That is the very nature of immunity: immunity is a shield for the doer, not for the actArticle 35, therefore, neither transforms an unlawful act into a lawful one, nor renders it one which shall not be questioned in any Court.” Thus it can be seen that the Supreme Court's dicta in relation to Presidential immunity certainly extinguished some common misconceptions, chief among them the erroneous idea that such immunity, if not absolute, was near absolute.
Puede verse por ello que la opinión de la Corte Suprema en relación con la inmunidad presidencial acaba ciertamente con algunos errores comunes, entre ellos la idea de que la inmunidad, si no absoluta, era casi absoluta.