XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, NC XXXX ; Cust. Serv. XXXX, acquired the mortgage on my rental property in XX/XX/XXXX. XX/XX/XXXX-XX/XX/XXXX, they requested proof of hazard insurance both by mail and by phone, which I provided. XX/XX/XXXX, I received another letter, telling me that XXXX would purchase a " forced '' hazard insurance policy XX/XX/XXXX, because I had not responded. At that time, I called XXXX again and re-sent the Hazard Insurance certificate via PDF/email. The representative on the phone verified that the certificate was received and the policy would not be needed. XX/XX/XXXX, I received a statement from XXXX, showing that {$3400.00} was credited back to my escrow account, as the charge for insurance was reversed when proof of insurance was provided. It appeared the matter was resolved. 

Then, on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, I received a letter from XXXX stating that I had a " projected Low Escrow Balance '' and that on XX/XX/XXXX, my escrow balance would fall below XXXX. As such, my automatic payment would be adjusted to withdraw an additional {$140.00} per month to make up for the projected shortfall of XXXX. After speaking to XXXX uninformed and sarcastic representatives on the phone, I was informed that this charge was for lender placed hazard insurance. One employee explained it was because the Insurance company had only credited Roundpoint half of the XXXX charge from XX/XX/XXXX. The second employee told me that I had provided a policy that began on XX/XX/XXXX, and so XXXX needed to purchase insurance ( purportedly in arrears ) for XX/XX/XXXX - XX/XX/XXXX. Neither of these employees could explain why my forced lender policy was approximately 10 times the cost of my condo associations hazard insurance. 
