this is the general approach in responding to them if they invalidate the view of the minds and it is the necessary certainty in refuting them. so we should not delve into the details with them but we should limit ourselves to telling them everything that you know from your school of thought from the truthfulness of the imam and his infallibility and the invalidity of opinion and the obligation of teaching with what you know and the claim of necessity is not possible so what remains is the view and hearing and the truthfulness of hearing also does not know necessity so what remains is the view and there is no way out of this. if someone says it is not thought that a rational person would claim a school of thought that is not necessary then… they deny the theory so perhaps they acknowledge the theory but they say that learning the method of the theory is obligatory because a person does not have theories on his own.
هذا هو المنهج الجملي في الرد عيهم إذا أبطلوا نظر العقول وهو الجزم الواجب في افحامهم فلا ينبغي ان نخوض معهم في التفصيل بل نقتصر على ان نقول لهم كل ما عرفتموه من مذهبكم من صدق الامام وعصمته وبطلان الرأي ووجوب التعليم بماذا عرفتموه ودعوى الضرورة غير ممكنة فيبقى النظر والسماع وصدق السمع أيضا لا يعرف ضرورة فيبقى النظر وهذا لا مخرج عنه فان قال قائل لا يظن بعاقل يدعي مذهبا ليس ضروريا ثم ينكر النظر فلعلهم يعترفون بالنظر إلا انهم يقولون تعلم طريق النظر واجب فان الانسان لا يسستقل بنفسه في النظريات