This is consistent both with caselaw of the Court of Justice (Cf. notably caselaw on the precautionary principle in Article 174 (2) TEC (replaced by Article III-233 of the Constitution): judgment of the CFI of 11 September 2002, T-13/99, Pfizer vs. Council, with numerous references to earlier case-law; and a series of judgments on Article 33 (ex 39) on the principles of agricultural law, e.g. judgment of the Court of Justice C-265/85, Van den Berg, 1987 ECR 1155: scrutiny of the principle of market stabilisation and of reasonable expectations) and with the approach of the Member States' constitutional systems to
Tagann sé seo le cásdlí na Cúirte Breithiúnais (féach go háirithe an cásdlí maidir le ‘prionsabal an réamhchúraim’ in Airteagal 174(2) CCE (a bhfuil Airteagal III 223 den Bhunreacht curtha ina ionad): breithiúnas na Cúirte Céadchéime an 11 Mean Fómhair 2002, T 13/99, Pfizer v. An Chomhairle, le tagairtí iomadúla don chásdlí roimhe sin; agus sraith breithiúnas ar Airteagal 33 (sean Airteagal 39) maidir le prionsabail dhlí na talmhaíochta, m.sh. breithiúnas na Cúirte Breithiúnais C 265/85, Van den Berg [1987] ECR 1155: mionscrúdú ar phrionsabal chobhsú an