Players face retrospective bans in Premier League trial by video next season There were immediate calls for McManaman to be banned and it is understood the FA was keen to charge him but it ultimately decided his conduct did not qualify as the type of "exceptional" incident that would allow it to punish him further using video evidence. That was despite Halsey, who retires at the end of this season, stating in his match report that he had not had a clear view and that, had he done so, he would have sent off McManaman. He is also thought to have urged the FA to take retrospective action and was left distraught by the criticism he faced for failing to produce a red card. Under the new pilot scheme, even if one of the officials has a partial view of such an incident, the FA will be able to refer it to a panel to determine whether further disciplinary action is required. It is understood it was decided it would place undue pressure on match referees to expect them to be involved in the process beyond confirming the extent to which their vision was obstructed. It was not clear why the pilot scheme was limited exclusively to the Premier League, although the Football League had previously been against any change to rules governing retrospective action, with its opposition entered on fears that referees could be tempted to shirk big decisions if they knew players would be punished by a panel days later. There were also concerns about the authority of officials being undermined and countless games being re-refereed, fears said initially to have been shared by the Premier League and the PFA. But the Football League found itself without an ally after March's stakeholders meeting, with Wednesday's summit representing a breakthrough on discussions which ended in stalemate last summer and left the FA - which has long been in favour of a rule change - exposed to a torrent of criticism for failing to punish the likes of McManaman. That is likely to continue, despite this week's agreement, because instances of violent conduct are set to remain unpunished in some cases. One such example is the Sergio Agüero-David Luiz incident during Manchester City's FA Cup semi-final against Chelsea last month. A tangle between the players saw Luiz use his elbow to ward off City striker Agüero, who reacted by kicking out at the Chelsea defender. A free-kick was awarded at the time, although the officials appeared not to appreciate the severity of the clash. Wednesday's meeting decided it could set a dangerous precedent to take retrospective action in off-the-ball cases where it could be argued both players share a degree of guilt. The stakeholders also decided against introducing some form of retrospective action for diving, although that could change if a scheme to eradicate it piloted by the Scottish Football Association proves to be successful.