On XX/XX/XXXX I came home from a long day of work and found the attached letter in my mail box. In this attached letter from XXXX XXXX it is advising that on XX/XX/XXXX a payment that was legitimately authorized to them from Bank of America on XX/XX/XXXX was advised unauthorized per a dispute given by the " now '' Bank of America account holder. I was an authorized party on the account until XX/XX/XXXX. The amount that was disputed was for XXXX. 
This was indeed an authorized payment due to I was a joint owner of the Bank of America account when the payment was submitted to XXXX XXXX. The reason that this payment was advised unauthorized by the current account hold is because my ex is being spiteful and he knows that Bank of America is not going to put in the extra legwork to ensure if this was indeed true or false. 

This is the XXXX time I am having to deal with this matter in a 1 month time frame and it is becoming ridiculous. If Bank of America did a better job in ensuring the following before the dispute was done we would n't have this issue : - Who 's name is on the bank account at the time that the payment was made? 
- Who 's name was on the account that the payment was made to? 
- Does the address match what was on file to Bank of America when the payments were made? 

I can answer this with ease - IT WAS MINE!!! Bank of America should not allow authorized payments to be disputed when they were made legitimately while it was a joint account. My ex is being spiteful due to I broke the XXXX because he became abusive. Bank of America this has to stop! I am tired of being a victim because someone is not doing their job correctly and continuing to breach their fiduciary duty. 
