user11541: After attaining Nirvana will I remember that I was once without Nirvana? If yes , as Buddha did, then isn't it true that my relationship with or possession of Nirvana had a beginning?

user254: I'm not sure how "I have attained", "I was once without", "my relationship with", and "my possession of" are compatible with Nibbana -- Nibbana is anatta, remember.
See also for example How do you know if you have attained Nibbana?
But yes the Buddha was able to remember and explain the details of his personal life (or lives), a sequence of events and experiences (including "the noble search") before enlightenment.

user6994: In Mahāyāna Abhidharma, we distinguish what is permanent (Skt. nitya) from what is eternal. That which is permanent is that which does not change from moment to moment. That which is eternal is that which is everlasting, never going out of existence.
Emptiness is permanent but occasional. This is because although emptiness is not produced and does not change from moment to moment as long as it abides (permanent), when the table ceases to exist, the emptiness of the table ceases to exist as well (occasional, not eternal).
With respect to nirvana, it is permanent, like all absences (the absence of inherent existence, the absence of John in the room, etc). But a Buddha has not always been established in nirvana. In this respect, it is occasional.
In addition, we usually say: although nirvana is not caused (because it's permanent), we can cause the achievement of nirvana. This is the whole point of the fourth noble truth, the path leading to the cessation of suffering.

user7309: 
When a monk's mind is thus freed, O monks, neither the gods with
  Indra, nor the gods with Brahma, nor the gods with the Lord of
  Creatures (Pajaapati), when searching will find[36] on what the
  consciousness of one thus gone (tathaagata) is based. Why is that? One
  who has thus gone is no longer traceable here and now, so I say.

MN22
During a lifetime, nibbana is attained with remainder. The remainder is what supports that life until parinibbana. Memories are not a support, but nibbana is not annihalationism - there is no requirement to wipe any thing but further kamma, further intentional activity. So long as memories do not lead to further kamma, they are inconsequential. 

user12123: Your question is not valid, because Nirvana cannot explain by our words we can not ask such questions about Nirvana, like it is not a place, it is not thing,it is not status, or whatever the other words. Read the Abidhamma then you'l know.

11541: <p>After attaining Nirvana will I remember that I was once without Nirvana? If yes , as Buddha did, then isn't it true that my relationship with or possession of Nirvana had a beginning?</p>
 254: <p>I'm not sure how "I have attained", "I was once without", "my relationship with", and "my possession of" are compatible with Nibbana -- Nibbana is <em>anatta</em>, remember.</p>

<p>See also for example <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/q/17304/254">How do you know if you have attained Nibbana?</a></p>

<p>But yes the Buddha was able to remember and explain the details of his personal life (or lives), a sequence of events and experiences (including "the noble search") before enlightenment.</p>
 6994: <p>In Mahāyāna Abhidharma, we distinguish what is permanent (Skt. nitya) from what is eternal. That which is permanent is that which does not change from moment to moment. That which is eternal is that which is everlasting, never going out of existence.</p>

<p>Emptiness is permanent but occasional. This is because although emptiness is not produced and does not change from moment to moment as long as it abides (permanent), when the table ceases to exist, the emptiness of the table ceases to exist as well (occasional, not eternal).</p>

<p>With respect to nirvana, it is permanent, like all absences (the absence of inherent existence, the absence of John in the room, etc). But a Buddha has not always been established in nirvana. In this respect, it is occasional.</p>

<p>In addition, we usually say: although nirvana is not caused (because it's permanent), we can cause the achievement of nirvana. This is the whole point of the fourth noble truth, the path leading to the cessation of suffering.</p>
 7309: <blockquote>
  <p>When a monk's mind is thus freed, O monks, neither the gods with
  Indra, nor the gods with Brahma, nor the gods with the Lord of
  Creatures (Pajaapati), when searching will find[36] on what the
  consciousness of one thus gone (tathaagata) is based. Why is that? One
  who has thus gone is no longer traceable here and now, so I say.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.022.nypo.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">MN22</a></p>

<p>During a lifetime, nibbana is attained with remainder. The remainder is what supports that life until parinibbana. Memories are not a support, but nibbana is not annihalationism - there is no requirement to wipe any thing but further kamma, further intentional activity. So long as memories do not lead to further kamma, they are inconsequential. </p>
 12123: <p>Your question is not valid, because <strong>Nirvana</strong> cannot explain by our words we can not ask such questions about <strong>Nirvana</strong>, like it is not a place, it is not thing,it is not status, or whatever the other words. Read the <strong>Abidhamma</strong> then you'l know.</p>
