is it perhaps because of which one group of reserved for what was all other things being right idea of creating permanent crisis management mechanism appeard cancel out the value of such an imprect
Is it perhaps because the treatment which one group of states reserved for what was, all other things being equal, the right idea of creating a permanent crisis management mechanism appeared to cancel out the added value of such a mechanism in practice, thereby sending the wrong message to the markets and putting us at risk of ending up with a mechanism that was a self-fulfilling prophecy of controlled bankruptcy?
Is it perhaps because the which one group of reserved for what was, all other things being right idea of creating permanent crisis management mechanism appeared cancel out the value of such a in practice, thereby sending the wrong message the markets and putting at ending with a that a prophecy bankruptcy?