My bank account was charged XXXX overdraft fees when only one should have been charged. XXXX payments posted to the account on XXXX/XXXX/15. These were for {$94.00}, {$17.00}, and {$10.00}. However, Suntrust posted the largest payment first causing the account to go to - {$1.00}, and then proceeded to post the other XXXX payments. Because of this, XXXX overdraft fees were changed. If the smaller payments would have been posted first, only XXXX overdraft fee would have been charged. When contacted on XXXX and XXXX, the XXXX of the XXXX stated that it was there policy to post the largest payment first, even though it may cause extra overdraft fees to be charged. Additionally, they said it was their policy to only refund XXXX overdraft fee, which they did. This is an abusive policy that is only in place to inflect the maximum number of overdraft fees. They said it was so the most important thing will be paid, but if that was the case, the other items should not have been paid because the account was overdrawn. Suntrust should not be allowed to have a policy that is only in place to cause a significant number of overdraft fees when an account goes into the negative. 
