text: what's the difference between a liberal and a terrorist? it's quite confusing seeing they support the same things and the same party. terrorists are not idiots, they sick, vile, demented humans but they are not idiots..  liberals on the other hand are islamofacist’s most useful idiots & best soldiers...  islam enjoys a large and influential ally among the non-muslims: a new generation of “useful idiots,” that lenin identified as those who lived in liberal democracies and furthered the work of communism. this new generation of useful idiots also lives in liberal democracies but serves the cause of islamofascism—another virulent form of totalitarian ideology.   useful idiots are naïve, foolish, ignorant of facts, unrealistically idealistic, dreamers, willfully in denial or deceptive. they hail from the ranks of the chronically unhappy, the anarchists, the aspiring revolutionaries, the neurotics who are at war with life, the disaffected alienated from government, corporations, and just about any and all institutions of society. the useful idiot can be a billionaire, a movie star, an academe of renown, a politician, or from any other segment of the population.   arguably, the most dangerous useful idiot is the “politically correct.” he is the master practitioner of euphemism, hedging, doubletalk, and outright deception.     the useful idiot derives satisfaction from being anti-establishment. he finds perverse gratification in aiding the forces that aim to dismantle an existing order, whatever it may be: an order he neither approves of nor he feels he belongs to.    the useful idiot is conflicted and dishonest. he fails to look inside himself and discover the causes of his own problems and unhappiness while he readily enlists himself in causes that validate his distorted perception.   understandably, it is easier to blame others and the outside world than to examine oneself with an eye to self-discovery and self-improvement. furthermore, criticizing and complaining—liberal practices of the useful idiot—require little talent and energy. the useful idiot is a great armchair philosopher and “monday morning quarterback.”   the useful idiot is not the same as a person who honestly has a different point of view. a society without honest and open differences of views is a dead society. critical, different and fresh ideas are the life blood of a living society—the very anathema of autocracies where the official position is sacrosanct.   even the “normal” spends a great deal more energy aiming to fix things out there than working to overcome his own flaws and shortcomings, or contribute positively to the larger society. people don’t like to take stock of what they are doing or not doing that is responsible for the conditions they disapprove.    the useful idiot, among other things, is a master practitioner of scapegoating. he assigns blame to others while absolving himself of responsibility, has a long handy list of candidates for blaming anything and everything, and by living a distorted life, he contributes to the ills of society.   the useful idiot may even engage in willful misinformation and deception when it suits him. terms such as “political islam,” or “radical islam,” for instance, are contributions of the useful idiot. these terms do not even exist in the native parlance of islam, simply because they are redundant. islam, by its very nature and according to its charter—the quran—is a radical political movement. it is the useful idiot who sanitizes islam and misguides the populace by saying that the “real islam” constitutes the main body of the religion; and, that this main body is non-political and moderate.    regrettably, a large segment of the population goes along with these nonsensical euphemisms depicting islam because it prefers to believe them. it is less threatening to believe that only a hijacked small segment of islam is radical or politically driven and that the main body of islam is indeed moderate and non-political.   but islam is political to the core. in islam the mosque and s