text: part i: with your own beliefs as a guide, write one paragraph to answer the following questions: what should s a midwest biologist has conducted numerous studies demonstrating that simple organisms such as worms and paramecia can learn through conditioning. it occurs to her that perhaps she could condition fertilized human ova, to provide a dramatic demonstration that abortions destroy adaptable, living human organisms. this possibility appeals to her, as she is ardently opposed to abortion. however, there is no way to conduct the necessary research on human ova without sacrificing the lives of potential human beings. she desperately wants to conduct the research, but obviously, the sacrifice of human ova is fundamentally incompatible with her belief in the sanctity of human life. (qtd. from weiten, 2006) part ii: please indicate the level of moral reasoning for each item below using kohlberg’s theory.   1.she should do the research. although it’s wrong to kill, there’s a greater good that can be realized through the research. 2.she shouldn’t do the research because people will think that she’s a hypocrite and condemn her.  3.she should do the research because she may become rich and famous as a result. kohlberg's theory!!! you're asking alot from a yahoo q&a. right to lifer's have always faced this quandry. how do you justify taking the life of a living being (doctors, nurses, patients) to save the life of an unborn? you can't! therefore, she cannot do the research because it would be contradictory to her beliefs!