we said that the analogy is that the reliance is on the intention of the one taking the oath and his exception because he is the one taking the oath and the one being sworn is opposed to the oath but he ruled to follow the intention of the one taking the oath in consideration of rights and to protect them by virtue of the necessity calling for it and that is in the case of the one who is right in taking an oath that is in accordance with the shariah and the sources of suspension in it. as for the one who is unjustly coerced and deceived aggressively and fraudulently then no and the matter of the one taking the oath is considered with him in the analogical law in consideration on the side of the one taking the oath because the reason for deviating to considering the side of the one taking the oath is the severity of the need and what need do we have to impose oppression on weak muslims by means of various forms of deception and trickery so we must refer to the law in this regard.
قلنا القياس أن يكون التعويل على نية الحالف واستثنائه فإنه الحالف والمحلف عارض عليه اليمين ولكنه حكم باتباع نية المستحلف مراعاة للحقوق وصيانة لها بحكم الضرورة الداعية إليه وذلك في المحق في التحليف الموافق للشرع وموارد التوقيف فيه فأما المكره ظلما والمخادع عدوانا وغشما فلا ويعتبر أمر الحالف معه في القانون القياسي في الاعتبار بجانب الحالف لأن سبب العدول إلى اعتبار جانب المستحلف شدة الحاجة وأي حاجة بنا إلى تسليط الظلمة على تأكيد اليمين على ضعفاء المسلمين بأنواع الخداع والتلبيس فيجب الرجوع فيه إلى القانون