text: a source of fuel that is more afective than petrolium,gives nothing and takes nothing from the enviroment? watch this clip from fox news before you read the rest http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klblnknbv_4      this would affect the world banks the people that basically own the petrolium companys,they run our governments (the new world order),even if you dont agree with that why is blair going on about global warming and pushing these sat devices that will be in every car and we will be charged by every mile . we will be tracked through this system everywhere you go which will be used by the police and go in the government central data base with all the other info cctv face recognition ,the biometric finger scanners there implamenting and the sat chips that have already been injected in over 100 peoples arms in the states that ignorantly volenteered.dont be fooled this will be implemented all over the western world .  now why are we not making desalinisation plants and pushing this technology for humanitys sake the world is covered in two thirds of water? did any of you pass high school science? maybe it has been awhile but think back and realize that your getting your panties in a bunch over nothing. this doesn't even make any sense. since none of you want to do research on your own, let me break down for you. especially you big brother conspiracy theorists that think bush has somehow halted science. lol  yes, this guy is turning water into hydrogen gas, the process is called electrolysis and has been around, i dont know, 40 years or so. junior high kids know that when you add electricity to water the hydrogen comes out as a gas that can be burned as fuel. but ah hah! there is your problem. where does the electricity come from. well, you can burn gasoline to make electricity, you can use atomic means to create electricity, or you can burn a crap load of coal to create electricity. none of them are pretty options. how much electricity does it take to turn h2o into hho? alot people!!! so guess what? by the time you load your car down with acid batteries that need electricity, which comes from gas or coal and your car still needs gas to run, guess what? you were better going to the pump in the first place and doing the environment a favor. its not gas companies that have us in the bind we are in folks, its mother nature. there is currently no better source of fuel for vehicles than good ol gas. you have to look at the efficiency of all processes and gas is the best. it takes less of it to move a car 100 miles than any other fuel on the planet, hands down. sorry, next conspiracy that will change the world please. and affecting world banks? calm down.....