iwill start with a general remark let us look first at the substance of this ruling could consider thee of someone something which was already there to be act ive democracy and freedom as some have claimed but wet
I will start with a general remark: obviously nobody let us look first at the substance of this ruling could consider the removal of someone and something which was already there to be an act of democracy and freedom, as some have claimed, but rather an action of the thought police, an anti-democratic act.
I will start with a general remark: let us look first at the substance of this ruling could consider the of someone something which was already there to be act of democracy and freedom, as some have claimed, but rather an of the thought police, anti-democratic