Question: what did clinton say when he was being investigated?

Monica Lewinsky breaks decade of silence over affair with Bill Clinton: 'It's time to burn the beret and bury the blue dress' | The Independent | The Independent Monica Lewinsky breaks decade of silence over affair with Bill Clinton: 'It's time to burn the beret and bury the blue dress'
Monica Lewinsky breaks decade of silence over affair with Bill Clinton: 'It's time to burn the beret and bury the blue dress'
The White House intern, whose affair with Clinton led to the former President's impeachment in 1998, has written a tell-all magazine column
The Lewinsky Scandal In Pictures
 Clinton was being investigated by Kenneth Starr, the Independent Counsel, on a number of perjury and obstruction of justice cases – all of which he was later acquitted of – when Starr was given taped conversations between the former President and Lewinsky by her Defense Department co-worker Linda Tripp, who had been secretly recording them. It led to a 21-day Senate trial, during which Clinton’s carefully worded argument hinged on the meaning of the word ‘is’ when determining the truthfulness of the statement: “ There is not a sexual relationship, an improper sexual relationship or any other kind of improper relationship.” It was the now infamous blue dress, gifted to Lewinsky by Clinton, that provided the DNA evidence proving the relationship had existed, despite Clinton’s initial denials that he “did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky”. “I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never,” he stated at the time. “ These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people. Thank you.” On 17 August 1998, Clinton admitted that he had in fact engaged in an “improper physical relationship” with Lewinsky.

Monica Lewinsky breaks decade of silence over affair with Bill Clinton: 'It's time to burn the beret and bury the blue dress' | The Independent | The Independent

Monica Lewinsky breaks decade of silence over affair with Bill Clinton: 'It's time to burn the beret and bury the blue dress'
Monica Lewinsky breaks decade of silence over affair with Bill Clinton: 'It's time to burn the beret and bury the blue dress'
The White House intern, whose affair with Clinton led to the former President's impeachment in 1998, has written a tell-all magazine column
The Lewinsky Scandal In Pictures

Clinton was being investigated by Kenneth Starr, the Independent Counsel, on a number of perjury and obstruction of justice cases – all of which he was later acquitted of – when Starr was given taped conversations between the former President and Lewinsky by her Defense Department co-worker Linda Tripp, who had been secretly recording them. It led to a 21-day Senate trial, during which Clinton’s carefully worded argument hinged on the meaning of the word ‘is’ when determining the truthfulness of the statement: “ There is not a sexual relationship, an improper sexual relationship or any other kind of improper relationship.” It was the now infamous blue dress, gifted to Lewinsky by Clinton, that provided the DNA evidence proving the relationship had existed, despite Clinton’s initial denials that he “did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky”. “I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never,” he stated at the time. “ These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people. Thank you.” On 17 August 1998, Clinton admitted that he had in fact engaged in an “improper physical relationship” with Lewinsky.

FBI Agents Angered By Obama's Attempt to Influence Hillary Clinton Investigation FBI Agents Angered By Obama’s Attempt to Influence Hillary Clinton Investigation
FBI Agents Angered By Obama’s Attempt to Influence Hillary Clinton Investigation The President just tried to influence the outcome of a criminal investigation, on behalf of a powerful Democrat politician. Of course, he loves to insert himself into politically useful criminal matters, while having nothing to say about politically damaging ones, such as sanctuary-city murders by illegal aliens. Outrage requires at least a pinch of surprise, and Obama has so numbed the American people to corruption and the lawless exercise of power that it’s not surprising to watch him influence an active FBI investigation. As the Times notes later in its article, Obama made similar thoughtless – and, as it turned out, incorrect – comments when former CIA director David Petraeus was under investigation. Petraeus did have to face the music, but Obama’s politicized Justice Department arranged a misdemeanor plea bargain for him… even though he demonstrably lied to FBI agents during the investigation. Unfortunately for Clinton, Obama’s effort to tip the scales on her behalf doesn’t seem to be working well. The White House was obliged to issue an extraordinary retraction of the President’s remarks, and the FBI agents working the case seem to be more inspired than ever. As former FBI official Ron Hosko told the New York Times, “Injecting politics into what is supposed to be a fact-finding inquiry leaves a foul taste in the F.B.I.’s mouth and makes them fear that no matter what they find, the Justice Department will take the president’s signal and not bring a case.” Notice that in the White House walkback, spokesman Josh Earnest still tried to pump a little hot air into Clinton’s favorite narrative trial balloon, namely her contention that she knows more about what should be “classified” than everyone in the intelligence community combined, and was trying to correct the spy kids on their excessive zeal for securing documents. “There’s a debate among national security experts, as part of their ongoing, independent review, about how or even whether to classify sections of those emails,” said Earnest. “

FBI Agents Angered By Obama's Attempt to Influence Hillary Clinton Investigation

FBI Agents Angered By Obama’s Attempt to Influence Hillary Clinton Investigation
FBI Agents Angered By Obama’s Attempt to Influence Hillary Clinton Investigation

A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga
A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga
1995
1996
1997
January 1998
February 1998
March 1998
April 1998
May 1998
June 1998
July 1998
August, 1998
 Clinton political adviser James Carville says "a war" will be waged between Clinton supporters and Kenneth Starr over Starr's investigation tactics. Jan. 26, 1998: Clinton forcefully repeats his denial, saying, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." Ginsburg offers Starr a summary of what Lewinsky is prepared to say to the grand jury in exchange for a grant of immunity from the prosecution. Jan. 27, 1998: Jones' attorney, John Whitehead, answers Starr's subpoena with several documents, possibly including Clinton's deposition in the Jones suit. Currie testifies before the grand jury. First lady Hillary Rodham Clinton says in a broadcast interview that a "vast right-wing conspiracy" is behind the charges against her husband. A Portland, Ore., man, Andy Bleiler, alleges he had a five-year affair with Lewinsky, and his lawyer promises to turn over documents and items to Starr's investigators. Clinton delivers his State of the Union address, making no mention of the scandal.

A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga

A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga
A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga
1995
1996
1997
January 1998
February 1998
March 1998
April 1998
May 1998
June 1998
July 1998
August, 1998

Clinton political adviser James Carville says "a war" will be waged between Clinton supporters and Kenneth Starr over Starr's investigation tactics. Jan. 26, 1998: Clinton forcefully repeats his denial, saying, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." Ginsburg offers Starr a summary of what Lewinsky is prepared to say to the grand jury in exchange for a grant of immunity from the prosecution. Jan. 27, 1998: Jones' attorney, John Whitehead, answers Starr's subpoena with several documents, possibly including Clinton's deposition in the Jones suit. Currie testifies before the grand jury. First lady Hillary Rodham Clinton says in a broadcast interview that a "vast right-wing conspiracy" is behind the charges against her husband. A Portland, Ore., man, Andy Bleiler, alleges he had a five-year affair with Lewinsky, and his lawyer promises to turn over documents and items to Starr's investigators. Clinton delivers his State of the Union address, making no mention of the scandal.

Emails Related to Clinton Case Found in Anthony Weiner Investigation Emails Related to Clinton Case Found in Anthony Weiner Investigation
Emails Related to Clinton Case Found in Anthony Weiner Investigation
New FBI Review in Clinton Case After Revelation from Weiner Case
Clinton responds to new FBI email probe
Clinton Campaign in Damage Control After New FBI Review
Recommended
U.S. news Teen charged with murder after death of 13-year-old Florida girl
Culture Matters Oprah and Prince Harry team up for series on mental health
Trump Reenergized After New Clinton Email FBI Review
What does the Clinton email investigation mean?
 “The FBI’s decision to reopen its investigation into Secretary Clinton reinforces what the House Judiciary Committee has been saying for months: the more we learn about Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server, the clearer it becomes that she and her associates committed wrongdoing and jeopardized national security," the Judiciary Committee said in a statement. But Comey, who is also a Republican and who took a lot of heat in July for his agency's decision to not charge Clinton with a crime, did not say in the letter that he was reexamining the FBI's previous finding, which concluded that her handling of the emails was sloppy but not criminal. What does the Clinton email investigation mean? Oct. 28, 201604:16
Documents related to the case were released just before the Labor Day weekend and included a summary of Clinton's July interview with the FBI about her private email server, as well as a detailed investigative summary of the case. It is unusual for the FBI to tell Congress, as Comey did, that it is looking over newly discovered evidence in a criminal inquiry that was otherwise closed. Federal practice is not to comment on ongoing investigations, or discuss details of concluded investigations. Comey previously explained his departure from that practice in his earlier congressional testimony, given the special nature of this case and congressional oversight inquiries. Still, some congressional Democrats told NBC News Friday that they are frustrated that Comey issued the letter reopening this issue without providing much in the way of specifics. Pete Williams
Pete Williams is an NBC News correspondent who covers the Justice Department and the Supreme Court, based in Washington.

Emails Related to Clinton Case Found in Anthony Weiner Investigation

Emails Related to Clinton Case Found in Anthony Weiner Investigation
Emails Related to Clinton Case Found in Anthony Weiner Investigation
New FBI Review in Clinton Case After Revelation from Weiner Case
Clinton responds to new FBI email probe
Clinton Campaign in Damage Control After New FBI Review
Recommended
U.S. news Teen charged with murder after death of 13-year-old Florida girl
Culture Matters Oprah and Prince Harry team up for series on mental health
Trump Reenergized After New Clinton Email FBI Review
What does the Clinton email investigation mean?

“The FBI’s decision to reopen its investigation into Secretary Clinton reinforces what the House Judiciary Committee has been saying for months: the more we learn about Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server, the clearer it becomes that she and her associates committed wrongdoing and jeopardized national security," the Judiciary Committee said in a statement. But Comey, who is also a Republican and who took a lot of heat in July for his agency's decision to not charge Clinton with a crime, did not say in the letter that he was reexamining the FBI's previous finding, which concluded that her handling of the emails was sloppy but not criminal. What does the Clinton email investigation mean? Oct. 28, 201604:16
Documents related to the case were released just before the Labor Day weekend and included a summary of Clinton's July interview with the FBI about her private email server, as well as a detailed investigative summary of the case. It is unusual for the FBI to tell Congress, as Comey did, that it is looking over newly discovered evidence in a criminal inquiry that was otherwise closed. Federal practice is not to comment on ongoing investigations, or discuss details of concluded investigations. Comey previously explained his departure from that practice in his earlier congressional testimony, given the special nature of this case and congressional oversight inquiries. Still, some congressional Democrats told NBC News Friday that they are frustrated that Comey issued the letter reopening this issue without providing much in the way of specifics. Pete Williams
Pete Williams is an NBC News correspondent who covers the Justice Department and the Supreme Court, based in Washington.

Bill Clinton 15 Years Ago: 'I Did Not Have Sexual Relations With That Woman' | National News | US News Bill Clinton 15 Years Ago: 'I Did Not Have Sexual Relations With That Woman'
Bill Clinton 15 Years Ago: 'I Did Not Have Sexual Relations With That Woman'
The "girl"
The floater
The fixer
The prosecutor
 To a startling degree, even senior White House staff found themselves kept in the dark last week; sources said Clinton was sharing the details of what he did, and didn't do, only with his outside lawyers. Senior Clinton advisers say the blackout is due to their reluctance to confront him over potentially embarrassing details—and their awareness that they could be vulnerable to subpoena later on if they learned sensitive information. Aides described Clinton himself as oddly subdued in discussing the furor, as if it were happening to someone else and he was observing it from afar. Ominously for the White House, Lewinsky's sworn denial of the affair hardly seemed ironclad. Her lawyer, Los Angeles attorney William H. Ginsburg, said that she stood by her statement "at this time." Even some of Clinton's initial denials seemed phrased with unusual, lawyerly precision. Asked by National Public Radio if he had "any conversations" with Lewinsky about her testimony, Clinton did not respond with a blanket denial. Instead, he said that "given the state of the investigation, it would be inappropriate" for him to expand on his earlier assertions that he didn't ask anyone "to tell anything other than the truth." So careful were Clinton's responses, and so high were the stakes, that analysts scrutinized his remarks with rabbinical care.

Bill Clinton 15 Years Ago: 'I Did Not Have Sexual Relations With That Woman' | National News | US News

Bill Clinton 15 Years Ago: 'I Did Not Have Sexual Relations With That Woman'
Bill Clinton 15 Years Ago: 'I Did Not Have Sexual Relations With That Woman'
The "girl"
The floater
The fixer
The prosecutor

To a startling degree, even senior White House staff found themselves kept in the dark last week; sources said Clinton was sharing the details of what he did, and didn't do, only with his outside lawyers. Senior Clinton advisers say the blackout is due to their reluctance to confront him over potentially embarrassing details—and their awareness that they could be vulnerable to subpoena later on if they learned sensitive information. Aides described Clinton himself as oddly subdued in discussing the furor, as if it were happening to someone else and he was observing it from afar. Ominously for the White House, Lewinsky's sworn denial of the affair hardly seemed ironclad. Her lawyer, Los Angeles attorney William H. Ginsburg, said that she stood by her statement "at this time." Even some of Clinton's initial denials seemed phrased with unusual, lawyerly precision. Asked by National Public Radio if he had "any conversations" with Lewinsky about her testimony, Clinton did not respond with a blanket denial. Instead, he said that "given the state of the investigation, it would be inappropriate" for him to expand on his earlier assertions that he didn't ask anyone "to tell anything other than the truth." So careful were Clinton's responses, and so high were the stakes, that analysts scrutinized his remarks with rabbinical care.

A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga
A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga
1995
1996
1997
January 1998
February 1998
March 1998
April 1998
May 1998
June 1998
July 1998
August, 1998
 Clinton reiterates his denial of the relationship and says he never urged Lewinsky to lie. Starr issues subpoenas for a number of people, as well as for White House records. Starr also defends the expansion of his initial Whitewater investigation. Jordan holds a press conference to flatly deny he told Lewinsky to lie. Jordan also says that Lewinsky told him that she did not have a sexual relationship with the president. Jan. 23, 1998: Clinton assures his Cabinet of his innocence. Judge Susan Webber Wright puts off "indefinitely" a deposition Lewinsky was scheduled to give in the Jones lawsuit. Clinton's personal secretary, Betty Currie, and other aides are subpoenaed to appear before a federal grand jury. Ginsburg says Lewinsky is being "squeezed" by Starr and is now a target of the Whitewater investigation.

Clinton reiterates his denial of the relationship and says he never urged Lewinsky to lie. Starr issues subpoenas for a number of people, as well as for White House records. Starr also defends the expansion of his initial Whitewater investigation. Jordan holds a press conference to flatly deny he told Lewinsky to lie. Jordan also says that Lewinsky told him that she did not have a sexual relationship with the president. Jan. 23, 1998: Clinton assures his Cabinet of his innocence. Judge Susan Webber Wright puts off "indefinitely" a deposition Lewinsky was scheduled to give in the Jones lawsuit. Clinton's personal secretary, Betty Currie, and other aides are subpoenaed to appear before a federal grand jury. Ginsburg says Lewinsky is being "squeezed" by Starr and is now a target of the Whitewater investigation.

The FBI Files on Clinton's Emails - FactCheck.org The FBI Files on Clinton’s Emails
The FBI Files on Clinton’s Emails
Deleted Emails
‘Everybody’ Didn’t Know
 The FBI Files on Clinton's Emails - FactCheck.org
The FBI Files on Clinton’s Emails
By Eugene Kiely
Posted on September 7, 2016
The FBI’s summary of its investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton contradicted some of her past statements about her use of a private email system for government business: The Clinton campaign previously had indicated that her personal emails were deleted before Clinton received a congressional subpoena on March 4, 2015. But the FBI said her emails were deleted “between March 25-31, 2015” — three weeks after the subpoena. The campaign now says it only learned when the emails were deleted from the FBI report. Clinton repeatedly had said “everybody in the government with whom I emailed knew that I was using a personal email.” But the FBI said “e-mails from Clinton … did not display her e-mail address,” and only 13 people directly emailed her. Deleted Emails
The FBI on Sept. 2 — the Friday before Labor Day — released an 11-page summary of its interview of Clinton and a 47-page “factual summary” of its investigation of her email use when she served as secretary of state from January 2009 to February 2013. The FBI probe focused on whether Clinton or her staff violated federal laws governing the handling of classified information, and whether foreign powers or hostile actors hacked into her private server, which was located at her home in New York. FBI Director James Comey on July 5 announced that although Clinton and her staff were “extremely careless” in handling classified information, the FBI did not find evidence that their actions were intentional. He declined to pursue criminal charges.

The FBI Files on Clinton's Emails - FactCheck.org

The FBI Files on Clinton’s Emails
The FBI Files on Clinton’s Emails
Deleted Emails
‘Everybody’ Didn’t Know

The FBI Files on Clinton's Emails - FactCheck.org
The FBI Files on Clinton’s Emails
By Eugene Kiely
Posted on September 7, 2016
The FBI’s summary of its investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton contradicted some of her past statements about her use of a private email system for government business: The Clinton campaign previously had indicated that her personal emails were deleted before Clinton received a congressional subpoena on March 4, 2015. But the FBI said her emails were deleted “between March 25-31, 2015” — three weeks after the subpoena. The campaign now says it only learned when the emails were deleted from the FBI report. Clinton repeatedly had said “everybody in the government with whom I emailed knew that I was using a personal email.” But the FBI said “e-mails from Clinton … did not display her e-mail address,” and only 13 people directly emailed her. Deleted Emails
The FBI on Sept. 2 — the Friday before Labor Day — released an 11-page summary of its interview of Clinton and a 47-page “factual summary” of its investigation of her email use when she served as secretary of state from January 2009 to February 2013. The FBI probe focused on whether Clinton or her staff violated federal laws governing the handling of classified information, and whether foreign powers or hostile actors hacked into her private server, which was located at her home in New York. FBI Director James Comey on July 5 announced that although Clinton and her staff were “extremely careless” in handling classified information, the FBI did not find evidence that their actions were intentional. He declined to pursue criminal charges.

27 Photos from the Monica Lewinsky Scandal 27 Photos from the Monica Lewinsky Scandal
27 Photos from the Monica Lewinsky Scandal This came after Lewinsky had been moved to the East Executive Building as a Social Office intern under Hillary Clinton. In January 1998, Tripp found out that Lewinsky had sworn an Affidavit in the Paula Jones case, a separate sex scandal involving Bill Clinton, denying any improper relationship with the President. Tripp gave the phone conversations she recorded to the Independent Prosecutor Kenneth Starr, who was investigating Clinton on the Whitewater Scandal and the FBI files controversy because Lewinsky attempted to persuade Tripp to commit perjury in the Paula Jones case. After Clinton stated that he â€˜did not have sexual relations with that woman,’ further investigation lead to perjury charges and to his impeachment in 1998. Clinton was eventually acquitted on all impeachment charges of perjury and obstruction of justice in a 21-day Senate trial. Monica Lewinsky, a former White House intern and Department of Defence employee who reportedly has had a year long affair with President Bill Clinton. Getty
Advertisement
Lewinsky (pictured center in the third row with fellow White House interns) started at the White House as an intern when she was just 22 years old. Clinton was 51 years old at the time. Daily Mail
Advertisement
President Clinton greets Monica Lewinsky at a Washington fundraising event in October 1996. Monica Lewinsky says there’s no question her boss, Bill Clinton, took advantage of her when he was president.

27 Photos from the Monica Lewinsky Scandal

27 Photos from the Monica Lewinsky Scandal
27 Photos from the Monica Lewinsky Scandal

This came after Lewinsky had been moved to the East Executive Building as a Social Office intern under Hillary Clinton. In January 1998, Tripp found out that Lewinsky had sworn an Affidavit in the Paula Jones case, a separate sex scandal involving Bill Clinton, denying any improper relationship with the President. Tripp gave the phone conversations she recorded to the Independent Prosecutor Kenneth Starr, who was investigating Clinton on the Whitewater Scandal and the FBI files controversy because Lewinsky attempted to persuade Tripp to commit perjury in the Paula Jones case. After Clinton stated that he â€˜did not have sexual relations with that woman,’ further investigation lead to perjury charges and to his impeachment in 1998. Clinton was eventually acquitted on all impeachment charges of perjury and obstruction of justice in a 21-day Senate trial. Monica Lewinsky, a former White House intern and Department of Defence employee who reportedly has had a year long affair with President Bill Clinton. Getty
Advertisement
Lewinsky (pictured center in the third row with fellow White House interns) started at the White House as an intern when she was just 22 years old. Clinton was 51 years old at the time. Daily Mail
Advertisement
President Clinton greets Monica Lewinsky at a Washington fundraising event in October 1996. Monica Lewinsky says there’s no question her boss, Bill Clinton, took advantage of her when he was president.

Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix - CBS News Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix
Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix Lynch told reporters that the topics of Benghazi and Clinton's email server did not come up, and that she and Clinton spoke largely about his grandchildren, golf and travel. "Actually, while I was landing at the airport, I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as I was leaving, and he spoke to myself and my husband on the plane," she said. " Our conversation was a great deal about his grandchildren. It was primarily social and about our travels. He mentioned the golf he played in Phoenix, and he mentioned travels he'd had in West Virginia." "There was no discussion of any matter pending for the department or any matter pending for any other body," Lynch added. " There was no discussion of Benghazi, no discussion of the State Department emails, by way of example." Asked further whether there was any "impropriety" to meeting with Clinton while the email investigation is ongoing, Lynch replied merely that the case is being handled by "career investigators and career agents." "My agency is involved in a matter looking at State Department policies and issues," she said. " It's being handled by career investigators and career agents.

Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix - CBS News

Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix
Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix

Lynch told reporters that the topics of Benghazi and Clinton's email server did not come up, and that she and Clinton spoke largely about his grandchildren, golf and travel. "Actually, while I was landing at the airport, I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as I was leaving, and he spoke to myself and my husband on the plane," she said. " Our conversation was a great deal about his grandchildren. It was primarily social and about our travels. He mentioned the golf he played in Phoenix, and he mentioned travels he'd had in West Virginia." "There was no discussion of any matter pending for the department or any matter pending for any other body," Lynch added. " There was no discussion of Benghazi, no discussion of the State Department emails, by way of example." Asked further whether there was any "impropriety" to meeting with Clinton while the email investigation is ongoing, Lynch replied merely that the case is being handled by "career investigators and career agents." "My agency is involved in a matter looking at State Department policies and issues," she said. " It's being handled by career investigators and career agents.

Trump's absurd projection reveals his anxiety (opinion) | CNN Trump’s absurd projection reveals his anxiety
Trump’s absurd projection reveals his anxiety
Avlon: Trump's projections serve a serious purpose
(CNN) —
Get our free weekly newsletter
 This impulse to deflect and project continued in the general election against Hillary Clinton. So, when Trump was accused of being the “ most corrupt candidate ever ,” she became “Crooked Hillary.” When Trump came under fire for racist appeals, he called Clinton a “bigot.” When Clinton raised questions about Trump’s erratic and impulsive behavior, he called her unstable, unhinged, lacking the “judgment, temperament and moral character to lead this country.” And who can forget his, “No puppet … You’re the puppet,” response when she accused him in a debate of being a puppet for Vladimir Putin. To be sure, that one was more of an impulsive bleat than evidence of strategy, but of course the pattern of projection has continued in the White House: For example, during the Mueller investigation, when he kept asserting without evidence that “there was no Collusion except bye Crooked Hillary and the Democrats.” And in saying that Russia really wanted Clinton to win – despite Putin saying the exact opposite. These projections may be absurd, but they serve a serious political purpose. They muddy the water between fact and fiction and make people think that everyone is guilty of what Trump’s been credibly accused of.

Trump's absurd projection reveals his anxiety (opinion) | CNN

Trump’s absurd projection reveals his anxiety
Trump’s absurd projection reveals his anxiety
Avlon: Trump's projections serve a serious purpose
(CNN) —
Get our free weekly newsletter

This impulse to deflect and project continued in the general election against Hillary Clinton. So, when Trump was accused of being the “ most corrupt candidate ever ,” she became “Crooked Hillary.” When Trump came under fire for racist appeals, he called Clinton a “bigot.” When Clinton raised questions about Trump’s erratic and impulsive behavior, he called her unstable, unhinged, lacking the “judgment, temperament and moral character to lead this country.” And who can forget his, “No puppet … You’re the puppet,” response when she accused him in a debate of being a puppet for Vladimir Putin. To be sure, that one was more of an impulsive bleat than evidence of strategy, but of course the pattern of projection has continued in the White House: For example, during the Mueller investigation, when he kept asserting without evidence that “there was no Collusion except bye Crooked Hillary and the Democrats.” And in saying that Russia really wanted Clinton to win – despite Putin saying the exact opposite. These projections may be absurd, but they serve a serious political purpose. They muddy the water between fact and fiction and make people think that everyone is guilty of what Trump’s been credibly accused of.

Emails Related to Clinton Case Found in Anthony Weiner Investigation Emails Related to Clinton Case Found in Anthony Weiner Investigation
Emails Related to Clinton Case Found in Anthony Weiner Investigation
New FBI Review in Clinton Case After Revelation from Weiner Case
Clinton responds to new FBI email probe
Clinton Campaign in Damage Control After New FBI Review
Recommended
U.S. news Teen charged with murder after death of 13-year-old Florida girl
Culture Matters Oprah and Prince Harry team up for series on mental health
Trump Reenergized After New Clinton Email FBI Review
What does the Clinton email investigation mean?
 Read the Letter
Donald Trump called the revelation "bigger than Watergate" and praised the FBI for having "the courage to right the horrible mistake they made," an apparent reference to the agency's decision earlier this year to not press criminal charges against Clinton. "I need to open with a very critical breaking news announcement," Trump said at a campaign rally in New Hampshire. " The FBI has just sent a letter to Congress informing them that they have discovered new emails pertaining to the former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's investigation." "This was a grave miscarriage of justice," he said, "it is about to be corrected." Trump Reenergized After New Clinton Email FBI Review
Oct. 28, 201603:14
The Republican-led House Judiciary Committee also applauded the FBI's move. “The FBI’s decision to reopen its investigation into Secretary Clinton reinforces what the House Judiciary Committee has been saying for months: the more we learn about Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server, the clearer it becomes that she and her associates committed wrongdoing and jeopardized national security," the Judiciary Committee said in a statement. But Comey, who is also a Republican and who took a lot of heat in July for his agency's decision to not charge Clinton with a crime, did not say in the letter that he was reexamining the FBI's previous finding, which concluded that her handling of the emails was sloppy but not criminal. What does the Clinton email investigation mean? Oct. 28, 201604:16
Documents related to the case were released just before the Labor Day weekend and included a summary of Clinton's July interview with the FBI about her private email server, as well as a detailed investigative summary of the case.

Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch meet privately | CNN Politics Bill Clinton meeting causes headaches for Hillary
Bill Clinton meeting causes headaches for Hillary
(CNN) —
 She also said the former president “did not raise anything” about an ongoing case or anything of that nature. “I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,” Lynch said according to CNN affiliate KNXV/ABC15. “ Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix.” Huma Abedin details Clinton email troubles in deposition
The former president’s aide said nothing beyond Lynch’s characterization of the account was discussed, and that Clinton “always” extends this courtesy when he is around cabinet secretaries, members of Congress and other dignitaries, pointing to the former president’s unplanned meeting with Sen. Ted Cruz at an Alabama airport in May.
Asked in Los Angeles on Wednesday whether the meeting risked the department’s impartiality in its investigation, Lynch said the email probe is “being handled by career investigators and career agents who always follow the facts and the law.” Top Democrats on Capitol Hill defended Lynch Thursday. “All I can say is Loretta Lynch is one of the most outstanding human beings I’ve ever known,” Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, told reporters. “ Her ethics is above reproach.” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, called Lynch an “honorable person.” “She has said nothing was discussed related to the investigation so you have two choices: To say this didn’t matter or she’s lying,” Schumer said. “

Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch meet privately | CNN Politics

Bill Clinton meeting causes headaches for Hillary
Bill Clinton meeting causes headaches for Hillary
(CNN) —

She also said the former president “did not raise anything” about an ongoing case or anything of that nature. “I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,” Lynch said according to CNN affiliate KNXV/ABC15. “ Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix.” Huma Abedin details Clinton email troubles in deposition
The former president’s aide said nothing beyond Lynch’s characterization of the account was discussed, and that Clinton “always” extends this courtesy when he is around cabinet secretaries, members of Congress and other dignitaries, pointing to the former president’s unplanned meeting with Sen. Ted Cruz at an Alabama airport in May.
Asked in Los Angeles on Wednesday whether the meeting risked the department’s impartiality in its investigation, Lynch said the email probe is “being handled by career investigators and career agents who always follow the facts and the law.” Top Democrats on Capitol Hill defended Lynch Thursday. “All I can say is Loretta Lynch is one of the most outstanding human beings I’ve ever known,” Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, told reporters. “ Her ethics is above reproach.” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, called Lynch an “honorable person.” “She has said nothing was discussed related to the investigation so you have two choices: To say this didn’t matter or she’s lying,” Schumer said. “

House Republicans detail perjury allegations against Clinton | Fox News House Republicans detail perjury allegations against Clinton
House Republicans detail perjury allegations against Clinton
House GOP wasting time seeking Clinton perjury charges?
 And they are being publicly released," Clinton testified. But FBI investigators found "several thousand work related emails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014." In the course of its investigation, the FBI recovered most but not all of the deleted records. The search included “the laborious review of the millions of email fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decomissioned in 2013." A retired assistant FBI director, and 28-year-veteran of the bureau, said a perjury review is generally straightforward for agents. "They look at the transcript of the testimony they provided in light of what they know to be, suspect to be the truth. They investigate both sides and take the aggregate and turn it over to the prosecuting authority for a decision," Steven Pomerantz said. "Since the Director (Comey) already established what she (Clinton) said and the investigation is complete, it would be a relatively simple matter to make a decision about perjury... given the history of this, it's hard to say - it would seem to me a matter of weeks not months in this case." A violation of 18 USC 1621 can lead to a fine, imprisonment up to five years, or both though legal experts said the crux of the case will rely on showing intent. When Comey testified July 7, Clinton's campaign said some of his statements vindicated the candidate's public statements.

House Republicans detail perjury allegations against Clinton | Fox News

House Republicans detail perjury allegations against Clinton
House Republicans detail perjury allegations against Clinton
House GOP wasting time seeking Clinton perjury charges?

And they are being publicly released," Clinton testified. But FBI investigators found "several thousand work related emails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014." In the course of its investigation, the FBI recovered most but not all of the deleted records. The search included “the laborious review of the millions of email fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decomissioned in 2013." A retired assistant FBI director, and 28-year-veteran of the bureau, said a perjury review is generally straightforward for agents. "They look at the transcript of the testimony they provided in light of what they know to be, suspect to be the truth. They investigate both sides and take the aggregate and turn it over to the prosecuting authority for a decision," Steven Pomerantz said. "Since the Director (Comey) already established what she (Clinton) said and the investigation is complete, it would be a relatively simple matter to make a decision about perjury... given the history of this, it's hard to say - it would seem to me a matter of weeks not months in this case." A violation of 18 USC 1621 can lead to a fine, imprisonment up to five years, or both though legal experts said the crux of the case will rely on showing intent. When Comey testified July 7, Clinton's campaign said some of his statements vindicated the candidate's public statements.

Definition and Examples of Apologia in Rhetoric Definition and Examples of Apologia in Rhetoric
Definition and Examples of Apologia in Rhetoric
The Art of Damage Control
Definition:
Apologia Strategies
Four Strategies
Examples and Observations
Purposes
Rhetoric
Damage Control
So Sorry
Taking Responsibility
Inappropriate Relationsship
 And good night. "—President Bill Clinton, televised speech to the American public, August 17, 1998. Clinton's apologia related to what was known as the "Monica Lewinsky Affair." In this case, Clinton initially denied having a relationship with Lewinsky, but he later recanted when confronted with physical evidence she presented of their relationship. In his apologia, Clinton initially denied the allegations; he then tried to bolster his image ("...at no time did I ask anyone to lie..."); he followed by using differentiation (comparing the accusations about the affair to the more egregious—in his view—investigation into his previous business dealings; and he finished with the strategy of transcendence (recrafting the context to say "it is past time to move on" from intrusive investigations and attempts to "pry" into his personal life). You could say that in his statement, Clinton met all four strategies that Ware and Linkugel set forth as the required parts of a true apologia. Cite this Article
Format
mla apa chicago
Your Citation
Nordquis

Definition and Examples of Apologia in Rhetoric

Definition and Examples of Apologia in Rhetoric
Definition and Examples of Apologia in Rhetoric
The Art of Damage Control
Definition:
Apologia Strategies
Four Strategies
Examples and Observations
Purposes
Rhetoric
Damage Control
So Sorry
Taking Responsibility
Inappropriate Relationsship

And good night. "—President Bill Clinton, televised speech to the American public, August 17, 1998. Clinton's apologia related to what was known as the "Monica Lewinsky Affair." In this case, Clinton initially denied having a relationship with Lewinsky, but he later recanted when confronted with physical evidence she presented of their relationship. In his apologia, Clinton initially denied the allegations; he then tried to bolster his image ("...at no time did I ask anyone to lie..."); he followed by using differentiation (comparing the accusations about the affair to the more egregious—in his view—investigation into his previous business dealings; and he finished with the strategy of transcendence (recrafting the context to say "it is past time to move on" from intrusive investigations and attempts to "pry" into his personal life). You could say that in his statement, Clinton met all four strategies that Ware and Linkugel set forth as the required parts of a true apologia. Cite this Article
Format
mla apa chicago
Your Citation
Nordquis

Clinton and Lynch Were Not Discussing Grandchildren and Golf | Observer Awkward Encounters: Clinton and Lynch Weren’t Talking Grandkids and Golf
Opinion
Awkward Encounters: Clinton and Lynch Weren’t Talking Grandkids and Golf
She’s going with 'The Axelrodian Optics Gambit'
 The Daily Caller news foundation asks if the Lynch-Clinton confab was a plea-bargaining session, with Clinton begging on behalf of himself, not Clinton. The thinking goes like this: The FBI (which works for Attorney General Lynch) discovers evidence of Clinton Foundation corruption, say, the selling of political appointments to Foundation donors. At the minimum the FBI would solicit Bill Clinton’s testimony—if not demand it with a subpoena. Fair bet former US Attorney Joseph DiGenova had this scenario in mind or one like when he told the Daily Caller that he believes Bill Clinton “is at least a witness in two criminal investigations, probably a subject in two criminal investigations. He is a person of interest officially to the Department of Justice.” Lynch just told reporters in Colorado she will not recuse herself from the investigation into Hillary Clinton. However, she once again swore she will follow the FBI’s recommendations regarding the investigation. Lynch now says she wouldn’t do it again because “No matter how I viewed it, I understand how people view it.” She’s going with The Axelrodian Optics Gambit.

Clinton and Lynch Were Not Discussing Grandchildren and Golf | Observer

Awkward Encounters: Clinton and Lynch Weren’t Talking Grandkids and Golf
Opinion
Awkward Encounters: Clinton and Lynch Weren’t Talking Grandkids and Golf
She’s going with 'The Axelrodian Optics Gambit'

The Daily Caller news foundation asks if the Lynch-Clinton confab was a plea-bargaining session, with Clinton begging on behalf of himself, not Clinton. The thinking goes like this: The FBI (which works for Attorney General Lynch) discovers evidence of Clinton Foundation corruption, say, the selling of political appointments to Foundation donors. At the minimum the FBI would solicit Bill Clinton’s testimony—if not demand it with a subpoena. Fair bet former US Attorney Joseph DiGenova had this scenario in mind or one like when he told the Daily Caller that he believes Bill Clinton “is at least a witness in two criminal investigations, probably a subject in two criminal investigations. He is a person of interest officially to the Department of Justice.” Lynch just told reporters in Colorado she will not recuse herself from the investigation into Hillary Clinton. However, she once again swore she will follow the FBI’s recommendations regarding the investigation. Lynch now says she wouldn’t do it again because “No matter how I viewed it, I understand how people view it.” She’s going with The Axelrodian Optics Gambit.

Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix | Daily Mail Online Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix while her department investigates Hillary
Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix while her department investigates Hillary
'We stand with you': Loretta Lynch to LGBT community
More top stories
DON'T MISS
From the Makers of Candy Crush
 Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix | Daily Mail Online
Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix while her department investigates Hillary
The two spoke for about 30 minutes aboard a private jet
Lynch got asked about the meeting at a press conference
Topics ranged from grandchildren to golf, she said
The two didn't discuss the agency's investigation of Clinton 's email practices, or Benghazi
By Geoff Earle, Deputy U.s. Political Editor For Mailonline.com
Published: 19:03 EDT, 29 June 2016 | Updated: 19:44 EDT, 29 June 2016
Attorney General Loretta Lynch, whose agency is investigating Hillary Clinton 's email practices, spent about 30 minutes meeting with President Clinton while both of them were separately passing through Phoenix. Clinton had landed ahead of the nation's top law enforcement officer, and waited for her arrival, a local affiliate ABC15 reported. Lynch was in town for an event on community policing. Clinton learned of her arrival, and decided to wait so they could meet, sources told the station. 'I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,' Lynch said at a press conference when asked about the prolonged chat, which took place aboard a jet on the tarmac. +3
Copy link to paste in your message
Attorney general Loretta Lynch met for about 30 minutes with former president Bill Clinton aboard a plane while both were passing through Phoenix Monday. She says her agency's investigation of Hillary Clinton didn't come up
+3
Copy link to paste in your message
Lynch said she and Clinton spoke a lot about his grandchildren
+3
Copy link to paste in your message
The AG said at a press conference in Phoenix that Clinton's email scandal didn't come up
But she indicated it had nothing to do with the controversies swirling around the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate.

Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix | Daily Mail Online

Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix while her department investigates Hillary
Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix while her department investigates Hillary
'We stand with you': Loretta Lynch to LGBT community
More top stories
DON'T MISS
From the Makers of Candy Crush

Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix - CBS News Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix
Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix - CBS News
Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix
By Emily Schultheis
Updated on: June 29, 2016 / 10:03 PM / CBS News
Clinton, Lynch Secret Talk
Clinton, Lynch Secret Talk 03:41
As his wife is under federal investigation for her use of a private email server, former President Bill Clinton met privately with U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch at the Phoenix Airport Monday evening in what both sides say was an unplanned encounter. An aide to Bill Clinton confirmed to CBS News that the meeting wasn't planned in advance: President Clinton saw the attorney general on the tarmac and wanted to say hello, so he boarded her plane to talk. The meeting comes as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is still under investigation for her email practices--and also came the day before House Republicans released a report criticizing the Obama administration's response to the 2012 Benghazi attacks. Lynch told reporters that the topics of Benghazi and Clinton's email server did not come up, and that she and Clinton spoke largely about his grandchildren, golf and travel. "Actually, while I was landing at the airport, I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as I was leaving, and he spoke to myself and my husband on the plane," she said. " Our conversation was a great deal about his grandchildren. It was primarily social and about our travels. He mentioned the golf he played in Phoenix, and he mentioned travels he'd had in West Virginia."

Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix - CBS News
Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix
By Emily Schultheis
Updated on: June 29, 2016 / 10:03 PM / CBS News
Clinton, Lynch Secret Talk
Clinton, Lynch Secret Talk 03:41
As his wife is under federal investigation for her use of a private email server, former President Bill Clinton met privately with U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch at the Phoenix Airport Monday evening in what both sides say was an unplanned encounter. An aide to Bill Clinton confirmed to CBS News that the meeting wasn't planned in advance: President Clinton saw the attorney general on the tarmac and wanted to say hello, so he boarded her plane to talk. The meeting comes as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is still under investigation for her email practices--and also came the day before House Republicans released a report criticizing the Obama administration's response to the 2012 Benghazi attacks. Lynch told reporters that the topics of Benghazi and Clinton's email server did not come up, and that she and Clinton spoke largely about his grandchildren, golf and travel. "Actually, while I was landing at the airport, I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as I was leaving, and he spoke to myself and my husband on the plane," she said. " Our conversation was a great deal about his grandchildren. It was primarily social and about our travels. He mentioned the golf he played in Phoenix, and he mentioned travels he'd had in West Virginia."

Hillary Clinton E-Mail Investigation: Jim Comey's FBI Record | Time Inside the FBI Investigation of Hillary Clinton's E-Mail
Inside the FBI Investigation of Hillary Clinton's E-Mail
Get our Politics Newsletter. The headlines out of Washington never seem to slow. Subscribe to The D.C. Brief to make sense of what matters most.
 Lawyers preparing Clinton and her aides for possible interviews are well aware that Comey has a history of prosecuting those who impede investigators. Cheney’s aide Libby was convicted not of leaking Plame’s identity but of obstructing justice, as was Martha Stewart. Comey had a front-row seat to Clinton’s controversial handling of documents in the White-water case. Ultimately the Senate committee he worked for two decades ago found no criminal wrongdoing but issued a politically damaging report anyway. Clinton campaign official Brian Fallon says that the FBI has not requested an interview with her yet and that she remains ready to cooperate with the probe. “ She first expressed her willingness to cooperate in any way possible last August,” says Fallon, “and that included offering to meet with them and answer any questions they might have.” Comey’s recommendation to Lynch, when it comes, could include a description of the evidence; what laws, if any, might have been violated; and how confident he is in the results of the probe, the sources familiar with the investigation tell TIME. What will come of the Comey primary?

Hillary Clinton E-Mail Investigation: Jim Comey's FBI Record | Time

Inside the FBI Investigation of Hillary Clinton's E-Mail
Inside the FBI Investigation of Hillary Clinton's E-Mail
Get our Politics Newsletter. The headlines out of Washington never seem to slow. Subscribe to The D.C. Brief to make sense of what matters most.

Lawyers preparing Clinton and her aides for possible interviews are well aware that Comey has a history of prosecuting those who impede investigators. Cheney’s aide Libby was convicted not of leaking Plame’s identity but of obstructing justice, as was Martha Stewart. Comey had a front-row seat to Clinton’s controversial handling of documents in the White-water case. Ultimately the Senate committee he worked for two decades ago found no criminal wrongdoing but issued a politically damaging report anyway. Clinton campaign official Brian Fallon says that the FBI has not requested an interview with her yet and that she remains ready to cooperate with the probe. “ She first expressed her willingness to cooperate in any way possible last August,” says Fallon, “and that included offering to meet with them and answer any questions they might have.” Comey’s recommendation to Lynch, when it comes, could include a description of the evidence; what laws, if any, might have been violated; and how confident he is in the results of the probe, the sources familiar with the investigation tell TIME. What will come of the Comey primary?

Hillary Clinton's FBI investigation: What you need to know | CNN Politics Clinton’s FBI investigation: What you need to know
Clinton’s FBI investigation: What you need to know
Story highlights
(CNN) —
Why is this happening now?
Does Comey’s decision break with precedent?
How mad are Democrats about Comey’s Friday move?
What does this have to do with Hillary Clinton?
What will happen next?
How will this impact the election?
 There’s never been a major party nominee under FBI investigation leading up to the election before. And how it’s being handled is equally out of the ordinary. Comey gave advance notice to top officials at the Justice Department before sending his letter to lawmakers Friday – but he didn’t get sign-off from those officials, and wasn’t seeking it. Instead he made an independent decision to go against longstanding Justice Department and FBI practice to not comment publicly about politically sensitive investigations within 60 days of an election, a law enforcement official said. Comey’s decision adds to the unusual role he has played in the Clinton email probe, which some critics have said usurped the role of prosecutors in the Justice Department whose job is to review FBI findings and make decisions on whether to bring charges. Comey made the unprecedented move in July to publicly announce that he would recommend no charges be brought in the email investigation, saying that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such charges. He made the July announcement without providing prior notice to Justice officials. That was in part because of another extraordinary part of the Clinton email investigation: A tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Lynch – who, because of that meeting, left decisions on whether to prosecute Clinton to others because of the conflict. The hubris of the 2016 candidates
How mad are Democrats about Comey’s Friday move?

Hillary Clinton's FBI investigation: What you need to know | CNN Politics

Clinton’s FBI investigation: What you need to know
Clinton’s FBI investigation: What you need to know
Story highlights
(CNN) —
Why is this happening now?
Does Comey’s decision break with precedent?
How mad are Democrats about Comey’s Friday move?
What does this have to do with Hillary Clinton?
What will happen next?
How will this impact the election?

There’s never been a major party nominee under FBI investigation leading up to the election before. And how it’s being handled is equally out of the ordinary. Comey gave advance notice to top officials at the Justice Department before sending his letter to lawmakers Friday – but he didn’t get sign-off from those officials, and wasn’t seeking it. Instead he made an independent decision to go against longstanding Justice Department and FBI practice to not comment publicly about politically sensitive investigations within 60 days of an election, a law enforcement official said. Comey’s decision adds to the unusual role he has played in the Clinton email probe, which some critics have said usurped the role of prosecutors in the Justice Department whose job is to review FBI findings and make decisions on whether to bring charges. Comey made the unprecedented move in July to publicly announce that he would recommend no charges be brought in the email investigation, saying that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such charges. He made the July announcement without providing prior notice to Justice officials. That was in part because of another extraordinary part of the Clinton email investigation: A tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Lynch – who, because of that meeting, left decisions on whether to prosecute Clinton to others because of the conflict. The hubris of the 2016 candidates
How mad are Democrats about Comey’s Friday move?

Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix | Daily Mail Online Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix while her department investigates Hillary
Loretta Lynch held private talks with Bill Clinton aboard a plane in Phoenix while her department investigates Hillary
'We stand with you': Loretta Lynch to LGBT community
More top stories
DON'T MISS
From the Makers of Candy Crush
 Lynch was in town for an event on community policing. Clinton learned of her arrival, and decided to wait so they could meet, sources told the station. 'I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,' Lynch said at a press conference when asked about the prolonged chat, which took place aboard a jet on the tarmac. +3
Copy link to paste in your message
Attorney general Loretta Lynch met for about 30 minutes with former president Bill Clinton aboard a plane while both were passing through Phoenix Monday. She says her agency's investigation of Hillary Clinton didn't come up
+3
Copy link to paste in your message
Lynch said she and Clinton spoke a lot about his grandchildren
+3
Copy link to paste in your message
The AG said at a press conference in Phoenix that Clinton's email scandal didn't come up
But she indicated it had nothing to do with the controversies swirling around the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate. 'Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix,' Lynch said. Lynch's husband apparently was along for the trip as well. 'I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,' she said. The tarmac talk took place at Sky Harbor International Airport. 'We stand with you':

Lynch was in town for an event on community policing. Clinton learned of her arrival, and decided to wait so they could meet, sources told the station. 'I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,' Lynch said at a press conference when asked about the prolonged chat, which took place aboard a jet on the tarmac. +3
Copy link to paste in your message
Attorney general Loretta Lynch met for about 30 minutes with former president Bill Clinton aboard a plane while both were passing through Phoenix Monday. She says her agency's investigation of Hillary Clinton didn't come up
+3
Copy link to paste in your message
Lynch said she and Clinton spoke a lot about his grandchildren
+3
Copy link to paste in your message
The AG said at a press conference in Phoenix that Clinton's email scandal didn't come up
But she indicated it had nothing to do with the controversies swirling around the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate. 'Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix,' Lynch said. Lynch's husband apparently was along for the trip as well. 'I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,' she said. The tarmac talk took place at Sky Harbor International Airport. 'We stand with you':

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal' | US news | The Guardian Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal'
Donald Trump
Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal'
Martin Pengelly in New York
Hillary Clinton: I never knowingly sent classified data using private email
The Guardian view on Donald Trump’s early lead in the race for the Republican nomination | Editorial
Veterans named as Donald Trump supporters say they were not consulted
 The fact is, what she has done is criminal.” Hillary Clinton: I never knowingly sent classified data using private email
Read more
Investigators this week asked the Justice Department to look into a “potential compromise of classified information” surrounding the private email server, a department official said on Friday. The official said the referral did not relate to possible criminal wrongdoing, despite having said earlier on Friday that it did. On Saturday, in Iowa, Clinton told reporters she never knowingly sent or received classified information using her private server and did not know what messages were being cited by investigators. Appearing on CNN on Sunday to discuss a new poll of GOP voters which showed him leading the 16-strong Republican field – on 18% to 15% for Jeb Bush and 10% for Scott Walker – Trump said “I haven’t focused on Hillary”, though he added that he had made “some very strong statements” about her at an Iowa rally of his own on Saturday. “The fact is that what she’s done is criminal,” he said. “ I don’t see how she can run. Because if the prosecutors – who are all Democrats, by the way, and that’s part of the problem with fairness here, they’re protecting her – but if you had an impartial prosecutor and they were honorable – maybe they are, we’re going to find out – but what she’s done is criminal.” The Guardian view on Donald Trump’s early lead in the race for the Republican nomination | Editorial
Read more
Trump said what Clinton did was “far worse than what General Petraeus did” – the former CIA director was sentenced to probation for leaking classified information to a biographer who was also his lover – and said she had “got rid of the server after getting a subpoena from the United States Congress”.

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal' | US news | The Guardian

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal'
Donald Trump
Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal'
Martin Pengelly in New York
Hillary Clinton: I never knowingly sent classified data using private email
The Guardian view on Donald Trump’s early lead in the race for the Republican nomination | Editorial
Veterans named as Donald Trump supporters say they were not consulted

The Injustices of Obama’s Department of Justice The Injustices of Obama’s Department of Justice
The Injustices of Obama’s Department of Justice Despite these findings, Director Comey cleared Clinton by making a statement that “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case”. This allowed Loretta Lynch at DOJ to announce the matter closed. It also allowed Clinton to pronounce herself cleared of all wrongdoing. Note, the FBI does not decide who will be prosecuted. They investigate. The Department of Justice reportedly refused to empanel a grand jury in either the e-mail case or in connection with the FBI’s investigation of the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play allegations. The FBI – and DOJ – granted immunity to five Clinton staff members – and agreed to destroy the evidence (laptops) when finished. These aides included Cheryl Mills, former Chief of Staff and Mrs. Clinton’s personal attorney along with Heather Samuelson, former senior advisor. Both women were present as attorneys for Clinton during the FBI Clinton Interview despite being interviewed as witnesses and offered immunity. Director Comey did not interview Clinton until the end of the investigation – three days before the press conference where he announced his conclusions.

The Injustices of Obama’s Department of Justice

The Injustices of Obama’s Department of Justice
The Injustices of Obama’s Department of Justice

Despite these findings, Director Comey cleared Clinton by making a statement that “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case”. This allowed Loretta Lynch at DOJ to announce the matter closed. It also allowed Clinton to pronounce herself cleared of all wrongdoing. Note, the FBI does not decide who will be prosecuted. They investigate. The Department of Justice reportedly refused to empanel a grand jury in either the e-mail case or in connection with the FBI’s investigation of the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play allegations. The FBI – and DOJ – granted immunity to five Clinton staff members – and agreed to destroy the evidence (laptops) when finished. These aides included Cheryl Mills, former Chief of Staff and Mrs. Clinton’s personal attorney along with Heather Samuelson, former senior advisor. Both women were present as attorneys for Clinton during the FBI Clinton Interview despite being interviewed as witnesses and offered immunity. Director Comey did not interview Clinton until the end of the investigation – three days before the press conference where he announced his conclusions.

What Really Happened with the Clinton Foundation and Haiti? What Really Happened with the Clinton Foundation and Haiti?
What Really Happened with the Clinton Foundation and Haiti?
What people are saying
 In light of the announcement by the Justice Department, the group says it remains vigilant and demands a serious investigation, and that any crimes are fully prosecuted and punished. “ It is itself a crime that this Justice Department prosecuted and got a conviction against Corrine Brown, Florida’s first African-American Congressperson since Reconstruction for corruption related to $800,000 from her ‘One Door for Education’ charity and yet it took them this long to even start an investigation of the Clintons,” the statement added. Komokoda’s claims of the Justice Department’s tardiness in looking at the Clintons notwithstanding, Bill and Hillary Clinton have together and separately weathered multiple federal and congressional investigations ranging from Whitewater in the 1990s through the probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email servers as secretary of state that wrapped up in 2016 during her campaign for president. The latest probe, a renewal of an investigation that began under the Obama administration, has found the Clintons prepared to respond. The Clinton Foundation told Atlanta Black Star that it raised $30 million for the Haiti earthquake relief efforts, and did not have control over the bulk of the $9 billion raised for Haiti. “ Overall, we’d point out that many of the claims about the Clinton Foundation and Haiti have been found to be flat-out false,” the Clinton Foundation press office said in a statement. “ All funding collected by the Clinton Foundation for Haiti was distributed in full to aid groups on the ground, and we have documented which groups received this funding and what it was for. The Clinton Foundation did not take a penny in overhead for our work.” The foundation also pointed to various refuted claims, including Trump’s assertion that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did favors for Clinton Foundation donors, and that “Hillary Clinton set aside environmental and labor rules to help a South Korean company with a record of violating workers’ rights set up what amounts to a sweatshop in Haiti.” Politifact depicted his claim as “mostly false.”

What Really Happened with the Clinton Foundation and Haiti?

What Really Happened with the Clinton Foundation and Haiti?
What Really Happened with the Clinton Foundation and Haiti?
What people are saying

Hillary Clinton email controversy - Wikipedia Hillary Clinton email controversy
Hillary Clinton email controversy
Contents
Background
Clinton's use of BlackBerrys
Domain names and email server
Initial awareness
Use of private server for government business
May 2016 report from State Department's inspector general
Server security and hacking attempts
Encryption and security
Hacking attempts
Deletion of emails
Classified information in emails
State Department inspector general reports and statements
FBI investigation
July 2015 – Security referral
August 2015 – Investigation continues; email recovery
May–July 2016 – Public statements
July 2016 – Investigation concludes
October 2016 – Additional investigation
Senate probes Loretta Lynch interference
Internal State Department investigation
Department of Justice Inspector General's report
Opinions of journalists and experts
Russian intelligence and Comey's pronouncements
House Oversight Committee hearing
Responses and analysis
Clinton's initial response
Later responses
Democratic response
Republican response
Comparisons and media coverage
House Select Committee on Benghazi
Freedom of Information lawsuits
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State
Jason Leopold v. U.S. Department of State
Associated Press v. U.S. Department of State
Other suits and coordination of email cases
See also
References
External links
 In July, FBI director James Comey announced that the FBI investigation had concluded that Clinton had been "extremely careless" but recommended that no charges be filed because Clinton did not act with criminal intent, the historical standard for pursuing prosecution. On October 28, 2016, eleven days before the election, Comey notified Congress that the FBI had started looking into newly discovered emails. On November 6, Comey notified Congress that the FBI had not changed its conclusion. Comey's timing was contentious, with critics saying that he had violated Department of Justice guidelines and precedent, and prejudiced the public against Clinton. The controversy received more media coverage than any other topic during the presidential campaign. Clinton and other observers argue that the reopening of the investigation contributed to her loss in the election. Comey said in his 2018 book A Higher Loyalty that his decision may have been unconsciously influenced by the fact that he considered it extremely likely that Clinton would become the next president. On June 14, 2018, the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General released its report on the FBI's and DOJ's handling of Clinton's investigation, finding no evidence of political bias and lending support for the decision to not prosecute Clinton. A three-year State Department investigation concluded in September 2019 that 38 individuals were "culpable" in 91 instances of sending classified information that reached Clinton's email account, though it found "no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information". Contents
1 Background
1.1 Clinton's use of BlackBerrys
1.2 Domain names and email server
1.3 Initial awareness
2 Use of private server for government business
2.1 May 2016 report from State Department's inspector general
3 Server security and hacking attempts
3.1 Encryption and security
3.2 Hacking attempts
4 Deletion of emails
5 Classified information in emails
5.1 State Department inspector general reports and statements
5.2 FBI investigation
5.2.1 July 2015 – Security referral
5.2.2 August 2015 – Investigation continues;

Hillary Clinton email controversy - Wikipedia

Hillary Clinton email controversy
Hillary Clinton email controversy
Contents
Background
Clinton's use of BlackBerrys
Domain names and email server
Initial awareness
Use of private server for government business
May 2016 report from State Department's inspector general
Server security and hacking attempts
Encryption and security
Hacking attempts
Deletion of emails
Classified information in emails
State Department inspector general reports and statements
FBI investigation
July 2015 – Security referral
August 2015 – Investigation continues; email recovery
May–July 2016 – Public statements
July 2016 – Investigation concludes
October 2016 – Additional investigation
Senate probes Loretta Lynch interference
Internal State Department investigation
Department of Justice Inspector General's report
Opinions of journalists and experts
Russian intelligence and Comey's pronouncements
House Oversight Committee hearing
Responses and analysis
Clinton's initial response
Later responses
Democratic response
Republican response
Comparisons and media coverage
House Select Committee on Benghazi
Freedom of Information lawsuits
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State
Jason Leopold v. U.S. Department of State
Associated Press v. U.S. Department of State
Other suits and coordination of email cases
See also
References
External links

EXCLUSIVE: Joint FBI-US Attorney Probe Of Clinton Foundation Is Underway | The Daily Caller EXCLUSIVE: Joint FBI-US Attorney Probe Of Clinton Foundation Is Underway
EXCLUSIVE: Joint FBI-US Attorney Probe Of Clinton Foundation Is Underway
An unanticipated problem was encountered, check back soon and try again
Font Size:
An unanticipated problem was encountered, check back soon and try again
 Silver had a seemingly intractable grip on power in the state for decades. He was convicted of accepting $4 million in exchange for helping a cancer researcher and two real estate developers. He also secured the conviction of New York Republican Majority Leader Dean Skelos, who was sentenced to five years in prison for corruption. [dcquiz] The former official said the investigation is being coordinated between bureau field offices and FBI managers at headquarters in Washington, D.C. The unusual process would ensure senior FBI supervisors, including Director James Comey, would be kept abreast of case progress and of significant developments. The reliance on U.S. attorneys would be a significant departure from the centralized manner in which the FBI managed the investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server and email addresses. That investigation was conducted with agents at FBI headquarters, who coordinated with the Department of Justice’s National Security Division (NSD). The Clinton email probe was considered a “small cell” investigation, with FBI agents and NSD attorneys frequently conferring. Comey short-circuited the effort in early July by announcing that “no reasonable prosecutor” would try Clinton for the “careless” handling of classified material. “Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,” he announced in a July 5 press conference. Comey, however, wouldn’t answer questions about any ongoing FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundation.

EXCLUSIVE: Joint FBI-US Attorney Probe Of Clinton Foundation Is Underway | The Daily Caller

EXCLUSIVE: Joint FBI-US Attorney Probe Of Clinton Foundation Is Underway
EXCLUSIVE: Joint FBI-US Attorney Probe Of Clinton Foundation Is Underway
An unanticipated problem was encountered, check back soon and try again
Font Size:
An unanticipated problem was encountered, check back soon and try again

House Oversight Committee chairman grills Comey on Hillary Clinton House Oversight Committee chairman grills the FBI director: 'Did Hillary Clinton lie?'
House Oversight Committee chairman grills the FBI director: 'Did Hillary Clinton lie?'
Pamela Engel
Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz.
Watch the exchange below:
 He also said Congress would send a referral to the FBI to investigate whether Clinton lied under oath about her handling of classified information. Clinton, who is now the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, has come under fire for using a private email server while she was secretary of state. Comey opened his testimony by explaining why the FBI decided to recommend the Justice Department not prosecute Clinton over the email scandal, despite concluding she was "extremely careless" with classified information. "There are two things that matter in a criminal investigation of a subject," Comey said. " What did the person do, and when they did that thing, what were they thinking? When you look at the hundred-years-plus of the Justice Department investigation and prosecution of mishandling of classified information, those two questions are obviously present." Comey continued: " We don't want to put people in jail unless we prove that they knew they were doing something they shouldn't do. When I look at the facts we gathered here, I see evidence of great carelessness, but I do not see evidence that is sufficient to establish that Secretary Clinton or those with whom she was corresponding both talked about classified information on email and that when they did it, they knew it was against the law." Chaffetz then started questioning Comey.

House Oversight Committee chairman grills Comey on Hillary Clinton

House Oversight Committee chairman grills the FBI director: 'Did Hillary Clinton lie?'
House Oversight Committee chairman grills the FBI director: 'Did Hillary Clinton lie?'
Pamela Engel
Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz.
Watch the exchange below:

He also said Congress would send a referral to the FBI to investigate whether Clinton lied under oath about her handling of classified information. Clinton, who is now the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, has come under fire for using a private email server while she was secretary of state. Comey opened his testimony by explaining why the FBI decided to recommend the Justice Department not prosecute Clinton over the email scandal, despite concluding she was "extremely careless" with classified information. "There are two things that matter in a criminal investigation of a subject," Comey said. " What did the person do, and when they did that thing, what were they thinking? When you look at the hundred-years-plus of the Justice Department investigation and prosecution of mishandling of classified information, those two questions are obviously present." Comey continued: " We don't want to put people in jail unless we prove that they knew they were doing something they shouldn't do. When I look at the facts we gathered here, I see evidence of great carelessness, but I do not see evidence that is sufficient to establish that Secretary Clinton or those with whom she was corresponding both talked about classified information on email and that when they did it, they knew it was against the law." Chaffetz then started questioning Comey.

Former FBI Official: FBI Has An ‘Intensive Investigation’ Ongoing Into Clinton Foundation [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller Former FBI Official: FBI Has An ‘Intensive Investigation’ Ongoing Into Clinton Foundation [VIDEO]
Former FBI Official: FBI Has An ‘Intensive Investigation’ Ongoing Into Clinton Foundation [VIDEO]
WATCH:
 Former FBI Official: FBI Has An ‘Intensive Investigation’ Ongoing Into Clinton Foundation [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller
Elections
Former FBI Official: FBI Has An ‘Intensive Investigation’ Ongoing Into Clinton Foundation [VIDEO]
(Reuters/Samantha Sais) / Reuters
Chuck Ross Investigative Reporter
October 30, 2016 9:29 AM ET
Font Size: Tom Fuentes, a former assistant director at the FBI and a CNN analyst, said Saturday that the bureau has an open investigation into the Clinton Foundation. The statement undermines a report from a team of CNN reporters in August that the Justice Department quashed an investigation into the Clinton family’s non-profit earlier this year. “The FBI has an intensive investigation ongoing into the Clinton Foundation,” Fuentes said Saturday, citing current and former senior FBI officials as sources. “The reports that three divisions came in with a request to Washington to open cases and that they were turned down by the Department of Justice, that’s not true,” he said, referring to the CNN report. “What was turned down was that they be the originating office. Headquarters at the FBI made the determination that the investigation would go forward as a comprehensive unified case and be coordinated,” he added. According to the CNN report, officials with the FBI and Justice Department met in Washington earlier this year to discuss opening an investigation into possible conflicts of interest between the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton State Department.

Former FBI Official: FBI Has An ‘Intensive Investigation’ Ongoing Into Clinton Foundation [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller

Former FBI Official: FBI Has An ‘Intensive Investigation’ Ongoing Into Clinton Foundation [VIDEO]
Former FBI Official: FBI Has An ‘Intensive Investigation’ Ongoing Into Clinton Foundation [VIDEO]
WATCH:

Former FBI Official: FBI Has An ‘Intensive Investigation’ Ongoing Into Clinton Foundation [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller
Elections
Former FBI Official: FBI Has An ‘Intensive Investigation’ Ongoing Into Clinton Foundation [VIDEO]
(Reuters/Samantha Sais) / Reuters
Chuck Ross Investigative Reporter
October 30, 2016 9:29 AM ET
Font Size: Tom Fuentes, a former assistant director at the FBI and a CNN analyst, said Saturday that the bureau has an open investigation into the Clinton Foundation. The statement undermines a report from a team of CNN reporters in August that the Justice Department quashed an investigation into the Clinton family’s non-profit earlier this year. “The FBI has an intensive investigation ongoing into the Clinton Foundation,” Fuentes said Saturday, citing current and former senior FBI officials as sources. “The reports that three divisions came in with a request to Washington to open cases and that they were turned down by the Department of Justice, that’s not true,” he said, referring to the CNN report. “What was turned down was that they be the originating office. Headquarters at the FBI made the determination that the investigation would go forward as a comprehensive unified case and be coordinated,” he added. According to the CNN report, officials with the FBI and Justice Department met in Washington earlier this year to discuss opening an investigation into possible conflicts of interest between the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton State Department.

Hillary Clinton email investigation: State Department cites 38 people, some may face disciplinary action - CBS News State Department cites 38 people in Clinton email investigation
State Department cites 38 people in Clinton email investigation The department said it found a total of 588 violations involving information then or now deemed to be classified but could not assign fault in 497 cases. For current and former officials, culpability means the violations will be noted in their files and will be considered when they apply for or renew security clearances. For current officials, there could also be disciplinary action, though it's unclear how they could potentially be reprimanded. The department began the review in 2016 after declaring 22 emails from Clinton's private server to be "top secret." Clinton was then running for president against Donald Trump, and Mr. Trump made the server a major focus of his campaign. Then-FBI Director James Comey held a news conference that year in which he criticized Clinton as "extremely careless" in her use of the private email server as secretary of state but said the FBI would not recommend charges. The Justice Department's inspector general said FBI specialists did not find evidence that the server had been hacked, with one forensics agent saying he felt "fairly confident that there wasn't an intrusion." Grassley started investigating Clinton's email server in 2017, when he was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The Iowa Republican has been critical of Clinton's handling of classified information and urged administrative sanctions.

Hillary Clinton email investigation: State Department cites 38 people, some may face disciplinary action - CBS News

State Department cites 38 people in Clinton email investigation
State Department cites 38 people in Clinton email investigation

The department said it found a total of 588 violations involving information then or now deemed to be classified but could not assign fault in 497 cases. For current and former officials, culpability means the violations will be noted in their files and will be considered when they apply for or renew security clearances. For current officials, there could also be disciplinary action, though it's unclear how they could potentially be reprimanded. The department began the review in 2016 after declaring 22 emails from Clinton's private server to be "top secret." Clinton was then running for president against Donald Trump, and Mr. Trump made the server a major focus of his campaign. Then-FBI Director James Comey held a news conference that year in which he criticized Clinton as "extremely careless" in her use of the private email server as secretary of state but said the FBI would not recommend charges. The Justice Department's inspector general said FBI specialists did not find evidence that the server had been hacked, with one forensics agent saying he felt "fairly confident that there wasn't an intrusion." Grassley started investigating Clinton's email server in 2017, when he was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The Iowa Republican has been critical of Clinton's handling of classified information and urged administrative sanctions.

House Oversight Committee chairman grills Comey on Hillary Clinton House Oversight Committee chairman grills the FBI director: 'Did Hillary Clinton lie?'
House Oversight Committee chairman grills the FBI director: 'Did Hillary Clinton lie?'
Pamela Engel
Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz.
Watch the exchange below:
 Close icon
Two crossed lines that form an 'X'. It indicates a way to close an interaction, or dismiss a notification. Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz. Andrew Harnik/Reuters
The chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee grilled the FBI director on Thursday about his decision to recommend that Hillary Clinton not be charged over her mishandling of classified information. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, a Republican from Utah, asked FBI Director James Comey point-blank if Clinton lied during the investigation of her emails. He also said Congress would send a referral to the FBI to investigate whether Clinton lied under oath about her handling of classified information. Clinton, who is now the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, has come under fire for using a private email server while she was secretary of state. Comey opened his testimony by explaining why the FBI decided to recommend the Justice Department not prosecute Clinton over the email scandal, despite concluding she was "extremely careless" with classified information. "There are two things that matter in a criminal investigation of a subject," Comey said. " What did the person do, and when they did that thing, what were they thinking?

Close icon
Two crossed lines that form an 'X'. It indicates a way to close an interaction, or dismiss a notification. Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz. Andrew Harnik/Reuters
The chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee grilled the FBI director on Thursday about his decision to recommend that Hillary Clinton not be charged over her mishandling of classified information. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, a Republican from Utah, asked FBI Director James Comey point-blank if Clinton lied during the investigation of her emails. He also said Congress would send a referral to the FBI to investigate whether Clinton lied under oath about her handling of classified information. Clinton, who is now the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, has come under fire for using a private email server while she was secretary of state. Comey opened his testimony by explaining why the FBI decided to recommend the Justice Department not prosecute Clinton over the email scandal, despite concluding she was "extremely careless" with classified information. "There are two things that matter in a criminal investigation of a subject," Comey said. " What did the person do, and when they did that thing, what were they thinking?

The Injustices of Obama’s Department of Justice The Injustices of Obama’s Department of Justice
The Injustices of Obama’s Department of Justice The Department of Justice reportedly refused to empanel a grand jury in either the e-mail case or in connection with the FBI’s investigation of the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play allegations. The FBI – and DOJ – granted immunity to five Clinton staff members – and agreed to destroy the evidence (laptops) when finished. These aides included Cheryl Mills, former Chief of Staff and Mrs. Clinton’s personal attorney along with Heather Samuelson, former senior advisor. Both women were present as attorneys for Clinton during the FBI Clinton Interview despite being interviewed as witnesses and offered immunity. Director Comey did not interview Clinton until the end of the investigation – three days before the press conference where he announced his conclusions. This runs against standard FBI protocol. Typically (always) they get the witness on record early so they can see how the testimony holds against what they find in the investigation. The FBI ignored direct evidence that Clinton’s aides knew about the server and helped to cover its existence up. This is particularly important in regards to Cheryl Mills. She took on the role of personal attorney to Clinton upon leaving the State Department – since she was able to claim she didn’t know about the server until that time all conversations with Mrs. Clinton are protected by attorney-client privilege.

The Department of Justice reportedly refused to empanel a grand jury in either the e-mail case or in connection with the FBI’s investigation of the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play allegations. The FBI – and DOJ – granted immunity to five Clinton staff members – and agreed to destroy the evidence (laptops) when finished. These aides included Cheryl Mills, former Chief of Staff and Mrs. Clinton’s personal attorney along with Heather Samuelson, former senior advisor. Both women were present as attorneys for Clinton during the FBI Clinton Interview despite being interviewed as witnesses and offered immunity. Director Comey did not interview Clinton until the end of the investigation – three days before the press conference where he announced his conclusions. This runs against standard FBI protocol. Typically (always) they get the witness on record early so they can see how the testimony holds against what they find in the investigation. The FBI ignored direct evidence that Clinton’s aides knew about the server and helped to cover its existence up. This is particularly important in regards to Cheryl Mills. She took on the role of personal attorney to Clinton upon leaving the State Department – since she was able to claim she didn’t know about the server until that time all conversations with Mrs. Clinton are protected by attorney-client privilege.

Book excerpt: "Compromised" by Peter Strzok - CBS News Book excerpt: "Compromised" by Peter Strzok
Book excerpt: "Compromised" by Peter Strzok
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Introduction
For more info:
 Since August 2015, I had supervised the FBI investigation into whether Hillary Clinton had mishandled classified email during her tenure as secretary of state. Toward the end of that investigation — which culminated in a weekend interview with Secretary Clinton just before July 4, 2016 — I sat with the core group of our team to review our findings. One by one, I asked each member if he or she thought there were any remaining investigative threads that might change our fundamental understanding of the case. And then I asked them, one by one, whether they were comfortable with the decision not to recommend criminal charges. The answer was unanimous and unequivocal: we had done a complete and exhaustive investigation, and the facts did not support bringing charges over the email. But Trump was a totally different matter. By the time Trump was sworn in, the FBI had been investigating Russian election interference for almost six months — and what the Bureau knew about the cases was far different from what the public did. The public knew that the FBI had investigated Clinton, but even within the Bureau very few people were aware of our investigations into Russian interference. And if the American people had known what we did at the time of the election, they would have been appalled.

Book excerpt: "Compromised" by Peter Strzok - CBS News

Book excerpt: "Compromised" by Peter Strzok
Book excerpt: "Compromised" by Peter Strzok
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Introduction
For more info:

Since August 2015, I had supervised the FBI investigation into whether Hillary Clinton had mishandled classified email during her tenure as secretary of state. Toward the end of that investigation — which culminated in a weekend interview with Secretary Clinton just before July 4, 2016 — I sat with the core group of our team to review our findings. One by one, I asked each member if he or she thought there were any remaining investigative threads that might change our fundamental understanding of the case. And then I asked them, one by one, whether they were comfortable with the decision not to recommend criminal charges. The answer was unanimous and unequivocal: we had done a complete and exhaustive investigation, and the facts did not support bringing charges over the email. But Trump was a totally different matter. By the time Trump was sworn in, the FBI had been investigating Russian election interference for almost six months — and what the Bureau knew about the cases was far different from what the public did. The public knew that the FBI had investigated Clinton, but even within the Bureau very few people were aware of our investigations into Russian interference. And if the American people had known what we did at the time of the election, they would have been appalled.

Peter Strzok writes in 'Compromised' that FBI pondered whether Trump was 'a Manchurian candidate elected' - The Washington Post FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book
FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book And as much as it pains me to admit it, the Russians weren’t the only ones who pushed the needle toward Trump. The Bureau did too.” Advertisement
But Strzok also jabs at Clinton advisers for, at times, not being fully cooperative, and says some of Clinton’s answers in her interview with the FBI were “aggravating” for how carefully she chose her words. He cryptically hints that Russians did not release more material they had procured about her, possibly saving it for if she had been elected. Story continues below advertisement
“We also knew through classified channels that the Russians had material with the potential to be greatly disruptive, yet they had chosen not to release it,” Strzok writes. “ Were they waiting for Election Day? Were they holding it in reserve to discredit Clinton?” He writes that the substance of the material is still classified. Peter Strzok, whose anti-Trump texts got him fired from the FBI, sues for reinstatement
As McCabe and Comey did, Strzok discusses at some length the behind-the-scenes talks about investigating Trump, including in the early days of Mueller’s investigation. Strzok, who was briefly the lead FBI agent on Mueller’s team, writes that he and Mueller composed a team “representing a cross-section of criminal and counterintelligence expertise,” because he was concerned with some of the noncriminal aspects of Trump’s behavior.

Peter Strzok writes in 'Compromised' that FBI pondered whether Trump was 'a Manchurian candidate elected' - The Washington Post

FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book
FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book

And as much as it pains me to admit it, the Russians weren’t the only ones who pushed the needle toward Trump. The Bureau did too.” Advertisement
But Strzok also jabs at Clinton advisers for, at times, not being fully cooperative, and says some of Clinton’s answers in her interview with the FBI were “aggravating” for how carefully she chose her words. He cryptically hints that Russians did not release more material they had procured about her, possibly saving it for if she had been elected. Story continues below advertisement
“We also knew through classified channels that the Russians had material with the potential to be greatly disruptive, yet they had chosen not to release it,” Strzok writes. “ Were they waiting for Election Day? Were they holding it in reserve to discredit Clinton?” He writes that the substance of the material is still classified. Peter Strzok, whose anti-Trump texts got him fired from the FBI, sues for reinstatement
As McCabe and Comey did, Strzok discusses at some length the behind-the-scenes talks about investigating Trump, including in the early days of Mueller’s investigation. Strzok, who was briefly the lead FBI agent on Mueller’s team, writes that he and Mueller composed a team “representing a cross-section of criminal and counterintelligence expertise,” because he was concerned with some of the noncriminal aspects of Trump’s behavior.

Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch meet privately | CNN Politics Bill Clinton meeting causes headaches for Hillary
Bill Clinton meeting causes headaches for Hillary
(CNN) —
 “I personally know I have work to do on this front,” she said in Chicago Monday. According to a law enforcement official familiar with the matter, the former president saw Lynch’s plane on the tarmac and walked onto her aircraft. Lynch’s FBI security detail did not stop Clinton and he proceeded to initiate an extended conversation that included discussion of grandchildren. Lynch was surprised to see Clinton walking onto her plane, the official said, and no Justice Department business was discussed. Speaking at a news conference in Phoenix on Tuesday, Lynch confirmed the meeting and denied the two spoke about any matter pending before the Justice Department or the Benghazi probe. She also said the former president “did not raise anything” about an ongoing case or anything of that nature. “I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane,” Lynch said according to CNN affiliate KNXV/ABC15. “ Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix.” Huma Abedin details Clinton email troubles in deposition
The former president’s aide said nothing beyond Lynch’s characterization of the account was discussed, and that Clinton “always” extends this courtesy when he is around cabinet secretaries, members of Congress and other dignitaries, pointing to the former president’s unplanned meeting with Sen. Ted Cruz at an Alabama airport in May.
Asked in Los Angeles on Wednesday whether the meeting risked the department’s impartiality in its investigation, Lynch said the email probe is “being handled by career investigators and career agents who always follow the facts and the law.” Top Democrats on Capitol Hill defended Lynch Thursday.

Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch meet privately | CNN Politics

Bill Clinton meeting causes headaches for Hillary
Bill Clinton meeting causes headaches for Hillary
(CNN) —

List of efforts to impeach presidents of the United States - Wikipedia List of efforts to impeach presidents of the United States
List of efforts to impeach presidents of the United States
Contents
Procedure
Presidents who have been impeached
Andrew Johnson (impeached Feb. 1868, acquitted May 1868)
Bill Clinton (impeached Dec. 1998, acquitted Feb. 1999)
Donald Trump
First impeachment (impeached Dec. 2019, acquitted Feb. 2020)
Second impeachment (impeached Jan. 2021, acquitted Feb. 2021)
President subjected to an impeachment process who resigned before it ended
Richard Nixon (initiated Oct. 1973, resigned Aug. 1974)
Presidents who, after a formal investigation, were not impeached
James Buchanan (1860)
Andrew Johnson (1867)
Presidents who the full House of Representatives voted against holding an impeachment inquiry into
Thomas Jefferson
John Tyler
Presidents against whom impeachment resolutions were introduced, but no full-house vote was held
Ulysses S. Grant
Grover Cleveland
Herbert Hoover
Harry S. Truman
Ronald Reagan
George H.W. Bush
George W. Bush
Joe Biden
Others
Lyndon B. Johnson
Barack Obama
See also
References
 The impeachment trial remained a unique event for 130 years. Bill Clinton (impeached Dec. 1998, acquitted Feb. 1999)
Main article: Efforts to impeach Bill Clinton
Further information: Impeachment of Bill Clinton and Clinton–Lewinsky scandal

Remarks including response to Monica Lewinsky scandal (January 26, 1998)
Play media
Bill Clinton making a presentation that ends with a short commentary on the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The presentation is known for the quote "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." ( 6:20)
Remarks including response to Monica Lewinsky scandal (January 26, 1998)
audio only version
Problems playing these files? See media help. On October 8, 1998, the House of Representatives voted to launch an impeachment inquiry against President Bill Clinton, in part because of allegations that he lied under oath when being investigated in the Clinton–Lewinsky scandal. On December 19, 1998, two articles of impeachment were approved by the House, charging Clinton with perjury and obstruction of justice. The charges stemmed from a sexual harassment lawsuit filed against Clinton by Arkansas state employee Paula Jones and from Clinton's testimony denying that he had engaged in a sexual relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

List of efforts to impeach presidents of the United States - Wikipedia

List of efforts to impeach presidents of the United States
List of efforts to impeach presidents of the United States
Contents
Procedure
Presidents who have been impeached
Andrew Johnson (impeached Feb. 1868, acquitted May 1868)
Bill Clinton (impeached Dec. 1998, acquitted Feb. 1999)
Donald Trump
First impeachment (impeached Dec. 2019, acquitted Feb. 2020)
Second impeachment (impeached Jan. 2021, acquitted Feb. 2021)
President subjected to an impeachment process who resigned before it ended
Richard Nixon (initiated Oct. 1973, resigned Aug. 1974)
Presidents who, after a formal investigation, were not impeached
James Buchanan (1860)
Andrew Johnson (1867)
Presidents who the full House of Representatives voted against holding an impeachment inquiry into
Thomas Jefferson
John Tyler
Presidents against whom impeachment resolutions were introduced, but no full-house vote was held
Ulysses S. Grant
Grover Cleveland
Herbert Hoover
Harry S. Truman
Ronald Reagan
George H.W. Bush
George W. Bush
Joe Biden
Others
Lyndon B. Johnson
Barack Obama
See also
References

The impeachment trial remained a unique event for 130 years. Bill Clinton (impeached Dec. 1998, acquitted Feb. 1999)
Main article: Efforts to impeach Bill Clinton
Further information: Impeachment of Bill Clinton and Clinton–Lewinsky scandal

Remarks including response to Monica Lewinsky scandal (January 26, 1998)
Play media
Bill Clinton making a presentation that ends with a short commentary on the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The presentation is known for the quote "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." ( 6:20)
Remarks including response to Monica Lewinsky scandal (January 26, 1998)
audio only version
Problems playing these files? See media help. On October 8, 1998, the House of Representatives voted to launch an impeachment inquiry against President Bill Clinton, in part because of allegations that he lied under oath when being investigated in the Clinton–Lewinsky scandal. On December 19, 1998, two articles of impeachment were approved by the House, charging Clinton with perjury and obstruction of justice. The charges stemmed from a sexual harassment lawsuit filed against Clinton by Arkansas state employee Paula Jones and from Clinton's testimony denying that he had engaged in a sexual relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

PolitiFact | Complex tale involving Hillary Clinton, uranium and Russia resurfaces
Complex tale involving Hillary Clinton, uranium and Russia resurfaces
The Uranium One deal
Featured Fact-check
Says Joe Biden was the only world leader to wear a face mask during a video conference.
The Clinton Foundation donations
How were the others involved?
Our ruling
Our Sources
Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!
 At the time, Mueller was the director of the FBI, and one would assume he would have been aware of the ongoing investigation. But in the Hill article, Assistant FBI Director Ronald Hosko was quoted saying he did not recall ever being briefed on the case. "‘I had no idea this case was being conducted,’ a surprised Hosko said in an interview," the article reported. Again, it's somewhat unclear what the post means when it says Mueller "delivered it," but there is no evidence Mueller played a role in the Uranium One transaction. The other implication is that Clinton either did know or should have known about problems with the Russian bid for Uranium One before deciding whether to let it go forward. Same goes for President Barack Obama, who had the power to veto the transfer. For now at least, we aren’t aware of any evidence that Clinton knew anything about the FBI investigation. If anything, the Hill’s reporting suggests the opposite. If the assistant FBI director at the time knew nothing of the investigation, then Clinton -- someone in a different department and several rungs higher in the organizational chart -- might not have known about it. Our ruling
A Facebook post claims that Hillary Clinton transferred uranium to Russia in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

PolitiFact | Complex tale involving Hillary Clinton, uranium and Russia resurfaces

Complex tale involving Hillary Clinton, uranium and Russia resurfaces
The Uranium One deal
Featured Fact-check
Says Joe Biden was the only world leader to wear a face mask during a video conference.
The Clinton Foundation donations
How were the others involved?
Our ruling
Our Sources
Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

At the time, Mueller was the director of the FBI, and one would assume he would have been aware of the ongoing investigation. But in the Hill article, Assistant FBI Director Ronald Hosko was quoted saying he did not recall ever being briefed on the case. "‘I had no idea this case was being conducted,’ a surprised Hosko said in an interview," the article reported. Again, it's somewhat unclear what the post means when it says Mueller "delivered it," but there is no evidence Mueller played a role in the Uranium One transaction. The other implication is that Clinton either did know or should have known about problems with the Russian bid for Uranium One before deciding whether to let it go forward. Same goes for President Barack Obama, who had the power to veto the transfer. For now at least, we aren’t aware of any evidence that Clinton knew anything about the FBI investigation. If anything, the Hill’s reporting suggests the opposite. If the assistant FBI director at the time knew nothing of the investigation, then Clinton -- someone in a different department and several rungs higher in the organizational chart -- might not have known about it. Our ruling
A Facebook post claims that Hillary Clinton transferred uranium to Russia in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.

Fact-check: Comey didn’t say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers - POLITICO Fact-check: Comey didn’t say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers
Fact-check: Comey didn’t say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers Fact-check: Comey didn’t say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers - POLITICO
The Republican response is based on a what seems to be a misreading of one passage in James Comey‘s new book in which the former FBI director reflects on the Clinton investigation. | Alex Brandon/AP Photo
Fact-check: Comey didn’t say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers
As FBI director, James Comey reopened the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server days before the 2016 election because of poll numbers, the White House said on Friday, repeating an assertion that doesn’t square with a passage in Comey’s new book. Press secretary Sarah Sanders leveled several broadsides against the former bureau director at a White House briefing, responding to reporters’ questions about decisions related to the Clinton investigation by saying, “Now he claims it was based because of poll numbers.” The comment appeared to be part of a coordinated Republican effort to undermine Comey’s reputation for integrity upon the release of his new book, “A Higher Loyalty.” The Republican National Committee sent an email quoting a tweet from political analyst Nate Silver, who wrote: “ If Comey’s decision to release the letter on Oct. 28 was influenced by his interpretation of the polls, that really ought to cut against his image as an honorable, principled decision-maker. Instead, he was just being expedient and trying to save his own hide.” The Republican response is based on what seems to be a misreading of one passage in the book, as Comey reflects on his decisions regarding the Clinton investigation in the days before the 2016 election.

Fact-check: Comey didn’t say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers - POLITICO

Fact-check: Comey didn’t say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers
Fact-check: Comey didn’t say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers

Fact-check: Comey didn’t say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers - POLITICO
The Republican response is based on a what seems to be a misreading of one passage in James Comey‘s new book in which the former FBI director reflects on the Clinton investigation. | Alex Brandon/AP Photo
Fact-check: Comey didn’t say he reopened Clinton investigation because of poll numbers
As FBI director, James Comey reopened the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server days before the 2016 election because of poll numbers, the White House said on Friday, repeating an assertion that doesn’t square with a passage in Comey’s new book. Press secretary Sarah Sanders leveled several broadsides against the former bureau director at a White House briefing, responding to reporters’ questions about decisions related to the Clinton investigation by saying, “Now he claims it was based because of poll numbers.” The comment appeared to be part of a coordinated Republican effort to undermine Comey’s reputation for integrity upon the release of his new book, “A Higher Loyalty.” The Republican National Committee sent an email quoting a tweet from political analyst Nate Silver, who wrote: “ If Comey’s decision to release the letter on Oct. 28 was influenced by his interpretation of the polls, that really ought to cut against his image as an honorable, principled decision-maker. Instead, he was just being expedient and trying to save his own hide.” The Republican response is based on what seems to be a misreading of one passage in the book, as Comey reflects on his decisions regarding the Clinton investigation in the days before the 2016 election.

How Many US Presidents Have Faced Impeachment? - HISTORY How Many US Presidents Have Faced Impeachment?
How Many US Presidents Have Faced Impeachment?
The framers of the Constitution intentionally made it difficult to remove a sitting president from office.
If Convicted, Removal From Office, Possible Disqualification from Government Service
Andrew Johnson: Impeached in 1868
Bill Clinton: Impeached in 1998
Donald Trump: Impeached in 2019 and 2021
Richard Nixon: Resigned in 1974
Other Presidents Threatened with Impeachment
FACT CHECK: We strive for accuracy and fairness. But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! HISTORY reviews and updates its content regularly to ensure it is complete and accurate.
SIGN UP FOR MORE HISTORY!
RELATED CONTENT
 In 1993, Clinton and his First Lady, Hillary, were the subject of a Justice Department investigation into the so-called Whitewater controversy, a botched business deal from their days in Arkansas. And in 1994, Clinton was sued for sexual harassment by Paula Jones, who claimed Clinton exposed himself to her in a hotel room in 1991. Interestingly, it was a combination of both legal cases that would ultimately lead to Clinton’s impeachment. Independent counsel Kenneth Starr was appointed by the Justice Department to investigate the Whitewater affair, but he couldn’t find any impeachable evidence. Meanwhile, lawyers for Jones got a tip that Clinton had an affair with a 21-year-old White House intern named Monica Lewinsky, a claim that both Lewinsky and Clinton denied under oath. Starr switched the focus of his investigation when he received 20 hours of taped phone conversations between Lewinsky and Linda Tripp, a former White House colleague, in which Lewinsky alludes to the affair. Starr then got the FBI to fit Tripp with a wire to meet with Lewinsky at a Ritz-Carlton hotel outside Washington, DC, when Lewinsky again admitted to a sexual relationship with the president. When the story went public, Clinton was forced to address the accusations on national television. “I want you to listen to me,” Clinton famously said. “ I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.

How Many US Presidents Have Faced Impeachment? - HISTORY

How Many US Presidents Have Faced Impeachment?
How Many US Presidents Have Faced Impeachment?
The framers of the Constitution intentionally made it difficult to remove a sitting president from office.
If Convicted, Removal From Office, Possible Disqualification from Government Service
Andrew Johnson: Impeached in 1868
Bill Clinton: Impeached in 1998
Donald Trump: Impeached in 2019 and 2021
Richard Nixon: Resigned in 1974
Other Presidents Threatened with Impeachment
FACT CHECK: We strive for accuracy and fairness. But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! HISTORY reviews and updates its content regularly to ensure it is complete and accurate.
SIGN UP FOR MORE HISTORY!
RELATED CONTENT

In 1993, Clinton and his First Lady, Hillary, were the subject of a Justice Department investigation into the so-called Whitewater controversy, a botched business deal from their days in Arkansas. And in 1994, Clinton was sued for sexual harassment by Paula Jones, who claimed Clinton exposed himself to her in a hotel room in 1991. Interestingly, it was a combination of both legal cases that would ultimately lead to Clinton’s impeachment. Independent counsel Kenneth Starr was appointed by the Justice Department to investigate the Whitewater affair, but he couldn’t find any impeachable evidence. Meanwhile, lawyers for Jones got a tip that Clinton had an affair with a 21-year-old White House intern named Monica Lewinsky, a claim that both Lewinsky and Clinton denied under oath. Starr switched the focus of his investigation when he received 20 hours of taped phone conversations between Lewinsky and Linda Tripp, a former White House colleague, in which Lewinsky alludes to the affair. Starr then got the FBI to fit Tripp with a wire to meet with Lewinsky at a Ritz-Carlton hotel outside Washington, DC, when Lewinsky again admitted to a sexual relationship with the president. When the story went public, Clinton was forced to address the accusations on national television. “I want you to listen to me,” Clinton famously said. “ I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.

Kenneth Starr, Who Tried to Bury Bill Clinton, Now Only Praises Him - The New York Times Kenneth Starr, Who Tried to Bury Bill Clinton, Now Only Praises Him
Kenneth Starr, Who Tried to Bury Bill Clinton, Now Only Praises Him
Lights, Camera, Trump
 He also seemed to echo Mr. Trump, however, saying, “Our children are not going to do as well as we did or as our parents’ generation,” and pointing to demographic shifts as a source of “considerable instability.” Then again, Mr. Starr also alluded to the danger posed by income inequality, a central theme of Senator Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaign. “ We simply have not adjusted as a society to what seems to be the 1 percent and the 99 percent,” Mr. Starr said. But it was Mr. Starr’s keening over the coarsening and polarization of American politics that seemed most noteworthy. He did not volunteer any responsibility for it — though Mr. Clinton, who in 2006 accused Mr. Starr of “indicting innocent people because they wouldn’t lie,” might well lay considerable blame at his feet. A federal judge in the Reagan administration and the solicitor general under President George Bush, Mr. Starr was named independent counsel in 1994, taking over the investigation of the Whitewater real estate venture and the suicide of Vincent W. Foster Jr., a deputy White House counsel. He expanded the investigation to include the Paula Jones lawsuit and the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Mr. Starr’s conclusion that Mr. Clinton had committed perjury in sworn testimony denying having had “sexual relations” with Ms. Lewinsky eventually led to Mr. Clinton’s impeachment. “Whether it’s Whitewater or whether it’s Vince or whether it’s Benghazi. It’s always a mess with Hillary,” Mr. Trump recently told The Washington Post.

Kenneth Starr, Who Tried to Bury Bill Clinton, Now Only Praises Him - The New York Times

Kenneth Starr, Who Tried to Bury Bill Clinton, Now Only Praises Him
Kenneth Starr, Who Tried to Bury Bill Clinton, Now Only Praises Him
Lights, Camera, Trump

He also seemed to echo Mr. Trump, however, saying, “Our children are not going to do as well as we did or as our parents’ generation,” and pointing to demographic shifts as a source of “considerable instability.” Then again, Mr. Starr also alluded to the danger posed by income inequality, a central theme of Senator Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaign. “ We simply have not adjusted as a society to what seems to be the 1 percent and the 99 percent,” Mr. Starr said. But it was Mr. Starr’s keening over the coarsening and polarization of American politics that seemed most noteworthy. He did not volunteer any responsibility for it — though Mr. Clinton, who in 2006 accused Mr. Starr of “indicting innocent people because they wouldn’t lie,” might well lay considerable blame at his feet. A federal judge in the Reagan administration and the solicitor general under President George Bush, Mr. Starr was named independent counsel in 1994, taking over the investigation of the Whitewater real estate venture and the suicide of Vincent W. Foster Jr., a deputy White House counsel. He expanded the investigation to include the Paula Jones lawsuit and the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Mr. Starr’s conclusion that Mr. Clinton had committed perjury in sworn testimony denying having had “sexual relations” with Ms. Lewinsky eventually led to Mr. Clinton’s impeachment. “Whether it’s Whitewater or whether it’s Vince or whether it’s Benghazi. It’s always a mess with Hillary,” Mr. Trump recently told The Washington Post.

Peter Strzok writes in 'Compromised' that FBI pondered whether Trump was 'a Manchurian candidate elected' - The Washington Post FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book
FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book Strzok, a veteran counterintelligence investigator, tries to bring his experience in that area to the discussion of Trump, alleging repeatedly that the president seemed to be compromising himself as he lied publicly about his business dealings in Russia, or his interactions with that country’s officials. That, Strzok writes, essentially gave Russia leverage over the president. “Trump’s apparent lies — public, sustained, refutable, and damaging if exposed — are an intelligence officer’s dream,” Strzok writes. “ For that very reason, they are also a counterintelligence officer’s nightmare.” Story continues below advertisement
Strzok was also a key figure in the investigation into whether Hillary Clinton had mishandled classified information by using a private email server while she was secretary of state during the Obama administration. His book seeks to pull back the curtain on that case as well, contrasting it with the investigation into Trump. FBI’s Peter Strzok told Congress election tampering was a ‘far graver threat’ than Clinton email scandal, new transcript says
Strzok writes that he now believes it was the wrong decision for Comey to announce publicly in July 2016, just months ahead of the election, that he was recommending Clinton not be charged while criticizing her conduct. He talks, too, of institutional bias against the former Democratic presidential candidate, claiming a retired executive — whom he did not name in the book — said at lunch one day, “Pete, you’ve got to get that b----.” Advertisement
Strzok’s view, though, is that the investigation into Clinton was a far less serious matter than the inquiry into Trump. Story continues below advertisement
Even as he says Clinton’s use of a private server is what fueled investigators’ interest, Strzok allows that had her email been housed on the State Department system, “it would have been less secure and probably much more vulnerable to hacking.”

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations - CNN Politics Trump: Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations
Trump: Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations
Story highlights
(CNN) —
 I think they want either fame, or her campaign did it. And I think it’s her campaign.” Clinton, the Democratic nominee, slammed Trump for his response to the allegations against him when they came out. “Well at the last debate, we heard Donald talking about what he did to women and after that a number of women have come forward saying that’s exactly what he did to them,” Clinton responded. “ Now what was his response? Well, he held a number of big rallies where he said he could not have possibly done those things to those women because they are not attractive enough.” “I did not say that,” Trump interrupted. Later Trump defended himself again, reiterating that the accusations are false. “Nobody has more respect for women than I do,” Trump said. Clinton responded, “Donald thinks belittling women makes him bigger.

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations - CNN Politics

Trump: Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations
Trump: Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations
Story highlights
(CNN) —

I think they want either fame, or her campaign did it. And I think it’s her campaign.” Clinton, the Democratic nominee, slammed Trump for his response to the allegations against him when they came out. “Well at the last debate, we heard Donald talking about what he did to women and after that a number of women have come forward saying that’s exactly what he did to them,” Clinton responded. “ Now what was his response? Well, he held a number of big rallies where he said he could not have possibly done those things to those women because they are not attractive enough.” “I did not say that,” Trump interrupted. Later Trump defended himself again, reiterating that the accusations are false. “Nobody has more respect for women than I do,” Trump said. Clinton responded, “Donald thinks belittling women makes him bigger.

How did they find out Monica Lewinsky had given Bill Clinton blow jobs? - Quora
How did they find out Monica Lewinsky had given Bill Clinton blow jobs?
Quora User
Stephen Samuel
Kelly La Rue
 Thus, to this day, there are still many people who say “who cares about oral sex?”, “ what happened was between Bill and Hillary”, or “lots of men lie about sex, why was this such a big deal? Continue Reading
Your question is understandable, because for years, supporters have tried to minimize Bill Clinton’s misdeeds by suggesting that what got him in trouble was having an affair and wanting privacy. This was in fact part of Clinton's strategy to weather his greatest scandal, i.e., trying to make it seem trivial and labeling his Republican accusers as obsessive prudes (which did have the benefit of being true). Thus, to this day, there are still many people who say “who cares about oral sex?”, “ what happened was between Bill and Hillary”, or “lots of men lie about sex, why was this such a big deal?” There are many legitimate criticisms that one can make of the investigation of Clinton that ultimately ended with Monica Lewinsky. For example, one can write for days about the questionable nature of the independent counsel and his never-ending, ever-changing investigations. However, the issue that got Bill Clinton in real legal trouble was not that he had a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Aside from giving Hillary Clinton strong evidence for a favorable divorce settlement had she wanted one, the fact that Bill Clinton had a consensual sexual relationship with an adult woman who wasn’t his wife violated no laws that I’m aware of.

How did they find out Monica Lewinsky had given Bill Clinton blow jobs? - Quora

How did they find out Monica Lewinsky had given Bill Clinton blow jobs?
Quora User
Stephen Samuel
Kelly La Rue

Thus, to this day, there are still many people who say “who cares about oral sex?”, “ what happened was between Bill and Hillary”, or “lots of men lie about sex, why was this such a big deal? Continue Reading
Your question is understandable, because for years, supporters have tried to minimize Bill Clinton’s misdeeds by suggesting that what got him in trouble was having an affair and wanting privacy. This was in fact part of Clinton's strategy to weather his greatest scandal, i.e., trying to make it seem trivial and labeling his Republican accusers as obsessive prudes (which did have the benefit of being true). Thus, to this day, there are still many people who say “who cares about oral sex?”, “ what happened was between Bill and Hillary”, or “lots of men lie about sex, why was this such a big deal?” There are many legitimate criticisms that one can make of the investigation of Clinton that ultimately ended with Monica Lewinsky. For example, one can write for days about the questionable nature of the independent counsel and his never-ending, ever-changing investigations. However, the issue that got Bill Clinton in real legal trouble was not that he had a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Aside from giving Hillary Clinton strong evidence for a favorable divorce settlement had she wanted one, the fact that Bill Clinton had a consensual sexual relationship with an adult woman who wasn’t his wife violated no laws that I’m aware of.

Peter Strzok writes in 'Compromised' that FBI pondered whether Trump was 'a Manchurian candidate elected' - The Washington Post FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book
FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book His book seeks to pull back the curtain on that case as well, contrasting it with the investigation into Trump. FBI’s Peter Strzok told Congress election tampering was a ‘far graver threat’ than Clinton email scandal, new transcript says
Strzok writes that he now believes it was the wrong decision for Comey to announce publicly in July 2016, just months ahead of the election, that he was recommending Clinton not be charged while criticizing her conduct. He talks, too, of institutional bias against the former Democratic presidential candidate, claiming a retired executive — whom he did not name in the book — said at lunch one day, “Pete, you’ve got to get that b----.” Advertisement
Strzok’s view, though, is that the investigation into Clinton was a far less serious matter than the inquiry into Trump. Story continues below advertisement
Even as he says Clinton’s use of a private server is what fueled investigators’ interest, Strzok allows that had her email been housed on the State Department system, “it would have been less secure and probably much more vulnerable to hacking.” He also concedes that Comey’s decision in October 2016 to reveal to Congress that the investigation had resumed — less than two weeks before voters were to go to the polls — probably altered the results of the election in Trump’s favor. “Reflecting back on 2016 reveals another hard truth: small margins matter in an election in which the total number of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan voters needed to swing the Electoral College would fit in one football stadium,” Strzok writes. “ Pundits who argue that it’s hard to substantively change public opinion miss the point: when you’re dealing with razor-thin margins, it doesn’t take much to move the needle.

Book excerpt: "Compromised" by Peter Strzok - CBS News Book excerpt: "Compromised" by Peter Strzok
Book excerpt: "Compromised" by Peter Strzok
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Introduction
For more info:
 we had done a complete and exhaustive investigation, and the facts did not support bringing charges over the email. But Trump was a totally different matter. By the time Trump was sworn in, the FBI had been investigating Russian election interference for almost six months — and what the Bureau knew about the cases was far different from what the public did. The public knew that the FBI had investigated Clinton, but even within the Bureau very few people were aware of our investigations into Russian interference. And if the American people had known what we did at the time of the election, they would have been appalled. For starters, we knew that one of Trump's foreign policy advisers, Papadopoulos, had boasted about his knowledge that Russia had information damaging to Hillary Clinton and Moscow had offered to assist the Trump campaign by releasing the material. A week after the inauguration, the Bureau interviewed Papadopoulos, and he lied to us. Despite telling us during a second interview a few weeks later that he'd cooperate, he left the interview and deactivated a Facebook account that he had used to communicate directly with Russians. Excerpted from "Compromised: Counterintelligence and the Threat of Donald J. Trump" by Peter Strzok.

we had done a complete and exhaustive investigation, and the facts did not support bringing charges over the email. But Trump was a totally different matter. By the time Trump was sworn in, the FBI had been investigating Russian election interference for almost six months — and what the Bureau knew about the cases was far different from what the public did. The public knew that the FBI had investigated Clinton, but even within the Bureau very few people were aware of our investigations into Russian interference. And if the American people had known what we did at the time of the election, they would have been appalled. For starters, we knew that one of Trump's foreign policy advisers, Papadopoulos, had boasted about his knowledge that Russia had information damaging to Hillary Clinton and Moscow had offered to assist the Trump campaign by releasing the material. A week after the inauguration, the Bureau interviewed Papadopoulos, and he lied to us. Despite telling us during a second interview a few weeks later that he'd cooperate, he left the interview and deactivated a Facebook account that he had used to communicate directly with Russians. Excerpted from "Compromised: Counterintelligence and the Threat of Donald J. Trump" by Peter Strzok.

Trump did not collude with Russia. The left and the media have carried that narrative based off of lies and a fake dossier. Trump allowed them to carry their false narrative because he knew he was innocent and that the investigation would eventually turn to the real parties who colluded with Russia. Enter the Clintons. What stands out in the affidavit Rosenstein signed included “matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation” because they knew an investigation into Russian collusion would eventually lead to Clinton. Trump is a man of his word and he’s making good on all of his campaign promises, so why wouldn’t he keep this one? The left and the media has been so blinded by their partisanship that they’ve failed to see that the greatest bait and switch in the history of the world is going down right before their very eyes. They’ve naively assumed that since Mueller had been a part of the swamp, he’d protect the swamp. However, just because he’s associated with corrupt politicians like the Clintons for years does not mean that he likes them or has any interest in protecting them at this point. After all, the Clintons did go to Trump’s wedding and you know what they say:

Trump did not collude with Russia. The left and the media have carried that narrative based off of lies and a fake dossier. Trump allowed them to carry their false narrative because he knew he was innocent and that the investigation would eventually turn to the real parties who colluded with Russia. Enter the Clintons. What stands out in the affidavit Rosenstein signed included “matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation” because they knew an investigation into Russian collusion would eventually lead to Clinton. Trump is a man of his word and he’s making good on all of his campaign promises, so why wouldn’t he keep this one? The left and the media has been so blinded by their partisanship that they’ve failed to see that the greatest bait and switch in the history of the world is going down right before their very eyes. They’ve naively assumed that since Mueller had been a part of the swamp, he’d protect the swamp. However, just because he’s associated with corrupt politicians like the Clintons for years does not mean that he likes them or has any interest in protecting them at this point. After all, the Clintons did go to Trump’s wedding and you know what they say:

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal' | US news | The Guardian Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal'
Donald Trump
Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal'
Martin Pengelly in New York
Hillary Clinton: I never knowingly sent classified data using private email
The Guardian view on Donald Trump’s early lead in the race for the Republican nomination | Editorial
Veterans named as Donald Trump supporters say they were not consulted
 Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal' | US news | The Guardian
Donald Trump
This article is more than 5 years old
Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal'
This article is more than 5 years old
Trump says Democratic prosecutors are ‘protecting’ former secretary of state
Republican candidate says he doesn’t see how Clinton ‘can run’
Martin Pengelly in New York
@MartinPengelly
Sun 26 Jul 2015 12.10 EDT
First published on Sun 26 Jul 2015
09.44 EDT
Trump campaigns at a rally and family picnic in Oskaloosa, Iowa. Photograph: Brian Cahn/Zuma Press/Corbis
Donald Trump on Sunday pitched into the ongoing furore over Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state, saying: “ The fact is, what she has done is criminal.” Hillary Clinton: I never knowingly sent classified data using private email
Read more
Investigators this week asked the Justice Department to look into a “potential compromise of classified information” surrounding the private email server, a department official said on Friday. The official said the referral did not relate to possible criminal wrongdoing, despite having said earlier on Friday that it did. On Saturday, in Iowa, Clinton told reporters she never knowingly sent or received classified information using her private server and did not know what messages were being cited by investigators.

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal' | US news | The Guardian

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal'
Donald Trump
Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal'
Martin Pengelly in New York
Hillary Clinton: I never knowingly sent classified data using private email
The Guardian view on Donald Trump’s early lead in the race for the Republican nomination | Editorial
Veterans named as Donald Trump supporters say they were not consulted

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal' | US news | The Guardian
Donald Trump
This article is more than 5 years old
Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton's private email use was 'criminal'
This article is more than 5 years old
Trump says Democratic prosecutors are ‘protecting’ former secretary of state
Republican candidate says he doesn’t see how Clinton ‘can run’
Martin Pengelly in New York
@MartinPengelly
Sun 26 Jul 2015 12.10 EDT
First published on Sun 26 Jul 2015
09.44 EDT
Trump campaigns at a rally and family picnic in Oskaloosa, Iowa. Photograph: Brian Cahn/Zuma Press/Corbis
Donald Trump on Sunday pitched into the ongoing furore over Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state, saying: “ The fact is, what she has done is criminal.” Hillary Clinton: I never knowingly sent classified data using private email
Read more
Investigators this week asked the Justice Department to look into a “potential compromise of classified information” surrounding the private email server, a department official said on Friday. The official said the referral did not relate to possible criminal wrongdoing, despite having said earlier on Friday that it did. On Saturday, in Iowa, Clinton told reporters she never knowingly sent or received classified information using her private server and did not know what messages were being cited by investigators.

Who is James Comey: 7 things about the FBI director | CNN Politics Who is James Comey: 7 things to know about the fired FBI director
Who is James Comey: 7 things to know about the fired FBI director
Story highlights
(CNN) —
He delivered an unprecedented “October Surprise” last year
He opposed Bush White House officials in a dramatic standoff
He prosecuted Martha Stewart
He’d investigated the Clintons previously
He was locked up and held at gunpoint by a high-profile serial criminal as a teen
He was overwhelmingly confirmed by the Senate in 2013
He was a registered Republican for many years
 Cancel
Confirm
More videos
More videos
Switch camera
Share
Include playlist
An error occurred while retrieving sharing information. Please try again later. Watch on
0:00
0:00
0:00 / 20:05
Live
•
He prosecuted Martha Stewart
When lifestyle guru Martha Stewart was indicted in 2003 on a series of charges connected to a dodgy 2000 stock deal, it was Comey who brought the charges. ”This criminal case is about lying – lying to the FBI, lying to the SEC, lying to investors,” Comey, then a US attorney for the Southern District of New York, said at a press conference. ” Martha Stewart is being prosecuted not for who she is, but because of what she did.” Stewart was convicted on all counts in 2004 and sentenced to five months in prison. She served her time and was released in March 2005. He’d investigated the Clintons previously
In fact, the email server probe marked the third time Comey has investigated Bill or Hillary Clinton. Their first run-in came in the mid-1990s, when Comey joined the Senate Whitewater Committee as a deputy special counsel. There he dug into allegations that the Clintons took part in a fraud connected to a Arkansas real estate venture gone bust.

Who is James Comey: 7 things about the FBI director | CNN Politics

Who is James Comey: 7 things to know about the fired FBI director
Who is James Comey: 7 things to know about the fired FBI director
Story highlights
(CNN) —
He delivered an unprecedented “October Surprise” last year
He opposed Bush White House officials in a dramatic standoff
He prosecuted Martha Stewart
He’d investigated the Clintons previously
He was locked up and held at gunpoint by a high-profile serial criminal as a teen
He was overwhelmingly confirmed by the Senate in 2013
He was a registered Republican for many years

Cancel
Confirm
More videos
More videos
Switch camera
Share
Include playlist
An error occurred while retrieving sharing information. Please try again later. Watch on
0:00
0:00
0:00 / 20:05
Live
•
He prosecuted Martha Stewart
When lifestyle guru Martha Stewart was indicted in 2003 on a series of charges connected to a dodgy 2000 stock deal, it was Comey who brought the charges. ”This criminal case is about lying – lying to the FBI, lying to the SEC, lying to investors,” Comey, then a US attorney for the Southern District of New York, said at a press conference. ” Martha Stewart is being prosecuted not for who she is, but because of what she did.” Stewart was convicted on all counts in 2004 and sentenced to five months in prison. She served her time and was released in March 2005. He’d investigated the Clintons previously
In fact, the email server probe marked the third time Comey has investigated Bill or Hillary Clinton. Their first run-in came in the mid-1990s, when Comey joined the Senate Whitewater Committee as a deputy special counsel. There he dug into allegations that the Clintons took part in a fraud connected to a Arkansas real estate venture gone bust.

Tony Rodham - Wikipedia Tony Rodham
Tony Rodham
Contents
Early life and education
Career
Early career
1992–2006
2007–2019
Personal life and death
References
 By the early 2010s, after a string of unsuccessful ventures in oil and gas, water, housing, pharmaceuticals, and tutoring, Rodham was in financial distress, behind on his mortgage payments, facing home foreclosure, and being sued by his lawyer in the child support case for lack of payment. He said in a legal proceeding that while the Clintons had helped him in the past, including paying for his son's school tuition, that was over: " Hillary and Bill are done. I mean, look at what they've done for me. They've given me money all the time." Nevertheless, Bill Clinton did help him get a job with longtime Clinton associate Terry McAuliffe to find foreign investors for McAuliffe's GreenTech Automotive firm. Rodham did not play a large, hands-on role in this effort, however, and a trip to China that he made to recruit investors went sour due to Chinese resentment of various Clinton administration actions, including the 1999 United States bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. Rodham found himself in the news again in 2013 when it was disclosed that Alejandro Mayorkas, the director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and President Obama's nominee for United States Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, was being investigated by the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General for Mayorkas' role in helping Gulf Coast Funds Management secure approval for participating in the EB-5 visa program for foreign investors. Rodham had been president and CEO of Gulf Coast Funds Management, a financing firm, since 2010 or so. The firm had been granted the go-ahead even though the original application had been denied and an appeal had been rejected.

Tony Rodham - Wikipedia

Tony Rodham
Tony Rodham
Contents
Early life and education
Career
Early career
1992–2006
2007–2019
Personal life and death
References

By the early 2010s, after a string of unsuccessful ventures in oil and gas, water, housing, pharmaceuticals, and tutoring, Rodham was in financial distress, behind on his mortgage payments, facing home foreclosure, and being sued by his lawyer in the child support case for lack of payment. He said in a legal proceeding that while the Clintons had helped him in the past, including paying for his son's school tuition, that was over: " Hillary and Bill are done. I mean, look at what they've done for me. They've given me money all the time." Nevertheless, Bill Clinton did help him get a job with longtime Clinton associate Terry McAuliffe to find foreign investors for McAuliffe's GreenTech Automotive firm. Rodham did not play a large, hands-on role in this effort, however, and a trip to China that he made to recruit investors went sour due to Chinese resentment of various Clinton administration actions, including the 1999 United States bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. Rodham found himself in the news again in 2013 when it was disclosed that Alejandro Mayorkas, the director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and President Obama's nominee for United States Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, was being investigated by the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General for Mayorkas' role in helping Gulf Coast Funds Management secure approval for participating in the EB-5 visa program for foreign investors. Rodham had been president and CEO of Gulf Coast Funds Management, a financing firm, since 2010 or so. The firm had been granted the go-ahead even though the original application had been denied and an appeal had been rejected.

Hillary Clinton's Handling of 1975 Rape Case Emerges Again - ABC News
 You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I heard you on tape laughing." The name of the woman, who is now 52, was withheld for privacy reasons. She decided to speak out after hearing never-before-heard audio tapes released by the Washington Free Beacon earlier this week of Hillary Clinton talking about the trial. In the recordings, dubbed the "Hillary Tapes," Clinton is heard laughing as she describes how she succeeded at getting her client a lighter sentence, despite suggesting she knew he was guilty. "He took a lie-detector test! I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs," Clinton said about her client on the tapes, which were initially recorded, but never used, in the early 1980s. The rape case has been investigated more than once, but with Clinton considering a presidential run, it is again commanding headlines. Here are some questions and answers about why the 1975 trial is in the news again, details of the case and what it could mean for Clinton: How did this all start?

Hillary Clinton's Handling of 1975 Rape Case Emerges Again - ABC News

You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I heard you on tape laughing." The name of the woman, who is now 52, was withheld for privacy reasons. She decided to speak out after hearing never-before-heard audio tapes released by the Washington Free Beacon earlier this week of Hillary Clinton talking about the trial. In the recordings, dubbed the "Hillary Tapes," Clinton is heard laughing as she describes how she succeeded at getting her client a lighter sentence, despite suggesting she knew he was guilty. "He took a lie-detector test! I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs," Clinton said about her client on the tapes, which were initially recorded, but never used, in the early 1980s. The rape case has been investigated more than once, but with Clinton considering a presidential run, it is again commanding headlines. Here are some questions and answers about why the 1975 trial is in the news again, details of the case and what it could mean for Clinton: How did this all start?

Hillary Clinton's Former Boss Says He Fired Her From an Investigative Position Because She Was 'a Liar' and 'Unethical'? - Truth or Fiction? Hillary Clinton’s Former Boss Says He Fired Her From an Investigative Position Because She Was ‘a Liar’ and ‘Unethical’?
Hillary Clinton’s Former Boss Says He Fired Her From an Investigative Position Because She Was ‘a Liar’ and ‘Unethical’?
Claim
Rating
Reporting
 Hillary Clinton's Former Boss Says He Fired Her From an Investigative Position Because She Was 'a Liar' and 'Unethical'? - Truth or Fiction? Skip to content
Hillary Clinton’s Former Boss Says He Fired Her From an Investigative Position Because She Was ‘a Liar’ and ‘Unethical’? Posted on March 17, 2015
December 28, 2018
by Rich Buhler & Staff
Claim
Hillary Clinton's former boss fired her for unethical behavior while she was working on the Watergate investigation. Rating
Not True
Reporting
High-profile politician Hillary Rodham Clinton has been dogged by rumors throughout her long career. One such rumor gained ground because it came directly from Jerome “Jerry” Ziefman, former counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, and it has been amplified in various forms ever since. According to the rumors, as a 27-year-old working on the Watergate investigation in the 1970s, Hillary Rodham Clinton was “fired” from her position for being a “liar” and “unethical.” However, none of this was true; pay stubs dug up by the Washington Post in 2016 clearly show that Clinton was not fired, but that her work there ended, like everyone else’s, when Richard Nixon resigned: Hillary Rodham Congressiona…
Despite the historical record showing otherwise, the claims persisted.

Hillary Clinton's Former Boss Says He Fired Her From an Investigative Position Because She Was 'a Liar' and 'Unethical'? - Truth or Fiction?

Hillary Clinton’s Former Boss Says He Fired Her From an Investigative Position Because She Was ‘a Liar’ and ‘Unethical’?
Hillary Clinton’s Former Boss Says He Fired Her From an Investigative Position Because She Was ‘a Liar’ and ‘Unethical’?
Claim
Rating
Reporting

Hillary Clinton's Former Boss Says He Fired Her From an Investigative Position Because She Was 'a Liar' and 'Unethical'? - Truth or Fiction? Skip to content
Hillary Clinton’s Former Boss Says He Fired Her From an Investigative Position Because She Was ‘a Liar’ and ‘Unethical’? Posted on March 17, 2015
December 28, 2018
by Rich Buhler & Staff
Claim
Hillary Clinton's former boss fired her for unethical behavior while she was working on the Watergate investigation. Rating
Not True
Reporting
High-profile politician Hillary Rodham Clinton has been dogged by rumors throughout her long career. One such rumor gained ground because it came directly from Jerome “Jerry” Ziefman, former counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, and it has been amplified in various forms ever since. According to the rumors, as a 27-year-old working on the Watergate investigation in the 1970s, Hillary Rodham Clinton was “fired” from her position for being a “liar” and “unethical.” However, none of this was true; pay stubs dug up by the Washington Post in 2016 clearly show that Clinton was not fired, but that her work there ended, like everyone else’s, when Richard Nixon resigned: Hillary Rodham Congressiona…
Despite the historical record showing otherwise, the claims persisted.

Hillary Clinton Has Starring Role in Sickening Emails on Wiener's Laptop | Brendan D Murphy Hillary Clinton Has Starring Role in Sickening Emails on Wiener’s Laptop
Hillary Clinton Has Starring Role in Sickening Emails on Wiener’s Laptop
September Is Coming
Transcript of Sidney Powell’s disturbing monologue
Brendan D. Murphy
 Well, guess what they did when they found them on the Wiener laptop, they got a search warrant for things that didn’t include the BlackBerry backup emails. So, when they told us when he stood there and said that day, “Oh, we’ve reviewed all the emails now, there’s nothing there.” That was a bald-face lie. They specifically did not look at the Blackberry backups and they didn’t look at a fraction of the emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. So one of the things, if I were the President, I’d do is demand the Anthony Weiner laptop and get it to the most trusted person in the military to take apart everything on it and then start using it. There’s a lot that can be prosecuted, I have no doubt on that laptop. In fact, I heard that the New York police officers who saw some of it, even though they’re hardened investigators, literally had to go throw up. It’s bad. ” [ Emphasis added]
Image of Hillary Clinton (before title was added) is by Gage Skidmore
https://www.infowars.com/flynn-lawyer-says-shocking-clinton-material-on-anthony-weiners-laptop-recommends-military-examine-it/
Tags: anthony weiner bill clinton black lives matter clinton foundation donald trump general flynn george soros hillary clinton jeffrey epstein michael flynn missing emails sidney powell
Brendan D. Murphy
Brendan D. Murphy is the Freedom Hacker and Truth Addict.

Hillary Clinton Has Starring Role in Sickening Emails on Wiener's Laptop | Brendan D Murphy

Hillary Clinton Has Starring Role in Sickening Emails on Wiener’s Laptop
Hillary Clinton Has Starring Role in Sickening Emails on Wiener’s Laptop
September Is Coming
Transcript of Sidney Powell’s disturbing monologue
Brendan D. Murphy

Well, guess what they did when they found them on the Wiener laptop, they got a search warrant for things that didn’t include the BlackBerry backup emails. So, when they told us when he stood there and said that day, “Oh, we’ve reviewed all the emails now, there’s nothing there.” That was a bald-face lie. They specifically did not look at the Blackberry backups and they didn’t look at a fraction of the emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. So one of the things, if I were the President, I’d do is demand the Anthony Weiner laptop and get it to the most trusted person in the military to take apart everything on it and then start using it. There’s a lot that can be prosecuted, I have no doubt on that laptop. In fact, I heard that the New York police officers who saw some of it, even though they’re hardened investigators, literally had to go throw up. It’s bad. ” [ Emphasis added]
Image of Hillary Clinton (before title was added) is by Gage Skidmore
https://www.infowars.com/flynn-lawyer-says-shocking-clinton-material-on-anthony-weiners-laptop-recommends-military-examine-it/
Tags: anthony weiner bill clinton black lives matter clinton foundation donald trump general flynn george soros hillary clinton jeffrey epstein michael flynn missing emails sidney powell
Brendan D. Murphy
Brendan D. Murphy is the Freedom Hacker and Truth Addict.

How to impeach a president - Vox How to impeach a president
How to impeach a president
What can the president be impeached for?
Would-be impeachers have needed some other body to build a case first
What's the formal procedure for impeachment proceedings?
At first, there was no consensus on what high crimes Johnson had committed
After impeachment, what happens in the Senate?
The Senate gets to decide on how the trial is conducted
What are the implications for Obama?
Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?
Next Up In Politics & Policy
 When Gerald Ford was House Minority Leader, he said, "An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history." And as a practical matter, he's absolutely right. If the House wants to vote to impeach the president, it doesn't seem that anyone can stop it from doing so — the Constitution says it has "the sole Power of Impeachment." Would-be impeachers have needed some other body to build a case first
However, in our two 20th-century examples where Congress seriously weighed impeachment — for Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton — they did so only after dramatic revelations from preexisting investigations. For Nixon, a select Senate committee had been investigating his campaign's potential involvement in the Watergate break-ins, leading to the sensational revelation of a White House taping system and Nixon's firing of special prosecutor Archibald Cox. For Clinton, independent counsel Ken Starr had been operating a years-long investigation into various sprawling matters, until he finally filed a report alleging that Clinton had lied under oath and obstructed justice to prevent his affair with Monica Lewinsky from becoming known. So would-be impeachers have needed some body to build their case first — such as, for instance, a select committee on Benghazi. What's the formal procedure for impeachment proceedings? Facing near-certain impeachment, Richard Nixon resigns the presidency. Photo:

How to impeach a president - Vox

How to impeach a president
How to impeach a president
What can the president be impeached for?
Would-be impeachers have needed some other body to build a case first
What's the formal procedure for impeachment proceedings?
At first, there was no consensus on what high crimes Johnson had committed
After impeachment, what happens in the Senate?
The Senate gets to decide on how the trial is conducted
What are the implications for Obama?
Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?
Next Up In Politics & Policy

When Gerald Ford was House Minority Leader, he said, "An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history." And as a practical matter, he's absolutely right. If the House wants to vote to impeach the president, it doesn't seem that anyone can stop it from doing so — the Constitution says it has "the sole Power of Impeachment." Would-be impeachers have needed some other body to build a case first
However, in our two 20th-century examples where Congress seriously weighed impeachment — for Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton — they did so only after dramatic revelations from preexisting investigations. For Nixon, a select Senate committee had been investigating his campaign's potential involvement in the Watergate break-ins, leading to the sensational revelation of a White House taping system and Nixon's firing of special prosecutor Archibald Cox. For Clinton, independent counsel Ken Starr had been operating a years-long investigation into various sprawling matters, until he finally filed a report alleging that Clinton had lied under oath and obstructed justice to prevent his affair with Monica Lewinsky from becoming known. So would-be impeachers have needed some body to build their case first — such as, for instance, a select committee on Benghazi. What's the formal procedure for impeachment proceedings? Facing near-certain impeachment, Richard Nixon resigns the presidency. Photo:

Why James Comey stood alone - CNN Politics Why Comey stood alone: Inside the FBI’s announcement
Why Comey stood alone: Inside the FBI’s announcement
Story highlights
(CNN) —
 Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
Now playing
02:14
See key moments from the Clinton email scandal (2018)
Story highlights
FBI Director Comey cleared Clinton on Tuesday
He made his announcement alone
(CNN) —
FBI Director James Comey in recent weeks decided that when the bureau’s investigation into Hillary Clinton was completed, he alone would make a public announcement on the findings of investigators, but the surprising orchestration was propelled in part by the political chaos over the last week. The result – clearing Clinton while simultaneously upbraiding her for her conduct – could help cement a legacy that shows skill in navigating some of the nation’s biggest political controversies. Comey well understood, according to officials, his decision either way would influence the election. On Tuesday, Comey held a press conference with little advance notice, on the same day President Barack Obama was to campaign with Clinton in North Carolina. Comey noted that he had not told his boss, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, or any other agency in the government about his decision to not recommend charges be brought against anyone in the Clinton investigation. “They do not know what I am about to say,” Comey said, with about a dozen FBI agents and high-level officials who helped oversee the probe standing in the back of the room. Susan Walsh/AP
President Barack Obama and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton wave upon arriving at a campaign event at the Charlotte Convention Center in Charlotte, N.C., Tuesday, July 5, 2016. Obama is spending the afternoon campaigning for Clinton. Hillary Clinton's day of drama
Indeed, very few knew, with most inside the FBI seemingly unaware of what he was about to say. The notice to the press only saying Comey would “speak to reporters” with no topic disclosed.

Why James Comey stood alone - CNN Politics

Why Comey stood alone: Inside the FBI’s announcement
Why Comey stood alone: Inside the FBI’s announcement
Story highlights
(CNN) —

F.B.I. Director James Comey Testifies Before Congress - The New York Times F.B.I. Director James Comey Testifies Before Congress
Live
F.B.I. Director James Comey Testifies Before Congress
Continuing Coverage of Congressional Testimony
Comey Won’t Answer Question About Clinton Foundation
Did Clinton Give Her Lawyers Access to Classified Documents?
As Hearing Winds Down, Questions on a Specific Document
Comey Shows Some Unusual Transparency
Three-Plus Hours, and a Query on Immunity for a Clinton Aide
Disciplinary Actions Against Some Former Clinton Aides?
A Flash of Anger From Comey
Hurd Questions Recommendation Not to Prosecute
Emails Were Confidential, With a ‘C’
Comey Talks About Top Secret Emails
‘No Justice Department’ Would Prosecute Case, Comey Says
Chafetz Use of Personal Email Questioned
Democrats Defend Comey Amid Personal attacks
Republicans Attack Hillary Clinton’s Truthfulness
Comparisons to David Petraeus Case
Hillary Clinton v. the F.B.I.: What They Said About Her Emails
Chaffetz to Comey: Did Hillary Clinton Lie?
Carelessness, but No Violations of the Law, Comey Says
Top Democrat on Committee Defends Comey’s Integrity
 “Don’t worry, we’re halfway done,” Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the committee, joked, prompting a wide smile on Mr. Comey’s face. The exchange came as Mr. Comey was asked by Representative Elijah E. Cummings whether he believed his appearance before the committee set a bad precedent. Mr. Comey said it did not, adding that he believed in providing extra transparency in cases of intense interest, like the one involving Mrs. Clinton’s email. 1:59 pm ET Jul 7, 2016
2016-07-07T17:59:54+00:00
Three-Plus Hours, and a Query on Immunity for a Clinton Aide
Three and a half hours into a hearing that was becoming increasingly repetitive, Mr. Comey came to a question that he declined to answer because of the investigation itself. Asked about the immunity deal offered to Bryan Pagliano, the aide who helped set up Mrs. Clinton’s email server, Mr. Comey said he had to be careful about what he could say about the arrangement. He finally promised to get back to the committee after looking into what he was able to discuss. 1:25 pm ET Jul 7, 2016
2016-07-07T17:25:39+00:00
Disciplinary Actions Against Some Former Clinton Aides? Beyond the impact on Mrs. Clinton’s political future, some of her former aides, both political appointees and officials still working at the State Department, face possible disciplinary actions  from a security review now underway. Mr. Comey said he could not address the specific question of what disciplinary measures might be taken, but he suggested that, in general, an official who did what Mrs. Clinton and her aides did  would almost certainly be punished, though not charged criminally. “There would be some range of discipline,” he said. “

F.B.I. Director James Comey Testifies Before Congress - The New York Times

F.B.I. Director James Comey Testifies Before Congress
Live
F.B.I. Director James Comey Testifies Before Congress
Continuing Coverage of Congressional Testimony
Comey Won’t Answer Question About Clinton Foundation
Did Clinton Give Her Lawyers Access to Classified Documents?
As Hearing Winds Down, Questions on a Specific Document
Comey Shows Some Unusual Transparency
Three-Plus Hours, and a Query on Immunity for a Clinton Aide
Disciplinary Actions Against Some Former Clinton Aides?
A Flash of Anger From Comey
Hurd Questions Recommendation Not to Prosecute
Emails Were Confidential, With a ‘C’
Comey Talks About Top Secret Emails
‘No Justice Department’ Would Prosecute Case, Comey Says
Chafetz Use of Personal Email Questioned
Democrats Defend Comey Amid Personal attacks
Republicans Attack Hillary Clinton’s Truthfulness
Comparisons to David Petraeus Case
Hillary Clinton v. the F.B.I.: What They Said About Her Emails
Chaffetz to Comey: Did Hillary Clinton Lie?
Carelessness, but No Violations of the Law, Comey Says
Top Democrat on Committee Defends Comey’s Integrity

“Don’t worry, we’re halfway done,” Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the committee, joked, prompting a wide smile on Mr. Comey’s face. The exchange came as Mr. Comey was asked by Representative Elijah E. Cummings whether he believed his appearance before the committee set a bad precedent. Mr. Comey said it did not, adding that he believed in providing extra transparency in cases of intense interest, like the one involving Mrs. Clinton’s email. 1:59 pm ET Jul 7, 2016
2016-07-07T17:59:54+00:00
Three-Plus Hours, and a Query on Immunity for a Clinton Aide
Three and a half hours into a hearing that was becoming increasingly repetitive, Mr. Comey came to a question that he declined to answer because of the investigation itself. Asked about the immunity deal offered to Bryan Pagliano, the aide who helped set up Mrs. Clinton’s email server, Mr. Comey said he had to be careful about what he could say about the arrangement. He finally promised to get back to the committee after looking into what he was able to discuss. 1:25 pm ET Jul 7, 2016
2016-07-07T17:25:39+00:00
Disciplinary Actions Against Some Former Clinton Aides? Beyond the impact on Mrs. Clinton’s political future, some of her former aides, both political appointees and officials still working at the State Department, face possible disciplinary actions  from a security review now underway. Mr. Comey said he could not address the specific question of what disciplinary measures might be taken, but he suggested that, in general, an official who did what Mrs. Clinton and her aides did  would almost certainly be punished, though not charged criminally. “There would be some range of discipline,” he said. “

Mueller Investigation: Too Many Anti-Trump Coincidences | National Review One Mueller-Investigation Coincidence Too Many
One Mueller-Investigation Coincidence Too Many
Loading your audio article
A Mandate Gone Wild
Whose ‘Army,’ Whose ‘Dream Team,’ and Whose ‘All-Stars’?
Also from Victor Davis Hanson
American Universities Have Lost Their Prestige
How Much Ruin Do We Have Left?
How to Start a War
What’s Next?
READ MORE:
 But then there was the weird position of Comey subordinate and deputy director of the FBI Andrew McCabe. He ran the Washington, D.C., office that was involved in the Clinton email investigations. For some strange reason, McCabe did not recuse himself from the email investigation until one week before the presidential election, even though just months earlier his wife, Jill McCabe, had announced her Democratic campaign for a state senate seat in Virginia — and had received a huge donation of more than $675,000 from the political organizations of Governor Terry McAuliffe, a longtime Clinton supporter and intimate. Like it or not, the behavior of the FBI during the Clinton email investigations also extends to the Russian-collusion probe, especially as it pertains to the Clinton-funded Fusion GPS/Steele dossier. Okay — Washington is an incestuous place, and such conflicts of interest may be unavoidable. Perhaps McCabe himself was not really so directly involved in the FBI investigations of Clinton, and perhaps he had not even talked about the current Mueller investigations. Advertisement
But then it was announced that at least six of Mueller’s staff of 15 lawyers, who previously had donated (in some cases quite generously) to Hillary Clinton’s campaigns, were now investigating her arch foe Donald Trump. Okay — no doubt, such apparent conflicts of interests are not what they seem (given the overwhelming preponderance of liberal lawyers in general and in particular in Washington). After all, no one should be disqualified from government service for his or her political beliefs. But then we came to the inexplicable case of Peter Strzok, an FBI investigator assigned to the Mueller investigation of Russian collusion.

Mueller Investigation: Too Many Anti-Trump Coincidences | National Review

One Mueller-Investigation Coincidence Too Many
One Mueller-Investigation Coincidence Too Many
Loading your audio article
A Mandate Gone Wild
Whose ‘Army,’ Whose ‘Dream Team,’ and Whose ‘All-Stars’?
Also from Victor Davis Hanson
American Universities Have Lost Their Prestige
How Much Ruin Do We Have Left?
How to Start a War
What’s Next?
READ MORE:

Everything We Know About the Hillary Clinton-Russia-Uranium 'Scandal' The truth about the Hillary Clinton-Russia-Uranium 'scandal'
The truth about the Hillary Clinton-Russia-Uranium 'scandal'
Chelsea Clinton (L), U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and former U.S. President Bill Clinton.
Frank Giustra, founder of the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership, speaks during the Clinton Global Initiative's 2015 Winter Meeting in New York February 10, 2015.
The Clintons
Newsletter
Sign up for the Business Insider newsletter - a daily selection of our best stories curated just for you.
SEE ALSO: Defending Hillary Clinton is getting harder
NOW WATCH: Here's how much sex happy couples have every month
 what matters is what Hillary Clinton did or didn't do. Is there anything else problematic relating to the foundation that we've recently learned? When Clinton became secretary of state, she made an agreement with the administration to publicly disclose all its donors, but donations from the chairman of Uranium One were not disclosed. We don't yet know whose fault that was, but it certainly means that someone didn't do what they should have. The Clintons
Reuters
The Clinton Foundation is now acknowledging that some of its donors weren't properly disclosed, and they say they're reviewing all their records to see what else may be missing. They're characterizing it as a clerical error, which is certainly possible; right now there are a cadre of journalists examining the foundation's donations and its activities around the world to see if there's anything else that smells fishy. So what can we draw from this? One of the most important tasks the press has during a presidential campaign is to investigate the candidates — who they are, what they've done in the past, and what they plan to do in the future. The investigations of Hillary Clinton will no doubt be vigorous and ongoing.

Everything We Know About the Hillary Clinton-Russia-Uranium 'Scandal'

The truth about the Hillary Clinton-Russia-Uranium 'scandal'
The truth about the Hillary Clinton-Russia-Uranium 'scandal'
Chelsea Clinton (L), U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and former U.S. President Bill Clinton.
Frank Giustra, founder of the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership, speaks during the Clinton Global Initiative's 2015 Winter Meeting in New York February 10, 2015.
The Clintons
Newsletter
Sign up for the Business Insider newsletter - a daily selection of our best stories curated just for you.
SEE ALSO: Defending Hillary Clinton is getting harder
NOW WATCH: Here's how much sex happy couples have every month

what matters is what Hillary Clinton did or didn't do. Is there anything else problematic relating to the foundation that we've recently learned? When Clinton became secretary of state, she made an agreement with the administration to publicly disclose all its donors, but donations from the chairman of Uranium One were not disclosed. We don't yet know whose fault that was, but it certainly means that someone didn't do what they should have. The Clintons
Reuters
The Clinton Foundation is now acknowledging that some of its donors weren't properly disclosed, and they say they're reviewing all their records to see what else may be missing. They're characterizing it as a clerical error, which is certainly possible; right now there are a cadre of journalists examining the foundation's donations and its activities around the world to see if there's anything else that smells fishy. So what can we draw from this? One of the most important tasks the press has during a presidential campaign is to investigate the candidates — who they are, what they've done in the past, and what they plan to do in the future. The investigations of Hillary Clinton will no doubt be vigorous and ongoing.

Scott Pelley - Net Worth, Salary, Wife, Age, Height, Wiki Scott Pelley – The 60 Minutes Sensation
Scott Pelley – The 60 Minutes Sensation
Table of Contents
Early life
Career rise
Scott Pelley- wife
Scott Pelley – Net Worth and Salary
 Pelley was given an assignment to cover the presidential campaigns of Bill Clinton and Ross Perot in 1992. He also reported on other major events such as the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and Branch Davidian siege near Waco, Texas. Sponsored link
From 1997 to 1999, Pelley served as the Chief White House Correspondent for CBS News. It is during that when United States House of Representatives impeached President Clinton. Pelley, covering investigation of President Clinton broke the news saying that Monica Lewinsky intended to become a cooperating witness in the saga, which was being investigated by the Office of Independent Counsel. He was the first reporter to report that Clinton had been subpoenaed to appear and testify before the grand jury. In 2001, the 5 feet 10 tall Pelley got an opportunity to interview former president Clinton following the after-effects of September 11 attacks. In 1999, Pelley exited White House and joined the program. And, in 2000, he got another opportunity to interview the new president-elect who was then George W. Bush. In 2001, on the morning of 11 September, Pelley was reporting from the ground zero site at the scene of attacks in the collapsing World Trade Center towers.

Scott Pelley - Net Worth, Salary, Wife, Age, Height, Wiki

Scott Pelley – The 60 Minutes Sensation
Scott Pelley – The 60 Minutes Sensation
Table of Contents
Early life
Career rise
Scott Pelley- wife
Scott Pelley – Net Worth and Salary

Pelley was given an assignment to cover the presidential campaigns of Bill Clinton and Ross Perot in 1992. He also reported on other major events such as the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and Branch Davidian siege near Waco, Texas. Sponsored link
From 1997 to 1999, Pelley served as the Chief White House Correspondent for CBS News. It is during that when United States House of Representatives impeached President Clinton. Pelley, covering investigation of President Clinton broke the news saying that Monica Lewinsky intended to become a cooperating witness in the saga, which was being investigated by the Office of Independent Counsel. He was the first reporter to report that Clinton had been subpoenaed to appear and testify before the grand jury. In 2001, the 5 feet 10 tall Pelley got an opportunity to interview former president Clinton following the after-effects of September 11 attacks. In 1999, Pelley exited White House and joined the program. And, in 2000, he got another opportunity to interview the new president-elect who was then George W. Bush. In 2001, on the morning of 11 September, Pelley was reporting from the ground zero site at the scene of attacks in the collapsing World Trade Center towers.

James Comey | Biography & Facts | Britannica James Comey
James Comey
American attorney and law enforcement official
Top Questions
Where was James Comey educated?
What were James Comey’s jobs?
What did James Comey write?
Why is James Comey famous?
Early life
Legal career and acting attorney general
FBI director: Hillary Clinton e-mail inquiry, Donald Trump, and firing
Memoir and later activities
 However, Comey did confirm that since July 2016 the FBI had been investigating whether members of Trump’s campaign had colluded with Russian officials to win the election. Some criticized the director for not having publicly revealed the probe during the election—as he had when the FBI reviewed additional Clinton e-mails. At a Senate hearing in May, Comey defended his handling of the Clinton inquiry and claimed that he felt “mildly nauseous” over the possibility that the FBI’s actions influenced the election. In addition, he touched on his agency’s investigation into Trump’s campaign advisers and alleged that Russian interference in U.S. elections would continue to be a major threat. Less than a week later, on May 9, Trump abruptly fired Comey, citing the recommendation of DOJ officials who faulted Comey’s conduct during the Clinton probe. Notably, the FBI director was accused of treating Clinton unfairly, with both the July press conference and the October letter to Congress being deemed inappropriate. Critics, however, alleged that Comey was dismissed because of the Russia inquiry, and Trump later conceded that the investigation had been one of his reasons for firing Comey. The DOJ’s inspector general oversaw a lengthy investigation into the FBI’s handling of the Clinton case, and the final report was released in June 2018. While it was critical of Comey’s actions—notably, it called him “insubordinate” and concluded that his deviations from the FBI’s standard procedures damaged the agency’s reputation for fairness—it found no evidence that he had been politically motivated. In addition, the FBI was not faulted for its decision not to charge Clinton.

James Comey | Biography & Facts | Britannica

James Comey
James Comey
American attorney and law enforcement official
Top Questions
Where was James Comey educated?
What were James Comey’s jobs?
What did James Comey write?
Why is James Comey famous?
Early life
Legal career and acting attorney general
FBI director: Hillary Clinton e-mail inquiry, Donald Trump, and firing
Memoir and later activities

However, Comey did confirm that since July 2016 the FBI had been investigating whether members of Trump’s campaign had colluded with Russian officials to win the election. Some criticized the director for not having publicly revealed the probe during the election—as he had when the FBI reviewed additional Clinton e-mails. At a Senate hearing in May, Comey defended his handling of the Clinton inquiry and claimed that he felt “mildly nauseous” over the possibility that the FBI’s actions influenced the election. In addition, he touched on his agency’s investigation into Trump’s campaign advisers and alleged that Russian interference in U.S. elections would continue to be a major threat. Less than a week later, on May 9, Trump abruptly fired Comey, citing the recommendation of DOJ officials who faulted Comey’s conduct during the Clinton probe. Notably, the FBI director was accused of treating Clinton unfairly, with both the July press conference and the October letter to Congress being deemed inappropriate. Critics, however, alleged that Comey was dismissed because of the Russia inquiry, and Trump later conceded that the investigation had been one of his reasons for firing Comey. The DOJ’s inspector general oversaw a lengthy investigation into the FBI’s handling of the Clinton case, and the final report was released in June 2018. While it was critical of Comey’s actions—notably, it called him “insubordinate” and concluded that his deviations from the FBI’s standard procedures damaged the agency’s reputation for fairness—it found no evidence that he had been politically motivated. In addition, the FBI was not faulted for its decision not to charge Clinton.

Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails? | US news | The Guardian Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails?
Hillary Clinton
Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails?
@smithinamerica
Did Hillary Clinton do the wrong thing when she used a private email server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013?
Did she break the law?
So how likely is it that Clinton will be indicted when the FBI hands its report to the Department of Justice?
Is anyone else in the line of fire?
If Clinton is indicted, what would happen?
But what if she is forced to pull out?
Delegate tracker: Democrats
Clinton
Sanders
 It’s going to be funny to watch when Hillary gets indicted, and all her supporters are like: [ with a gif of a person’s head exploding].” He says: “ There’s been a large push online to say this investigation is over and Hillary Clinton has been cleared and nothing’s going to happen. I think that’s total bullshit in that no one knows what’s happening at the FBI and, if they did, they [the FBI or those outside the bureau with knowledge of the investigation] broke the law. “I would hope that if the FBI determines that she has broken the law, she will be indicted. I would hope that we have the strength and courage as a country to hold everyone to the law.” Dan Metcalfe, a Democrat who served as director of the Department of Justice’s Office of Information and Privacy for more than 25 years, wrote in a column last month: “ So what you must contemplate, as a leader of the Democratic Party, is the very real possibility of your likely presidential candidate actually being indicted, on criminal charges, sometime between now and, say, (a) the time of the convention at the end of July; ( b) the time of the general election in early November;

Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails? | US news | The Guardian

Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails?
Hillary Clinton
Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails?
@smithinamerica
Did Hillary Clinton do the wrong thing when she used a private email server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013?
Did she break the law?
So how likely is it that Clinton will be indicted when the FBI hands its report to the Department of Justice?
Is anyone else in the line of fire?
If Clinton is indicted, what would happen?
But what if she is forced to pull out?
Delegate tracker: Democrats
Clinton
Sanders

It’s going to be funny to watch when Hillary gets indicted, and all her supporters are like: [ with a gif of a person’s head exploding].” He says: “ There’s been a large push online to say this investigation is over and Hillary Clinton has been cleared and nothing’s going to happen. I think that’s total bullshit in that no one knows what’s happening at the FBI and, if they did, they [the FBI or those outside the bureau with knowledge of the investigation] broke the law. “I would hope that if the FBI determines that she has broken the law, she will be indicted. I would hope that we have the strength and courage as a country to hold everyone to the law.” Dan Metcalfe, a Democrat who served as director of the Department of Justice’s Office of Information and Privacy for more than 25 years, wrote in a column last month: “ So what you must contemplate, as a leader of the Democratic Party, is the very real possibility of your likely presidential candidate actually being indicted, on criminal charges, sometime between now and, say, (a) the time of the convention at the end of July; ( b) the time of the general election in early November;

Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's Private Plane At Least 26 Times Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's Private Plane At Least 26 Times
Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's Private Plane At Least 26 Times
No comments yet - make the first one!
 Davies' name has come up in court documents because she was listed in Epstein's books under "Massage- California." Epstein and his staff kept lists of young girls in cities around the world who would be able to give the billionaire "massages" when he was in town, or at least that is what they called them on paper. Some of the girls that appeared on these lists were later identified as Epstein's child sex victims. Chauntae Davies denies any allegation that she was a sex worker for Epstein, but has also failed to explain why she -- a massage therapist from California -- was brought along to serve as a stewardess on Bill Clinton's 6-day, multi-country trip to Africa to fight AIDS...
The more we dig, the more questions we have. But it remains clear that Bill Clinton's statement about only taking four trips aboard Epstein's jet -- even if we parse language and accept that each trip can have multiple legs -- is simply not accurate because Clinton did not admit to the 2002 domestic flight from Miami to Westchester...
Bill Clinton's statement also says that he has never been to Little St. James Island, the 72-acre private island that Epstein owns and allegedly uses for his orgies. While the flight records do not show Clinton flying on any of Epstein's flights to the island, or into nearby public airports, one of Epstein's child victims has testified that she saw Clinton on the island. Virginia Roberts, now 35, was trafficked and abused by Epstein when she was just 15 years old. She has repeatedly publicly claimed that she saw Bill Clinton on Epstein's island in 2002. All of this has been public information for years, both through previous public reporting and Fox News' investigative report back in 2016. So why would Bill Clinton lie?

Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's Private Plane At Least 26 Times

Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's Private Plane At Least 26 Times
Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's Private Plane At Least 26 Times
No comments yet - make the first one!

Peter Strzok writes in 'Compromised' that FBI pondered whether Trump was 'a Manchurian candidate elected' - The Washington Post FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book
FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book He also concedes that Comey’s decision in October 2016 to reveal to Congress that the investigation had resumed — less than two weeks before voters were to go to the polls — probably altered the results of the election in Trump’s favor. “Reflecting back on 2016 reveals another hard truth: small margins matter in an election in which the total number of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan voters needed to swing the Electoral College would fit in one football stadium,” Strzok writes. “ Pundits who argue that it’s hard to substantively change public opinion miss the point: when you’re dealing with razor-thin margins, it doesn’t take much to move the needle. And as much as it pains me to admit it, the Russians weren’t the only ones who pushed the needle toward Trump. The Bureau did too.” Advertisement
But Strzok also jabs at Clinton advisers for, at times, not being fully cooperative, and says some of Clinton’s answers in her interview with the FBI were “aggravating” for how carefully she chose her words. He cryptically hints that Russians did not release more material they had procured about her, possibly saving it for if she had been elected. Story continues below advertisement
“We also knew through classified channels that the Russians had material with the potential to be greatly disruptive, yet they had chosen not to release it,” Strzok writes. “

Peter Strzok writes in 'Compromised' that FBI pondered whether Trump was 'a Manchurian candidate elected' - The Washington Post

FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book
FBI pondered whether Trump was ‘a Manchurian candidate elected,’ former agent alleges in new book

He also concedes that Comey’s decision in October 2016 to reveal to Congress that the investigation had resumed — less than two weeks before voters were to go to the polls — probably altered the results of the election in Trump’s favor. “Reflecting back on 2016 reveals another hard truth: small margins matter in an election in which the total number of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan voters needed to swing the Electoral College would fit in one football stadium,” Strzok writes. “ Pundits who argue that it’s hard to substantively change public opinion miss the point: when you’re dealing with razor-thin margins, it doesn’t take much to move the needle. And as much as it pains me to admit it, the Russians weren’t the only ones who pushed the needle toward Trump. The Bureau did too.” Advertisement
But Strzok also jabs at Clinton advisers for, at times, not being fully cooperative, and says some of Clinton’s answers in her interview with the FBI were “aggravating” for how carefully she chose her words. He cryptically hints that Russians did not release more material they had procured about her, possibly saving it for if she had been elected. Story continues below advertisement
“We also knew through classified channels that the Russians had material with the potential to be greatly disruptive, yet they had chosen not to release it,” Strzok writes. “

Bill Clinton Visited Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Pedophile Island’: Unsealed Court Documents Bill Clinton Visited Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Pedophile Island’: Unsealed Court Documents
US News
Bill Clinton Visited Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Pedophile Island’: Unsealed Court Documents
 Gianfranco Gaglione/AP Photo)
“I said to Sharon that Ghislaine told me that she flew Bill in the heli—the black helicopter that Jeffrey bought her, and I just wanted to clarify that I didn’t actually see her do that. I heard from Ghislaine that she did that,” she later added. “ I heard a lot of things from Ghislaine that sounded too true—too outrageous to be true, but you never knew what to believe, so…”
Giuffre also confirmed that she flew on Epstein’s plane while Clinton was on board and said that Secret Service agents were on the plane but were “not where we were eating.” Giuffre did not allege that Clinton engaged in sexual conduct with her or anyone else and did not detail what the former president was allegedly doing on the island, if he was there. Maxwell told investigators that Giuffre’s claim was a “flat out total fabrication and lie.” Churcher wrote in a 2011 story that Epstein hosted a dinner on his island for Clinton shortly after he left office in 2001. Giuffre did not dispute that detail. Giuffre did name people she said sexually abused her, including Prince Andrew and lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and said in the newly unsealed documents that she had sex on the orders of Epstein with former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and former U.S. Sen. George Mitchell. All four men have denied the allegations. Epstein is being held in New York on charges that he sexually abused and exploited dozens of girls, some as young as 14, and sex trafficked them.

Bill Clinton Visited Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Pedophile Island’: Unsealed Court Documents

Bill Clinton Visited Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Pedophile Island’: Unsealed Court Documents
US News
Bill Clinton Visited Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Pedophile Island’: Unsealed Court Documents

Gianfranco Gaglione/AP Photo)
“I said to Sharon that Ghislaine told me that she flew Bill in the heli—the black helicopter that Jeffrey bought her, and I just wanted to clarify that I didn’t actually see her do that. I heard from Ghislaine that she did that,” she later added. “ I heard a lot of things from Ghislaine that sounded too true—too outrageous to be true, but you never knew what to believe, so…”
Giuffre also confirmed that she flew on Epstein’s plane while Clinton was on board and said that Secret Service agents were on the plane but were “not where we were eating.” Giuffre did not allege that Clinton engaged in sexual conduct with her or anyone else and did not detail what the former president was allegedly doing on the island, if he was there. Maxwell told investigators that Giuffre’s claim was a “flat out total fabrication and lie.” Churcher wrote in a 2011 story that Epstein hosted a dinner on his island for Clinton shortly after he left office in 2001. Giuffre did not dispute that detail. Giuffre did name people she said sexually abused her, including Prince Andrew and lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and said in the newly unsealed documents that she had sex on the orders of Epstein with former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and former U.S. Sen. George Mitchell. All four men have denied the allegations. Epstein is being held in New York on charges that he sexually abused and exploited dozens of girls, some as young as 14, and sex trafficked them.

PolitiFact | Complex tale involving Hillary Clinton, uranium and Russia resurfaces
Complex tale involving Hillary Clinton, uranium and Russia resurfaces
The Uranium One deal
Featured Fact-check
Says Joe Biden was the only world leader to wear a face mask during a video conference.
The Clinton Foundation donations
How were the others involved?
Our ruling
Our Sources
Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!
 Telfer was an investor who the New York Times found contributed between $1.3 million and $5.6 million to the foundation during and after the review process for the deal. So while it isn’t wrong to question links between foundation donors and their ties to Uranium One, this specific charge was exaggerated. How were the others involved? A 2017 report by The Hill revealed that Rosatom’s main executive, Vadim Mikerin, orchestrated "a racketeering plot involving kickbacks, bribes and extortion designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States." This was revealed by an undercover FBI informant who had infiltrated Uranium One in 2009 – a year before the deal was approved by CFIUS. At the time, Mueller was the director of the FBI, and one would assume he would have been aware of the ongoing investigation. But in the Hill article, Assistant FBI Director Ronald Hosko was quoted saying he did not recall ever being briefed on the case. "‘I had no idea this case was being conducted,’ a surprised Hosko said in an interview," the article reported. Again, it's somewhat unclear what the post means when it says Mueller "delivered it," but there is no evidence Mueller played a role in the Uranium One transaction. The other implication is that Clinton either did know or should have known about problems with the Russian bid for Uranium One before deciding whether to let it go forward.

PolitiFact | Complex tale involving Hillary Clinton, uranium and Russia resurfaces

Complex tale involving Hillary Clinton, uranium and Russia resurfaces
The Uranium One deal
Featured Fact-check
Says Joe Biden was the only world leader to wear a face mask during a video conference.
The Clinton Foundation donations
How were the others involved?
Our ruling
Our Sources
Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

Telfer was an investor who the New York Times found contributed between $1.3 million and $5.6 million to the foundation during and after the review process for the deal. So while it isn’t wrong to question links between foundation donors and their ties to Uranium One, this specific charge was exaggerated. How were the others involved? A 2017 report by The Hill revealed that Rosatom’s main executive, Vadim Mikerin, orchestrated "a racketeering plot involving kickbacks, bribes and extortion designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States." This was revealed by an undercover FBI informant who had infiltrated Uranium One in 2009 – a year before the deal was approved by CFIUS. At the time, Mueller was the director of the FBI, and one would assume he would have been aware of the ongoing investigation. But in the Hill article, Assistant FBI Director Ronald Hosko was quoted saying he did not recall ever being briefed on the case. "‘I had no idea this case was being conducted,’ a surprised Hosko said in an interview," the article reported. Again, it's somewhat unclear what the post means when it says Mueller "delivered it," but there is no evidence Mueller played a role in the Uranium One transaction. The other implication is that Clinton either did know or should have known about problems with the Russian bid for Uranium One before deciding whether to let it go forward.

Scott Pelley - Net Worth, Salary, Wife, Age, Height, Wiki Scott Pelley – The 60 Minutes Sensation
Scott Pelley – The 60 Minutes Sensation
Table of Contents
Early life
Career rise
Scott Pelley- wife
Scott Pelley – Net Worth and Salary
 In 1982, he joined WFAA-TV in Dallas where he served for seven years. The executives at CBS News identified Pelley’s as a potential anchor and reporter in 1985 when he was reporting on Guatemalan refugees who lived in remote jungles of Mexico. However, it was not until four years later when Pelley moved to CBS network. He joined CBS in 1989 in New York City and later returned to Dallas where he covered national affairs news from the CBS bureau. Pelley reported news on 1990/91 Gulf war in Baghdad and travelled with XVIII Airborne Corps during the time they were assaulting Iraq and Kuwait. Pelley was given an assignment to cover the presidential campaigns of Bill Clinton and Ross Perot in 1992. He also reported on other major events such as the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and Branch Davidian siege near Waco, Texas. Sponsored link
From 1997 to 1999, Pelley served as the Chief White House Correspondent for CBS News. It is during that when United States House of Representatives impeached President Clinton. Pelley, covering investigation of President Clinton broke the news saying that Monica Lewinsky intended to become a cooperating witness in the saga, which was being investigated by the Office of Independent Counsel.

In 1982, he joined WFAA-TV in Dallas where he served for seven years. The executives at CBS News identified Pelley’s as a potential anchor and reporter in 1985 when he was reporting on Guatemalan refugees who lived in remote jungles of Mexico. However, it was not until four years later when Pelley moved to CBS network. He joined CBS in 1989 in New York City and later returned to Dallas where he covered national affairs news from the CBS bureau. Pelley reported news on 1990/91 Gulf war in Baghdad and travelled with XVIII Airborne Corps during the time they were assaulting Iraq and Kuwait. Pelley was given an assignment to cover the presidential campaigns of Bill Clinton and Ross Perot in 1992. He also reported on other major events such as the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and Branch Davidian siege near Waco, Texas. Sponsored link
From 1997 to 1999, Pelley served as the Chief White House Correspondent for CBS News. It is during that when United States House of Representatives impeached President Clinton. Pelley, covering investigation of President Clinton broke the news saying that Monica Lewinsky intended to become a cooperating witness in the saga, which was being investigated by the Office of Independent Counsel.

PolitiFact | What did Hillary Clinton tell the families of people who lost their lives in Benghazi? What did Hillary Clinton tell the families of people who lost their lives in Benghazi?
What did Hillary Clinton tell the families of people who lost their lives in Benghazi?
‘Because of this film that came out’
‘Part of the fog of war’
In conclusion
 Even absent protests in Benghazi, some intelligence says the video played some motivational role, providing a rallying call for opportunistic attackers, according to congressional investigations. A Libyan terrorist intimately involved in the Benghazi attack, who the United States has since captured, reportedly said at the time that he was partially motivated by the video, for example. "I believe to this day the video played a role," Clinton said at her congressional testimony Oct. 22, 2015. In conclusion
It is impossible to know with certainty what Clinton told these families in brief conversations at a private reception only three days after Benghazi. Some, but not all, family members who have spoken to the media said Clinton mentioned a video or protests in their meeting. Some said she didn’t mention a video. Clinton says she did not. If she did say something about the video, would it have been an intentional lie? It’s very possible that this is one of the many conflicting pieces of intelligence that the administration was working with at the time. There simply is not enough concrete information in the public domain for Rubio or anyone to claim as fact that Clinton did or did not lie to the Benghazi families.

PolitiFact | What did Hillary Clinton tell the families of people who lost their lives in Benghazi?

What did Hillary Clinton tell the families of people who lost their lives in Benghazi?
What did Hillary Clinton tell the families of people who lost their lives in Benghazi?
‘Because of this film that came out’
‘Part of the fog of war’
In conclusion

Even absent protests in Benghazi, some intelligence says the video played some motivational role, providing a rallying call for opportunistic attackers, according to congressional investigations. A Libyan terrorist intimately involved in the Benghazi attack, who the United States has since captured, reportedly said at the time that he was partially motivated by the video, for example. "I believe to this day the video played a role," Clinton said at her congressional testimony Oct. 22, 2015. In conclusion
It is impossible to know with certainty what Clinton told these families in brief conversations at a private reception only three days after Benghazi. Some, but not all, family members who have spoken to the media said Clinton mentioned a video or protests in their meeting. Some said she didn’t mention a video. Clinton says she did not. If she did say something about the video, would it have been an intentional lie? It’s very possible that this is one of the many conflicting pieces of intelligence that the administration was working with at the time. There simply is not enough concrete information in the public domain for Rubio or anyone to claim as fact that Clinton did or did not lie to the Benghazi families.

Larry Ellison
Larry Ellison ... But he went further. Press reports in June revealed that in 1999, Oracle hired Investigative Group International, the Washington, D.C., private investigation firm that had earlier helped the tobacco industry and President Clinton with its hardball tactics. IGI, as The Wall Street Journal reported, “promptly went trash-hunting” – literally prowling through dumpsters containing the garbage of trade associations and other groups friendly to Microsoft. Ellison’s response to this sleaze: “ I feel very good about what we did,” he told the press. “ All we did was to try to take information that was hidden and bring it into the light. I don’t think that’s arrogance. That’s public service.” This sordid history came to mind last week when Bill Clinton -- who, in quite another sense, has done some dumpster-diving on his own -- gave a speech Feb. 19 at an Oracle applications conference in New Orleans. Clinton and Ellison are made for each other.

Larry Ellison

But he went further. Press reports in June revealed that in 1999, Oracle hired Investigative Group International, the Washington, D.C., private investigation firm that had earlier helped the tobacco industry and President Clinton with its hardball tactics. IGI, as The Wall Street Journal reported, “promptly went trash-hunting” – literally prowling through dumpsters containing the garbage of trade associations and other groups friendly to Microsoft. Ellison’s response to this sleaze: “ I feel very good about what we did,” he told the press. “ All we did was to try to take information that was hidden and bring it into the light. I don’t think that’s arrogance. That’s public service.” This sordid history came to mind last week when Bill Clinton -- who, in quite another sense, has done some dumpster-diving on his own -- gave a speech Feb. 19 at an Oracle applications conference in New Orleans. Clinton and Ellison are made for each other.

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations - CNN Politics Trump: Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations
Trump: Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations
Story highlights
(CNN) —
 Several women have publicly accused Trump of sexual misconduct, with many saying they decided to come forward after a leaked hot mic conversation in which the Republican nominee bragged about being able to touch women because he is a “star.” Trump has repeatedly denied all of the allegations against him and CNN has not independently verified the claims made against the Republican presidential nominee. Trump said at the debate that “he didn’t even apologize” to his wife Melania Trump because he didn’t do anything to the women. The final debate: CNN’s Reality Check Team vets the claims
“I didn’t know any of these women, I didn’t see these women,” Trump said. “ I think they want either fame, or her campaign did it. And I think it’s her campaign.” Clinton, the Democratic nominee, slammed Trump for his response to the allegations against him when they came out. “Well at the last debate, we heard Donald talking about what he did to women and after that a number of women have come forward saying that’s exactly what he did to them,” Clinton responded. “ Now what was his response?

Donald Trump: Hillary Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations - CNN Politics

Trump: Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations
Trump: Clinton is behind sexual assault allegations
Story highlights
(CNN) —

Several women have publicly accused Trump of sexual misconduct, with many saying they decided to come forward after a leaked hot mic conversation in which the Republican nominee bragged about being able to touch women because he is a “star.” Trump has repeatedly denied all of the allegations against him and CNN has not independently verified the claims made against the Republican presidential nominee. Trump said at the debate that “he didn’t even apologize” to his wife Melania Trump because he didn’t do anything to the women. The final debate: CNN’s Reality Check Team vets the claims
“I didn’t know any of these women, I didn’t see these women,” Trump said. “ I think they want either fame, or her campaign did it. And I think it’s her campaign.” Clinton, the Democratic nominee, slammed Trump for his response to the allegations against him when they came out. “Well at the last debate, we heard Donald talking about what he did to women and after that a number of women have come forward saying that’s exactly what he did to them,” Clinton responded. “ Now what was his response?

Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails? | US news | The Guardian Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails?
Hillary Clinton
Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails?
@smithinamerica
Did Hillary Clinton do the wrong thing when she used a private email server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013?
Did she break the law?
So how likely is it that Clinton will be indicted when the FBI hands its report to the Department of Justice?
Is anyone else in the line of fire?
If Clinton is indicted, what would happen?
But what if she is forced to pull out?
Delegate tracker: Democrats
Clinton
Sanders
 The nameless former government lawyer says: “ Aides of hers are, sadly, in jeopardy. Did they transfer stuff from classified accounts to unclassified accounts, for example by retyping parts of messages on to a smartphone and sending them to Clinton? It’s the kind of thing people get indicted for.” It seems highly unlikely that Barack Obama and the attorney general, Loretta Lynch, would do anything to jeopardise Clinton’s historic candidacy, which Obama backed on Thursday, he adds. “ I can’t imagine Lynch doing it but it’s not inconceivable the FBI report will leak and say a lot of critical things. There’s nothing good coming out of that investigation.” That could yet have political fallout before the election and, if she wins it, there might even be pressure for President Clinton to face a special prosecutor, like Richard Nixon before her. If Clinton is indicted, what would happen? Innocent until proven guilty, she would not be legally barred from running for president.

The nameless former government lawyer says: “ Aides of hers are, sadly, in jeopardy. Did they transfer stuff from classified accounts to unclassified accounts, for example by retyping parts of messages on to a smartphone and sending them to Clinton? It’s the kind of thing people get indicted for.” It seems highly unlikely that Barack Obama and the attorney general, Loretta Lynch, would do anything to jeopardise Clinton’s historic candidacy, which Obama backed on Thursday, he adds. “ I can’t imagine Lynch doing it but it’s not inconceivable the FBI report will leak and say a lot of critical things. There’s nothing good coming out of that investigation.” That could yet have political fallout before the election and, if she wins it, there might even be pressure for President Clinton to face a special prosecutor, like Richard Nixon before her. If Clinton is indicted, what would happen? Innocent until proven guilty, she would not be legally barred from running for president.

Has any US president ever been impeached? If so, why was he impeached? - Quora Has any US president ever been impeached? If so, why was he impeached?
Has any US president ever been impeached? If so, why was he impeached?
Michael Coburn
Mike Jones
Lee Katcher
 And as the congressional investigation proved that Clinton had lied about the affair, he was impeached under the charge of perjury (lying under oath). Again the Senate trial failed to convict by one vote… but this had more to do with the point being made that the “crime” that the Republican House was referring to was NOT so much the perjury but what Clinton lied about. The lie was simply the excuse for the trial. Third: Donald J. Trump: Nervous over the possibility of facing Joe Biden… and believing that Biden was the corrupt politician, Trump used money earmarked by congress to put pressure on the Ukraine to open… or at least state an opening of an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden over Biden’s actions as VP prior to 2016 when Hunter Biden got a job working for an Ukrainian oil firm. This lead to a series of reports and at least one formal complaint against Trump using Federally approved funds to get political dirt on a political rival. This report… coming relatively close on the heals to the conclusion of the Mueller investigation, which had concluded that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election on Trump’s behalf and that Trump had also tried to obstruct Mueller’s progress… was enough to get the House to begin an investigation into Trump’s dealings in the Ukraine. What then followed an investigation by the House, which Trump obstructed as much as he could, and which ultimately settled on charges related to the abuse of power… though one could technically cite bribery with regard to the “favor” over Ukraine aid… but that’s old news now. It also became a source of congressional division as Republican House and Senate members did everything possible to make it seem like the Democrats were doing this to invalidate the 2016 election… despite the fact that none of the Democratic members had ever said that.

Has any US president ever been impeached? If so, why was he impeached? - Quora

Has any US president ever been impeached? If so, why was he impeached?
Has any US president ever been impeached? If so, why was he impeached?
Michael Coburn
Mike Jones
Lee Katcher

MONEY & INVESTING UPDATE -- Review & Outlook The Lonely Crusade of Linda Ives
The Lonely Crusade of Linda Ives
By Micah Morrison
 Interviewed this week, Mr. Harmon says that Ms. Duffey is a "crackpot" and that he was "planning to replace her when all hell broke loose." Ms. Duffey says that matters were a great deal more serious than a personal dispute between her and Mr. Harmon: " My agents were turning up information linking Mr. Harmon to drugs, that's what the real problem was." Mr. Harmon also was identified in leaked investigative documents as a "target" in the 1989-1991 U.S. attorney's drug-corruption probe, and Ms. Duffey says the reason she did not respond to Mr. Harmon's attacks was that the U.S. attorney's office was assuring her that his indictment was imminent. But in November 1990 the case supervisor, Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Govar, was removed from the investigation and U.S. Attorney Banks took charge. In June 1991, Mr. Banks announced that the investigation was over. " There's not going to be any pressing of indictment against Mr. Harmon or any other public official," he said. " We found no evidence of any drug-related misconduct by public officials." Mr. Banks added that there would be no arrests in connection with the deaths of Kevin Ives and Don Henry. Bill Clinton's gubernatorial administration assumed a role in the Ives and Henry case shortly after Dr. Malak's marijuana-induced accidental death ruling.

MONEY & INVESTING UPDATE -- Review & Outlook

The Lonely Crusade of Linda Ives
The Lonely Crusade of Linda Ives
By Micah Morrison

Interviewed this week, Mr. Harmon says that Ms. Duffey is a "crackpot" and that he was "planning to replace her when all hell broke loose." Ms. Duffey says that matters were a great deal more serious than a personal dispute between her and Mr. Harmon: " My agents were turning up information linking Mr. Harmon to drugs, that's what the real problem was." Mr. Harmon also was identified in leaked investigative documents as a "target" in the 1989-1991 U.S. attorney's drug-corruption probe, and Ms. Duffey says the reason she did not respond to Mr. Harmon's attacks was that the U.S. attorney's office was assuring her that his indictment was imminent. But in November 1990 the case supervisor, Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Govar, was removed from the investigation and U.S. Attorney Banks took charge. In June 1991, Mr. Banks announced that the investigation was over. " There's not going to be any pressing of indictment against Mr. Harmon or any other public official," he said. " We found no evidence of any drug-related misconduct by public officials." Mr. Banks added that there would be no arrests in connection with the deaths of Kevin Ives and Don Henry. Bill Clinton's gubernatorial administration assumed a role in the Ives and Henry case shortly after Dr. Malak's marijuana-induced accidental death ruling.

Author claims new details about Bill Clinton's secret meeting on the tarmac with Loretta Lynch | Daily Mail Online Author claims he's about to reveal new details about Bill Clinton's secret meeting on the tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch and how it 'was not a coincidence'
Author claims he's about to reveal new details about Bill Clinton's secret meeting on the tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch and how it 'was not a coincidence'
Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch met privately in July 2016
FBI director Comey on secret meeting of Lynch and Bill Clinton
Lynch to Congress in 2016: 'No need for recusal' in Clinton probe
From the Makers of Candy Crush
 'My family received significant death threats shortly after breaking this story,' he told Fox. ' Credit cards hacked. You know, my children, we have code words. We have secret code words that they know what to do.' He added that his work had nothing to do with right or left-wing politics, but about what is right and wrong. In May last year, Sign told a Real Clear Investigations team: ' To this day I have never found a single person who claims or corroborates any story that Bill Clinton played golf on this particular trip ... I feel strongly the former president did not play golf on this visit.' Hillary's campaign was in full swing at this point and one might think Bill Clinton would be more involved in that than his golf swing on a 110-degree day in Phoenix. Copy link to paste in your message
+3
Copy link to paste in your message
Author Christopher Sign, who broke the story on Phoenix's ABC 15, says his family has received death threats for his investigative reporting
FBI director Comey on secret meeting of Lynch and Bill Clinton
Loaded
: 0%
Progress
:

Author claims new details about Bill Clinton's secret meeting on the tarmac with Loretta Lynch | Daily Mail Online

Author claims he's about to reveal new details about Bill Clinton's secret meeting on the tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch and how it 'was not a coincidence'
Author claims he's about to reveal new details about Bill Clinton's secret meeting on the tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch and how it 'was not a coincidence'
Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch met privately in July 2016
FBI director Comey on secret meeting of Lynch and Bill Clinton
Lynch to Congress in 2016: 'No need for recusal' in Clinton probe
From the Makers of Candy Crush

'My family received significant death threats shortly after breaking this story,' he told Fox. ' Credit cards hacked. You know, my children, we have code words. We have secret code words that they know what to do.' He added that his work had nothing to do with right or left-wing politics, but about what is right and wrong. In May last year, Sign told a Real Clear Investigations team: ' To this day I have never found a single person who claims or corroborates any story that Bill Clinton played golf on this particular trip ... I feel strongly the former president did not play golf on this visit.' Hillary's campaign was in full swing at this point and one might think Bill Clinton would be more involved in that than his golf swing on a 110-degree day in Phoenix. Copy link to paste in your message
+3
Copy link to paste in your message
Author Christopher Sign, who broke the story on Phoenix's ABC 15, says his family has received death threats for his investigative reporting
FBI director Comey on secret meeting of Lynch and Bill Clinton
Loaded
: 0%
Progress
:

POLITICO’S top 10 State of the Union moments - Mackenzie Weinger - POLITICO.com POLITICO’S top 10 State of the Union moments
Navigate:
POLITICO’S top 10 State of the Union moments
Text Size
Get reporter alerts
 I believe that I have provided all the material that he needs to conclude his investigations and to proceed to prosecute the guilty and to clear the innocent.” “I believe the time has come to bring that investigation and the other investigations of this matter to an end. One year of Watergate is enough,” he said. Continue Reading
Text Size
-
+
reset
Listen
Six months later, he resigned. - “I did not actually hear George Washington say that”
President Ronald Reagan kicked off his 1982 State of the Union address with a crowd-pleasing joke poking fun at the media. “President Washington began this tradition in 1790 after reminding the nation that the destiny of self-government and the ‘preservation of the sacred fire of liberty’ is ‘finally staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people,’” Reagan said. “For our friends in the press, who place a high premium on accuracy, let me say: l did not actually hear George Washington say that,” he said to huge laughs. - “The era of big government is over”: President Bill Clinton delivered one of his most famous lines during the last State of the Union of his first term when he declared “the era of big government is over.”

POLITICO’S top 10 State of the Union moments - Mackenzie Weinger - POLITICO.com

POLITICO’S top 10 State of the Union moments
Navigate:
POLITICO’S top 10 State of the Union moments
Text Size
Get reporter alerts

I believe that I have provided all the material that he needs to conclude his investigations and to proceed to prosecute the guilty and to clear the innocent.” “I believe the time has come to bring that investigation and the other investigations of this matter to an end. One year of Watergate is enough,” he said. Continue Reading
Text Size
-
+
reset
Listen
Six months later, he resigned. - “I did not actually hear George Washington say that”
President Ronald Reagan kicked off his 1982 State of the Union address with a crowd-pleasing joke poking fun at the media. “President Washington began this tradition in 1790 after reminding the nation that the destiny of self-government and the ‘preservation of the sacred fire of liberty’ is ‘finally staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people,’” Reagan said. “For our friends in the press, who place a high premium on accuracy, let me say: l did not actually hear George Washington say that,” he said to huge laughs. - “The era of big government is over”: President Bill Clinton delivered one of his most famous lines during the last State of the Union of his first term when he declared “the era of big government is over.”

Here’s What a Special Counsel Means in the Russia Investigation - The New York Times Here’s What a Special Counsel Means in the Russia Investigation
Here’s What a Special Counsel Means in the Russia Investigation
What is within Mr. Mueller’s jurisdiction?
What is a special counsel?
Is Mr. Mueller fully independent?
What are the limits of a special counsel’s autonomy?
How might the requirement to obey department practices matter?
Can Mr. Rosenstein overrule Mr. Mueller’s decisions?
What about firing him?
 While the Supreme Court upheld this arrangement, critics said it allowed the prosecutor to run amok. Republicans learned to hate the arrangement during the Iran-contra investigation into the Reagan administration, and Democrats did, as well, during the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky investigations into President Bill Clinton. When the independent counsel law expired in 1999, Congress did not renew it. Instead, the Justice Department during the Clinton administration issued internal regulations enabling the attorney general to appoint a special counsel. But there appears to be room for potential conflict over how to interpret those regulations. Sarah Isgur Flores, a Justice Department spokeswoman, noted that there was scant precedent to scrutinize when interpreting the 1999 regulations because only one previous special counsel was appointed under them. Image
Robert S. Mueller III was F.B.I. director for 12 years. Credit...
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
That case involved misconduct by law enforcement officials, not a national security matter. What are the limits of a special counsel’s autonomy? Although Mr. Rosenstein’s letter says Mr. Mueller is authorized “to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters,” it also says he is subject to the special counsel regulations.

Here’s What a Special Counsel Means in the Russia Investigation - The New York Times

Here’s What a Special Counsel Means in the Russia Investigation
Here’s What a Special Counsel Means in the Russia Investigation
What is within Mr. Mueller’s jurisdiction?
What is a special counsel?
Is Mr. Mueller fully independent?
What are the limits of a special counsel’s autonomy?
How might the requirement to obey department practices matter?
Can Mr. Rosenstein overrule Mr. Mueller’s decisions?
What about firing him?

While the Supreme Court upheld this arrangement, critics said it allowed the prosecutor to run amok. Republicans learned to hate the arrangement during the Iran-contra investigation into the Reagan administration, and Democrats did, as well, during the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky investigations into President Bill Clinton. When the independent counsel law expired in 1999, Congress did not renew it. Instead, the Justice Department during the Clinton administration issued internal regulations enabling the attorney general to appoint a special counsel. But there appears to be room for potential conflict over how to interpret those regulations. Sarah Isgur Flores, a Justice Department spokeswoman, noted that there was scant precedent to scrutinize when interpreting the 1999 regulations because only one previous special counsel was appointed under them. Image
Robert S. Mueller III was F.B.I. director for 12 years. Credit...
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
That case involved misconduct by law enforcement officials, not a national security matter. What are the limits of a special counsel’s autonomy? Although Mr. Rosenstein’s letter says Mr. Mueller is authorized “to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters,” it also says he is subject to the special counsel regulations.

Fact or Fiction: Was Hillary Clinton fired from Watergate investigation? | Urban Myths Fact or Fiction: Was Hillary Clinton fired from Watergate investigation?
Fact or Fiction: Was Hillary Clinton fired from Watergate investigation?
2013 Version:
So what did Hillary do?
Comments
 North Star was a newspaper syndicate that provided services until early 2012. Calabrese’s information came from Democrat Jerry Zeifman, a counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Clinton on the Watergate investigation. Zeifman’s 2006 book, “Hillary’s Pursuit of Power,” states that she “… engaged in a variety of self-serving unethical practices in violation of House rules.” On his now-shuttered website, Zeifman said, “Hillary Clinton is ethically unfit to be either a senator or president — and if she were to become president, the last vestiges of the traditional moral authority of the party of Roosevelt, Truman and Johnson will be destroyed.” The problem is that Hillary Clinton remained on the Watergate Committee until Richard Nixon resigned and the Committee was shut down. Hillary Clinton did not work directly for Jerry Zeifman, and so he had no authority to fire her. There is no evidence she was fired, so this story is false. Here are two versions of the e-mail via TruthorFiction.com,
2013 Version: FLASHBACK: HILLARY CLINTON FIRED FROM WATERGATE INVESTIGATION FOR FOR ‘LYING, UNETHICAL BEHAVI OR’
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther … and goes much deeper … than anyone realizes.

Fact or Fiction: Was Hillary Clinton fired from Watergate investigation? | Urban Myths

Fact or Fiction: Was Hillary Clinton fired from Watergate investigation?
Fact or Fiction: Was Hillary Clinton fired from Watergate investigation?
2013 Version:
So what did Hillary do?
Comments

North Star was a newspaper syndicate that provided services until early 2012. Calabrese’s information came from Democrat Jerry Zeifman, a counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Clinton on the Watergate investigation. Zeifman’s 2006 book, “Hillary’s Pursuit of Power,” states that she “… engaged in a variety of self-serving unethical practices in violation of House rules.” On his now-shuttered website, Zeifman said, “Hillary Clinton is ethically unfit to be either a senator or president — and if she were to become president, the last vestiges of the traditional moral authority of the party of Roosevelt, Truman and Johnson will be destroyed.” The problem is that Hillary Clinton remained on the Watergate Committee until Richard Nixon resigned and the Committee was shut down. Hillary Clinton did not work directly for Jerry Zeifman, and so he had no authority to fire her. There is no evidence she was fired, so this story is false. Here are two versions of the e-mail via TruthorFiction.com,
2013 Version: FLASHBACK: HILLARY CLINTON FIRED FROM WATERGATE INVESTIGATION FOR FOR ‘LYING, UNETHICAL BEHAVI OR’
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther … and goes much deeper … than anyone realizes.

Trump is a man of his word and he’s making good on all of his campaign promises, so why wouldn’t he keep this one? The left and the media has been so blinded by their partisanship that they’ve failed to see that the greatest bait and switch in the history of the world is going down right before their very eyes. They’ve naively assumed that since Mueller had been a part of the swamp, he’d protect the swamp. However, just because he’s associated with corrupt politicians like the Clintons for years does not mean that he likes them or has any interest in protecting them at this point. After all, the Clintons did go to Trump’s wedding and you know what they say: keep your friends close and your enemies closer. So the investigation is steering straight for the real guilty actors and Tony Podesta is under the gun for The Podesta Group’s involvement with selling the country’s Uranium to Russia. This will lead to the indictments of his brother, John, Clinton’s former campaign manager, and, yes, Hillary too! Now if Mueller wasn’t going after Tony, why did he step down as CEO of his company last week? Multiple sources have confirmed to me Podesta is one of the 17 sealed indictments currently sitting in DC.

Trump is a man of his word and he’s making good on all of his campaign promises, so why wouldn’t he keep this one? The left and the media has been so blinded by their partisanship that they’ve failed to see that the greatest bait and switch in the history of the world is going down right before their very eyes. They’ve naively assumed that since Mueller had been a part of the swamp, he’d protect the swamp. However, just because he’s associated with corrupt politicians like the Clintons for years does not mean that he likes them or has any interest in protecting them at this point. After all, the Clintons did go to Trump’s wedding and you know what they say: keep your friends close and your enemies closer. So the investigation is steering straight for the real guilty actors and Tony Podesta is under the gun for The Podesta Group’s involvement with selling the country’s Uranium to Russia. This will lead to the indictments of his brother, John, Clinton’s former campaign manager, and, yes, Hillary too! Now if Mueller wasn’t going after Tony, why did he step down as CEO of his company last week? Multiple sources have confirmed to me Podesta is one of the 17 sealed indictments currently sitting in DC.

Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails? | US news | The Guardian Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails?
Hillary Clinton
Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails?
@smithinamerica
Did Hillary Clinton do the wrong thing when she used a private email server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013?
Did she break the law?
So how likely is it that Clinton will be indicted when the FBI hands its report to the Department of Justice?
Is anyone else in the line of fire?
If Clinton is indicted, what would happen?
But what if she is forced to pull out?
Delegate tracker: Democrats
Clinton
Sanders
 But a longtime government lawyer, who does not wish to be named, muses: “ My gut is telling me she won’t be indicted. It would also have told you Donald Trump won’t be nominated.” Some are convinced she will be. Dave Handy, a political organiser who will represent Bernie Sanders as a delegate-at-large at the Democratic convention in Philadelphia, tweeted: “ It’s going to be funny to watch when Hillary gets indicted, and all her supporters are like: [ with a gif of a person’s head exploding].” He says: “ There’s been a large push online to say this investigation is over and Hillary Clinton has been cleared and nothing’s going to happen. I think that’s total bullshit in that no one knows what’s happening at the FBI and, if they did, they [the FBI or those outside the bureau with knowledge of the investigation] broke the law.

But a longtime government lawyer, who does not wish to be named, muses: “ My gut is telling me she won’t be indicted. It would also have told you Donald Trump won’t be nominated.” Some are convinced she will be. Dave Handy, a political organiser who will represent Bernie Sanders as a delegate-at-large at the Democratic convention in Philadelphia, tweeted: “ It’s going to be funny to watch when Hillary gets indicted, and all her supporters are like: [ with a gif of a person’s head exploding].” He says: “ There’s been a large push online to say this investigation is over and Hillary Clinton has been cleared and nothing’s going to happen. I think that’s total bullshit in that no one knows what’s happening at the FBI and, if they did, they [the FBI or those outside the bureau with knowledge of the investigation] broke the law.

Kevin Clinesmith: Former FBI Lawyer: 5 Fast Facts to Know | Heavy.com Kevin Clinesmith: Former FBI Lawyer Expected to Plead Guilty in Russia Inquiry
Kevin Clinesmith: Former FBI Lawyer Expected to Plead Guilty in Russia Inquiry
1. Clinesmith, a Michigan Native Who Previously Worked for the Department of Energy, Is Expected to Enter a Plea to a Single Felony Count
2. Clinesmith Is Accused of Being the Attorney Who Wrote ‘Viva Le Resistance,’ Was Devastated by Trump’s Victory & Described Mike Pence as ‘Stupid’
3. Clinesmith Is a Marathon Runner & Dragoncon Fan
4. Clinesmith Was Married & Loved the Diversity of His Virginia Neighborhood
5. Clinesmith Was the Attorney Who Was Removed From the Mueller Investigation
 He altered the original email to say that Mr. Page had not been a source — a material change to a document used in a federal investigation.” The ties were downplayed in other FISA warrants but the accusations against Clinesmith relate to the third renewal, the newspaper reported. Clinesmith’s name surfaced previously. In 2018, GOP Congressman Mark Meadows publicly accused Clinesmith of possibly being the FBI lawyer described in the inspector general’s report as writing anti-Trump messages, including one that declared “viva le resistance.” The Times is now reporting that Clinesmith is that lawyer, known as FBI lawyer 2 in the IG’s earlier report into the Clinton email investigation. Meadows, a Republican from North Carolina, released the identity of Clinesmith during a hearing on the Inspector General’s report into the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails. According to The New York Post, Meadows did so at the time over the objections of the FBI. Here’s what you need to know: 1. Clinesmith, a Michigan Native Who Previously Worked for the Department of Energy, Is Expected to Enter a Plea to a Single Felony Count
Kevin Clinesmith
On August 14, the Times reported, via three sources, that Clinesmith, a “former F.B.I. lawyer,” intends “to plead guilty to falsifying a document as part of a deal with prosecutors conducting their own criminal inquiry of the Russia investigation.”

Kevin Clinesmith: Former FBI Lawyer: 5 Fast Facts to Know | Heavy.com

Kevin Clinesmith: Former FBI Lawyer Expected to Plead Guilty in Russia Inquiry
Kevin Clinesmith: Former FBI Lawyer Expected to Plead Guilty in Russia Inquiry
1. Clinesmith, a Michigan Native Who Previously Worked for the Department of Energy, Is Expected to Enter a Plea to a Single Felony Count
2. Clinesmith Is Accused of Being the Attorney Who Wrote ‘Viva Le Resistance,’ Was Devastated by Trump’s Victory & Described Mike Pence as ‘Stupid’
3. Clinesmith Is a Marathon Runner & Dragoncon Fan
4. Clinesmith Was Married & Loved the Diversity of His Virginia Neighborhood
5. Clinesmith Was the Attorney Who Was Removed From the Mueller Investigation

He altered the original email to say that Mr. Page had not been a source — a material change to a document used in a federal investigation.” The ties were downplayed in other FISA warrants but the accusations against Clinesmith relate to the third renewal, the newspaper reported. Clinesmith’s name surfaced previously. In 2018, GOP Congressman Mark Meadows publicly accused Clinesmith of possibly being the FBI lawyer described in the inspector general’s report as writing anti-Trump messages, including one that declared “viva le resistance.” The Times is now reporting that Clinesmith is that lawyer, known as FBI lawyer 2 in the IG’s earlier report into the Clinton email investigation. Meadows, a Republican from North Carolina, released the identity of Clinesmith during a hearing on the Inspector General’s report into the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails. According to The New York Post, Meadows did so at the time over the objections of the FBI. Here’s what you need to know: 1. Clinesmith, a Michigan Native Who Previously Worked for the Department of Energy, Is Expected to Enter a Plea to a Single Felony Count
Kevin Clinesmith
On August 14, the Times reported, via three sources, that Clinesmith, a “former F.B.I. lawyer,” intends “to plead guilty to falsifying a document as part of a deal with prosecutors conducting their own criminal inquiry of the Russia investigation.”

Andrew McCabe - Wikipedia Andrew McCabe
Andrew McCabe
Contents
Early life
Professional career
Crossfire Hurricane, Jeff Sessions investigation, and James Comey's termination
Wall Street Journal articles and aftermath
Political pressure
Resignation and firing
Legal proceedings
Personal life
Works
See also
References
External links
 Although the existence of the FBI's investigation in the Clinton Foundation had been leaked, the FBI up until that point had not officially confirmed the investigation. In January 2017, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice and the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee investigated McCabe over concerns that he should have recused himself from the investigation of the Clinton email scandal. The investigation ceased one year later, in January 2018, with the release of FBI documents showing that McCabe had followed FBI protocol regarding potential conflicts of interest. In 2015, before his wife ran for political office in Virginia, McCabe had notified the FBI about his wife's plans and consulted with the FBI about how he would avoid a conflict of interest. McCabe did not oversee the Clinton email server probe while his wife was running for office, and he was excluded from FBI investigations into public corruption cases in Virginia. According to USA Today, "the internal documents, published on the FBI's website, support what the bureau has asserted previously: that McCabe had no conflicts when he assumed oversight of th

Andrew McCabe - Wikipedia

Andrew McCabe
Andrew McCabe
Contents
Early life
Professional career
Crossfire Hurricane, Jeff Sessions investigation, and James Comey's termination
Wall Street Journal articles and aftermath
Political pressure
Resignation and firing
Legal proceedings
Personal life
Works
See also
References
External links

Although the existence of the FBI's investigation in the Clinton Foundation had been leaked, the FBI up until that point had not officially confirmed the investigation. In January 2017, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice and the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee investigated McCabe over concerns that he should have recused himself from the investigation of the Clinton email scandal. The investigation ceased one year later, in January 2018, with the release of FBI documents showing that McCabe had followed FBI protocol regarding potential conflicts of interest. In 2015, before his wife ran for political office in Virginia, McCabe had notified the FBI about his wife's plans and consulted with the FBI about how he would avoid a conflict of interest. McCabe did not oversee the Clinton email server probe while his wife was running for office, and he was excluded from FBI investigations into public corruption cases in Virginia. According to USA Today, "the internal documents, published on the FBI's website, support what the bureau has asserted previously: that McCabe had no conflicts when he assumed oversight of th

Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin On 'Tragedy' Of Mueller Investigation : NPR Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Explains The 'Tragedy' Of The Mueller Investigation
Politics
Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Explains The 'Tragedy' Of The Mueller Investigation
National Security
Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction
Interview Highlights
On why it was important to interview Trump face-to-face — which Mueller didn't do
On how Trump's team turned Mueller into a political opponent
On Mueller's efforts to stay apolitical
National Security
The Mueller Report Is Getting A Lot Of Attention. Here's How We Got Here
On how Mueller didn't investigate Trump's financial dealings with Russia
Politics
How Trump's Impeachment Unfolded, In The Words Of Those Who Administered It
On the dedication of the book to "my fellow journalists"
Fund public radio's future
 Saul Loeb, Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images
Six months after the conclusion of President Trump's impeachment, CNN legal analyst and New Yorker staff writer Jeffrey Toobin says special counsel Robert Mueller 's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election was fundamentally flawed. "The tragedy of the Mueller investigation is they did this brilliant investigation proving that Donald Trump repeatedly obstructed justice — far worse than Richard Nixon did in Watergate, far worse than Bill Clinton did in the Lewinsky matter ," Toobin argues. " But then he doesn't finish the job and say what is obvious." Toobin says that Mueller's decision to conclude his report without explicitly stating that the president had obstructed of justice left the door open for Trump to claim he had done nothing wrong — despite evidence to the contrary. "When he told the FBI director not to investigate Michael Flynn, when he tried to get his White House counsel to fire Mueller, when he told his White House counsel to lie about whether he tried to get him to fire Mueller — all of that was egregious obstruction of justice," he says. Toobin's new book, True Crimes and Misdemeanors, looks at how Trump survived the Mueller investigation and impeachment. He says the conclusion of Mueller's report was driven by the Justice Department policy of not indicting a sitting president. National Security
Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction
"It's all laid out in the Mueller report," Toobin says. " But then ... Mueller pulled this punch ultimately. And it gave the president a free pass effectively on the fact that he repeatedly committed obstruction of justice."

Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin On 'Tragedy' Of Mueller Investigation : NPR

Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Explains The 'Tragedy' Of The Mueller Investigation
Politics
Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Explains The 'Tragedy' Of The Mueller Investigation
National Security
Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction
Interview Highlights
On why it was important to interview Trump face-to-face — which Mueller didn't do
On how Trump's team turned Mueller into a political opponent
On Mueller's efforts to stay apolitical
National Security
The Mueller Report Is Getting A Lot Of Attention. Here's How We Got Here
On how Mueller didn't investigate Trump's financial dealings with Russia
Politics
How Trump's Impeachment Unfolded, In The Words Of Those Who Administered It
On the dedication of the book to "my fellow journalists"
Fund public radio's future

Saul Loeb, Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images
Six months after the conclusion of President Trump's impeachment, CNN legal analyst and New Yorker staff writer Jeffrey Toobin says special counsel Robert Mueller 's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election was fundamentally flawed. "The tragedy of the Mueller investigation is they did this brilliant investigation proving that Donald Trump repeatedly obstructed justice — far worse than Richard Nixon did in Watergate, far worse than Bill Clinton did in the Lewinsky matter ," Toobin argues. " But then he doesn't finish the job and say what is obvious." Toobin says that Mueller's decision to conclude his report without explicitly stating that the president had obstructed of justice left the door open for Trump to claim he had done nothing wrong — despite evidence to the contrary. "When he told the FBI director not to investigate Michael Flynn, when he tried to get his White House counsel to fire Mueller, when he told his White House counsel to lie about whether he tried to get him to fire Mueller — all of that was egregious obstruction of justice," he says. Toobin's new book, True Crimes and Misdemeanors, looks at how Trump survived the Mueller investigation and impeachment. He says the conclusion of Mueller's report was driven by the Justice Department policy of not indicting a sitting president. National Security
Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction
"It's all laid out in the Mueller report," Toobin says. " But then ... Mueller pulled this punch ultimately. And it gave the president a free pass effectively on the fact that he repeatedly committed obstruction of justice."

Mueller report: collusion findings are devastating for Trump - Vox The Mueller report’s collusion section is much worse than you think
The Mueller report’s collusion section is much worse than you think
The strong evidence of (something like) collusion
What “no collusion” gets wrong
Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?
 The section of the report focusing on Russian interference in the election is not an exoneration of Trump’s innocence. It’s a devastating portrayal of his approach to politics. The strong evidence of (something like) collusion
Although Attorney General William Barr said that there was “no collusion” in his press conference before the report’s release, Mueller is actually quite explicit that he did not address the question of “collusion.” This is because, to his mind, the term is not precise enough, nor does it fall within the ambit of what was essentially a criminal investigation. “Collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law,” Mueller writes. “ For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.” So when Mueller concludes that he “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities,” he is not saying that there is no evidence of “collusion” at all, in any sense. What he is saying is that there is insufficient evidence to prove that the Trump administration was directly involved in Russian crimes like stealing Clinton’s emails. But did the Trump campaign actively work with the Russian government to improve its electoral chances? If that’s the standard, then the report provides plenty of evidence to suggest the answer is yes.

Mueller report: collusion findings are devastating for Trump - Vox

The Mueller report’s collusion section is much worse than you think
The Mueller report’s collusion section is much worse than you think
The strong evidence of (something like) collusion
What “no collusion” gets wrong
Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?

The section of the report focusing on Russian interference in the election is not an exoneration of Trump’s innocence. It’s a devastating portrayal of his approach to politics. The strong evidence of (something like) collusion
Although Attorney General William Barr said that there was “no collusion” in his press conference before the report’s release, Mueller is actually quite explicit that he did not address the question of “collusion.” This is because, to his mind, the term is not precise enough, nor does it fall within the ambit of what was essentially a criminal investigation. “Collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law,” Mueller writes. “ For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.” So when Mueller concludes that he “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities,” he is not saying that there is no evidence of “collusion” at all, in any sense. What he is saying is that there is insufficient evidence to prove that the Trump administration was directly involved in Russian crimes like stealing Clinton’s emails. But did the Trump campaign actively work with the Russian government to improve its electoral chances? If that’s the standard, then the report provides plenty of evidence to suggest the answer is yes.

Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin On 'Tragedy' Of Mueller Investigation : NPR Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Explains The 'Tragedy' Of The Mueller Investigation
Politics
Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Explains The 'Tragedy' Of The Mueller Investigation
National Security
Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction
Interview Highlights
On why it was important to interview Trump face-to-face — which Mueller didn't do
On how Trump's team turned Mueller into a political opponent
On Mueller's efforts to stay apolitical
National Security
The Mueller Report Is Getting A Lot Of Attention. Here's How We Got Here
On how Mueller didn't investigate Trump's financial dealings with Russia
Politics
How Trump's Impeachment Unfolded, In The Words Of Those Who Administered It
On the dedication of the book to "my fellow journalists"
Fund public radio's future
 Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin On 'Tragedy' Of Mueller Investigation : NPR
Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin On 'Tragedy' Of Mueller Investigation Toobin's new book, True Crimes and Misdemeanors, examines how Trump and his team outmaneuvered special counsel Robert Mueller. Mueller, he says, gave Trump "a free pass" on obstruction of justice. Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Explains The 'Tragedy' Of The Mueller Investigation
Listen · 43:04
43-Minute Listen
Add to Playlist
Toggle more options
Download
Embed
Embed < iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/899270408/899406971" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
Transcript
Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Explains The 'Tragedy' Of The Mueller Investigation 43:04
NPR
subscribe to The NPR Politics Podcast podcast
NPR One
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Pocket Casts
Spotify
RSS link
Politics
Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Explains The 'Tragedy' Of The Mueller Investigation
August 5, 20201:36 PM ET
Heard on Fresh Air
Terry Gross
Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Explains The 'Tragedy' Of The Mueller Investigation
Listen · 43:04
43-Minute Listen
Add to
Toggle more options
Download
Embed < iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/899270408/899406971" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
Transcript
Enlarge this image
Robert Mueller (left) "gave the president a free pass effectively on the fact that he repeatedly committed obstruction of justice," legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin says. Saul Loeb, Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images hide caption
toggle caption
Saul Loeb, Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images
Robert Mueller (left) "gave the president a free pass effectively on the fact that he repeatedly committed obstruction of justice," legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin says. Saul Loeb, Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images
Six months after the conclusion of President Trump's impeachment, CNN legal analyst and New Yorker staff writer Jeffrey Toobin says special counsel Robert Mueller 's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election was fundamentally flawed. "The tragedy of the Mueller investigation is they did this brilliant investigation proving that Donald Trump repeatedly obstructed justice — far worse than Richard Nixon did in Watergate, far worse than Bill Clinton did in the Lewinsky matter ," Toobin argues. " But then he doesn't finish the job and say what is obvious." Toobin says that Mueller's decision to conclude his report without explicitly stating that the president had obstructed of justice left the door open for Trump to claim he had done nothing wrong — despite evidence to the contrary. "When he told the FBI director not to investigate Michael Flynn, when he tried to get his White House counsel to fire Mueller, when he told his White House counsel to lie about whether he tried to get him to fire Mueller — all of that was egregious obstruction of justice," he says.

Hillary Clinton's Handling of 1975 Rape Case Emerges Again - ABC News
 According to a Newsday investigation, what should have been a five-year sentence, was reduced to four years of probation and a year in county jail, with two months taken off for time he had already served. What has Hillary Clinton said about the trial? Hillary Clinton wrote about the trial in her 2003 autobiography, "Living History." In the book, Clinton defended taking on the client, saying that while at first she "didn't feel comfortable," she realized that as an attorney she had "an ethical and legal obligation to defend him to the fullest extent of the law." She described how as his lawyer she was able to hire a New York-based forensics expert who "cast doubt on the evidentiary value of semen and blood samples collected by the sheriff's office." Clinton wrote that her experience from the trial is what led her to set up Arkansas' first rape hotline. Did Clinton take the case voluntarily or was she appointed by the court? In "Living History," Clinton wrote that the criminal court judge appointed her, and that she "couldn't very well refuse the judge's request." The 2008 Newsday story quotes then-Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson who refers to her as being "appointed by the Circuit Court of Washington County." However, in the newly-released audio tapes Clinton says a prosecutor for the case asked to take the case "as a favor to him."

Hillary Clinton's Handling of 1975 Rape Case Emerges Again - ABC News

According to a Newsday investigation, what should have been a five-year sentence, was reduced to four years of probation and a year in county jail, with two months taken off for time he had already served. What has Hillary Clinton said about the trial? Hillary Clinton wrote about the trial in her 2003 autobiography, "Living History." In the book, Clinton defended taking on the client, saying that while at first she "didn't feel comfortable," she realized that as an attorney she had "an ethical and legal obligation to defend him to the fullest extent of the law." She described how as his lawyer she was able to hire a New York-based forensics expert who "cast doubt on the evidentiary value of semen and blood samples collected by the sheriff's office." Clinton wrote that her experience from the trial is what led her to set up Arkansas' first rape hotline. Did Clinton take the case voluntarily or was she appointed by the court? In "Living History," Clinton wrote that the criminal court judge appointed her, and that she "couldn't very well refuse the judge's request." The 2008 Newsday story quotes then-Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson who refers to her as being "appointed by the Circuit Court of Washington County." However, in the newly-released audio tapes Clinton says a prosecutor for the case asked to take the case "as a favor to him."

Gary Byrne, Former Secret Service Agent: 5 Fast Facts | Heavy.com Gary Byrne, Former Secret Service Agent: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Gary Byrne, Former Secret Service Agent: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
1. He Worked in Bill Clinton’s White House
2. He Says Hillary Clinton is Erratic and Violent
3. He Was Worried Hillary Clinton Might Have Him Killed
4. Secret Service Agents Have Discredited the Book
5. Donald Trump Has Repeatedly Promoted the Book
 He Was Worried Hillary Clinton Might Have Him Killed
In Crisis of Character, Gary Byrne says he was seriously worried the Clintons might try to kill him. ( Facebook)
Throughout the book, Byrne runs through various Hillary Clinton conspiracy theories from over the years, including the allegation that she had Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster killed, according to Media Matters. Though he offers no new evidence, Byrne says that Foster always seemed uncomfortable in the White House and says that word circulated throughout the Secret Service that Hillary berated Foster endlessly. He describes the circumstances surrounding Foster’s suicide as “spooky” and goes as far as to say he was worried Bill and Hillary Clinton might try to have him killed next. Byrne recalls instances when he was being interviewed by lawyers, and he was so paranoid of being assassinated he had his weapon loaded and ready to fire. Foster’s death was ruled a suicide after five separate investigations, one of which spanned three years. On the campaign trail in May, Donald Trump described Foster’s death “very fishy,” according to The Washington Post. 4. Secret Service Agents Have Discredited the Book
A secret service agent protects Hillary Clinton during a campaign stop in Iowa. ( Getty)
The Association of Former Agents of the United States Secret Service, a nonpartisan organization of Secret Service veterans, has denounced Byrne’s book, saying he clearly only wrote it for political purposes.

Gary Byrne, Former Secret Service Agent: 5 Fast Facts | Heavy.com

Gary Byrne, Former Secret Service Agent: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Gary Byrne, Former Secret Service Agent: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
1. He Worked in Bill Clinton’s White House
2. He Says Hillary Clinton is Erratic and Violent
3. He Was Worried Hillary Clinton Might Have Him Killed
4. Secret Service Agents Have Discredited the Book
5. Donald Trump Has Repeatedly Promoted the Book

He Was Worried Hillary Clinton Might Have Him Killed
In Crisis of Character, Gary Byrne says he was seriously worried the Clintons might try to kill him. ( Facebook)
Throughout the book, Byrne runs through various Hillary Clinton conspiracy theories from over the years, including the allegation that she had Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster killed, according to Media Matters. Though he offers no new evidence, Byrne says that Foster always seemed uncomfortable in the White House and says that word circulated throughout the Secret Service that Hillary berated Foster endlessly. He describes the circumstances surrounding Foster’s suicide as “spooky” and goes as far as to say he was worried Bill and Hillary Clinton might try to have him killed next. Byrne recalls instances when he was being interviewed by lawyers, and he was so paranoid of being assassinated he had his weapon loaded and ready to fire. Foster’s death was ruled a suicide after five separate investigations, one of which spanned three years. On the campaign trail in May, Donald Trump described Foster’s death “very fishy,” according to The Washington Post. 4. Secret Service Agents Have Discredited the Book
A secret service agent protects Hillary Clinton during a campaign stop in Iowa. ( Getty)
The Association of Former Agents of the United States Secret Service, a nonpartisan organization of Secret Service veterans, has denounced Byrne’s book, saying he clearly only wrote it for political purposes.

Stephen Hargrove, Loretta Lynch’s Husband: 5 Fast Facts | Heavy.com Stephen Hargrove, Loretta Lynch’s Husband: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Stephen Hargrove, Loretta Lynch’s Husband: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
1. He Is a Former Showtime Employee
2. He Has Two Children From a Previous Marriage
3. He and Loretta Met at a Police Event
4. When His Daughter Was Taken Into Police Custody, He Ensured She Was Not Given Special Treatment
5. He Was Present During the Meeting With Bill Clinton
 The Daily News reports that he went as far as to ensure that Absalom’s shoelaces were removed when she was put in the cell. Absalom herself apparently didn’t want special treatment either, as she reportedly made no mention of her relationship to Loretta Lynch during the ordeal. 5. He Was Present During the Meeting With Bill Clinton
Loretta Lynch speaks at a press conference in Washington, DC. ( Getty)
Loretta Lynch was criticized by both Republicans and Democrats when she held a private meeting with Bill Clinton this week; due to her role in the ongoing Hillary Clinton email investigation, many questioned her secretly speaking to Clinton’s husband in this fashion. Stephen Hargrove, as it turns out, was present for that exchange; Stephen had been with his wife on a recent trip, and the two had just landed when Bill Clinton noticed their plane and decided to go over and say hello, according to the Los Angeles Times . Lynch told reporters that their conversation was only concerning Clinton’s new grandchildren and that they did not discuss the Clinton email case. However, Lynch acknowledged that this may have been a mistake and said that she would accept whatever decisions the FBI makes, according to The New York Times.

Stephen Hargrove, Loretta Lynch’s Husband: 5 Fast Facts | Heavy.com

Stephen Hargrove, Loretta Lynch’s Husband: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Stephen Hargrove, Loretta Lynch’s Husband: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
1. He Is a Former Showtime Employee
2. He Has Two Children From a Previous Marriage
3. He and Loretta Met at a Police Event
4. When His Daughter Was Taken Into Police Custody, He Ensured She Was Not Given Special Treatment
5. He Was Present During the Meeting With Bill Clinton

The Daily News reports that he went as far as to ensure that Absalom’s shoelaces were removed when she was put in the cell. Absalom herself apparently didn’t want special treatment either, as she reportedly made no mention of her relationship to Loretta Lynch during the ordeal. 5. He Was Present During the Meeting With Bill Clinton
Loretta Lynch speaks at a press conference in Washington, DC. ( Getty)
Loretta Lynch was criticized by both Republicans and Democrats when she held a private meeting with Bill Clinton this week; due to her role in the ongoing Hillary Clinton email investigation, many questioned her secretly speaking to Clinton’s husband in this fashion. Stephen Hargrove, as it turns out, was present for that exchange; Stephen had been with his wife on a recent trip, and the two had just landed when Bill Clinton noticed their plane and decided to go over and say hello, according to the Los Angeles Times . Lynch told reporters that their conversation was only concerning Clinton’s new grandchildren and that they did not discuss the Clinton email case. However, Lynch acknowledged that this may have been a mistake and said that she would accept whatever decisions the FBI makes, according to The New York Times.

Has any US president ever been impeached? If so, why was he impeached? - Quora Has any US president ever been impeached? If so, why was he impeached?
Has any US president ever been impeached? If so, why was he impeached?
Michael Coburn
Mike Jones
Lee Katcher
 Elected over HW Bush, Bill Clinton entered the White House with a rather centrist view of politics and taking a big step to the Right to try and compete in a political climate that was fast becoming a generally Republican stronghold, so long as the economy was stable. And in many ways Clinton did relatively well… BUT he also had issues with the fact that he couldn’t keep his hands to himself. He’d had relations with women other than Hillary and in Washington’s political climate… these rumors soon attracted attention. The attention was used to draw conclusions that Clinton was a bad president for being unfaithful to his wife and that a good President would be faithful. Clinton ultimately didn’t help himself when he tried to cover information up and then block access to witnesses and evidence, much of which confirmed that he’d had an extramarital affair. And as the congressional investigation proved that Clinton had lied about the affair, he was impeached under the charge of perjury (lying under oath). Again the Senate trial failed to convict by one vote… but this had more to do with the point being made that the “crime” that the Republican House was referring to was NOT so much the perjury but what Clinton lied about. The lie was simply the excuse for the trial. Third: Donald J. Trump:

Elected over HW Bush, Bill Clinton entered the White House with a rather centrist view of politics and taking a big step to the Right to try and compete in a political climate that was fast becoming a generally Republican stronghold, so long as the economy was stable. And in many ways Clinton did relatively well… BUT he also had issues with the fact that he couldn’t keep his hands to himself. He’d had relations with women other than Hillary and in Washington’s political climate… these rumors soon attracted attention. The attention was used to draw conclusions that Clinton was a bad president for being unfaithful to his wife and that a good President would be faithful. Clinton ultimately didn’t help himself when he tried to cover information up and then block access to witnesses and evidence, much of which confirmed that he’d had an extramarital affair. And as the congressional investigation proved that Clinton had lied about the affair, he was impeached under the charge of perjury (lying under oath). Again the Senate trial failed to convict by one vote… but this had more to do with the point being made that the “crime” that the Republican House was referring to was NOT so much the perjury but what Clinton lied about. The lie was simply the excuse for the trial. Third: Donald J. Trump:

Foundation faceoff: The Trump Foundation vs. the Clinton Foundation - The Washington Post Foundation faceoff: The Trump Foundation vs. the Clinton Foundation
Foundation faceoff: The Trump Foundation vs. the Clinton Foundation
The Facts
The Pinocchio Test
Four Pinocchios
 Advertisement
Allison told The Fact Checker he was referring to media coverage, in particular a Washington Post report that revealed that Bill Clinton was paid at least $26 million in speaking fees by companies and organizations that are also major donors to the foundation. A memo written by a top Clinton aide, leaked by WikiLeaks in 2016, further exposed the inner workings of “Bill Clinton Inc.,” in which donors to the Clinton Foundation were pressed to provide personal income to the former president. Story continues below advertisement
“It was highly unusual to me and ethically challenged,” Allison said, adding that he stood by the quote. But he noted that he made the “slush-fund” comment in the course of a 20-minute conversation. “ What was robbed from the context of the quote is that I did say that the Clinton Foundation did good work,” he said. In any case, by the end of 2015, Charity Navigator removed the Clinton Foundation from its watch list. The organization indicated that tax information made available by the Clinton Foundation, including four years of tax returns amended by the organization, as well as a public memo submitted by the group, met Charity Navigator’s requirements for removal. Advertisement
In 2016, Charity Navigator began listing the Clinton Foundation as a “low concern” charity, with a four-star rating, its highest rating. The Clinton Foundation currently has a score of 93.91 out of 100 for finances, accountability and transparency. Story continues below advertisement
Meanwhile, Charity Navigator in 2016 issued a “high concern” advisory on the Trump Foundation after news reports that the New York attorney general would investigate it and Trump would seek to close it.

Foundation faceoff: The Trump Foundation vs. the Clinton Foundation - The Washington Post

Foundation faceoff: The Trump Foundation vs. the Clinton Foundation
Foundation faceoff: The Trump Foundation vs. the Clinton Foundation
The Facts
The Pinocchio Test
Four Pinocchios

Hillary Clinton is Going to Jail Hillary Clinton is Going to Jail
Hillary Clinton is Going to Jail
No comments yet - make the first one!
 But by now, anything of substance has probably been deleted. You need to DEMAND that Congress go through ALL of her emails with a fine-toothed comb. We know that Clinton has concealed documents/emails. That’s the only reason that a Federal employee would go to such great lengths to maintain control over her email servers. General Petraeus did the same thing and he is being let off with just a slap on the wrist. Even if Congress hands over evidence to Eric Holder’s Department of Justice, the Obama administration will never prosecute Hillary Clinton. The House has been trying to get Hillary Clinton’s emails for years. When the State Department opened its investigation into the Benghazi attack, Hillary Clinton’s emails were never even used! What is going on here is criminal and now this woman wants to be President? No way!

Hillary Clinton is Going to Jail

Hillary Clinton is Going to Jail
Hillary Clinton is Going to Jail
No comments yet - make the first one!

But by now, anything of substance has probably been deleted. You need to DEMAND that Congress go through ALL of her emails with a fine-toothed comb. We know that Clinton has concealed documents/emails. That’s the only reason that a Federal employee would go to such great lengths to maintain control over her email servers. General Petraeus did the same thing and he is being let off with just a slap on the wrist. Even if Congress hands over evidence to Eric Holder’s Department of Justice, the Obama administration will never prosecute Hillary Clinton. The House has been trying to get Hillary Clinton’s emails for years. When the State Department opened its investigation into the Benghazi attack, Hillary Clinton’s emails were never even used! What is going on here is criminal and now this woman wants to be President? No way!

Bruce Ohr & Nellie Ohr: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com Bruce Ohr & Nellie Ohr: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Bruce Ohr & Nellie Ohr: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
1. Ohr, Who worked on Drug Strategy, Lost His Main Title & the FISA Memo Says He Was a Steele Contact Within DOJ
2. Ohr Is Accused of Meeting with Glenn Simpson, the Founder of Fusion GPS
3. Ohr Is Accused of Discussing Trump with Simpson Over Coffee
4. Ohr Graduated From Harvard Law School & Has a Degree in Physics
5. Clinton & the DNC Were Exposed as Fusion GPS Funders
 According to Fox News, it’s now been revealed that Bruce Ohr’s wife, Nellie Ohr, “worked for Fusion GPS during the 2016 election.” She has written on Russian-related subjects, according to Fox. The FISA memo released to the public on February 2, 2018 alleges that Nellie Ohr was assisting “in the cultivation of” opposition research against Trump that was ultimately being paid for by the DNC and Clinton’s campaign. Special prosecutor Robert Mueller is now investigating former Trump campaign officials, and Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. His investigation has been further challenged with claims of bias after an FBI agent, Peter Strzok, was removed from it after it was revealed that he allegedly exchanged anti-Trump and pro-Clinton messages with an FBI lawyer. Here’s what you need to know: 1. Ohr, Who worked on Drug Strategy, Lost His Main Title & the FISA Memo Says He Was a Steele Contact Within DOJ
FOX NEWS: DOJ official Bruce G. Ohr demoted amid investigation into his contacts with Fusion GPS pic.twitter.com/Oo3VQgnhqS
— Josh Caplan (@joshdcaplan) December 7, 2017
What’s being called the secret “FISA memo” was supposedly “worse than Watergate,” according to conservative Fox News host Sean Hannity and reveals KGB-like tactics, according to a GOP lawmaker. Democrats and the FBI have hotly contested its release.

Bruce Ohr & Nellie Ohr: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

Bruce Ohr & Nellie Ohr: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Bruce Ohr & Nellie Ohr: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
1. Ohr, Who worked on Drug Strategy, Lost His Main Title & the FISA Memo Says He Was a Steele Contact Within DOJ
2. Ohr Is Accused of Meeting with Glenn Simpson, the Founder of Fusion GPS
3. Ohr Is Accused of Discussing Trump with Simpson Over Coffee
4. Ohr Graduated From Harvard Law School & Has a Degree in Physics
5. Clinton & the DNC Were Exposed as Fusion GPS Funders

According to Fox News, it’s now been revealed that Bruce Ohr’s wife, Nellie Ohr, “worked for Fusion GPS during the 2016 election.” She has written on Russian-related subjects, according to Fox. The FISA memo released to the public on February 2, 2018 alleges that Nellie Ohr was assisting “in the cultivation of” opposition research against Trump that was ultimately being paid for by the DNC and Clinton’s campaign. Special prosecutor Robert Mueller is now investigating former Trump campaign officials, and Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. His investigation has been further challenged with claims of bias after an FBI agent, Peter Strzok, was removed from it after it was revealed that he allegedly exchanged anti-Trump and pro-Clinton messages with an FBI lawyer. Here’s what you need to know: 1. Ohr, Who worked on Drug Strategy, Lost His Main Title & the FISA Memo Says He Was a Steele Contact Within DOJ
FOX NEWS: DOJ official Bruce G. Ohr demoted amid investigation into his contacts with Fusion GPS pic.twitter.com/Oo3VQgnhqS
— Josh Caplan (@joshdcaplan) December 7, 2017
What’s being called the secret “FISA memo” was supposedly “worse than Watergate,” according to conservative Fox News host Sean Hannity and reveals KGB-like tactics, according to a GOP lawmaker. Democrats and the FBI have hotly contested its release.

Sean Hannity: Americans deserve to know if Obama had Trump spied on | Fox News Sean Hannity: Americans deserve to know if Obama had Trump spied on
Sean Hannity: Americans deserve to know if Obama had Trump spied on
Hannity: Breaking down President Trump's wiretapping claims
Subscribe
 Any suggestion otherwise is simply false." That very lawyerly statement doesnot say that President Obama did not know about the surveillance, just that he didn't directly order it. Even President Obama's former speech writer noted this on Twitter this past weekend. So the old familiar question is, what did the president know and when did he know it? Did the president have any answers about surveillance of an opposition candidate in the middle of an election? Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey who knows a thing or two about this entire process, and here's what he said: “This is the difference between being correct and being right,” Mukasey told ABC News’ Martha Raddatz, who cried on election night when Hillary Clinton lost. “ I think the president was not correct, certainly, in saying that President Obama ordered a tap on a server in Trump Tower. However, I think he's right in that there was surveillance and that it was conducted at the behest of the attorney -- of the Justice Department through the FISA court.” I believe what happened to Flynn and what we are now seeing with all these other intelligence leaks represents the tip of the iceberg.

Sean Hannity: Americans deserve to know if Obama had Trump spied on | Fox News

Sean Hannity: Americans deserve to know if Obama had Trump spied on
Sean Hannity: Americans deserve to know if Obama had Trump spied on
Hannity: Breaking down President Trump's wiretapping claims
Subscribe

Any suggestion otherwise is simply false." That very lawyerly statement doesnot say that President Obama did not know about the surveillance, just that he didn't directly order it. Even President Obama's former speech writer noted this on Twitter this past weekend. So the old familiar question is, what did the president know and when did he know it? Did the president have any answers about surveillance of an opposition candidate in the middle of an election? Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey who knows a thing or two about this entire process, and here's what he said: “This is the difference between being correct and being right,” Mukasey told ABC News’ Martha Raddatz, who cried on election night when Hillary Clinton lost. “ I think the president was not correct, certainly, in saying that President Obama ordered a tap on a server in Trump Tower. However, I think he's right in that there was surveillance and that it was conducted at the behest of the attorney -- of the Justice Department through the FISA court.” I believe what happened to Flynn and what we are now seeing with all these other intelligence leaks represents the tip of the iceberg.

In Florida, Trump supporters say they don't care about accusations - CBS News In Florida, Trump supporters say they don't care about accusations
In Florida, Trump supporters say they don't care about accusations These events never ever happened and the people that said them meekly fully understand,” said Trump. “These lies come from outlets whose past stories and past claims have already been discredited. The media outlets did not even attempt to confirm the most basic facts, because even a simple investigation would’ve shown that these were nothing more than false smears.” And just like Trump did in the second presidential debate, his supporters are also quick to turn the tables and reference the complex history that the Clintons have with women. Some say that Hillary Clinton’s treatment of women who have slept with her husband is more offensive than Trump’s comments. Others call Bill Clinton’s sexual misconduct in the White House incomparable to what Trump has, potentially, done. “Prove it,” says Kim King when asked about the women accusing Trump. Trump supporters on allegations 02:35
“They paid off Paula Jones. That is enough proof,” King says in moving the conversation, to focus on Bill Clinton’s sexual history. King’s husband, who has his arm around her, dives into conspiracy theories that Clinton got expelled from Harvard for rape.

In Florida, Trump supporters say they don't care about accusations - CBS News

In Florida, Trump supporters say they don't care about accusations
In Florida, Trump supporters say they don't care about accusations

These events never ever happened and the people that said them meekly fully understand,” said Trump. “These lies come from outlets whose past stories and past claims have already been discredited. The media outlets did not even attempt to confirm the most basic facts, because even a simple investigation would’ve shown that these were nothing more than false smears.” And just like Trump did in the second presidential debate, his supporters are also quick to turn the tables and reference the complex history that the Clintons have with women. Some say that Hillary Clinton’s treatment of women who have slept with her husband is more offensive than Trump’s comments. Others call Bill Clinton’s sexual misconduct in the White House incomparable to what Trump has, potentially, done. “Prove it,” says Kim King when asked about the women accusing Trump. Trump supporters on allegations 02:35
“They paid off Paula Jones. That is enough proof,” King says in moving the conversation, to focus on Bill Clinton’s sexual history. King’s husband, who has his arm around her, dives into conspiracy theories that Clinton got expelled from Harvard for rape.

Donald Accuser Fires Shot at Melania, Says She's Doing What Hillary Did Your Wife's Doing What Hillary Did
Donald Accuser Fires Shot at Melania, Says She's Doing What Hillary Did
Melania Trump Donald Accuser Fires Shot Your Wife's Doing What Hillary Did
 Donald Accuser Fires Shot at Melania, Says She's Doing What Hillary Did
Donald Accuser Fires Shot at Melania, Says She's Doing What Hillary Did
Melania Trump Donald Accuser Fires Shot Your Wife's Doing What Hillary Did
EXCLUSIVE
6.1K
10/18/2016 10:45 AM PT
Jessica Leeds -- the woman who claims Donald Trump groped her on a plane 35 years ago -- says Melania Trump is no different than Hillary Clinton ... defending husbands who do bad things. Leeds tells TMZ, she feels for Melania, who's now in the hot seat for defending Donald in the wake of various allegations by women. Leeds says Melania's defense of her husband is no different than Hillary's defense of Bill Clinton. Leeds says, "The wives are in a difficult position if they want to save their marriage," adding, "They'll make compromises and accept the good with the bad." She also says, "I feel it's terrible Melania is being viewed as sympathetic when Donald is beating up on Hillary for doing the same with Bill." As for Melania's comment that the allegations are suspicious because they're all surfacing just weeks before the election, Leeds repeated ... she was prompted to contact The New York Times after Trump denied ever actually doing the things he talked about with Billy Bush. And she says, she never expected The Times to run her story because "it was 35 years ago and there was no way of fact checking." Play video content
FOX News
Donald Trump Melania Trump Hillary Clinton Politix Exclusive Celebrity Feuds
Search

Donald Accuser Fires Shot at Melania, Says She's Doing What Hillary Did

Your Wife's Doing What Hillary Did
Donald Accuser Fires Shot at Melania, Says She's Doing What Hillary Did
Melania Trump Donald Accuser Fires Shot Your Wife's Doing What Hillary Did

Donald Accuser Fires Shot at Melania, Says She's Doing What Hillary Did
Donald Accuser Fires Shot at Melania, Says She's Doing What Hillary Did
Melania Trump Donald Accuser Fires Shot Your Wife's Doing What Hillary Did
EXCLUSIVE
6.1K
10/18/2016 10:45 AM PT
Jessica Leeds -- the woman who claims Donald Trump groped her on a plane 35 years ago -- says Melania Trump is no different than Hillary Clinton ... defending husbands who do bad things. Leeds tells TMZ, she feels for Melania, who's now in the hot seat for defending Donald in the wake of various allegations by women. Leeds says Melania's defense of her husband is no different than Hillary's defense of Bill Clinton. Leeds says, "The wives are in a difficult position if they want to save their marriage," adding, "They'll make compromises and accept the good with the bad." She also says, "I feel it's terrible Melania is being viewed as sympathetic when Donald is beating up on Hillary for doing the same with Bill." As for Melania's comment that the allegations are suspicious because they're all surfacing just weeks before the election, Leeds repeated ... she was prompted to contact The New York Times after Trump denied ever actually doing the things he talked about with Billy Bush. And she says, she never expected The Times to run her story because "it was 35 years ago and there was no way of fact checking." Play video content
FOX News
Donald Trump Melania Trump Hillary Clinton Politix Exclusive Celebrity Feuds
Search

Who is Kevin Clinesmith? (Former FBI) Wiki, Bio, Age, Family, Career, Net Worth, Many More Facts You Need To Know Who is Kevin Clinesmith? (Former FBI) Wiki, Bio, Age, Family, Career, Net Worth, Many More Facts You Need To Know
Who is Kevin Clinesmith? (Former FBI) Wiki, Bio, Age, Family, Career, Net Worth, Many More Facts You Need To Know
Kevin Clinesmith Wiki – Kevin Clinesmith Biography
Kevin Clinesmith Background
Kevin Clinesmith is a Suspect
Attorney Who Wrote ‘Viva Le Resistance,’ Was Devastated by Trump’s Victory
Clinesmith Is a Marathon Runner
 What happened was that Page, who had not been told to the Court, was informing the CIA. The Times told the Chief Inspector, “Mr. Page’s relationship with the C.I.A. was not properly communicated to the Justice Department and was eventually detained from the judges who approved the surveillance orders.” According to the Times, when another FBI agent asked if Page was a CIA source, “Clinesmith erroneously said that Mr. Page was” never a source “and sent the CIA’s information to his supervisor. Page was altered to say that it was not a source – a significant change in a document used in a federal investigation. ” The ties were downplayed in other FISA decisions, the newspaper reported, but the charges against Clinesmith are related to the third renewal. Clinesmith’s name appeared before. In 2018, GOP Congressman Mark Meadows accused Clinesmith of possibly being an FBI attorney and wrote anti-Trump messages, including a message declaring “resistance” in the investigator’s report. The Times are now reporting that Clinesmith, known as FBI attorney 2 in IG’s previous report on the Clinton email investigation, was the attorney. Meadows, a Republican from North Carolina, revealed Clinesmith’s identity at the hearing in the Chief Inspector’s report on the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails. Meadows did this over objections from the FBI, according to The New York Post.

Who is Kevin Clinesmith? (Former FBI) Wiki, Bio, Age, Family, Career, Net Worth, Many More Facts You Need To Know

Who is Kevin Clinesmith? (Former FBI) Wiki, Bio, Age, Family, Career, Net Worth, Many More Facts You Need To Know
Who is Kevin Clinesmith? (Former FBI) Wiki, Bio, Age, Family, Career, Net Worth, Many More Facts You Need To Know
Kevin Clinesmith Wiki – Kevin Clinesmith Biography
Kevin Clinesmith Background
Kevin Clinesmith is a Suspect
Attorney Who Wrote ‘Viva Le Resistance,’ Was Devastated by Trump’s Victory
Clinesmith Is a Marathon Runner

What happened was that Page, who had not been told to the Court, was informing the CIA. The Times told the Chief Inspector, “Mr. Page’s relationship with the C.I.A. was not properly communicated to the Justice Department and was eventually detained from the judges who approved the surveillance orders.” According to the Times, when another FBI agent asked if Page was a CIA source, “Clinesmith erroneously said that Mr. Page was” never a source “and sent the CIA’s information to his supervisor. Page was altered to say that it was not a source – a significant change in a document used in a federal investigation. ” The ties were downplayed in other FISA decisions, the newspaper reported, but the charges against Clinesmith are related to the third renewal. Clinesmith’s name appeared before. In 2018, GOP Congressman Mark Meadows accused Clinesmith of possibly being an FBI attorney and wrote anti-Trump messages, including a message declaring “resistance” in the investigator’s report. The Times are now reporting that Clinesmith, known as FBI attorney 2 in IG’s previous report on the Clinton email investigation, was the attorney. Meadows, a Republican from North Carolina, revealed Clinesmith’s identity at the hearing in the Chief Inspector’s report on the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails. Meadows did this over objections from the FBI, according to The New York Post.

Was Hillary Clinton fired from the Watergate investigation? - Quora Was Hillary Clinton fired from the Watergate investigation?
Kelly La Rue
Richard H. Schwartz
Kevin Mark Wray
Quora User
Steven Franklin
Quora User
Andrew Weill
Richard Dress
Gary Denson
Meredith Lesly
Chris Briggs
Patrick Donovan
Nancy Rajasekaran
Scott Welch
John Butler
B. Hufnagel
Kevin Barry
Bill Mearns
 Was Hillary Clinton fired from the Watergate investigation? - Quora
Watergate Scandal (1972–74)
Hillary Clinton
Politics of the United States of America
Was Hillary Clinton fired from the Watergate investigation? 18 Answers
Kelly La Rue
, I'm an American
Updated 2 years ago · Author has 17.9K answers and 42.3M answer views
Originally Answered: What were the exact circumstances of Hillary Rodham's firing by her Democrat boss on the Watergate committee? No. Jerry Zeifman, who claims to be her boss but in fact was not, says he did not fire her but does say he would have if he could. However there is every reason to question his honesty in the matter. For one thing he has changed his story (yes I fired her, no I didn't) and he has a long history of Clinton and Democratic bashing. He has been caught in a lie then presented false evidence to support the lie. Zeifman claims to be a lifelong Democrat but talks like a Republican.

Was Hillary Clinton fired from the Watergate investigation? - Quora

Was Hillary Clinton fired from the Watergate investigation?
Kelly La Rue
Richard H. Schwartz
Kevin Mark Wray
Quora User
Steven Franklin
Quora User
Andrew Weill
Richard Dress
Gary Denson
Meredith Lesly
Chris Briggs
Patrick Donovan
Nancy Rajasekaran
Scott Welch
John Butler
B. Hufnagel
Kevin Barry
Bill Mearns

Was Hillary Clinton fired from the Watergate investigation? - Quora
Watergate Scandal (1972–74)
Hillary Clinton
Politics of the United States of America
Was Hillary Clinton fired from the Watergate investigation? 18 Answers
Kelly La Rue
, I'm an American
Updated 2 years ago · Author has 17.9K answers and 42.3M answer views
Originally Answered: What were the exact circumstances of Hillary Rodham's firing by her Democrat boss on the Watergate committee? No. Jerry Zeifman, who claims to be her boss but in fact was not, says he did not fire her but does say he would have if he could. However there is every reason to question his honesty in the matter. For one thing he has changed his story (yes I fired her, no I didn't) and he has a long history of Clinton and Democratic bashing. He has been caught in a lie then presented false evidence to support the lie. Zeifman claims to be a lifelong Democrat but talks like a Republican.

Putin clarifies Trump comment and says America is the world's 'only superpower' | Vladimir Putin | The Guardian Putin clarifies Trump comment and says America is the world's 'only superpower'
Vladimir Putin
Putin clarifies Trump comment and says America is the world's 'only superpower'
Alan Yuhas
656
 The Kremlin and its allies have over 15 years dismantled independent news organizations, and the 2006 murder of investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya has also been linked by activists to Putin’s Kremlin. Trump told ABC in December: “ it’s never been proven that he killed anybody.” The businessman’s top campaign aide, Paul Manafort, was an adviser to Viktor Yanukovych, a pro-Kremlin Ukrainian politician who was fled to Russia after a 2014 revolution ousted him from office. Putin also spoke carefully on Friday about the presumptive Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, saying he did not work much with her directly when she was secretary of state. “She probably has her own view of US-Russian relations,” he said. Who supports Donald Trump? The new Republican center of gravity
Read more
But he praised her husband, former president Bill Clinton, saying: “ We had a very nice relationship. “I can even say that I’m grateful to him for several moments, when I was making my entrance into world politics.

Putin clarifies Trump comment and says America is the world's 'only superpower' | Vladimir Putin | The Guardian

Putin clarifies Trump comment and says America is the world's 'only superpower'
Vladimir Putin
Putin clarifies Trump comment and says America is the world's 'only superpower'
Alan Yuhas
656

The Kremlin and its allies have over 15 years dismantled independent news organizations, and the 2006 murder of investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya has also been linked by activists to Putin’s Kremlin. Trump told ABC in December: “ it’s never been proven that he killed anybody.” The businessman’s top campaign aide, Paul Manafort, was an adviser to Viktor Yanukovych, a pro-Kremlin Ukrainian politician who was fled to Russia after a 2014 revolution ousted him from office. Putin also spoke carefully on Friday about the presumptive Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, saying he did not work much with her directly when she was secretary of state. “She probably has her own view of US-Russian relations,” he said. Who supports Donald Trump? The new Republican center of gravity
Read more
But he praised her husband, former president Bill Clinton, saying: “ We had a very nice relationship. “I can even say that I’m grateful to him for several moments, when I was making my entrance into world politics.

Who is Larry Nichols , page 1 Who is Larry Nichols
Who is Larry Nichols
onequestion
Former Pandemic Researcher: "Don't Panic—Prepare"
Watch The Video
You May Like
How Dogs Cry For Help: 3 Warning Signs Your Dogs Is Crying For Help
Enlarged Prostate Caused by a 'DHT Clog' You Can Easily Clear by Doing This
12x Better Than Solar Panels? Prepper's Invention Takes Country by Storm!
People from History Who Look Exactly Same
"Natural" Dog Behavior is Sign of Severe Allergy - Do This
30-second Stretch Ends Back Pain and Sciatica (Watch)
southbeach
Ohanka
onequestion
southbeach
onequestion
Rylex
onequestion
ignorant_ape
MotherMayEye
onequestion
MotherMayEye
F4guy
stinkelbaum
DJW001
tweetie
onequestion
tweetie
 onequestion
a reply to: MotherMayEye
But what your saying was he was with the Clintons in the early days. Well, I am accepting your source for the following: "Larry Nichols is a former Green Beret and a longtime associate of Bill Clinton. The two men first met in the late 1970s when Bill was an up-and-coming politician. When Bill was Arkansas governor, Nichols was the marketing director of the Arkansas Development Finance Authority, an Arkansas state agency that was one of the entities investigated by the Senate Whitewater Committee." I did not vet this information though. So if it was completely wrong, I might reconsider my comment. F4guy
posted on Apr, 18 2016 @ 04:59 AM
link
originally posted by: southbeach
a reply to:

Who is Larry Nichols , page 1

Who is Larry Nichols
Who is Larry Nichols
onequestion
Former Pandemic Researcher: "Don't Panic—Prepare"
Watch The Video
You May Like
How Dogs Cry For Help: 3 Warning Signs Your Dogs Is Crying For Help
Enlarged Prostate Caused by a 'DHT Clog' You Can Easily Clear by Doing This
12x Better Than Solar Panels? Prepper's Invention Takes Country by Storm!
People from History Who Look Exactly Same
"Natural" Dog Behavior is Sign of Severe Allergy - Do This
30-second Stretch Ends Back Pain and Sciatica (Watch)
southbeach
Ohanka
onequestion
southbeach
onequestion
Rylex
onequestion
ignorant_ape
MotherMayEye
onequestion
MotherMayEye
F4guy
stinkelbaum
DJW001
tweetie
onequestion
tweetie

onequestion
a reply to: MotherMayEye
But what your saying was he was with the Clintons in the early days. Well, I am accepting your source for the following: "Larry Nichols is a former Green Beret and a longtime associate of Bill Clinton. The two men first met in the late 1970s when Bill was an up-and-coming politician. When Bill was Arkansas governor, Nichols was the marketing director of the Arkansas Development Finance Authority, an Arkansas state agency that was one of the entities investigated by the Senate Whitewater Committee." I did not vet this information though. So if it was completely wrong, I might reconsider my comment. F4guy
posted on Apr, 18 2016 @ 04:59 AM
link
originally posted by: southbeach
a reply to:

Michael Chertoff - Wikipedia Michael Chertoff
Michael Chertoff
Contents
Early life and education
Career
Federal judgeship
Secretary of Homeland Security
Construction of border fence
Actions regarding illegal immigration
Post-DHS career
Views
Globalization
Body scanners
Climate change
Political endorsements
References
External links
 Chertoff was asked to stay in his position when the Clinton administration took office in 1993, at the request of Democratic Senator Bill Bradley. He was the only United States Attorney who was not replaced due to the change in administrations. He continued to work with the U.S. Attorney's office until 1994, when he entered private practice, returning to Latham & Watkins as a partner. Despite his friendly relationship with some Democrats, Chertoff was appointed as the special counsel for the Senate Whitewater Committee studying allegations against President Clinton and his wife in what was known as the Whitewater investigation. No charges were brought against the Clintons. In 2000, Chertoff worked as special counsel to the New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee, investigating racial profiling in New Jersey. He also did some fundraising for George W. Bush and other Republicans during the 2000 election cycle. He advised Bush's presidential campaign on criminal justice issues. Chertoff was appointed by Bush to head the criminal division of the Department of Justice, serving from 2001 to 2003. He led the federal prosecution's case against suspected terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui .

Michael Chertoff - Wikipedia

Michael Chertoff
Michael Chertoff
Contents
Early life and education
Career
Federal judgeship
Secretary of Homeland Security
Construction of border fence
Actions regarding illegal immigration
Post-DHS career
Views
Globalization
Body scanners
Climate change
Political endorsements
References
External links

Chertoff was asked to stay in his position when the Clinton administration took office in 1993, at the request of Democratic Senator Bill Bradley. He was the only United States Attorney who was not replaced due to the change in administrations. He continued to work with the U.S. Attorney's office until 1994, when he entered private practice, returning to Latham & Watkins as a partner. Despite his friendly relationship with some Democrats, Chertoff was appointed as the special counsel for the Senate Whitewater Committee studying allegations against President Clinton and his wife in what was known as the Whitewater investigation. No charges were brought against the Clintons. In 2000, Chertoff worked as special counsel to the New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee, investigating racial profiling in New Jersey. He also did some fundraising for George W. Bush and other Republicans during the 2000 election cycle. He advised Bush's presidential campaign on criminal justice issues. Chertoff was appointed by Bush to head the criminal division of the Department of Justice, serving from 2001 to 2003. He led the federal prosecution's case against suspected terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui .

Did Rush Limbaugh really call 13 year old Chelsea Clinton “the white house dog”? - Quora Did Rush Limbaugh really call 13 year old Chelsea Clinton “the white house dog”?
Did Rush Limbaugh really call 13 year old Chelsea Clinton “the white house dog”?
Al Franken was a professional comedian. Not an historian.
 The only thing out of bounds, in terms of Hunter Biden, is Donald Trump blackmailing the head of an allied nation under siege from Russia into announcing he’s opening an investigation into the Bidens based on bogus data and Russian propaganda to help Trump win re-election … That’s not okay. And Republicans in the Senate saying they want the Bidens to testify as “witnesses” in the impeachment trial, along with the whistleblower, is further proof of how low the GOP has sunk. It’s a self-parody party now. I’m not sure what Graham means when he refers to President Obama having “drug-addled, wayward. and/or miscreant children.” I guess he just couldn’t leave the discussion without somehow talking smack about the first black president and his two daughters? And I guess we will never know if he meant anything specific since, again, this brave Quoran has made it impossible for anyone to comment on his post. Note: Getting back to Rush Limbaugh, I see it’s now on youtube — this is what Mr. Medal of Freedom did with Chelsea Clinton, back when he had a TV show: Tom Graham
, studied Associate of Special Science at House Of Life Extension
Updated 1 year ago · Author has 1.5K answers and 808.1K answer views
QUESTION
“Did Rush Limbaugh really call 13 year old Chelsea Clinton ‘the white house dog’?”

Did Rush Limbaugh really call 13 year old Chelsea Clinton “the white house dog”? - Quora

Did Rush Limbaugh really call 13 year old Chelsea Clinton “the white house dog”?
Did Rush Limbaugh really call 13 year old Chelsea Clinton “the white house dog”?
Al Franken was a professional comedian. Not an historian.

The only thing out of bounds, in terms of Hunter Biden, is Donald Trump blackmailing the head of an allied nation under siege from Russia into announcing he’s opening an investigation into the Bidens based on bogus data and Russian propaganda to help Trump win re-election … That’s not okay. And Republicans in the Senate saying they want the Bidens to testify as “witnesses” in the impeachment trial, along with the whistleblower, is further proof of how low the GOP has sunk. It’s a self-parody party now. I’m not sure what Graham means when he refers to President Obama having “drug-addled, wayward. and/or miscreant children.” I guess he just couldn’t leave the discussion without somehow talking smack about the first black president and his two daughters? And I guess we will never know if he meant anything specific since, again, this brave Quoran has made it impossible for anyone to comment on his post. Note: Getting back to Rush Limbaugh, I see it’s now on youtube — this is what Mr. Medal of Freedom did with Chelsea Clinton, back when he had a TV show: Tom Graham
, studied Associate of Special Science at House Of Life Extension
Updated 1 year ago · Author has 1.5K answers and 808.1K answer views
QUESTION
“Did Rush Limbaugh really call 13 year old Chelsea Clinton ‘the white house dog’?”

How many times did bill Clinton play golf while president? - Answers How many times did bill Clinton play golf while president
?

How many times did bill Clinton play golf while president?
Your Answer
How many times did bill Clinton play golf while president?
Related Questions
Who became the president when Clinton was impeached?
Who was the president when justin bieber was born?
What does Bill Clinton do after his presidential?
How many times did Bill Clinton run for president?
When Bill Clinton was on trial did al gore serve as president?
What number president was Bill Clinton?
Is Vice President George Clinton kin to President Bill Clinton?
When was Bill Clinton vice president?
How much did Bill Clinton get paid as president?
Was Bill Clinton rich?
What did former President Bill Clinton do laboratory community?
How did president Bill Clinton die?
Who was the secretary of the state when Bill Clinton was president?
Where did Bill Clinton travel while being president?
When was Bill Clinton president of the US?
Is Bill Clinton a Republican or Democrat?
Who was the president for two terms after bush's father?
Who was the last president to visit Russia?
What did Bill Clinton do before becoming President?
How long was Bill Clinton the youngest president?
What are facts about Bill Clinton?
When was Bill Clinton President of the United States of America?
What degree does Bill Clinton have?
What was the US president and vice president in the year 2000?
Who was the president after bush?
 How much did Bill Clinton get paid as president? $400,000 a year and it is not for life, it is only while being President. Was Bill Clinton rich? No, Bill Clinton became rich after he was president. What did former President Bill Clinton do laboratory community? what did former president Bill Clinton do for community laboratory? How did president Bill Clinton die? President Bill Clinton is still alive as of February 6th, 2012. Who was the secretary of the state when Bill Clinton was president? the secretary of the state when bill clinton was president is Madeleine Albright
Where did Bill Clinton travel while being president?

How many times did bill Clinton play golf while president? - Answers

How many times did bill Clinton play golf while president
?

How many times did bill Clinton play golf while president?
Your Answer
How many times did bill Clinton play golf while president?
Related Questions
Who became the president when Clinton was impeached?
Who was the president when justin bieber was born?
What does Bill Clinton do after his presidential?
How many times did Bill Clinton run for president?
When Bill Clinton was on trial did al gore serve as president?
What number president was Bill Clinton?
Is Vice President George Clinton kin to President Bill Clinton?
When was Bill Clinton vice president?
How much did Bill Clinton get paid as president?
Was Bill Clinton rich?
What did former President Bill Clinton do laboratory community?
How did president Bill Clinton die?
Who was the secretary of the state when Bill Clinton was president?
Where did Bill Clinton travel while being president?
When was Bill Clinton president of the US?
Is Bill Clinton a Republican or Democrat?
Who was the president for two terms after bush's father?
Who was the last president to visit Russia?
What did Bill Clinton do before becoming President?
How long was Bill Clinton the youngest president?
What are facts about Bill Clinton?
When was Bill Clinton President of the United States of America?
What degree does Bill Clinton have?
What was the US president and vice president in the year 2000?
Who was the president after bush?

How much did Bill Clinton get paid as president? $400,000 a year and it is not for life, it is only while being President. Was Bill Clinton rich? No, Bill Clinton became rich after he was president. What did former President Bill Clinton do laboratory community? what did former president Bill Clinton do for community laboratory? How did president Bill Clinton die? President Bill Clinton is still alive as of February 6th, 2012. Who was the secretary of the state when Bill Clinton was president? the secretary of the state when bill clinton was president is Madeleine Albright
Where did Bill Clinton travel while being president?

How to Fight the New World Order - Preserved Word Ministries How to Fight the New World Order
How to Fight the New World Order
Get Right With God
Get informed about the major issues.
The False Left-Right Paradigm.
Resist government encroachments on God-given rights
Get out there and do something!
Pick an issue or issues to focus on.
 Their agendas are the same!! Here are a few examples: Why did Bush help cover up some of Clinton’s crimes? When Clinton left, he pardoned many of his imprisoned friends (ie “Pardongate”). But one of the first thing that Bush does when he comes to power is hinder Rep. Dan Burton’s committee investigating Pardongate. He shut down the entire investigation!!! Why? Why is a “good conservative” President blocking the investigation of that criminal, Bill Clinton? On the other side, why are Clinton and George H. W. Bush buddying up and hanging out together! ( CITE) Why is Clinton considered a surrogate member of the Bush family?

How to Fight the New World Order - Preserved Word Ministries

How to Fight the New World Order
How to Fight the New World Order
Get Right With God
Get informed about the major issues.
The False Left-Right Paradigm.
Resist government encroachments on God-given rights
Get out there and do something!
Pick an issue or issues to focus on.

Their agendas are the same!! Here are a few examples: Why did Bush help cover up some of Clinton’s crimes? When Clinton left, he pardoned many of his imprisoned friends (ie “Pardongate”). But one of the first thing that Bush does when he comes to power is hinder Rep. Dan Burton’s committee investigating Pardongate. He shut down the entire investigation!!! Why? Why is a “good conservative” President blocking the investigation of that criminal, Bill Clinton? On the other side, why are Clinton and George H. W. Bush buddying up and hanging out together! ( CITE) Why is Clinton considered a surrogate member of the Bush family?

Who is Terrence Williams (Jeffrey Epstein's Death Conspiracy Theorist) Bio, Wiki, Age, Comedy, Videos, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram | Latest Bios Who is Terrence Williams (Jeffrey Epstein’s Death Conspiracy Theorist) Bio, Wiki, Age, Comedy, Videos, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram
Who is Terrence Williams (Jeffrey Epstein’s Death Conspiracy Theorist) Bio, Wiki, Age, Comedy, Videos, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram
Terrence Williams cites the Clintons as culpable for the death of Jeffrey Epstein in a Tweet retweeted by President Donald Trump.
Terrence Williams Bio, Wiki
Terrence Williams on Jeffrey Epstein Death
Terrence Williams Support for Trump
23,091 likes
Terrence Williams Facebook Suspension
Terrence Williams Accident
Terrence Williams Instagram
30,959 likes
 Williams also mentions the 1993 suicide of White House aide Vince Foster that conspiracy theorists have tied to the Clintons, implying that they were behind the deaths of Epstein and Foster. “I’m not surprised, I told ya’ll last month this was going to happen.” he says in the video, “No for some odd reason, people that have information on the Clintons end up dead. And they usually die of suicide. The word around the street is that the Clintons did it.” – Terrence, K. Williams. That was not the first conspiracy theory that Trump has promoted via Twitter. He once implied that Joe Scarborough should be investigated for the death of one of his former aides who passed away in 2001. He also suggested that the death of former Clinton aide Vince Foster was “very fishy” despite five official investigations finding no evidence of foul play. Terrence Williams Support for Trump
According to a post on his Instagram, Terrence K. Williams went to the White House on October 12, 2018, and met the president in the oval office.

Who is Terrence Williams (Jeffrey Epstein's Death Conspiracy Theorist) Bio, Wiki, Age, Comedy, Videos, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram | Latest Bios

Who is Terrence Williams (Jeffrey Epstein’s Death Conspiracy Theorist) Bio, Wiki, Age, Comedy, Videos, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram
Who is Terrence Williams (Jeffrey Epstein’s Death Conspiracy Theorist) Bio, Wiki, Age, Comedy, Videos, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram
Terrence Williams cites the Clintons as culpable for the death of Jeffrey Epstein in a Tweet retweeted by President Donald Trump.
Terrence Williams Bio, Wiki
Terrence Williams on Jeffrey Epstein Death
Terrence Williams Support for Trump
23,091 likes
Terrence Williams Facebook Suspension
Terrence Williams Accident
Terrence Williams Instagram
30,959 likes

Williams also mentions the 1993 suicide of White House aide Vince Foster that conspiracy theorists have tied to the Clintons, implying that they were behind the deaths of Epstein and Foster. “I’m not surprised, I told ya’ll last month this was going to happen.” he says in the video, “No for some odd reason, people that have information on the Clintons end up dead. And they usually die of suicide. The word around the street is that the Clintons did it.” – Terrence, K. Williams. That was not the first conspiracy theory that Trump has promoted via Twitter. He once implied that Joe Scarborough should be investigated for the death of one of his former aides who passed away in 2001. He also suggested that the death of former Clinton aide Vince Foster was “very fishy” despite five official investigations finding no evidence of foul play. Terrence Williams Support for Trump
According to a post on his Instagram, Terrence K. Williams went to the White House on October 12, 2018, and met the president in the oval office.

Chelsea Clinton gives birth to a daughter - CNN Chelsea Clinton gives birth to a daughter
Chelsea Clinton gives birth to a daughter
Chelsea Clinton gives birth —
Chelsea Clinton gives birth —
Chelsea Clinton gives birth —
Story highlights
(CNN) —
Own family ambitions
 For the last month, the baby has somewhat overshadowed the Clintons’ everyday activities. When Hillary Clinton, who recently published her latest memoir, “Hard Choices,” would travel to book signings, a number of well-wishers mentioned her becoming a grandparent. “I must have shaken 70,000 hands and over half of them mentioned something about being a grandparent,” Clinton said last week during a panel discussion with CNN’s Sanjay Gupta at the Clinton Global Initiative annual meeting. Chelsea Clinton baby watch upstages celebrities at Clinton nonprofit meeting
Hillary Clinton later added: “ Most of us, when we have our children, we’re still younger, we’re still striving, we’re still preoccupied with what’s going to happen in our lives, and I think a lot of people look back and say, ‘I did the best I could,’ but…being a grandparent you just have that freedom, at least that’s what I’m told, and I’m anxious to find out.” Current Secretary of State John Kerry welcomed the news: “ Being a grandparent is the best – period,” he said on Twitter. CNN’s Carma Hassan contributed to this report.

Chelsea Clinton gives birth to a daughter - CNN

Chelsea Clinton gives birth to a daughter
Chelsea Clinton gives birth to a daughter
Chelsea Clinton gives birth —
Chelsea Clinton gives birth —
Chelsea Clinton gives birth —
Story highlights
(CNN) —
Own family ambitions

For the last month, the baby has somewhat overshadowed the Clintons’ everyday activities. When Hillary Clinton, who recently published her latest memoir, “Hard Choices,” would travel to book signings, a number of well-wishers mentioned her becoming a grandparent. “I must have shaken 70,000 hands and over half of them mentioned something about being a grandparent,” Clinton said last week during a panel discussion with CNN’s Sanjay Gupta at the Clinton Global Initiative annual meeting. Chelsea Clinton baby watch upstages celebrities at Clinton nonprofit meeting
Hillary Clinton later added: “ Most of us, when we have our children, we’re still younger, we’re still striving, we’re still preoccupied with what’s going to happen in our lives, and I think a lot of people look back and say, ‘I did the best I could,’ but…being a grandparent you just have that freedom, at least that’s what I’m told, and I’m anxious to find out.” Current Secretary of State John Kerry welcomed the news: “ Being a grandparent is the best – period,” he said on Twitter. CNN’s Carma Hassan contributed to this report.