Knowledge of key drivers and therapeutic targets in mucosal melanoma is limited due to the paucity of comprehensive mutation data on this rare tumor type.,To better understand the genomic landscape of mucosal melanoma, here we describe whole genome sequencing analysis of 67 tumors and validation of driver gene mutations by exome sequencing of 45 tumors.,Tumors have a low point mutation burden and high numbers of structural variants, including recurrent structural rearrangements targeting TERT, CDK4 and MDM2.,Significantly mutated genes are NRAS, BRAF, NF1, KIT, SF3B1, TP53, SPRED1, ATRX, HLA-A and CHD8.,SF3B1 mutations occur more commonly in female genital and anorectal melanomas and CTNNB1 mutations implicate a role for WNT signaling defects in the genesis of some mucosal melanomas.,TERT aberrations and ATRX mutations are associated with alterations in telomere length.,Mutation profiles of the majority of mucosal melanomas suggest potential susceptibility to CDK4/6 and/or MEK inhibitors.,Mucosal melanomas are challenging to treat partly because so little is known about the genetic drivers underpinning them.,Here, the authors perform a genomic landscape analysis of samples collected from three continents, revealing a potential role for CDK4/6 or MEK inhibition in the treatment of the disease.
Ipilimumab improves the survival of metastatic melanoma patients.,Despite documented, durable objective responses, a significant number of patients fails to benefit from treatment.,The aim of this study was to identify an upfront marker for treatment benefit.,A total of 187 metastatic melanoma patients treated in three Italian Institutions with 3 mg kg−1 ipilimumab, and 27 patients treated with 10 mg kg−1 ipilimumab, were evaluated.,Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was calculated from pre-therapy full blood counts.,Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox models were applied, adjusting for confounders and other prognostic factors.,In the training cohort of 69 patients treated at European Institute of Oncology, pre-therapy NLR was identified as the strongest and independent marker for treatment benefit in multivariate analyses.,Patients with baseline NLR<5 had a significantly improved PFS (HR=0.38; 95% CI: 0.22-0.66; P=0.0006) and OS (HR=0.24; 95% CI: 0.13-0.46; P<0.0001) compared with those with a NLR⩾5.,Associations of low NLR with improved survival were confirmed in three validation cohorts of patients.,Our findings show that baseline NLR is strongly and independently associated with outcome of patients treated with ipilimumab, and may serve to identify patients most likely to benefit from this therapy.