user157: I'm very fortunate to live in an affluent part of the world. Even so, it is a common site to see people begging for money in the street. In our town there are posters up asking people not to give to beggars as it just encourages people to beg more. However habitually walking past people begging does not feel like the compassionate thing to do. 
Is it possible to bring Buddhist ethics and philosophy to bear on this? Should one give to beggars in this circumstance? It would be good if answers could include textual references to illustrate the point however all answers gratefully received.

user3660: Instead of giving to beggars (which most likely would use money to buy alcohol), I give regularly money to few nonprofits helping causes which are important to me. I believe that such giving is more effective (accomplishes more good), and if someone ask for money, I can say: I already contributed $10 today.
I even read the article how ineffective is collecting food. If you give money instead, charity could: 

(1) buy food for wholesale price, or even at discount from wholesale instead you paying retail
(2) volunteers would not waste time moving, sorting and packing it - could buy what is needed, when needed.

As a result, $10 in cash donation is about same value as $100 in kind.
Of course, politicians prefer moving boxes, because it makes better photo opportunities.

user295: It is the thought or volition that counts underpinning the action.
If you do not give to baggers with good intention then this is acceptable. If you choose not to give may be you can be of more service to them by helping them make a living and also perhaps find employment.
If you give to beggars with good intention then this is also acceptable are you are practising generosity.
Generosity is not limited to material giving. It is a will and volition to the benevolence and betterment of others and acting upon it.

user43: To add to Sankha's answer above - it is not as much whether to give or not to give, as it is about the right factor of prioritization. When you give to someone/anyone - person or organization - you support a certain program, certain idea, you help it go on, you help it do its thing, you help it affect the world in whatever way it affects the world.
According to Buddha (interpreting his words broadly, Mahayana-style), sponsoring the more virtuous programs is of greater benefit than sponsoring the less virtuous programs - therefore if there is competition for our sponsorship, if we have to choose - we should choose sponsoring the more virtuous programs, the more enlightened programs.
Of course, providing for the less fortunate is supporting a virtuous program already - no doubt about that. The question is, are there more virtuous programs that could benefit from our resources?
According to Buddha (again interpreting broadly, Mahayana-style), the programs that spread virtue and wisdom, and help reduce greed/hatred/confusion locally or globally, are a better long term investment of our resources IF we have to choose. That said, simply giving to beggars is still much better than doing nothing at all.

user7141: there is a simple answer to your question.
Lord Buddha said....

One should give when he has more
One should give when he has a lot
One should give when he has some
One should give when he has little

Lord Buddha said these four in an one sentence to inform the value of giving.
And asked to give in this manner.....

Plan to give with happiness in your mind
Give with happiness in your mind
Be happy about the giving afterwards and forever
Happily memorize what you gave

And went on to say these...
There is only one help to beings who roam in Samsara/Sansara,That is the good karma they have done.No good karma is small.
"Like a pot getting filled with small drops of water any good karma is an aid for one's path!"
Let me tell you a strange story....
One day people in a certain area planned a beautiful festival.A festival to worship a "Stupa" with flowers.
 

(A stupa)

Everyone found some to offer but a one lady.She could not find any because everyone has taken flowers so none was left.all she could find was a flower of an vegetable plant so she took it even though it was a bit unorthodox.She offered it and time went by.She died and when she opened her eyes she was in the "Deva Realm".When asked she was bit shy to reveal how she came there and to this day her story is the model story to explain to power of good deeds.
No matter how so unimportant or small something good you can do would appear just do it because no one knows when such a good deed would come in handy.

user254: I don't know about the UK.
In France, some people work (volunteer) for e.g. the Restaurants du Cœur; or in Canada, for the Daily Bread Food Bank.
There are some benefits to an organization like that:

It's communal (sociable, friendly) work
It's affordable (time not money)
As well as helping 'beggars', food banks also help e.g. children who are living in poverty
People who are there to distribute food are sometimes also able to offer other types of help


user2265: The quote given by Sankha is a great one and I love to read such things but the 1st training is very time-dependent and we have to learn to think critically and live our lives with good, highly informed, moderate principles of the Buddha considering relativities of our day.
Anyway... here is my time-and-place sensitive solution to the issue of seeing beggars everywhere:
We pay taxes that go to welfare so beggars... they should take opportunity of that welfare instead of just begging!
If anything IMO, you should explain the above to a beggar and see if they need help being taken to the social security office (so that they can apply). Also provide them with busfare to go back.
It really might be that easy to completely help a homeless person.
I have done an experiment and claimed homelessness before and received enough money to feed myself far more than amply and could actually live very comfortably so long as I stayed in a homeless center (or some other place) at night. It would be very easy to live as a monk on welfare... meditating in the jungle at day and finding shelter by night.
I have thought about it and experimented with it somewhat... I can verify that the system in the U.S. is very generous with food stamps program.
The homeless life that Buddha praised is much easier to do than people think!
[I'm glad I experimented with homeless survivalism because I always have that as a backup to compare to working 40 hours a week and straining to make house payments and bills.]
The reason homeless people suffer is entirely mental: they suffer from the mental dis-ease of scarcity and self-victimization.
I don't believe in donating money to help beggars though. It is quite naive to do so for a lot of reasons...

user3658: I cannot give any specific insight into the ethics of Buddhism , as I know little about it but I hope this answer will be of use to you nonetheless.
As a human being (Religion is, I believe, irrelevant in this case) I believe that it is not compassionate to pass a beggar (or anyone else asking for help) when I have the means to help them.
My own philosophy is that even if you suspect that the person begging doesn't really "need" to beg, let it be on their conscience, not yours; after all, who are we to judge others on face value?
If you're not entirely sure that giving money is a good idea (for example - if the person shows obvious signs of substance addiction and you believe the money is going towards their next fix, etc) then I would recommend instead offering (if you feel it's safe to do so) to buy them some food, or a cup of coffee, etc - you'd be surprised how much difference even this simple gesture can make to someone who's down on their luck.
I don't have any professional experience dealing with beggars, but I have talked to quite a few of them, and although I will admit that many aren't particularly savoury characters, a lot of them are just people like you and I who "fell through the cracks" in the system; it can happen pretty easily, even in places like the UK and Ireland (where I live).

user289: The Brahman Net Sutra says 


Being Stingy 
  “Buddha-Sons, one should not be stingy or incite others to be stingy, through any causes, conditions, methods, or karmas. 
  “A Bodhisattva should give to those who come to him all that they need. If, out of malice or anger, he instead refuses to give to the
  poor even a coin, a needle, or a blade of grass, or refuses to say a
  verse or a stanza to those who request the Dharma, scolding and
  insulting them, it is a parājika sin.


But a good percentage of the beggars on the street have chemical dependency problems. So giving them money (sometimes they ask for the exact amount necessary to buy a bottle of malt liquor) violates this precept:


Selling Alcohol 
  “Buddha-Sons, one should not sell alcohol or incite others to sell alcohol, through any causes, conditions, methods, or karmas. One
  should not sell any kind of alcohol because it can cause one to commit
  sins. 
  “A Bodhisattva should bring clear wisdom out of sentient beings. If he instead causes them to muddle their minds, it is a parājika sin.


Enabling people to drink alcohol in the BNS is worse than consuming it yourself! (A major vs a minor precept)
Anyhow, it was a document written in China in the middle ages, when begging probably had a different dynamic, different circumstances (maybe they're peasants from the country side during time of drought!).  In many jurisdictions where I live, giving to beggars is illegal as is the begging and beggars that stand in the middle of the road get hit by cars from time to time.
A beggar who receives a $1 will spend it sometimes on food, sometimes on drugs. He will pay retail prices. A beggar that goes to a food bank, soup kitchen or the like will be eating food and no drugs. The food bank pays wholesale prices.
Your dollar is better donated to the soup kitchen.

user701: There are some great answers here. I would also like to add the following comment by Buddha which emphasizes the importance of giving to anyone in need.   

If beings knew, as I know, the results of giving & sharing, they would
  not eat without having given, nor would the stain of selfishness
  overcome their minds. Even if it were their last bite, their last
  mouthful, they would not eat without having shared, if there were
  someone to receive their gift. But because beings do not know, as I
  know, the results of giving & sharing, they eat without having given.
  The stain of selfishness overcomes their minds.
Iti 1.26 


user3688: First of all, God bless your heart for even caring and contemplating on this.  There are several different reasons why people ask for money, and, therefore, there are several different reasons why you would be asked not to give them money.  On one hand, and as have some kindly suggested, you can resort to donating your money or service to a charity organization, just to make sure that whatever you are giving is channeled correctly.  On another hand, and if you can, you may ask the person about what is it that they need, and bring it to them, if you can.  I have friends that kindly approach the person and ask them why they need the money.  When it is for food, clothing or something they can afford buying for them, they buy it and bring it to them.  An act of kindness that brightens their day.

user3670: You should give because it is possible they are in a life-threatening situation so in giving you are potentially saving a life. If they are lying then God sees everything, you are covered!  But as previous poster mentioned, you are really giving for yourself.  

user-1: Of course you should give to the beggar... because the act of giving, isn't for the beggar, it's for you. The same goes for forgiveness, love and the removal of hate and judgment... it's not for them ( even though it impacts their life) it's for you, it's for your peace of mind, happiness and love!!
What we see in the world, it reflects our own minds and hearts. If you want to see more love in the world...then give to beggars and love all unconditionally, regardless of how they treat you!
Metta.

user111: Dakkhina Vibhanga Sutta is the one you want to have a look at.

Ananda, there are these fourteen individual gifts (cuddasa
  pāṭipuggalikā dakkhi). What are the fourteen?

One gives a gift to the Tathagata, the arhat [worthy one], fully self-awakened one—this is the first individual gift
One gives a gift to a pratyeka Buddha—this is the second individual gift
One gives a gift to an arhat disciple of the Tathagata—this is the third individual gift
One gives a gift to one on the way to realize the fruition of arhathood [an arhat-to-be]—this is the fourth individual gift
One gives a gift to a non-returner—this is the fifth individual gift
One gives a gift to one on the way to realize the fruition of non-return [a non-returner-to-be]—this is the sixth individual gift
One gives a gift to a once-returner—this is the seventh individual gift.
One gives a gift to one on the way to realize the fruition of once-return [a once-returner-to-be]— this is the eighth individual
  gift
One gives a gift to a streamwinner—this is the ninth individual gift
One gives a gift to one on the way to realize the fruition of streamwinning [a streamwinner-to-be] —this is the tenth individual
  gift
One gives a gift to one outside (the path) who is free from sensual pleasures—this is the eleventh
  individual gift.
One gives a gift to a virtuous worldling—this is the twelfth individual gift
One gives a gift to an immoral worldling —this is the thirteenth individual gift
One gives a gift to an animal—this is the fourteenth individual gift

In this regards, Ananda, having made a gift to an animal, one may
  expect a hundredfold gift. Having made a gift to an immoral
  worldling, one may expect a thousandfold gift. Having made a gift to a
  virtuous worldling, one may expect a hundred-thousandfold gift. Having
  made a gift to one outside (the path) who is free from sensual
  pleasures, one may expect a hundred-thousand times a
  hundred-thousandfold gift. Having made a gift to on the way to realize
  the fruition of streamwinning [a streamwinner-to-be], one may expect
  boundless, immeasurable gift. What more to speak of a streamwinner?
  What more to speak of one on the way to realize the fruition of
  once-return [a once-returner-to-be]? What more to speak of a
  once-returner? What more to speak of one on the way to realize the
  fruition of once-return [a non-returner-to-be]? What more to speak of
  a non-returner? What more to speak of one on the way to realize the
  fruition of arhathood [an arhat-to-be]? What more to speak of an arhat
  disciple of the Tathagata? What more to speak of a pratyeka Buddha?
  What more to speak of the Tathagata, fully self-awakened arhat, ripen
  in an incalculable way?

#12 and #13 are the ones relevant to your question. So whether it is encouraged by the community or not, you will get merits(thousandfold/hundred thousandfold) if you give to beggars. 
ps: n-fold could mean a gift 'n' times bigger or a similar gift for 'n' number of lives.

user3665: I have worked with homeless persons through non-profit agencies for over twenty years, therefore my answer is based on much experience. You are wise to seek the compassionate response. There is tremendous judgement about people who beg: assumptions are made that they are addicts, or unwilling to work (prefer to beg), or uninformed about available social services, or simple-minded, or mentally ill, or lazy, or falling through the cracks, or __________ (fill in the blank with your thoughts about them). 
You know what? Any or all of these things might be true of the next beggar you see. Or none of them might be true. Which is why it is wise to just rest in your compassion. The beggar you see is a human being first. Say hello. Smile. Give that person your full respect and do not assume for a minute that you know what is best for them. Do not assume you can gauge their capacity. Do not assume that you know anything About their past or present, or that you can predict their behavior (such as assuming they will buy liquor if you give them money). 
Compassion validates human worth. Compassion listens. Compassion sees each beggar as an individual human being who is a very important person.
I believe that when you embrace your compassion, you will see the person. The person. And when you see the person, and have some conversation (or just simple eye contact and a nod), that your compassion will direct your actions. When you see the person, and listen, and pay attention to them, you will be positioned to help should you choose to do so. Perhaps Money. Perhaps bus fare. Perhaps food. Or perhaps a handshake and small-talk well-wishes.
There is no one-size-fits-all when we talk about people and their needs. It is wrong to put up a sign that points to a group of people as less-than, which is the essence of the  "don't give money to beggars" sign... It is giving the message "do not feed the animals". It is taking away their human dignity.

157: <p>I'm very fortunate to live in an affluent part of the world. Even so, it is a common site to see people begging for money in the street. In our town there are posters up asking people not to give to beggars as it just encourages people to beg more. However habitually walking past people begging does not feel like the compassionate thing to do. </p>

<p>Is it possible to bring Buddhist ethics and philosophy to bear on this? Should one give to beggars in this circumstance? It would be good if answers could include textual references to illustrate the point however all answers gratefully received.</p>
 3660: <p>Instead of giving to beggars (which most likely would use money to buy alcohol), I give regularly money to few nonprofits helping causes which are important to me. I believe that such giving is more effective (accomplishes more good), and if someone ask for money, I can say: I already contributed $10 today.</p>

<p>I even read the article how ineffective is collecting food. If you give money instead, charity could: </p>

<ul>
<li>(1) buy food for wholesale price, or even at discount from wholesale instead you paying retail</li>
<li>(2) volunteers would not waste time moving, sorting and packing it - could buy what is needed, when needed.</li>
</ul>

<p>As a result, $10 in cash donation is about same value as $100 in kind.</p>

<p>Of course, politicians prefer moving boxes, because it makes better photo opportunities.</p>
 295: <p>It is the thought or volition that counts underpinning the action.</p>

<p>If you do not give to baggers with good intention then this is acceptable. If you choose not to give may be you can be of more service to them by helping them make a living and also perhaps find employment.</p>

<p>If you give to beggars with good intention then this is also acceptable are you are practising generosity.</p>

<p>Generosity is not limited to material giving. It is a will and volition to the benevolence and betterment of others and acting upon it.</p>
 43: <p>To add to Sankha's answer above - it is not as much whether to give or not to give, as it is about <em>the right factor of prioritization</em>. When you give to someone/anyone - person or organization - you support a certain program, certain idea, you help it go on, you help it do its thing, you help it affect the world in whatever way it affects the world.</p>

<p>According to Buddha (interpreting his words broadly, Mahayana-style), sponsoring the more virtuous programs is of greater benefit than sponsoring the less virtuous programs - therefore if there is competition for our sponsorship, if we have to choose - we should choose sponsoring the more virtuous programs, the more enlightened programs.</p>

<p>Of course, providing for the less fortunate <em>is</em> supporting a virtuous program already - no doubt about that. The question is, are there more virtuous programs that could benefit from our resources?</p>

<p>According to Buddha (again interpreting broadly, Mahayana-style), the programs that spread virtue and wisdom, and help reduce greed/hatred/confusion locally or globally, are a better long term investment of our resources IF we have to choose. That said, simply giving to beggars is still much better than doing nothing at all.</p>
 7141: <p>there is a simple answer to your question.</p>

<p><strong>Lord Buddha said....</strong></p>

<ul>
<li>One should give when he has more</li>
<li>One should give when he has a lot</li>
<li>One should give when he has some</li>
<li>One should give when he has little</li>
</ul>

<p>Lord Buddha said these four in an one sentence to inform the value of giving.</p>

<p><strong>And asked to give in this manner....</strong>.</p>

<ul>
<li>Plan to give with happiness in your mind</li>
<li>Give with happiness in your mind</li>
<li>Be happy about the giving afterwards and forever</li>
<li>Happily memorize what you gave</li>
</ul>

<p><strong>And went on to say these...</strong></p>

<p>There is only one help to beings who roam in Samsara/Sansara,That is the good karma they have done.No good karma is small.</p>

<p><em>"Like a pot getting filled with small drops of water any good karma is an aid for one's path!"</em></p>

<p>Let me tell you a strange story....</p>

<p>One day people in a certain area planned a beautiful festival.A festival to worship a "Stupa" with flowers.</p>

<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/WokyA.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/WokyA.jpg" alt="A stupa"></a> </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>(A stupa)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Everyone found some to offer but a one lady.She could not find any because everyone has taken flowers so none was left.all she could find was a flower of an vegetable plant so she took it even though it was a bit unorthodox.She offered it and time went by.She died and when she opened her eyes she was in the "Deva Realm".When asked she was bit shy to reveal how she came there and to this day her story is the model story to explain to power of good deeds.</p>

<p>No matter how so unimportant or small something good you can do would appear just do it because no one knows when such a good deed would come in handy.</p>
 254: <p>I don't know about the UK.</p>

<p>In France, some people work (volunteer) for e.g. the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restaurants_du_C%C5%93ur" rel="nofollow">Restaurants du Cœur</a>; or in Canada, for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Bread_Food_Bank" rel="nofollow">Daily Bread Food Bank</a>.</p>

<p>There are some benefits to an organization like that:</p>

<ul>
<li>It's communal (sociable, friendly) work</li>
<li>It's affordable (time not money)</li>
<li>As well as helping 'beggars', food banks also help e.g. children who are living in poverty</li>
<li>People who are there to distribute food are sometimes also able to offer other types of help</li>
</ul>
 2265: <p>The quote given by Sankha is a great one and I love to read such things but the 1st training is very time-dependent and we have to learn to think critically and live our lives with good, highly informed, moderate principles of the Buddha considering relativities of our day.</p>

<p>Anyway... here is my time-and-place sensitive solution to the issue of seeing beggars everywhere:</p>

<p>We pay taxes that go to welfare so beggars... they should take opportunity of that welfare instead of <em>just</em> begging!</p>

<p>If anything IMO, you should explain the above to a beggar and see if they need help being taken to the social security office (so that they can apply). Also provide them with busfare to go back.</p>

<p>It really might be that easy to completely help a homeless person.</p>

<p>I have done an experiment and claimed homelessness before and received enough money to feed myself far more than amply and could actually live very comfortably so long as I stayed in a homeless center (or some other place) at night. It would be very easy to live as a monk on welfare... meditating in the jungle at day and finding shelter by night.
I have thought about it and experimented with it somewhat... I can verify that the system in the U.S. is very generous with food stamps program.</p>

<p><strong>The homeless life that Buddha praised is much easier to do than people think!</strong>
[I'm glad I experimented with homeless survivalism because I always have that as a backup to compare to working 40 hours a week and straining to make house payments and bills.]</p>

<p>The reason homeless people suffer is entirely mental: they suffer from the mental dis-ease of scarcity and self-victimization.</p>

<p>I don't believe in donating money to help beggars though. It is quite naive to do so for a lot of reasons...</p>
 3658: <p>I cannot give any specific insight into the ethics of Buddhism , as I know little about it but I hope this answer will be of use to you nonetheless.</p>

<p>As a <em>human being</em> (Religion is, I believe, irrelevant in this case) I believe that it is not compassionate to pass a beggar (or anyone else asking for help) when I have the means to help them.</p>

<p>My own philosophy is that even if you suspect that the person begging doesn't really "need" to beg, let it be on their conscience, not yours; after all, who are we to judge others on face value?</p>

<p>If you're not entirely sure that giving money is a good idea (for example - if the person shows obvious signs of substance addiction and you believe the money is going towards their next fix, etc) then I would recommend instead offering (if you feel it's safe to do so) to buy them some food, or a cup of coffee, etc - you'd be surprised how much difference even this simple gesture can make to someone who's down on their luck.</p>

<p>I don't have any professional experience dealing with beggars, but I have talked to quite a few of them, and although I will admit that many aren't particularly savoury characters, a lot of them are just people like you and I who "fell through the cracks" in the system; it can happen pretty easily, even in places like the UK and Ireland (where I live).</p>
 289: <p>The Brahman Net Sutra says </p>

<blockquote>
  <ol start="8">
  <li>Being Stingy 
  “Buddha-Sons, one should not be stingy or incite others to be stingy, through any causes, conditions, methods, or karmas. 
  “A Bodhisattva should give to those who come to him all that they need. If, out of malice or anger, he instead refuses to give to the
  poor even a coin, a needle, or a blade of grass, or refuses to say a
  verse or a stanza to those who request the Dharma, scolding and
  insulting them, it is a parājika sin.</li>
  </ol>
</blockquote>

<p>But a good percentage of the beggars on the street have chemical dependency problems. So giving them money (sometimes they ask for the exact amount necessary to buy a bottle of malt liquor) violates this precept:</p>

<blockquote>
  <ol start="5">
  <li>Selling Alcohol 
  “Buddha-Sons, one should not sell alcohol or incite others to sell alcohol, through any causes, conditions, methods, or karmas. One
  should not sell any kind of alcohol because it can cause one to commit
  sins. 
  “A Bodhisattva should bring clear wisdom out of sentient beings. If he instead causes them to muddle their minds, it is a parājika sin.</li>
  </ol>
</blockquote>

<p>Enabling people to drink alcohol in the BNS is worse than consuming it yourself! (A major vs a minor precept)</p>

<p>Anyhow, it was a document written in China in the middle ages, when begging probably had a different dynamic, different circumstances (maybe they're peasants from the country side during time of drought!).  In many jurisdictions where I live, giving to beggars is illegal as is the begging and beggars that stand in the middle of the road get hit by cars from time to time.</p>

<p>A beggar who receives a $1 will spend it sometimes on food, sometimes on drugs. He will pay retail prices. A beggar that goes to a food bank, soup kitchen or the like will be eating food and no drugs. The food bank pays wholesale prices.</p>

<p>Your dollar is better donated to the soup kitchen.</p>
 701: <p>There are some great answers here. I would also like to add the following comment by Buddha which emphasizes the importance of giving to anyone in need.   </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>If beings knew, as I know, the results of giving &amp; sharing, they would
  not eat without having given, nor would the stain of selfishness
  overcome their minds. <strong><em>Even if it were their last bite, their last
  mouthful, they would not eat without having shared, if there were
  someone to receive their gift</em></strong>. But because beings do not know, as I
  know, the results of giving &amp; sharing, they eat without having given.
  The stain of selfishness overcomes their minds.<br>
  <a href="http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/kn/iti/iti.1.001-027.than.html" rel="nofollow"><em>Iti 1.26</em></a> </p>
</blockquote>
 3688: <p>First of all, God bless your heart for even caring and contemplating on this.  There are several different reasons why people ask for money, and, therefore, there are several different reasons why you would be asked not to give them money.  On one hand, and as have some kindly suggested, you can resort to donating your money or service to a charity organization, just to make sure that whatever you are giving is channeled correctly.  On another hand, and if you can, you may ask the person about what is it that they need, and bring it to them, if you can.  I have friends that kindly approach the person and ask them why they need the money.  When it is for food, clothing or something they can afford buying for them, they buy it and bring it to them.  An act of kindness that brightens their day.</p>
 3670: <p>You should give because it is possible they are in a life-threatening situation so in giving you are potentially saving a life. If they are lying then God sees everything, you are covered!  But as previous poster mentioned, you are really giving for yourself.  </p>
 -1: <p>Of course you should give to the beggar... because the act of giving, isn't for the beggar, it's for you. The same goes for forgiveness, love and the removal of hate and judgment... it's not for them ( even though it impacts their life) it's for you, it's for your peace of mind, happiness and love!!</p>

<p>What we see in the world, it reflects our own minds and hearts. If you want to see more love in the world...then give to beggars and love all unconditionally, regardless of how they treat you!</p>

<p>Metta.</p>
 111: <p><a href="http://www.themindingcentre.org/dharmafarer/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/1.9-Dakkhina-Vibhanga-S-m142-proto11.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Dakkhina Vibhanga Sutta</a> is the one you want to have a look at.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Ananda, there are these fourteen individual gifts (cuddasa
  pāṭipuggalikā dakkhi). What are the fourteen?</p>
  
  <ol>
  <li>One gives a gift to the Tathagata, the arhat [worthy one], fully self-awakened one—this is the first individual gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to a pratyeka Buddha—this is the second individual gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to an arhat disciple of the Tathagata—this is the third individual gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to one on the way to realize the fruition of arhathood [an arhat-to-be]—this is the fourth individual gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to a non-returner—this is the fifth individual gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to one on the way to realize the fruition of non-return [a non-returner-to-be]—this is the sixth individual gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to a once-returner—this is the seventh individual gift.</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to one on the way to realize the fruition of once-return [a once-returner-to-be]— this is the eighth individual
  gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to a streamwinner—this is the ninth individual gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to one on the way to realize the fruition of streamwinning [a streamwinner-to-be] —this is the tenth individual
  gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to one outside (the path) who is free from sensual pleasures—this is the eleventh
  individual gift.</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to a virtuous worldling—this is the twelfth individual gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to an immoral worldling —this is the thirteenth individual gift</li>
  <li>One gives a gift to an animal—this is the fourteenth individual gift</li>
  </ol>
  
  <p>In this regards, Ananda, having made a gift to an animal, one may
  expect a hundredfold gift. <strong>Having made a gift to an immoral
  worldling, one may expect a thousandfold gift. Having made a gift to a
  virtuous worldling, one may expect a hundred-thousandfold gift.</strong> Having
  made a gift to one outside (the path) who is free from sensual
  pleasures, one may expect a hundred-thousand times a
  hundred-thousandfold gift. Having made a gift to on the way to realize
  the fruition of streamwinning [a streamwinner-to-be], one may expect
  boundless, immeasurable gift. What more to speak of a streamwinner?
  What more to speak of one on the way to realize the fruition of
  once-return [a once-returner-to-be]? What more to speak of a
  once-returner? What more to speak of one on the way to realize the
  fruition of once-return [a non-returner-to-be]? What more to speak of
  a non-returner? What more to speak of one on the way to realize the
  fruition of arhathood [an arhat-to-be]? What more to speak of an arhat
  disciple of the Tathagata? What more to speak of a pratyeka Buddha?
  What more to speak of the Tathagata, fully self-awakened arhat, ripen
  in an incalculable way?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>#12 and #13 are the ones relevant to your question. So whether it is encouraged by the community or not, you will get merits(thousandfold/hundred thousandfold) if you give to beggars. </p>

<p><em>ps: n-fold could mean a gift 'n' times bigger or a similar gift for 'n' number of lives.</em></p>
 3665: <p>I have worked with homeless persons through non-profit agencies for over twenty years, therefore my answer is based on much experience. You are wise to seek the compassionate response. There is tremendous judgement about people who beg: assumptions are made that they are addicts, or unwilling to work (prefer to beg), or uninformed about available social services, or simple-minded, or mentally ill, or lazy, or falling through the cracks, or __________ (fill in the blank with your thoughts about them). </p>

<p>You know what? Any or all of these things might be true of the next beggar you see. Or none of them might be true. Which is why it is wise to just rest in your compassion. The beggar you see is a human being first. Say hello. Smile. Give that person your full respect and do not assume for a minute that you know what is best for them. Do not assume you can gauge their capacity. Do not assume that you know anything About their past or present, or that you can predict their behavior (such as assuming they will buy liquor if you give them money). 
Compassion validates human worth. Compassion listens. Compassion sees each beggar as an individual human being who is a very important person.</p>

<p>I believe that when you embrace your compassion, you will see the person. The person. And when you see the person, and have some conversation (or just simple eye contact and a nod), that your compassion will direct your actions. When you see the person, and listen, and pay attention to them, you will be positioned to help should you choose to do so. Perhaps Money. Perhaps bus fare. Perhaps food. Or perhaps a handshake and small-talk well-wishes.</p>

<p>There is no one-size-fits-all when we talk about people and their needs. It is wrong to put up a sign that points to a group of people as less-than, which is the essence of the  "don't give money to beggars" sign... It is giving the message "do not feed the animals". It is taking away their human dignity.</p>
