user-1: Whats the different between leaving, abounding, letting go, push away, say out of aversion, anger, and renouncing?
Both seems to be combined with tanha (thirst), yet one is called ku-sala (bad-cutting away) and one a-ku-sala (not bad-cutting away). And/Or is renouncing combined with a-moha, not-not-knowing or moha, not-knowing/delusion root of aversive notion of desire for leaving, letting go?

If, by forsaking
  a limited ease,
  he would see
  an abundance of ease,
  the enlightened man
  would forsake
  the limited ease
  for the sake
  of the abundant.
— Dhp 290

Sound gready, that what gives rise to "aversion", like strong desire for refined pleasure, yet even 'enlightened' situation.
How is renouncing conductive toward and on the path, leaving and let go part of the path of liberation?

A realated topic with given space for discussion and possible answer can be found here.
(note that this question is not given for trade, stacks, exchange or entertainment, but for ones work trough the wheel here and liberation)

user14789: well you said the difference, aversion is not samma sankappa, because aversion is devoid of dispassion from the knowledge of the worthlessness of whatever  is avoided.

And what, Brethren, is what is free from the asavas?
The destruction of lust, Brethren, the destruction of hatred, the
  destruction of illusion, - that is called what is free from the
  asavas.
And what, Brethren, is the path that goes to what is free from the
  asavas?
Herein, Brethren, a brother practises right aim, which is founded on
  singleness of heart, founded on dispassion, founded on cessation,
  whicb leads to giving up.
He strives, puts forth energy, exerts bis mind and strives.
That, Brethren, is called 'the path that goes to what is free from the
  asavas.'

singleness of heart translates weirdly viveka-nissitam
here is what happens with the the akulasa sankappa
http://obo.genaud.net/a/dhamma-vinaya/pts/sn/04_salv/sn04.35.096.wood.pts.htm

user11009: 
Vibhava tanha arises as a result of attachement, aversion and ignorance combined with the wrong view of Nicca, Suka , Atta and Subha. 
Nekkhamma is a result of non-attachement, non-aversion and wisdom combind with the right view of Anicca, Dukkha ,Anatta and Asubha. 


-1: <p>Whats the different between leaving, abounding, letting go, push away, say out of aversion, anger, and renouncing?</p>

<p>Both seems to be combined with tanha (thirst), yet one is called ku-sala (bad-cutting away) and one a-ku-sala (not bad-cutting away). And/Or is renouncing combined with a-moha, not-not-knowing or moha, not-knowing/delusion root of aversive notion of desire for leaving, letting go?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><code>If, by forsaking
  a limited ease,
  he would see
  an abundance of ease,
  the enlightened man
  would forsake
  the limited ease
  for the sake
  of the abundant.</code></p>
  
  <p>— <a href="http://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/ptf/dhamma/nekkhamma/index_en.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Dhp 290</a></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Sound gready, that what gives rise to "aversion", like strong desire for refined pleasure, yet even 'enlightened' situation.</p>

<p>How is renouncing conductive toward and on the path, leaving and let go part of the path of liberation?</p>

<hr>

<p><em>A realated topic with given space for discussion and possible answer can be found <a href="http://sangham.net/index.php/topic,9320.msg19053.html#msg19053" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>.</em></p>

<p><em>(note that this question is not given for trade, stacks, exchange or entertainment, but for ones work trough the wheel here and liberation)</em></p>
 14789: <p>well you said the difference, aversion is not samma sankappa, because aversion is devoid of dispassion from the knowledge of the worthlessness of whatever  is avoided.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>And what, Brethren, is what is free from the asavas?</p>
  
  <p>The destruction of lust, Brethren, the destruction of hatred, the
  destruction of illusion, - that is called what is free from the
  asavas.</p>
  
  <p>And what, Brethren, is the path that goes to what is free from the
  asavas?</p>
  
  <p>Herein, Brethren, a brother practises right aim, which is founded on
  singleness of heart, founded on dispassion, founded on cessation,
  whicb leads to giving up.</p>
  
  <p>He strives, puts forth energy, exerts bis mind and strives.</p>
  
  <p>That, Brethren, is called 'the path that goes to what is free from the
  asavas.'</p>
</blockquote>

<p>singleness of heart translates weirdly viveka-nissitam</p>

<p>here is what happens with the the akulasa sankappa
<a href="http://obo.genaud.net/a/dhamma-vinaya/pts/sn/04_salv/sn04.35.096.wood.pts.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://obo.genaud.net/a/dhamma-vinaya/pts/sn/04_salv/sn04.35.096.wood.pts.htm</a></p>
 11009: <ul>
<li>Vibhava tanha arises as a result of attachement, aversion and ignorance combined with the wrong view of Nicca, Suka , Atta and Subha. </li>
<li>Nekkhamma is a result of non-attachement, non-aversion and wisdom combind with the right view of Anicca, Dukkha ,Anatta and Asubha. </li>
</ul>
