In the Memorandums of evidence attached, you will find a timeline reflecting the amount of time wasted in trying to communicate with XXXX and Select Portfolio Servicing XXXX Inc. ( SPS ). Additionally, there is a breach in contract due to the fact that neither XXXX nor Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ( SPS ) honored the Loan Modification promised, although taking the payment for the loan modification account AND a judge approving that the loan modification contract should be upheld ( also attached ). 

We believe that XXXX willfully denied the modification ( after contact signature and taking payments ) and transferred the loan to Select Portfolio Servicing XXXX Inc. ( SPS ) within 24 hours after the denial so that they would not have to face consequences. Furthermore more, willful negligence is purported on Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ( SPS ) as they did not even give a reason for the breach of contract until XXXX 2015, 150 days after they received the notification of transferal. Additionally, both XXXX and Select Portfolio Servicing , Inc. ( SPS ) is refusing to uphold a judge 's ruling to honor the loan modification as well as refusing to honor the loan modification contract itself. 
Therefore, we are charging your company with the following acts : Unfair Business Practices : These XXXX banks are using the bankruptcy process to push homeowners into foreclosure ( XXXX vs Select Portfolio Servicing , Inc. formerly known as XXXX XXXX XXXX Performance of Deceptive business practices ( misleading me regarding true reason of loan denial ) Breach of Contract : refusal to adhere to judge 's ruling and refusal to acknowledge the loanmodification contract that was signed and sent back Intentional/Negligent infliction of emotional distress : intentionally and negligently withholdinginformation of the true reason of denial for 3+ months Predatory lending strategies : trying to force a new loan modification procedure/application while not upholding previous contract 
