According to the SEGO, in perimenopausal women with heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding who require contraception, the levonorgestrel IUD (also called MIRENA IUD) is the first option.

According to the SEGO, in perimenopausal women with heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding who require contraception, the levonorgestrel IUD (also called MIRENA IUD) is [HIDDEN].

45-year-old woman. Two previous pregnancies with normal deliveries (G2PN2). Heavy menstrual bleeding for approximately 1 year. Ultrasound shows a 2 cm subserosal myoma that has been stable for several years. Endometrial biopsy was performed and it was normal. The patient has hemoglobin 10 g/dL despite oral ferrotherapy and the amount of menstrual flow has not decreased despite treatment with tranexamic acid and mefenamic acid. Which of the following is the treatment of first choice in this patient?

Total hysterectomy preserving appendages.

Clinical practice guidelines on menorrhagia: management of abnormal uterine bleeding before menopause.

Normal menstrual periods last 3-6 days and involve blood loss of up to 80ml. Menorrhagia is defined as menstrual periods lasting more than 7 days and/or involving blood loss greater than 80ml. The prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is estimated at 11-13% in the general population and increases with age, reaching 24% in those aged 36-40 years. A blood count for red cells+platelets to test for anemia is recommended on a first-line basis for women consulting for AUB whose history and/or bleeding score justify it. A pregnancy test by an hCG assay should be ordered. A speculum examination and Pap smear, according to the French High Health Authority guidelines should be performed early on to rule out any cervical disease. Pelvic ultrasound, both abdominal (suprapubic) and transvaginal, is recommended as a first-line procedure for the etiological diagnosis of AUB. Hysteroscopy or hysterosonography can be suggested as a second-line procedure. MRI is not recommended as a first-line procedure. In idiopathic AUB, the first-line treatment is medical, with efficacy ranked as follows: levonorgestrel IUD, tranexamic acid, oral contraceptives, either estrogens and progestins or synthetic progestins only, 21 days a month, or NSAIDs. When hormone treatment is contraindicated or immediate pregnancy is desired, tranexamic acid is indicated. Iron must be included for patients with iron-deficiency anemia. For women who do not wish to become pregnant in the future and who have idiopathic AUB, the long-term efficacy of conservative surgical treatment is greater than that of oral medical treatment. Placement of a levonorgestrel IUD (or administration of tranexamic acid by default) is recommended for women with idiopathic AUB. If this fails, a conservative surgical technique must be proposed; the choices include second-generation endometrial ablation techniques (thermal balloon, microwave, radiofrequency), or, if necessary, first-generation techniques (endometrectomy, roller-ball). A first-line hysterectomy is not recommended in this context. Should a hysterectomy be selected for functional bleeding, it should be performed by the vaginal or laparoscopic routes.

Diagnosis and treatment of menorrhagia.

One-third of all women experience heavy menstrual bleeding at some point in their life. In western countries, about 5% of women of reproductive age will seek help for menorrhagia annually. Half of all women who consult for hypermenorrhea have some uterine abnormality, most often fibroids (among patients under 40 years of age) and endometrial polyps (above 40 years of age). Appropriate treatment considerably improves the quality of life of these patients, and it is important to make a rigorous assessment of the patient to provide the best treatment options. This guideline provides instructions on how to examine and treat women of fertile age who have menorrhagia. The subject's own assessment of the amount of menstrual blood loss does not generally reflect the true amount. All patients should undergo a pelvic examination and, if the menstrual pattern has changed substantially or if anaemia is present, a vaginal sonography should be carried out as the most important supplemental examination. Vaginal sonography combined with an endometrial biopsy is a reliable method for diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma, but it is insufficient for diagnosing endometrial polyps and fibroids; these can be diagnosed more reliably by sonohysterography or hysteroscopy. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and tranexamic acid reduce menstrual blood loss by 20-60%, and the effectiveness of a hormonal intrauterine system (IUS) is comparable with that of endometrial ablation or hysterectomy. Cyclic progestogens do not significantly reduce menstrual bleeding of women who ovulate. Treatment should be started with one of the drug therapies, i.e. the IUS, tranexamic acid, anti-inflammatory drugs, or oral contraceptive. Drug treatment should be used and evaluated before surgical interventions are considered. With an effective training and feedback system, it is possible to organise the diagnostics, medical treatment and follow-up of heavy menstrual bleeding in the primary health care setting or in outpatient clinics, which reduces the burden on specialist health care.

One patient, two uteri, two endometrial ablations: case report of thermal balloon ablation in uterine didelphys.

To describe the clinical application and outcomes after endometrial ablation with ThermachoiceIII (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) in a patient with uterine didelphys with heavy menstrual bleeding. Case report. Inner-city community obstetrics and gynecology clinic. A 44-year-old Hispanic woman, gravida 3, para 0, with three spontaneous abortions. The patient underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy, gynecologic dilation and curettage, and endometrial ablation with ThermachoiceIII. Menstrual pattern at 3 months postoperatively, as either amenorrhea (complete lack of menstrual flow), hypomenorrhea (scant or minimal flow lasting <5 days, requiring only light pads), or failure (flow similar to pretreatment state or requiring any other therapy), as well as dysmenorrhea reduction from baseline. Hemoglobin value at 3 months was compared with baseline. At 3 months, hypomenorrhea was maintained. Bleeding days were 10 per month at baseline and 2 per month after therapy. Visual analogue scale score for dysmenorrhea was 8 at baseline and 2 (mean) at study end. Hemoglobin was 8.9 g/dL at baseline (preoperatively) and 11.1 g/dL at 3 months postoperatively. Successful conservative therapy of menorrhagia seems possible with thermal balloon ablation in a uterine didelphic patient.

Medical treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding in primary care: 10-year data from the ECLIPSE trial.

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common problem that can significantly affect women's lives. There is a lack of evidence on long-term outcomes after seeking treatment. To assess continuation rates of medical treatments and rates of surgery in women 10 years after initial management for HMB in primary care. This was a prospective observational cohort study. Women with HMB who participated in the ECLIPSE primary care trial (ISRCTN86566246) completed questionnaires 10 years after randomisation to the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) or other usual medical treatments (oral tranexamic acid, mefenamic acid, combined oestrogen-progestogen; or progesterone alone). Outcomes were rates of surgery, medical treatments, and quality of life using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and EuroQoL EQ-5D. The responding cohort of 206 women was demographically and clinically representative of the original trial population. Mean age at baseline was 41.9 years (SD 4.9) and 53.7 years (SD 5.1) at follow-up. Over the 10-year follow-up, 60 of 206 (29.1%) women had surgery (hysterectomy <in</i = 34, 16.5%; endometrial ablation <in</i = 26, 12.6%). Between 5 and 10 years, 89 women (43.2%) ceased all medical treatments and 88 (42.7%) used LNG-IUS alone or in combination with other treatments. Fifty-six women (27.2%) were using LNG-IUS at 10 years. There were improvements over time in quality-of-life scores, with no evidence of differences in these or other outcomes between the two groups. Medical treatments for women with HMB can be successfully initiated in primary care, with low rates of surgery and improvement in quality of life observed a decade later.

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Premenopausal Women.

Abnormal uterine bleeding is a common symptom in women. The acronym PALM-COEIN facilitates classification, with PALM referring to structural etiologies (polyp, adenomyosis, leiomyoma, malignancy and hyperplasia), and COEIN referring to nonstructural etiologies (coagulopathy, ovulatory dysfunction, endometrial, iatrogenic, not otherwise classified). Evaluation involves a detailed history and pelvic examination, as well as laboratory testing that includes a pregnancy test and complete blood count. Endometrial sampling should be performed in patients 45 years and older, and in younger patients with a significant history of unopposed estrogen exposure. Transvaginal ultrasonography is the preferred imaging modality and is indicated if a structural etiology is suspected or if symptoms persist despite appropriate initial treatment. Medical and surgical treatment options are available. Emergency interventions for severe bleeding that causes hemodynamic instability include uterine tamponade, intravenous estrogen, dilation and curettage, and uterine artery embolization. To avoid surgical risks and preserve fertility, medical management is the preferred initial approach for hemodynamically stable patients. Patients with severe bleeding can be treated initially with oral estrogen, high-dose estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives, oral progestins, or intravenous tranexamic acid. The most effective long-term medical treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding is the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Other long-term medical treatment options include estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives, oral progestins, oral tranexamic acid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and depot medroxyprogesterone. Hysterectomy is the definitive treatment. A lower-risk surgical option is endometrial ablation, which performs as well as the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Select patients with chronic uterine bleeding can be treated with myomectomy, polypectomy, or uterine artery embolization.

Heavy menstrual bleeding

NICE guidelines says that for women (with HMB and no identified pathology or fibroids less than 3 cm in diameter) who do not wish to have pharmacological treatment and who do not want to conserve their fertility, surgical options could be considered as a first-line treatment option. And options are hysterectomy and second generation endometrial ablation. With hysterectomy more effective than second generation endometrial ablation. Tranexamic acid treatments, which reduce bleeding by inhibiting the clot-dissolving enzymes, appear to be more effective than anti-inflammatory treatment like NSAIDs, but are less effective than LNG-IUS. Tranexamic acid tablets may reduce loss by up to 50%. This may be combined with hormonal medication previously mentioned. NSAIDs are also used to reduce heavy menstrual bleeding by an average of 20-46%. For this purpose, NSAIDs are ingested for only 5 days of the menstrual cycle, limiting their most common adverse effect of dyspepsia.

[Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding: A French multicenter study].

To evaluate the levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system as an alternative to surgical treatment in patients presenting with menorrhagia. In the set of a prospective multicenter study, 49 patients with menorrhagia resistant to medical treatment and/or referred for hysterectomy or endometrial ablation were included. Medical visits were organized 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system. Visual score of menstrual bleeding and satisfaction index were noted on each visit. Transvaginal ultrasound, pap smear, endometrial biopsy, and clinical data were retrieved one month before and 12 months after inclusion for tolerance evaluation. Renouncement rate was 90.0% (95% CI = 80.7-96.6%). After a twelve months follow-up, 86.1% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their clinical state. We found a significant increase of hemoglobin rates from baseline (14,0 versus 12,9 g/dl; P < 10(-4)). Similar increases were also found in serum iron and ferritin. This study confirms the efficacy of the levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system in the control and reduction of menstrual blood loss in patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding. The high rate of surgery cancellation is a proof of the potential role of the levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system as an alternative treatment in these patients.

The levonorgestrel intrauterine system is an effective treatment in women with abnormal uterine bleeding and anticoagulant therapy.

To evaluate the efficacy of levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (LNG-IUS) in obese women with AUB on anticoagulant therapy. Prospective observational case series (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3). University affiliated teaching hospital. Premenopausal women on Warfarin therapy. From January 2002 through January 2007, 10 women were identified from the senior author's clinical practice (G.A.V.). After clinical assessment, including Papanicolaou smear, endometrial biopsy, and pelvic sonography, the LNG-IUS was placed to treat their AUB. The median and range of age, parity, and body mass index were 45 years (34-49), 1 (0-4), and 38 kg/m(2) (26-52), respectively. All women were receiving warfarin therapy (4-12.5 mg/d) for previous venous thromboembolism. Some patients had additional comorbid conditions and were at high risk for traditional medical or surgical therapies. After placement of the LNG-IUS, all women reported menstrual reduction at 3 and 6 months. By 12 months, 1 woman with large fibroids expelled the LNG-IUS and was treated with transfemoral uterine artery embolization. Two women had amenorrhea, and 7 had hypomenorrhea. At 2 to 5 years, 1 woman expelled the LNG-IUS and hysterectomy indicated extensive adenomyosis in a 195-g uterus, and 1 woman had hysteroscopic endometrial ablation, 4 were menopausal, 2 had amenorrhea, and 1 had hypomenorrhea. In the 5 women with uterine fibroids measuring 4.2 to 147 cm(3), the fibroids were reduced in volume by approximately 75% in 2, were no longer detectable in 1, were subsequently shown to be adenomyoma in 1, and required uterine artery embolization in 1. In properly assessed and selected obese, premenopausal women with AUB receiving warfarin therapy and at high risk for traditional therapies, the LNG-IUS was an effective treatment in 70% of patients.

Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation without endometrial preparation.

To study the effectiveness of endometrial ablation by hysteroscopic resection without prior medical preparation for the treatment of women with persistent menorrhagia. From January 1996 to January 1997, a total of 170 women with persistent menorrhagia and/or dysmenorrhea and who underwent hysteroscopic endometrial resection were included in the study. A thorough suction curettage was done before the procedure. The operation was conducted through a continuous flow hysteroscopic resectoscope with electrosurgery while the patient was under intravenous general anesthesia. The distention fluid used was 5% dextrose with a gravity feed infusion system consisting of a 2-1 bag between 1 and 1.5 m above the uterine cavity. After the procedure, the patients' conditions were followed for at least 6-18 months by telephone interview or at our clinic. A total of 127 women were available for a follow-up period of at least 6 months. Operative complications were 3%; three women had fever and received oral antibiotics; no uterine perforation occurred; one case of post-operative bleeding was controlled by intrauterine balloon inflation; the average operation time was 21 min; The mean fluid deficit was 435 ml. Ninety-nine out of 127 women (78%) had adequately controlled menorrhagia (18.1% had amenorrhea, 42.5% hypomenorrhea and 17.3% had normal menstrual flow), while 27 women (21.2%) were failed due to unchanged or heavier menstrual flow after surgery. Eleven (40%) out of the 27 failed cases had myoma with menorrhagia, whereas only five women (5%) out of the 99 adequately treated women had myomas (P < 0.05). Thirty-eight (54%) out of the 70 women with severe dysmenorrhea reported either lessening dysmenorrhea or no dysmenorrhea after the surgery. A total of 76 women (60%) were satisfied with the procedure. A second surgical procedure, either a resection or hysterectomy, was necessary in 13 women (10%) after ablation (seven received repeated ablations and six underwent hysterectomy). Endometrial ablation without endometrial suppression is a cheap, effective and acceptable procedure for treatment in women with persisted persistent menorrhagia.

Combined Endometrial Ablation and Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Use in Women With Dysmenorrhea and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Novel Approach for Challenging Cases.

To evaluate the feasibility and impact of levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) on treatment failure after endometrial ablation (EA) in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and dysmenorrhea at 4 years. Cohort study (Canadian Task Force II-2). An academic institution in the upper Midwest. All women with HMB and dysmenorrhea who underwent EA with combined placement of LNG-IUS (EA/LNG-IUS cohort, 23 women) after 2005 and an historic reference group from women who had EA alone (EA cohort, 65 women) from 1998 through the end of 2005. Radiofrequency EA, thermal balloon ablation, and LNG-IUS. The primary outcome was treatment failure defined as persistent pain, bleeding, and hysterectomy after EA at 4 years. The combined treatment failure outcome was documented in 2 patients (8.7%) in the EA/LNG-IUS group and 19 patients (29.2%) in the EA group with an unadjusted OR of .23 (95% CI, .05-1.08). After adjusting for known risk factors of failure, the adjusted OR was .19 (95% CI, .26-.88). None of the women who underwent EA/LNG-IUS had hysterectomy for treatment failure compared with 16 (24%) in the EA group (p = .009); postablation pelvic pain was documented in 1 woman (4.3%) in the EA/LNG-IUS group compared with 8 women (12.3%) in the EA group (p = .24). One woman in the EA/LNG-IUS group (4.3%) presented with persistent bleeding compared with 15 (23.1%) in the EA group (p = .059). Office removal of the intrauterine device was performed in 4 women with no complications. LNG-IUS insertion at the time of EA is feasible and can provide added benefit after EA in women with dysmenorrhea and HMB.

Use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of adenomyosis associated heavy menstrual bleeding.

To evaluate the effects of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of adenomyosis associated with heavy menstrual bleeding. The retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in Izmir, Turkey, and comprised data on adenomyosis patients who were implanted with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device for heavy menstrual bleeding between December 2004 and January 2008. After the insertion of the device, all patients were followed up by transvaginal ultrasonography and serum haemoglobin levels and menstrual patterns were determined at the 6th and 12th month. Data was analysed using SPSS 10. The mean age of the 42 women in the study was 43.2 +/- 0.8 years. At the sixth month, amenorrhoea, oligomenorrhoea, spotting and regular menstrual flow were 9.5% (n = 4), 7% (n = 3), 19% (n = 8), and 64% (n = 27), respectively. At the 12th month, the same parametres were 9.5% (n = 4), 7% (n = 3), 12% (n = 5), and 71% (n = 30), respectively. Haemoglobin levels had increased and endometrial thickness had decreased, and these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The easy-to-use levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device can be added to the treatment options as a well-tolerated alternative in cases where a woman who has completed her fertility and does not request a hysterectomy has anaemia associated with adenomyosis.

Heavy menstrual bleeding

Usually, oral combined contraceptive or progesterone only pills may be taken for a few months, but for longer-term treatment the alternatives of injected Depo Provera or the more recent progesterone releasing IntraUterine System (IUS) may be used. In particular, an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and dienogest may be more effective than tranexamic acid, NSAIDs and IUDs. Fibroids may respond to hormonal treatment, and if they do not, then surgical removal may be required. Concerning hormonal treatment, the NICE guidelines states that: "No evidence was found on MRI-guided transcutaneous focused ultrasound for uterine fibroids nor for the progestogen-only pill, injectable progestogens, or progestogen implants." Progestogen pills, independently if taken in a short or long course, are not as effective at reducing menstrual blood loss as LNG-IUS or tranexamic acid.

Menstrual disorder

Amenorrhea associated with structural anomalies can be addressed with surgical treatment such as gonadectomy. Menorrhagia Acute management of menstrual bleeding includes hormonal therapy with estrogen or oral contraceptives until bleeding has stopped followed by a oral contraceptive tapering regimen. Adjunctive therapy may include iron supplements and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients who do not respond to hormonal therapy may use antifibrinolytics. Procedural therapy such as a suction curettage and intrauterine balloon tamponade are reserved for patients who do not respond to medication therapy and do not put fertility at risk. Life-threatening situations may consider more invasive procedures such as endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, and hysterectomy. Long-term management include estrogen-containing therapy and progestin therapy.

[The role of copper-releasing intrauterine device or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on uterine bleeding and iron status (prospective study of 8 years)].

The aims of this study were the effects of copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) compared to progesterone (PRG-IUS) or levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNg-IUS) on menstrual bleeding, menorrhagia and dysfunctional uterine bleeding. The authors evaluated the effect of copper surface area on uterine bleeding. Between March 1992 and November 1999, 223 women, referred to I Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Rome, were recruited in a prospective study with follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months to evaluate the incidence of endometrial pathology. The study includes 38 fertile women with regular menstruations and without intrauterine devices, as control group, and 185 patients with intrauterine devices, divides as follows: - 117 copper-releasing intrauterine devices: 30 with a copper (Cu) surface area =200 mm2, releasing 45 microgram Cu/24h (Nova T (R)); 27 with a copper surface area =250 mm2, releasing 50 microgram Cu/24h (Multiload 250 (R)); 25 with a copper surface area =375 mm2, releasing 65 microgram Cu/24h (Multiload 375 (R)); 20 with a copper surface area =384 mm2, releasing 100 microgram Cu/24h (No Gravid M (R)); 15 with a copper surface area =440 mm2, releasing 120 microgram Cu/24h (No Gravid 0,5 (R)). - 68 progesterone/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices: 40 progesterone-releasing intrauterine systems (Progestasert(R)); 28 levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems 20 mg/24h (Mirena (R)). A total of 211 subjects had data that were valid for analysis: 12 women out of 223 (5,4%) were excluded from the prospective study lost to follow-up. A venous blood sample for serum ferritin (mg/l), iron (mg/dl), hemoglobin (g/dl), hematocrit (%), blood cell count, MCHC and MCV was taken during follow-up. PRG or LNg-IUSs determined a significant reduction in menstrual blood loss and in irregular bleeding by gradually reducing endometrial fitness and vascularisation. Serum ferritin significantly increased in women inserted with LNg- IUSs already after 6 months (26+/-22 e 28+/-14 microgram/l versus 32.5+/-19 e 34.5+/-25 microgram/l). Hemoglobin significantly increased (p>0.05) 6 months after insertion. On the contrary this did not occur with the insertion of Cu-IUDs. We observed that the increased amount of copper, released by IUD, causes increasing of bleeding. The LNg-IUS is a new contraceptive method combining the advantages of both hormonal and intrauterine contraception. In addition, it can be considered an alternative method in the treatment of menorrhagia and dysfunctional uterine bleeding. On the contrary, in women inserted with Cu-IUDs, the main reason of menorrhagia probably is due both to the shape of device and to copper surface area.

Thermal balloon endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: an evidence-based analysis.

The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of thermal balloon endometrial ablation (TBEA) for dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB). CONDITION AND TARGET POPULATION Abnormal uterine bleeding is defined as an increase in the frequency of menstruation, duration of flow or amount of blood loss. (1) DUB is a diagnosis of exclusion when there is no pelvic pathology or underlying medical cause for the increased bleeding. (1) It is characterized by heavy prolonged flow with or without breakthrough bleeding. It may occur as frequent, irregular, or unpredictable bleeding; lengthy menstrual periods; bleeding between periods; or a heavy flow during periods. Menorrhagia, cyclical HMB over several consecutive cycles during the reproductive years, is the most frequent form of DUB. The incidence of DUB has not been reported in the literature. For Ontario, an expert estimated that about 15% to 20% of women over 30 years have DUB. The prevalence increases with age and peaks just before menopause. (1) Using 2001 Ontario census-based population estimates, there are about 2 million women between the ages of 30 and 49 years; therefore, of these, about 290,965 to 387,953 may have DUB. THERMAL BALLOON ENDOMETRIAL ABLATION Since the 1990s, second-generation endometrial ablation (EA) techniques developed, the aim to provide simpler, quicker, and more effective treatment options for menorrhagia compared with first-generation EA techniques and hysterectomy. (2) Compared with first-generation techniques these depend less on the people operating them and more on the actual devices to ensure safety and efficacy. TBEA relies on the transfer of heat from heated liquid within a balloon that is inserted into the uterus. (2) It does not require a hysteroscope for direct visualization of the uterus and can be performed under local anesthesia. In order to use TBEA, patients with DUB cannot have a long (>10-12 cm) or irregularly shaped uterine cavity, because the balloon must be in direct contact with the uterine wall to cause ablation. For Ontario, an expert estimated that about 70% of patients with DUB considered for EA would have a uterus suitable for TBEA based on these criteria. If 70% of Ontario women between 30 and 49 years of age with DUB have a uterus suitable for TBEA, then about 203,675 to 271,567 women may be eligible. However, some of these women will be successfully treated by drugs or will want amenorrhea (the cessation of their periods) and therefore choose to have a hysterectomy. The standard Medical Advisory Secretariat search strategy was used to locate international health technology assessments and English-language journal articles published from January 1996 to June 2004. A Cochrane systematic review from 2004 was identified that examined the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of TBEA for heavy menstrual bleeding. (2) Another literature search was done to update information from the systematic review. A 2004 systematic review of the literature by Garside et al. (2) in the United Kingdom, found that overall, there were few significant differences between outcomes for first-generation techniques and TBEA. The outcomes were bleeding, postoperative complications, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and repeat surgery rates. Significant differences were reported most often by one study by Pellicano et al., (3) but this was a level 2 study with methodological weaknesses. Furthermore, according to Garside et al., there was considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity among the studies in the systematic review. Therefore, a quantitative synthesis using meta-analysis was not done. In Garfield and colleagues' review: TBEA had significantly shorter operating and theatre times (P < .05, < .01, and .0001).TBEA had fewer intraoperative adverse effects (e.g., reported rates of uterine perforation with RB ablation: from 1% to 5%; TBEA: 0%; rates of cervical laceration with RB: 2% to 5%; TBEA 0%).They found no studies have directly compared second-generation techniques and hysterectomy; therefore, the comparison can only be indirectly inferred from studies of first-generation techniques and hysterectomy.Compared with hysterectomy, TCRE and RB are quicker to perform and result in shorter hospitalization stays and a faster return to work.Hysterectomy results in more adverse effects.Satisfaction with hysterectomy is initially higher, but there is no difference after 2 years.Studies (level 2 evidence) published after Garside's systematic review support these conclusions.A study with level 2 evidence reported a significantly higher risk overall of intraoperative complications for RB compared with TBEA (P < .001). This included uterine perforation (RB, 5%; TBEA, 0%) and suspicion of perforation (RB, 2%; TBEA, 0%).A multicentre long-term case series (level 4 evidence) that examined avoidance of hysterectomy after TBEA for menorrhagia reported that 86% of women who had TBEA did not require a hysterectomy, and 75% did not have any further surgery during a follow-up period of 4 to 6 years. (4)Several TBEA studies did not provide justification for using general anesthesia over local anesthesia.Patient preferences for different treatments will depend on a woman's desire for amenorrhea as an outcome and/or avoidance of major surgery. Hysterectomy is the only procedure that can guarantee amenorrhea. TBEA will not totally replace hysterectomy in the treatment of DUB, because some women may want cessation of menstruation.Ensuring that patient expectations are consistent with the outcomes achievable with TBEA is important to obtain high levels of satisfaction. Vilos et al. (5) noted that up to one-half of patients who underwent a second attempt at TBEA might have avoided the second procedure with proper preoperative counselling. Meyer et al. (6) noted that one consideration for patients with menorrhagia (and no structural lesions) is to return to normal or less blood loss rather than amenorrhea. Patients may have distinct concepts of menstrual bleeding depending on cultural background, and maintaining an acceptable menstrual flow instead of amenorrhea may represent a healthier status. (7)A budget impact analysis suggests that the net annual budget outlay for TBEA would be between $1.4 million in savings and $2.8 million in additional outlays. (Note: Not all savings would be realized directly by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, because much of the savings would accrue to the global budgets of hospitals). TBEA is effective, safe, and cost-effective for patients with DUB.For women who are not worried about amenorrhea, first-generation techniques offer advantages over hysterectomy.TBEA is a better alternative to first-generation techniques for DUB, because it is associated with fewer intraoperative adverse effects.

The impact of alternative treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding on hysterectomy rates in a tertiary referral center.

The purpose of this study was to estimate the influence of alternatives to hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) on hysterectomy rates. Retrospective cohort study. Canadian Task Force II-2. University hospital. Premenopausal patients with AUB. Medical records of all premenopausal patients treated for AUB in our university clinic between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2004, were reviewed. Patients were identified based on (specific) diagnostic and therapy codes used in the registry system of the hospital. The total number of placements of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD), hysteroscopic surgery, and hysterectomies performed/year was estimated. In addition, the course of treatment of each patient was assessed. A total of 640 patients received surgery and 246 LNG-IUDs were placed. The proportion of endometrial ablations decreased significantly over time (p <.001), whereas hysteroscopic polyp or myoma removal (p =.030) and insertion of LNG-IUD (p <.001) both increased. The proportion of patients receiving hysterectomy for AUB as their first therapy decreased significantly (p =.005) from 40.6% to 31.4%, although the total number of patients receiving hysterectomy remained similar (p =.449). The 5-year intervention-free percentage for LNG-IUD was 70.6% (SD = 3.3%), for hysteroscopic polyp or myoma removal 75.5% (SD = 3.3%), and for endometrial ablation 78.0% (SD = 4.3%; p =.067). Despite the introduction of alternative therapies, the total hysterectomy rate in the management of AUB did not decrease in our clinic.

Cost-effectiveness of treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Heavy menstrual bleeding affects up to one third of women in the United States, resulting in a reduced quality of life and significant cost to the health care system. Multiple treatment options exist, offering different potential for symptom control at highly variable initial costs, but the relative value of these treatment options is unknown. The objective of the study was to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of 4 treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding: hysterectomy, resectoscopic endometrial ablation, nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation, and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. We formulated a decision tree evaluating private payer costs and quality-adjusted life years over a 5 year time horizon for premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding and no suspected malignancy. For each treatment option, we used probabilities derived from literature review to estimate frequencies of minor complications, major complications, and treatment failure resulting in the need for additional treatments. Treatments were compared in terms of total average costs, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to understand the range of possible outcomes if model inputs were varied. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system had superior quality-of-life outcomes to hysterectomy with lower costs. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was cost-effective compared with hysterectomy in the majority of scenarios (90%). Both resectoscopic and nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation were associated with reduced costs compared with hysterectomy but resulted in a lower average quality of life. According to standard willingness-to-pay thresholds, resectoscopic endometrial ablation was considered cost effective compared with hysterectomy in 44% of scenarios, and nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation was considered cost effective compared with hysterectomy in 53% of scenarios. Comparing all trade-offs associated with 4 possible treatments of heavy menstrual bleeding, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was superior to both hysterectomy and endometrial ablation in terms of cost and quality of life. Hysterectomy is associated with a superior quality of life and fewer complications than either type of ablation but at a higher cost. For women who are unwilling or unable to choose the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system as a first-course treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding, consideration of cost, procedure-specific complications, and patient preferences can guide the decision between hysterectomy and ablation.

Adenomyosis

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices or hormonal IUDs, such as the Mirena, are an effective treatment for adenomyosis. They reduce symptoms by causing decidualization of the endometrium, reducing or eliminating menstrual flow. Additionally, by helping downregulate estrogen receptors, hormonal IUDs shrink the clusters of endometrial tissue within the myometrium. This leads to reduced menstrual blood flow, helps the uterus contract more properly, and helps to reduce the menstrual pain. The use of hormonal IUDs in patients with adenomyosis have been proven to reduce menstrual bleeding, improve anemia and iron levels, reduce pain, and even result in an improvement of adenomyosis with a smaller uterus on medical imaging. At least in the short term, patients who can tolerate hormonal IUDs for the treatment of adenomyosis result in equivalent improvement of symptoms and better quality-of-life and social well-being as compared to women who undergo a hysterectomy. Hormonal IUDs are

[Hysteroscopic resection of submucosal myomas in abnormal uterine bleeding: results of a 4-year prospective study].

The evaluation of the effect of transcervical resection of submucous myoma/s in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Prospective clinical study. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic. 45 patients with resected submucous myoma/s within the period 1995-1998 were selected. Patients in whom resection of myoma was combined with endometrial ablation were excluded. The average age of the cohort was 43 years (29-53). In 37 patients (82%) therapeutical curettage was performed for severe bleeding in the past (3 procedures on average, interval 1-7). In 16 patients (36%) transfusion was administered in the treatment of anaemia secondary to abnormal uterine bleeding in the past. Hysteroscopy, ultrasound scan or both techniques were used to diagnose and classify myomas. In 39 patients 1 myoma was resected, in 6 patients 2 myomas. In 12 (27%) patients myoma of 0., in 29 (64%) of I. and in 4 (9%) of II. has been diagnosed according to the ESH classification. In case of several myomas, the classification was based on the one of the highest degree. Surgery was performed in the early proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. Purisol (sorbitol and mannitol) was used as a distension medium. Myomas were resected using loop high frequency electroendoresection technique. In 3 (7%) patients myomas of ESH II. were resected in more steps--in 2 cases (5%) in 2 steps and in 1 case (2%) in 3 steps. In patients with myomas classified as a 0. and I., only the character of menstrual cycle has been monitored after surgery. Ultrasound investigation was performed in patients with myomas of II. 3 months after surgery. The bleeding was controlled in terms of eumenorrhoea or hypomenorrhoea in all 45 patients (100%). Ultrasound investigation showed no residual myoma in any of 4 patients after resection of II. myoma. One case fluid overload syndrome of minor degree was documented as the only complication. Hysteroscopic high frequency endorsection is a safe and effective method and method of choice in the treatment of submucous myomas in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. The high success rate in our cohort is certainly influenced by the number of patients included and by the length of follow-up.

Endometrial ablation

Endometrial ablation is most often employed in women who suffer from excessive menstrual bleeding, who have failed medical therapy and do not wish to undergo a hysterectomy. Heavy menstrual bleeding is most commonly due to dysfunctional uterine bleeding or adenomyosis. The procedure is almost always performed as an outpatient treatment, either at the hospital, ambulatory surgery center, or physician office. The Endometrial Ablation procedure is primarily performed while patients are under local and/or light sedative anesthesia, or if necessary, general or spinal anesthesia. Patients normally leave the treatment facility within one hour following the procedure and generally spend one day resting at home, before returning to the activities of daily living.

The effect on menstrual blood loss in women with uterine fibroids of a novel "frameless" intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing drug delivery system: a pilot study.

To evaluate the effect on menstrual blood loss, in women with uterine fibroids, of a novel "frameless" intrauterine drug delivery system (IUS), FibroPlant-levonorgestrel (LNG), releasing 14 microg of LNG per day. An open label, non-comparative ongoing pilot study. Fourteen insertions were performed in premenopausal women between 39 and 48 years of age for the treatment of menorrhagia. The effect on menstrual blood loss was evaluated using a simple visual assessment technique. Women were followed-up for at least 12 months (range 12-30 months). At the time of study analysis the total number of women-months was 283. All women, except one reported greatly reduced bleeding. In two women, the treatment failed although both reported reduced bleeding. One failure (patient no. 4) was due to the presence of a large endometrial polyp. This patient underwent hysterectomy. The other women (patient no. 1) had submucosal fibroids. She refused hysterectomy and is continuing treatment. In the other 12 patients, reduction of bleeding was appreciable after one month of treatment and tended to decrease further over the next months to stabilize afterwards. The mean bleeding score before treatment was 465 (185-960) and dropped to a mean score of 100 (range 5-300) after a minimum of 12 months of treatment which is highly statistically significant (P<0.001). In eight women, the bleeding reduced to very low scores. An effect on the size of the uterine fibroids could not be demonstrated. Significant spotting was rare after the first 3 months following insertion. Neither complications (e.g. infection, expulsion or perforation) nor pregnancies occurred. The FibroPlant-LNG IUS was well tolerated by all women involved in the study and no systemic hormonal side effects were reported. This study suggests that FibroPlant-LNG IUS is effective to significantly reduce the amount of menstrual blood loss in women with menorrhagia in the presence of intramural and subserosal fibroids and can avoid surgery. The strong endometrial suppression is the principal mechanism explaining the effect on menstrual blood loss of the IUS. The two failures probably explain that a successful treatment in women with endometrial abnormalities (e.g. polyps, submucous fibroids) is unlikely with the IUS. The low daily release rate of LNG from the FibroPlant-LNG IUS results in a low incidence of hormonal side effects. The simple design characteristics and revolutionary anchoring system account for minimizing the occurrence of complaints of pain and expulsion. The flexible fibrous delivery system adapts to cavities of every size even when severely distorted.

Endometrial ablation

Sterilization Women who wish to become pregnant should not undergo endometrial ablation; pregnancy is rare (less than 2 percent) and can have mortal risks for the mother and child. Effectiveness The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approves and audits clinical studies to test and evaluate the effectiveness of all endometrial ablation treatments. Two patient effectiveness outcomes are measured at one year following treatment: 1.) Success Rate = the % of women who have their bleeding reduced to a normal period level or less, and 2.) Amenorrhea Rate = the % of women that have their bleeding completely eliminated. According to the results of the Randomized Controlled Trials performed for the FDA approval of the different treatment options, effectiveness Success Rates range from a high of 93% to a low of 67%, and the Amenorrhea Rates range from a high of 72% to a low of 22%.

Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a significant health problem in premenopausal women; it can reduce their quality of life and can cause social disruption and physical problems such as iron deficiency anaemia. First-line treatment has traditionally consisted of medical therapy (hormonal and non-hormonal), but this is not always successful in reducing menstrual bleeding to acceptable levels. Hysterectomy is a definitive treatment, but it is more costly and carries some risk. Endometrial ablation may be an alternative to hysterectomy that preserves the uterus. Many techniques have been developed to 'ablate' (remove) the lining of the endometrium. First-generation techniques require visualisation of the uterus with a hysteroscope during the procedure; although it is safe, this procedure requires specific technical skills. Newer techniques for endometrial ablation (second- and third-generation techniques) have been developed that are quicker than previous approaches because they do not require hysteroscopic visualisation during the procedure. To compare the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of endometrial destruction techniques to reduce heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in premenopausal women. We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo (from inception to May 2018). We also searched trials registers, other sources of unpublished or grey literature, and reference lists of retrieved studies, and we made contact with experts in the field and with pharmaceutical companies that manufacture ablation devices. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different endometrial ablation or resection techniques for women reporting HMB without known uterine pathology, other than fibroids outside the uterine cavity and smaller than 3 centimetres, were eligible. Outcomes included improvement in HMB and in quality of life, patient satisfaction, operative outcomes, complications, and the need for further surgery, including hysterectomy. Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trials for risk of bias, and extracted data. We contacted study authors for clarification of methods or for additional data. We assessed adverse events only if they were separately measured in the included trials. We undertook comparisons with individual techniques as well as an overall comparison of first- and second-generation ablation methods. We included in this update 28 studies (4287 women) with sample sizes ranging from 20 to 372. Most studies had low risk of bias for randomisation, attrition, and selective reporting. Less than half of these studies had adequate allocation concealment, and most were unblinded. Using GRADE, we determined that the quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. We downgraded evidence for risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency.Overall comparison of second-generation versus first-generation (i.e. gold standard hysteroscopic ablative) techniques revealed no evidence of differences in amenorrhoea at 1 year and 2 to 5 years' follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.27; 12 studies; 2145 women; I² = 77%; and RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.72; 672 women; 4 studies; I² = 80%; very low-quality evidence) and showed subjective improvement at 1 year follow-up based on a Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) (< 75 or acceptable improvement) (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.09; 5 studies; 1282 women; I² = 0%; and RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.28; 236 women; 1 study; low-quality evidence). Study results showed no difference in patient satisfaction between second- and first-generation techniques at 1 year follow-up (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04; 11 studies; 1750 women; I² = 36%; low-quality evidence) nor at 2 to 5 years' follow-up (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.13; 672 women; 4 studies; I² = 81%).Compared with first-generation techniques, second-generation endometrial ablation techniques were associated with shorter operating times (mean difference (MD) -13.52 minutes, 95% CI -16.90 to -10.13; 9 studies; 1822 women; low-quality evidence) and more often were performed under local rather than general anaesthesia (RR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8 to 4.4; 6 studies; 1434 women; low-quality evidence).We are uncertain whether perforation rates differed between second- and first-generation techniques (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.01; 1885 women; 8 studies; I² = 0%).Trials reported little or no difference between second- and first-generation techniques in requirement for additional surgery (ablation or hysterectomy) at 1 year follow-up (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.26; 6 studies: 935 women; low-quality evidence). At 5 years, results showed probably little or no difference between groups in the requirement for hysterectomy (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.22; 4 studies; 758 women; moderate-quality evidence). Approaches to endometrial ablation have evolved from first-generation techniques to newer second- and third-generation approaches. Current evidence suggests that compared to first-generation techniques (endometrial laser ablation, transcervical resection of the endometrium, rollerball endometrial ablation), second-generation approaches (thermal balloon endometrial ablation, microwave endometrial ablation, hydrothermal ablation, bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation, endometrial cryotherapy) are of equivalent efficacy for heavy menstrual bleeding, with comparable rates of amenorrhoea and improvement on the PBAC. Second-generation techniques are associated with shorter operating times and are performed more often under local rather than general anaesthesia. It is uncertain whether perforation rates differed between second- and first-generation techniques. Evidence was insufficient to show which second-generation approaches were superior to others and to reveal the efficacy and safety of third-generation approaches versus first- and second-generation techniques.

Endometrial ablation in the year 2000--do we have more methods than indications?

Approximately 20-25% of hysterectomies are done for the relief of menorrhagia, excessive menstrual bleeding without gynecologic pathology. Menorrhagia represents a widespread clinical problem, and it is one of the leading causes of elective hysterectomy in women with a normal uterus in the US as well as in Europe. The current management of dysfunctional bleeding includes medical or different types of surgical therapies. When patients wish a nonsurgical therapy for menorrhagia we can offer them different medical treatments, a IUD releasing levonorgestrel or a therapeutic dilatation and curettage (D&C). Until recently, women who did not respond to medication were limited to either hysterectomy or continued cycles of heavy menstrual bleeding. Methods for hysteroscopic endometrial ablation were introduced in the 1980s including Nd:YAG laser ablation, transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) and 'rollerball' electrocoagulation (RBE). These first-generation procedures are nowadays the gold standard for the hysteroscopic treatment of menorrhagia. In the 1990s different types of therapeutic alternatives were introduced. The second generation of hysteroscopic ablation techniques include: balloon heating methods, methods with intrauterine instillation of heated saline, the endometrial laser intrauterine thermal therapy procedure ELITT using a diode laser, global 3-D bipolar ablation method, punctual vaporizing methods, photodynamic endometrial ablation method, microwave endometrial ablation method, the radiofrequency method menostat and a cryotherapy method.

Medical management of heavy menstrual bleeding: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common complaint among reproductive-aged women, which negatively affects their health as well as their social, professional, and family lives. Modern medical management usually provides effective control of HMB irrespective of the underlying cause. Surgical interventions should be reserved for women with significant pelvic pathology and those unresponsive to medical therapy. The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive summary of the efficacy and safety of available medical treatments of HMB. A comprehensive MEDLINE and EMBASE literature search was undertaken using selected terms associated with HMB to identify clinical studies published before March 20, 2013, that reported changes in menstrual blood loss in women receiving medical intervention. The effectiveness of treatments to reduce HMB due to endometrial dysfunction in descending order was as follows: (1) the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) (initial release rate of 20 μg of LNG per 24 hours), (2) combined hormonal contraceptives (oral or transvaginal), (3) tranexamic acid, and (4) long-course oral progestogens (≥3 weeks per cycle). The LNG-IUS was found to reduce HMB due to some structural causes (leiomyomas and adenomyosis). The reduction in menstrual blood loss achieved with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and short-course oral progestogens (≤14 days per cycle) is less impressive but may be sufficient for women who have marginally increased blood loss. For women not seeking pregnancy, the LNG-IUS is the first-line medical therapy for HMB, with combined hormonal contraceptives as second choice. For other women, fewer effective options exist.

Heavy menstrual bleeding due to primary myelofibrosis in a woman: a case report.

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) due to primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is secondary to progressive pancytopenia, which is a rare and difficult to treat condition. We report this case with the aim of sharing our experiences and exploring a safe and effective way to treat patients with HMB due to PMF. A 40-year-old woman who had been taking combined oral contraceptives (COCs) for eight years was admitted to our hospital with HMB. A bone marrow biopsy report and genetic testing confirmed the diagnosis of PMF. Norethisterone tablets had an unsatisfactory hemostatic effect. The patient underwent a hysteroscopy and the insertion of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). At the 5-month follow-up, the patient had a lower menstruation bleeding volume. COCs are unsuitable for managing the menstruation of patients with PMF in the long run. Endometrial ablation is the long-term method. However, the patient's fertility requirements should be taken into account. The insertion of an LNG-IUS after hysteroscopic curettage to exclude endometrial malignant lesions is recommended.

Hysterectomy

Alternatives Depending on the indication there are alternatives to hysterectomy: Heavy bleeding Levonorgestrel intrauterine devices are highly effective at controlling dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) or menorrhagia and should be considered before any surgery. Menorrhagia (heavy or abnormal menstrual bleeding) may also be treated with the less invasive endometrial ablation which is an outpatient procedure in which the lining of the uterus is destroyed with heat, mechanically or by radio frequency ablation. Endometrial ablation greatly reduces or entirely eliminates monthly bleeding in ninety percent of patients with DUB. It is not effective for patients with very thick uterine lining or uterine fibroids. Uterine fibroids

Heavy menstrual bleeding

A definitive treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding is to perform hysterectomy (removal of the uterus). The risks of the procedure have been reduced with measures to reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis after surgery, and the switch from the front abdominal to vaginal approach greatly minimizing the discomfort and recuperation time for the patient; however extensive fibroids may make the womb too large for removal by the vaginal approach. Small fibroids may be dealt with by local removal (myomectomy). A further surgical technique is endometrial ablation (destruction) by the use of applied heat (thermoablation). The effectiveness of endometrial ablation is probably similar to that of LNG‐IUS but the evidence is uncertain if hysterectomy is better or worse than LNG-IUS for improving HMB.

Heavy menstrual bleeding

Surgery Dilation and curettage (D&C) is not recommended for cases of simple heavy menstrual bleeding, having a reserved role if a spontaneous abortion is incomplete Endometrial ablation is not recommended for women with active or recent genital or pelvic infection, known or suspected endometrial hyperplasia or malignancy. Uterine artery embolization (UAE): The rate of serious complications is comparable to that of myomectomy or hysterectomy; however, UAE presents an increased risk of minor complications and requiring surgery within two to five years. Hysteroscopic myomectomy to remove fibroids over 3 cm in diameter Hysterectomy

von Willebrand disease and other disorders of hemostasis in the patient with menorrhagia.

Separately, von Willebrand disease and menorrhagia are two relatively common conditions; in combination they occur at a prevalence of approximately 11-16%. Such patients exhibit a reduced quality of life and can incur a relatively high rate of gynecologic interventions; for example dilatation and curettage, endometrial ablation and hysterectomy. Initial evaluation involves a focused history for the following bleeding symptoms: menorrhagia since menarche, easy bruising of greater than 5 cm 1-2 times/month, frequent gum bleeding when flossing or brushing teeth or epistaxis 1-2 times/month. In addition, for those who have already undergone invasive interventions with the subsequent risk for hemorrhage, inquiry should be made regarding excessive bleeding with childbirth, dental tooth extraction and/or surgery. Step-wise testing includes a complete blood cell count and an assessment of the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, iron profile, serum creatinine and thyroid-stimulating hormone level, followed by Factor VIII level, von Willebrand factor antigen and ristocetin cofactor, followed by consideration of platelet aggregation studies. Additional hemostatic studies may include obtaining a Factor XI level and euglobulin clot lysis time. Intuitively, failure to diagnose an underlying hemostatic disorder may lead to continued menorrhagia and diminished quality of life, as well as unnecessary surgical interventions that may in turn be fraught with an increased risk of bleeding. The management of von Willebrand disease-related menorrhagia involves consideration of the patient's age, childbearing status and preference. In the adolescent, surgical intervention is not an option, whereas an older patient beyond her childbearing years may choose a hysterectomy as a definitive treatment in lieu of continued medical therapy with intranasal/subcutaneous 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP), oral antifibrinolytic agents or oral contraceptive. The sexually active patient may initially choose a trial of oral contraceptive or the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, Mirena((R)). Pending ongoing comparative trials in von Willebrand disease-related menorrhagia of intranasal DDAVP, tranexamic acid and the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, specific recommendations cannot be made at present regarding the superiority of one intervention compared with another. It should also be noted that the dose and schedule of intranasal DDAVP, tranexamic acid and epsilon-amino caproic acid have not been well established and warrant further study in combination and at various doses and schedules.

Hormonal IUDs

The IUD with levonorgestrel was first approved for medical use in 1990 in Finland and in the United States in 2000. It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines. Medical uses The hormonal IUD is an extremely effective method of birth control, and a 2021 study demonstrated that it may be used for emergency contraception. In addition to birth control, the hormonal IUD is used for prevention and treatment of: Heavy menstrual periods Endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain Adenomyosis and dysmenorrhea Anemia Endometrial hyperplasia (especially in pre-menopausal women who wish to maintain fertility in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia) In some cases, use of a hormonal IUD may prevent a need for a hysterectomy.

HEALTH: laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus second-generation endometrial ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common problem affecting approximately 1.5 million women in England and Wales with a major impact on their physical, emotional, social and material quality of life. It is the fourth most common reason why women attend gynaecology outpatient clinics and accounts for one-fifth of all gynaecology outpatient referrals. Initial treatment in primary care is medical - either by means of oral or injected medication or the levonorgestrel-intrauterine system (Mirena®). If medical treatment fails then surgical treatment can be offered, either endometrial ablation (EA), which destroys the lining of the cavity of the uterus (endometrium), or hysterectomy, i.e. surgical removal of the uterus. While effective, conventional hysterectomy is invasive and carries a risk of complications due to injury to other pelvic structures. The procedure can be simplified and complications minimised by undertaking a 'supracervical' hysterectomy where the cervix is left in situ and only the body of the uterus removed. Recent advances in endoscopic technologies have facilitated increased use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) which can be performed as a day-case procedure and is relatively easy for the surgeon to learn. HEALTH (Hysterectomy or Endometrial AbLation Trial for Heavy menstrual bleeding) aims to address the question 'Is LASH superior to second generation EA for the treatment of HMB in terms of clinical and cost effectiveness?' Women aged < 50 years, with HMB, in whom medical treatment has failed and who are eligible for EA will be considered for trial entry. We aim to recruit women from approximately 30 active secondary care centres in the UK NHS who carry out both surgical procedures. All women who consent will complete a diary of pain symptoms from day 1 to day 14 after surgery, postal questionnaires at six weeks and six months after surgery and 15 months post randomisation. Healthcare utilisation questions will also be completed at the six-week, six-month and 15-month time-points. Measuring the comparative effectiveness of LASH vs EA will provide the robust evidence required to determine whether the new technique should be adopted widely in the NHS. International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ISRCTN49013893 . Registered on 28 January 2014.