England batsman Jonathan Trott unperturbed by Saeed Ajmal threat as tourists head for the academy "Obviously there's going to be a bit of speculation and stuff around his action," Trott said. Whenever you're successful there will be. So, as a team, the guys aren't really too fussed. It would be foolish for us every time we face him to think it's a bit suspect, but the fact of the matter is we are 1-0 down and have got to win Test matches. Pointedly, though, Trott added: "The ICC have got their job to do and we fully trust they'll be able to do it." The implication - nothing more - is that England want Ajmal to have his action tested again at the University of Perth, as it was three years ago. The protocol is then for the board of every Test-playing country to be informed of the results on a suspect bowler's action. This is the stage at which diplomatic representations can be made - not after he takes ten wickets for 97. Trott would not reveal whether he read Ajmal from his hand or through the air, or both. But he does not believe Ajmal's propaganda about having a third delivery or "teesra": "I think he has the doosra and just the offie." So while other England batsmen tinker with their technique, Trott will stick to what he knows - which has already proven to be enough. In the Lord's Test of August 2010, he made 184 and shared a stand of 332 with Stuart Broad against a Pakistan attack that included Ajmal, in addition to two spot-fixing pace bowlers. Trott spoke wisely about the game plans that he has developed: "You've got to have a good all-round game. As a batsman you've got to be able to play both (pace and spin), otherwise you'll get found out pretty quickly. If the England coach Andy Flower was undiplomatic yesterday, it was about his team's batting, not Ajmal and his bowling. "On a pitch like that in the first innings, with the bounce so low, cross-bat shots were dangerous," Flower said. I don't want to belittle Ajmal's performance in any way, but we made some bad decisions.