the first thing is the confusion that created between the primary and committee asked for an opinion because the primary committee rejects amendments of the committee ask for an opinion
The first thing is the confusion that will inevitably be created between the primary committee and the committee asked for an opinion, because when the primary committee rejects the amendments of the committee asked for an opinion, these amendments might end up directly in the Chamber, obviously creating an extremely risky potential for legal confusion as we also incidentally saw in the case of REACH.
The first thing is the confusion that created between the primary and committee asked for an opinion, because the primary committee rejects amendments of the committee asked for an opinion, these amendments might end up directly in the Chamber, obviously creating extremely potential for legal confusion as we incidentally saw in the case of REACH.