text: why the fk don't the us etc sort out their usless sex ed so like the detailed dutch? look how inferior it is. with all the kids having to come here and ask stuff and all the unwanted pregnancies... look at places like europe... they start from a very young age well below 11, anve lots of lessons as the kid grows up and the later ones when you are getting the birds and bees they go heavily into explicit detail covering aspects like oral sex, all the ways you can get pregnant, relationships, and that would include all the information being redily availiable teaching about gays and all.  plus a lower age of concent not like looney tunes 18 which is trying to fight nature and clearly looses.   result a higher average age of teenagers loosing it around 17, virtually no unwanted pregancies or stds except maybe with relgious imigrant communities (who prob keep their kids out of it...what a conincidence) , far more balanced teenagers with a fraction of the crime rate.  a more happy and peaceful society (bar the odd relgious nut immigrant) open about sex and friendy sorry to say - its not sex education at fault (well abit) its the general level of education...  look at the level of teenage pregnancies within the lower levels of inteligence & higher...  the lower levels expect less, require less & are content with less - hence child at 12 - 17 - no asperations, another child with different father next year, etc...  by now sex education is a moot point - but being given money to help "support" the "child" - well - they may be thick - but not that thick..  being given money for each child you produce - great motivation.....  children arn't stupid - but sex, coupled with lower inteligence = children at a young age when they can't really support them.  i know its drastic - but reversable sterilisation at 12 is a good idea..