the second art is to invalidate the details of their doctrines from the beliefs they received from dualism and the philosophers and their letters from their positions and they changed their words intentionally to cover up and confuse. this also i do not see the concern with it because speaking about it and uncovering the cover from its invalidity by clarifying the reality of the truth and its proof is not specific to the sect who are the offspring of the time. so stripping the intention to conveying the characteristics of their doctrines that they are unique in believing in from the rest of the sects is the obligatory and necessary duty. so the author should not lead in his book except the purpose that he seeks and the manner that he seeks it and rejects it. it is part of a persons good islam to leave what does not concern him and that is from what does not concern him in this situation even if it was
والفن الثاني في إبطال تفصيل مذاهبهم من عقائد تلقوها من الثنوية والفلاسفة وحروفها عن اوضاعها وغيروا ألفاظها قصدا للتغطية والتلبيس هذا أيضا لا أرى التشاغل به لان الكلام عليها وكشف الغطاء عن بطلانها بايضاح حقيقة الحق وبرهانها ليس يختص بالطائفة الذين هم نابتة الزمان فتجريد القصد الى نقل خصائص مذاهبهم التي تفردوا باعتقادها عن سائر الفرق هو الواجب المتعين فلا ينبغي أن يؤم المصنف في كتابه الا المقصد الذي يبغيه والنحو الذي يرومه وينتحيه فمن حسن إسلام المرء ترك مالا يعنيه وذلك مما لا يعنيه في هذا المقام وان كان