the second is that he performs a matter in his oath and intends something other than what is sought from him and conceals something other than what is apparent and the concealment is in a way that the wording allows so he thinks between himself and allah the almighty so he may contradict the apparent meaning of his words and follow in it the requirement of his conscience and intention. if it is said that reliance in the oath is on the intention of the one taking the oath because if reliance is placed on the intention of the one taking the oath and his exception then the oaths in the courts of judges would be invalid and the one taking the oath before them would not be unable to conceal an intention and conceal an exception and that leads to invalidating rights
الثاني أن يؤدى في يمينه أمرا وينوي خلاف ما يلتمس منه ويضمر خلاف ما يظهر ويكون الإضمار على وجه يحتمله اللفظ فيدبر بينه وبين الله عز وجل فله أن يخالف ظاهر كلامه ويتبع فيه موجب ضميره ونيته فإن قيل الاعتماد في اليمين على نية المستحلف إذ لو عول على نية الحالف واستثنائه لبطلت الأيمان في مجالس القضاة ولم يعجز المحلف بين أيديهم عن إضمار نية وإسرار استثناء وذلك يؤدي إلى إبطال الحقوق