My credit went from XXXX to XXXX due to the Great Recession and problems in paying medical bills and being unemployed. In XXXX I landed a job and have not missed any bill payments since then. Accordingly, my credit went from XXXX to XXXX in XXXX. However, in XXXX of XXXX my credit suddenly dropped from XXXX to XXXX per XXXX XXXX 's data collected from Transunion and XXXX. When I checked to see why I discovered a XXXX NEW entries for unpaid balances that were FOURTEEN YEARS OLD, both dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX. Both entries involved " XXXX XXXX XXXX '' which I have never heard of in amounts of {$13000.00} and {$4600.00}. I contacted XXXX and Transunion and got their typical barrage of obfuscation and confusing emails, none of which addressed the problem. Then they simply noted the " entries were removed '' but my credit remained dinged by XXXX points. 
I want to know if the Big XXXX credit reporting firms business models rely on keeping people beaten down, downtrodden, and miserable to enhance their profits by selling their services? They seem quick to harm someone but unresponsive in fixing problems. For me, this is very damaging in that it may preclude me from getting a mortgage. Worse yet, credit in this range will likely have an adverse affect on me getting a promotion. 

There is no salient documentation as my complaints were filed with Transunion and XXXX on line and I was unable to save correspondence in their website. There responses did not address, or rectify, the issue. 

Thank you. 
