user10304: When I was searching for the translated name from Chinese 阿那律 to Sanskrit while attempting a comment on one post, I entered 阿那律 or Anuruddha to Google it came up with the list and the usual short brief at the right corner of the screen, to my amusement the brief said:

Anuruddha
Born: Sri Lanka


Though I open the brief the Wikipedia full page is Born: Kapilavastu, India
Is there a movement to relocate Buddhism (not just relocate, but part of the grand scheme to invent in the sense of re-invent Buddha's teachings) to be originated from Sri Lanka since the Sri Lankan Pali Canon is splendidly adored as the only authentic plus the most early Buddhism's teaching? - As the first step. Now here comes the next step to relocate Buddha gradually first by migrating :D !! one of his ten major disciples? I'm diligently waiting to be enlightened in this context.

user254: I've no previous experience with how Google creates this kind of summary.
I'm not sure I understand where Google got that data from, to put in its summary -- "Sri Lanka" isn't given in any version of the history of the Wikipedia article.
There are modern Anuruddhas born in Sri Lanka (e.g. a cricketer) but that (mixing different people with the same name) seems like an unlikely or silly mistake for Google to make.
The image (of a statue) in the Google summary does comes from a different web site (not Wikipedia) though, so maybe Google does aggregate data from different sites somehow.
Based on this page I wonder if it's possible that Google prefers to scrape its data from Wikidata instead of from Wikipedia -- the Wikidata entry for Anuruddha doesn't include a birth place (it was in the Wikipedia article but not in the Persondata template when the Persondata template was migrated to Wikidata) so perhaps Google is aggregating from several sites, getting its information mixed up, or confusing it with a modern Anaruddha?
If you want to report a correction to Google's summary, perhaps you could try editing the Wikidata entry, and/or pressing the Feedback link on the Google summary.

user10100: Anuruddha-mahāsāmi (thai:anuruddhācāriya) was one of ancient saṅgarāja in sri lanka. He author abhidhammatthasaṅgaha, that is popular summary of  abhidhamma-pitaka.

10304: <p>When I was searching for the translated name from Chinese 阿那律 to Sanskrit while attempting a <em>comment</em> on <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/21951/10304">one post</a>, I entered 阿那律 or Anuruddha to Google it came up with the list and the usual short brief at the right corner of the screen, to my amusement the brief said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Anuruddha</p>
<p><strong>Born: Sri Lanka</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/Zt95f.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/Zt95f.jpg" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>Though I open the brief the Wikipedia full page is <code>Born: Kapilavastu, India</code></p>
<p>Is there a <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/q/21485/10304">movement to relocate Buddhism</a> (not just relocate, but part of the grand scheme to <strong>invent</strong> in the sense of <em>re-invent</em> Buddha's teachings) to be originated from Sri Lanka since the Sri Lankan Pali Canon is splendidly adored as the only authentic plus the most early Buddhism's teaching? - As the first step. Now here comes the next step to relocate Buddha gradually first by <em>migrating</em> <code>:D !!</code> one of his ten major disciples? I'm diligently waiting to be enlightened in this context.</p>
 254: <p>I've no previous experience with how Google creates this kind of summary.</p>

<p>I'm not sure I understand where Google got that data from, to put in its summary -- "Sri Lanka" isn't given in any version of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anuruddha&amp;action=history" rel="nofollow noreferrer">the history of the Wikipedia article</a>.</p>

<p>There are <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=Anuruddha+born+Sri+Lanka" rel="nofollow noreferrer">modern Anuruddhas born in Sri Lanka</a> (e.g. a cricketer) but that (mixing different people with the same name) seems like an unlikely or silly mistake for Google to make.</p>

<p>The image (of a statue) in the Google summary does comes from a different web site (not Wikipedia) though, so maybe Google does aggregate data from different sites somehow.</p>

<p>Based on <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Persondata" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this page</a> I wonder if it's possible that Google prefers to scrape its data from Wikidata instead of from Wikipedia -- the <a href="https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3306373" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wikidata entry for Anuruddha</a> doesn't include a birth place (it was in the Wikipedia article but not in the Persondata template when <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anuruddha&amp;type=revision&amp;diff=710782271&amp;oldid=708599211" rel="nofollow noreferrer">the Persondata template was migrated to Wikidata</a>) so perhaps Google is aggregating from several sites, getting its information mixed up, or confusing it with a modern Anaruddha?</p>

<p>If you want to report a correction to Google's summary, perhaps you could try editing the Wikidata entry, and/or pressing the Feedback link on the Google summary.</p>
 10100: <p>Anuruddha-mahāsāmi (thai:anuruddhācāriya) was one of ancient saṅgarāja in sri lanka. He author abhidhammatthasaṅgaha, that is popular summary of  abhidhamma-pitaka.</p>
