Bad UI, but good conversational learning
The UI is pretty bad, it’s not always clear what you’re supposed to do, it’s not fun to look at, and the voice recognition is TERRIBLE. You’ll have to try several times for it to hear you. Literally every single time, you’ll have to try at least twice for the voice recognition to work, so you’re marked “wrong” for all the speaking questions. That being said, I’ve been using Duolingo for the last couple of years and I realized I’ve gotten no closer to having a conversation in Italian. I’ve been learning to say things like “the bee eats sugar” so it’s been pretty useless. Right from the start, Babbel is much better for actually learning how to have conversation.
UI, UI, Conversation learning
Conversational learning, Voice recognition, Learning efficiency
negative, negative, negative
UI - Conversational learning - negative, UI - Voice recognition - negative, Conversation learning - Learning efficiency - negative
### USER:Bad UI, but good conversational learning, The UI is pretty bad, it’s not always clear what you’re supposed to do, it’s not fun to look at, and the voice recognition is TERRIBLE. You’ll have to try several times for it to hear you. Literally every single time, you’ll have to try at least twice for the voice recognition to work, so you’re marked “wrong” for all the speaking questions. That being said, I’ve been using Duolingo for the last couple of years and I realized I’ve gotten no closer to having a conversation in Italian. I’ve been learning to say things like “the bee eats sugar” so it’s been pretty useless. Right from the start, Babbel is much better for actually learning how to have conversation. ### ASSISTANT: UI - Conversational learning - negative, UI - Voice recognition - negative, Conversation learning - Learning efficiency - negative )))
### Review: title: Bad UI, but good conversational learning, content: The UI is pretty bad, it’s not always clear what you’re supposed to do, it’s not fun to look at, and the voice recognition is TERRIBLE. You’ll have to try several times for it to hear you. Literally every single time, you’ll have to try at least twice for the voice recognition to work, so you’re marked “wrong” for all the speaking questions. That being said, I’ve been using Duolingo for the last couple of years and I realized I’ve gotten no closer to having a conversation in Italian. I’ve been learning to say things like “the bee eats sugar” so it’s been pretty useless. Right from the start, Babbel is much better for actually learning how to have conversation. ### Analysis: categories: UI, UI, Conversation learning, aspects: Conversational learning, Voice recognition, Learning efficiency, sentiments: negative, negative, negative )))
### Review: title: Bad UI, but good conversational learning, content: The UI is pretty bad, it’s not always clear what you’re supposed to do, it’s not fun to look at, and the voice recognition is TERRIBLE. You’ll have to try several times for it to hear you. Literally every single time, you’ll have to try at least twice for the voice recognition to work, so you’re marked “wrong” for all the speaking questions. That being said, I’ve been using Duolingo for the last couple of years and I realized I’ve gotten no closer to having a conversation in Italian. I’ve been learning to say things like “the bee eats sugar” so it’s been pretty useless. Right from the start, Babbel is much better for actually learning how to have conversation. ### Analysis: categories: (UI, UI, Conversation learning) aspects: (Conversational learning, Voice recognition, Learning efficiency) sentiments: (negative, negative, negative) )))
Instruction: Extract triplets of category - aspect - sentiment, from the given Input. Each pair should include the category, the specific aspect within that category, and the sentiment expressed towards that aspect. Input: Bad UI, but good conversational learning, The UI is pretty bad, it’s not always clear what you’re supposed to do, it’s not fun to look at, and the voice recognition is TERRIBLE. You’ll have to try several times for it to hear you. Literally every single time, you’ll have to try at least twice for the voice recognition to work, so you’re marked “wrong” for all the speaking questions. That being said, I’ve been using Duolingo for the last couple of years and I realized I’ve gotten no closer to having a conversation in Italian. I’ve been learning to say things like “the bee eats sugar” so it’s been pretty useless. Right from the start, Babbel is much better for actually learning how to have conversation. Output: UI - Conversational learning - negative, UI - Voice recognition - negative, Conversation learning - Learning efficiency - negative $$$