 from him let it be so for there is no impossibility in it. rather impossibility is in the sequence of causes. if it is interrupted then the impossibility is removed. beyond that its impossibility is not known so there must be proof of its impossibility. all their proofs are arguments based on taking the word necessary existence with a meaning that has implications and accepting that the evidence has indicated the necessary existence with the description that they described and it is not so as mentioned previously.
عنه فليكن كذلك فلا استحالة فيه، إنما الإستحالة في تسلسل العلل فإذا انقطع فقد اندفعت الإستحالة، وما عدى ذلك لم تعرف استحالته فلا بد من برهان على استحالته. وكل براهينهم تحكمات مبناها على أخذ لفظ واجب الوجود بمعنى له لوازم وتسلم أن الدليل قد دل على واجب الوجود بالنعت الذي وصفوه وليس كذلك كما سبق.