iave done not because changed persuasion i het this agreement insufficient to protect our industries from counterfeiting that it fails guarantee for geographical indications that serves for
I would have done so not because I have changed political persuasion, but because I believe that this agreement is insufficient to protect our industries from counterfeiting, that it fails to guarantee respect for geographical indications, that it serves little purpose if it does not involve China, the biggest counterfeiter in the world, and that it endangers the rights and freedoms of citizens as it concerns 'intangible' property rights.
I have done not because changed persuasion, I that this agreement insufficient to protect our industries from counterfeiting, that it fails guarantee for geographical indications, that serves purpose if not involve China, the biggest counterfeiter in and that it endangers rights and of citizens it concerns 'intangible' rights.