questioning the member states existing be lateral treaties to remain force i agree with the roperteur's position the sense of insuring a high degree of legal certainty during the transition
Without questioning the need for the Member States' existing bilateral treaties to remain in force, I agree with the rapporteur's position in the sense of ensuring a high degree of legal certainty during the transition period, and also with the three reasons for withdrawing authorisation for a bilateral treaty: 'conflicts with the law of the Union', 'overlap, in part or in full, with an agreement in force with that third country and this specific overlap is not addressed in the latter agreement' and treaties that might 'constitute an obstacle to the development and the implementation of the Union's policies relating to investment'.
questioning the Member States' existing bilateral treaties to remain force, I agree with the rapporteur's position the sense of ensuring a high degree of legal certainty during the transition and also with the three reasons for withdrawing authorisation a bilateral treaty: 'conflicts with the law of the Union', 'overlap, in part in with agreement in force with that third country and this overlap is not latter agreement' and treaties that might 'constitute an obstacle to the development and the implementation of the Union's policies relating to investment'.