Causal Discovery for Fairness
It is crucial to consider the social and ethical consequences of AI and ML
based decisions for the safe and acceptable use of these emerging technologies.
Fairness, in particular, guarantees that the ML decisions do not result in
discrimination against individuals or minorities. Identifying and measuring
reliably fairness/discrimination is better achieved using causality which
considers the causal relation, beyond mere association, between the sensitive
attribute (e.g. gender, race, religion, etc.) and the decision (e.g. job
hiring, loan granting, etc.). The big impediment to the use of causality to
address fairness, however, is the unavailability of the causal model (typically
represented as a causal graph). Existing causal approaches to fairness in the
literature do not address this problem and assume that the causal model is
available. In this paper, we do not make such assumption and we review the
major algorithms to discover causal relations from observable data. This study
focuses on causal discovery and its impact on fairness. In particular, we show
how different causal discovery approaches may result in different causal models
and, most importantly, how even slight differences between causal models can
have significant impact on fairness/discrimination conclusions. These results
are consolidated by empirical analysis using synthetic and standard fairness
benchmark datasets. The main goal of this study is to highlight the importance
of the causal discovery step to appropriately address fairness using causality.