AS REFERENCED IN SPS ' RESPONSE TO MY PRIOR CFPB COMPLAINT # XXXX, SPS STATED THAT THEY INFORMED ME AS TO WHY THE HIGHER CONTRACTUAL PAYMENT WAS DRAFTED HOWEVER SPS DID NOT DISCLOSE OR EXPLAIN WHY THEY ASKED ME TO ALSO MAKE CHECK PAYMENTS WHEN THEY WERE AUTODRAFTING MY ACCOUNT PER THEIR DOCUMENTATION RECEIVED BY ME IN MID XXXX XXXX WITH MY LOAN MODIFICATION PAPERWORK. 

IT IS NOT BECAUSE SPS AUTODRAFTED ME THAT I INCURRED BANK FEES, IT IS BECAUSE SPS AUTODRAFTED FOR A CONSIDERABLY HIGHER AMOUNT AND ALSO REQUESTED THAT I COMPLETE AUTODRAFT PAPERWORK TO REINSTITUTE AUTODRAFTS AND MAKE CHECK PAYMENTS IN THE INTERIM TO ENSURE MY ACCOUNTS REMAINED CURRENT, TO WHICH I WAS OVERCHARGED AND INCURRED BANK FEES OF {$110.00} FOR DUPLICATE CHECK PAYMENTS ( AS I WAS NOT AWARE THAT SPS WAS CONTINUING WITH MY ORIGINAL AUTODRAFT SET-UP WHEN MY ACCOUNTS ORIGINALLY TRANSFERRED TO THEM IN XXXX ). 

AS PART OF THE LOAN MODIFICATION PROCESS, SPS HAD STATED TO ME ON SEVERAL OCCASSIONS THAT THE AUTODRAFT PROCESS WOULD HAVE TO BE SET-UP AGAIN ONCE THE MODIFICATION WAS FINALIZED. YOU CAN IMAGINE HOW UPSET I WAS AFTER A LENGTHY MODIFICATION PROCESS WHERE THE SAME DOCUMENTS HAD TO BE SUBMITTED 5-6 TIMES BEFORE THEY COULD FINALLY GET THE MODIFICATION GOING, TO THEN HAVE THEM FINALLY FINISH IT 6+ MONTHS LATER BY SIGNIFICANTLY OVERCHARGING MY BANK ACCOUNT, CONTINUING TO PROCESS CHECKS - NOT ONCE, BUT TWICE EVEN AFTER I NOTIFIED THEM OF THEIR ERROR, REFUSE TO APPLY THE OVERPAYMENT TO MY ACCOUNTS APPROPRIATELY ( AT LEAST FOR ANOTHER THREE MONTHS ), REFUSE TO CREDIT ME THE {$110.00} IN BANK FEES, AND THEN START REPORTING DELINQUENCY ON MY ACCOUNTS AS A RESULT, DESPITE MY ORIGINAL REQUESTS FOR CORRECTION IN XXXX XXXX AND CONTINUALLY REQUESTED BY ME EACH MONTH UNTIL I STARTED FILING COMPLAINTS THROUGH CFPB IN XXXX XXXX ... THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO FURTHER DISPUTE, NO FRAUDLENT CREDIT BUREAU REPORTING, ETC. 

THE FINAL CORRECTION DEMANDED BASED UPON SPS ' ERROR IN XXXX XXXX, IS THAT MY CREDIT WORTHINESS BE RESTORED AND THE LATE REPORTINGS TO THE CREDIT BUREAUS FOR THE MONTHS OF XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX BE CORRECTED. SPS HAS ALREADY CORRECTED THE PRIOR MONTHS CREDIT REPORTINGS TO THE BUREAUS FOR THE PREVIOUS MONTHS IN THEIR RESPONSE TO MY CFPB COMPLAINT NUMBER XXXX. THEY SHOULD HAVE CORRECTED THESE THREE MONTHS AS WELL AT THAT TIME, BUT THEY CONTINUE TO CONDUCT THEIR BUSINESS IN A DISHONEST FASHION, DEFRAUDING CONSUMERS OF THEIR RIGHTS. I FOLLOWED UP WITH THEM VIA TELEPHONE SEEKING AN AGAIN TO ACHIEVE AN AMICABLE SOLUTION AND NOT INVOLVE OUTSIDE PARTIES, HOWEVER, SPS LEAVES ME NO OTHER RECOURSE BUT TO CONTINUE MY COMPLAINT THROUGH CFPB. 
