They	are	getting	wise	to	the	Salk	vaccine	concoction	in	the	Far	West,	Idaho,
	
Oregon	and	California	having	given	evidence	they	are	seeing	thru	the
	
commercial	propaganda	that	has	been	making	serum	companies	and	undertakers
	
rich	by	selling	millions	of	shots. The	people	of	Oregon	were	chastised	in	the	newspapers	last	week	by	the	press
	
and	USPH	for	not	using	49,000	cubic	centimeters	of	the	state’s	"quota"	of
	
79,744	cc. The	state	health	officer	"threatened"	to	withdraw	these	49,000	cc	and
	
not	let	the	people	have	it	if	they	didn’t	use	it	at	once. The	San	Francisco	Chronicle	reports—’The	demand	for	Salk	Vaccine	has
	
dropped	off	to	almost	zero	in	San	Francisco,	and	apparently	in	the	rest	of	the
	
West.’
They	had	a	meeting	of	80	Idaho	doctors,	nurses,	public	health	officials	and
	
laboratory	technicians. State	officials	have	declared	an	‘indefinite	postponement’
	
of	any	more	mass	shots	of	its	school	children. Following	Dr.	J.	E.	Wyatt’s	frank	statement	that	Salk	Vaccine	has	given	polio	to
	
more	people	in	the	nation	than	it	has	protected	from	the	disease,	the	boys’
	
typewriters	and	mimeographs	have	been	working	overtime	to	discredit	this
	
intrepid	physician. The	AMA	has	been	quoted	as	saying	‘there	ain’t	no	Dr.	Wyatt’. The	USPHS	says
	
there	is	no	doctor	working	for	USPHS	by	that	name. This	latter	statement	is
	
believable,	since	it	was	a	foregone	conclusion	that	any	USPHS	doctor	or
	
employee	spilling	such	a	truth	as	that	would	be	summarily	separated	from	the
	
service. The	serum	publicists	know	their	business. The	job	now	is	to	take	the	public	mind
	
off	the	failure	to	wipe	out	polio	this	summer	with	Salk	vaccine. Spectacular
	
yarns	that	make	good	bedtime	reading	are	the	order	of	the	day. Such	as	"a
	
machine	that	spins	blood	plasma	and	polio	vaccine	into	a	film	thin	enough	that
	
virus	and	bacteria	may	be	killed	by	ultraviolet	light." This	seems	to	cancel	out
	
the	many	official	statements	that	Salk	vaccine	had	been	made	"safe"	after	the
	
many	unnecessary	polio	deaths. February	11,	1956
	
HORNSWOGGLE,	Inc.—The	March	of	Dimes	racketeers	leave	no	stones
	
unturned	to	nick	the	gullible	public. Like	the	late	unlamented	Hitler	the	Big	Lie
	
is	their	chief	stock	in	trade. To	our	desk	has	come	a	clipping	from	a	Long	Beach
	
(California)	paper	headed:	"The	Country	That	Licked	Polio—In	its	own	quiet
	
way	little	Denmark	has	proved	that	Salk	vaccine	is	both	safe	and	effective." Our	stomach	is	strong. We	did	not	regurgitate. The	prevaricator	(professional)
	
who	thought	up	that	yarn	completely	forgot	that	Salk’s	deadly	and	worthless
	
concoction	wasn’t	unveiled	until	April	12,	1955. Yet	he	blandly	says	that
	
Denmark	started	to	stockpile	it	in	1954. CAPSULE	NEWS	readers	already	know
	
how	effective	it	is—in	piling	up	business	for	the	undertakers	and	hospitals. These	pages	on	the	Salk	Vaccine	used	by	special	permission	of	Morris	A.	Bealle,
	
Editor	American	CAPSULE	NEWS,	1400	M	Street,	Northwest,	Washing.’	ton,
	
D.	C.
	
"POLIO	GROPINGS"
	
By	T.	M.	Schippell,	N.	D.
	
HERALD	OF	HEALTH,	APRIL	1955
	
A	great	deal	has	been	written	about	infantile	paralysis—commonly	called	polio. Yet,	when	all	this	mass	of	material	is	analyzed,	you	discover	that	practically
	
nothing	whatsoever	is	known	about	this	crippling	disease. The	hundreds	of
	
millions	of	dollars	that	have	been	tossed	by	the	public,	during	the	past	15	years,
	
into	the	maw	of	the	March	of	Dimes	have	accomplished	little	or	nothing. All	of
	
this	straining	on	the	part	of	the	National	infantile	paralysis	organization,	instead
	
of	erecting	mountains	of	protection	against	polio,	has	not	resulted	in	even	a
	
modest	molehill. Of	course,	nobody	but	the	"insiders"	have	any	knowledge	as	to	how	many
	
millions	of	these	charity	dollars	have	been	cruelly	wasted. Nobody	but	the
	
‘insiders"	can	even	guess	the	fortunes	of	dimes	spent	in	extravagant	plans	which
	
came	to	naught. Nobody	but	the	"insiders"	can	even	approximate	the	plush
	
salaries	paid	to	useless	desk	parasites—mountebanks	who	found	"good	pickings"
	
along	the	trail	of	this	childhood	scourge. Before	the	advent	of	the	March	of	Dimes,	polio	was	unpredictable	and
	
uncheckable. With	the	lapse	of	some	15	years	and	the	expenditure,	on	haywire
	
polio	preventatives,	of	the	wealth	of	a	Solomon,	polio	is	still	unpredictable	and
	
uncheckable. Medical	experts	are	actually	as	much	in	the	dark	today—despite
	
their	‘past	flamboyant	promises	and	hollow	declarations	as	they	were	before
	
generous	and	gullible	Americans	threw	this	unlimited	golden	harvest	to	every
	crack-brained	laboratory	in	this	country. Nutritionists	believe—and	rightly	so—that,	since	all	polio	cases	invariably	show
	
a	lack	of	blood	calcium—and	since	the	eating	of	large	amounts	of	refined	sugar
	
admittedly	lowers	the	calcium	in	the	blood—there	must	be	some	close
	
connection	between	the	spread	of	polio	and	the	large	amounts	of	sweets	the
	
modern	youngster	consumes. Soft	drinks	have	been	singled	out	particularly	by
	
Naturopaths	as	the	likely	culprits	for	this	blood	calcium	deficiency—which
	
brings	on	these	polio	epidemics	during	the	warm	months	but	candy	and	other
	
forms	of	refined	sugar,	in	all	probability,	will	eventually	have	to	share	some	of
	
the	blame. Pregnant	mothers,	noted	for	their	lack	of	blood	calcium	because	of
	
the	calcium	stealing	by	the	unborn	child,	are	victims	of	polio	400%	more	often
	
than	other	women. Two	years	ago,	the	country	was	all	stirred	up	about	the	polio	prevention
	
possibilities	of	gamma	globulin. This	gamma	globulin	was	a	derivative	of	rotten,
	
human	blood. It	was	made	from	the	great	store	of	"unkilled"	diseased	plasma—
the	amounts	of	which	were	bursting	the	seams	of	the	various	blood	banks. The
	
doctors	of	the	army,	navy	and	marine	corps	had	refused	absolutely	to	"shoot"
	
this	putrid	plasma	into	the	bodies	of	wounded	service	men. They	declared	it	was
	
"too	disease-ridden"	to	use	on	our	heroes	in	uniform	but	such	characterization	of
	
the	filthy	stuff	did	not	deter	the	medical	men,	on	the	payroll	of	the	March	of
	
Dimes,	from	proclaiming	it	entirely	suitable	to	go	into	the	clean	bloodstreams	of
	
helpless	little	American	children. Common	sense	was	thrown	overboard	and	the	protests	of	the	few	thinking
	
medical	men	were	disregarded. And	as	we	predicted,	this	highly	touted	panacea
	
turned	out	to	be	a	sham—a	despicable	hoax—and	a	breeder	of	disease. Fortunately,	gamma	globulin	is	now	secretly	abandoned	as	worthless	by	the
	
March	of	Dimes	although	no	public	announcement	of	that	fact	has	ever	been
	
made. Yes,	gamma	globulin	"hopes"	have	gone	down	the	drain,	the	March	of
	
Dimes	remembers	the	incident	merely	as	a	worthless	remedy	that	turned	out	to
	
be	a	good	money-getter. A	different	situation	entirely	is	found	when	a	survey	is
	
made	of	the	children	who	were	so	cruelly	subjected	to	these	ghastly	inoculations. From	all	reports	many	of	them	are	even	now	suffering	from	the	effects	of	this
	
poisoning	and	no	hope	is	held	out	that	matters	will	get	better	as	the	years
	
advance. We	all	know	that	the	vaccinating	of	the	children	of	Japan	against	smallpox—a
	disgraceful	mass	medication	spree	engineered	by	our	conquering	army’s	medical
	
doctors—resulted	in	putting	eyeglasses	on	fully	50%	of	the	race	that	Admiral
	
Perry—back	in	1870—reported	to	have	the	"finest	eyesight	of	any	nation	in	the
	
world." What	terrors	this	gamma	globulin	filth	will	yet	bring	forth	in	the	bodies
	
of	those	it	contaminated	is	anybody’s	guess. And	what	of	this	Salk	vaccine? Only	time	will	show	how	greatly	it	damages	and
	
cripples. Just	remember,	no	vaccine	ever	prevented	any	disease. Sanitation	and
	
hygiene,	together,	have	beaten	smallpox	and	malaria. More	persons	die	of
	
smallpox	today	in	countries	having	compulsory	vaccination	against	smallpox
	
than	pass	out	from	that	disease	in	places	where	no	law	compels	a	population	to
	
so	poison	its	bloodstreams. Is	a	vaccine	needed	to	kill	the	virus	of	polio? Frankly,	there	is	no	virus	which
	
CAUSES	polio	normally. Any	more	than	there	is	virus	that	NORMALLY	passes
	
smallpox	from	one	person	to	another. All	such	viruses—germs	if	you	prefer	the
	
term—are	the	RESULT	of	such	diseases	already	growing	in	a	weakened	body. Of	course,	a	moronic	doctor	can	CAUSE	almost	any	ailment	in	a	normal	person
	
by	filling	the	bloodstream	of	the	victim	so	FULL	OF	VIRUS	that	this	poison
	
overbalances	normal	resistance. But	that	happens	ONLY	when	a	needle-pusher
	
BY-PASSES	the	natural	filters	which	the	Almighty	has	created	for	the	protection
	
of	the	blood. In	use,	the	Salk	vaccine	introduces	into	the	child	only	a	small
	
amount	of	these	viruses. Of	course,	they	will	NOT	PREVENT	polio	and	only	the
	
Almighty	knows	the	extent	of	the	damage	such	foreign	substances	will	do	to	that
	
child	in	the	future. Can	the	Salk	vaccine	prevent	polio? It	cannot! Smallpox	vaccine	never	stopped
	
the	spread	of	smallpox	and	malaria	vaccine	never	stopped	the	spread	of	malaria! If	a	child,	vaccinated	with	the	Salk	filth	continues	to	take	great	quantities	of
	
refined	sugar	into	its	small	body,	much	of	the	blood	calcium	will	be	destroyed
	
and—Salk	vaccine	or	not—that	child	will	probably	come	down	with	polio	easier
	
than	a	youngster	whose	bloodstream	has	not	been	so	weakened. But	while	we	are	on	the	subject	of	the	Salk	vaccine,	let	us	look	at	another	angle. It	should	prove	interesting	to	any	parents	who	foolishly	pushed	their	children
	
into	the	clutches	of	the	experimenters	during	that	outrageous	orgy	of	last
	
summer	when	approximately	2	million	children	were	made	"human	guinea-
pigs". It	is	reported	that	fully	one-quarter	of	them	had	that	filthy	Salk	concoction
	"pushed"	into	their	clean	young	bloodstreams. Actually	nobody	but	a	few
	
"insiders"	of	the	March	of	Dimes	know	which	children	had	their	blood	so
	
poisoned	and	which	of	them	received	only	colored	water. These	same	‘insiders"
	
now	can	arrange	the	names	of	those	children	in	any	fashion	they	wish	and	thus
	
show	any	result	of	this	"mass	medication"	they	believe	will	bring	in	more	dimes
	
next	year. In	January	of	this	year,	a	certain	Dr.	Robert	F.	Korns	released	to	the	press	a
	
statement	from	his	workshop	in	the	University	of	Michigan	where	he	supposedly
	
was	engaged	in	examining	samples	of	blood	taken	from	the	"unknown"	little
	
children	who	had	been	"Salk	vaccine	poisoned"	during	that	orgy	of	last	year. The
	
good	doctor	admitted	to	newspaper	men—at	the	EXACT	time	the	March	of
	
Dimes	was	conducting	a	nation-wide	"scooping	up"	of	every	available	coin—
	
that	"no	one	in	this	country	knows	whether	the	Salk	vaccine	is	any	good	or	not." This	was	his	complete	summary	of	that	great	"Salk	experiment". But	interesting
	
as	his	observation	is,	it	shades	into	nothingness	when	compared	with	another
	
item	which	slipped	from	his	lips	during	the	same	interview. Dr.	Korns	admitted
—	according	to	these	newspaper	accounts,	that	"NONE	OF	HIS	FIVE	SMALL
	
CHILDREN	WAS	INOCULATED	WITH	THE	SALK	VACCINE". He	gave,	as	his	weak	excuse	for	this	oversight,	the	fact	that	"THE
	
COMMUNITY	IN	WHICH	HIS	FAMILY	HAPPENED	TO	LIVE	DID	NOT
	
PARTICIPATE	IN	THE	SALK	VACCINE	TEST." Certainly	a	glorious	record	to	be	handed	down	to	medical	posterity! Laymen
	
everywhere	should	be	proud	to	honor	such	an	upstanding	doctor. This	good
	
follower	of	Hippocrates	was	entirely	willing—with	an	unproven	vaccine—to
	
sacrifice	YOUR	CHILDREN	on	the	altar	of	medicine’s	mad	Salk
	
experimentations	but	HIS	OWN	CHILDREN—ah,	they	were	far,	far	too
	
precious	to	be	"thrown’	to	the	tender	devices	of	these	wild	March	Hares. As	I	said	in	the	beginning—a	great	deal	has	been	written	about	polio	but	the	real
	
searing	stories	of	what	actually	happened	"behind	the	scenes"	during	the	15	year
	
unfoldment	of	this	flamboyant	farce	of	the	March	of	Dimes	is	probably	known
	
only	to	the	Man	Upstairs	Who	will	have	much	to	say	on	the	subject	whet	these
	
same	March	of	Dimes	practitioners	try	to	storm	the	Pearly	Gates. "LET	US	FACE	THE	FACTS"
	
By	T.	M.	Schippell,	N.	D.
	
HERALD	OF	HEALTH	,	AUGUST	1955
	
In	my	last	article,	I	made	the	flat	statement	that,	it	was	my	opinion,	this	country
	
had	gone	"vaccine	crazy". And	nationwide	developments,	since	that	was	written,
	
only	verifies	my	month	old	sordid	conclusion. The	sound	common	sense	which
	
has	characterized	American	thought	for	centuries,	seems	to	have	utterly
	
evaporated	as	the	entire	population	struggled	to	fling	its	children	upon	the	altar
	
of	bungling	medical	experimentation. And	we,	in	the	natural	healing	field,
	
realise	that	coming	disasters	have,	as	usual,	cast	their	long	sinister	shadows
	
before. NO	VACCINE	WAS	EVER	A	SUCCESS. First,	because	vaccines	are	the
	
product	C	abject	animal	misery—brought	into	being	through	tortures	of	dumb
	
animals	in	the	stately	laboratories	of	drug	kingdom. Tens	of	thousands	of
	
helpless	creatures	must	each	die	a	thousand	horrible	deaths	before	a	single
	
vaccine	emerges	to	poison	the	bloodstream	of	human	beings. You	can	paste	this
	
statement	in	your	hat	as	absolute:	As	long	as	the	holy	Bible	states	"as	ye	do	unto
	
the	least	of	them,	ye	do	unto	me",	the	Almighty	will	not	crown	with	success	this
	
crucifying	diabolicalness	of	moronic	investigators. Second,	our	Creator,	when	He	fashioned	the	human	body,	closed	the
	
bloodstream	from	outside	contamination. All	objects	entering	the	circulation
	
must	pass	through	intricate,	but	efficient,	natural	filters	which	bar	out	impurities. Yet	man,	with	his	hypodermic	gadget,	circumvents	these	filters,	regardless	of	the
	
Almighty’s	forethought. If	the	Creator	had	believed	that	those	filters	were	not
	
important,	a	valve	leading	into	the	blood	circulation	would	have	been	provided
	
with	the	same	ease	with	which	He	has	fashioned	a	human	pump	for	the	blood
	
that	will	outwear,	out	beat	and	outlast	anything	that	man	ever	has,	or	ever	will,
	
conceive. Third,	a	nutritional	unbalance	cannot	be	corrected	by	cow	pus	or	monkey-juice. All	ailments	result	from	such	unbalance. No	vaccine	can	supply	what	is	missing
	
or	absorb	poisons	that	cause	the	damage. That	is	why	the	Salk	vaccine	will	fail
—and	fail	utterly	as	every	other	vaccine	has	failed. Let	us	look	at	the	Salk	concoction,	which	admittedly	is	made	from	the	diseased
	
dead	entrails	of	paralyzed	monkeys. Last	Summer,	some	440,000	children	of	a
	
group	of	1,500,000	had	their	clean	bloodstreams	contaminated	by	this	monkey-
juice	which	had	not	even	been	laboratory	tested—let	alone	clinically	tried	out. Frankly,	those	vaccinations	of	last	Summer	did	not	constitute	a	real	test. It	was	a
	
complete	hoax. One	child	in	four	received	the	Salk	concoction—the	others,
	
colored	water. The	names	of	all	youngsters-those	poisoned	and	those	who	got
	
only	water—were	kept	secret	from	everybody	by	a	select	group	of	hirelings
	
inside	the	March	of	Dimes. So	it	was	easy	to	"shuffle	the	cards"	anytime	during
	
the	so-called	"six	months	trial	period"	when	scientists	supposedly	were	checking
	
the	test	tubes. If	any	child—who	had	received	the	Salk	monkey-juice—died,	it
	
was	easy	to	slip	that	child’s	card	into	the	cards	of	those	youngsters	who	had
	
received	"only	colored	water"	and	to	claim	the	victim	was	a	"poor	unfortunate"
	
who	had	not	been	vaccinated	at	all! If	such	a	"set-up"	is	a	sample	of	American
	
medical	fair	play—it	is	time	the	laymen	made	some	changes	in	the	rules. This	year	the	Salk	vaccine	was	approved	with	all	the	Hollywood	"first	night"
	
trimmings. Special	platforms	were	erected	at	the	cooperating	university,	the	red
	
carpet	was	spread	for	two	hundred	selected	guests	and	then	the	dumb-founding
	
news	was	sent	out	over	loud	speakers	that	at	long	last,	after	careful	checking,	the
	
Salk	monkey-juice	was	finally	"approved". Yet	before	the	echoes	of	the	shouts
	
of	delight	from	those	200	assembled	guests	had	died	away,	the	great	laboratories
	
were	shipping	millions	of	"shots"	of	this	monkey-juice	which	had	been
	
manufactured	months	and	months	before. Just	how	gullible	does	Modern	Medicine	take	the	Americans	to	be? How	raw	a
	
deal	will	those	self-appointed	"Guardians	of	the	Public	Health"	spring	upon	their
	
unsuspecting	patients? This	time,	even	the	man	on	the	street	can	see	that	his
	
sainted	family	physician	has	taken	the	whole	blighted	country	for	a	buggy-ride. Yet	what	the	man	on	the	street	does	not	see	is	the	mark	this	vaccination	orgy	will
	
leave	on	generations	yet	unborn. Thousands	of	vaccines	have	been	brought	forward	and	not	one	of	them	ever
	
accomplished	what	was	hoped	for	it. No	need	to	go	into	the	whole	bevy	of	these
	
rotten,	disgusting,	filth	concoctions—let	us	briefly	inspect	the	authentic	history
	
of	the	most	common	of	all	vaccines—the	putrid	cow	pus	that	is	supposed	to
	
prevent	smallpox. Edward	Jenner,	who	died	in	1823,	invented	this	anti-smallpox	vaccine. But	up	to
	
the	time	of	his	death	he	was	not	certain	whether	the	pus	from	a	diseased	cow	or
	the	grease	from	the	hocks	of	a	diseased	horse	was	the	better	preventative	for
	
smallpox. He	admitted,	just	before	he	died,	that	his	vaccine	was	worthless. Rumor	has	it	that	the	vaccine,	which	is	today	mixed	with	the	human	blood,	is	the
	
offspring	of	the	original	sick	Jenner	cow. But	whether	it	is	or	not	is	immaterial. Let	us	see	what	a	frank,	honest	medical	man	learned	of	smallpox	vaccination. His	name	Charles	Creighton,	MA,	MD,	of	England. This	licensed	medical	man
	
was	instructed	by	the	Encyclopaedia	Britannica	to	look	into	the	subject	of
	
smallpox	vaccination	and	to	write	objectively	about	it	as	the	facts	warranted. Dr.	Creighton	delved	into	the	work	and	for	several	years	checked	through	the
	
records	in	all	civilized	countries. His	written	report	was	eventually	printed	in	the
	
Ninth	Edition	of	that	publication. But	his	findings	about	smallpox	vaccination
	
contributed	to	his	finis. The	medical	heavens	fell	upon	him. As	a	medical	expert
	
he	was	"through". And	in	the	Tenth,	and	all	subsequent	editions	of	the
	
Encyclopaedia	Britannica	his	account	is	missing. The	good	doctor	must	have	realized	the	gravity	of	what	he	was	doing. Perhaps
	
he	sensed	that	this	effort	to	tell	the	truth	about	the	smallpox	vaccine	folly	would
	
be	his	lorelei	into	medical	oblivion. Because	he	begins	as	follows:
	
"It	is	right	to	say	that	the	views	expressed	in	the	present	article	diverge	in	many
	
points	from	the	opinions	generally	received	among	medical	men	and	must	be
	
regarded	not	as	an	exposition	of	established	and	undisputed	doctrines	but	as	the
	
outcome	of	an	independent	and	laborious	research." The	account	covers	several	pages	of	small	type. It	shows	that	this	investigator
	
went	from	horizon	to	horizon	for	his	data—all	of	which	was	damaging	r	to	the
	
continuance	of	smallpox	vaccination. Not	one	thing	was	unearthed	that	was
	
favorable	to	rotten	cow	pus	or	the	grease	from	the	hocks	of	diseased	horses,
	
either	as	a	preventative	or	as	a	cure	of	smallpox. As	an	example,	Dr.	Creighton	shows	that	compulsory	vaccination	became	a	law
	
in	England	in	1854. Infant	deaths,	from	smallpox,	rose	from	380	in	1853	to	591
	
in	1854. The	records	of	the	Eastern	Metropolitan	Hospital	(Homerton,	England)
	
tell	a	complete	story:	from	its	opening	early	in	1871	to	the	end	of	1878—	about
	
eight	years—of	the	6,533	persons	received	as	smallpox	patients,	4,283	of	them
	
bore	vaccination	marks,	793	admitted	they	had	also	been	vaccinated	but	bore	no
	
marks	while	only	1,477	of	the	6,533	HAD	NOT	BEEN	VACCINATED. Also,	in
	Bavaria,	in	the	year	1871—of	the	30,742	smallpox	cases	reported,	29,429	had
	
been	vaccinated. Is	there	any	wonder	that	England	repealed	its	compulsory
	
vaccination	law? In	addition,	Dr.	Creighton’s	figures	indicate	that	in	practically
	
every	smallpox	epidemic	since	the	invention	of	the	smallpox	vaccine	in	1799—a
	
full	one	hundred	and	fifty-six	years—the	start	was	always	with	vaccinated
	
victims. It	is	also	interesting	to	note	that	despite	widespread	vaccination	against
	
smallpox,	the	death	rate	from	that	disease,	proportioned	to	the	population,	is	the
	
same	today—about	18%—as	in	the	days	when	there	was	no	vaccination
	
whatsoever. But	merely	that	a	vaccine	fails	is	NOT	THE	WHOLE	STORY. No,	there	is
	
another	feature	that	has	not	been	properly	put	before	the	lay	populations	of	the
	
world. Medical	men	have	never	admitted	openly	that	vaccination	to	prevent
	
smallpox	may	cause	aftermath’s	in	the	shape	of	scrofula,	tubercle,	whooping
	
cough	and	diarrhea—but	they	DO	ADMIT	that	such	poisoning	of	the
	
bloodstream	may	RE-DISPOSE	a	child	to	these	diseases—in	other	words,
	
weaken	such	child’s	resistance	and	make	such	child	an	easy	victim	for	any	and
	
all	of	these	ailments. But	here	is	the	real	menace	of	vaccines:	Dr.	Creighton	found	that	in	1884,	more
	
than	1,733	of	the	vaccinated	infants	DIED	OF	SYPHILIS! With	this	syphilis	as	a
	
definite	follower	of	many	vaccinations	for	smallpox—which	no	medical	man
	
will	deny—we	wonder	what	horrible	revelations	may	be	in	store	for	the	parents
	
who	permitted	the	bloodstreams	of	their	youngsters	to	be	contaminated	by	this
	
untested	Salk	monkey	entrails	filth. The	parents	of	any	child	who	comes	down	with	Polio,	after	such	monkey	juice
	
inoculation,	should	seek	redress	from	the	local	doctor,	who	administered	this
	
rotten	concoction,	and	not	overlook	the	laboratories	which	manufactured	it. The	March	of	Dimes	might	also	be	worth	considering	in	this	regard. "NEW	ENGLAND	AND	SALK’S	OFFAL"
	
By	T.	M.	Schippell,	N.	D.
	HERALD	OF	HEALTH,	OCTOBER	1955
	
When	the	epidemic	of	polio	hit	New	England	in	late	July	and	August	of	is	year,
	
the	befuddled	public	did	not	realize	that	the	medical	men—the	self-appointed
	
"Guardians	of	the	Public	Health"—never	even	mentioned	the	rushing	of	Salk
	
vaccine	to	the	stricken	area. Instead,	the	physicians	blandly	declared	that	the
	
epidemic	was	not	an	epidemic	and	that	the	many	cases	of	polio,	which	were
	
popping	up	everywhere,	were	JUST	NORMAL. Yet	some	communities	reported
—despite	all	efforts	to	hush	hush	the	news—that	the	incidence	of	polio	for	1955
	
outstripped	the	preceding	year’s	total	many	times	over. One	community,	last	year,	had	17	cases	while	this	year	the	total	had	leaped	to
	
115—another	city	had	only	5	cases	in	1954,	but	this	year	found	them	with	69
	
cases	on	their	hands. Massachusetts	alone,	there	were	94	cases	in	1954—and
	
over	1,500	in	1955. And	so	the	figures	went	climbing—and	the	public	was	fed
	
the	same	old	don’t	worry,	this	is	not	an	epidemic"	advice	day	after	day	as	the
	
medical	men	sought	their	best	to	placate	the	alarmed	parents. And	while	these
	
"Guardians	of	the	Public	Health"	told	the	Bostonians	that	this	polio	outbreak	was
	
not	"dangerous"—from	the	other	side	of	their	mouths	came	the	warning	to
	
visitors	not	bring	their	children	into	eastern	Massachusetts	until	the	"situation
	
clarified	itself." This	monstrous	double	talk	was	repeated	over	and	over	again	and	the	figures	of
	
the	polio	victims	in	New	England	mounted	to	more	than	2,000. Yet,	through	all,
	
there	was	no	mention	that	a	special	session	of	the	legislature	should	be	called
	
and	money	made	available	to	have	the	Salk	vaccine	rushed	in	by	airmail. The
	
only	reference	made	to	the	Salk	vaccine	was	an	official	"face-saving"	statement
	
that,	in	spite	of	those	unfortunate	children	who	had	been	stricken	with	polio
	
during	this	present	unfortunate	situation,	only	19	children—out	of	the	thousands
	
of	youngsters	who	had	received	inoculations	of	the	Salk	monkey-entrails	juice—
	
had	come	down	with	the	disease. And	the	gullible	public—not	having	time	to	go
	
into	the	figures—uttered	thankful	prayers	of	deliverance. Especially	was	this
	
true	with	those	parents	who	had	so	ruthlessly	permitted	their	youngsters	to	be
	
experimented	upon	with	this	dead	monkey	vaccine. This	reassuring	message,	by
	
inference,	was	intended	to	show	that	the	Salk	concoction,	in	this	crisis,	had	come
	
through	with	flying	colors. Yes,	the	misleading	information,	given	so	glibly	by
	
the	medical	authorities,	was	intended	to	imply	that	the	Salk	vaccine—
administered	in	New	England	last	year	and	this	Spring—was	doing	a
	
magnificent	job. Is	there	any	wonder	that	we	natural	healing	doctors	are	aghast	at	these	untruthful
	
reports	which	emanate	from	that	select	citadel	of	medical	might? Had	John	Q. Public	delved	into	those	figures	he	would	have	found,	doubtless	much	to	his
	
consternation,	that	once	more	he	had	been	taken	for	a	"medical	joy	ride	into
	
Never	Never	Land." Instead	of	those	sparse	19	polio	cases	among	the	Salk
	
inoculated	children	being	a	tremendously	wee	percentage	of	the	great	number	of
	
children	who	had	been	given	this	Salk	monkey-juice,	those	19	cases	bore	exactly
	
the	same	relationship—constituted	the	VERY	SAME	PERCENTAGE—as	the
	
cases	of	unvaccinated	victims	of	polio	bore	to	the	vastly	larger	number	of
	
children	who	had	not	been	Salk	vaccinated. In	other	words-just	as	many
	
children,	proportionately,	who	had	been	vaccinated	with	the	Salk	monkey-juice,
	
came	down	with	polio	as	did	the	children	who	were	not	carrying	Salk’s	famous
	
vaccine	in	their	veins. It	was	all	a	horrible	hoax! Now,	to	say	that	the	doctors	in	charge	of	that	New	England	polio	situation	did
	
not	know	this,	is	to	stretch	credulity	a	little	too	far. To	say	that	the	doctor,	on	the
	
radio,	who	praised	the	lack	of	polio	victims	among	those	who	had	been	so
	
ruthlessly	given	this	Salk	concoction,	was	not	familiar	with	the	statistics,	is	a
	
little	more	than	those	outside	the	medical	profession	can	stomach. But	the	main	lesson	taught	by	this	polio	epidemic	in	New	England	is	the	fact	that
	
medical	doctors	everywhere	are	now	realizing	that	this	is	another	day—	that	the
	
glamor	of	the	Salk	discovery	is	wearing	off—and	that	vaccines	are	vaccines
	
(always	dangerous)	and	need	especial	care	in	handling. Yes,	the	medical	men	as
	
a	whole	are	now	unwilling	to	back	this	Salk	laboratory	mess	until	the	facts	about
	
it	are	known	and	are	PROVEN	BEYOND	A	SHADOW	OF	A	DOUBT. They	are
	
unwilling	to	take	the	chance	of	being	COMPLETELY	WRONG	in	this	vaccine
	
matter. They	do	not	forget	that	several	of	their	more	courageous	fellows	were	not
	
afraid	to	stand	up	and	defy	the	dictates	of	the	medical	hierarchy	when	they	told
	
the	world	that,	in	their	opinion,	the	Salk	vaccine	was	manifestly	UNSAFE. Now
	
the	doctors	who	formerly	applauded	Salk—are	standing	silent	on	the	sidelines
	
waiting,	waiting,	waiting. What	the	next	move	of	the	"hypodermic	boys"—in	the	realm	of	the	Salk	empire
—will	be,	is	anybody’s	guess. That	they	will	not	abandon	this	El	Dorado	of	skin
	
puncturing	is	a	foregone	conclusion. But	it	will	be	interesting	to	watch	what	their
	
new	steps	will	be. You	may	be	sure	that	they	will	want	a	part	of	the	millions	of
	
dollars	voted	by	Congress	for	this	monkey	juice. They	will	not	willingly
	abandon	the	fortunes	this	blood	contamination	of	youngsters	will	bring	to	them. Nobody	will	be	able	to	stay	this	holocaust	because	the	public	has	been	so
	
propagandized—covering	the	infallibility	of	medical	prowess	that	the	average
	
M.D.,	in	public	esteem,	is	now	placed	somewhere	between	the	saints	and	the
	
Almighty. When	such	a	condition	exists	in	the	world—the	finding	of	plausible
	
and	acceptable	excuses	for	the	failures	of	the	Salk	concoction	rests	with	the	mere
	
matter	of	proper	selection	of	words	that	have	public	appeal. When	the	United
	
States	Government	votes	millions	of	dollars	for	free	Salk	vaccine	inoculations
	
and	the	medical	men	see	their	incomes	mounting	during	1956	by	thousands	upon
	
thousands	of	dollars	through	this	"skin	punching	technique"—what	happens	to
	
the	helpless	little	children	involved	means	very	little	to	the	dollar	grabbers. I	take	no	pleasure	in	bringing	this	sort	or	truth	to	the	American	people. I	would
	
much	rather	forget	that	such	things	could	happen. But	I	am	dedicated	to	the
	
service	of	humanity	and	as	long	as	I	have	life,	I	shall	say	what	is	closest	to	my
	
heart. Now,	do	not	get	the	impression	that	I	believe	all	medical	doctors	are	mercenary. Nothing	could	be	further	from	the	truth. I	know	that	the	vast	majority	of	medical
	
men	are	honest,	trustworthy	and	reliable. These	men	give	their	best	efforts	to
	
mankind	and	while	I	do	not	agree	with	many	of	their	methods	and	healing	ideas,
	
I	honor	them	for	the	sincere	efforts	they	are	always	making. Again,	the	average
	
medical	man	is	a	creature	of	organizations	that	are	ruthless	to	any	practitioner
	
who	seems	to	have	"stepped	out	of	line". These	corporate	bodies	have	the	power
	
to	deprive	a	medical	man	of	his	license,	without	giving	him	a	day	in	court. They
	
can	throw	him	out	of	any	or	all	hospitals	supported	by	the	taxpayers	of	this	great
	
country. They	can	break	him	completely	by	ruining	his	practice. All	medical
	
men	understand	vividly	the	shadow	under	which	they	work. They	know	what
	
they	can	safely	do	and	what	they	cannot	do. And	that	is	why	it	is	the	exceptional
	
practitioner	who	dares	stand	up	in	public	and	disapprove	of	any	action	that	has
	
already	received	the	commendation	of	the	medical	elect—as	has	the	Salk
	
vaccine. All	honor	to	those	doctors	who	were	not	afraid	to	express	their	doubts
	
as	to	the	safety	of	this	monkey-juice	concoction. That	sainted	"remedy"	will,	in
	
all	probability,	leave	its	mark	upon	many	generations	yet	unborn	in	the	same
	
manner	a	smallpox	vaccination	leaves	its	lurid	trail	of	syphilis. It	is	unfortunate	that	the	medical	profession	in	this	country	are	not	as	free	spoken
	
as	are	the	members	of	the	medical	fraternity	in	Great	Britain. Over	there,	the
	Salk	vaccine	received	the	same	Hollywood	sendoff	accorded	it	in	this	country. Yet	the	British	doctors	were	not	stampeded	by	the	wealth	of	the	March	of	Dimes
	
or	the	cajolery	of	their	high	up	brothers	in	medicine. Those	who	realized	the
	
dangers	involved	with	an	untested,	unknown,	unreliable	laboratory	makeshift,
	
were	quick	to	gain	an	audience	and	there	was	no	countrywide	vaccination	orgy
	
that	the	United	States	was	forced	to	endure. British	doctors	make	sure	they	know
	
where	they	are	headed	before	they	plunge	into	a	series	of	experiments—because
	
the	Salk	vaccine	inoculations	are	all	experiments. Since	American	doctors	have	annexed	the	title	of	"Guardians	of	the	Public
	
Health",	they	should	actually	"lean	over	backward"	in	their	desire	to	see	that
	
"their	wards"	received	the	best	that	can	be	given	them	in	the	way	of	medical
	
treatments. Making	the	lay	population	into	human	guinea	pigs	for	rash
	
experimentation	will	have	its	repercussions	in	a	manner	the	orthodox	doctor	will
	
not	enjoy. And	those	repercussions	will	come	swiftly	because	the	American
	
public	can	be	fooled	only	just	so	long. What	New	England	needed,	in	its	polio	outbreak,	was	the	addition,	from	Great
	
Britain,	of	a	few	of	the	level	headed	practitioners. Those	doctors	would	have	told
	
the	unvarnished	truth	and	would	have	ended	the	confusing	double	talk	on	polio
	
conditions	that	kept	pouring	out	of	high	medical	circles. SERUMS	AND	POLIO
	
By	Herbert	M.	Shelton,	N.D.,	1951
	
DR.	SHELTON’S	HYGIENIC	REVIEW,	AUGUST	1951
	
It	has	long	been	known	that	inoculations	of	all	kinds	frequently	cause	nervous
	
diseases	including	paralysis. Smallpox	vaccination	often	results	in	paralysis	of
	
one	side	of	the	body. That	it	also	causes	encephalitis	lethargica	(sleeping
	
sickness)	is	now	well	established. All	vaccines	and	serums	tend	to	produce
	
nervous	diseases. Several	disasters	following	inoculations	in	France	and	Italy
	
have	been	reported	in	which	one	feature	of	the	victim’s	illness	was	paralysis. When,	in	1947	the	question	was	brought	up	before	the	British	Ministry	of	Health
	
as	to	what	extent	the	vaccinations	and	inoculations	that	were	going	on	in
	
England	were	responsible	for	poliomyelitis,	the	Ministry	remained	silent	over
	
the	possibility. By	1950,	however,	it	attitude	had	changed	and	Mr.	Bevan	agreed
	
to	consider	that	the	matter	be	investigated. In	April	of	that	year	The	Lancet	(London	medical	journal)	and	The	Medical
	
Officer	published	papers	revealing	that	infantile	paralysis	had	followed
	
inoculations	with	diphtheria	toxoid,	whooping	cough	vaccine	and	the	combined
	
diphtheria	vaccine	and	whooping	cough	vaccine. These	papers	revealed	that
	
there	was	a	definite	connection	between	the	inoculation	and	the	paralysis	that
	
occurred	within	a	month	of	the	inoculation. The	Lancet	paper	was	published	by	an	Australian	physician,	a	Dr.	McCloskey,
	
who	is	said	to	be	a	poliomyelitis	expert. He	reported	from	Melbourne	that	a
	
complaint	by	the	parents	of	children	who	developed	"paralytic	poliomyelitis"
	
soon	after	a	"prophylactic	inoculation"	had	led	the	Health	Department	of	the
	
state	of	Victoria	to	investigate	the	"immunization"	history	of	375	cases	of
	
poliomyelitis	reported	during	the	epidemic	between	Jan.	8,	and	Aug.	30,	1949. Dr.	McCloskey	says	that	out	of	340	cases	investigated,	31	had	received
	
"prophylactic"	injections	of	one	kind	or	another	within	three	months	of
	
development	of	the	paralysis	and	that	the	paralysis	occurred	in	the	limb	which
	
had	been	inoculated. McCloskey	discovered	twenty-three	similar	cases	occurring
	
from	3	to	12	months	after	inoculation	and	121	cases	occurring	more	than	a	year
	
after	inoculation. The	article	in	The	Medical	Officer	(April	8)	was	by	Dennis	H.	Geffen,	M.D.,
	
D.P.M.,	Medical	Officer	of	the	London	Borough	of	St.	Pancras. It	was	a	paper	he
	
had	read	at	a	meeting	of	London	Medical	Officers	of	health	the	previous	October
	
on	"The	Incidence	of	Paralysis	Occurring	in	London	Children	Within	Four
	
Weeks	After	Inoculation." In	this	paper,	Dr.	Geffen	showed	that	these	cases	had
	
been	occurring	for	some	time. He	mentioned	a	Dr.	Martin	who	had	been
	
collecting	cases	"over	a	period	of	years,"	and	a	Dr.	Gale	who	had	found	cases	as
	
far	back	as	1942. Geffen,	himself,	had	started	his	inquiries	because	there	had
	
been	reported	to	him	in	September	1949	two	cases	of	poliomyelitis	in	children
	
who	had	been	inoculated	within	the	proceeding	two	or	three	weeks. He	found
	
that	out	of	182	cases	of	poliomyelitis	in	London	under	five	years	of	age	since	the
	
beginning	of	1949,	32	had	developed	the	disease	within	four	weeks	of	receiving
	
the	injection,	the	paralysis	developing	in	the	particular	limb	of	injection. In	21	of
	
these	a	combined	vaccine	had	been	used,	in	8	a	diphtheria	toxoid,	and	in	I	case,
	
whooping	cough	vaccine	alone. Geffen	excluded	from	his	list	all	cases	of	polio
	
that	had	developed	more	than	four	weeks	after	inoculation	and	all	cases	where
	
the	paralysis	occurred	in	the	limb	into	which	no	injection	had	been	made. Chapman	Pincher,	writing	of	these	findings	in	the	Daily	Express,	April	10,	says:
	
"Realizing	the	danger	of	their	findings	in	the	Government	diphtheria
	
immunization	campaign,	the	doctors	withheld	publication	until	some	cases	could
	
be	followed	up	over	many	months." The	matter	finally	received	a	full	airing	in
	
the	British	public	press. At	first,	the	Ministry	of	Hell(th)	played	down	the	whole
	
affair	and	insisted	that	the	risk	of	inoculation	was	"unappreciable." Finally,
	
however,	the	Ministry	of	Hell(th)	sent	a	circular	to	medical	officers	in	June,	after
	
the	results	of	a	statistical	investigation,	suggested	by	Sir	William	Janieson	had
	
been	carried	out	and	the	findings	learned. The	investigation	had	been	carried	out
	
by	Prof.	A.	Bradford	Hill	and	Dr.	Knowelden. These	men	reported	in	the	British
	
Medical	Journal	(July	1,	1950)	that	in	the	1949	epidemic	of	poliomyelitis	in
	
England	and	Wales	"cases	of	paralysis	were	occurring	which	were	associated
	
with	inoculation	procedures	carried	out	within	the	month	preceding	the	recorded
	
date	of	onset	of	the	illness." At	first	the	British	authorities	were	inclined	to	believe	that	all	the	danger	resided
	
in	the	use	of	the	mixed	vaccines,	but	when	it	was	shown	statistically	that	there	is
	
as	much	danger	associated	with	the	diphtheria	toxoid	alone	or	the	whooping
	
cough	vaccine	alone	as	with	the	two	combined,	they	were	forced	to	abandon	this
	
position. Sir	John	Charles,	Chief	Medical	Officer,	sent	out	an	official	letter
	
warning	medical	officers	of	the	possible	danger	and	admitting	that	the	paralysis
	
referred	to	had	been	associated	with	diphtheria	toxoid	alone. The	Medical
	
Officers	were	told	to	use	their	own	judgement	as	to	suspending	inoculation
	
programmes	in	the	event	of	an	unusual	number	of	cases	of	infantile	paralysis	in
	
their	area. The	Department	of	Hell(th)	of	Scotland	sent	out	a	similar	circular. The
medical	officers	of	Birmingham,	Glasgow	and	a	number	of	other	British	towns
	
suspended	inoculation	for	several	months	from	July. These	findings	indicate	that	inoculations	given	at	the	periphery	of	a	nerve	may
	
result	in	severe	and	lasting	damage	at	the	center. The	tendency	of	the
	
investigators	is	to	think	of	the	chief	danger	as	coming	within	the	first	four	weeks
	
after	inoculation,	although	there	is	no	reason	given	for	thinking	that	full	recovery
	
of	the	nerve	centre	always	occurs	within	this	period. Indeed,	no	proof	is	offered
	
to	show	that	complete	recovery	ever	occurs. The	Australian	physician,
	
McCloskey,	reported	cases	occurring	more	than	a	year	after	inoculation. What	is
	
to	prevent	an	inoculation	given	in	the	fall	of	this	year	being	instrumental	in
	
producing	paralysis	in	a	child	at	the	end	of	the	summer	of	next	year? (I	would
	
suggest	a	study	of	these	cases	in	the	light	of	Speransky’s	findings.) One	physician	showed	that	these	post-inoculation	cases	of	poliomyelitis	have
	
been	developing	from	the	very	beginning	of	the	inoculation	programs. Such
	
cases	will	be	difficult	to	investigate	statistically	after	the	lapse	of	so	much	time,
	
but	if	the	inoculations	are	definitely	associated	with	the	occurrence	of	many
	
cases	of	polio	today,	there	is	every	reason	to	think	that	they	have	been	so
	
associated	from	the	start	of	the	inoculation	practice. It	seems	to	me	that	the	more
	
that	is	learned	about	the	evils	of	inoculations,	the	more	evil	inoculations	are
	
shown	to	be. To	merely	suspend	an	inoculation	campaign	for	a	season	and	then
	
resume	the	evil	is	hardly	a	remedy	for	the	many	evils	that	flow	from
	
inoculations. The	British	Ministry	of	Hell(th)	did	not	want	to	believe	that	their	precious
	
inoculations	were	in	any	way	responsible	for	paralysis,	because,	as	they	said	to
	
the	press:	"It	would	be	a	tragedy	if	people	stopped	having	their	children
	
immunized	against	diphtheria." If	they	were	a	real	Ministry	of	Health,	instead	of
	
the	farce	that	they	are,	they	would	know	that	there	are	helpful	ways	of	assuring
	
the	health	of	children,	that	there	is	no	such	thing	as	immunity,	and	that	harming
	
the	organisms	of	children	is	not	the	way	to	prevent	disease	in	them. As	an	aftermath	of	these	observations	this	year	the	Health	Department	in	New
	
York	City	suspended	inoculating	(they	called	It	"immunizing")	infants	and
	
children	against	diphtheria	and	whooping	cough	at	its	76	child	health	stations
	
from	June	15,	to	Oct.	1,	which	it	calls	the	"polio	season." The	Department,
	
which	expressed	its	intention	of	requesting	private	physicians	to	follow	its
	
example,	made	known	its	action	to	New	York	City’s	five	county	medical
	
societies. The	news	account,	as	published	in	the	New	York	Times,	June	12,	1951,	says:
	
"The	step	was	taken	on	the	basis	of	a	preliminary	report	on	a	research	study
	
started	here	last	March,	when	findings	published	in	medical	journals	by	English
	
and	Australian	scientists	came	to	the	attention	of	health	authorities	in	this
	
country. "The	foreign	studies,	which	now	appear	to	be	substantiated	by	the	health
	
department	survey,	indicated	that	of	children	who	contracted	paralytic	polio	a
	
considerable	proportion	had	been	immunized	within	the	previous	month	with
	
diphtheria	toxoid,	whooping	cough	vaccine,	and	that	the	site	of	the	paralysis	was
	
more	apt	to	be	in	the	limb	injected." The	contentions	of	Hygienists,	made	many	times	during	the	past	twenty	years,
	
that	vaccines	and	serums	are	among	the	chief	causes	of	poliomyelitis,	is	thus
	
verified,	but	the	"scientists"	(by	which	is	simply	meant,	medical	men	who	give
	
the	serums	and	vaccines)	do	not	admit	this	to	be	the	fact. They	say	instead,	as
	
quoted	in	the	Times	article,	"It	must	be	made	clear	that	we	know	immunization
	
is	not	the	cause	or	even	a	cause	of	poliomyelitis. Investigators,	among	whom
	
were	specialists	of	the	Department	of	Health,	have	found	indications	that	during
	
the	polio	season	persons	who	have	become	ill	with	polio	and	who	have	been
	
recently	immunized	against	diphtheria	or	whooping	cough	may	develop
	
paralysis	in	the	injected	limb." These	are	the	words	of	John	F.	Mahoney,	M.D. Commissioner	of	Hell(th),	New	York	City. Mahoney	says	that	the	Hell(th)	Department	was	simply	adopting	the	same
	
procedure	in	regard	to	"immunization"	that	it	has	followed	for	a	number	of	years
	
in	regard	to	tonsillectomies. He	said:	"For	a	number	of	years	it	has	been	it	has
	
been	known	that	while	the	removal	of	tonsils	and	adenoids	does	not	cause
	
poliomyelitis,	children	who	have	their	adenoids	or	tonsils	removed	or	have	other
	
mouth	operations	during	the	polio	season	are	more	apt	to	develop	a	severe	form
	
of	poliomyelitis	than	children	on	whom	such	operations	have	not	been
	
performed. "Therefore,	the	Department	of	Health	and	the	medical	profession	generally
	
advises	against	such	operations	during	the	months	when	polio	is	most	prevalent. We	are	doing	the	same	thing	in	regard	to	immunization	for	exactly	the	same
	
reasons:	since	investigation	has	shown	a	probable	relationship	between
	
immunization	during	the	polio	season	and	the	localization	of	the	paralysis,	we
	
are	postponing	immunization	until	the	danger	is	over." The	Times	article	adds	that	it	had	learned	that	the	American	Public	Health
	
Association’s	Ad	Hoc	Committee	on	the	Relationship	of	the	Incidence	of
	
Poliomyelitis	and	Recent	Immunization	is	in	agreement	with	the	action	of	the
	
Hell(th)	Department. The	Committees	report,	which	was	to	have	been	published
	
the	following	week	in	The	American	Journal	of	Public	Health,	says	that	although
	
further	studies	are	imperative,	"the	data	so	far	available	would	suggest	that,	in
	
the	face	of	an	abnormal	prevalence	of	poliomyelitis	in	a	given	locality,	antigen
	
inoculations	may	well	be	postponed	until	after	the	subsidence	of	the	abnormal
	
prevalence." The	Report	also	says	that	"recent	published	and	unpublished	data	strongly
	
suggests	that	an	individual	who	develops	poliomyelitis	within	a	month	after
	
receipt	of	an	injection	of	antigen,	or	possibly	of	some	other	material,	shows	an
	
increased	frequency	of	paralysis	in	the	extremity	into	which	the	injection	has
	
been	given. There	are	also	suggestions	that	among	the	reported	cases	of	polio	are
	
cases	which	would	not	have	been	clinically	diagnosed	as	polio	at	all	if	their
	
(recent)	inoculation	had	not	brought	them	into	the	paralytic	group." On	the	following	day,	June	13,	the	State	Department	of	Hell(th)	of	New	York,
	
issued	a	statement	to	the	press	in	which	it	said	that	this	proneness	to
	
development	of	paralysis	follows	all	injections	of	diphtheria	toxoid	and	anti-
whooping	cough	vaccine. This	means	that	all	injections	of	any	substance
	
whatsoever,	are	harmful	and,	if	they	are	not	the	direct	cause	of	the	disease	that
	
follows,	as	Mahoney	insists,	they	are	determining	and	complicating	factors	that
	
must	be	reckoned	with	in	any	study	of	the	cause	of	these	diseases. It	has	always	been	the	assumption	of	the	medical	profession	that	they	could
	
inject	their	so-called	"immunizing"	substances	into	the	bodies	of	old	and	young,
	
that	this	would	produce	"immunity"	and	that	there	the	matter	would	end. It	is
	
now	quite	obvious,	even	to	the	members	of	the	medical	profession,	that	there	the
	
matter	does	not	end. Eighty	or	more	years	ago,	Herbert	Spencer,	writing	of
	
vaccination,	showed	that	"there	the	matter	does	not	end,"	when	people	are
	
vaccinated	against	smallpox. It	was	shown	years	ago,	a	fact	recorded	by	no	less	a
	
medical	authority	than	Sir	William	Osler,	that	serum	injections	damage	the	germ
	
plasm,	the	results	showing	up	in	the	second	and	third	generations. It	does	not	really	matter	whether	the	vaccines	and	serums	are	the	cause	of
	
poliomyelitis,	or	merely	complicating	factors,	the	damage	is	there,	and	it	is	folly
	
to	think	that	the	body	can	be	rendered	more	resistant	to	any	so-called	disease	by
	
seriously	impairing	it. It	should	be	noted	that	the	actual	pathological
	
development	that	results	in	paralysis	is	in	the	brain	and	spinal	cord,	not	in	the
	
limb. The	destruction	of	the	nerve	center	is	the	reason	for	the	paralysis. Inoculating	a	child	in	the	arm	and	rendering	the	nerve	center	more	likely	to	be
	
destroyed	means	that	the	damage	is	done	far	removed	from	the	point	of
	
injection. As	there	is	no	means	of	controlling	this	distant	damage,	nor	of
	
localizing	it,	they	have	no	means	of	knowing	what	other	serious	developments
	
follow	in	the	wake	of	their	ill-advised	pollution	of	the	human	bloodstream. By	omitting	the	inoculations	during	the	summer	months,	when	polio	is	most
	prevalent	(it	has	been	reported	in	the	arctic	regions	and	cases	in	this	country
	
have	been	reported	in	Winter),	may	have	the	effect	of	reducing	the	number	of
	
cases	of	polio	and	it	may	reduce	the	amount	of	paralysis,	but	to	resume	the
	
inoculations	in	the	Fall	and	continue	them	through	the	Winter	and	Spring,	may
	
simply	render	other	"diseases,"	such	as	pneumonia,	"influenza"	measles,
	
whooping	cough,	scarlet	fever,	diphtheria,	etc.,	much	worse	and	build	serious
	
complications	in	these	diseases. How	can	they	confine	the	evil	effects	of	these
	
injections	of	various	kinds	to	poliomyelitis? It	will	be	noted	that	the	Report	of	the	"American	Public	Health	Association’s"
	
committee	states	that	published	and	unpublished	data	so	far	collected	indicate
	
that	many	cases	that	are	reported	as	polio	would	not	have	been	so	reported	if
	
prior	inoculation	had	not	resulted	in	the	development	of	paralysis	in	these	cases. This	is	to	say,	had	these	children	not	been	inoculated	a	short	time	prior	to
	
becoming	ill,	they	would	not	have	become	paralyzed. Have	we	not	declared	for
	
many	years	that	the	medical	profession	is	composed	of	past	masters	of	the	art	of
	
producing	pathology? If	part	of	the	paralysis	seen	in	these	cases	is	admittedly
	
due	to	treatment	given	prior	to	the	development	of	disease,	how	much	of	the	rest
	
of	it	is	due	to	treatment	given	during	the	course	of	the	illness? Are	medical
	
treatments	responsible	for	the	paralysis? I	would	answer	this	question	in	the
	
affirmative	and	challenge	the	profession	to	produce	cases	of	paralysis	that	have
	
developed	under	non-medical	care. When	wholesale	deaths	follow	an	orgy	of	inoculations,	it	is	customary	to	blame
	
the	deaths	on	faulty	serum. As	an	example	of	this,	there	were	the	large	number
	
of	deaths	reported	in	Japan	in	December,	1949	following	inoculation	with
	
diphtheria	anti-toxin	On	Dec	30,	the	press	reported	64	deaths	and	900	ill	from
	
the	inoculations	The	inoculations	were	halted,	while	the	serum	was	being
	
investigated. I	do	not	know	how	many	more	of	the	900	who	were	ill	also	died,
	
nor	how	many	of	them	were	left	with	serious	after	effects. The	press	did	not	find
	
this	matter	to	be	"news." But	all	deaths	from	inoculations	and	all	serious	disease	resulting	from	these
	
inoculations	are	not	due	to	"faulty	serums." On	the	contrary,	in	every	orgy	of
	
inoculations,	as	in	the	army,	many	serious	troubles	arise	and	deaths	are	often
	
reported. In	these	instances,	"faulty	serum"	is	not	blamed—only	when	several
	
deaths	and	much	serious	sickness	follow	do	they	find	the	serum	to	be	"faulty." But	all	inoculations	give	rise	to	troubles	ranging	all	the	way	from	slight,
	
transient	trouble	to	instantaneous	death	from	anaphylaxis. In	many	instances,
	serious	organic	impairment	has	resulted	that	has	been	permanent. Despite	all	of	this	injury	and	danger,	parents	might	be	justified	in	taking	a
	
chance	with	the	health	and	life	of	their	children,	did	the	inoculations. actually
	
prevent	the	diseases	against	which	they	are	directed. But	there	is	not	a	shred	of
	
unequivocal	evidence	that	any	vaccine	or	serum	ever	prevents	any	disease. There
	
is	no	justification	for	parents	subjecting	their	children	to	the	risks	inherent	in
	
inoculations	and	vaccinations	and	there	is	certainly	no	justification	for	resort	to
	
compulsion	in	the	use	of	these	vaccines	and	serums. Compulsory	inoculation	and
	
vaccination	is	a	form	of	tyranny	that	sooner	or	later,	mankind	must	destroy. THE	CRIME	AT	HOUSTON
DR.	SHELTON’S	HYGIENIC	REVIEW,	MAY	1955
	
The	scene	was	a	room	in	Houston,	Texas. It	was	a	temporary	"clinic"	set	up	for
	
the	purpose	of	experimenting	on	a	great	mass	of	hapless	and	helpless	children. It
	
was	but	one	of	eight	such	"clinics"	that	had	been	set	up	in	the	city. The	room	was
	
filled	with	children	and	their	frightened	parents,	who	had	"voluntarily"	brought
	
their	children	for	the	experiment. The	children	ranged	from	toddlers	barely	past
	
their	first	birthday	to	six-year-olds,	who	brought	their	"comic"	books	or	listened
	
as	their	parents	told	them	"children’s	stories." In	the	room	where	the	children
	
were	being	tortured	by	needles	being	pushed	into	them	and	through	which	a
	
serum	was	inoculated	into	them,	there	were	cries	of	pain	and	fear. Parents	of	the
	
frightened	children	attempted	to	still	their	fears	and	stop	their	cries	with
	
"soothing	words." What	was	it	all	about? Why	were	the	children	being	thus	tormented? What	were
	
they	afraid	of? Why	were	they	having	needles	stuck	into	them? The	answer	is,
	
they	were	being	used	as	guinea	pigs	in	a	mass	experiment	conducted	by	a	gang
	
of	voodoo	priests	whom	the	newspapers	referred	to	as	"scientists." Headed	by
	
William	D.	Hammon,	a	professor	of	something	or	other	in	the	University	of
	
Pennsylvania,	the	voodoo	practitioners	were	inoculating	the	children	with	a
	
blood	fraction	which	they	call	gamma	globulin	and	which,	they	said,	contains
	
"disease	fighting	antibodies." This	was	being	done,	not	to	prevent	poliomyelitis,
	
for	they	acknowledge	that	the	serum	will	not	prevent	polio,	but	in	the	hope	that
	
those	children	who	developed	polio	subsequent	to	inoculation,	would	not
	
become	paralyzed. Hammon	"stressed	the	fact	that	gamma	globulin	cannot
	prevent	polio,"	but	that	he	believes,	from	tests	made	on	monkeys,	(I	assume	that
	
he	means	the	monkeys	of	the	lower	order,	not	the	ones	that	were	inoculating	the
	
children)	it	can	prevent	paralysis. Thirty-five	thousand	children	were	to	be	used	in	the	test. Half	of	them	were
	
being	inoculated	with	the	"gamma	globulin,"	the	other	half	were	being
	
inoculated	with	an	"ineffective	substance"	that	resembled	gamma	globulin. This,
	
said	Hammon,	is	the	only	way	to	test	the	theory	that	paralysis	can	be	prevented
	
by	the	blood	fraction. A	previous	test,	using	5,768	children	of	Provo,	Utah,	made
	
last	year,	was	not	on	a	big	enough	scale	to	be	"conclusive." A	bigger	test	was
	
needed,	and	Houston	was	chosen	as	the	laboratory	in	which	to	use	the	human
	
guinea	pigs. Last	year	we	had	a	physician	here	in	Texas	to	inoculate	a	lot	of	children	with
	
anti-rabies	serum	on	the	absurd	theory	that	it	would	prevent	polio. Last	year,
	
also,	the	gamma	globulin	was	tested	on	a	large	number	of	children	in	a
	
midWestern	state. Now	comes	the	news	from	Sacramento,	Calif.,	dated	July	24,
	
1952	that	fifty	children	in	the	Sonoma	State	Home	(presumably	orphans	who
	
have	nobody	to	protect	them	from	the	state	and	the	medical	gangsters)	are	being
	
fed	a	"special	kind	of	chocolate	milk	containing	a	virus	which	"scientists"	hope
	
will	prevent	polio. Frank	Tallman,	state	mental	hygiene	director,	said	in	a	report
	
to	Governor	Warren	(a	man	who	dared	to	aspire	to	the	presidency)	that	the	milk
	
diet	is	the	key	part	of	an	experiment	aimed	at	finding	means	of	preventing	polio. The	rascals	who	are	conducting	this	experiment	selected	"100	children	who	were
	
found	to	have	no	naturally	built	immunity	to	polio." Why	do	newspapers
	
continue	to	dignify	men	of	this	stripe	with	the	title	"scientists"? Why	do	they	not
	
rather	expose	the	scoundrels	for	what	they	are—reckless	experimenters	who	toy
	
with	human	life	as	though	it	were	the	life	of	a	guinea	pig? These	are	the	mass	experiments	that	are	being	carried	out	or	that	have	been
	
carried	out	during	the	past	two	years	on	children	in	this	country	that	have	made
	
the	headlines. There	is	no	way	to	tell	how	many	other	such	experiments	are
	
going	on	or	have	been	carried	out	that	have	been	and	are	being	kept	secret. The
	
children	of	America	are	being	freely	used	as	guinea	pigs	and	the	parents	of
	
America	seem	to	be	indifferent	to	the	whole	matter. What	has	become	of	the
	
sense	of	responsibility	that	parents	are	supposed	to	feel	towards	their	children? Where	is	the	love	that	parents	are	traditionally	supposed	to	have	for	their
	
children? Is	it	true	that	modern	American	parents	would	sacrifice	their	children
	to	a	modern	Moloch	as	did	the	parents	of	ancient	Carthage;	or	that	they	would
	
throw	their	babies	in	the	path	of	the	Juggernaught	as	did	the	parents	of	India? Let	no	one	deny	that	they	will	do	this,	for	do	we	not	see	them	sacrificing	their
	
children	to	the	superstitions	and	hallucinations	of	medical	idiots? Why	was	Houston	chosen	for	this	mass	experiment? It	was	stated	that	Houston
	
was	picked	because	of	the	high	rate	of	polio	there,	but	this	may	not	be	the	whole
	
truth. It	may	be	that	the	high	rate	of	polio	in	Houston	was	due	to	the	fact	that	the
	
city	had	been	chosen	for	the	test. Before	parents	can	be	induced	to	submit	their
	
children	to	the	dangers	of	inoculation	in	this	manner,	and	especially	before	they
	
can	be	induced	to	permit	their	children	to	be	used	for	purely	experimental
	
purposes,	they	must	first	be	frightened	out	of	their	wits. There	is	nothing	like	an
	
epidemic	to	frighten	ignorant	people. It	is	not	probable	that	more	than	one	third
	
of	the	cases	diagnosed	as	polio	in	Houston	were	polio. But	this	fact	is	not	known
	
to	the	parents	of	that	city. Parents	are	as	easily	frightened	by	false	diagnoses	as
	
by	correct	ones	The	epidemic	at	Houston	may	have	been	staged	because
	
Houston	had	been	secretly	picked	as	the	place	for	the	test. The	manner	in	which	Houston	parents	crowded	into	the	inoculation	centers	with
	
their	children	and	the	readiness	with	which	they	submitted	their	children	to	the
	
experiment	indicates,	not	alone	the	abject	ignorance	of	parents,	but	also	the	fear
	
that	was	in	them,	as	the	physicians	and	board	of	health	of	that	city	had	built	up	a
	
synthetic	epidemic	for	that	very	purpose. The	plan	of	the	experimenters	was	to	inoculate	35,000	children—half	of	them
	
with	gamma	globulin,	which	it	was	hoped	would	prevent	paralysis;	the	other	half
	
with	gelatine,	which	they	referred	to	as	an	"ineffective	substitute." The	children
	
who	were	to	get	the	"ineffective	substitute"	were	to	be	"controls." But	many
	
frightened	parents	in	Houston	refused	to	wait	and	see	if	the	experiment	was	a
	
success. They	refuse	to	take	a	chance	on	not	getting	the	gamma	globulin	for	their
	
children. They	took	their	children	to	private	physicians	and	paid	to	have	them
	
inoculated. Oh,	yes,	the	serum	was	available	and	for	sale	and	so	were	physicians
	
(most	physicians,	in	fact)	who	will	administer	it	for	a	fee,	even	though	it	is	not
	
yet	known	to	have	any	value. The	manufacturers	and	the	physicians	are	in	a
	
hurry	to	reap	their	profits,	for	they	know	that	at	the	conclusion	of	the	test,	they
	
may	not	be	able	to	sell	it	even	to	the	most	frightened	individual. According	to	a	July	27	report	from	Houston,	but	33,000	children	were	used	in
	
the	test. This	means	that	so	many	of	the	frightened	parents	went	to	private
	physicians	and	had	their	children	inoculated	with	gamma	globulin,	rather	than
	
risk	having	them	get	the	"ineffective	substance,"	that	the	experimenters	did	not
	
get	the	expected	35,000	children	out	to	the	experimental	centers. The	frightened
	
parents,	thinking,	in	their	ignorance,	that	the	serum	would	prevent	the	disease,	or
	
at	least	prevent	paralysis,	and	knowing	that	if	they	took	their	children	to	the
	
experimental	clinics	they	stood	but	a	fifty-fifty	chance	of	getting	gamma
	
globulin,	paid	for	the	inoculations	and	thus	made	certain	that	their	children	did
	
not	receive	a	shot	of	gelatine. Thus	the	expected	35,000	guinea	pigs	did	not
	
materialize. Not	all	of	the	parents	of	Houston	were	as	"scientifically"	minded	as	Robert	N.
	
Smaistria,	of	that	city,	who	said:	"I’m	willing	to	do	anything	to	help	prevent
	
paralysis—in	my	children	and	in	all	children." Actually,	he	was	a	very	frightened
	
man,	who	did	not	know	whether	his	child	received	the	supposed	protective
	
serum,	or	the	"ineffective"	substitute—the	"harmless	gelatine." It	is	never
	
harmless	to	inject	any	foreign	substance	into	the	bloodstream,	and	gelatine,	a
	
foreign	protein,	is	certainly	not	harmless,	but	the	use	of	the	phrase	"harmless
	
gelatine"	in	with	the	gamma	globulin,	carries	the	implication	that	gamma
	
globulin	i	less. In	the	same	way,	the	statement	that	half	of	the	children	used	as
	
guinea	pigs	would	receive	the	serum	and	the	other	half	would	receive	a
	
substance	implied	that	the	serum	is	effective. Indeed,	the	effectiveness	is	taken
	
for	granted,	even	before	it	is	tested. By	June	30	thousands	of	parents	in	Houston	were	demanding	the	serum	for	their
	
children,	but	the	experimenters	could	give	them	no	guarantee	that	their	children
	
would	receive	the	serum	and	not	the	gelatine,	so	the	parents	went	to	their	family
	
physicians,	who,	always	willing	to	oblige,	for	a	fee,	gave	them	the	shots. They
	
reaped	a	financial	harvest	while	the	publicity	was	flooding	the	papers,	even
	
though	they	were	well	aware	that	there	is	not	a	shred	of	evidence	to	lead	to	the
	
belief	that	the	G.G. serum	will	prevent	polio. Hammond	complained	that	the	inoculating	of	children	by	private	physicians	was
	
reducing	the	number	of	children	available	for	"field	study." But	parents	were
	
taking	no	"chances." If	they	took	their	children	to	the	Hammond	clinics,	they	ran
	
a	fifty-fifty	chance	of	getting	the	"ineffective	substance,"	and	they	wanted	their
	
children	to	get	the	"protective"	gamma	globulin. Hammond	was	interested	in	a
	
"controlled	experiment,"	parents	were	interested	in	saving	their	children	from	the
	
jaws	of	the	dreaded	monster,	polio. There	is	also	the	possibility	that	parents
	
whose	children	were	taken	to	the	clinic,	fearing	that	their	little	guinea	pigs	got
	the	gelatine	instead	of	the	globulin,	might	take	them	to	physicians	and	have	them
	
given	the	"real	medicine,"	in	which	case	they	would	have	no	value	to	the	"field
	
study." Therefore,	parents	who	submitted	their	children	to	the	experiment	were	urged
	
not	to	go	to	physicians	and	have	them	given	gamma	globulin. The	experimenters
	
said	in	effect	to	them:	"We	believe	that	the	gamma	globulin	will	prevent	the
	
paralysis	of	polio	and	we	know	that	the	gelatine	will	not,	but	we	want	you	to
	
take	a	chance	with	your	child. Don’t	give	him	gamma	globulin;	be	content	with
	
the	gelatine. Don’t	spoil	our	test	for	the	sake	of	your	child." On	hand	at	the	opening	of	the	ten	days’	orgy	of	inoculating	was	another	voodoo
	
priest,	the	Rev. Thomas	Summers,	rector	of	the	St.	John	the	Divine	Episcopal
	
Church	and	president	of	the	Houston	Council	of	Churches,	who	"expressed	the
	
hope	of	each	of	the	silent,	tense	parents"	when	he	said:	"We	pray,	oh	God,	that
	
the	scourge	of	polio	may	be	removed." That	should	have	settled	it! When	two	of
	
the	three	modern	branches	of	shamanism	combine	to	make	war	upon	the	demon
	
of	polio,	this	demon	should	seek	the	tall	timber. I	would	call	the	attention	of	those	of	my	readers	who	may	have	been	so	misled	in
	
the	past	as	to	contribute	to	the	"March	of	Dimes"	fund	that,	this	orgy	of	human
	
vivisection	was	financed	by	a	grant	of	$500,000	supplied	by	the	National
	
Foundation	for	Infantile	Paralysis. From	financing	experiments	on	rats	and
	
monkeys,	this	Foundation	has	turned	to	financing	experiments	on	children. At
	
least	they	have	to	pay	for	the	rats	and	monkeys,	whereas,	they	can	frighten
	
parents	into	contributing	their	children	without	cost. Blood	donors	will	be	happy	to	learn	that	their	donations	are	being	used	for	many
	
worthy	purposes. Hammond	stated	that	the	gamma	globulin	used	in	the	polio
	
experiment	is	the	same	as	that	used	in	measles	and	that	it	is	obtained	from	blood
	
collected	by	the	American	Red	Cross	from	donors	all	over	the	country. Thus
	
Clara	Barton’s	organization	(one	she	repented	ever	having	formed)	is	revealed	as
	
being	in	all	ways	a	stooge	of	organized	voodooism. It	serves	its	adopted	master
	
well,	the	very	thing	that	caused	Clara	Barton	to	express	the	wish	that	she	had
	
never	founded	the	organization. For	Clara	Barton	was	a	Hygienist. The	gamma	globulin	is	referred	to	by	Hammond	and	the	newspapers	as
	
"medicine,"	that	is,	a	"healing	agent." Not	only	it	is	being	used	as	a	"prophylactic
	
agent"	(a	preventive),	and	this	would	not	be	a	"healing	agent,"	but	there	is
	absolutely	no	evidence	so	far	that	it	has	either	preventive	or	healing	powers. Indeed,	there	is	no	such	thing	as	a	healing	agent. Drugs,	serums,	vaccines,	heal
	
nothing. Medical	men	are	not	healers,	hence	they	are	wrongly	branded	when
	
they	are	called	medical	men. There	are	no	medicines	and	the	practice	of
	
"medicine"	is	not	the	practice	of	a	"healing	art." They	have	surrounded
	
themselves	and	then	practices	with	a	terminology	that	is	utterly	false. On	July	27	it	was	stated	in	a	news	report	from	Houston	that	some	of	the	children
	
used	in	the	test	had	already	developed	polio,	but	it	was	not	known	whether	these
	
children	had	received	gamma	globulin	or	the	"ineffective	gelatine." To	make	the
	
test	more	sensational	the	man	from	the	Pittsburgh	University	who	directed	the
	
test	in	Houston	sent	all	records	to	New	York	City	and	had	them	locked	in	a	safe
	
where	they	will	remain	until	January	1953. So,	it	will	not	be	known	until	these
	
records	are	examined	some	time	in	1953,	how	many	of	each	group	of	children
	
developed	polio. "The	results	of	the	test	won’t	be	known	for	months,	probably
	
early	in	1953,"	so	"a	team	of	experts	(ex-spurts)	will	remain	here	(in	Houston)
	
through	the	polio	season	into	the	fall	to	check	on	children	inoculated." If	it	is	decided	to	make	the	serum	"effective"	this	can	be	done	by	diagnosis	and
	
statistics. All	that	will	be	needed	will	be	to	diagnose	as	something	else	large
	
numbers	of	cases	that	are	now	diagnosed	as	polio. In	those	children	receiving	the
	
"non-effective"	substance	the	same	cases	may	still	be	diagnosed	polio. This	is
	
the	way	in	which	smallpox	vaccination	is	upheld. If	the	patient	has	been
	
vaccinated	it	is	chickenpox,	if	he	has	not	been	vaccinated	it	is	smallpox. Or,	it	is	always	possible,	to	assume,	as	in	the	case	of	smallpox	vaccination,
	
where	polio	does	follow	the	inoculation,	that	the	inoculation	was	not
	
"successful." It	can	also	be	claimed,	as	indeed,	it	is	already	hinted,	that	if	the
	
new	serum	does	not	prevent	polio	it	at	least	makes	the	disease	lighter. The	same
	
claim	is	made	for	smallpox	vaccine,	it	lessens	the	severity	of	the	"attack." It	will	also	be	possible,	as	in	the	case	of	typhoid	and	"paratyphoid,"	to	discover
	
that	there	are	two	or	more	polio	viruses	and	that	the	serum	protects	from	only
	
one	of	these. Indeed,	the	medical	classifiers	have	already	determined	that	there
	
are	"three	types	of	polio." How	long	will	the	alleged	"immunity"	last? Will	the	children	have	to	be
	
inoculated	each	summer	or	twice	a	year? How	often	will	they	have	to	be	given
	
"booster	shots?" One	physician	says	the	"shots"	must	be	repeated	every	four	to
	six	weeks. Which	children	among	those	that	are	inoculated	with	the	serum	would	have	had
	
polio	if	they	had	not	been	inoculated? What	effect	will	the	injection	of	the	"non-
effective"	substance	have	in	producing	polio	in	the	children	that	receive	it? Statistics	based	on	such	uncertainties	must	be	equally	as	uncertain. A	tragic	situation	grew	out	of	all	the	publicity	the	gamma	globulin	experiment	in
	
Houston	received. The	ignorant	and	frightened	public	began	to	demand	the
	
inoculation	of	their	children	with	the	serum	without	waiting	to	see	how	the
	
Houston	experiment	came	out. Here	in	the	city	of	San	Antonio,	nearly	two
	
hundred	miles	from	the	scene	of	the	Houston	crime,	the	physicians	were	deluged
	
with	demands	for	the	gamma	globulin. Although	many	of	them	were	honest
	
enough	to	warn	parents	that	it	was	but	"a	shot	in	the	dark,"	and	that	they	were
	
"buying	a	pig	in	a	poke,"	the	frightened	parents	demanded	the	inoculation	for
	
their	children	anyway. Told	that	there	is	not,	as	yet,	any	proof	that	the	gamma
	
globulin	will	prevent	polio,	they	insisted	on	having	it	for	their	children. One	pediatrician	who	was	getting	an	average	of	ten	calls	a	day	for	the
	
inoculation	said	that,	parents	"seem	to	think	it	would	ease	their	conscience
	
should	their	children	get	polio. They	can	at	least	say	they	have	done	what	they
	
could." The	abject	ignorance	that	this	statement	reflects	is	not	altogether	the	fault
	
of	the	parents. These	parents	have	trusted	their	medical	advisers	and	have	been
	
miseducated	by	them. The	fact	is	that,	several	local	physicians	were	giving	their
	
own	children	gamma	globulin	with	the	same	idea	in	mind. They	are	as	ignorant
	
as	lay	parents. One	pediatrician	recommended	"shots"	only	for	those	children
	
who	were	"exposed"	to	polio.
548615196-Eleanor-McBean-Trung-Nguyen-The-Poisoned-Needle-Suppressed-Facts-About-Vaccination-2018-Update.txt
Summarize the following text section accurately and concisely. Maintain specific details and numerical information, and use anti-repetition mechanisms:

        They	are	getting	wise	to	the	Salk	vaccine	concoction	in	the	Far	West,	Idaho,
	
Oregon	and	California	having	given	evidence	they	are	seeing	thru	the
	
commercial	propaganda	that	has	been	making	serum	companies	and	undertakers
	
rich	by	selling	millions	of	shots. The	people	of	Oregon	were	chastised	in	the	newspapers	last	week	by	the	press
	
and	USPH	for	not	using	49,000	cubic	centimeters	of	the	state’s	"quota"	of
	
79,744	cc. The	state	health	officer	"threatened"	to	withdraw	these	49,000	cc	and
	
not	let	the	people	have	it	if	they	didn’t	use	it	at	once. The	San	Francisco	Chronicle	reports—’The	demand	for	Salk	Vaccine	has
	
dropped	off	to	almost	zero	in	San	Francisco,	and	apparently	in	the	rest	of	the
	
West. ’
They	had	a	meeting	of	80	Idaho	doctors,	nurses,	public	health	officials	and
	
laboratory	technicians. State	officials	have	declared	an	‘indefinite	postponement’
	
of	any	more	mass	shots	of	its	school	children. Following	Dr. J. E. Wyatt’s	frank	statement	that	Salk	Vaccine	has	given	polio	to
	
more	people	in	the	nation	than	it	has	protected	from	the	disease,	the	boys’
	
typewriters	and	mimeographs	have	been	working	overtime	to	discredit	this
	
intrepid	physician. The	AMA	has	been	quoted	as	saying	‘there	ain’t	no	Dr. Wyatt’. The	USPHS	says
	
there	is	no	doctor	working	for	USPHS	by	that	name. This	latter	statement	is
	
believable,	since	it	was	a	foregone	conclusion	that	any	USPHS	doctor	or
	
employee	spilling	such	a	truth	as	that	would	be	summarily	separated	from	the
	
service. The	serum	publicists	know	their	business. The	job	now	is	to	take	the	public	mind
	
off	the	failure	to	wipe	out	polio	this	summer	with	Salk	vaccine. Spectacular
	
yarns	that	make	good	bedtime	reading	are	the	order	of	the	day. Such	as	"a
	
machine	that	spins	blood	plasma	and	polio	vaccine	into	a	film	thin	enough	that
	
virus	and	bacteria	may	be	killed	by	ultraviolet	light. " This	seems	to	cancel	out
	
the	many	official	statements	that	Salk	vaccine	had	been	made	"safe"	after	the
	
many	unnecessary	polio	deaths. February	11,	1956
	
HORNSWOGGLE,	Inc. —The	March	of	Dimes	racketeers	leave	no	stones
	
unturned	to	nick	the	gullible	public. Like	the	late	unlamented	Hitler	the	Big	Lie
	
is	their	chief	stock	in	trade. To	our	desk	has	come	a	clipping	from	a	Long	Beach
	
(California)	paper	headed:	"The	Country	That	Licked	Polio—In	its	own	quiet
	
way	little	Denmark	has	proved	that	Salk	vaccine	is	both	safe	and	effective. " Our	stomach	is	strong. We	did	not	regurgitate. The	prevaricator	(professional)
	
who	thought	up	that	yarn	completely	forgot	that	Salk’s	deadly	and	worthless
	
concoction	wasn’t	unveiled	until	April	12,	1955. Yet	he	blandly	says	that
	
Denmark	started	to	stockpile	it	in	1954. CAPSULE	NEWS	readers	already	know
	
how	effective	it	is—in	piling	up	business	for	the	undertakers	and	hospitals. These	pages	on	the	Salk	Vaccine	used	by	special	permission	of	Morris	A. Bealle,
	
Editor	American	CAPSULE	NEWS,	1400	M	Street,	Northwest,	Washing. ’	ton,
	
D. C. "POLIO	GROPINGS"
	
By	T. M. Schippell,	N. D. HERALD	OF	HEALTH,	APRIL	1955
	
A	great	deal	has	been	written	about	infantile	paralysis—commonly	called	polio. Yet,	when	all	this	mass	of	material	is	analyzed,	you	discover	that	practically
	
nothing	whatsoever	is	known	about	this	crippling	disease. The	hundreds	of
	
millions	of	dollars	that	have	been	tossed	by	the	public,	during	the	past	15	years,
	
into	the	maw	of	the	March	of	Dimes	have	accomplished	little	or	nothing. All	of
	
this	straining	on	the	part	of	the	National	infantile	paralysis	organization,	instead
	
of	erecting	mountains	of	protection	against	polio,	has	not	resulted	in	even	a
	
modest	molehill. Of	course,	nobody	but	the	"insiders"	have	any	knowledge	as	to	how	many
	
millions	of	these	charity	dollars	have	been	cruelly	wasted. Nobody	but	the
	
‘insiders"	can	even	guess	the	fortunes	of	dimes	spent	in	extravagant	plans	which
	
came	to	naught. Nobody	but	the	"insiders"	can	even	approximate	the	plush
	
salaries	paid	to	useless	desk	parasites—mountebanks	who	found	"good	pickings"
	
along	the	trail	of	this	childhood	scourge. Before	the	advent	of	the	March	of	Dimes,	polio	was	unpredictable	and
	
uncheckable. With	the	lapse	of	some	15	years	and	the	expenditure,	on	haywire
	
polio	preventatives,	of	the	wealth	of	a	Solomon,	polio	is	still	unpredictable	and
	
uncheckable. Medical	experts	are	actually	as	much	in	the	dark	today—despite
	
their	‘past	flamboyant	promises	and	hollow	declarations	as	they	were	before
	
generous	and	gullible	Americans	threw	this	unlimited	golden	harvest	to	every
	crack-brained	laboratory	in	this	country. Nutritionists	believe—and	rightly	so—that,	since	all	polio	cases	invariably	show
	
a	lack	of	blood	calcium—and	since	the	eating	of	large	amounts	of	refined	sugar
	
admittedly	lowers	the	calcium	in	the	blood—there	must	be	some	close
	
connection	between	the	spread	of	polio	and	the	large	amounts	of	sweets	the
	
modern	youngster	consumes. Soft	drinks	have	been	singled	out	particularly	by
	
Naturopaths	as	the	likely	culprits	for	this	blood	calcium	deficiency—which
	
brings	on	these	polio	epidemics	during	the	warm	months	but	candy	and	other
	
forms	of	refined	sugar,	in	all	probability,	will	eventually	have	to	share	some	of
	
the	blame. Pregnant	mothers,	noted	for	their	lack	of	blood	calcium	because	of
	
the	calcium	stealing	by	the	unborn	child,	are	victims	of	polio	400%	more	often
	
than	other	women. Two	years	ago,	the	country	was	all	stirred	up	about	the	polio	prevention
	
possibilities	of	gamma	globulin. This	gamma	globulin	was	a	derivative	of	rotten,
	
human	blood. It	was	made	from	the	great	store	of	"unkilled"	diseased	plasma—
the	amounts	of	which	were	bursting	the	seams	of	the	various	blood	banks. The
	
doctors	of	the	army,	navy	and	marine	corps	had	refused	absolutely	to	"shoot"
	
this	putrid	plasma	into	the	bodies	of	wounded	service	men. They	declared	it	was
	
"too	disease-ridden"	to	use	on	our	heroes	in	uniform	but	such	characterization	of
	
the	filthy	stuff	did	not	deter	the	medical	men,	on	the	payroll	of	the	March	of
	
Dimes,	from	proclaiming	it	entirely	suitable	to	go	into	the	clean	bloodstreams	of
	
helpless	little	American	children. Common	sense	was	thrown	overboard	and	the	protests	of	the	few	thinking
	
medical	men	were	disregarded. And	as	we	predicted,	this	highly	touted	panacea
	
turned	out	to	be	a	sham—a	despicable	hoax—and	a	breeder	of	disease. Fortunately,	gamma	globulin	is	now	secretly	abandoned	as	worthless	by	the
	
March	of	Dimes	although	no	public	announcement	of	that	fact	has	ever	been
	
made. Yes,	gamma	globulin	"hopes"	have	gone	down	the	drain,	the	March	of
	
Dimes	remembers	the	incident	merely	as	a	worthless	remedy	that	turned	out	to
	
be	a	good	money-getter. A	different	situation	entirely	is	found	when	a	survey	is
	
made	of	the	children	who	were	so	cruelly	subjected	to	these	ghastly	inoculations. From	all	reports	many	of	them	are	even	now	suffering	from	the	effects	of	this
	
poisoning	and	no	hope	is	held	out	that	matters	will	get	better	as	the	years
	
advance. We	all	know	that	the	vaccinating	of	the	children	of	Japan	against	smallpox—a
	disgraceful	mass	medication	spree	engineered	by	our	conquering	army’s	medical
	
doctors—resulted	in	putting	eyeglasses	on	fully	50%	of	the	race	that	Admiral
	
Perry—back	in	1870—reported	to	have	the	"finest	eyesight	of	any	nation	in	the
	
world. " What	terrors	this	gamma	globulin	filth	will	yet	bring	forth	in	the	bodies
	
of	those	it	contaminated	is	anybody’s	guess. And	what	of	this	Salk	vaccine. Only	time	will	show	how	greatly	it	damages	and
	
cripples. Just	remember,	no	vaccine	ever	prevented	any	disease. Sanitation	and
	
hygiene,	together,	have	beaten	smallpox	and	malaria. More	persons	die	of
	
smallpox	today	in	countries	having	compulsory	vaccination	against	smallpox
	
than	pass	out	from	that	disease	in	places	where	no	law	compels	a	population	to
	
so	poison	its	bloodstreams. Is	a	vaccine	needed	to	kill	the	virus	of	polio. Frankly,	there	is	no	virus	which
	
CAUSES	polio	normally. Any	more	than	there	is	virus	that	NORMALLY	passes
	
smallpox	from	one	person	to	another. All	such	viruses—germs	if	you	prefer	the
	
term—are	the	RESULT	of	such	diseases	already	growing	in	a	weakened	body. Of	course,	a	moronic	doctor	can	CAUSE	almost	any	ailment	in	a	normal	person
	
by	filling	the	bloodstream	of	the	victim	so	FULL	OF	VIRUS	that	this	poison
	
overbalances	normal	resistance. But	that	happens	ONLY	when	a	needle-pusher
	
BY-PASSES	the	natural	filters	which	the	Almighty	has	created	for	the	protection
	
of	the	blood. In	use,	the	Salk	vaccine	introduces	into	the	child	only	a	small
	
amount	of	these	viruses. Of	course,	they	will	NOT	PREVENT	polio	and	only	the
	
Almighty	knows	the	extent	of	the	damage	such	foreign	substances	will	do	to	that
	
child	in	the	future. Can	the	Salk	vaccine	prevent	polio. It	cannot. Smallpox	vaccine	never	stopped
	
the	spread	of	smallpox	and	malaria	vaccine	never	stopped	the	spread	of	malaria. If	a	child,	vaccinated	with	the	Salk	filth	continues	to	take	great	quantities	of
	
refined	sugar	into	its	small	body,	much	of	the	blood	calcium	will	be	destroyed
	
and—Salk	vaccine	or	not—that	child	will	probably	come	down	with	polio	easier
	
than	a	youngster	whose	bloodstream	has	not	been	so	weakened. But	while	we	are	on	the	subject	of	the	Salk	vaccine,	let	us	look	at	another	angle. It	should	prove	interesting	to	any	parents	who	foolishly	pushed	their	children
	
into	the	clutches	of	the	experimenters	during	that	outrageous	orgy	of	last
	
summer	when	approximately	2	million	children	were	made	"human	guinea-
pigs". It	is	reported	that	fully	one-quarter	of	them	had	that	filthy	Salk	concoction
	"pushed"	into	their	clean	young	bloodstreams. Actually	nobody	but	a	few
	
"insiders"	of	the	March	of	Dimes	know	which	children	had	their	blood	so
	
poisoned	and	which	of	them	received	only	colored	water. These	same	‘insiders"
	
now	can	arrange	the	names	of	those	children	in	any	fashion	they	wish	and	thus
	
show	any	result	of	this	"mass	medication"	they	believe	will	bring	in	more	dimes
	
next	year. In	January	of	this	year,	a	certain	Dr. Robert	F. Korns	released	to	the	press	a
	
statement	from	his	workshop	in	the	University	of	Michigan	where	he	supposedly
	
was	engaged	in	examining	samples	of	blood	taken	from	the	"unknown"	little
	
children	who	had	been	"Salk	vaccine	poisoned"	during	that	orgy	of	last	year. The
	
good	doctor	admitted	to	newspaper	men—at	the	EXACT	time	the	March	of
	
Dimes	was	conducting	a	nation-wide	"scooping	up"	of	every	available	coin—
	
that	"no	one	in	this	country	knows	whether	the	Salk	vaccine	is	any	good	or	not. " This	was	his	complete	summary	of	that	great	"Salk	experiment". But	interesting
	
as	his	observation	is,	it	shades	into	nothingness	when	compared	with	another
	
item	which	slipped	from	his	lips	during	the	same	interview. Dr. Korns	admitted
—	according	to	these	newspaper	accounts,	that	"NONE	OF	HIS	FIVE	SMALL
	
CHILDREN	WAS	INOCULATED	WITH	THE	SALK	VACCINE". He	gave,	as	his	weak	excuse	for	this	oversight,	the	fact	that	"THE
	
COMMUNITY	IN	WHICH	HIS	FAMILY	HAPPENED	TO	LIVE	DID	NOT
	
PARTICIPATE	IN	THE	SALK	VACCINE	TEST. " Certainly	a	glorious	record	to	be	handed	down	to	medical	posterity. Laymen
	
everywhere	should	be	proud	to	honor	such	an	upstanding	doctor. This	good
	
follower	of	Hippocrates	was	entirely	willing—with	an	unproven	vaccine—to
	
sacrifice	YOUR	CHILDREN	on	the	altar	of	medicine’s	mad	Salk
	
experimentations	but	HIS	OWN	CHILDREN—ah,	they	were	far,	far	too
	
precious	to	be	"thrown’	to	the	tender	devices	of	these	wild	March	Hares. As	I	said	in	the	beginning—a	great	deal	has	been	written	about	polio	but	the	real
	
searing	stories	of	what	actually	happened	"behind	the	scenes"	during	the	15	year
	
unfoldment	of	this	flamboyant	farce	of	the	March	of	Dimes	is	probably	known
	
only	to	the	Man	Upstairs	Who	will	have	much	to	say	on	the	subject	whet	these
	
same	March	of	Dimes	practitioners	try	to	storm	the	Pearly	Gates. "LET	US	FACE	THE	FACTS"
	
By	T.
The people in these states are not using the vaccine, as they have realized that it is not effective.
What is the reaction of the people in Oregon, Idaho, and California to the Salk vaccine concoction?
The author strongly criticizes the vaccine, stating that it is dangerous and ineffective.
What is the author's opinion on the Salk vaccine?
The author believes that the organization is a scam and is only interested in making money.
What is the author's view on the March of Dimes organization?
The author is strongly opposed to the use of vaccines and serums, stating that they are not only ineffective but also dangerous.
What is the author's opinion on the use of vaccines and serums?
The author is critical of the medical profession, stating that they are more interested in making money than in the well-being of patients.
What is the author's view on the medical profession?