On XXXX/XXXX/2016, Asurint provided a employment background check report on me for their client XXXX XXXX XXXX. Asurint claimed I had a criminal misdemeanor charge which I disputed directly with the prospective employer and Asurint as not belonging to me and identity fraud. The report in question clearly states charges against a XXXX XXXX XXXX ( my name is XXXX XXXX XXXX ) with addresses not used or belonging to me. Asurint fraudulently stated the criminal report claimed alsias ( es ) XXXX XXXX XXXX which is not true. The criminal report clearly states criminal charges against a XXXX XXXX XXXX and it does not state anywhere in the charging documents XXXX XXXX XXXX was charged with a crime or XXXX XXXX XXXX was using an alias XXXX XXXX XXXX. 
The criminal charges does not show or state both XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX were both charged with a crime or using aliases. The criminal report does not reflect my social security number and I have disputed use of addresses listed on report to all the specialty resellers supplying inaccurate date to companies like Asurint that are using inaccurate addresses to associate or attached my name to criminal charges. 
Under the FCRA I requested Asurint to validate their claim and provide the actual charging documents showing my social security number and charges against XXXX XXXX XXXX or courts records clearly stating XXXX XXXX XXXX was using a alias XXXX XXXX XXXX to date Asurint is refusing to valid their claim and supply the information. 
In addition, I requested the names, physical and emails addresses, telephone and fax numbers and contact names of all parties associating my social number with said inaccurate addresses to date Asurint has refused to provide this information to allow the consumer to dispute the inaccurate information directly with their source. 
