My husband and I boh have an account with Wells Fargo as well as our joint account. My husbands account became over drawn on XXXX XXXX. On XXXX XXXX Wells Fargo exercised their 'right to off set ' by withdrawing the overdrawn money from our joint account to cover the beg balance in his personal account. ( I understand this and I 'm fine with this ) the problem is that at this time our joint account did not have enough funds to cover this it actually only had {$20.00} in it but they still took {$240.00} out, overdrawing the account. That transaction posted immediately and now they want to charge my overdraft fees for the transaction that are pending BUT was made while I actually had money on the account. It seems to me that the right to offset should actually serve the purpose of off setand by making XXXX account t posit XXXX only to make another negative so you can then charge more fees seems illigal to me. 
Please help 
