We asked the bank for a minimum net proceeds amount to determine if we could find a buyer. The bank told us on XXXX that acceptable net proceeds of {$230000.00} were required. We provided an offer to avoid the foreclosure. the investor then, after reivew for one week change their mind and now want an additional {$7500.00} above the offer and to reduce commission to 3 % for XXXX agents to split. The short sale national protocol is 6 % between XXXX agents. We reduced the commission to 5 % split between XXXX agents to try to make this offer work. This was the highest offer received in 2 years on market, they turned it down the day of the foreclosure, then 5 minutes before the foreclosure they postponed the foreclosure for offer review again. That was on XXXX XXXX, 2015. Now they have returned today XXXX XXXX XXXX, 2015 ) at the same terms as prior to their review XXXX {$260000.00} and reduce commission to 3 %, split between XXXX agents. So in essence, they are now again more intent on foreclosing on an XXXX service member and his veteran exwife who is suffering XXXX. Therefore we feel that the investor XXXX United Security Financial XXXX is force placing this foreclure by offering terms that no one could oblige. 
