Anti-PD-1 therapy yields objective clinical responses in 30-40% of advanced melanoma patients.,Since most patients do not respond, predictive biomarkers to guide treatment selection are needed.,We hypothesize that MHC-I/II expression is required for tumour antigen presentation and may predict anti-PD-1 therapy response.,In this study, across 60 melanoma cell lines, we find bimodal expression patterns of MHC-II, while MHC-I expression was ubiquitous.,A unique subset of melanomas are capable of expressing MHC-II under basal or IFNγ-stimulated conditions.,Using pathway analysis, we show that MHC-II(+) cell lines demonstrate signatures of ‘PD-1 signalling', ‘allograft rejection' and ‘T-cell receptor signalling', among others.,In two independent cohorts of anti-PD-1-treated melanoma patients, MHC-II positivity on tumour cells is associated with therapeutic response, progression-free and overall survival, as well as CD4+ and CD8+ tumour infiltrate.,MHC-II+ tumours can be identified by melanoma-specific immunohistochemistry using commercially available antibodies for HLA-DR to improve anti-PD-1 patient selection.,Immunotherapy is used to treat melanoma, however patient responses vary widely highlighting the need for factors that can predict therapeutic success.,Here, the authors show that MHC-II molecules expressed by tumour cells are positively correlated with a good response to therapy and overall patient survival.
Cross-feedback activation of MAPK and AKT pathways is implicated as a resistance mechanism for cancer therapeutic agents targeting either RAF/MEK or PI3K/AKT/mTOR.,It is thus important to have a better understanding of the molecular resistance mechanisms to improve patient survival benefit from these agents.,Here we show that BRAFV600E is a negative regulator of the AKT pathway.,Expression of BRAFV600E in NIH3T3 cells significantly suppresses MEK inhibitor (RG7167) or mTORC1 inhibitor (rapamycin) induced AKT phosphorylation (pAKT) and downstream signal activation.,Treatment-induced pAKT elevation is found in BRAF wild type melanoma cells but not in a subset of melanoma cell lines harboring BRAFV600E.,Knock-down of BRAFV600E in these melanoma cells elevates basal pAKT and downstream signals, whereas knock-down of CRAF, MEK1/2 or ERK1/2 or treatment with a BRAF inhibitor have no impact on pAKT.,Mechanistically, we show that BRAFV600E interacts with rictor complex (mTORC2) and regulates pAKT through mTORC2.,BRAFV600E is identified in mTORC2 after immunoprecipitation of rictor.,Knock-down of rictor abrogates BRAFV600E depletion induced pAKT.,Knock-down of BRAFV600E enhances cellular enzyme activity of mTORC2.,Aberrant activation of AKT pathway by PTEN loss appears to override the negative impact of BRAFV600E on pAKT.,Taken together, our findings suggest that in a subset of BRAFV600E melanoma cells, BRAFV600E negatively regulates AKT pathway in a rictor-dependent, MEK/ERK and BRAF kinase-independent manner.,Our study reveals a novel molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of feedback loops between the MAPK and AKT pathways.