The Ombudsman made a further remark with regard to the Commission's overall handling of the complainant's application.In case 2782/2006/(MHZ)RT, even if the Commission paid the indemnity insurance benefits to which the complainant was entitled, the Ombudsman closed the case with two critical remarks because of the delay with which this had occurred and because of behaviour which the Ombudsman considered discourteous towards the complainant.
Rinne an tOmbudsman ráiteas breise i ndáil leis an mbealach tríd is tríd ar dhéileáil an Coimisiún le hiarratas an ghearánaigh.I gcás 2782/2006/(MHZ)RT, cé gur íoc an Coimisiún na sochair árachais slánaíochta a raibh an gearánach ina dteideal, dhún an tOmbudsman an cás le dhá ráitis chriticiúla mar gheall ar an moill i gceist leis na sochair sin a íoc agus mar gheall ar iompar a bhí míchúirtéiseach i leith an ghearán‑aigh, i dtuairim an Ombudsman.