Ms. Wedgwood said that in the case of Karttunen v. Finland, the judge had clear financial and personal connections to one of the litigants and had stated repeatedly from the bench that one of the witnesses was lying.
Wedgwood dice que en el caso de Karttunen c. Finlandia, el juez tenía conexiones financieras y personales claras con uno de los litigantes y había afirmado repetidamente desde el estrado que uno de los testigos mentía.