text: what's the universe, whats in the universe and how big is the universe?   the fundamental particles of the universe that physicists have identified—electrons, neutrinos, quarks, and so on—are the "letters" of all matter. just like their linguistic counterparts, they appear to have no further internal substructure. string theory proclaims otherwise. according to string theory, if we could examine these particles with even greater precision—a precision many orders of magnitude beyond our present technological capacity—we would find that each is not pointlike but instead consists of a tiny, one-dimensional loop. like an infinitely thin rubber band, each particle contains a vibrating, oscillating, dancing filament that physicists have named a string.  in the figure at right, we illustrate this essential idea of string theory by starting with an ordinary piece of matter, an apple, and repeatedly magnifying its structure to reveal its ingredients on ever smaller scales. string theory adds the new microscopic layer of a vibrating loop to the previously known progression from atoms through protons, neutrons, electrons, and quarks.  although it is by no means obvious, this simple replacement of point-particle material constituents with strings resolves the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and general relativity (which, as currently formulated, cannot both be right). string theory thereby unravels the central gordian knot of contemporary theoretical physics. this is a tremendous achievement, but it is only part of the reason string theory has generated such excitement.  field of dreams  in einstein's day, the strong and weak forces had not yet been discovered, but he found the existence of even two distinct forces—gravity and electromagnetism—deeply troubling. einstein did not accept that nature is founded on such an extravagant design. this launched his 30-year voyage in search of the so-called unified field theory that he hoped would show that these two forces are really manifestations of one grand underlying principle. this quixotic quest isolated einstein from the mainstream of physics, which, understandably, was far more excited about delving into the newly emerging framework of quantum mechanics. he wrote to a friend in the early 1940s, "i have become a lonely old chap who is mainly known because he doesn't wear socks and who is exhibited as a curiosity on special occasions."  einstein was simply ahead of his time. more than half a century later, his dream of a unified theory has become the holy grail of modern physics. and a sizeable part of the physics and mathematics community is becoming increasingly convinced that string theory may provide the answer. from one principle—that everything at its most microscopic level consists of combinations of vibrating strands—string theory provides a single explanatory framework capable of encompassing all forces and all matter.  string theory proclaims, for instance, that the observed particle properties—that is, the different masses and other properties of both the fundamental particles and the force particles associated with the four forces of nature (the strong and weak nuclear forces, electromagnetism, and gravity)—are a reflection of the various ways in which a string can vibrate. just as the strings on a violin or on a piano have resonant frequencies at which they prefer to vibrate—patterns that our ears sense as various musical notes and their higher harmonics—the same holds true for the loops of string theory. but rather than producing musical notes, each of the preferred mass and force charges are determined by the string's oscillatory pattern. the electron is a string vibrating one way, the up-quark is a string vibrating another way, and so on.  far from being a collection of chaotic experimental facts, particle properties in string theory are the manifestation of one and the same physical feature: the resonant patterns of vibration—the music, so to speak—of fundamental l