Shrien Dewani told Anni their union was 'not natural' days before she was murdered I left my home, family and everything to be with you and three days later you say that if you knew marriages were like this, you wouldn't [have] got married. Seriously, do you want me to leave you?" she wrote on November 5, 2010 after the couple returned from their three-day wedding in India at the end of October. It's very mean of you to tell me things you told me just after marriage. Then you should have told me this before. I don't want an insecure man or a man whose feelings doesn't come naturally that you have to force yourself. In a second email, sent from her Blackberry moments later, she added: "Because we had a Bollywood wedding, it doesn't mean we are Bollywood actors and just pretend everything is good when it isn't. It will just end up with us hating each other. In response, Mr Dewani wrote: "When I said it was not natural and was forcing myself - we were talking about not feeling happy. Not that I was forcing myself to be with you. They are very different comments and seriously you cannot just take a meaning that you want. The emails were read to the court during the evidence of Captain Paul Hendrickse, the detective who led the investigation into the 28-year-old Swedish engineer's murder. Mrs Dewani told her husband that they should not "pretend" if their marriage was a sham (PA) He obtained them from Mrs Dewani's Blackberry which he sent to the UK for analysis in January 2011 after the couple's taxi driver, Zola Tongo, claimed Mr Dewani hired him to find two hit men to kill his wife. Captain Hendrickse said that Mr Dewani seemed surprised when he told him the taxi driver had been arrested, and that the next day he was contacted by a lawyer who asked if Mr Dewani had been implicated. He dismissed as "newly fabricated" a claim by the defendant that he had large amounts of cash changed and a series of secret conversations with Tongo because he was trying to organise a surprise helicopter ride over Cape Town for his new bride. The officer said the first he knew about the helicopter trip was from a plea statement Mr Dewani made at the start of his trial in October this year. He said Mr Dewani mentioned neither the plan, nor the large amount of money that was taken in the carjacking, to officers when interviewed shortly after the attack. He also failed to mention it in a meeting about what happened with Mrs Dewani's family, he added. Anni added: "Because we had a Bollywood wedding, it doesn't mean we are Bollywood actors and just pretend everything is good." "Had that explanation been given to me, Mr Tongo would've become a suspect right from the beginning," Captain Hendrickse told the court. It would have provided a motive for Tongo to extort money. In cross-examination, Captain Hendrickse admitted his team had "overlooked" tests for gunshot residue conducted on the gloves worn by one of the two hit men, who have already been convicted for their role in Mrs Dewani's death. Mr Dewani's lawyer has suggested that the residue found on the gloves suggested the wrong man was convicted of firing the fatal shot. The detective rejected the suggestion that the fact Mrs Dewani was shot in the neck rather than the head meant it might not have been an execution. "The fact that it doesn't appear like a professional hit, doesn't mean it wasn't," he said. The shot was still aimed at vital organs. "Be careful sir, bias is showing," Mr Dewani's lawyer Francois Van Zyl responded. Mr Dewani denies five charges including kidnapping and murder.