Lynch v. Nurdin
Lynch v. Nurdin 1 QB 29, (1841) Arn and H 158, (1841) 113 ER 1041 was the first case law to define the attractive nuisance doctrine and was cited by later sources in the United States and the Commonwealth of Nations in developing the doctrine.

Lord Chief Justice Thomas Denman wrote the opinion, which held that the owner of a cart left unattended on the street could be held liable for injuries to a child who climbed onto the cart and fell. The seven-year-old child was "acting under natural impulse, in obedience to his instinctive nature, [and] was enticed to meddle with the attractive cart, and that the danger of the situation was created by the defendant in failing to observe the tendency of children to play about unprotected vehicles."
Q11022655
case law
Concept
Q4818699
attractive nuisance doctrine
UNK
Q30
United States
LOC
Q7785
Commonwealth of Nations
Concept
Q687908
Lord Chief Justice
PER
Q333102
Thomas Denman
PER
Q234668
cart
Concept
Q86752782
Lynch v. Nurdin
UNK
1041-01-01T00:00:00Z^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime
1041
DATE
+1^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal
1
NUMBER
+29^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal
29
NUMBER
+1841^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal
1841
NUMBER
+1841^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal
1841
NUMBER
position held