rather the infallible imam does not suffice at all for he does not add to the owner of the law and he does not suffice in both aspects. he does not have the ability to comprehend the images through the texts nor the ability to speak to all of creation nor to charge them with the condition of continuous transmission in everything that is transmitted from him peace be upon him. i wish i knew what their infallible teacher would suffice in these two aspects. does all of creation know the texts of his sayings while they are in the farthest east and west based on the words of individual preachers and they have no infallibility so that they are trusted or continuous transmission from him is required in every word and he is… in himself he is veiled and none can find him except the singular and the deviant. this is if we assume that he is aware of the truth through revelation in every incident as was the owner of the law. so how is it when the situation is as we know it and as the special ones among his followers who surround him in his country and his state know it? it has been revealed by these words that they are confusing and saying that if you say there is no need for education then you have denied customs and if you acknowledge it then you have agreed with us in proving education. so they take education as a general and accepted expression then they detail it by saying that it contains an acknowledgment of the obligation of learning from the infallible. i understood which science does not require a teacher and which science requires him and if he is needed then what is it that is learned from the teacher his path and not imitated in himself so that his infallibility is dispensed with and what is it that is imitated in himself so that his infallibility is needed and that the infallible one is the prophet may god bless him and grant him peace and what is taken from him how is it divided into what is known for certain and what is thought?
بل لا يغني الامام المعصوم شيئا فانه لا يزيد على صاحب الشرع وهو لم يغن في كلا الطرفين فلا قدرة على استيعاب الصور بالنصوص ولا قدرة على مشافهة جميع الخلق ولا على تكليفهم اشتراط التواتر في كل ما ينقل عنه عليه السلام فليت شعري معلمهم المعصوم ماذا يغني في هذين الطرفين أيعرف كافة الخلق نصوص أقاويله وهم في اقصى الشرق والغرب بقول آحاد هؤلاء الدعاة ولا عصمة لهم حتى يوثق بهم او يشترط التواتر عنه في كل كلمة وهو في نفسه محتجب لا يلقاه الا الاحاد والشواذ هذا لوسلم انه مطلع على الحق بالوحي في كل واقعة كما كان صاحب الشرع فكيف والحال كما نعرفه ويعرفه خواص اشياعه المحدقين به في بلده وولايته فقد انكشف بهذا الكلام انهم يلبسون ويقولون ان قلتم لا حاجة الى التعليم فقد انكرتم العادات وان اعترفتم فقد وافقتمونا على اثبات التعليم فيأخذون التعليم لفظا مجملا مسلما ثم يفصلونه بأن فيه اعترافا بوجوب التعلم من المعصوم فقد فهمت أي علم يستغنى فيه عن المعلم واي علم يحتاج فيه اليه واذا احتيج فما الذي يستفاد من المعلم طريقه ولا يقلد في نفسه فيستغني عن عصمته وما الذي يقلد في نفسه فيحتاج فيه الى عصمته وان ذلك المعصوم هو النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وان ما يؤخذ منه كيف ينقسم الى ما يعلم تحقيقا والى ما يظن