You must accept fracking for the good of the country, David Cameron tells southerners The intervention will be seen as an attempt by Mr Cameron to repair the damage done Lord Howell of Guildford, a former Government adviser and George Osborne's father in law, who said two week ago that gas fracking should only take place in the North East because it was filled with "desolate" areas. Mr Cameron, who represents an Oxfordshire constituency, said that it was wrong to suggest that fracking should only be confined to the north of England, where fewer people live. He said: "It's been suggested in recent weeks that we want fracking to be confined to certain parts of Britain. This is wrong. I want all parts of our nation to share in the benefits: north or south, Conservative or Labour. We are all in this together. If neighbourhoods can really see the benefits - and get proper reassurance about the environment - then I don't see why fracking shouldn't get real public support. The technique, which involves fracturing rocks deep underground with water and chemicals to extract natural gas, has dramatically cut energy bills in the USA. Ministers are hoping that it could do the same in the UK however campaigners and local people are bitterly fighting drilling. Mr Cameron made clear that the potential benefits are too good to ignore. He said that fracking has "real potential to drive energy bills down," adding: "It's simple - gas and electric bills can go down when our home grown energy supply goes up. We're not turning our back on low carbon energy, but these sources aren't enough - we need a mix. Latest estimates suggest that there's about 1,300 trillion cubic feet of shale gas lying underneath Britain at the moment - and that study only covers eleven counties. To put that in context, even if we just extract a tenth of that figure, that's still the equivalent of 51 years gas supply. There were also large rewards on offer to communities which find themselves sitting on vast reserves. He said: "Companies have agreed to pay £100,000 to every community situated near an exploratory well - somewhere where they're looking to see if shale gas exists. If shale gas is then extracted, one per cent of the revenue - perhaps as much as £10million - will go straight back to residents who live nearby. This is real money that could be used for a variety of purposes - from money off the council tax bill to investment in local schools. It's important that local people share in the wealth generated by fracking. Mr Cameron also insisted a drive to increase fracking in Britain would lead to the creation of more than 70,000 jobs in a North Sea oil-type boom. He also tried to tackle the persistent argument that fracking was not safe and risked poisoning local water sources. He said: "We must make the case that fracking is safe. International evidence shows there is no evidence why fracking should cause contamination of water supplies or other environmental damage, if properly regulated. And the regulatory system in this country is one of the most stringent in the world. If any shale gas well were to pose a risk of pollution then we have all the powers we need to close it down. Downing Street will hope that the article addresses the growing panic about what fracking entails for rural communities. Last week Nick Herbert, a former minister who resigned from the Coalition last September, told The Daily Telegraph that fracking was the biggest threat to the countryside after the concern about the spread of unwanted housing developments. Mr Herbert, who represents Arundel and South Downs, called on the Government to explain the risks, adding that a "fear of the unknown" was fuelling the concern. Mr Cameron goes some way to dealing with these worries in his article by insisting that the British countryside is not going to be ruined by fracking. He said: "One myth still remains - that fracking damages our countryside. I just don't agree with this. Our countryside is one of the most precious things we have in Britain and I am proud to represent a rural constituency. Mr Cameron said people had to understand that the area which had to be set aside for the drilling equipment was relatively small. He said: "I would never sanction something that would ruin our landscapes and scenery. For a start, shale gas pads are relatively small - about the size of a cricket pitch. But more than that, similar types of drilling have been taking place for decades in this country without any real protest. Two areas of Surrey and Sussex are estimated to hold hundreds of millions of barrels of recoverable shale oil - or more than a year's supply for Britain. Mr Cameron directed his comments to the people living in the South Downs National Park, which is one of the focuses for drilling. This month energy company Cuadrilla started drilling at a site in Balcombe, West Sussex, despite protests, and attention is due to shift in the next few weeks to the South Downs National Park where a drilling application has been submitted near Fernhurst. He said that the South Downs "is one of the most beautiful parts of Britain and it has been home to conventional oil and gas drilling since the 1980s. The huge benefits of shale gas outweigh any very minor change to the landscape. Lord Howell of Guildford said last month that "there are large, uninhabited and desolate areas, certainly in parts of the North East, where there is plenty of room for fracking, well away from anybody's residence, and where it could be conducted without any threat to the rural environment." The peer was forced to apologise and insisted he "did not intend to suggest that the North East is desolate." Days later, he revealed that he meant to suggest gas fracking should take place in the North West. Read David Cameron's full article on fracking here