in writing we broadly supported the report submitted series of amendments mostly been for an em and but at it put it littlele te dibut watch and liteen
in writing. We broadly supported the draft report and submitted a series of amendments which have mostly been included, for instance: an emphasis on green priority objectives: energy and climate change, resource efficiency, regeneration of biological resources and promoting social cohesion; addressing eco-innovation at all stages, including design, through the adoption of a properly funded and ambitious eco-innovation action plan, as well as the adoption of a strategy for promoting product/service systems and function-oriented business models; promoting the use of open standards as drivers for innovation and open access to publicly funded research, as well as focusing public financing on socially valuable fields where knowledge is created as a public good, such as inducement prizes in the health sector (we also tried, with varying degrees of success, to propose better wording for IPR issues); we managed to retain the wording welcoming the Commission's efforts to prevent IPR from constituting a barrier to competition and innovation.
in writing. We broadly supported the report submitted series of amendments mostly been for an emphasis on green energy and climate change, resource efficiency, regeneration of biological resources and social cohesion; addressing all including design, through the adoption of a properly and ambitious eco-innovation action plan, as well as the adoption of a strategy for product/service and business models; promoting the use open standards as drivers for innovation and open access to publicly funded as well as public financing on socially valuable fields where knowledge created as a public good, such as prizes in the health sector (we also tried, with varying degrees of to propose wording for IPR issues); we managed to retain the wording welcoming Commission's efforts to IPR from constituting a barrier to and innovation.