did not disproportionately affect his right to communicate with his lawyer in conditions ensuring full respect for the confidentiality of the communications between them, as the District Court distinguished between tapped conversations in which A.T.M.M. participated as the author's lawyer, and ordering their removal from the evidence, and other conversations, which were admitted as evidence because they were intercepted in the context of the preliminary inquiry against A.T.M.M.
no afectaron desproporcionadamente a su derecho a comunicarse con su abogado en condiciones de pleno respeto del carácter confidencial de las comunicaciones entre ambos, ya que el Tribunal de Distrito hizo una distinción entre las conversaciones intervenidas en las que A. T. M. M. participaba en calidad de abogado del autor, que el Tribunal ordenó retirar del sumario, y las demás conversaciones, que fueron admitidas como pruebas porque se habían intervenido en el contexto de la investigación preliminar sobre A. T. M. M.