user6925: I am born Hindu and have been following Buddhism for more than a year. The change has been a life changing experience but now I find myself at the junction of two religions. I sometimes face contradictory situations where its ok in one religion but violates the other. Traveling in two boats at the same time is certainly not possible but its also difficult to choose one over the other. So my question is:
1) Can one follow Hinduism and Buddhism at the same time?
2) How to maintain a balance between the two?
3) Or would I have to choose one over the other?
4) Or is it possible to choose Buddhism as subset of Hinduism, just like Jains do i.e. the mainly follow their own religion first & then they following Hinduism. So even in contradictory situations, they choose Jain rule over Hindu rule.

user11306: In order to answer these questions, you need to understand the Dhamma Differences in Hinduism and Buddhism. In DN1/ Digha Nikaya 1, Buddha expounded the differences between the dhamma that he teached and the dhamma of the brahmins/hinduism. 
My answer is that, you need to find this yourself. but to tell you the truth, it's not possible.

user11033: You may get close, but so long you believe in the concept of an everlasting soul (i.e atman), you will not achieve what the Buddha called the ultimate cessation of suffering, because of the clinging to the Self which arises in conjunction with this belief.
Remember: the Buddha spoke of four types of clinging. Clinging to sensual pleasures, clinging to views, clinging to rules and observances, and clinging to a doctrine of self.

user11330: Your question already implies differences in practice between your variation of Hinduism and what Buddhism you have practiced. On these issues you will have to choose. 
When it comes to doctrine too, you will have to be clear in your mind. The very word dharma means something very different in Brahmanical Hinduism vs. Buddhism. There are differences in the nuances of the word karma too - and so on. 
It's certainly easier to stick with the faith and practices you grew up with, and merely add those practices and doctrines from Buddhism that you can without contradiction. It's easier not merely for you personally, but also within the context of your family and social sphere. 
In other words: take those aspects of Buddhism that make you a better human being and a better Hindu. Leave the rest be. 
To do anything other than that should only be done after more time and study than you have at present devoted to it. Westerners often become Buddhists as converts from Christianity - but they only do so after they've already become disenchanted from Christianity. Even so - it's a difficult process that leads to culture-shock. 
You do not sound like you are done with Hinduism because of anything within Hinduism. 
As for seeing Buddhism as part of Hinduism... That's Hindu propaganda that doesn't respect Buddhism. It's a bit like Muslims claiming Christianity is part of Islam: it doesn't respect Buddhism as a separate religion. [Jainism: same thing.] 
[This is advice that fits in with H.H. the Dalai Lama's advice on mixing religions.]

user471: Here are some differences between Buddhism, and Hinduism and Jainism:

The middle way between eternalism and annihilationism (both Hinduism and Jainism subscribe to eternalism of the self) - see this answer
The middle way between asceticism and indulgence (Jainism tends towards asceticism) - see this answer
The self is not eternal, not standalone and not independent - see this answer, and SN44.10, and contrast with Hindu BG2.24
The self or soul does not pervade the body (unlike the Hindu BG2.17) - see SN35.85
In terms of karma, not everything we experience is a result of past karma (compared to Jainism) - see this answer, SN36.21 and MN101
There is no Supreme Creator God (unlike Hinduism and the Abrahamic religions) - see this answer
The self or soul does not transmigrate (unlike Hindu BG2.22) - see this answer
Warriors dying on the battlefield while performing their duty do not go to heavan after death according to SN42.3 (unlike Hindu BG2.32)
Lay people eating meat that was bought dead and frozen from the supermarket is not sinful - see this answer

However, as also discussed in this answer, later on, Buddhist and Hindu philosophy influenced each other to produce Advaita Vedanta and Indian Mahayana Buddhist philosophy. Also, Tibetan Buddhism have adopted some Hindu deities. On the other hand, there has also been debates in later times between Hindu and Buddhist scholars (see this question).
However, Anatta (no eternal self) and the lack of a Supreme Creator God, still keeps Buddhism very far apart from the other religions, and due to this, it is very unlikely that one could truly practise Buddhism simultaneously with other religions including Hinduism and/or Jainism.

user12223: I cannot provide my own answer to your question. However, since most answers here are in the No camp, I thought I’d mention a famous proponent of the Yes camp, S.N. Goenka who believed that one can practice the core teachings of the Buddha while continuing to be a practitioner of another religion. I am not sure if his idea of such practice meets your or someone else’s definition of “practicing Buddhism”, though, so please keep that in mind. 
He has taught hundreds of thousands of people and has hundreds of centers around the world. He grew up in an orthodox Hindu family and considered himself a devout Hindu till his death.  Under his view this is not particular to Hinduism and there are people who are Christian and Muslim also who practice his way. 
As Katinka already pointed out, the Dalai Lama is in the No camp. He thinks Buddhism is suitable for those who are disillusioned with other religions or do not have one - otherwise, just follow “your own religion” whatever that is. Again, this would be dependent on what his view of “practicing Buddhism” is. 

user8044: 
Can one follow Hinduism and Buddhism at the same time?

Theravāda branch of Buddhism (in its truest sense) is in stark contrast with Hinduism, but it may not be so for the other branches of Buddhism. It is mainly because the view of sassata is not found in Theravāda. Hinduism teaches that one possesses a soul that lives eternally. This soul is considered to be one’s real self, a form of personality view. Hinduism teaches that the soul exists even after death. In the Bhagavad Gita, the God Krishna says that he created the world and that everybody possesses a soul. When one dies, the four physical elements (pathavi, apo, tejo and vayo – earth, water, fire and wind) vanish. But the soul is not harmed. 
On the other extreme is “non being”. That is the view of Uccheda. This world is divided between these two extremes: Existence and Non-Existence. The Dhamma that Buddha taught overcome both these two extremes. We are taught that there is only cause and effect. Because of a cause, there is an effect. When causes cease, then effects cease too. So then there is no reason to fall into either of the two standpoints of sassata ditti & Uccheda ditti.

How to maintain a balance between the two?

Both believe in Kamma, but unlike in Hinduism, Kamma is not deterministic in Theravāda. In Buddhism, even if root causes are there, we can stop kamma from bringing their results by blocking the conditions for them to come to fruition.  It is like a seed that has the potential to bring about a tree, but for that to happen the seed must be given a fertile soil, water, and sunlight. 
Both practice Ānāpānasati. If by Ānāpānasati one takes it to mean  "mindfulness of breathing” – then it is no different to that of Hinduism. In Hinduism what ‘Buddhists’ call the four Jhana is referred to  as “kundalini awakening”. These similarities are because of Buddhaghosa introducing Hindu Vedic meditation techniques to Buddha Dhamma in his Visuddhimagga. Buddhaghosa was always devoted student of Patanjali's Yoga Sutras, and because of his influence, Buddhism as it is seen and practiced today has become similar to Hinduism.

Or would I have to choose one over the other?

I would choose Buddha Dhamma over Hinduism. If you follow the true Dhamma it will lead you to lead to the completion of the four satipattanas, the seven bojjangas, removal of avijja, and the attainment of Nibbana. The four satipattanas, when cultivated and pursued, bring the seven bojjangas to their completion. The seven bojjangas, when cultivated and pursued, bring vijja (opposite of avijja) and vimutti (or Nibbana) to their completion. 

Or is it possible to choose Buddhism as subset of Hinduism, just like Jains do.

Is Jainism a subset of Hinduism? In Jainism, this view of eternalism is taught different to Hinduism. Jains explain that our previous karma has accumulated around our pristine soul like layers of bark around the core of a tree. To help remove these old karmas the Jains do not wear clothes, do not take baths, refrain from eating, or do not shave, do not wash their faces and so on. They believe that these kinds of severe practices remove the bark of the old karma thereby allowing them to reach a state of eternal purity. As I see it both Hindus & Jains have similar severe practices, but that does not mean it is a subset.
Sadly as it is practised today, if you do wish to go this way, you are in good company. Few Buddhists understand urgency of coming to Nibbana and hence the distortion and dwarfing prelevant today. The rituals that are embedded in Hinduism are common in Buddhism today. Rituals have hidden the greatness of Hindu thoughts and concepts from most Hindus. Rituals have evolved into an attempt at bribing the God/ Gods in Hinduism today. The Buddhism practiced today is no different. Hinduism and Buddhism are thoughts and philosophies that stimulate and fire the intellect. Unfortunately, they have been reduced to the level of blind faiths and beliefs today. “Shraddha” has been erroneously brought to the forefront instead of “Panna”. Both religions have lost their dynamism and direction in practice. Both religions have been brought to the level of the masses.  As a result the sublime and profound in both is lost. The need to strive has been negated in both religions in practice.

user295: In Buddhism the main teachings you have to have faith in is the 8 Fold Path divided into 3 trainings, which is to develop higher virtue, higher mind and higher wisdom.
No religion is incompatible with developing higher virtue, higher mind and higher wisdom, therefore you can start practicing considering you self a Hindu. As you find parts of Buddhism logical and verified at the experiential level then you can lowly accepting parts of Buddhism at your own pace.

6925: <p>I am born Hindu and have been following Buddhism for more than a year. The change has been a life changing experience but now I find myself at the junction of two religions. I sometimes face contradictory situations where its ok in one religion but violates the other. Traveling in two boats at the same time is certainly not possible but its also difficult to choose one over the other. So my question is:<br>
1) Can one follow Hinduism and Buddhism at the same time?<br>
2) How to maintain a balance between the two?<br>
3) Or would I have to choose one over the other?<br>
4) Or is it possible to choose Buddhism as subset of Hinduism, just like Jains do i.e. the mainly follow their own religion first &amp; then they following Hinduism. So even in contradictory situations, they choose Jain rule over Hindu rule.</p>
 11306: <p>In order to answer these questions, you need to understand the Dhamma Differences in Hinduism and Buddhism. In <a href="https://suttacentral.net/en/dn1" rel="nofollow noreferrer">DN1/ Digha Nikaya 1</a>, Buddha expounded the differences between the dhamma that he teached and the dhamma of the brahmins/hinduism. </p>

<p>My answer is that, you need to find this yourself. but to tell you the truth, it's not possible.</p>
 11033: <p>You may get close, but so long you believe in the concept of an everlasting soul (i.e atman), you will <strong>not</strong> achieve what the Buddha called the ultimate cessation of suffering, because of the clinging to the Self which arises in conjunction with this belief.</p>

<p>Remember: the Buddha spoke of four types of clinging. Clinging to sensual pleasures, clinging to views, clinging to rules and observances, and <strong>clinging to a doctrine of self.</strong></p>
 11330: <p>Your question already implies differences in practice between your variation of Hinduism and what Buddhism you have practiced. On these issues you will have to choose. </p>

<p>When it comes to doctrine too, you will have to be clear in your mind. The very word dharma means something very different in Brahmanical Hinduism vs. Buddhism. There are differences in the nuances of the word karma too - and so on. </p>

<p>It's certainly easier to stick with the faith and practices you grew up with, and merely add those practices and doctrines from Buddhism that you can without contradiction. It's easier not merely for you personally, but also within the context of your family and social sphere. </p>

<p>In other words: take those aspects of Buddhism that make you a better human being and a better Hindu. Leave the rest be. </p>

<p>To do anything other than that should only be done after more time and study than you have at present devoted to it. Westerners often become Buddhists as converts from Christianity - but they only do so after they've already become disenchanted from Christianity. Even so - it's a difficult process that leads to culture-shock. </p>

<p>You do not sound like you are done with Hinduism because of anything within Hinduism. </p>

<p>As for seeing Buddhism as part of Hinduism... That's Hindu propaganda that doesn't respect Buddhism. It's a bit like Muslims claiming Christianity is part of Islam: it doesn't respect Buddhism as a separate religion. [Jainism: same thing.] </p>

<p>[This is advice that fits in with H.H. the Dalai Lama's advice on mixing religions.]</p>
 471: <p>Here are some differences between Buddhism, and Hinduism and Jainism:</p>

<ul>
<li>The middle way between eternalism and annihilationism (both Hinduism and Jainism subscribe to eternalism of the self) - see <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/8164/471">this answer</a></li>
<li>The middle way between asceticism and indulgence (Jainism tends towards asceticism) - see <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/8164/471">this answer</a></li>
<li>The self is not eternal, not standalone and not independent - see <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/9655/471">this answer</a>, and <a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn44/sn44.010.than.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SN44.10</a>, and contrast with Hindu <a href="http://www.holy-bhagavad-gita.org/chapter/2/verse/24" rel="nofollow noreferrer">BG2.24</a></li>
<li>The self or soul does not pervade the body (unlike the Hindu <a href="http://www.holy-bhagavad-gita.org/chapter/2/verse/17" rel="nofollow noreferrer">BG2.17</a>) - see <a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn35/sn35.085.than.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SN35.85</a></li>
<li>In terms of karma, not everything we experience is a result of past karma (compared to Jainism) - see <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/8935/471">this answer</a>, <a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn36/sn36.021.than.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SN36.21</a> and <a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.101.than.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">MN101</a></li>
<li>There is no Supreme Creator God (unlike Hinduism and the Abrahamic religions) - see <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/11653/471">this answer</a></li>
<li>The self or soul does not transmigrate (unlike Hindu <a href="http://www.holy-bhagavad-gita.org/chapter/2/verse/22" rel="nofollow noreferrer">BG2.22</a>) - see <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/8070/471">this answer</a></li>
<li>Warriors dying on the battlefield while performing their duty do not go to heavan after death according to <a href="https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn42/sn42.003.than.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SN42.3</a> (unlike Hindu <a href="http://www.holy-bhagavad-gita.org/chapter/2/verse/32" rel="nofollow noreferrer">BG2.32</a>)</li>
<li>Lay people eating meat that was bought dead and frozen from the supermarket is not sinful - see <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/q/5948/471">this answer</a></li>
</ul>

<p>However, as also discussed in <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/12117/471">this answer</a>, later on, Buddhist and Hindu philosophy influenced each other to produce Advaita Vedanta and Indian Mahayana Buddhist philosophy. Also, Tibetan Buddhism have adopted some Hindu deities. On the other hand, there has also been debates in later times between Hindu and Buddhist scholars (see <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/q/7426/471">this question</a>).</p>

<p>However, <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/1894/471">Anatta</a> (no eternal self) and the <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/11653/471">lack of a Supreme Creator God</a>, still keeps Buddhism very far apart from the other religions, and due to this, it is very unlikely that one could truly practise Buddhism simultaneously with other religions including Hinduism and/or Jainism.</p>
 12223: <p>I cannot provide my own answer to your question. However, since most answers here are in the No camp, I thought I’d mention a famous <a href="https://www.dhamma.org/en-US/about/goenka" rel="nofollow noreferrer">proponent of the Yes camp, S.N. Goenka</a> who believed that one can practice the core teachings of the Buddha while continuing to be a practitioner of another religion. I am not sure if <a href="http://www.vipassana.co/A-store-house-of-answers-by-Shri-S-N-Goenka" rel="nofollow noreferrer">his idea of such practice</a> meets your or someone else’s definition of “practicing Buddhism”, though, so please keep that in mind. </p>

<p>He has taught hundreds of thousands of people and has hundreds of centers around the world. He grew up in an orthodox Hindu family and considered himself a devout Hindu till his death.  Under his view this is not particular to Hinduism and there are people who are Christian and Muslim also who practice his way. </p>

<p>As Katinka already pointed out, the Dalai Lama is in the No camp. He thinks Buddhism is suitable for those who are disillusioned with other religions or do not have one - otherwise, just follow “your own religion” whatever that is. Again, this would be dependent on what <em>his</em> view of “practicing Buddhism” is. </p>
 8044: <blockquote>
  <p>Can one follow Hinduism and Buddhism at the same time?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Theravāda branch of Buddhism (in its truest sense) is in stark contrast with Hinduism, but it may not be so for the other branches of Buddhism. It is mainly because the view of sassata is not found in Theravāda. Hinduism teaches that one possesses a soul that lives eternally. This soul is considered to be one’s real self, a form of personality view. Hinduism teaches that the soul exists even after death. In the Bhagavad Gita, the God Krishna says that he created the world and that everybody possesses a soul. When one dies, the four physical elements (pathavi, apo, tejo and vayo – earth, water, fire and wind) vanish. But the soul is not harmed. </p>

<p>On the other extreme is “non being”. That is the view of Uccheda. This world is divided between these two extremes: Existence and Non-Existence. The Dhamma that Buddha taught overcome both these two extremes. We are taught that there is only cause and effect. Because of a cause, there is an effect. When causes cease, then effects cease too. So then there is no reason to fall into either of the two standpoints of sassata ditti &amp; Uccheda ditti.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>How to maintain a balance between the two?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Both believe in Kamma, but unlike in Hinduism, Kamma is not deterministic in Theravāda. In Buddhism, even if root causes are there, we can stop kamma from bringing their results by blocking the conditions for them to come to fruition.  It is like a seed that has the potential to bring about a tree, but for that to happen the seed must be given a fertile soil, water, and sunlight. </p>

<p>Both practice Ānāpānasati. If by Ānāpānasati one takes it to mean  "mindfulness of breathing” – then it is no different to that of Hinduism. In Hinduism what ‘Buddhists’ call the four Jhana is referred to  as “kundalini awakening”. These similarities are because of Buddhaghosa introducing Hindu Vedic meditation techniques to Buddha Dhamma in his Visuddhimagga. Buddhaghosa was always devoted student of Patanjali's Yoga Sutras, and because of his influence, Buddhism as it is seen and practiced today has become similar to Hinduism.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Or would I have to choose one over the other?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I would choose Buddha Dhamma over Hinduism. If you follow the true Dhamma it will lead you to lead to the completion of the four satipattanas, the seven bojjangas, removal of avijja, and the attainment of Nibbana. The four satipattanas, when cultivated and pursued, bring the seven bojjangas to their completion. The seven bojjangas, when cultivated and pursued, bring vijja (opposite of avijja) and vimutti (or Nibbana) to their completion. </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Or is it possible to choose Buddhism as subset of Hinduism, just like Jains do.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Is Jainism a subset of Hinduism? In Jainism, this view of eternalism is taught different to Hinduism. Jains explain that our previous karma has accumulated around our pristine soul like layers of bark around the core of a tree. To help remove these old karmas the Jains do not wear clothes, do not take baths, refrain from eating, or do not shave, do not wash their faces and so on. They believe that these kinds of severe practices remove the bark of the old karma thereby allowing them to reach a state of eternal purity. As I see it both Hindus &amp; Jains have similar severe practices, but that does not mean it is a subset.</p>

<p>Sadly as it is practised today, if you do wish to go this way, you are in good company. Few Buddhists understand urgency of coming to Nibbana and hence the distortion and dwarfing prelevant today. The rituals that are embedded in Hinduism are common in Buddhism today. Rituals have hidden the greatness of Hindu thoughts and concepts from most Hindus. Rituals have evolved into an attempt at bribing the God/ Gods in Hinduism today. The Buddhism practiced today is no different. Hinduism and Buddhism are thoughts and philosophies that stimulate and fire the intellect. Unfortunately, they have been reduced to the level of blind faiths and beliefs today. “Shraddha” has been erroneously brought to the forefront instead of “Panna”. Both religions have lost their dynamism and direction in practice. Both religions have been brought to the level of the masses.  As a result the sublime and profound in both is lost. The need to strive has been negated in both religions in practice.</p>
 295: <p>In Buddhism the main teachings you have to have faith in is the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_Eightfold_Path" rel="noreferrer">8 Fold Path</a> divided into <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threefold_Training" rel="noreferrer">3 trainings</a>, which is to develop higher <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9A%C4%ABla" rel="noreferrer">virtue</a>, higher <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samadhi_(Buddhism)" rel="noreferrer">mind</a> and higher <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisdom_in_Buddhism" rel="noreferrer">wisdom</a>.</p>

<p>No religion is incompatible with developing higher <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9A%C4%ABla" rel="noreferrer">virtue</a>, higher <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samadhi_(Buddhism)" rel="noreferrer">mind</a> and higher <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisdom_in_Buddhism" rel="noreferrer">wisdom</a>, therefore you can start practicing considering you self a Hindu. As you find parts of Buddhism logical and verified at the experiential level then you can lowly accepting parts of Buddhism at your own pace.</p>
