Malignant melanoma is the most aggressive and deadly form of skin cancer.,Dacarbazine (DTIC) has been the approved first-line treatment for metastatic melanoma in routine clinical practice.,However, response rates with single-agent DTIC are low.,The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of DTIC with or without placebo and DTIC-based combination therapies in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma.,We searched from electronic databases such as The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EBSCO, EMBASE, Ovid, CNKI, and CBMDisc from 2003 to 2013.,The primary outcome measures were overall response and 1-year survival, and the secondary outcome measurements were adverse events.,Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,481 patients were included in the meta-analysis.,DTIC-based combination therapies was superior to DTIC alone in overall response (combined risk ratio [RR]  = 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-2.01) and 1-year survival (combined RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.14-1.39).,Patients with DTIC-based combination therapies had higher incidence of adverse events including nausea (combined RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.10-1.36), vomiting (combined RR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.41-2.12) and neutropenia (combined RR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.42-2.16) compared to the group for DTIC alone.,These data suggested that DTIC-based combination therapies could moderately improve the overall response and the 1-year survival but increased the incidence of adverse events.,Further large-scale, high-quality, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.
BRAF is a serine/threonine protein kinase activating the MAP kinase/ERK-signaling pathway.,About 50 % of melanomas harbors activating BRAF mutations (over 90 % V600E).,BRAFV600E has been implicated in different mechanisms underlying melanomagenesis, most of which due to the deregulated activation of the downstream MEK/ERK effectors.,The first selective inhibitor of mutant BRAF, vemurafenib, after highly encouraging results of the phase I and II trial, was compared to dacarbazine in a phase III trial in treatment-naïve patients (BRIM-3).,The study results showed a relative reduction of 63 % in risk of death and 74 % in risk of tumor progression.,Considering all trials so far completed, median overall survival reached approximately 16 months for vemurafenib compared to less than 10 months for dacarbazine treatment.,Vemurafenib has been extensively tested on melanoma patients expressing the BRAFV600E mutated form; it has been demonstrated to be also effective in inhibiting melanomas carrying the V600K mutation.,In 2011, both FDA and EMA therefore approved vemurafenib for metastatic melanoma carrying BRAFV600 mutations.,Some findings suggest that continuation of vemurafenib treatment is potentially beneficial after local therapy in a subset of patients with disease progression (PD).,Among who continued vemurafenib >30 days after local therapy of PD lesion(s), a median overall survival was not reached, with a median follow-up of 15.5 months from initiation of BRAF inhibitor therapy.,For patients who did not continue treatment, median overall survival from the time of disease progression was 1.4 months.,A clinical phase I/II trial is evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of vemurafenib in combination with the CTLA-4 inhibitor mAb ipilimumab.,In the BRIM-7 trial vemurafenib is tested in association with GDC-0973, a potent and highly selective inhibitor of MEK1/2.,Preliminary data seem to indicate that an additional inhibitor of mutated BRAF, GSK2118436, might be also active on a wider range of BRAF mutations (V600E-K-D-R); actually, treatment with such a compound is under evaluation in a phase III study among stage III-IV melanoma patients positive for BRAF mutations.,Overall, BRAF inhibitors were well tolerated; common adverse events are arthralgia, rash, fatigue, alopecia, keratoacanthoma or cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, photosensitivity, nausea, and diarrhea, with some variants between different inhibitors.