Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.,Uveal melanoma is a rare form of melanoma with particularly poor outcomes in the metastatic setting.,In contrast with cutaneous melanoma, uveal melanoma lacks BRAF mutations and demonstrates very low response rates to immune-checkpoint blockade.,Our objectives were to study the transcriptomics of metastatic uveal melanoma with the intent of assessing gene pathways and potential molecular characteristics that might be nominated for further exploration as therapeutic targets.,We initially analyzed transcriptional data from The Cancer Genome Atlas suggesting PI3K/mTOR and glycolysis as well as IL6 associating with poor survival.,From tumor samples collected in a prospective phase II trial (A091201), we performed a transcriptional analysis of human metastatic uveal melanoma observing a novel role for epithelial-mesenchymal transition associating with survival.,Specifically, we nominate and describe initial functional validation of neuropillin-1 from uveal melanoma cells as associated with poor survival and as a mediator of proliferation and migration for uveal melanoma in vitro.,These results immediately nominate potential next steps in clinical research for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.
Uveal melanoma (UM) is highly refractory to treatment with dismal prognosis in advanced stages.,The value of the combined checkpoint blockade with CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition in metastatic UM is currently unclear.,Patients with metastatic or unresectable UM treated with ipilimumab in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor were collected from 16 German skin cancer centers.,Patient records of 64 cases were analyzed for response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.,Clinical parameters and serum biomarkers associated with OS and treatment response were determined with Cox regression modelling and logistic regression.,The best overall response rate to combined checkpoint blockade was 15.6% with 3.1 and 12.5% complete and partial response, respectively.,The median duration of response was 25.5 months (range 9.0-65.0).,Stable disease was achieved in 21.9%, resulting in a disease control rate of 37.5% with a median duration of the clinical benefit of 28.0 months (range 7.0-65.0).,The median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.4-3.6).,The median OS was estimated to 16.1 months (95% CI 12.9-19.3).,Regarding safety, 39.1% of treated patients experienced a severe, treatment-related adverse event according to the CTCAE criteria (grade 3: 37.5%; grade 4: 1.6%).,The most common toxicities were colitis (20.3%), hepatitis (20.3%), thyreoiditis (15.6%), and hypophysitis (7.8%).,A poor ECOG performance status was an independent risk factor for decreased OS (p = 0.007).,The tolerability of the combined checkpoint blockade in UM may possibly be better than in trials on cutaneous melanoma.,This study implies that combined checkpoint blockade represents the hitherto most effective treatment option available for metastatic UM available outside of clinical trials.