Mucosal melanomas are a rare subtype of melanoma, arising in mucosal tissues, which have a very poor prognosis due to the lack of effective targeted therapies.,This study aimed to better understand the molecular landscape of these cancers and find potential new therapeutic targets.,Whole-exome sequencing was performed on mucosal melanomas from 19 patients and 135 sun-exposed cutaneous melanomas, with matched peripheral blood samples when available.,Mutational profiles were compared between mucosal subgroups and sun-exposed cutaneous melanomas.,Comparisons of molecular profiles identified 161 genes enriched in mucosal melanoma (P<0.05).,KIT and NF1 were frequently comutated (32%) in the mucosal subgroup, with a significantly higher incidence than that in cutaneous melanoma (4%).,Recurrent SF3B1 R625H/S/C mutations were identified and validated in 7 of 19 (37%) mucosal melanoma patients.,Mutations in the spliceosome pathway were found to be enriched in mucosal melanomas when compared with cutaneous melanomas.,Alternative splicing in four genes were observed in SF3B1-mutant samples compared with the wild-type samples.,This study identified potential new therapeutic targets for mucosal melanoma, including comutation of NF1 and KIT, and recurrent R625 mutations in SF3B1.,This is the first report of SF3B1 R625 mutations in vulvovaginal mucosal melanoma, with the largest whole-exome sequencing project of mucosal melanomas to date.,The results here also indicated that the mutations in SF3B1 lead to alternative splicing in multiple genes.,These findings expand our knowledge of this rare disease.
Uveal melanoma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the eye in adults, predominantly found in Caucasians.,Local tumor control of uveal melanoma is excellent, yet this malignancy is associated with relatively high mortality secondary to metastasis.,Various clinical, histopathological, cytogenetic features and gene expression features help in estimating the prognosis of uveal melanoma.,The clinical features associated with poor prognosis in patients with uveal melanoma include older age at presentation, male gender, larger tumor basal diameter and thickness, ciliary body location, diffuse tumor configuration, association with ocular/oculodermal melanocytosis, extraocular tumor extension, and advanced tumor staging by American Joint Committee on Cancer classification.,Histopathological features suggestive of poor prognosis include epithelioid cell type, high mitotic activity, higher values of mean diameter of ten largest nucleoli, higher microvascular density, extravascular matrix patterns, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-infiltrating macrophages, higher expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, and higher expression of human leukocyte antigen Class I and II.,Monosomy 3, 1p loss, 6q loss, and 8q and those classified as Class II by gene expression are predictive of poor prognosis of uveal melanoma.,In this review, we discuss the prognostic factors of uveal melanoma.,A database search was performed on PubMed, using the terms “uvea,” “iris,” “ciliary body,” “choroid,” “melanoma,” “uveal melanoma” and “prognosis,” “metastasis,” “genetic testing,” “gene expression profiling.”,Relevant English language articles were extracted, reviewed, and referenced appropriately.