prompt: Do you think the cancelled bowls games so far are just some media political crap or is their some legitimacy behind it? None of the players from what I have read are sicker than a mild cold?
chosen.content: Do you think the cancelled bowls games so far are just some media political crap or is their some legitimacy behind it? None of the players from what I have read are sicker than a mild cold?
chosen.role: user
chosen.content: I think there is legitimacy to the cancellation of the bowl games so far in that the safety of the players should be considered. Although the majority of players report having a mild cold, it is still likely that there will be severe complications for those with weaker immune systems. While not all players may show symptoms, some illnesses can develop with more time, therefore caution should be taken to ensure player safety. It is understandable why the bowl games have been cancelled so far, as they strive to protect the players.
chosen.role: assistant
rejected.content: Do you think the cancelled bowls games so far are just some media political crap or is their some legitimacy behind it? None of the players from what I have read are sicker than a mild cold?
rejected.role: user
rejected.content: I think the cancelled bowl games so far are mostly the result of concerns over the pandemic. Although most bowl teams don't have significantly more sick players than a mild cold, the health risks associated with travel and gathering large numbers of people make postponement a valid decision in most cases.
rejected.role: assistant