as for infallibility it is dispensed with as is the case with judges and governors. if they refuse and claim infallibility for judges and governors and every candidate for a matter from the side of the imam this is what the imamis believe until the guard the spy and the doorman were brought against them and each one of them has a matter connected to them. they responded by saying that these matters were religious matters that required infallibility for those responsible for them and the one who is appointed for them by appointing the imam cannot be anything but infallible. we seek refuge in god from believing in a doctrine that compels its supporter and defender. until he denies what he witnesses and realizes intuitively and necessarily then injustice against the classes of people is witnessed from the conditions of the arrogant from the side of their leader and the most pious religious among them does not cease from making permissible the usurped money in the name of land tax and taxes from the money of the muslims knowing that it is forbidden. and no matter how much the opponents speech ends with denying necessity there is no reason except to refrain from it and limit oneself to consoling him for what has befallen his mind.
فأما العصمة فيستغنى عنها كما في حق القضاة والولاة فإن منعوا وإدعوا العصمة للقضاة والولاة وكل مترشح لإمر من الأمور من جهة الإمام وهذا ما اعتقده الإمامية حتى اورد عليهم الحارس والمتعسس والبواب ويرتبط بكل واحد منهم امر فأجابوا بأن هذه الأمور إنا كانت امورا دينية شرطت العصمة في المتكفلين بها والمنتصب لها بنصب الامام لا يكون إلا معصوما ونعوذ بالله من اعتقاد مذهب يضطر ناصره والذاب عنه إلى ان يجاحد ما يشاهده ويدركه على البديهة والضرورة فالظلم على طبقات الناس مشاهد من أحوال المتصبين من جهة إمامهم ولا ينفك أورع متدين منهم عن استحلال الأموال المغصوبة باسم الخراج والضريبة من اموال المسلمين العلم بتحريمه ومهما انتهى كلام الخصم الى مجاحدة الضرورة فلا وجه الا الكف عنه والاقتصار على تعزيته فيما اصيب به من عقله