know donald trump would nightmare supreme court nominee judge neil gorsuch try present sort legal scholar enforce law fairly regardless personal view however past come back haunt turn misogynistic bastard would make horrific decisions come protect women right workplace letter write judiciary former student judge gorsuch days law school professor say follow view regard women workplace judge gorsuch outline law firm company general ask female interviewees pregnancy plan order protect company least one student counter employer could ask question interviewee pregnancy plan however judge gorsuch inform class wrong instead judge gorsuch tell class could future employer ask female interviewees pregnancy family plan company must ask females family pregnancy plan protect company another anonymous declaration judiciary also confirm complain gorsuch view work women say say many female lawyers become pregnant question whether law firm dime go rule court 2003 say ask women deeply personal issue family plan say historically denial curtailment women employment opportunities traceable directly pervasive presumption women mother first workers second prevail ideology women roles turn justify discrimination women mother mothers-to-be opinion author chief justice renquist go say mutually reinforce stereotype create self-fulfilling cycle discrimination force women continue assume role primary family caregiver foster employers stereotypical view women commitment work value employees come surprise trump well mike pence huge misogynists however downright terrify guy confirm supreme court turn back women right 100 years let even get start women reproductive health roe v. wade go heartbeat guy.democrats ever important fight take one keep neil gorsuch supreme court matter takes.featured image via alex wong/getty image trump scotus nominee disturb history open misogyny