he said if he made a mistake he uncovered it or part of it or cut something that cannot be cut or his hand reached the egg or something similar to that mistake and he went beyond what is correct then he is liable. he was aware of his work and was known for it or not . if he is not known for it then from his wealth whether it is little or much. if he was aware of his actions and was known for them then that is on his kin if that exceeds onethird of the blood money. they differ in punishment. the one who is not known for that action is punished and the punishment is diverted from the one who is known for his actions and is aware of them. malik said the same about all of that. umar ibn abd alaziz ruled in the case of his circumciser thus and the boy died so the blood money is on her kin.
قال وإن كان أخطأ فقد أكشفه، أو بعضها، أو قطع ما لا يقطع، أو مضت يده إلى البيضة، أو ما أشبه ذلك من الخطأ وتعدى الصواب فهو ضامن. كان بصيرا بعمله معروفا به أو غير . وإن كان غير به ففي ماله قليلا كان أو كثيرا وإن كان بصيرا بعمله معروفا به فذلك على عاقلته إذا جاوز ذلك ثلث الدية، وإنما يفترقان في العقوبة يعاقب غير المعروف بذلك العمل، وتصرف العقوبة عن المعروف بعمله البصير به. كذلك قال مالك في ذلك كله، وقضى عمر بن عبد العزيز في خاتنه كذا، فمات الصبي فالدية على عاقلتها.