DPRK's planned rocket launch puts U.S. in dilemma
 2009-03-25 15:30:21
Special Report: DPRK to Launch Satellite, U.S., S Korea Hold Drill BEIJING, March 25 (Xinhua) -- Hostilities have been increasing recently on the Korean Peninsula after the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) announced its intention to launch a communications satellite in early April. The United States, South Korea and Japan have said the satellite is a disguised test-launch of a long-range ballistic missile and have threatened to intercept it using their missile defense systems. DPRK: INTERCEPTION MEANS WAR On March 9, the DPRK said it will launch a war on the territory of the U.S., Japan and South Korea, if its satellite launching "for peaceful purpose" was intercepted. On Tuesday, the DPRK warned that it would leave the six-party talks aimed at ending its nuclear weapons program if the U.S. and Japan intercept the rocket. It insisted that an interception of its rocket, which was part of a peaceful space program of the DPRK, would ruin the foundation of the six-nation talks. That's because the U.S. and Japan would have denied the right of the DPRK to develop space for peaceful purposes and violated its sovereignty under the name of the United Nations, the official KCNA news agency cited a Foreign Ministry spokesman as saying. It is a legitimate right for every country to develop a peaceful space program, the spokesman said, adding that the U.S. and Japan should take the responsibility for ruining the six-party talks. KEY RESOLVE: OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE On March 9, the U.S. and South Korea launched the annual joint military exercise Key Resolve-Foal Eagle. The exercise, timed just before the DPRK's planned launch, was larger in scale and duration than previous years. The exercise was extended from the original four to five days to 12 days and involved 26,000 U.S. servicemen, including 13,100 stationed outside South Korea. The U.S. also mobilized the USS John C. Stennis, a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier of the U.S. Navy's 3rd Fleet and a few Aegis destroyers for the exercise. U.S. Army General Walter Sharp, commander of U.S. forces in South Korea, insisted that it was "a routine training exercise that takes place every year at about the same time. It is not tied in any way to any political or real-world event." The exercise prompted the DPRK to put its military on "full combat readiness," saying it viewed the joint land and sea exercise as prelude to an invasion. JAPAN: BE PREPARED The rocket the DPRK said it will fire is expected to drop a booster stage in the Sea of Japan and then pass over the north of the country. Kyodo News agency reported that the Japanese government is expected to issue an order as early as Friday calling for the destruction of debris or parts of the missile that fall toward Japan, allowing the defense minister to deploy interceptors in areas where the fragments are likely to fall. However, Japanese Foreign Minister Hirofumi Nakasone said on Tuesday that his country would find it difficult to intercept debris, saying Japan's missile defense system has yet to be tested in action. But Japanese defense expert Tetsuo Maeda said the missile defense system on Aegis-equipped destroyers and the ground-based Patriot Advanced Capability-3 system could be effective to some extent. Japanese media has reported that the country may also deploy two Aegis-equipped destroyers carrying sea-based Standard Missile-3 interceptors to the Sea of Japan and the Pacific Ocean. On Monday, USS Stethem, the U.S. Navy's guided missile destroyer originally based in Yokosuka near Tokyo, entered port in Aomori in northern Japan. U.S. IN DILEMMA As a matter of fact, to intercept or not has become a difficult choice for the United States. Firstly, opinions are divided on whether the DPRK rocket is being used for launching a satellite or a ballistic missile. Gen. Walter Sharp said last week that North Korea has been deploying new intermediate-range ballistic missiles capable of hitting Alaska. South Korea's Yonhap news agency quoted an unidentified intelligence official as saying authorities "strongly believe" the launch will take place on April 4-5 and believe it will involve a long-range missile, not a satellite. However, U.S. National Intelligence director Dennis Blair told the Senate Armed Services Committee on March 10 that "the North Koreans announced that they were going to do a space launch and I believe that's what they intend." If the DPRK has concrete proof that a civil satellite has been launched, using military forces to target it will hardly win support from the international community. The DPRK has warned that any attempt to shoot down the rocket would be regarded as an act of war. Would the U.S risk a war? Secondly, like its ally Japan, the U.S. is not 100 percent sure of a successful interception. Analysts said the U.S. has the capability to intercept a missile headed for Alaska or Hawaii, but the systems are largely untested. "You don't know until you shoot if you are going to hit it or not," Ralph Cossa, president of the Hawaii-based think tank Pacific Forum CSIS, said. TALKS OR SANCTIONS Recently, the Barack Obama administration has become less tough on the launch, urging to refrain from trying to intercept the rocket and revive the stalled missile talks with the DPRK. "Over-reaction would be shooting down the missile, taking out the missile from the launch pad, suspending or terminating the six party talks," said Frank Jannuzi, staff member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and key foreign policy adviser to the Obama administration. "North Korea may be aiming to revive the negotiations stalled at the end of the Clinton administration," Jannuzi said. On March 11, U.S. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton talked about the "need to have a conversation about missiles" with the DPRK. Clinton also said "a range of options" could be pursued against Pyongyang if it tests a long-range ballistic missile, including seeking action in the U.N. Security Council. Japan has warned the DPRK of more sanctions if the country goes ahead with a rocket launch. Prime Minister Taro Aso has said he would bring the case to the United Nations Security Council. On Tuesday, the European Union warned that the DPRK rocket launch "would be seen as a breach of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1718, and it would send a wrong signal to the international community." On Tuesday, a DPRK Foreign Ministry spokesman blasted Washington and Tokyo's attempts to impose UN sanctions on his country's satellite launch. These countries' attempts to submit the DPRK satellite issue to the UN was in violation of the spirit of "mutual respect and equality" stated in the 2005 six-party talks statement, he said. Editor:
Xiong Tong
Related Stories DPRK: UN sanctions to rupture six-party talks DPRK warns U.S., Japan intercepting satellite may ruin six-party talks DPRK warns UN sanctions on rocket launch will rupture six-party talks 3 chief nuke negotiators to meet over DPRK rocket launch DPRK informs S Korea of temporary closure of two air routes Home World Back to Top