17)	Compulsory	vaccination	has	been	abolished	in	England,	Switzerland,	and
	
certain	other	countries,	while	laws	sustaining	this	crime	still	disgrace	the	statute
	
books	of	many	states	in	free	America. 18)	Vaccination	is	one	of	the	foulest	blots	on	the	escutcheon	of	the	‘noble	art	of
	
healing.’	”CHAPTER	4
THE	HISTORY	OF	VACCINATION
"A	mere	assumption	of	belief	unsupported	by	demonstrable	facts	is	always
	
open	to	criticism. It	is	easy	to	be	carried	away	by	the	beauty	of	an	ideal	or
	
entranced	by	the	overwhelming	appeal	of	a	pet	delusion...We	hav,	had	much
	
to	learn	but	even	more	to	unlearn. Many	think	they	are	thinking
	
constructively	when	they	are	merely	rearranging	their	prejudices." —Dr. George	S.	Weger,	M.D. WHO	STARTED	VACCINATION	AND	WHY
	
It	has	been	claimed,	by	an	unenlightened	few,	that	vaccination	is	based	on
	
scientific	principles	and	is	of	comparatively	recent	origin. But	these	claims	have
	
been	proved	false,	first,	because	inoculation	was	practiced	and	abandoned	as
	
useless	by	primitive	tribes	many	centuries	ago,	and	second	because	Jenner	and
	
the	modern	experimenters	in	vaccination	were	not	scientists	and	did	not	test	and
	
prove	their	theories	by	any	scientific	criteria	before	launching	the	hazardous
	
practice	on	the	public. For	many	years	Edward	Jenner	was	acclaimed	a	hero	for	what	was	thought	to	be
	
his	discovery	of	cowpox	vaccination. But	this	dubious	honor	was	later	admitted
	
to	belong	to	Benjamin	Jesty,	whom	all	the	chroniclers	name	as	the	one
	
responsible	for	the	original	discovery	of	cowpox	inoculation. Jesty,	a	farmer,
	
Plett,	a	teacher	and	Jensen,	a	farmer,	were	named	as	“successful	experimenters”
	
in	the	field	of	cowpox	vaccination	several	years	before	Jenner’s	first	inoculation. These	and	all	subsequent	vaccination	experiments	were	then,	and	still	are,
	
haphazard	and	unscientific	attempts	at	solving	the	problem	of	disease
	
prevention. Before	we	trace	the	ancient	history	of	vaccination	let	us	review	some	of	the
	
outstanding	authorities	who	recognized	that:
	
VACCINATION	IS	NOT	SCIENTIFIC
	
Many	of	the	world’s	greatest	thinkers,	scientists,	statesmen	and	even	doctors
	have	condemned	vaccination	as	being	a	crime	against	humanity,	a	fraud
	
promoted	for	private	gain,	an	insult	to	the	race	and	a	blot	upon	the	name	of
	
civilization. Yet,	this	treacherous	practice	of	blood	pollution,	which	was	cradled
	
in	the	lap	of	ignorant	savage	tribes,	has	been	adopted	by,	supposedly,	enlightened
	
government	of	the	present	day	and	forced	on	the	protesting	population—for
	
profit. M.M. Gernerd	in	his	book	"The	Vaccination	Imposture"	says:
	
"Vaccination	is	not	in	any	sense	scientific;	doctors	never	know	what	the	result
	
will	be	in	any	case;	they	don’t	absolutely	know	that	it	ever	prevented	smallpox;
	
they	never	know	when	they	have	pure	vaccine;	the	practice	is	born	of	pure
	
superstition;	and	it	has	been	a	breeder	of	many	kindred	fallacies." Florence	Nightingale,	the	world’s	most	famous	nurse	and	an	authority	on
	
smallpox	by	right	of	extensive	experience,	said:
	
"Everyone	who	knows	anything	about	public	health	questions	will	agree	to	the
	
practical	unity	of	epidemics,	and	the	determining	causes,	and	that	exemption
	
from...disease	must	be	sought	not	by	any	one	thing,	such	as	vaccination,	but	by
	
inquiring	into	and	removing	the	causes	of	epidemic	susceptibility	generally." Alfred	Russell	Wallace,	in	his	famous	book,	"The	Wonderful	Century”	(p.	314)
	
says:
	
"The	successive	Vaccination	Acts	were	passed	by	means	of	allegations	which
	
were	wholly	untrue,	and	promises	which	have	all	been	unfulfilled. They	stand
	
alone	in	modern	legislation	as	a	gross	interference	with	personal	liberty	and	the
	
sanctity	of	the	home;	while	as	an	attempt	to	cheat	outraged	nature,	and	to	avoid	a
	
zymotic	disease	without	getting	rid	of	the	foul	conditions	that	produce	or
	
propagate	it,	the	practice	of	vaccination	is	utterly	opposed	to	the	whole	teaching
	
of	sanitary	science,	and	is	one	of	those	terrible	blunders	which,	in	their	far
	
reaching	evil	consequences,	are	worse	than	the	greatest	of	crimes." Among	our	best	authoritative	sources	of	information	are	the	actual	government
	
records	showing	the:
	
INCREASED	Death	Rate	AFTER	VACCINATION	WAS	ESTABLISHED
	The	report	of	Dr.	William	Farr,	Compiler	of	Statistics	of	the	Registrar	General,
	
London. states:
	
"Smallpox	attained	its	maximum	mortality	after	vaccination	was
	
introduced...The	mean	annual	(smallpox)	mortality	to	10,000	population	from
	
1850	to	1869	was	at	the	rate	of	(only)	2.04,	whereas	(after	compulsory
	
vaccination)	in	1871	the	death	rate	was	10.24	and	in	1872	the	death	rate	was
	
8.33,	and	this	after	the	most	laudable	efforts	to	extend	vaccination	by	legislative
	
enactments." Other	authorities	and	numerous	records	and	case	histories	showing	the	failure	of
	
vaccination	are	given	elsewhere	in	this	book. The	truly	great	minds	of	the	world	recognize	the	balanced	economy	of	nature
	
and	know	that	when	the	chemistry	of	the	body	is	thrown	out	of	balance	by	faulty
	
nutrition	and	other	causes,	toxins	accumulate	and	the	entire	physical	organism
	
marshals	its	healing	forces	in	an	effort	to	meet	the	emergency	and	make
	
adjustment	to	the	condition. This	healing	effort	may	be	expressed	in	many	ways,
	
such	as	accelerated	circulation	and	fever,	disturbed	breathing,	intensified	bowel
	
elimination	(diarrhea)	and	mucous	discharges	to	expel	poisons,	eruptions,
	
swelling	of	lymphatic	glands	such	as	the	tonsils	to	handle	the	overload	of	toxic
	
waste,	pain,	indicating	the	presence	of	irritants,	etc. All	this	display	of	the	vital
	
energy	at	work	to	restore	normalcy,	is	interpreted	by	the	average	physician,	as
	
disease	and	something	to	interfere	with	by	giving	poison	drugs,	vaccines	and
	
crippling	operations. Modern	medical	methods	delay	and	frustrate	the	unexcelled
	
healing	efforts	of	nature. Dr.	Oliver	Wendell	Holmes,	one	of	the	few	enlightened	physicians	expressed	this
	
point	in	one	powerful	sentence	when	he	said:
	
"THE	DISGRACE	OF	MEDICINE	HAS	BEEN	THE	COLOSSAL	SYSTEM
	
OF	SELF-DECEPTION,	IN	OBEDIENCE	TO	WHICH	MINES	HAVE	BEEN
	
EMPTIED	OF	THEIR	CANKERING	MINERALS,	THE	ENTRAILS	OF
	
ANIMALS	TAXED	FOR	THEIR	IMPURITIES,	THE	POISON	BAGS	OF
	
REPTILES	DRAINED	OF	THEIR	VENOM,	AND	ALL	THE
	
INCONCEIVABLE	ABOMINATIONS	THUS	OBTAINED,	THRUST	DOWN
	
THE	THROATS	OF	HUMAN	BEINGS	SUFFERING	MERELY	FROM	SOME
	
WANT	OF	ORGANIZATION,	NOURISHMENT,	OR	VITAL	STIMULATION." When	we	read	of	primitive	witch	doctors	experimenting	with	inoculation	by
	
rubbing	the	pus	from	the	diseased	into	scratches	on	the	body	of	the	well,	we	look
	
upon	it	with	tolerance	because	they	did	not	have	enough	knowledge	about
	
physiology	to	understand	that	nature	does	not	produce	health	by	contaminating
	
the	bloodstream	with	filth. Although	we	are	willing	to	make	excuses	for	the	mental	immaturity	of	those
	
backward	races,	what	excuse	can	be	make	for	our	modern	doctors	who	do	the
	
same	thing—on	a	larger	scale—with	a	longer	needle? Vaccination	has	been	a	tragic	failure	because	it	is	based	on	the	false	theory	that
	
disease	is	a	ruthless	enemy	that	must	be	fought	and	killed	by	poison	drugs	or
	
outwitted	by	(supposedly)	implanting	antibodies	from	vaccines	into	the
	
bloodstream. These	mythical	antibodies	are	said	to	make	war	on	disease	germs. But	germs	are	not	the	cause	of	disease	in	the	first	place	and	are	useful	wherever
	
they	are	found	in	nature,	whether	they	are	serving	as	scavengers	working	on	the
	
decaying	waste	products,	or	whether	they	are	helping	with	the	decomposing	and
	
renewing	of	cell	structure	that	takes	place	continually,	they	are	inseparably	a	part
	
of	the	great	pattern	of	pulsating	life. (For	detailed,	scientific	experiments	proving
	
the	importance	and	nature	of	germs,	bacteria,	microbes,	etc.,	read	the	findings	of
	
Antoine	Bechamp	as	recorded	in	the	remarkable	book,	BECHAMP	OR
	
PASTEUR,	by	E.	Douglas	Hume—English	Pub. see	bibliography.) As	has	been	stated	before,	disease	is	a	cleansing	effort	of	the	body	in	its	attempt
	
to	rid	itself	of	excess	poisons,	waste	matter,	obstructions,	and	incompatible	food. DISEASE	IS	NOT	SOMETHING	TO	BE	CURED;	IT	IS	A	CURE. Germs	do	not	attack	from	without;	they	develop	within	the	cells	themselves
	
when	the	need	for	them	occurs. The	whole	framework	of	vaccination	is	based	on
	
the	misconception	that	germs	cause	disease	and	must	be	counteracted	with
	
vaccines. But	this	procedure	can	bring	no	other	result	than	harm. TUBERCULOSIS	CAUSED	BY	VACCINATION
	
Dr.	Walter	James,	of	Philadelphia	said:
	
"VACCINATION	DOES	NOT	STAY	THE	SPREAD	OF	DISEASE	OR	EVEN
	
MODIFY	IT	in	those	cases	who	get	it	after	vaccination. IT	DOES	INTRODUCE
	
INTO	THE	SYSTEM	TUBERCULOSIS,	CANCER,	AND	LEPROSY. It	does
	just	what	inoculation	did—cause	the	spread	of	disease." Annie	Riley	Hale,	(researcher	for	Congressmen)	stated:
	
"The	Surgeon	General	of	the	United	States	Army	innocently	recorded	in	the
	
1918-1919	report	that	‘for	all	officers	and	enlisted	men,	Americans	and	native
	
troops	in	all	countries	where	U.S.	troops	were	serving,	tuberculosis	of	the	lungs
	
was	the	leading	cause	for	discharge;	and	among	American	troops	at	home	and
	
abroad	there	were	31,106	hospital	admissions	for	pulmonary	tuberculosis	with
	
1,114	deaths,	in	the	period	of	this	country’s	participation	in	the	First	World
	
War.’"	—“Medical	Voodoo”,	p.27
	
No	tubercular	men	were	inducted	into	the	Army. It	was	after	the	blood	poisoning
	
vaccinations	at	camp	that	diseases	of	every	description	developed. Then	the	men
	
were	invalided	home	by	the	thousands	and	dumped	on	society	as	physical	and
	
mental	wrecks. Many	of	these	men	had	never	been	in	battle	nor	had	even	left
	
American	soil. Dr.	E.	C.	Rosenow,	an	experimentalist	at	the	Mayo	Clinic,	recorded	in	the	Mayo
	
Collected	Papers	(Vol. II,	p.	92)	that	he	found	"the	vaccine	serums	injected	into
	
guinea	pigs	tended	to	localize	in	the	lungs." Edward	Jenner	inoculated	his	18	months	old	son	with	swinepox,	on	November
	
1791	and	again	in	April,	1798	with	cowpox. The	boy	was	never	very	well	after
	
that	and	died	of	tuberculosis	at	the	age	of	21. In	Baron’s	Life	of	Jenner,	(Vol. II,	p.	304)	we	learn	that,	"On	the	14th	of	May,
	
1796...	Jenner	vaccinated	James	Phipps,	a	boy	about	eight	years	old,	with	the
	
matter	taken	from	the	hand	of	a	dairymaid	infected	with	casual	cowpox. After	waiting	six	weeks	Jenner	inoculated	this	boy	on	both	arms	with	smallpox
	
matter,	taken	from	the	arm	of	a	boy	with	smallpox. Several	months	later	Phipps
	
was	again	inoculated	with	the	variolous	matter	(smallpox	pus)	but	no	effect	was
	
produced." The	inoculation	didn’t	"take"	so	on	the	strength	of	this	one	experiment	and	its
	
questionable	interpretation,	Jenner	based	his	claim	that	one	vaccination	would
	
"forever	secure	a	person	from	smallpox." No	time	had	elapsed	to	prove	whether
	
it	would	last	a	lifetime	or	a	month	or	at	all;	but	without	any	proof	or	any
	
scientific	basis	or	evidence	for	its	practice,	the	doctors	and	the	government
	adopted	it	and	made	it	compulsory,	no	doubt,	seeing	the	gold	mine	in	profits	that
	
it	would	yield. James	Phipps	was	declared	immune	to	smallpox	but	be	too,	died	of	tuberculosis
	
at	the	age	of	20. In	Baron’s	Life	of	Jenner,	the	author	refers	to	Phipps	condition	as	follows:
	
"While	walking	with	a	friend	one	day	they	passed	young	Phipps,	when	Jenner
	
exclaimed,	‘Oh,	there	is	poor	Phipps;	I	wish	you	could	see	him;	he	has	been	very
	
unwell	lately	and	I	am	afraid	he	has	got	tuberculosis	on	his	lungs. He	was
	
recently	inoculated	for	smallpox,	I	believe	for	the	20th	time,	and	all	without
	
effect.’"
	
	VACCINATION	IS	OF	VERY	ANCIENT	ORIGIN
	
As	was	previously	stated,	neither	Jenner,	with	all	his	fanfare	and	praise,	nor	the
	
obscure	Jesty,	was	the	discoverer	of	inoculation. It	was	a	"carry	over"	from	very
	
ancient	times	when	superstitious	fear	and	guesswork	dominated	the	healing
	
field. An	idea	of	its	ancient	origin	may	be	gathered	from	the	"Lecture
	
Memoranda,"XVII	International	Congress	of	Medicine,	London,	1913,	which
	
states:
	
"The	practice	of	inoculation	for	the	prevention	of	disease	is	one	of	considerable
	
antiquity. The	period	of	its	discovery	can	only	be	conjectured..."
	
"Dhanwantari,	the	Vedic	Father	of	Medicine,	and	the	earliest	known	Hindu
	
physician,	who	lived	about	1,500	B.C.,	is	supposed	to	have	been	the	first	to
	
practice	inoculation	for	smallpox. It	is	even	stated	that	the	ancient	Hindus
	
employed	a	vaccine,	which	they	prepared	by	the	transmission	of	the	smallpox
	
virus	through	a	cow." —“History	of	Inoculation	and	Vaccination”,	p.	6-13
	
This	common	practice	of	disease	transmission	of	both	ancient	and	modern	tunes,
	
undoubtedly,	has	a	strong	relationship	to	the	plagues	and	epidemics	that	sweep
	
those	countries	where	vaccination	is	still	practiced. If	this	method	of	disease	prevention	had	ever	been	successful,	smallpox	would
	have	been	eliminated	from	the	world	centuries	ago,	but	smallpox	persists	in
	
localities	where	vaccination	is	compulsory	and	declines	where	it	is	abandoned	in
	
favor	of	sanitation	and	hygienic	measures. The	practice	of	inoculation	spread	like	a	noxious	weed,	from	the	savage	tribes	of
	
the	forgotten	past	into	the	civilizations	of	Africa,	Arabia,	Tibet,	India	and	finally
	
into	Europe	and	America. Dr.	Clements	in	his	pamphlet,	"A	Superstitious	Custom"	traces	the	inoculation
	
practices	through	the	various	modern	countries	previous	to	Jenner’s	day. He
	
writes:
	
"In	1673	inoculation	against	smallpox	appeared	in	Denmark;	and	in	1778,	on
	
recommendation	of	the	medical	fraternity,	two	inoculation	houses	were
	
established	by	the	king	in	the	capitol. "In	Italy,	inoculation	was	secretly	practiced	by	the	Neapolitans	from	early	times. It	was	freely	performed	by	nurses,	who	inoculated	infants,	entrusted	to	their
	
care,	without	the	knowledge	of	the	parents. "In	1722,	Dr.	Wright,	a	surgeon	of	Wales	refers	to	inoculation	against	smallpox
	
in	the	British	Isles	as	‘a	very	ancient	custom.’	(Jenner	didn’t	begin	his
	
vaccinations	until	1796). One	William	Allen,	then	99	years	old,	said	inoculation
	
had	been	known	and	used	during	his	entire	lifetime,	and	he	well	remembered	his
	
mother	stating	that	it	had	been	commonly	done	all	her	life,	and	that	she	got
	
smallpox	that	way. "The	first	record	of	inoculation	in	France	appears	in	1712,	and	in	1763	a	fatal
	
epidemic	of	smallpox	occurred	in	that	country	that	wiped	out	a	large	part	of	the
	
population;	it	was	attributed	to	inoculation	and	for	a	time	the	Government
	
prohibited	the	practice. Five	years	later,	on	the	insistence	of	the	medical
	
faculties,	this	decree	was	rescinded	and	by	the	latter	part	of	the	18th	century
	
inoculation	was	again	commonly	practiced	in	that	country. "The	first	record	of	inoculation	in	Ireland	appears	in	1723,	when	a	medical
	
doctor	in	Dublin	inoculated	25	persons. Three	of	these	died	as	a	result,	and	the
	
custom	was	abandoned	for	some	time. “Inoculation	appears	to	have	been	first	introduced	in	Germany	in	1724. It	soon
	fell	into	disfavor,	however,	because	of	the	many	deaths	in	Berlin	from	smallpox,
	
as	a	result	of	it. After	many	years	of	diligent	medical	propagandizing,	the
	
doctors	were	able	to	get	the	people	to	accept	it	again. "In	1754,	Peverani	introduced	inoculation	for	smallpox	into	Rome,	but	smallpox
	
soon	began	to	spread	and	opposition	rose	to	such	a	pitch	that	the	practice	was
	
discontinued,	until	the	medical	profession,	after	years	of	labor,	persuaded	the
	
people	to	again	submit	to	it. "One	hundred	forty-two	years	later,	Carlo	(Charles)	Ruta,	Professor	of	Materia
	
Medica	at	the	University	of	Perugia,	Italy,	protested	against	the	deadly	custom	in
	
these	scathing	words:
	
"Vaccination	is	a	monstrosity,	a	misbegotten	offspring	of	error	and	ignorance;
	
and,	being	such,	it	should	have	no	place	in	either	hygiene	or	medicine...Believe
	
not	in	vaccination,	it	is	a	worldwide	delusion,	an	unscientific	practice,	a	fatal
	
superstition	with	consequences	measured	today	by	tears	and	sorrow	without
	
end.”
	
	
"In	Ancient	Greece	and	Rome,	the	MIGHTY	NATIONS	OF	MIGHTY	MEN,
	
there	was	no	inoculation—no	vaccination—and	no	smallpox." These	nations
	
have	been	known	down	through	history	as	being	famous	for	their	general	habits
	
of	health,	cleanliness	and	stability	as	well	as	their	vigor	and	strength. Among	the
	
Greeks	and	Romans	smallpox	was	unknown	until	it	was	carried	there	by	the
	
inoculators	from	other	countries.”
	
INOCULATION	IN	AMERICA
	
In	America,	inoculation	for	smallpox	appears	to	have	been	first	introduced	in
	
1721	by	Cotton	Mather,	a	clergyman. His	method	was	that	of	taking	a	toothpick
	
and	dipping	it	into	the	pus	from	a	pustule	of	a	smallpox	patient	and	smearing	it
	
into	a	scratch	on	the	arm	of	a	well	person. He	inoculated	224	persons	during	the
	
first	six	months	of	his	experimentation. Six	of	them	died	from	poisoning,	six	had
	
no	apparent	reaction	at	the	time	and	the	rest	suffered	reactions	of	varying
	
intensity. "He	was	bitterly	attacked	for	recommending	such	a	practice,"	says	Dr.	Clements,
	
"and	for	a	time	his	life	was	in	danger. This	incident	incited	strong	opposition	to
	
inoculation,	in	this	country...A	public	meeting	was	called	in	Boston	where	the
	practice	was	deprecated	as	causing	the	death	of	many	persons. "It	was	contended	that	the	operation	was	likely	to	prove	most	dangerous	to	those
	
submitting	to	it. In	the	meeting	the	following	resolution	was	agreed	upon	and
	
published	by	the	public	authorities:
	
"A	resolve	upon	a	debate	by	the	people	of	Boston	concerning	inoculation	of
	
smallpox,	on	the	21st	day	of	July,	1721. "It	appears	by	numerous	instances	that	it	has	proven	the	death	of	many	persons
	
even	after	the	operation,	and	brought	distemper	upon	many	others	which	have	in
	
the	end	proven	fatal	to	them;	that	the	natural	tendency	of	infusing	such
	
malignant	filth	in	the	blood	is	to	corrupt	and	putrefy	it,	and	if	there	be	not	a
	
sufficient	discharge	of	that	malignity	by	the	place	of	inoculation	or	elsewhere,	it
	
lays	the	foundation	for	many	dangerous	diseases;	that	the	operation	tends	to
	
spread	and	continue	the	infection	in	a	place	longer	than	otherwise	might	be	(as	in
	
the	case	of	smallpox);	that	the	continuance	of	the	operation	among	us	is	likely	to
	
prove	of	the	most	dangerous	consequences.”	—By	the	Select	Men	of	the	Town
	
of	Boston,	July	22,	1721
	
We	observe,	here,	that	the	Founding	Fathers	of	this	country	were	intelligent	men
	
who	were	vitally	concerned	with	the	health	and	welfare	of	the	people	whom	they
	
governed. Although	this	was	years	before	our	revolution,	these	same	men,	no
	
doubt,	played	a	part	in	shaping	the	destiny	of	this	country. This	was	also	before
	
the	medical	association	got	its	strangle	hold	on	the	health	of	our	people	and
	
prostituted	the	art	of	healing	to	the	business	of	making	money	without	giving
	
"full	value	received". Those	leaders	with	ideals	and	high	purposes	were	not	able
	
to	hold	the	gilded-edge	vaccination	monster	at	bay	very	long. The	high	pressure
	
"tactics"	of	the	serum	promoters	finally	corrupted	the	minds	of	the	people	and
	
they	were	induced	to	submit	to	full	scale	vaccination	in	many	states. America,
	
today,	is	unfortunately,	one	of	the	most	lucrative	fields	for	medical	exploitation. Our	Constitution	promises	the	people	freedom	but	the	enslavement	of
	
compulsory	vaccination	hounds	the	employees	and	personnel	of	our	tax
	
supported	institutions	such	as	Civil	Service,	county	and	state	hospitals	and
	
institutions,	state	colleges,	military	service,	many	public	schools	and	some	entire
	
states. There	is	absolutely	no	proof	of	benefits	from	vaccination	and	no	sound
	
basis	for	its	compulsion	but	it	is	forced	into	operation	from	year	to	year	and	the
	
outraged	taxpayers	are	forced	to	pay	for	it. The	useless	and	hazardous	but	inflexible	law	that	requires	vaccination	in	order
to	travel	abroad	brands	U.	S.	as	backward	and	unscientific. Other	countries	have
	
learned	the	fallacy	of	vaccination	and	discarded	it	as	worthless	and	deadly. "Medical	schools	claim	that	the	theory	of	inoculation	is	based	on	scientific	facts
	
but	history	proves	that	this	claim	is	false. What	are	these	so-called,	scientific
	
facts? Where	are	they	(if	any)? Medical	history	discusses	many	theories	and
	
hypotheses,	but	it	describes	no	scientific	facts. It	is	a	gross	misrepresentation	to
	
hold	that	the	superstitious	practice	of	barbarians	‘is	based	on	discoveries	made	in
	
the	fundamental	sciences,’	or	on	scientific	facts." —Clements. The	testament	from	medical	history	itself	proves	that	smallpox	increased
	
tremendously	after	the	enforcement	of	vaccination	and	at	the	present	time	there
	
are	far	more	deaths	and	diseases	from	vaccination	itself	than	from	the	diseases
	
the	vaccinations	are	supposed	to	prevent. Figures	and	case	histories	to	support
	
this	statement	are	given	elsewhere	in	this	book	and	in	many	other	books	on
	
vaccination. VACCINATION	BASED	ON	DAIRYMAID’S	STORY—NOT	SCIENCE
	
Lady	Mary	Wortley	Montagu	was	said	to	have	been	the	one	who	introduced
	
inoculation	into	England	in	1717	after	she	returned	from	the	Orient	(in	Turkey,
	
where	her	husband	was	an	ambassador). Inoculation	was	in	its	popular
	
experimental	stage	there	at	that	time. The	custom	had	probably	been	taken	by	the
	
Arabs	into	Africa,	notably,	those	countries	near	the	Red	Sea. From	there	it	may
	
have	been	taken	into	Europe	by	way	of	the	Bosphorus. When	Lady	Montagu
	
spoke	of	this	practice	of	arm-to-arm	inoculation	to	Jenner	he	said:
	
"Ay,	but	the	Gloucestershire	dairymaids	have	a	better	trick	than	that. They	say
	
that	if	a	person	takes	the	cowpox	from	the	cow,	he	will	never	after	have
	
smallpox. Now	cowpox	is	smallpox	of	the	cow. Cowpox	is	not	infectious;	a
	
person	once	having	cowpox	will	never	have	smallpox	afterwards,	and	there	are
	
no	dangerous	results	to	be	anticipated,	as	there	are	with	(arm-to-arm)
	
inoculations." All	these	claims	have	been	refuted	by	scientific	findings,	but	as	Jenner	was	not	a
	
scientist	he	was	satisfied	to	accept	the	opinions	and	superstitions	of	unlearned
	
dairymaids. Science	has	later	presented	sound	proof	that	cowpox	is	not	the	same
	
as	smallpox	and	does	not	protect	from	smallpox	or	even	from	cowpox. VACCINATION	DOES	NOT	IMMUNIZE,	SAY	AUTHORITIES
	
Space	will	not	permit	the	quoting	of	all	the	qualified	authorities	who	brought
	
forth	evidence	that	cowpox	has	no	relation	to	smallpox	and	cannot	immunize
	
against	it. A	few	will	show	the	trend	in	this	direction. Joseph	Swan,	in	his	comprehensive	work,	"THE	VACCINATION	PROBLEM"
	
(pp. 87-102)	gives	the	results	of	government	surveys	and	reports	of	doctors	and
	
scientists	who	investigated	this	matter. He	reports	Sir	Thomas	Watson	(the
	
distinguished	surgeon	and	a	believer	in	vaccination)	who	said:
	
"A	little	consideration	will	suffice	to	show	that	the	vaccine	disease	is	
sui	generis
. In	no	sense	does	it	own	its	origin	to	smallpox. There	is	no	such	relation	between
	
the	two...The	true	attitude	of	cowpox	towards	smallpox	is	an	attitude	of
	
antagonism." —British	Medical	Journal,	Jan.	17,	1880
	
The	renowned	bacteriologist,	E.	M.	Crookshank	stated:
	
"COWPOX	HAS	NEVER	BEEN	CONVERTED	INTO	HUMAN	SMALLPOX,
	
AND	IN	THEIR	CLINICAL	HISTORY	AND	EPIDEMIOLOGY,	NATURAL
	
COWPOX	AND	HUMAN	SMALLPOX	ARE	SO	DIFFERENT,	THAT	THE
	
COMPARATIVE	PATHOLOGIES	IS	NO	MORE	PREPARED	TO	ADMIT
	
THEIR	IDENTITY	THAN	HE	IS	PREPARED	TO	ADMIT	THE	IDENTITY	OF
	
COWPOX	AND	SHEEP-POX	OR	SMALLPOX	AND	THE	PLAGUE." —Dr. Crookshank,	“Bacteriology	and	Infectious	Diseases”,	Fourth	Edition,	p.328
	
Dr.	(later	Sir)	William	Osler,	one	of	the	most	highly	respected	medical
	
authorities,	although	an	advocate	of	vaccination	was	forced,	by	factual	evidence
	
to	admit	the	dangers	attending	this	practice. He	did	not	endorse	Jenner’s
	
exaggerated	promises	of	lifetime	immunity	without	danger. In	his	"Principles
	
and	Practice	of	Medicine",	p.	330,	8th	Edition,	he	wrote:
	
"With	the	greatest	care	(in	vaccinating)	certain	risks	are	present...A	quiescent
	
malady	may	be	lighted	into	activity	by	vaccination. This	has	happened	with
	
congenital	syphilis,	also	with	tuberculosis." (emphasis	supplied)
	
WHAT	HAPPENED	TO	JENNER’S	LIFETIME	IMMUNITY? When	Jenner	promised	the	world	that	his	cowpox	vaccinations	would	give
	
lifetime	immunity	"with	no	dangerous	results"	as	with	the	usual	inoculations,	he
	
admitted	that	inoculation	had	always	been	accompanied	with	danger	that	all
	
recognized. It	was	not	long,	however,	before	Jenner’s	cowpox	vaccinations	were
	
followed	by	death	and	disease	and	that	practice	was	also	branded	as	dangerous
	
and	deadly. Regarding	the	increased	death	rate	due	to	vaccination,	Herbert	Spencer	states	in
	
his	Facts	and	Comments:
	
"Jenner	and	his	disciples	have	assumed	that	when	the	vaccine	has	passed
	
through	the	patient’s	system	he	is	safe	against	smallpox,	and	there	the	matter
	
ends...I	propose	to	show	that	there	the	matter	does	not	end. The	interference	with
	
the	order	of	Nature	has	various	sequences	other	than	those	counted	upon. Some
	
have	been	made	known. "A	Parliamentary	Return	issued	in	1880	(No. 392)	shows...that	there	was	a
	
decrease	of	6,600	(per	million	births)	in	the	deaths	of	infants	from	all	causes;
	
while	the	deaths	caused	by	eight	specified	diseases,	either	directly
	
communicable	or	exacerbated	by	the	effects	of	vaccination,	increased	from
	
20,524	to	41,353	per	million	births	per	annum—more	than	double. It	is	clear	that
	
far	more	were	killed	by	these	other	diseases	than	were	saved	from	smallpox." Vaccination	was	made	compulsory	in	England	in	1853. Judging	by	the	data	from
	
the	above	quoted	Parliamentary	Return,	it	would	appear	that	after	27	years	of
	
enforced	vaccination,	the	death	rate	increased	only	among	the	vaccinated
	
diseases. The	decline	in	deaths	from	other	causes	was,	no	doubt,	brought	about
	
by	the	improvement	in	sanitation	and	nutrition	that	came	into	prominence	about
	
that	time. It	was	around	1840	that	Sylvester	Graham,	Dr.	Trall	and	other	pioneers
	
of	the	new	health	movement	emphasized	the	importance	of	correct	nutrition	and
	
through	this	teaching	they	helped	raise	the	health	standards	that	saved	many
	
lives. If	vaccination	had	not	been	persisted	in,	the	great	improvements	in
	
sanitation	and	nutrition	would	have	had	a	better	chance	to	eliminate	disease. But
	
as	it	is,	we	now	have	a	greater	scourge	of	killer	diseases	than	at	any	other	time	in
	
recorded	history;	and	much	of	it	is	traceable	to	vaccination. JENNER’S	ATTITUDE	TOWARD	COMPLAINTS	AND	DISASTER	OF
	
VACCINATION
	Dr.	W.	R.	Hadwen	who	had	considerable	experience	with	smallpox	patients	in
	
the	hospitals	of	England	and	had	seen	the	tragic	results	of	vaccination,	gave
	
lecture	in	Liverpool	where	he	discussed	the	typical	excuses	and	evasions	made
	
by	Jenner	regarding	the	complaints	and	failures	of	his	vaccinations. Excerpts
	
from	this	lecture	are	as	follows:
	
	
"Now,	after	Jenner	had	written	a	paper	on	this	wonderful	legend	of	the
	
dairymaids,	there	came	forward	on	every	hand	no	end	of	cow-doctors	who	had	a
	
large	experience	in	the	matter,	and	had	literally	flooded	him	with	evidence	of
	
people	who	had	had	cowpox	vaccinations	and	later	contracted	smallpox. "Here	was	proof	that	he	could	not	ignore...But	Jenner	was	one	of	the	most
	
resourceful	men	in	excuse	making	that	ever	lived;	let	anyone	read	his	and	there
	
will	be	no	difficulty	in	coming	to	that	conclusion. "‘Ay’,	said	Jenner,	‘There	are	two	kinds	of	smallpox;	there	is	a	genuine	kind	and
	
a	spurious	kind,	(laughter	from	the	audience)	and	those	who	have	been
	
vaccinated	and	had	smallpox	afterwards,	they	have	been	vaccinated	with
	
spurious	cowpox,	but	those	who	have	been	vaccinated	and	have	not	had
	
smallpox	afterwards,	they	have	been	inoculated	with	the	genuine	variety.’"
	
(laughter)
	
Jenner	had	no	answer	when	asked	how	to	tell	the	difference	between	spurious
	
and	genuine	cowpox. Neither	he	nor	anyone	else	was	able	to	find	a	safe	vaccine,
	
yet	the	vaccinations	were	continued	without	interruption	with	the	same
	
questionable	vaccines	that	had	no	proof	of	purity	or	assurance	of	safety. The
	
people	reminded	Jenner	that	a	person	is	just	as	dead	whether	he	died	of	spurious
	
or	genuine	smallpox	and	it	was	little	comfort	to	know	that	he	and	the
	
government	approved	of	the	vaccine	used. When	Jenner	was	confronted	with	the	evidence	that	a	group	of	people	had	been
	
vaccinated	with	the	same	batch	of	vaccine	but	some	had	developed	smallpox	and
	
others	did	not,	he	told	them	that	those	who	were	unfortunate	enough	to	get
	
smallpox	must	have	been	vaccinated	too	soon	or	too	late	after	exposure	to
	
smallpox. But	he	never	was	able	to	determine	just	when	was	the	right	time	to
	
vaccinate. As	many	of	the	casualties	were	among	his	own	patients	it	was	clear
	
that	the	whole	procedure	was	operated	on	a	basis	of	guesswork. ENGLISH	GOVERNMENT	SUPPORTED	JENNER	IN	HIS	VENTURE	
In	spite	of	the	obvious	failure	of	vaccination,	Jenner	applied	to	the	English
	
Government	for	money	to	promote	his	scheme. It	was	on	the	strength	of	the
	
dairymaid’s	story	and	his	groundless	promise	of	lifetime	immunity,	and	his
	
unscientific	experiment	on	James	Phipps	that	Parliament	gave	him	10	000	in
	
1802. Either	Jenner	had	an	unusual	gift	of	persuasion	or	the	English	government
	
was	a	victim	of	"wishful	thinking"	for	in	1807	Jenner	talked	them	out	another
	
20,000	pounds	which	amounted	to	30,000	pounds	in	all,	($150,000)	public	funds
	
with	which	to	propagate	his	vaccination	diseases	and	death	throughout	the
	
world. When	Jenner	made	the	statement	that	one	vaccination	would	give	lifelong
	
protection	against	smallpox	he	seemed	to	expect	that	people	would	regard	him	as
	
some	great	Oracle	whose	words	would	never	be	questioned. Even	after	deaths
	
had	occurred	from	vaccination	he	brazenly	submitted	a	manuscript	to	the	Royal
	
College	of	Surgeons	entitled,	"An	Inquiry	into	the	Causes	and	Effects	of	Variolae
	
Vaccine"	in	which	he	again	stated	his	theory,"	...What	renders	the	cowpox	virus
	
so	extremely	singular	is,	that	the	person	who	has	been	thus	affected	is	forever
	
after	secure	from	the	infusion	of	smallpox;	neither	exposure	to	the	various
	
effluvia	nor	the	insertion	of	the	matter	into	the	skin	producing	the	malady." The	complaints	continued	to	pour	in	but	Jenner	ignored	the	facts	and	like	one
	
possessed	by	an	obsession	he	wrote	in	his	third	publication	an	answer	to	the
	
objectors	as	follows:
	
	
"Some	there	are	who	suppose	the	security	(Immunity)	obtained	through	the
	
cowpox	will	be	of	temporary	nature	only. This	supposition	is	refuted,	not	only
	
by	analogy	with	respect	to	the	habits	of	disease	of	a	similar	kind,	but	by
	
incontrovertible	facts,	which	appear	again	its..."	(Baron	1,	p.	490)
	
Where	(we	ask)	are	these	incontrovertible	facts? No	one	has	seen	them	and
	
Jenner	never	did	bring	them	forth. But	Jenner	and	a	certain	class	of	doctors	had
	
discovered	that	vaccination	could	be	a	paying	business	even	if	they	couldn’t
	
make	it	work;	so	from	then	on,	the	colossal	advertising	program	was	set	up	to
	
propagandize	the	population	into	believing	in	vaccination. Lord	Lyttleton	must	have	had	a	stake	in	this	multi-million	dollar	enterprise	when
	
he	stated	in	the	House	of	Lords:
	
	"It	is	unnecessary	to	speak	of	the	certainty	of	vaccination	as	a	preventive	of
	
smallpox,	that	being	a	point	on	which	the	whole	medical	profession	has	arrived
	
at	complete	unanimity." This	statement	was	not	quite	true	because	all	the	enlightened	doctors,	(of	which
	
there	were	not	a	great	many)	condemned	vaccination. But	the	words	of	Lyttleton
	
had	their	desired	effect	on	the	people	and	that	was	the	purpose	of	the	speech. Everything	possible	was	done	to	suppress	the	facts	that	revealed	the	dismal
	
failure	of	vaccination. According	to	Thomas	Morgan	in	his	Medical	Delusions	(p.	48-49)	"Jenner	soon
	
discovered	that	vaccination	did	not	give	immunity	from	smallpox,	including
	
some	who	had	been	vaccinated	by	himself	and	had	died	from	it. Not	wishing	to
	
bring	vaccination	into	disrepute,	he	endeavored	to	suppress	reports,	and	in
	
writing	to	a	friend,	said,	‘I	wish	my	professional	brethren	to	be	slow	to	publish
	
fatal	results	after	vaccination.’	and	in	1810	he	wrote:
	
	
“When	I	found	Dr.	Woodworth	about	to	publish	his	pamphlet	relative	to	the
	
eruption	(smallpox)	cases	at	the	Smallpox	Hospital,	I	entreated	him	in	the
	
strongest	terms,	both	by	letter	and	conversation,	not	to	do	a	thing	that	would	so
	
disturb	the	progress	of	vaccination.’	(Barron’s	Life	of	Jenner)
	
"The	foregoing	plainly	proves	that	Jenner	himself	was	aware	of	the	utter
	
uselessness	of	vaccination;	but,	having	received	the	bounty	from	the	government
	
he	preferred	to	resort	to	all	kinds	of	schemes	rather	than	acknowledge	its	failure. "From	its	inception	until	the	present	day,	the	vaccination	scheme	has	been	an
	
endless	record	of	lies,	deception,	fraud,	juggling	statistics,	and	falsifying	death
	
certificates	in	order	to	preserve	vaccination	from	reproach	and	to	secure	its
	
continuation...and	all	this	after	more	than	a	century	of	terrible	experience,	which
	
has	demonstrated	that	vaccination	has	killed	more	than	smallpox,	besides
	
crippling	and	disfiguring	millions	more." EVEN	JENNER	RECOGNIZED	THE	FAILURE	OF	VACCINATION
	
In	his	work	on	The	Value	of	Vaccination	(pp. 68-69)	Dr.	William	Winterburn
	
says	that	even	"The	Royal	Jennerian	Society"	(under	Jenner’s	direction)	in	its
	
second	report	in	1806,	"Admitted	having	seen	a	few	cases	of	smallpox	in
	
persons	who	had	passed	through	the	cowpox	in	the	usual	way." He	says	further:	
"In	the	same	year	the	Royal	College	of	Surgeons	issued	a	circular	letter	to	1,000
	
of	its	members	asking	their	experience	with	vaccination. They	received	426
	
answers,	with	the	information	of	56	cases	of	smallpox	in	the	vaccinated,	66
	
cases	of	eruption	and	24	bad	arms." The	London	MEDICAL	OBSERVER,	(VoL	VI,	1810)	published	particulars	of
	
"535	CASES	OF	SMALLPOX	AFTER	VACCINATION—the	operation	having
	
been	performed	in	some	of	them	by	Jenner	himself—including	their	names	and
	
the	authorities	reporting	them;	and	similar	details	of	97	FATAL	CASES	OF
	
SMALLPOX	IN	THE	VACCINATED,	with	150	cases	of	serious	injury	arising
	
from	vaccination	among	whom	were	10	medical	men—with	their	names	and
	
addresses—including	two	professors	of	anatomy,	who	had	suffered	from	the
	
operation	in	their	own	families." (Medical	Voodoo—Hale	p.	85)
	
Winterburn	gives	additional	proof	of	the	failure	of	vaccination	to	protect	from
	
smallpox,	in	a	report	of	a	"Severe	epidemic	in	Marseilles	when	2,000	vaccinated
	
persons	were	stricken	with	smallpox;	and	the	epidemic	of	1831	in	Wurttemberg
	
when	995	‘protected’	ones	succumbed	to	the	prevailing	malady." When	Jenner	was	faced	with	the	disturbing	fact	that	vaccination	with	cowpox
	
was	as	much	a	failure	as	the	previous	inoculations	with	human	smallpox,	he
	
invented	all	manner	of	excuses	which	were	as	unconvincing	as	they	were
	
useless. His	one—track	mind	seemed	to	admit	no	other	thought	except	pus. So
	
when	cow	or	human	putrescence	didn’t	prevent	smallpox	he	continued	to
	
experiment	with	other	varieties. He	noticed	that	in	the	suppurating	cracks	in	the
	
feet	of	diseased	horses	there	was	a	putrid	mass	of	pus. This	disease	was	called
	
"horse	grease"	by	some	people	but	was	considered,	by	some	veterinarians,	to	be
	
a	form	of	syphilis	of	the	horse. Others	said	it	was	a	type	of	consumption	or
	
wasting	disease. For	some	unaccountable	reason,	Jenner	thought	this	pus	would
	
be	a	good	addition	to	his	discredited	vaccines	so	he	injected	it	into	a	cow	and
	
produced	a	disease	in	the	cow. With	the	concoction	of	pus	from	the	diseased
	
horse	and	cow	he	made	a	serum. When	the	people	learned	what	he	had	done	they
	
protested	so	violently	that	Dr.	Pearson	wrote	to	Jenner	immediately	and	said,
	
"For	God’s	sake	take	the	horse	out,	or	you	will	damn	the	whole	business." Following	that	incident	Jenner	wrote	to	a	friend	and	said,	"I	am	on	the	lookout	to
	
be	able	to	make	a	fortune;	and	to	appease	the	public." Then,	as	Dr.	Hadwen
	
related	in	his	famous	lecture,	"Jenner	decided	to	take	the	horse	out. But	he	was
	still	faced	with	the	problem	of	finding	genuine	cowpox. This	he	was	never	able
	
to	do...In	sheer	desperation,	he	fell	back	upon	spontaneous	cowpox	although	he
	
had	declared	previously,	it	was	absolutely	useless	in	preventing	smallpox. And	it
	
is	this	spontaneous	cowpox	vaccine,	this	which	was	denounced	by	Edward
	
Jenner,	this	which	was	scouted	by	the	so-called	inventor	himself	as	absolutely
	
useless	in	protecting	against	smallpox;	this	is	the	stuff	that	is	being	used	today
	
under	the	name	of	‘pure	calf	lymph	smallpox	vaccine’	and	before	which	the
	
medical	profession	is	bowing,	while	professing	to	follow	in	the	footsteps	of
	
Jenner. "There	is	not	one	medical	man	in	10,000	who	has	ever	seen	cowpox	in	a	cow,
	
and	very	few	who	have	seen	a	case	of	smallpox	so	they	really	know	very	little
	
about	it. There	are	two	things	the	medical	profession	should	learn:	The	first	is	to
	
know	smallpox	when	they	see	it;	and	the	next	is	to	know	how	to	treat	it	when
	
they	do	see	it." —Dr. W.	R.	Hadwen,	MD,	“The	Vaccination	Delusion”
	
REVACCINATION	DESTROYS	PROMISED
	
IMMUNITY
"We	will	suppose"	said	Dr.	Hadwen,	"for	the	sake	of	argument,	that	cowpox	is
	
smallpox	(as	some	doctors	still	claim)	and	that	when	you	give	a	person	cowpox
—that	is	when	you	vaccinate	him—you	give	him	a	mild	(or	severe)	sort	of
	
smallpox. Jenner	himself,	said,	‘Cowpox	does	not	prevent	smallpox;	it	is
	
smallpox.’	So	that,	according	to	that	theory,	you	are	literally	"smallpoxing"	a
	
person	when	you	vaccinate	him...Jenner	said,	‘A	person	once	vaccinated	is
	
forever	after	secure	from	smallpox’	and	that,	‘revaccination	would	rob	his
	
discovery	of	half	its	virtues.’	But	what	is	the	medical	propaganda	telling	you? The	doctors	know	that	vaccination	will	not	protect	you	against	another
	
vaccination. If	one	cowpox	inoculation	will	not	protect	you	from	being
	
cowpoxed	again,	how	on	earth	is	it	going	to	protect	you	from	being	smallpoxed? Why,	the	very	theory	of	revaccination	is	condemnatory	of	the	whole	creed. If	it
	
cannot	protect	against	a	mild	form	in	vaccination	how	can	it	protect	one	from	a
	
serious	form	of	smallpox? The	most	amazing	thing	on	earth	is	the	fact	that	the
	
medical	men	cannot	see	this." —	“The	Vaccination	Delusion”,	Dr.	Hadwen
	
JENNER	FANS	RESENT	THE	TRUTH
	
The	Editor	of	"TRUTH"	(London)	answers	a	complaint	in	an	editorial	of	his
	publication	as	follows:
	
"In	his	article,	‘The	Fraud	of	Vaccination,’	published	last	week	in	"TRUTH,	Dr.
	
Hadwen	made	some	remarks	not	altogether	complimentary	to	Jenner,	the	(self
	
proclaimed)	discoverer	of	vaccination. These	remarks	led	one	reader	to
	
denounce	both	Dr.	Hadwen	and	myself—Dr. Hadwen	for	libelling	one	of	the
	
greatest	benefactors	of	humanity	(she	thinks)	and	myself	for	propagating	the
	
libel. Dr.	Hadwen	is	well	able	to	take	care	of	himself. For	my	own	part,	not
	
wishing	to	do	any	injustice	to	the	name	and	fame	of	the	late	Dr.	Jenner,	I	asked
	
Dr.	Hadwen	what	he	had	against	him	and	he	replied	by	sending	me	a	pamphlet
	
he	had	written	on	the	subject. This	I	have	compared	with	the	account	of	Jenner’s
	
life	given	in	the	"Dictionary	of	National	Biography,"	and	the	result	is	so
	
illuminating	that	I	will	now	give	the	salient	facts	as	briefly	as	possible. "To	begin	with,	it	is	clear	that	Jenner	never	possessed	anything	that	would	be
	
recognized	today	as	a	medical	qualification. At	the	age	of	16	he	was	apprenticed
	
to	a	country	doctor	and	apothecary	and	at	21	he	was	sent	for	two	years	as	a	pupil
	
to	Dr.	John	Hunter	of	London. At	23	Jenner	returned	to	his	native	village	and
	
started	to	practice	as	a	surgeon	and	apothecary. He	continued	for	several	years	as
	
just	a	plain,	unqualified	country	doctor. At	the	end	of	this	time	be	made	his	first
	
bid	for	fame. In	l787	he	sent	a	paper	on	"The	Natural	History	of	the	Cuckoo"	to
	
the	Royal	Society,	and	as	a	result,	with	Hunter’s	influence	he	was	elected	F.R.C. Three	years	later	he	applied	to	St.	Andrew’s	University	for	an	M.D. degree,	and
	
as	St.	Andrew’s,	in	those	days,	was	not	squeamish	about	degrees	so	long	as	the
	
fees	were	forthcoming,	Jenner	became	Doctor	Jenner	for	the	modest	sum	of	15
	
pounds. (about	$75.00	in	those	days)
	
"As	for	the	vaccination	discovery	it	appears	to	have	been	founded	upon	what	Dr.
	
Hadwen	calls	a	superstition	among	the	dairymaids." The	editorial	continues	with
	
the	history	of	vaccination	as	already	covered	in	this	chapter	so	I	do	not	think	it	is
	
necessary	to	repeat	it	He	concludes	his	article	with	this	paragraph:
	
“What	strikes	me	as	remarkable	about	the	whole	affair	is	the	ease	with	which
	
Jenner	got	his	theory	accepted...It	is	true	that	medical	research	in	the	19th
	
century	was	not	what	it	is	today,	but	even	then	the	picture	of	the	whole	of	the
	
College	of	Physicians	and	Surgeons	swallowing	the	theory	of	an	unqualified
	
country	apothecary,	based	on	one	totally	unreliable	experiment,	seems	scarcely
	
credible...I	should	imagine	that	he	was	one	of	those	unscientific	researchers	who
	
are	always	on	the	lookout	for	facts	to	fit	their	theories,	instead	of	first	making	of
	their	facts"
	
Dr.	J.	W.	Hodge,	of	New	York,	had	extensive	experience	with	smallpox
	
epidemics	and	vaccination	epidemics	also. Out	of	his	wealth	of	knowledge	on
	
this	subject	he	wrote	on	all	its	phases. In	a	published	article	dealing	with	"Some
	
of	the	False	Claims,	Erroneous	Deductions	and	Self	Contradictions	of	the	of	the
	
Vaccination	Dogma"	he	stated:
	
"At	first	it	was	confidently	asserted	that	vaccination	would	exterminate
	
smallpox. That	claim	has	been	abandoned	by	Jenner’s	most	enthusiastic
	
followers	and	the	claim	that	revaccination	will	exterminate	smallpox,	was	set	up
	
in	its	stead. The	proof	that	the	theory	and	the	practice	espoused	by	Jenner	have
	
been	everywhere	abandoned	is	found	in	the	fact	that	all	vaccinists	now	admit	the
	
necessity	of	revaccination,	but	do	not	agree	on	the	period	that	may	be	allowed
	
between	successive	repetitions	of	the	‘protective’	rite. "If	you	ask	how	often	it	must	be	repeated,	you	will	be	confronted	with	a	babel	of
	
discordant	replies	You	can	choose	any	answer	you	please	from	‘once	only’	of	the
	
original	Jenner	up	to	an	indefinite	repetition,	‘until	it	no	longer	takes’,	as	now
	
prescribed	by	the	Chicago	‘Vaccination	Creed’"
	
This	"Vaccination	Creed"	formulated	by	the	Chicago	Health	Department	in	1902
	
stated	"True	vaccination	repeated	until	it	no	longer	"takes"	always	prevents
	
smallpox. Nothing	else	does." Regarding	this	fantastic	assertion,	Dr.	Hodge	has	this	to	say:
	
"The	above	dogmatic	deliverance	aptly	illustrates	the	recklessness	of	the
	
disciples	of	Jenner	in	making	bold	asseverations	in	favor	of	vaccination	which
	
scorn	the	slightest	attempt	at	verification." The	frequent	and	variegated	vaccinations	given	to	our	service	men	give	us	a	full
	
scale	picture	of	what	"repeated	vaccination	until	it	no	longer	takes"	will	do	to	the
	
body	and	brain. Thousands	of	our	healthiest	men	at	the	prime	of	life	were
	
rendered	insane	and	millions	of	others	were	infected	with	disease	of	every
	
description	including	the	very	ones	they	were	"protected"	against. A	typical
	
example	is	that	of	our	Philippine	soldiers. According	to	our	military	records:
	
	
"Every	enlisting	soldier	is	subjected	to	vaccination	at	the	time	of	being	recruited,
	and	revaccinated,	not	only	on	entering	the	US	Army,	but	also	as	often	after	that
	
as	seems	advisable	by	the	Army	medical	authorities	"	Chief	Surgeon	of	the	U.	S.
	
Philippine	Army,	said	in	his	report,	regarding	the	high	incidence	of	smallpox
	
among	his	vaccinated	men	"I	can	say	that	no	Army	was	ever	more	thoroughly
	
looked	after	in	the	matter	of	vaccination	than	ours. AND	REVACCINATION
	
MANY	TIMES	REPEATED	WENT	AS	REGULARLY	AS	THE	DRILLS	AT	A
	
REGULAR	POST." (emphasis	supplied)
	
Yet,	the	records	show	a	steady	increase	of	smallpox	among	these	men:
	
-In	1888—there	were	76	cases	of	smallpox	and	21	deaths	from	this	cause. -In	1890—there	were	207	cases	of	smallpox	and	78	deaths	from	this	cause. -In	1900—there	were	246	cases	of	smallpox	and	113	deaths	from	this	cause. 246	cases	of	smallpox	and	113	deaths	among	the	thoroughly	and	frequently
	
vaccinated	men	would	hardly	bear	out	the	claim	of	the	Chicage	Creed,	that	says:
	
"Repeated	revaccination	always	prevents	smallpox	and	nothing	else	does." Jenner	and	his	followers	had	committed	themselves	to	the	view	that	Vaccination
	
gave	lifelong	immunity	to	smallpox. Therefore,	they	asserted	that	revaccination
	
was	not	merely	unnecessary,	but	impossible." Dr.	Pearson,	one	of	Jenner’s	strongest	supporters	said,	"If	a	child	can	be
	
revaccinated,	then	it	can	take	smallpox;	therefore,	vaccination	is	not	an
	
equivalent	for	smallpox	and	where,	then,	is	the	good	of	it?" (Medical	Gazette,
	
1831)
	
Dr.	Pearson	also	stated,	"It	has	been	found	that	a	person	whose	constitution	has
	
distinctly	undergone	the	vaccine	disease	is	in	the	future,	unsusceptible	of	that
	
same	disease." (I	wonder	where	he	found	that	remarkable	person.) Here	is	an	authority	on	the	Jenner	theory	who	promises	that	if	the	vaccination
	
"takes"	then	a	person	cannot	ever	have	another	vaccination	that	will	"take". This
	
fortunate	person	is	then	supposed	to	be	immune	to	both	smallpox	and
	
vaccination	reactions	(vaccina). The	cases	of	smallpox	and	vaccination	diseases	and	deaths	continued	to	increase
	
in	large	numbers	among	Jenner’s	prize	patients	so	he	and	his	supporters	had	to
	
retreat	behind	a	bulwark	of	excuses. As	usual,	these	failed	to	shield	them	from
	
the	rise	of	public	indignation,	so	Jenner	had	to	discard	the	impossible	claim	of
	
lifetime	immunity	in	order	to	hold	onto	the	vaccination	fantasy	at	all. Although	they	had	previously	taught	that	revaccination	would	cancel	any	hope
	
of	protection	from	vaccination,	they	nevertheless,	changed	their	policy	and
	
advocated	revaccination. They	had	learned,	undeniably,	that	vaccination	would
	
not	work	and	were	to	learn	later	that	revaccination	was	even	more	disastrous	but
	
it	was	continued	in	spite	of	this. In	1860	the	Encyclopedia	Britannica	(Eighth	Edition)	stated:
	
"Nothing	is	more	likely	to	prove	hurtful	to	the	cause	of	vaccination	and	render
	
the	public	careless	of	securing	to	themselves	its	benefits,	than	the	belief	that	they
	
would	require	to	submit	to	revaccination	every	10	to	15	years." Years	later,	the	Eleventh	Edition	of	the	Encyclopedia	shows	the	change	of	policy
	
when	it	states:
	
"It	is	desirable	that	the	operation	(vaccination)	should	be	repeated	at	the	age	of
	
from	7	to	10	years,	and	thereafter,	if	it	be	possible,	at	intervals	during	life." (The
	
more	often	the	vaccinations,	the	greater	the	revenue	to	the	doctors	and	vaccine
	
promoters. This	is	the	prime	consideration	in	this	business.) RECORDS	SHOW	REVACCINATION	FAILS
Since	numerous	examples	of	the	failure	of	revaccination	are	given	throughout
	
this	book,	only	a	few	will	be	mentioned	in	this	chapter	to	show	its	position	in	the
	
history	of	vaccination. Dr.	Sobatta,	of	the	German	Army	gave	a	report	of	154	soldiers	who	had	been
	
vaccinated	four	times	with	a	lapse	of	a	year	and	a	half	between	shots. 146	of
	
these	cases	had	reactions	of	vaccina,	indicating	that	the	vaccinations	and
	
revaccinations	did	not	protect	for	even	one	and	one-half	years. Some	startling	results	of	revaccination	experiments	were	published	by	the
	German	Vaccination	Commission	in	1884. The	experiments	were	made	on	30
	
boys	ranging	in	age	from	8	to	14	years. Five	of	them	had	had	smallpox	within
	
the	previous	two	years;	four	of	them	had	been	vaccinated. The	vaccinations	were
	
repeated	every	eight	days	with	the	following	results:
	
	
Vaccinations
of	Boys
reactions
unsuccessful
Percent	of
	
Reactions
1st
30
7
23
23
2nd
23
9
14
39
3rd
14
6
8
36
4th
9
3
6
33
5th
6
4
2
67
	
The	report	stated	that	the	7	boys	on	the	top	row	(including	the	4	who	had	had
	
smallpox)	had	reactions	of	vaccina	indicating	that	neither	smallpox	nor
	
revaccination	had	protected	them	for	even	three	weeks. The	9	boys	on	the
	
second	row	who	had	reactions	showed	that	67%	of	the	group	did	not	have
	
immunity	that	lasted	even	8	days. Then	the	7	boys	on	the	top	row	who	had	been
	
revaccinated	were	revaccinated	again	and	6	of	them	"took"	which	showed	that
	
86%	of	the	group	did	not	receive	the	promised	immunity	for	as	long	as	one
	
week. The	other	boy	in	that	group	of	7	was	reported	as	unsuccessful	because	he
	
had	developed	dysentery	during	that	week. This	is	an	interesting	point	because	it
	
bears	out	the	contention	that	when	poisons	are	introduced	into	the	body	the
	
healing	mechanism	attempts	to	expel	them	by	way	of	diarrhea,	mucous
	
discharge,	eruptions,	etc. The	diarrhea	was,	no	doubt,	one	of	the	reactions	of
	
vaccina	which	would	indicate	that	his	vaccination	also	"took",	making
	
revaccination	a	100%	failure	in	that	group. This	is	concrete	proof	that	vaccination	or	revaccination	does	not	protect	against
	
itself,	or	against	smallpox	and	has	no	constructive	quality	to	recommend	it. One	of	the	favorite	arguments	of	the	exponents	of	revaccination	is	the	claim	that
	
the	revaccinated	nurses	in	smallpox	hospitals	do	not	get	smallpox. It	would	be
	
more	accurate	to	say	that	the	records	of	the	casualties	of	these	revaccinated
	
nurses	are	not	made	public. We	read	in	the	chapter	on	Falsified	Death
	
Certificates	(Book	II)	that	it	is	an	accepted	custom	among	doctors,	to	withhold
	
from	the	death	certificate	the	real	cause	of	death	when	nurses	(and	sometimes
	
when	patients)	die	of	smallpox	after	vaccination;	some	other	causes	are	given. However,	occasionally	the	private	records	are	seen	and	it	is	then	found	that	the
	
vaccinated	and	revaccinated	personnel	show	a	higher	incidence	of	smallpox	and
	
other	diseases	than	do	the	unvaccinated	laymen. Many	records	and	testimonies	were	brought	forth	when	the	Royal	Vaccination
	
Commission	was	making	its	investigation	of	this	revaccination	question. W.	J.
	
Collins,	M.D. and	J. A.	Piecton,	two	of	these	Commissioners,	after	weighing	the
	
evidence	of	hundreds	of	witnesses	who	had	testified	before	the	Royal
	
Commission,	recorded	their	joint	conclusions	on	this	matter	in	the	minority
	
report	(p.	61,	par. 152)	as	follows:
	
"When	we	consider	the	large	number	of	attacks	and	deaths	by	smallpox	which
	
have	occurred	among	our	thoroughly	revaccinated	army...as	well	as	the	number
	
and	fatality	of	revaccinated	persons	attacked	by	smallpox	in	London	and	at
	
Warrington	and	Dewsbury,	we	are	forced	to	the	conclusion	that	the	remarkable
	
immunity	recorded	in	the	cases	of	nurses	in	smallpox	hospitals	cannot	be
	
accounted	for	by	the	fact	that	they	have	been	revaccinated. "In	the	hospital	at	Bicetre	during	the	siege	of	Paris,	in	the	midst	of	a	larger
	
accumulation	of	smallpox	patients	than	has	ever	been	known	before	or	since,	the
	
immunity	of	those	attendants	and	doctors	who	neglected	revaccination	was	even
	
more	marked	than	in	the	case	of	the	orderlies	who	were	nearly	all	revaccinated. We	attach	considerable	importance	to	the	narrative	given	by	M.	Colin,	Chief
	
Medical	Officer	to	the	Bicetre	Hospital	during	the	siege. "The	point	of	this	narrative	is	that	while	15	of	the	revaccinated	or	well	protected
	
orderlies	took	the	disease	(smallpox),	not	one	of	the	80	who	composed	the
	
medical	and	nursing	staff,	so	many	of	whom	had	neglected	revaccination,	was
	
attacked. "It	is	sufficiently	clear,"	declared	the	Royal	Vaccination	Commissioners,	"that
	
M.	Cohn,	though	an	impassioned	advocate	of	vaccination,	was	so	struck	with	the
	
complete	immunity	of	the	medical	and	nursing	staff,	who	by	their	neglect	of
	
revaccination	appeared	to	offer	less	guarantee	of	protection	than	the	orderlies,
	
nearly	all	of	whom	had	been	revaccinated	under	his	own	eyes,	that	he	thought	it
	
necessary	to	attempt	some	explanation." (THE	VACCINATION	PROBLEM,
	
Swan,	p.8)
	
Japan	is	one	of	the	most	glaring	examples	of	the	failure	of	vaccination	and
	revaccination. Dr.	Ruta,	in	his	review	of	world	statistics	on	smallpox	reported:
	
"Between	1886	and	1892,	there	were	25,474,370	vaccinations	and
	
revaccinations	performed	in	Japan,	which	meant	that	about	two-thirds	of	the
	
entire	Japanese	population,	already	vaccinated	by	the	law	of	1872,	were
	
revaccinated. During	that	7-year	period	(1886-1892)	of	thorough	revaccination,
	
there	were	reported	165,774	cases	of	smallpox	with	28,979	deaths." When	our	U.	S.	Army	of	occupation	moved	into	Japan	after	World	War	II,	we
	
could	have	been	the	means	of	liberating	these	needy	people	from	this	curse	of
	
medical	ignorance,	but	instead,	our	medical,	drug	and	chemical	companies
	
moved	in	also	with	their	program	of	exploitation,	and	as	a	result,	under	the
	
MacArthur	regime,	"The	people	were	given	the	largest	immunization	and
	
vaccination	treatment	in	history. Every	Japanese,	received	two	smallpox	shots
	
making	a	total	of	160	million	vaccinations." —LIFE,	Aug.	22,	1955CHAPTER	5
CANCER	CAUSED	BY	VACCINATION
“The	chief,	if	not	the	sole	cause	of	the	monstrous	increase	in	cancer	has	been
	
vaccination.”
	—Dr. Robert	Bell,	the	famous	cancer	specialist	of	the	British
	
Cancer	Hospital
	
We	do	not	claim	that	vaccination	is	the	only	cause	of	cancer	although	Dr.	Bell
	
(quoted	above)	observed	so	many	cases	of	cancers	at	the	site	of	the	vaccination
	
and	elsewhere,	but	directly	traced	to	this	cause	that	he	affirmed	that	vaccination
	
was	the	cause	of	the	great	increase	in	the	cancer	rate. Dr	Bell	is	just	one	of	the	many	authorities	who	have	been	faced	with	the
	
uncomfortable	realization	that	the	blood	contamination	from	vaccines	is	one	of
	
the	leading	causes	of	cancer. Dr.	E.	J. Post,	a	prominent	physician	of	Berlmont,	Michigan,	said:
	
"I	HAVE	REMOVED	CANCERS	FROM	VACCINATED	ARMS	EXACTLY
	
WHERE	THE	POISON	WAS	INJECTED." In	the	New	York	Press,	January	26,	1909,	W.	B.	Clark	stated:
	
"Cancer	was	practically	unknown	until	cowpox	vaccination	began	to	be
	
introduced. I	have	had	to	do	with	200	cases	of	cancer	and	I	NEVER	SAW	A
	
CASE	OF	CANCER	IN	AN	UNVACCINATED	PERSON." Dr.	Herbert	Snow,	Surgeon	of	the	London	Cancer	Hospital,	had	this	to	say:
	
"I	am	convinced	that	some	80%	of	these	cancer	deaths	are	caused	by	the
	
inoculations	or	vaccinations	they	have	undergone. These	are	well-known	to
	
cause	grave	and	permanent	disease	of	the	heart	also." Dr.	Dennis	Turnbull,	who	had	studied	cancer	for	30	years	declared:
	
"I	have	no	hesitation	in	stating	that	in	my	judgement	the	most	frequent	disposing
	condition	for	cancerous	development	is	infused	into	the	blood	by	vaccination
	
and	revaccination." Dr.	Forbes	Laurie,	late	Medical	Director	of	the	Metropolitan	Cancer	Hospital,
	
(London)	said:
	
"I	am	thoroughly	convinced	that	the	increase	of	cancer	is	due	to	vaccination." In	his	book	CANCER	AND	VACCINATION,	Esculapius	says:
	
"No	candid	and	scientific	inquirer	who	has	read	the	works	of	such	authorities	as
	
Doctors	Creighton,	Crookshank	and	Scott	Tebb,	can	be	surprised	that	an
	
alarming	increase	in	cancer	is	now	evident. Those	who	adopt	the	brutal	practice
	
of	calf-lymph	vaccination	are	but	too	surely	sowing	the	wind	which	they	must
	
inevitably	reap	as	the	whirlwind,	a	whirlwind	of	corruption,	disease	and	national
	
deterioration. Where	the	so-called,	human	lymph	is	employed,	syphilis,	leprosy
	
and	tuberculosis	follow	in	its	train;	and	wherever	calf-lymph	is	used,
	
tuberculosis	and	cancer	spread	like	a	conflagration.”
	
Sir	Thomas	Paget,	M.D.,	tells	us	that	"the	progress	of	vaccine	infection	in	the
	
blood	shows	us	that	a	permanent	morbid	condition	is	established;	in	the	tissues
	
themselves,	it	is	also	established	by	this	specific	poison." Dr.	Benchetrit	states	that	serums	and	vaccines	"are	principally	responsible	for	the
	
increase	of	those	two	really	dangerous	diseases,	cancer	and	heart	disease." Dr.	F.	P.	Millard,	prominent	Osteopath	of	Toronto	and	President	of	the	National
	
League	for	Prevention	of	Spinal	Curvature	says:
	
	
"Abolish	vaccination,	and	you	will	cut	the	cancer	death	rate	in	half." PHOTOGRAPHS	OF	FATAL	CANCER	CASES	CAUSED	BY	VACCINATION
	
Although	there	have	been	thousands	of	cancers	caused	by	vaccination	space	will
	
not	permit	the	reviewing	of	the	case	histories	or	even	a	small	fraction	of	them. The	photographs	below	will	give	an	idea	of	the	tragic	condition	and	intense
	
suffering	brought	about	by	this	curse	of	the	modern	age:	vaccination. Photograph	by	permission	of	Harbison	Printers,	Oceano,	Calif.
	
Mrs	Helen	Goates	of	Bolivar,	Missouri	was	a	strong,	healthy	woman	with	no
	
skin	trouble	or	chronic	disease	when	she	was	persuaded,	during	a	vaccination
	
drive,	to	submit	to	vaccination. Almost	immediately,	after	the	injection,	an
	
inflamed	swelling	started	to	develop	around	the	vaccination. It	continued	to
	
increase	in	size	and	intensity	until	it	covered	her	entire	arm	and	hand. After	a
	
period	of	time	it	spread	over	her	back	and	breast	as	is	shown	in	the	photograph. She	was	treated	by	more	than	a	dozen	doctors	and	cancer	specialists	but	the
	
condition	grew	steadily	worse	until	death	relieved	her	of	her	agony. Before	her
	
death	she	requested	that	a	photograph	be	taken	of	the	cancer	in	order	that	others
	
might	see	the	results	of	vaccination	and	be	warned,	in	time	against	this	ever
	
present	danger	of	vaccine	poisoning. The	cancer	does	not	always	start	immediately. It	usually	takes	months	or	years
	
for	the	poisons	to	degenerate	enough	tissue	for	a	cancer	to	form. Photo	from	VACCINATION	AND	THE	MEDICAL	PROFESSION	Case	XXV
	
It	is	for	this	reason	that	most	doctors	fail	to	recognize	the	connection	between
	
the	vaccinations	and	the	cancers. The	following	photograph	is	an	example	of	a
	
later	development. Benjamin	F.	Olevine	of	Altoona,	Pennsylvania,	was	vaccinated	when	in	good
	
health. Two	months	later	a	sarcomatous	(tumorous)	growth	began	to	develop
	
where	the	vaccination	sore	had	not	healed. The	growth	reached	enormous
	
proportions,	as	may	be	seen	from	the	photograph,	and	caused	intense	pain	and
	
untold	suffering,	not,	only	in	the	arm	but	throughout	the	entire	body. No	cure
	
was	possible	and	his	misery	was	relieved	only	by	death. AMERICAN	CANCER	SOCIETY	REVEALS	STARTLING	FACTS
	
The	1955	advertising	circular	sent	out	by	the	American	Cancer	Society,	states:
	
"Cancer	will	strike	one	of	every	four	persons	now	living	according	to	the	present
	
estimates. "MORE	CHILDREN	FROM	3	TO	15	YEARS	OF	AGE	DIE	OF	CANCER
	
THAN	FROM	ANY	OTHER	DISEASE". This	is	a	shocking,	tragic	situation	when	we	consider	that	just	a	short	time	ago—
less	than	50	years—cancer	was	unheard	of	among	children. It	was,	even	then,	a
	
rare	disease	associated	with	old	age	degeneration. But	today,	after	the	intensive
	
vaccination	programs	conducted	several	times	a	year	in	the	schools,	cancer	has
	become	so	prevalent	that	it	is	now	taking	a	death	toll	among	the	children	that	is
	
almost	unbelievable. According	to	the	report	of	the	American	Cancer	Society,	"The	cancer	death	rate
	
has	increased	from	65	persons	per	100,000	in	1900	to	134.8	persons	per	100,000
	
in	1948." Newsweek	magazine	(April	25,	1955)	stated	that	cancer	took	128,000	lives	in
	
1933. In	1953	(just	20	years	later)	the	death	rate	from	cancer	had	increased	to
	
224,000	with	an	estimated	cost	of	$175,000,000	in	hospital	bills	and
	
$12,000,000	yearly	loss	of	productivity	of	the	afflicted. The	recent	1955	report	of	the	American	Cancer	Society,	stating	that	cancer
	
strikes	one	out	of	every	four	persons	in	the	United	States,	means	that	25%	of	the
	
people	are	cancerous. Our	present	population	is	160,000,000. Every	fourth
	
person,	or	25%	of	our	population	amounts	to	6,400,000	people. Is	this	our
	
present	cancer	rate,	as	compared	to	only	224,000	two	years	ago	in	1953? If	these
	
figures	are	right	then	our	cancer	rate	has	increased	from	128,000	in	1933	to
	
6,400,000	in	1955	which	is	an	increase	of	6,272,000	cases	of	cancer	in	the	short
	
span	of	22	years. This	staggering	increase	in	a	preventable	disease	is	a	grave
	
reflection	upon	our	present	system	of	living	with	its	popularized	blood	pollution
	
practices	by	way	of	vaccination	campaigns	and	mass	poisoning	as	a	result	of
	
government	enforced	spraying	of	fruits	and	vegetables	with	deadly	lead	arsenate
	
and	other	poisons. The	power	politics	of	the	drug	and	chemical	companies	have
	
also	influenced	legislation	to	set	aside	vast	sums	of	the	taxpayer’s	money	with
	
which	to	buy	their	poison	chemicals,	such	as	chlorine,	fluorides,	etc.,	for
	
contaminating	the	public	water	supply	and	for	enforcing	tuberculin	testing	of
	
cows. The	people	are	told	that	these	practices	are	beneficial	but	facts	disclaim
	
these	statements. (See	the	chapters	on	DRUGS	vs.	HEALTH	and	THE	CASE
	
AGAINST	TUBERCULIN—Book	II)
	
DOCTOR	FORESEES	A	NATION	OF	INVALIDS
	
Dr.	S.	S.	Goldwater,	New	York	Commissioner	of	Hospitals	pointed	out	in	The
	
Modern	Hospital	Magazine	that	the	present	measures	used	to	check	contagious
	
diseases	may	permit	of	longer	life—but	not	of	stronger	life. As	a	result	of	the
	
drugs,	vaccines	and	other	suppressive	treatments	used	to	check	diseases,	he	says
	
that,	"chronic	diseases	are	growing	at	such	a	rate	that	America	may	become	a
	
nation	of	invalids. Over	half	the	hospital	beds	are	filled	with	chronic	sufferers,
	
both	old	and	young." (from	Health	Practitioner’s	Journal,	June,	1944)	
FAULTY	CANCER	RESEARCH	IMPEDES	PROGRESS
	
There	is	no	argument	against	the	urgent	need	for	the	prevention	and	cure	of
	
cancer. Doctors	as	well	as	laymen	recognize	the	dangers	of	this	advancing
	
menace;	but	there	is	great	confusion	and	conflict	regarding	theories	and	practices
	
used	in	treating	cancer. The	medical	and	non-medical	schools	of	healing	have
	
opposing	views	which	set	up	a	state	of	warfare	between	them	instead	of	the	unity
	
and	cooperation	that	should	prevail	in	order	to	solve	this	critical	problem..	A	few
	
of	the	drugless	doctors	are	using	cancer	treatments	that	are	80%	more	effective
	
in	removing	cancer	than	those	used	and	endorsed	by	the	medical	profession	as	a
	
whole. But	the	monopolistic	domination	of	the	A.M.A. constantly	thwarts	these
	
efforts	toward	improvement	because	they	cannot	collect	the	fees. It	is	no	secret	that	the	newspapers	are	also	muzzled	by	the	A.M.A.,	and	are	not
	
permitted	to	publish	any	health	news,	or	information	or	advertise	any	books
	
about	health	without	the	sanction	of	the	Medical	gestapo	through	their	hirelings
	
in	the	Better	Business	Bureaus. If	health	information	reflects	unfavorably	on	the
	
medical	profession	or	exposes	its	rackets	it	is	immediately	suppressed	no	matter
	
how	factual	and	critical	to	life	it	may	be. The	health	books	in	tax	supported
	
public	libraries	and	schools	are	also	limited	to	the	out-of-date,	erroneous,
	
"slanted"	data	passed	upon	or	written	by	medical	men. THE	MEDICALLY	MADE	IRON	CURTAIN
	
Because	of	this	medically	made	iron	curtain,	the	public	is	shown	only	one	side
	
of	the	cancer	picture	and	is	constantly	being	drilled	on	the	one	theme	endorsed
	
by	the	medical	hierarchy—that	"there	are	only	three	proved	ways—and	only
	
three—to	curb	cancer,
	
1)	X-ray,
2)	radium,
	
3)	and	surgery,	either	singly	or	in	combination..."		—CANCER	FACTS,
	
American	Cancer	Society,	1955
	
If	it	is	true,	as	they	state,	that	the	medical	profession	has	three	proved	ways	to
	
cure	cancer,	why	is	there	such	a	rapid	increase	in	cancer	every	year? Why	do	we
	
see	thousands	of	deaths	occurring	all	the	time,	of	those	who	have	been	treated	by
	
these	"proved"	methods? Also,	why	do	we	have	this	never	ending	fund	raising
	cancer	campaigns	to	support	laboratories	that	are	supposed	to	be	hunting	a	cure
	
for	cancer? If	one	of	these	claims	is	true,	it	cancels	out	the	other;	that	is:	if	they
	
have	a	proved	cure	for	cancer	then	it	proves	that	the	cancer	campaigns	are
	
merely	money	making	schemes	for	the	pleasure	and	profit	of	the	promoters. On	the	other	hand,	if	they	know	that	they	have	no	cure	and	are	deliberately
	
taking	money	(large	sums)	from	their	patients	under	the	false	pretenses	of
	
offering	a	proved	cure	THAT	DOES	NOT	CURE,	but	instead	OFTEN	KILLS
	
THE	PATIENTS,	THEN	THEY	ARE	ENGAGED	IN	FRAUDULENT
	
PRACTICES	and	should	be	dealt	with	accordingly. The	law	is	not	lenient	with
	
fraud	cases,	even	when	they	do	no	bodily	harm. Many	innocent	drugless
	
practitioners	and	writers	of	non-medical	health	books	have	been	barred	from	the
	
mails	on	fraud	charges	merely	because	they	disagreed	with	accepted	medical
	
theories. (See	chapter	on	MEDICAL	INTERFERENCE)
	
90%	DIE	OF	MEDICALLY	TREATED	CANCER
Medical	authorities,	themselves,	have	estimated	that	"over	90%	of	the	medically
	
diagnosed	cases	of	cancer	die	of	it	in	spite	of	frequent	applications	of	both
	
surgery	and	radiation." Dr.	James	Ewing,	one	of	the	"expert	witnesses"	at	a
	
Senate	hearing,	admitted	this	high	death	rate	of	medically	treated	cancer	and
	
further	voiced	the	pessimistic	view	that	he	"did	not	believe	there	is	any
	
reasonable	expectation	of	a	great	discovery	entering	the	cancer	field	in	this	age." This	indicates	that	he	also	believes	that	the	cancer	campaigns	and	laboratories
	
are	merely	in	the	business	for	profit. Although	most	of	the	confessions	of	failure	have	been	made	in	the	privacy	of	the
	
medical	conference	chambers,	a	few	of	them	have	reached	the	public	by	way	of
	
reports	in	medical	journals	and	sometime	through	legal	investigation.
548615196-Eleanor-McBean-Trung-Nguyen-The-Poisoned-Needle-Suppressed-Facts-About-Vaccination-2018-Update.txt
Summarize the following text section accurately and concisely. Maintain specific details and numerical information, and use anti-repetition mechanisms:

        17)	Compulsory	vaccination	has	been	abolished	in	England,	Switzerland,	and
	
certain	other	countries,	while	laws	sustaining	this	crime	still	disgrace	the	statute
	
books	of	many	states	in	free	America. 18)	Vaccination	is	one	of	the	foulest	blots	on	the	escutcheon	of	the	‘noble	art	of
	
healing. ’	”CHAPTER	4
THE	HISTORY	OF	VACCINATION
"A	mere	assumption	of	belief	unsupported	by	demonstrable	facts	is	always
	
open	to	criticism. It	is	easy	to	be	carried	away	by	the	beauty	of	an	ideal	or
	
entranced	by	the	overwhelming	appeal	of	a	pet	delusion. We	hav,	had	much
	
to	learn	but	even	more	to	unlearn. Many	think	they	are	thinking
	
constructively	when	they	are	merely	rearranging	their	prejudices. " —Dr. George	S. Weger,	M. D. WHO	STARTED	VACCINATION	AND	WHY
	
It	has	been	claimed,	by	an	unenlightened	few,	that	vaccination	is	based	on
	
scientific	principles	and	is	of	comparatively	recent	origin. But	these	claims	have
	
been	proved	false,	first,	because	inoculation	was	practiced	and	abandoned	as
	
useless	by	primitive	tribes	many	centuries	ago,	and	second	because	Jenner	and
	
the	modern	experimenters	in	vaccination	were	not	scientists	and	did	not	test	and
	
prove	their	theories	by	any	scientific	criteria	before	launching	the	hazardous
	
practice	on	the	public. For	many	years	Edward	Jenner	was	acclaimed	a	hero	for	what	was	thought	to	be
	
his	discovery	of	cowpox	vaccination. But	this	dubious	honor	was	later	admitted
	
to	belong	to	Benjamin	Jesty,	whom	all	the	chroniclers	name	as	the	one
	
responsible	for	the	original	discovery	of	cowpox	inoculation. Jesty,	a	farmer,
	
Plett,	a	teacher	and	Jensen,	a	farmer,	were	named	as	“successful	experimenters”
	
in	the	field	of	cowpox	vaccination	several	years	before	Jenner’s	first	inoculation. These	and	all	subsequent	vaccination	experiments	were	then,	and	still	are,
	
haphazard	and	unscientific	attempts	at	solving	the	problem	of	disease
	
prevention. Before	we	trace	the	ancient	history	of	vaccination	let	us	review	some	of	the
	
outstanding	authorities	who	recognized	that:
	
VACCINATION	IS	NOT	SCIENTIFIC
	
Many	of	the	world’s	greatest	thinkers,	scientists,	statesmen	and	even	doctors
	have	condemned	vaccination	as	being	a	crime	against	humanity,	a	fraud
	
promoted	for	private	gain,	an	insult	to	the	race	and	a	blot	upon	the	name	of
	
civilization. Yet,	this	treacherous	practice	of	blood	pollution,	which	was	cradled
	
in	the	lap	of	ignorant	savage	tribes,	has	been	adopted	by,	supposedly,	enlightened
	
government	of	the	present	day	and	forced	on	the	protesting	population—for
	
profit. M.
The author strongly criticizes vaccination, stating it is a "monstrosity", "utterly opposed to the whole teaching of medicine", and a "breeder of many kindred fallacies".
What is the author's stance on vaccination?
The author states that it was not Edward Jenner, but rather Benjamin Jesty, a farmer, who is mentioned as the one responsible for the original discovery of cowpox inoculation.
Who is credited with the discovery of cowpox inoculation?
The author argues that vaccination has been a failure, has caused harm, and has led to an increase in the death rate, citing numerous examples and statistics to support their claims.
What is the author's claim about the effects of vaccination?
The author suggests that vaccination is a cause of cancer, citing numerous cases and statistics to support their claim.
What is the author's view on the relationship between vaccination and cancer?
The author quotes several medical authorities, including Dr. Clements, Dr. W. R. Hadwen, Dr. E. C. Rosenow, Dr. J. Swan, Dr. Forbes Laurie, and others, who all express skepticism or outright condemnation of vaccination.
Who is quoted as saying that vaccination has not been a success?