text: is the usa competent to lead the world? i don't intend to hurt anyone. i'm just talking about facts. bush said that saddam had weapons of mass destruction. but the inspectors found nothing. then, the us government presented photos taken by the satellite and said that this was the clear evidence of his accusal. the war began as he wanted.but what did we gain? democracy; they would say? obviously, absence of safety, death of tens of citizens every single day, paucity of basic daily needs and probability of native war is not democracy by any means. and what did we lose? thousands of soldiers left their homes. thousands of soldiers died for nothing other than gratification of mr. bush. thousands of iraqis died without enjoying the democracy they were promised to live. and guess what? iraq had no mass destruction weapons after all. but what now? nothing new. just replace mass destruction with nuclear weapons. replace satellite pictures with suspicious uranium. and replace the q in iraq with n. the same scenario with with the same end. bad intentions, bad evaluations and bad results. i think it's more important for mr. bush to provide democracy for his people first. 30% popularity is obviously not a sign of democracy wow, where were you people when saddam gassed 5,000 of his own people?how about the night of the long knives?what about the mass graves? kuwait? offering money to the family's of suicide bombers if their children accomplished their deed? this just to name a few. don't you find it strange we didn't find anything? where do you think it went? syria?iran?we know he had some pretty bad chemical weapons because he used them against iran. but we didn't find anything. go figure.