Objective To quantify the accuracy and reproducibility of pathologists’ diagnoses of melanocytic skin lesions.,Design Observer accuracy and reproducibility study.,Setting 10 US states.,Participants Skin biopsy cases (n=240), grouped into sets of 36 or 48.,Pathologists from 10 US states were randomized to independently interpret the same set on two occasions (phases 1 and 2), at least eight months apart.,Main outcome measures Pathologists’ interpretations were condensed into five classes: I (eg, nevus or mild atypia); II (eg, moderate atypia); III (eg, severe atypia or melanoma in situ); IV (eg, pathologic stage T1a (pT1a) early invasive melanoma); and V (eg, ≥pT1b invasive melanoma).,Reproducibility was assessed by intraobserver and interobserver concordance rates, and accuracy by concordance with three reference diagnoses.,Results In phase 1, 187 pathologists completed 8976 independent case interpretations resulting in an average of 10 (SD 4) different diagnostic terms applied to each case.,Among pathologists interpreting the same cases in both phases, when pathologists diagnosed a case as class I or class V during phase 1, they gave the same diagnosis in phase 2 for the majority of cases (class I 76.7%; class V 82.6%).,However, the intraobserver reproducibility was lower for cases interpreted as class II (35.2%), class III (59.5%), and class IV (63.2%).,Average interobserver concordance rates were lower, but with similar trends.,Accuracy using a consensus diagnosis of experienced pathologists as reference varied by class: I, 92% (95% confidence interval 90% to 94%); II, 25% (22% to 28%); III, 40% (37% to 44%); IV, 43% (39% to 46%); and V, 72% (69% to 75%).,It is estimated that at a population level, 82.8% (81.0% to 84.5%) of melanocytic skin biopsy diagnoses would have their diagnosis verified if reviewed by a consensus reference panel of experienced pathologists, with 8.0% (6.2% to 9.9%) of cases overinterpreted by the initial pathologist and 9.2% (8.8% to 9.6%) underinterpreted.,Conclusion Diagnoses spanning moderately dysplastic nevi to early stage invasive melanoma were neither reproducible nor accurate in this large study of pathologists in the USA.,Efforts to improve clinical practice should include using a standardized classification system, acknowledging uncertainty in pathology reports, and developing tools such as molecular markers to support pathologists’ visual assessments.
BRAF and MEK inhibitors are effective in BRAF mutant melanoma, but most patients eventually relapse with acquired resistance, and others present intrinsic resistance to these drugs.,Resistance is often mediated by pathway reactivation through receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)/SRC-family kinase (SFK) signaling or mutant NRAS, which drive paradoxical reactivation of the pathway.,We describe pan-RAF inhibitors (CCT196969, CCT241161) that also inhibit SFKs.,These compounds do not drive paradoxical pathway activation and inhibit MEK/ERK in BRAF and NRAS mutant melanoma.,They inhibit melanoma cells and patient-derived xenografts that are resistant to BRAF and BRAF/MEK inhibitors.,Thus, paradox-breaking pan-RAF inhibitors that also inhibit SFKs could provide first-line treatment for BRAF and NRAS mutant melanomas and second-line treatment for patients who develop resistance.,•pan-RAF inhibitors also inhibit SRC family kinases•The compounds do not induce paradoxical activation of ERK in RAS mutant cells•The compounds are active in BRAF and NRAS mutant melanomas•The compounds are active in PDXs resistant to BRAF or BRAF plus MEK inhibitors,pan-RAF inhibitors also inhibit SRC family kinases,The compounds do not induce paradoxical activation of ERK in RAS mutant cells,The compounds are active in BRAF and NRAS mutant melanomas,The compounds are active in PDXs resistant to BRAF or BRAF plus MEK inhibitors,Girotti et al. describe two pan-RAF inhibitors that also inhibit SRC-family kinases.,These compounds do not drive paradoxical MEK/ERK activation and can inhibit MEK in NRAS mutant cells.,Moreover, the agents can overcome resistance to clinical BRAF or combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patient-derived xenografts.