Immunologic responses to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients occur rapidly with pharmacodynamic T cell responses detectable in blood by 3 weeks.,It is unclear, however, whether these early blood-based observations translate to the tumor microenvironment.,We conducted a study of neoadjuvant/adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in stage III/IV melanoma.,We hypothesized that immune reinvigoration in the tumor would be detectable at 3 weeks and this response would correlate with disease-free survival.,We identified a rapid and potent anti-tumor response, with 8/27 patients experiencing a complete or major pathological response after a single dose of anti-PD-1, all of whom remain disease-free.,These rapid pathologic and clinical responses were associated with accumulation of exhausted CD8 T cells in the tumor at 3 weeks with reinvigoration in the blood observed as early as 1 week.,Transcriptional analysis demonstrated a pre-treatment immune signature (Neoadjuvant Response Signature) that was associated with clinical benefit.,In contrast, patients with disease recurrence displayed mechanisms of resistance including immune suppression, mutational escape, and/or tumor evolution.,Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment is effective in high-risk resectable stage III/IV melanoma.,Pathological response and immunological analyses after a single neoadjuvant dose can be used to predict clinical outcome and to dissect underlying mechanisms in checkpoint blockade.
Activated RAS promotes dimerization of members of the RAF kinase family1-3.,ATP-competitive RAF inhibitors activate ERK signaling4-7 by transactivating RAF dimers4.,In melanomas with mutant BRAF(V600E), levels of RAS activation are low and these drugs bind to BRAF(V600E) monomers and inhibit their activity.,This tumor-specific inhibition of ERK signaling results in a broad therapeutic index and RAF inhibitors have remarkable clinical activity in patients with melanomas that harbor mutant BRAF(V600E)8.,However, resistance invariably develops.,Here, we identify a novel resistance mechanism.,We find that a subset of cells resistant to vemurafenib (PLX4032, RG7204) express a 61kd variant form of BRAF(V600E) that lacks exons 4-8, a region that encompasses the RAS-binding domain. p61BRAF(V600E) exhibits enhanced dimerization in cells with low levels of RAS activation, as compared to full length BRAF(V600E).,In cells in which p61BRAF(V600E) is expressed endogenously or ectopically, ERK signaling is resistant to the RAF inhibitor.,Moreover, a mutation that abolishes the dimerization of p61BRAF(V600E) restores its sensitivity to vemurafenib.,Finally, we identified BRAF(V600E) splicing variants lacking the RAS-binding domain in the tumors of six of 19 patients with acquired resistance to vemurafenib.,These data support the model that inhibition of ERK signaling by RAF inhibitors is dependent on levels of RAS-GTP too low to support RAF dimerization and identify a novel mechanism of acquired resistance in patients: expression of splicing isoforms of BRAF(V600E) that dimerize in a RAS-independent manner.