user-1: When I was on a Self Inquiry retreat last year, I was explaining why I wanted to help other people. One of the two teachers looked at me and said, "There are no other people." That sort-of made sense to me. The next day I had a realization which made it make sense completely.
But the other day (is there another day?) I saw it in a different way: that it simply does not matter whether there are other people or not, because I can never have real insight in to them, so I am completely alone in my path. My image of two people is like spheres touching at one hypothetical point (Indra's Net). I cannot see much through a point-sized window on to (hypothetical) someone-else's world. This is like Vivekacudemani #515:  

I am Actionless.
  I am Changeless.
  I am Partless.
  I am Without Purpose.
  I am Eternal.
  I do not require any prop.
I am One, without a Second.

If I am One, can I know anyone else? What does Buddhism say on this point?

user151: There are no words.
There are no borders.
There are no countries .
There is no "other".
There is no "self" 
But that doesn't mean we do not conceive of words, borders, countries, others and the self but we mix conceived reality with ultimate reality without even realizing it. Mindful Meditation on reality shows us how to untangle our perceptions of reality. We have to practice to understand this.

user-1: no comprende, UUU, and those here possible interested,
assuming it's asked for the purpose of release, for it's purpose this answer follows:
Q: Are there other people, according to Buddhism?
According to the Buddha and his Dhamma, there are all around, all the time, other people, and to hold the perception of the two governing principles arosen, in cases that the perception of self is current out of sign, is a very needed to be reminded to keep right effort arosen and to gain deliverence, so be sure that I or others see UUU`s, or your actions, know what you think, speak or do.
Phenomenalical pondering and try to grasp this view or that are not conductive for release. One just will die, the arrow not removed.
An what is right effort, supported by one, two or three governing principles, not having abound them, not denying them?

"One tries to abandon wrong view & to enter into right view: This is one's right effort...

"And how is right view the forerunner? One discerns wrong view as wrong view, and right view as right view. This is one's right view. And what is wrong view? 'There is nothing given, nothing offered, nothing sacrificed. There is no fruit or result of good or bad actions. There is no this world, no next world, no mother, no father, no spontaneously reborn beings; no brahmans or contemplatives who, faring rightly & practicing rightly, proclaim this world & the next after having directly known & realized it for themselves.' This is wrong view...

"One tries to abandon wrong resolve & to enter into right resolve: This is one's right effort...

"And what is right resolve? Being resolved on renunciation, on freedom from ill-will, on harmlessness: This is called right resolve."
— SN 45.8

"One tries to abandon wrong speech & to enter into right speech: This is one's right effort...

"There are these ten topics of [proper] conversation. Which ten? Talk on modesty, on contentment, on seclusion, on non-entanglement, on arousing persistence, on virtue, on concentration, on discernment, on release, and on the knowledge & vision of release. These are the ten topics of conversation. If you were to engage repeatedly in these ten topics of conversation, you would outshine even the sun & moon, so mighty, so powerful — to say nothing of the wanderers of other sects."
— AN 10.69

"One tries to abandon wrong action & to enter into right action: This is one's right effort...

"Having thus gone forth, following the training & way of life of the monks, abandoning the taking of life, he abstains from the taking of life. He dwells with his rod laid down, his knife laid down, scrupulous, kind, compassionate for the welfare of all living beings. Abandoning the taking of what is not given, he abstains from taking what is not given. He takes only what is given, accepts only what is given, lives not by stealth but by means of a self that has become pure. Abandoning uncelibacy, he lives a celibate life, aloof, refraining from the sexual act that is the villager's way."
— AN X 99

"One tries to abandon wrong livelihood & to enter into right livelihood: This is one's right effort."

"'When brahmans or contemplatives who are unpurified in their livelihood resort to isolated forest or wilderness dwellings, it's the fault of their unpurified livelihood that they give rise to unskillful fear & terror. But it's not the case that I am unpurified in my livelihood when I resort to isolated forest or wilderness dwellings. I am purified in my livelihood. I am one of those noble ones who are purified in their livelihood when they resort to isolated forest or wilderness dwellings.' Seeing in myself this purity of livelihood, I felt even more undaunted about staying in the wilderness.
"The thought occurred to me: 'When brahmans or contemplatives who are covetous & fiercely passionate for sensual pleasures... I am not covetous... I have a mind of good will... devoid of sloth & drowsiness... a still mind... gone beyond uncertainty... I do not praise myself or disparage others... gone beyond horripilation... few wants... persistence is aroused... mindfulness established......'When brahmans or contemplatives who are unconcentrated, with straying minds... I am consummate in concentration.
— MN 4

— MN 117
"And what, monks, is right effort?
[i] "There is the case where a monk generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds & exerts his intent for the sake of the non-arising of evil, unskillful qualities that have not yet arisen.
[ii] "He generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds & exerts his intent for the sake of the abandonment of evil, unskillful qualities that have arisen.
[iii] "He generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds & exerts his intent for the sake of the arising of skillful qualities that have not yet arisen.
[iv] "He generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds & exerts his intent for the maintenance, non-confusion, increase, plenitude, development, & culmination of skillful qualities that have arisen: This, monks, is called right effort."
— SN 45.8

On significantly of the circumstances here:

The Contemplation of Dualities
Those who don't discern stress,
  what brings stress into play,
  & where it totally stops,
      without trace;
  who don't know the path,
  the way to the stilling of stress:
      lowly
  in their awareness-release
  & discernment-release,
      incapable
  of making an end,
      they're headed
      to birth & aging.
But those who discern stress,
  what brings stress into play,
  & where it totally stops,
      without trace;
  who discern the path,
  the way to the stilling of stress:
      consummate
  in their awareness-release
  & discernment-release,
      capable
  of making an end,
      they aren't headed
         to birth & aging.


[Note: This is a gift of Dhamma, not meant for commercial purpose and other low wordily gains by means of trade and exchange]

user2265: There is no not-others and there is no others. Buddhism teaches a nondual perspective beyond either extreme, beyond the dichotimization that is the habit of the intellect.
There is not even that One because to mention that One is to already create a separateness. There is just is-ness.
There is not even just is-ness because is-ness implies separation from not-is-ness.
Being such, you may notice that the answers to these kind of questions are not given by words alone but the answer can only be tasted through experience and Insight, a process that obviates the intellect and uses intuition (primordial forms of awareness) to "get it".
Also, arrow analogy here

user-1: In Theravada Buddhism the Abhidhamma Pitaka teaches that there are 2 kinds of realities, i.e. the conventional reality (sammuti sacca) and ultimate reality (paramattha sacca).
Conventional reality consists of concepts and entities, e.g. a man, woman, animal, car, planet, galaxy etc. These do not really exist since they are merely concepts with no real point of reference. A car or a person is merely a designation given to a collection of parts put together in a certain configuration.
Ultimate reality consists of Citta (consciousness), Cetasika (mental concomitants), Rupa (materialty) and Nibbana (unconditioned realm). 
So when speaking about people we are dealing with conventional reality. In conventional reality concepts exist meaning that people exist.
In ultimate reality people do not exist. 
Here is a quote from the Palikanon.com:

"The Buddha, in explaining his doctrine, sometimes used conventional language and sometimes the philosophical mode of expression which is in accordance with undeluded insight into reality. In that ultimate sense, existence is a mere process of physical and mental phenomena within which, or beyond which, no real ego-entity nor any abiding substance can ever be found. Thus, whenever the suttas speak of man, woman or person, or of the rebirth of a being, this must not be taken as being valid in the ultimate sense, but as a mere conventional mode of speech (vohāra-vacana).
It is one of the main characteristics of the Abhidhamma Pitaka, in distinction from most of the Sutta Pitaka, that it does not employ conventional language, but deals only with ultimates, or realities in the highest sense (paramattha-dhammā). But also in the Sutta Pitaka there are many expositions in terms of ultimate language (paramattha-desanā), namely, wherever these texts deal with the groups (khandha), elements (dhātu) or sense-bases (āyatana), and their components; and wherever the 3 characteristics (ti-lakkhana) are applied. The majority of Sutta texts, however, use the conventional language, as appropriate in a practical or ethical context, because it "would not be right to say that 'the groups' (khandha) feel shame, etc."

If you would like to read a bit more about what the Abhidhamma and ultimate reality is there is a well written chapter called "What is Abhidhamma" in the book "What Buddhists Believe" by Ven. K. Sri Dhammananda, p. 105-111. Here is a quote from the chapter:

The Abhidharma teaches that the egoistic beliefs and other concepts such as ‘I’, ‘you’, ‘person’ and ‘the world’ , which we use in daily conversation, do not adequately describe the real nature of existence. The conventional concepts do not reflect the fleeting nature of pleasures, uncertainties, impermanence of every component thing, and the conflict among the elements and energies intrinsic in all animate or inanimate things. The Abhidharma doctrine gives a clear exposition of the ultimate nature of human beings and brings the analysis of the human condition further than other studies known to them.
The Abhidharma deals with realities existing in the ultimate sense, or paramattha dhamma in Pali. There are four such realities:

Citta, mind or consciousness, defined as ‘that which knows or experiences’ an object. Citta occurs as distinct momentary states of consciousness.
Cetasika, the mental factors that arise and occur along with the citta.
Rupa, physical phenomenon or material form.
Nirvana, the unconditioned state of bliss which is the final
  goal.

Citta, the cetasika, and rupa are conditioned realities. They arise because of conditions, and will disappear when the conditions sustaining them cease to continue to do so. They are impermanent states. Nirvana, on the other hand, is an unconditioned reality. It does not arise and, therefore, does not fall away. These four realities can be experienced regardless of the names we may choose to give them. Other than these realities, everything—be they within ourselves or without, whether in the past, present or future, whether coarse or subtle, low or lofty, far or near—is a concept and not the ultimate reality.
Citta, cetasika, and Nirvana are also called nama. Nirvana is an unconditioned nama. The two conditioned nama, that is, citta and cetasika, together with rupa (form), make up psychophysical organisms, including human beings. Both mind and matter, or nama-rupa, are analysed in Abhidharma as though under a microscope. Events connected with the process of birth and death are explained in detail. The Abhidharma clarifies intricate points of the Dharma and enables the arising of an understanding of reality, thereby setting forth in clear terms the Path of Emancipation. The realization we gain from the Abhidharma with regard to our lives and the world is not to be understood in a conventional sense, but is an absolute reality.


user254: 
The practice of a bodhisatvva
The entire practice of a bodhisattva is divided into six perfections, which are generosity, discipline, patience, effort, meditative concentration, and wisdom.
  In order to fulfill the hopes of others, it is very important to engage in the practice of generosity, which in turn should be strengthened by a strict observance of ethical discipline, that is, of non-violence.
  The practice of discipline must itself be complemented by that of patience, because you will need to have forebearance when facing the harm inflicted on you by others.
  In order to succeed in these practices, your endeavour must be strong and stable.
  And without meditative concentration that effort will not be so effective.
  Finally if you do not have the wisdom that realizes the nature of all phenomena, you will not be capable of guiding others on the path that leads to enlightenment.
The sweet taste of bodhicitta
If there is one practice that is sufficient to bring about buddhahood, it is the practice of great compassion.
  Chandragomin, a sixth-century Indian poet, said that it is stupid to expect to change the taste of a very bitter fruit by simply adding one or two drops of sugar to it.
  In the same way, we cannot expect the fragrance of our minds, which are so contaminated by the bitter taste of delusion, to change instantaneously into the sweet taste of boddhicitta or compassion on the basis of just one or two sessions of meditation.
  Sustained and continuous effort is extremely important.
As the Buddha himself said, on th strength of their wisdom bodhisattvas abandon all delusion, but through the vigour of applying compassionate methods, they never abandon beings.

The Dalai Lama's Little Book of Inner Peace -- The Essential Life and Teachings

There was also a video in which the Dalai Lama said,

I never consider myself as something special. If I consider myself as something different from you, like I am Buddhist, or even more, I am His Holiness the Dalai Lama, or even if I consider I am Nobel Laureate, then actually you create yourself as a prisoner. I forget these things, I simply consider I am one of the seven billion human beings. We are mentally, emotionally, intellectually, we are the same.

He goes on to say that people get fulfillment of purpose, and "always feel happy", from helping others, etc.
It's not that other people "don't exist": it's that there are not "other" people, not different; i.e. "we are the same".

-1: <p>When I was on a Self Inquiry retreat last year, I was explaining why I wanted to help other people. One of the two teachers looked at me and said, "<strong>There are no other people.</strong>" That sort-of made sense to me. The next day I had a realization which made it make sense completely.</p>

<p>But the other day (is there another day?) I saw it in a different way: that it simply does not matter whether there are other people or not, because I can never have real insight in to them, so I am completely alone in my path. My image of two people is like spheres touching at one hypothetical point (Indra's Net). I cannot see much through a point-sized window on to (hypothetical) someone-else's world. This is like <strong>Vivekacudemani #515</strong>:  </p>

<blockquote>
  <p><em>I am Actionless.<br>
  I am Changeless.<br>
  I am Partless.<br>
  I am Without Purpose.<br>
  I am Eternal.<br>
  I do not require any prop.<br>
  <strong>I am One, without a Second</strong>.</em></p>
</blockquote>

<p>If I am One, can I know anyone else? What does Buddhism say on this point?</p>
 151: <p>There are no words.
There are no borders.
There are no countries .
There is no "other".
There is no "self" </p>

<p>But that doesn't mean we do not conceive of words, borders, countries, others and the self but we mix conceived reality with ultimate reality without even realizing it. Mindful Meditation on reality shows us how to untangle our perceptions of reality. We have to practice to understand this.</p>
 -1: <p>no comprende, UUU, and those here possible interested,</p>

<p>assuming it's asked for the purpose of release, for it's purpose this answer follows:</p>

<p><strong>Q: Are there other people, according to Buddhism?</strong></p>

<p>According to the Buddha and his Dhamma, there are all around, all the time, other people, and to hold the perception of the two <a href="http://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/tipitaka/an/an03/an03.040.than_en.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">governing principles</a> arosen, in cases that the perception of self is current out of sign, is a very needed to be reminded to keep right effort arosen and to gain deliverence, so be sure that I or others see UUU`s, or your actions, know what you think, speak or do.</p>

<p>Phenomenalical pondering and try to grasp this view or that are not conductive for release. <a href="http://www.zugangzureinsicht.org/html/tipitaka/mn/mn.063.than_en.html#poison" rel="nofollow noreferrer">One just will die, the arrow not removed</a>.</p>

<p>An what is <a href="http://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/ptf/dhamma/sacca/sacca4/samma-vayamo/index_en.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">right effort</a>, supported by one, two or three governing principles, not having abound them, not denying them?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"One tries to abandon wrong view &amp; to enter into <a href="http://zugangzureinsicht.org/html/ptf/dhamma/sacca/sacca4/samma-ditthi/index_en.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">right view</a>: This is one's right effort...</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>"And how is right view the forerunner? One discerns wrong view as wrong view, and right view as right view. This is one's right view. And what is wrong view? 'There is nothing given, nothing offered, nothing sacrificed. There is no fruit or result of good or bad actions. There is no this world, no next world, no mother, no father, no spontaneously reborn beings; no brahmans or contemplatives who, faring rightly &amp; practicing rightly, proclaim this world &amp; the next after having directly known &amp; realized it for themselves.' This is wrong view...</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>"One tries to abandon wrong resolve &amp; to enter into right resolve: This is one's right effort...</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>"And what is right resolve? Being resolved on renunciation, on freedom from ill-will, on harmlessness: This is called right resolve."</p>
    
    <p>— SN 45.8</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>"One tries to abandon wrong speech &amp; to enter into right speech: This is one's right effort...</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>"There are these ten topics of [proper] conversation. Which ten? Talk on modesty, on contentment, on seclusion, on non-entanglement, on arousing persistence, on virtue, on concentration, on discernment, on release, and on the knowledge &amp; vision of release. These are the ten topics of conversation. If you were to engage repeatedly in these ten topics of conversation, you would outshine even the sun &amp; moon, so mighty, so powerful — to say nothing of the wanderers of other sects."</p>
    
    <p>— AN 10.69</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>"One tries to abandon wrong action &amp; to enter into right action: This is one's right effort...</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>"Having thus gone forth, following the training &amp; way of life of the monks, abandoning the taking of life, he abstains from the taking of life. He dwells with his rod laid down, his knife laid down, scrupulous, kind, compassionate for the welfare of all living beings. Abandoning the taking of what is not given, he abstains from taking what is not given. He takes only what is given, accepts only what is given, lives not by stealth but by means of a self that has become pure. Abandoning uncelibacy, he lives a celibate life, aloof, refraining from the sexual act that is the villager's way."</p>
    
    <p>— AN X 99</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>"One tries to abandon wrong livelihood &amp; to enter into right livelihood: This is one's right effort."</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>"'When brahmans or contemplatives who are unpurified in their livelihood resort to isolated forest or wilderness dwellings, it's the fault of their unpurified livelihood that they give rise to unskillful fear &amp; terror. But it's not the case that I am unpurified in my livelihood when I resort to isolated forest or wilderness dwellings. I am purified in my livelihood. I am one of those noble ones who are purified in their livelihood when they resort to isolated forest or wilderness dwellings.' Seeing in myself this purity of livelihood, I felt even more undaunted about staying in the wilderness.</p>
    
    <p>"The thought occurred to me: 'When brahmans or contemplatives who are covetous &amp; fiercely passionate for sensual pleasures... I am not covetous... I have a mind of good will... devoid of sloth &amp; drowsiness... a still mind... gone beyond uncertainty... I do not praise myself or disparage others... gone beyond horripilation... few wants... persistence is aroused... mindfulness established......'When brahmans or contemplatives who are unconcentrated, with straying minds... I am consummate in concentration.</p>
    
    <p>— MN 4</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>— MN 117</p>
  
  <p>"And what, monks, is right effort?</p>
  
  <p>[i] "There is the case where a monk generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds &amp; exerts his intent for the sake of the non-arising of evil, unskillful qualities that have not yet arisen.</p>
  
  <p>[ii] "He generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds &amp; exerts his intent for the sake of the abandonment of evil, unskillful qualities that have arisen.</p>
  
  <p>[iii] "He generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds &amp; exerts his intent for the sake of the arising of skillful qualities that have not yet arisen.</p>
  
  <p>[iv] "He generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds &amp; exerts his intent for the maintenance, non-confusion, increase, plenitude, development, &amp; culmination of skillful qualities that have arisen: This, monks, is called right effort."</p>
  
  <p>— SN 45.8</p>
</blockquote>

<p>On significantly of the circumstances here:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><strong><a href="http://www.zugangzureinsicht.org/html/tipitaka/kn/snp/snp.3.12.than_en.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Contemplation of Dualities</a></strong></p>
  
  <p><code>Those who don't discern stress,
  what brings stress into play,
  &amp; where it totally stops,
      without trace;
  who don't know the path,
  the way to the stilling of stress:
      lowly
  in their awareness-release
  &amp; discernment-release,
      incapable
  of making an end,
      they're headed
      to birth &amp; aging.</code></p>
  
  <p><code>But those who discern stress,
  what brings stress into play,
  &amp; where it totally stops,
      without trace;
  who discern the path,
  the way to the stilling of stress:
      consummate
  in their awareness-release
  &amp; discernment-release,
      capable
  of making an end,
      they aren't headed
         to birth &amp; aging.</code></p>
</blockquote>

<hr>

<p><em>[Note: This is a gift of Dhamma, not meant for commercial purpose and other low wordily gains by means of trade and exchange]</em></p>
 2265: <p>There is no not-others and there is no others. Buddhism teaches a nondual perspective beyond either extreme, beyond the dichotimization that is the habit of the intellect.</p>

<p>There is not even that One because to mention that One is to already create a separateness. There is just is-ness.
There is not even just is-ness because is-ness implies separation from not-is-ness.</p>

<p>Being such, you may notice that the answers to these kind of questions are not given by words alone but the answer can only be tasted through experience and Insight, a process that obviates the intellect and uses intuition (primordial forms of awareness) to "get it".</p>

<p>Also, <a href="http://www.zugangzureinsicht.org/html/tipitaka/mn/mn.063.than_en.html#poison" rel="nofollow noreferrer">arrow analogy here</a></p>
 -1: <p>In Theravada Buddhism the Abhidhamma Pitaka teaches that there are 2 kinds of realities, i.e. <em>the conventional reality (sammuti sacca) and ultimate reality (paramattha sacca)</em>.</p>

<p>Conventional reality consists of concepts and entities, e.g. a man, woman, animal, car, planet, galaxy etc. These do not really exist since they are merely concepts with no real point of reference. A car or a person is merely a designation given to a collection of parts put together in a certain configuration.</p>

<p>Ultimate reality consists of Citta (consciousness), Cetasika (mental concomitants), Rupa (materialty) and Nibbana (unconditioned realm). </p>

<p>So when speaking about people we are dealing with conventional reality. In conventional reality concepts exist meaning that people exist.</p>

<p>In ultimate reality people do not exist. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.palikanon.com/english/wtb/n_r/paramattha.htm" rel="nofollow">Here is a quote from the Palikanon.com:</a></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"The Buddha, in explaining his doctrine, sometimes used conventional language and sometimes the philosophical mode of expression which is in accordance with undeluded insight into reality. In that ultimate sense, existence is a mere process of physical and mental phenomena within which, or beyond which, no real ego-entity nor any abiding substance can ever be found. Thus, whenever the suttas speak of man, woman or person, or of the rebirth of a being, this must not be taken as being valid in the ultimate sense, but as a mere conventional mode of speech (vohāra-vacana).</p>
  
  <p>It is one of the main characteristics of the Abhidhamma Pitaka, in distinction from most of the Sutta Pitaka, that it does not employ conventional language, but deals only with ultimates, or realities in the highest sense (paramattha-dhammā). But also in the Sutta Pitaka there are many expositions in terms of ultimate language (paramattha-desanā), namely, wherever these texts deal with the groups (khandha), elements (dhātu) or sense-bases (āyatana), and their components; and wherever the 3 characteristics (ti-lakkhana) are applied. The majority of Sutta texts, however, use the conventional language, as appropriate in a practical or ethical context, because it "would not be right to say that 'the groups' (khandha) feel shame, etc."</p>
</blockquote>

<p>If you would like to read a bit more about what the Abhidhamma and ultimate reality is there is a well written chapter called <em>"What is Abhidhamma"</em> in the book <a href="http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/whatbelieve.pdf" rel="nofollow">"What Buddhists Believe"</a> by Ven. K. Sri Dhammananda, p. 105-111. Here is a quote from the chapter:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The Abhidharma teaches that the egoistic beliefs and other concepts such as ‘I’, ‘you’, ‘person’ and ‘the world’ , which we use in daily conversation, do not adequately describe the real nature of existence. The conventional concepts do not reflect the fleeting nature of pleasures, uncertainties, impermanence of every component thing, and the conflict among the elements and energies intrinsic in all animate or inanimate things. The Abhidharma doctrine gives a clear exposition of the ultimate nature of human beings and brings the analysis of the human condition further than other studies known to them.</p>
  
  <p>The Abhidharma deals with realities existing in the ultimate sense, or paramattha dhamma in Pali. There are four such realities:</p>
  
  <ol>
  <li><p>Citta, mind or consciousness, defined as ‘that which knows or experiences’ an object. Citta occurs as distinct momentary states of consciousness.</p></li>
  <li><p>Cetasika, the mental factors that arise and occur along with the citta.</p></li>
  <li><p>Rupa, physical phenomenon or material form.</p></li>
  <li><p>Nirvana, the unconditioned state of bliss which is the final
  goal.</p></li>
  </ol>
  
  <p>Citta, the cetasika, and rupa are conditioned realities. They arise because of conditions, and will disappear when the conditions sustaining them cease to continue to do so. They are impermanent states. Nirvana, on the other hand, is an unconditioned reality. It does not arise and, therefore, does not fall away. These four realities can be experienced regardless of the names we may choose to give them. Other than these realities, everything—be they within ourselves or without, whether in the past, present or future, whether coarse or subtle, low or lofty, far or near—is a concept and not the ultimate reality.</p>
  
  <p>Citta, cetasika, and Nirvana are also called nama. Nirvana is an unconditioned nama. The two conditioned nama, that is, citta and cetasika, together with rupa (form), make up psychophysical organisms, including human beings. Both mind and matter, or nama-rupa, are analysed in Abhidharma as though under a microscope. Events connected with the process of birth and death are explained in detail. The Abhidharma clarifies intricate points of the Dharma and enables the arising of an understanding of reality, thereby setting forth in clear terms the Path of Emancipation. The realization we gain from the Abhidharma with regard to our lives and the world is not to be understood in a conventional sense, but is an absolute reality.</p>
</blockquote>
 254: <blockquote>
  <p><strong>The practice of a bodhisatvva</strong></p>
  
  <p>The entire practice of a <em>bodhisattva</em> is divided into six <em>perfections</em>, which are generosity, discipline, patience, effort, meditative concentration, and wisdom.
  In order to fulfill the hopes of others, it is very important to engage in the practice of generosity, which in turn should be strengthened by a strict observance of ethical discipline, that is, of non-violence.
  The practice of discipline must itself be complemented by that of patience, because you will need to have forebearance when facing the harm inflicted on you by others.
  In order to succeed in these practices, your endeavour must be strong and stable.
  And without meditative concentration that effort will not be so effective.
  Finally if you do not have the wisdom that realizes the nature of all phenomena, you will not be capable of guiding others on the path that leads to enlightenment.</p>
  
  <p><strong>The sweet taste of bodhicitta</strong></p>
  
  <p>If there is one practice that is sufficient to bring about buddhahood, it is the practice of great compassion.
  Chandragomin, a sixth-century Indian poet, said that it is stupid to expect to change the taste of a very bitter fruit by simply adding one or two drops of sugar to it.
  In the same way, we cannot expect the fragrance of our minds, which are so contaminated by the bitter taste of delusion, to change instantaneously into the sweet taste of <em>boddhicitta</em> or compassion on the basis of just one or two sessions of meditation.
  Sustained and continuous effort is extremely important.</p>
  
  <p>As the Buddha himself said, on th strength of their wisdom <em>bodhisattvas</em> abandon all delusion, but through the vigour of applying compassionate methods, they never abandon beings.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><em>The Dalai Lama's Little Book of Inner Peace -- The Essential Life and Teachings</em></p>

<hr>

<p>There was also a video in which the Dalai Lama said,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I never consider myself as something special. If I consider myself as something different from you, like I am Buddhist, or even more, I am His Holiness the Dalai Lama, or even if I consider I am Nobel Laureate, then actually you create yourself as a prisoner. I forget these things, I simply consider I am one of the seven billion human beings. We are mentally, emotionally, intellectually, we are the same.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>He goes on to say that people get fulfillment of purpose, and "always feel happy", from helping others, etc.</p>

<p>It's not that other people "don't exist": it's that there are not "other" people, not different; i.e. "we are the same".</p>
