 and your saying if we assumed that the movement of the finger with the finger was eternally eternal the movement of the water would not be an action is a deception because the finger has no action but rather the agent is the one with the finger which is the one who desires. and if it were assumed eternally the movement of the finger would be an action for it in the sense that every part of the movement is created from nothingness so with this
وقولكم لو قدرنا حركة الإصبع مع الإصبع قديما دائما لم يخرج حركة الماء عن كونه فعلا، تلبيس، لأن الإصبع لا فعل له وإنما الفاعل ذو الإصبع وهو المريد، ولو قدر قديما لكانت حركة الإصبع فعلا له من حيث أن كل جزء من الحركة فحادث عن عدم، فبهذا