Wealthy woman with connections with a foreign head of state wins ban on allegations of her sex life being made public When Mr Burby continued to pursue her she was granted an injunction against him as long ago as September 2009. She claimed Mr Burby and others had published or threatened to publish on a website operated by him "private and confidential information" about her. WXY claims it was to put pressure on her to obtain payment of the debt from the head of state, sd the judge. She added: "In posting and threatening to post the claimant's private and confidential; information on the website , Mr. Burby was pursuing a course of conduct which was unreasonable , oppressive to her and unacceptable. The interviews given by Mr. Burby and reported in the press were likely to add to her distress. Mr. Burby's conduct amounted to harassment and it was unreasonable. She said WXY had told her in evidence "that she was a private person and that she was very distressed to hear that allegations about her private life had been posted on the website. She felt that Mr. Burby tarnished her name and at the same time wanted her to give him money. She was also upset by the publication of the allegations about her because she did not want the head of state to think she had a conversation with M about terrorism and other matters. As for Mr Burby fearing for his life, the judge said: "Even if he held such a belief , in my judgement on the evidence before the court he did not have any reasonable grounds for such a belief." In her judgement unless restrained Mr. Burby was "likely to resume publication of or threatening to publish private and confidential information of the claimant and thereby to continue to harass her." The judge added that despite recent publicity describing the court orders in the case as "super injunctions," apart from the woman being granted anonymity, none of them have been. An action against PR consultant Henry Gewanter and his company Positive Profile Ltd , who had been engaged by Mr. Burby , for permanent orders and damages for breach of confidence, misuse of private information and harassment , have yet to be heard. Temporary banning orders remain against them in the meantime.