On Monday, XXXX XXXX, 2015, I received a letter from Quality Loan Service Corporation ( " Quality '' ) titled " Debt Validation Notice '' with an XXXX XXXX, 2015 date, which stated pursuant to, and in compliance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the XXXX Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) the notice allowed me to respond in writing within 30 days to dispute the debt. This notice also further stated Quality was a non-judicial foreclosure trustee and has been instructed to commence foreclosure proceedings against a property I own. I am unfamiliar the creditors named within the Quality notice and the debt amount that is claimed to be owed on this property different from my records. 
On XXXX XXXX, 2015 ( less than 30 days ), I responded in writing by sending a Dispute and Notice to Validate Debt to Quality at XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, CA XXXX via U.S. Certified Mail No. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. This is well within the 30 day requirement of FDCPA regulatory guidelines. 
Concurrently, on XXXX XXXX, 2015, Quality agents executed order paperwork to process the foreclosure and on XXXX XXXX, 2015 Quality filed the documents with the Office of the Recorder in XXXX XXXX County with a Trustee Sale date of XXXX XXXX, 2015. This means that in 24 days, Quality sent the original notice than filed paperwork against me. 
Quality has violated several XXXX XXXX. XXXX & XXXX subsections. If Quality claims it filed the Trustee Sale and/or foreclosure order as a " bona-fide error '' and " overshadowed '' whether clerical, procedural or otherwise, then Quality must immediately cease and desist with the foreclosure proceeding of the property until this matter is rectified and resolved XXXX. Quality must postpone the Trustee Sale immediately and Good Faith must be evidenced by stopping any further action whether non-judicial, legal or collection until it has complied with FDCPA requirements allocated to me by law. These actions are inconsistent and to the contrary of federal and state laws inclusive of those of the FDCPA. 
Conclusion, Quality has commenced, processed, signed documentation and have acted in malice, deceptively and unfair within no intent to honor the 30 day period before pursuing on any action against me. Quality has in fact unethically commenced in the collection of debt without VALIDATING THE DEBT XXXX. This is negligence and a total disregarding for my lawful rights. Quality has not responded to my dispute, nor practice fair collection practices when they filed at the Office of the Recorder within less than 30 days from the date on the Debt Validation Notice, and several days prior the Quality agent signed the Order No. XXXX and authorized the foreclosure. 
