we would like to avoid possible where we get proposals the initiative every week on nonsensical issues on which there would be an to pronounce view on admissibility and then it to be appealed to cors
We would like to avoid possible abuse where we might get proposals for the initiative every second week on nonsensical issues on which there would be an obligation to pronounce a view on admissibility, and then for it to be appealed to the Court initiatives whose only reason for proposal would be the self-promotion of the potential organisers for negative political agenda.
We would like to avoid possible where we get proposals the initiative every week on nonsensical issues on which there would be an to pronounce view on admissibility, and then it to be appealed to Court initiatives only reason for would be self-promotion of the potential organisers for negative political agenda.