motion for a resolution recognizes it not without some hypocrisy since those who are at the same who thesis causing the negative effects mentioned same
The motion for a resolution recognises it, not without some hypocrisy, since those who are proposing it are the same ones who approved the agreement that is causing the negative effects mentioned; the same ones who now express pious concerns about these effects, but who made them possible with their vote; the same ones who are demanding an impact assessment of the agreement, but who are not waiting for the results of this assessment to endorse it; the same ones who are now calling for respect for the Decent Work Agenda of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), but who tune blindly to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) tuning fork and close their eyes to the reports of violations of human rights by US multinationals in the countries of Latin America.
The motion for a resolution recognises it, not without some hypocrisy, since those who are it the same who the is causing the negative effects mentioned; same ones who now express pious concerns about these effects, but who made them possible with their vote; the same ones who are demanding an impact assessment of but who waiting for the this assessment to endorse it; the same ones who are now calling respect the Decent Work Agenda of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), but who tune blindly to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) fork and close their eyes to reports of human rights US multinationals in the Latin America.