Approximately 10% of women of reproductive age seek medical care each year for evaluation and treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. Women with heavy menstrual bleeding suffer diminished quality of life, [1-2] lose work productivity,[3] and utilize expensive medical resources.[4] Although hysterectomy is considered the "definitive" treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding, many other options are available including endometrial ablation, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), combined oral contraceptives (COCs), oral progestin, NSAIDs, and tranexamic acid. Better characterization of the relative efficacy of commonly used therapies for abnormal uterine bleeding will improve patient counseling, facilitate informed decision-making, and reduce the burden of unnecessary procedures on both the patient and the health care system. The data comparing these treatments in terms of patient-based outcome measures and bleeding-related quality of life are quite limited. We plan to prospectively compare bleeding-related quality of life between treatment methods within a cohort of patients receiving clinical care for heavy menstrual bleeding.