In general, melanoma can be considered as a UV‐driven disease with an aggressive metastatic course and high mutational load, with only few tumors (acral, mucosal, and uveal melanomas) not induced by sunlight and possessing a lower mutational load.,The most commonly activated pathway in melanoma is the mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.,However, the prognostic significance of mutational stratification is unclear and needs further investigation.,Here, in silico we combined mutation data from 162 melanomas subjected to targeted deep sequencing with mutation data from three published studies.,Tumors from 870 patients were grouped according to BRAF,RAS,NF1 mutation or triple‐wild‐type status and correlated with tumor and patient characteristics.,We found that the NF1‐mutated subtype had a higher mutational burden and strongest UV mutation signature.,Searching for co‐occurring mutated genes revealed the RASopathy genes PTPN11 and RASA2, as well as another RAS domain‐containing gene RASSF2 enriched in the NF1 subtype after adjustment for mutational burden.,We found that a larger proportion of the NF1‐mutant tumors were from males and with older age at diagnosis.,Importantly, we found an increased risk of death from melanoma (disease‐specific survival, DSS; HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.21-3.10; P = 0.046) and poor overall survival (OS; HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.28-2.98; P = 0.01) in the NF1 subtype, which remained significant after adjustment for age, gender, and lesion type (DSS  P = 0.03, OS  P = 0.06, respectively).,Melanoma genomic subtypes display different biological and clinical characteristics.,The poor outcome observed in the NF1 subtype highlights the need for improved characterization of this group.
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine tumor with high mortality rates.,Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), identified in the majority of MCC, may drive tumorigenesis via viral T antigens.,However, mechanisms underlying pathogenesis in MCPyV-negative MCC remain poorly understood.,To nominate genes contributing to pathogenesis of MCPyV-negative MCC, we performed DNA microarray analysis on 30 MCCs.,MCPyV status of MCCs was determined by PCR for viral DNA and RNA. 1593 probe-sets were differentially expressed between MCPyV-negative and -positive MCC, with significant differential expression defined as at least 2-fold change in either direction and p-value of ≤ 0.05.,MCPyV-negative tumors showed decreased RB1 expression, whereas MCPyV-positive tumors were enriched for immune response genes.,Validation studies included immunohistochemistry demonstration of decreased RB protein expression in MCPyV-negative tumors and increased peritumoral CD8+ T lymphocytes surrounding MCPyV-positive tumors.,In conclusion, our data suggest that loss of RB1 expression may play an important role in tumorigenesis of MCPyV-negative MCC.,Functional and clinical validation studies are needed to determine whether this tumor suppressor pathway represents an avenue for targeted therapy.