Symbolic intifada death of boy did not happen, says Israel Yuval Steinitz, Israel's strategic affairs minister, presenting the new report, baldy reversed that verdict by calling news coverage of the incident "a blood libel against Israel, alongside other blood libels like the claims of an alleged massacre in Jenin [in 2002]." The 36-page report accuses the France 2 TV channel which first aired the footage shot by its local stringer, of reporting that Israeli soldiers had been responsible for the death despite possessing extra video evidence which suggested otherwise. It said a thorough examination of unedited film shows Mohammad al-Durra to be still alive at the end of the incident. "Contrary to the claim that the boy was dead, the committee's review of the raw footage indicates that at the end of the video - the part that was not broadcast - the boy appears to be alive," the inquiry stated. The probe has found that there is no evidence to support the claims that the father, Jamal, or the boy Mohammed, were shot. Furthermore, the video does not show Jamal being seriously wounded. Mr Netanyahu - who commissioned the investigation last September - said he was highlighting the issue now more than 12 years later because the original report and subsequent dispatches had gravely harmed Israel's reputation. Israeli officials say it has fuelled an increase of anti-Semitism and acts of terrorism against Jewish targets worldwide. "It is important to focus on this incident - which has slandered Israel's reputation," Mr Netanyahu said. This is a manifestation of the ongoing mendacious campaign to de-legitimise Israel. There is only one way to counter lies and that is through the truth. Only the truth can prevail over lies. The report said France 2"s dispatch "had the immediate effect of harming Israel's international standing and fanning the flames of terror and hate." It added: "The echoes of the Al-Durrah report, both in terms of accusations against Israel, and the behaviour of Western media outlets and their local stringers, have continued to resonate in the media coverage of Israel's operations against terrorist organisations." The investigation panel - overseen by Moshe Ya'alon, the former strategic affairs minister who is now defence minister - included a host of specialists from the Israeli police, the army, the foreign ministry and even one of the country's leading pathologists, whose testimony was central to the conclusion that Mohammad had not died in the incident. It did not include any journalists but the report said the affair "demonstrates the need for media outlets to implement the highest professional and ethical standards when covering asymmetric conflicts." The findings provoked angry rebuttals from Charles Enderlin - France 2's Jerusalem bureau chief, who is heavily criticised in the report - and Jamal al-Durra, who offered to exhume his son's body. Mr Enderlin, who is Jewish and holds Israeli citizenship, accused the inquiry panel of failing to contact him. "From the start of the incident, until today, France 2 has shown a willingness to participate in any official independent investigation, carried out according to international standards," he said. France 2 learned about the existence of the committee from the press - and this speaks for itself. Speaking to Israel's Army Radio, Mr al-Durra, called Israel's claims "lies" and said his son had died "on the spot." "He died next to me," he said. Israel now has a black stain on it in the eyes of the world. They're trying to erase everything.