We entered into an agreement with our servicer on new payment terms for our mortgage through email with our attorney and their attorney. The servicer agreed to adjust our interest rate, reduce the unpaid principal balance, adjust our monthly payment amount, correct our property address and offered us a settlement amount of {$18000.00} in exchange for us dropping our law suit against the servicer with prejudice. The servicer than produced a formalized settlement agreements ( Including the confidentiality and loan-modification agreements ) that provided language that we did not agree to. There was also an issue on who " relevant parties '' are regarding the formalized settlement agreements ( Including the confidentiality and loan-modification agreements ). We exchanged emails with the servicer 's attorney to change the language in these formalized settlement agreements ( Including the confidentiality and loan-modification agreements ), but the attorney did not agree to changing the language and told us if we did not sign these formalized settlement agreements ( Including the confidentiality and loan-modification agreements ), we would not have an agreement. The CFPB has found that these agreements are not required for the servicer to grant homeowners a loan modification. The servicer is now attempting to foreclose on our home because they will not grant us a loan modification without signing these formalized settlement agreements ( Including the confidentiality and loan-modification agreements ) and never adjusted our interest rate, unpaid principal balance, monthly payment amount, corrected our property address and did not pay the settlement amount of {$18000.00}. As part of the agreement, we had to non-suit our lawsuit with the servicer with prejudice. Since the servicer 's attorney informed us that there is not an agreement if we did not sign the formalized settlement agreements ( Including the confidentiality and loan-modification agreements ), we non-suited our lawsuit without prejudice. The servicer 's attorney filed a motion to get the judge to force us to honor the agreement and changed our non-suit to with prejudice. We did appeal the trial court 's decision and the appellate court ruled we did have a valid Rule XXXX agreement but that the formalized settlement agreements ( Including the confidentiality and loan-modification agreements ) exceeded the scope of the Rule XXXX agreement. The servicer has still not provided us a loan modification as agreed and plans to proceed with the foreclosure. The servicer had posted our home for foreclosure sale on XXXX/XXXX/2016, but we filed a temporary restraining order. That TRO expired on XXXX/XXXX/2016. Our home has now been listed for foreclosure sale for XXXX/XXXX/16. 
