We have been applying for a HAMP loan mod from SPS representing XXXX. We submitted a full financial packet in XXXX and then more in XXXX 2015. We were approved for a HAMP Tier 1 Trial Payment Plan in XXXX 2015, but our gross income input to the NPV was significantly higher than our actual income. We appealed in writing, clearly explaining and documenting our real income. Finally, in XXXX SPS responded to our appeal stating that they had checked and they reaffirmed that they were correct in entering our gross income. They wrote that we needed to pay the inflated trial payment by the first of the previous moth, obviously impossible. 
Three days later we received another letter from SPS saying we were not eligible for HAMP due to the new NPV which showed our gross income at {$2000.00} a moth less than actual. Our new Trial Payment would be almost {$1000.00} a month more than the previous offer. Our HUD certified counselor who had been helping us asked the agent on the phone, which income was right and which was the offer being made. She ( SPS ) told us both income figures were right ( even though wildly different ), and that we no longer qualified for HAMP 1, because we had not paid the inflated Trial Payment, AND that we could no longer apply for HAMP. We would have to pay their SPS offer at over 50 % of our gross income now, increasing to 80 % of our fixed income. 
If we did not, they would foreclose. 
She said there is no appeal to errors on their part on the NPV used to determine a modified mortgage payment. 
