This simple adjustment alone could tremendously reduce health care costs and  
dramatically  upgrade  health  care  quality  by  providing  and  teaching  effective,  
simple, inexpensive natural medical self-help approaches like urine therapy that  
can take the place of expensive and dangerous drugs and surgical therapies that  
should be rightly reserved for crisis and emergency care, and free up doctors' and  
specialists' precious time. We already know that traditional natural therapies like herbal medicines, urine  
therapy and homeopathy work, and many are still widely used in other civilized  
countries. Chinese  hospitals  and  doctors  even  today  largely  depend  on  their  
traditional natural  herbal  medicine  and acupuncture;  England  has homeopathic  
hospitals; Germans rely heavily on their herbal medicines which are even available  
in their drugstores. In France, too, pharmacies carry and doctors prescribe natural  
homeopathic and herbal medicines in addition to synthetic drugs. There are a wonderful variety of alternatives to invasive and synthetic medicine  
that  have  been  proven  to  be  safe  and  effective  over  centuries  of  use  and  
observations, we just have to relearn the art of using them and cure ourselves of  
our dependency  on drugs and surgery. Also, there are many more  books (see  
Appendix) besides the ones I've already mentioned in this chapter which will help  
you to learn more about how to care for your health safely and effectively. The challenge of achieving and maintaining good health is in creating a balanced  
lifestyle and in finding the combination of natural treatments and remedies that are  
right for you individually. And as you'll discover in this book, urine therapy is the most powerful, most  
individualized natural medicine we could ever hope for. After reading all that urine  
therapy has to offer, I know you'll agree that even though man has failed to find the  
synthetic "magic bullet" medicine to cure every illness, Nature had already created  
it for us and given us an incredible, safe, cost-free and simple, natural tool to heal  
ourselves – our body's own amazing, natural medicine. 67CHAPTER 4
THE RESEARCH EVIDENCE
AND CASE STUDIES
The medical applications of urine and its constituents have been  tested, discussed,  
researched and utilized to such an extent throughout the twentieth century that it  
seems incredible that almost none of us, including the majority of our doctors and  
medical administrators have ever heard anything about it. But again, the reason for this is not entirely a mystery. As we discussed in the last  
chapter, even though the success of urine therapy was reported long before the  
1900's,  twentieth century medical  researchers,  doctors and  the public  were no  
longer interested in traditional natural medicines. So urine therapy was moved out of the home and doctor's offices and into the  
oblivion  of  research  laboratories,  where,  unfortunately,  it  still  largely  remains  
today. As we've discussed, urine therapy largely disappeared from public use at the turn  
of the century and the knowledge of the therapy is now hidden in medical journals  
and  research  reports  that  people  and  doctors in  general  never  see;  also,  urine  
ingredients are simply isolated and converted into unrecognizable drug forms. Even though there have been amazing scientific discoveries about the medical use  
of urine, medical researchers, for the most part, do not tell the public about their  
discoveries. Again, this situation is most likely the result of two factors. One,  
modem  medical  researchers  are  primarily  oriented  towards  finding  strong,  
monetarily profitable chemical "bullets" to knock out specific diseases – and not  
towards discovering natural medicines which augment the body's natural capacity  
to heal. 68Secondly, most medical researchers work for pharmaceutical companies and many  
are contractually bound not to reveal the results of their research until the research  
can be applied as a profit-making medical therapy that can be patented by the  
company who funded the research. Also, medical researchers tend to devote their research to extremely specialized  
branches of medicine, and these separate departments of medicine don't generally  
communicate their findings to departments outside of their own research fields. So  
the urologists, for instance, who discovered that urine can prevent and heal urinary  
tract infections might publish their findings for other urologists, but a doctor in  
general practice would probably not come in contact with these studies on the  
importance of urine in bladder or kidney infections. The public and most practicing doctors today consider urine to be nothing more  
than a body waste. But many medical researchers know that in reality, urine is an  
enormously comprehensive and powerful medical substance. Now you get to read  
what many scientists and doctors know, but haven't told us about the amazing  
curative effects of urine therapy. The research studies and articles selected for this chapter are each nurnbered and  
presented in chronological order to present a broad overview of how consistently  
and intensively urine has been researched during the twentieth century. You'll be amazed and astounded by these studies on the medical use of urine. As I  
was reading over these reports, and looking at all of the other many studies on  
urine therapy, I couldn't help exclaiming "Why didn't anyone ever tell us?". More About Urea
As  an  added  note,  many  of  these  research  studies  were  done  using  the  urine 
extract, urea, which is the primary organic solid of urine. Urea, an organic salt  
formed in the liver,  is the result of the body's use, or synthesis, of protein. The  
body eliminates excess nitrogen which is produced during protein metabolism in  
the form of urea. Urea is also used by the body to help in the mechanism which  
determines how concentrated the urine is, or in other words, how much water is  
excreted from the blood. Urea was discovered centuries ago, in 1773, when it was  
69first  separated  from  urine;  later,  in  1828,  natural  urea  was  synthesized  or  
chemically "copied" in the laboratory. The discovery of urea was one of the most important events of modem chemistry  
and biochemistry because it was the first organic compound to be separated in a  
relatively pure state. Urea, which is critical to our body's use of protein, also  
provides innumerable profound keys as to how our bodies work and function. For this reason, chemists have been fascinated for years by urea and its amazing  
and diverse applications in the fields of science and medicine:
"More scientific papers have probably been published on urea than on  any other 
organic compound..."
— Journal of the American Medical Association
July 1954, "De Urina"
Urea has so many beneficial properties that it was used historically, and  is still 
used today, in a wide variety of medical applications – for reducing excess fluid  
pressure  on  the  brain,  as  a  remarkable  skin  treatment  for  eczema,  dry  skin  
disorders, and fungal infections; as a moisturizer in cosmetic creams, as a safe and  
effective diuretic, and as an anti-bacterial, antiseptic treatment for healing serious  
wounds. People who have heard of the term "uremia", or uremic poisoning, often assume  
that urea itself is toxic and is therefore excreted in the urine. But this is not the  
case. Excess urea becomes toxic to the body only when the filtering mechanisms of  
the  kidneys  are  damaged  or  impaired,  and  the  urea  level  of  the  blood  is  not  
properly regulated But in this case, excessive amounts of other benign substances  
like wáter and sodium become toxic also if the kidney is unable to regulate them in  
the blood. As you'll discover in the research studies in this chapter, urea is not only  
not toxic, but in reality has tremendous medical and physiological value, and can  
be safely used even in large quantities. Urea is on the FDA list of approved drugs for medical use and many products  
made from urea are listed in the Physician's Desk Reference, (which is the book  
70that  doctors  refer  to  in  deciding  what  drug  to  prescribe),  and  in  the  U.S. 
Pharmacological Index. However, as wonderful as urea has proven to be in medicine, I want to  stress that it 
cannot and should not be used to replace or supersede natural urine as a healing  
agent. As the research in this chapter proves, whole urine contains hundreds of  
known and unknown medically important elements that clearly and definitively are  
not found in urea alone. Also, as medical studies have unequivocally shown, each person's urine contains  
antibodies, natural 'vaccines' and many other critical physiological elements that  
are carried in the blood that are specific to each individual's health condition. These elements in whole urine are not found in either natural or synthetic urea  
alone. For instance, if you have an allergic reaction to wheat, your body produces a  
complex of antibodies to deal with the allergy and those antibodies are found in  
your urine. Medical studies have demonstrated that when you reintroduce these  
urine antibodies into your system by ingesting or injecting your own urine, that the  
allergy can be corrected. But urea alone would not contain these allergy-fighting  
antibodies. In using your own urine to heal yourself, you're getting medicinal elements that  
your particular body has produced in order to deal with your specific, intricate and  
often undetectable disturbances in your body's functioning. You could be exposed to polio, for example or tuberculosis and not even realize it  
until acute symptoms appear – but, as medical research has proven, your urine can  
contain antibodies to those diseases even if acute symptoms are not appearing. So  
regular use of urine therapy can most definitely provide extremely comprehensive  
therapeutic treatment that goes far beyond urea or other medicines. This is not to say that other therapies are not useful and effective, they are, of  
course, but urine therapy, correctly applied, should be the foundation for our health  
regimens and medical treatments and should definitely be used routinely in illness  
and preventive health care. 71I recently read a magazine article about a 12 year-old girl in the Midwest who was  
admitted to the hospital with a high fever, lassitude, and drooling heavily from the  
mouth. Doctors tried frantically but unsuccessfully to diagnose her condition but  
she deteriorated and died several days later. Only after her death was it discovered  
that she'd died of an undiagnosed and therefore untreated case of rabies. This is a good example of why urine and urea therapy should be incorporated into  
all types of medicine. In this girl's case, urine therapy could have been invaluable. In the first place, urea itself has been scientifically proven to dissolve or destroy  
the rabies virus, so it could most definitely have aided this little girl. Additionally, the rabies antibody would have been present in the girl's urine, so she  
would  have  gotten  the  benefit  of  both  the  urea  and  the  rabies  antibody  after  
ingesting  her  urine. Her  doctors  couldn't  diagnose  her  illness  –  but  her  body  
already had, and if she'd been given her urine orally, or by injection with perhaps,  
added urea, it might well have saved her life. And the real tragedy is that there is absolutely no downside risk here – absolutely  
none!. Urine is free, it's backed by almost 100 years of medical testing, and in  
every single study ev r done on urine and urea's medicinal use in humans, no  
toxicity ha ever been reported. So what did this young girl have to lose by being  
treated with them? As hundreds of people have experienced, and as research has shown,  urine is  
undoubtedly an amazing natural medicine that can give you health benefits beyond  
any other natural or chemical substance in existence. The  information  on  the  medical  uses  of  urine  most  definitely  deserves  public  
recognition and frankly, if we don't routinely take advantage of this incredible  
natural remedy, we can't honestly say that we're doing all that we can to preserve  
and regain our good health. Sometimes  it's  hard  to  believe  that  even  with  all  our  medical  knowledge  and  
technological genius, we still don't have strong, healthy, disease-resistant bodies –  
but the fact that widespread, crippling health disorders still abound should tell us  
that we're doing something wrong and overlooking something important. Let's not overlook this simplest and yet most useful of natural medicines. 72RESEARCH AND
CLINICAL STUDIES
=========================== ===============================
Report # 1 
TITLE: PLEOMORPHISM, AS EXHIBITED BY BACTERIA GROWN  ON 
A MEDIA CONTAINING UREA , 1906, by W. James Wilson, B.A., M.B, from  
the Pathological Laboratory of Queen's College Belfast, published in the Journal of  
Pathological Bacteria, London. SUBJECT: THE ANTI-BACTERIAL EFFECT OF UREA
This laboratory study is presented first because it's one of the more  thorough and 
earliest twentieth century laboratory research studies on the medical applications of  
urea. Don't be intimidated by the word 'pleomorphism'. In this context it just basically  
means  that  urea  changed  the  shape,  or  stopped  the  normal  growth  of  disease  
bacteria. After medical researchers discovered that certain types of living microorganisms,  
such as bacteria, could cause disease, it became almost their sole aim to discover  
ways of killing or stopping the growth of these microorganisms, or germs. In this particular study, the researcher, James Wilson, placed different disease-
causing bacteria, such as Bacillus typhosus (typhoid) into petridishes containing  
urea solutions and found, as had other researchers, that the urea stopped the normal  
growth of the bacteria:
"In October 1905, at the suggestion of Professor Symmers, I was investigating the  
action  of the  Bacillus typhosus  and the  B.Coli  on  urea. I.. found  that as the  
73percentage of urea in the medium varied, so did the amount of growth of the  
bacillus...
with greater percentages of urea, the growth of the organism was  inhibited; with 7  
per cent (urea),  very little growth occurred; with 8 per cent practically none...
Urea has an antiseptic or inhibitory effect on the growth of microorganisms." This anti-bacterial effect of urea was also proven by several other  researchers very  
early in the twentieth century. But rather than present each of these studies on urea  
separately, the most notable of these research findings are listed below in order to  
give a coherent overview on the important studies on urea that were conducted and  
published during the first decades of the new era of modem medicine:
1900
A  German  researcher  by  the  name  of  Spiro  reported  his  discovery  that  urea 
solutions have a remarkable ability to "dissolve" foreign proteins. This is medically  
important because viruses, for example, are molecular proteins as are allergens. Later research confirmed that urea has an amazing ability to rapidly and easily  
destroy viruses such as polio and rabies viruses, and during the 1980's, urine was  
defined as an extremely effective treatment for a wide variety of allergies. 1902
W. Ramsden, another researcher, published a report in the American  Journal of 
Physiology further detailing the protein dissolving properties of urea. Ramsden  
also discovered that urea prevented putrefaction in wounds. His work is often  
referred to by later researchers looking into the anti-bacterial applications of urea. 1906
74Two French researchers, G. Peju and H. Rajat published a report on  their detailed 
study of the effect of urea on various disease-causing bacteria. Their research  
demonstrated that the more concentrated the urea, the more it inhibited bacterial  
growth. In  concentrated  solutions  of  urea,  no  bacterial  growth  occurred. The  
research done by Peju and Rajat has been referred to many times over the years by  
other researchers who studied and clinically applied the anti-bacterial properties of  
urea. This research also supported the later use of urea as an antiseptic in the  
treatment of wounds and infections during the 1930's and 40's. 1915
In England, two other researchers, W. Symmers and T.S Kirk, published  their 
report entitled  "Urea  as a  Bactericide and Its Application in the Treatment of  
Wounds". Symmers and Kirk were actually military doctors, so of course their  
work with urea centered around its use as an antiseptic for wounds. In their report,  
they comment that "all the wounded soldiers under our care in the Ulster Volunteer  
Force Hospital have been treated with urea, and it has been found that.. infected  
wounds dressed with urea once in 24 hours give better results than similar cases  
treated in any other way." Later 20th century researchers firmly established and  
proved that urea, both topically, and internally, provides a wide variety of excellent  
benefits and produces no adverse side effects. As you read more about the remarkable clinical data on the benefits of urea further  
on, you'll be extremely surprised that our medical community today has failed to  
emphasize the use of this incredibly inexpensive, effective and safe anti-bacterial  
medicine. =========================== ===============================
Report # 2 
75TITLE:  AUTOTHERAPY ,  (book),  1918,  by  Dr.  Charles  H.  Duncan. The  
following report is taken from a chapter from Dr. Duncan's book entified "Urine as  
An Autotherapeutic Remedy". Dr. Duncan was the Attending Surgeon, Genito-
Urinary Specialist and co-founder of the Volunteer Hospital, New York City. Dr. Duncan used the word Autotherapy, as have other doctors, to refer  to the 
utilization of natural substances of the body to create a healing response. In his  
chapter  on  "Urine  as  An  Autotherapeutic  Remedy,"  Dr.  Duncan  describes  his  
clinical  observations  on  the  use  of  urine  therapy  in  his  medical  practice,  and  
discusses reports from other doctors who were using urine therapy at the time. From an historical point of view, it's interesting to note the seriousness with which  
urine  therapy  was  treated  by  even  mainstream  twentieth  century  doctors. Dr.  
Duncan was a practicing surgeon, founder of the Volunteer Hospital in New York  
City, a Genito-Urinary Specialist –and a supporter of natural urine therapy. Our  medical  community  today  in  general  would  have  us  believe  that  urine  
therapists are traveling road-show quacks giving out ludicrous and unsubstantiated  
medical claims, but that's a gross misrepresentation of the truth. As Dr. Duncan observed:
"There is scarcely a pathogenic (disease) condition which does not affect  the urine 
contents...It may be said that urine is like a weather vane, sensitively registering  
any change in the patient's condition, be it great or small. Many pathogenic conditions...are quickly cured by the therapeutic employment of  
urine alone...it is significant, indeed, when Clark's Materia Medico gives many  
conditions in which uric acid and urea have been proved to be therapeutically  
effective. In  the  New  York  Medical  Journal  of  December  14  and  21,  1912  and  in  the  
Therapeutic  Record  of  January  1914,  I  reported  that  I  was  employing  urine  
successfully in the treatment of many conditions...since then it has been employed  
successfully  both  by  myself  and  many  other  physicians  in  treating  patients  
suffering with a great variety of pathogenic conditions." 76Duncan goes on to cite several case studies in which he successfully  used urine 
therapy. For instance:
CASE 190. "Patient, male, 30 years, applied for treatment for cystitis that  developed after a  
long drive in the rain. At night he had to void every hour or twa...A teaspoonful of  
morning urine one-half hour before ineals completely cleared up the case within  
two days." CASE 198. "Patient, male, age 50 years, applied for treatment suffering  with inflammation of  
the bladder and prostate...Upon rising from a sitting posture it was necessary to  
void urine within a minute. He had to get up at night five and six times. The usual  
remedies for such conditions gave little or no relief. It was then decided to treat  
him autotherapeutically. He was instructed to take a drachm of early morning  
urine a half hour before each meal. Within twenty-four hours his improved condition was so marked that be became  
alarmed thinking his recovery was too quick. [He stopped the therapy] and the  
pain and tenesmus (spasms) returned; he continued the treatment and improved  
greatly. He gradually improved and he is [now) apparently in good health." CASE 203. The following article by Dr. C.G. Moore was republished  in the New Albany  
Medical Herald, February, 1915, from the Archives of Pediatrics:
"I  find  diabetes  mellitus  an  uncommonly  difficult  disease  for  the  general 
practitioner to treat. April 14,1912, I was called to see a little seven-year-old girl. They gave me a history of her having felt badly for a few days and of having had  
some fever. On examining the child I found her to have a temperature of 102  
degrees F., but all other findings were negative. In a couple of days they informed  
me her temperature was normal and she was feeling all right, but she was passing  
a large (sticky) amount of urine frequently. Having tried all methods of treatment on several other patients whom I have had  
within the past few months suffering with glycosuria (sugar in the urine), I decided  
77to try Autotherapy, for I had known cases of icterus (jaundice) which had failed to  
respond to any medical treatment, but cleared up in a very short time when they  
were given their own urine to drink. I gave this little girl three ounces of her own urine three times daily and then  
examined for the sugar percentage and found that when she was taking the urine,  
the percentage of sugar dropped, and that when it was withdrawn, the percentage  
increased. I could also see some improvement in her general condition. She did  
not urinate so often  or so much; did not drink so much water; her skin was more  
moist, she was not so nervous…
CASE 202 
From the report of Dr. Deachman of N.Y.:  “Patient, male, 49, was extremely  
nervous and irritable; he had wandering pains all over his body, headache and  
general lassitude. He complained a great deal of pain in the lumbar region and in  
the abdomen. He improved on nothing I gave him...microscopic urine examination showed red  
blood cells, pus cells, renal cells and abundance of calcium oxalate crystals. The treatment consisted of a twenty minim injection of urine diluted 1 to 100 with  
distilled  water. He  improved  with  this to  a  certain  point  but  did  not  entirely  
recover until I used a less diluted urine, after which he made a prompt recovery. Two months after he recovered a urinalysis showed absence of pus and renal cells  
and a normal volume of urine.”
Dr. Deachman comments:
"These are but a few of the many cases I have successfully treated by this method,  
the value of which  I consider inestimable. I make this statement after a wide experience in using urine] in treating many  
patients suffering with chronic diseases and particularly in the use of urine as an  
autotherapeutic agent. I am free to say that the results obtained with urine therapy  
are [far better] than the usual recognized methods." Dr. Duncan's reports on the use of urine therapy are quite  detailed and include  
many other extensive observations on his and other doctors' clinical treatments and  
78case studies on the effects of both orally and hypodermically administered urine  
therapy. =========================== ===============================
Report # 3
TITLE:  THE ANTISEPTIC  AND BACTERICIDAL  ACTION  OF  UREA , 
1935, by John FL Foulger, M.D., and Lee Foshay, M.D., Journal of Laboratory and  
Clinical  Medicine. From  the  Departments  of  Pharmacology  and  Experimental  
Bacteriology, University of Cincinnati. The researchers in this study, Foulger and Foshay, found that urea was  extremely 
effective in curing or preventing a wide variety of bacterial infections and, unlike  
sulfa drugs, which were widely used at the time, had no deleterious side effects:
"...In an account of the action of urea...Ramsden (1902) made the very
interesting observation that urea prevents putrefaction...the first
detailed study of urea as a bactericide, (destroys bacteria), is that of
Peju and Rajat...no great attention was paid to the bactericidal action of
urea until Symmers and Kirk (1915), (who) found urea of undoubted
value  as a  wash  in  the  treatment of  diphtheria  carriers (and)  the  treatment of  
wounds. That urea is innocuous to human tissues was
adequately proved. In one case with a chronic staphylococcus blood infection, urea (powder) was  
sprinkled between the layers of tissue and the wound then...
closed with sutures. Healing followed with no sign of infection. ... Infected wounds dressed with urea powder gave better results than similar wounds  
treated by other methods...
79Unaware of the work of Symmers and Kirk, one of us (J.F,) selected as
material for a clinical study of urea a few cases of purulent otitis
media (middle ear infection)...all of the cases which had failed to
respond to other local medicaments responded to urea...
A boy of ten developed otitis media and hemorrhagic nephritis...
(kidney inflammation) about the third week of hospitalization for
77Your Own Perfect Medicine
scarlet fever... urea treatments were started. The ear discharges at once
became less foul...At the same time the blood gradually disappeared
from the urine... The results so far obtained suggest that urea may be of considerable
value in the treatment of purulent discharges of many types and in the
treatment, also of suppurating wounds producing foul odors. This latter use of urea  
has been reported recently by Millar (see next report)... The cheapness and harmlessness of urea should encourage other
investigations of its clinical use. As an added note, Foulger and Foshay also discovered, as did other
urea researchers later, that destroying strong bacterial strains such as
those which cause staph and strep infections required longer exposure
to urea than some other types of bacteria, which is something to keep in
mind when using urine therapy to combat staph and strep infections. Report #4 TITLE: UREA CRYSTALS IN CANCER,  1933, by Dr. William M.  
Millar,
80From the Department of Surgery, College of Medicine of the University
of Cincinnati. SUBJECT: USE OF UREA CRYSTALS IN TREATING CANCEROUS
LESIONS
Following Foulger's and Foshay's work on the antibacterial action of
urea, Dr. Millar began using urea crystals to heal external cancerous
ulcerations:
"The peculiarly penetrating odor of a sloughing cancer is one of the
horrible aspects of this disease. For the past year at the Tumor Clinic of
the Cincinnati General Hospital, urea crystals have been advocated and
prescribed in such cases. If they are packed into the wound, the odor
will be stopped to a great extent. Although they dissolve in a few minutes, the offensive character of the
ulcer becomes less with each application. The crystals are cheap, they possess a considerable antiseptic value, and
there is no fear of a systemic reaction..."
As research progressed through the twentieth century, the antibacterial
properties of urea became increasingly well-known and it was used in
78The Research Evidence and Case Studies
the treatment of wounds and infections in Europe and the U.S. until the
development of antibiotic creams in the latter half of the century, when
it appears that its antiseptic use was discontinued in favor of the newer
and supposedly more effective drugs. 81Urea, or urine, is cheap, effective and, as a natural substance, causes no
adverse reactions in the body. It's proven antibacterial properties make
it an excellent treatment for wounds and burns of all kinds. TITLE: AUTO-URINE THERAPY, 1934, by Dr. Martin Krebs, (pediatri- Report  
#5
cian), from a lecture delivered at the Society of Pediatricians, Leipzig. Dr. Krebs, a practicing pediatrician in Dresden, like other many other
physicians, was intrigued by reports of the medical uses of patients'
own urine to treat and cure a wide variety of disorders. Like Dr.
Duncan and other practitioners, he referred to this practice as autourine therapy. Dr. Krebs began injecting urine in the course of his own medical practice and was  
surprised at the rapid and often extraordinary response:
"Through intramuscular injections of the patient's own urine, allergies
and certain spastic conditions in children are remarkably improved. Extraordinary improvement can be seen with asthma and hayfever. The use of auto-urine therapy is also indicated in the treatment of muscular spasms  
caused by birth traumas to the brain. I treated an eight-year old boy with hay-fever by injecting 5 cc. of his
own urine, and was surprised at the result. The boy immediately
began breathing better, and in a few minutes the extreme redness of the
eyes disappeared. Another child who had spent 31/2  months in a sanatorium for  
treatment of his asthma, received an injection  of 4 cc. of
urine. After only 6 minutes, he was able to breathe deeply and then
slept well. 82After my first experiences with the therapy, I was encouraged to try it
on other types of cases, and subsequently treated a 10 month old child
who had exhibited partial paralysis and muscle spasms apparently
caused by birth trauma. After the first injection of urine, he began to
loosen and open his fists, his general movements were freer and he
laughed, something which his parents had never seen him do. Also, the
attacks of angina which he had experienced, stopped after the injection. 79Your Own Perfect Medicine
Urine therapy has been indicated as a treatment for:
1) toxemia in pregnancy,
2) allergic conditions,
3) pertussis,
4) spasms
5) increasing breast milk
6) hayfever
7) asthma
8) migraine-like conditions
9) eczema
I believe that Auto-Urine Therapy is worthy of being applied in the
area of pediatric medicine. I highly recommend the therapy in the treatment of  
hayfever and asthma, and I would like to see further follow-up
clinical studies done on its application to the other conditions that were
mentioned." 83Dr. Krebs undertook further clinical research studies in 1940 using natural urine in  
treating children. His study, entitled The Use of
Convalescent Urine in the Mitigation of Acute Infections, demonstrated
that urine therapy (administered by means of enemas) was safe and
effective for treating childhood infections such as whooping cough,
measles and chicken pox. Dr. Krebs was impressed by the results of his treatments on 58 infected
children, and recommended urine therapy to other physicians as a
treatment for infections in children. Krebs, like many other doctors and researchers, discovered excellent
uses for urine therapy and he instructed some of the parents of his
young patients how to use it at home for treating their children. 80p
nni
The Research Evidence and Case Studies
TITLE: AUTO-URINE VACCINE THERAPY FOR ACUTE HEMORRHAGIC  
NEPHRITIS, 1934, by Dr. R. Tiberi, Institute of Clinical
Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy. Nephritis is an acute or chronic inflammation of the kidney or in other
words, a kidney infection, which can be a serious health threat and is
difficult to cure. The kidneys are essential for maintaining proper nutrient and  
water balances in the blood, but nephritis interferes with this
function, often causing the bloodstream to become overloaded with
excess elements such as water and salt. The body's ability to utilize
84protein is also often impaired during kidney infection, and protein, or
albumin can be abnormally excreted in the urine. Symptoms of nephritis are chills, fever, urgent and frequent urination,
back and abdominal pain, loss of appetite, nausea and vomiting. Blood
in the urine and cloudy urine are also symptoms. This study revealed that urine injections significantly reduced the
symptoms and successfully eliminated kidney infections in most cases:
"The modern therapeutic tendency for acute infectious diseases is typically an  
etiologic tendency; it is exactly from this basis that the concept
of vaccine therapy, for example, autogenous (individual, natural) vaccines and  
protein-therapy, has entered today's standard practice. Actually, there are many infectious diseases far which this type of treatment is  
utilized... Since 1926, Professor Silvestrini has been using urine vaccine
autotherapy for cases of nephritis; however until now, a systematic and
particularly a clinically statistical study which could offer a precise
indication of its effectiveness had not been compiled. Therefore, I have
collected the medical histories of numerous patients who underwent
this therapy during previous years, and, in addition, a group of others
which I was able to personally follow and administer laboratory investigations with  
the goal of obtaining as many clinical observations as was
possible. CASE STUDIES
CASE 111. A patient came into the clinic presenting albuminuria
85(protein) and blood cells [in the urine], fever, edema
(water retention, or swelling), and cyanosis (blue discoloration of the skin). The  
patient was treated with a
course of seven injections (7 cc. each) of auto-urine vaccine. An examination of  
the patient's urine was done
after the third injection and showed only small traces of
Report #6
81
rYour Oren Perfect Medicine
albumin and blood cells and the edema and cyanosis had
disappeared. After completing the treatment course, the
patient was discharged from the hospital, completely
healed. CASE IV. The patient came into the clinic presenting albuminuria
and blood cells in the urine, temperature, but no edema. The patient received urine injections, and after the eighth
injection, all of his symptoms had gone into total remission. Three weeks after the  
treatments, the patient continues to remain completely healed. CASE V. Upon entering the clinic, the patient's examination
revealed considerable protein and blood in the urine and
visual disturbances in the left eye. After only three injections of the urine vaccine,  
the symptoms completely disappeared and the patient was released completely  
cured. This Italian research study on nephritis and urine therapy was an
86extremely in-depth report, detailing 18 cases of clinical nephritis which
were successfully treated with urine injections. Another similar study on the treatment of nephritis, entitled, Treatment
Of Glomer-ulonephritis By Antigen, published in the London Lancet, in
Dec., 1936, by Dr. H.B. Day, (London), also demonstrated the effectiveness of a  
simple, natural urine extract on several cases of both acute
and chronic nephritis:
"Treatment by injection of urine extract appeared of distinct
value in acute glomerulonephritis and for exacerbations or
relapses in chronic active forms of the disease...In chronic cases,
the effect of this treatment is often striking." Day also noted that:
Tests on patients without nephritis showed that the urine extract, even
in large doses, had no adverse effect on renal function or on the blood
pressure. 82The Research Evidence and Case Studies
TITLE: TREATMENT OF COLIBACILLARY CYSTITIS WITH AUTO- Report  
#7
URINE THERAPY, 1935, by Dr. M. Garotescu, published in the medical
journal, Romania Medicala. In this report, the author, Dr. Garotescu, describes his experiences in
treating cystitis, a painful inflammation, or infection of the bladder
which commonly affects women and can lead to more serious conditions, such as  
kidney infections. 87Dr. Garotescu treated numerous cases of cystitis with injections of the
patients' own urine, and discovered that these treatments produced
excellent results, which were corroborated by laboratory tests showing
that the cystitis bacteria had completely disappeared after the urine
injection treatments. For example:
CASE #1: A thirty-two year-old woman with typical symptoms of
cystitis  including  frequent,  painful  urination;  also  complained  of  chronic  
constipation for which she has been
taking laxatives unsuccessfully for several years. She was
treated with 12 urine injections and all symptoms completely disappeared. The  
success of the treatment was
verified by laboratory tests which showed a complete
absence of colibaccilli (cystitis bacteria) in her urine. CASE #2: A 28 year-old woman complaining of frequent and
painful urination. Laboratory analysis of urine sample
revealed the presence of numerous colonies of colibacilli. Patient was given 4 injections of auto-urine, after which
all symptoms and signs of the infection were completely
ameliorated. Dr. Garotescu reported that he gave 220 urine injections to patients
without any adverse side effects whatever, other than an occasional,
temporary redness and swelling at the site of the injection which is
commonly reported with urine injections, or injections of any kind. 88r
83Your Own Perfect Medicine
Report #8 TITLE: VIRUCIDAL (RABIES AND POLIOMYELITIS) ACTIVITY  
OF
AQUEOUS UREA SOLUTIONS,  1936, by Dr. Eaton M. MacKay and
Dr. Charles R. Schroeder, published for the American Proceedings of
the Society of Experimental Biology
SUBJECT: DESTRUCTION OF THE RABIES AND POLIO VIRUS BY
UREA. This report on urea's ability to destroy viruses is extremely interesting
and important in view of the fact that even today, almost  60 years after
this study was published, there is still no medical cure or effective drug
treatment for viral infections. And as we know, viruses can be deadly. After experimenting with the effect of urea on the polio and rabies
viruses, McKay and Schroeder report that:
"...The effect of urea in strong concentration on these viruses (rabies
and polio) proved interesting. As first recorded by Spiro and Ramsden,
urea in aqueous solution has a remarkable ability to 'dissolve'
proteins...
We conclude...that the strong solution of urea not only attenuates
(weakens) or dilutes the poliomyelitis virus in the sense that it is noninfective but  
actually destroys it...
Urea is such a relatively inactive substance and certainly not a
89protoplasmic poison such as are most virucidal agents that it is
in a way surprising that rabies and poliomyelitis are killed so
easily by urea solutions... It is true that neutral and inactive as it is, urea, like alkalies, denatures
protein when dissolving it and this reaction may be associated with the
death of the virus. This denaturation occurs in a very few
minutes..."
This report appears to hold important implications for the treatment of
the AIDS virus, HIV. Because concentrated urea has been proven to
destroy viruses without harming the body, oral urine therapy, which
increases urea concentrations (see Dr. D. Kaye), would logically be an
extremely important addition to treatment regimens; especially in view
of the fact that urine therapy also provides a wide variety of antibodies
(including HIV antibodies in infected patients) and other important
immune defense supporting agents. 84The Research Evidence and Case Studies
No one with HIV or AIDS can afford to ignore the information on urine
therapy, especially considering the danger and ineffectiveness of the
'accepted' AIDS treatments such as AZT. A separate section on AIDS
and urine therapy is presented further on in this chapter. Again,
because urine therapy is easily accessed, inexpensive and proven to be
completely safe, there is absolutely no downside risk to using it in treating AIDS  
and other viral iinfections. 90r
TITLE: TREATMENT OF INFECTED WOUNDS WITH UREA,  1938,
by Leon Muldavis (Senior Casualty Officer at the Royal Free Hospital,
London) and Jean M Holtzman (Demonstrator in Physiology, London
School of Medicine for Women). Published in the English medical journal, The  
London Lancet. SUBJECT: HEALING INFECTED WOUNDS, SKIN ULCERS AND
BURNS WITH UREA
Report #9
Drawing on earlier research into the treatment of wounds with urea,
Muldavis and Holtzman began using urea crystals extensively in their
hospital treatments of serious wounds and bums:
"The protein solvent properties of urea were first investigated by Spiro
(1900) and independently by Ramsden (1902)... Symmers and Kirk
(1915) reported on its bactericidal properties together with its use in
the treatment of wounds. In spite of this article, the use of urea for
wound therapy has apparently enjoyed little popularity in this country
[England]. In  America,  however,  it  has  recently  been  used  for  the  treatment  of  various  
infected wounds by Robinson (1936) and by Holder and McKay
(1937), who found it extremely efficient. Moreover, it is a substance
that is readily obtainable in quantity and is both cheap and stable. For
these reasons it was thought desirable to test its efficacy in the casualty
91department of the Royal Free Hospital (London)...
No toxic effects have been recorded even though the urea has been
applied in solid form. We therefore decided to use both the saturated
solution and crystals throughout. The procedure employed was as follows: The wounds were syringed
free from pus and necrotic (dead) material with a saturated solution of
urea, excessive moisture was removed and the urea crystals were then
liberally applied. Waxed paper was placed next to the crystals to keep
85Your Own Perfect Medicine
them in contact wit
h the wound and to prevent the dressing becoming
soaked. For a period of six months cases of the following types have been treated: (1)  
Abscesses–superficial and deep lesions, (2) Infected traumatic
wounds of all descriptions, (3) infected hematomas (bruised areas), (4)
Cellulitis, (inflamed subcutaneous tissue), (5) Septic wounds due to
burns of 2nd, 3rd, and 4th degree, (6) varicose ulcers, (7) carbuncles
(external staph infections), (8) Infected tenosynovitis (inflamed tendons) of the  
hand. In all, 170 cases have been treated. Notes were kept
on the progress of all of them...
With a view to comparing the efficiency of urea with that of other solutions, the  
cases at first selected for treatment were those which had
either behaved sluggishly with other antiseptics  or had actually retrogressed. 'The  
results obtained were so favorable that we began to use
92urea more generally. TYPICAL CASES
CASE 1. A man aged 27 presented a varicose ulcer...of the left
leg...He had it for nearly 18 months without its having
healed. During this time it had been treated with
Eastoplast and various other substances. At the time the
urea treatment was begun the ulcer was of oval irregular
outline with everted swollen edges and a floor covered
with a whitish, foul smelling slough. The ulcer received
the urea dressings daily for 14 days. After 2 days the foul
odor had disappeared and after 4 days the base of the
ulcer was covered by a mass of bright red granulations
(new tissue). By the 14th day the skin edges had grown in
and the size of the ulcer was 3/4 by 1/2 in. The floor was
dry. The patient had a dry dressing and was discharged. The ulcer was again examined 10 days after the patient's
discharge and was found to be completely healed. CASE 2. A male aged 47 had a septic area on the...third right finger. This was  
drained but discharge of pus continued. The wound was opened again when it was found that the
infection had entered the tendon sheath. Adequate
drainage was provided and the finger X-rayed. The
wound was then treated with eusol baths. After several
93days there was no attempt at healing. Urea treatment
was started and after 3 days the ,
 slough was removed
thus  exposing  the  underlying  tendon. Healthy  granulations  (new  tissue)  were  
present at this time. The urea
86The Research Evidence and Case Studies
treatment was continued. The patient was discharged 22
days after the treatment was begun, the wound having
healed completely. There was no loss of function...
As will be seen from the above, we have used urea in a
variety of casualty department cases. Owing to the
extreme diffusibility of urea even the deepest wound can
be treated effectively. A very definite response to urea treatment is nearly
always obtained after two or three applications...septic
bums, even though they cover a very wide area, under
this treatment become clean and form granulations so
quickly that the surrounding epithelium is able to grow in
with but little delay. The same prompt response is often
obtained in varicose ulcers. Coupled with this is a considerable decrease of edema  
as the local circulatory conditions improve. For the carbuncles (external staph  
infections), treated, we found urea preferable to any other
dressing after initial incision... In none of the cases of our series did we observe any skin
94reaction which could be called a urea dermatitis (rash),
nor have we evidence of any toxic effects. We never saw
a spread of sepsis (infection) under urea treatment or any
undermining of the wound edges. The advantages of the urea treatment are as follows: (1) It
is cheap, the crystals costing one shilling per pound...(2) It
produces no dermatitis. (3) It deodorizes foul smelling
wounds. (4) By dissolving necrotic (dead) material, it
produces a clean wound, so allowing healing to proceed. (5) Local circulatory conditions are improved and healthy
granulations (new tissues) are produced. (6) It has no
toxic effect and causes no necrosis (death) of living material. For this reason,  
unlike strong anti-septics it does not
destroy  the  "leucocytic  barrier"  essential  to  the  organism's  defense. (7)  Urea  
treatment has been successful
where other treatments have failed. (8) We found no contra-indications to its use." It seems extremely unfortunate, after reading this study, that safe, effective'and  
inexpensive urea was ignored as a general antiseptic and
wound treatment in favor of cortisone and antibiotic creams. Cortisone
has been proven to be dangerous and toxic and antibiotics destroy good
bacteria along with the bad. Also by using antibiotics routinely, we
p
p
p
95p
p
87Your Own Perfect Medicine
have  greatly  reduced  their  effectiveness  as  bacterial  strains  have  developed  
increasing resistance to them. Report #10 TITLE: THE EFFECT OF URINE EXTRACTS ON PEPTIC ULCER,
1941, by David J. Sandweiss, M.D., M.H. Sugarman, M.D., M.H.F. Friedman, Ph.D., H.C. Saltzstein, M.D., (Research aided by grants from
the Mendelson Fund and Parke-Davis & Co.). SUBJECT: TREATMENT OF STOMACH ULCERS WITH URINE
EXTRACTS
This is a report on clinical and laboratory studies indicating that urine
extracts taken from pregnancy urine and normal urine, when given
intravenously or injected, have beneficial and therapeutic effects on
chronic duodenal ulcers and other types of stomach ulcers in humans
and on experimentally induced animal stomach ulcers. The researchers reported, among other things, that:
1) urine contains a type of gastric secretory suppressant (or antacid)
called urogastrone, that can protect against irritation of the stomach lining that may  
lead to ulcers. 2)  certain  urine  extracts  also  encouraged  healing  of  ulcers  by  stimulating  the  
growth of new cells, tissues and blood vessels in the damaged
area. 96The study also discusses a pregnancy urine extract called Antuitrin S
which  was  reported  to  have  a  beneficial  therapeutic  effect  on  experimentally  
induced ulcers in animals.. In the report, urine extract therapy is compared to other ulcer drug
treatments and diet changes and it was found in human testing that:
"...a higher per cent of those [ulcer patients] treated with urine extract
became symptom free during treatment (thus, a greater number enjoyed
a maintenance diet sooner) and a much higher percent enjoyed longer
symptom free intervals (thus, a greater number continued with a more
liberal diet over a much longer period of time). 88The Research Evidence and Case Studies
This study references 13 other research studies before 1941 that were
also  conducted  on  the  beneficial  effects  of  urine  extracts  in  the  treatment  of  
stomach ulcers. TITLE: THE WATER OF LIFE, (book) 1944, by John Armstrong. Report #11
This book was not written by a doctor or researcher, but it's the most
compelling and powerful book of testimonials ever written on the use
of urine therapy and deserves to be included in any work on urine
therapy. John Armstrong was just an "ordinary" Englishman with an extraordinary insight. When he contracted tuberculosis at the age of 34 and later
diabetes, he went to various doctors for help, but after two years of
unsuccessful treatments, decided to look for his own solution to his
health problems. The solution he discovered was urine therapy. 97After fasting for forty-five days on nothing but urine and water
Armstrong reported that
"I felt and was 'an entirely new man'. I weighed 140 lbs., was full of
vim and looked about eleven years younger than I actually was." Armstrong was so amazed at his own recovery, that he began to advise
other people on how to cure themselves with urine fasting. His technique was so  
successful that many hundreds of people with everything
from cancer to heart disease, gangrene, kidney disease, venereal
disease, obesity, prostrate problems and many other difficult disorders
came to Armstrong for help and were cured. Armstrong himself
reportedly lived healthily and happily ever after, well into his eighties,
by maintaining a good diet, a healthful lifestyle and by ingesting a
small daily dose of urine. One thing lacking in Armstrong's book is scientific evidence, but the
stories  are  so  full  of  the  incredible  drama  of  dreadfully  sick  people  getting  
miraculously well that most people who read it cease to care about
corroborative laboratory studies. Armstrong's book is a wonderful inspiration, but the fact that so much
scientific evidence supporting urine therapy does exist needs be recognized and  
made public because until it is, the majority of people will be
scared away from urine therapy by doctors and medical practitioners
89Your Dam Perfect Medicine
who insist that there are no laboratory and clinical studies supporting
it. 98Also, Armstrong's method of extended urine and water fasts is very
radical and is definitely not advisable for home use, especially since
Armstrong supervised his patients extremely carefully and provided
certain conditions for his fasts which are not easily duplicated today. John Arm-strong's book is an inspiring compilation of testimonials and
makes excellent reading for everyone interested in urine therapy
Report  #12  TITLE:  THE  ACTION  OF  UREA  AND  SOME  OF  ITS  
DERIVATIVES
ON BACTERIA, by Louis Weinstein and Alice McDonald, 1946, From
the Evans Memorial, Massachusetts Memorial Hospitals, and
the Department of Medicine, Boston,Massachusetts. SUBJECT: THE BACTERIA-DESTROYING PROPERTIES OF UREA
DISCUSSION: THE POTENTIAL DANGER OF USING SYNTHETIC
URINE DERIVATIVES. This study is only one of several conducted on the anti-bacterial properties of urea  
by the two researchers, Weinstein and McDonald. In this
report, they discuss previous research into the antibacterial effect of
urea and report that their studies also confirmed that urea will both
inhibit the growth and destroy many different types of bacteria such as
those that cause dysentery, typhoid, and staph and strep infections:
"Urea and urethane are bacteriostatic and bactericidal for a number of
gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria..."
In other words, this study proved, as did others like it, that urea can
99stop the growth or kill many different types of disease bacteria. This particular study on urea is also good example of why synthetic
drug compounds should not routinely be considered for use in the
place of basic or natural medicinal elements. As  Weinstein  and  McDonald  stated,  they  used  both  urea  and  a  chemically  
synthesized urea compound called urethane to kill bacteria and
they recommended both urea and urethane for medical use as anti-bacterial agents. 90r
I
r
The Research Evidence and Case Studies
Weinstein and McDonald discovered that urethane (made by heating
urea and mixing it with alcohol and other synthetic agents) was sometimes a faster  
and deadlier "kill" than urea alone on bacteria, and so
emphasized its use over simple urea. But what they didn't realize at
the time was that urethane has a carcinogenic (cancer-causing) effect on
t•=1 the body. As  the  Fourth  Annual  Report  on  Carcinogens,  1985  stated:   "This  substance  
(urethane] may reasonably be anticipated to be a carcinogen". A
review  of  urethane's  carcinogenic  action  was  also  reported  in  the  journal  of  
Advanced Cancer Research in 1968. So  you  can  see  how  extremely  dangerous  errors  can  be  made  by  scientists  
experimenting with new and "improved" synthetic drugs. In
Weinstein and McDonald's day, there was no way of knowing or predicting how  
urethane would affect the body in the long term. And the
100same is true today of new drugs that initially seem like miracle cures
but later tum out to be deadly substances. Compound urine-derivative drugs may seem superior in the minds of
medical researchers, and even consumers, but what good are they if
they later prove to be harmful or even fatal? Simple urea and urine
have been shown to be safe over nearly a full century of scientific study
and use, so it certainly makes sense to start using them routinely in
medicine before resorting to potentially dangerous compound chemical
drugs. TITLE: URINE THERAPY, 1947, by Professor J. Plesch, M.D., From an Report  
#13
article in the English medical journal, The Medical Press (London). SUBJECT: USE OF URINE THERAPY 1/N THE TREATMENT OF
INFECTIOUS DISEASES, ASTHMA, ALLERGIES, MIGRAINES,
VIRAL INFECTIONS, HAYFEVER, DIABETES, GOUT,
DYSFUNCTION OF THE ADRENAL AND THYROID GLANDS,
HEART CONDITIONS. Dr. Plesch, an English physician, used natural urine injections in his
medical  practice  extensively  and  with  excellent  success  on  a  large  variety  of  
disease conditions:
"...In fact, my recommendation to use the urine of the infected person
for auto-vaccination is only an extension of the methods of Jenner and
Pasteur and therefore it is strange that auto-urine vaccination has not
10191Your Own Perfect Medicine
been used before. The main difference between the Pasteur-Fenner
methods and auto-urine therapy lies in the fact that by inoculating the fresh urine  
of the patient the active infectious material has been weakened by passage through  
the recipient's own
body. I am convinced from my experience that it is worthwhile investigating
this method systematically with respect to all infectious diseases,
including poliomyelitis, etc. Moreover, during the application of this therapy, I observed some
remarkable effects. Among my first patients whom I treated by urine
therapy was a typical case of asthma. Immediately after the first injection and  
before the vaccination effect had time to develop, this patient
lost his daily attacks of asthma. Following up this clue, I found that anaphylactic (allergic) persons
could  be  desensitized  by  the  auto-urine  injection. Subsequent  investigation  
convinced me that auto-urine therapy could be used with considerable advantage  
against all kinds of anaphylactic (allergic) diseases, such as hayfever, urticaria,  
(hives), disfunction of the
intestinal tract such as cramps, etc. It also relieved migraine
and other spastic conditions. Since I started the auto-urine therapy three years ago, I have
given several hundred injections and I have not come across a
single case where the patient suffered any harm. It is for this reason, and because the method is so simple that is
102can be used by any practitioner without any difficulties, that I
decided to publish my findings at this early stage. The observations which I have quoted are without doubt sufficient
to indicate to the expert that a completely new field of research is
being opened up which may entail considerable additions to our
knowledge of bacteriology, immunology and serology. The fresh urine of men is practically sterile and that of women, too, if
the exterior genitalia have been cleaned previously. For purposes of
immediate injection the urine may therefore be collected directly into
sterile vessels... The application is very simple indeed. The most suitable method is
intragluteal injection. When using urine as an auto-vaccine I found
that usually one injection of a quarter to a half cc. of fresh urine is sufficient. In  
anaphylactic (allergy) cases I have found it useful to start
J
92r
C
C
The Research Evidence and Case Studies
with 5 cc. of fresh urine and to repeat the injections with diminishing
doses down to 1/2 cc. of fresh urine... Thus urine can be used for immunization or desensitization. Treatment
with the patient's own urine is indicated against bacterial or
103virus infections and against allergic conditions...Moreover, the
hormonal end products and enzymes contained in the urine
make it probable that this method may be useful against metabolic disturbances  
such as diabetes and gout and against
derangements of the ovarial or thyroid, etc. functions." CASE STUDIES
JAUNDICE
(1) Miss M. —14 years old. At school several attacks of
icterus (jaundice). Since 2/1/45 depressed, headaches, no
appetite, coated tongue, somewhat increased temperature. Blown up feeling in the  
abdomen, pains in the right
hypogastritum 13/1, Fully developed jaundice, urine
dark brown. 16/1, Intragluteal injection of 1/2 cc. own
urine. No local reaction. 31/1. Jaundice symptoms in
the skin, sclera and urine disappeared entirely. Feeling
well again. ULCERS, DIGESTIVE PROBLEMS
(2) Lance-Corporal L. — 28 years of age. Joined New
Zealand forces 1942. Contracted infective hepatitis in
Africa. After hospital treatment the icterus (jaundice) disappeared, a feeling of  
weakness, intestinal troubles and
depression remained. In the following years repeated
hospital treatment. Has been X-rayed several times for
duodenal ulcer and gallstones. Since then he dragged
104himself about complaining of loss of appetite, tiredness
and indifference, pains in the abdomen after food, constipation, distension and  
abdominal discomfort with flatulence. 14/3/45, Injection with 1/2 cc. fresh urine. The patient's report is as follows — felt better after injection. 15/3, felt normal,  
bowels regular. 16/3, Feeling
quite normal except for tenderness in stomach. 17/3, No
change. 21/3, Quite well, but tenderness in stomach
worse. 24/3, Sore throat, feverish, feeling weak and
depressed. 25/3, Cannot eat, sore throat, feverish, weak. 26/3, Eating. Sore throat better. 29/3, Feels quite well,
93
CYour Own Perfect Medicine
bowels regular, strength returned...3/4, No change, still in
high spirits, feel well. 26/8, Patient writes: I enjoyed 100
percent improvement in my health, I am eating well,
sleeping well and feel very active with no stomach tenderness or sickness. ASTHMA
(4) Mister T. – 17 years of age. First asthma attack at the
age of one:- – "Flushy, cyanotic, gasping for breath. Attacks last for hours." Change of domicile brought no
relief. Daily attacks. Asthmatic deformation of thorax. 12/10/45, Injection of 2 cc. fresh urine. No asthma until
8/11/45, after exertion. In the afternoon 2 cc. of fresh
105urine. Within five minutes attack ceases. Strong local
reaction for 30 hours. 30/12, Starting cold, but with only
very slight attacks of asthma. Since last injection no
strong attack. 12/4/46. After renewed injection on 25/4
of 1/2 cc. of fresh urine, the attacks stop. HAYFEVER
(5) Mr. J.B. – 44 years of age. Since childhood severe
hayfever at the end of May. 31/5/46, 2 cc. fresh urine
injected. 8/6, new injection of 2 cc. 9/6, slight running
and burning sensation of the eyes began but the hayfever
did not develop further and disappeared entirely on
20/6/46. MIGRAINES, MENSTRUAL PROBLEMS
(8) Lady H. – 32 years of age. Married. Complaints since
childhood. Complaints about distention, flatulence, digestive troubles...attacks of  
severe migraine (which) occur
regularly before menstruation. 4/4/45, 2 cc. of fresh
urine injected. Injection repeated on 10/4 and 17/4. In
the last two years no digestive troubles, no migraine
attacks any more before menstruation. Other spastic
symptoms have also disappeared. ARTHRITIS, HEART PROBLEMS
(9)Mr. F. – 43 years. At 20 years of age polyarthritis with
106chorea (nervous disorder). Mitral insufficiency which led
to an enormous dilation of the left auricle. Severe attacks
of heart weakness. In the last four years repeated fits of
pulmonal edema with bloody sputum. For the last two
years this condition is aggravated by bronchial asthma. First injection 12/1/46 with 3 cc. fresh urine. On the day
94The Research Evidence and Case Studies
of injection patient feels much better, after 24 hours severe
attack of asthma. Heart becomes weak and must be treated. Only slight asthma; on  
3/3 2 cc. fresh urine injected. Severe attack of heart weakness, sleep is disturbed. Since
then patient recovered; not only have his attacks of
bronchial asthma ceased, but the condition of the heart
has also improved substantially He is able to lie down
again and can take some exercise. Since the last injection
patient does not require any cardiac medicine. WHOOPING COUGH
(3) Master. W. — 4-1/2 years of age. Developed a severe fit
of coughing with vomiting. Whooping-cough epidemic
in the village. Urine injection given...In the night, severe
fit of coughing with thick phlegm and mucus, sick feeling...Next day, feeling much  
better in every way, no
whooping or return of chronic asthma. His mother later
107writes "Child better than ever, is free from asthma since
the first injections [several weeks ago)", Have seen the
child [four months after injections]. He is developing
physically without any disturbance. Chronic eczema and
blepharedenitis (inflammation of the eyelids) also healed. Plesch reports on many more successful cases during his
clinical use of urine therapy and the results are so impressive that it seems hard to  
believe that urine therapy has
received so little public attention as an over-all medical
treatment for both adults and children. TITLE: ON THE EFFECT OF HUMAN URINE ON TUBERCULE
BACILLI, 1951 by Dr. K.B. Bjornesjo, From the Department of Medical
Chemistry, Uppsala, Sweden. SUBJECT: ANTI-TUBERCULE EFFECT OF URINE
Report #14
Although some medical researchers for many years had been aware
that different body fluids such as serum and saliva had an inhibitory
effect on tuberculosis bacteria, Bjornesjo, a Scandinavian researcher, discovered  
that urine was much more effective that any other body fluids
in arresting the growth of tuberculosis bacilli:
95Your Own Perfect Medicine
"In a preliminary experiment performed in this laboratory employing
(solutions of) saliva, serum and urine from different subjects...it became
108apparent that under the experimental conditions the inhibitory effect of
saliva and serum was very weak...On the other hand urine seemed to
have a considerably stronger inhibitory effect and a concentration of 50
per cent urine in (a) medium completely inhibited the growth of the
tubercule bacilli in most cases..."
Bjomesjo conducted extensive testing of the anti-tuberculosis property
of urine and concluded that:
1) The majority of urines examined showed a strong inhibitory
effect of the growth of the tubercule bacteria. 2) Human urine also has a bactericidal (bacteria-killing) effect on
tuberculosis bacteria. 3) The anti-TB element of urine was shown in laboratory tests to be
present in tuberculin positive and negative individuals and also
in healthy vegetarians and in patients with active tuberculosis. 4) The presence of urine in the urinary tract exerts an anti-TB effect
that can influence the course and spreading of tuberculosis in the
urinary tract itself. Bjomesjo's experiments dearly demonstrated that human urine could
inhibit the growth and even completely destroy the tuberculosis bacteria, but he  
was unable to identify which element in urine is responsible
for its anti-tubercule activity
Actually, Bjornesjo tried for many years to determine the anti-tubercular element  
in urine, so that it could be isolated, but he was never successful. It wasn't until  
1965 that Japanese researchers discovered and
109isolated this mystery anti-TB element in urine —14 years after
Bjomesjo's first attempts. Bjomesjo considered the possibility that urea is the antitubercular agent
in urine, but he ruled this out, perhaps prematurely. In his experiments, Bjornesjo  
only considered the anti-bacterial strength of a 2 per
cent solution of urea, which is the average amount of urea found in
normal urine.
your-own-perfect-medicine-by-martha-christy-with-testimonials.txt
Summarize the following text section accurately and concisely. Maintain specific details and numerical information, and use anti-repetition mechanisms:

        This simple adjustment alone could tremendously reduce health care costs and  
dramatically  upgrade  health  care  quality  by  providing  and  teaching  effective,  
simple, inexpensive natural medical self-help approaches like urine therapy that  
can take the place of expensive and dangerous drugs and surgical therapies that  
should be rightly reserved for crisis and emergency care, and free up doctors' and  
specialists' precious time. We already know that traditional natural therapies like herbal medicines, urine  
therapy and homeopathy work, and many are still widely used in other civilized  
countries. Chinese  hospitals  and  doctors  even  today  largely  depend  on  their  
traditional natural  herbal  medicine  and acupuncture;  England  has homeopathic  
hospitals; Germans rely heavily on their herbal medicines which are even available  
in their drugstores. In France, too, pharmacies carry and doctors prescribe natural  
homeopathic and herbal medicines in addition to synthetic drugs. There are a wonderful variety of alternatives to invasive and synthetic medicine  
that  have  been  proven  to  be  safe  and  effective  over  centuries  of  use  and  
observations, we just have to relearn the art of using them and cure ourselves of  
our dependency  on drugs and surgery. Also, there are many more  books (see  
Appendix) besides the ones I've already mentioned in this chapter which will help  
you to learn more about how to care for your health safely and effectively. The challenge of achieving and maintaining good health is in creating a balanced  
lifestyle and in finding the combination of natural treatments and remedies that are  
right for you individually. And as you'll discover in this book, urine therapy is the most powerful, most  
individualized natural medicine we could ever hope for. After reading all that urine  
therapy has to offer, I know you'll agree that even though man has failed to find the  
synthetic "magic bullet" medicine to cure every illness, Nature had already created  
it for us and given us an incredible, safe, cost-free and simple, natural tool to heal  
ourselves – our body's own amazing, natural medicine. 67CHAPTER 4
THE RESEARCH EVIDENCE
AND CASE STUDIES
The medical applications of urine and its constituents have been  tested, discussed,  
researched and utilized to such an extent throughout the twentieth century that it  
seems incredible that almost none of us, including the majority of our doctors and  
medical administrators have ever heard anything about it. But again, the reason for this is not entirely a mystery. As we discussed in the last  
chapter, even though the success of urine therapy was reported long before the  
1900's,  twentieth century medical  researchers,  doctors and  the public  were no  
longer interested in traditional natural medicines. So urine therapy was moved out of the home and doctor's offices and into the  
oblivion  of  research  laboratories,  where,  unfortunately,  it  still  largely  remains  
today. As we've discussed, urine therapy largely disappeared from public use at the turn  
of the century and the knowledge of the therapy is now hidden in medical journals  
and  research  reports  that  people  and  doctors in  general  never  see;  also,  urine  
ingredients are simply isolated and converted into unrecognizable drug forms. Even though there have been amazing scientific discoveries about the medical use  
of urine, medical researchers, for the most part, do not tell the public about their  
discoveries. Again, this situation is most likely the result of two factors. One,  
modem  medical  researchers  are  primarily  oriented  towards  finding  strong,  
monetarily profitable chemical "bullets" to knock out specific diseases – and not  
towards discovering natural medicines which augment the body's natural capacity  
to heal. 68Secondly, most medical researchers work for pharmaceutical companies and many  
are contractually bound not to reveal the results of their research until the research  
can be applied as a profit-making medical therapy that can be patented by the  
company who funded the research. Also, medical researchers tend to devote their research to extremely specialized  
branches of medicine, and these separate departments of medicine don't generally  
communicate their findings to departments outside of their own research fields. So  
the urologists, for instance, who discovered that urine can prevent and heal urinary  
tract infections might publish their findings for other urologists, but a doctor in  
general practice would probably not come in contact with these studies on the  
importance of urine in bladder or kidney infections. The public and most practicing doctors today consider urine to be nothing more  
than a body waste. But many medical researchers know that in reality, urine is an  
enormously comprehensive and powerful medical substance. Now you get to read  
what many scientists and doctors know, but haven't told us about the amazing  
curative effects of urine therapy. The research studies and articles selected for this chapter are each nurnbered and  
presented in chronological order to present a broad overview of how consistently  
and intensively urine has been researched during the twentieth century. You'll be amazed and astounded by these studies on the medical use of urine. As I  
was reading over these reports, and looking at all of the other many studies on  
urine therapy, I couldn't help exclaiming "Why didn't anyone ever tell us. ". More About Urea
As  an  added  note,  many  of  these  research  studies  were  done  using  the  urine 
extract, urea, which is the primary organic solid of urine. Urea, an organic salt  
formed in the liver,  is the result of the body's use, or synthesis, of protein. The  
body eliminates excess nitrogen which is produced during protein metabolism in  
the form of urea. Urea is also used by the body to help in the mechanism which  
determines how concentrated the urine is, or in other words, how much water is  
excreted from the blood. Urea was discovered centuries ago, in 1773, when it was  
69first  separated  from  urine;  later,  in  1828,  natural  urea  was  synthesized  or  
chemically "copied" in the laboratory. The discovery of urea was one of the most important events of modem chemistry  
and biochemistry because it was the first organic compound to be separated in a  
relatively pure state. Urea, which is critical to our body's use of protein, also  
provides innumerable profound keys as to how our bodies work and function. For this reason, chemists have been fascinated for years by urea and its amazing  
and diverse applications in the fields of science and medicine:
"More scientific papers have probably been published on urea than on  any other 
organic compound. "
— Journal of the American Medical Association
July 1954, "De Urina"
Urea has so many beneficial properties that it was used historically, and  is still 
used today, in a wide variety of medical applications – for reducing excess fluid  
pressure  on  the  brain,  as  a  remarkable  skin  treatment  for  eczema,  dry  skin  
disorders, and fungal infections; as a moisturizer in cosmetic creams, as a safe and  
effective diuretic, and as an anti-bacterial, antiseptic treatment for healing serious  
wounds. People who have heard of the term "uremia", or uremic poisoning, often assume  
that urea itself is toxic and is therefore excreted in the urine. But this is not the  
case. Excess urea becomes toxic to the body only when the filtering mechanisms of  
the  kidneys  are  damaged  or  impaired,  and  the  urea  level  of  the  blood  is  not  
properly regulated But in this case, excessive amounts of other benign substances  
like wáter and sodium become toxic also if the kidney is unable to regulate them in  
the blood. As you'll discover in the research studies in this chapter, urea is not only  
not toxic, but in reality has tremendous medical and physiological value, and can  
be safely used even in large quantities. Urea is on the FDA list of approved drugs for medical use and many products  
made from urea are listed in the Physician's Desk Reference, (which is the book  
70that  doctors  refer  to  in  deciding  what  drug  to  prescribe),  and  in  the  U. S. Pharmacological Index. However, as wonderful as urea has proven to be in medicine, I want to  stress that it 
cannot and should not be used to replace or supersede natural urine as a healing  
agent. As the research in this chapter proves, whole urine contains hundreds of  
known and unknown medically important elements that clearly and definitively are  
not found in urea alone. Also, as medical studies have unequivocally shown, each person's urine contains  
antibodies, natural 'vaccines' and many other critical physiological elements that  
are carried in the blood that are specific to each individual's health condition. These elements in whole urine are not found in either natural or synthetic urea  
alone. For instance, if you have an allergic reaction to wheat, your body produces a  
complex of antibodies to deal with the allergy and those antibodies are found in  
your urine. Medical studies have demonstrated that when you reintroduce these  
urine antibodies into your system by ingesting or injecting your own urine, that the  
allergy can be corrected. But urea alone would not contain these allergy-fighting  
antibodies. In using your own urine to heal yourself, you're getting medicinal elements that  
your particular body has produced in order to deal with your specific, intricate and  
often undetectable disturbances in your body's functioning. You could be exposed to polio, for example or tuberculosis and not even realize it  
until acute symptoms appear – but, as medical research has proven, your urine can  
contain antibodies to those diseases even if acute symptoms are not appearing. So  
regular use of urine therapy can most definitely provide extremely comprehensive  
therapeutic treatment that goes far beyond urea or other medicines. This is not to say that other therapies are not useful and effective, they are, of  
course, but urine therapy, correctly applied, should be the foundation for our health  
regimens and medical treatments and should definitely be used routinely in illness  
and preventive health care. 71I recently read a magazine article about a 12 year-old girl in the Midwest who was  
admitted to the hospital with a high fever, lassitude, and drooling heavily from the  
mouth. Doctors tried frantically but unsuccessfully to diagnose her condition but  
she deteriorated and died several days later. Only after her death was it discovered  
that she'd died of an undiagnosed and therefore untreated case of rabies. This is a good example of why urine and urea therapy should be incorporated into  
all types of medicine. In this girl's case, urine therapy could have been invaluable. In the first place, urea itself has been scientifically proven to dissolve or destroy  
the rabies virus, so it could most definitely have aided this little girl. Additionally, the rabies antibody would have been present in the girl's urine, so she  
would  have  gotten  the  benefit  of  both  the  urea  and  the  rabies  antibody  after  
ingesting  her  urine. Her  doctors  couldn't  diagnose  her  illness  –  but  her  body  
already had, and if she'd been given her urine orally, or by injection with perhaps,  
added urea, it might well have saved her life. And the real tragedy is that there is absolutely no downside risk here – absolutely  
none. Urine is free, it's backed by almost 100 years of medical testing, and in  
every single study ev r done on urine and urea's medicinal use in humans, no  
toxicity ha ever been reported. So what did this young girl have to lose by being  
treated with them. As hundreds of people have experienced, and as research has shown,  urine is  
undoubtedly an amazing natural medicine that can give you health benefits beyond  
any other natural or chemical substance in existence. The  information  on  the  medical  uses  of  urine  most  definitely  deserves  public  
recognition and frankly, if we don't routinely take advantage of this incredible  
natural remedy, we can't honestly say that we're doing all that we can to preserve  
and regain our good health. Sometimes  it's  hard  to  believe  that  even  with  all  our  medical  knowledge  and  
technological genius, we still don't have strong, healthy, disease-resistant bodies –  
but the fact that widespread, crippling health disorders still abound should tell us  
that we're doing something wrong and overlooking something important. Let's not overlook this simplest and yet most useful of natural medicines. 72RESEARCH AND
CLINICAL STUDIES
=========================== ===============================
Report # 1 
TITLE: PLEOMORPHISM, AS EXHIBITED BY BACTERIA GROWN  ON 
A MEDIA CONTAINING UREA, 1906, by W. James Wilson, B. A. , M. B, from  
the Pathological Laboratory of Queen's College Belfast, published in the Journal of  
Pathological Bacteria, London. SUBJECT: THE ANTI-BACTERIAL EFFECT OF UREA
This laboratory study is presented first because it's one of the more  thorough and 
earliest twentieth century laboratory research studies on the medical applications of  
urea. Don't be intimidated by the word 'pleomorphism'. In this context it just basically  
means  that  urea  changed  the  shape,  or  stopped  the  normal  growth  of  disease  
bacteria. After medical researchers discovered that certain types of living microorganisms,  
such as bacteria, could cause disease, it became almost their sole aim to discover  
ways of killing or stopping the growth of these microorganisms, or germs. In this particular study, the researcher, James Wilson, placed different disease-
causing bacteria, such as Bacillus typhosus (typhoid) into petridishes containing  
urea solutions and found, as had other researchers, that the urea stopped the normal  
growth of the bacteria:
"In October 1905, at the suggestion of Professor Symmers, I was investigating the  
action  of the  Bacillus typhosus  and the  B. Coli  on  urea. I. found  that as the  
73percentage of urea in the medium varied, so did the amount of growth of the  
bacillus. with greater percentages of urea, the growth of the organism was  inhibited; with 7  
per cent (urea),  very little growth occurred; with 8 per cent practically none. Urea has an antiseptic or inhibitory effect on the growth of microorganisms. " This anti-bacterial effect of urea was also proven by several other  researchers very  
early in the twentieth century. But rather than present each of these studies on urea  
separately, the most notable of these research findings are listed below in order to  
give a coherent overview on the important studies on urea that were conducted and  
published during the first decades of the new era of modem medicine:
1900
A  German  researcher  by  the  name  of  Spiro  reported  his  discovery  that  urea 
solutions have a remarkable ability to "dissolve" foreign proteins. This is medically  
important because viruses, for example, are molecular proteins as are allergens. Later research confirmed that urea has an amazing ability to rapidly and easily  
destroy viruses such as polio and rabies viruses, and during the 1980's, urine was  
defined as an extremely effective treatment for a wide variety of allergies. 1902
W. Ramsden, another researcher, published a report in the American  Journal of 
Physiology further detailing the protein dissolving properties of urea. Ramsden  
also discovered that urea prevented putrefaction in wounds. His work is often  
referred to by later researchers looking into the anti-bacterial applications of urea. 1906
74Two French researchers, G. Peju and H. Rajat published a report on  their detailed 
study of the effect of urea on various disease-causing bacteria. Their research  
demonstrated that the more concentrated the urea, the more it inhibited bacterial  
growth. In  concentrated  solutions  of  urea,  no  bacterial  growth  occurred. The  
research done by Peju and Rajat has been referred to many times over the years by  
other researchers who studied and clinically applied the anti-bacterial properties of  
urea. This research also supported the later use of urea as an antiseptic in the  
treatment of wounds and infections during the 1930's and 40's. 1915
In England, two other researchers, W. Symmers and T. S Kirk, published  their 
report entitled  "Urea  as a  Bactericide and Its Application in the Treatment of  
Wounds". Symmers and Kirk were actually military doctors, so of course their  
work with urea centered around its use as an antiseptic for wounds. In their report,  
they comment that "all the wounded soldiers under our care in the Ulster Volunteer  
Force Hospital have been treated with urea, and it has been found that. infected  
wounds dressed with urea once in 24 hours give better results than similar cases  
treated in any other way. " Later 20th century researchers firmly established and  
proved that urea, both topically, and internally, provides a wide variety of excellent  
benefits and produces no adverse side effects. As you read more about the remarkable clinical data on the benefits of urea further  
on, you'll be extremely surprised that our medical community today has failed to  
emphasize the use of this incredibly inexpensive, effective and safe anti-bacterial  
medicine. =========================== ===============================
Report # 2 
75TITLE:  AUTOTHERAPY,  (book),  1918,  by  Dr. Charles  H. Duncan. The  
following report is taken from a chapter from Dr. Duncan's book entified "Urine as  
An Autotherapeutic Remedy". Dr. Duncan was the Attending Surgeon, Genito-
Urinary Specialist and co-founder of the Volunteer Hospital, New York City.
Reducing healthcare costs and upgrading healthcare quality by promoting natural medical self-help approaches.
What is the primary goal of the adjustment mentioned in the passage?
The lack of interest in traditional natural medicines and the fact that research was moved to laboratories, making it inaccessible to the public.
According to the passage, what is the primary reason for the lack of awareness about urine therapy?
It is a natural, inexpensive, and safe treatment with no adverse side effects.
What is the main advantage of using urine therapy over other treatments?
The author believes that urine therapy should be the foundation of health regimens and medical treatments, emphasizing its effectiveness and safety.
What is the author's stance on the use of urea and urine therapy?
Urea alone does not contain the antibodies and other critical physiological elements found in whole urine, which are essential for treating specific health conditions.
What is the main issue with using urea alone for treatment, according to the passage?