text: the argument that donald shaw and his buddies fear.? "the one argument that you fear, is the one from the bible. the bible says specifically that anyone who denies that jesus is the son of god is anti-christ. islam teaches that jesus is not the son of god, so the bible identifies them as anti-christ. the anti-christ works for satan"  here is the comeback to this statement first one from the bible which is a work by man and rife with contradictions. god is all knowing and in so would know the many ways all things can be taken if he doesn't well then he just ain't god now is he. so in the bible god says you have no savior beside me...and guess who is sitting beside him. jesus. interesting.   but that was not the argument here it is.  buddha says in the teaching of anatman that there is no you. that's right according to buddhas teaching people are made up of skandas therefore there is nothing for jesus to save. so the bible is wrong. see. now people are going to say that buddha was wrong. prove it. but you can't just quote the bible. you're wasting your time you cannot argue a matter of faith using references outside of that which their faith considers truth.  your reference to the buddha's teachings are irrelevant to a christianist.  but i think all religionists are wrong, with the exception of hindus and even they are slightly wrong.