"Dream Team" of Behavioral Scientists Advised Obama Campaign Late last year Matthew Barzun, an official with the Obama campaign, called Craig Fox, a psychologist in Los Angeles, and invited him to a political planning meeting in Chicago, according to two people who attended the session. "He said, "Bring the whole group; let's hear what you have to say," " recalled Dr. Fox, a behavioral economist at the University of California, Los Angeles. So began an effort by a team of social scientists to help their favored candidate in the 2012 presidential election. Some members of the team had consulted with the Obama campaign in the 2008 cycle, but the meeting in January signaled a different direction. "The culture of the campaign had changed," Dr. Fox said. Before then I felt like we had to sell ourselves; this time there was a real hunger for our ideas. This election season the Obama campaign won a reputation for drawing on the tools of social science. The book "Victory Lab," by Sasha Issenberg, and news reports have portrayed an operation that ran its own experiment and, among other efforts, consulted with the Analyst Institute, a Washington voter research group established in 2007 by union officials and their allies to help Democratic candidates. Less well known is that the Obama campaign also had a panel of unpaid academic advisers. The group - which calls itself the "consortium of behavioral scientists," or COBS - provided ideas on how to counter false rumors, like one that President Obama is a Muslim. It suggested how to characterize the Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, in advertisements. It also delivered research-based advice on how to mobilize voters. "In the way it used research, this was a campaign like no other," said Todd Rogers, a psychologist at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government and a former director of the Analyst Institute. It's a big change for a culture that historically has relied on consultants, experts and gurulike intuition. When asked about the outside psychologists, the Obama campaign would neither confirm nor deny a relationship with them. "This campaign was built on the energy, enthusiasm and ingenuity of thousands of grass-roots supporters and our staff in the states and in Chicago," said Adam Fetcher, a campaign spokesman. Throughout the campaign we saw an outpouring of individuals across the country who lent a wide variety of ideas and input to our efforts to get the president re-elected. For their part, consortium members said they did nothing more than pass on research-based ideas, in e-mails and conference calls. They said they could talk only in general terms about the research, because they had signed nondisclosure agreements with the campaign. In addition to Dr. Fox, the consortium included Susan T. Fiske of Princeton University; Samuel L. Popkin of the University of California, San Diego; Robert Cialdini, a professor emeritus at Arizona State University; Richard H. Thaler, a professor of behavioral science and economics at the University of Chicago's business school; and Michael Morris, a psychologist at Columbia. "A kind of dream team, in my opinion," Dr. Fox said. He said that the ideas the team proposed were "little things that can make a difference" in people's behavior. For example, Dr. Fiske's research has shown that when deciding on a candidate, people generally focus on two elements: competence and warmth. "A candidate wants to make sure to score high on both dimensions," Dr. Fiske said in an interview. You can't just run on the idea that everyone wants to have a beer with you; some people care a whole lot about competence. Mr. Romney was recognized as a competent businessman, polling found. But he was often portrayed in opposition ads as distant, unable to relate to the problems of ordinary people. When it comes to countering rumors, psychologists have found that the best strategy is not to deny the charge ("I am not a flip-flopper") but to affirm a competing notion. "The denial works in the short term; but in the long term people remember only the association, like "Obama and Muslim," " said Dr. Fox, of the persistent false rumor. The president's team affirmed that he is a Christian. At least some of the consortium's proposals seemed to have found their way into daily operations. Campaign volunteers who knocked on doors last week in swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio and Nevada did not merely remind people to vote and arrange for rides to the polls. Rather, they worked from a script, using subtle motivational techniques that research has shown can prompt people to take action. "We used the scripts more as a guide," said Sarah Weinstein, 18, a Columbia freshman who traveled with a group to Cleveland the weekend before the election. The actual language we used was invested in the individual person.