user8157: It's said that gods/devas experience more superior sensual pleasures than human beings. Human beings who keep Buddhist five precepts will be able to take rebirth in heavenly realm. Sensual pleasure is associated with greed (lobha), superior sensual pleasure means high level of greed & lust. If one wants to take rebirth in heaven, does it mean one has to practice five precepts and he also has to have high degree of greed & lust? For example, a person who often visits prostitute has both the quality of keeping five precepts and high degree of lust/greed. Does that increase his chance to be reborn as deva?

Suppose, Māgandiya, a householder or a householder’s son was rich, with great wealth and property, and being provided and endowed with
  the five cords of sensual pleasure, he might enjoy himself with forms
  cognizable by the eye…with sounds cognizable by the ear…with odours
  cognizable by the nose…with flavours cognizable by the tongue…with
  tangibles cognizable by the body that are wished for, desired,
  agreeable, and likeable, connected with sensual desire and provocative
  of lust. Having conducted himself well in body, speech and mind, on
  the dissolution of the body, after death, he might reappear in a happy
  destination, in the heavenly world in the retinue of the gods of the
  Thirty-three; and there, surrounded by a group of nymphs in the
  Nandana Grove, he would enjoy himself, provided and endowed with the
  five cords of divine sensual pleasure. Suppose he saw a householder or
  a householder’s son enjoying himself, provided and endowed with the
  five cords of human sensual pleasure. What do you think, Māgandiya?
  Would that young god surrounded by the group of nymphs in the Nandana
  Grove, enjoying himself, provided and endowed with the five cords of
  divine sensual pleasure, envy the householder or the householder’s son
  for the five cords of human sensual pleasure or would he be enticed by
  human sensual pleasures?”
MN 75



user254: According to MN 75, it is the "having conducted himself well" that results in "a 
happy destination".

sensuality + misconduct => unhappy destination
sensuality + good conduct => happy destination

Maybe see also What is effluent?

user17762: I would suggest looking at some of the narratives found in the Vimānavatthu of the Khuddakanikāya for some elucidation on this point. There the heavenly rewards granted to laypersons for positive ethical conduct are outlined. Laypersons who provide for the sangha with material requisites and observe the precepts are reborn in heavenly realms where they enjoy various sensual pleasures. These include, for example, having an exquisite golden complexions, dwelling in resplendent mansions, enjoying sweet scents, and hearing divine music, etc. These would all be reckoned as "deva-like sensual pleasures". 
Note, however, how in these narratives sexual pleasure is entirely lacking. There are many "nymphs" spoken of in these narratives, but their contribution in affording sensual pleasure to heaven-dwellers is primarily through the use of song, dance, etc., not through sexual intercourse. 

user10304: The one asked this question misunderstood what is "superior". Superior means finer, inferior coarser (vulgar). For instance, classical ballet is finer, Beyonce & Lady Gaga dances vulgar. All sensual pleasure are born by greed, finer pleasure with lesser greed whilst coarser with stronger greed. Therefore, "superior sensual pleasure means high level of greed & lust" a wrong analogy - from someone who doesn't have a clear mind or logic got his/er thinking entangled by words misleading himself/herself also others.     
The Sutras (likely also found in the Pali canon) mention there six Celestial Realms of Desire. The lowest and Trayastriṃśa (Pali: Tāvatiṃsa) get their xxx pleasures like the humans (while humans shared part similar to the Animal Realm); the 3rd by embracing; in Tuṣita only by holding hands. The highest Desire Realm Parinirmita-vaśavartin gets supreme OGSM simply by looking at each other in the eyes, no physical contact at all.
If one doesn't abide in his/er sincerity to understand the Buddhavacana, but leashed to certain bias that pleased him/er, cherry-picking here there, likely s/he unable to interpret the teaching correctly. Vocalizing Anatta doesn't endorse one the realization of Anatta hence there none "Nibanna" to enter - so to speak; likewise one bolted unconsciously onto his/er pride of superiority even to the point fooled his/er very self - equanimity a far cry, how could this person enter any Jhana?          




Postscript:
One who thinks there *sexier heavenly sensual rebirth*, sorry, no Beyonce for Devas, only the Flying Apsaras performance! 
I wonder those masters need anyone to provide any answer; for those their minds already full, no room there! However, other readers may be interested. The question has already had the less undesired answer selected, my post merely for those descendants who got the genes for satire and capable of laugh ~ :D    

8157: <p>It's said that gods/devas experience more superior sensual pleasures than human beings. Human beings who keep Buddhist five precepts will be able to take rebirth in heavenly realm. Sensual pleasure is associated with greed (lobha), superior sensual pleasure means high level of greed &amp; lust. If one wants to take rebirth in heaven, does it mean one has to practice five precepts and he also has to have high degree of greed &amp; lust? For example, a person who often visits prostitute has both the quality of keeping five precepts and high degree of lust/greed. Does that increase his chance to be reborn as deva?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><em>Suppose, Māgandiya, a householder or a householder’s son was rich, with great wealth and property, and being provided and endowed with
  the five cords of sensual pleasure, he might enjoy himself with forms
  cognizable by the eye…with sounds cognizable by the ear…with odours
  cognizable by the nose…with flavours cognizable by the tongue…with
  tangibles cognizable by the body that are wished for, desired,
  agreeable, and likeable, <strong>connected with sensual desire and provocative
  of lust. Having conducted himself well in body, speech and mind, on
  the dissolution of the body, after death, he might reappear in a happy
  destination, in the heavenly world in the retinue of the gods of the
  Thirty-three; and there, surrounded by a group of nymphs in the
  Nandana Grove, he would enjoy himself, provided and endowed with the
  five cords of divine sensual pleasure</strong>. Suppose he saw a householder or
  a householder’s son enjoying himself, provided and endowed with the
  five cords of human sensual pleasure. What do you think, Māgandiya?
  Would that young god surrounded by the group of nymphs in the Nandana
  Grove, enjoying himself, provided and endowed with the five cords of
  divine sensual pleasure, envy the householder or the householder’s son
  for the five cords of human sensual pleasure or would he be enticed by
  human sensual pleasures?”</em></p>
  
  <p><a href="https://suttacentral.net/en/mn75" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><em>MN 75</em></a></p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/TQw4D.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/TQw4D.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>
 254: <p>According to MN 75, it is the "having conducted himself well" that results in "a 
happy destination".</p>

<ul>
<li>sensuality + misconduct => unhappy destination</li>
<li>sensuality + good conduct => happy destination</li>
</ul>

<p>Maybe see also <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/q/9414/254">What is effluent?</a></p>
 17762: <p>I would suggest looking at some of the narratives found in the Vimānavatthu of the Khuddakanikāya for some elucidation on this point. There the heavenly rewards granted to laypersons for positive ethical conduct are outlined. Laypersons who provide for the sangha with material requisites and observe the precepts are reborn in heavenly realms where they enjoy various sensual pleasures. These include, for example, having an exquisite golden complexions, dwelling in resplendent mansions, enjoying sweet scents, and hearing divine music, etc. These would all be reckoned as "deva-like sensual pleasures". </p>

<p>Note, however, how in these narratives sexual pleasure is entirely lacking. There are many "nymphs" spoken of in these narratives, but their contribution in affording sensual pleasure to heaven-dwellers is primarily through the use of song, dance, etc., not through sexual intercourse. </p>
 10304: <p>The one asked this question misunderstood what is "superior". Superior means finer, inferior coarser (vulgar). For instance, classical ballet is finer, Beyonce &amp; Lady Gaga dances vulgar. All sensual pleasure are born by greed, finer pleasure with lesser greed whilst coarser with stronger greed. Therefore, <em><code>"superior sensual pleasure means high level of greed &amp; lust"</code></em> a wrong analogy - from someone who doesn't have a clear mind or logic got his/er thinking entangled by words misleading himself/herself also others.     </p>

<p>The Sutras (likely also found in the Pali canon) mention there six Celestial Realms of Desire. The lowest and Trayastriṃśa (Pali: Tāvatiṃsa) get their xxx pleasures like the humans (while humans shared part similar to the Animal Realm); the 3rd by embracing; in Tuṣita only by holding hands. The highest Desire Realm Parinirmita-vaśavartin gets supreme <sup>O</sup>GSM simply by looking at each other in the eyes, no physical contact at all.</p>

<p>If one doesn't abide in his/er sincerity to understand the Buddhavacana, but leashed to certain bias that pleased him/er, cherry-picking here there, likely s/he unable to interpret the teaching correctly. Vocalizing Anatta doesn't endorse one the realization of Anatta hence there none "Nibanna" to enter - so to speak; likewise one bolted unconsciously onto his/er pride of superiority even to the point fooled his/er very self - equanimity a far cry, how could this person enter any Jhana?          </p>

<hr>

<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/YIZCw.gif" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/YIZCw.gif" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/RoL9A.gif" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/RoL9A.gif" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<hr>

<p><em>Postscript:</em></p>

<p>One who thinks there <em><code>*sexier heavenly sensual rebirth*</code></em>, sorry, no Beyonce for Devas, only the Flying Apsaras performance! </p>

<p>I wonder those <em>masters</em> need anyone to provide any answer; for those their minds already full, no room there! However, other readers may be interested. The question has already had the less undesired answer selected, my post merely for those descendants who got the genes for satire and capable of laugh ~ :D    </p>
