yes justice ginsberg preside gay marriage objective america think would decision last week glare example might time term limit supreme court anyone think decisions political nut supreme court ignore rule law constitution fundamental transformation andrew mccarthy give fantastic assessment go scotus last week court legislature chief justice john roberts actually publish sentence same-sex marriage dissent friday mere 24 hours maestro performance supreme court legislative rewrite affordable care act formerly know obamacare etch memory scotuscare thank justice antonin scalia wither dissent.roberts denial court legislate astonish cynicism save scotuscare chief justice usurp congress law-writing role gusto claim power first divine legislative purpose contradictory expression legislative language manufacture legislative ambiguity pretext twist language serve contrive purpose take clintonian quantum cheek pull one day next inveigh think it.already ocean ink spill analyze laud bemoan supreme court work week second life line toss scotuscare three years location heretofore unknown constitutional right same-sex marriage almost century-and-a-half adoption fourteenth amendment refashion congress fair house act embrace legal academe loopy disparate impact theory induce discrimination.yet non-stop commentary one detail go nearly unmentioned omission best explain week fundamental transformation trifecta.did notice iota speculation four progressive justices would vote never shadow doubt plethora opinions generate three case single one author ruth bad ginsburg stephen breyer elena kagan sonia sotomayor need leave vote bloc good chance sun would rise morning would wander reservation.how jurisprudence complex supple mind however likeminded often diverge sometimes dramatically principles constitutional adjudication canons statutory construction murky separation-of-powers boundaries etymology language much else witness example spirit debate court two originalists scalia clarence thomas statute defiance obama policy treat jerusalem sovereign israeli territory.but court lefties major cases.and much move lockstep one expect anything move lockstep fellow justices political branch certainly commentariat right left.it simply accept justices judge vote get desire outcome way disparate-impact voodoo always manage get discrimination start end work backwards guide precedents quaint business administer justice social justice business road never travel one less travel unavailable.but problem become give critical mass supreme court long expect much less oblige law court long legal institution political institution.that thus drop pretense court tribunal worthy protections system design non-political entity life-tenure insulation elections veil secrecy shroud judicial deliberations.if justices go politics electoral politics john roberts go write laws days pose powerless write laws anthony kennedy truly believe country crave eccentric notion liberty one condemn government restraints marriage 24 hours tighten government noose around one-sixth u.s. economy seat insulate third branch government accountable third chamber congress.if old time sake want maintain harmless vestige charade let keep wear rob work least long persuade voters keep job let dispense though fiction judgments product legal acumen rather sheer will.read national review face activism supreme court justices america accept judge never render objective opinion