Newborn baby found face down in stationery cupboard after couple left it in care of midwives Yvonne Musonda-Malata and Christine Onade are accused of failing to provide appropriate clinical care to a baby while on a night shift It is alleged that Malata tended to the baby in a cot by the midwives station before moving it into a stationery cupboard after it became unsettled Both midwives deny all allegations at Nursing and Midwifery Council hearing Two midwives responsible for a sick woman's four-day-old baby lay the child on its stomach and left it in a stationery cupboard, a tribunal has heard. Yvonne Musonda-Malata and Christine Onade are accused of failing to provide appropriate clinical care to a baby while working on a night shift at Queen's Hospital, Romford, north east London. Ms Malata, 35, who has worked as a nurse since 2004, was responsible for looking after the baby while its mother caught up on sleep, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) was told. It is alleged that she tended to the baby, known as Baby A, in a cot by the midwives station before moving it into a large stationery cupboard after it became unsettled. Yvonne Musonda-Malata (left) was responsible for looking after the baby while its mother caught up on sleep. Both she and Ms Onade (right) are also accused of failing to record any feeds given to Baby A She and Ms Onade, 46, are also accused of failing to record any feeds given to Baby A. Both midwives deny all allegations. The alleged incident, which occurred on 18 April, 2011, was reported by Alex Curtis, a nursery nurse at the hospital who found the baby alone in the cupboard at about 6:30am. She told the tribunal: 'I went to the post-natal ward to get an envelope from the stationery cupboard and found a baby lying on its tummy on its own. The baby was in the cot just behind the door. I cannot remember whether the light was off or on, but I saw baby on its front and went to check if it was breathing. This was an unusual occurrence. We always lie a baby on its back as there is a risk of cot death. 'If, as a nursery nurse, I took responsibility for a parent's baby, I would never leave it alone. If I needed to go off and do something, I would ask another nurse to look after the baby. Derek Zeitlin, the case presenter at the NMC, said: 'The baby's mother has a health condition and it is vitally important for her to get a good night's sleep. Midwife Yvonne Musonda-Malata leaves the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), in central London, where she is facing allegations alongside of failing to provide appropriate clinical care to a baby 'Her husband therefore invited the midwives to take the baby away so that his wife could get a good night's sleep. That decision was not taken lightly. The nurse looking after Baby A's mother was involved in that decision. It was the right thing to do. Mr Zeitlin explained that the baby became unsettled at 'various points' throughout the night, adding that there was 'no specific place to put a baby' while it was looked after in the post-natal ward. He said that Ms Malata and Ms Onade had both confirmed that Ms Malata had placed Baby A in a cot in the doorway of the cupboard, but claim that the door was kept open. Mr Zeitlin said: 'There came a stage where Ms Malata was called away to another patient and was away for about 20 minutes. The next thing that happened was a member of the nursing staff went to the cupboard and was shocked to find Baby A inside. Midwife Christine Onade is accused of failing to record any feeds given to Baby A The door was closed. The baby was found on its stomach, but babies are always placed on their back to avoid cot death. He added: 'There were no feeding charts for Baby A. The reality of that was that entries that were made about feeds didn't coincide with what the registrants record about the feeds. There was a question of whether Baby A may have been overfed. Rita Skeats, a midwife who was working alongside the midwives that evening, said: 'The first time I encountered Baby A was at 1.30am. I went to the midwives" station and noticed Baby A in its cot. I remember that the father of the baby came out of the room [where his wife was sleeping] at 2.30am, complaining that the mother could still hear the baby crying. She could therefore not sleep. I recommended that the baby be cared for at the nursery, but Ms Malata and Ms Onade said they were coping OK and would keep the baby there. This decision was made jointly between the two midwives. Ms Skeats, who has been a midwife at the hospital since 2001, told the tribunal that she had two further encounters with the baby, when she fed and changed it. She continued: 'When I returned [to the midwife station], Baby A had been placed in darkened section of the area. Ms Onade was looking after the baby at this time. She was by the desk and Baby A was fast asleep on [its] back. We do not allow babies under three months old to sleep on their front. At 6am I went to the nurses" cupboard to retrieve my stethoscope, which I keep in my bag. At this time, Baby A was still in her cot in the darkened area of the midwives" station. I went to to my patients and when I returned back to the midwives station later I did not know where the baby was, but I assumed it had been taken back to its mother. Alex Curtis said the baby was in a cupboard and it had vomited all over itself and it was suffocating in an airless cupboard. Baby A was fast asleep and the sheets were clean. There was no vomit. Ms Malata told me that the baby had not been in the cupboard. She told me that Baby A had been wedged in the door way. An internal investigation was carried out by the hospital which found that Baby A had been overfed and there were poor records of the feedings. Helen Mansfield, supervisory midwife who conducted a preliminary investigation, said there were no guidelines for midwives caring for babies in that situation. Mr Zeitlin explained that the baby became unsettled at 'various points' throughout the night, adding that there was 'no specific place to put a baby' while it was looked after She said: 'I was asked to investigate the incident, my role was to investigate the clinical care surrounding the incident. I looked at the guidelines on the post-natal ward and found there was no applicable policy or procedures on how to act in these circumstances. I discovered that Baby A had been overfed, there were no clear records of the feeding. I believe the baby had been overfed by the midwives. I concluded that there were no care issues during the incident. Apart from Alex Curtis not one other person saw the baby in the cupboard and it was all denied from every person I spoke to. If there had been more evidence of Baby A being in the cupboard it absolutely would have triggered a care issue but I had no other evidence apart from one person. Baby A was a well baby so there would be no requirement for that baby to have a feeding chart. The baby was fed although it was overfed. A further investigation was carried out which led to both nurses being suspended. Claire O'Toole, associate human resources director at Queen's Hospital, said: 'I was asked to investigate a complaint on April 20 in 2011, raised by Alex Curtis. Miss Musonda-Malata was the named midwife and was unable to provide satisfactory care explanation for the duration of the shift. There was a lack of clarity for who was caring for Baby A. 'Miss Onade did have a significant level of involvement in the care of Baby A, she couldn't clearly outline the care when she had actually taken part in it. Miss Musonda-Malata engaged with the process well and was consistent but Miss Onoade was unresponsive and unwilling to engage. Miss Onade was reluctant to accept responsibility for Baby A. The incident brought the hospital into disrepute due to the publicity in The Sun. It exacerbated bad publicity we were experiencing as a trust, impacted on staff morale and the feelings of expectant mothers in the trust.