my second question is this do you not believe that the psychology of besiege fortreson is rael which in the addriving force behind for agnd now has much justification because the threat posed y
My second question is this: do you not believe that the psychology of a besieged fortress in Israel, which, in the past, was a driving force behind its foreign policy, now has much less justification, because the threat posed by what are becoming democratic regimes is very much less and also because democracies do not go to war against each other?
My second question is this: do you not believe that the psychology of besieged fortress in Israel, which, in the a driving force behind foreign now has much justification, because the threat posed by what regimes very much less and also because democracies to war each