The original disputes for these accounts were sent out XXXX XXXX, XXXX. The first correspondence from your company stated you reviewed documentation and determined you were not able to use it to make a determination for changes or deletions XXXX XXXX, XXXX. See Attached. Documentation in all disputes contained credit report with account in question circled and letter detailing issue related to it. See Attached. All of these accounts were sent seperately by certified mail on the same day. See Attached. Your correspondence letter indicated all accounts disputed had projected completion dates of XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX, respectively. See Attached. Results from investigations were dated XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX included : XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, Chapter XXXX Bankruptcy Accounts, and XXXX XXXX XXXX. See Attached. 

On XXXX XXXX, XXXX you were sent a certified letter as a followup to the investigation results. See Attached. This letter requested a method of verification for each account verified and notice to delete all accounts not investigated within 30 days. See Attached. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I received documents dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX providing additional results for XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX and uncompleted XXXX projection date. See Attached. As a result these accounts were not investigated timely. Whether this late response attempts to circumvent the rule, nevertheless it is ineffective due to sufficient record keeping by customer. One further note, after contacting the US Bkpt Ct Ga XXXX concerning accounts # XXXX ; XXXX ; XXXX ; and XXXX, at ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX no debt validation or otherwise took place as reported by your results. Customer seeks compliance to these enforceable rules. 
