we said how did you know that it has no preoccupation? and why did its worship and longing for the first not consume it and preoccupy it from imagining the detailed particulars? or what is it that prevents the estimation of another obstacle other than anger and desire and these perceptible obstacles? and how did he know that the obstacle is limited to the amount that we have seen from ourselves and in the rational there are preoccupations of high ambition and seeking leadership that are impossible for children to imagine and they do not believe it to be a preoccupation and an obstacle so how did he know the impossibility of
قلنا وبم عرفتم أنه لا شاغل لها؟ وهلا كانت عبادتها واشتياقها إلى الأول مستغرقا لها وشاغلا لها عن تصور الجزئيات المفصلة؟ أو ما الذي يحيل تقدير مانع آخر سوى الغضب والشهوة وهذه الموانع المحسوسة؟ ومن أين عرف انحصار المانع في القدر الذي شاهدناه من أنفسنا، وفي العقلاء شواغل من علو الهمة وطلب الرئاسة ما يستحيل تصوره عند الأطفال ولا يعتقدونها شاغلا ومانعا، فمن أين يعرف استحالة