text: god, supreme being or media hype? most religions seem to hold that if god was to prove his existance to mankind, then faith would be negated and he would cease to be. does anyone else find this most convenient for faith leaders that exercise influence and power over ''blind faith'' followers? to be clear, i have nothing against faith as a personal concept, but i do dislike organised religions of all denominations, your thoughts please.. god proves his existance every day when i wake up. i literally should have died a couple of years ago and was almost there but god obviously decided to let me live.  i myself do not need anymore proof. anyone who requires proof has only to look around them to see all that god does and gives.i personally believe that if you need proof of his existence in the form of some miracle of sorts, then you must first ask yourself what kind of miracle would appease you. i am sure that everyone has a different litmus test they would require for proof. what one person would accept, another person would not. therefore it is pointless for god to try to prove to you that he exists. that is why he left it up to you as an individual to believe or disbelieve.