I discovered a recurring charge on my Barclays ' VISA card, issued by LLBean. It was a service I was not using, and I spoke to a Barclays rep who told me I needed to change my account number. After following this advice, the charge still appeared on my next statement. I called Barclays and was told that when a person orders something online, checks the box agreeing to " terms and conditions '', and charges it to their VISA card, the business is connected to that specific account, NOT the account number! So changing my account number did not matter ; I was still being charged. She kindly offered to stay on the " line '' with me while I cancelled that subscription, which I did. On reflection, however, I was concerned about the ability of Barclays to have that kind of control over my account, i.e., my " money ''. Why should any company be tied to my account, especially since I XXXX told that every time I changed my account number, then I need to give that new number to all the accounts that I have automatically charge my card each month, such as XXXX. It did not make sense that online companies should have that kind of " special '' treatment over my local companies with which I do business all the time. In the meantime, I had " googled '' the recurring address of the initial subscription I had ordered as it appeared on my credit card statement. I was shocked to see the words " Fraud '' and " Scam '' in the addresses that came up from " googling '' the company, which happened to be " XXXX XXXX ''. That is what prompted me to contact LLBean and let them know that ( in my opinion ) Barclays was " aiding and abetting '' that fraud by allowing companies to tie directly to my account, rather than just to my account number! For myself, I am done with that company since Barclays had helped me contact XXXX and cancel my subscription. However, I was concerned that others may not realize and be likewise charged each month, not aware that Barclays policy allowed a " tie-in '' to one 's account, as opposed to one 's credit card number. Plus, it could reflect badly on LLBean 's good name. 
