abortion become legal procedure 1973. accord supreme court woman right privacy 40 years late republican judge put new spin abortion debate rule fine doctor discriminate woman ever abortion discriminate men man bear female body parts.the affordable care act obamacare forbid discrimination basis sex gender identity also forbid discrimination base whether woman abortion word federal government apply fairly broad definition sex discrimination should.u.s justice reed connor different vision though rule sex discrimination one mean discrimination woman woman man man slate point though determine man woman connor recognize one kind sex discrimination hostility man woman man woman belief directly contradict supreme court authority also make much sense since raise key question decide whether individual man woman discrimination intersex person sex discrimination person ambiguous genitalia identify male still connor get away blinker understand sex block federal guidelines bathroom access transgender students naturally pull trick hold hhs rule build upon sex discrimination therefore unlawful.clearly rule base ludicrous idea religious people discriminate tell discriminate much like hobby lobby rule allow businesses discriminate women offer birth control company insurance plan ironically offer pay maternity leave help consequences access birth control still connor try rationalize call insure transgender people burden fear undeniable reality connor hold treat transgender patients even insure transgender patients substantially burden insurance company hospitals exercise religion result rfra hhs rule must least restrictive mean further compel government interest connor decide rule constitute least restrictive mean prevent discrimination government assume cost transgender-related treatment assist transgender individuals find doctor treat judge go suggest protect transgender people discrimination actually compel government interest first place.as abortion part rule well doctor never require perform abortions though would allow doctor treat 55-year-old woman let say cancer abortion 17.the bizarre part rule though nothing law everything 16th century think christian medical associations bring suit argue treat either transgender patients women abortions tantamount material cooperation evil century rule though would open doors type discrimination essentially anything religious doctor might find yucky like treat lgbt people children lgbt people.many shrug shoulder argue big deal majority doctor still treat patients hard say true right part country simple many part south example might difficult find doctor will treat either woman abortion transgender person funny though doctor still allow discriminate people bear male christians.featured image via joe readle/getty image republican judge rule doctor freely refuse treat people people