Phenomenal learning resource with bad user interface
I’m switched from Duolingo to Babbel because I found that I learned much easier with Babbel. Also the content of Babbel is more relevant to someone like me who is living in a foreign country. , , I used Babbel about 45 minutes a day for 4 months before moving to Sweden. On my first day here I ordered a custom sandwich from a restaurant in Swedish and had a small conversation with the server. The app’s pedagogy is sound: they use spaced repetition; alternate between listening, speaking, writing, and reading; and have native speakers dictate everything., , There are two problems I have with Babbel., , 1. Their user interface is horrible. The app looks like it hasn’t been updated since 2014. For example, when you finish a section, the iPad app just says congratulations- it doesn’t automatically take you to the next section. You have to navigate back through their fairly confusing interface to get to the next section., , 2. They have put minimal effort into creating a point system. With Duolingo, users compete to get the most points each week and reach different leagues, incentivizing users to spend more time learning. Babbel has an arbitrary point counter, but they don’t tell you what 2000 points mean and there’s never any competition., , Even with these two faults, I believe that Babbel is the most cost effective and efficient way to learn a foreign language with an app and I would highly recommend it.
User Interface, User Interface, User Interface, Point System, Point System
User Interface, User Interface, Navigation, Point System, Competition
negative, negative, negative, negative, negative
User Interface - User Interface - negative, User Interface - User Interface - negative, User Interface - Navigation - negative, Point System - Point System - negative, Point System - Competition - negative
### USER:Phenomenal learning resource with bad user interface, I’m switched from Duolingo to Babbel because I found that I learned much easier with Babbel. Also the content of Babbel is more relevant to someone like me who is living in a foreign country. , , I used Babbel about 45 minutes a day for 4 months before moving to Sweden. On my first day here I ordered a custom sandwich from a restaurant in Swedish and had a small conversation with the server. The app’s pedagogy is sound: they use spaced repetition; alternate between listening, speaking, writing, and reading; and have native speakers dictate everything., , There are two problems I have with Babbel., , 1. Their user interface is horrible. The app looks like it hasn’t been updated since 2014. For example, when you finish a section, the iPad app just says congratulations- it doesn’t automatically take you to the next section. You have to navigate back through their fairly confusing interface to get to the next section., , 2. They have put minimal effort into creating a point system. With Duolingo, users compete to get the most points each week and reach different leagues, incentivizing users to spend more time learning. Babbel has an arbitrary point counter, but they don’t tell you what 2000 points mean and there’s never any competition., , Even with these two faults, I believe that Babbel is the most cost effective and efficient way to learn a foreign language with an app and I would highly recommend it. ### ASSISTANT: User Interface - User Interface - negative, User Interface - User Interface - negative, User Interface - Navigation - negative, Point System - Point System - negative, Point System - Competition - negative )))
### Review: title: Phenomenal learning resource with bad user interface, content: I’m switched from Duolingo to Babbel because I found that I learned much easier with Babbel. Also the content of Babbel is more relevant to someone like me who is living in a foreign country. , , I used Babbel about 45 minutes a day for 4 months before moving to Sweden. On my first day here I ordered a custom sandwich from a restaurant in Swedish and had a small conversation with the server. The app’s pedagogy is sound: they use spaced repetition; alternate between listening, speaking, writing, and reading; and have native speakers dictate everything., , There are two problems I have with Babbel., , 1. Their user interface is horrible. The app looks like it hasn’t been updated since 2014. For example, when you finish a section, the iPad app just says congratulations- it doesn’t automatically take you to the next section. You have to navigate back through their fairly confusing interface to get to the next section., , 2. They have put minimal effort into creating a point system. With Duolingo, users compete to get the most points each week and reach different leagues, incentivizing users to spend more time learning. Babbel has an arbitrary point counter, but they don’t tell you what 2000 points mean and there’s never any competition., , Even with these two faults, I believe that Babbel is the most cost effective and efficient way to learn a foreign language with an app and I would highly recommend it. ### Analysis: categories: User Interface, User Interface, User Interface, Point System, Point System, aspects: User Interface, User Interface, Navigation, Point System, Competition, sentiments: negative, negative, negative, negative, negative )))
### Review: title: Phenomenal learning resource with bad user interface, content: I’m switched from Duolingo to Babbel because I found that I learned much easier with Babbel. Also the content of Babbel is more relevant to someone like me who is living in a foreign country. , , I used Babbel about 45 minutes a day for 4 months before moving to Sweden. On my first day here I ordered a custom sandwich from a restaurant in Swedish and had a small conversation with the server. The app’s pedagogy is sound: they use spaced repetition; alternate between listening, speaking, writing, and reading; and have native speakers dictate everything., , There are two problems I have with Babbel., , 1. Their user interface is horrible. The app looks like it hasn’t been updated since 2014. For example, when you finish a section, the iPad app just says congratulations- it doesn’t automatically take you to the next section. You have to navigate back through their fairly confusing interface to get to the next section., , 2. They have put minimal effort into creating a point system. With Duolingo, users compete to get the most points each week and reach different leagues, incentivizing users to spend more time learning. Babbel has an arbitrary point counter, but they don’t tell you what 2000 points mean and there’s never any competition., , Even with these two faults, I believe that Babbel is the most cost effective and efficient way to learn a foreign language with an app and I would highly recommend it. ### Analysis: categories: (User Interface, User Interface, User Interface, Point System, Point System) aspects: (User Interface, User Interface, Navigation, Point System, Competition) sentiments: (negative, negative, negative, negative, negative) )))
Instruction: Extract triplets of category - aspect - sentiment, from the given Input. Each pair should include the category, the specific aspect within that category, and the sentiment expressed towards that aspect. Input: Phenomenal learning resource with bad user interface, I’m switched from Duolingo to Babbel because I found that I learned much easier with Babbel. Also the content of Babbel is more relevant to someone like me who is living in a foreign country. , , I used Babbel about 45 minutes a day for 4 months before moving to Sweden. On my first day here I ordered a custom sandwich from a restaurant in Swedish and had a small conversation with the server. The app’s pedagogy is sound: they use spaced repetition; alternate between listening, speaking, writing, and reading; and have native speakers dictate everything., , There are two problems I have with Babbel., , 1. Their user interface is horrible. The app looks like it hasn’t been updated since 2014. For example, when you finish a section, the iPad app just says congratulations- it doesn’t automatically take you to the next section. You have to navigate back through their fairly confusing interface to get to the next section., , 2. They have put minimal effort into creating a point system. With Duolingo, users compete to get the most points each week and reach different leagues, incentivizing users to spend more time learning. Babbel has an arbitrary point counter, but they don’t tell you what 2000 points mean and there’s never any competition., , Even with these two faults, I believe that Babbel is the most cost effective and efficient way to learn a foreign language with an app and I would highly recommend it. Output: User Interface - User Interface - negative, User Interface - User Interface - negative, User Interface - Navigation - negative, Point System - Point System - negative, Point System - Competition - negative $$$