the promise and threat of the quran with various types of false interpretations is something we know that if any of it had been mentioned in the time of the messenger of allah and the era of the companions after him they would have rushed to behead him and would not have disputed that it is an explicit denial of allah and his messenger. so whoever denies allah in his oneness and does not believe in the verses that have been revealed about monotheism and does not believe in the resurrection the resurrection and the hereafter how can he be fit to assume the position of imamate and for the bonds of islam to be entrusted to him? this path will be realized by the observer if he browses through it and then returns to their doctrines that we mentioned in their nullification so that by the sum of the two views what we mentioned him as a source of religious disorder and corruption of belief and that someone who has such vice in his mouth is fit for leadership.
وعد القران ووعيده بفنون من التاويلات باطلة وذلك مما نعلم انه لو ذكر شيء منه في زمان رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وعصر الصحابة بعده لبادروا إلى حز الرقبة ولم يتماروا انه صريح التكذيب لله ورسوله فمن كذب الله في وحدانيته ولم يصدق بالايات الواردة في التوحيد ولم يصدق بالقيامة والبعث والنشور كيف يصلح ان ينتصب منصب الامامة وان يناط به عرى الاسلام وهذا المسلك يتحققه الناظر اذا تصفح ثم رجع الى مذاهبهم التي ذكرناها في ابطالها فيصح له بمجموع النظرين ما ذكرناه من اختلال الدين وفساد العقيدة واني يصلح للامامة من فيه مثل هذه الرذيلة