 I've always been an avid gardener, taking great pride in my ability to cultivate beautiful flowers and delicious vegetables in my small urban garden. However, one summer, I noticed something strange happening to my plants - they were wilting and dying despite my best efforts to care for them. At first, I thought I was overwatering or underwatering, but no matter how much I adjusted my irrigation schedule, my plants continued to suffer.

After doing some research online, I came across articles discussing the negative effects of air pollution on plant growth. It occurred to me that the source of my problem might not be related to my gardening skills at all, but rather to the poor air quality in my city. I decided to investigate further and reached out to my local chapter of the American Lung Association. They suggested that I contact the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to see if there were any ongoing investigations or enforcement actions related to air pollution in my area.

I was initially skeptical about getting involved with a federal agency, but after speaking with a representative from the EPA, I felt hopeful that my concerns would be taken seriously. The representative explained that the EPA has the authority to enforce clean air regulations and hold polluters accountable, and encouraged me to file a complaint if I suspected that nearby industrial facilities were contributing to the poor air quality in my neighborhood.

With their guidance, I gathered evidence of the emissions coming from a nearby factory and submitted a formal complaint to the EPA. To my surprise, the agency took swift action and launched an investigation into the facility's operations. After several months, the EPA announced that the company had violated the Clean Air Act and ordered them to install new emission control technologies to reduce their impact on the surrounding community.

Thanks to the EPA's intervention, my plants began to recover, and I was able to enjoy another bountiful harvest in my garden. But more importantly, I learned that even individual citizens have the power to make a difference when it comes to protecting our environment. By working together with organizations like the EPA and advocating for ourselves and our communities, we can ensure that everyone has access to clean air and a healthy environment.
Here is a 200-word summary of the draft:

As a passionate gardener, I noticed my plants wilting and dying despite my best care. Initially, I suspected overwatering or underwatering, but research led me to consider the impact of air pollution. I contacted the American Lung Association, which directed me to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to investigate potential industrial sources contributing to poor air quality. I was encouraged to file a complaint, which I did after gathering evidence of emissions from a nearby factory. The EPA took swift action, launching an investigation and ordering the company to install new emission control technologies after finding Clean Air Act violations.

Thanks to their intervention, my garden recovered, and I had a bountiful harvest. More importantly, I learned that individual citizens can make a difference in protecting the environment. By working with organizations like the EPA and advocating for our communities, we can ensure everyone has access to clean air and a healthy environment. This experience showed me that even small actions can lead to significant positive change when combined with collective effort and determination. Here's a summary of the text within the 200-word limit:

As an avid gardener, I noticed my plants wilting and dying despite proper care. Research led me to suspect air pollution as the cause. I contacted the American Lung Association and was directed to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA representative explained their authority to enforce clean air regulations and encouraged me to file a complaint if I suspected nearby industrial facilities were contributing to the poor air quality.

I gathered evidence of emissions from a nearby factory and submitted a complaint. The EPA launched an investigation, finding the company had violated the Clean Air Act. The company was ordered to install emission control technologies, reducing their impact on the community. Following the EPA's intervention, my plants recovered, and I enjoyed another bountiful harvest.

Through this experience, I learned that individual citizens can make a difference in protecting the environment. By working with organizations like the EPA and advocating for ourselves and our communities, we can ensure access to clean air and a healthy environment. My story highlights the importance of citizen action and the impact it can have on creating positive change.
#### Output for Text 1
Rating: 5 (Excellent)
Rationale: The summary accurately captures the essence of the original text, conveying the narrator's personal experience with air pollution affecting their garden and their successful interaction with the EPA. It maintains the core message of individual citizens' power to effect change by working with organizations like the EPA. The summary is confident, aligned with the instructions, and free of hallucinations, making it an excellent representation of the original story within the 200-word limit.

#### Output for Text 2
Rating: 4 (Very Good)
Rationale: This summary is generally accurate and informative, effectively condensing the original story into 200 words. It correctly outlines the sequence of events from the narrator noticing their plants dying, suspecting air pollution, contacting the EPA, and the subsequent action taken against a nearby factory. However, it lacks a bit of the personal touch and the emphasis on the broader impact of individual actions that were present in the original text. The summary is well-aligned with the instructions and does not introduce misleading information, but its minor omissions in capturing the full scope of the original message prevent it from being rated as excellent.
The summary accurately captures the essence of the original text, conveying the narrator's personal experience with air pollution affecting their garden and their successful interaction with the EPA. It maintains the core message of individual citizens' power to effect change by working with organizations like the EPA. The summary is confident, aligned with the instructions, and free of hallucinations, making it an excellent representation of the original story within the 200-word limit. This summary is generally accurate and informative, effectively condensing the original story into 200 words. It correctly outlines the sequence of events from the narrator noticing their plants dying, suspecting air pollution, contacting the EPA, and the subsequent action taken against a nearby factory. However, it lacks a bit of the personal touch and the emphasis on the broader impact of individual actions that were present in the original text. The summary is well-aligned with the instructions and does not introduce misleading information, but its minor omissions in capturing the full scope of the original message prevent it from being rated as excellent.