eithere is a case for presenting it because to me that the reporter has recycled the argument last time mures wallace who concluded that my parliamentary immunity should be something that the court of ju
I believe there is a case for presenting it, because it seems to me that the rapporteur has recycled the argument cited last time by Mrs Wallis, who concluded that my parliamentary immunity should be lifted, something that the Court of Justice condemned in very clear terms.
I there is a case for presenting it, because to me that the rapporteur has recycled the argument last time Mrs Wallis, who concluded that my parliamentary immunity should be something that the Court of Justice condemned in clear terms.