text: share your thoughts on the new book "the true meaning of your birthday"? breaks the mystery of the stars and says that astrrology is a cover for something deeper thats being hidden. is this true. the author of the book michael walker does make a few interesting points. rethinking the phrase what's your sign? the book, along with the entire concept or astrology, is a crock. it has no scientific validity whatsoever.   walker cobbles together some coincidences, a few statements of the obvious and tries to use it to prop up astrology. he makes no attempt at formulating coherent arguments, much less indulging in anything resembling science.  the book reminds me of nothing so much as the worst efforts of von daniken.