user-1: What has historical precedent to teach and what is your opinion?

user16635: One doesn't introduce Buddhism to a country. One introduces Buddhism to people, and people carry it with them where they go.
Spreading Buddhism is like spilling water; it goes where it will, without much regard for borders, and nourishes those it touches.

user21374: Good householder,
By generosity, respect and goodwill toward the Gems, through the carrier (or vehicle) which is the Sangha of Monks, this Dhamma-Vinaya would have foundation to get introduced and maybe established within the country.
The teachings of the Buddha, and its spreading deeper into a certain community in the world, would always have to be introduced by the Sublime Buddha's disciples, the Sangha.
Establishing of the (Re-)legion requires foremost the Sangha of Bhikkhus and could take place when invited by the reigning King of the country, or leader of a certain community. Such would mean: There is Dhamma-Vinaya present in this country or community.
As for the current situation, there are for the most part, no more Kings, leader, really in charge and as far as I'm aware, while having or doing die off in old countries, Dhamma-Vinaya hasn't been established anywhere else in the world.
And as far as I'm aware, there is only one country left where a dhammic King still reigns, where most laws are still in harmony with the Dhamma-Vinaya and no disputes over its sublimeness have yet arisen. However, it might also end after this generation.
Soon, if negative tendencies continue, there will be no more Sangha present, no more Dhamma-Vinaya, but just a worldly attempt at an inferior copy: Buddhism.
One, seeing still an opportunity, should, if wise, go to join the holy life within an institution that will soon decay and one will less likely be able to go forth without such support.
Hurry up, whenever an opportunity is found. Those heading for liberation shouldn't wait.

-1: <p>What has historical precedent to teach and what is your opinion?</p>
 16635: <p>One doesn't introduce Buddhism to a country. One introduces Buddhism to people, and people carry it with them where they go.</p>
<p>Spreading Buddhism is like spilling water; it goes where it will, without much regard for borders, and nourishes those it touches.</p>
 21374: <p>Good householder,</p>
<p>By generosity, respect and goodwill toward the Gems, through the carrier (or vehicle) which is the Sangha of Monks, this Dhamma-Vinaya would have foundation to get introduced and maybe established within the country.</p>
<p>The teachings of the Buddha, and its spreading deeper into a certain community in the world, would always have to be introduced by the Sublime Buddha's disciples, the Sangha.</p>
<p>Establishing of the (Re-)legion requires foremost the Sangha of Bhikkhus and could take place when invited by the reigning King of the country, or leader of a certain community. Such would mean: There is Dhamma-Vinaya present in this country or community.</p>
<p>As for the current situation, there are for the most part, no more Kings, leader, really in charge and as far as I'm aware, while having or doing die off in old countries, Dhamma-Vinaya hasn't been established anywhere else in the world.</p>
<p>And as far as I'm aware, there is only one country left where a dhammic King still reigns, where most laws are still in harmony with the Dhamma-Vinaya and no disputes over its sublimeness have yet arisen. However, it might also end after this generation.</p>
<p>Soon, if negative tendencies continue, there will be no more Sangha present, no more Dhamma-Vinaya, but just a worldly attempt at an inferior copy: Buddhism.</p>
<p>One, seeing still an opportunity, should, if wise, go to join the holy life within an institution that will soon decay and one will less likely be able to go forth without such support.</p>
<p>Hurry up, whenever an opportunity is found. Those heading for liberation shouldn't wait.</p>
