user13190: The question is: How does Kamma associate with "provocation"?
Example 1:
A says to B "Hit/kill me if you dare."
Example 2: 
A tells B that killing is justified if the cause is right.
In the above examples, and if B did the hitting/killing after the provocation, who's kamma is worse? A or B? And Why?

user-1: Kamma is largly based on intention...in both the cases you have given the intention is not clear. 
Moreover Kamma is not some measurable quantity that can be quantified...so you cannot ask such questions like whose Kamma is more bad...

user111: Example 1: A commits bad Karma for provocation. B commits bad karma for hitting/killing. B's Karma is usually severe than A's for breaking the first precept.
Example 2: A commits bad karma for being ignorant or for lying. B commits bad karma for killing. B's Karma is usually severe than A's for breaking the first precept unless A's actions were caused by extremely strong ignorant views.

13190: <p>The question is: How does Kamma associate with "provocation"?</p>

<p>Example 1:
A says to B "Hit/kill me if you dare."</p>

<p>Example 2: 
A tells B that killing is justified if the cause is right.</p>

<p>In the above examples, and if B did the hitting/killing after the provocation, who's kamma is worse? A or B? And Why?</p>
 -1: <p>Kamma is largly based on intention...in both the cases you have given the intention is not clear. </p>

<p>Moreover Kamma is not some measurable quantity that can be quantified...so you cannot ask such questions like whose Kamma is more bad...</p>
 111: <p>Example 1: A commits bad Karma for provocation. B commits bad karma for hitting/killing. B's Karma is usually severe than A's for breaking the first precept.</p>

<p>Example 2: A commits bad karma for being ignorant or for lying. B commits bad karma for killing. B's Karma is usually severe than A's for breaking the first precept unless A's actions were caused by extremely strong ignorant views.</p>
