Cancer victims could be hindering treatment by taking multivitamins Prof Watson said studies should be carried out to test his theory which he described as "among my most important work since the double helix." Writing in the Royal Society's Open Biology journal, he said: "For as long as I have been focused on the understanding and curing [of] cancer, well-intentioned individuals have been consuming antioxidative nutritional supplements as cancer preventatives if not actual therapies. In light of the recent data strongly hinting that much of late-stage cancer's untreatability may arise from its possession of too many antioxidants, the time has come to seriously ask whether antioxidant use much more likely causes than prevents cancer. Blueberries [which are high in antioxidants] best be eaten because they taste good, not because their consumption will lead to less cancer. Professor Nic Jones, Cancer Research UK's chief scientist, said: "We know from many large studies that, far from being potent cancer-fighters, [antioxidant supplements] seem to be ineffective for cancer prevention in healthy people, and some can even slightly increase the risk of cancer. This should give people good reason to think twice about relying on them. Steve Williamson, consultant pharmacist and cancer spokesman for the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, added: "A lot of people having cancer treatment pick up on the idea of antioxidants which they have read might protect them against cancer. I always advise patients not to take antioxidants while they are having chemotherapy in case it counteracts it.