diff --git "a/data/part_4/0315ac1169289441a7fee0ceb6024132.json" "b/data/part_4/0315ac1169289441a7fee0ceb6024132.json"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/data/part_4/0315ac1169289441a7fee0ceb6024132.json"
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"metadata":{"id":"0315ac1169289441a7fee0ceb6024132","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/587c1ee8-07f0-4485-9c54-91c982f219f2/retrieve"},"pageCount":40,"title":"CGIAR RESEARCH PROGRAM ON AGRICULTURE FOR NUTRITION AND HEALTH (A4NH) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT FOR 2013","keywords":[],"chapters":[{"head":"","index":1,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":59,"text":"chains have been implemented and results will be published in 2014-15. Initial development of value chain typologies and assessment frameworks were compiled and will be developed further with key partners in 2014 for a range of value chains from informal through commercial and also for structure value chains such as school feeding and food aid (e.g. purchase for progress)."},{"index":2,"size":244,"text":"For the integrated programs pathway, our main research contributions are in the area of knowledge and evidence. There are three main output types: developing robust and rigorous methods, process evaluation to improve program implementation and impact evaluation to provide evidence of efficacy and impact of interventions. Researchers supporting the Alive & Thrive (A&T) project produced two methods articles; the first one describes the evaluation methodology developed and used for impact evaluations of complex integrated programs. The paper uses the example of A&T, a multiple platform, health sector-based program aimed at improving child nutrition through improved infant and young child feeding in Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Vietnam. The second article describes the method of using a theory-driven process evaluation to understand how and why impacts have been achieved and how they can be replicated, building on past reports. Both papers appeared in the Food and Nutrition Bulletin and were presented at the 2013 International Congress on Nutrition. To respond to the demand from policy makers and investors, the portfolio of process and impact nutrition-sensitive development evaluations was further strengthened in 2013. Supporting this effort was the Lancet paper on nutrition-sensitive development and a symposium organized by A4NH researchers, hosted by A&T on \"generating evidence of impact for integrated programs aimed to improve child nutrition during the first 1000 days\" at the International Congress of Nutrition. In 2013, process evaluation results were presented to partners in the A&T project and with Helen Keller International in Burkina Faso."},{"index":3,"size":248,"text":"In nutrition-sensitive agriculture, biofortified foods have the strongest evidence base, particularly for improving vitamin A levels. In 2013, important progress was made on evidence for improving iron levels. A 2013 efficacy study measured improvements in iron status among iron deficient women who consumed biofortified high iron beans; results will be published in 2014. At the International Congress on Nutrition Conference in 2013, an initial analysis summarizing four evaluation studies of high-iron crops, showing positive efficacy was presented. This meta-analysis and some of the recent iron efficacy studies, such as 2013 iron pearl millet bioavailability study, where results for children in India and women in Benin showed 70% of iron requirements were met, will be published in 2014-15 and provide solid evidence for improving iron levels to supplement already published results on vitamin A efficacy from biofortified crops. Results from just-initiated nutrition-sensitive intervention evaluations in the A4NH portfolio will become available in 2016 and 2017. Other knowledge and evidence outputs in 2013 included a book \"Diversifying food and diets: using agricultural biodiversity to improve nutrition and health\" led by Bioversity and integrating contributions from 50 authors from partner CGIAR Centers (CIP, ICRAF, and World Fish), UN agencies, NGOs, and Universities. The SPRING project presented to the World Health Organization (WHO) a paper on the economic feasibility of maize meal fortification using a Household Consumption and Expenditure Survey (HCES) as part of the WHO's process of reviewing evidence informed guidelines for the fortification of staple foods as public health interventions."},{"index":4,"size":274,"text":"For the policies and investments pathway several outputs have contributed to understanding policy processes in target regions. In 2013, A4NH and the CRP on Policies, Institutions and Markets (PIM) cohosted a three-day \"Workshop on Approaches and Methods for Policy Process Research\" during which more than 50 policy experts, researchers, and practitioners from the agriculture, natural resource management, nutrition, and health sectors gathered to develop a community of practice, working papers and a toolkit (to be finalized in 2014). To assist interested national governments and implementing partners identify \"highest opportunity\" countries for expanding biofortification, HarvestPlus developed the biofortification prioritization index (BPI). The BPI was first used in a partnership with World Vision to plan the introduction of biofortified crops to five new countries in sub-Saharan Africa. In Vietnam, evidence reviews on food safety, slaughterhouse reform, and animal waste management were produced. Addressing evidence for policies for food safety in Vietnam, three aflatoxin briefs were produced and food safety reform for slaughterhouses, effects on livelihood generation for poor farmers, and management of human and animal waste were analyzed. Also at the International Congress on Nutrition, a Symposium on Sustainable Food and Diets with a major emphasis on exploring policy options for sustainable local food systems was supported by Bioversity. Leveraging Agriculture for Nutrition in South Asia (LANSA) worked on tools and approaches for policy impact and developed a stakeholder interview guide which is now being adapted for a new program, Leveraging Agriculture for Nutrition in East Africa (LANEA). Transform Nutrition completed its second full year of operation, and with partners produced policy evidence reviews and supported the launch of the Hunger and Nutrition Commitment Index (HANCI)."}]},{"head":"C.2 Progress towards the achievement of research outcomes and IDOs (List of Publications)","index":2,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":98,"text":"To track progress towards the achievement of the four A4NH IDOs, the focus is on two more immediate research or development outcomes. The first is improvements in capacity and performance of key value chain actors, program implementers or national and international researchers. The second is support to policy makers and investors to create a more enabling environment for outcomes and impacts. Also for the outcomes towards IDOs for nutrition (IDO1 on diet quality) and/or health (IDO2 on reduced exposure to AAD), immediate outcomes need to be integrated with or linked to those for empowerment (IDO3) and enabling (IDO4)."},{"index":2,"size":151,"text":"In 2013 and to grow in subsequent years, the most rapid building of capacity and knowledge to improve diet quality is in biofortification delivery in eight target countries. Country delivery managers actively support national public and private sector actors. In Rwanda, the Rwanda Agricultural Board has greatly expanded its capacity to advise farmers and to deliver seeds as well as supporting private seed companies to ensure saturation coverage of high-iron beans. In Zambia, the national extension systems as well as private seed companies have knowledge and skills to deliver high-vitamin A maize. In India, the private sector seed company, Nirmal Seeds, has been supported and is rapidly increasing the supply of iron-pearl millet seeds. Previously, the gender empowerment dimensions of biofortification delivery have been overlooked but a gender assessment was commissioned in 2013 and will report in 2014 with recommendations on concrete actions to enhance the effectiveness of delivery with partners."},{"index":3,"size":122,"text":"A major on-going research success, preceding and during A4NH, is supporting the knowledge, capacity and skills for program implementers in nutrition-sensitive agriculture. Key development implementers partnering with A4NH include Helen Keller International (HKI), BRAC, Concern and partners in the Preventing Malnutrition in under Twos Approach (PM2A), and Alive & Thrive (A&T) programs. Beyond nutrition-sensitive agriculture, implementation support includes nutrition education, gender empowerment, and social protection inputs. A presentation by HKI at the 2013 Science Forum provides a good example of such outcomes. The challenge is how to spread these capacities beyond the current group of willing development partners. In 2014, a collaboration with TANGO will identify the potential for supporting the knowledge, capacity and skills of more development implementers at greater scale."},{"index":4,"size":97,"text":"Another key target group in which A4NH seeks to build knowledge and capacity is researchers in CRPs with nutrition IDOs. For the CRPs that share the common CGIAR nutrition IDO (11 CRPs), A4NH works with other CRPs in the CRP-IDO working group, successfully advocating for defining this IDO around improvements in diet quality, as well as supporting the evaluation and gender leaders of these CRPs (see workshop report) on impact pathways and theories of change for nutrition-gender outcomes. Bringing in the agricultural partner networks of other CRPs will greatly increase the spread of these approaches to partners."},{"index":5,"size":182,"text":"Increased capacity outcomes for numerous country partners were also achieved towards IDO2 on reduced exposure to causes of agriculture-associated disease. Support over several years by ILRI and partners, has helped the Kenya veterinary department in developing and utilizing a decision support framework in planning emergency responses to outbreaks. Initial risk maps for Rift Valley fever have been disseminated and have helped the Kenyan government to focus surveillance efforts. Four universities in Africa and Asia have developed new modules and courses based on research outputs. 2013 marked the final year of EcoZD, a five-year Ecohealth capacity building project in Southeast Asia. The multi-disciplinary country teams gained practical policy communication experience through the process of identifying policy and practice-relevant messages from their research and sharing these messages through stakeholder workshops and briefs. The first Thai-language manual on Ecohealth was finalized and disseminated, which will be instrumental in increasing awareness, understanding and application to zoonotic disease control in the region. An Ecohealth consultation in South Asia was held in 2013, to build on and extend lessons and experiences from south-east Asia and new projects initiated."},{"index":6,"size":73,"text":"For enabling the reduction of exposure to foodborne disease (IDO 2), in 2013, food safety regulators in Vietnam were informed and supported to draft guidelines. A number of food safety and zoonoses disease control research outputs have also been inserted into high-profile global processes such as, the Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG), convened by WHO; and the Global Agenda of Action in Support of Sustainable Livestock Sector Development led by FAO."},{"index":7,"size":161,"text":"The other major outcome contribution is in supporting key actors to provide a more enabling environment (IDO4) for nutrition and health sensitive agriculture and associated development actions. In 2013, there were important achievements in communicating nutrition-sensitive knowledge and evidence from research. In Brazil, research from Bioversity and partners supported a decision by the Government to include information on the nutritional value of 40 native species of current or potential economic value in the Plano Nacional de Agroecologia e Produçao Orgânica. Researchers supporting A&T produced a guide for nutrition programs to work with journalists and media to meet child nutrition advocacy goals. Beyond scholarly journals, research results have been widely disseminated through presentations at international conferences such as the 2013 International Congress of Nutrition, through blog postings such as Development Horizons, and media outlets such as BBC, National Public Radio and allAfrica.com. Together with other partners, there was a concerted effort in communicating the key messages from the Lancet papers highlighted above."},{"index":8,"size":135,"text":"In its first year of full-scale implementation of the research and knowledge mobilization strategy, Partnerships and Opportunities to Strengthen and Harmonize Actions for Nutrition in India (POSHAN) made great progress in helping to strengthen relationships between various stakeholders in the nutrition landscape in India. In mid-2013, an event to share findings of the review on multisectoral actions for nutrition brought together senior staff from different ministries and the Planning Commission. The government has since come back to POSHAN with requests for meeting outputs and a policy note summarizing key insights. In late-2013, the POSHAN team and key partners organized a technical workshop on improving nutrition in Odisha for the Odisha state government. POSHAN was invited to support the development of the vision document for the nutrition mission of Uttar Pradesh, the largest state in India."},{"index":9,"size":131,"text":"Likewise, significant progress has been made in enabling biofortification. In 2013, HarvestPlus was invited to submit a discussion paper to the Codex Alimentarius Committee on Nutrition and Foods of Special Dietary Use (CCNFSDU). At the Committee meeting in November 2013 there was great support for continuing discussions on the subject of biofortification, and the committee requested that a revised discussion paper with an attached project document be prepared for the next session of the CCNFSDU. Because only a country can submit a project document, Zimbabwe and South Africa will jointly submit this with preparatory support from IFPRI/HarvestPlus. In addition, the Government of Nigeria in 2013 was supported to revise their Micronutrient Deficiency Control Guidelines to include biofortified crops and in DRC biofortification has been included in the government's Strategic Nutrition Plan."}]},{"head":"C.3 Progress towards Impact","index":3,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":69,"text":"The most advanced flagship for achieving impact at scale is Biofortification. In 2013, HarvestPlus built and strengthened country programs in eight target countries: Rwanda, DRC, Uganda, Zambia, Nigeria, India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, and delivered high iron beans to 210,000 households in Rwanda and 150,000 households in DRC. In total for all improved seed, across the target countries, biofortified crops have reached 632,000 households in 2013 and 1,374,100 households cumulatively."},{"index":2,"size":123,"text":"Ethiopia will be added as a 9 th target country, in 2014. Donor consultations were conducted to plan for the next phase to decide how best to allocate resources to position country programs for the 2014-2018 delivery phase. In assessing its delivery strategy at scale, HarvestPlus identified two gaps it began addressing in 2013. The first is the role of gender in delivery, adoption and consumption. An assessment was started in 2013 that will be completed in 2014. The second is on the implications of climate change for production and delivery of biofortified staples, for which a panel was formed to assess and advise. A partnership with World Vision will expand delivery to five additional countries: Burundi, Tanzania, Malawi, Ghana and Sierra Leone."},{"index":3,"size":144,"text":"In the AAD flagship, an area of focus for accelerating progress toward impacts at scale is aflatoxin control. One very promising control measure is biocontrol. IITA and partners are rapidly progressing pilot activities with a view to delivery in nine African countries over the next five years. Progress is most advanced in Nigeria where a pilot production facility was completed that can produce 5 tons of Aflasafe™ per hour and a project under the World Bank AgResults Initiative was launched to stimulate commercial use. Researchers across a number of CGIAR Centers are conducting complementary research to fill knowledge gaps of delivery at scale related to economic incentives and willingness to pay, providing evidence on the public health benefits of control, diagnostics and evaluation methods and providing health, market and agricultural evidence for policy makers and regulators, initially in Nigeria and the East African community."}]},{"head":"D. GENDER RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS","index":4,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":319,"text":"This year, A4NH took concrete steps to operationalize its approved Gender Strategy. A Gender Research Coordinator was recruited with a budget of $250K in 2013 (increasing by 20% in 2014) in addition to gender research already estimated for each research flagship. She will work with participating Centers, other CRPs and partners as both a researcher and member of the A4NH program management unit, coordinating both gender research capacity building activities and strategic gender research. She will also lead the review and integration of gender in the detailed theories of change being developed. While the gender strategy describes the general strengths and weaknesses of gender research in A4NH, a more detailed assessment of gender research across the A4NH portfolio was started in 2013, in partnership with the Swedish Agricultural University (SLU). The inventory will describe the types of gender research questions being explored, methods and tools being used, and how technologies and interventions are being assessed for gender impact. It is also expected that this will help identify gaps in capacity that can be addressed in the coming years. Although the results will not be available until 2014, the process of completing this inventory has already helped the program management unit consider how improvements could be made to program monitoring systems and where and what types of gender research and research capacity need strengthening. A4NH initiated partnerships in two areas identified, gender in value chains with a post-doc from SLU, and the impact of agricultural interventions on women's time, being developed with the University of London (including two senior researchers and a post-doc). These are areas where agricultural development has in the past had unintended negative consequences for women and for nutrition and this research is designed to ensure that this does not happen in the future. For Biofortification, HarvestPlus' gender assessment, initiated in 2013, will provide recommendations to strengthen outcomes and impacts by explicitly addressing gender opportunities and constraints."},{"index":2,"size":150,"text":"In addition to internal coordination, the Gender Research Coordinator will provide an important link to the CGIAR Gender and Agriculture Research Network and help A4NH provide strategic guidance to other CRPs with nutrition IDOs to think about where gender issues are important to consider along their impact pathways. To this end, the first A4NH Gender-Nutrition Methods workshop was held in Nairobi in December 2013. Representatives from all CRPs with nutrition or diet quality IDOs plus some research and implementing partners met to discuss and agree on a framework for nutrition outcomes that explicitly highlights gender issues, appropriate gender and nutrition indicators for outcomes as well as supporting capacity of different teams. A workshop report, presentations, and other resources were disseminated online to facilitate sharing with a wider global audience. Future plans for a community of practice, joint research and an annual learning event will be finalized and implemented in 2014."},{"index":3,"size":103,"text":"In 2013, there were several major gender research accomplishments. Data from a major nationallyrepresentative household survey for Bangladesh combining detailed production, consumption and other socioeconomic data, including components for calculating the Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) and conducting other types of gender analyses, was made publically available. The expanding portfolio of nutrition-sensitive development evaluations include baseline, progress and endline gender-disaggregated data. For most of the flagship products, tools and technologies reported in Table 1, there is a lag in meeting requirements for gender-disaggregated data and additional lags for assessment of potential of gender impacts from research that was planned in earlier years."},{"index":4,"size":322,"text":"In addition two major areas of gender research were completed with other CRPs. The first are results from gender research in informal animal source food value chains with the Livestock and Fish CRP, were summarized in a number of conference presentations, a chapter in the Safe Food Fair Food book and in a special journal issue (to appear in 2014). The findings, based on 20 livestock and fish value chains, revealed that gender roles rather that biological differences were the more important determinants of health risk. Differences in risk were mainly due to differences in occupational exposure, and secondarily to differences in consumption patterns. Women are risk managers in realms of food consumption, preparation, processing, selling and, to a lesser extent, production. The results will be used to design future food safety research in A4NH. . The second is a successful collaboration between researchers from PIM and A4NH produced a number of exciting outputs related to women's empowerment in agriculture, nutrition and health. An evidence review of three types of interventions to improve women's empowerment: cash transfer programs, agricultural interventions, and microfinance programs. They found that in general CCTs and in some cases agricultural interventions had positive impacts on women's empowerment, as measured by participation in decision-making or control over income. Nutrition evidence was mixed, largely due to quality of evaluation design. A long-term impact assessment of projects in Bangladesh found that there may be tradeoffs between income gains in the short-run and long term poverty and nutrition impacts. Growing interest in the Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) has provided a number of opportunities for capacity building, and initial findings on associations between women's empowerment and nutrition in Nepal and food security in Bangladesh were published. In general, the findings suggest that different aspects of empowerment matter for nutrition and food security in different contexts, underscoring the importance of understanding the context and the pathways through which gender affects nutrition outcomes."},{"index":5,"size":147,"text":"The penultimate year of the Gender, Agriculture, and Assets Project (GAAP) generated preliminary findings on the impact of a variety of agriculture innovation and programs on women's ownership and control over assets, with case studies related to dairy value chain projects in Bangladesh; household dynamics and asset transfers, in Bangladesh and Burkina Faso; and the household decision-making patterns and adoption of biofortified crops in Uganda, among others. In general, the studies found that while some interventions were able to increase women's assets, their impacts on the gender-asset gap tended to be less positive for women. In some cases this had to do with how asset ownership was defined and measured. These results will have important implications for understanding and measuring women's assets, an important indicator of women's empowerment that has been proposed as an indicator for the gender IDO-and how they contribute to women's welfare outcomes ."}]},{"head":"E. PARTNERSHIPS BUILDING ACHIEVEMENTS","index":5,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":187,"text":"An integral part of A4NH's partnership strategy is establishing and strengthening partnerships with actors -development implementers, private industry, and policy enablers -that are essential for nutrition and health impacts. As many of the concepts in integrating agriculture and food systems with nutrition and health goals are relatively new, one important partnerships activity in 2013, has been in increasing awareness and knowledge among the very different groups that need to develop a common understanding and coordinate their efforts. One important event was the CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council Science Forum in Bonn. A4NH actively collaborated with the Forum organizers in planning and engaging key participants across the agriculture, nutrition and health communities. For A4NH, the Forum was very useful in increasing the understanding of nutrition and health issues within the CGIAR and with key development partners, researchers and donors. A4NH co-hosted other partnership convening with a range of key actors. Two examples were an event co-hosted with the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) for public and private partners at the Science Forum, and a dialogue with development partners and civil society, co-hosted with 1,000 Days Partnership."},{"index":2,"size":135,"text":"In 2013, important progress was made in developing partnerships that will be critical for achieving impacts-at-scale. To better understand how to support development banks, an A4NH researcher was seconded to International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) to support nutrition-sensitive strategy and programming. As described in section C2, there are a number of examples of progress in scaling-up biofortification with public=private delivery partnerships, including national programs and seed companies in 8 target countries. Looking forward, A4NH is actively exploring partnerships to link agriculture with food systems. In 2013, A4NH has invested in collaborations with a coalition of business schools (McGill University and the India Institute of Management Bangalore), pulse grower associations and private sector processing equipment and ingredient companies to develop models for speeding up technical, marketing and policy innovations for producing more nutritious pulse-containing foods."},{"index":3,"size":66,"text":"Likewise, HarvestPlus has been discussing with food companies their testing and subsequent large-scale use of biofortified crops. We see these emerging partnerships as critical for a more coordinated support to developing small and medium sized enterprises in target countries that can accelerate both overall economic transformation through agri-food systems and the availability and accessibility of more nutritious foods to expanding urban and net-food purchasing rural populations."},{"index":4,"size":108,"text":"Research collaborations continue to expand. Under value chains, IITA conducted a series of trainings and awareness raising activities to promote introduction of soybean to traditional foods, improve nutrition knowledge and promote novel soybean products in Zambia. Trainings consisted of two-day hands-on workshops where participants, both male and female, in rural community agriculture camps, learned about soybean processing and utilization. In Mozambique, community based demonstrations and exhibitions have been held weekly on soybean nutrition and usage reaching, over the course of six months, over 3,400 people. Local entrepreneurs were trained in business skills in order to participate in the trade of soybean based products and monthly mentorship is on-going."},{"index":5,"size":46,"text":"More strategically, A4NH is considering capacity building as part of its partnerships for impact and theories of change. While there are multiple demands for capacity development (for example in Gender and Nutrition), capacity development focus would be on contributions linked to priorities for impacts at scale."}]},{"head":"G. RISK MANAGEMENT","index":6,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":118,"text":"1. Partnerships are essential to meet impact expectations. A4NH relies on adding nutrition and health benefits to agriculture and cross-sectoral development actions of others. Research and development partnerships are complex. Current partnerships with BRAC and HKI serve as good working models. However, partnerships are also required with more diverse partners such as agricultural and development planners and private sector firms with different goals and less knowledge or interest in nutrition and health outcomes. Beyond good partnership practices, the major partnership risk mitigation is to jointly develop the impact pathways and theory of change in discussion with key partners as described in Section E. In these tasks, capacity needs for essential national partners will be identified and plans made."},{"index":2,"size":92,"text":"2. Clarity in expectations of results is essential. One of the major efforts has been to clarify that agriculture can be directly accountable for improving diets but that reductions in stunting require more joint interventions including water and sanitation, gender empowerment, poverty reduction and social protection. This clarity will then need to translate into the individual research programs and research clusters. For example, in the value chain pathway, research can expect to inform actions of value chain actors that can lead to improving the availability and access of safe and nutritious foods."},{"index":3,"size":36,"text":"A more complex step is how these foods are combined into improved diets. For mothers and infants, the availability and accessibility of more nutritious foods needs to be integrated with health care to improve diet quality."},{"index":4,"size":1,"text":"H. "}]},{"head":"LESSONS LEARNED","index":7,"paragraphs":[]},{"head":"iii. Lessons learned by the CRP from its monitoring of the indicators and from its qualitative analyses of progress","index":8,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":57,"text":"Increased monitoring of gender is helping to identify areas to strengthen. In A4NH, gender research is strong in the Integrated programs and policies flagships. However in some research projects and teams, gender research is weak and even basic sex-aggregated hypotheses and data are lacking. Specific activities for gender research strengthening are described in the gender section above."},{"index":2,"size":1,"text":"In "}]}],"figures":[{"text":" Our priority is to work with other agriculture-nutritionhealth (ANH) research partners in accelerating learning and evidence and to support the development of capacity for this research in Africa and South Asia. In 2013, a number of complementary actions progressed. A4NH discussed and provided a background paper to the West and Central African Council for Agricultural Research and Development (CORAF) for stakeholder discussion on how to include nutrition and health issues in CORAF's new implementation plan. To better understand the research needs and opportunities, A4NH began a collaboration with SLU researchers to engage Africa-based ANH researchers, institutions and networks. This will inform a number of consultations in Africa in 2014.HarvestPlus and partners conducted numerous trainings through Training of Trainers (TOT) workshops, field days and demonstrations and formal residential training programs to impart knowledge and build skills in production and management practices of biofortified crops. HarvestPlus has focused on changing consumption patterns through targeted nutrition education of caregivers about balanced diets especially for children under five years of age and pregnant and lactating women. Trainings have been across seven countries in two regions, reaching more women than men.ICRISAT has disseminated evidence-based aflatoxin management guidelines to more than 3,800 female and 3,300 male farmers and extension agents. Across six countries in two regions, trainings have covered integrated aflatoxin management strategies pre and post-harvest often targeted female farmer groups. Participants were trained with demonstration plots in partnership with local NGOs. National Agricultural Research Systems (NARS) researchers and research technicians from Sokoine University in Tanzania and Agricultural Research Institute Homolo were trained in ELISA-based assays for aflatoxin detection, integrated management and Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs). F. CAPACITY BUILDING F.CAPACITY BUILDING  "},{"text":" Analysis of variance from what was planned:i. Estimate the overall level of confidence/uncertainty of the indicators provided in Table1.The actual indicators compiled in Table1for 2013 are underestimated, reflecting both the conservative application of evidence criteria for achievement and the inexperience of some researchers in documenting the evidence required. The 2013 and 2014 targets estimated in the 2012 annual report were overoptimistic. Actual achievements completed in 2013 reflected a lag in outputs based on new CRP investments. This should have been anticipated given the time that new research investments take to produce flagship products and tools, databases, publications and other indicators in Table1.ii. Description, if relevant, of research avenues that did not produce expected results, and description of actions taken by the CRP, such as new research directions pursued and their expected outputs and outcomesAt this early stage, the issue is more with delayed results rather than unexpected results. For newer areas of research, lags are associated with time to recruitment, CGIAR and partner capacity gaps and in particular the time and effort required to develop new partnerships and ways of working. One example is in the Value chains for enhanced nutrition flagship. Given new funding in 2013, an additional USD 1.3 million was committed for 2013 to recruit new staff, build new partnerships and provide initial research grants. However, due to the unexpected departure of the research leader (recruited in 2012), time required to recruit new staff and a few other delays, many anticipated outputs for 2013 will now be completed in 2014. A number of actions have been taken to accelerate results including identification of a replacement leader, new research partnerships and forming a cross-center nutrition-sensitive value chain working group. For partnerships with value chain actors, this will be an area of expansion in 2014; however, it is difficult to predict which initiatives will succeed and when. On the other hand, for some areas of A4NH, progress was faster than expected. Aflatoxin research in biocontrol now has critical mass and the improved coordination with different CGIAR research teams and partners has potential to meet need to better understand market incentives and health risks if this research is to lead to impacts at scale.Another area of over-achievement was in supporting partners in the CGIAR and outside with nutritional expertise. A4NH worked with evaluation and gender leads in other CRPs with nutrition outcomes in realigning nutrition indicators to focus on diet quality and providing frameworks for how these can be achieved in different CGIAR research areas. A4NH will continue to support this CGIAR-wide activity in the next few years. This is vital given the past weakness of agriculture research relative to nutrition and gender outcomes. Negotiating cross-CRP work is taking time. The 2015-16 extension proposal will lay out specific priorities for joint CRP work that there is hope to expand in Phase 2.  "},{"text":"CRP indicators of progress, with glossary and targets CRPs concerned by this indicator Indicator Glossary/guidelines for defining and measuring the indicator, and description of what the CRP includes in the indicator measured, based upon the glossary  A 4 N H 2 0 1 3 A n n u a l P e r f o r m a n c e R e p o r t     A 4 N H 2 0 1 3 A n n u a l P e r f o r m a n c e R e p o r t  systems study framework; 4) nutrition manual for community Kenya urban slum ASF value chain Best practices in productivity, pre and post-harvest management, increase productivity and/or resiliency to climate change. IPM, reporting year. Any technology made available in a previous year 3. Strengthen multisectoral nutrition approaches in India     systems study framework; 4) nutrition manual for community Kenya urban slum ASF value chain Best practices in productivity, pre and post-harvest management, increase productivity and/or resiliency to climate change. IPM, reporting year. Any technology made available in a previous year 3. Strengthen multisectoral nutrition approaches in India  nutrition scholars Bangladesh vegetable seed value chain new technologies, nutrition education, marketing. . ISFM, and PHH as related to agriculture should all be included as should not be included. 4. Stakeholder mapping Odisha, India for state-government     nutrition scholars Bangladesh vegetable seed value chain new technologies, nutrition education, marketing. . ISFM, and PHH as related to agriculture should all be included as should not be included. 4. Stakeholder mapping Odisha, India for state-government All All All All All KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA 14. Number of trainees in short-term programs facilitated by CRP (female) 15. Number of trainees in long-term programs facilitated by CRP (male) 30. Number of policies / 16.Number of trainees in regulations / administrative long-term programs procedures presented for facilitated by CRP (female) legislation(Stage 3) 31. Number of policies / All 1. Number of flagship \"products\" produced by CRP All 5. % of tools that have an explicit target of women farmers regulations / administrative TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN VARIOUS procedures prepared STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT All 18. Number of technologies/NRM practices under research in the CRP All 19. % of technologies under passed/approved (Stage 4) research that have an explicit target of women farmers POLICIES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF (Phase I) All 20. % of technologies under DEVELOPMENT All 32. Number of policies / research that have been All 28. Numbers of Policies/ regulations / administrative assessed for likely gender-Regulations/ Administrative procedures passed for which CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT AND disaggregated impact Procedures implementation has begun INNOVATION PLATFORMS All, except 23. Number of technologies Analyzed (Stage 1) (Stage 5) All 13. Number of trainees in 2 /NRM practices field tested short-term programs (phase II) OUTCOMES ON THE GROUND facilitated by CRP (male) All 33. Number of hectares All 2. % of flagship products produced that have explicit target of women farmers/NRM managers All 6. % of tools assessed for under improved technologies likely gender-disaggregated or management practices as impact a result of CRP research All 3. % of flagship products produced that have been assessed for likely gender-disaggregated impact All 4. Number of \"tools\" produced by CRP consultation (Stage 2) value chains analyzed by CRP public/stakeholder 1,2,3, 4, 6 10. Number of strategic globally (phase III) presented for ISI journals produced by CRP private sector partners procedures drafted and All 7. Number of open access databases maintained by CRP All 8. Total number of users of these open access databases All 9. Number of publications in All 34. Number of farmers and others who have applied released by public and regulations / administrative All, except 2 27.Number of technologies/NRM practices new technologies or All 29. Number of policies / management practices as a result of CRP research HarvestPlus 5 manuals/protocols: 1) training for vit A maize; 2) Peru mango value chain Best practices in productivity, pre and post-harvest management, improved technologies or management practices. 5. Revision to national recommendations of the Nutrition training for vit A cassava; 3) XRF protocols for mineral crops; 4) i-Kenya mango value chain new technologies, nutrition education, marketing. -Training, branding and certification for safe milk in informal Coalition -India Check protocols for vit A crops; 5) protocols for developing Bangladesh sweet potato planting material value chain New technologies or management practices under research markets -India 6. WHO's evidence inform-guidelines for the fortification of biofortified food products Rwanda OFSP baked product value chains Masters: 25; PhD: 23 counted should be only those under research in the current -Community delivered vaccination for poultry diseases -staple foods as public health interventions (specific to maize ILRI developed 3 Ecohealth training manuals; Nigeria cassava value chain reporting year. Any new technology or management practice Tanzania, Kenya meal) -global Alive & Thrive journalist/media guide for advancing child nutrition Vietnam pork chain under research in a previous year but not under research in the -Optimising rabies vaccination -Indonesia : … underwent the third stage of the policy reform process advocacy. Vietnam rice value chain Masters: 51; PhD: 29 reporting year should not be included. -Water management for safety -Vietnam (policies were presented for legislation/decree to improve the LANSA stakeholder Interview Guide Ethiopia sheep and goat chain -Biosecurity in backyard systems -Nigeria policy environment for smallholder-based agriculture.) IITA 3: 1) Guide for aflasafeKE01 application in the field to control Uganda pig value chain Biological: Kenya, Mali, Niger, Malawi, India, DRC, Zambia, -High zinc rice -Bangladesh 1. National Nutrition Strategy -Zambia aflatoxin contamination; 2) Protocols for sample collection of Tanzania dairy value chain Bangladesh -2 varieties of OFSP -Uganda : …underwent the fourth stage of the policy reform process Vitamin A maize -Zambia Vitamin A cassava -Nigeria, DRC Vision 2020 Aflatoxin Briefs -Global Intensification & Disease Emgergence Framework -worldwide \"Diversifying food and diets: using agricultural biodiversity to aflasafe treated maize; 3) Manual/guideline document for collecting and preserving soil and samples for the identification of micro-organisms of medical importance in environmental investigations Biofortification Prioritization Index (BPI) Food product protocols: OFSP Bangladesh EcoHealth BPI LANSA stakeholder interview guide Cote d'Ivoire livestock and fish value chain Abidjan Kenya livestock value chain in Nairobi Western Kenya livestock value chains Kenya dairy chain Thailand poultry value chain Cultural practice: aflatoxin control in India -2 varieties of vit A maize -Nigeria (official approval (legislation/decree) of new or revised policy / Management practices: Vietnam, Ethiopia -Open-pollenated variety of pearl millet -India regulation / administrative procedure by relevant authority). Glossary: Technologies to be counted here are agriculture-related The papers, web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy -5 varieties of iron bean -DRC 1. Four districts that are part of the Rwandan Crop briefs supporting indicator #x must have an explicit focus on Intensification Program included sweet potato as a priority and NRM-related technologies and innovations including those women farmers/NRM managers to be counted crop -Rwanda. that address climate change adaptation and mitigation. Relevant Indonesia poultry value chain Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus on : …completed the policy reform process (implementation of new technologies include but are not limited to: Laos pig value chain gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted Number of agricultural enabling environment policies / regulations or revised policy / regulation / administrative procedure by • Mechanical and physical: New land preparation, harvesting, South Africa informal sector livestock chains / administrative procedures in the areas of agricultural resource, relevant authority) processing and product handling technologies, including food, market standards & regulation, public investment, natural Clearly identify in this cell the type of policy and the biodegradable packaging Glossary; Under \"field testing\" means that research has moved resource or water management and climate change country/region concerned • Biological: New germplasm (varieties, breeds, etc.) that could be A&T media/journalist advocacy guide for child nutrition Glossary: The number of individuals to whom significant higher-yielding or higher in nutritional content and/or more from focused development to broader testing (pilot project pahse) adaptation/mitigation as it relates to agriculture that underwent improve nutrition and health\" Book knowledge or skills have been imparted through interactions that resilient to climate impacts; affordable food-based nutritional and this testing is underway under conditions intended to the first stage of the policy reform process i.e. analysis (review of 2 Lancet papers in the 2013 Lancet Series on Maternal and Child are intentional, structured, and purposed for imparting knowledge supplementation such as vitamin A-rich sweet potatoes or rice, or duplicate those encountered by potential users of the new existing policy / regulation / administrative procedure and/or Bangladesh -new or continuing, unknown Nutrition 2 Lancet Series Papers: http://globalnutritionseries.org/ BPI: or skills should be counted. This includes farmers, ranchers, high-protein maize, or improved livestock breeds; soil technology. This might be in the actual facilities (fields) of proposal of new policy / regulations / administrative http://www.harvestplus.org/sites/default/files/working%20paper fishers, and other primary sector producers who receive training in management practices that increase biotic activity and soil organic potential users, or it might be in a facility set up to duplicate those procedures).Please count the highest stage completed during the Aflatoxin brief #4: %20_11_web.pdf a variety of best practices in productivity, post-harvest matter levels; and livestock health services and products such as conditions. reporting year -don't double count for the same policy. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/focus20_04.p df 2 Lancet Series Papers: http://www.ifpri.org/blog/lead-g8-launch-lancet-seminal-series-undernutrition CIP's NQAEN project produced 2 manuals on sampling, sample Bangladesh fortified yogurt value chain (Grameen Danone) resilience energy efficiency, and natural resource management practices that 2. Strategic Nutrition Plan -DRC plantation technology; 2) vine multiplication strategy; 3) seed Bangladesh dried fish in complementary food value chain management/IWRM, sustainable agriculture, and climate change disaster risk strategies in place, climate change mitigation and transfer should be only those made available in the current include biofortified crops -Nigeria CIP's OFSP Bangladesh project produced 4 manuals: 1) root crop India dairy value chain agriculture. Training should include food security, water resources practices, increased use of climate information for planning research and testing process. Technologies made available for 1. Revision of the Micronutrient Deficiency Control Guidelines to sweet potato. Senegal nomadic dairy value chain mitigation, and vulnerability assessments, as it relates to improved/sustainable agricultural production and marketing and be as ready for use as it can be as it emerges from the policy / regulation / administrative procedure. preparation and beta-carotene and mineral analysis in potato and management. Include training on climate risk analysis, adaptation, sustainable fishing practices; Information technology, for multiplication. The technology should have proven benefits consultation with stakeholders on the proposed new or revised Case studies; Cassava delivery dissemination tracking; Farmer survey data for aflatoxin contamination; Biorepository: Bangladesh HH data survey management, linking to markets, etc. It also includes rural vaccines; East Africa, India, Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya, Bangladesh, Rwanda, entrepreneurs, processors, managers and traders receiving • Chemical: Fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides sustainably and Management: Bangladesh, Rwanda, Kenya Market standards and regulations; agircultural enabling DRC, Zambia, Nigeria training in application of new technologies, business management, linking to markets, etc., and training to extension specialists, researchers, policymakers and others who are engaged in the management; practices; sustainable land management practices; approval process, and seed of the new variety should be available process. The second stage includes public debate and/or food, feed and fiber system and natural resources and water environmentally applied, and soil amendments that increase fertilizer-use efficiencies; • Management and cultural practices: sustainable water Biological: Zamiba, DRC, Bangladesh Glossary: In the case of crop research that developed a new variety, e.g., the variety must have passed through any required environment regulations; natrual resource management; public New or continuing area: unknown investment ….. ……that underwent the second stage of the policy reform 34 (a) number of women farmers concerned 34(b) number of male farmers concerned Deviatio n narrative (if actual is more than 10% away from target) Target (if availabl e for 2012) 2012 12,718 34 1 42 Actual 0 6 46 188,002 0 0 0 9 1548 37,092 unknown 67 8 17 12 13 6 unknown 115 203,972 10 2 2013 50,732 48 1 80 Actual 1 7 55 175,007 10,116 20 1 15 Target 1 13 46 0 150,018 150,010 50,650 2014 50 1 70 1 Target 67 50% 0 50% 0 0 1 59 12 15 1209 1000 10,148 39,273 40,600 unknown 231 unknown 0 12 5 50 43 29 14 25 25 26 20 3 5 7 unknown unknow n unknown 72 93 115 304,600 Total: Total: 645,075 1,128,200 6 16 19 5075 18200 2 6 7 1000 10000 All All All All All KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA 14. Number of trainees in short-term programs facilitated by CRP (female) 15. Number of trainees in long-term programs facilitated by CRP (male) 30. Number of policies / 16.Number of trainees in regulations / administrative long-term programs procedures presented for facilitated by CRP (female) legislation(Stage 3) 31. Number of policies / All 1. Number of flagship \"products\" produced by CRP All 5. % of tools that have an explicit target of women farmers regulations / administrative TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN VARIOUS procedures prepared STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT All 18. Number of technologies/NRM practices under research in the CRP All 19. % of technologies under passed/approved (Stage 4) research that have an explicit target of women farmers POLICIES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF (Phase I) All 20. % of technologies under DEVELOPMENT All 32. Number of policies / research that have been All 28. Numbers of Policies/ regulations / administrative assessed for likely gender-Regulations/ Administrative procedures passed for which CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT AND disaggregated impact Procedures implementation has begun INNOVATION PLATFORMS All, except 23. Number of technologies Analyzed (Stage 1) (Stage 5) All 13. Number of trainees in 2 /NRM practices field tested short-term programs (phase II) OUTCOMES ON THE GROUND facilitated by CRP (male) All 33. Number of hectares All 2. % of flagship products produced that have explicit target of women farmers/NRM managers All 6. % of tools assessed for under improved technologies likely gender-disaggregated or management practices as impact a result of CRP research All 3. % of flagship products produced that have been assessed for likely gender-disaggregated impact All 4. Number of \"tools\" produced by CRP consultation (Stage 2) value chains analyzed by CRP public/stakeholder 1,2,3, 4, 6 10. Number of strategic globally (phase III) presented for ISI journals produced by CRP private sector partners procedures drafted and All 7. Number of open access databases maintained by CRP All 8. Total number of users of these open access databases All 9. Number of publications in All 34. Number of farmers and others who have applied released by public and regulations / administrative All, except 2 27.Number of technologies/NRM practices new technologies or All 29. Number of policies / management practices as a result of CRP researchHarvestPlus 5 manuals/protocols: 1) training for vit A maize; 2) Peru mango value chain Best practices in productivity, pre and post-harvest management, improved technologies or management practices. 5. Revision to national recommendations of the Nutrition training for vit A cassava; 3) XRF protocols for mineral crops; 4) i-Kenya mango value chain new technologies, nutrition education, marketing. -Training, branding and certification for safe milk in informal Coalition -India Check protocols for vit A crops; 5) protocols for developing Bangladesh sweet potato planting material value chain New technologies or management practices under research markets -India 6. WHO's evidence inform-guidelines for the fortification of biofortified food products Rwanda OFSP baked product value chains Masters: 25; PhD: 23 counted should be only those under research in the current -Community delivered vaccination for poultry diseases -staple foods as public health interventions (specific to maize ILRI developed 3 Ecohealth training manuals; Nigeria cassava value chain reporting year. Any new technology or management practice Tanzania, Kenya meal) -global Alive & Thrive journalist/media guide for advancing child nutrition Vietnam pork chain under research in a previous year but not under research in the -Optimising rabies vaccination -Indonesia : … underwent the third stage of the policy reform process advocacy. Vietnam rice value chain Masters: 51; PhD: 29 reporting year should not be included. -Water management for safety -Vietnam (policies were presented for legislation/decree to improve the LANSA stakeholder Interview Guide Ethiopia sheep and goat chain -Biosecurity in backyard systems -Nigeria policy environment for smallholder-based agriculture.) IITA 3: 1) Guide for aflasafeKE01 application in the field to control Uganda pig value chain Biological: Kenya, Mali, Niger, Malawi, India, DRC, Zambia, -High zinc rice -Bangladesh 1. National Nutrition Strategy -Zambia aflatoxin contamination; 2) Protocols for sample collection of Tanzania dairy value chain Bangladesh -2 varieties of OFSP -Uganda : …underwent the fourth stage of the policy reform process Vitamin A maize -Zambia Vitamin A cassava -Nigeria, DRC Vision 2020 Aflatoxin Briefs -Global Intensification & Disease Emgergence Framework -worldwide \"Diversifying food and diets: using agricultural biodiversity to aflasafe treated maize; 3) Manual/guideline document for collecting and preserving soil and samples for the identification of micro-organisms of medical importance in environmental investigations Biofortification Prioritization Index (BPI) Food product protocols: OFSP Bangladesh EcoHealth BPI LANSA stakeholder interview guide Cote d'Ivoire livestock and fish value chain Abidjan Kenya livestock value chain in Nairobi Western Kenya livestock value chains Kenya dairy chain Thailand poultry value chain Cultural practice: aflatoxin control in India -2 varieties of vit A maize -Nigeria (official approval (legislation/decree) of new or revised policy / Management practices: Vietnam, Ethiopia -Open-pollenated variety of pearl millet -India regulation / administrative procedure by relevant authority). Glossary: Technologies to be counted here are agriculture-related The papers, web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy -5 varieties of iron bean -DRC 1. Four districts that are part of the Rwandan Crop briefs supporting indicator #x must have an explicit focus on Intensification Program included sweet potato as a priority and NRM-related technologies and innovations including those women farmers/NRM managers to be counted crop -Rwanda. that address climate change adaptation and mitigation. Relevant Indonesia poultry value chain Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus on : …completed the policy reform process (implementation of new technologies include but are not limited to: Laos pig value chain gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted Number of agricultural enabling environment policies / regulations or revised policy / regulation / administrative procedure by • Mechanical and physical: New land preparation, harvesting, South Africa informal sector livestock chains / administrative procedures in the areas of agricultural resource, relevant authority) processing and product handling technologies, including food, market standards & regulation, public investment, natural Clearly identify in this cell the type of policy and the biodegradable packaging Glossary; Under \"field testing\" means that research has moved resource or water management and climate change country/region concerned • Biological: New germplasm (varieties, breeds, etc.) that could be A&T media/journalist advocacy guide for child nutrition Glossary: The number of individuals to whom significant higher-yielding or higher in nutritional content and/or more from focused development to broader testing (pilot project pahse) adaptation/mitigation as it relates to agriculture that underwent improve nutrition and health\" Book knowledge or skills have been imparted through interactions that resilient to climate impacts; affordable food-based nutritional and this testing is underway under conditions intended to the first stage of the policy reform process i.e. analysis (review of 2 Lancet papers in the 2013 Lancet Series on Maternal and Child are intentional, structured, and purposed for imparting knowledge supplementation such as vitamin A-rich sweet potatoes or rice, or duplicate those encountered by potential users of the new existing policy / regulation / administrative procedure and/or Bangladesh -new or continuing, unknown Nutrition 2 Lancet Series Papers: http://globalnutritionseries.org/ BPI: or skills should be counted. This includes farmers, ranchers, high-protein maize, or improved livestock breeds; soil technology. This might be in the actual facilities (fields) of proposal of new policy / regulations / administrative http://www.harvestplus.org/sites/default/files/working%20paper fishers, and other primary sector producers who receive training in management practices that increase biotic activity and soil organic potential users, or it might be in a facility set up to duplicate those procedures).Please count the highest stage completed during the Aflatoxin brief #4: %20_11_web.pdf a variety of best practices in productivity, post-harvest matter levels; and livestock health services and products such as conditions. reporting year -don't double count for the same policy. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/focus20_04.p df 2 Lancet Series Papers: http://www.ifpri.org/blog/lead-g8-launch-lancet-seminal-series-undernutrition CIP's NQAEN project produced 2 manuals on sampling, sample Bangladesh fortified yogurt value chain (Grameen Danone) resilience energy efficiency, and natural resource management practices that 2. Strategic Nutrition Plan -DRC plantation technology; 2) vine multiplication strategy; 3) seed Bangladesh dried fish in complementary food value chain management/IWRM, sustainable agriculture, and climate change disaster risk strategies in place, climate change mitigation and transfer should be only those made available in the current include biofortified crops -Nigeria CIP's OFSP Bangladesh project produced 4 manuals: 1) root crop India dairy value chain agriculture. Training should include food security, water resources practices, increased use of climate information for planning research and testing process. Technologies made available for 1. Revision of the Micronutrient Deficiency Control Guidelines to sweet potato. Senegal nomadic dairy value chain mitigation, and vulnerability assessments, as it relates to improved/sustainable agricultural production and marketing and be as ready for use as it can be as it emerges from the policy / regulation / administrative procedure. preparation and beta-carotene and mineral analysis in potato and management. Include training on climate risk analysis, adaptation, sustainable fishing practices; Information technology, for multiplication. The technology should have proven benefits consultation with stakeholders on the proposed new or revised Case studies; Cassava delivery dissemination tracking; Farmer survey data for aflatoxin contamination; Biorepository: Bangladesh HH data survey management, linking to markets, etc. It also includes rural vaccines; East Africa, India, Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya, Bangladesh, Rwanda, entrepreneurs, processors, managers and traders receiving • Chemical: Fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides sustainably and Management: Bangladesh, Rwanda, Kenya Market standards and regulations; agircultural enabling DRC, Zambia, Nigeria training in application of new technologies, business management, linking to markets, etc., and training to extension specialists, researchers, policymakers and others who are engaged in the management; practices; sustainable land management practices; approval process, and seed of the new variety should be available process. The second stage includes public debate and/or food, feed and fiber system and natural resources and water environmentally applied, and soil amendments that increase fertilizer-use efficiencies; • Management and cultural practices: sustainable water Biological: Zamiba, DRC, Bangladesh Glossary: In the case of crop research that developed a new variety, e.g., the variety must have passed through any required environment regulations; natrual resource management; public New or continuing area: unknown investment ….. ……that underwent the second stage of the policy reform 34 (a) number of women farmers concerned 34(b) number of male farmers concernedDeviatio n narrative (if actual is more than 10% away from target)Target (if availabl e for 2012)2012 12,718 34 1 42 Actual 0 6 46 188,002 0 0 0 9 1548 37,092 unknown 67 8 17 12 13 6 unknown 115 203,972 10 22013 50,732 48 1 80 Actual 1 7 55 175,007 10,116 20 1 15 Target 1 13 46 0 150,018 150,010 50,650 2014 50 1 70 1 Target 67 50% 0 50% 0 0 1 59 12 15 1209 1000 10,148 39,273 40,600 unknown 231 unknown 0 12 5 50 43 29 14 25 25 26 20 3 5 7 unknown unknow n unknown 72 93 115 304,600 Total: Total: 645,075 1,128,200 6 16 19 5075 18200 2 6 7 1000 10000  "},{"text":"4 -Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH) Period: January 1 -December 31, 2013 Amounts in USD (000's) Report Description                Report Description Name of Report: Cumuative Financial Summary              Name of Report:Cumuative Financial Summary Frequency/Period: Annual               Frequency/Period:Annual Deadline: Every April 15th               Deadline:Every April 15th Summary Report -by CG Partners  (a)              Summary Report -by CG Partners(a)  Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral Funding Center funds Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral Funding Center funds Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral Funding Center funds Total Funding Windows 1 & 2Window 3Bilateral Funding Center funds Total FundingWindows 1 & 2Window 3Bilateral FundingCenter funds Total FundingWindows 1 & 2Window 3 Bilateral Funding Center funds Total Funding 1. AFRICA RICE     -     - - - - - - 1. AFRICA RICE------- 2. BIOVERSITY 3,340 176 4,425 - 7,941 2,855 17 2,323 91 5,286 485 68 2,102 (91) 2,564 2. BIOVERSITY3,3401764,425-7,9412,855172,323915,286485682,102(91)2,564 3. CIAT 9,522 612 15,441  25,575 8,297 277 8,457 - 17,031 39 - - - 39 3. CIAT9,52261215,44125,5758,2972778,457-17,03139---39 4. CIFOR     -     - - - - - - 4. CIFOR------- 5. CIMMYT     -   2,752  2,752    - - 5. CIMMYT-2,7522,752-- 6. CIP 920 - 3,312  4,232 919 664 2,670  4,253 1 (664) 642 - (21) 6. CIP920-3,3124,2329196642,6704,2531(664)642-(21) 7. ICARDA     -     - - - - - - 7. ICARDA------- 8. ICRAF 780 226 1,909 38 2,953 592 226 332 27 1,177 188 - 1,577 11 1,776 8. ICRAF7802261,909382,953592226332271,177188-1,577111,776 9. ICRISAT 3,579  1,466  5,045 3,159  1,246  4,405 420 - 220 - 640 9. ICRISAT3,5791,4665,0453,1591,2464,405420-220-640 10. IFPRI 24,982 3,590 71,304 407 100,283 18,833 3,590 71,304 407 94,134 6,149 - - - 6,149 10. IFPRI24,9823,59071,304407100,28318,8333,59071,30440794,1346,149---6,149 11. IITA 3,910 265 14,998  19,173 3,420 448 8,818  12,686 490 (183) 6,180 - 6,487 11. IITA3,91026514,99819,1733,4204488,81812,686490(183)6,180-6,487 12. ILRI 6,790 1,067 5,230  13,087 5,164 744 5,118  11,025 1,627 323 112 - 2,062 12. ILRI6,7901,0675,23013,0875,1647445,11811,0251,627323112-2,062 13. IRRI 1,223    1,223 1,205    1,205 18 - - - 18 13. IRRI1,2231,2231,2051,20518---18 14. IWMI     -     - - - - - - 14. IWMI------- 15. WORLDFISH 180  378  558 109  449  558 71 - (71) - - 15. WORLDFISH18037855810944955871-(71)-- Total for CRP 55,226 5,936 118,463 445 180,070 44,553 5,966 103,469 525 154,512 9,488 (456) 10,762 (80) 19,714 Total for CRP55,2265,936118,463445180,07044,5535,966103,469525154,5129,488(456)10,762(80)19,714  31% 3% 66% 0% 100% 29% 4% 67% 0% 100% 48% -2% 55% 0% 100% 31%3%66%0%100%29%4%67%0%100%48%-2%55%0%100%  "},{"text":"Total POWB budget since inception (b) Actual cumulative Expenses (c) Variance / Balance Cumulative Financial Summary PART 2 -Funding Summary for Year Windows 1&2 Window 3 Bilateral Funding Center funds Total Funding  CRP No. 4-A4NH                     CRP No. 4-A4NH Period:  January 1 -December 31, 2013                  Period:January 1 -December 31, 2013 Amounts in USD (000's)                     Amounts in USD (000's) Report Description                     Report Description Name of Report: Annual Financial Summary by Centers & Other Participants                 Name of Report:Annual Financial Summary by Centers & Other Participants Frequency/Period: Annual                    Frequency/Period:Annual Deadline:  Every April 15th                   Deadline:Every April 15th  1 1CGIAR Fund  38,132 172    - 38,304       11CGIAR Fund38,132172-38,304 2 Summary Report -by CG Partners ACIAR (a) CRP 2013 POWB approved budget    623 1,797 (b) CRP 2013 Expenditure    2,420  (c) Variance this Year     2 Summary Report -by CG PartnersACIAR (a) CRP 2013 POWB approved budget6231,797 (b) CRP 2013 Expenditure2,420(c) Variance this Year  3 4 AU-IBAR Austria Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral Funding -Center funds 92 Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 54 185 Window 3 Bilateral Funding Center funds 54 277 Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral Funding Center funds Total Funding 3 4AU-IBAR Austria Windows 1 & 2Window 3Bilateral Funding-Center funds92 Total FundingWindows 1 & 254 185 Window 3Bilateral FundingCenter funds54 277 Total FundingWindows 1 & 2Window 3Bilateral FundingCenter fundsTotal Funding 1. AFRICA RICE 5 BMGF   -  - -  2,871    2,871 - - - -  - - 1. AFRICA RICE5BMGF---2,8712,871------ 2. BIOVERSITY 3. CIAT 6 Carasso Foundation 1,670 176 3,722 263 2,511 11,403 - -- -4,357 15,388 1,309 3,180 86 91 185 1,208 7,170  86 2,608 10,535 361 542 85 78 1,303 4,233 (1,208) - 541 4,853 2. BIOVERSITY 3. CIAT6Carasso Foundation 1,670 176 3,722 2632,511 11,403----4,357 15,3881,309 3,1808691 1851,208 7,170862,608 10,535361 54285 781,303 4,233(1,208) -541 4,853 4. CIFOR 5. CIMMYT 2 CFC 2,672 - 80  - -2,752 2,672 139 - 80 - 139 -2,752 -- -- - (0) -- - (0) 4. CIFOR 5. CIMMYT2CFC2,672-80--2,7522,672139-80-139-2,752-----(0)---(0) 7 8 9 Total for CRP 7. ICARDA 6. CIP 8. ICRAF 9. ICRISAT 10. IFPRI 11. IITA 12. ILRI 13. IRRI 14. IWMI 15. WORLDFISH CIAT CONCERN 611 501 DELOITTTE 2,670 14,381 DFID 2,450 4,970 EC 1,223 FAO/GEF 163 35,033 666 226 -2,363 265 579 --4,538 1,249 1,039 23 20,609 8,917 2,565 -110 48,506 ---- --221 38 ----259 2,526 --1,804 2,693 37,574 -11,632 8,114 695 1,223 --273 88,337 610 -318 2,250 8,669 2,430 3,344 1,205 92 26,079 641 137 108 1,079 107 270 664 226 -2,363 427 591 --4,547 1,100 132 6 20,609 5,742 2,902 -209 39,158 --221 27 --1,079 641 137 108 -802 -270 248 2,374 -702 2,256 31,862 8,599 6,837 1,205 -301 70,031 1 183 -420 5,712 20 1,626 18 -71 8,954 2 0 (162) ---(12) ---(9) 149 -907 17 -3,175 (337) --(99) 9,348 ---------(1,196) 11 152 -1,102 437 5,712 3,033 1,277 18 -(28) 17,098 7 8 9 Total for CRP 7. ICARDA 6. CIP 8. ICRAF 9. ICRISAT 10. IFPRI 11. IITA 12. ILRI 13. IRRI 14. IWMI 15. WORLDFISHCIAT CONCERN 611 501 DELOITTTE 2,670 14,381 DFID 2,450 4,970 EC 1,223 FAO/GEF 163 35,033666 226 -2,363 265 579 --4,5381,249 1,039 23 20,609 8,917 2,565 -110 48,506------221 38 ----2592,526 --1,804 2,693 37,574 -11,632 8,114 695 1,223 --273 88,337610 -318 2,250 8,669 2,430 3,344 1,205 92 26,079641 137 108 1,079 107 270664 226 -2,363 427 591 --4,5471,100 132 6 20,609 5,742 2,902 -209 39,158--221 27 --1,079 641 137 108 -802 -270 2482,374 -702 2,256 31,862 8,599 6,837 1,205 -301 70,0311 183 -420 5,712 20 1,626 18 -71 8,9542 0 (162) ---(12) ---(9)149 -907 17 -3,175 (337) --(99) 9,348---------(1,196) 11152 -1,102 437 5,712 3,033 1,277 18 -(28) 17,098   FHI 40% 5% 55% - 0% -100% 37% 3,664 6% 56% 3,664 0% 100% 52% 0% 55% -7% 100% FHI40%5%55%-0%-100%37%3,6646%56%3,664 0%100%52%0%55%-7%100%   Finalnd   -  -   901    901       Finalnd--901901   Germany-GIZ  -  -   486    486       Germany-GIZ--486486   H+ (DFID,Syngenta Foundation,USAID, BMGF)   7,303    7,303       H+ (DFID,Syngenta Foundation,USAID, BMGF)7,3037,303   HarvestPlus       23,409   23,409       HarvestPlus23,40923,409   ICRAF          27  27       ICRAF2727   ICRISAT     163  1    164       ICRISAT1631164   IDRC         138    138       IDRC138138   IFAD      226      226       IFAD226226   IFPRI         202    202       IFPRI202202   IFPRI Center own         221  221       IFPRI Center own221221   ILRI    -  -   14    14       ILRI--1414   Ireland        31    31       Ireland3131   JHU    -  -   97    97       JHU--9797   JIRCAS        34    34       JIRCAS3434   JSI    -  -   427    427       JSI--427427   MARD DRC        16    16       MARD DRC1616   MERIDIAN        1,436    1,436       MERIDIAN1,4361,436   MSSRF   -  -   196    196       MSSRF--196196   NERC         311    311       NERC311311   NESTEC LTD       74    74       NESTEC LTD7474   Netherlands  -  -   53    53       Netherlands--5353   NRI         1    1       NRI11   OFID         232    232       OFID232232   Shiree        34    34       Shiree3434   SIDA    -  -   56    56       SIDA--5656   SLARI         16    16       SLARI1616   UNEP/GEF        2,059    2,059       UNEP/GEF2,0592,059   UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURG      44    44       UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURG4444   USAID   -  2,912  747    3,659       USAID-2,9127473,659   WB     -    208    208       WB-208208   USDA        291    291       USDA291291   WB         97    97       WB9797   Total for CRP \"4\"  38,132 4,883 50,051  248 93,315       Total for CRP \"4\"38,1324,88350,05124893,315  "},{"text":"Annual Financial Summary by Centers CRP No.4 -A4NH Period:   January 1 -December 31, 2013               January 1 -December 31, 2013 Amounts in USD 000's                Amounts in USD 000's Report Description                Report Description Name of Report: Financial Summary by Natural Classification lines             Name of Report:Financial Summary by Natural Classification lines Frequency/Period:                Frequency/Period:  Every April 15th               Every April 15th  Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral Funding Center Funds Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral Funding Center Funds Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral Funding Center Funds Total Funding Windows 1 & 2Window 3Bilateral FundingCenter FundsTotal FundingWindows 1 & 2Window 3Bilateral FundingCenter FundsTotal FundingWindows 1 & 2Window 3Bilateral FundingCenter FundsTotal Funding Total CRP\"4\" -A4NH                Total CRP\"4\" -A4NH Personnel 11,987  12,034 72 24,830 7,977 779 10,059 59 18,873 4,010 (42) 1,975 13 5,957 Personnel11,98712,0347224,8307,97777910,0595918,8734,010(42)1,975135,957 Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers 13,137  13,748 - 27,465 12,053 335 10,791 - 23,179 1,084 245 2,957 - 4,286 Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers13,13713,748-27,46512,05333510,791-23,1791,0842452,957-4,286 Collaborator Costs -Partners 6,041 2,074 19,373 44 27,532 5,446 2,300 14,037 44 21,827 595 (226) 5,336 - 5,705 Collaborator Costs -Partners6,0412,07419,3734427,5325,4462,30014,0374421,827595(226)5,336-5,705 Supplies and services 9,631  8,105 113 18,784 7,086 776 7,679 113 15,654 2,545 159 426 - 3,130 Supplies and services9,6318,10511318,7847,0867767,67911315,6542,545159426-3,130 Operational Travel 1,856  2,459 11 4,507 1,751 128 2,085 11 3,975 104 53 375 - 532 Operational Travel1,8562,459114,5071,7511282,085113,97510453375-532 Depreciation 438  526 2 1,100 299 92 640 4 1,034 139 42 (114) (2) 66 Depreciation43852621,1002999264041,03413942(114)(2)66 Sub-total of Direct Costs 43,090 4,641 56,245 242 104,219 34,612 4,410 45,291 231 84,544 8,478 231 10,954 11 19,675 Sub-total of Direct Costs43,0904,64156,245242104,21934,6124,41045,29123184,5448,47823110,9541119,675 Indirect Costs 5,081  6,008 17 11,583 3,521 472 4,658 17 8,668 1,560 5 1,350 - 2,915 Indirect Costs5,0816,0081711,5833,5214724,658178,6681,56051,350-2,915 Total -All Costs 48,171 5,118 62,253 259 115,802 38,133 4,882 49,949 248 93,211 10,038 236 12,304 11 22,591 Total -All Costs48,1715,11862,253259115,80238,1334,88249,94924893,21110,03823612,3041122,591 LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers (13,137.0) (580.2) (13,748.0) - (27,465.2) (12,053.0) (335.0) (10,791.1) - (23,179) (1,084) (245) (2,957) - (4,286) LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers(13,137.0)(580.2)(13,748.0)-(27,465.2)(12,053.0)(335.0)(10,791.1)-(23,179)(1,084)(245)(2,957)-(4,286) Total Net Costs 35,034 4,538 48,505 259 88,337 26,080 4,547 39,158 248 70,032 8,954 (9) 9,348 11 18,304 Total Net Costs35,0344,53848,50525988,33726,0804,54739,15824870,0328,954(9)9,3481118,304       diff. b/c of CIMMYT remapping diff. b/c of CIMMYT remapping       diff. b/c of CIMMYT remappingdiff. b/c of CIMMYT remapping Amounts for each participating center below:               Amounts for each participating center below: BIOVERSITY                BIOVERSITY Personnel 655  436  1,159 570 37 459  1,066 85 31 (23) - 93 Personnel6554361,159570374591,0668531(23)-93 Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers--------------- Collaborator Costs -Partners -  1,417  1,430 102 28 371 - 501 (102) (15) 1,046 - 929 Collaborator Costs -Partners-1,4171,43010228371-501(102)(15)1,046-929 Supplies and services 665  421  1,152 401 18 240  659 264 48 181 - 493 Supplies and services6654211,1524011824065926448181-493 Operational Travel 100  102  215 30 1 39 - 70 70 12 63 - 145 Operational Travel10010221530139-70701263-145 Depreciation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Depreciation--------------- Sub-total of Direct Costs 1,420  2,376  3,956 1,103 84 1,108 - 2,295 317 76 1,268 - 1,661 Sub-total of Direct Costs1,4202,3763,9561,103841,108-2,295317761,268-1,661 Indirect Costs 251  134  401 206 7 100  313 45 9 34 - 88 Indirect Costs251134401206710031345934-88 Total -All Costs 1,671  2,510 - 4,357 1,309 91 1,208 - 2,608 362 85 1,302 - 1,749 Total -All Costs1,6712,510-4,3571,309911,208-2,608362851,302-1,749 LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers--------------- Total Net Costs 1,671  2,510 - 4,357 1,309 91 1,208 - 2,608 362 85 1,302 - 1,749 Total Net Costs1,6712,510-4,3571,309911,208-2,608362851,302-1,749 CIAT                CIAT Personnel 1,096  1,825  3,002 999 78 1,764  2,841 97 3 61 - 161 Personnel1,0961,8253,002999781,7642,84197361-161 Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers 5,129  3,043  8,521 4,486 92 133  4,711 643 349 2,910 - 3,902 Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers5,1293,0438,5214,486921334,7116433492,910-3,902 Collaborator Costs -Partners 810 - 5,427  6,237 624 - 1,615  2,239 186 (58) 3,812 - 3,940 Collaborator Costs -Partners810-5,4276,237624-1,6152,239186(58)3,812-3,940 Supplies and services 1,073  1,727  2,866 899 58 1,946  2,903 174 8 (219) - (37) Supplies and services1,0731,7272,866899581,9462,9031748(219)-(37) Operational Travel 138  380  525 139 - 557  696 (1) 7 (177) - (171) Operational Travel138380525139-557696(1)7(177)-(171) Depreciation 18  253  331 6 21 246  273 12 39 7 - 58 Depreciation1825333162124627312397-58 Sub-total of Direct Costs 8,264  12,655 - 21,482 7,153 249 6,261 - 13,663 1,111 348 6,394 - 7,853 Sub-total of Direct Costs8,26412,655-21,4827,1532496,261-13,6631,1113486,394-7,853 Indirect Costs 587  1,791  2,427 513 28 1,042  1,583 74 21 749 - 844 Indirect Costs5871,7912,427513281,0421,5837421749-844 Total -All Costs 8,851  14,446 - 23,909 7,666 277 7,303 - 15,246 1,185 369 7,143 - 8,697 Total -All Costs8,85114,446-23,9097,6662777,303-15,2461,1853697,143-8,697 LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers (5,129.0) (349.0) (3,043.0) - (8,521.0) (4,486) (92) (133) - (4,711) (643) (349) (2,910) - (3,902) LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers(5,129.0)(349.0)(3,043.0)-(8,521.0)(4,486)(92)(133)-(4,711)(643)(349)(2,910)-(3,902) Total Net Costs 3,722  11,403 - 15,388 3,180 185 7,170 - 10,535 542 20 4,233 - 4, Total Net Costs3,72211,403-15,3883,1801857,170-10,535542204,233-4,  "},{"text":"795 Annual Financial Summary by Natural Classification   Windows 1 & 2 Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Window 3  Bilateral Funding Bilateral Funding Center Funds Center Funds  Total Funding Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Window 3  Bilateral Funding Bilateral Funding Center Funds Center Funds Total Funding Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Windows 1 & 2  Window 3 Window 3  Bilateral Funding Bilateral Funding Center Funds Center Funds Total Funding Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Windows 1 & 2Window 3 Window 3Bilateral Funding Bilateral FundingCenter Funds Center FundsTotal Funding Total FundingWindows 1 & 2 Windows 1 & 2Window 3 Window 3Bilateral Funding Bilateral FundingCenter Funds Center FundsTotal Funding Total FundingWindows 1 & 2 Windows 1 & 2Window 3 Window 3Bilateral Funding Bilateral FundingCenter Funds Center FundsTotal Funding Total Funding IFPRI   POWB Approved Budget       Actual       Unspent/Variance IFPRIPOWB Approved BudgetActualUnspent/Variance Personnel 5,074 402 5,238 34 10,748 2,130 402  5,238 34 7,804 2,944 -  - - 2,944 Personnel5,0744025,2383410,7482,1304025,238347,8042,944---2,944 CIMMYT Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers 7,988 POWB Approved Budget 202 10,650 -  18,840 7,552 202 Actual 10,650 - 18,404 436 - Unspent/Variance - - 436 CIMMYT Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers7,988POWB Approved Budget 202 10,650-18,8407,552202Actual 10,650-18,404436-Unspent/Variance --436 Personnel Collaborator Costs -Partners 1,336 3,199 1,400 32 10,264 44 1,368 14,907 936 4,117 1,400 70 10,264 44 1,006 15,825 400 (918) --  (38) - -- 362 (918) Personnel Collaborator Costs -Partners1,336 3,1991,40032 10,264441,368 14,907936 4,1171,40070 10,264441,006 15,825400 (918)--(38) ---362 (918) Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers Supplies and services 3,073 287 2,087 113 -5,560 1,116 287  2,087 113 -3,603 -1,957 --  -- -- -1,957 Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers Supplies and services3,0732872,087113-5,5601,1162872,087113-3,603-1,957-------1,957 Collaborator Costs -Partners Operational Travel 802 855  38 8 658 11 810 1,562 115 349  38  658 11 115 1,056 687 506 --  - 8 -- 695 506 Collaborator Costs -Partners Operational Travel802 855388 65811810 1,562115 3493865811115 1,056687 506---8--695 506 Supplies and services Depreciation 186  19 16 249  2 16 456 687 101  19  249 2 687 371 (687) 85 --  - 16 -- (671) 85 Supplies and services Depreciation1861916 249216 456687 101192492687 371(687) 85---16--(671) 85 Operational Travel Sub-total of Direct Costs 20,375 2,348 8 29,146 204 8 52,073 535 15,365 2,348 29,146 204 535 47,063 (535) 5,010 --  - 8 -- (527) 5,010 Operational Travel Sub-total of Direct Costs20,3752,3488 29,1462048 52,073535 15,3652,34829,146204535 47,063(535) 5,010---8--(527) 5,010 Depreciation Indirect Costs 1,994 217 2,113 17 -4,341 856 217  2,113 17 -3,203 -1,138 --  -- -- -1,138 Depreciation Indirect Costs1,9942172,11317-4,3418562172,11317-3,203-1,138-------1,138 Sub-total of Direct Costs Total -All Costs 2,138 22,369 -2,565 64 31,259 221 2,202 56,414 2,272 16,221 -2,565 70 31,259 221 2,342 50,266 (135) 6,148 --  - (6) -- (141) 6,148 Sub-total of Direct Costs Total -All Costs2,138 22,369-2,56564 31,2592212,202 56,4142,272 16,221-2,56570 31,2592212,342 50,266(135) 6,148---(6)--(141) 6,148 Indirect Costs 534  POWB Approved Budget 16   550 401   Actual 10  411 133 - Unspent/Variance 6 - 139 Indirect Costs534POWB Approved Budget 16550401Actual10411133-Unspent/Variance6-139 Total -All Costs LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers 2,672 (7,988.0) -(202.0) 80 (10,650.0) -  2,752 (18,840.0) 2,673 (7,552) -(202) 80 (10,650) - 2,753 (18,404) (1) (436) --  -- -- (1) (436) Total -All Costs LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers2,672 (7,988.0)-(202.0)80 (10,650.0)-2,752 (18,840.0)2,673 (7,552)-(202)80 (10,650)-2,753 (18,404)(1) (436)------(1) (436) Total Net Costs 14,381 2,363 20,609 221 37,574 8,669 2,363  20,609 221 -31,862 5,712 -  - - 5,712 Total Net Costs14,3812,36320,60922137,5748,6692,36320,609221-31,8625,712---5,712 LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers - -  - -  -  -   - - - -  -  - - - LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers-------------- Total Net Costs 2,672 -  80 -  2,752 2,673    80 - 2,753  (1) -  - - (1) Total Net Costs2,672-80-2,7522,67380-2,753(1)---(1) IITA   POWB Approved Budget       Actual       Unspent/Variance IITAPOWB Approved BudgetActualUnspent/Variance Personnel 869  72 3,328   4,269 617 158  1,419  2,194 252 (86) 1,909 - 2,075 Personnel869723,3284,2696171581,4192,194252(86)1,909-2,075 CIP Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers   POWB Approved Budget   -   9 Actual   9 -   Unspent/Variance (9) - - (9) CIP Collaborators Costs -CGIAR CentersPOWB Approved Budget-9Actual9-Unspent/Variance (9) --(9) Personnel Collaborator Costs -Partners 143 373  59 281 1,155   424 1,587 122 6  23 23  402 423  547 452 21 367 (23) 36 (121) 732 -- (123) 1,135 Personnel Collaborator Costs -Partners143 37359281 1,155424 1,587122 623 23402 423547 45221 367(23) 36(121) 732--(123) 1,135 Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers Supplies and services 681  73 2,279   -3,033 1,286 128  2,479  -3,893 -(605) -(55) -(200) -- -(860) Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers Supplies and services681732,279-3,0331,2861282,479-3,893-(605)-(55)-(200)---(860) Collaborator Costs -Partners Operational Travel 84 156 364 17 432 864   880 1,037 78 168 554 47  258 467  890 682 6 (12) (190) (30) 174 397 -- (10) 355 Collaborator Costs -Partners Operational Travel84 156364 17432 864880 1,03778 168554 47258 467890 6826 (12)(190) (30)174 397--(10) 355 Supplies and services Depreciation 178 55 214 2 254 3   646 60 230 7  36 3  195 134  461 144 (52) 48 178 (1) 59 (131) -- 185 (84) Supplies and services Depreciation178 55214 2254 3646 60230 736 3195 134461 144(52) 48178 (1)59 (131)--185 (84) Operational Travel Sub-total of Direct Costs 83 2,134 44 223 100 7,629 -  227 9,986 63 2,084 13 368  110 4,922 - 186 7,374  20 50 31 (145) (10) 2,707 -- 41 2,612 Operational Travel Sub-total of Direct Costs83 2,13444 223100 7,629-227 9,98663 2,08413 368110 4,922-186 7,37420 5031 (145)(10) 2,707--41 2,612 Depreciation Indirect Costs 316  10 42 10 1,288   20 1,646 346  6 68  820  6 1,234 -(30) 4 (26) 10 468 -- 14 412 Depreciation Indirect Costs31610 4210 1,28820 1,6463466 688206 1,234-(30)4 (26)10 468--14 412 Sub-total of Direct Costs Total -All Costs 488 2,450 632 265 1,077 8,917 --  2,197 11,632 493 2,430 632 436  965 5,742 -- 2,090 8,608  (5) 20 -(171) 112 3,175 -- 107 3,024 Sub-total of Direct Costs Total -All Costs488 2,450632 2651,077 8,917--2,197 11,632493 2,430632 436965 5,742--2,090 8,608(5) 20-(171)112 3,175--107 3,024 Indirect Costs 123  34 172   329 117  32  135  284  6  2 37 - 45 Indirect Costs12334172329117321352846237-45 Total -All Costs LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers Total Net Costs 611 -2,450 POWB Approved Budget 666 1,249 --265 8,917 ---  2,526 -11,632 610 -2,430 664 (9) 427 Actual 1,100 -5,742 --- 2,374 (9) 8,599 - 1 20 2 9 Unspent/Variance 149 -(162) 3,175 --- 152 9 3,033 Total -All Costs LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers Total Net Costs611 -2,450POWB Approved Budget 666 1,249 --265 8,917---2,526 -11,632610 -2,430664 (9) 427Actual1,100 -5,742---2,374 (9) 8,599-1 202 9 Unspent/Variance 149 -(162) 3,175---152 9 3,033 LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers - -  - -  - - -   - - - -  -  - - - LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers--------------- Total Net Costs 611 666 1,249 -  2,526 610 664  1,100 - 2,374  1  2 149 - 152 Total Net Costs6116661,249-2,5266106641,100-2,37412149-152 ICRISAT   POWB Approved Budget       Actual       Unspent/Variance ICRISATPOWB Approved BudgetActualUnspent/Variance Personnel 1,000   18   1,018 926    10 - 936  74 -  8 - 82 Personnel1,000181,01892610-93674-8-82 Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers ILRI   POWB Approved Budget   - -   Actual   - -  - -Unspent/Variance - - Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers ILRIPOWB Approved Budget--Actual----Unspent/Variance-- Collaborator Costs -Partners Personnel 331 1263 114 680   331 2056 258 1,115  81  2 581  260 1,776 73 148 - 33 (2) 99 -- 71 280 Collaborator Costs -Partners Personnel331 1263114680331 2056258 1,115812 581260 1,77673 148-33(2) 99--71 280 Supplies and services Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers 824  29 4   828 29 709 -  32  (6)  703 32 115 - - (3) - 10 -- 125 (3) Supplies and services Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers824294828 29709 -32(6)703 32115 --(3)-10--125 (3) Operational Travel Collaborator Costs -Partners 117 239 238 554   117 1031 46 2 295  1,077  46 1,374 71 237 -(57) -(523) -- 71 (343) Operational Travel Collaborator Costs -Partners117 239238554117 103146 22951,07746 1,37471 237-(57)-(523)--71 (343) Depreciation Supplies and services 57 2566  91 820   57 3477 12 1,291 111  673  12 2,075 45 1,275 -(20) -147 -- 45 1,402 Depreciation Supplies and services57 25669182057 347712 1,29111167312 2,07545 1,275-(20)-147--45 1,402 Sub-total of Direct Costs Operational Travel Indirect Costs Depreciation 2,329 184 341 - POWB Approved Budget 22 45 179 1 -  2,351 407 342 0 1,951 265 299 82 - 12 Actual 6 179 - 1,957 455 299 82 378 (81) 42 (82) --- 33 Unspent/Variance - 16 (0) 1 ---- 394 (48) 43 (82) Sub-total of Direct Costs Operational Travel Indirect Costs Depreciation2,329 184 341-POWB Approved Budget 22 45 179 1-2,351 407 342 01,951 265 299 82-12Actual6 179-1,957 455 299 82378 (81) 42 (82)---33 Unspent/Variance -16 (0) 1----394 (48) 43 (82) Total -All Costs Sub-total of Direct Costs 2,670 4252 -517 23 2232 - 0 2,693 7000 2,250 2,755 -531  6 2,509 -- 2,256 5,794 420 1,497 -(14) 17 (277) -- 437 1,206 Total -All Costs Sub-total of Direct Costs2,670 4252-51723 2232-02,693 70002,250 2,755-5316 2,509--2,256 5,794420 1,497-(14)17 (277)--437 1,206 Indirect Costs 718  91 334   1144 589  93  394  1,075 130  (1) (60) - 69 Indirect Costs718913341144589933941,075130(1)(60)-69 LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers Total -All Costs -4970 -608 -2565 - 0 -8144 -3,344 -623  -2,902 -- -6,869 -1,626 -(15) -(337) -- -1,274 LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers Total -All Costs-4970-608-2565-0-8144-3,344-623-2,902---6,869-1,626-(15)-(337)---1,274 Total Net Costs 2,670 -  23 -  2,693 2,250 -  6 - 2,256 420 -  17 - 437 Total Net Costs2,670-23-2,6932,250-6-2,256420-17-437 LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers - (29.2) - -  (29.2) 0 (32)  - - (32) -  2.7 - - 3 LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers-(29.2)--(29.2)0(32)--(32)-2.7--3 Total Net Costs 4,970 579 2,565 -  8,114 3,344 591  2,902 - 6,837 1,626 (12) (337) - 1,277 Total Net Costs4,9705792,565-8,1143,3445912,902-6,8371,626(12)(337)-1,277 IRRI                   IRRI Personnel 300      300 329      329 (29) -  - - (29) Personnel300300329329(29)---(29) Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers -      - -      - -  -  - - - Collaborators Costs -CGIAR Centers--------- Collaborator Costs -Partners 99      99 142      142 (43) -  - - (43) Collaborator Costs -Partners9999142142(43)---(43) Supplies and services 454      454 405      405  49 -  - - 49 Supplies and services45445440540549---49 Operational Travel 126      126 102      102  24 -  - - 24 Operational Travel12612610210224---24 Depreciation 112      112 91      91  21 -  - - 21 Depreciation112112919121---21 Sub-total of Direct Costs 1,091 -  - -  1,091 1,069 -   - - 1,069  22 -  - - 22 Sub-total of Direct Costs1,091---1,0911,069---1,06922---22 Indirect Costs 132      132 136      136  (4) -  - - (4) Indirect Costs132132136136(4)---(4) Total -All Costs 1,223 -  - -  1,223 1,205 -   - - 1,205  18 -  - - 18 Total -All Costs1,223---1,2231,205---1,20518---18 LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers - -  - -  - - -   - - - -  -  - - - LESS Coll Costs CGIAR Centers--------------- Total Net Costs 1,223 -  - -  1,223 1,205 -  - - 1,205  18 -  - - 18 Total Net Costs1,223---1,2231,205---1,20518---18  "},{"text":"POWB Approved Budget Actual Unspent/Variance CRP No.4 -A4NH Period: 01/01/2013 -12/31/2013 Amounts in USD 000's Report Description Name of Report: Summary Report -by Themes Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs BIOVERSITY Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs CIAT Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination CIMMYT Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination CIP Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs ICRISAT Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs IFPRI Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5: Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs IITA Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs ILRI Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs IRRI Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5: Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs WORLDFISH Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5: Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs 9. ICRISAT Total for CRP 8. ICRAF Total for CRP WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE (ICRAF) 6. CIP Every April 15th POWB Approved 9,249 45,269 14,277 12,930 160 6,482 88,367 2,195 2,162 4,357 15,388.00 Annual Financial Current Year Actual Expenditures 6,270 37,400 12,877 11,855 67 1,665 70,134 1,610 998 2,608 10,535.00 Summary by Themes POWB Approved Current Year Actual Expenditures 2,752 2,752 2,752 2,752 578 508 1,231 1,154 718 712 2,527 2,374 23 6 1,479 1,278 1,191 972 2,693 2,256 POWB Approved Current Year Actual Expenditures 2,013 902 17,870 17,587 999 1,496 10,050 10,145 --160 67 6,482 1,665 37,574 31,862 940 1,034 6,549 4,094 4,143 3,471 11,632 8,599 200 3 7,944 6,938 8,144 6,941 1,223 1,205 1,223 1,804 1,804 273 273 Actual Expenses -This Year Unspent Budget 2,979 7,869 1,400 1,075 93 4,817 18,233 586 -1,164 ---1,750 -4,853.00 -----Unspent Budget -(0.18) ----(0.18) 70 77 -6 ---153 17 201 219 ----Unspent Budget 1,111 283 (497) (95) -93 4,817 5,712 (94) 2,455 672 ----3,033 197 -1,006 ----1,203 -18 -----1,102 ------1,102 (28) ------(28) Actual Expenses -This Year 1,205 POWB Approved Current Year Actual Unspent Budget Expenditures Actual Expenses -This Year Report Description Name of Report: Summary Report -by Themes Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs BIOVERSITY Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs CIAT Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination CIMMYT Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination CIP Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs ICRISAT Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs IFPRI Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5: Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs IITA Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs ILRI Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs IRRI Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5 Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5: Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs WORLDFISH Theme 1: Value Chains for Enhanced Nutrition Theme 2: Biofortification Theme 3: Agriculture Associated Diseases Theme 4: Integrated Programs and Policies Theme 5: Gender Strategies CRP Management/Coordination Total -All Costs 9. ICRISAT Total for CRP 8. ICRAF Total for CRP WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE (ICRAF) 6. CIPEvery April 15th POWB Approved 9,249 45,269 14,277 12,930 160 6,482 88,367 2,195 2,162 4,357 15,388.00 Annual Financial Current Year Actual Expenditures 6,270 37,400 12,877 11,855 67 1,665 70,134 1,610 998 2,608 10,535.00 Summary by Themes POWB Approved Current Year Actual Expenditures 2,752 2,752 2,752 2,752 578 508 1,231 1,154 718 712 2,527 2,374 23 6 1,479 1,278 1,191 972 2,693 2,256 POWB Approved Current Year Actual Expenditures 2,013 902 17,870 17,587 999 1,496 10,050 10,145 --160 67 6,482 1,665 37,574 31,862 940 1,034 6,549 4,094 4,143 3,471 11,632 8,599 200 3 7,944 6,938 8,144 6,941 1,223 1,205 1,223 1,804 1,804 273 273 Actual Expenses -This Year Unspent Budget 2,979 7,869 1,400 1,075 93 4,817 18,233 586 -1,164 ---1,750 -4,853.00 -----Unspent Budget -(0.18) ----(0.18) 70 77 -6 ---153 17 201 219 ----Unspent Budget 1,111 283 (497) (95) -93 4,817 5,712 (94) 2,455 672 ----3,033 197 -1,006 ----1,203 -18 -----1,102 ------1,102 (28) ------(28) Actual Expenses -This Year 1,205 POWB Approved Current Year Actual Unspent Budget Expenditures Actual Expenses -This Year Total -All Costs 15,388 10,535  4,853.00 Total -All Costs15,38810,5354,853.00 Total for CRP  - - - 258 Total for CRP---258  "}],"sieverID":"c8d0bf0d-88b4-4584-b72b-41912b1e7770","abstract":"A4NH focuses on the CGIAR system-level outcome (SLO) of improving nutrition and health. In 2013, A4NH made major progress in refining its Strategic Results Framework and in defining four Intermediate Development Outcomes (IDOs) and their indicators and targets that further orient A4NH future research to support nutrition and health impacts at scale. IDO 1 focuses on improved diet quality as an appropriate nutrition outcome for agriculture. A4NH has worked with other CRPs on a common nutrition IDO, with diet diversity as a common indicator of diet quality. Likewise, A4NH was able to use well-established indicators, such as prevalence of pathogens in food at point of consumption, as indicators for reducing exposure to agriculture-associated disease risks (IDO 2). However research and development practice show that two other IDOs will be crucial for improving nutrition and health for target beneficiaries. One is on empowering women and poor communities (IDO 3). The other is creating an enabling environment through cross-sector programs, policies and investments (IDO 4). A4NH has proposed initial indicators and targets for the empowerment and enabling IDOs 3 and 4, which can be improved with results from evaluation of development actions and on-going research.A4NH research is organized into four research flagships: Value chains for enhanced nutrition, Biofortification, Agriculture-associated diseases (AAD), and Integrated programs and policies. Each of these flagships and their 2-3 research clusters are designed to focus on a group of immediate development outcomes that will contribute to IDOs and for which a critical mass of research and partners can be assembled. Through the three A4NH delivery pathways, (1) value chains, (2) integrated programs and (3) policies and investments, research outputs will translate into outcomes towards achieving the IDOs, either individually or in combination. While impact pathways have provided a useful platform for describing what research, partnerships and capacities A4NH should support, there is a need to better understand how change could occur and how to measure progress. Thus in 2013, investment began in developing more detailed theories of change for our research flagships, clusters, and outputs. Groups of A4NH researchers and partners will develop and refine these in 2014 and 2015. These detailed theories of change guide how research is planned, implemented and evaluated and provide development partners with a deeper understanding of the impact-oriented development processes in which they are trying to catalyze change.•"}
\ No newline at end of file