Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer associated with a high risk of metastasis.,In 2017, avelumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)) became the first approved treatment for patients with metastatic MCC (mMCC), based on the occurrence of durable responses in a subset of patients.,Here, we report long-term efficacy and safety data and exploratory biomarker analyses in patients with mMCC treated with avelumab.,In a cohort of this single-arm, phase 2 trial (JAVELIN Merkel 200), patients with mMCC and disease progression after prior chemotherapy received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks.,The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1.,Other assessments included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), safety and biomarker analyses.,As of 14 September 2018, 88 patients had been followed up for a median of 40.8 months (range 36.4-49.7 months).,The ORR was 33.0% (95% CI 23.3% to 43.8%), including a complete response in 11.4% (10 patients), and the median duration of response was 40.5 months (95% CI 18.0 months to not estimable).,As of 2 May 2019 (≥44 months of follow-up), the median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI 7.5 to 17.1 months) and the 42-month OS rate was 31% (95% CI 22% to 41%).,Of long-term survivors (OS >36 months) evaluable for PD-L1 expression status (n=22), 81.8% had PD-L1+ tumors.,In exploratory biomarker analyses, high tumor mutational burden (≥2 non-synonymous somatic variants per megabase) and high major histocompatibility complex class I expression (30% of tumors with highest expression) were associated with trends for improved ORR and OS.,In long-term safety assessments (≥36 months of follow-up), no new or unexpected adverse events were reported, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.,Avelumab showed continued durable responses and meaningful long-term survival outcomes in patients with mMCC, reinforcing avelumab as a standard-of-care treatment option for this disease.,NCT02155647
Up to 50% of patients with uveal melanoma develop metastatic disease with poor prognosis.,Regional, mainly liver-directed, therapies may induce limited tumor responses but do not improve overall survival.,Response rates of metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) to systemic chemotherapy are poor.,Insights into the molecular biology of MUM recently led to investigation of new drugs.,In this study, to compare response rates of systemic treatment for MUM we searched Pubmed/Web of Knowledge databases and ASCO website (1980-2013) for “metastatic/uveal/melanoma” and “melanoma/eye.”,Forty studies (one case series, three phase I, five pilot, 22 nonrandomized, and two randomized phase II, one randomized phase III study, data of three expanded access programs, three retrospective studies) with 841 evaluable patients were included in the numeric outcome analysis.,Complete or partial remissions were observed in 39/841 patients (overall response rate [ORR] 4.6%; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 3.3-6.3%), no responses were observed in 22/40 studies.,Progression-free survival ranged from 1.8 to 7.2, median overall survival from 5.2 to 19.0 months as reported in 21/40 and 26/40 studies, respectively.,Best responses were seen for chemoimmunotherapy (ORR 10.3%; 95% CI 4.8-18.7%) though mainly in first-line patients.,Immunotherapy with ipilimumab, antiangiogenetic approaches, and kinase inhibitors have not yet proven to be superior to chemotherapy.,MEK inhibitors are currently investigated in a phase II trial with promising preliminary data.,Despite new insights into genetic and molecular background of MUM, satisfying systemic treatment approaches are currently lacking.,Study results of innovative treatment strategies are urgently awaited.,Forty clinical studies on metastatic uveal melanoma were reviewed regarding responses to systemic treatments.,New insights into genetic and molecular background led to investigation of new substances but promising in vitro data have not yet been translated into satisfying treatment responses; however, preliminary results of ongoing studies are highly encouraging.