On XXXX XXXX, 2012, while I was at work, I, XXXX XXXX XXXX, was forced out of my home for the second time ; by which XXXX, XXXX XXXX and its affiliates committed fraud upon the court, coercion, racketeering, conversion, XXXX, wrongful eviction, trespassing, breaking and entering, fraud, constructive fraud, etc., with the motive to cover up all loose ends of this mortgage transaction by confiscating all of my belongings in order to dispose of any incriminating evidence that chronicled my dealings with XXXX that could possible yield to any potential wrong doing on their behalf. Since XXXX fraudulently achieved a favorable foreclosure decision on the merit of abandonment, it is plausible to believe that the motive for why XXXX needed to confiscate all my belongings without returning them is due in part that XXXX could not turn around and request the courts to issue an eviction notice when it was XXXX 's sworn testimony in court that my residence was deemed " abandoned '' by their preservation team XXXX! 

With that being said, all evidence clearly indicates how XXXX only sole purpose for contracting XXXX 's was for them to diminish and/or eliminate any potential defense against mortgage fraud with the perceived notion that once XXXX was successful in empting out my home I would be without a justifiable defense to refute any mortgage documentation presented by XXXX XXXX as being authentic. As a result, U.S. Bank, via my initial complaint with them, took the liberty to either replace my mortgage loan documents or alter them with fraudulent ones of their own [ XXXX ]. Nevertheless, when I filed former complaint ( s ) against the closing agent/notary-XXXX, along with complaint ( s ) against XXXX Fargo/Wachovia-who originated this loan-they confirmed via their response ( s ) that the documents presented by XXXX XXXX were not documents prepared or presented for me to view and sign for at closing [ XXXX ]. Nevertheless, it is XXXX who is proclaiming that there was no wrong doing committed on their behalf ; therefore, all documentation they presented via the CFPB was a part of my " original '' closing packet that was packaged and sold to them by Wells-Fargo/Wachovia. 

With that being said, I request for Wells-Fargo/Wachovia, via the CFPB, to explain to me in detail why a ) did Wells-Fargo/Wachovia intentionally and maliciously commit fraud by fabricating my loan documents with fraudulent signatures ; and b ) if XXXX XXXX proclaims that they did not commit fraud by forging my signatures to mortgage documents for Wells-Fargo/Wachovia to explain in detail the who, what, when, where of HOW XXXX XXXX came to be in possession of fraudulent mortgage documentation that can not be accounted for by the originating source ( s ) who had me to sign " all '' applicable mortgage documents at closing [ XXXX ] that now contradicts documentation XXXX XXXX presented as being a part of my " original '' loan packet! 
