Quite good for Dutch
likes: unlike Duolingo, grammar and  vocabulary list that Dutch people actually use. (I take conversation lessons and everything I've double checked with her seems to be accurate and common use.) I like the mix of exercise types, the usage notes, and in general, the app interface, , dislikes: the pronunciation good but is imperfect, there's waaay too much emphasis on 'n's at the ends of words, which is (as far as I've been taught by multiple sources and nearly two years living in Amsterdam) not standard. They should be (save a few exceptions) barely there, not hard finishes like in German verbs and plurals., , In the writing exercises it is not always clear if the stressed or unstressed pronoun is desired and you get it wrong if you use the undesired one—even if the answer is correct. Also goes for vocab reviews where you have several options that all mean the same thing., , Also i miss from Duolingo the tolerance for small typos, especially since the app's keyboard can be pretty fussy sometimes., , So please fix those! But otherwise quite good
App, App, App, App, App, App, App, App
Pronunciation, Grammar and  vocabulary, Interface, Exercise types, Usage notes, Writing exercises, Vocab reviews, Typos
negative, positive, positive, positive, positive, negative, negative, negative
App - Pronunciation - negative, App - Grammar and  vocabulary - positive, App - Interface - positive, App - Exercise types - positive, App - Usage notes - positive, App - Writing exercises - negative, App - Vocab reviews - negative, App - Typos - negative
### USER:Quite good for Dutch, likes: unlike Duolingo, grammar and  vocabulary list that Dutch people actually use. (I take conversation lessons and everything I've double checked with her seems to be accurate and common use.) I like the mix of exercise types, the usage notes, and in general, the app interface, , dislikes: the pronunciation good but is imperfect, there's waaay too much emphasis on 'n's at the ends of words, which is (as far as I've been taught by multiple sources and nearly two years living in Amsterdam) not standard. They should be (save a few exceptions) barely there, not hard finishes like in German verbs and plurals., , In the writing exercises it is not always clear if the stressed or unstressed pronoun is desired and you get it wrong if you use the undesired one—even if the answer is correct. Also goes for vocab reviews where you have several options that all mean the same thing., , Also i miss from Duolingo the tolerance for small typos, especially since the app's keyboard can be pretty fussy sometimes., , So please fix those! But otherwise quite good ### ASSISTANT: App - Pronunciation - negative, App - Grammar and  vocabulary - positive, App - Interface - positive, App - Exercise types - positive, App - Usage notes - positive, App - Writing exercises - negative, App - Vocab reviews - negative, App - Typos - negative )))
### Review: title: Quite good for Dutch, content: likes: unlike Duolingo, grammar and  vocabulary list that Dutch people actually use. (I take conversation lessons and everything I've double checked with her seems to be accurate and common use.) I like the mix of exercise types, the usage notes, and in general, the app interface, , dislikes: the pronunciation good but is imperfect, there's waaay too much emphasis on 'n's at the ends of words, which is (as far as I've been taught by multiple sources and nearly two years living in Amsterdam) not standard. They should be (save a few exceptions) barely there, not hard finishes like in German verbs and plurals., , In the writing exercises it is not always clear if the stressed or unstressed pronoun is desired and you get it wrong if you use the undesired one—even if the answer is correct. Also goes for vocab reviews where you have several options that all mean the same thing., , Also i miss from Duolingo the tolerance for small typos, especially since the app's keyboard can be pretty fussy sometimes., , So please fix those! But otherwise quite good ### Analysis: categories: App, App, App, App, App, App, App, App, aspects: Pronunciation, Grammar and  vocabulary, Interface, Exercise types, Usage notes, Writing exercises, Vocab reviews, Typos, sentiments: negative, positive, positive, positive, positive, negative, negative, negative )))
### Review: title: Quite good for Dutch, content: likes: unlike Duolingo, grammar and  vocabulary list that Dutch people actually use. (I take conversation lessons and everything I've double checked with her seems to be accurate and common use.) I like the mix of exercise types, the usage notes, and in general, the app interface, , dislikes: the pronunciation good but is imperfect, there's waaay too much emphasis on 'n's at the ends of words, which is (as far as I've been taught by multiple sources and nearly two years living in Amsterdam) not standard. They should be (save a few exceptions) barely there, not hard finishes like in German verbs and plurals., , In the writing exercises it is not always clear if the stressed or unstressed pronoun is desired and you get it wrong if you use the undesired one—even if the answer is correct. Also goes for vocab reviews where you have several options that all mean the same thing., , Also i miss from Duolingo the tolerance for small typos, especially since the app's keyboard can be pretty fussy sometimes., , So please fix those! But otherwise quite good ### Analysis: categories: (App, App, App, App, App, App, App, App) aspects: (Pronunciation, Grammar and  vocabulary, Interface, Exercise types, Usage notes, Writing exercises, Vocab reviews, Typos) sentiments: (negative, positive, positive, positive, positive, negative, negative, negative) )))
Instruction: Extract triplets of category - aspect - sentiment, from the given Input. Each pair should include the category, the specific aspect within that category, and the sentiment expressed towards that aspect. Input: Quite good for Dutch, likes: unlike Duolingo, grammar and  vocabulary list that Dutch people actually use. (I take conversation lessons and everything I've double checked with her seems to be accurate and common use.) I like the mix of exercise types, the usage notes, and in general, the app interface, , dislikes: the pronunciation good but is imperfect, there's waaay too much emphasis on 'n's at the ends of words, which is (as far as I've been taught by multiple sources and nearly two years living in Amsterdam) not standard. They should be (save a few exceptions) barely there, not hard finishes like in German verbs and plurals., , In the writing exercises it is not always clear if the stressed or unstressed pronoun is desired and you get it wrong if you use the undesired one—even if the answer is correct. Also goes for vocab reviews where you have several options that all mean the same thing., , Also i miss from Duolingo the tolerance for small typos, especially since the app's keyboard can be pretty fussy sometimes., , So please fix those! But otherwise quite good Output: App - Pronunciation - negative, App - Grammar and  vocabulary - positive, App - Interface - positive, App - Exercise types - positive, App - Usage notes - positive, App - Writing exercises - negative, App - Vocab reviews - negative, App - Typos - negative $$$