We are filing a complaint on our Loan Number XXXX based on the fact that we were given a trial modification in which we started sending payments on time. Without any reasons -after ASC received their 3rd payment- we were told by ASC that we were not longer part of this approved given trial period. 

This trial period, granted by ASC, was suddenly withdrawn, despite payments having been timely made, resulting in foreclosure. 

We asked ASC for an explanation and we were told that it was an internal decision and was confidential to ASC. 

Thereafter ; we hire lawyers to represent our case for a loan modification. In the processes thru several years, we submitted different loan modifications providing information based on different incomes. 

Regardless of how much income we were making ; we were always given an excuse and or a reason by ASC that we would not qualify -whether- it was because we were making too much money or we were not making enough money or that our income was too high and or too low. Never, we were ever able to please ASC with our income. 

Actually, on one of the loan modification programs, our lawyers found mistakes and errors in which they sent a notice of error pursuant to XXXX CFR sec. XXXX of regulation X of the Mortgage Servicing Act. 

Our laywer mentioned that the " error '' in this specific situation stems from a violation of XXXX CFR sec. XXXX ( XXXX ). 

Pursuant to XXXX CFR sec. XXXX ( XXXX ), an " Error ' within Section XXXX includes the failure to provide accurate information to a borrower regarding loss mitigation options and foreclosure. 

Our Lawyer found out that many contradicting statements indicate a grossly negligent review of our modification package. 

Actually, in one of the laon modification process, a member of ACS admited wrongdoing and failing to do a good job in our case. 
ASC wrote " I apologize for the confusion as I could have done a better job explaining the use of the XXXX separate figures '' In addition, ASC mentioned that they are currently working with their customer or bank but we have not heard from ASC since this last response of failing to do a good job. 

In the process of all of these -many submitted loans modification- our arrears incremented tremendously. 
It feels as if ASC set up us to fail. ( Not acting in good faith ). 

If ASC would have not removed us from the original trial period given to us in the year of 2010, we would have never been so late on arrears -to that end- ASC is directly responsible for these arrears putting our family into financial distress due to their wrong doing. 

We believe that we have not been given a fair treatment to our case and we are looking forward for our case to be reviewed carefully to find a fair solution. 
