Actively learning to learn causal relationships
How do people actively learn to learn? That is, how and when do people choose
actions that facilitate long-term learning and choosing future actions that are
more informative? We explore these questions in the domain of active causal
learning. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian model that goes beyond past models
by predicting that people pursue information not only about the causal
relationship at hand but also about causal
overhypotheses$\unicode{x2014}$abstract beliefs about causal relationships that
span multiple situations and constrain how we learn the specifics in each
situation. In two active "blicket detector" experiments with 14
between-subjects manipulations, our model was supported by both qualitative
trends in participant behavior and an individual-differences-based model
comparison. Our results suggest when there are abstract similarities across
active causal learning problems, people readily learn and transfer
overhypotheses about these similarities. Moreover, people exploit these
overhypotheses to facilitate long-term active learning.