user-1: I noticed some buddhist monks spend a lot of their time teaching and giving dhamma talks, while other monks spend minimal time on these things. 
I was wondering if there are any rules in the monastic code for monks regarding how much time a monk should spent on teaching?

user-1: No. Of course it can be a heavy attachment and diversion of the main task one has. Older say, sharing about 10-20% of time for lay people teaching is a proper way in training.
Don't forget, that the Buddha and some of his Arahat Disciple spend the rest of the life with teaching. On the other hand, there are other kind of arahats who do not teach at all, some can, some can and do, some do but can not... 
There is how ever, not duty to teach at all.
To understand the "jumping point", it's possible good to ask the Buddha in this regard:

"'A person living alone. A person living alone,' thus it is said. To what extent, lord, is one a person living alone, and to what extent is one a person living with a companion?"... Migajala Sutta: To Migajala

[Note that this is not given for trade, exchange, stackes... but for release from this wheel by proper use] 

user8157: In Christianity, priests generally do not meditate. Often, the sole role of a Catholic priest is to preach the religion to devotees. 
In Asian Buddhism, the role of many monks is similar, which is why they devote most, if not all, of their time to teaching & conducting ceremonies. There are even Western monks, in Asia, that mostly teach & translate. 
While I have never read it myself, I have heard the Buddha stated that monks who primarily meditate should not criticise monks who primarily study & teach. If this is true, then the dichotomy between 'meditation monks' & 'study/teaching monks' goes back to the time of the Buddha. A good example is Venerable Ananda, who often gives the impression in the suttas of not being a particularly adept meditation practitioner. 
In my monastic experiences, I have not observed any correlation between teaching & practising the eightfold path. Often it is those that are seriously practising the eightfold path that do not teach. 
There are highly reputed monks (eg. Ajahn Jayasaro) that spent many years as a (highly reputed) meditation monk before teaching extensively to the public.

user5012: The main role of the monastic community is to preserve the Buddha's teaching, but I don't think that the Buddha gave a prescription on how exactly to do that. It's been left to each community to set rules of teaching and the level of community interaction. I don't think you're going to find one magic answer. In my tradition, you're expected to have some mastery over the subject matter before giving Dharma talks. It also helps to practice the Eightfold Path enough to where you are without reproach when you enter the community with instruction. 
I don't believe it's wrong to participate and reach out to the community at any time. It just may not be helpful. Maybe like this post ;-) Then again, mastery is hard to see from the outside. 
"Before Enlightenment chop wood, carry water.  After enlightenment chop wood, carry water."


user8699: As a Zen Monk I can answer the question regarding worldly participation in the following way. There is no definitive suggestion or rule within the Monastic Code of a Mahayana Monk. A Monk or Nun has no requirement to teach or not teach. Often the suggestion may come from the Senior Abbot that one should follow the teaching path. This is what happened in my case. Naturally the Abbot has to feel that the particular Monk or Nun has the required personal experience before they can teach others. I teach as often as I can and I am also the Buddhist Chaplain to a number of Hospitals. One should always direct the teaching at a level that would match the understanding of the audience. Thank you. Thay Tam Thien.

-1: <p>I noticed some buddhist monks spend a lot of their time teaching and giving dhamma talks, while other monks spend minimal time on these things. </p>

<p>I was wondering if there are any rules in the monastic code for monks regarding how much time a monk should spent on teaching?</p>
 -1: <p>No. Of course it can be a heavy attachment and diversion of the main task one has. Older say, sharing about 10-20% of time for lay people teaching is a proper way in training.</p>

<p>Don't forget, that the Buddha and some of his Arahat Disciple spend the rest of the life with teaching. On the other hand, there are other kind of arahats who do not teach at all, some can, some can and do, some do but can not... </p>

<p>There is how ever, not duty to teach at all.</p>

<p>To understand the "jumping point", it's possible good to ask the Buddha in this regard:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"'A person living alone. A person living alone,' thus it is said. To what extent, lord, is one a person living alone, and to what extent is one a person living with a companion?"... <a href="http://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/tipitaka/sn/sn35/sn35.063.than_en.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Migajala Sutta: To Migajala</a></p>
</blockquote>

<p><em>[Note that this is not given for trade, exchange, stackes... but for release from this wheel by proper use]</em> </p>
 8157: <p>In Christianity, priests generally do not meditate. Often, the sole role of a Catholic priest is to preach the religion to devotees. </p>

<p>In Asian Buddhism, the role of many monks is similar, which is why they devote most, if not all, of their time to teaching &amp; conducting ceremonies. There are even Western monks, in Asia, that mostly teach &amp; translate. </p>

<p>While I have never read it myself, I have heard the Buddha stated that monks who primarily meditate should not criticise monks who primarily study &amp; teach. If this is true, then the dichotomy between 'meditation monks' &amp; 'study/teaching monks' goes back to the time of the Buddha. A good example is Venerable Ananda, who often gives the impression in the suttas of not being a particularly adept meditation practitioner. </p>

<p>In my monastic experiences, I have not observed any correlation between teaching &amp; practising the eightfold path. Often it is those that are seriously practising the eightfold path that do not teach. </p>

<p>There are highly reputed monks (eg. Ajahn Jayasaro) that spent many years as a (highly reputed) meditation monk before teaching extensively to the public.</p>
 5012: <p>The main role of the monastic community is to preserve the Buddha's teaching, but I don't think that the Buddha gave a prescription on how exactly to do that. It's been left to each community to set rules of teaching and the level of community interaction. I don't think you're going to find one magic answer. In my tradition, you're expected to have some mastery over the subject matter before giving Dharma talks. It also helps to practice the Eightfold Path enough to where you are without reproach when you enter the community with instruction. </p>

<p>I don't believe it's wrong to participate and reach out to the community at any time. It just may not be helpful. Maybe like this post ;-) Then again, mastery is hard to see from the outside. </p>

<pre><code>"Before Enlightenment chop wood, carry water.  After enlightenment chop wood, carry water."
</code></pre>
 8699: <p>As a Zen Monk I can answer the question regarding worldly participation in the following way. There is no definitive suggestion or rule within the Monastic Code of a Mahayana Monk. A Monk or Nun has no requirement to teach or not teach. Often the suggestion may come from the Senior Abbot that one should follow the teaching path. This is what happened in my case. Naturally the Abbot has to feel that the particular Monk or Nun has the required personal experience before they can teach others. I teach as often as I can and I am also the Buddhist Chaplain to a number of Hospitals. One should always direct the teaching at a level that would match the understanding of the audience. Thank you. Thay Tam Thien.</p>
