i cannot agree with because the proposed system does not square the equal treatment of unions official languages and of users will eventually undoubtedly lead to the exclusion
I cannot agree with it, because the proposed system: does not square with the principle of equal treatment of the Union's official languages and of their users; will eventually undoubtedly lead to the exclusion of languages other than the six mentioned; will, in practice, be impossible to run in a workable fashion, for the simple reason that the member concerned will have to submit a request for interpretation in a supplementary language before they get to see the agenda; risks turning the language policy into a power game.
I cannot agree with because the proposed system: does not square the equal treatment of Union's official languages and of users; will eventually undoubtedly lead to the exclusion of other than the mentioned; will, in be impossible run a workable for the simple reason that the concerned will have to submit a request for interpretation in a language before get to agenda; risks turning language policy into a power game.