My wife and I have credit cards showing logos either from Visa, XXXX, or XXXX. Within the XXXX Card category there is XXXX card whose processing is done by a third party, XXXX XXXX XXXX, who send out the monthly statement and receive the monthly payment. We have XXXX other XXXX cards whose processing is done by XXXX itself. 

Our card that is processed by XXXX XXXX XXXX has again been the object of attempted fraud. XXXX phoned us to confirm that certain new charges were fraudulent. Since the charges were fraudulent, XXXX said they would cancel the current card and issue a new card and send it to us " overnight. '' I thank them for their vigilance. This latest nuisance gave us reason to pause. 

In reviewing our personal records, we discovered that XXXX has had to issue XXXX replacement cards to us in three years because of attempted fraud ; this last card will be number XXXX ; this year we have had XXXX fraud attempts with XXXX card. 

Our XXXX cards have never been lost or stolen, yet these breeches have continued for three years. The charges were made out of state, at supermarkets, fast food businesses, etc. Our frequency of use of the XXXX other XXXX cards is about the same as the XXXX card ; ditto the Visa XXXX. However, cards processed by XXXX itself, have not been breeched. XXXX XXXX was breeched once several years ago, due to a problem originating at the processing bank. 

Why does XXXX XXXX XXXX not conduct its business in a proactive way, to prevent fraud attempts rather than acting after the fact. Our latest cards, whether bearing the Visa, XXXX, or XXXX logo all have the new " chip '' technology. In my opinion, security has to be improved. The name of XXXX XXXX, on whose behalf XXXX processes the card information, suffers by association. 
