This is in response to case number XXXX. I placed a complaint against Bank of America, and just got a summary of research from Bank of America. Am I really to expect that BOA would honestly and without prejudice conduct pure research into my complaint against them? Is there not an independent omsbudsman or review panel to investigate claims? In my original claim, I specifically stated that my case was mismanaged, and yet, the word " mismanage '' did not occur anywhere in the summary of their findings. Therefore, I argue that they had bias in conducting this research because of the omission of this claim. Furthermore, XXXX XXXX stated repeatedly how Bank of America wants customers " to be pleased '' with their service. Again, if this research was carried out independently, this is a statement that should not be made. XXXX XXXX stated that BOA was grateful for me paying off the loan in full, which is ironic because during the payout process, BOA " advisers '' suggested I should in fact do a short sale if I could not bring the full amount I owed to the closing. The simple fact that I am sking for {$5000.00} in forgiveness towards INTEREST - not principle mind you, but INTEREST - and BOA will not concede is frightening. {$5000.00} is less than XXXX XXXX of the BOA CEO 's paycheck. So BOA thanks me for saving them money by not conducting a short sale, but can not do any more than verbally acknowledge this point. 
In summary - I disagree with allowing BOA to conduct their own investigation as this is not impartial. They missed many facts including the main one that BOA mismanaged my account and summarily dismissed any short sale assistance because of incompetence by their agents. 
