The Committee also noted that, while it was not open to the author to enter into marriage with his same-sex permanent partner, the Act in question did not make a distinction between married and unmarried couples but between homosexual and heterosexual couples.
El Comité también observó que, mientras que el autor no tenía la posibilidad de contraer matrimonio con su pareja permanente del mismo sexo, la ley en cuestión no distinguía entre parejas casadas y no casadas sino entre parejas homosexuales y heterosexuales.