Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.,The overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma is short, the evidence for effectiveness of treatments is limited, and no consensus on the choice of treatment exists.,We aimed to advance interpretation of OS as an outcome by pooling peer-reviewed data.,The design is a systematic review and meta-analysis.,We searched PubMed from 1 January 1980, to 29 March 2017, for articles reporting patient-level survival in Kaplan-Meier or numerical form.,We digitized survival graphs, pooled individual survival times, calculated median OS by treatment modality, and compared each modality by the log-rank test and Cox regression using conventional chemotherapy (CHT) as a reference.,Individual-level data were obtained from 78 articles with 2494 patients.,The median OS across all treatment modalities was 1.07 years (range: 0.59-2.50 years).,Pooled OS reported after isolated hepatic perfusion [median OS: 1.34 years; hazard ratio (HR): 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.97, P = 0.0040], immunoembolization (median OS: 1.63; HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-1.00, P = 0.0080), and surgery (median OS: 1.43; HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.96, P < 0.0001) was longer, and after checkpoint inhibitor shorter (median OS: 0.59; HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, P < 0.0001) than after CHT (median OS: 0.91 years), but subject to identifiable confounding factors.,OS following other modalities did not differ from CHT.,Reported OS was unassociated with the decade of publication, but depended on the percentage of first-line treated patients.,Our results suggest no clinically significant difference in OS by treatment modality or decade.,Most of the difference in reported OS likely is attributable to surveillance, selection, and publication bias rather than treatment-related prolongation.,Our pooled data provide benchmarks for future trials.
Women diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma have a survival advantage compared to men, which has been hypothesized to be due to difference in behavior and/or biology (sex hormones).,It remains controversial whether this advantage is dependent on age or stage of disease.,We sought to compare melanoma‐specific survival between females in pre, peri, and postmenopausal age groups to males in the same age group, adjusting for stage of disease.,This is a retrospective population‐based cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.,Patients diagnosed from 1 January 1992 through 31 January 2011 with primary invasive cutaneous melanoma were included in our cohort.,Melanoma‐specific survival was the main outcome studied.,Of the 106,511 subjects that were included, 45% were female.,Females in all age groups (18-45, 46-54, and ≥55) with localized and regional disease, were less likely to die from melanoma compared to males in the same age group.,Among patients with localized and regional disease, the relative risk of death due to melanoma increased with advancing age at diagnosis; this increase was more pronounced among females than males.,In contrast, we observed no female survival advantage among patients with distant disease and no effect of age on relative risk of death from melanoma.,Females with localized and regional melanoma have a decreased risk of death compared to males within all age groups.,Our data show no differences in survival between men and women with metastatic melanoma, indicating that the influence of sex on survival is limited to early stage disease but not confined to pre or perimenopausal age groups.