In case XXXX, SPS continues to say that XXXX was acting to protect their interest in advancing funds to pay off XXXX. 
This is not the case, because I was in NO threat of foreclosure from XXXX, and XXXX did not have any idea of arrangements with XXXX to bring the account current. 
The reason I was delinquent in the first place was because I had XXXX and it took a long time to recover. XXXX was very helpful during this time, unlike XXXX. 
Because I was not in danger of foreclosure from XXXX, XXXX did not protect their interest, but did arbitrarily ( and I say illegally and unethically ) decide to pay off my first mortgage with XXXX. 
As such, it was a cash out refinance, entitling me to the right of rescission. As I have said before, I NEVER received ANYTHING showing where any of the money went, let alone any RESPA documents. 
I am willing to see what a Judge would say in a court of law, is SPS? 
