A Bailout by Any Other Name LONDON - Bailouts beget more bailouts. That is the cautionary lesson from the latest revamping of Greece's financial rescue deal, according to some economists. And they warn that unless Europe starts enforcing its own stated rules against bailouts and big budget deficits, governments will never get serious about putting their financial houses in order. Of course, none of the finance ministers who worked out the new financial terms for Greece in Brussels called it a bailout. But for critics it was precisely that. By reducing interest rates and extending the payback maturities on the €168 billion, or $217 billion, that European governments have lent Greece so far, those loans will now become barely profitable for the countries that made them. As such, it is the sixth bailout since the European debt crisis exploded in 2009 - three for Greece and one each for Ireland, Portugal and Spain. And these rescues have occurred despite the fact that the treaty underpinning Europe's common currency project bars bailouts by forbidding one member country from assuming the debts of another. But if the majority of euro zone countries did not consistently flout another treaty principle - the one limiting a member government's debt to 60 percent of gross domestic product - there would not be a euro zone debt crisis in the first place. Greece might be the most glaring violator, but Germany and France are also breaking that rule. Although it buys time for Greece, the latest debt deal has been widely criticized for being overly optimistic in expecting Greece to produce the growth and fiscal discipline needed to bring its debt down from the level of 195 percent of G.D.P. today to below 120 percent after 2020. Skeptics cite Germany's demand that Greece impose another round of spending cuts in return for this latest dispensation as further proof that the architects of monetary union have decided that the last best hope for the euro's survival is to continue subscribing to the principle that punishments and threats from Brussels will keep spendthrift nations from falling into hock. But some economists contend that as long as countries in trouble continue to accept that they will get bailed out when they run out of money, there will be scant incentive for them to accede to the demands of the euro zone's stability and growth pact, which requires countries to keep their debts and deficits at reasonable levels. "There is an acknowledgment in Brussels and Berlin that the stability pact has not worked because it was not strong enough - so now they have tried to make it tougher by imposing more punishments," said Charles Wyplosz, an international economist at the Graduate Institute in Geneva who contends that latest Greek debt deal is nothing more than another bailout. But what they don't realize is that this will not work as long as local parliaments remain sovereign. In a recent paper, Mr. Wyplosz argues that the only way sovereign states will become fiscally responsible over the long run is when they truly grasp that Brussels will abide by the founding treaty's prohibition against country's bailing out one another. He points to the United States as an example. With dozens of states that manage their own fiscal affairs, yet operate comfortably within a federal system, the common currency system in the United States has long been seen as a model by those who seek improvements in euro zone policy. At the root of this success, say proponents of the U.S. model, is the fact that despite there being no law or constitutional provision against the federal government's bailing out bankrupt states, in the past 150 years there has not been a single case in which Washington has had to rescue a penniless state. And the last time a state went belly up was in 1933, when Arkansas stopped paying investors who held its highway bonds. To be sure, as the economist C. Randall Henning, an expert on the topic, has described in detail, in the early years of the United States, the federal government presided over numerous bailouts - until Congress said no more in the mid-1840s. For better or worse, American states got the message and the majority of them have adopted various legal statutes that require them to balance their budgets each year.