<p>You are given a <strong>0-indexed</strong> array of <strong>positive</strong> integers <code>nums</code> and a <strong>positive</strong> integer <code>limit</code>.</p>

<p>In one operation, you can choose any two indices <code>i</code> and <code>j</code> and swap <code>nums[i]</code> and <code>nums[j]</code> <strong>if</strong> <code>|nums[i] - nums[j]| &lt;= limit</code>.</p>

<p>Return <em>the <strong>lexicographically smallest array</strong> that can be obtained by performing the operation any number of times</em>.</p>

<p>An array <code>a</code> is lexicographically smaller than an array <code>b</code> if in the first position where <code>a</code> and <code>b</code> differ, array <code>a</code> has an element that is less than the corresponding element in <code>b</code>. For example, the array <code>[2,10,3]</code> is lexicographically smaller than the array <code>[10,2,3]</code> because they differ at index <code>0</code> and <code>2 &lt; 10</code>.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong class="example">Example 1:</strong></p>

<pre>
<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [1,5,3,9,8], limit = 2
<strong>Output:</strong> [1,3,5,8,9]
<strong>Explanation:</strong> Apply the operation 2 times:
- Swap nums[1] with nums[2]. The array becomes [1,3,5,9,8]
- Swap nums[3] with nums[4]. The array becomes [1,3,5,8,9]
We cannot obtain a lexicographically smaller array by applying any more operations.
Note that it may be possible to get the same result by doing different operations.
</pre>

<p><strong class="example">Example 2:</strong></p>

<pre>
<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [1,7,6,18,2,1], limit = 3
<strong>Output:</strong> [1,6,7,18,1,2]
<strong>Explanation:</strong> Apply the operation 3 times:
- Swap nums[1] with nums[2]. The array becomes [1,6,7,18,2,1]
- Swap nums[0] with nums[4]. The array becomes [2,6,7,18,1,1]
- Swap nums[0] with nums[5]. The array becomes [1,6,7,18,1,2]
We cannot obtain a lexicographically smaller array by applying any more operations.
</pre>

<p><strong class="example">Example 3:</strong></p>

<pre>
<strong>Input:</strong> nums = [1,7,28,19,10], limit = 3
<strong>Output:</strong> [1,7,28,19,10]
<strong>Explanation:</strong> [1,7,28,19,10] is the lexicographically smallest array we can obtain because we cannot apply the operation on any two indices.
</pre>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Constraints:</strong></p>

<ul>
	<li><code>1 &lt;= nums.length &lt;= 10<sup>5</sup></code></li>
	<li><code>1 &lt;= nums[i] &lt;= 10<sup>9</sup></code></li>
	<li><code>1 &lt;= limit &lt;= 10<sup>9</sup></code></li>
</ul>

# emmm greedy? treemap?? wow simple sorting?!
from typing import List


class Solution:
    def lexicographicallySmallestArray(self, nums: List[int], limit: int) -> List[int]:
        arr = []
        for i, x in enumerate(nums):
            arr.append([x, i])  # val, ind
        arr.sort()
        n = len(nums)
        ret = [-1] * n
        # find the range(compliant with the limit) then assign the numbers

        def ass(a: int, b: int) -> None:
            tmp = []  # sorted index
            for _, ind in arr[a:b]:
                tmp.append(ind)
            tmp.sort()
            for ind, xx in enumerate(tmp):
                ret[xx] = arr[a + ind][0]
            return

        i, j = 0, 1
        while i < n:  # not j < n
            while j < n and arr[j][0] - arr[j - 1][0] <= limit:
                j += 1
            # print(i, j)
            ass(i, j)
            i = j
            j += 1
        return ret
41837