GOP Senator Says Obama's Immigration Speech Could Trigger Some Kind of White Ferguson Senator Tom Coburn (USA Today) Retiring Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn, in an interview with USA Today's Susan Page yesterday, seemed to both warn about and threaten white violence against President Obama's executive action on immigration reform, saying the president's speech Thursday night could provoke "violence" and "anarchy." He even suggested that the reaction could parallel the demonstrations and violence in Ferguson, Missouri. Page asked what will be the reaction of Republicans in Washington, and Coburn acted as if it's not the GOP that will be upset ("cause, you know, they're such a even-keeled bunch: Alabama Representative Mo Brooks actually thinks Obama could end up in jail, as well as impeached). Rather, it's all those regular folks out there who will be terribly disappointed that the president isn't working with Congress. "Oh, I don't think it's so much a Republican reaction here," Coburn said. The country's going to go nuts. Because they are going to see it as a move outside of the authority of the president. And it's going to be a very dangerous situation. You're going to see - hopefully not - but you could see instances of anarchy. "You could see violence," Coburn continued. This is a big step, to not work with Congress, now that he's got a new Congress, to go completely around it. Then, oddly, Coburn cited the protests in Ferguson, Missouri, saying that Obama's immigration action could invoke similar concerns about injustice: "Well, here's how people think - if the law doesn't apply to the president, and it's not affirmatively acted on for us as a group, like you're seeing in Ferguson, Missouri, then why should it apply to me?" As Josh Marshall pointed out at TPM, Coburn's warnings about street violence over allowing the parents of American-born citizens to stay here without fear of deportation were logically challenged in the first place. The protesters in Ferguson are outraged by a direct government action, the shooting to death of an unarmed black teenager. Any violence over Obama's executive order would mean people taking to the streets in anger over a government inaction - its refusal to actively deport people already living in the US for years. But logic is never a strong component of American conniptions over race. You could also see what Coburn said as implying a sort of good-for-the-goose, good-for-the-gander equivalency: if blacks get to riot over a perceived injustice, so should whites. That plays directly into the right's sense of victimization and "reverse racism." Coburn's remarks should also be seen in the context of the 2016 elections. Obama's immigration reforms, modest as they are in reality, would further the perception driven home by Fox News, hate radio, and millions of dollars of GOP advertising that Obama only helps the poor and minorities. Obama saying that if he had a son, "he'd look like Trayvon" Martin, Eric Holder's intervention in Ferguson, and even Obamacare, which actually helps more whites than blacks but is believed to do the exact opposite by many whites - all are grist for that mill of resentment. Add to that changing immigration practices by executive order, and the right may be able to orchestrate a backlash of epic proportions against a Democratic nominee. In politics, what is true is never as important as what works. See the Coburn interview here: Read Next: "Why Gruber's "Stupid" Comment Has Become a Dog Whistle for the GOP"