On XXXX XXXX and XXXX someone made several transactions using my sons account that I am listed as a co-owner of. There was a {$500.00} cash deposit, followed by visits to XXXX Wells Fargo offices in XXXX XXXX and XXXX all within XXXX minutes of each other to cash checks. The majority of those funds were received as cash back with the rest being deposited into the account. 

The transactions are as follows : XXXX XXXX {$500.00} cash deposit at Wells Fargo XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$620.00} check deposit with {$490.00} cash back Wells Fargo XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX GA at XXXX {$610.00} check deposit with {$490.00} cash back Wells Fargo XXXX XXXX XXXX GA at XXXX {$620.00} Check deposit with {$490.00} cash back at Wells Fargo XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX GA @ XXXX {$610.00} Check deposit with {$490.00} cash back at Wells Fargo XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX GA @ XXXX {$650.00} Check deposit with {$490.00} cash back at Wells Fargo XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX GA @ XXXX {$650.00} Cash deposit with {$490.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX GA at XXXX {$300.00} withdrawal at NON- wells Fargo ATM at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX GAAnd on XXXX XXXX, {$300.00} withdrawal at Wells Fargo XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX GAMy son and I requested a fraud investigation with Wells Fargo that they have closed ever after admitting that it was not my son at surveillance making these transactions. They closed the ( ATM ) case previously after comparing surveillance for XXXX transaction I reported against a second transaction I reported concluding that the pictures matched. I was told that case was being reopened but I can not find any evidence that it was actually reopened. The ( edeposit ) case was simply closed because his ( reported ) debit card and PIN were used to make the fraudulent transactions. After speaking with a supervisor, I was told that it was going to be given a second look and called back ~ XXXX hours later with the news that it was being closed again. The reason I was given was because they had picture/video of someone other than my son making a authorized transaction ( {$50.00} deposit ) on XXXX XXXX. Thereby, essentially giving up his rights to claim fraud. 
