supreme court decide everyone access firearms uphold federal law domestic abuser able possess gun seem like no-brainer domestic abuser already prove much cognitive ability.the case question maine resident mad lose right possess firearm accord cnn stephen voisine plead guilty misdemeanor assault charge 2004 girlfriend five years late investigate shoot bald eagle part investigation turn firearm authorities seem like real winner oh bald eagle really think able gun well guess mr. voisine domestic abusers get gun.justice elena kagan read opinion court federal law prohibit person convict misdemeanor crime domestic violence possess firearm phrase define include misdemeanor commit domestic relation necessarily involve use physical force question present whether misdemeanor assault convictions reckless contrast know intentional conduct trigger statutory firearms ban hold kagan cite gun law enact congress two decades ago congress enact 20 years ago close dangerous loophole gun control laws unite state v. castleman exist provision already bar convict felons possess firearms many perpetrators domestic violence charge misdemeanors rather felonies notwithstanding harmfulness conduct irearms domestic strife potentially deadly combination accordingly congress add prohibit person convict misdemeanor crime domestic violence possess gun ammunition connection interstate commerce gun domestic violence incredibly lethal combination kudos court step right thing every tom dick sally deserve gun second amendment amendment write arm stand state militias train utilize federal government pretty clear read entire constitution especially article section amendment add arm aforementioned militias.hopefully begin supreme court wake realize gun lethal good regulate whole way around maybe congress take notes.featured photo scott olson/getty image supreme court decide second amendment apply everyone