Good, but needs better speech recognition.
I have used both Rosetta Stone and now Babble.  I like Babble’s teaching techniques better, and how they show the English translation on phrases.  The only criticism I have of Babble over Rosetta Stone is Babble’s speech recognition.  It seems like about half the time you can never get the phrase correct, even after trying numerous times. I’ve listened to my recorded responses and they marched the examples, but it still told me it was wrong.  I’ve even had native (Spanish) speakers try it and it told them they were wrong, so I know it’s not just me.  Rosetta Stones speech recognition was MUCH better.  If they work on or improve their speech recognition I’d change my rating to 5 star.
Learning Techniques, Learning Techniques, Features
teaching techniques, showing English translation, speech recognition
positive, positive, negative
Learning Techniques - teaching techniques - positive, Learning Techniques - showing English translation - positive, Features - speech recognition - negative
### USER:Good, but needs better speech recognition., I have used both Rosetta Stone and now Babble.  I like Babble’s teaching techniques better, and how they show the English translation on phrases.  The only criticism I have of Babble over Rosetta Stone is Babble’s speech recognition.  It seems like about half the time you can never get the phrase correct, even after trying numerous times. I’ve listened to my recorded responses and they marched the examples, but it still told me it was wrong.  I’ve even had native (Spanish) speakers try it and it told them they were wrong, so I know it’s not just me.  Rosetta Stones speech recognition was MUCH better.  If they work on or improve their speech recognition I’d change my rating to 5 star. ### ASSISTANT: Learning Techniques - teaching techniques - positive, Learning Techniques - showing English translation - positive, Features - speech recognition - negative )))
### Review: title: Good, but needs better speech recognition., content: I have used both Rosetta Stone and now Babble.  I like Babble’s teaching techniques better, and how they show the English translation on phrases.  The only criticism I have of Babble over Rosetta Stone is Babble’s speech recognition.  It seems like about half the time you can never get the phrase correct, even after trying numerous times. I’ve listened to my recorded responses and they marched the examples, but it still told me it was wrong.  I’ve even had native (Spanish) speakers try it and it told them they were wrong, so I know it’s not just me.  Rosetta Stones speech recognition was MUCH better.  If they work on or improve their speech recognition I’d change my rating to 5 star. ### Analysis: categories: Learning Techniques, Learning Techniques, Features, aspects: teaching techniques, showing English translation, speech recognition, sentiments: positive, positive, negative )))
### Review: title: Good, but needs better speech recognition., content: I have used both Rosetta Stone and now Babble.  I like Babble’s teaching techniques better, and how they show the English translation on phrases.  The only criticism I have of Babble over Rosetta Stone is Babble’s speech recognition.  It seems like about half the time you can never get the phrase correct, even after trying numerous times. I’ve listened to my recorded responses and they marched the examples, but it still told me it was wrong.  I’ve even had native (Spanish) speakers try it and it told them they were wrong, so I know it’s not just me.  Rosetta Stones speech recognition was MUCH better.  If they work on or improve their speech recognition I’d change my rating to 5 star. ### Analysis: categories: (Learning Techniques, Learning Techniques, Features) aspects: (teaching techniques, showing English translation, speech recognition) sentiments: (positive, positive, negative) )))
Instruction: Extract triplets of category - aspect - sentiment, from the given Input. Each pair should include the category, the specific aspect within that category, and the sentiment expressed towards that aspect. Input: Good, but needs better speech recognition., I have used both Rosetta Stone and now Babble.  I like Babble’s teaching techniques better, and how they show the English translation on phrases.  The only criticism I have of Babble over Rosetta Stone is Babble’s speech recognition.  It seems like about half the time you can never get the phrase correct, even after trying numerous times. I’ve listened to my recorded responses and they marched the examples, but it still told me it was wrong.  I’ve even had native (Spanish) speakers try it and it told them they were wrong, so I know it’s not just me.  Rosetta Stones speech recognition was MUCH better.  If they work on or improve their speech recognition I’d change my rating to 5 star. Output: Learning Techniques - teaching techniques - positive, Learning Techniques - showing English translation - positive, Features - speech recognition - negative $$$