in future if some one arouses slight suspicion in the united for example not account af filiation their a eprovin connection but is suspicious because fly a short notice without luggage
In future, if someone arouses slight suspicion in the United Kingdom, for example not on account of religious affiliation, where there is a proven terrorism connection but is suspicious because they fly at short notice, possibly without luggage, and pay in cash, then, for the transfer of passenger name record data, and not only to the US, at the very least there should be a general right to complain and to take legal action and the data should not simply be stored in perpetuity.
In future, if someone arouses slight suspicion in the United for example not account affiliation, there a proven connection but is suspicious because fly at short notice, without luggage, and pay in cash, for the transfer of name data, not only to US, at the very least there should be general right and to take legal action and the data should simply be in perpetuity.