Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.

### Instruction:
identify whether following news is true or not

Input:
PRO-LIFE LICENSE PLATE DEEMED ‘Patently Offensive’ BY FEDERAL APPEALS COURT;Because after all, what s more offensive than choosing to allow your baby to live?The pro-life message can be classified as  patently offensive,  a federal appeals court ruled last week. The new opinion came as a three-judge panel ruled that New York state was right to reject a  Choose Life  license plate on the grounds that it may grate on New Yorkers  political sensibilities.The judges split on whether New York could deny a pro-adoption group the right to have its own license plate, although the state has in the past allowed plates endorsing political causes associated with the liberal viewpoint, such as environmentalism.Judge Rosemary Pooler, who was appointed by President Clinton, wrote that the state s denial did not harm anyone s right to freedom of expression, because drivers  may display a  Choose Life  bumper sticker   or even cover every available square inch of their vehicle with such stickers. That message will resonate just as loudly as if vehicle displayed a  Choose Life  license plate. Judge Debra Ann Livingston, a President George W. Bush appointee, wrote in her dissent that  a proposed custom plate depicting a sun and two smiling children, and bearing the words,  Choose Life  [thought] to be  patently offensive  was  surprising. Pro-adoption organizations should have the same speech rights as any other organization. While the district court affirmed this basic freedom, the circuit court denied free speech in favor of government censorship,  said Jeremy Tedesco, senior counsel at ADF.  The state doesn t have the authority to target The Children First Foundation specialty plates for censorship based on its life-affirming viewpoint. The ruling is the lastest round in a legal battle that has raged for more than a decade and, pro-lifers say, seen state officials repeatedly suppress their First Amendment rights.The Children First Foundation applied for the specialty license plate in 2002, but state officials say the message and design was  too controversial.  In 2004, the Alliance Defending Freedom filed a lawsuit on CFF s behalf.New York s Department of Motor Vehicles repeatedly denied the  Choose Life  license plates on the grounds that the message was  patently offensive. The same appeals court rejected an effort to suppress the plates made by then-Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and agreed that Albany officials denied the plates based on viewpoint discrimination.Via: LifeSite News;May 27, 2015

### Response:
Fake news

### End