Imagine tobacco in time of social media
Imagine how tobacco would have acted when accused of causing cancer and other issues in the time of Instagram etc. Cig makers would have spent millions on fake studies showing that lung cancer caused by smoking was a coincidence  (they did) and persuaded social media to block people’s personal stories and researchers not paid by them. They would have paid off Drs to defend cigs (they did) and silenced everyone. , If it were in the time of social media even if your Dad died of second hand smoke and you could prove it the act of posting this would have caused you to be blocked with no way to defend yourself. This important signal would be lost  I understand the need to warn against certain messages but it you are going to block people you need to give them a way to defend themselves with science and with proof . Imagine how many women could have been saved if the once  disputed link between talc and ovarian cancer had been discovered decades ago . We are silencing a powerful signals by taking industry, Pharma; corporatize narratives as the only truth. You can fix this by having a clear and rigorous way for those who disagree with your findings to prove their point. Lookup thalidomide. Lookup up the history of lead in gas and lead in paint. Don’t silence us give us a true forum. Thank you.
Social Media
Censorship
Negative
Health - Secondhand Smoke - Negative
### USER:Imagine tobacco in time of social media, Imagine how tobacco would have acted when accused of causing cancer and other issues in the time of Instagram etc. Cig makers would have spent millions on fake studies showing that lung cancer caused by smoking was a coincidence  (they did) and persuaded social media to block people’s personal stories and researchers not paid by them. They would have paid off Drs to defend cigs (they did) and silenced everyone. , If it were in the time of social media even if your Dad died of second hand smoke and you could prove it the act of posting this would have caused you to be blocked with no way to defend yourself. This important signal would be lost  I understand the need to warn against certain messages but it you are going to block people you need to give them a way to defend themselves with science and with proof . Imagine how many women could have been saved if the once  disputed link between talc and ovarian cancer had been discovered decades ago . We are silencing a powerful signals by taking industry, Pharma; corporatize narratives as the only truth. You can fix this by having a clear and rigorous way for those who disagree with your findings to prove their point. Lookup thalidomide. Lookup up the history of lead in gas and lead in paint. Don’t silence us give us a true forum. Thank you. ### ASSISTANT: Health - Secondhand Smoke - Negative )))
### Review: title: Imagine tobacco in time of social media, content: Imagine how tobacco would have acted when accused of causing cancer and other issues in the time of Instagram etc. Cig makers would have spent millions on fake studies showing that lung cancer caused by smoking was a coincidence  (they did) and persuaded social media to block people’s personal stories and researchers not paid by them. They would have paid off Drs to defend cigs (they did) and silenced everyone. , If it were in the time of social media even if your Dad died of second hand smoke and you could prove it the act of posting this would have caused you to be blocked with no way to defend yourself. This important signal would be lost  I understand the need to warn against certain messages but it you are going to block people you need to give them a way to defend themselves with science and with proof . Imagine how many women could have been saved if the once  disputed link between talc and ovarian cancer had been discovered decades ago . We are silencing a powerful signals by taking industry, Pharma; corporatize narratives as the only truth. You can fix this by having a clear and rigorous way for those who disagree with your findings to prove their point. Lookup thalidomide. Lookup up the history of lead in gas and lead in paint. Don’t silence us give us a true forum. Thank you. ### Analysis: categories: Social Media, aspects: Censorship, sentiments: Negative )))
### Review: title: Imagine tobacco in time of social media, content: Imagine how tobacco would have acted when accused of causing cancer and other issues in the time of Instagram etc. Cig makers would have spent millions on fake studies showing that lung cancer caused by smoking was a coincidence  (they did) and persuaded social media to block people’s personal stories and researchers not paid by them. They would have paid off Drs to defend cigs (they did) and silenced everyone. , If it were in the time of social media even if your Dad died of second hand smoke and you could prove it the act of posting this would have caused you to be blocked with no way to defend yourself. This important signal would be lost  I understand the need to warn against certain messages but it you are going to block people you need to give them a way to defend themselves with science and with proof . Imagine how many women could have been saved if the once  disputed link between talc and ovarian cancer had been discovered decades ago . We are silencing a powerful signals by taking industry, Pharma; corporatize narratives as the only truth. You can fix this by having a clear and rigorous way for those who disagree with your findings to prove their point. Lookup thalidomide. Lookup up the history of lead in gas and lead in paint. Don’t silence us give us a true forum. Thank you. ### Analysis: categories: (Social Media) aspects: (Censorship) sentiments: (Negative) )))
Instruction: Extract triplets of category - aspect - sentiment, from the given Input. Each pair should include the category, the specific aspect within that category, and the sentiment expressed towards that aspect. Input: Imagine tobacco in time of social media, Imagine how tobacco would have acted when accused of causing cancer and other issues in the time of Instagram etc. Cig makers would have spent millions on fake studies showing that lung cancer caused by smoking was a coincidence  (they did) and persuaded social media to block people’s personal stories and researchers not paid by them. They would have paid off Drs to defend cigs (they did) and silenced everyone. , If it were in the time of social media even if your Dad died of second hand smoke and you could prove it the act of posting this would have caused you to be blocked with no way to defend yourself. This important signal would be lost  I understand the need to warn against certain messages but it you are going to block people you need to give them a way to defend themselves with science and with proof . Imagine how many women could have been saved if the once  disputed link between talc and ovarian cancer had been discovered decades ago . We are silencing a powerful signals by taking industry, Pharma; corporatize narratives as the only truth. You can fix this by having a clear and rigorous way for those who disagree with your findings to prove their point. Lookup thalidomide. Lookup up the history of lead in gas and lead in paint. Don’t silence us give us a true forum. Thank you. Output: Health - Secondhand Smoke - Negative $$$