	VIRUS
	The	word	poliomyelitis	was	coined	from	the	Greek	words	"polios"	meaning
	
gray,	and	"myelos"	meaning	marrow,	plus	"itis"	meaning	inflammation. Thus	the
	
word	means	inflammation	of	the	gray	matter	of	the	spinal	cord	or	brain	or
	
wherever	gray	matter	is	to	be	found. Every	cell	of	the	body	contains	a	small
	
amount	of	gray	matter	but	it	is	more	concentrated	in	the	brain	and	spinal	cord. Inflammation	results	from	poisoning,	irritation	and	obstructions	that	interfere
	
with	normal	functioning. This	damage,	decay	and	disintegration	of	cell	structure
	
may	terminate	in	paralysis	or	death	without	any	invasion	of	viruses	or	germs. Isolated	germs	have	never	been	known	to	attack	and	cause	decay	and	disease	of
	
any	part	of	the	body. It	is	the	corrosive	poison	products	of	decay	that	form	the
	
body	of	the	vaccine	that	does	the	damage	and	causes	the	disease. Germs,
	
bacteria	and	other	such	organisms	are	a	part	of	decayed	substance;	they	evolve
	
from	it	and	are	necessary	ingredients	in	the	life	process	of	eternal	change	and
	
conversion	from	one	form	of	life	to	a	related	one. Vaccine	poisoning	is	just	one
	
of	a	number	of	causes	of	polio	and	other	diseases. The	section	on	OTHER
	
CAUSES	OF	POLIO	will	deal	with	the	other	main	causes. Our	concern	in	this
	
section	is	to	show	that	viruses	do	not	cause	polio. Since	VIRUS	has	been	medically	designated	as	the	"official"	cause	of	polio	we
	
should	first	of	all	agree	upon	some	stable	definition	of	the	term. Some
	
dictionaries	define	virus	as	a	poison. If	this	were	the	accepted	definition	it	would
	
be	possible	for	us	to	see	the	connection	between	virus	and	polio. But	the
	
physicians	and	serum	makers	prefer	to	imagine	a	virus	that	can	fly	around	in	the
	
air	and	attack	people. Any	other	kind	of	a	virus	could	not	be	made	to	frighten
	
people	into	making	large	donations	and	in	being	vaccinated	in	the	hope	of
	
protecting	against	it. Without	an	"airborne"	virus	to	play	with,	the	whole	vaccine
	
racket	would	collapse. Therefore,	the	people	are	constantly	reminded	that	polio	is	"catching"	and	they
	
must	have	anti-polio	"shots"	that	are	intended	to	build	up	"antibodies"	(which
	
are	also	mythical	suppositions). Although	the	promoters	of	the	virus	theory	of
	
polio	insist	that	viruses	are	living	organisms	that	fly	around	in	the	air	and	cause
	
polio,	this	has	never	been	proved. This	unscientific,	unsound,	and
	
undemonstrated	virus	theory	of	causation	not	only	has	no	value,	but	it	might
	
safely	be	said	that	it	has	had	the	opposite	effect. The	rapid	and	ungoverned
	
spread	of	polio	is	largely	due	to	the	misplaced	confidence	in	the	wrong	belief. The	popular	practice	of	combating	a	false	theory,	not	only	leaves	the	disease
	
unchecked	but	it	directs	the	attention	away	from	the	real	causes	and	discourages
	
true	investigation. WHAT	IS	A	VIRUS? The	1940	Medical	Dictionary	defines	virus	as	"the	specific	living	principle	by
	
which	an	infectious	disease	is	transmitted." This	definition	is	vague	and	meaningless	because	there	is	no	such	thing	as	a
	
"living"	principle. According	to	the	dictionaries,	a	principle	is	a	rule,	truth,	law
	
etc. and	is	not	a	living	entity. The	Scientific	Encyclopedia	says	viruses	have	been	obtained	for
	
experimentation	by	means	of	extremely	powerful	centrifuges	which	must	be
	
specially	built. In	the	same	article	it	is	stated	that	viruses	are	so	small	that	they
	
cannot	be	seen	by	the	most	powerful	microscopes. Then	how	do	they	know	they
	
produced	any? Or	is	this	game	of	hide	and	seek	just	another	means	of	using	up
	
the	millions	of	dollars	contributed	to	the	March	of	Dimes	program? The	Modern	Encyclopedia,	(1944)	says	in	part	"A	virus	differs	from	a	bacterium
	
in	that	the	latter	can	live	and	reproduce	itself	in	an	artificial	culture	such	as	beef
	
broth,	whereas	a	virus	must	live	inside	a	living	cell. It	is	because	of	the
	
protection	which	the	living	cell	affords	a	virus	that	serums	are	of	no	value	in	the
	
treatment	of	virus	diseases." This	shows	us	that	as	far	back	as	1944	it	was	known	that	virus	vaccines	have	no
	
value	in	treating	disease. Yet	these	succeeding	10	years	have	seen	more	millions
	
of	dollars	squandered	and	more	monkeys	and	other	animals	and	people	tortured
	
and	killed	and	more	propaganda	built	on	the	false	premise	that	viruses	cause
	
polio,	than	ever	before. Webster’s	Dictionary	refers	to	virus	as	a	"slimy	or	poisonous	liquid". Pus	is	a
	
slimy	poisonous	liquid	and	forms	where	there	is	inflammation	and	disintegration
	
of	tissue. This	breakdown	and	disintegration	of	life	cells	is	not	a	result	of
	
invasion	of	germs	or	viruses	but	is	due	to	the	interference	with	the	chemical
	
balance	that	holds	the	structure	in	a	state	of	normal	functioning. When	poisons
	
from	such	things	as	vaccines,	drugs,	narcotics,	contaminated	and	devitalized
	
foods	etc. cause	degeneration	of	the	cells	and	disease,	the	condition	is	usually
	
labeled	according	to	the	location	of	the	most	decay. For	instance,	when	there	is
	
inflammation	of	the	kidney	it	is	called	Bright’s	Disease;	if	it	is	in	the	joints,	it	is
	
arthritis,	in	the	stomach	it	is	ulcers,	in	the	lungs,	we	call	it	tuberculosis,	in	the
	
pancreas,	it	is	diabetes	and	when	there	is	inflammation	of	the	brain	and	spinal
	cord	affecting	the	nerves	and	muscles	it	is	called	POLIO. All	cases	of	polio	are	not	paralytic. Dr.	Shelton	discusses	the	subject	in	an	article
	
titled,	DO	PHYSICIANS	CAUSE	INFANTILE	PARALYSIS? (Hygienic
	
Review,	Dec.	1944)	in	which	he	says:
	
	
"I	have	never	seen	paralysis	result	in	cases	of	poliomyelitis	that	had	not	been
	
treated	with	drugs...They	(the	physicians)	kill	and	cripple	their	patients	with	their
	
suppressive	measures	and	then	blame	the	results	on	the	‘disease’	or	on	an
	
unknown	virus. The	value	of	the	Kenny	treatment	is	the	negative	one	of	being
	
less	suppressive	and	less	destructive	than	the	battle	ax	treatment	of	the	medical
	
profession. It	does	not	cure	more,	it	merely	kills	fewer." "In	1908	Dr.	Karl	Landsteiner,	Austrian	pathologist,	published	his	theory,	still
	
held	today	(by	backward	medical	doctors)	that	it	is	a	‘virus’	that	launches
	
epidemic	polio. A	‘virus’	is	defined	(by	him)	as	a	pathogenic,	or	disease
	
producing	microbe,	the	poison	of	a	contagious	disease. Landsteiner	based	his
	
theory	on	the	fact	that	he	had	been	able	to	induce	polio	in	monkeys	by	injecting
	
them	with	nerve	tissues	from	fatal	human	cases. Believing	that	‘the	poliomyelitis
	
produced	in	experimental	animals	is	pseudo-poliomyelitis	produced	by	Pseudo
	
(false)	virus’. Dr.	Scobey	(in	his	research)	reasoned	that	‘the	disease	they
	
produced	in	the	monkey	was	an	artificial	disease	and	not	a	natural	illness	as	it
	
occurred	in	man.’	After	exhausting	medical	literature	in	the	form	of	case-
histories	of	the	subject	in	all	lands	and	at	all	known	times	of	its	appearance,	he
	
concluded:
	
	
1)	It	has	never	been	proved	that	the	‘virus’	of	polio	can	cause	that	disease	in
	
human	beings;
	
	
2)	It	has	been	proved	that	polio	can	be	caused	by	cyanide	poisoning." (Prevention	Magazine,	June,	1950)
	
Cyanide	is	one	of	the	deadly	poisons	that	is	permitted	to	be	used	in	insecticide
	
sprays	on	farm	produce. It	not	only	poisons	the	food	it	is	sprayed	on	but	it	is
	
washed	by	the	rains	into	the	soil	where	it	kills	the	valuable	earth	worms	and
	
other	soil	building	organisms	and	renders	the	farm	land	sterile	and	unproductive. It	also	washes	down	into	the	streams	and	contaminates	the	water	supply	for	both
	
man	and	animals. During	one	of	our	most	widespread	polio	epidemics	(1949)	‘contraction	of	polio
	
by	definite	contact	with	other	victims	of	the	disease	was	not	established	in	an
	
elaborate	study	made	by	the	New	York	State	Health	Department. The	United
	
States	Public	Health	Service	in	its	studies	also	found	the	same	negative	answer
	
during	succeeding	outbreaks	of	polio. In	short,	they	learned	that	the	disease	was
	
not	contagious." TIME	Magazine	commented	on	this	unexpected	revelation	of
	
these	surveys	by	remarking	that	"when	and	where	people	catch	polio	remains	a
	
mystery." The	supposition	that	viruses	entered	through	the	mouth	and	nose	led	the
	
experimenters	to	make	exhaustive	tests	on	both	animals	and	human	beings,
	
mostly	prisoners	and	orphans	in	institutions. They	were	exposed	(by	close
	
association)	to	polio	patients	and	their	throats	and	nasal	passages	were
	
frequently	swabbed	with	matter	(from	the	patients)	that	was	supposed	to	contain
	
viruses. No	polio	was	produced	in	this	way	and	about	the	only	noticeable	after
	
effect	was	that	the	subjects	of	the	experiments	lost	their	sense	of	taste	and	smell
	
due	to	the	damaging	effects	of	the	poisons	in	the	serum	that	was	used	on	the
	
swabs. CONFUSION	IN	THE	RANKS	OF	THE	GERM	BREEDERS
	
In	spite	of	all	the	proof	to	the	contrary,	those	who	profit	by	the	sale	of	vaccines
	
are	trying	to	make	their	theory	‘stick,’	but	there	is	dissension	and	clash	of
	
conflicting	belief	for	lack	of	facts	to	depend	on	Dr	Salk’s	stand	on	his	dead	virus
	
theory	is	reviewed	in	LIFE	magazine	in	the	article	‘Tracking	the	Killer’	in	which
	
the	writer	says	Dr	Salk	has	reason	to	believe	that	his	killed	virus	when	given	in
	
the	prescribed	manner—the	third	booster	shot	increases	antibodies	enormously
—may	even	improve	on	nature. A	confused	little	man	with	a	batch	of	putrid
	
serum	thinks	he	can	improve	on	nature. Robert	Goglan	(in	the	same	article)	writes:
	
	
"Virus	diseases,	preventable	by	vaccination,	were	found	to	be	ones	in	which	the
	
virus	was	blood-borne	during	some	early	stage	of	the	infection	And	this	brings
	
us	to	a	basic	dilemma	that	confronted	polio	researchers	Nobody	could	find	polio
	
viruses	in	the	blood	of	the	polio	victims	at	any	stage." This	is	an	interesting	point	because	the	blood	circulates	through	the	body	every
	
three	minutes	carrying	the	purified	arterial	blood	to	the	cells	and	carrying	away
	the	waste	laden	blood	in	the	veins	to	be	purified	again	If	viruses	caused	polio
	
then	there	would	be	some	indication	of	dead	viruses	found	in	the	venous	blood
	
and	live	viruses	would	be	found	both	in	and	outside	of	the	body. What	started	the	"dead	virus"	tangent	anyway? It	was	disastrous	effects	of	the
	
previous	vaccines	that	were	supposed	to	contain	live	viruses	that	turned	the
	
people	against	this	method	of	mass	murder	But	the	one	track	minds	of	some	of
	
the	researchers	were	determined	to	hang	on	to	the	virus	gimmick,	whether	alive
	
or	dead,	so	dead	virus	vaccine	was	invented
	
An	account	of	one	of	the	deadly	polio	vaccine	experiments	on	living	human
	
beings	may	be	found	in	the	Journal	of	the	American	Medical	Association,	(Dec.
	
28,	1935,	Vol	105	p	2152). The	report	was	made	by	the	Medical	Director	of	the
	
United	States	Public	Health. He	says:
	
"During	the	past	year	in	the	United	States,	several	thousand	individuals	mostly
	
children,	have	received	subcutaneous	and	intracutaneous	injections	of	treated
	
poliomyelitis	virus	with	high	fatality"	He	describes	12	cases	of	which	6	died
	
within	20	days	of	receiving	the	first	dose	of	vaccine. Of	the	remaining	6	hope	of
	
recovery	was	doubtful. This	was	from	(supposedly)	live	virus. Here	we	see	that	the	doctors	were	able	to	cause	polio	with	serum	(protein
	
poisons)	but	they	were	not	able	to	cure	or	control	it. The	report	continues:	"It	is
	
believed	that,	to	many	physicians,	this	series	of	cases...readers	undesirable	the
	
further	use	of	polio	virus	for	human	vaccination." The	deadly	effects	of	the	"dead	virus"	vaccine	of	Dr.	Salk	and	the	equally	deadly
	
effects	of	the	"live	virus"	vaccines	should	close	the	chapter	on	polio	vaccine	but
	
physicians	"die	hard"	when	there	are	large	profits	in	sight. So	a	few	of	these
	
doctors	are	still	trying	to	revive	the	virus	corpse	by	other	concoctions. Dr.	Albert
	
Sabin	is	toying	with	the	idea	of	a	virus	just	between	the	dead	and	the	live	variety
	
which	according	to	the	U.S.	News	and	World	Report	(May	13,	1955)	"would	be
	
tamed—weakened	so	it	could	no	longer	cause	polio	but	could	trigger	the	body
	
into	setting	up	protective	immunity." (This	would	be	laughable	if	it	were	not	so
	
pathetic.) Dr.	Richie	Russell	favors	the	use	of	live	viruses	taken	by	mouth	instead	of
	
injection. He	says:
	
	"It	is	certainly	more	effective	than	the	Salk	method,	and	may	even	involve	less
	
risk,	for	should	an	oral	(by	mouth)	vaccine	lead	unexpectedly	to	a	febrile	illness,
	
there	are	still	many	chances	that	no	paralytic	disease	will	develop...When,
	
however,	poliomyelitis	is	precipitated	by	an	inoculation	the	natural	defences	of
	
the	nervous	system	seem	to	be	ineffective,	and	nearly	all	such	illnesses	develop
	
into	a	paralytic	form	of	the	disease	affecting	especially	the	limb	used	for	the
	
injection." —"The	Story	of	Salk	Anti-Poliomyeitis	Vaccine",	Dr.	M.	Beddow
	
Bayly
	
Dr.	Russell	admits	the	danger	of	injecting	poison	into	the	body	and
	
acknowledges	the	hazards	of	taking	the	poison	by	mouth	but	suggests	that	it
	
would	be	a	little	less	damaging	in	this	way. This	gives	a	choice	of	two	risky,
	
worthless	methods	with	no	proof	of	any	benefits. Poison	always	does	serious	damage	no	matter	how	it	is	taken,	so	why	nurture	the
	
hope	that	any	special	brand	of	"virus"	poison	vaccine	can	ever	be	expected	to	do
	
any	good? If	the	physicians	cannot	comprehend	this	simple	fact	then	the	people
	
will	need	to	do	their	own	protecting	by	avoiding	all	vaccines	and	the	rest	of	the
	
harmful	practices	of	modern	medicine. It	gives	us	hope	to	find	a	few	doctors	here	and	there	who	seem	to	be	getting	a
	
clearer	understanding	of	the	situation. Among	them	is	Dr.	William	J.	McCormick
	
who	states:
	
"The	associated	virus	is	regarded	as	a	biochemical	substance	produced	by	the
	
disease,	which,	although	capable	of	producing	paralysis	in	experimental	animals
	
by	catalytic	chemical	action	in	the	nervous	system,	is	not	necessarily	a	means	of
	
spreading	of	the	disease	under	ordinary	circumstances." —Archives	of
	
Pediatrics,	Feb.	1950
	
Ralph	R.	Scobey,	M.D. (Archives	of	Pediatrics,	Sept.-	Oct.	1950)	tells	us	that
	
"the	so-called	virus	of	poliomyelitis	is	considered	to	be	an	endogenous	(growing
	
from	within)	substance	resulting	from	poisoning." He	gives	evidence	in	the
	
article	to	support	this	claim. J.	E.	R.	McDonagh	(The	Universe	Through	Medicine)	states	that	"the	virus	is
	
formed	within,	and	does	not	come	from	without." A	UP	Release,	(Sept.	8,	1950)	reports	the	views	of	Dr.	Joseph	Melnick	(at	the
	International	Conference	of	Biology)	in	these	words:	"He	said	studies	have
	
shown	that	the	nucleus	of	the	cells	in	the	spinal	cord	may	be	the	place	where	the
	
polio	virus	is	manufactured	when	the	disease	strikes." The	total	lack	of	scientific	evidence	that	viruses	cause	polio	or	that	they	can	exist
	
outside	the	body	and	attack	from	there,	has	forced	the	researchers	to	look	within
	
the	cause	of	disease. When	they	(the	whole	healing	profession)	fully
	
comprehend	this	simple	fact	there	will	no	longer	be	any	fear	of	germs	and	there
	
will	be	no	vaccines,	disinfectants	or	other	harmful	germicides	used. The	healing
	
field	can	then	begin	to	make	rapid	advancement	and	disease	can	be	understood
	
and	eliminated. MONKEY	TESTS	ARE	NO	MEASURE	FOR	MAN
	
It	is	the	blind	acceptance	of	a	false	theory	(of	virus	attack)	that	has	promoted	and
	
sustained	the	terrible	slaughter	of	thousands	of	monkeys	to	make	a	vaccine	that
	
can	never	produce	anything	but	disastrous	results. Even	if	vaccines	were	useful,	an	artificial	laboratory	disease	induced	in	a	healthy
	
monkey	by	methods	not	experienced	by	man	is	not	a	dependable	means	of
	
judging	the	effectiveness	of	a	vaccine	in	a	self	induced	cleansing	disease	of	man. Dr.	Jean	MacNamara	in	the	Medical	Journal,	(Aug.	12,	1933)	emphasized	the
	
danger	of	applying	facts	determined	in	experimental	poliomyelitis	in	monkeys	to
	
the	natural	disease	in	man. He	pointed	out	that	there	are	"marked	clinical
	
differences	between	the	pre-paralytic	stage	of	poliomyelitis	in	children	and	in
	
monkeys." The	Lancet	(Aug.	19,	1933)	discusses	this	same	point	by	saying:
	
	
"To	draw	analogies	between	the	pathogenesis	of	poliomyelitis	in	man	and	the
	
experimental	disease	in	monkeys	might	lead	us	far	astray." John	A.	Toomey,	M.D. (Science,	82:200. Aug.	30,	1955)	stated	that	"the
	
intranasal	and	intracerebral	inoculation	of	the	poliomyelitis	virus	in	monkeys
	
does	not	produce	the	same	disease	seen	in	man." In	an	article	in	the	Journal	of
	
Pediatrics,	(19:103,	1941)	Dr.	Toomey	gives	evidence	to	prove	that	"no	animal
	
gets	the	disease	from	another	no	matter	how	intimately	exposed." For	this	reason
	
QUARANTINE	FOR	POLIOMYELITIS	IS	USELESS. Dr.	Patrick	Meenan,	bacteriologist	at	St.	Vincent’s	Hospital,	Dublin,	states
	
(Lancet,	April	18,	1953)	that	"most	of	the	recent	work	on	poliomyelitis	has	been
	
done	on	chimpanzees,	which	seem	to	react	to	infection	much	as	man	does." Of
	
course	monkeys	and	other	animals	suffer	from	induced	disease	the	same	as
	
people	but	this	has	nothing	to	do	with	the	cause	and	cure	of	disease. This
	
realization	is	slowly	filtering	through	the	muddled	minds	of	some	of	the	doctors,
	
which	gives	us	some	hope. Dr.	Patrick	Meenan	shows	us	that	he	is	getting	a	little	closer	to	the	correct
	
understanding	when	he	says:
	
	
"The	fundamental	difficulty	is	to	know	how	far	experimental	findings	can	be
	
applied	to	natural	infection	in	man. What	is	the	relation	between	the	disease	in
	
animals	produced	by	large	doses	of	laboratory	adapted	strains	and	that	in	man
	
produced	by	small	doses	of	naturally	occurring	virus? Is	the	pathogenesis	of
	
poliomyelitis	in	man	the	same	as	in	the	chimpanzee?" Dr.	E.	R.	Krumbiegel,	City	Health	Commissioner	of	Milwaukee,	Wisc. reported
	
(Sentinal,	May	24,	1955)	that	these	tests	on	monkeys	"do	not	rule	out	the
	
possibility	that	small	amounts	of	weakened	polio	virus	which	will	not	infect
	
monkey	tissues,	may	still	be	able	to	multiply	in	human	tissues...Monkey	tissues
	
are	not	necessarily	comparable	to	human	tissues	in	this	respect. This	is
	
exemplified	by	the	fact	that	the	amount	of	inactivated	virus	necessary	to	produce
	
a	good	polio	response	in	humans	is	far	less	than	that	needed	in	monkeys,	and	far
	
less	in	monkeys	than	in	mice." These	two	doctors	are	still	floundering	around	in	the	delusion	of	"virus
	
causation"	but	they	are	discovering	the	fallacies	and	in	time	will	probably
	
emerge	into	the	light. When	they	inject	some	of	the	putrefied	protein	which	they
	
call	virus	vaccine,	into	people	it	takes	less	of	it	to	produce	toxic	poisoning	and
	
paralysis	than	it	does	in	animals. This	is	not	because	man’s	reaction	to	germs	or
	
viruses	is	any	different	from	that	of	animals;	it	is	because	man	is	already	on	the
	
borderline	of	toxemia	because	of	the	incompatible	foods	and	poisons	he	uses,
	
while	the	animals	that	live	out	in	nature	and	eat	unprocessed	foods	are	strong
	
and	more	resistant	to	poisons. Dr.	Alfred	Byrne,	in	a	scathing	criticism	of	the	Salk	vaccine,	in	the	Spectator	for
	
July	22,	1955,	stated:
		
"It	is	known	that	the	monkey	test	for	the	virus	is	so	crude	as	to	constitute	a
	
source	of	danger	as	it	will	not	always,	by	any	means,	differentiate	between	the
	
presence	of	no	live	virus	and	live	virus	present	in	small	amounts." He	recognized
	
the	potential	hazards	to	be	so	apparent	that	he	considered	it	remarkable	that	there
	
were	not	considerably	more	deaths	and	paralysis	from	the	Salk	vaccine. He
	
wrote:	"The	deaths	might	have	been	multiplied	ten	or	a	hundredfold." If	the	complete	records	were	made	public	we	would	all	be	surprised	to	find	that
	
there	are	so	many	more	Salk	casualties	than	have	been	reported. WHAT	DOES	THE	"SALK"	IMMUNITY	MEAN? The	U.S.	News	and	World	Report	(May	13,	1955)	in	an	article	on	"Better	Polio
	
Vaccine	in	Sight"	states:	"The	Salk	vaccine,	admittedly,	offers	only	limited
	
protection,	though	its	developer	believes	it	can	be	improved	over	the	60	to	90%
	
effectiveness	shown	by	the	trials	last	summer." There	is	a	wide	margin	between	60	and	90%. Would	any	employer	hire	a	worker
	
who	made	mistakes	40%	of	the	time	and	never	improved	over	90%? Would
	
anyone	run	his	business	with	such	haphazard	results? Yet	the	parents	are	urged
	
to	trust	the	lives	of	their	children	in	the	hands	of	"Salk	serum	shooters"	whose
	
most	optimistic	promise	is	for	only	60	to	90%	protection. This	is	no	protection	at
	
all. The	protection	among	the	unvaccinated	is	far	higher	than	that. This	means
	
that	out	of	every	100	who	are	vaccinated	with	the	Salk	vaccine,	10	can	be
	
expected	to	get	polio. For	the	general	unvaccinated	population	only	one	person
	
in	4,000	(in	U.S.)	is	likely	to	get	polio	and	only	one	in	11,000	in	England. ARE	DR.	SALK’S	FIGURES	ON	EFFECTIVENESS	ACCURATE? How	were	the	percentages	of	effectiveness	arrived	at? An	article	in	LIFE	magazine	(April	25,)	stated:
	
	
"Although	the	test	had	beer	carried	out	in	44	states,	the	most	dependable	results
	
came	from	11	in	which	200,745	children	received	three	vaccine	shots	and
	
201,229	got	dummy	shots	to	serve	as	a	yardstick	for	the	vaccine’s	effectiveness. Ten	vaccinated	and	68	unvaccinated	children	caught	laboratory	confirmed	cases
	
of	polio. This	indicated	(to	them)	that	the	vaccine	was	more	than	80%	effective." It	is	apparent	that	this	is	not	in	any	sense	a	true	measurement	of	the	effective
	
ness	of	the	vaccine. In	the	first	place,	if	44	states	were	tested	why	were	the
	
figures	used	in	only	11	of	them. The	statement	that	they	were	more	dependable
	
no	doubt,	means	that	they	were	the	only	ones	that	were	not	too	extremely
	
condemnatory. If	only	the	most	favorable	figures	are	used	in	a	test	the	estimate	is
	
not	accurate. In	the	second	place,	the	dummy	shots	of	colored	water	are	not	a
	
fair	"yardstick"	because	injection	of	anything	at	all	even	distilled	water	is
	
harmful	and	often	fatal. What	was	the	coloring	matter	that	was	added	to	the
	
dummy	shots? Was	it	carbolic	acid	or	mercurochome	or	was	it	food	coloring
	
which	is	a	coal	tar	derivative	and	condemned	as	a	poison	by	the	Food	and	Drug
	
Administration? There	was	a	high	percentage	of	polio	among	the	children	vaccinated	with	the
	
colored	water. Six	times	more	polio	was	caused	by	these	dummy	shots	than	by
	
the	vaccine. This	certainly	cannot	be	accepted	by	any	sane	person	as	a	fair	test	of
	
the	effectiveness	of	any	vaccine. The	colored	water	plus	the	Salk	vaccine
	
produced	far	more	polio	and	death	per	population	than	we	have	among	the
	
unvaccinated	masses. All	this	showed	up	in	spite	of	their	own	"hand	picked"
	
records	in	which	only	the	favorable	reports	were	publicized. The	Francis	Report
	
(statistics	of	the	Salk	experiment)	upon	which	the	effectiveness	was	based
	
showed	that	the	Salk	vaccine	seemed	to	protect	against	the	paralytic	form	of
	
polio	in	only	30%	of	the	cases—on	the	average. According	to	that,	70%	of	those
	
vaccinated	could	be	subject	to	the	worst	paralytic	form	of	polio. On	the	other
	
hand	only	one	person	in	4,571	(in	U.S.)	gets	polio	without	the	vaccine. It	was	never	proved	that	the	vaccine	gave	even	the	30%	protection. That	was
	
merely	assumed	from	the	faulty	experiments	and	the	"manipulated"	figures. For
	
instance	(Salk	Story	by	Bayly	p14),	"No	case	was	considered	as	immunized
	
unless	it	had	received	two	shots	of	the	vaccine. This	means	that	a	child
	
developing	poliomyelitis	after	the	first	inoculation	and	before	the	second	one
	
would	automatically	be	placed	in	the	uninoculated	class,"	and	would	not	be
	
counted	as	a	Salk	vaccine	casualty	even	though	he	died	of	the	"shot". This
	
probably	accounts	for	the	comparatively	few	deaths	that	were	reported	as	a	result
	
of	the	experiment. This	would	also	invalidate	all	the	conclusions	drawn	from	the
	
figures. Dr.	Salk	is	reported	to	have	said	that	"children	vaccinated	last	year	should	be
	
given	booster	inoculations	this	year." If	the	full	course	of	shots	failed	last	year
	how	can	they	expect	some	more	of	the	same	failure	mechanism	to	do	any	better
	
this	year? OTHER	CAUSES	OF	POLIO
	
Although	vaccination	is	one	of	the	quickest	and	surest	ways	of	getting	polio
	
because	poisons	are	injected	directly	into	the	unprotected	bloodstream,	there	are
	
a	number	of	other	causes	that	should	not	be	overlooked. Some	of	the	most
	
common	of	these	are	listed	below	and	discussed	briefly	in	this	section:
	
1. Carbohydrates:	Sugar	products	such	as	ice	cream,	soft	drinks,	desserts,	etc. Denatured	products	such	as	white	flour,	alcoholics,	etc. 2. Cola	beverages	that	contain	drugs	and	sugar. 3. Poison	sprays	on	foods,	poison	preservatives	in	foods,	etc. 4. Operations	of	all	kinds,	especially	removal	of	tonsils. 5. Fatigue	and	all	other	practices	that	deplete	the	vital	energy. 6. Negative	emotions	that	generate	internal	poisons. 7. Interference	of	any	kind	that	impedes	circulation	or	normal	functioning. FATIGUE	is	claimed,	by	the	"virus	fans,"	to	lower	the	energy	and	let	the	viruses
	
attack. Viruses	have	nothing	to	do	with	the	cause	of	polio	but	fatigue	does	in	that
	
it	generates	certain	byproducts	of	metabolism	that	can	result	in	paralysis	under
	
certain	conditions. "According	to	Professor	A.V. Hill,	an	English	physiologist,	the	direct	cause	of
	
the	fatigue	resulting	from	muscular	effort	is	the	accumulation	of	lactic	acid,	the
	
source	of	which	is	glycogen. The	body	stores	up	carbohydrates	in	the	form	of
	
glycogen	or	liver	starch,	which	is	used	up	during	muscular	activity. The
	
excessive	accumulation	of	lactic	acid	in	the	blood	is	the	result	of	an	insufficient
	
intake	of	oxygen	by	the	system. If	the	iron	and	sodium	contents	of	the	blood	are
	
below	normal,	due	to	faulty	diet,	both	the	absorption	of	oxygen	and	the
	
discharge	of	carbonic	acid	are	diminished,	lactic	acid	then	accumulates	in	the
	
muscles;	the	latter	subsequently	stiffen	and	fail	to	function—the	sign	of	fatigue. "It	is	therefore	of	great	importance	for	athletes	and	for	those	who	are	subjected
	
to	muscular	strain,	to	maintain	a	high	degree	of	alkalinity	of	the	blood	by
	
avoiding	as	much	as	possible,	highly	acid	forming	foods	such	as	meat,	eggs,
	
legumes,	breads,	fried	foods	etc.,	and	by	consuming	an	adequate	supply	of	fruits
	
and	green	leaf	vegetables. When	proper	attention	is	paid	to	diet,	fatigue	is
	
retarded,	while	endurance	is	increased. The	Japanese,	Chinese	and	some	of	the
	
Hindu	tribes	living	in	the	Himalaya	mountains,	who	subsist	on	frugal	diet	and
	
hardly	eat	any	meat,	possess	most	remarkable	physical	stamina. These	facts	are
	
worthy	of	careful	attention,	not	only	by	athletes,	but	by	all	who	want	to	derive
	
much	benefit	from	their	regular	exercise." (from	Vital	Facts	About	Foods"	by
	
Otto	Carque	p. 22.) A	booklet	on	"The	Prevention	of	Infantile	Paralysis"	published	by	the	National
	
Chiropractic	Association	discusses	the	subject	of	fatigue	as	follows:
	
"Naturally,	since	the	body	is	a	very	delicately	balanced	electrochemical	machine,
	
a	disturbance	of	major	calibre	is	set	up	when	fatigue	appears. Let	us	quote	an
	
authoritative	pathologist. ‘There	is’	he	says,	‘an	excess	of	waste	matter	which
	
accumulates	in	the	muscles,	and	when	this	is	not	quickly	washed	away	it	causes
	
loss	of	motion	to	a	degree	of	complete	loss	of	power. If	this	point	is	actually
	
reached,	there	occurs	the	escape	from	the	muscles	of	a	rich	liquid	protein	which
	
results	in	stiffness	and	un-usability.’
	
"In	nerve	fatigue,	which	is	brought	about	by	substitution	in	the	nutritive	fluids	of
	
poison	for	oxygen,	there	occurs	‘a	blocking	of	the	nerve	impulses	from	the
	
spinal	cord	to	the	muscles.’	The	immediate	effect	upon	the	muscles	under	fatigue
	
is	to	produce	slight	swelling	and	rigidity,	morbid	substances	accumulate	from
	
which	toxins	(poisons)	arise. Upon	the	nerve	the	immediate	effect	is	to	cause	the
	
great	cells	which	preside	over	those	pathways	of	action	to	swell—just	as	does
	
any	injured	part.
548615196-Eleanor-McBean-Trung-Nguyen-The-Poisoned-Needle-Suppressed-Facts-About-Vaccination-2018-Update.txt
Summarize the following text section accurately and concisely. Maintain specific details and numerical information, and use anti-repetition mechanisms:

        Time	tested	health	books
	
that	have	been	selling	all	over	the	world	from	hundreds	of	book	stores	were	all	at
	
once	declared	to	be	the	cause	of	the	fraud	order. And,	although	the	other	stores
	
would	continue	to	sell	them,	HEALTH	RESEARCH	was	to	be	denied	mail
	delivery	and	completely	put	out	of	business,	for	selling	these	same	books. Dr. Wilborn	had	heard	about	some	of	the	questionable	fraud	order	cases,	so	years
	
ago	before	investing	in	this	expensive	book	business	he	checked	with	the	post
	
office	authorities	and	had	one	of	the	postal	inspectors	examine	all	his	stock	of
	
books	to	be	sure	they	met	with	the	legal	specifications. The	books	were	declared
	
to	be	in	order	so	when	the	fraud	charges	came	he	knew	it	did	not	originate	in	the
	
post	office	department	The	postal	authorities	refused	to	give	the	names	of	the
	
attackers	who	were	seeking	to	destroy	the	Health	Business,	so	in	concealing	the
	
criminals	the	postal	authorities	become	parties	to	the	crime. Excerpts	from	the	fraud	complaint	are	as	follows:
	
"POST	OFFICE	DEPARTMENT
	
OFFICE	OF	THE	CHIEF	HEARING	EXAMINER
	
WASHINGTON,	D. C. May	11,	1955	(delivered	May	14,	1955)
	
“In	the	matter	of	the	complaint	that	HEALTH	RESEARCH,	Dr. R. G. Wilborn
	
(D.
HEALTH RESEARCH
Who is being denied mail delivery and put out of business?
Mulford Co.
What is the name of the company that was involved in the production of a vaccine that caused 7 deaths?
The article does not suggest a reason for the increase in the number of polio cases.
According to the article, what is the alleged reason for the increase in the number of polio cases?
Dr. Scheele
What is the name of the doctor who stated that the vaccine is "hard to make and not safe"?
The article does not mention the name of a specific company that was forced to stop compulsory vaccination.
What is the name of the company that was forced to stop compulsory vaccination in the UK?