One	of	the
	
voluntary	confessions	was	made	by	Dr.	Raballiati,	who	stated,	"In	the	early	part
	
of	my	career	I	performed	over	500	major	operations	for	cancer	and	growths,	and
	
it	was	the	uniform	lack	of	success	with	the	knife	that	caused	me	to	search	for
	
other	means	of	more	effectively	treating	cancer—though	without	success." At	the	Atlantic	City	Convention	of	the	American	Medical	Association,	when
	
each	cancer	specialist	was	asked	what	was	the	cause	of	cancer,	each	one	in	turn
	
admitted	he	did	not	know. One	of	them	said,	"I	admit	I	know	neither	the	cause
	
nor	the	cure	of	cancer—and	neither	do	you,	not	anyone	else	here." This	statement,	no	doubt,	voices	the	orthodox	medical	view	regarding	cancer. If
	
they	did	know	the	cause	of	this	disease	they	would	not	use	the	three	hazardous
	
treatments	they	claim	are	the	only	"proved	cures". CANCER—NO	MYSTERY
	
Outside	the	medical	field	and	among	the	few	independent	physicians	who	dare
	
to	think	for	themselves,	there	are	to	be	found	those	who	do	know	the	cause	and
	
cure	of	cancer	because	they	understand	the	underlying	cause	of	disease	in
	
general. Only	when	this	is	known	can	the	right	approach	to	prevention	and	cure
	
be	attempted	with	any	certainty	of	success. Dr.	Herbert	M.	Shelton	is	one	of	these	men	with	a	clear	view	as	to	the	cause	and
	
control	of	disease. In	an	article	in	The	Hygienic	Review,	for	April,	1949	he
	
writes:
	
"Cancer	has	no	secret. It	is	but	a	part	of	general	pathology	(disease). It	is	an	end-
point	in	a	chain	of	pathological	sequences	that	need	only	to	be	watched	to	be
	
recognized. There	is	no	specific	cause	of	cancer. It	is	merely	another	and	final
	
link	in	the	pathological	chain	that	began	in	infancy	with	the	first	cold. It	is	a
	
product	of	pathological	evolution:
	
"They	(the	medical	profession)	insist	upon	viewing	cancer	as	some	spontaneous
	
horror	that	suddenly	springs	upon	its	victims	from	out	of	the	void. They	refuse	to
	
recognize	the	office	of	the	general	causes	of	pathology	in	the	production	of
	
cancer. "So	long	as	cancer	"research"	is	only	a	search	for	a	"cancer	secret"	that,	after	all,
	
is	but	a	figment	of	the	imagination,	their	experiments	will	continue	to	be	sterile
	
repetitions	of	experiments	that	have	already	been	performed. "What,	then,	is	the	cause	of	cancer? It	is	an	evolution	out	of	toxemia
	
(poisoning). Toxemia	is	a	chronic	state,	due	to	ones	enervating	(depleting)	mode
	
of	living. Toxemia	produces	the	chronic	local	irritative	conditions	that	form	the
	
site	of	cancer. External	irritations	such	as	tobacco,	mineral	oil,	alcohol,	spices,
	
coal	tar	products,	drugs,	etc.,	may	and	do	add	to	the	cause	in	many	cases,	but	it	is
	
noteworthy	that	only	a	few	of	those	subjected	to	these	irritants	develop	cancer. In
	
the	absence	of	sufficient	tissue	degeneration	from	chronic	toxemia,	the	body
	successfully	resists	these	irritants." J.	Ellis	Barker	has	this	to	say	regarding	the	cause	of	cancer	(This	quotation	is
	
from	his	book	on	cancer,	foreworded	by	Sir	Arbuthnot	Lane,	famous	English
	
Surgeon	and	physician	to	the	Royal	Family	of	England. ):
	
"The	cause	of	cancer	is	twofold:
	
	
1)	chronic	poisoning	and
	
	
2)	vitamin	starvation." (The	required	vitamins	do	not	include	the	manufactured
	
products	by	that	name	many	of	which	are	coal	tar	products	and	injurious	in
	
themselves. The	only	vitamins	worthy	of	the	name	are	to	be	found	in	natural,
	
unprocessed	foods	such	as	vegetables	and	fruits,	nuts	and	grams	Eleanor
	
McBean)
	
	
"The	poison	may	be	introduced	from	without	or	generated	from	within. In	the
	
former	class	are	aniline	and	paraffin	fumes,	deep	burns	of	any	kind—including
	
X-ray	and	radium	burns,	and	arsenical	poisons	(as	in	arsenic	insecticides	sprayed
	
on	fruits	and	vegetables)	whether	breathed	in	through	the	lungs	or	taken	as
	
medicine	into	the	system	through	the	mouth	or	by	subcutaneous	injection." Mr.
	
Barker	quotes	other	authorities	to	show	that	"continued	medical	use	of	arsenic,
	
even	in	extremely	small	doses,	may	lead	to	cancer	after	20	years	or	more,	and
	
even	after	the	discontinuance	of	the	drug." He	referred	to	the	Silesian	miners	in
	
the	cobalt	mines	of	Schineeverg,	"who	developed	a	most	unusual	form	of	cancer,
	
cancer	of	the	lungs,	from	breathing	in	arsenic	after	having	been	employed	in	the
	
mines	for	more	than	20	years." (Medical	Voodoo,	p.	207)
	
Dr.	George	S.	Weger,	a	"reformed"	medical	doctor	who	rose	head	and	shoulders
	
above	his	colleagues,	summed	up	the	cancer	situation,	in	his	"Genesis	and
	
Control	of	Disease. (p.	334). He	wrote:
	
"No	germ	for	cancer	has	yet	been	found,	and,	in	the	author’s	opinion	none	ever
	
will	be	found. Cancer	is	one	disease	that	is	distinctive	of	toxemia,	(poisoning)
	
plus	trauma,	plus	irritation. It	occurs	most	frequently	in	selective	areas	but	may
	
be	found	anywhere	in	the	body. No	infection	of	secondary	nature	is	necessary	to
	
make	this	abnormality	a	cancer	by	conversion	from	something	else. If	a
	
cancerous	mass	breaks	down,	softens,	and	suppurates,	it	is	usually	in	a	late	stage
	
and	signifies	a	serious	breach	in	the	defenses—the	vitality	of	the	individual—and	the	toxemia	then	immediately	takes	on	the	characteristics	of	sepsis	which
	
destroys	the	life	of	the	blood. "Some	specialists	advance	the	theory	that	cancer	activity	is	dependent	upon	a
	
vegetable	parasite,	a	protozoa,	identified	as	Trichomonas. It	is	conceded,
	
however,	that	this	parasite	(if	any)	is	not	capable	of	producing	cancer	without	the
	
accompaniment	of	two	other	important	factors:	first,	proper	soilage	(toxemia);
	
second,	continued	irritation	or	injury." Another	cancer	authority	who	recognized	that	toxemia	or	internal	poisons	cause
	
cancer,	is	Dr.	Robert	Bell,	Vice	President	of	the	International	Society	for	Cancer
	
Research. His	statement	in	The	Medical	Record	for	March,	1922	reads	as
	
follows:
	
	
"Cancer	is	rooted	in	every	drop	of	blood	in	the	body,	and	we	may	as	well	expect
	
to	stop	the	growing	of	apples	by	picking	them	off	the	trees...as	to	expect	to
	
destroy	malignancy	in	the	human	body	by	attacking	the	outward	growth..For
	
depend	on	it,	every	cell	of	the	body	is	affected,	and	has	been	affected	for	a	long
	
period,	prior	to	the	appearance	of	the	local	outcrop...In	my	view,	cancer	is	the
	
outcome	of	prolonged	toxemia,	and	a	vitiated	(polluted)	blood	supply	affecting
	
the	nervous	system	and	the	efficiency	of	the	endocrine	glands,	which	explains
	
the	absence	of	healthy	metabolism	and	the	dire	disturbance	which	we	call
	
cancer." LYMPHATIC	INVOLVEMENT	IN	CANCER
Without	going	into	technical	detail	on	this	subject	it	is,	nevertheless,	important	to
	
show	the	relationship	of	the	lymphatic	glands	to	vaccinal	cancer. The	lymph
	
vessels	form	a	fine	network	that	interpenetrates	the	connective	tissue	and	covers
	
the	entire	body. The	continuity	of	these	lymph	vessels	"is	interrupted	by
	
interposed	nodular	aggregations	of	lymph	tissue	which	are	known	as	lymph
	
glands." —Textbook	of	Anatomy,	Cunningham
	
One	of	the	functions	of	the	lymph	glands	is	to	filter	the	poisons	from	circulation
	
before	they	reach	the	cells. When	an	excess	of	poison	is	generated	in	the	body	or
	
is	introduced	from	the	outside	as	in	vaccination,	the	lymph	glands	become
	
enlarged	in	an	effort	to	collect	and	hold	in	abeyance,	the	accumulation	of	poison. In	the	case	of	blood	poisoning	or	a	bite	of	a	poison	insect	a	lump	usually	forms
	under	the	arm	or	in	the	groin,	to	meet	the	emergency,	but	disappears	again	when
	
the	condition	has	healed. In	the	case	of	the	continued	intake	of	poison	such	as
	
tobacco,	coffee,	drugs,	etc.,	the	glands	most	effected	keep	enlarging	to
	
accommodate	the	inflow	of	poison. A	protective	coating	of	tissue	is	formed
	
around	the	gland	to	protect	the	body	from	collected	poisons. It	is	this	wonderful
	
defense	mechanism	that	the	body	provides	against	the	ignorance	and	willfulness
	
of	the	individual,	that	the	doctors	attack	as	an	enemy. They	call	it	a	wild	growth
	
of	tissue—a	cancer	or	tumor. To	cut	or	burn	(as	with	radium,	X-ray	or	surgery)
	
this	bulwark	of	protection	is	to	add	insult	to	injury	and	allow	the	self-generated
	
poisons	to	flow	unchecked	through	the	body	and	do	serious	damage	to	the	vital
	
organs,	tissues	and	glands. Dr.	J.	Morrison,	former	Professor	of	Chemistry	and	Toxicology	in	the	Medical
	
Department	of	the	National	University	at	Washington,	D.	C.,	had	ample
	
opportunity	to	observe	the	lymphatic	involvement	in	cancer	and	other	diseases
	
during	his	many	years	as	a	specialist	in	nervous	and	chronic	diseases. He	was
	
formerly	a	member	of	the	Medical	Council	and	Examiner	in	the	College	of
	
Physicians	and	Surgeons,	(Ontario,	Canada). Regarding	cancer	he	said:
	
"Cancer	can	only	attack	the	organs	and	tissues	moderately	or	abundantly
	
supplied	by	the	lymphatic	circulation...Therefore,	cancer	is	a	disease	of	the
	
lymphatic	system	"per	Se"	in	the	same	sense	that	tuberculosis	is	regarded	as	a
	
disease	of	the	lungs	or	respiratory	system." Speaking	of	causes	he	had	this	to	say:
	
	
"Two	well-known	causes	of	this	fatal	malady	are,
	
	
1)	nicotine	(tobacco)	poisoning	and
	
	
2)	vaccination,	which	is	certainly	the	most	prolific	cause	of	both	external	and
	
internal	cancer...Vaccine	virus	poisons	the	lymphatic	system,	impairs	its	function
	
and	lays	the	foundation	for	internal	cancer,	for	which	there	has	hitherto	been	no
	
(successful	medical)	treatment	or	relief." In	Ontario,	Canada,	vaccination	is	very,	very	seldom	performed	and	it	is	not	a
	
mere	coincidence	that	cancer	is	exceedingly	rare	there. On	the	other	hand,
	
Massachusetts,	in	the	United	States,	is	one	of	the	nine	backward	states	that	defy
	
the	Constitution	in	forcing	vaccination	upon	school	children	The	cancer	rate	is
	so	high	there,	that	there	have	been	established	more	cancer	hospitals	per
	
population	than	in	other	states	not	under	compulsory	vaccination	laws. However
	
the	multiplying	of	medical	hospitals	has	never	solved	the	cancer	problems
	
because	their	methods	defy	the	laws	of	nature,	ignore	the	cause	and	purpose
	
interfere	with	the	orderly	healing	efforts	of	the	body. As	long	as	continue	to
	
attempt	to	remove	the	cancer	without	of	poison)	so	long	will	they	meet	with
	
failure	or,	at	best,	see	the	temporary	appearance	of	success. Some	of	the	patients
	
may	survive	the	medical	treatments	and	have	no	return	of	the	cancer,	so	far	as
	
outward	symptoms	are	concerned,	and	yet	the	interference	with	the	protective
	
efforts	of	the	lymphatic	system	may	release	the	poisons	into	the	blood	and	cause
	
heart	trouble	or	some	other	chronic	disease. Some	of	the	most	observant	doctors	have	recognized	the	hazards	of	cutting	or
	
tampering	with	a	growth	on	the	body. Dr.	Leo	Loeb,	of	the	University	of
	
Pennsylvania,	sometimes	referred	to	as	"the	father	of	cancer	research	in
	
America",	said	that	he	learned	early	in	his	cancer	practice	that	"merely	drawing	a
	
silken	thread	through	a	benign,	slowly	developing	tumor	would	transform	it	into
	
a	malignant,	rapidly	developing	one,"	and	that	cutting	with	a	knife	had	the	same
	
effect. In	spite	of	this	knowledge	among	the	best	qualified	authorities,	the	cutting	and
	
burning	is	continued	(with	X-ray,	radium	and	surgery)—no	doubt	because	it	is	so
	
profitable. The	latest	cancer	propaganda	urges	the	women	to	do	some	self-
diagnosing	and	hunt	for	lumps	on	the	breasts. These	lumps	are	nothing	but
	
overworked	lymphatic	glands	and	since	most	people	are	toxic	they	will	find
	
some	that	will	feel	tender. The	medical	advice	is	that	they	should	rush	to	the
	
nearest	hospital	and	have	them	operated	on,	but	the	advice	of	common	sense	and
	
sound	reasoning	is	to	leave	them	alone	and	do	some	internal	housecleaning	in
	
the	form	of	fasting	and	proper	diet. DOES	DIET	HAVE	ANY	EFFECT	ON	CANCER? The	American	Cancer	Society,	in	a	circular	entitled	FACTS	AND	FALLACIES
	
ABOUT	CANCER	says:
	
	
"Cancer	is	not	caused	or	cured	by	any	known	diet." Since	most	of	the	statements
	
in	that	leaflet	are	false,	this	one	is	not	to	be	taken	seriously	either. Abundant
	
evidence	to	the	contrary	proves	this	claim	to	be	without	foundation	in	fact. Dr.	Willard	Parker,	who	for	30	years	held	the	chair	of	surgery	at	Columbia
	
University	Medical	School	was	quoted	as	saying:
	
"Luxurious	living,	and	particularly	excess	in	animal	food,	increases	the	waste
	
products	of	the	body,	which	if	retained	in	the	system	have	a	tendency	to	produce
	
abnormal	growths...Cancer	is	to	a	great	degree	one	of	the	final	results	of	a	long
	
continued	course	of	error	in	diet,	and	a	strict	dietetic	regimen	is,	therefore,	a
	
chief	factor	in	the	treatment—preventive	and	curative." Another	authoritative	voice	to	be	heard	on	this	subject	is	that	of	Dr.	Horace
	
Packard	who	in	an	address	to	the	Homeopathic	Surgical	and	Gynecological
	
Society	of	Chicago	in	1915	said:
	
"Some	critical	examination	of	the	habits	of	life	of	civilized,	cancer	plagued
	
people,	in	comparison	with	the	habits	of	primitive,	cancer	free	people,	shows
	
that	the	main	difference	between	them	is	in	a	dietary	poor	in	mineral	salts	among
	
the	cancer	plagued	and	a	dietary	rich	in	mineral	salts	among	the	cancer	free
	
people,	the	most	logical	and	rational	course	is	to	adopt	this	as	a	keynote	to
	
cancer	treatment." Mineral	salt,	needless	to	say,	does	not	mean	common	table	salt	(sodium	chloride)
	
which	is	a	poison	irritant	in	itself,	and	excessive	use	of	which	can	cause	death	in
	
a	few	hours. The	foods	high	in	mineral	salts	are	fresh	vegetables,	fruits,	seeds,
	
nuts,	grains,	sea	plants,	etc. This	partly	accounts	for	the	remarkable	recoveries	of	cancer	patients	who	had
	
been	given	up	as	hopeless	by	the	medical	doctors	but	who	went	on	a	simple	fast
	
followed	by	a	grape	diet	or	carrot	juice	diet	at	home. Many	reports	have	been
	
received	of	recovery	from	cancer	of	the	stomach	after	a	systematic	raw	carrot
	
juice	and	vegetable	diet	but	the	carrot	juice	had	a	negative	effect	on	cancer	of	the
	
liver. Many	cases	of	external	and	internal	cancer	have	been	reported	cured	as	a
	
result	of	a	fast	followed	by	a	30-day	diet	of	fresh	(unsprayed)	grapes. Some	used
	
crushed	grape	leaf	poultices	on	the	external	cancer. Others	have	recovered	on	an
	
extended	fast	including	water	but	no	food	or	juices. One	cancer	patient	did	not
	
respond	to	this	or	any	other	treatment. She	had	been	under	medical	care	and	had
	
received	the	full	course	of	X-ray,	radium	and	surgery,	before	she	decided	to	go	to
	
a	drugless	sanitarium	to	try	the	fasting	and	diet	regimen. Even	fasting	cannot
	
save	the	patient	when	cell	degeneration	has	advanced	to	the	point	where	a	large
	percentage	of	a	vital	organ	has	been	destroyed. However,	even	these	hopeless
	
cases	experience	an	easy	and	more	painless	death	by	fasting,	this	is	far	superior
	
to	morphine	or	other	drugs. HOW	SHALL	WE	LEARN	ABOUT	FASTING? Since	fasting	(the	foundation	of	healing)	is	not	taught	in	the	schools,	not	even
	
medical	schools,	where	healing	should	be	taught,	how	shall	we	learn	the	correct
	
technique	of	this	important	healing	measure. Few	writers	are	sufficiently
	
experienced	in	fasting	to	be	qualified	to	write	on	this	subject,	therefore	there	are
	
only	a	very	few	dependable	books	available	that	should	be	used	as	guides. As
	
wonderful	as	the	fast	is	in	eliminating	pain,	and	disease	it	should	be	preceded	by
	
a	thorough	study	of	the	technique	of	fasting	in	order	to	know	what	to	do	about
	
the	reactions	or	healing	crises	that	occur	from	time	to	time	as	the	accumulation
	
of	toxins	are	brought	into	circulation	to	be	eliminated. These	reactions	may	be	in
	
the	form	of	fainting,	vomiting,	diarrhea,	coughing	or	some	other	violent
	
cleansing	effort. Unless	the	patient	understands	the	situation	he	may	become
	
alarmed	and	call	a	doctor	who	would	give	drugs	to	suppress	the	discharges. All
	
drugs	are	poison	and	poisons	at	this	critical	time	could	cause	death. The	most
	
experienced	fasting	authority	in	this	country	is	Dr.	Herbert	M.	Shelton	who	has
	
fasted	thousands	of	patients	with	almost	miraculous	results. Therefore,	his	book	on	fasting,	(Volume	II,	of	THE	HYGIENIC	SYSTEM)	is	the
	
standard	authority	on	the	subject. THERAPEUTIC	FASTING	by	Arnold	De
	
Vries	is	another	reliable	book. This	author	fasted	45	days	to	test	this	system	after
	
studying	many	of	the	best	books	on	the	subject. There	are	several	other	books
	
that	cover	the	subject	of	the	fast	but	do	not	give	sufficient	data	on	breaking	the
	
fast	and	how	to	follow	it	up. The	right	way	to	end	or	break	the	fast	is	as
	
important	as	the	fast	itself	and	can	be	dangerous	if	the	wrong	foods	are	eaten	at
	
this	time. The	appetite	returns	after	a	complete	fast	and	the	patient	may	be
	
tempted	to	eat	some	of	the	same	foods	he	considered	nourishing	before	the	fast,
	
only	to	learn	that	his	body	chemistry	has	normalized	during	the	fast	and	many
	
wrong	foods	will	react	as	poisons. For	instance,	one	person	broke	the	fast	on	two	chocolate	bars	and	soon	died	as	a
	
result	of	it. Chocolate	contains	a	poisonous	drug	(theobromine)	which	is	almost
	
as	harmful	as	the	drugs	in	coffee. Another	person	broke	the	fast	on	beef	steak
	
and	fried	potatoes	and	also	died	soon	after. No	one	dies	of	a	fast	if	it	is	properly
	
conducted	and	terminated. Most	medical	doctors	think	that	fasting	is	starving	but
	the	average	person,	even	a	sick	person,	can	fast	40	days	before	the	starvation
	
process	even	begins	to	take	place. This	point	is	usually	indicated	by	the	pink,
	
clean	tongue,	which	has	been	gray	and	coated	during	the	fast. This	is	the	cue	to
	
break	the	fast,	as	the	cleansing	is	completed. If	the	fast	is	continued	after	that
	
point	the	body	begins	to	use	some	of	the	tissues	of	lesser	importance	in	the
	
starvation	process. Fasting	is	never	intended	to	extend	into	the	starving	period,
	
therefore	fasting	is	not	starving. WHAT	KILLED	BERNARR	MACFADDEN? The	newspapers	quoted	the	doctors	as	saying	that	Bernarr	MacFadden	died	of	a
	
three-day	fast. They	also	quoted	his	lawyer	as	saying	the	same	thing. The	lawyer,
	
Harry	Gilgulin,	was	shocked	when	he	read	the	statement	he	was	supposed	to
	
have	made. Excerpts	from	a	published	letter	(Hygienic	Review,	Jan	1956)
	
refuting	this	statement	are	as	follows:
	
	
"I	could	never	have	made	such	a	statement	since	I	myself	fasted	some	eight	or
	
nine	times	for	a	total	of	175	days	and	benefitted	enormously	from	each	of	these
	
fasts...	Three	of	my	fasts	were	of	30	days	duration	and	my	wife’s	two	fasts	were
	
of	34	and	30-day	duration...As	a	staunch	supporter	and	enthusiastic	advocate	of
	
hygienic	living	and	an	ardent	believer	in	fasting,	it	must	be	obvious	to	you	that	I
	
could	never	have	made	the	statement	attributed	to	me	by	the	newspapers. "What	I	did	tell	the	reporters	was	that	whenever	Mr.	MacFadden	didn’t	feel	well,
	
he	would	go	on	a	short	fast	of	several	days	duration...He	had	fasted	three	days
	
but	broke	the	fast	improperly	by	one	small	glass	of	fruit	juice	in	the	morning	and
	
a	meat	meal	with	eight	or	more	pals	of	butter	in	the	evening	and	that	the
	
improper	breaking	of	the	fast	is	not	only	dangerous	but	may	lead	to	dire
	
consequences	and	even	death." Mr.	MacFadden	was	taken	to	the	hospital	and	what	they	did	to	him	in	the	way	of
	
shots	and	medicines	was	not	stated,	but	he	died	soon	after	being	taken	to	the
	
hospital. People	do	not	die	of	three	day	fasts,	especially	athletic	men	like
	
MacFadden	who	are	used	to	fasting. I	talked	to	a	man	who	had	just	completed	a
	
21	day	fast	to	restore	his	eyesight. He	had	been	totally	blind	for	9	months. The
	
fast	had	cleansed	his	bloodstream	enough	to	enable	the	opaque	film	over	his
	
eyes	to	dissolve	and	he	was	reading	a	newspaper	when	I	met	him. Soon	after	that
	
I	talked	with	a	man	who	had	just	completed	a	60	day	fast	to	cure	a	persistent
	
case	of	psoriasis. He	was	entirely	healed	after	the	fast	on	water—no	food	or
	juices—and	had	so	improved	in	health	and	strength	that	he	was	helping	the
	
workmen	dig	a	swimming	pool	at	Dr.	Bernard	C.	Jensen’s	health	sanitarium
	
where	he	fasted. Dr.	Shelton,	in	his	Hygienic	SYSTEM,	Vol. 7,	page	613	said:
	
"The	effects	of	fasting	are	certain. There	is	nothing	hit-or-miss	about	the	process. It	works	always	in	the	same	general	direction." This	deviation	into	the	subject	of	fasting	and	diet	may	seem	a	little	off	the
	
subject	in	a	chapter	on	cancer	yet	it	is	of	great	importance	in	that	it	offers	the
	
best	solution	to	the	cancer	problem. In	fact	it	is	the	basis	of	healing	of	all
	
diseases,	with	the	possible	exception	of	those	which	are	products	of	the
	
imagination. Even	in	those	cases	a	fast	would	help	the	mental	and	emotional	re-
adjustment. Since	beginning	this	chapter	on	cancer	my	attention	has	been	called	to	a	severe,
	
seemingly	hopeless	case	of	cancer	of	seven	years	standing. The	woman	has	been
	
a	bed	patient,	unable	to	walk	for	many	years. Recently	she	abandoned	her
	
medical	treatment	and,	as	a	last	resort,	decided	to	try	what	her	doctors	called	a
	
"crackpot	diet." This	simple	diet,	so	frowned	upon	by	medical	men,	is	nothing
	
but	freshly	made	carrot	juice,	one	or	two	quarts	a	day,	a	glass	or	so	every	hour. After	six	days	on	this	carrot	juice	she	had	the	first	peaceful	night’s	sleep,	without
	
pain,	in	seven	years. At	the	end	of	two	weeks	she	could	walk,	with	aid,	to	the	car
	
and	go	for	a	ride. Distressing	reactions	will	no	doubt,	be	experienced	within	four
	
more	weeks	but	she	will	be	prepared	and	understand	what	to	do. She	has	learned
	
that	there	is	hope	of	recovery	from	cancer	and	all	diseases	when	the	simple	laws
	
of	nature	are	understood	and	followed. WHAT’S	WRONG	WITH	EARLY	DIAGNOSIS? The	medical	profession	boasts	of	having	"three	proved	cures	for	cancer"	namely
	
X-ray,	radium	and	surgery,	and	yet	the	cancer	rate	continues	to	mount	year	after
	
year. When	people	ask	the	reason	for	this,	the	doctor’s	favorite	answer	is:
	
	
"The	patients	came	too	late—early	diagnosis	would	have	saved	them." We	might
	
be	able	to	believe	this	argument	if	it	were	not	for	the	fact	that	there	never	was	a
	
time	in	recorded	history	when	there	was	so	much	early	diagnosis	as	right	now	in
	
this	country. This	mass	diagnosis	starts	at	the	tender	age	of	four	and	a	half	years	when	the
	
children	start	to	kindergarten. The	teachers	are	instructed	to	examine	the	children
	
every	day	for	obvious	symptoms	of	disease	and	report	it	to	the	school	nurse. The
	
nurse	examines	them,	herself,	each	week	and	reports	her	findings	to	the	doctors
	
and	the	doctors	and	dentists	come	in	for	their	check	once	or	twice	a	year	to
	
round	up	considerable	business	for	themselves	by	frightening	the	parents	into
	
needless	treatments	and	operations	for	their	children. The	tonsils	are	the	most
	
vulnerable	targets	of	these	"mixed	up"	doctors. Tonsils	are	very	necessary
	
lymphatic	glands	of	filtration	that	enlarge	when	the	body	is	overloaded	with
	
incompatible	foods	and	drugs. Certain	drugless	doctors	claim	and	have	proved
	
that	enlarged	tonsils	are	100%	curable	under	the	right	non-medical	treatment. The	public	is	bombarded	with	cancer	literature	stressing	the	need	for	early
	
diagnosis. The	people	are	even	told	to	do	their	own	diagnosis—hunt	for	lumps
	
on	the	breast,	growths,	moles,	sores,	etc.,	that	could	be	treated	as	cancer. And
	
yet,	the	doctors,	themselves,	don’t	even	know	how	to	detect	cancer	in	many
	
cases. No	wonder	there	is	so	much	confusion,	suffering	and	death	with	so	many
	
blind	leaders	of	the	blind. On	page	8	of	the	Doctor’s	Manual	put	out	by	the
	
American	Cancer	Society	we	read:
	
"It	is	a	well-known	fact	that	a	considerable	number	of	malignant	tumors	are	not
	
recognized	by	the	doctors	themselves	when	the	patients	present	the	early
	
symptoms	of	the	disease. The	early	diagnosis	of	cancer	is	the	one	factor	of
	
greatest	importance	in	the	successful	control	of	the	disease,	but	unfortunately	the
	
early	symptoms	of	cancer	are	not	distinctive,	and	serve	only	to	arouse	suspicion
	
of	the	presence	of	the	disease...In	most	situations,	the	dictum	holds	true	that	the
	
more	certain	the	diagnosis	the	less	the	probability	of	cure." So	here	we	have	the	admission	from	the	medical	cancer	field,	that	they	are	not
	
sure	how	to	detect	cancer	until	it	is	too	advanced	to	be	cured. I	have	had	patients	tell	me	that	when	they	went	to	the	doctor	with	a	painful	lump
	
the	doctor	said	it	had	not	reached	the	cancer	stage	and	they	had	nothing	to
	
prevent	its	developing	into	cancer	but	to	come	back	in	a	few	months	when	it	had
	
turned	to	cancer	and	they	could	use	their	standard	"cures"	radium,	X-ray,	and
	
surgery. During	the	frenzy	of	one	of	the	Cancer	Week	scare	campaigns,	someone	asked
	
the	question,	"Is	there	not	some	danger	in	developing	"cancer	phobia"	in	the
	public	mind	by	this	scare-head	publicity?" Dr.	John	Cerster,	chairman	of	the	New	York	Committee	of	the	Society	for
	
Control	of	Cancer,	replied	that	"it	would	be	a	good	thing	if	it	did;	anything	that
	
would	scare	the	people	into	going	to	a	physician	for	an	examination	would	be
	
beneficial." The	financial	benefit	to	the	doctors	is	apparent	but	the	benefit	to	the	people	is	in
	
reverse	ratio	to	the	amount	of	diagnosis	and	treatment	given. This	is	obvious
	
since	the	cancer	rate	has	quadrupled	within	the	past	ten	years. Dr.	G.	Earl	Thomas	has	charged	that,	"CANCER	IS	THE	MOST	PROFITABLE
	
DISEASE	THAT	THE	MEMBERS	OF	THE	A.M.A. HAVE." One	of	the	noted	American	cancer	authorities,	Dr.	L.	Duncan	Bulkley,	senior
	
surgeon	of	the	New	York	Skin	and	Cancer	Hospital,	denounced	the	popular
	
medical	claim	that	cancer	is	a	"surgical	disease"	when	he	stated:
	
"Cancer	is	not	a	surgical	disease. Neither	surgery	not	X-ray	nor	radium	have
	
changed,	in	anyway	whatever,	the	ultimate	mortality	of	cancer	in	forty	years. It
	
was	90%	in	1884. Now	it	is	92%". For	more	details	on	the	other	side	of	the	cancer	question	see	the	book,	IS
	
CANCER	CURABLE? published	by	Health	Research. CHAPTER	6
SYPHILIS	AND	VACCINATION
“If	syphilis	were	as	infectious	as	most	medical	men	believe	it	to	be,	there
	
would	not	be	an	uninfected	person	in	the	world.”	
—Dr. John	Tilden,	M.D. Dr.	M.	Ricord,	one	of	the	most	noted	authorities	on	syphilitic	affections,	in	a
	
lecture	to	medical	men	in	Paris,	said:
	
"At	first	I	repelled	the	idea	that	syphilis	could	be	transmitted	by	vaccination. The
	
recurrence	of	facts	appearing	more	and	more	confirmatory,	I	accepted	the
	
possibility	of	this	mode	of	transmission. I	should	say,	with	reserve,	and	even
	
with	repugnance;	but	today,	in	the	face	of	all	these	facts	I	hesitate	no	more	to
	
proclaim	their	reality. Who,	pray,	will	run	such	a	risk	to	escape	smallpox?" Dr	Brundenell	Carter,	surgeon	to	St	George	s	Hospital,	London,	observed:
	
	
"I	think	that	a	large	proportion	of	the	cases	of	apparently	inherited	syphilis	are	in
	
reality	vaccinal;	and	that	the	syphilis	in	these	cases	does	not	show	itself	until	the
	
age	of	from	eight	to	ten	years,	by	which	time	the	relation	between	cause
	
(vaccination)	and	effect	(syphilis)	are	lost	sight	of." Dr.	Ballard,	one	of	the	vaccine	inspectors	for	the	English	government	stated:
	
“There	can	be	no	doubt	that	the	vaccine	virus	and	the	syphilitic	virus	may	both
	
be	drawn	at	the	same	time,	upon	the	same	instrument,	from	one	and	the	same
	
vesicle. The	vesicle	which	is	thus	capable	of	furnishing	both	vaccine	and
	
syphilitic	virus	may	present,	prior	to	being	opened,	all	the	normal	and	fully
	
developed	characters	of	the	true	Jennerian	vesicle	as	ordinarily	met	with.”
	
In	his	book	entitled	COMPULSORY	VACCINATION,	from	his	years’	world
	
wide	research,	Dr.	J.	M.	Peebles	(M.D.,	Ph.D.)	gave	an	account	of	seventeen
	
school	girls	who	developed	syphilis	as	a	result	of	vaccination	at	Lebus,	near
	
Frankfort	Yet	the	vaccinator’s	report	stated	that	the	vaccinations	were	from	the
	
regular,	official	calf-lymph	"absolutely	pure,	glycerinated,	sterilized,	all	germs
	
but	the	‘vaccine	sporule’,	destroyed,	hermetically	sealed	until	used." Protesting	the	vaccination	laws	in	various	cities	he	says:
	
"Think	of	it,	fathers	and	mothers,	who	would	bring	your	daughters	up	to	be
	
comely,	chaste	and	pure,	that	your	state	and	municipality	should	place	you	under
	
absolute	compulsion	to	observe	a	rite	to	taint	these	maidens	with	the	disease
	
against	which	civilization	revolts." Nichols	adds,	"At	the	present	time	little	children	are	subject	to	the	assault	(with	a
	
deadly	weapon—the	poisoned	needle),	and	a	healthy,	unvaccinated	child,	in	the
	
eye	of	the	law,	is	considered	a	nuisance	and	as	dangerous	at	time	of	an	epidemic
	
as	a	mad	dog." "Viewed	in	this	light,"	Nichols	continues,	(in	his	BLUNDER	IN	POISONS	p.41)
	
the	blunder,	perhaps	of	greater	gravity	than	that	of	transmission	of	tuberculosis
	
by	vaccination,	again	becomes	the	crime;	vaccination	for	mere	business	interest
	
would	be	(and	is)	a	deliberate	assault	on	the	health	of	a	community,	and	the
	
medical	man	committing	the	assault	might	well	be	termed	‘a	perverter	of
	
common	sense	and	an	enemy	of	the	human	race’	". In	THE	VACCINATION	SUPERSTITION	(35)	Dr.	J.	W.	Hodge	writes:
	
"Think	of	the	unparalleled	absurdity	of	deliberately	infecting	the	organism	of	a
	
healthy	child	with	the	poisonous	matter	obtained	from	the	sores	of	a	sick	animal,
	
under	the	pretense	of	protecting	the	victim	of	the	ingrafted	disease,	against	the
	
contagion	of	another	disease. "So-called	successful	vaccination	is	nothing	less	than	the	implanting	into	the
	
body,	the	virulent	products	of	diseased	animal	tissue,	with	the	effect	of	inducing
	
actual	disease. The	performance	of	such	an	operation,	in	the	very	nature	of	the
	
case,	violates	every	principle	of	modern	aseptic	surgery,	the	legitimate	aim	of
	
which	is	to	remove	from	the	organism	the	products	of	disease	and	never	to
	
introduce	them." Professor	Scott	Tebb,	in	a	treatise	against	compulsory	vaccination	stated:
	
"Once	admitted	that	the	risk	of	contracting	venereal	disease	is	real,	and	one
	
which	no	amount	of	care	can	guard	against	even	if	vaccination	were	a	preventive
	
of	smallpox,	all	ground	for	compulsion	vanishes,	for	it	then	becomes	a	ground
	for	personal	responsibility,	as	in	any	other	operation	or	treatment	involving	risk
	
of	life	and	health. No	surgeon	would	dream	of	administering	chloroform	or
	
performing	the	most	trivial	operation	without	first	gaining	the	patient’s	consent,
	
and	therefore,	no	authority,	whether	medical	or	state,	has	the	right	to	override	the
	
patients	scruples. Compulsory	vaccination	is	now	beginning	to	be	recognized,
	
even	by	medical	men,	as	a	grievous	and	mischievous	mistake,	and	I	have	not	the
	
slightest	doubt	that	the	profession	would	gladly	relinquish	it	tomorrow,	if	their
	
credit	and	prestige	were	not	so	deeply	involved." So	enormous	are	the	profits	from	vaccination	that	many	efforts	are	made	by
	
members	of	the	medical	profession	to	minimize	the	dangers	of	syphilis	caused
	
by	vaccination. One	of	these,	Dr.	Henry	A.	Martain,	of	Boston	wrote	a	paper	denying	the
	
possibility	of	syphilitic	infection	from	this	cause. The	London	Lancet	(Medical
	
Journal)	in	criticizing	this	paper	said:
	
	
"The	notion	that	animal	lymph	would	be	free	from	chances	of	syphlitic
	
contamination	is	so	fallacious	that	we	are	surprised	to	see	Dr.	Martain	reproduce
	
it." Professor	Fournier	said:
	
	
"A	real	and	serious	danger	incurred	in	vaccination	is	that	every	(vaccinated)
	
individual	is	destined	to	undergo,	one	or	several	times	in	his	life	the	danger	of
	
vaccinal	syphilis. For	myself	alone,	I	have	knowledge	of	two	actual	epidemics	of
	
this	disease	(vaccinal	syphilis)". ENCYCLOPEDIA	ON	VACCINAL	SYPHILIS
	
In	the	Encyclopedia	Britannica	(9th	edition)	under	the	heading	"Smallpox—
Cowpox,"	Dr.	Charles	Creighton	says:
	
"The	real	affinity	of	cowpox	is	not	to	smallpox,	but	to	the	great	pox	(syphilis). The	vaccinal	roseola	is	not	only	very	like	the	syphilitic	roseola,	but	it	means	the
	
same	sort	of	thing. The	vaccinal	ulcer	of	everyday	practice	is,	to	all	intents	and
	
purposes,	a	chancre	(syphilitic	ulcer)." "The	photographs,	Fig. 1	and	2	show	the	marked	similarity	between	the
	smallpox	vaccination	roseola	and	the	syphilis	ulcer.”
	
	
In	his	voluminous	work	on	vaccination	Crookshank	tells	us	that	"Auzias
	
Turenne,	of	France,	was	the	first	to	point	out	that	cowpox	is	analogous	to
	
syphilis;	but	even	the	earliest	opponents	of	vaccination	regarded	the	disease	as
	
"lues	bovilla",	(syphilis)	and	it	had	even	been	suggested	that	the	cow	had	derived
	
the	complaint	from	milkers	who	were	affected	with	syphilis. However,	there	is
	
no	more	ground	for	believing	in	the	latter	theory	than	there	is	for	believing	that
	
cowpox	is	produced	by	milkers	suffering	from	smallpox. It	is	the	course	which	the	malady	runs	which	brings	it	so	closely	into	relations
	
with	syphilis...There	appears	to	be	very	little	doubt	that	syphilis	may	be
	
transmitted	by	vaccination;	but	many	cases	which	are	attributed	to	syphilis	are
	
unquestionably	the	full	effects	of	cowpox	virus;	and	nothing	could	more	clearly
	
point	to	the	analogy	between	the	two	diseases	than	the	difficulty	in	diagnosing
	
the	exact	nature	of	vaccinal	accidents	(diseases)". "Again,	if	we	study	the	effects	of	syphilis	artificially	inoculated	on	the	human
	
subject,	the	appearance	in	some	cases	are	strikingly	similar	to	inoculated	horse-
pox. Without	entering	into	a	prolonged	discussion	of	this	subject,	I	will	refer,	as
	
an	example,	to	the	progress	in	Dr.	Ricord’s	cases	of	syphilization. As	in
	
inoculated	horse-pox	we	have	the	stages	of	papule,	vesicle,	ulcer,	scab	and	scar;
	
and	no	one	can	compare	his	plates	with	Jenner’s	without	being	struck	with	the
	
similarity	in	their	appearances. (See	Fig. 2	and	3)
	
Fig. 3
	
"The	results	of	the	artificial	inoculation	of	syphilis	were	unknown	to	Jenner,	but
	
if	they	had	been	he	would	scarcely	have	failed	to	have	observed	the	likeness
	
between	them. So	striking	indeed	are	the	appearances,	that	it	is	possible	that. by
	
judicious	selection,	a	strain	of	syphilitic	lymph	might	be	cultivated	which	would
	
produce	in	time,	all	the	physical	characteristics	of	the	‘vaccine’	vesicle." MORE	EVIDENCE
	
In	THE	VACCINATION	SUPERSTITION	by	J.	W.	Hodge,	MD,	we	read:
	
"To	the	scientific	physician,	conclusive	evidence	of	the	real	affinity	of	cowpox	is
	
furnished	at	a	glance,	by	the	pathological	diagnostic	table	of	M.	R.	Leverson,
	M.D.,	Ph.D.,	which	was	read	before	the	American	Association	of	Physicians	and
	
Surgeons	at	Indianapolis,	(Jan.	1896)	and	has	been	unquestioned	by	the
	
profession. "The	table	which	I	now	present	to	you,	is	a	condensed	statement	in	paralleled
	
columns,	of	the	primary	and	secondary	symptoms	of	smallpox,	cowpox	and
	
syphilis,	from	the	separate	descriptions	of	the	most	renowned	authorities	upon
	
these	several	diseases. It	shows	an	almost	complete	likeness	between	the	two
	
latter	and	the	total	unlikeness	of	each	to	(natural,	un-induced)	smallpox. Here	we
	
have	some	of	the	highest	authorities	who	have	produced	the	clearest	evidence
	
showing	that	vaccinia	(vaccination	disease)	is	modified	syphilis. The	chronic
	
and	protean	manifestations	which,	at	times,	follow	vaccination	must	have
	
impressed	us	all	with	their	close	analogy	to	syphilitic	lesions." COMPARISON	OF	SMALLPOX,	COWPOX	AND	SYPHILIS
	
SMALLPOX
	
1)	Eruption	general,	superficial. 2)	Constitutional	or	general	symptoms	precede	the	eruption	and	are	relieved	on
	
appearance. 3)	Eruption	first	felt	as	a	No. 8	bird	shot	beneath	the	skin,	it	then	appears	as	a
	
papule;	then	a	vesicle,	becoming	pustular	about	the	5th	or	6th	day,	is	from	one	to
	
three	lines	in	length;	but	the	pustules	are	of	various	kinds,	irregular,	elevated,
	
generally	perforated	by	a	hair,	induration,	if	any,	very	slight,	no	tendency	to
	
gnawing	ulceration	of	the	skin. 4)	The	fluid	is	contained	in	two	chambers—a	superficial	and	a	deep,	which
	
communicate	around	the	edges	of	the	separating	membrane. 5)	The	smallpox	pustules	leave	no	scar	if	properly	treated. 6	)	The	smallpox	eruption	does	not	affect	the	lymphatic	system. 7)	Infectious. 8	)	Inoculable. 9)	The	smallpox	epidemic	seems	to	be	taking	its	rise	in	filthy	locations. (also,
	
when	the	body	is	contaminated	with	vaccines,	drugs	and	incompatible	foods	and
	
impure	water,	etc.) COWPOX	(vaccination)	Primary	Lesion
	
1)	Eruption	local,	deep,	in	corium	of	skin	or	subcutaneous	tissue	or	in	mucous
	
membrane. 2)	Constitutional	symptoms	do	not	precede	but	follow	the	eruption	in	all	cases. 3)	Pustule	(chancre)	always	the	same,	first	a	papule,	then	a	vesicle,	becoming
	
pustular	about	the	8th	day,	7	to	10	lines	in	diameter,	round,	centrally	depressed,
	
margin	indurated	and	not	perforated	by	a	hair,	has	a	cellular	membrane	at	floor,
	
tendency	to	gnawing	ulceration. 4)	The	fluid	is	contained	in	a	single	chamber,	reticulated,	is	non-volatile,	and	the
	
infection	is	communicated	only	by	immediate	contact	with	an	abraded	surface. 5)	The	cowpox	leaves	a	foveated	scar. 6)	The	cowpox	poison	permeates	the	lymphatic	channels	and	ganglia,	causing
	
inflammation,	buboes,	and	abscesses. 7)	Not	infectious. 8)	Inoculable. 9)	Cowpox	is	independent	of	time	and	place;	communicated	only	by	direct
	
inoculation. SYPHILIS	or	Greatpox
	
1)	Eruption	local,	deep,	in	the	corium	of	skin	or	subcutaneous	tissue,	or	in	the
	
mucous	membrane. 2)	Constitutional	symptoms	do	not	precede	but	follow	the	eruption	in	all	cases. 3)	Pustule	always	the	same,	first	a	papule	rapidly	becoming	pustular	without
	
perceptibly	passing	through	a	vesicular	stage,	7	to	10	lines	in	diameter,	scooped
	
out,	deep	funnel-shaped	with	sloping	often	elevated,	.not	perforated	by	a	hair,
	
has	a	fungoid	membrane	at	floor,	tendency	to	a	gnawing	ulceration. 4)	Absolutely	the	same	as	the	cowpox. 5)	Similar	to	the	scar	of	cowpox. 6)	Absolutely	the	same	as	the	cowpox. 7)	Not	infectious. 8)	Inoculable. 9)	Absolutely	the	same	as	cowpox. "The	smallpox	patient,	upon	recovery,	is	free	from	the	disease	even	if	he	is
	
marked	by	scars. Smallpox	will	not	beget	cowpox	or	syphilis. "On	the	contrary,	there	are	various	subsequent	manifestations	in	vaccination,	or
	
cowpox,	which	are	remarkably	like	those	that	appear	in	what	are	known	as
	
secondary	and	tertiary	periods	of	syphilis. "We	have	tabulated	in	parallel	columns	some	of	the	many	manifestations	that
	
appear	in	both	these	diseases,	and	a	glance	will	reveal	their	striking	similarity." MANIFESTATIONS	OF	AFTER-EFFECTS	OF
COWPOX	(VACCINA)
SYPHILIS
Phagedenic	sores
same
Nodes	in	the	head
same
Ophthalmia
same
Dentition	delayed	in	children,	with	production	of	the	so-
called	syphilitic	teeth
same
Eczema	of	all	kinds
same
Herpes
same
Ready	fracture	and	difficult	healing	of	bones,	also	probably
	canes	in	some	cases
Caries	of	bone	(cavities)
Insanity,	probably
same
Scrofula
same
Mucous	patches	on	tonsils,	tongue	and	lips	tending	to
	
ulceration. same
Bronchitis
same
Tuberculosis	(arrest	of	development)
same
	
WHY	VACCINATION	CANNOT	IMMUNIZE	AGAINST	SMALLPOX
	
Smallpox,	to	a	large	extent,	went	out	when	improved	sanitation	came	in,	except
	
in	countries	where	vaccination	is	compulsory. There	the	smallpox	epidemics
	
continue	to	ravage	the	population	at	frequent	intervals. Un-refutable,	scientific	evidence	proves	that	smallpox	and	cowpox	are	not	the
	
same	disease,	therefore,	cowpox	vaccination	cannot	introduce	antibodies	into	the
	
system	that	fight	smallpox,	as	is	claimed	by	the	medical	doctors. As	stated	before,	smallpox,	(as	well	as	disease	in	general,)	is	an	enforced
	
cleansing	effort	of	the	body. If	the	patients	get	eruptive	diseases,	like	smallpox,
	
after	vaccination	it	merely	indicates	that	they	have	internal	vitality	enough	to
	
throw	off	some	of	the	excess	poison	in	this	violent	way. Usually,	however,	the
	
vaccine	poison	so	lowers	the	resistance	of	the	body	that	it	cannot	rally	enough
	
reserves	for	a	defensive	action	in	the	form	of	an	eruptive	disease. Therefore,	the
	
poisons	are	retained	where	they	corrode	and	destroy	the	tissues	of	the	heart,
	
kidneys,	lungs	and	other	vital	organs. This	suppression	of	symptoms	and
	
masking	of	one	disease	with	another—this	delayed	reaction	in	disease	causation
—is	what	the	medical	profession	calls	the	conquering	of	disease	by	antibiotics. Dr.	Chauven,	in	an	address	before	the	French	Academy	of	medicine,	October,
	
1891,	reviewed	the	results	of	his	years	of	detailed	and	carefully	tested
	
experiments. In	the	face	of	undeniable	facts	he	was	forced	to	the	conclusion	that:
	
1)	"Vaccine	virus	never	gives	smallpox	to	anyone." (Although	it	produces	many
	
diseases,	some	of	which	resemble	smallpox	and	are	diagnosed	as	smallpox	and
	
are	more	damaging	than	smallpox.) 2)	"Vaccinia	(disease	produced	by	vaccination)	is	not	even	attenuated	smallpox. "Vaccinia	is,	in	all	probability,	a	modified	form	of	syphilis,	as	has	been	clearly
	
pointed	out	by	Doctors	Charles	Creighton	and	E.	M.	Crookshank,	Professor	of
	
Pathology	and	Bacteriology	in	King’s	College,	London,	two	of	the	highest
	
authorities	on	these	subjects." CHAPTER	7
OTHER	DISEASES	CAUSED	BY
	
VACCINATION
"Are	we	the	issue	of	an	inferior	stock,	or	are	we	inferior	representatives	of
	
men	who	were	physically	and	culturally	our	superiors?" —From	Genesis	and
	
Control	of	Disease,	Weger
	
Even	now,	in	what	is	sometimes	called	the	enlightened	age,	we	still	hear	some
	
people,	(not	so	enlightened)	claim	or	repeat	what	they	have	been	taught	to	say,
	
that	"vaccination	has	reduced	smallpox	and	certain	other	diseases,	and	has	been
	
a	blessing	to	mankind." Those	who	make	this	claim	have	not	bothered	to	consult
	
authentic	records	or	become	acquainted	with	the	most	elementary	facts	on	the
	
subject. When	traced	down,	these	statements	are	found	to	originate	from	the	fabricated
	
propaganda	of	those	who	profit	from	the	sale	of	serums	and	drugs. Unfortunately
	
many	of	these	people	are	in	places	of	authority	where	they	influence	the	thinking
	
of	students,	writers,	public	officials,	teachers	and	others	who	mold	the	thinking
	
of	the	masses. These	errors	in	theory	and	practice	have	steadily	reduced	our
	
nations	health	to	a	state	of	crisis	in	which	90%	of	the	people	are	either	critically
	
ill	or	below	par,	physically	or	mentally. In	addition	to	the	vaccination	diseases	treated	separately	in	other	chapters,	there
	
are	a	number	of	other	serious	diseases	that	have	been	traced	directly	to
	
vaccination. Some	of	the	most	noticeably	persistent	of	these	will	be	treated	in
	
this	chapter. GOVERNMENT	REPORTS	REVEAL	MORE	DEATHS	FROM
	
VACCINATION	THAN	FROM	SMALLPOX
	
Dr.	D.	Killick	Millard,	Medical	Officer	of	Health,	(Leicester,	England)	in
	
reporting	on	this	subject	stated	(in	his	book	THE	VACCINATION	QUESTION):
	
"It	cannot	be	denied	that	vaccination	causes,	in	the	aggregate,	very	considerable
	injury	to	health,	most	of	it	only	temporary	but	some	permanent. It	is	true	that	the
	
deaths	certified	as	due	to	vaccination...have	several	times	outnumbered	those
	
from	smallpox,	while	if	we	have	regard	for	the	amount	of	ill-health	caused	by
	
the	two	diseases...it	looks	as	if	vaccinia	were	becoming,	so	far	as	the	community
	
is	concerned,	the	more	serious	disease	of	the	two." 30,438	SOLDIERS	WERE	STRICKEN	BY	VACCINATION	DISEASE
	
The	Report	of	the	Surgeon	General	of	the	Army,	(1919)	vol. I,	page	37,	gives	the
	
number	of	admissions	to	hospitals	during	the	year	1918,	on	account	of	vaccinia
	
(vaccination	disease)	as	10,830. The	Report	of	the	Surgeon	General	of	the	Army,	(1918)	gives	me	the	number	of
	
admissions	to	hospitals	during	the	year	1917,	on	account	of	vaccinia	and
	
vaccinal-typhoid	combined	as	19,608. Here	we	find	that	in	only	two	years	of	the	war	and	in	only	one	army	there	were
	
over	30,000	soldiers	hospitalized	by	vaccination. This	does	not	take	into
	
consideration	the	thousands	who	were	seriously	ill	but	not	critical	enough	to	be
	
hospitalized,	nor	the	cases	of	chronic	disease	that	developed	later	as	a	result	of
	
the	cumulative	effects	of	poisons	from	vaccines	and	drugs. Herbert	Spencer,	in	his	"History	of	Epidemics	in	Great	Britain"	voiced	the
	
sentiments	of	the	best	authorities	when	he	said:
	
"Vaccination,	in	subduing	one	disease	only	increases	others." Charles	M.	Higgins	made	an	extensive	and	thorough	worldwide	investigation
	
and	study	of	the	vaccination	question	and	reported	most	of	the	pertinent	data	in
	
his	book	"The	Horrors	of	Vaccination	Exposed." In	his	effort	to	bring	the
	
dangers	of	vaccination	to	the	attention	of	the	people	he,	for	several	years,	carried
	
a	paid	advertisement	in	one	of	the	large	New	York	dailies,	challenging	the	New
	
York	City	and	State	Health	Departments	to	open	their	books,	and	he	"would
	
undertake	to	prove	from	their	own	records	that	THERE	HAD	BEEN	MORE
	
DEATHS	FROM	VACCINATION	THAN	FROM	SMALLPOX	IN	NEW
	
YORK,	EVERY	YEAR	FOR	THE	PAST	15	YEARS." His	challenge	was	never	accepted. The	facts	were	not	reported	to	the	people	and
	
the	killing	of	innocent	children	has	continued	without	interruption,	down
	through	the	years. DEFECTIVE	TEETH	AND	EYESIGHT	TRACED	TO	VACCINATION
	
In	his	book,	"Vaccination	a	Disastrous	Delusion"	(p.	13)	Ernest	McCormick,
	
discussed	the	findings	of	the	researcher,	Sir	James	Paget	as	follows:
	
"In	the	same	cause	he	finds	a	probable	explanation	for	the	defective	eyesight	and
	
dentition	which	have	become	so	prevalent,	giving	examples	to	show	that,	owing
	
to	the	teeth	and	sense	organs	arising	out	of	the	dermal	layer	in	the	embryo,	skin
	
diseases,	of	which	vaccination	is	one,	are	likely	to	produce	abnormalities	in	all
	
of	these. According	to	the	LANCET	(British	Medical	Journal	1904)	85%	of
	
school	children	have	defective	teeth	and	3,000	servicemen	(all	vaccinated)	were
	
returned	from	South	Africa,	from	that	cause	alone,	while	the	Navy	is	still	worse
	
in	that	respect. Sir	William	Osler	(M.D. ),	in	his	PRINCIPLES	AND	PRACTICE	OF
	
MEDICINE,	in	discussing	the	various	characteristics	of	vaccinia	says:
	
"About	the	end	of	the	first	week:	Generalized	vaccina;	impetigo;	vaccinal
	
ulceration;	glandular	abscess;	septic	infections;	gangrene." Dr.	Osler	is	one	of	the	most	completely	accepted	and	respected	authorities	on
	
medicine	in	the	world. He	was	Regius	Professor	of	Medicine	at	Oxford
	
University	and	Fellow	of	the	Royal	College	of	Physicians	(London),	and
	
Honorary	Professor	of	Medicine	at	Johns	Hopkins	University,	(U.S.). He	knew
	
the	financial	importance	of	vaccination	(to	the	medical	profession)	and	he	knew
	
the	professional	hazards	of	making	any	unfavorable	statements	about
	
vaccination,	yet	he	publicly	admitted	that	some	of	the	most	loathsome	and
	
painful	diseases	including	leprosy	and	syphilis	were	caused	by	vaccination. Ricardo	Corfield,	of	Lowell	Ave.,	Providence,	Rhode	Island,	was	vaccinated	at
	
the	age	of	5	years	and	4	months	in	order	to	secure	admission	to	school. His	arm
	
swelled	and	the	ulcer	enlarged	until	pieces	of	decayed	flesh	dropped	off	leaving
	
the	bone	exposed. On	September	5th	the	tendons	under	the	right	knee	became	so
	
enlarged	and	painful	that	the	child	cried	out	in	agony. An	incision	was	made	and
	
more	than	a	quart	of	putrid,	brown	matter	exuded. The	shin	bone	rotted	off." (from	"Victims	of	State	Poisoning",	published	by	Liberator	Pub. Co.,
	
Minneapolis,	Minn.)	
FOOT	AND	MOUTH	DISEASE	CAUSED	BY	VACCINATION
	
"The	Department	of	Agriculture,	in	its	efforts	to	suppress	the	foot-and-mouth
	
disease	traced	the	disease	to	the	vaccine	virus	imported	into	the	United	States	by
	
our	manufacturing	chemists	and	sold	to	our	people. The	investigation	revealed
	
that	the	virus,	used	upon	calves	in	the	District	of	Columbia,	communicated	the
	
foot-and-mouth	disease	to	them." (From	the	Declaration	by	the	late	Senator
	
Dolliver,	of	Iowa,	in	an	address	to	the	United	States	Senate,	February	25,	1909.) From	the	FARMER’S	BULLETIN,	(page	15)	April	22,	1915,	published	by	the
	
U.S.	Department	of	Agriculture,	we	have	the	following	statement:
	
"The	foot-and-mouth	disease	is	primarily	a	disease	of	cattle;	secondarily	and
	
casually,	a	disease	of	man...It	is	probable	that	the	infection	may	be
	
communicated	to	man	if	the	virus	directly	enters	the	blood	through	wounds	of
	
any	kind	(including	vaccination)... The	symptoms	in	man	resemble	those
	
observed	in	animals." WHAT	OTHER	AUTHORITIES	SAY	ABOUT	VACCINATION	AND
	
DISEASE
	
Dr.	William	Hitchman,	Consulting	Surgeon	to	the	Cancer	Hospital	of	Leeds	and
	
formerly	public	vaccinator	to	the	City	of	Liverpool,	expressly	stated	that,
	
‘Syphilis,	abdominal	phthisis,	scrofula,	cancer,	erysipelas,	and	almost	all
	
diseases	of	the	skin,	have	been	either	conveyed,	or	intensified	by	vaccination." Dr.	Peebles,	(world	renowned	researcher	and	authority	on	vaccination)	stated	in
	
his	book	on	Compulsory	Vaccination:
	
"We	shall	never	stamp	out	smallpox,	cancer,	consumption,	or	leprosy,	so	long	as
	
we	continue	to	STAMP	THEM	IN	through	the	idiotic	and	vicious	practice	of
	
vaccination. The	Germans	endeavored	to	stamp	out	syphilis	by	stamping	it	in
	
with	syphilized	vaccine. They	have	abandoned	that	practice	now	and	in	time
	
they	will	abandon	vaccination	altogether." In	the	Encyclopedia	Britannica	(9th	edition),	under	the	title	of	VACCINATION,
	
by	Dr.	Charles	Creighton,	we	find	some	carefully	authenticated	statistics
	
showing	that	vaccination	has	caused	a	great	many	cases	of	syphilis,	cancer,
	tumors,	scrofula,	eczema,	tuberculosis,	etc. In	his	VACCINE	AND	SERUM	EVILS	(page	6)	Dr.	Herbert	M.	Shelton
	
discusses	some	of	the	complications	that	often	accompany	or	follow	vaccination. He	writes:
	
"Abscess,	sloughing,	cellulitis,	erysipelas,	syphilis,	leprosy,	tuberculosis,
	
tetanus(lock	jaw),	actinomycosis	(big	jaw),	general	septic	infection,	urticarial
	
eruptions,	‘paralysis,	meningitis,	sleeping	sickness,	etc.,	may	follow
	
vaccination...In	some	instances	the	abcess	that	may	form,	refuses	to	heal. I	saw
	
one	case	of	this	kind	where	the	abscess	continued	to	discharge	pus	after	14
	
years." From	the	high	ranking	medical	authority	Dr.	William	Osler	we	have	this
	
concession:
	
"Syphilis	has	undoubtedly	been	transmitted	by	vaccination." Under	the	topic	heading,	INFLUENCE	OF	VACCINATION	UPON	OTHER
	
DISEASES,	Dr.	Osler	says:
	
"A	quiescent	malady	may	be	lighted	into	activity	by	vaccination. This	happens
	
with	congenital	syphilis	and	occasionally	with	tuberculosis...At	the	height	of	the
	
vaccination,	convulsions	may	occur	and	be	followed	by	hemiplegia	(paralysis	of
	
one	side	of	the	body)." Our	recent	"vaccination"	wars	have	presented	a	dismal	picture	of	paralysis
	
among	the	soldiers	with	large	hospital	wards	filled	with	paraplegics	(paralysis	of
	
both	sides)	and	hemiplegics	(paralysis	of	one	side.) Thus	we	see	that	the	doctors
	
know	and	the	government	knows	what	vaccination	is	doing	to	our	service	men
	
and	civilians. Why	have	they	turned	their	"blind	side"	to	it	and	allowed	it	to
	
continue? VACCINATION	INCREASES	COMMON	DISEASES	SUCH	AS	MEASLES
	
INFLUENZA,	CHICKENPOX,	MUMPS,	SCARLET	FEVER,	ETC. Not	only	do	vaccine	poisons	cause	some	of	the	strange	and	terrible	diseases	that
	
baffle	the	doctors,	but	these	same	poisons	also	increase	the	incidence	of	the
	
common	"zymotic"	diseases	such	as	measles,	chickenpox,	mumps,	scarlet	fever,
	etc.,	which	are	usually	referred	to	as	"contagious	diseases." These	diseases	are
	
not	contagious	but	are	merely	cleansing	measures	of	the	body	in	its	effort	to
	
eliminate	some	of	the	excess	poison	and	waste	matter. CITY	SURVEY	BEFORE	AND	AFTER	VACCINATION	SHOWS	INCREASE
	
IN	DISEASE
	
Wherever	an	honest	survey	is	made	after	a	vaccination	campaign	it	is	noticed
	
that	there	is	always	a	marked	increase	in	disease. Thomas	Morgan,	in	his
	
"Medical	Delusions"	reports	a	survey	that	was	made	of	the	city	of	Youngstown,
	
Ohio,	after	a	general	vaccination	order	of	school	children. "It	was	found	that
	
nearly	all	the	cases	of	scarlet	fever,	measles	and	diphtheria	had	been	recently
	
vaccinated. What	is	true	of	this	city	is	true	everywhere,	and	any	close	observer	can	satisfy
	
himself	in	this	direction." After	reading	this	I	decided	to	"satisfy	myself	in	this	direction"	as	suggested;	so	I
	
obtained	a	LOS	ANGELES	COUNTY	HEALTH	INDEX,	which	gives	the
	
weekly	record	of	diseases	for	the	entire	year	(this	was	1954). I	was	amazed	to	find	that	the	common	diseases	mentioned	by	Morgan,	more	than
	
doubled	after	the	annual	June	vaccination	campaign. The	figures	are	given	below
	
and	will	speak	for	themselves. DISEASES	(Annually	to	date)
APRIL	3,	1954
Before	vaccinations
JULY	10,	1954
After	vaccination	campaign
Chickenpox
6,684
13,515
Measles	(also	German)
4,056
13,912
Mumps
2,182
5,196
Scarlet	fever
1,256
2,295
Syphilis
828
1,631
Total	of	the	48	diseases	recorded
19,997
47,070
	
FALSIFIED	SMALLPOX	REPORTS
	
In	numerous	reports	we	find	incontestable	proof	from	government	records	and
	
hospital	data,	etc.,	that	smallpox	increased	in	the	countries	having	compulsory
	vaccination. It	is	only	natural	that	it	should	do	so	because	the	admitted	purpose
	
of	vaccination	is	to	engraft	a	mild	form	of	smallpox	into	the	patient. Because
	
there	is	no	test	and	no	control	that	can	assure	a	mild	case,	we	find	that	the
	
induced	disease	is	often	more	severe	than	natural	smallpox,	and	frequently
	
terminates	in	death. In	disregard	to	the	known	facts	and	the	statements	of	the	world’s	greatest
	
medical	authorities	on	the	subject,	the	Los	Angeles	(city	and	county)	health
	
departments	claim	that	their	annual	vaccination	campaigns	have	absolutely
	
wiped	out	smallpox	in	the	county. In	this	large	population	of	4,000,000	people
	
(Los	Angeles	county)	with	its	thousands	of	people	infected	with	disease	in	each
	
vaccination	drive,	and	the	increase	of	all	other	diseases	after	each	of	these	blood
	
5	poisoning	sprees,	the	record	department	omits	from	the	records	all	the
	
smallpox	cases	and	issues	the	report	that	"there	has	not	been	one	case	of
	
smallpox	in	the	county	for	the	past	ten	years." In	the	complete	record	of	48
	
diseases	reported,	smallpox	was	the	only	one	on	the	list	that	showed	no	report	of
	
cases. When	a	"coverup"	job	is	overdone	it	makes	people	suspicious	so	I	went	to	the
	
County	Hospital	to	check	more	closely. They	willingly	gave	me	the	information
	
I	asked	for	on	all	other	diseases	except	smallpox. The	record	department	flatly
	
refused	to	let	me	see	those	records	or	even	know	if	these	were	any	cases	at	that
	
time	in	the	hospital. Disgusted,	but	not	discouraged,	I	walked	across	the	grounds	toward	the
	
contagion	ward	and	met	a	nurse	coming	from	there. I	walked	with	her	and
	
chatted	a	bit	then	asked	her	if	there	were	any	cases	of	smallpox	in	her
	
department. She	said,	"Yes.”
	
I	asked	how	many	there	were	and	she	said,	"I	haven’t	any	idea." I	said,	"I	take	it	from	that,	that	there	are	more	than	a	half	a	dozen?" She	said,	"Oh,	yes—I	haven’t	been	assigned	the	job	of	counting	them	so	I	really
	
don’t	know." I	said,	"Are	you	sure	they	are	smallpox	and	not	just	chickenpox." She	said,	"They’re	smallpox. We	keep	them	separate	from	the	chickenpox." I	rushed	back	to	the	record	department	and	told	them	what	I	had	learned	and
	
demanded	to	see	the	records	that	should	be	public	property	in	a	tax	supported
	
public	institution. The	girl	looked	worried	and	went	into	the	inner	office	and
	
called	someone	on	the	phone. When	she	came	back	she	said	that	the	smallpox
	
report	was	not	available	as	it	was	being	worked	on. So	there	we	have	the	answer. Whenever	we	see	a	statement	about	smallpox	being	wiped	out	by	vaccination,
	
we	can	be	quite	sure	that	the	cases	have	been	concealed	in	the	"closed"
	
contagion	ward	and	the	records	have	been	worked	on. Other	investigations	have
	
shown	that	in	this	official	scrambling	of	figures,	the	mild	cases	of	smallpox	are
	
placed	on	the	list	of	such	diseases	as	chickenpox	and	measles,	while	the	serious
	
cases	are	recorded	as	syphilis,	scrofula	or	something	else. George	Bernard	Shaw	said,	"During	the	last	considerable	epidemic	at	the	turn	of
	
the	century,	I	was	a	member	of	the	Health	Committee	of	London	Borough
	
Council,	and	I	learned	how	the	credit	of	vaccination	is	kept	up	statistically	by
	
diagnosing	all	the	revaccinated	cases	(of	smallpox)	as	pustular	eczema,	varioloid
	
or	what	not—except	smallpox." POST	WAR	GERMANY	REVEALS	TRUTH	ABOUT
	
VACCINATION
	
In	the	American	Sector	of	Occupied	Germany,	when	the	American	medico-drug
	
combine	moved	in	for	a	sweeping	vaccination	campaign,	the	Germans	begged	to
	
be	spared,	on	the	ground	that	they	no	longer	had	the	hospitals,	help,	medicines	or
	
equipment	that	would	be	required	to	take	care	of	the	outbreak	of	disease	that
	
would	and	had	always	followed	vaccination	campaigns. Germany	had	been
	
under	compulsory	vaccination	in	previous	years	and	her	doctors	had	made	lush
	
profits	from	the	crop	of	diseases	induced	by	each	vaccination	drive. When	it	was
	
seen	that	the	profits	were	to	be	made	by	the	foreign	invaders	(America),	they
	
admitted	the	uselessness	of	the	practice,	as	well	as	the	physical	and	financial
	
disadvantages	to	their	people. WHAT	DOES	VACCINATION	DO	TO	THE	BODY? "Citing	an	admission	by	Sir	James	Paget	that	vaccination	probably	effects	a
	
permanent	change	in	the	components	of	the	body,	he	inquires	whether	it	is	likely
	that	the	constitution	can	be	altered	in	relation	to	one	invading	agent	(like	vaccine
	
serum	from	diseased	animal	tissue	or	pus	or	from	drugs)	and	remain	unchanged
	
in	regard	to	all	other	invading	agents. There	is	every	reason...to	believe	the
	
contrary,	and	to	think	that	a	system	which	has	taken	up	a	morbific	principle,
	
even	though	it	should	acquire	thereby,	immunity	from	cognate	disease,	must
	
have	its	power	of	resistance	to	perturbing	influences	in	general,	diminished. Mr.	Spencer	(Herbert)	finds	evidence	of	this	general	relative	debility	in	the
	
greatly	increased	severity	and	enlarged	incidence	of	many	diseases	such	as
	
measles,	chickenpox,	and	influenza,	which,	before	vaccination	became	general,
	
were	of	relatively	rare	occurrence	and	trifling	in	their	effect. By	a	comparison	of
	
the	infant	mortality	returns	in	quinquennial	(five	year)	periods	before	and	since
	
compulsory	vaccination,	he	finds	that	‘the	mortality	from	8	specified	diseases,
	
either	directly	communicable	or	exacerbated	(aggravated)	by	vaccination,
	
increased	from	20,524	to	41,353	per	million	births	per	annum." (from
	
“Vaccination	a	Disastrous	Delusion”,	by	McCormick,	p.13)
	
VACCINE	CANNOT	BE	MADE	SAFE
	
The	backbone	of	the	vaccine	argument	is	that	it	has	been	made	safe—modified
—by	passing	the	virus	through	a	cow	and	later	all	the	harmful	organisms	are
	
supposed	to	have	been	killed	in	the	processing	and	glycerinizing,	except	a	few
	
select	ones	that	are	earmarked	to	produce	the	antibodies	in	the	human	organism. The	absurdity	of	this	is	too	apparent	for	any	serious	argument. (See	chapter	on
	
HOW	SERUMS	ARE	MADE,	Book	II). It	has	been	scientifically	proved	and
	
tested	that	what	is	promised	for	vaccine	virus	is	not	so. Dr.	Cameron,	summed
	
this	up	in	his	report	before	the	Lyons	Commission	when	he	stated:
	
"THE	CHARACTER	OF	THE	VIRUS	CANNOT	BE	CHANGED	BY
	
PASSING	IT	THROUGH	THE	COW,	ANYMORE	THAN	BY	STUNTING	AN
	
OAK	IT	CAN	BE	CONVERTED	INTO	A	GOOSEBERRY	BUSH." If	the	vaccine	virus	had	been	modified	or	made	safe	by	passing	it	through	the
	
body	of	an	animal	and	then	processing	it,	there	would	not	be	the	ever	increasing
	
list	of	deaths	and	disasters	from	vaccination. A	few	of	the	many	examples	of	this
	
will	be	given	in	the	following	pages	of	this	chapter. Most	of	the	cases	are
	
selected	from	the	Rowton	survey	of	Denver	and	Colorado	Springs,	Colorado. (The	addresses	are	omitted,	but	on	file.) CASE	HISTORIES
	
HEART	TROUBLE	FROM	VACCINATION
	
Earl	Richardson,	(Colorado	Springs)	was	vaccinated	by	the	local	doctor	when
	
six	years	of	age. Up	to	that	time	he	was	strong	and	healthy,	but	9	days	after	the
	
vaccination	he	developed	an	illness	accompanied	by	extreme	nervousness	that
	
the	doctor	diagnosed	as	St.	Vitus	Dance. He	was	given	an	examination	and
	
found	the	heart	and	other	organs	to	be	sound	and	unaffected. A	few	days	later
	
complications	set	in	and	the	doctor	was	called	again. On	examination	he	found
	
that	the	boy	had	developed	a	valvular	heart	condition. The	mother	took	him	to
	
Kentucky	to	three	heart	specialists	who	all	declared	that	it	was	due	to	infection. One	doctor	said	the	ailment	was	probably	due	to	vaccination,	as	he	had	seen
	
some	other	cases	of	valvular	heart	trouble	develop	after	vaccination. Four	years
	
later,	when	Mr.	Rowton	had	his	last	interview	with	this	family,	the	child	was	still
	
too	ill	to	attend	school. His	mother	said	he	often	had	to	sleep	sitting	up	in	bed	on
	
account	of	the	heart	condition. It’s	a	strange	law	that	compels	children	to	be	vaccinated	in	order	to	attend	school
	
and	then	disables	them	so	they	cannot	attend—anything. According	to	NEWSWEEK,	April	25,	1955,	heart	trouble,	our	number	one
	
killer,	takes	794,000	victims	each	year	and	10	million	Americans	suffer	from	it. Less	than	a	third	of	the	deaths	were	caused	by	heart	trouble	20	years	ago. "Today,	it	causes	more	than	one	death	out	of	every	two. "The	cost	is	staggering:	Industry	loses	the	work	of	653,000	men	annually
	
because	of	heart	disease	disabilities;	annual	compensation	and	pensions	to
	
veterans	total	$168,000,000." Many	of	these	same	industries	that	are	pressed	with	heavy	disability	costs	are	the
	
ones	that	require	compulsory	vaccination	of	their	employees. The	heart	is	the	strongest	muscle	in	the	body	and	it	takes	an	extreme	amount	of
	
poison	or	abuse	to	impair	its	functioning. Tobacco,	liquor,	drugs,	cola	drinks,
	poison	preservatives	in	foods	and	poison	spray	on	farm	produce,	in	addition	to
	
the	incompatible,	devitalized	foods	are	some	of	the	other	poisons	that	corrode
	
the	tissues	of	the	heart	as	well	as	every	cell	in	the	body. Arteriosclerosis,	which
	
accompanies	about	half	of	the	heart	deaths,	is	also	a	disease	which	is	induced	by
	
body	poisoning,	overeating	of	incompatible,	devitalized	foods	and	depleting
	
habits. TUBERCULOSIS	FROM	VACCINATION
	
Lena	Long,	(Denver)	was	vaccinated	in	October,	1922,	in	order	to	attend	school. In	four	days	her	arm	began	to	fester	and	she	developed	a	high	fever. She	was
	
extremely	nervous	and	confined	to	her	bed	for	about	a	week. A	little	later	she
	
developed	pneumonia	with	symptoms	of	tuberculosis. The	doctor	checked	the
	
family	records	to	try	to	find	tuberculosis	in	the	family	or	ancestry	but	none	was
	
found. The	last	report	from	the	mother,	Mrs.	S.	A. Long,	was	that	Lena	was	still
	
unable	to	attend	school	and	was	suffering	from	tuberculosis. Mr.	Long	(Lena’s
	
father)	was	vaccinated	the	same	year,	in	December,	after	which	12	boils
	
developed	on	his	neck. This	gave	him	a	great	deal	of	trouble. He	had	never	bad	a
	
boil	before	that	time. SCARLET	FEVER	FROM	VACCINATION
	
Mrs.	Donnelly,	(Denver)	was	successfully	vaccinated	for	smallpox	on	December
	
21,	1922. A	few	hours	after	the	injection	she	began	to	experience	severe
	
reactions	which	developed	into	scarlet	fever	in	such	a	serious	form	that	she	was
	
rushed	to	the	hospital	where	she	hovered	between	life	and	death	for	several
	
weeks. KIDNEY	TROUBLE	FROM	VACCINATION
	
Katie	Blessant,	(Denver)	was	given	toxin-anti-toxin	for	diphtheria. In	a	short
	
time	she	lost	her	voice	and	soon	after	that	she	developed	kidney	trouble	and
	
stomach	trouble	which	she	had	never	been	bothered	with	before. BRIGHT’S	DISEASE	FROM	VACCINATION
	
Earl	Rohsbecker,	(Denver)	was	vaccinated	for	smallpox	after	which	he
	
developed	Bright’s	disease	(an	advanced	form	of	degeneration	of	the	kidneys). The	doctors	do	not	hold	out	much	hope	for	his	recovery. PARALYSIS	FROM	VACCINATION
	
Raymond	Nelson	(Denver)	was	given	diphtheria	toxin-anti-toxin	after	which	he
	
developed	paralysis. His	son	was	given	the	antitoxin	also,	and	died	of	it. Mrs.	Black	(Colorado	Springs)	was	vaccinated	for	smallpox	and	soon	developed
	
spinal	meningitis. The	case	was	so	severe	that	the	attending	physician	had	to	call
	
in	assistance	from	Denver. VACCINE	POISONING
	
David,	son	of	Mr.	and	Mrs.	C.	Robinson,	was	vaccinated	on	November	6,	1921. By	the	family	physician,	in	compliance	with	the	school	requirement. After	three
	
days	his	arm	festered	and	was	inflamed. Then	for	several	weeks	the	vaccination
	
seemed	to	be	healing	but	continued	to	be	sore	and	inflamed. In	February	the
	
glands	in	his	neck	began	to	swell	and	some	lumps	formed	under	each	arm. Some
	
of	the	lumps	decreased	in	size	but	all	were	painful	so	the	doctor	lanced	one	of
	
the	larger	ones. It	never	did	heal	properly	and	began	to	discharge	pus	a	little
	
later. At	the	time	of	the	last	report	(March,	1921)	it	had	not	healed	and	the	child
	
was	still	in	bed	and	unable	to	walk. It	is	not	likely	that	he	will	be	able	to	attend
	
school	for	a	long	time. A	Mother’s	Report	(name	withheld	by	request),
	
"I	had	my	daughter	vaccinated	on	the	21st	of	December,	1921. In	less	than	a
	
week	her	arm	started	to	swell,	become	inflamed,	and	discharged	pus	at	the	site	of
	
the	vaccination. A	lump	developed	under	the	arm	and	she	was	seriously	ill	for
	
four	months. I	had	her	treated	for	over	a	year	with	X-ray	and	now	her	arm	is
	
blistered	with	X-ray	burns	in	addition	to	the	original	ailment.”
	
SMALLPOX	FROM	VACCINATION
	
Mrs.	Jessie	Wuns	(Colorado	Springs)	was	vaccinated	for	smallpox	and	a	few
	
days	later	she	developed	a	severe	case	of	smallpox	which	lasted	seven	weeks. DROPSY	FROM	VACCINATION
	
Mrs.	Anna	Heller	(Colorado	Springs)	developed	sores	on	her	arm,	neck	and	leg
	
after	her	vaccination. Although	many	years	have	passed,	it	still	bothers	her. Her
	two	daughters	were	also	vaccinated	and	both	of	them	developed	vaccinia	and
	
almost	died	from	it.
548615196-Eleanor-McBean-Trung-Nguyen-The-Poisoned-Needle-Suppressed-Facts-About-Vaccination-2018-Update.txt
Summarize the following text section accurately and concisely. Maintain specific details and numerical information, and use anti-repetition mechanisms:

        One	of	the
	
voluntary	confessions	was	made	by	Dr. Raballiati,	who	stated,	"In	the	early	part
	
of	my	career	I	performed	over	500	major	operations	for	cancer	and	growths,	and
	
it	was	the	uniform	lack	of	success	with	the	knife	that	caused	me	to	search	for
	
other	means	of	more	effectively	treating	cancer—though	without	success. " At	the	Atlantic	City	Convention	of	the	American	Medical	Association,	when
	
each	cancer	specialist	was	asked	what	was	the	cause	of	cancer,	each	one	in	turn
	
admitted	he	did	not	know. One	of	them	said,	"I	admit	I	know	neither	the	cause
	
nor	the	cure	of	cancer—and	neither	do	you,	not	anyone	else	here. " This	statement,	no	doubt,	voices	the	orthodox	medical	view	regarding	cancer. If
	
they	did	know	the	cause	of	this	disease	they	would	not	use	the	three	hazardous
	
treatments	they	claim	are	the	only	"proved	cures". CANCER—NO	MYSTERY
	
Outside	the	medical	field	and	among	the	few	independent	physicians	who	dare
	
to	think	for	themselves,	there	are	to	be	found	those	who	do	know	the	cause	and
	
cure	of	cancer	because	they	understand	the	underlying	cause	of	disease	in
	
general. Only	when	this	is	known	can	the	right	approach	to	prevention	and	cure
	
be	attempted	with	any	certainty	of	success. Dr. Herbert	M. Shelton	is	one	of	these	men	with	a	clear	view	as	to	the	cause	and
	
control	of	disease. In	an	article	in	The	Hygienic	Review,	for	April,	1949	he
	
writes:
	
"Cancer	has	no	secret. It	is	but	a	part	of	general	pathology	(disease). It	is	an	end-
point	in	a	chain	of	pathological	sequences	that	need	only	to	be	watched	to	be
	
recognized. There	is	no	specific	cause	of	cancer. It	is	merely	another	and	final
	
link	in	the	pathological	chain	that	began	in	infancy	with	the	first	cold. It	is	a
	
product	of	pathological	evolution:
	
"They	(the	medical	profession)	insist	upon	viewing	cancer	as	some	spontaneous
	
horror	that	suddenly	springs	upon	its	victims	from	out	of	the	void. They	refuse	to
	
recognize	the	office	of	the	general	causes	of	pathology	in	the	production	of
	
cancer. "So	long	as	cancer	"research"	is	only	a	search	for	a	"cancer	secret"	that,	after	all,
	
is	but	a	figment	of	the	imagination,	their	experiments	will	continue	to	be	sterile
	
repetitions	of	experiments	that	have	already	been	performed. "What,	then,	is	the	cause	of	cancer. It	is	an	evolution	out	of	toxemia
	
(poisoning). Toxemia	is	a	chronic	state,	due	to	ones	enervating	(depleting)	mode
	
of	living. Toxemia	produces	the	chronic	local	irritative	conditions	that	form	the
	
site	of	cancer. External	irritations	such	as	tobacco,	mineral	oil,	alcohol,	spices,
	
coal	tar	products,	drugs,	etc. ,	may	and	do	add	to	the	cause	in	many	cases,	but	it	is
	
noteworthy	that	only	a	few	of	those	subjected	to	these	irritants	develop	cancer. In
	
the	absence	of	sufficient	tissue	degeneration	from	chronic	toxemia,	the	body
	successfully	resists	these	irritants. " J. Ellis	Barker	has	this	to	say	regarding	the	cause	of	cancer	(This	quotation	is
	
from	his	book	on	cancer,	foreworded	by	Sir	Arbuthnot	Lane,	famous	English
	
Surgeon	and	physician	to	the	Royal	Family	of	England. ):
	
"The	cause	of	cancer	is	twofold:
	
	
1)	chronic	poisoning	and
	
	
2)	vitamin	starvation. " (The	required	vitamins	do	not	include	the	manufactured
	
products	by	that	name	many	of	which	are	coal	tar	products	and	injurious	in
	
themselves. The	only	vitamins	worthy	of	the	name	are	to	be	found	in	natural,
	
unprocessed	foods	such	as	vegetables	and	fruits,	nuts	and	grams	Eleanor
	
McBean)
	
	
"The	poison	may	be	introduced	from	without	or	generated	from	within. In	the
	
former	class	are	aniline	and	paraffin	fumes,	deep	burns	of	any	kind—including
	
X-ray	and	radium	burns,	and	arsenical	poisons	(as	in	arsenic	insecticides	sprayed
	
on	fruits	and	vegetables)	whether	breathed	in	through	the	lungs	or	taken	as
	
medicine	into	the	system	through	the	mouth	or	by	subcutaneous	injection. " Mr. Barker	quotes	other	authorities	to	show	that	"continued	medical	use	of	arsenic,
	
even	in	extremely	small	doses,	may	lead	to	cancer	after	20	years	or	more,	and
	
even	after	the	discontinuance	of	the	drug. " He	referred	to	the	Silesian	miners	in
	
the	cobalt	mines	of	Schineeverg,	"who	developed	a	most	unusual	form	of	cancer,
	
cancer	of	the	lungs,	from	breathing	in	arsenic	after	having	been	employed	in	the
	
mines	for	more	than	20	years. " (Medical	Voodoo,	p. 207)
	
Dr. George	S. Weger,	a	"reformed"	medical	doctor	who	rose	head	and	shoulders
	
above	his	colleagues,	summed	up	the	cancer	situation,	in	his	"Genesis	and
	
Control	of	Disease. (p. 334). He	wrote:
	
"No	germ	for	cancer	has	yet	been	found,	and,	in	the	author’s	opinion	none	ever
	
will	be	found. Cancer	is	one	disease	that	is	distinctive	of	toxemia,	(poisoning)
	
plus	trauma,	plus	irritation. It	occurs	most	frequently	in	selective	areas	but	may
	
be	found	anywhere	in	the	body. No	infection	of	secondary	nature	is	necessary	to
	
make	this	abnormality	a	cancer	by	conversion	from	something	else. If	a
	
cancerous	mass	breaks	down,	softens,	and	suppurates,	it	is	usually	in	a	late	stage
	
and	signifies	a	serious	breach	in	the	defenses—the	vitality	of	the	individual—and	the	toxemia	then	immediately	takes	on	the	characteristics	of	sepsis	which
	
destroys	the	life	of	the	blood. "Some	specialists	advance	the	theory	that	cancer	activity	is	dependent	upon	a
	
vegetable	parasite,	a	protozoa,	identified	as	Trichomonas. It	is	conceded,
	
however,	that	this	parasite	(if	any)	is	not	capable	of	producing	cancer	without	the
	
accompaniment	of	two	other	important	factors:	first,	proper	soilage	(toxemia);
	
second,	continued	irritation	or	injury. " Another	cancer	authority	who	recognized	that	toxemia	or	internal	poisons	cause
	
cancer,	is	Dr. Robert	Bell,	Vice	President	of	the	International	Society	for	Cancer
	
Research. His	statement	in	The	Medical	Record	for	March,	1922	reads	as
	
follows:
	
	
"Cancer	is	rooted	in	every	drop	of	blood	in	the	body,	and	we	may	as	well	expect
	
to	stop	the	growing	of	apples	by	picking	them	off	the	trees. as	to	expect	to
	
destroy	malignancy	in	the	human	body	by	attacking	the	outward	growth. For
	
depend	on	it,	every	cell	of	the	body	is	affected,	and	has	been	affected	for	a	long
	
period,	prior	to	the	appearance	of	the	local	outcrop. In	my	view,	cancer	is	the
	
outcome	of	prolonged	toxemia,	and	a	vitiated	(polluted)	blood	supply	affecting
	
the	nervous	system	and	the	efficiency	of	the	endocrine	glands,	which	explains
	
the	absence	of	healthy	metabolism	and	the	dire	disturbance	which	we	call
	
cancer. " LYMPHATIC	INVOLVEMENT	IN	CANCER
Without	going	into	technical	detail	on	this	subject	it	is,	nevertheless,	important	to
	
show	the	relationship	of	the	lymphatic	glands	to	vaccinal	cancer. The	lymph
	
vessels	form	a	fine	network	that	interpenetrates	the	connective	tissue	and	covers
	
the	entire	body. The	continuity	of	these	lymph	vessels	"is	interrupted	by
	
interposed	nodular	aggregations	of	lymph	tissue	which	are	known	as	lymph
	
glands. " —Textbook	of	Anatomy,	Cunningham
	
One	of	the	functions	of	the	lymph	glands	is	to	filter	the	poisons	from	circulation
	
before	they	reach	the	cells. When	an	excess	of	poison	is	generated	in	the	body	or
	
is	introduced	from	the	outside	as	in	vaccination,	the	lymph	glands	become
	
enlarged	in	an	effort	to	collect	and	hold	in	abeyance,	the	accumulation	of	poison. In	the	case	of	blood	poisoning	or	a	bite	of	a	poison	insect	a	lump	usually	forms
	under	the	arm	or	in	the	groin,	to	meet	the	emergency,	but	disappears	again	when
	
the	condition	has	healed. In	the	case	of	the	continued	intake	of	poison	such	as
	
tobacco,	coffee,	drugs,	etc. ,	the	glands	most	effected	keep	enlarging	to
	
accommodate	the	inflow	of	poison. A	protective	coating	of	tissue	is	formed
	
around	the	gland	to	protect	the	body	from	collected	poisons. It	is	this	wonderful
	
defense	mechanism	that	the	body	provides	against	the	ignorance	and	willfulness
	
of	the	individual,	that	the	doctors	attack	as	an	enemy. They	call	it	a	wild	growth
	
of	tissue—a	cancer	or	tumor. To	cut	or	burn	(as	with	radium,	X-ray	or	surgery)
	
this	bulwark	of	protection	is	to	add	insult	to	injury	and	allow	the	self-generated
	
poisons	to	flow	unchecked	through	the	body	and	do	serious	damage	to	the	vital
	
organs,	tissues	and	glands.
He stated that he had performed over 500 major operations for cancer and that it was the lack of success with the knife that led him to search for other means of treating cancer.
What was Dr. Raballiati's response to the question about the cause of cancer?
He stated that the cause of cancer is twofold: chronic poisoning and vitamin starvation.
What did Dr. J. Ellis Barker say about the cause of cancer?
He stated that it is a serious mistake to think that vaccination has reduced the incidence of diseases, as it has actually increased the number of cases.
What did Dr. George W. Hodge say about the relationship between vaccination and disease?
He said that it is not possible to diagnose cancer until it has reached an advanced stage, and even then, it is difficult to cure.
What did Dr. Weger say about the diagnosis of cancer?
He stated that vaccination causes permanent changes in the body, leading to the development of various diseases.
What did Dr. Herbert M. Shelton say about the effect of vaccination on the body?