so the idea of a binding legal specifically designed for arctic unfortunately difficult because not of five arctic states dedmark norway canada russia and the united isi
So the idea of establishing a binding legal regime specifically designed for the Arctic is, unfortunately, difficult, because none of the five Arctic Ocean coastal states Denmark, Norway, Canada, Russia and the United States is in favour of such a regime.
So the idea of a binding legal specifically designed for Arctic unfortunately, difficult, because none of five Arctic states Denmark, Norway, Canada, Russia and the United is in favour of such a regime.