Attorney General set to examine case of paedophile who was spared jail after judge said 13-year-old victim was ¿predatory¿ Judge Nigel Peters' comments condemned by campaigners Neil Wilson, 41, lured teenager to his home where she stripped out of her school uniform and performed a sex act on him Judge described girl as 'predatory and egging you on' Handed Wilson a suspended sentence and supervision order Barnardo's boss says 'children can never truly consent to their own abuse' Controversy: Judge Peters has been criticised after describing a 13-year-old sex abuse victim as 'predatory' The Attorney General is set to examine the case of paedophile who was spared jail after a judge said his 13-year-old victim was "predatory." Neil Wilson, 41, lured the teenager to his home where he watched her strip out of her school uniform before she performed a sex act on him. He was also found to have images of child abuse in his possession. But he was given a suspended sentence on Monday by Judge Nigel Peters, who said the girl was "predatory and egging you on." The judge also said he took into account that the girl looked and behaved "a little bit older." Last night the Attorney General's Office confirmed that the sentence will be reviewed in response to a string of complaints. That means a senior law officer will examine the punishment handed down to see whether it was "unduly lenient." If he considers it too soft, the sentence could be referred to the Court of Appeal to be increased. The Crown Prosecution Service also described the language used by the prosecution counsel as 'inappropriate.' A spokesman said: 'The transgressor in this case was the defendant and he bears responsibility for his criminal acts.' The initial sentence sparked fury among children's campaigners. Barnardo's deputy director of strategy, Alison Worsley, condemned the sentence and the description of the victim in court, saying: "Children can never truly consent to their own abuse. It is plain wrong to imply in any way that the experiences of sexually exploited children are something they bring on themselves. Over two weeks, he bombarded her with phone calls and text messages, and she visited him at his home in Romford, Essex. Snaresbrook Crown Court heard that the abuse did not come to light until the girl - whose identity is protected - told a friend, who then called the police. Officers searched Wilson's home and found a stash of images and videos depicting child abuse and bestiality. He pleaded guilty to two counts of downloading child pornography and one of sexual activity with a child. Sentencing him on Monday, Judge Peters told him: "You have come as close to prison as is imaginable. Lenient: Paedophile Neil Wilson was spared a jail sentence at Snaresbrook Crown Court I have taken into account that even though the girl was 13, the prosecution say she looked and behaved a little bit older. You knew she was not nearly 16, as she said, and your plea of guilty recognises that you knew. The eight-month term was suspended for two years - meaning Wilson will not go to jail as long as he commits no further crimes in that period. He will also face probation supervision for three years, must allow police to examine his computer and also attend a sex offenders" programme. The prosecutor in the case will also face scrutiny after he, too, appeared to suggest that it was at least partly the girl's fault. Robert Colover told the court that the sex act was "forced upon" Wilson by the victim. He said: "The girl is predatory in all her actions and she is sexually experienced. She appeared to look around 14 or 15 and had the mental age of a 14- or 15-year-old despite being younger than that. There was sexual activity but it was not of Mr Wilson's doing. You might say it was forced upon him despite his being older and stronger than her. A spokesman for the Attorney General's Office said: "The case has been drawn to the attention of this office as a possibly unduly lenient sentence. This means it'll be considered by a law officer (the Attorney or Solicitor General) who will decide whether it should be referred to the Court of Appeal under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme. The law officers have 28 days to make their considerations, this office will ask the CPS for more information on the case and the decision will be announced once all the information has been considered. A CPS spokesman added: "The language used by prosecution counsel was inappropriate. The transgressor in this case was the defendant and he bears responsibility for his criminal acts.