أَوَلَمْ يَتَفَكَّرُوا۟ مَا بِصَاحِبِهِم مِّن جِنَّةٍ إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا نَذِيرٌ مُّبِينٌ
أَوَلَم يَتَفَكَّروا ما بِصاحِبِهِم مِن جِنَّةٍ إِن هُوَ إِلّا نَذيرٌ مُبينٌ
Have they not bethought themselves their companion is not mad? He is only a plain admonisher.
Do they not ponder that their companion is far removed from insanity? In fact he is clearly a Herald of Warning.
Have they not reflected? No madness is in their comrade; he is naught but a plain warner.
Has it, then, never occurred to them that there is no madness whatever in [this] their fellowman? He is only a plain warner.
Reflect they not that in their companions there is no madness! he is naught but a manifest warner.
Do they not reflect? There is no madness in their companion (Muhammad SAW). He is but a plain warner.
Do they not think? There is no madness in their friend. He is but a plain warner.
Have they not pondered that their companion [i.e. the Prophet Muhammad] is not afflicted with insanity? He is only a plain warner.
Do they not reflect There is no madness in their companion. He is but a plain warner.
Have they not bethought them (that) there is no madness in their comrade? He is but a plain warner.
Have they not reflected that there is no madness in their companion, [and that] he is just a manifest warner?
Have they not reflected? There is no madness in their companion, he is but a plain warner.
Then do they not give thought? There is in their companion [Muhammad] no madness. He is not but a clear warner.
Why will they not understand that their companion (Muhammad) is not possessed by jinn. (Muhammad) is only a (Divinely) authorized preacher.
Do they not reflect that their companion has not unsoundness in mind; he is only a plain warner.
Have they not reflected that their companion is not mad? He is only a plain warner.
Do they not reflect? Their companion is not seized with madness: he is but a perspicuous warner.