Treatment options are limited for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC); mortality rates exceed 70% in patients with distant metastases.,Here, we present the first interim analysis of the R/M cSCC cohort from the 2-cohort-locally advanced and R/M-phase II KEYNOTE-629 study.,Patients with R/M cSCC not amenable to surgery or radiation received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks.,The primary end point was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1.,Secondary end points were duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.,At data cutoff (April 8, 2019), median follow-up of 105 enrolled patients in the R/M cohort was 11.4 months (range, 0.4 to 16.3 months).,Objective response rate was 34.3% (95% CI, 25.3% to 44.2%; 4 complete responses, 32 partial responses), and disease control rate was 52.4% (95% CI, 42.4% to 62.2%).,Median duration of response was not reached (range, 2.7 to 13.1+ months; ‘+’ refers to ongoing response at data cutoff).,Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 3.1 months to 8.5 months).,Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 10.7 months to not reached).,Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66.7% of patients (n = 70), the most common of which were pruritus (n = 15; 14.3%), asthenia (n = 14; 13.3%), and fatigue (n = 13; 12.4%).,Grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 5.7% (n = 6) of patients.,One patient died of treatment-related cranial nerve neuropathy.,Pembrolizumab demonstrated effective antitumor activity; clinically meaningful, durable responses; and acceptable safety in primarily elderly patients with R/M cSCC, supporting its use in clinical practice.,Pembrolizumab adverse events in this study were consistent with its established safety profile.
Cross-feedback activation of MAPK and AKT pathways is implicated as a resistance mechanism for cancer therapeutic agents targeting either RAF/MEK or PI3K/AKT/mTOR.,It is thus important to have a better understanding of the molecular resistance mechanisms to improve patient survival benefit from these agents.,Here we show that BRAFV600E is a negative regulator of the AKT pathway.,Expression of BRAFV600E in NIH3T3 cells significantly suppresses MEK inhibitor (RG7167) or mTORC1 inhibitor (rapamycin) induced AKT phosphorylation (pAKT) and downstream signal activation.,Treatment-induced pAKT elevation is found in BRAF wild type melanoma cells but not in a subset of melanoma cell lines harboring BRAFV600E.,Knock-down of BRAFV600E in these melanoma cells elevates basal pAKT and downstream signals, whereas knock-down of CRAF, MEK1/2 or ERK1/2 or treatment with a BRAF inhibitor have no impact on pAKT.,Mechanistically, we show that BRAFV600E interacts with rictor complex (mTORC2) and regulates pAKT through mTORC2.,BRAFV600E is identified in mTORC2 after immunoprecipitation of rictor.,Knock-down of rictor abrogates BRAFV600E depletion induced pAKT.,Knock-down of BRAFV600E enhances cellular enzyme activity of mTORC2.,Aberrant activation of AKT pathway by PTEN loss appears to override the negative impact of BRAFV600E on pAKT.,Taken together, our findings suggest that in a subset of BRAFV600E melanoma cells, BRAFV600E negatively regulates AKT pathway in a rictor-dependent, MEK/ERK and BRAF kinase-independent manner.,Our study reveals a novel molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of feedback loops between the MAPK and AKT pathways.