Towards a Fair Comparison and Realistic Design and Evaluation Framework of Android Malware Detectors
As in other cybersecurity areas, machine learning (ML) techniques have
emerged as a promising solution to detect Android malware. In this sense, many
proposals employing a variety of algorithms and feature sets have been
presented to date, often reporting impresive detection performances. However,
the lack of reproducibility and the absence of a standard evaluation framework
make these proposals difficult to compare. In this paper, we perform an
analysis of 10 influential research works on Android malware detection using a
common evaluation framework. We have identified five factors that, if not taken
into account when creating datasets and designing detectors, significantly
affect the trained ML models and their performances. In particular, we analyze
the effect of (1) the presence of duplicated samples, (2) label
(goodware/greyware/malware) attribution, (3) class imbalance, (4) the presence
of apps that use evasion techniques and, (5) the evolution of apps. Based on
this extensive experimentation, we conclude that the studied ML-based detectors
have been evaluated optimistically, which justifies the good published results.
Our findings also highlight that it is imperative to generate realistic
datasets, taking into account the factors mentioned above, to enable the design
and evaluation of better solutions for Android malware detection.