I received a temporary modification via which the interest rate I am charged during the interest only period of my loan was more or less fixed. The interest only period will end in XXXX 2016 and the loan will become fully amortizing in XXXX 2016. Since I am permanently and totally XXXX and my income is not likely to increase I will not be able to make the fully amortizing payment beginning in XXXX 2016. I contacted Wells so that we could begin the modification process well before any potential delinquency. Unfortunately it is beyond clear, based on statements made to me by Wells ' employees, that they are either unable or unwilling to address my actual circumstances. I was expressly told yesterday that Wells would evaluate my information to see if there has been any change in circumstances since the temporary modification was made even though I am not requesting a modification for anything except the fully amortizing loan period. In effect, I am being told there is no point in my submitting any information since Wells is unwilling or unable to understand the fairly simple nature of my request which is to modify the fully amortizing loan terms scheduled, by contract, to begin in XXXX 2016. Simple math is sufficient to understand that I will NOT be able to make the fully amortizing loan payments nor do I wish to wait until I am already seriously delinquent which will happen beginning in XXXX 2016. Since first contacting Wells I have been told that I have a single point of contact and was told yesterday that I will be assigned a single point of contact. In any case what I need is to speak with someone who actually understands I am being proactive in the hopes that I can, inter XXXX, not become delinquent and not have to engage Wells Fargo in litigation to process what is, at present, a simple request. Because the nature of my XXXX involves having XXXX which has XXXX and because the XXXX any attorney from representing me in negotiations with Wells I am reaching out to the CFPB for assistance. I will also note that NONE of the " HUD counselors '' actually offer assistance and, instead, provide " workshops '' or what amounts to cheerleading neither of which constitutes any actual assistance in my case. While I realize, especially after having worked as a legal aid attorney, that most consumers do not seek assistance until they are seriously delinquent I do not believe that is prudent or in any parties ' best interests. Accordingly I am hoping that CFPB can assist me in reaching someone at Wells who, like me, sees the benefit of assisting me proactively and taking meaningful steps to ensure we do not wind up in litigation. 
