if it is said that you have transmitted their doctrines and you have not mentioned the reason for the invalidation then what is the reason for that? we say that what we have transmitted from them is divided into matters that can be applied in a way that we do not deny and into what is required by the shariah to deny and the denied is the doctrine of the dualists and the philosophers and the response to them in it would be long so that is not from the characteristics of the doctrine of these people so that we would be preoccupied with it but we respond to them in the specificity of their doctrine of invalidating the opinion and establishing the teaching from the infallible imam but despite that we we mention one path that is in fact the backbreaker. we mean in invalidating their doctrine in all that we will tell about them and what we have told and it is that we say to them in all their claims that distinguish them from us such as denying the resurrection the eternity of the world and denying the resurrection of bodies.
فإن قيل قد نقلتم مذاهبهم وما ذكرتم وجه الإبطال فما السبب فيه قلنا إن ما نقلناه عنهم ينقسم الى امور يمكن تنزيلها على وجه لا ننكره والى ما يتعين من الشرع انكاره والمنكر هو مذهب الثنوية والفلاسفة والرد عليهم فيه يطول فليس ذلك من خصائص مذهب هؤلاء حتى نتشاغل به وانما نرد عليهم في خصوص مذهبهم من ابطال الرأي واثبات التعليم من الامام المعصوم ولكنا مع ذلك نذكر مسلكا واحدا هو على التحقيق قاصم الظهر نعني في ابطال مذهبهم في جميع ما سنحكي عنهم وما حكيناه وهو أنا نقول لهم في جميع دعاويهم التي تميزوا بها عنا كإنكار القيامة وقدم العالم وإنكار بعث الأجساد