Inference-Based Quantum Sensing
In a standard Quantum Sensing (QS) task one aims at estimating an unknown
parameter $\theta$, encoded into an $n$-qubit probe state, via measurements of
the system. The success of this task hinges on the ability to correlate changes
in the parameter to changes in the system response $\mathcal{R}(\theta)$ (i.e.,
changes in the measurement outcomes). For simple cases the form of
$\mathcal{R}(\theta)$ is known, but the same cannot be said for realistic
scenarios, as no general closed-form expression exists. In this work we present
an inference-based scheme for QS. We show that, for a general class of unitary
families of encoding, $\mathcal{R}(\theta)$ can be fully characterized by only
measuring the system response at $2n+1$ parameters. In turn, this allows us to
infer the value of an unknown parameter given the measured response, as well as
to determine the sensitivity of the sensing scheme, which characterizes its
overall performance. We show that inference error is, with high probability,
smaller than $\delta$, if one measures the system response with a number of
shots that scales only as $\Omega(\log^3(n)/\delta^2)$. Furthermore, the
framework presented can be broadly applied as it remains valid for arbitrary
probe states and measurement schemes, and, even holds in the presence of
quantum noise. We also discuss how to extend our results beyond unitary
families. Finally, to showcase our method we implement it for a QS task on real
quantum hardware, and in numerical simulations.