dnc chairman tom perez decide create reality speech tuesday democrat thing love make false narrative push sheeple follow really pitiful many months democrats lie electoral college brilliant creation give balance voters would want california new york decide elections would happen without electoral college bet perez already know count uneducated voters buy .democratic national committee chairman tom perez incorrectly state electoral college creation constitution tuesday night speech function id var js fjs d.getelementsbytagname d.getelementbyid id return js d.createelement js.id id js.src 'https //connect.facebook.net/en_us/sdk.js xfbml=1 version=v2.10 fjs.parentnode.insertbefore js fjs document 'script 'facebook-jssdk dnc chair tom perez incorrectly claim electoral college creation constitution post fox friends friday october 27 2017 electoral college creation constitution perez say lecture indiana university law school electoral college mechanism indirect election president create found father compromise small state large state clearly lay article ii constitution state shall appoint manner legislature thereof may direct number electors equal whole number senators representatives state may entitle congress perez previously state president donald trump win last november election hillary clinton popular vote follow comment perez go explain hop state agree national popular vote compact state agree give allocate electoral vote winner national popular vote national popular vote compact number state pass bill say allocate vote electoral vote person win national popular vote state total 170 electoral vote perez say frankly proud tell first state pass law maryland main supporters plan put forward perez seem understand plan circumvent system create constitution argument system exist.the comment perez come lecture honor former indiana democratic sen. birch bayh accuse last year sexual assault writer say bayh grope backseat limousine via wfbour previous report electoral college please share clueless leave president elect unfiltered national vote small rural state would become irrelevant campaign would spend time large populous district electoral college remain place two centuries framers constitution empower select presidents though occasionally malign system elect chief executive incredibly successful american people.the found father create electoral college much debate compromise provide stability process pick presidents though winner national popular vote typically take presidency vote fail determine winner four elections 1824 1876 1888 2000.some see electoral college peculiar mystify institution ensure select individuals ever cast direct vote president unite state others complain system reward small state proportional power large ones.every four years around election time murmur revamp system move toward direct national popular vote.the founder collegeas one heritage foundations legal experts hans von spakovsky note paper electoral college create basic architecture american government founder struggle satisfy state demand great representation attempt balance popular sovereignty risk pose minority majoritarian rule elements electoral college indirect vote intermediaries hotly debate 1787 constitutional convention eventually justify part stopgap potentially reverse vote people elect criminal traitor similar kind heinous person founder want empower democratic elements american system fear kind pure unrestrained democracy bring great republics past.the product founder compromise well balance endure would wise leave intact.alexander hamilton defend electoral college federalist 68. argue important people whole great deal power choose president also desirable immediate election make men capable analyze qualities adapt station act circumstances favorable deliberation judicious combination reason inducements proper govern choice hamilton also write system intermediaries would produce great amount stability intermediate body electors much less apt convulse community extraordinary violent movements choice one final object public wish students ancient history founder fear destructive passions direct democracy recent subject overreach monarch equally fear rule elite unresponsive people electoral college compromise neither fully democratic aristocratic.the constitution state state shall appoint manner legislature thereof may direct number electors equal whole number senators representatives state may entitle congress.in addition balance protection individual right majority rule found father attempt create federalist system would keep policymaking power reserve state localities america presidential election system also design empower state american people undifferentiated mass.the total number electors thus electoral vote across state district columbia include passage 23rd amendment add 538. winner must receive majority 270 vote become president.the system empower state especially small ones incentivizes presidential candidates appeal place may far away population center farmers iowa may different concern bankers new york federalist system elect presidents take account.the state free select method choose electors early days republic state choose legislatures pick electors rather people time state shift choose electors via state popular vote instead every state opt popular election least since civil war.calls abolishmodern opponents electoral college argue call antidemocratic aspects institution criticize intermediary electors state-by-state system voting.calls fundamentally change electoral college reach peak republican george w. bush defeat democrat al gore tightly contest 2000 election gore narrowly national popular vote many supporters howl system even without supreme court step unfair.one organization national popular vote work toward eliminate electoral college amendment constitution state compact national popular vote argue current system encourage presidential candidates spend time swing state rather campaign vote across entire country.this plan national popular vote receive moderate level support heritage von spakovsky call bad policy base mistake assumptions swing state write change election election many state today consider reliably blue red presidential race recently unpredictable many state sign bill essentially would tie state electoral vote national popular vote state pledge swing electoral vote winner national vote.but incentives would appeal big population center swing state change time 2016 election could prime example swing-state unpredictability erosion traditional partisan political map.additionally president elect unfiltered national vote small rural state would become irrelevant campaign would spend time large populous districts.finally democrats proud disgust man curse lie read daily signal dnc chair perez say trump win …decides rewrite constitution without electoral college…