During recent visit to XXXX my Debit Card kept being declined, I chalked it up to the merchants processing as Credit as the individuals just stated decline no reason provided, until I returned home to XXXX and received notification from XXXX XXXX and XXXX that payments rejected. contacted Wells Fargo regarding this and they stated that there was a Fraud Hold on the account as I was making a purchase out side of my routine, indicated that I was in XXXX - In formed that is why, indicated that I was in XXXX the previous month and this did not occur and I was not impacted on the use of my Debit Card - so the practice of detecting fraud is not consistent if it hold true to what I was advised, I have now incurred additional costs to per-authorized providers and now I have to go through the process of contacting all my providers to ensure that they have received there payments. The solution I received from WF is that they will provide letter explaining situation and that I would have to call back in to get reimbursement - however no grantee, now due to the inconsistent Fraud Detection practice, I now have to contact all my per-authorized accounts to ensure them that my account is in deed in good standing and that if not already been paid to please proceed and process the transaction again. Do not understand why I should be incurring additional work load as a result of a policy that is not consistent with in the WF organization 
