text: why the world media(nations) doesnot ask g bush to suuport the existing democratic victory in palistine.? the us government always claims of to be the active supporter of democratic nations, i-e where the fairly elected governments are established.now the palistinians have collectively elected the hamas party, then why america is reluctant to accept the reality and extend wholeheartedly unconditional support to the elected hamas. why rest of the world especially european are worried at the establishment of future democratic rule in palistine. if they are not supporting the hamas noe it means they are the violators of their own principles and their people should take serious view of the hypocracy of their states themselves, otherwise they should not claim to be so called the civilized nations. i like your question and your answer.  you nailed it.  bush got caught with his foot in his mouth.  his attempt to spread democracy in the middle east his way backfired on him.  yep, instead of congratulating hamas on their elected victory, something he's not too familiar with, he wants them to renounce terrorism and put down their weapons, or take away their foreign aid money.  now that i think about it, would bush even be in office if we had fair elections?