diff --git "a/data/part_3/01f608a0d151ed99bcaf74b6df393534.json" "b/data/part_3/01f608a0d151ed99bcaf74b6df393534.json"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/data/part_3/01f608a0d151ed99bcaf74b6df393534.json"
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"metadata":{"id":"01f608a0d151ed99bcaf74b6df393534","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c73b1d0b-7670-4046-aa9d-b3d4af2a9881/retrieve"},"pageCount":52,"title":"","keywords":[],"chapters":[{"head":"","index":1,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":20,"text":"Management Team in WLE, improved communications with partners and stronger ownership of the program by the newly broadened Management Committee."},{"index":2,"size":36,"text":"WLE is attempting to improve sustainable intensification of agriculture and to ensure that the benefits associated with sustainable natural resource management are shared among stakeholders, particularly the poor and marginalized. These two stories exemplify WLE work:"},{"index":3,"size":70,"text":" The incorporation of the National Irrigation Management Fund in India's 12th Five Year Plan worth USD 1.25 billion, is designed to incentivize irrigation agencies to improve the management of India's public irrigation system. This is a direct outcome of the IWMI Tata Program engagement with the Planning Commission and will make a significant impact in increasing the performance of canal-based irrigation schemes, thereby improving overall efficiency in water use."},{"index":4,"size":76,"text":" The Africa Soil Information Service project has applied advanced infrared soil spectroscopy technology, soil mapping methods and analytical tools for landscape assessment to 60 sentinel sites. This initiative has significantly advanced soil and landscape assessment mapping science and capacity in sub-Saharan Africa, and will be an invaluable resource in planning sustainable intensification. The project, led by CIAT, was a collaboration with ICRAF, Colombia University, ISRIC and national partners in Mali, Tanzania, Malawi, Kenya and Nigeria."}]},{"head":"Financial Summary","index":2,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":27,"text":"outcomes we seek. This will include livelihood outcomes, changes in policies and legislation as well as innovative linkages with the private sector where business models are used."},{"index":2,"size":66,"text":"Activity clusters, indicators and IDOs were still in development at the end of the year, therefore the baselines that will be needed to measure progress along WLE Impact Pathways are not yet compiled. WLE's Monitoring and Evaluation system will guide the establishment of baselines including initiating a survey of baseline data available for WLE's portfolio of individual activities to assess its value and any potential gaps."}]},{"head":"C. Progress along the Impact Pathway","index":3,"paragraphs":[]},{"head":"C.1 Narrative of major achievements, by Theme","index":4,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":67,"text":"Given that agreements with partners were only signed midway through year and impact pathways are still being designed, it has not been possible to undertake a systematic review of progress along the IPs during this first year; instead the following narrative refers to a few highlighted activities representing important outputs and outcomes. Further details can be found within the individual partner reports, which can be found here."},{"index":2,"size":84,"text":"One hundred sixty-two activities were implemented in 2012 with funding from Windows 1, 2 and 3 as well as bilateral funding; the full list of which is available here. Partners provided data for indicators based on a template sent by WLE at the end of the reporting period. It has not been possible to address several of the indicators since the amended template from the Consortium Office was only received recently and partners were not asked to collect certain data during their 2012 activities."},{"index":3,"size":70,"text":"Results of the irrigation SRP's partner workshop in May included a spotlight on the potential of water management to increase agriculture productivity in African and peri-urban agriculture (with the RRR SRP). The SRP also held a number of e-discussions and a workshop with FAO. Further planning was carried out on African irrigation, water management in Eastern Gangetic Basin, and managing salt-water balance in the Indus and Central Asian irrigation systems."},{"index":4,"size":74,"text":"The Rainfed SRP made progress in aligning partners and with global initiatives. Activities included a partner workshop in June, consultative processes in developing a white paper, cohosting a UNEP-STAP workshop on soil carbon, visiting partners and donors, and engaging in high level conferences and forums. These activities have introduced WLE at various forums in Europe and Australia, and have begun new research collaborations with partners including FAO, Economics of Land Degradation (ELD) and UNCCD."},{"index":5,"size":124,"text":"The Resource Recovery and Re-Use (RRR) SRP was already underway at IWMI, hence it has become operational very quickly within WLE. The Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)-funded flagship project works in nine peri-urban areas in Asia, Africa and Latin America. RRR research is mainly led by IWMI with ICRISAT implementing a North-South technology transfer project in India and ICARDA addressing grey water reuse in the Near East. Activity clusters were developed on business opportunities for resource recovery and use, the use of safe wastewater, and efficient water and land management in peri-urban areas (with SRP Irrigation). Brochures were developed for these activities and a business plan for the SRP has been drafted, which will serve as a model for the other SRPs."},{"index":6,"size":129,"text":"The River Basins SRP kicked off with a workshop in May and has developed activity clusters on managing water resources variability, resource allocation and benefit sharing, water and energy for food and water data and accounting. Inception meetings were held for components on natural and built infrastructure and \"Underground Taming of Floods\" (UTF) through innovative groundwater recharge. These and parallel CPWF developments resulted in several new ideas on revitalizing water storage as a means of buffering water resources variability, putting the natural flow regulating ecosystem services into focus, and improving management of reservoir storage for livelihoods. Two special sessions for the Global Water Systems Project 2013 conference on the water, energy and food nexus also were developed and WLE and the basin theme were introduced at various international forums."},{"index":7,"size":85,"text":"The Information SRP has developed activity clusters on connecting information to development decisions and measuring agro-ecosystem health. A workshop on Applied Information Economics took place in October, which resulted in the design of an A list of all completed indicators for WLE submitted by each center is available here. In all cases, data given for CPWF is for the period April 2011-April 2012, since the program has a different reporting structure and has not been able to collect data for the calendar year of 2012."}]},{"head":"C.2 Progress towards outputs","index":5,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":136,"text":"WLE counts seven major flagship products (following the definition given in Annex 1) that were in the early stages of development in 2012: 1) Integrated frameworks for assessment and diagnosis of landscape integrity; 2) Intervention packages and adoption frameworks for spatially-and socially-explicit integrated solutions to increase eco-efficiency of production systems and enhance ecosystem services and livelihoods; 3) Catalogues of promising RRR business cases and models for nutrient, water and energy; 4) Demonstrated technical performance of underground solutions and wetlands in terms of mitigation of flood risks (UTF) and conjunctive management of flood and droughts, with potential large economic benefits to farmers; 5) Water Accounting (WA+) framework that summarizes water resources flows, stocks, conditions and management at the basin level; 6) Probabilistic Intervention Decision Modeling Platform; 7) Global Information and Knowledge Facility for Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Usage."},{"index":2,"size":78,"text":"Partner centers cited a number of flagship products in their reports to WLE. Based on the definition in Annex 1, we have classified 41 of these products as tools. About 15% of these tools likely can be assessed for gender-disaggregated impact. Examples of such products include a gendered map of farming systems in Sub-Saharan Africa, and a participatory video of rainwater management issues between farmers and policy makers. Highlights from the wide variety of outputs from WLE include:"},{"index":3,"size":81,"text":" The January 2013 publication of \"Essential Biodiversity Variables\" in Science (vol 339, 18 January 2013) identifies candidate essential biodiversity variables that need to be monitored by the global community in order to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss, avert dangerous biodiversity change, and meet the 2020 Aichi Targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Through Bioversity, WLE represents agricultural and development sectors on the Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services focusing on how the poor benefit from ecosystem services."},{"index":4,"size":233,"text":" A concept of flood attenuation through underground storage demonstrated that in a river basin of some 16,000 km 2 such as the Chao Phraya in Thailand, an additional 5,000 million m 3 of flood water can be harvested in the long-term. While this was only an initial assessment, it sets an example. Linked to this, regional analysis on flood risks has been undertaken in South Asia (in partnership with CCAFS) and similar work is being conducted in Southeast Asia. Estimated long-term annual economic losses of USD 20 billion, attributable to catastrophic floods in flood hotspots globally, sets a preliminary threshold against which to evaluate further benefits. This estimate will be further refined in 2013, and more site-specific estimates may be possible.  Within RRR, a revision of the agricultural policy in a province of Sri Lanka was achieved based on research on business opportunities related to urban farming, which in turn catalyzed a revision to the National Agriculture Policy. FAO published its Farmer Field School manual based on WLE research on safe wastewater use, and USEPA-USAID Wastewater Use Guidelines, international chapter, build strongly on this research for WHO and refer to WLE. WHO has signed a memorandum of understanding with IWMI to join its Global Expert Group on water quality. A manual \"Safety Guidelines for Grey and Wastewater Use in Palestine\" was adopted by policy makers and beneficiaries in the MENA region."},{"index":5,"size":86,"text":" The CPWF in the Nile has developed and tested tools, models and scenarios for its landscape approach to rainwater management, utilizing primary and secondary biophysical and socio-economic data in three sentinel sites in the uplands of Ethiopia with differing degrees of land degradation. At these sites, primary biophysical data (meteorological, soil and groundwater and stream discharge), economic surveys of livelihoods, and both formal and informal governance structures have been evaluated. Innovation platforms have been established at the local level to identify issues and possible solutions."},{"index":6,"size":68,"text":" The CPWF in Mekong, along with the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Sida released a one-hour documentary film on the impacts of hydropower development in the region. This film was widely viewed throughout the Mekong region through the Goethe Institute Southeast Asian Film Festival which attracts more than 500,000 viewers. The movie has appeared on Vietnam National TV as well as Thai Public Broadcasting Station."},{"index":7,"size":64,"text":" The first ever environmental flow assessment of the Ganges produced multiple outputs ranging from a guide for replicating the study in other Indian river basins, a methodology paper on the trade-off between environmental and agricultural water needs in the basin, a water allocation model for the basin, and a pioneering idea of how to incorporate spiritual water requirements into basin water development plans."},{"index":8,"size":5,"text":" 158 publications, listed here."}]},{"head":"C.3 Progress towards the achievement of outcomes","index":6,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":29,"text":"The following highlights from WLE activities are at a general outcome level, rather than being focused on the IDOs of the CRP, as these are under development. They include:"},{"index":2,"size":260,"text":" CIAT and IITA are contributing to N2Africa a major initiative to improve soil fertility and yields among smallholder farmers by introducing nitrogen fixation technologies. The initiative focuses on growing legumes such as soybeans, cowpeas and peanuts, as well as using the most advanced rhizobium, compost and chemical fertilizer practices. Some legumes are particularly effective at converting nitrogen in the air to the soil through their rootsthe soil bacteria rhizobium aids in such nitrogen fixing. N2Africa will reach more than 225,000 farmers, more than 50 percent of whom are women, in eight sub-Saharan African countries with more countries soon to be on board.  Since 2007, IWMI has worked to foster transboundary cooperation on two small rivers in Central Asiathe Khojabakirgansai shared by Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, and the Shakhimardansa in Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. In contrast to a basin wide approach in managing water resource on these transboundary rivers, it has been recognized that potential conflicts in this volatile region can be eased through cooperation on small rivers, with the hope such efforts will spread. The two rivers feed into the Syr Darya River which, in turn, empties into the depleted Aral Sea. IWMI organized workshops and helped provide a framework for joint river-management action plans. Changed behaviors have included better communication during extreme weather events, joint water measurements and data sharing, more reliable and timely water distribution, improved maintenance, and a process for resolving disputes. The next logical step is to replicate the process in other places, and encourage regional organizations to set up special funds to support such cooperation."},{"index":3,"size":156,"text":" Livestock is the largest on-farm income generator in Zimbabwe and together with off-farm income such as labor and remittances, it drives a household's financial portfolio. To stimulate greater reinvestment in agriculture, ICRISAT has led a project over the past decade to develop small stock markets. In Gwanda district, for example, a strong local market has helped raise the value of one goat from USD 10 to USD 60. The rewards from these functional markets have illustrated to farmers the value of feed and fodder, stimulated onfarm thinking about the value of feed resources, and are slowly changing farmers' investments in crop production, especially the use of legumes as fodder crops. The work is done using an innovation platform approach that brings together various stakeholders in a value chain to determine where the bottlenecks may be found. Changes in how farmers use new technologies has been seen as well as changes between participants in the platforms."},{"index":4,"size":86,"text":" ICARDA works with home farmers in arid and semi-arid areas of Jordan, Lebanon and Palestine to promote the safe use of wastewater and grey water for irrigation. A total of 24 grey-water treatment units were installed in target areas between 2010-2012. Project beneficiaries in Jordan formed their own Grey-Water Reuse Association, and safe reuse of grey water was promoted through a public-awareness campaign that included posters, radio discussions and a video. Training, particularly targeting women, was conducted on the operation and maintenance of the systems. "}]},{"head":"C.4 Progress towards Impact","index":7,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":7,"text":"Two illustrative activities leading to impact include:"},{"index":2,"size":148,"text":" The WLE Program is influencing the 12 th Five Year Plan of the Government of India, through its co-funding of the IWMI Tata Program (ITP) research. ITP research contributed to the core ideas of a USD 250 million investment to rewire a rural power grid to separate and intelligently ration electricity to farmers and their agricultural wells. The Jyotigram scheme in Gujarat was used to control groundwater overpumping caused by heavily-subsidized electricity, and is being replicated in several states of India. This directly led to a USD 450 million tubewell recharge scheme announced by India's Finance Minister in the 2007 budget. These and other outcomes of this research effort have led to the incorporation of a USD 1.25 billion National Irrigation Management Fund in India's 12 th Five Year Plan. The fund is designed to incentivize irrigation agencies to improve the management of India's public irrigation system."},{"index":3,"size":109,"text":" In Tanzania, AgWater Solutions recommendations were presented to the Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture, Water and Livestock. The Committee pledged to support a USD 6 million increase in the Ministry of Agriculture 2012-2013 budget to accommodate the proposed solutions for smallholder farmers. The meeting resulted in substantial media interest and a follow-up media workshop. As a result, the AWM project and proposed solutions have been highlighted on prime time TV, radio and print media. In August 2012, the Deputy Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives, confirmed that the project research and dialogue process were important factors in the government's decision to increase national investment in agriculture."}]},{"head":"D. GENDER RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS","index":8,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":83,"text":"The Gender, Poverty and Institutions Coordinator was recruited in 2012 with the Coordinator beginning in March 2013. Emphasis on gender issues was provided through the CGIAR Gender Strategy, with CPWF providing support on principles of gender mainstreaming. As the gender strategy is still being developed, WLE decided to continue with selected gender-related research activities, which will feed into the gender strategy once completed. Overall, WLE partners state that 37 of their outputs in 2012 will be used to enhance gender equality. These include:"},{"index":2,"size":43,"text":" One hypothesis being tested is that low adoption of soil and water conservation practices by smallholder farmers is due to lack of gender neutral technologies, as most conservation measures are either labor or cash intensive and are difficult for women to adopt."},{"index":3,"size":37,"text":" Research on nitrogen fixation in Africa has involved Women4Women, an NGO dealing exclusively with women from post-war areas, to implement a program for women on processing legume products into various recipes for improved nutrition and income."},{"index":4,"size":38,"text":" A case study was carried out on women's farmer-based organizations and gender mainstreaming in national, regional and local level politics in the Upper East Region of Ghana and carried out gender training for the Ganges Basin Challenge."},{"index":5,"size":49,"text":" Under the AgWater Solutions project, methods for mapping gendered farm management systems in Sub-Saharan Africa were explored. An interactive gender map for Africa was produced which illustrates gender-related farming systems to inform future investments. Papers were developed on Gendered Farming Systems and Gender Aspects of Small Private Irrigation."},{"index":6,"size":36,"text":" The complementary roles of men and women in market-oriented urban vegetable farming were analyzed to assess opportunities and disadvantages which gender mainstreaming would cause if current activity domains would be accessible to the opposite gender3."},{"index":7,"size":47,"text":" An activity on grey water use created beneficiary women's committees and undertook 28 training sessions with women of beneficiary households. This project supported six demonstration site visits from partners in Lebanon and Palestine, providing training on the installation, operation and maintenance of household grey-water treatment units."},{"index":8,"size":65,"text":" An assessment of integrated landscape initiatives for Latin America and Africa (Ecoagriculture Partners, Bioversity, Conservation International and ICRAF) was completed, with a similar effort now launched in Asia. These assessments considered the motivating forces that drove more than 300 landscape scale co-management initiatives. The survey included several components related to the role of gender both in terms of driving efforts, and representation in leadership."}]},{"head":"D.1 Gender equality targets defined","index":9,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":106,"text":"Gender equality targets are being established through two processes. Within the SRPs, the most pertinent gender issues are being identified in specific research areas through a gender analysis, which will feed into the development of targets. Since a majority of gender issues are context and culturally specific, a more process-oriented and participatory approach also will be used within WLE focal regions to develop appropriate targets. A set of indicators and a monitoring process will be developed as part of the initial design work in these regions, beginning with Volta/Niger, Indus/Ganges and Nile/East Africa. Baselines will be defined as part of WLE's strategy for Monitoring and Evaluation."}]},{"head":"D.2 Institutional architecture for gender mainstreaming in place (integration of gender across the research cycle)","index":10,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":127,"text":"Each partner has, to different degrees and success, established mechanisms to perform research in a gender-sensitive way. So far, there has been limited capacity within the CRP management to add value to this. However with the appointment of a Gender, Poverty and Institutions Coordinator, there is now a strong basis for developing the capacity within WLE. The type of support and training needed will be identified through a rapid but thorough gender audit done within each of the SRPs. The main method of mainstreaming will be to ensure a limited set of criteria within each SRP, tailored to each SRP, and to ensure that the coordinator is linked with the gender focal points of our partners for the development of the research design within the focal regions. "}]},{"head":"E. PARTNERSHIPS BUILDING ACHIEVEMENTS","index":11,"paragraphs":[]},{"head":"G. RISK MANAGEMENT","index":12,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":68,"text":"In 2012 there was a lack of additional W1&2 funding available to encourage innovation. Funds have now been made available for this and the process is under development. Uncertainty about the possibilities for carry-over of unspent W1&W2 funds during 2012 has caused considerable concern among contributing partners, who were not able or willing to absorb the risk of reduced funding for their activity portfolio under WLE for 2013."},{"index":2,"size":73,"text":"WLE in 2012 supported 162 separate activities, an approach which is not sustainable in the long term but was a necessity due to the legacy nature of projects during the development period for SRPs, activity clusters and the strategy for the program as a whole. The program will now move toward a focal region approach which will show the interactions between different research efforts within a landscape, creating more coherency within the program."},{"index":3,"size":57,"text":"The administrative burden from the CGIAR management during this period of establishing CRPs and setting up systems took time away from WLE planning and research. Considerable effort and resources have been expended to meet demands from the Consortium Office. There is considerable fatigue among collaborators within and outside the CGIAR with the continuous consultation and redefinition process."}]},{"head":"H. LESSONS LEARNED","index":13,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":47,"text":"One of the main lessons learned is that if the CRP is going to be a real partnership-driven program, there is a need for greater buy-in as WLE was seen primarily as the \"IWMI\" CRP. After discussions with various Director Generals, the WLE Management Committee was expanded."},{"index":2,"size":45,"text":"There are now co-leaders for each SRP that has allowed more partners to participate directly in the governance of WLE as well as broadened the focus. In addition, a substantial amount of time was spent articulating the impact pathways of the SRPs into activity clusters."},{"index":3,"size":106,"text":"Another lesson that has emerged is the importance of forming solid Theories of Change and Impact Pathways at the regional level where change is most likely to occur and where real integration of the SRPs can happen. The initial proposal and program setup was very \"silo'd\" with each SRP working on its own. It was found that where integration most naturally happens is in geographies. Each SRP was broken down into two to four activity clusters, allowing for more geographic and thematic focus. The next step in 2013 and 2014 will be to establish integrated impact pathways in WLE focal regions where SRPs can work together."},{"index":4,"size":136,"text":"The need for adaptive and flexible evolution of the SRP was also important. For instance, the Rainfed SRP was identified as the least defined. In 2012 a number of workshops with partners were held to better define the SRP. This has led to a better articulation of its theories of change, closer integration and linkages with the ESS&R working group as well as greater buy-in of partners. Likewise the Information SRP reoriented its initial emphasis on ecosystem health surveillance systems in priority river basins, and instead re-directed efforts on new decision analysis research to identify high-value variables and indicators that could most improve major development intervention decisions in WLE. Having such a flexible research agenda which meets the challenges and opportunities identified by development partners will be essential if WLE research is going to have outcomes."}]},{"head":"i. Estimate the overall level of confidence/uncertainty of the indicators provided in","index":14,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":2,"text":"Table 1."},{"index":2,"size":5,"text":"See footnotes to Annex 1"}]},{"head":"ii. Description, if relevant, of research avenues that did not produce expected results, and description of implications for the CRP, such as new research directions pursued instead and their expected outputs and outcomes.","index":15,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":60,"text":"ILRI's efforts under WLE were focused on the development of a proposal, the intended outcome of which was that policymakers, planners and pastoralists use insights on the role of ecosystem services to support the livelihoods of pastoralists and to identify grazing and rangeland management options that will strengthen livelihood support over the long-term. However, the proposal submission was not successful."}]},{"head":"iii. Lessons learned by the CRP from monitoring the indicators and from qualitative analyses of progress.","index":16,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":69,"text":"Indicators that could be tracked at this stage are, as expected, mainly at the output end of the spectrum, with more outcome oriented results expected as the program grows. From the indicators we have been able to measure within the current portfolio of activities, we can see that training and publications have been a major focus and that sex-disaggregation of data needs more focus in the future of WLE."},{"index":2,"size":29,"text":"A lesson learned is that the indicators in Annex 1 may provide a distorted view. WLE has asked contributing centers to provide their indicators, which has two potential risks:"},{"index":3,"size":49,"text":"i. Accountabilityit is not clear for some indicators whether they are to be attributed to WLE or to individual centers. It is also not clear whether \"double reporting\" is likely, i.e. are indicators such as outputs attributed to one or more CRPs and, if so, whether that is justified."},{"index":4,"size":38,"text":"ii. 'Traceability' or compliance; how do indicators realistically contribute to the CRP and how can we ensure quality control? Monitoring these indicators appears likely to bear huge transaction costs on the part of the centers and the CRP(s)."},{"index":5,"size":27,"text":"Not all of the original indicators were meaningful. For example \"number of countries using results\" cannot be aggregated across activities as countries will be counted several times.  "}]},{"head":"And","index":17,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":28,"text":"The CRP has defined and collected baseline data on the main dimensions of gender inequality in the CRP's main target populations relevant to its expected outcomes ( IDOs)"},{"index":2,"size":21,"text":"Sex-disaggregated social data collected and used to diagnose important gender-related constraints in at least one of the CRP's main target populations"}]},{"head":"And","index":18,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":27,"text":"The CRP has defined and collected baseline data on the main dimensions of gender inequality in the CRP's main target populations relevant to its expected outcomes (IDOs)"},{"index":2,"size":57,"text":"And CRP targets changes in levels of gender inequality to which the CRP is or plans to contribute, with related numbers of men and women beneficiaries in main target populations 2. Institutional architecture for integration of gender is in place -CRP scientists and managers with responsibility for gender in the CRP's outputs are appointed, have written TORS."},{"index":3,"size":70,"text":"-Procedures defined to report use of available diagnostic or baseline knowledge on gender routinely for assessment of the gender equality implications of the CRP's flagship research products as per the Gender Strategy -CRP M&E system has protocol for tracking progress on integration of gender in research -CRP scientists and managers with responsibility for gender in the CRP's outputs are appointed, have written TORS and funds allocated to support their interaction."},{"index":4,"size":81,"text":"-Procedures defined to report use of available diagnostic or baseline knowledge on gender routinely for assessment of the gender equality implications of the CRP's flagship research products as per the Gender Strategy -CRP M&E system has protocol for tracking progress on integration of gender in research And A CRP plan approved for capacity development in gender analysis CRP scientists and managers with responsibility for gender in the CRP's outputs are appointed, have written TORS and funds allocated to support their interaction."},{"index":5,"size":57,"text":"-Procedures defined to report use of available diagnostic or baseline knowledge on gender routinely for assessment of the gender equality implications of the CRP's flagship research products as per the Gender Strategy -CRP M&E system has protocol for tracking progress on integration of gender in research And A CRP plan approved for capacity development in gender analysis"}]},{"head":"And","index":19,"paragraphs":[{"index":1,"size":17,"text":"The CRP uses feedback provided by its M&E system to improve its integration of gender into research "}]}],"figures":[{"text":" social data is being collected and used to diagnose important gender-related constraints in at least one of the CRP's main target populations Sex-disaggregated social data collected and used to diagnose important gender-related constraints in at least one of the CRP's main target populations "},{"text":"  "},{"text":"  "},{"text":"  "},{"text":" Intervention Decision Model framework, in partnership with Hubbard Decision Research. This will be used to analyze interventions across the WLE research portfolio, in many cases focusing on intervention decisions in the focal regions to identify high value information needs, beginning in 2013. The Ecosystem Service and Resilience working group, comprising members from each center and from each SRP, met for the first time in October 2012. The group has compiled a working list of CRP research on ecosystem services. It is currently working on the development of the Ecosystem Service and Resilience framework with active contributions from CRP partners (e.g.  "},{"text":" Investment options for scaling-up irrigation and the M&E for Agricultural Water Management Indicators are being undertaken to help the Southern African Development Community achieve its target of doubling the area under irrigation by 2015. An annual status and outlook report including investment levels and the tracking of Agricultural Water Indicators are two high-level outputs that serve as sources of information and evidence for investment and policy decisions.  "},{"text":" The project is changing behavior in farming techniques. It was designed as a development program, but at the same time data collected through field trials can be used to better understand crop production variability and target future interventions with the goal of improving livelihoods and sustaining resources.  Since 2005, CIAT and CPWF have been working on understanding benefit sharing  Since 2005, CIAT and CPWF have been working on understanding benefit sharing mechanisms (BSM) to maintain watersheds in Peru. In close partnership with the Ministry of mechanisms (BSM) to maintain watersheds in Peru. In close partnership with the Ministry of Environment of Peru, the projects have helped define priority areas and design a BSM for the Environment of Peru, the projects have helped define priority areas and design a BSM for the Cañete River Basin. Cañete will be used by the Ministry as a pilot project to guide the Cañete River Basin. Cañete will be used by the Ministry as a pilot project to guide the development of BSMs in more than 30 additional basins. CIAT and CPWF also recently development of BSMs in more than 30 additional basins. CIAT and CPWF also recently served on an advisory group to draft national Ecosystem Services legislation. The work in served on an advisory group to draft national Ecosystem Services legislation. The work in Peru has advanced this year to the design of a trust fund to finance the Cañete BSM and Peru has advanced this year to the design of a trust fund to finance the Cañete BSM and with the likely support of IFAD and the Global Environment Facility. The proposed scheme with the likely support of IFAD and the Global Environment Facility. The proposed scheme would use funds provided by downstream users such as urban water consumers and river would use funds provided by downstream users such as urban water consumers and river rafting tourism operators and invest the money in improved water and land management rafting tourism operators and invest the money in improved water and land management practices, and conservation in the highlands. practices, and conservation in the highlands.  "},{"text":" As an example of the project and a change of behavior, a group of farmers and technical staff from the West Bank and Gaza Strip visited farms, research stations and water treatment plants in Jordan to learn how to safely use grey water and wastewater, and how to monitor water quality with simple tests. The Palestinians have since repaired a neglected wastewater treatment station in the city of Ateel in the northern West Bank.  "},{"text":" West and Southern Africa offer significant opportunities to work together across scales and agendas among these programs, as does Central America. The ESS&R group collaborates with Dryland Systems, Humidtropics and Aquatic Agriculture Systems CRPs, as well as with Forests, Trees and Agroforesty on ecosystem service research and frameworks. The Information Systems SRP is supporting the CGIAR process of developing System-Level Outcome Impact Pathways and Linkages; land health surveillance methods are being used as a baseline and monitoring system in a number of CGIAR and other projects. Mars Inc. is supporting application of land health surveillance to prioritize and monitor improved agro-ecosystem productivity in the smallholder cocoa sector in Cote d'Ivoire. The World Bank Living Standards Measurement Study requested CGIAR assistance to pilot soil monitoring using soil spectroscopy into the LSMS protocol. The overlap with Dryland Systems and Humidtropics in the Volta Basin, and with Humidtropics in the Nile, presents a critical opportunity for cross-scale interaction.WLE is now defining its strategy for capacity development, which will facilitate a more coherent capacity building portfolio for 2013 onwards. In 2012, WLE supported 3,802 trainees through its research activities. Of these 1,443 were female. WLE-related activities involved 299 MSc/PhD students, of whom 114 were female. CPWF implemented capacity building events for more than 745 people and engaged more than 2,500 people in more than 220 outreach events. Of these 55% were male and 45% female. An estimated 95% of participants were from Africa, Asia and Latin America. CPWF engaged 95 students, 82 MScs, 13 PhDs, 1 MPhil, of which 34 (36%) female students; 94 of these students are nationals from CPWF basin countries. The RRR SRP supported together with UN-Water the training of NARS in 70 countries, in safe wastewater use. Details of individual trainings can be found in partner reports. Highlights include IFPRI training of 15 staff from two NGOs in India on the \"groundwater game\"; CIAT's training of more than 110 NARs partners in socio-economic and agronomic data collection, and Open Data Kit data collection using Samsung tablets in Kenya and Tanzania.  "},{"text":"CRP indicators of progress, with glossary and targets 4 It was useful to receive a set of more considered indicators, however these arrived too late to be measured in 2012. For meaningful qualitative analysis of progress, there should be clear qualitative indicators. Indicators such as No. 11 \"number of targeted agro-ecosystems analyzed/ characterized by CRP\" are not useful without qualitative information. The guideline to \"Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology[…]  to define these agro-ecosystems and specify the regions concerned\" is not helpful to WLE which has with a more integrative focus, putting people first. WLE partners had been asked to provide data for a set of indicators which were provided in the first annual report template received. Where possible, data collected have been used to complete thistable, however many of these indicators are not answerable by the data available; for this reason there are a number of gaps in the table in terms of achievements for 2012 and also for targets for 2012 -14 since WLE partners have not yet set these. Number of open access databases maintained Number of users of open-access databases Number of hits/views/requests coming in through electronic media such as knowledge banks, CRP and institutional home portals, websites, other ICT media Number of trainees (total) Out of which: number of female trainees Out of which: number of male trainees Out of which: number of trainees from developing countries Out of which: number of trainees from developed countries Number of M.Sc. and PhD students supervised (total) Out of which: number of female M.Sc. and PhD students Out of which: number of male M.Sc. and PhD students Out of which: number of M.Sc. and PhD students from developing countries Out of which: number of M.Sc. and PhD students from developed countries Number of meetings, workshops, seminars Number of countries using results Number of agencies, actors using tools & results in implementation Number of outputs used to enhance gender equality WLE did not establish and maintain open access databases as yet; participating centers do and have noted these in individual reports 12 Idem 13 Based on reports from partners. WLE has not verified that all are published in ISI journals. 14 Result based on FAO system http://www.fao.org/nr/gaez/en/To be counted, a multi-stakeholder platform has to have a clear purpose, generally to manage some type of tradeoff/conflict among the different interests of different stakeholders in the targeted agro-ecosystems, and inclusive and clear governance mechanisms, leading to decisions to manage the variety of perspectives of stakeholders in a manner satisfactory to the whole platform. use of climate information for planning disaster risk strategies in place, climate change mitigation and energy efficiency, and natural resource management practices that increase productivity and/or resiliency to climate change. IPM, ISFM, and PHH as related to agriculture should all be included as improved technologies or management practices.Under \"field testing\" means that research has moved from focused development to broader testing and this testing is underway under conditions intended to duplicate those encountered by potential users of the new technology. This might be in the actual facilities (fields) of potential users, or it might be in a facility set up to duplicate those conditions. Number of agricultural enabling environment policies / regulations / administrative procedures in the areas of agricultural resource, food, market standards & regulation, public investment, natural resource or water management and climate change adaptation/mitigation as it relates to agriculture that underwent the first stage of the policy reform process i.e. CRPs concerned by this CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT AND Indicator long-term programs finalised, for the scaling implementation has begun INNOVATION PLATFORMS 16 facilitated by CRP up of strategies 26 (Stage 5) All 13. Number of trainees in short-term programs (female) 20 1,5,6,7 17. Number of multi-All, except 2 23. Number of POLICIES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF technologies /NRM DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES ON THE GROUND Glossary/guidelines for measuring the indicator not be included. Deviation narrative (if actual is 2012 available available Not available None None 21 2013 available available available available 2014 Not available Not available Not Not CRPs concerned by this CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT AND Indicator long-term programs finalised, for the scaling implementation has begun INNOVATION PLATFORMS 16 facilitated by CRP up of strategies 26 (Stage 5) All 13. Number of trainees in short-term programs (female) 20 1,5,6,7 17. Number of multi-All, except 2 23. Number of POLICIES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF technologies /NRM DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES ON THE GROUNDGlossary/guidelines for measuring the indicator not be included.Deviation narrative (if actual is2012 available available Not available None None 212013 available available available available 2014 Not available Not available Not Not indicator All All All All 1,5,6,7 All KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA facilitated by CRP (male) stakeholder R4D innovation platforms practices field tested 28. Numbers of Policies/ 33. Number of hectares (phase II) 27 Regulations/ under improved 5. % of tools that have an established for the Administrative Procedures technologies or explicit target of women farmers targeted agro-ecosystems Analyzed (Stage 1) management practices as 6. % of tools assessed for by the CRPs 24. Number of agro-a result of CRP research ecosystems for which 34. Number of farmers All 1. Number of flagship \"products\" produced by CRP likely gender-innovations (technologies, and others who have disaggregated impact All 7. Number of open access TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN policies, practices, applied new technologies VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT All 19. % of technologies integrative approaches) or management practices All 2. % of flagship products produced that have explicit target of women All 3. % of flagship products produced that have been assessed for likely All 4. Number of \"tools\" for nutrient, water and energy; 4) Demonstrated technical performance of underground solutions and wetlands in terms of mitigation of flood risks (UTF); 5) Water Accounting more than 10% away available available Indicate the regions where this is occurring and whether the application of technologies is on a new or continuing area from target) Target (if available for 2012) Actual Target The web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy briefs Not Not Not Not Target supporting indicator #4 must have an explicit focus on women farmers/NRM managers to be counted available available available available New technologies or management practices under research 9 Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus Not counted should be only those under research in the current Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of 15% 10 Not Not reporting year. Any new technology or management practice cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, Indicate the regions where this is occurring and whether the These are frameworks and concepts that are significant and complete enough to have been highlighted on web pages, Not available None 7 5 on gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted available available available under research in a previous year but not under research in the 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and application of technologies is on a new or continuing area and Not available None reporting year should not be included. Trends, Volume 1) to define these agro-ecosystems and specify indicate: None 11 Not Not The papers, web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy the regions where field testing is underway 34 (a) number of women farmers concerned publicized through blog stories, press releases and/or policy the way stakeholders along the impact pathway allocate These are significant decision-support tools, guidelines, and/or Not 41 8 Not (WA+) framework that summarizes water resources conditions and management at the basin level; 6) Probabilistic Intervention Decision Modeling Platform; 7) Global Information and Knowledge Facility for Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Usage 10 2012 estimate derived from Center reporting; 2013-14 not available (unknown) passed for which 16 Not helpful that no distinction is anymore made between \"from developed countries\" and \"from developing countries\" administrative procedures relevant authority) 15 Impossible to tell approximate number of inhabitants in those agro-ecosystems at this stage improved/sustainable agricultural production and marketing from plans, once year. Any technology made available in a previous year should regulations / or revised policy / regulation / administrative procedure by 9 Impossible to analyze within short time-frame practices; sustainable fishing practices; Information technology, who will potentially benefit should be only those made available in the current reporting All 32. Number of policies / : …completed the policy reform process (implementation of new 1 28 integrated solutions to increase eco-efficiency of production systems and enhance ecosystem services and livelihoods; 3) Catalogues of promising RRR business cases and models All 16.Number of trainees in (see above, but for female) Not Not Not management; practices; sustainable land management 1,5,6,7 22. Number of people III) and testing process. Technologies made available for transfer 4) Indicate the potential number of both women and men 5 Estimate: 1) Integrated frameworks for assessment and diagnosis of landscape integrity; 2) Intervention packages and adoption frameworks for spatially-and socially-explicit 1,5,6,7 12. Estimated population of above-mentioned agro-ecosystems Not available Not available 15 Not available available program in the fiscal year and currently participating in another long term training program should be counted only once. fertilizer-use efficiencies; • Management and cultural practices: sustainable water partners globally (phase be as ready for use as it can be as it emerges from the research passed/approved (Stage CRP's recommendations 25 public and private sector multiplication. The technology should have proven benefits and prepared functions as per the Not studies program. A person completing one long term training and environmentally applied, and soil amendments that increase improve ecosystem practices released by administrative procedures regulation / administrative procedure by relevant authority). process, and seed of the new variety should be available for Not the regions concerned training program such as a fellowship program or a post-doctoral • Chemical: Fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides sustainably technologies/NRM the variety must have passed through any required approval regulations / (official approval (legislation/decree) of new or revised policy / incentives for farmers to impact by CRP Trends, Volume 1) to define these agro-ecosystems and specify current fiscal year a long term (degree-seeking) advanced such as vaccines; All, except 2 27.Number of In the case of crop research that developed a new variety, e.g., All 31. Number of policies / : …underwent the fourth stage of the policy reform process establishing positive gender-disaggregated Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus on gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted Not available None 15% 7 agro-ecosystems analysed/characterised cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and available long-term programs program or are currently participating in or have completed in the organic matter levels; and livestock health services and products services and for agro-ecosystems legislation(Stage 3) facilitated by CRP (male) 19 in the current fiscal year from a bachelor's, master's or Ph.D. available available available management practices that increase biotic activity and soil improving ecosystem regions if possible presented for CRP utilised in targeted available 1,5,6,7 11. Number of targeted Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of Not 3 14 3 3 All 15. Number of trainees in The number of people who are currently enrolled in or graduated Not Not Not or high-protein maize, or improved livestock breeds; soil feasible approaches for Trends, Volume 1) to define these agro-ecosystems; identify the administrative procedures policy environment for smallholder-based agriculture.) research outputs from Not CRP (female) supplementation such as vitamin A-rich sweet potatoes or rice, CRP has identified 1,5,6,7 26. Number of published regulations / (policies were presented for legislation/decree to improve the 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and farmers/NRM managers The web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy briefs supporting indicator #1 must have an explicit focus on women value chains analyzed by facilitated by CRP resilient to climate impacts; affordable food-based nutritional ecosystems for which cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, All 30. Number of policies / : … underwent the third stage of the policy reform process between men and women farmers/NRM managers to be counted Not available None 15% 6 Not 1,2,3, 4, 6 10. Number of strategic short-term programs available available available be higher-yielding or higher in nutritional content and/or more 1,5,6,7 21 Number of agro-Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of consultation (Stage 2) decreasing inequality available in ISI journals produced by CRP available available available All 14. Number of trainees in (see above, but for female) Not Not Not biodegradable packaging • Biological: New germplasm (varieties, breeds, etc.) that could ptions that are targeted at public/stakeholder impact 24 innovations/approaches/o drafted and presented for policy / regulation / administrative procedure. gender-disaggregated not included in this indicator All 9. Number of publications Not 158 13 Not Not processing and product handling technologies, including 1,5,6,7 25. % of above administrative procedures consultation with stakeholders on the proposed new or revised been assessed for likely decision-support tools, guidelines and/or training manuals are databases 12 • Mechanical and physical: New land preparation, harvesting, under research that have on gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted regulations / process. The second stage includes public debate and/or field tested (Phase II) that change the way these stakeholders think and act. Tools, of these open access available available available available in the CRP (Phase I) technologies include but are not limited to: All 20. % of technologies Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus All 29. Number of policies / ….. ……that underwent the second stage of the policy reform developed and are being resources and/or implement activities. They should be products CRP All 8. Total number of users Not Not Not Not technologies/NRM practices under research NRM-related technologies and innovations including those that address climate change adaptation and mitigation. Relevant an explicit target of level have been year -don't double count for the same policy. women farmers 23 women farmers/NRM managers to be counted Please count the highest stage completed during the reporting research improvement at system briefs. They are significant in that they should be likely to change databases maintained by available available All 18. Number of Technologies to be counted here are agriculture-related and 10 22 10 under research that have briefs supporting indicator #x must have an explicit focus on and options for as a result of CRP 34(b) number of male farmers concerned indicator All All All All 1,5,6,7 All KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA facilitated by CRP (male) stakeholder R4D innovation platforms practices field tested 28. Numbers of Policies/ 33. Number of hectares (phase II) 27 Regulations/ under improved 5. % of tools that have an established for the Administrative Procedures technologies or explicit target of women farmers targeted agro-ecosystems Analyzed (Stage 1) management practices as 6. % of tools assessed for by the CRPs 24. Number of agro-a result of CRP research ecosystems for which 34. Number of farmers All 1. Number of flagship \"products\" produced by CRP likely gender-innovations (technologies, and others who have disaggregated impact All 7. Number of open access TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN policies, practices, applied new technologies VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT All 19. % of technologies integrative approaches) or management practices All 2. % of flagship products produced that have explicit target of women All 3. % of flagship products produced that have been assessed for likely All 4. Number of \"tools\" for nutrient, water and energy; 4) Demonstrated technical performance of underground solutions and wetlands in terms of mitigation of flood risks (UTF); 5) Water Accounting more than 10% away available available Indicate the regions where this is occurring and whether the application of technologies is on a new or continuing area from target) Target (if available for 2012) Actual Target The web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy briefs Not Not Not Not Target supporting indicator #4 must have an explicit focus on women farmers/NRM managers to be counted available available available available New technologies or management practices under research 9 Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus Not counted should be only those under research in the current Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of 15% 10 Not Not reporting year. Any new technology or management practice cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, Indicate the regions where this is occurring and whether the These are frameworks and concepts that are significant and complete enough to have been highlighted on web pages, Not available None 7 5 on gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted available available available under research in a previous year but not under research in the 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and application of technologies is on a new or continuing area and Not available None reporting year should not be included. Trends, Volume 1) to define these agro-ecosystems and specify indicate: None 11 Not Not The papers, web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy the regions where field testing is underway 34 (a) number of women farmers concerned publicized through blog stories, press releases and/or policy the way stakeholders along the impact pathway allocate These are significant decision-support tools, guidelines, and/or Not 41 8 Not (WA+) framework that summarizes water resources conditions and management at the basin level; 6) Probabilistic Intervention Decision Modeling Platform; 7) Global Information and Knowledge Facility for Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Usage 10 2012 estimate derived from Center reporting; 2013-14 not available (unknown) passed for which 16 Not helpful that no distinction is anymore made between \"from developed countries\" and \"from developing countries\" administrative procedures relevant authority) 15 Impossible to tell approximate number of inhabitants in those agro-ecosystems at this stage improved/sustainable agricultural production and marketing from plans, once year. Any technology made available in a previous year should regulations / or revised policy / regulation / administrative procedure by 9 Impossible to analyze within short time-frame practices; sustainable fishing practices; Information technology, who will potentially benefit should be only those made available in the current reporting All 32. Number of policies / : …completed the policy reform process (implementation of new 1 28 integrated solutions to increase eco-efficiency of production systems and enhance ecosystem services and livelihoods; 3) Catalogues of promising RRR business cases and models All 16.Number of trainees in (see above, but for female) Not Not Not management; practices; sustainable land management 1,5,6,7 22. Number of people III) and testing process. Technologies made available for transfer 4) Indicate the potential number of both women and men 5 Estimate: 1) Integrated frameworks for assessment and diagnosis of landscape integrity; 2) Intervention packages and adoption frameworks for spatially-and socially-explicit 1,5,6,7 12. Estimated population of above-mentioned agro-ecosystems Not available Not available 15 Not available available program in the fiscal year and currently participating in another long term training program should be counted only once. fertilizer-use efficiencies; • Management and cultural practices: sustainable water partners globally (phase be as ready for use as it can be as it emerges from the research passed/approved (Stage CRP's recommendations 25 public and private sector multiplication. The technology should have proven benefits and prepared functions as per the Not studies program. A person completing one long term training and environmentally applied, and soil amendments that increase improve ecosystem practices released by administrative procedures regulation / administrative procedure by relevant authority). process, and seed of the new variety should be available for Not the regions concerned training program such as a fellowship program or a post-doctoral • Chemical: Fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides sustainably technologies/NRM the variety must have passed through any required approval regulations / (official approval (legislation/decree) of new or revised policy / incentives for farmers to impact by CRP Trends, Volume 1) to define these agro-ecosystems and specify current fiscal year a long term (degree-seeking) advanced such as vaccines; All, except 2 27.Number of In the case of crop research that developed a new variety, e.g., All 31. Number of policies / : …underwent the fourth stage of the policy reform process establishing positive gender-disaggregated Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus on gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted Not available None 15% 7 agro-ecosystems analysed/characterised cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and available long-term programs program or are currently participating in or have completed in the organic matter levels; and livestock health services and products services and for agro-ecosystems legislation(Stage 3) facilitated by CRP (male) 19 in the current fiscal year from a bachelor's, master's or Ph.D. available available available management practices that increase biotic activity and soil improving ecosystem regions if possible presented for CRP utilised in targeted available 1,5,6,7 11. Number of targeted Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of Not 3 14 3 3 All 15. Number of trainees in The number of people who are currently enrolled in or graduated Not Not Not or high-protein maize, or improved livestock breeds; soil feasible approaches for Trends, Volume 1) to define these agro-ecosystems; identify the administrative procedures policy environment for smallholder-based agriculture.) research outputs from Not CRP (female) supplementation such as vitamin A-rich sweet potatoes or rice, CRP has identified 1,5,6,7 26. Number of published regulations / (policies were presented for legislation/decree to improve the 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and farmers/NRM managers The web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy briefs supporting indicator #1 must have an explicit focus on women value chains analyzed by facilitated by CRP resilient to climate impacts; affordable food-based nutritional ecosystems for which cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, All 30. Number of policies / : … underwent the third stage of the policy reform process between men and women farmers/NRM managers to be counted Not available None 15% 6 Not 1,2,3, 4, 6 10. Number of strategic short-term programs available available available be higher-yielding or higher in nutritional content and/or more 1,5,6,7 21 Number of agro-Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of consultation (Stage 2) decreasing inequality available in ISI journals produced by CRP available available available All 14. Number of trainees in (see above, but for female) Not Not Not biodegradable packaging • Biological: New germplasm (varieties, breeds, etc.) that could ptions that are targeted at public/stakeholder impact 24 innovations/approaches/o drafted and presented for policy / regulation / administrative procedure. gender-disaggregated not included in this indicator All 9. Number of publications Not 158 13 Not Not processing and product handling technologies, including 1,5,6,7 25. % of above administrative procedures consultation with stakeholders on the proposed new or revised been assessed for likely decision-support tools, guidelines and/or training manuals are databases 12 • Mechanical and physical: New land preparation, harvesting, under research that have on gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted regulations / process. The second stage includes public debate and/or field tested (Phase II) that change the way these stakeholders think and act. Tools, of these open access available available available available in the CRP (Phase I) technologies include but are not limited to: All 20. % of technologies Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus All 29. Number of policies / ….. ……that underwent the second stage of the policy reform developed and are being resources and/or implement activities. They should be products CRP All 8. Total number of users Not Not Not Not technologies/NRM practices under research NRM-related technologies and innovations including those that address climate change adaptation and mitigation. Relevant an explicit target of level have been year -don't double count for the same policy. women farmers 23 women farmers/NRM managers to be counted Please count the highest stage completed during the reporting research improvement at system briefs. They are significant in that they should be likely to change databases maintained by available available All 18. Number of Technologies to be counted here are agriculture-related and 10 22 10 under research that have briefs supporting indicator #x must have an explicit focus on and options for as a result of CRP 34(b) number of male farmers concerned 28 NIMF within the 5 year plan for the Government of India.    28 NIMF within the 5 year plan for the Government of India.     20 20  "},{"text":"Annex 3: Consolidated Financial Report here are illustrative only, and are in USD 000's Section (a) is cumulative -includes financial plan of current year as well as those of prior years. Section (b) is cumulative -refers to all costs since inception, not just current year. Section (c) amounts are the differences between Sections (a) and (b). Report Description L101              Report Description L101 Name of Report Report Description L106 CRP Cumuative Financial Summary            Name of Report Report Description L106 CRP Cumuative Financial Summary Reporting Line Name of Report Lead Center Report to Consortium Office CRP Annual Funding Summary Frequency/Period Every 6 months Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office         Reporting Line Name of Report Lead Center Report to Consortium Office CRP Annual Funding Summary Frequency/Period Every 6 months Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months            Frequency/Period Every 6 months Period 1 January 2012 -31 December 2012  CRP Nr 5 : CRP on Water, Land and Ecosystems       Period1 January 2012 -31 December 2012CRP Nr 5 : CRP on Water, Land and Ecosystems Period  (a) Cumulative budget per annual financial plans. 1 January 2012 -  (b) Actual Expenses -Cumulative  (c) Variance -Cumulative Period(a) Cumulative budget per annual financial plans. 1 January 2012 -(b) Actual Expenses -Cumulative(c) Variance -Cumulative   Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total WindowsWindowBilateralCenterTotalWindowsWindowBilateralCenterTotalWindowsWindowBilateralCenterTotal   1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding 1 & 23fundingfundsFunding1 & 23fundingfundsFunding1 & 23fundingfundsFunding Africa Rice  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Africa Rice--------------- Bioversity  1,920 - 934 - 2,854 1,919 - 580 - 2,500 1 - 354 - 354 Bioversity1,920-934-2,8541,919-580-2,5001-354-354 CIAT  1,088 - 8,785 - 9,873 1,064 - 8,136 - 9,200 24 - 648 - 672 CIAT1,088-8,785-9,8731,064-8,136-9,20024-648-672 CIFOR  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIFOR--------------- CIMMYT  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIMMYT--------------- CIP  426 - - - 426 394 - - - 394 32 - - - 32 CIP426---426394---39432---32 ICARDA  980 - 1,770 - 2,750 773 253 1,602 - 2,627 207 (253) 168 - 123 ICARDA980-1,770-2,7507732531,602-2,627207(253)168-123 ICRISAT  1,050 - 1,526 - 2,576 1,047 - 939 - 1,986 3 - 587 - 590 ICRISAT1,050-1,526-2,5761,047-939-1,9863-587-590 IFPRI  1,225 - 638 - 1,863 453 - 487 1 941 772 - 151 (1) 921 IFPRI1,225-638-1,863453-4871941772-151(1)921 IITA  230 1,055 1,626 - 2,911 230 1,403 1,601 - 3,234 - (348) 25 - (323) IITA2301,0551,626-2,9112301,4031,601-3,234-(348)25-(323) ILRI  196 - - - 196 196 - 174 - 370 0 - (174) - (174) ILRI196---196196-174-3700-(174)-(174) IRRI  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IRRI--------------- IWMI  20,340 5,196 20,771 -46,307 14,673 4,306 11,927 -30,905 5,667 891 8,844 -15,402 IWMI20,3405,196 20,771-46,30714,6734,306 11,927-30,9055,6678918,844-15,402 World Agroforestry 1,440 - 3,355 471 5,266 1,440 - 1,523 127 3,091 (0) - 1,832 344 2,175 World Agroforestry1,440-3,3554715,2661,440-1,5231273,091(0)-1,8323442,175 World Fish  170 - 26 25 222 170 - 52 3 226 - - (26) 22 (4) World Fish170-2625222170-523226--(26)22(4) Totals for CRP 29,064 6,251 39,430 496 75,243 22,359 5,961 27,023 132 55,474 6,705 291 12,408 365 19,769 Totals for CRP29,0646,251 39,430496 75,24322,3595,961 27,023132 55,4746,70529112,408365 19,769   39% 8% 52% 1% 100% 30% 8% 36% 0% 74% 34% 1% 63% 2% 100% 39%8%52%1% 100%30%8%36%0%74%34%1%63%2% 100%  "},{"text":"31 December 2012 CRP Nr 5 : CRP on Water, Land and Ecosystems PART 1 -Annual FINANCE PLAN (Totals for Windows 1 and 2 combined)  China CIAT OPEC Report Description OXFAM Name of Report Reporting Line L111 CRP Annual Financial Summary Lead Center Report to Consortium Office 29 - -- -405 98 25 China CIAT OPEC Report Description OXFAM Name of Report Reporting LineL111 CRP Annual Financial Summary Lead Center Report to Consortium Office29 ----405 98 25 CIC CIRAD PN Frequency/Period PRODERN CRP Every 6 months -- -- 82 28 58 36 CIC CIRAD PN Frequency/Period PRODERN CRPEvery 6 months----82 28 58 36 Coca Cola ROCKFELLER  - - 106 220 Coca Cola ROCKFELLER--106 220 Concern Worlwide Sir Ratan Tata Trust - - 126 90 Concern Worlwide Sir Ratan Tata Trust--126 90 DFID SM  - - 24 93 DFID SM--24 93 DFID/ICRAF Stockholm Environment Institute - - 7 17 DFID/ICRAF Stockholm Environment Institute--7 17 DFID/NERC Sweden  - - 105 171 DFID/NERC Sweden--105 171 EC Switzerland  -1,358 362 2,664 4,023 EC Switzerland-1,358362 2,6644,023 Approved Level for Year -Initial Approval EC/IFAD TCF 1,446 - -39 1,446 Approved Level for Year -Initial Approval EC/IFAD TCF1,446--391,446 Approved Level for Year -Final Amount EcoAgriculture The McKnight Foundation - - 41 18 29,064 Approved Level for Year -Final Amount EcoAgriculture The McKnight Foundation--41 1829,064 Emory University the Netherlands  - - 9 771 Emory University the Netherlands--9 771 FAO TOO Kurylys Servis BKK, Kazakhstan PART 2 -Funding Summary for Year FIBL UNEP Only the W3 & Bilateral Component completed GDN UNEP-GEF CRP 2012 Actual Funding ------GIZ -UNESCO-IHE - 359 3 18 174 5 24 601 12 FAO TOO Kurylys Servis BKK, Kazakhstan PART 2 -Funding Summary for Year FIBL UNEP Only the W3 & Bilateral Component completed GDN UNEP-GEF CRP 2012 Actual Funding ------GIZ -UNESCO-IHE -359 3 18 174 5 24 601 12 Window 1 Window 2 United Nations University Government of Finland W1 Donors ACF ACIAR ADA ADB AFDB AFESD AGRA ASARECA AusAID Balochistan BMGF Government of India University of Yale Government of South Africa ICAR USAID ICRISAT Wageningen University IDRC WFC IFAD WORLD BANK IFAR WOTRO IFPRI (USAID) WUR IITA WWF International Water and Sanitation Centre Other Funds Italy JAPAN JICA Totals for CRP --CNADA/CIDA CAR CARE CCF Challenge Program Khon Kaen University (KKU) MARS Notes MBE All figures shown here are illustrative only, and are in USD 000's Window 3 Bilateral funding -309 -10 -25 29 1,002 -141 -158 -135 -156 -1,112 -91 -1,759 -27 1,403 5,333 80 545 -1 49 --1,532 483 7 --1,487 81 --147 108 -2,226 -141 --2 1 --2,808 478 --10 66 --154 9 ---367 ---336 -5,961 27,023 32,983 Total Funding -25 1,031 141 158 135 156 1,112 91 1,759 27 2,015 1,487 2,226 2,808 33 6,735 34 -34 -124 124 -62 62 -77 77 -31 31 -13 -140 -5 Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences -Amount shown for Window 1 donors is total, as these funds are co-mingled 7 Norway -Amounts shown for Window 2 donors are as per Report L411. 24 Amounts shown for Window 3 donors are as per Report L201 Window 1 Window 2 United Nations University Government of Finland W1 Donors ACF ACIAR ADA ADB AFDB AFESD AGRA ASARECA AusAID Balochistan BMGF Government of India University of Yale Government of South Africa ICAR USAID ICRISAT Wageningen University IDRC WFC IFAD WORLD BANK IFAR WOTRO IFPRI (USAID) WUR IITA WWF International Water and Sanitation Centre Other Funds Italy JAPAN JICA Totals for CRP --CNADA/CIDA CAR CARE CCF Challenge Program Khon Kaen University (KKU) MARS Notes MBE All figures shown here are illustrative only, and are in USD 000's Window 3 Bilateral funding -309 -10 -25 29 1,002 -141 -158 -135 -156 -1,112 -91 -1,759 -27 1,403 5,333 80 545 -1 49 --1,532 483 7 --1,487 81 --147 108 -2,226 -141 --2 1 --2,808 478 --10 66 --154 9 ---367 ---336 -5,961 27,023 32,983 Total Funding -25 1,031 141 158 135 156 1,112 91 1,759 27 2,015 1,487 2,226 2,808 33 6,735 34 -34 -124 124 -62 62 -77 77 -31 31 -13 -140 -5 Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences -Amount shown for Window 1 donors is total, as these funds are co-mingled 7 Norway -Amounts shown for Window 2 donors are as per Report L411. 24 Amounts shown for Window 3 donors are as per Report L201 Amounts shown for Bilateral funding are as per Report L201   Amounts shown for Bilateral funding are as per Report L201  "},{"text":"Nr 5 : CRP on Water, Land and Ecosystems Period 1 January 2012 -31 December 2012 (a) CRP2012 Fin plan approved budget (b) CRP 2012 Expenditure (c) Variance this Year  Report Description L121               Report Description L121 Name of Report CRP Financial Report -Expenditure by natural classification (by Center)          Name of ReportCRP Financial Report -Expenditure by natural classification (by Center) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office            Reporting LineLead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months              Frequency/Period Every 6 months CRP                CRP   Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Window Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total WindowsWindowBilateralCenterTotalWindowWindowBilateralCenterTotalWindowsWindowBilateralCenterTotal   1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding s 1 & 3 funding funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding 1 & 23fundingfundsFundings 1 &3fundingfundsFunding1 & 23fundingfundsFunding        2         2 Africa Rice  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Africa Rice--------------- Bioversity  1,920 - 934 - 2,854 1,919 - 580 - 2,500 1 - 354 - 354 Bioversity1,920-934-2,8541,919-580-2,5001-354-354 CIAT  1,088 - 8,785 - 9,873 1,064 - 8,136 - 9,200 24 - 648 - 672 CIAT1,088-8,785-9,8731,064-8,136-9,20024-648-672 CIFOR  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIFOR--------------- CIMMYT  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIMMYT--------------- CIP  426 - - - 426 394 - - - 394 32 - - - 32 CIP426---426394---39432---32 ICARDA  980 - 1,770 - 2,750 773 253 1,602 - 2,627 207 (253) 168 - 123 ICARDA980-1,770-2,7507732531,602-2,627207(253)168-123 ICRISAT  1,050 - 1,526 - 2,576 1,047 - 939 - 1,986 3 - 587 - 590 ICRISAT1,050-1,526-2,5761,047-939-1,9863-587-590 IFPRI  1,225 - 638 - 1,863 453 - 487 1 941 772 - 151 (1) 921 IFPRI1,225-638-1,863453-4871941772-151(1)921 IITA  230 1,055 1,626 - 2,911 230 1,403 1,601 - 3,234 - (348) 25 - (323) IITA2301,0551,626-2,9112301,4031,601-3,234-(348)25-(323) ILRI  196 - - - 196 196 - 174 - 370 0 - (174) - (174) ILRI196---196196-174-3700-(174)-(174) IRRI  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IRRI--------------- IWMI  20,340 5,196 20,771 -46,307 14,673 4,306 11,927 -30,905 5,667 891 8,844 - 15,402 IWMI20,3405,196 20,771-46,30714,6734,306 11,927-30,9055,6678918,844-15,402 World Agroforestry 1,440 - 3,355 471 5,266 1,440 - 1,523 127 3,091 (0) - 1,832 344 2,175 World Agroforestry1,440-3,3554715,2661,440-1,5231273,091(0)-1,8323442,175 World Fish  170 - 26 25 222 170 - 52 3 226 - - (26) 22 (4) World Fish170-2625222170-523226--(26)22(4) Totals for CRP  29,064 6,251 39,430 496 75,243 22,359 5,961 27,023 132 55,474 6,705 291 12,408 365 19,769 Totals for CRP29,0646,251 39,430496 75,24322,3595,961 27,023132 55,4746,70529112,40836519,769   147% 32% 199% 3% 381% 113% 30% 137% 1% 281% 34% 1% 63% 2% 100% 147%32%199%3% 381%113%30% 137%1%281%34%1%63%2%100%  "},{"text":"Nr 5 : CRP on Water, Land and Ecosystems  Report Description L131              Report DescriptionL131 Name of Report  CRP Themes Report (by Center, and Funding Source)            Name of ReportCRP Themes Report (by Center, and Funding Source) Reporting Line  Lead Center Report to Consortium Office             Reporting LineLead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period  Every 6 months              Frequency/PeriodEvery 6 months CRP                CRP Period 1 January 2012 -31 December 2012              Period1 January 2012 -31 December 2012    Annual Budget     Actual Expenses -This Year    Unspent Budget Annual BudgetActual Expenses -This YearUnspent Budget   Windows 1 Window Bilateral Center Total Windows 1 Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Windows 1WindowBilateralCenterTotalWindows 1WindowBilateralCenterTotalWindowsWindowBilateralCenterTotal   and 2 Funds 3 funding Funds  and 2 Funds 3 funding Funds  1 and 2 3 funding Funds and 2 Funds3fundingFundsand 2 Funds3fundingFunds1 and 23fundingFunds              Funds   Funds Total CRP                Total CRP Personnel   13,258 1,308 11,310 410 26,286 8,328 1,144 6,990 82 16,545 4,930 164 4,320 328 9,741 Personnel13,2581,30811,31041026,2868,3281,1446,99082 16,5454,9301644,320328 9,741 Collaborator Costs -CGIAR Centers - 1,913 1,998 - 3,911 1,918 988 554 - 3,460 (1,918) 925 1,444 - 451 Collaborator Costs -CGIAR Centers-1,9131,998-3,9111,918988554-3,460(1,918)9251,444-451 Collaborator Costs -Partners 4,257 1,365 12,106 - 17,729 3,123 1,803 6,875 0 11,801 1,135 (437) 5,231 (0) 5,928 Collaborator Costs -Partners4,2571,36512,106-17,7293,1231,8036,8750 11,8011,135(437)5,231(0) 5,928 Supplies and Services  6,260 967 6,886 14 14,128 4,339 915 7,628 20 12,902 1,921 52 (741) (6) 1,225 Supplies and Services6,2609676,8861414,1284,3399157,62820 12,9021,92152(741)(6) 1,225 Operational Travel  1,576 344 2,642 8 4,570 990 442 1,824 28 3,284 586 (98) 819 (20) 1,286 Operational Travel1,5763442,64284,5709904421,824283,284586(98)819(20) 1,286 Depreciation   387 55 857 - 1,299 195 87 413 - 695 192 (32) 444 - 604 Depreciation38755857-1,29919587413-695192(32)444-604 Sub-total of Direct Costs 25,739 5,952 35,800 432 67,924 18,893 5,379 24,284 131 48,687 6,846 573 11,517 301 19,236 Sub-total of Direct Costs25,7395,95235,80043267,92418,8935,37924,284131 48,6876,84657311,517301 19,236 Indirect Costs  3,326 299 3,630 64 7,319 3,466 581 2,739 1 6,787 (140) (282) 891 64 533 Indirect Costs3,3262993,630647,3193,4665812,73916,787(140)(282)89164533 Total -all Costs  29,064 6,251 39,430 496 75,243 22,359 5,961 27,023 132 55,474 6,705 291 12,408 365 19,769 Total -all Costs29,0646,25139,43049675,24322,3595,96127,023132 55,4746,70529112,408365 19,769         - 76 95 - 172 8 (76) 20 - (49) -7695-1728(76)20-(49) Sub-total of Direct Costs 196 930 1,485 - 2,611 196 1,256 1,435 - 2,886 0 (326) 50 -(275) Sub-total of Direct Costs1969301,485-2,6111961,2561,435-2,8860(326)50-(275) Indirect Costs  34 125 141 - 300 34 147 167 - 348 (0) (22) (26) - (48) Indirect Costs34125141-30034147167-348(0)(22)(26)-(48) Total -all Costs  230 1,055 1,626 - 2,911 230 1,403 1,601 - 3,234 0 (348) 25 -(323) Total -all Costs2301,0551,626-2,9112301,4031,601-3,2340(348)25-(323)  "},{"text":"Nr 5 : CRP on Water, Land and Ecosystems Period 1 January 2012 -31 December 2012  Report Description     Report Description Annual Budget Bilateral funding Center funds 7,433 -13,123 -1,527 -10,582 25 6,767 471 --39,431 496 -565 -829 -131 -245 -IWMI Actual Expenses this Year Unspent Budget Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral funding Center funds Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral funding CRP Report -by Themes SRP 1: Irrigation 6,084 1,065 14,581 4,228 876 6,275 1 11,380 1,856 189 1,157 SRP 2: Rainfed 7,344 2,175 22,642 6,270 2,375 11,309 -19,955 1,074 (200) 1,814 SRP 3: RRR 1,048 1,000 3,575 962 34 1,320 -2,316 86 966 206 SRP 4: River Basins 6,825 2,010 19,443 6,110 1,389 4,498 3 12,000 714 621 6,084 SRP 5: Information 3,085 -10,322 3,179 1,287 3,619 127 8,212 (94) (1,287) 3,147 CRP Management/Coordination 4,680 -4,680 1,609 ---1,609 3,070 --Totals for CRP 29,064 6,250 75,243 22,359 5,961 27,022 132 55,473 6,705 290 12,409 ICARDA SRP 1: Irrigation 210 -775 204 127 754 -1,084 6 (127) (189) Center funds (1) --22 344 -365 SRP 2: Rainfed 521 -1,350 372 126 333 -831 149 (126) 496 SRP 3: RRR 144 -275 117 -448 -565 27 -(317) SRP 4: River Basins 105 -350 80 -67 -148 25 SRP 1: Irrigation 5,153 1,065 6,299 -12,517 3,533 749 5,102 -9,384 1,620 316 1,197 SRP 2: Rainfed 2,493 1,120 161 -3,774 1,542 847 233 -2,622 951 273 (72) SRP 3: RRR 668 1,000 1,215 -2,883 845 34 873 -1,752 (177) 966 342 SRP 4: River Basins 5,888 2,010 10,301 -18,200 5,501 1,389 4,204 -11,094 387 621 6,097 SRP 5: Information 1,458 -2,796 -4,254 1,642 1,287 1,515 -4,444 (184) (1,287) 1,281 CRP Management/Coordination 4,680 ---4,680 1,609 ---1,609 3,070 --Total -all Costs 20,340 5,195 20,772 -46,307 14,673 4,306 11,927 -30,905 5,667 890 8,845 Report Description Name of Report CRP Financial Report -Bilateral Grants (by Center) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months CRP Nr 5 : CRP on Water, Land and Ecosystems Period 1 January 2012 -31 December 2012 Annual Budget Actual Expenses this Year Variance Totals for CRP Window 3 ACIAR -29 (29) BMGF 2,055 1,403 652 CANADA/CIDA 57 34 23 China -29 (29) EC/IFAD 2,738 1,446 1,292 Government of India -80 (80) South Africa -49 (49) Switzerland 1,400 1,358 42 USAID -1,532 (1,532) Sub-total 6,250 5,961 OPEC 99 1 B/F & Stability B/F & Stability 3,749 3,595 290 Expenditure EC 400 38 EcoAgriculture 46 5 Emory University 9 FAO 634 FIBL 42 GDN 19 GEF 56 -GIZ 481 Government of Finland 826 Government of India 532 Government of Irish 39 -ICAR 54 ICRISAT 43 IDRC 414 IFAD 3,220 2,226 994 IFAR -(1) IFPRI (USAID) 580 102 IITA -(66) International Water and Sanitation Centre -(9) Italy 367 -JAPAN 364 28 JICA 50 17 Khon Kaen University (KKU) 13 -MARS 424 283 MBE 5 -Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences -(7) Norway 49 24 Sub-total -Window 3 --Association for Strengthening of Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa ASARECA 124 Government of India GOI 532 International Development Research Centre IDRC 313 Cococola Foundation CCF 59 Sabmiller SM 52 Action Contre la Faim ACF 26 Chllenge Program Water and Food CPWF 420 -Sub-total -Bilateral 1,526 WWF WWF 10 -587 WOTRO WOTRO 13 12 420 WORLD BANK WORLD BANK 114 (17) 1 USAID USAID 1,297 1,092 (41) University of Yale University of Yale -(1) (18) United Nations University United Nations University 10 -205 UNESCO-IHE UNESCO-IHE -(12) (13) UNESCO UNESCO 11 -11 33 TOO Kurylys Servis BKK, Kazakhstan TOO Kurylys Servis BKK, Kazakhstan 6 2 Bilateral Switzerland Switzerland 3,320 2,664 655 -Sweden Sweden 231 61 -Stockholm Environment Institute Stockholm Environment Institute 17 0 Window 3 Sir Ratan Tata Trust Sir Ratan Tata Trust 94 4 ICRISAT ROCKFELLER ROCKFELLER 220 -306 OXFAM OXFAM 25 0 (38) Totals for CRP -ICARDA 1,770 1,855 (85) OPEC OPEC 99 1 47 Norway Norway 49 24 39 Sub-total -Bilateral 1,770 1,602 168 Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences -(7) (13) Coca Cola Foundation Coca Cola 106 -Netherlands Netherlands 942 203 517 United States Agency for International Development USAID 463 253 Khon Kaen University (KKU) Khon Kaen University (KKU) 13 -(120) Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development AFESD 156 -Japan Japan 189 54 56 International Fund for Agricultural Development IFAD 100 (30) International Water and Sanitation Centre International Water and Sanitation Centre -(9) 14 Government of Italy Italy 367 -IFPRI (USAID) IFPRI (USAID) 580 102 23 Australian Center for International Agricultural Research ACIAR 436 (55) IFAR Nourishing Scientific Excellence through the CGIAR IFAR -(1) 275 Austrian Development Agency ADA 141 (0) International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) IFAD 2,890 1,789 1,101 -ICARDA Name of Report CRP Funding Statement, Windows 1 and 2 Window 3 USAID USAID -The Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FIBL 42 23 Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office (253) Sub-total -Window 3 -Government of Finland Finland -(66) Frequency/Period Every 3 months (253) Bilateral Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GIZ 209 (246) Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) ICAR 54 47 CRP Total Funding 3,201 2,688 1,258 7,442 2,110 3,070 19,769 -(309) -519 -(290) -3,133 -1,151 -1,131 -7,106 -(190) -3,070 -15,402 Annual Budget Bilateral funding Center funds 7,433 -13,123 -1,527 -10,582 25 6,767 471 --39,431 496 -565 -829 -131 -245 -IWMI Actual Expenses this Year Unspent Budget Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral funding Center funds Total Funding Windows 1 & 2 Window 3 Bilateral funding CRP Report -by Themes SRP 1: Irrigation 6,084 1,065 14,581 4,228 876 6,275 1 11,380 1,856 189 1,157 SRP 2: Rainfed 7,344 2,175 22,642 6,270 2,375 11,309 -19,955 1,074 (200) 1,814 SRP 3: RRR 1,048 1,000 3,575 962 34 1,320 -2,316 86 966 206 SRP 4: River Basins 6,825 2,010 19,443 6,110 1,389 4,498 3 12,000 714 621 6,084 SRP 5: Information 3,085 -10,322 3,179 1,287 3,619 127 8,212 (94) (1,287) 3,147 CRP Management/Coordination 4,680 -4,680 1,609 ---1,609 3,070 --Totals for CRP 29,064 6,250 75,243 22,359 5,961 27,022 132 55,473 6,705 290 12,409 ICARDA SRP 1: Irrigation 210 -775 204 127 754 -1,084 6 (127) (189) Center funds (1) --22 344 -365 SRP 2: Rainfed 521 -1,350 372 126 333 -831 149 (126) 496 SRP 3: RRR 144 -275 117 -448 -565 27 -(317) SRP 4: River Basins 105 -350 80 -67 -148 25 SRP 1: Irrigation 5,153 1,065 6,299 -12,517 3,533 749 5,102 -9,384 1,620 316 1,197 SRP 2: Rainfed 2,493 1,120 161 -3,774 1,542 847 233 -2,622 951 273 (72) SRP 3: RRR 668 1,000 1,215 -2,883 845 34 873 -1,752 (177) 966 342 SRP 4: River Basins 5,888 2,010 10,301 -18,200 5,501 1,389 4,204 -11,094 387 621 6,097 SRP 5: Information 1,458 -2,796 -4,254 1,642 1,287 1,515 -4,444 (184) (1,287) 1,281 CRP Management/Coordination 4,680 ---4,680 1,609 ---1,609 3,070 --Total -all Costs 20,340 5,195 20,772 -46,307 14,673 4,306 11,927 -30,905 5,667 890 8,845 Report Description Name of Report CRP Financial Report -Bilateral Grants (by Center) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months CRP Nr 5 : CRP on Water, Land and Ecosystems Period 1 January 2012 -31 December 2012 Annual Budget Actual Expenses this Year Variance Totals for CRP Window 3 ACIAR -29 (29) BMGF 2,055 1,403 652 CANADA/CIDA 57 34 23 China -29 (29) EC/IFAD 2,738 1,446 1,292 Government of India -80 (80) South Africa -49 (49) Switzerland 1,400 1,358 42 USAID -1,532 (1,532) Sub-total 6,250 5,961 OPEC 99 1 B/F & Stability B/F & Stability 3,749 3,595 290 Expenditure EC 400 38 EcoAgriculture 46 5 Emory University 9 FAO 634 FIBL 42 GDN 19 GEF 56 -GIZ 481 Government of Finland 826 Government of India 532 Government of Irish 39 -ICAR 54 ICRISAT 43 IDRC 414 IFAD 3,220 2,226 994 IFAR -(1) IFPRI (USAID) 580 102 IITA -(66) International Water and Sanitation Centre -(9) Italy 367 -JAPAN 364 28 JICA 50 17 Khon Kaen University (KKU) 13 -MARS 424 283 MBE 5 -Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences -(7) Norway 49 24 Sub-total -Window 3 --Association for Strengthening of Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa ASARECA 124 Government of India GOI 532 International Development Research Centre IDRC 313 Cococola Foundation CCF 59 Sabmiller SM 52 Action Contre la Faim ACF 26 Chllenge Program Water and Food CPWF 420 -Sub-total -Bilateral 1,526 WWF WWF 10 -587 WOTRO WOTRO 13 12 420 WORLD BANK WORLD BANK 114 (17) 1 USAID USAID 1,297 1,092 (41) University of Yale University of Yale -(1) (18) United Nations University United Nations University 10 -205 UNESCO-IHE UNESCO-IHE -(12) (13) UNESCO UNESCO 11 -11 33 TOO Kurylys Servis BKK, Kazakhstan TOO Kurylys Servis BKK, Kazakhstan 6 2 Bilateral Switzerland Switzerland 3,320 2,664 655 -Sweden Sweden 231 61 -Stockholm Environment Institute Stockholm Environment Institute 17 0 Window 3 Sir Ratan Tata Trust Sir Ratan Tata Trust 94 4 ICRISAT ROCKFELLER ROCKFELLER 220 -306 OXFAM OXFAM 25 0 (38) Totals for CRP -ICARDA 1,770 1,855 (85) OPEC OPEC 99 1 47 Norway Norway 49 24 39 Sub-total -Bilateral 1,770 1,602 168 Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences -(7) (13) Coca Cola Foundation Coca Cola 106 -Netherlands Netherlands 942 203 517 United States Agency for International Development USAID 463 253 Khon Kaen University (KKU) Khon Kaen University (KKU) 13 -(120) Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development AFESD 156 -Japan Japan 189 54 56 International Fund for Agricultural Development IFAD 100 (30) International Water and Sanitation Centre International Water and Sanitation Centre -(9) 14 Government of Italy Italy 367 -IFPRI (USAID) IFPRI (USAID) 580 102 23 Australian Center for International Agricultural Research ACIAR 436 (55) IFAR Nourishing Scientific Excellence through the CGIAR IFAR -(1) 275 Austrian Development Agency ADA 141 (0) International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) IFAD 2,890 1,789 1,101 -ICARDA Name of Report CRP Funding Statement, Windows 1 and 2 Window 3 USAID USAID -The Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FIBL 42 23 Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office (253) Sub-total -Window 3 -Government of Finland Finland -(66) Frequency/Period Every 3 months (253) Bilateral Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GIZ 209 (246) Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) ICAR 54 47 CRPTotal Funding 3,201 2,688 1,258 7,442 2,110 3,070 19,769 -(309) -519 -(290) -3,133 -1,151 -1,131 -7,106 -(190) -3,070 -15,402 IFPRI OXFAM Totals for CRP -ICRISAT Bilateral ACF PN ACIAR ADA ADB AFDB AFESD AGRA ASARECA AusAID Balochistan BMGF CAR CARE CCF Challenge Program China Academy of Science Sub-total -Bilateral CIAT CIC CIRAD Coca Cola Concern Worlwide WFC Wageningen University USAID University of Yale Totals for CRP -IFPRI United Nations University UNESCO-IHE Sub-total -Bilateral UNESCO ICRAF UNEP-GEF WorldFish UNEP Leibniz Institute TOO Kurylys Servis BKK, Kazakhstan Natural Environment Research Council the Netherlands Asian Development Bank The McKnight Foundation Government of German TCF GDN Switzerland IWMI (BMGF) Sweden Japan International Corporation Stockholm Environment Institute Bilateral SM Sub-total -Window 3 Sir Ratan Tata Trust ROCKFELLER Window 3 PRODERN Totals for CRP -IWMI DFID/ICRAF WFC GIZ/Leibniz DFID/NERC ADB GIZ GDN IWMI (BMGF) JICA 25 1,526 20,772 26 58 1,283 141 242 150 156 1,715 124 3,803 27 5,769 201 62 59 33 30 434 105 28 106 200 229 1,246 1,842 -638 10 -638 11 11 375 17 -10 6 136 942 197 18 43 -19 3,420 155 231 50 17 52 -94 220 61 25,967 11,927 1,002 25 141 158 135 156 1,112 91 1,759 27 5,333 124 62 77 31 -405 82 28 106 126 1,487 --2,664 -16,232 0 587 (0) 1 74 83 (242) 8,845 --1,358 23 (1) 151 29 -30 (12) 151 2 11 4 (18) 350 17 -(174) 8 77 2 31 436 171 83 1 (0) 1 2,044 (39) 14 33 755 (24) 603 61 17 -0 16 (41) -84 4 -(0) -281 25 9,735 IFPRIOXFAM Totals for CRP -ICRISAT Bilateral ACF PN ACIAR ADA ADB AFDB AFESD AGRA ASARECA AusAID Balochistan BMGF CAR CARE CCF Challenge Program China Academy of Science Sub-total -Bilateral CIAT CIC CIRAD Coca Cola Concern Worlwide WFC Wageningen University USAID University of Yale Totals for CRP -IFPRI United Nations University UNESCO-IHE Sub-total -Bilateral UNESCO ICRAF UNEP-GEF WorldFish UNEP Leibniz Institute TOO Kurylys Servis BKK, Kazakhstan Natural Environment Research Council the Netherlands Asian Development Bank The McKnight Foundation Government of German TCF GDN Switzerland IWMI (BMGF) Sweden Japan International Corporation Stockholm Environment Institute Bilateral SM Sub-total -Window 3 Sir Ratan Tata Trust ROCKFELLER Window 3 PRODERN Totals for CRP -IWMIDFID/ICRAF WFC GIZ/Leibniz DFID/NERC ADB GIZ GDN IWMI (BMGF) JICA25 1,526 20,772 26 58 1,283 141 242 150 156 1,715 124 3,803 27 5,769 201 62 59 33 30 434 105 28 106 200 229 1,246 1,842 -638 10 -638 11 11 375 17 -10 6 136 942 197 18 43 -19 3,420 155 231 50 17 52 -94 220 61 25,96711,927 1,002 25 141 158 135 156 1,112 91 1,759 27 5,333 124 62 77 31 -405 82 28 106 126 1,487 --2,664 -16,2320 587 (0) 1 74 83 (242) 8,845 --1,358 23 (1) 151 29 -30 (12) 151 2 11 4 (18) 350 17 -(174) 8 77 2 31 436 171 83 1 (0) 1 2,044 (39) 14 33 755 (24) 603 61 17 -0 16 (41) -84 4 -(0) -281 25 9,735  CPWF  420 - 420 CPWF420-420  DFID  20 24 (3) DFID2024(3)  DFID/ICRAF  11 7 4 DFID/ICRAF1174  DFID/NERC  136 105 31 DFID/NERC13610531  "},{"text":"Nr 5 : CRP on Water, Land and Ecosystems PART 1 -REPORT OF LEAD CENTER Opening Balance -1 January - W1 Receipts from Consortium Office (actual dates  )  ) 01-May-12 6,583 01-May-126,583 13-Jul-12 3,041 13-Jul-123,041 26-Oct-12 3,637 26-Oct-123,637 20-Dec-12 5,242 20-Dec-125,242 Total Receipts 18,503 Total Receipts18,503 W2 Receipts from Consortium Office (actual dates)  W2 Receipts from Consortium Office (actual dates) 30-Apr-12 690 30-Apr-12690 01-May-12 2 01-May-122 13-Jul-12 597 13-Jul-12597 26-Oct-12 1,470 26-Oct-121,470 27-Nov-12 3,368 27-Nov-123,368 Total Receipts 6,127 Total Receipts6,127 Transfers to CG Partners  Transfers to CG Partners Bioversity (1,182) Bioversity(1,182) CIAT (665) CIAT(665) CIP (262) CIP(262) ICARDA (603) ICARDA(603) ICRISAT (647) ICRISAT(647) IFPRI (306) IFPRI(306) IITA (142) IITA(142) ILRI (121) ILRI(121) World Agroforestry (887) World Agroforestry(887) World Fish (105) World Fish(105) Total Disbursments (4,918) Total Disbursments(4,918) Expenditure by Lead Center (IWMI) (14,673) Expenditure by Lead Center (IWMI)(14,673) Unliquidated Advances to IWMI Partners (92) Unliquidated Advances to IWMI Partners(92)  "},{"text":"Funds held -end of Period 4,948 PART 2 -REPORT OF CGIAR CENTERS Funds held - start of Period  Report Description      Report Description Name of Report  CRP Funding Statement, Window 2 Name of ReportCRP Funding Statement, Window 2 Reporting Line  Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Reporting LineLead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period  Every 6 months   Frequency/PeriodEvery 6 months CRP      CRP   Transfers Unliquidated  TransfersUnliquidated   from Lead Advances to Funds held - from LeadAdvances toFunds held -   Center Expenditure Partners end of Period Center ExpenditurePartnersend of Period Bioversity - 1,182 (1,919)  (737) Bioversity-1,182(1,919)(737) CIAT - 665 (1,064)  (399) CIAT-665(1,064)(399) CIP - 262 (394)  (132) CIP-262(394)(132) ICARDA - 603 (773)  (170) ICARDA-603(773)(170) ICRISAT - 647 (1,047)  (401) ICRISAT-647(1,047)(401) IFPRI - 306 (453)  (147) IFPRI-306(453)(147) IITA - 142 (230)  (88) IITA-142(230)(88) ILRI - 121 (196)  (75) ILRI-121(196)(75) World Agroforestry - 887 (1,440)  (554) World Agroforestry-887(1,440)(554) World Fish - 105 (170)  (65) World Fish-105(170)(65) Totals - 4,918 (7,686) - (2,769) Totals-4,918(7,686)-(2,769)  "},{"text":"Nr 5 : CRP on Water, Land and Ecosystems   Date    Date Year 1 -2011     Year 1 -2011 Receipts from Donors     Receipts from Donors DFID 7-Jul-11 GBP 1,000 1,500 DFID7-Jul-11GBP1,0001,500 USAID 10-Oct-11 USD 500 500 USAID10-Oct-11USD500500     2,000 2,000 Transfers to Lead Center (via CO)     Transfers to Lead Center (via CO) (if applicable)     (if applicable) Other Disbursments     Other Disbursments CSP paid to Window 1 12-Dec-11   (40) CSP paid to Window 112-Dec-11(40) Funds held by Trustee -end of Period 31-Dec-11   1,960 Funds held by Trustee -end of Period31-Dec-111,960 Year 2 -2012     Year 2 -2012 Receipts from Donors     Receipts from Donors DGIS  GBP 400 600 DGISGBP400600 IBRD     IBRD SIDA  USD 500 500 SIDAUSD500500     1,100 1,100 Transfers to Lead Center (via CO)     Transfers to Lead Center (via CO) Transfer 1 15-Mar-12   (200) Transfer 115-Mar-12(200) Transfer 2 6-Jun-12   (1,500) Transfer 26-Jun-12(1,500) Transfer 3 12-Dec-12   (1,338) Transfer 312-Dec-12(1,338) Other Disbursments     Other Disbursments CSP paid to Window 1 10-Dec-12   (22) CSP paid to Window 110-Dec-12(22)  "},{"text":"Funds held by Trustee -end of Period 31-Dec-12 - Notes Amounts should be reported in USD 000's This reports is on a cumulative basis (prior periods also shown) Donor Currency USD Donor CurrencyUSD wle.cgiar.org  wle.cgiar.org wle.cgiar.org/blogs  wle.cgiar.org/blogs  "}],"sieverID":"777fd796-0bfb-49f8-855b-0262d138bb29","abstract":"This was a startup year for the CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE), focused on gaining buy-in from partners and further articulating both the value proposition of the program as well as how it operates.A major area of achievement was clarifying organizational arrangements and appointing leaders to the program. This has included: Each WLE partner agreed on budgets and signed contracts. They also identified a Science Focal Point to be the main contact point of each institution with WLE. In all, 162 research activities were mapped to the program in 2012.  Strategic Research Portfolio (SRP) leaders were appointed from IWMI, IFPRI, ICRAF and CIAT, and consultations took place for the Rainfed, Irrigation, Basins and Resource Recovery & Reuse SRPs.  The WLE Management Committee 1 , responsible for program planning and strategic management, was established, holding its first face-to-face meeting in November.  The WLE Steering Committee with 11 members was established in 2012 and held its first meetings in September and December.  An Operations Team has been established including a Program Director, Program Manager, Support Scientist and Communication and Knowledge Management support. A major acheivement has been the establishment of the Ecosystem Services & Resilience (ESS&R) Working Group led by Bioversity, which has proven to be a dynamic forum for collaboration for partners within and outside WLE. Outputs include two proposals to the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation research program and publication of WLE papers including one in BioScience 2 on the importance of matching ecological and governance scales in the management of ecosystem services. A guidance document was prepared on WLE Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning & Impact Assessment, which was the basis for partner level reporting and SRP-level evaluations of reports and activity plans against a standard template. A complete system for M&E will be implemented in 2013, including the establishment of a meaningful program baseline. Moreover, WLE held a joint Knowledge Management and Communication workshop in October in collaboration with the CRP on Livestock and Fish. The WLE website and blog underpin WLE's strategy for engagement with CGIAR and external partners, with the blog generating 9,000 unique page views from 42 posts in 2012 since going live in September.Programmatically, a major challenge has been to articulate how WLE operates as a whole and different elements link together. This is largely due to the legacy of projects mapped to WLE that have contractual obligations that restrict the ability of the program to move into new integrated areas of research for development. In addition, the initial set of impact pathways described in the proposal had to be revised. WLE initiated a strategic planning process to hone its direction with a draft developed in September 2012. The plan is now being reworked following recommendations from the Management and Steering Committees to operationalize the program in focal regions.Three focal regions will be designed in 2013 (Volta/Niger, Indus/Ganges and Nile/Eastern Africa) and further focal regions will follow in 2014; at the same time, the program also will continue to accommodate research in other regions and at a global scale for learning and outreach.Finally, the Program Director appointed in February 2012 resigned at the end of the year. An Interim Director has been appointed and a full-time replacement will be secured in 2013. While this was initially a setback for the program, there is now greater involvement of the IWMI 1 Based on consultation with CGIAR DGs in 2012, the composition of the WLE Management Committee was adjusted in early 2013 to ensure that all institutions that have committed significant W1 & W2 funding are now represented 2 Fremier, A."}
\ No newline at end of file