andrew korybko 21st century wire global media awash analysis speculation resignation former national security advisor michael flynn everyone try make sense happen occur mean future trump presidency us-russian relations broadly.flynn resign break laws leave white house supposedly erosion trust president occur result deep state -driven fake scandal.neoconservative obama/clinton-aligned elements us permanent military intelligence diplomatic bureaucracies conspire get rid one trump trust promise advisors order preemptively undermine hoped-for new tente russia new cold war.flynn integral part initiative therefore take soon possible since political assassination could change momentum us deep state civil war improve odds revolutionary think leaders stephen bannon stephen miller could next go.retracing sequence eventsthe grand objective neutralize trump capacity drain swamp even partially relate us-russian relations restore old order business washington even go far delegitimize late impeach president bend mainstream media make big fuss nothing significant incoming national security advisor speak one many foreign counterparts transitional period allege technicality pertain 1799 logan act american hero able take deep state .according report fbi coincidentally happen eavesdrop russian ambassador sergey kislyak exact time hold one discussions flynn story go designate national security advisor time legally still civilian make suggestions american foreign policy unwittingly put violation aforementioned law furthermore purportedly mislead vice president pence full content conversation ambassador turn contribute erosion trust ultimately lead trump ask resignation.almost right afterwards white house press secretary sean spic declare trump expect russian government return crimea echo un ambassador nikki haley early copy obama-era sloganeer russian occupation crimea prompt mainstream alternative voice declare trump reveal true face hope new tente ever materialize general sentiment mainstream media good thing alternative one rue loss historic opportunity.uncomfortable questionsbut really right way assess situation flynn experience operative us deep state know good clumsily slip speak anything could remotely interpret presume anti-trump eavesdroppers violation arcane legislation probably make simple mistake term express blame whole scandal way know exactly say official transcript become available ever nevertheless judge euphemisms use resignation letter evident flynn fact apparently mislead pence relate conversation ambassador kislyak.or want everyone think.it doubtful flynn would go rogue trump simply due overzealousness might felt towards help reach new tente matter taboo may wonder help countenance whatever speak russian ambassador trump implicit approval per president-elect suggestions case flynn might well mislead pence establishment powerful figure new administration still take fall order save trump possible impeachment proceed 1799 logan act.pbhistory 21st centuryall brouhaha create flynn resignation manufacture deep state scandal conversation russian ambassador really 21st-century manifestation old cold war cia project codenamed pbhistory operation take place post-coup guatemala us successfully overthrow government 1954 objective concoct evidence former president link soviet union could justify coup carry happen trump right almost reverse implementation plan.instead try link trump moscow impeachment deep state try order catalyze legal regime change flynn present strong evidence allegedly connect american president russian counterpart wide degrees imaginative speculation nevertheless narrative-controlled vacuum mainstream media alternative reality begin take root become never-ending talk point among army pay shill employ order wiggle trap trump reactively take parrot establishment position towards russia send spic channel message crimea like early preemptively haley un.does tente even matter case unclear whether trump really believe position large scheme things really matter much would ideal us finally mature point see world moscow multipolar eye accept reality crimea fact russian even change facts grind confirm sanction pertain peninsula historic reunification russia remain place much consternation neoliberal political economic influencers moscow might want lift wrong self-interested reasons.of course would great economic restrictions remove eu decide follow suit could symbolically usher new era cooperation russia west though downside counter-sanctions would lift russian domestic producers already enjoy economic renaissance sort would force compete international counterparts russian marketplace cost-benefit assessment pertain either-or decision entirely russia strategists decision makers calculate judgement render regard objectively expect fact western recognition crimea reunification russia might bode negatively competitiveness russian company mostly agricultural within country.now flynn trump double anti-russian rhetoric seem ever less likely new tente reach anytime soon hope optimists may supposedly imminent removal sanction completely evaporate nevertheless us remind russia traditional hostility european front mean necessarily behave way mideast one still chance two great power might indeed enter sort joint cooperation daesh carry damascus bless whether state imply could also work russia benefit well.or deception provocative position devil advocate purpose simply present alternative angle late events possible prior dream russian strategists decision makers might reach new tente nothing carefully craft deception us moscow officially say multiple occasion discuss removal sanction washington illusions difficulty restore bilateral relations two countries popular speculation corner russia will engage preliminary trust-building concessions order facilitate presume eventuality.there course real proof ever case narrative convince many rely conjecture relate russian-written draft constitution syria moscow refusal conventionally intervene late ukrainian-provoked aggression donbas author refute first line think best-case scenario outline recent article topic analysis two half years ago threat reverse brzezinski still accurately account russia refusal invade ukraine even assume author wrong however russia really concede multiple front order attain sanction relief elite new tente strategists late statements come white house must certainly sober even diehard pro-d tente individuals kremlin crimea leave ukraine join russian federation march 2014 image source youtube cold hard reality even trump sincerely want recognize crimea part russia remove sanction whether genuine desire start new era relations order cynically squeeze many concessions moscow possible beforehand domestic political situation us make impossible let alone anytime near future shatter hop well-intentioned ideologues truly believe dawn new era cusp finally approach unprecedentedly meet differ degrees acceptance mainstream media western neoconservatives one side also foreign policy realists patriotic skeptics russia other.the first group obviously want everything power undermine russian-us rapprochement second extremely cautious washington might expect moscow exchange new tente whatever respective reason may regard cause support syria donbas even general foreign policy realists patriotic skeptics russia felt uncomfortable country potentially concede recent geopolitical gain us part grand bargain despite impossible ever reach new tente without side participate extent deal-making.this conservative camp inadvertently get boost flynn scandal however since leverage influence kremlin convince need double relations china iran response us renew aggression towards russia consider expand country newfound partnerships turkey pakistan long semi-legitimate concern serious circle russia concede anything front long trump keep hostile shtick whether really believe say distraction domestic problems .whatever deception us might mind russia hint new tente disappear moscow honeymoon trump over.draining swamp rule trump volte face towards russia exploit critics even sincerely believe order allege drain swamp rule draw attention real differentiate factor separate trump obama administrations policies towards multipolar countries eurasia 45th president presumably poise enter cordial relations russia even author early forecast immediately election entirely dependent drain deep state foreign policy swamp ambitious initiative however trump already disappoint many people come stances towards china iran lead many people conclude try separate moscow eurasian great power alliance neutralize multipolar effectiveness per neo-kissinger stratagem.those fear safely discard highly unlikely russia would ever move direction without tempt carrots offer us possible recognition crimea removal anti-russian sanction consider trump administration foreign policy towards russia china iran almost identical obama except possibility pragmatic joint cooperation daesh syria pending damascus uncertain approval course fair say trump essentially lead swamp come foreign affairs little structurally change except nature us manage establish spheres influence western hemisphere eurasian rimland might admittedly lead dynamic unpredictable developments .ask regular trump supporter however totally disagree anyone say trump rule swamp author talk foreign policy wonks facebook alternative international media standard joes sallys vote heartland could honestly care less international relations except come keep us another big war halfway across world truth generic trump voter might sympathetic candidate reasonable pragmatism towards russia never really one main factor determine support take clevelander nuclear physicist academician twitter troll jet-setting journalist among many professional tropes become influential alternative media lately average trump voter care give order build wall mexico kick illegal immigrants crack welfare relate government benefit freeloaders restore law order america gang-ridden riotous streets fight war hard drug ease business regulations tax work class include obamacare create bring back job trump supporters also instinctively anti-clinton since hillary hawk russia automatically receptive soft stance promise trump way whether right wrong regular americans vote trump honestly care much policy towards russia long impede ability carry domestic agenda side first place trump base love hate domestically focus care america first even disagree elements foreign policy still vote base promise domestically electorate anywhere across world typically behave anyhow.this opposite position hold majority pro-trump voice alternative media community count breitbart course might oppose trump domestic policies side regardless international ones vis- -vis russia many non-americans frequent online communities might therefore come mislead impression trump supporters think way influential voice exactly case pro-trump alternative media influencers turn due volte face towards russia declare lead swamp non-american audience might think position representative bulk supporters general inaccurate owe professional idiosyncrasies say voice relative work class core trump movement.no matter angle look however escape observation trump indeed rule foreign policy swamp appear full revolt domestic one least relate key platforms early enumerate upon profile important issue typical trump voter obama succumb neoconservative deep state order relatively free hand carry domestic agenda trump appear poise although 45th president might simply choose battle wisely understand might impossible drain two swamp go less evil globally speak first aim great one ever lot personal political self-preservation trump understand support base mostly even recognize foreign policy swamp exist outside clinton foundation george soros neither obviously rub shoulder still drain swamp long stay loyal domestic concern movement.concluding thoughtsthe neoconservative deep state ouster national security advisor flynn trump administration worry development show clintonian counter-revolution proceed apace stop trump either control impeached.in reaction onslaught team respond fake russian puppet narrative come dominate mainstream media discourse trump start full-throatedly parrot establishment well-known talk point russia especially relate crimea mark dramatic change tone rhetoric president signal domestic political pressure right result late manufacture scandal overwhelm fully continue hoped-for new tente russia nevertheless mean eventuality completely dismiss since still possible principle us coordinate joint anti-daesh strike russia syria conditional damascus approval course importantly change however prospect new tente even remote semblance one europe markedly diminish help catch attention kremlin.it unclear go behind close doors grand kremlin palace sort factions russian ministry foreign affairs previously concern express various sectors alternative media community moscow risk go soft us syria donbas elsewhere order exhibit goodwill gesture design reach grand goal new tente pecuniary reward sanction removal speculations contribute persistent ever-growing narrative among various circle turn lead wonder whether pertinent arguments base objective reality convince attempt gaslighting whatever may may become irrelevant however since readjust expectations russia us flynn ouster trump embrace neoconservative rhetoric crimea embolden patriotic conservatives previously cautious possibly even outright skeptical new tente thus mitigate chance russia engage unnecessary preemptive concessions towards us long attitude remain place key conditional .the foreign policy twist play trump administration towards russia lead influential pro-trump supporters alternative media conclude president give drain swamp instead rule whether decide show true color along self-interested reason preserve political personal survival non-american audience frequent say alternative media platforms might come false impression sentiment mirror typical trump supporter necessarily case owe professional particularities highest-profile commentators community certainly entitle individual analyse exactly channel sentiment grassroots mass bring trump power position towards president mostly determine foreign policy unlike domestic policy motivate base say author mean condone trump anti-russian rhetoric expect complementary action understand see separately president domestic agenda therefore impact reason movement support first place.trump definitely defensive come drain foreign policy swamp case argue already process coopted large degree situation remarkably different come domestic swamp supporters want drain appointment former goldman sachs investment banker steven mnuchin secretary treasury completely go presumable expectations trump slogan issue take absolute precedence base comparison reason vote trump supporters want president restore law order streets fight hard drug crime tough illegal immigration unfair trade deal ease draconian obama-era regulations small businesses include obamacare populist leader poise regardless foreign macroeconomic policies endorse either latter simply explain reality trump still popular among base perceive sell dichotomy alternative media narrative grassroots one due differ emphasis first category voice typically place foreign policy oppose second one natural focus domestic issues.all flynn resignation evidence deep state clintonian counter-revolution full swing successfully swiftly remove one top advisors international consequences apparent russia much reserve prospect ever reach new tente less likely ever enter preemptive concessions whether speculatively substantially aim attain russia probably reinforce relationships china iran well expand partnerships newfound friends turkey pakistan us stand ready return back obama-era policies towards multipolar leaders eurasia part trump administration foreign policy begin look almost identical obama administration spite president still enjoy overwhelm approval grassroots movement reverence no-nonsense politically incorrect approach domestic issue whether good bad thing reader decide objective reality author presently understand though fully accept could quickly change regard depend certain variables.for moment however diminish hop new tente necessarily defeat russia contrarily see opportunity strategists supporters reason previously mentioned.disclaimer author write publication private capacity unrepresentative anyone organization except personal view nothing write author ever conflate editorial view official position media outlet institution author geopolitical analyst andrew korybko contributor 21st century wire study international relations moscow state university international relations mgimo member expert council institute strategic study predictions people friendship university russia also work current affairs writer sputnik news host trend storm sputnik radio book hybrid war indirect adaptive approach regime change extensively analyze situations syria ukraine claim prove represent new model strategic warfare wag us.read russia news 21st century wire russia filessupport work subscribe become member 21wire.tv flynn new détente really dead russia still benefit