<p>You are given a <strong>0-indexed</strong> array of <strong>positive</strong> integers <code>nums</code> and a <strong>positive</strong> integer <code>limit</code>.</p>

<p>In one operation, you can choose any two indices <code>i</code> and <code>j</code> and swap <code>nums[i]</code> and <code>nums[j]</code> <strong>if</strong> <code>|nums[i] - nums[j]| &lt;= limit</code>.</p>

<p>Return <em>the <strong>lexicographically smallest array</strong> that can be obtained by performing the operation any number of times</em>.</p>

<p>An array <code>a</code> is lexicographically smaller than an array <code>b</code> if in the first position where <code>a</code> and <code>b</code> differ, array <code>a</code> has an element that is less than the corresponding element in <code>b</code>. For example, the array <code>[2,10,3]</code> is lexicographically smaller than the array <code>[10,2,3]</code> because they differ at index <code>0</code> and <code>2 &lt; 10</code>.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong class="example">Example 1:</strong></p>

<pre>
<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [1,5,3,9,8], limit = 2
<strong>Output:</strong> [1,3,5,8,9]
<strong>Explanation:</strong> Apply the operation 2 times:
- Swap nums[1] with nums[2]. The array becomes [1,3,5,9,8]
- Swap nums[3] with nums[4]. The array becomes [1,3,5,8,9]
We cannot obtain a lexicographically smaller array by applying any more operations.
Note that it may be possible to get the same result by doing different operations.
</pre>

<p><strong class="example">Example 2:</strong></p>

<pre>
<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [1,7,6,18,2,1], limit = 3
<strong>Output:</strong> [1,6,7,18,1,2]
<strong>Explanation:</strong> Apply the operation 3 times:
- Swap nums[1] with nums[2]. The array becomes [1,6,7,18,2,1]
- Swap nums[0] with nums[4]. The array becomes [2,6,7,18,1,1]
- Swap nums[0] with nums[5]. The array becomes [1,6,7,18,1,2]
We cannot obtain a lexicographically smaller array by applying any more operations.
</pre>

<p><strong class="example">Example 3:</strong></p>

<pre>
<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [1,7,28,19,10], limit = 3
<strong>Output:</strong> [1,7,28,19,10]
<strong>Explanation:</strong> [1,7,28,19,10] is the lexicographically smallest array we can obtain because we cannot apply the operation on any two indices.
</pre>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Constraints:</strong></p>

<ul>
	<li><code>1 &lt;= nums.length &lt;= 10<sup>5</sup></code></li>
	<li><code>1 &lt;= nums[i] &lt;= 10<sup>9</sup></code></li>
	<li><code>1 &lt;= limit &lt;= 10<sup>9</sup></code></li>
</ul>

class UnionFind:
    def __init__(self, n):
        self.parent = list(range(n))
        self.rank = [1] * n

    def find(self, x):
        if self.parent[x] != x:
            self.parent[x] = self.find(self.parent[x])
        return self.parent[x]

    def union(self, x, y):
        rootX = self.find(x)
        rootY = self.find(y)
        if rootX != rootY:
            if self.rank[rootX] > self.rank[rootY]:
                self.parent[rootY] = rootX
            elif self.rank[rootX] < self.rank[rootY]:
                self.parent[rootX] = rootY
            else:
                self.parent[rootY] = rootX
                self.rank[rootX] += 1

class Solution:
    def lexicographicallySmallestArray(self, nums: List[int], limit: int) -> List[int]:
        n = len(nums)
        nums2 = sorted([(nums[i], i) for i in range(n)])
        indices = []
        result = [0] * n
        for i in range(n):
            if i == 0 or nums2[i][0] - nums2[i - 1][0] > limit:
                indices.append([])
            indices[-1].append(nums2[i][1])
        for index in indices: # index is one set of sortable numbers
            sortedIndex = sorted(index)
            for j in range(len(index)):
                result[sortedIndex[j]] = nums[index[j]]
        return result
940