/ Maggie Koerth-Baker /
9:25 pm Thu Aug 16, 2012 Retired NASA flight director blogs about the aftermath of Columbia disaster
On February 1, 2003, the space shuttle Columbia broke up in the sky over Texas, bits and pieces falling onto at least two states. All seven astronauts on board died. As we close in on the 10-year anniversary of the disaster, you can expect lots of media outlets and experts to start offering their take on what happened and what we've learned from it. But there's one voice that you should really be listening to ... and he's speaking already.
Wayne Hale was a flight director on the space shuttle for 40 or 41 missions (His blog says 40, his NASA bio says 41). Flight controllers are the people who manage a space flight - they deal with the logistics, monitor all the various systems of the vehicle, make the decision to launch or abort, and deal with trouble-shooting. In other words, they play a key role in safety, and the flight director is the person in charge of all the flight controllers.
More importantly, Wayne Hale is one of the people who suspected something might be wrong with Columbia before its fatal reentry, and tried to get his superiors at NASA to pay attention to the risks. Here's Dwayne Day writing at The Space Review:
During the Columbia accident investigation I was one of over 100 staff members who worked for the CAIB (not all of them worked simultaneously, and for the many months I was there, the staff probably numbered no more than 50-60). There were so many aspects to the investigation that it was impossible to follow them all, and my responsibility was for policy, history, and budget, and later, some of the issues concerning schedule pressure. But I remember one afternoon when I was talking with an Air Force colonel skilled in aircraft accident investigations when Hale's name came up and I asked how Hale had been involved in the accident. The colonel explained how Hale had been one of the people who had been concerned about the foam strike during the flight and had tried to obtain on-orbit imagery of the orbiter during its mission, only to be rebuffed by upper level managers. Then, after a short pause, the colonel added: "Hale was one of the good guys."
But being one of the good guys doesn't mean you don't feel guilty when something goes horribly wrong. On Tuesday, Hale posted on his blog about the Columbia disaster and what is going on in his head as the anniversary creeps closer. It's a sad, poignant post, and Hale promises it's just the beginning of a series of articles addressing his experiences before, during, and after the Challenger disaster:
All of this has brought the searing memories from a decade ago into the forefront of my mind. Not that those memories has ever left me; the memories of early 2003. I was intimately involved in the events leading up to the Columbia tragedy so maybe that is to be expected. But often in the wee hours of the morning when sleep fails, the questions return: why did it happen, how did we allow it to happen, and what could I have done to prevent it.
Some others who lived through those days remember things from different perspectives, they had different experiences, but - somewhat frighteningly - remember events we shared in common in different ways. The passage of time, too, is riddling my memories with holes like Swiss cheese. Names escape me, details are getting fuzzy, and though concentrated thought can bring some things back from the recesses, others are gone forever. Some memories stand out like a lightning bolt in a dark night; many others of those events are gone into the darkness. If I am ever to write down my experience, the time is now.
Basically, you should bookmark Wayne Hale's blog and check it frequently. He'll be posting regularly, over the next several months, and I'm am certain you'll want to read the full series.
Also read: The Space Review article that mentions Hale's role in the Columbia disaster.
Via Alexandra Witze
columbia / disasters / NASA / Science / Space / Wayne Hale
Climate denial's internal contradictions spring from a need to defend economic doctrine
A trio of scholars who study the psychology and philosophy of science have written a fantastic paper for Springer's Sythese looking at the way that climate change conspiracy theorists construct their view of the world, and how these conspiracy theories contain self-contradictory theses (like the idea that climate change can't be predicted and the idea [...]
Psychology's reproducibility crisis: why statisticians are publicly calling out social scientists
Princeton University psych prof Susan Fiske published an open letter denouncing the practice of using social media to call out statistical errors in psychology research, describing the people who do this as "terrorists" and arguing that this was toxic because of the structure of social science scholarship, having an outsized effect on careers.
SF writer Peter Watts needs help diagnosing mysterious, debilitating illness
Blue writes, "Peter Watts has be stricken with debilitating pain, loss of range of motion and motor control. Watts' doctors remain baffled despite a battery of tests, and Watts has reached out to his fans to ask for their theories and ideas as to what might be causing his illness."
Live your dream creating mobile games for a living
With this comprehensive course in App & Game Development for iOS and Android, you'll be able to take full advantage of this career opportunity without committing to going back to school full time. You'll learn how to build immersive, interactive games and apps from start to finish using Python, C#, Unity, and HTML - some of the most in-demand programming [...]
Learn to build a stunning website without coding
CloudPress is a responsive WordPress theme builder that allows you to create a whole site in less than 30 minutes. CloudPress comes with tools like pre-built headers, content blocks, and footers - all you have to do is pick what you like, and drag and drop. With your subscription, you get access to 13 professionally designed WordPress themes, over 80 [...]
Treat your pup to a free month of BarkBox
If you own a dog, you've most likely heard of BarkBox - the monthly subscription box for dogs. What started as a simple idea to try out the subscription model on pet owners has since developed a cult following of dog lovers. If you haven't given it a try yet, this one month free deal is the [...]
11 Ian Wood says: August 16, 2012 at 9:34 pm Columbia could've been NASA's second Apollo 13. And that would've been a good thing. bzishi says: August 16, 2012 at 10:48 pm I doubt it. The same management that would take corrective action due to a potential foam strike in space would also analyze the danger of foam strikes during launch. Apollo 13 was obvious. The management knew there was a problem. But when someone, even a flight director, tells the senior management there is potential problem due to design, they are going to be listened to and then kindly dismissed. After all, if there was a problem with the foam, there would have been some evidence in 100 or so flights, right? And engineering has already evaluated foam strikes as being safe, right? And aren't you supposed to be doing your job instead questioning how others have done their jobs?
I know this type of interaction from experience. Engineers are forced to PROVE there is a problem before management will act.
digi_owl says: August 17, 2012 at 1:01 am Management...
When did the PHBs infect NASA?
bzishi says: August 17, 2012 at 3:51 am They are everywhere. Look at the history for the Columbia accident. Engineers asked the DOD to use their secret tech for photographs. NASA management found out and stopped the requests.
digi_owl says: August 17, 2012 at 6:41 am And the subcontractor that supplied the Challenger o-rings said go for launch when the CEO switched from his engineer "cap" to his management "cap".
Ian Wood says: August 17, 2012 at 2:31 pm I meant if they had managed to identify the strike damage after Columbia was in orbit.
So, yeah. Could've been. Wasn't.
jay curry says: August 16, 2012 at 10:27 pm "But being one of the good guys doesn't mean you don't feel guilty when something goes horribly wrong."
I don't think I'm going too far out on a limb when I say that I think that 'being one of the good guys' actually means that even if you are not one of the people actually responsible when things go wrong, you feel guilty when they do and what you suspect was wrong, actually turns out to be a significant contributor to the disaster.
digi_owl says: August 17, 2012 at 12:59 am Yep, i suspect he will eternally wonder if they would still be alive if he had done just a bit more. While those that brushed him off may well have no issue sleeping for the rest of their days.
Ashen Victor says: August 17, 2012 at 1:41 am Sense of guilt is only for those who has a conscience, those who feel bad knowing that someone was hurt and no one was able or did nothing to stop it. That is why assholes never feel guilty.
digi_owl says: August 17, 2012 at 12:57 am Has it already been a decade?! Peter Morris says: August 17, 2012 at 2:43 am In the paragraph of the post that begins "But being one of the good" it ends with "and after the Challenger disaster:". But this post is about Columbia. Comments are closed.