[…] Once an international judicial institution has made up its mind that it desires to have resort to any balancing process between conflicting rights, good faith and reasonableness are certainly preferable to less articulate criteria in accordance with which, otherwise, such adjustments between conflicting rights might be made.” Georg Schwarzenberger, International Law and Order, London, Stevens & Sons, 1971, pp. 103 and 107.
[] Una vez que una institución judicial internacional ha decidido que desea recurrir a un mecanismo para equilibrar derechos contrapuestos, la buena fe y la razonabilidad son ciertamente preferibles a otros criterios menos claros que pueden usarse para hacer esos ajustes entre derechos incompatibles”, Georg Schwarzenberger, International Law and Order, Londres, Stevens & Sons, 1971, págs. 103 y 107.