mean global climate change man make man powerful god liar chief try tell america top scientists america agree climate model use alarmist scientists predict global warm get bad good carbon dioxide far good harm president obama back wrong side war climate change say one world great theoretical physicists dr freeman dyson picture british-born naturalise american citizen work princeton university contemporary einstein advise us government wide range scientific technical issues.in interview andrew orlowski register dyson express despair current scientific obsession climate change say scientific mystery human mystery happen whole generation scientific experts blind obvious facts mystery say dyson partly explain term follow money also blame believe kind collective yearn apocalyptic doom.it true large community people make money scar public money certainly involve extent think full explanation.it like hundred years ago world war insane crave doom way help cause world war i. people like poet rupert brooke glorify war escape dullness modern life feel go soft degenerate war would good us air lead world war ways air today.dyson longstanding democrat voter especially disappoint choose party unscientific stance climate change issue.it sad country political opinion part people view climate change 100 per cent democrat like obama take wrong side issue republicans take right side.part problem say democrats conflation pollution genuine problem climate change natural phenomenon quite beyond mankind ability control .china india rely coal keep grow clearly burn coal huge amount need get rich whatever rest world agree china india continue burn coal discussion quite pointless.at time coal unpleasant stuff problems coal quite apart climate remember england burn coal everything filthy really bad way china clean england take certain amount political willpower take time pollution quite separate climate problem one solve public understand that.the short-to-medium term solution pollution problem argue replacement coal much-maligned shale gas whose rejection much europe find unfathomable counter-productive.as far next 50 years concern two main force energy coal shale gas emissions go us go europe shale gas half carbon dioxide emissions coal china may fact able develop shale gas big scale mean burn lot less coal.it seem complete madness prohibit shale gas wonder climate change anglophone preoccupation well france even dogmatic britain shale gas dyson 91 enjoy long distinguish career physicist mathematician public intellectual show promise early age five calculate number atoms sun world war ii work operation research section royal air force bomber command move us robert oppenheimer award permanent post institute advance study princeton also work oak ridge national laboratory look climate system 25 years ago become hot political issue.the dangers carbon dioxide believe much overrate foreword report global warm policy foundation indur goklany call carbon dioxide good news report breitbart say unprejudiced person read account facts obvious non-climatic effect carbon dioxide sustainer wildlife crop plant enormously beneficial possibly harmful climatic effect carbon dioxide greatly exaggerate benefit clearly outweigh possible damage.i consider unprejudiced person facts obvious facts obvious majority scientists politicians consider carbon dioxide evil dangerous people suppose experts claim understand science precisely people blind evidence.he liken climate change issue irrational beliefs promote history famous thinkers adopt loyal disciples sometimes use bleed treatment various diseases irrational belief harm large number human victims george washington one victims irrational beliefs phlogiston theory burn aristotelian cosmology circular celestial motion harm delay careful examination nature case see community people happily unite false belief bring leaders followers together anyone question prevail belief would upset peace community.dyson refusal ever accommodate modish notions hour may explain unlike less distinguish brilliant contemporaries years never award nobel prize.he conclude hop scientists politicians blindly demonize carbon dioxide 37 years one day open eye look evidence via breitbart news wow world top physicist democrat obama back wrong side war climate change follow money carbon far good harm