Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with distant metastatic disease (mMCC).,In an initial analysis from JAVELIN Merkel 200, a phase 2, prospective, open-label, single-arm trial in mMCC, avelumab-a human anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody-showed promising efficacy and a safety profile that was generally manageable and tolerable.,Here, we report the efficacy of avelumab after ≥1 year of follow-up in patients with distant mMCC that had progressed following prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease.,Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg by 1-h intravenous infusion every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal.,The primary endpoint was best overall response.,Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).,Patients (N = 88) were followed for a minimum of 12 months.,The confirmed objective response rate was 33.0% (95% CI, 23.3%-43.8%; complete response: 11.4%).,An estimated 74% of responses lasted ≥1 year, and 72.4% of responses were ongoing at data cutoff.,Responses were durable, with the median DOR not yet reached (95% CI, 18.0 months-not estimable), and PFS was prolonged; 1-year PFS and OS rates were 30% (95% CI, 21%-41%) and 52% (95% CI, 41%-62%), respectively.,Median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI, 7.5-not estimable).,Subgroup analyses suggested a higher probability of response in patients receiving fewer prior lines of systemic therapy, with a lower baseline disease burden, and with PD-L1-positive tumors; however, durable responses occurred irrespective of baseline factors, including tumor Merkel cell polyomavirus status.,With longer follow-up, avelumab continues to show durable responses and promising survival outcomes in patients with distant mMCC whose disease had progressed after chemotherapy.,Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02155647.
Cross-feedback activation of MAPK and AKT pathways is implicated as a resistance mechanism for cancer therapeutic agents targeting either RAF/MEK or PI3K/AKT/mTOR.,It is thus important to have a better understanding of the molecular resistance mechanisms to improve patient survival benefit from these agents.,Here we show that BRAFV600E is a negative regulator of the AKT pathway.,Expression of BRAFV600E in NIH3T3 cells significantly suppresses MEK inhibitor (RG7167) or mTORC1 inhibitor (rapamycin) induced AKT phosphorylation (pAKT) and downstream signal activation.,Treatment-induced pAKT elevation is found in BRAF wild type melanoma cells but not in a subset of melanoma cell lines harboring BRAFV600E.,Knock-down of BRAFV600E in these melanoma cells elevates basal pAKT and downstream signals, whereas knock-down of CRAF, MEK1/2 or ERK1/2 or treatment with a BRAF inhibitor have no impact on pAKT.,Mechanistically, we show that BRAFV600E interacts with rictor complex (mTORC2) and regulates pAKT through mTORC2.,BRAFV600E is identified in mTORC2 after immunoprecipitation of rictor.,Knock-down of rictor abrogates BRAFV600E depletion induced pAKT.,Knock-down of BRAFV600E enhances cellular enzyme activity of mTORC2.,Aberrant activation of AKT pathway by PTEN loss appears to override the negative impact of BRAFV600E on pAKT.,Taken together, our findings suggest that in a subset of BRAFV600E melanoma cells, BRAFV600E negatively regulates AKT pathway in a rictor-dependent, MEK/ERK and BRAF kinase-independent manner.,Our study reveals a novel molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of feedback loops between the MAPK and AKT pathways.