Rupert Murdoch deemed 'not a fit person' to run international company Select committee report concludes media mogul is 'not a fit person' to lead a major international company Link to this video Rupert Murdoch's media conglomerate conceded that MPs had fastened on "hard truths" in a parliamentary report into the phone-hacking scandal that also concluded he was "not a fit person" to exercise stewardship of a major international company. A chastened News Corporation accepted that the culture, media and sport select committee was right to highlight "serious wrongdoing at the News of the World" and that its response to hacking allegations was "slow and too defensive." It also accepted the committee's verdict that former employees misled parliament, including the former editor of the News of the World. But Murdoch's company adopted a more defensive tone in responding to the MPs' hostile description of its 81-year-old patriarch, noting that it considered the verdict "unjustified and highly partisan" because it was only agreed following a vote that saw five Labour MPs and the sole Liberal Democrat, Adrian Sanders, outvoting a Conservative bloc. The criticism of Murdoch travelled around the world with Murdoch titles such as the Times and the Wall Street Journal among those repeating the "not a fit person" quote prominently. The remarks even had the apparently paradoxical effect of boosting News Corporation's share price in New York by 24 cents to $20.08 - a move some analysts put down to the belief that the day's events heralded the point where the company would sell its British newspapers. The influential Wall Street media analyst Rich Greenfield said US investors "would love to see News Corp sell off their UK newspapers," including the Sun and the Times titles, and that a declaration by the media regulator Ofcom that the company be unfit to continue holding its 39.1% shareholding in BSkyB would allow it to raise cash in excess of its implied market value by selling down the stake. The media regulator, Ofcom, said its separate inquiry into whether News Corp was a "fit and proper" owner of a 39% stake in BSkyB was continuing, and insiders said it would monitor the hacking-related criminal cases and the Leveson inquiry before deciding whether to take any action. If it concluded that News Corp was not "fit and proper" it could force the company to sell its stake in BSkyB. In a separate memo to staff, Murdoch said he found it "difficult to read many of the report's findings." He added: "We certainly should have acted more quickly and aggressively to uncover wrongdoing. We deeply regret what took place and have taken our share of responsibility for not rectifying the situation sooner. A chaotic press conference laid bare the divisions between Labour and Conservative MPs when it came to Rupert Murdoch. Tom Watson, the Labour MP who drafted the passage of the report criticising the media mogul, said Rupert and his son James must now answer for News International's "rampant cover-up." He added: "Everybody in the world knows who is responsible for the wrongdoing of News Corp: Rupert Murdoch. Louise Mensch, a Conservative, distanced herself from Watson's rhetoric. She said the Murdoch claim was outside the scope of the committee and risked undermining its report. "That will mean it will be correctly seen as a partisan report and will have lost a very great deal of its credibility, which is an enormous shame," she said. Mensch added that the remarks about Rupert Murdoch prevented the Conservative MPs voting for the final report, which was passed by six votes to four. James Murdoch, once considered a certainty to take over from his father, was also subject to further criticism. The committee said he showed "wilful ignorance" of the extent of phone hacking between 2008 and 2010. The highly charged document led to MPs from both sides arguing over the meaning of the report - the first of a series of political, judicial and regulatory inquiries expected to conclude in the coming months. According to the document, Rupert Murdoch "did not take steps to become fully informed about phone hacking" and "turned a blind eye and exhibited wilful blindness to what was going on in his companies and publications." Within the report there were also some passages critical of the Murdoch family that met with cross-party approval. One paragraph, approved by nine votes to one, said the committee found it "simply astonishing" that it took Rupert Murdoch and James Murdoch at least two and a half years between 2008 and the end of 2010 to conclude that the company line - that hacking was confined to a single rogue reporter, jailed former royal editor Clive Goodman - was "untrue." The only dissenting voice was that of Therese Coffey, a Conservative MP. James Murdoch was accused of failing to appreciate the significance of the News of the World's hacking when he signed off the secret £700,000 phone-hacking payment to the chief executive of the Professional Footballers' Association, Gordon Taylor, in June 2008. Similar accusations were levelled at Murdoch over the "for Neville" email, which appeared to show that hacking went more widespread than Goodman when it became public in 2009, and for his response to the investigations by parliament in February 2010 and the New York Times in September 2010. The report continued to note that "as the head of a journalistic enterprise, we are astonished that James Murdoch did not seek more information or ask to see the evidence and counsel's opinion when he was briefed by Tom Crone and Colin Myler on the Gordon Taylor case." But allies of James Murdoch said he was pleased the criticism did not go any further, and in particular that the MPs did not conclude he had misled parliament. That was reserved for three others. Les Hinton, the former executive chairman of News International, and a lifelong associate of Rupert Murdoch's, was "complicit" in a cover-up at the newspaper group. It accused Colin Myler, a former editor of the News of the World, and the paper's ex-head of legal, Tom Crone, deliberately withheld crucial information and answered questions falsely. Minutes published by the committee showed the MPs were unanimous in agreeing that Hinton, Myler and Crone had misled parliament - a charge all three men denied. The committee will put forward an all-party motion to censure them before the Commons, reviving a punishment last used to admonish John Junor, the editor of the Sunday Express in 1957. Junor was summoned to the Commons and forced to apologise over a report into petrol allowances. But the committee members admitted that they were creating parliamentary precedent and it was unclear what would happen if the three did not say sorry. Labour leader, Ed Miliband, urged Ofcom to speed up its investigation into whether News Corp is a "fit and proper" owner of the broadcasting licence held by BSkyB. "I take extremely seriously what the committee are saying," said Miliband. They've gone through the evidence, they've reached a considered conclusion and I think now that what needs to happen is the regulator, Ofcom - and it is a matter for them - needs to come to its own conclusions. Lib Dem president, Tim Farron, said Ofcom should take seriously the claim that Murdoch was an unfit owner of a global media firm. He said: "Given the significant role he has in the governance of News Corp, this should be an important consideration in Ofcom's determination. It's nearly a year since we asked for this review. The public will want Ofcom to conclude its work on this issue as quickly as possible, and I urge them to do so.