later asked what would if there should be to to a dispute and each claimd different but competing and possibly writes for example the right to practise one's religion without being offended 
I later asked what would be decided if there should be two parties to a dispute and each claimed different but competing, and possibly contradictory, rights for example, the right to practise one's religion without being offended and the right of freedom of expression involving criticism of the tenets of followers of a religion.
later asked what would if there should be two to a dispute and each claimed different but competing, and possibly rights for example, the right to practise one's religion without being offended right of freedom expression involving criticism of the tenets followers of a religion.