Immunotherapy prolongs survival in only a subset of melanoma patients, highlighting the need to better understand the driver tumor microenvironment.,We conducted bioinformatic analyses of 703 transcriptomes to probe the immune landscape of primary cutaneous melanomas in a population-ascertained cohort.,We identified and validated 6 immunologically distinct subgroups, with the largest having the lowest immune scores and the poorest survival.,This poor-prognosis subgroup exhibited expression profiles consistent with β-catenin-mediated failure to recruit CD141+ DCs.,A second subgroup displayed an equally bad prognosis when histopathological factors were adjusted for, while 4 others maintained comparable survival profiles.,The 6 subgroups were replicated in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) melanomas, where β-catenin signaling was also associated with low immune scores predominantly related to hypomethylation.,The survival benefit of high immune scores was strongest in patients with double-WT tumors for BRAF and NRAS, less strong in BRAF-V600 mutants, and absent in NRAS (codons 12, 13, 61) mutants.,In summary, we report evidence for a β-catenin-mediated immune evasion in 42% of melanoma primaries overall and in 73% of those with the worst outcome.,We further report evidence for an interaction between oncogenic mutations and host response to melanoma, suggesting that patient stratification will improve immunotherapeutic outcomes.
Cross-feedback activation of MAPK and AKT pathways is implicated as a resistance mechanism for cancer therapeutic agents targeting either RAF/MEK or PI3K/AKT/mTOR.,It is thus important to have a better understanding of the molecular resistance mechanisms to improve patient survival benefit from these agents.,Here we show that BRAFV600E is a negative regulator of the AKT pathway.,Expression of BRAFV600E in NIH3T3 cells significantly suppresses MEK inhibitor (RG7167) or mTORC1 inhibitor (rapamycin) induced AKT phosphorylation (pAKT) and downstream signal activation.,Treatment-induced pAKT elevation is found in BRAF wild type melanoma cells but not in a subset of melanoma cell lines harboring BRAFV600E.,Knock-down of BRAFV600E in these melanoma cells elevates basal pAKT and downstream signals, whereas knock-down of CRAF, MEK1/2 or ERK1/2 or treatment with a BRAF inhibitor have no impact on pAKT.,Mechanistically, we show that BRAFV600E interacts with rictor complex (mTORC2) and regulates pAKT through mTORC2.,BRAFV600E is identified in mTORC2 after immunoprecipitation of rictor.,Knock-down of rictor abrogates BRAFV600E depletion induced pAKT.,Knock-down of BRAFV600E enhances cellular enzyme activity of mTORC2.,Aberrant activation of AKT pathway by PTEN loss appears to override the negative impact of BRAFV600E on pAKT.,Taken together, our findings suggest that in a subset of BRAFV600E melanoma cells, BRAFV600E negatively regulates AKT pathway in a rictor-dependent, MEK/ERK and BRAF kinase-independent manner.,Our study reveals a novel molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of feedback loops between the MAPK and AKT pathways.