my point is not really to do with gender equality is to do with the fairness of states thinking that they have signed one and then finding that it is interpreted in the byghoat meaning that it could
My point is not really to do with gender equality, it is to do with the fairness of Member States thinking that they have signed one Treaty, and then finding that it is interpreted in the courts by judges who give it a meaning that it could not possibly have been intended to have.
My point is not really to do with gender equality, is to do with the fairness of States thinking that they have signed one and then finding that it is interpreted in the by who it meaning that it could possibly have been to have.