Transcriptional reprogramming of proliferative melanoma cells into a phenotypically distinct invasive cell subpopulation is a critical event at the origin of metastatic spreading.,Here we generate transcriptome, open chromatin and histone modification maps of melanoma cultures; and integrate this data with existing transcriptome and DNA methylation profiles from tumour biopsies to gain insight into the mechanisms underlying this key reprogramming event.,This shows thousands of genomic regulatory regions underlying the proliferative and invasive states, identifying SOX10/MITF and AP-1/TEAD as regulators, respectively.,Knockdown of TEADs shows a previously unrecognized role in the invasive gene network and establishes a causative link between these transcription factors, cell invasion and sensitivity to MAPK inhibitors.,Using regulatory landscapes and in silico analysis, we show that transcriptional reprogramming underlies the distinct cellular states present in melanoma.,Furthermore, it reveals an essential role for the TEADs, linking it to clinically relevant mechanisms such as invasion and resistance.,The key regulators that allow transition from proliferative to invasive phenotype in melanoma cells have not been identified yet.,The authors perform chromatin and transcriptome profiling followed by comprehensive bioinformatics analysis identifying new candidate regulators for two distinct cell states of melanoma.
The approval of vemurafenib in the US 2011 and in Europe 2012 improved the therapy of not resectable or metastatic melanoma.,Patients carrying a substitution of valine to glutamic acid at codon 600 (p.V600E) or a substitution of valine to leucine (p.V600K) in BRAF show complete or partial response.,Therefore, the precise identification of the underlying somatic mutations is essential.,Herein, we evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and feasibility of six different methods for the detection of BRAF mutations.,Samples harboring p.V600E mutations as well as rare mutations in BRAF exon 15 were compared to wildtype samples.,DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues by manual micro-dissection and automated extraction.,BRAF mutational analysis was carried out by high resolution melting (HRM) analysis, pyrosequencing, allele specific PCR, next generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC).,All mutations were independently reassessed by Sanger sequencing.,Due to the limited tumor tissue available different numbers of samples were analyzed with each method (82, 72, 60, 72, 49 and 82 respectively).,There was no difference in sensitivity between the HRM analysis and Sanger sequencing (98%).,All mutations down to 6.6% allele frequency could be detected with 100% specificity.,In contrast, pyrosequencing detected 100% of the mutations down to 5% allele frequency but exhibited only 90% specificity.,The allele specific PCR failed to detect 16.3% of the mutations eligible for therapy with vemurafenib.,NGS could analyze 100% of the cases with 100% specificity but exhibited 97.5% sensitivity.,IHC showed once cross-reactivity with p.V600R but was a good amendment to HRM.,Therefore, at present, a combination of HRM and IHC is recommended to increase sensitivity and specificity for routine diagnostic to fulfill the European requirements concerning vemurafenib therapy of melanoma patients.