Pembrolizumab demonstrated robust antitumor activity and safety in the phase Ib KEYNOTE-001 study (NCT01295827) of advanced melanoma.,Five-year outcomes in all patients and treatment-naive patients are reported herein.,Patients whose disease progressed following initial response and who received a second course of pembrolizumab were also analyzed.,Patients aged ≥18 years with previously treated or treatment-naive advanced/metastatic melanoma received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient/investigator decision to withdraw.,Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated.,Objective response rate and PFS were based on immune-related response criteria by investigator assessment (data cut-off, September 1, 2017).,KEYNOTE-001 enrolled 655 patients with melanoma; median follow-up was 55 months.,Estimated 5-year OS was 34% in all patients and 41% in treatment-naive patients; median OS was 23.8 months (95% CI, 20.2-30.4) and 38.6 months (95% CI, 27.2-not reached), respectively.,Estimated 5-year PFS rates were 21% in all patients and 29% in treatment-naive patients; median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.8-11.1) and 16.9 months (95% CI, 9.3-35.5), respectively.,Median response duration was not reached; 73% of all responses and 82% of treatment-naive responses were ongoing at data cut-off; the longest response was ongoing at 66 months.,Four patients [all with prior response of complete response (CR)] whose disease progressed during observation subsequently received second-course pembrolizumab.,One patient each achieved CR and partial response (after data cut-off).,Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 86% of patients and resulted in study discontinuation in 7.8%; 17% experienced grade 3/4 TRAE.,This 5-year analysis of KEYNOTE-001 represents the longest follow-up for pembrolizumab to date and confirms the durable antitumor activity and tolerability of pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma.,ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827.
The prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in metastatic melanoma patients remains uncertain, with several studies reporting conflicting results, often biased by the inclusion of patients treated with BRAF and MEK (MAPK) inhibitors.,We therefore interrogated a historical cohort of patients free of the confounding influence of MAPK inhibitor therapy.,Patients with available archival tissue first diagnosed with metastatic melanoma between 2002 and 2006 were analysed.,Mutational analysis was performed using the OncoCarta Panel.,Patient characteristics, treatment outcome and survival were correlated with BRAF/NRAS mutation status.,In 193 patients, 92 (48%) melanomas were BRAF-mutant, 39 (20%) were NRAS-mutant and 62 (32%) were wild-type for BRAF/NRAS mutations (wt).,There was no difference in response to chemotherapy based on mutation status (35-37%).,The distant disease-free interval (DDFI) was significantly shorter in patients with wt melanoma (27.9 months vs 35.1 for BRAF and 49.1 for NRAS) although this was not significant in multivariate analysis.,Survival from stage IV melanoma diagnosis was not significantly different based on mutation status.,The DDFI was significantly shorter in patients with BRAFV600K/R versus BRAFV600E melanoma in univariate and multivariate analyses.,BRAF and NRAS mutation status does not influence survival in metastatic melanoma.