Scottish football reconstruction shows no sign of consensus with SPL, SFA and SFL at loggerheads "If you're bringing in any change, then you start the season knowing what you're playing for," he said. That's my personal opinion - and that's No 1. The other [issue] is that, whatever reconstruction we're looking at, it has to be something that satisfies - or takes care of - all 42 clubs. It's fair to say that there are two top professional leagues in the country. You can argue over where that's 22 or 24. Then there are semi-pro leagues. All 42 clubs are working closely in community schemes but the current SFL 2 and 3 teams are buying more into our worthwhile community programmes. I want to see all clubs taken care of. Under the SPL's proposals, 12 SFL clubs will be invited to join their breakaway movement but Ogilvie expressed his opposition to Rangers, or any other lower league club, being catapulted into the second tier. "Whatever model we agree on, then it has to be on sporting merit," he said. I believe you play for your place in the top two leagues - there isn't a definitive line that says this club is professional or not. There has to be promotion and relegation, which brings us back to the pyramid, which the SFA strongly back. That has to be opened up to the bottom tier of the professional leagues. Ogilvie also believes that the SFA is ahead of schedule regarding the appointment of a replacement for Craig Levein as manager of the national team. "The process is presently underway with that, we are not sitting back doing nothing," he said. That process is well underway. I can't say too much more. We did say at the outset that we would look to have a manager in place before the next competitive game [in March] but I would hope it's sooner than that.