the proof only indicates the severance of the chain. as for the great things that they invented regarding the necessity of the necessary being being described with them no proof indicates them. if the necessary being is what they described him as which is that he does not have multiplicity and does not need anything else for his existence then there is no proof for proving the necessary being. rather the proof indicates the severance of the chain only and we have finished with this in the attributes.
البرهان لا يدل إلا على قطع التسلسل فقط فأما العظائم التي اخترعوها في لزوم اتصاف واجب الوجود به فلم يدل عليه دليل. فإن كان واجب الوجود ما وصفوه به وهو أنه لا يكون فيه كثرة فلا يحتاج في قوامه إلى غيره، فلا دليل إذن على إثبات واجب الوجود وإنما الدليل دل على قطع التسلسل فقط، وهذا قد فرغنا منه في الصفات.