On XXXX XXXX, 2015, I filed an affidavit of fraud with Suntrust Bank, after reviewing my bank statement and noticing XXXX ( XXXX ) fraudulent charges for the period of XXXX XXXX, 2015. A total of {$940.00} worth of charges stemming from XXXX, Michigan was deducted from my account using my bank debit card information. After submitting the affidavit of fraud to Suntrust Bank, I was given a refund of {$120.00} for XXXX ( XXXX ) of the XXXX charges. I was told that I would need to contact XXXX directly to inquire about a refund for the amount of {$480.00}, in which I did, and XXXX was able to conduct a payment search, located the fraudulent charge and reimbursed the amount immediately. Suntrust Bank then gave me a provisional credit of {$460.00} for the remaining charges, which included a XXXX of XXXX amount of {$310.00}. Several days later, Suntrust Bank reversed the provisional credit all but {$120.00}, indicating that I have a past history of making payments to XXXX and shopping at XXXX XXXX. I do have a history of making payments to XXXX of XXXX XXXX XXXX, but NOT to XXXX of XXXX, which is were the fraudulent payments all stem from. I do shop at XXXX, but in the XXXX area, and NOT in XXXX. As such, I submitted a rebuttal to Suntrust on XXXX XXXX, 2015, and was then told that it takes XXXX days for the investigators to make a decision. I believe it is absolutely ridiculous that I have to fight a bank that I have been a customer with for over XXXX years regarding fraudulent charges. Further, it is beyond understanding why they were able to refund most of the other charges that were also made in XXXX, but refused to reimburse XXXX of the largest charges. 
