user461: This answer includes the following statement:

But some other dharmas are still empty without being dependently originated, like nirodha or tathata.

A comment after the answers gives the following definitions:

nirodha is cessation of suffering (nirvana), and tathata is true reality.

Doesn't the cessation of suffering depend on the existence of suffering, and is therefore dependently originated? 

user295: Suffering (un-satisfactoriness) is the result of impermanence of Sensations / what is felt and Fabrication in general when Perceived through Mental Distortions when there is a gap between reality and Perception. (In many Suttas, inclusive of the latter, it is mentioned "in short 5 aggregates of clinging is suffering" but in Titth’ayatana Sutta it is mentioned "Now, it is for one who feels that I make known: This is suffering ...")
Nirodha is not creating more un-satisfactoriness through Becoming or creating Fabrications by Distortion through Perception as well as Craving and Clinging.
Nirvana is unconditioned hence non dependent on anything. If it was conditioned it will be unsatisfactory as condition or its existance ceases it also ceases. This leads to a Paradox in the line of thinking in the question as when suffering ceases so does end of suffering.

user-1: The distinction you are making is a lower octave of the ultimate distinction between nirvana and samsara. From the perspective of samsara, nirvana is negation and therefore dualistic and relative. Thus the Buddha says that nirvana is the door to the supermundane, not the supermundane itself, which is transdual.
This led to the distinction between a nirvana attainment that excludes samsara, and a nirvana attainment that includes samsara. One can fall back into nirvana from the former, but not from the latter. Even in the Pali Canon one finds a distinction between nibbana and parinibbana, the latter only being attained at death. From the supermundane perspective, both nirvana and samsara are illusions.

user7141: There is a connection, 
If there was no suffering there is no nirodha.
Let me give an explain from a famous teaching from Lord Buddha (The Four Noble Truths)....

Suffering exist because of not understanding
If the person understood the reality there wouldn't be a suffering in
the first place
To end the suffering one must first understand
If understanding happens in a person's mind he will not suffer
anymore!

Lord Buddha said...

Everything is born because of reasons
Everything exist because of reasons
Things will exist only till the reasons exist
if you take them away it will not exist anymore

What are the Four Noble Truths - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Noble_Truths
This is the answer to your question and any such questions about connections between things.

user43: Although nirodha is usually translated "cessation", its main meaning is "restraint", "prevention" - e.g. of crime or any undesired activity/outcome. In modern Hindi, nirodh is even used as a word for condom.
If you really think about it, this makes sense. The way cessation of dukkha is achieved is through non-attachment - i.e. non-creation of conditions that make arising of dukkha possible. In other words, non-attachment is prevention of dukkha.
Prevention of X does not depend on existence of X.

user6999: I don't know if the word "dependent" is 100% correct.  I would say suffering is the supporting condition for cessation. 
From  Upanisaa Sutta 

suffering is the support condition for faith
faith is the support condition for joy
joy is the support condition for delight
delight is the support condition for tranquillity 
tranquillity is the support condition for happiness
happiness is the support condition for concentration
concentration is the support condition for for knowledge and wisdom for things as they are
knowledge and wisdom for things as they are is the support condition for disenchantment
disenchantment is the support condition for dispassion
dispassion is the support condition for liberation (another word Buddha used for Nirodha or nibbana)


461: <p><a href="https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/a/11560/1127">This answer</a> includes the following statement:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>But some other <strong>dharmas</strong> are still empty <strong>without being dependently originated</strong>, like <em>nirodha</em> or <em>tathata</em>.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>A comment after the answers gives the following definitions:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><em>nirodha</em> is cessation of suffering (nirvana), and <em>tathata</em> is true reality.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Doesn't the cessation of suffering depend on the existence of suffering, and is therefore dependently originated? </p>
 295: <p>Suffering (un-satisfactoriness) is the result of impermanence of Sensations / what is felt and Fabrication in general when Perceived through Mental Distortions when there is a gap between reality and Perception. (In many Suttas, inclusive of the latter, it is mentioned "in short 5 aggregates of clinging is suffering" but in <a href="http://www.themindingcentre.org/dharmafarer/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/6.8-Titthayatana-S-a03.61-piya.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Titth’ayatana Sutta</a> it is mentioned "Now, it is for one who feels that I make known: This is suffering ...")</p>

<p>Nirodha is not creating more un-satisfactoriness through Becoming or creating Fabrications by Distortion through Perception as well as Craving and Clinging.</p>

<p>Nirvana is unconditioned hence non dependent on anything. If it was conditioned it will be unsatisfactory as condition or its existance ceases it also ceases. This leads to a Paradox in the line of thinking in the question as when suffering ceases so does end of suffering.</p>
 -1: <p>The distinction you are making is a lower octave of the ultimate distinction between nirvana and samsara. From the perspective of samsara, nirvana is negation and therefore dualistic and relative. Thus the Buddha says that nirvana is the door to the supermundane, not the supermundane itself, which is transdual.</p>

<p>This led to the distinction between a nirvana attainment that excludes samsara, and a nirvana attainment that includes samsara. One can fall back into nirvana from the former, but not from the latter. Even in the Pali Canon one finds a distinction between nibbana and parinibbana, the latter only being attained at death. From the supermundane perspective, both nirvana and samsara are illusions.</p>
 7141: <p><strong>There is a connection,</strong> </p>

<p>If there was no suffering there is no nirodha.</p>

<p><strong>Let me give an explain from a famous teaching from Lord Buddha (The Four Noble Truths)....</strong></p>

<ul>
<li>Suffering exist because of not understanding</li>
<li>If the person understood the reality there wouldn't be a suffering in
the first place</li>
<li>To end the suffering one must first understand</li>
<li>If understanding happens in a person's mind he will not suffer
anymore!</li>
</ul>

<p><strong>Lord Buddha said...</strong></p>

<ul>
<li><p>Everything is born because of reasons</p></li>
<li><p>Everything exist because of reasons</p></li>
<li><p>Things will exist only till the reasons exist</p></li>
<li><p>if you take them away it will not exist anymore</p></li>
</ul>

<p><strong>What are the Four Noble Truths - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Noble_Truths" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Noble_Truths</a></strong></p>

<p><em>This is the answer to your question and any such questions about connections between things.</em></p>
 43: <p>Although <em>nirodha</em> is usually translated "cessation", its main meaning is "restraint", "prevention" - e.g. of crime or any undesired activity/outcome. In modern Hindi, nirodh is even used as a word for condom.</p>

<p>If you really think about it, this makes sense. The way cessation of dukkha is achieved is through non-attachment - i.e. non-creation of conditions that make arising of <code>dukkha</code> possible. In other words, non-attachment is <em>prevention</em> of <code>dukkha</code>.</p>

<p>Prevention of X does not depend on existence of X.</p>
 6999: <p>I don't know if the word "dependent" is 100% correct.  I would say suffering is the supporting condition for cessation. </p>

<p>From  <a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn12/sn12.023x.wlsh.html" rel="nofollow">Upanisaa Sutta</a> </p>

<ul>
<li>suffering is the support condition for faith</li>
<li>faith is the support condition for joy</li>
<li>joy is the support condition for delight</li>
<li>delight is the support condition for tranquillity </li>
<li>tranquillity is the support condition for happiness</li>
<li>happiness is the support condition for concentration</li>
<li>concentration is the support condition for for knowledge and wisdom for things as they are</li>
<li>knowledge and wisdom for things as they are is the support condition for disenchantment</li>
<li>disenchantment is the support condition for dispassion</li>
<li>dispassion is the support condition for liberation (another word Buddha used for Nirodha or nibbana)</li>
</ul>
