Immunologic responses to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients occur rapidly with pharmacodynamic T cell responses detectable in blood by 3 weeks.,It is unclear, however, whether these early blood-based observations translate to the tumor microenvironment.,We conducted a study of neoadjuvant/adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in stage III/IV melanoma.,We hypothesized that immune reinvigoration in the tumor would be detectable at 3 weeks and this response would correlate with disease-free survival.,We identified a rapid and potent anti-tumor response, with 8/27 patients experiencing a complete or major pathological response after a single dose of anti-PD-1, all of whom remain disease-free.,These rapid pathologic and clinical responses were associated with accumulation of exhausted CD8 T cells in the tumor at 3 weeks with reinvigoration in the blood observed as early as 1 week.,Transcriptional analysis demonstrated a pre-treatment immune signature (Neoadjuvant Response Signature) that was associated with clinical benefit.,In contrast, patients with disease recurrence displayed mechanisms of resistance including immune suppression, mutational escape, and/or tumor evolution.,Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment is effective in high-risk resectable stage III/IV melanoma.,Pathological response and immunological analyses after a single neoadjuvant dose can be used to predict clinical outcome and to dissect underlying mechanisms in checkpoint blockade.
The mechanisms by which melanoma and other cancer cells evade anti-tumor immunity remain incompletely understood.,Here, we show that the growth of tumors formed by mutant BrafV600E mouse melanoma cells in an immunocompetent host requires their production of prostaglandin E2, which suppresses immunity and fuels tumor-promoting inflammation.,Genetic ablation of cyclooxygenases (COX) or prostaglandin E synthases in BrafV600E mouse melanoma cells, as well as in NrasG12D melanoma or in breast or colorectal cancer cells, renders them susceptible to immune control and provokes a shift in the tumor inflammatory profile toward classic anti-cancer immune pathways.,This mouse COX-dependent inflammatory signature is remarkably conserved in human cutaneous melanoma biopsies, arguing for COX activity as a driver of immune suppression across species.,Pre-clinical data demonstrate that inhibition of COX synergizes with anti-PD-1 blockade in inducing eradication of tumors, implying that COX inhibitors could be useful adjuvants for immune-based therapies in cancer patients.,•Cyclooxygenase in tumors induces PGE2 that subverts myeloid cell function•COX ablation in tumors enables immune control•COX inhibition synergizes with checkpoint blockade therapy•A COX inflammatory signature is conserved across mouse and human cancer biopsies,Cyclooxygenase in tumors induces PGE2 that subverts myeloid cell function,COX ablation in tumors enables immune control,COX inhibition synergizes with checkpoint blockade therapy,A COX inflammatory signature is conserved across mouse and human cancer biopsies,Cyclooxygenase-driven prostaglandin E2, produced by a variety of tumors, drives malignant growth through successful evasion of type I interferon and/or T-cell-dependent tumor elimination.,A remarkable synergy between cyclooxygenase inhibitors and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy results in tumor eradication.