user16806: Some body close to me said to me, "you failed in the real world and so now you are chasing Nirvana and running away". It hurt me a little but set me thinking if he is right?
The story is, I come from a Hindu background and long story short I got into terrible life situation. By some miracle I got stumbled on Ajahn Brahm's talk on youtube four years back. I started digging deep and now calling myself a Buddhist, I sitting on my cushion aiming Jhanas and Nirvana.
But could he be right, imparting status quo worldly wisdom of 'I should fight, I should work harder, I should not give up on my worldly goals'
I have given up my job and no relationship. I spend all my time meditating and listening and reading Buddhism. But have I taken this path as sort of run away from responsibilities. Did I even had a choice to begin with in doing what I am doing. Have I chosen this path or I am just blindly riding what has came to my way with no say of mine.

user19671: 
I should fight, I should work harder

If you are really following the path, believe me, you will have to do that and more.  Much more.  But ask yourself truly, are you running toward the dharma or running away from samsara?  Which of the two more accurately describes your intent?  If it's the former, have at it.  If there is even a shred of the latter,  stop.  That is your practice first and foremost.  Those causes, those obstacles aren't going to go away.  In fact, you will find yourself dealing with them again and again on the cushion.  You might as well disentangle them now.  Determine their nature.  What is it about you that are causing those feelings to arise?  When you get to the root of things, I can promise you that you will have a different perspective both of the dharma and how you manifest your practice.  You won't have to ask what is dharma and what is samsara, what is Buddha and what is not.
My advice to you would be to stop reading.  Stop thinking.  As Dogen writes, to practice the way "is to study the self; to study the self is to forget the self."  Remain in the world, support yourself, but begin embarking on a long forgetting.  And for the love of Pete, find someone to guide you along on the process.

user2282: 
The story is, I come from a Hindu background and long story short I got into terrible life situation. By some miracle I got stumbled on Ajahn Brahm's talk on youtube four years back. I started digging deep and now calling myself a Buddhist, I sitting on my cushion aiming Jhanas and Nirvana.

Sometimes failure in life IS a blessing, while worldly success is a curse in disguise. This explains why the Buddha said being born humans allows the most conducive environment to cultivate the Path. The devas had too much worldly merits, they don't know what suffering is, hence they don't see any need for training until it's too late. Even right here on earth, if one's born with a silver spoon in one's mouth, then grew up to become some successful businessman who has it all: wealth, health, fame, good-look, the most beautiful wife and kids, etc.. then odds are good that s/he will not pay attention to the Teaching, let alone practicing the Teaching. Only until old age, sickness, and death come crashing into his face would he realizes the urgency to cultivate, but it'd all be too late by then! By the way, the task of seriously cultivating the Dhamma is no easy task, and it's certainly not for the faint of heart or the lazy. So, bottom line is, only you would be able to tell deep down in your heart whether you use the Dhamma as your crutch, or as your new noble way of life. If it's the former, then your close friend did speak the truth, hence no reason to feel upset. If it's the latter, then have compassion for your friend and simply invite him to join you with the practice for a month to really see it for himself whether it's an escapist life or not!

user14489: I think no one can give you a satisfying answer on this. You'll know. But in the future, when looking back. But maybe you are afraid about the consequences you have to face. (Concerning job and private life) But this "fear" is part of samsara.
I admire your courage. Because you are walking a path leading you out of this. But maybe not. Who can say now? Maybe you get totally new opportunities/perspectives. Important is, that you took a decision. I wish you all the best.

user17553: Indeed it is an escape. Escape from suffering. Someone told you that you are a failure and that is why you are running away from world, and you lost your faith. This does not suit a follower of Buddha. Having no doubt about the nature of the world is one the primary requirements for the spiritual growth. Don’t be so shaky. Test the knowledge of Dhamma yourself and then believe it.

user10205: Footsteps taken at the start of a journey do not control the footsteps taken at the end.
The feet that return to their first footsteps are different feet.
Let your journey do it's work and soon where you are will be less important than who you are.

user13190: There have always been, and currently, many successful people who followed a path of Buddhism Dharma. Prince Gautama, for example, relinquished worldly materials to awaken as the Buddha.
What success means in worldly concepts and wisdom concepts, are obviously different.

user2502: There's plenty of people in the West that - according to Western psychology - pursue escapism through hedonism, movies, sex and even work.
If Buddhism works for you - and you say that it does - then it's not escapism. It's Buddhism.
edit
@Lio Elbammaf: I'm answering from a Buddhist perspective and what's wrong with that on a site devoted to Buddhism? It seems to me that the OP isn't critiquing the 'critique' and merely accepting it.

user13694: I use to think that people which state this kind of ideas (the criticism made to you) do it under the implicit assumption of life having a clearly objective way to follow, while any other path being a deviation from it. This tends to happen when people is too attached to their own traditions and cultures, and maybe it's because they don't know people from other backgrounds and places, which could have completely different lifestyles, worldviews and goals.
In the west (me being from a western country), this is really common, and there's the impression that of something is not following our contemporary practices, that thing is objectively bad, unhealthy, inmoral or ugly. If we westeners are following the obviously objective best way to live, every other kind of action needs to be justified.
The life under the Dhamma is your chosen path, because there are certain kind of values and ideas that resonate with you. Should there be any more justification than this?
We all do things to achieve satisfaction and well-being, and to avoid dissatisfaction and disconfort. It just happens that the Dhamma offers some views about how to achieve those general goals (and how to not do it), while giving us reasons and the chance to put such reasons to test. I think all of this is way more that what most people tend to do with their paths; paths which most of the time are not chosen with a well-informed mind.
If this path is what helps you to achieve those general goals above described, I think that's what should matter the most.
Kind regards!

user-1: It's praiseworthy, good householder, if one reflec5s serious on critic and investigates it first to gain right release from doubt and use this critic as a well-meant gift, yet to prove.
The Uposatha of the fox as well as corrupt escapetism, both are very common this days, not of shine and glory, and righteous success is seldom to trace.
And there is next to twofold social-misuse of many modern Buddhists also what is called "Spiritual bypassing".
There are of course duties, good householder, one needs to fullfil in regard of relations one uses and in regard of livelihood. As such is hard to combine with lay-life, for the most (seldom would one have a supporter). It would be of course a negative escapetism if one tries to neglect ones duties, say for example still enjoying sensual pleasures while living on alms. So in regard of livelihood and duties in a relation, if after a Contemplative Life, if one is after righteous and most praisworthy escapetism, then one should go after it with the highest blessing from all wise and good people and seek for ways which are made for it, the monastic order or look after alternative.
While it is natural, gain, lose, when caught in the world, the way of abounding both may appear for the unattentive as lose as he could hardly trace the only win which lasts, that of real freedom.
It's good to go after thing fully, of which requires giving up, only less are capable, but one should be sure that this path can be walked, inwardly, starting outwardly and means are given.
This days there are a lot of those wishing to enjoy both, world and unbound and for the most they increase hindrances for prosperty in both and develop wrong views and act on them. Next that it is rightly criticized, it most harmful for oneself if using thing otherwise as thought by the giver.
May good householder have the strength and effort to go after the most holly escaping, the holly live, and may one be sure that the Devas open up the doors for one who goes after highest, wishing to leave both, enjoyment and duties in this world.
That one actually walks a righteous way first of all one needs to leave association with corrupt, traders, and seek for actually given means for ones aim.
Don't one follow the real ugly, as there are many "Buddhist", lay but also monastic, of this sort around, failing in regard of doing duties in regard of the Sangha and in regard of worldily sociaty going after the lose of all their merits, consume and incapable even outwardly to give. It's good for one to be kicked to work and be clear about ones ways not to live a useless live: in the youth not gained wealth, even in the old still not renounce as so many here around...
Prove all well and then, seen right way clear, go for it! (Here just burning a poor woman - who couldn't go after any gain, caught by the roots of suffering strongly - having died yesterday in the early morning hours in the near village) Don't one waste time and forget or neglect the paths of merits!
[note that this isn't given for stacks, exchange, other worldbinding trades and for households, but as means to work one fast possibel out]

user8157: If you feel freedom following Buddhism, it is the right path.
The Buddha abandoned the world.

user-1: Just ask yourself if you would abandon the pursuit if your circumstances changed.  There is your answer.

user19673: This is a profound question.  Somebody may want to delve into spirituality because he is a "loser" and isn't prospering in life.  This is not a new concept.  In fact, the Ratthapala Sutta addresses this very point.  You should go to the link and study the sutta in full.
In Majjhima Nikaya 82, we are introduced to the ascetic Ratthapala, who took up the life of the holy man even though he was from a privileged background, and wealthy, athletic, successful, in the prime of his youth.  We are led to believe that, in the secular life, he had countless opportunities at his disposal.
In the Sutta, the king asks the ascetic Ratthapala, in effect, Why are you joining the spiritual life with the other ascetics, when they are not rich or strong and successful, and you are?

King Koravya sat down on a seat made ready and said: "Master
Raṭṭhapāla, there are four kinds of loss. Because they have
undergone these four kinds of loss, some people here shave off their
hair and beard, put on the yellow robe, and go forth[.]  What are
the four? They are loss through ageing, loss through sickness, loss of
wealth, and loss of relatives.
And what is loss through ageing? Here, Master Raṭṭhapāla, someone is
old, aged, burdened with years, advanced in life, come to the last
stage. He considers thus: ‘I am old, aged, burdened with years,
advanced in life, come to the last stage. It is no longer easy for
me to acquire unacquired wealth or to augment wealth already
acquired....
And what is loss through sickness? Here, Master Raṭṭhapāla, someone is
afflicted, suffering, and gravely ill. He considers thus: ‘I am
afflicted, suffering, and gravely ill. It is no longer easy for me
to acquire unacquired wealth....  This is called loss through
sickness.  But Master Raṭṭhapāla now is free from illness....
And what is loss of wealth? Here, Master Raṭṭhapāla, someone is rich,
of great wealth, of great possessions. Gradually his wealth dwindles
away. He considers thus: Formerly I was rich, of great wealth....
But Master Raṭṭhapāla is the son of the leading clan in this same
Thullakoṭṭhita. Master Raṭṭhapāla has not undergone any loss of
wealth.
And what is loss of relatives? Here, Master Raṭṭhapāla, someone has
many friends and companions, kinsmen and relatives. Gradually those
relatives of his dwindle away. He considers thus: ‘Formerly I had
many friends and companions, kinsmen and relatives....'

Answering the king, Ratthapala more or less responds that worldly success and prosperity is overrated, and not worth chasing.  It doesn't bring peace.

“Great king, there are four summaries of the Dhamma that have been
taught by the Blessed One who knows and sees, accomplished and fully
enlightened. Knowing and seeing and hearing them, I went forth from
the home life into homelessness. What are the four?
“‘Life in any world is unstable, it is swept away’: this is the
first summary of the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One who knows and
sees, accomplished and fully enlightened. Knowing and seeing and
hearing this, I went forth from the home life into homelessness.
“‘Life in any world has no shelter and no protector’: this is the
second summary of the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One who knows and
sees…
“‘Life in any world has nothing of its own; one has to leave all and
pass on’: this is the third summary of the Dhamma taught by the
Blessed One who knows and sees…
“‘Life in any world is incomplete, insatiate, the slave of
craving’: this is the fourth summary of the Dhamma taught by the
Blessed One who knows and sees…"

Personally, I see nothing wrong with somebody taking up the spiritual life simply because he is a "loser" in the "real world".  Don't feel self-critical; don't feel lonely.  There are a lot of "losers" in the "real world", almost all of whom cope with severely dysfunctional forms of escape (alcohol, drugs and whatnot).  It is better to have "escapism" with something that is actually an escape, and more importantly, develop the ability to help others to truly escape, losers and successful people alike.
Remember that losers and unsuccessful people, suffering people, full of confusion and despondent from lack -- are the very reason that the Tathagata appeared into the world.
Don't let anybody, especially non-Buddhist, criticize you for following Buddhism for the wrong reason; they don't know any better.  Grow yourself.  Decide for yourself whether you "need" more material prosperity than you currently have, but don't be stressed or distraught about it.  Practice skepticism towards ideas that aren't life-sustaining, and that weren't developed with your interest at heart.  Choose good role models, people who actually have empathy and inner peace of mind -- not just the the temporary trappings of what passes for status or success.  Learn what is beneficial for this life, and the hereafter, and follow that.

16806: <p>Some body close to me said to me, &quot;you failed in the real world and so now you are chasing Nirvana and running away&quot;. It hurt me a little but set me thinking if he is right?</p>
<p>The story is, I come from a Hindu background and long story short I got into terrible life situation. By some miracle I got stumbled on Ajahn Brahm's talk on youtube four years back. I started digging deep and now calling myself a Buddhist, I sitting on my cushion aiming Jhanas and Nirvana.</p>
<p>But could he be right, imparting status quo worldly wisdom of 'I should fight, I should work harder, I should not give up on my worldly goals'</p>
<p>I have given up my job and no relationship. I spend all my time meditating and listening and reading Buddhism. But have I taken this path as sort of run away from responsibilities. Did I even had a choice to begin with in doing what I am doing. Have I chosen this path or I am just blindly riding what has came to my way with no say of mine.</p>
 19671: <blockquote>
<p>I should fight, I should work harder</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you are really following the path, believe me, you will have to do that and more.  Much more.  But ask yourself truly, are you running toward the dharma or running away from samsara?  Which of the two more accurately describes your intent?  If it's the former, have at it.  If there is even a shred of the latter,  stop.  That is your practice first and foremost.  Those causes, those obstacles aren't going to go away.  In fact, you will find yourself dealing with them again and again on the cushion.  You might as well disentangle them now.  Determine their nature.  What is it about you that are causing those feelings to arise?  When you get to the root of things, I can promise you that you will have a different perspective both of the dharma and how you manifest your practice.  You won't have to ask what is dharma and what is samsara, what is Buddha and what is not.</p>
<p>My advice to you would be to stop reading.  Stop thinking.  As Dogen writes, to practice the way &quot;is to study the self; to study the self is to forget the self.&quot;  Remain in the world, support yourself, but begin embarking on a long forgetting.  And for the love of Pete, find someone to guide you along on the process.</p>
 2282: <blockquote>
<p>The story is, I come from a Hindu background and long story short I got into terrible life situation. By some miracle I got stumbled on Ajahn Brahm's talk on youtube four years back. I started digging deep and now calling myself a Buddhist, I sitting on my cushion aiming Jhanas and Nirvana.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sometimes failure in life IS a blessing, while worldly success is a curse in disguise. This explains why the Buddha said being born humans allows the most conducive environment to cultivate the Path. The devas had too much worldly merits, they don't know what suffering is, hence they don't see any need for training until it's too late. Even right here on earth, if one's born with a silver spoon in one's mouth, then grew up to become some successful businessman who has it all: wealth, health, fame, good-look, the most beautiful wife and kids, etc.. then odds are good that s/he will not pay attention to the Teaching, let alone practicing the Teaching. Only until old age, sickness, and death come crashing into his face would he realizes the urgency to cultivate, but it'd all be too late by then! By the way, the task of seriously cultivating the Dhamma is no easy task, and it's certainly not for the faint of heart or the lazy. So, bottom line is, only you would be able to tell deep down in your heart whether you use the Dhamma as your crutch, or as your new noble way of life. If it's the former, then your close friend did speak the truth, hence no reason to feel upset. If it's the latter, then have compassion for your friend and simply invite him to join you with the practice for a month to really see it for himself whether it's an escapist life or not!</p>
 14489: <p>I think no one can give you a satisfying answer on this. You'll know. But in the future, when looking back. But maybe you are afraid about the consequences you have to face. (Concerning job and private life) But this &quot;fear&quot; is part of samsara.</p>
<p>I admire your courage. Because you are walking a path leading you out of this. But maybe not. Who can say now? Maybe you get totally new opportunities/perspectives. Important is, that you took a decision. I wish you all the best.</p>
 17553: <p>Indeed it is an escape. Escape from suffering. Someone told you that you are a failure and that is why you are running away from world, and you lost your faith. This does not suit a follower of Buddha. Having no doubt about the nature of the world is one the primary requirements for the spiritual growth. Don’t be so shaky. Test the knowledge of Dhamma yourself and then believe it.</p>
 10205: <p>Footsteps taken at the start of a journey do not control the footsteps taken at the end.</p>
<p>The feet that return to their first footsteps are different feet.</p>
<p>Let your journey do it's work and soon where you are will be less important than who you are.</p>
 13190: <p>There have always been, and currently, many successful people who followed a path of Buddhism Dharma. Prince Gautama, for example, relinquished worldly materials to awaken as the Buddha.</p>
<p>What success means in worldly concepts and wisdom concepts, are obviously different.</p>
 2502: <p>There's plenty of people in the West that - according to Western psychology - pursue escapism through hedonism, movies, sex and even work.</p>
<p>If Buddhism works for you - and you say that it does - then it's not escapism. It's Buddhism.</p>
<p><strong>edit</strong></p>
<p>@Lio Elbammaf: I'm answering from a Buddhist perspective and what's wrong with that on a site devoted to Buddhism? It seems to me that the OP isn't critiquing the 'critique' and merely accepting it.</p>
 13694: <p>I use to think that people which state this kind of ideas (the criticism made to you) do it under the implicit assumption of life having a clearly objective way to follow, while any other path being a deviation from it. This tends to happen when people is too attached to their own traditions and cultures, and maybe it's because they don't know people from other backgrounds and places, which could have completely different lifestyles, worldviews and goals.</p>
<p>In the west (me being from a western country), this is really common, and there's the impression that of something is not following our contemporary practices, that thing is objectively bad, unhealthy, inmoral or ugly. If we westeners are following the obviously objective best way to live, every other kind of action needs to be justified.</p>
<p>The life under the Dhamma is your chosen path, because there are certain kind of values and ideas that resonate with you. Should there be any more justification than this?</p>
<p>We all do things to achieve satisfaction and well-being, and to avoid dissatisfaction and disconfort. It just happens that the Dhamma offers some views about how to achieve those general goals (and how to not do it), while giving us reasons and the chance to put such reasons to test. I think all of this is way more that what most people tend to do with their paths; paths which most of the time are not chosen with a well-informed mind.</p>
<p>If this path is what helps you to achieve those general goals above described, I think that's what should matter the most.</p>
<p>Kind regards!</p>
 -1: <p>It's praiseworthy, good householder, if one reflec5s serious on critic and investigates it first to gain right release from doubt and use this critic as a well-meant gift, yet to prove.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/tipitaka/kn/j/j06/j300_en.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Uposatha of the fox</a> as well as corrupt escapetism, both are very common this days, not of shine and glory, and righteous success is seldom to trace.</p>
<p>And there is next to twofold social-misuse of many modern Buddhists also what is called &quot;<a href="https://forum.sangham.net/index.php?topic=775.msg2362#msg2362" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Spiritual bypassing</a>&quot;.</p>
<p>There are of course duties, good householder, one needs to fullfil in regard of relations one uses and in regard of livelihood. As such is hard to combine with lay-life, for the most (seldom would one have a supporter). It would be of course a negative escapetism if one tries to neglect ones duties, say for example still enjoying sensual pleasures while living on alms. So in regard of livelihood and duties in a relation, if after a <a href="https://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/tipitaka/dn/dn.02.0.than_en.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Contemplative Life</a>, if one is after righteous and most praisworthy escapetism, then one should go after it with the highest blessing from all wise and good people and seek for ways which are made for it, the monastic order or look after alternative.</p>
<p>While it is natural, gain, lose, when caught in the world, the way of abounding both may appear for the unattentive as lose as he could hardly trace the only win which lasts, that of real freedom.</p>
<p>It's good to go after thing fully, of which requires giving up, only less are capable, but one should be sure that this path can be walked, inwardly, starting outwardly and means are given.
This days there are a lot of those wishing to enjoy both, world and unbound and for the most they increase hindrances for prosperty in both and develop wrong views and act on them. Next that it is rightly criticized, it most harmful for oneself if using thing otherwise as thought by the giver.</p>
<p>May good householder have the strength and effort to go after the most holly escaping, the holly live, and may one be sure that the Devas open up the doors for one who goes after highest, wishing to leave both, enjoyment and duties in this world.</p>
<p>That one actually walks a righteous way first of all one needs to leave association with corrupt, traders, and seek for actually given means for ones aim.</p>
<p>Don't one follow the real ugly, as there are many &quot;Buddhist&quot;, lay but also monastic, of this sort around, failing in regard of doing duties in regard of the Sangha and in regard of worldily sociaty going after the lose of all their merits, consume and incapable even outwardly to give. It's good for one to be kicked to work and be clear about ones ways not to live a useless live: in the youth not gained wealth, even in the old still not renounce as so many here around...</p>
<p>Prove all well and then, seen right way clear, go for it! (Here just burning a poor woman - who couldn't go after any gain, caught by the roots of suffering strongly - having died yesterday in the early morning hours in the near village) Don't one waste time and forget or neglect the paths of merits!</p>
<p><em>[note that this isn't given for stacks, exchange, other worldbinding trades and for households, but as means to work one fast possibel out]</em></p>
 8157: <p>If you feel freedom following Buddhism, it is the right path.</p>
<p>The Buddha abandoned the world.</p>
 -1: <p>Just ask yourself if you would abandon the pursuit if your circumstances changed.  There is your answer.</p>
 19673: <p>This is a profound question.  <strong>Somebody may want to delve into spirituality because he is a &quot;loser&quot; and isn't prospering in life.</strong>  This is not a new concept.  In fact, the <strong>Ratthapala Sutta addresses this very point.</strong>  You should go to the link and study the sutta in full.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://suttacentral.net/mn82/en/bodhi" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Majjhima Nikaya 82</a>, we are introduced to the ascetic Ratthapala, who took up the life of the holy man even though he was from a privileged background, and wealthy, athletic, successful, in the prime of his youth.  We are led to believe that, in the secular life, he had countless opportunities at his disposal.</p>
<p>In the Sutta, the king asks the ascetic Ratthapala, in effect, <em><strong>Why are you joining the spiritual life with the other ascetics, when they are not rich or strong and successful, and you are?</strong></em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>King Koravya sat down on a seat made ready and said: &quot;Master
Raṭṭhapāla, <strong>there are four kinds of loss. Because they have
undergone these four kinds of loss, some people here shave off their
hair and beard, put on the yellow robe</strong>, and go forth[.]  What are
the four? They are loss through ageing, loss through sickness, loss of
wealth, and loss of relatives.</p>
<p>And what is loss through ageing? Here, Master Raṭṭhapāla, someone is
old, aged, burdened with years, advanced in life, come to the last
stage. He considers thus: ‘I am old, aged, burdened with years,
advanced in life, come to the last stage. <strong>It is no longer easy for
me to acquire unacquired wealth</strong> or to augment wealth already
acquired....</p>
<p>And what is loss through sickness? Here, Master Raṭṭhapāla, someone is
afflicted, suffering, and gravely ill. He considers thus: <strong>‘I am
afflicted, suffering, and gravely ill.</strong> It is no longer easy for me
to acquire unacquired wealth....  This is called loss through
sickness.  But Master Raṭṭhapāla now is free from illness....</p>
<p>And what is loss of wealth? Here, Master Raṭṭhapāla, someone is rich,
of great wealth, of great possessions. <strong>Gradually his wealth dwindles
away. He considers thus: Formerly I was rich, of great wealth</strong>....
But Master Raṭṭhapāla is the son of the leading clan in this same
Thullakoṭṭhita. Master Raṭṭhapāla has not undergone any loss of
wealth.</p>
<p>And what is loss of relatives? Here, Master Raṭṭhapāla, someone has
many friends and companions, kinsmen and relatives. Gradually those
relatives of his dwindle away. He considers thus: <strong>‘Formerly I had
many friends and companions, kinsmen and relatives</strong>....'</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Answering the king, Ratthapala more or less responds that worldly success and prosperity is overrated, and not worth chasing.  It doesn't bring peace.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“Great king, there are four summaries of the Dhamma that have been
taught by the Blessed One who knows and sees, accomplished and fully
enlightened. Knowing and seeing and hearing them, I went forth from
the home life into homelessness. What are the four?</p>
<p>“<strong>‘Life in any world is unstable, it is swept away’</strong>: this is the
first summary of the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One who knows and
sees, accomplished and fully enlightened. Knowing and seeing and
hearing this, I went forth from the home life into homelessness.</p>
<p>“<strong>‘Life in any world has no shelter and no protector’</strong>: this is the
second summary of the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One who knows and
sees…</p>
<p>“<strong>‘Life in any world has nothing of its own; one has to leave all and
pass on’</strong>: this is the third summary of the Dhamma taught by the
Blessed One who knows and sees…</p>
<p>“<strong>‘Life in any world is incomplete, insatiate, the slave of
craving’</strong>: this is the fourth summary of the Dhamma taught by the
Blessed One who knows and sees…&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Personally, I see nothing wrong with somebody taking up the spiritual life simply because he is a &quot;loser&quot; in the &quot;real world&quot;.  Don't feel self-critical; don't feel lonely.  <strong>There are a lot of &quot;losers&quot; in the &quot;real world&quot;, almost all of whom cope with severely dysfunctional forms of escape</strong> (alcohol, drugs and whatnot).  <strong>It is better to have &quot;escapism&quot; with something that is actually an escape,</strong> and more importantly, develop the ability to help others to truly escape, losers and successful people alike.</p>
<p>Remember that losers and unsuccessful people, suffering people, full of confusion and despondent from lack -- are the very reason that the Tathagata appeared into the world.</p>
<p>Don't let anybody, especially non-Buddhist, criticize you for following Buddhism for the wrong reason; they don't know any better.  Grow yourself.  Decide for yourself whether you &quot;need&quot; more material prosperity than you currently have, but don't be stressed or distraught about it.  Practice skepticism towards ideas that aren't life-sustaining, and that weren't developed with your interest at heart.  <strong>Choose good role models, people who actually have empathy and inner peace of mind</strong> -- not just the the temporary trappings of what passes for status or success.  Learn what is beneficial for this life, and the hereafter, and follow that.</p>
