would hope wise latina woman richness experience would often reach good conclusion white male live life supreme court justice sotomayoras main stream media hit job donald trump express view preside judge trump university case bias trump view immigration racist latina supreme court justice openly declare ethnicity sex judge make difference judge leave want ways out total hypocrites unreal judge sotomayor question whether achieve impartiality possible even case add wonder whether ignore differences women men color disservice law society call trump racist washington 2001 sonia sotomayor appeal court judge give speech declare ethnicity sex judge may make difference judge speech judge sotomayor question famous notion often invoke justice ruth bad ginsburg retire supreme court colleague sandra day connor wise old man wise old woman would reach conclusion decide case would hope wise latina woman richness experience would often reach good conclusion white male live life say judge sotomayor consider near top president obama list potential supreme court nominees.her remark annual judge mario g. olmos law cultural diversity lecture university california berkeley instance publicly describe view judge term could provoke sharp question confirmation hearing.this month example video surface judge sotomayor assert 2005 court appeal policy make immediately add know know tape never say make law know o.k know promote advocate know video panel discussion law students interest become clerk explain different experience gain work district court appeal court remark catch eye conservative bloggers accuse judicial activist although jonathan h. adler professor case western reserve university law school argue critics read far much remarks.republicans signal intend put eventual nominee microscope say put guard mr. obama statement judge empathy word suggest could code inject liberal ideology law.judge sotomayor give several speeches importance diversity 2001 remark berkeley publish berkeley la raza law journal go assert judge identities affect legal outcomes whether bear experience inherent physiological cultural differences say jurists women nonwhite gender national origins may make difference judge remark come context reflect life experience hispanic female judge increase diversity federal bench effect development law judge make argument judge sotomayor sound many cautionary note say uniform perspective women members minority group emphasize talk individual case.she also note supreme court uniformly white male deliver historic rule racial sexual discrimination say try question opinions sympathies prejudice aspire impartiality.still judge sotomayor question whether achieve impartiality possible even case add wonder whether ignore differences women men color disservice law society read nyt judicial bias latina supreme court justice declare shockingly racist view ethnicity sex judge