XXXX XXXX OR XXXX ' XXXX, XXXX ( SON ), OPENED A RABOBANK N.A., XXXX XXXX, CA., ACCOUNT # XXXX, ON XXXX XXXX XXXX FOR HIS FATHER XXXX XXXX XXXX ' XXXX ( VICTIM ), [ ACCT. SSN/TIN XXXX. ] ; XXXX, PARTNER IN A 'FAMILY CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS : XXXX XXXX XXXX & XXXX '. THE SON WAS AN 'AUTHORIZED SIGNER ' ON VICTIM 'S ACCOUNT. JUST PRIOR TO THE SON PASSING ON XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, VICTIM THOUGHT THE SON 'S WIFE [ XXXX XXXX XXXX. ] ( SUBJECT ), TRICKED VICTIM INTO BELIEVING SHE WAS ADDED TO HIS ACCOUNT AS A 'TEMPORARY AUTHORIZED SIGNER ' TO MAKE THE CURRENT AND SUBSEQUENT MONTHS PAYROLL & INVOICES [ UNTIL SHE LEARNED THE ACCOUNTING PROCESS AT ANOTHER BANK OWNED BY THE SON. ]. IN FACT [ SUBJECT ADMITTED TO FORGING VICTIM 'S NAME SEVERAL TIMES. ], SUBJECT OPENED A NEW RABOBANK XXXX ACCOUNT # XXXX, ON XXXX/XXXX/XXXX - BY IDENTITY THEFT : NAMING HERSELF AS 'OWNER ' OF THE NEW ACCOUNT AND VICTIM AS AN 'AUTHORIZED SIGNER ' ; USING, VICTIMS SSN/TIN XXXX, AS THE NEW ACCOUNT TIN. WHILE SUBJECT DID MAKE PAYROLL ; SHE, WITHDREW {$70000.00} ON XXXX/XXXX/XXXX FROM THE XXXX ACCOUNT ; AND, {$61000.00} FROM THE XXXX ACCOUNT [ KEEP IN MIND, VICTIM WAS XXXX YEARS-AGED AND AT THE HOSPITAL AWAITING HIS SON 'S DEMISE. ]. SUBJECT, THEN WITHDREW {$31000.00} ON XXXX/XXXX/XXXX AND CLOSED THE ACCOUNT. THE BANK NEVER NOTIFIED VICTIM THAT HIS ACCOUNT HAD BEEN TAKEN OVER BY SUBJECT ; AND, HAD VICTIM SIGN A SIGNATURE CARD ON XXXX/XXXX/XXXX ; LEADING VICTIM TO BELIEVE SUBJECT WAS 'TEMPORARILY ' PUT ON HIS ACCOUNT AS AN 'AUTHORIZED SIGNER ' TO MAKE PAYROLL. FURTHER, SUBPOENAED BANK RECORD AFFIDAVIT DOES NOT SHOW SUBJECT AS THE OWNER OF ACCOUNT XXXX ; AND, THE BANK WANTONLY FAILED TO NOTIFY ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES [ AS MANDATED. ] OF REASONABLY SUSPECTED ELDER FINANCIAL ABUSE. UPON SEEKING REIMBURSEMENT, THE BANK HAS ASSERTED THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THE BANK HAS INSURANCE UPON WHICH A CLAIM CAN BE MADE. THE ONLY OTHER WAY TO OBTAIN VICTIM 'S MONEY IS BY AN EQUITABLE SUIT BROUGHT BY THE GOVERNMENT TO PROTECT A RIGHT [ AND SINCE VICTIM REPRESENTS AN ELDER CLASS NOT PROTECTED BY THE STATE - A PUBLIC RIGHT. ] ; AN, ACTION AS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS NEEDED AS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS OR DOCTRINE OF LATCHES DO NOT APPLY UNDER SUCH SUITS. CAN YOU REPRESENT OR HELP XXXX XXXX, NOW AGED XXXX RECOVER HIS LIFE 'S SAVINGS. I PRAY YOU CAN HELP CR. 

XXXX XXXX, ADVOCATE FOR XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX DETECTIVE AGENCY CA STATE LIC. NO. XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX 
