Scientific Inference With Interpretable Machine Learning: Analyzing Models to Learn About Real-World Phenomena
Interpretable machine learning (IML) is concerned with the behavior and the
properties of machine learning models. Scientists, however, are only interested
in the model as a gateway to understanding the modeled phenomenon. We show how
to develop IML methods such that they allow insight into relevant phenomenon
properties. We argue that current IML research conflates two goals of
model-analysis -- model audit and scientific inference. Thereby, it remains
unclear if model interpretations have corresponding phenomenon interpretation.
Building on statistical decision theory, we show that ML model analysis allows
to describe relevant aspects of the joint data probability distribution. We
provide a five-step framework for constructing IML descriptors that can help in
addressing scientific questions, including a natural way to quantify epistemic
uncertainty. Our phenomenon-centric approach to IML in science clarifies: the
opportunities and limitations of IML for inference; that conditional not
marginal sampling is required; and, the conditions under which we can trust IML
methods.