Updates? No. Stop making unnecessary “improvements.”
For starters, I don’t want “instagram - from the company that sold your data to Russians in an attempt to win the 2016 presidential election” (Muller report concluded this; So did Ocasio-Cortez’s questioning of Zuckerberg). Considering Instagrams heavy youth use, and the prevalence of being against corruption, this distance would be an obvious marketing point. I think one of the main reasons people use Instagram is because they prefer that diversity between apps; even though it’s owned by Facebook. Not to mention the fact that now, the DM’s look scarily similar to messenger. I have to ask exactly why? Users prefer differences between their apps. If they wanted a messenger-like experience, they’d get messenger. I’d greatly appreciate the app to not lose a significant amount of user support. Also, the algorithm has consistently failed us. If you could address and correct these problems before they become even more of an issue, that would be great. Facebook to most Instagram users, it leads a feeling of uncertainty and mistrust. Our data was sold to a foreign nation. That’s unacceptable. So saying “Instagram- from Facebook” while making substantial changes to the app; it’s quite concerning. The app was amazing before. Now? No. Not at all. If this wouldn’t have happened, you’d have five stars. Zuckerberg has destroyed facebooks reputation. It’s not too late for Instagram... yet.
App
Design
Negative
App - Aspects - Sentiment, App - Privacy - Negative, App - Data - Negative, App - Political Ties - Negative, App - Features - Negative, App - Company Reputation - Negative, App - Trust - Negative
### USER:Updates? No. Stop making unnecessary “improvements.”, For starters, I don’t want “instagram - from the company that sold your data to Russians in an attempt to win the 2016 presidential election” (Muller report concluded this; So did Ocasio-Cortez’s questioning of Zuckerberg). Considering Instagrams heavy youth use, and the prevalence of being against corruption, this distance would be an obvious marketing point. I think one of the main reasons people use Instagram is because they prefer that diversity between apps; even though it’s owned by Facebook. Not to mention the fact that now, the DM’s look scarily similar to messenger. I have to ask exactly why? Users prefer differences between their apps. If they wanted a messenger-like experience, they’d get messenger. I’d greatly appreciate the app to not lose a significant amount of user support. Also, the algorithm has consistently failed us. If you could address and correct these problems before they become even more of an issue, that would be great. Facebook to most Instagram users, it leads a feeling of uncertainty and mistrust. Our data was sold to a foreign nation. That’s unacceptable. So saying “Instagram- from Facebook” while making substantial changes to the app; it’s quite concerning. The app was amazing before. Now? No. Not at all. If this wouldn’t have happened, you’d have five stars. Zuckerberg has destroyed facebooks reputation. It’s not too late for Instagram... yet. ### ASSISTANT: App - Aspects - Sentiment, App - Privacy - Negative, App - Data - Negative, App - Political Ties - Negative, App - Features - Negative, App - Company Reputation - Negative, App - Trust - Negative )))
### Review: title: Updates? No. Stop making unnecessary “improvements.”, content: For starters, I don’t want “instagram - from the company that sold your data to Russians in an attempt to win the 2016 presidential election” (Muller report concluded this; So did Ocasio-Cortez’s questioning of Zuckerberg). Considering Instagrams heavy youth use, and the prevalence of being against corruption, this distance would be an obvious marketing point. I think one of the main reasons people use Instagram is because they prefer that diversity between apps; even though it’s owned by Facebook. Not to mention the fact that now, the DM’s look scarily similar to messenger. I have to ask exactly why? Users prefer differences between their apps. If they wanted a messenger-like experience, they’d get messenger. I’d greatly appreciate the app to not lose a significant amount of user support. Also, the algorithm has consistently failed us. If you could address and correct these problems before they become even more of an issue, that would be great. Facebook to most Instagram users, it leads a feeling of uncertainty and mistrust. Our data was sold to a foreign nation. That’s unacceptable. So saying “Instagram- from Facebook” while making substantial changes to the app; it’s quite concerning. The app was amazing before. Now? No. Not at all. If this wouldn’t have happened, you’d have five stars. Zuckerberg has destroyed facebooks reputation. It’s not too late for Instagram... yet. ### Analysis: categories: App, aspects: Design, sentiments: Negative )))
### Review: title: Updates? No. Stop making unnecessary “improvements.”, content: For starters, I don’t want “instagram - from the company that sold your data to Russians in an attempt to win the 2016 presidential election” (Muller report concluded this; So did Ocasio-Cortez’s questioning of Zuckerberg). Considering Instagrams heavy youth use, and the prevalence of being against corruption, this distance would be an obvious marketing point. I think one of the main reasons people use Instagram is because they prefer that diversity between apps; even though it’s owned by Facebook. Not to mention the fact that now, the DM’s look scarily similar to messenger. I have to ask exactly why? Users prefer differences between their apps. If they wanted a messenger-like experience, they’d get messenger. I’d greatly appreciate the app to not lose a significant amount of user support. Also, the algorithm has consistently failed us. If you could address and correct these problems before they become even more of an issue, that would be great. Facebook to most Instagram users, it leads a feeling of uncertainty and mistrust. Our data was sold to a foreign nation. That’s unacceptable. So saying “Instagram- from Facebook” while making substantial changes to the app; it’s quite concerning. The app was amazing before. Now? No. Not at all. If this wouldn’t have happened, you’d have five stars. Zuckerberg has destroyed facebooks reputation. It’s not too late for Instagram... yet. ### Analysis: categories: (App) aspects: (Design) sentiments: (Negative) )))
Instruction: Extract triplets of category - aspect - sentiment, from the given Input. Each pair should include the category, the specific aspect within that category, and the sentiment expressed towards that aspect. Input: Updates? No. Stop making unnecessary “improvements.”, For starters, I don’t want “instagram - from the company that sold your data to Russians in an attempt to win the 2016 presidential election” (Muller report concluded this; So did Ocasio-Cortez’s questioning of Zuckerberg). Considering Instagrams heavy youth use, and the prevalence of being against corruption, this distance would be an obvious marketing point. I think one of the main reasons people use Instagram is because they prefer that diversity between apps; even though it’s owned by Facebook. Not to mention the fact that now, the DM’s look scarily similar to messenger. I have to ask exactly why? Users prefer differences between their apps. If they wanted a messenger-like experience, they’d get messenger. I’d greatly appreciate the app to not lose a significant amount of user support. Also, the algorithm has consistently failed us. If you could address and correct these problems before they become even more of an issue, that would be great. Facebook to most Instagram users, it leads a feeling of uncertainty and mistrust. Our data was sold to a foreign nation. That’s unacceptable. So saying “Instagram- from Facebook” while making substantial changes to the app; it’s quite concerning. The app was amazing before. Now? No. Not at all. If this wouldn’t have happened, you’d have five stars. Zuckerberg has destroyed facebooks reputation. It’s not too late for Instagram... yet. Output: App - Aspects - Sentiment, App - Privacy - Negative, App - Data - Negative, App - Political Ties - Negative, App - Features - Negative, App - Company Reputation - Negative, App - Trust - Negative $$$