he is considered one of those who walk towards allah not one of those who have reached him. how can this be denied when the doctrine of the christians is based on the union of divinity with the humanity of jesus peace be upon him to the point that some of them called him a god some of them the son of god and some of them said he was half god and they agreed that when he was killed only his humanity was killed not his divinity. how can this be when a group of the rafidis imagined that about ali may allah be pleased with him and they claimed that he was god and that was during his time until he ordered that they be burned with fire but they did not return and they said this makes it clear. we are truthful in our statement that he is god because the messenger of god may god bless him and grant him peace said no one is punished with the fire except its lord. thus it is clear that the invalidity of this doctrine is not necessary but rather it is a kind of foolishness and its invalidity is known by rational consideration just as the invalidity of their doctrine is known. thus their statement has been invalidated there is no one who claims infallibility except our companion. rather someone has appeared who claims infallibility and more.
يعد من جملة السائرين الى الله لا من زمرة الواصلين وكيف ينكر هذا وعليه مذهب النصارى في اتحاد اللاهوت بناسوت عيسى عليه السلام حتى سماه بعضهم إلها وبعضهم ابن الإله وبعضهم قالوا هو نصف الإله واتفقوا على انه لما قتل انما قتل منه الناسوت دون اللاهوت كيف وقد تخيل جماعة من الروافض ذلك في علي رضي الله عنه وزعموا أنه الإله وكان ذلك في زمانه حتى امر باحراقهم بالنار فلم يرجعوا وقالوا بهذا يبين صدقنا في قولنا أنه الإله لأن رسول الله صلى الله عيه وسلم قال لا يعذب بالنار إلا ربها فبهذا يبين ان بطلان هذا المذهب ليس بضروري ولكنه ضرب من الحماقة ويعرف بطلانه بالنظر العقلي كما يعرف بطلان مذهبهم فإذا قد بطل قولهم لا مدعي للعصمة سوى صاحبنا بل قد ظهر من يدعي العصمة وزيادة