this aspect did not occur nor was it transmitted nor did anyone claim that it occurred believing in falsehood or out of stubbornness let alone uttering it out of belief. and transmitting this text and claiming that it is mutawatir is like the claim of someone who transmitted its opposite which is that the imamate is not for ali after me but rather it is for abu bakr and it will only be after him by choice and consultation. and whoever claims the text or that the imamate is exclusive to his sons from the rest of the quraysh then he is a liar and a falsifier. just as we know that this news did not occur and was not transmitted neither individually nor mutawatir we know that. whatever contradicts it and no matter how much the door of invention is opened everyone who tries to be stubborn and dispute will share in the ability to do so and that is something that people of religion do not consider permissible at all.
هذا الوجه لم يقع ولا نقل ولا إدعى مدع وقوعه معتقدا بالباطل ولا على سبيل العناد فضلا عن أن ينطق به عن الإعتقاد ونقل هذا النص ودعوى التواتر فيه كدعوى من نقل مضاده وهو ان الإمامة ليست لعلي بعدي وإنما هي لابي بكر وانما تكون بعده بالاختيار والشورى وان من ادعى النص او اختصاص الإمامة بأولاده من سائر قريش فهو كاذب مبطل فكما نعلم ان هذا الخبر لم يكن ولم ينقل لاآحادا ولا تواترا نعلم ذلك فما يناقضه ومهما فتح باب الاختراع اشترك في الاقتدار عليه كل من يحاول اللجاج والنزاع وذلك مما لا يستحله ذوو الدين أصلا