the interpretation of this is that if the patient dies from the doctors treatment of cutting cauterizing cutting or splitting his leg and his hand did not make a mistake in anything and he did not disobey then in that case there is no liability on him if he is known for medicine. if he is not known for medicine then he is liable for that from his money and the blood money is not borne by the kin and there is no retaliation on him because he did not intentionally kill him but rather the one who sought the one who was injured made a mistake.
وإنما تفسير هذا أن يموت المريض من علاج الطبيب من بطه، أو كيه، أو من قطعه، أو من شقه، ولم يخط يده في شيء، ولم يخالف فعند ذلك لا يكون عليه ضمان إذا كان معروفا بالطب، وإذا لم يكن معروفا بالطب فهو ضامن لذلك في ماله ولا تحمل ذلك العاقلة، ولا قود عليه لأنه لم يتعمد قتله وإنما أخطأ الذي طلب من أصابت