could we then instead of adopting rule after rule later proved to be insufficient and bearing in my poor results far why not to the root of the changing the rules that were late
Could we say, then, that instead of adopting rule after rule which later prove to be 'insufficient', and bearing in mind the 'poor results obtained so far', why not simply go to the root of the problem by changing the rules that relate to freedom of movement?
Could we then, instead of adopting rule after rule later prove to be 'insufficient', and bearing in mind 'poor results far', why not to the root of the changing the rules that relate to freedom of movement?