how be that we are designing a set plan and reremarking you basically a lower share to renewables then the market is already to day while diverting the money to sequestration and to nuclear fusion
So how can it be that we are designing a SET Plan and earmarking money at EU level that basically gives a lower share to renewables than the market is already uptaking today, while diverting the money to carbon sequestration and to nuclear fusion, which is not addressed in this paper but which receives by far the largest share of EU money?
how be that we are designing a SET Plan and earmarking EU basically a lower share to renewables than the market is already today, while diverting the money to sequestration and to nuclear fusion, which is not addressed this paper but which receives the share of EU money?