Please see my Complaint # XXXX of XXXX XXXX. The following information refers to an additional letter received from Bank of America, and your office may want to add it to my first complaint or else establish a new complaint. The reason is that I intended the complaint of XXXX to cover XXXX, but Bank of America apparently has separated my dispute of charges into XXXX cases, the first one with Bank America Case # XXXX concerning XXXX and the second XXXX received recently, as described below, with Bank America Case # XXXX concerning XXXX. As described in the enclosed copy of my faxed reply to Bank America 's recent XXXX letters dated XXXX, the XXXX paragraph describes some kind of activity after you put the original complaint in motion. However, Bank of America sent me XXXX letters re their Case # XXXX, XXXX requesting more information which I do not have and the second requesting that I choose XXXX " description of my situation '' as well as requesting my authorization to cancel my current credit card and let them issue a new XXXX. The enclosed copy of my fax indicates these facts that I ca n't provide more information requested in the first letter and that I will not authorize the cancellation/reissue move. With reference to my refusal to authorize the cancellation of my current credit card and issuance of a new card, I crossed out the authorization because it will not solve the dispute but it will have an adverse effect on my currently excellent credit rating. I believe that with this latest request Bank of America is now resorting to threats, which is simply reprehensible. Finally, as noted in my faxed reply to Bank of America, I was unable to learn who XXXX Customer Care Resolution is or who FIA Care Services is, but the message one gets upon dialing XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX is that FIA Care Services is a debt collection company. I would appreciate your help with this additional turn of events since Bank of America has created this confusion and threat. 
