Preclinical studies suggest that treatment with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade is associated with enhanced survival and antigen-specific T cell responses over adjuvant treatment1; however, optimal regimens have not been defined.,Herein, we report results from a randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant nivolumab versus combined ipilimumab with nivolumab in 23 patients with high-risk resectable melanoma (NCT02519322).,RECIST overall response rates (ORR), pathologic complete response rates (pCR), treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), and immune correlates of response were assessed.,Treatment with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab yielded high response rates (RECIST ORR 73%, pCR 45%) but substantial toxicity (73% grade 3 trAEs), whereas treatment with nivolumab monotherapy yielded modest responses (ORR 25%, pCR 25%) and low toxicity (8% grade 3 trAEs).,Immune correlates of response were identified, demonstrating higher lymphoid infiltrates in responders to both therapies and a more clonal and diverse T cell infiltrate in responders to nivolumab monotherapy.,These results are the first to describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma and emphasize the need for additional studies to optimize treatment regimens and to validate putative biomarkers.
Genomic analyses of cutaneous melanoma (CM) have yielded biological and therapeutic insights, but understanding of non-ultraviolet (UV)-derived CMs remains limited.,Deeper analysis of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM), a rare sun-shielded melanoma subtype associated with worse survival than CM, is needed to delineate non-UV oncogenic mechanisms.,We thus performed comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analysis of 34 ALM patients.,Unlike CM, somatic alterations were dominated by structural variation and absence of UV-derived mutation signatures.,Only 38% of patients demonstrated driver BRAF/NRAS/NF1 mutations.,In contrast with CM, we observed PAK1 copy gains in 15% of patients, and somatic TERT translocations, copy gains, and missense and promoter mutations, or germline events, in 41% of patients.,We further show that in vitro TERT inhibition has cytotoxic effects on primary ALM cells.,These findings provide insight into the role of TERT in ALM tumorigenesis and reveal preliminary evidence that TERT inhibition represents a potential therapeutic strategy in ALM.