The Boy Scouts" 19th-Century Decision Based on the recommendation of a secret 11-member committee, the policy is at odds with the nation's diminishing acceptance of antigay discrimination and is destined to hurt many young people and their families. It compounds the dilemma faced by parents who welcome the positive community service and outdoor experiences that the Boy Scouts offer, but are repelled by discrimination. A dozen years ago, the Supreme Court ruled 5 to 4 that as a private organization, the Boy Scouts may exclude gay members even though it may conflict with a state's anti-discrimination laws. The Boy Scouts are, indeed, a private organization, but there is a public interest in its decisions. The organization boasts on its Web site that it has a charter from Congress and that every president since William Howard Taft has served as its honorary chairman. That now puts the government in the untenable position of implicitly endorsing the discriminatory policies of the Boy Scouts. President Obama, who has shown a real commitment to combating the unfair treatment of gay people, should respond by ending the group's prestigious tie to the White House. His doing so is unlikely, unfortunately. Congress should also sever its tie, but that is even more unlikely. Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, said in a debate with Senator Edward Kennedy in 1994 that he believes the Boy Scouts should be open to all, "regardless of their sexual orientation." If he still believes that, this would be a good time to say so.