According to this party, the argument that injury was at hand also for the companies that had changed business model had to be rejected as it was considered that a change in business model as such would not necessarily indicate that there were no structural problems at hand.
Según esta parte, debía rechazarse el argumento de que también habían sufrido perjuicio las empresas que habían cambiado de modelo empresarial, pues consideraba que un cambio de modelo empresarial no indicaba necesariamente que no hubiera problemas estructurales.