the rational spirituality in which the tangibles have no influence. if it is permissible for the one who performed the miracle to be a liar with these interpretations that never occurred to the mind of the one who heard them then why is it not permissible to be a liar with your infallible one who has no miracle with his interpretation of matters that never occurred to them for the sake of interest or to touch a need? the ultimate goal of his words is to state explicitly and swear and these words in the quran are explicit and supported by oaths. they claimed that this was mentioned for the sake of interest and the intended meaning is something other than what was previously understood from them and there is no escape from this.
الروحانية العقلية التي لا مدخل فيها للمحسوسات فإن جاز أن يكذب صاحب المعجزة بهذه التأويلات التي لم تخطر قط ببال من سمعها فلم لا يجوز تكذيب معصومكم الذي لا معجزة له بتأويله على امور ليس تخطر ببالهم لمصلحة او لمسيس حاجة فإن غاية لفظه التصريح والقسم وهذه الآلفاظ في القرآن صريحة ومؤيدة بالقسم وزعموا ان ذلك ذكر لمصلحة والمراد غير ما سبق الى الأفهام منها وهذا لا مخلص عنه