The Obama Paradox
New York Times columnist Tom Friedman's extended interview with President Obama shed some light on how Obama can be well-informed, thoughtful, prudent -- yet still be seen as faltering as a foreign policy president.  If you compare Obama with George W. Bush (okay -- a low bar), Obama wins, hands down. Unlike Bush, Obama inhabits the reality-based foreign policy space, with no apologies.  Unlike Bush, he has no messianic zealots among his advisers. He gives the kind of well-considered responses that suggest a president who carefully engages with truly difficult policy conundrums.  Yet at the end of the day, he often comes across as vacillating and indecisive -- an impression that can be fatal in his dealings with allies, adversaries, and of course electorates.
obama paradox new york times columnist tom friedman extended interview president obama shed light obama inform thoughtful prudent see falter foreign policy president   compare obama george w bush okay low bar obama win hand unlike bush obama inhabit reality base foreign policy space apology   unlike bush messianic zealot adviser give kind consider response suggest president carefully engage truly difficult policy conundrum   end day come vacillate indecisive impression fatal dealing ally adversary co USA  electorate