The Court observed that the contract had as its main object the acquisition of 49 % of the capital of Mont Parnès casino and as ancillary object, indivisibly linked with that main object, the supply of services and the performance of works.
El Tribunal observó que el contrato tenía por objeto principal la adquisición del 49 % del capital del casino Mont Parnès y, por objeto secundario, vinculado indivisiblemente al objeto principal, el suministro de servicios y la realización de obras.