text: what are some false aspects about marcus brutus in real life compared to the play?   marcus brutus: roman senator and praetor who helps plan and carry out caesar's assassination. historically, marcus junius brutus (84-42 b.c.) enjoyed a reputation in his day among roman republicans as a noble and fair-minded statesman. however, his opponents–notably supporters of caesar–regarded him as a traitor. first, brutus sided with pompey the great against caesar when the roman civil war started in 49 b.c. after caesar defeated pompey at pharsalus, greece, in 48 b.c., he pardoned brutus and appointed him governor of cisalpine gaul in 46 b.c. and a praetor of rome in 44 b.c. but brutus turned against caesar a second time, helping to lead the conspiracy that led to caesar’s assassination in 44 b.c. brutus believed the action was necessary to prevent caesar from becoming dictator-for-life, meaning that all power would reside in caesar and not in the delegates representing the people. in shakespeare’s play, brutus’s nobility and idealism gain the audience’s sympathy. but in the ancient roman world of power politics, characterized by perfidy and pragmatism, it is his virtues that doom him. his downfall and death are the real tragedy of the play, not the death of caesar.    wow, lot of info.  definitely an interesting character--above quote from last link.