shadow banning & silencing
Dear instagram, It’s extremely problematic and concerning to see content creators and people attempting to spread vital information of the people in Gaza and Palestine. People simply trying to be seen and heard, and to see that an extremely influential and powerful app would silence and shadow ban them is wrong. These people have been silenced by not allowing them to share information through posts, stories or reels with the public and limiting who views their content to their followers or niche views. I have seen the screenshots from at least 3 different accounts of Instagram limiting their views to their followers and think it’s wrong when this should be information and content available to the public to witness and take in what’s going on in Gaza and to the Palestinian people. Instagram has a history of shadow banning content creators of different medias such a digital artists with small followings. Many of these creators rely on views, likes, saves, and follows to support themselves and generate not only a following but profit. I find it very harmful and unethical of Instagram to silence and shadow ban content creators and people attempting to spread critical information., As well as the changes in setting to limiting political content is a form of censorship.
Social Justice, Features, Social Justice
Censorship, Post visibility, Shadow banning
negative, negative, negative
Social Justice - Censorship - negative, Features - Post visibility - negative, Social Justice - Shadow banning - negative
### USER:shadow banning & silencing, Dear instagram, It’s extremely problematic and concerning to see content creators and people attempting to spread vital information of the people in Gaza and Palestine. People simply trying to be seen and heard, and to see that an extremely influential and powerful app would silence and shadow ban them is wrong. These people have been silenced by not allowing them to share information through posts, stories or reels with the public and limiting who views their content to their followers or niche views. I have seen the screenshots from at least 3 different accounts of Instagram limiting their views to their followers and think it’s wrong when this should be information and content available to the public to witness and take in what’s going on in Gaza and to the Palestinian people. Instagram has a history of shadow banning content creators of different medias such a digital artists with small followings. Many of these creators rely on views, likes, saves, and follows to support themselves and generate not only a following but profit. I find it very harmful and unethical of Instagram to silence and shadow ban content creators and people attempting to spread critical information., As well as the changes in setting to limiting political content is a form of censorship. ### ASSISTANT: Social Justice - Censorship - negative, Features - Post visibility - negative, Social Justice - Shadow banning - negative )))
### Review: title: shadow banning & silencing, content: Dear instagram, It’s extremely problematic and concerning to see content creators and people attempting to spread vital information of the people in Gaza and Palestine. People simply trying to be seen and heard, and to see that an extremely influential and powerful app would silence and shadow ban them is wrong. These people have been silenced by not allowing them to share information through posts, stories or reels with the public and limiting who views their content to their followers or niche views. I have seen the screenshots from at least 3 different accounts of Instagram limiting their views to their followers and think it’s wrong when this should be information and content available to the public to witness and take in what’s going on in Gaza and to the Palestinian people. Instagram has a history of shadow banning content creators of different medias such a digital artists with small followings. Many of these creators rely on views, likes, saves, and follows to support themselves and generate not only a following but profit. I find it very harmful and unethical of Instagram to silence and shadow ban content creators and people attempting to spread critical information., As well as the changes in setting to limiting political content is a form of censorship. ### Analysis: categories: Social Justice, Features, Social Justice, aspects: Censorship, Post visibility, Shadow banning, sentiments: negative, negative, negative )))
### Review: title: shadow banning & silencing, content: Dear instagram, It’s extremely problematic and concerning to see content creators and people attempting to spread vital information of the people in Gaza and Palestine. People simply trying to be seen and heard, and to see that an extremely influential and powerful app would silence and shadow ban them is wrong. These people have been silenced by not allowing them to share information through posts, stories or reels with the public and limiting who views their content to their followers or niche views. I have seen the screenshots from at least 3 different accounts of Instagram limiting their views to their followers and think it’s wrong when this should be information and content available to the public to witness and take in what’s going on in Gaza and to the Palestinian people. Instagram has a history of shadow banning content creators of different medias such a digital artists with small followings. Many of these creators rely on views, likes, saves, and follows to support themselves and generate not only a following but profit. I find it very harmful and unethical of Instagram to silence and shadow ban content creators and people attempting to spread critical information., As well as the changes in setting to limiting political content is a form of censorship. ### Analysis: categories: (Social Justice, Features, Social Justice) aspects: (Censorship, Post visibility, Shadow banning) sentiments: (negative, negative, negative) )))
Instruction: Extract triplets of category - aspect - sentiment, from the given Input. Each pair should include the category, the specific aspect within that category, and the sentiment expressed towards that aspect. Input: shadow banning & silencing, Dear instagram, It’s extremely problematic and concerning to see content creators and people attempting to spread vital information of the people in Gaza and Palestine. People simply trying to be seen and heard, and to see that an extremely influential and powerful app would silence and shadow ban them is wrong. These people have been silenced by not allowing them to share information through posts, stories or reels with the public and limiting who views their content to their followers or niche views. I have seen the screenshots from at least 3 different accounts of Instagram limiting their views to their followers and think it’s wrong when this should be information and content available to the public to witness and take in what’s going on in Gaza and to the Palestinian people. Instagram has a history of shadow banning content creators of different medias such a digital artists with small followings. Many of these creators rely on views, likes, saves, and follows to support themselves and generate not only a following but profit. I find it very harmful and unethical of Instagram to silence and shadow ban content creators and people attempting to spread critical information., As well as the changes in setting to limiting political content is a form of censorship. Output: Social Justice - Censorship - negative, Features - Post visibility - negative, Social Justice - Shadow banning - negative $$$