he says if there is no alternative to an infallible teacher and there is no miracle for the infallible but he is known by his claim and the owner of the batiniyya does not claim divinity how is that possible and the owner of the shabassiyya claims divinity then his followers are more deserving. if you say that whoever claims divinity knows the invalidity of his claim of necessity then the answer is from two aspects one of them is that he only claims that by way of incarnation and he claims that that was inherited in their lineage and that continued in their house for a long time and the claimant now was his grandfather who claimed that.
يقول اذا لم يكن بد من معلم معصوم ولا معجزة للمعصوم وانما يعرف بالدعوى وصاحب الباطنية لا يدعي الربوبيه كيف وصاحب الشاباسية يدعي الربوبيه فأتباعه اولى فان قلتم من يدعي الربوبيه يعرف بطلان قوله ضرورة فالجواب من وجهين أحدهما أنه إنما يدعى ذلك بطريق الحلول ويزعم ان ذلك توارث في نسبهم وقد استمر ذلك في بيتهم عصرا طويلا والمدعي الآن كان جده مدعيا لذلك