twice as much of a waste as one bottle [SEP] the current version of tsar is a pitiful inert dullard of a fragrance that smells markedly like old spice no need for anyone save masochists to stockpileper other reviewers considering vintage bottles this fragrance used to be an interesting powerhouse unfortunately as ifra regulatory agency restrictions on perfume content and overall manufacturing costs have increased many manufacturers have simply stopped trying to inventively reformulate older fragrances so what the buyer ends up with is the modern version of tsar all still around all smell great though maybe not quite as good as they used to even grey flannel which is currently much cheaper than tsar smells much better and still has some of its cojones attached so if you want to see what the or earlier smelled like you have a lot of options tsar certainly will not appeal to most young modern male fragrance buyers who love calone seaweed and apple and if your tastes are for more refined older stuff the dull ghostwater found in bottles of tsar holds little appeal at the current price point get azzarro ph or lapidus for less money and have more funon the plus side tsar is certainly workplace friendly as no one will smell it on you unless you are giving them a piggyback ride or are lying on top of them both of which circumstances are uncommon enough in the workplace so as to preclude their likelihood of occurrenceother exhibits in the realm of the former powerhouse roll of dishonor are worse than tsar unless this falls in price to the level of nausea voyage there are many better options for less money