Wife of sex pest Emran Ahmed sues Ray Hadley for libel after 'grub' comment Kim Ahmed, right, the wife of a convicted sex offender with the same surname leaving the Supreme Court. Ray Hadley helps one of his legal team with her files in the strong winds outside The Supreme Court. THE wife of a convicted sex offender is suing broadcaster Ray Hadley for defamation after he called her a "grub" and alleged she took out a false AVO against the father of the young victim. Kim Anne Ahmed, who owned Seafood Lovers at Carlingford Court with her husband, Emran Ahmed, took Mr Hadley and 2GB to court yesterday over three broadcasts in 2008 and 2009. Mr Ahmed was convicted in 2007 of indecently assaulting a 17-year-old employee, who cannot be named. The court found he took the girl into the shop's cool room and asked her if she wanted to have sex. After she refused, he put his hands under her top, and when she struggled, he tried to put his hands down her pants. Mr Ahmed said: "You like it, the guys are going to do this to you, I'm just helping you." Four days later, he was interviewed by police and charged with indecent assault. He was given a 12-month suspended jail sentence. In May 2008, Hadley interviewed the girl's father, "Glen," on air, where it was revealed Mrs Ahmed had taken out an AVO against him. "Glen" told Hadley he was in America when he found out about it. Later in the broadcast, Hadley said that if either Mr Ahmed or his "grub of a wife" still owned their seafood store, "they should completely and utterly be sent out of business." "Glen" told Hadley he was not allowed to go to Carlingford Court after Mrs Ahmed claimed he was stalking her. In another broadcast Hadley said Mrs Ahmed's complaint was "frivolous, vexatious and without substance because you're the husband - you're the wife, rather, of a convicted sexual offender, who offended against this man's daughter and has been convicted." Mrs Ahmed's barrister, Clive Evatt, said yesterday he would present evidence to show there was a "long and sustained course of conduct" by "Glen" that "intimidated the plaintiff (Mrs Ahmed) and others in the shop." Mr Hadley's solicitors, Banki Haddock Fiora, will claim the broadcaster was reporting on a matter of public interest, that the reports were true and included the opinion of both Mr Hadley and "Glen." The case continues.