Restrictions
Here’s what I think of Meta in general, though I’m pretty sure a human will never read it:, , Quote from Zuckerberg…free expression, he said, has always been part of his company’s mission—but sometimes people use their voices to put others in danger. Meta shouldn’t be making so many decisions on speech by itself.” So Meta created an Oversight Board, & Zuckerberg gave that board $150 million dollars to continue it’s work through 2025. I don’t think you can say the oversight board is independent if Zuckerberg paid to create it. If you want some entertainment, go read the bio’s for the current board members & tell me if it’s a diverse group of independent voices, as Zuckerberg claims. It’s clear that the board was created, not for the purpose Zuckerberg claims, but to ensure Meta can continue silencing who they want, & can blame the board if their actions are ever called into question. I see posts/videos CONSTANTLY from people inciting hate & violence, but they’re never taken down or have their accounts restricted. No Democrat politician who openly called on the public to intimidate & harass political opponents, & they weren’t silenced. , , My grandfather, who served the US military for 30 yrs, said that this country would begin losing it’s freedom if one political ideology ever gained control of the flow of information to the people. He was willing to sacrifice his life for this country, & I’m almost glad that he’s not here to watch it happen.
Company
Speech moderation
Negative
Company - Policy - Negative
### USER:Restrictions, Here’s what I think of Meta in general, though I’m pretty sure a human will never read it:, , Quote from Zuckerberg…free expression, he said, has always been part of his company’s mission—but sometimes people use their voices to put others in danger. Meta shouldn’t be making so many decisions on speech by itself.” So Meta created an Oversight Board, & Zuckerberg gave that board $150 million dollars to continue it’s work through 2025. I don’t think you can say the oversight board is independent if Zuckerberg paid to create it. If you want some entertainment, go read the bio’s for the current board members & tell me if it’s a diverse group of independent voices, as Zuckerberg claims. It’s clear that the board was created, not for the purpose Zuckerberg claims, but to ensure Meta can continue silencing who they want, & can blame the board if their actions are ever called into question. I see posts/videos CONSTANTLY from people inciting hate & violence, but they’re never taken down or have their accounts restricted. No Democrat politician who openly called on the public to intimidate & harass political opponents, & they weren’t silenced. , , My grandfather, who served the US military for 30 yrs, said that this country would begin losing it’s freedom if one political ideology ever gained control of the flow of information to the people. He was willing to sacrifice his life for this country, & I’m almost glad that he’s not here to watch it happen. ### ASSISTANT: Company - Policy - Negative )))
### Review: title: Restrictions, content: Here’s what I think of Meta in general, though I’m pretty sure a human will never read it:, , Quote from Zuckerberg…free expression, he said, has always been part of his company’s mission—but sometimes people use their voices to put others in danger. Meta shouldn’t be making so many decisions on speech by itself.” So Meta created an Oversight Board, & Zuckerberg gave that board $150 million dollars to continue it’s work through 2025. I don’t think you can say the oversight board is independent if Zuckerberg paid to create it. If you want some entertainment, go read the bio’s for the current board members & tell me if it’s a diverse group of independent voices, as Zuckerberg claims. It’s clear that the board was created, not for the purpose Zuckerberg claims, but to ensure Meta can continue silencing who they want, & can blame the board if their actions are ever called into question. I see posts/videos CONSTANTLY from people inciting hate & violence, but they’re never taken down or have their accounts restricted. No Democrat politician who openly called on the public to intimidate & harass political opponents, & they weren’t silenced. , , My grandfather, who served the US military for 30 yrs, said that this country would begin losing it’s freedom if one political ideology ever gained control of the flow of information to the people. He was willing to sacrifice his life for this country, & I’m almost glad that he’s not here to watch it happen. ### Analysis: categories: Company, aspects: Speech moderation, sentiments: Negative )))
### Review: title: Restrictions, content: Here’s what I think of Meta in general, though I’m pretty sure a human will never read it:, , Quote from Zuckerberg…free expression, he said, has always been part of his company’s mission—but sometimes people use their voices to put others in danger. Meta shouldn’t be making so many decisions on speech by itself.” So Meta created an Oversight Board, & Zuckerberg gave that board $150 million dollars to continue it’s work through 2025. I don’t think you can say the oversight board is independent if Zuckerberg paid to create it. If you want some entertainment, go read the bio’s for the current board members & tell me if it’s a diverse group of independent voices, as Zuckerberg claims. It’s clear that the board was created, not for the purpose Zuckerberg claims, but to ensure Meta can continue silencing who they want, & can blame the board if their actions are ever called into question. I see posts/videos CONSTANTLY from people inciting hate & violence, but they’re never taken down or have their accounts restricted. No Democrat politician who openly called on the public to intimidate & harass political opponents, & they weren’t silenced. , , My grandfather, who served the US military for 30 yrs, said that this country would begin losing it’s freedom if one political ideology ever gained control of the flow of information to the people. He was willing to sacrifice his life for this country, & I’m almost glad that he’s not here to watch it happen. ### Analysis: categories: (Company) aspects: (Speech moderation) sentiments: (Negative) )))
Instruction: Extract triplets of category - aspect - sentiment, from the given Input. Each pair should include the category, the specific aspect within that category, and the sentiment expressed towards that aspect. Input: Restrictions, Here’s what I think of Meta in general, though I’m pretty sure a human will never read it:, , Quote from Zuckerberg…free expression, he said, has always been part of his company’s mission—but sometimes people use their voices to put others in danger. Meta shouldn’t be making so many decisions on speech by itself.” So Meta created an Oversight Board, & Zuckerberg gave that board $150 million dollars to continue it’s work through 2025. I don’t think you can say the oversight board is independent if Zuckerberg paid to create it. If you want some entertainment, go read the bio’s for the current board members & tell me if it’s a diverse group of independent voices, as Zuckerberg claims. It’s clear that the board was created, not for the purpose Zuckerberg claims, but to ensure Meta can continue silencing who they want, & can blame the board if their actions are ever called into question. I see posts/videos CONSTANTLY from people inciting hate & violence, but they’re never taken down or have their accounts restricted. No Democrat politician who openly called on the public to intimidate & harass political opponents, & they weren’t silenced. , , My grandfather, who served the US military for 30 yrs, said that this country would begin losing it’s freedom if one political ideology ever gained control of the flow of information to the people. He was willing to sacrifice his life for this country, & I’m almost glad that he’s not here to watch it happen. Output: Company - Policy - Negative $$$