user13006: The thirty-six states (6 x 6 classes of contact) to which beings are attached are described in Salayatana-vibhanga Sutta; I have made a caricature while reading each state as below, states 1, 2, 4 & 5 are easy to understand, however, I'm straggling to clearly identify the two type of equanimity and how they differ.
Quoted below is the definition given for each equanimity states in the Sutta, but it’s not clear to me how the foolish deluded householder equanimity is any different from the other. How do these two people react to a given situation? 
I will give an example for the householder equanimity and If possible please try to use the same situation to represent the state of the renunciation equanimity and if possible beyond renunciation equanimity (atammayata) in which there is no act of intention, not even the intention underlying equanimity is said to be present.
For example, a householder loses his beloved son or a wife he could reason and say ‘I know I was only in love with a mortal and what has happened is natural’ and he remains calm without suffering. This equanimity, I take it, doesn’t go beyond form. With a wide open eye as I caricatured his state, he looks into pain and pleasure even death with equanimity without reasoning beyond form. Let them change he is just looking.
Many thanks.

"And what are the six kinds of household equanimity? The equanimity
  that arises when a foolish, deluded person — a run-of-the-mill,
  untaught person who has not conquered his limitations or the results
  of action 2 & who is blind to danger [3] — sees a form with the eye.
  Such equanimity does not go beyond the form, which is why it is called
  household equanimity. (Similarly with sounds, smells, tastes, tactile
  sensations, & ideas.)
"And what are the six kinds of renunciation equanimity? The equanimity
  that arises when — experiencing the inconstancy of those very forms,
  their change, fading, & cessation — one sees with right discernment as
  it actually is that all forms, past or present, are inconstant,
  stressful, subject to change: This equanimity goes beyond form, which
  is why it is called renunciation equanimity. (Similarly with sounds,
  smells, tastes, tactile sensations, & ideas.)
"And what is equanimity coming from multiplicity, dependent on
  multiplicity? There is equanimity with regard to forms, equanimity
  with regard to sounds...smells...tastes...tactile sensations [& ideas:
  this word appears in one of the recensions]. This is equanimity coming
  from multiplicity, dependent on multiplicity.
"And what is equanimity coming from singleness, dependent on
  singleness? There is equanimity dependent on the dimension of the
  infinitude of space, equanimity dependent on the dimension of the
  infinitude of consciousness... dependent on the dimension of
  nothingness... dependent on the dimension of neither perception nor
  non-perception. This is equanimity coming from singleness, dependent
  on singleness.



user43: Here is my interpretation of what's written in that sutta.
Householder equanimity is clueless equanimity. It is equanimity of someone who does not realize the three marks of existence and the three types of suffering. Basically, equanimity of a fool who does not realize the house is burning.
Buddhist equanimity comes in a different sequence altogether. First, Buddhist practitioner feels distress due to aversion towards the world and longing for Nirvana. Then, Buddhist practitioner feels joy from having realized the real meaning of three marks of existence, Emptiness, and the unity of two truths. And then, with cessation of that joy, because s\he understands that even this joy is subject to impermanence, and even this realization has a character of Emptiness, however compassion still has its role and Buddha-Dharma is still useful and valid -- the Buddhist practitioner attains equanimity. So Buddhist equanimity is not just equanimity of wisdom, it is equanimity of wisdom having understood its own limits!
Finally, if I drew a graphical representation of that sutta, I would not focus as much on the states themselves, as on relationships between them, as explained in the text
            NF  
            ^  
            |    
            ES  
            ^  
            |    
RD => RJ => RE  
^     ^     ^   
|     |     | 
HD    HJ    HE

Here, HD/HJ/HE stands for householder's Distress/Joy/Equanimity.
RD/RJ/RE stands for Buddhist (Renunciation) Distress/Joy/Equanimity.
ES stands for Equanimity Of Formless Jhanas (Signlessness).
And NF stands for Non-Fashioned Equanimity (what's known as aniketa-cari, atanmayata, non-abiding Nirvana, tathata)

user14106: One way to approach the question is from the perspective of meditative practice. This answer is based on my meditative experience and discussion with Theravada teachers.
It's important to keep in mind that the Buddha was not teaching meditative practice to householders, it was for renunciants alone. So the renunciant equanimity is an equanimity which arises from a trained mind. The renunciant would have awareness of mind as separate from forms. The quality of equanimity of the renunciant is a mind that does not move, it is not drawn out to meet the sense objects, but stay collected in "singleness". It is "beyond form". Also, there is no intent required to achieve this state, it's just there and emerges as consequence of training (and seeing into the three characteristics). 
On the contrary the householder mind will go out to meet objects, and establishing equanimity will then require intent to work with the feeling consequences of the contact. The householder would not have that awareness of mind, but only understand equanimity in term of feeling after contact with the object, so it is not beyond form.

user295: 
(E) Therein, what are the 6 kinds of equanimity of the household life (cha gehasitā upekkhā)?
(25) On seeing a form with the eye, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,
  in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations
nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.
Such an equanimity as this does not transcend form.
Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.
(26) On hearing a sound with the ear, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,
in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations
nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.
Such an equanimity as this does not transcend sound.
Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.
(27) On smelling a smell with the nose, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,
in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations
nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.
Such an equanimity as this does not transcend smell.
Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.
(28) On tasting a taste with the tongue, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,
in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations
nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.
Such an equanimity as this does not transcend taste.
Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.
(29) On feeling a touch with the body, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,
in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations
nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.
Such an equanimity as this does not transcend touch.
Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.
(30) On cognizing a mind-object with the mind, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,
in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations
nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.
Such an equanimity as this does not transcend mind-object.
Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.
These are the 6 kinds of equanimity of the household life. 
...
(F) Therein, what are the 6 kinds of equanimity of renunciation (cha nekkhammasitā upekkhā)?
(31) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of forms,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom
those forms both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,
one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those forms both in the past and now
  are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.
An equanimity such as this transcends form.
Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.
(32) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of sounds,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom
those sounds both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,
one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those sounds both in the past and now
  are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.
An equanimity such as this transcends sound.
Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.
(33) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of smells,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom
those smells both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,
one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those smells both in the past and now
  are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.
An equanimity such as this transcends smell.
Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.
(34) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of tastes,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom
those tastes both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,
one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those tastes both in the past and now
  are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.
An equanimity such as this transcends taste.
Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.
(35) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of touches,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom
those touches both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,
one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those touches both in the past and now
are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.
An equanimity such as this transcends touch.
Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.
(36) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of mind-objects,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom
those mind-objects both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,
one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those mind-objects both in the past and now
are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.
An equanimity such as this transcends mind-object.
Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.
These are the 6 kinds of equanimity of renunciation.

Sal,āyatana Vibhanga Sutta
The difference 

On seeing a [___] with the [___], equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,
  in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations
nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.
Such an equanimity as this does not transcend [___].
Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.
...
When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of [___],
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom
those  [___] both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,
one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those [___] both in the past and now
are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.
An equanimity such as this transcends [___].
Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.

The householder has not overcome karma or accumulation of karma. On each experience, the householder creates new karma has he does not see the reality and how to react to them. The person who has renounced see impermanence, suffering, changing by nature, according to reality, with right wisdom, hence can transcend the worldly experience.

(1) the latent tendency to lust reinforced by being attached to pleasant feelings;
(2) the latent tendency to aversion reinforced by rejecting painful feelings;
(3) the latent tendency to ignorance reinforced by ignoring neutral feelings

Pahāna Sutta
So the neutral feeling or equanimous feeling experienced, in the case of a householder leads to ignorance whereas the person who renounces this does not lead to ignorance, as he sees with wisdom and right understanding. The recluse must have wisdom and right understanding for this to be true.

user12996: It's good to get aware of issues of different kind of equanimity not only because most modern, especially lay teacher, even whole "schools" actually teach the dangerous "household-equanimity". The differernt is btw. actually drawn out in the notes and also in the translators intoduction of the sutta:

A person who "has not conquered his limitations or the results of action": this passage seems related to the passage in AN 3.99, which defines a person of limited mind, prey to the results of past bad actions, as one who is "undeveloped in contemplating the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in concentration, and undeveloped in discernment; restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering." As AN 3.99 points out, such a person suffers more intensely from the results of past unskillful actions than does one whose awareness is unrestricted. SN 42.8 recommends the practice of the four sublime attitudes as a way of developing an unrestricted awareness that weakens the results of past unskillful actions.

A person who is "blind to danger" is one who does not see the drawbacks of sensual pleasure or attachment to the body. For such a person, moments of equanimity are usually a dull spot in the midst of the quest for sensual pleasure. This is why such moments do not go beyond the sensory stimulus that generated them.


Ordinary equanimity is based on gross ignorance/moha.
The two illustrations here might also provide for an understanding:
Ignoring the truth & Bhaṅgañāņa and bhayañāņa.
Some "provoking" questions for an understanding in this regard may be also found here: Freed of Fivefold Fear.
Typical outwardly indicators for people dwelling in household-equanimity is total lack in basics like gratitude, goodness, generosity and virtue. Once such states a reached, people are merely hopless lost which is one reason the Buddha often nearly "fighted" against teachers leading in such directions while other teachings, even if not much of benefit have been merely tolerated as current wishes for certain destinies of others.
The immense danger of giving rise to firm household-equanimity is also the reason why in Bodhisatta-vehicles the teaching of emptiness of immature people is a grave fault and breach of the root vows, knowing that they are walking on a tiny edge and althought propably even understood as encouragement to act wrong.
[Note: This is a gift of Dhamma, given for release, not meant for commercial use or other lower wordily gains by ways of exchange or trade.]

13006: <p>The thirty-six states (6 x 6 classes of contact) to which beings are attached are described in <a href="https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.137.than.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Salayatana-vibhanga Sutta</a>; I have made a caricature while reading each state as below, states 1, 2, 4 &amp; 5 are easy to understand, however, I'm straggling to clearly identify the two type of equanimity and how they differ.</p>

<p>Quoted below is the definition given for each equanimity states in the Sutta, but it’s not clear to me how the foolish deluded householder equanimity is any different from the other. How do these two people react to a given situation? </p>

<p>I will give an example for the householder equanimity and If possible please try to use the same situation to represent the state of the renunciation equanimity and if possible beyond renunciation equanimity (atammayata) in which there is no act of intention, not even the intention underlying equanimity is said to be present.</p>

<p>For example, a householder loses his beloved son or a wife he could reason and say ‘I know I was only in love with a mortal and what has happened is natural’ and he remains calm without suffering. This equanimity, I take it, doesn’t go beyond form. With a wide open eye as I caricatured his state, he looks into pain and pleasure even death with equanimity without reasoning beyond form. Let them change he is just looking.</p>

<p>Many thanks.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"And what are the six kinds of household equanimity? The equanimity
  that arises when a foolish, deluded person — a run-of-the-mill,
  untaught person who has not conquered his limitations or the results
  of action <a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/YDMrj.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer">2</a> &amp; who is blind to danger [3] — sees a form with the eye.
  Such equanimity does not go beyond the form, which is why it is called
  household equanimity. (Similarly with sounds, smells, tastes, tactile
  sensations, &amp; ideas.)</p>
  
  <p>"And what are the six kinds of renunciation equanimity? The equanimity
  that arises when — experiencing the inconstancy of those very forms,
  their change, fading, &amp; cessation — one sees with right discernment as
  it actually is that all forms, past or present, are inconstant,
  stressful, subject to change: This equanimity goes beyond form, which
  is why it is called renunciation equanimity. (Similarly with sounds,
  smells, tastes, tactile sensations, &amp; ideas.)</p>
  
  <p>"And what is equanimity coming from multiplicity, dependent on
  multiplicity? There is equanimity with regard to forms, equanimity
  with regard to sounds...smells...tastes...tactile sensations [&amp; ideas:
  this word appears in one of the recensions]. This is equanimity coming
  from multiplicity, dependent on multiplicity.</p>
  
  <p>"And what is equanimity coming from singleness, dependent on
  singleness? There is equanimity dependent on the dimension of the
  infinitude of space, equanimity dependent on the dimension of the
  infinitude of consciousness... dependent on the dimension of
  nothingness... dependent on the dimension of neither perception nor
  non-perception. This is equanimity coming from singleness, dependent
  on singleness.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/YDMrj.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/YDMrj.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>
 43: <p>Here is my interpretation of what's written in that sutta.</p>
<p>Householder equanimity is clueless equanimity. It is equanimity of someone who does not realize the three marks of existence and the three types of suffering. Basically, equanimity of a fool who does not realize the house is burning.</p>
<p>Buddhist equanimity comes in a different sequence altogether. First, Buddhist practitioner feels distress due to aversion towards the world and longing for Nirvana. Then, Buddhist practitioner feels joy from having realized the real meaning of three marks of existence, Emptiness, and the unity of two truths. And then, with cessation of that joy, because s\he understands that even this joy is subject to impermanence, and even this realization has a character of Emptiness, however compassion still has its role and Buddha-Dharma is still useful and valid -- the Buddhist practitioner attains equanimity. So Buddhist equanimity is not just equanimity of wisdom, it is equanimity of wisdom having understood its own limits!</p>
<p>Finally, if I drew a graphical representation of that sutta, I would not focus as much on the states themselves, as on relationships between them, as explained in the text</p>
<pre><code>            NF  
            ^  
            |    
            ES  
            ^  
            |    
RD =&gt; RJ =&gt; RE  
^     ^     ^   
|     |     | 
HD    HJ    HE
</code></pre>
<p>Here, HD/HJ/HE stands for householder's Distress/Joy/Equanimity.<br />
RD/RJ/RE stands for Buddhist (Renunciation) Distress/Joy/Equanimity.<br />
ES stands for Equanimity Of Formless Jhanas (Signlessness).<br />
And NF stands for Non-Fashioned Equanimity (what's known as aniketa-cari, atanmayata, non-abiding Nirvana, tathata)</p>
 14106: <p>One way to approach the question is from the perspective of meditative practice. This answer is based on my meditative experience and discussion with Theravada teachers.</p>

<p>It's important to keep in mind that the Buddha was not teaching meditative practice to householders, it was for renunciants alone. So the renunciant equanimity is an equanimity which arises from a trained mind. The renunciant would have awareness of mind as separate from forms. The quality of equanimity of the renunciant is a mind that does not move, it is not drawn out to meet the sense objects, but stay collected in "singleness". It is "beyond form". Also, there is no intent required to achieve this state, it's just there and emerges as consequence of training (and seeing into the three characteristics). </p>

<p>On the contrary the householder mind will go out to meet objects, and establishing equanimity will then require intent to work with the feeling consequences of the contact. The householder would not have that awareness of mind, but only understand equanimity in term of feeling after contact with the object, so it is not beyond form.</p>
 295: <blockquote>
  <p>(E) Therein, what are the 6 kinds of equanimity of the household life (cha gehasitā upekkhā)?</p>
  
  <p>(25) On seeing a form with the eye, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,
  in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations</p>
  
  <p>nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.</p>
  
  <p>Such an equanimity as this does not transcend form.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.</p>
  
  <p>(26) On hearing a sound with the ear, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,</p>
  
  <p>in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations</p>
  
  <p>nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.</p>
  
  <p>Such an equanimity as this does not transcend sound.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.</p>
  
  <p>(27) On smelling a smell with the nose, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,</p>
  
  <p>in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations</p>
  
  <p>nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.</p>
  
  <p>Such an equanimity as this does not transcend smell.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.</p>
  
  <p>(28) On tasting a taste with the tongue, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,</p>
  
  <p>in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations</p>
  
  <p>nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.</p>
  
  <p>Such an equanimity as this does not transcend taste.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.</p>
  
  <p>(29) On feeling a touch with the body, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,</p>
  
  <p>in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations</p>
  
  <p>nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.</p>
  
  <p>Such an equanimity as this does not transcend touch.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.</p>
  
  <p>(30) On cognizing a mind-object with the mind, equanimity arises in a foolish, confused, worlding,</p>
  
  <p>in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations</p>
  
  <p>nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.</p>
  
  <p>Such an equanimity as this does not transcend mind-object.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.</p>
  
  <p>These are the 6 kinds of equanimity of the household life. </p>
  
  <p>...</p>
  
  <p>(F) Therein, what are the 6 kinds of equanimity of renunciation (cha nekkhammasitā upekkhā)?</p>
  
  <p>(31) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of forms,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom</p>
  
  <p>those forms both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,</p>
  
  <p>one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those forms both in the past and now
  are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.</p>
  
  <p>An equanimity such as this transcends form.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.</p>
  
  <p>(32) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of sounds,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom</p>
  
  <p>those sounds both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,</p>
  
  <p>one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those sounds both in the past and now
  are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.</p>
  
  <p>An equanimity such as this transcends sound.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.</p>
  
  <p>(33) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of smells,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom</p>
  
  <p>those smells both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,</p>
  
  <p>one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those smells both in the past and now
  are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.</p>
  
  <p>An equanimity such as this transcends smell.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.</p>
  
  <p>(34) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of tastes,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom</p>
  
  <p>those tastes both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,</p>
  
  <p>one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those tastes both in the past and now
  are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.</p>
  
  <p>An equanimity such as this transcends taste.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.</p>
  
  <p>(35) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of touches,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom</p>
  
  <p>those touches both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,</p>
  
  <p>one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those touches both in the past and now</p>
  
  <p>are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.</p>
  
  <p>An equanimity such as this transcends touch.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.</p>
  
  <p>(36) When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of mind-objects,
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom</p>
  
  <p>those mind-objects both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,</p>
  
  <p>one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those mind-objects both in the past and now</p>
  
  <p>are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.</p>
  
  <p>An equanimity such as this transcends mind-object.</p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.</p>
  
  <p>These are the 6 kinds of equanimity of renunciation.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.themindingcentre.org/dharmafarer/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/29.5-Salayatana-Vibhanga-S-m137-piya.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Sal,āyatana Vibhanga Sutta</a></p>

<p>The difference </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>On seeing a [___] with the [___], equanimity arises in a <strong>foolish, confused, worlding,
  in an untutored worldling who has not conquered his limitations</strong></p>
  
  <p><strong>nor conquered his karmic fruits, who sees not danger.</strong></p>
  
  <p><strong>Such an equanimity as this does not transcend [___].</strong></p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called the equanimity of the household life.</p>
  
  <p>...</p>
  
  <p><strong>When, by knowing the impermanence, change, fading away and ending of [___],
  one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom</strong></p>
  
  <p><strong>those  [___] both in the past and now are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature,</strong></p>
  
  <p><strong>one sees, according to reality, with right wisdom those [___] both in the past and now</strong></p>
  
  <p><strong>are all impermanent, suffering, changing by nature—equanimity arises.</strong></p>
  
  <p><strong>An equanimity such as this transcends [___].</strong></p>
  
  <p>Therefore, it is called equanimity of renunciation.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The householder has not overcome karma or accumulation of karma. On each experience, the householder creates new karma has he does not see the reality and how to react to them. The person who has renounced see impermanence, suffering, changing by nature, according to reality, with right wisdom, hence can transcend the worldly experience.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>(1) the latent tendency to lust reinforced by being attached to pleasant feelings;</p>
  
  <p>(2) the latent tendency to aversion reinforced by rejecting painful feelings;</p>
  
  <p>(3) the latent tendency to ignorance reinforced by ignoring neutral feelings</p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.themindingcentre.org/dharmafarer/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/31.1-Pahana-S-s36.3-piya.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Pahāna Sutta</a></p>

<p>So the neutral feeling or equanimous feeling experienced, in the case of a householder leads to ignorance whereas the person who renounces this does not lead to ignorance, as he sees with wisdom and right understanding. The recluse must have wisdom and right understanding for this to be true.</p>
 12996: <p>It's good to get aware of issues of different kind of equanimity not only because most modern, especially lay teacher, even whole &quot;schools&quot; actually teach the dangerous &quot;household-equanimity&quot;. The differernt is btw. actually drawn out in the <a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.eu/tipitaka/mn/mn.137.than_en.html#fn-2" rel="nofollow noreferrer">notes</a> and also in the translators intoduction of the sutta:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A person who &quot;has not conquered his limitations or the results of action&quot;: this passage seems related to the passage in AN 3.99, which defines a person of limited mind, prey to the results of past bad actions, as one who is &quot;undeveloped in contemplating the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in concentration, and undeveloped in discernment; restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering.&quot; As AN 3.99 points out, such a person suffers more intensely from the results of past unskillful actions than does one whose awareness is unrestricted. SN 42.8 recommends the practice of the four sublime attitudes as a way of developing an unrestricted awareness that weakens the results of past unskillful actions.</p>
<ol start="3">
<li>A person who is &quot;blind to danger&quot; is one who does not see the drawbacks of sensual pleasure or attachment to the body. For such a person, moments of equanimity are usually a dull spot in the midst of the quest for sensual pleasure. This is why such moments do not go beyond the sensory stimulus that generated them.</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>Ordinary equanimity is based on gross ignorance/moha.</p>
<p>The two illustrations here might also provide for an understanding:</p>
<p><a href="http://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/lib/authors/buddhadasa/dhammawithpictures_en.html#12" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ignoring the truth</a> &amp; <a href="http://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/lib/authors/buddhadasa/dhammawithpictures_en.html#30" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Bhaṅgañāņa and bhayañāņa</a>.</p>
<p>Some &quot;provoking&quot; questions for an understanding in this regard may be also found here: <a href="http://sangham.net/index.php/topic,1850.0.html#post_en1" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Freed of Fivefold Fear</a>.</p>
<p>Typical outwardly indicators for people dwelling in household-equanimity is total lack in basics like gratitude, goodness, generosity and virtue. Once such states a reached, people are merely hopless lost which is one reason the Buddha often nearly &quot;fighted&quot; against teachers leading in such directions while other teachings, even if not much of benefit have been merely tolerated as current wishes for certain destinies of others.</p>
<p>The immense danger of giving rise to firm household-equanimity is also the reason why in Bodhisatta-vehicles the teaching of emptiness of immature people is a grave fault and breach of the <a href="http://sangham.net/index.php/topic,1801.0.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">root vows</a>, knowing that they are walking on a tiny edge and althought propably even understood as encouragement to act wrong.</p>
<p><em>[Note: This is a gift of Dhamma, given for release, not meant for commercial use or other lower wordily gains by ways of exchange or trade.]</em></p>
