no opinion for the one who is not obeyed. if his power is established by following the majority of his followers from the uprising of those who are erected to oppose him then how can power not be established in our time and the situation is as we mentioned? if it is said that ali may god be pleased with him took charge of the matter himself and directly waged wars and displayed himself to people and did not hide himself from them we say and who is the one who stipulated in the imamate that he directly conduct matters and deal with them himself? yes there is no blame on him if he conducts them himself. so if he is satisfied with his soldiers and followers and does not have to endure the war himself then it is permissible for him. relying on mere opinion and management if it is referred to in matters close to him and his country and delegating to those with a reliable opinion and insight in matters far from him and this now in our era is dispensed with for god has subjected the men of the world and their heroes to the loyalty and obedience of this presence until they were dispersed in the regions of the world as we witness and see so behind this thorn there is no matter whose existence is required for the validity of the imamate. so if it is said why do you look at these and do not look at… the soldiers of the dissenters and they are also showing off with a thorn in the opposition of this thorn we said no matter how many there were from this side the opposition of the two thousand minds did not spark. do you think that the batini did not look at the thorn of muawiyah and his equipment and his resistance to ali with his soldiers and supporters? so how did he not stipulate for the validity of the imamate that the aspects of the world be clear of the filth of opposition? if he had stipulated this in the trustworthiness the imamate would not have been established for anyone ever from the beginning of the matter to our time. it has become clear that the condition of this quality exists. and more
لا رأى لمن لا يطاع فاذا كانت تقوم شوكته باتباع الاكثر من اتباعه من انتصاب من انتصب لمخالفته فكيف لا تقوم الشوكة في زماننا هذا والحال على ما ذكرنا فان قيل كان علي رضى الله عنه يتولى الامر بنفسه ويباشر الحروب ويتبرج للخلق ولا يحتجب عنهم قلنا ومن الذي شرط في الإمامة مباشرة الأمور وتعاطيها بنفسه نعم لا حرج عليه لو باشر بنفسه فإذا استغنى بجنوده وأتباعه عن المقاساة للحرب بنفسه جاز له الاقتصار على مجرد الرأي والتدبير إذا روجع في الأمور القريبة منه ومن قطره والتفويض إلى ذوي الرأي الموثوق ببصيرتهم في الأمور البعيدة عنه وهذا الآن في عصرنا مستغنى عنه فقد سخر الله رجال العالم وأبطالهم لموالاة هذه الحضرة وطاعتها حتى تبددوا في أقطار الدنيا كما نشاهد ونرى فليس وراء هذه الشوكة أمر يشترط وجوده لصحة الإمامة فإن قيل وما بالكم تنظرون إلى هؤلاء ولا تنظرون إلى جنود المخالفين وهم أيضا مستظهرين بشوكة على مخالفة هذه الشوكة قلنا مهما كانت الكثرة من هذا الجانب لم تقدح مخالفة المخ الفين أفترى لم لم ينظر الباطني إلى شوكة معاوية وعدته ومقاومته لعلى بجنوده وأنصاره فكيف لمم يشترط في صحة الإمامة أن تصفو له جوانب الدنيا عن قذى المخالفة ولو شرط هذافي الإمانة لم تنعقد الأمامة لأحد قط من مبدأالامرإلى زماننا هذا فقد اتضح أن المشروط من هذه الصفة موجود وزيادة