user-1: I live in Denmark and here we have gotten an amazing concept called "City Gardens". Its basically a 3 x 3 meter garden in the middle of the city granting city dwellers acces to grow their own vegetables, flowers etc. 
Yesterday i got one of these gardens (see picture below). I thought about cleaning it up and plant some new stuff in it but then i saw that there were many small plants and flowers growing in it already. 
I do know that the first precept is not broken since it covers life that has a breath and a consciousness. But i was wondering if im breaking any other buddhist ethics or precepts by interfering with that plant life already living there?
Help would be much appreciated. Thank you.
Lanka


user2265: People who worry about sentience of plant life as beings are actually considered delusional.
I will revise this answer when I find which Buddhist text I read this from but just know that if my memory serves me well, then I remember reading a original Buddhist text Q&A about sentience with the answer ending with a list of delusional trains of thoughts: "there are certain people whom think that since plants are sentient they are also beings, like our brothers and sisters, and to eat them would be wrong. This is a delusion and false thinking."
The take home message: just because something is sentient does not mean it is a being.
However, this does not give you license to go out trampling every plant you see (anger karma and an unnecessarily decreased beneficial thing in the world--you aren't eating it you are smashing it away).
I also add that the attitude of care and love that you approach plants with is excellent and definitely beneficial.

user5391: I am too concerned that I am hurting the 'weeds' when clearing my garden. It's hard to find a balance when you want to be clean of clutter in a communal space. For the most part, I have let the weeds flower at least, giving the insects plenty of available food sources. I've been particular about leaving certain plants ie. Ragwort, as I know cinnabar moth caterpillars eat only this. But now the flowers have died off, I'm now just going to have to dig them up. It's going to be a long task, but I'm also looking forward to the end result of a clean patio ready for my friends to come over and enjoy the summer with me in the garden :)

user-1: It's not a sin, however, for doing plant killing you would curse yourself and every generation would be affected. If you kill plant life, make sure you plant one; one to one; Theruwan saranayi

user-1: In AN 4.198  (quotes below from Bhikkhu Bodhi translation), we have the Buddha discussing four kinds of persons existing in the world: 

the one who torments/tortures himself; 
the one who torments/tortures others; 
the one who torments/tortures himself and others;
and the one who does not torment/torture himself and others:


And how is a person one who does not torment himself or pursue the practice of torturing himself and does not torment others or pursue the practice of torturing others -- the one who, since he torments neither himself nor others, in this very life dwells hungerless, quenched and cooled, experiencing bliss, having himself become divine?  

Among the characteristics of this person, we find:

He abstains from injuring seeds and plants.


user715: In "What the Buddha never taught", by Tim Ward, there's a rather humorous section describing the workarounds that monks resort to when they need to kill plants or disturb insects, either to collect firewood, or clear the walking path or empty a water bucket full of mosquito larvae. Since they can't ask a lay person to directly do these harmful deeds for them, they resort to innuendo and hints. This irks the author who resents being the lay assassin for the monks. The author points out that in the end, despite all the fussy rules, of course the jungle always gets cleared one way or the other, and the bucket full of mosquitoes always gets overturned.
Thai Buddhists love their meat, but they can't kill animals, so typically butchers in Thailand are Thai Muslims.
I agree with the author, for I think such workarounds miss the point of Buddhism. 
Life is precious, and life needs to be respected. There's no need to make a fuss about it, lest it become a rite and ritual. Nor is it right action to pass on the burden of destruction to someone else.
I'm a vegetarian because I respect life, but if I have to clear a garden I'd rather clear it out myself and take on the karmic consequence than get someone to do it for me. 

user-1: Good question or better Sadhu for being that heedful! In short remember aside of getting support by certain opinions simply the advises to Rahula and simply process according to them. Maybe Atma can provide some food for thoughts and arguments to deny certain views later.

user254: Buddhist monks
I think that the vinaya forbids monks to dig: see Destroying Vegetation.
That depends on the school/tradition though, e.g. in some countries where the lay society doesn't support the monks, the monks might do agriculture themselves.
Jains
There's some historical relationship between Buddhism and the Jains. Perhaps Gautama studied with Jain teachers before his enlightenment? Jainism takes ahimsa to a level beyond that in Buddhist doctrine, e.g. vegetarianism is mandatory and it forbids the eating of roots etc.
Tiny animals
I think too I read something of someone visiting Tibet a while ago and reporting that people there were careful about how they dug: very slowly, wanting to avoid hurting worms and so on that live in the soil.
Similarly here's a sentence from Wikipedia's description of Jainism,

Strict Jains, including Jain monks and nuns, do not eat root vegetables such as potatoes, onions and garlic, because tiny organisms are injured when the plant is pulled up, and also because a bulb or tuber's ability to sprout is seen as characteristic of a living being.

The introduction to the Buddhist Vinaya that I mentioned above says,

Digging, breaking the surface of the earth, lighting a fire on it, pounding a stake into it are all disallowed. (If such 'earth' is more gravel or sand than 'soil' — and has no living creatures in it — it may then be dug.)


user5733: It is all about intention. you must set your intention on peaceable love, fruition of that love in your garden. there are weeds which are essentially herbs, and you may want to leaner a little of them, as they are actually medicine, and food.
On the weekend we had lectures from the venerable Robina Courtin who spoke of a child crying that his shaved head would take the home from his lice. but if you take yogurt, garlic, you kill the bad flora in your gut. If you take sugar, you kill the good bacteria.if you take medicine, you do the same. everything you do, every action is constructive and destructive. and that is beautiful. it is not the action, but the mind. it is vitriol, pleasure in killing, hatred we must steer clear of. 
Your intention is to create a thing of beauty, food for others, something lovely and peaceful to provide retreat. I would build on those thoughts. In good health. Do your best. forget the rest.

user832: The Buddha reportedly ate a meal of pork at least once in his life. So one pig had to lose its life. The Buddha ate rice pudding so some cow had to eat the grass to produce milk and some weeds must have lost their life to have grown the rice.
It seems that no matter what we do in life some harm is done. Maybe do less harm would be more sensible. The Buddha advocated the middle way between hedonism and asceticism. The Tibetan Buddhists eat meat. So what are we to do?
Do no harm against life for selfish ends. Do no harm against our neighbor to gain advantage. Dedicate your work to all beings. 
In your case you could donate some of the crop to food pantries servicing the homeless or needy. 
In another sense there is only consciousness. When we weed the garden in meditation we make room for a new consciousness. When we plant seeds in the garden or consciousness, we are planting the divine seed of awakening.
Being paralyzed by fear of doing harm is not the middle way as I see it.
Perhaps the saying should be Clear your intentions of doing harm. Have an intention of giving life.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path

Right intention[edit] Right intention (samyak-saṃkalpa / sammā
  sankappa) can also be known as "right thought", "right resolve",
  "right conception", "right aspiration" or "the exertion of our own
  will to change". In this factor, the practitioner should constantly
  aspire to rid themselves of whatever qualities they know to be wrong
  and immoral. Correct understanding of right view will help the
  practitioner to discern the differences between right intention and
  wrong intention. In the Chinese and Pali Canon, it is explained
  thus:[19][19][21][31][32]
And what is right resolve? Being resolved on renunciation, on freedom
  from ill will, on harmlessness: This is called right resolve.
It means the renunciation of the worldly things and an accordant
  greater commitment to the spiritual path; good will; and a commitment
  to non-violence, or harmlessness, towards other living beings.


-1: <p>I live in Denmark and here we have gotten an amazing concept called "City Gardens". Its basically a 3 x 3 meter garden in the middle of the city granting city dwellers acces to grow their own vegetables, flowers etc. </p>

<p>Yesterday i got one of these gardens (see picture below). I thought about cleaning it up and plant some new stuff in it but then i saw that there were many small plants and flowers growing in it already. </p>

<p>I do know that the first precept is not broken since it covers life that has a breath and a consciousness. But i was wondering if im breaking any other buddhist ethics or precepts by interfering with that plant life already living there?</p>

<p>Help would be much appreciated. Thank you.</p>

<p>Lanka</p>

<p><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/JiQ31.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></p>
 2265: <p><strong>People who worry about sentience of plant life as beings are actually considered delusional.</strong></p>

<p>I will revise this answer when I find which Buddhist text I read this from but just know that if my memory serves me well, then I remember reading a original Buddhist text Q&amp;A about sentience with the answer ending with a list of delusional trains of thoughts: "there are certain people whom think that since plants are sentient they are also beings, like our brothers and sisters, and to eat them would be wrong. This is a delusion and false thinking."</p>

<p>The take home message: <strong>just because something is sentient does not mean it is a being.</strong></p>

<p>However, this does not give you license to go out trampling every plant you see (anger karma and an unnecessarily decreased beneficial thing in the world--you aren't eating it you are smashing it away).</p>

<p>I also add that the attitude of care and love that you approach plants with is excellent and definitely beneficial.</p>
 5391: <p>I am too concerned that I am hurting the 'weeds' when clearing my garden. It's hard to find a balance when you want to be clean of clutter in a communal space. For the most part, I have let the weeds flower at least, giving the insects plenty of available food sources. I've been particular about leaving certain plants ie. Ragwort, as I know cinnabar moth caterpillars eat only this. But now the flowers have died off, I'm now just going to have to dig them up. It's going to be a long task, but I'm also looking forward to the end result of a clean patio ready for my friends to come over and enjoy the summer with me in the garden :)</p>
 -1: <p>It's not a sin, however, for doing plant killing you would curse yourself and every generation would be affected. If you kill plant life, make sure you plant one; one to one; Theruwan saranayi</p>
 -1: <p>In AN 4.198  (quotes below from Bhikkhu Bodhi translation), we have the Buddha discussing four kinds of persons existing in the world: </p>

<ol>
<li>the one who torments/tortures himself; </li>
<li>the one who torments/tortures others; </li>
<li>the one who torments/tortures himself and others;</li>
<li>and the one who does not torment/torture himself and others:</li>
</ol>

<blockquote>
  <p>And how is a person one who does not torment himself or pursue the practice of torturing himself and does not torment others or pursue the practice of torturing others -- the one who, since he torments neither himself nor others, in this very life dwells hungerless, quenched and cooled, experiencing bliss, having himself become divine?  </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Among the characteristics of this person, we find:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>He abstains from injuring seeds and plants.</p>
</blockquote>
 715: <p>In <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17946664-what-the-buddha-never-taught" rel="nofollow">"What the Buddha never taught", by Tim Ward</a>, there's a rather humorous section describing the workarounds that monks resort to when they need to kill plants or disturb insects, either to collect firewood, or clear the walking path or empty a water bucket full of mosquito larvae. Since they can't ask a lay person to directly do these harmful deeds for them, they resort to innuendo and hints. This irks the author who resents being the lay assassin for the monks. The author points out that in the end, despite all the fussy rules, of course the jungle always gets cleared one way or the other, and the bucket full of mosquitoes always gets overturned.</p>

<p>Thai Buddhists love their meat, but they can't kill animals, so typically butchers in Thailand are Thai Muslims.</p>

<p>I agree with the author, for I think such workarounds miss the point of Buddhism. </p>

<p>Life is precious, and life needs to be respected. There's no need to make a fuss about it, lest it become a rite and ritual. Nor is it right action to pass on the burden of destruction to someone else.</p>

<p>I'm a vegetarian because I respect life, but if I have to clear a garden I'd rather clear it out myself and take on the karmic consequence than get someone to do it for me. </p>
 -1: <p>Good question or better Sadhu for being that heedful! In short remember aside of getting support by certain opinions simply <a href="http://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/tipitaka/mn/mn.061.than_en.html" rel="nofollow">the advises to Rahula</a> and simply process according to them. Maybe Atma can provide some food for thoughts and arguments to deny certain views later.</p>
 254: <p><strong>Buddhist monks</strong></p>

<p>I think that the vinaya forbids <em>monks</em> to dig: see <a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/ariyesako/layguide.html#veggie" rel="nofollow">Destroying Vegetation</a>.</p>

<p>That depends on the school/tradition though, e.g. in some countries where the lay society doesn't support the monks, the monks might do agriculture themselves.</p>

<p><strong>Jains</strong></p>

<p>There's some historical relationship between Buddhism and the Jains. Perhaps Gautama studied with Jain teachers before his enlightenment? Jainism takes <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahimsa" rel="nofollow">ahimsa</a></em> to a level beyond that in Buddhist doctrine, e.g. vegetarianism is mandatory and it forbids the eating of roots etc.</p>

<p><strong>Tiny animals</strong></p>

<p>I think too I read something of someone visiting Tibet a while ago and reporting that people there were careful about how they dug: very slowly, wanting to avoid hurting worms and so on that live in the soil.</p>

<p>Similarly here's a sentence from Wikipedia's description of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jainism#Non-violence_.28ahimsa.29" rel="nofollow">Jainism</a>,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Strict Jains, including Jain monks and nuns, do not eat root vegetables such as potatoes, onions and garlic, because tiny organisms are injured when the plant is pulled up, and also because a bulb or tuber's ability to sprout is seen as characteristic of a living being.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The introduction to the Buddhist Vinaya that I mentioned above says,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Digging, breaking the surface of the earth, lighting a fire on it, pounding a stake into it are all disallowed. (If such 'earth' is more gravel or sand than 'soil' — and has no living creatures in it — it may then be dug.)</p>
</blockquote>
 5733: <p>It is all about intention. you must set your intention on peaceable love, fruition of that love in your garden. there are weeds which are essentially herbs, and you may want to leaner a little of them, as they are actually medicine, and food.</p>

<p>On the weekend we had lectures from the venerable Robina Courtin who spoke of a child crying that his shaved head would take the home from his lice. but if you take yogurt, garlic, you kill the bad flora in your gut. If you take sugar, you kill the good bacteria.if you take medicine, you do the same. everything you do, every action is constructive and destructive. and that is beautiful. it is not the action, but the mind. it is vitriol, pleasure in killing, hatred we must steer clear of. </p>

<p>Your intention is to create a thing of beauty, food for others, something lovely and peaceful to provide retreat. I would build on those thoughts. In good health. Do your best. forget the rest.</p>
 832: <p>The Buddha reportedly ate a meal of pork at least once in his life. So one pig had to lose its life. The Buddha ate rice pudding so some cow had to eat the grass to produce milk and some weeds must have lost their life to have grown the rice.</p>

<p>It seems that no matter what we do in life some harm is done. Maybe do less harm would be more sensible. The Buddha advocated the middle way between hedonism and asceticism. The Tibetan Buddhists eat meat. So what are we to do?</p>

<p>Do no harm against life for selfish ends. Do no harm against our neighbor to gain advantage. Dedicate your work to all beings. </p>

<p>In your case you could donate some of the crop to food pantries servicing the homeless or needy. </p>

<p>In another sense there is only consciousness. When we weed the garden in meditation we make room for a new consciousness. When we plant seeds in the garden or consciousness, we are planting the divine seed of awakening.</p>

<p>Being paralyzed by fear of doing harm is not the middle way as I see it.</p>

<p>Perhaps the saying should be Clear your intentions of doing harm. Have an intention of giving life.
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path</a></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Right intention[edit] Right intention (samyak-saṃkalpa / sammā
  sankappa) can also be known as "right thought", "right resolve",
  "right conception", "right aspiration" or "the exertion of our own
  will to change". In this factor, the practitioner should constantly
  aspire to rid themselves of whatever qualities they know to be wrong
  and immoral. Correct understanding of right view will help the
  practitioner to discern the differences between right intention and
  wrong intention. In the Chinese and Pali Canon, it is explained
  thus:[19][19][21][31][32]</p>
  
  <p>And what is right resolve? Being resolved on renunciation, on freedom
  from ill will, on harmlessness: This is called right resolve.</p>
  
  <p>It means the renunciation of the worldly things and an accordant
  greater commitment to the spiritual path; good will; and a commitment
  to non-violence, or harmlessness, towards other living beings.</p>
</blockquote>
