text:
Steeda S550 Mustang Strut Tower Brace
Steeda's double-bar strut tower brace is made specifically to work with your 2015 and up Ford Mustang S550 (GT & Ecoboost).
Made from high-strength chrome-moly steel and powder coated wrinkle black. This easy-to-install bar will stiffen up the front end of your Mustang to improve vehicle handling.
Completely designed and constructed in the United States of America. Easy-to-install and a great looking piece for under your hood. Designed by Steeda to work with EU & UK spec LHD and RHD cars
Product Benefits
- Improves front chassis stiffness
- Improves ride quality over rough surfaces
- Improved vehicle handling
- Design allows easy oil dipstick access
- Fits LHD and RHD cars
- Looks great!
- Normally in stock in the UK
S550 Mustang
Manual & Automatic
Install Tip: On EU cars which are PP equipped in US terms, the Strut Tower brace only uses spacers on the outside threads. This leaves a small gap under the inside threads and the base of the strut bar, but as strut tower directional forces are directed outwards, this is not an issue and means your kit will have spare spacers as these are used for US non PP cars.
1. Store Orders General Information
All orders are subject to product availability. As U.K. stock of items increases, more and more products are available for delivery within 3 working days. However many items that we offer might only be available at the manufacturer and can take time to get in for you.
Wherever possible we aim to fulfil all orders within 15 working day's. In instances like this we will inform you and aim to keep you updated.
In extreme instances some products may be manufactured to order, in these instances delivery times can be over a month from the purchase date. We will contact you to let you know if this is the case before we place the order with the manufacturer.
In any case, please feel free to contact us for updates on your order once it is placed.
2. Services General Information
When booking services with us the booking date will reflect stock availability. In some cases we may require a deposit from you at the time of booking.


text:
Just minutes prior to the Chicago Bulls preseason game against the Indiana Pacers on Saturday, Derrick Rose emerged out of the tunnel of the Banker Life Fieldhouse to a huge cheer from the crowd.
Chicago fans had come to watch the game with many seated behind Chicago's bench. They made the drive of three-hours to see the return of their Bulls' star Rose after 526 days off the court following his anterior cruciate tear during the first round of the playoffs in 2012.
Just prior to tip-off Gar Forman, the General Manager of the Bulls sat down among the fans. No shortage of people were interested in watching Rose.
Rose was the Most Valuable Player in the NBA during the 2010-2011 season. He provided a few glimpses of the player he was prior to his injury. Rose scored 13 points in the 20 minutes he played. He also committed four turnovers, showing there was some rust that needed to be shed.
Rose said after that he felt normal and great. He told reporters he had been playing that way in Chicago's practices and was only trying to get his timing back.
Rose started at point guard and scored his first hoop driving to the basket. He missed his original shot on the drive but was able to grab the rebound and score.
Many in the crowd of 15,000 stood in appreciation after he made his first basket. The Chicago guard played in three different stretches during the game and finished the game hitting 5 of his 12 shots, with three assists and two rebounds. The Bulls defeated the Pacers 82-76, which almost became a sideline to the much anticipated return of Chicago's point guard.
Rose has promised to keep his aggressiveness and said he would attack the basket as he always has in his short but successful career, which defined his game prior to his injury.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Centenary Update: 17 July 2018
July 17, 2018
Plans for the launch of our Centenary celebrations over Labour Weekend are coming along apace, and the team are working hard to make it one to remember. As well as the events that have already been advertised (Classic Boat race, Old Salts Day and Opening Day), it is looking like we will have a great selection of old movies from in and around the Club and a Movie night is being added to the agenda on the Friday night. If you have any video footage that may be of interest, please let us know.
Souvenir tankards and clothing have been sourced and more details on what's available and how to order will be provided very soon.
However, we still need your help.
The committee is looking for material relating to the club to be part of an exhibition in the clubhouse over Labour weekend. We are particularly keen to see curios with a direct relationship to the club and its members over the whole period of our history, so if you have any of the below you are willing to temporarily share, or can think of anything else of interest. These are the sorts of things:
Club or championship pennants
Campaign/event ribbons and badges
T shirts and other clothing
Boat hardware (homemade or now out of date, or up to the minute blocks, cleats, spars, rope, sails, etc)
Boat models
Boat plans
All material will be kept on site, which will be locked when unattended. A register will be kept of all loans, and receipts will be given for those who require them. Items can be returned to owners at any stage, so long as the Club is advised and the register is updated.
If you would like to help and/or have any questions please contact Jane Thomassen by email to firstname.lastname@example.com to talk about it. Please do not bring anything to Club just yet as we need to finalise logistics for collecting and storing items until Labour weekend
Our Recent Posts


text:
Citrix Systems (NASDAQ:CTXS) stock is climbing after the software virtualization specialist announced better-than-expected fourth-quarter results. Revenue rose 6.1% over the same year-ago period, to $851 million, while adjusted net income increased 5.8%, to $1.10 per diluted share. That might not sound impressive at first, but analysts were only expecting earnings of $1.03 per share on sales of $844 million.
It's also valuable to listen to what Citrix management has to say in their subsequent earnings conference calls, when they spend roughly an hour speaking with analysts to provide more insight on the results. Here are five of the most important points they brought up during this quarter's call:
The restructuring centers around long-term growth
Over the last few months, we've simplified our software-defined workplace strategy, a unique perspective and approach that's resonating well with customers and partners. Internally this is driving organizational realignment, clarity and focus. In addition, the actions announced today will drive operational efficiency while enabling continued investments in the areas that will power long-term growth, like mobility, cloud services and networking. -- Citrix CFO David Henshall
In my initial earnings recap, I noted that Citrix's restructuring -- which unfortunately eliminates 700 full-time and 200 contractor positions -- is expected to generate annualized pre-tax savings of $90 million to $100 million. But arguably more important than those savings is that this move should better align Citrix's business with its long-term ambitions. In turn, this will allow it to focus on its most promising growth prospects.
As CEO Mark Templeton later put it, "I think we all know it's extremely difficult to make a restructuring decision like this. ... At the same time, these changes are necessary to deliver on the promise of our software-defined workplace strategy."
Mobility is leading the way
We've been driving a broader conversation with customers about transforming the delivery of IT services to enable mobile work styles, securely and efficiently. Mobility has been the primary catalyst, plus the need for customers is to take a holistic approach to solving these problems. This strategy is what drove the creation of the Workspace Suite offering in the middle of last year. -- David Henshall
As mobile devices become more prominent in the enterprise world, it should surprise no one that mobile solutions are driving Citrix's core Workspace Services business, which accounted for more than 51% of total revenue during the quarter. And if Henshall's next quote is any indication, customers apparently love what they've seen so far.
Workspace Suite customers are in it for long haul
In Q4 we saw significant uptake of the Suite from both new and existing customers. And while contributing about 15% of Workspace Services license revenue, it also drove the majority of growth in our long term deferred revenue as many customers chose to enter into multi-year arrangements. -- David Henshall
Remember, after last quarter's conference call, Henshall explained that the new licensing structure of Workspace Suite was expected to drive a significant uptick in recurring revenue per customer. Investors should be encouraged, then, that his prediction is coming true, with so many customers not only adopting Workspace Suite, but signifying their satisfaction and confidence in Citrix by signing multi-year agreements. Over the long-term, this should also mean a much more predictable revenue stream for Citrix.
Innovation at Citrix is alive and well
I'm also very excited about our increased pace of innovation, both organic and acquired, especially what we're launching this quarter. ... For example, in customers and engineering, manufacturing and government sectors, we're adding support for Linux-based DDI and remote apps. To add contextual security for banking, government and health care apps, we're releasing HDX screen recording. During our recent partner summit, this feature was highly, highly applauded. -- Citrix CEO Mark Templeton
Investors should also be happy knowing Citrix isn't resting on its laurels. In addition to the HDX recording example, Templeton highlighted multiple other innovations, including HTML five-based receivers to simplify "anywhere access" for people connecting over high-packet loss networks, a streamlined single console in XenMobile 10 to handle app delivery and device and mobile app security, and storage virtualization tools from its recent acquisition of Sanbolic. Together, these innovations should serve to both win new customers and accelerate pipeline closure rates.
Guidance is better than it seems
In the first half [of 2015], we'll continue to optimize the business model, streamlining the organization, initiating a multi-year expansion of margins, and increasing focus on our core growth markets. Our guidance accounts for some potential impacts executions stemming from the restructuring, modest headwinds from foreign currency, and a slightly higher deferral rate on new customer bookings.
Finally, the rise in Citrix shares might be confusing at first because, despite the beat, Citrix also offered weaker-than-expected revenue and earnings guidance. Given the wild card presented by the restructuring, however, it seems prudent of Citrix management to incorporate the possibility it might have a negative effect on the company's near-term execution. If those execution challenges wane after the restructuring is complete, it would be a trade-off that should be more than worth it for patient, long-term investors.


text:
WASHINGTON – The United States has urged all parties in Zimbabwe's electoral dispute to respect the country's constitution and the rule of law.
The US Department of State, in a statement issued by its Spokesperson, Ms Heather Nauert, noted "several improvements'' in Zimbabwe's recent electoral process compared to what obtained in the past.
Zimbabwe's main opposition leader said Saturday he respectfully rejects the court ruling upholding President Emmerson Mnangagwa's narrow election win and he called the inauguration set for Sunday "false."
Nelson Chamisa spoke a day after the Constitutional Court unanimously rejected the opposition's claims of vote-rigging and said it did not bring "sufficient and credible evidence."
Chamisa said "we have the right to peaceful protest" and that other routes will be pursued now that the legal one has reached an end.
On Friday, August 24, Zimbabwe's Constitutional Court declared Emmerson Mnangagwa the winner of the July 30 presidential election and Zimbabwe's next President.
Consequently, the Court dismissed Nelson Chamisa's – the candidate of opposition Movement for Democratic Change Alliance – challenge of the election results.
"The IRI-NDI Zimbabwe International Electoral Observation Mission reported, "several improvements to the electoral process compared to Zimbabwe's past elections, though equally important problems gave rise to deep concerns that the process thus far has not made the mark.''
The US said further reforms were necessary to meet standards Zimbabweans expect, deserve and which reflect regional and international best practices for democratic elections.
"The United States remains concerned over politically motivated human rights violations and abuses and acts of post-electoral retribution in Zimbabwe.
"Violence and unlawful activity should not be part of the political process and those responsible for such transgressions must be held accountable,'' the US said.
It added that human rights and fundamental freedoms, such as freedom of expression and association must be respected and victims and witnesses of human rights violations and abuses deserve protection under the law.
"The United States encourages the Government of Zimbabwe to hold substantive discussions with all stakeholders and implement electoral and broader political and economic reforms.
"We stand ready to continue our dialogue with Zimbabwe's political, economic and civil society leaders to foster inclusive democratic governance for the betterment of all citizens.''
The Zimbabwe Electoral Commission declared Mnangagwa winner of the election after some delays, which some observers said created opportunities for citizens to speculate about the potential to manipulate results.
The elections had been largely peaceful and well-organised before violence broke out during a demonstration by supporters of MDC Alliance, alleging malpractices and leading to the killing of three people by security forces.
Last month's peaceful election was seen as a chance for Zimbabwe to move on from Robert Mugabe's repressive 37-year-rule. Now Chamisa alleges "a new persecution" after a deadly crackdown on the opposition.
The 40-year-old opposition leader again said he won the election and that the southern African nation needs fundamental reforms that cannot be resolved by five more years of "vacant leadership."
The 75-year-old Mnangagwa, a former Mugabe enforcer who has tried to restyle himself as a reformer, appealed for calm after the court ruling and in a Twitter post told Chamisa "my door is open and my arms are outstretched."
Chamisa responded with skepticism, saying the opposition had reached out to Mnangagwa for dialogue earlier but the president did not respond.
Zimbabwe's electoral commission had declared Mnangagwa the winner of the July 30 balloting with 50.8 percent of the vote. It later revised it to 50.6 percent, citing an "error" but arguing it was not significant enough to invalidate the win. It said Chamisa received 44.3 percent.
Chamisa's opposition Movement for Democratic Change party late Friday issued an angry statement saying in the coming days it would announce a "vigorous program of action in response to this electoral theft of the century."
Chamisa on Saturday, however, said he didn't know where that statement came from. He said the party's national council will meet next week on the way forward, and he did not directly respond to questions about the possibility of a government of national unity.
Mnangagwa, who took power in November after Mugabe stepped down under military pressure, called the election Zimbabwe's most transparent and credible ever. The government badly needed a credible vote to help end its status as a global pariah, have international sanctions lifted and open the door to investment in an economy that collapsed under Mugabe.
Zimbabweans now await the final reports from dozens of Western observers invited into the country for the first time in nearly two decades. The observers noted few issues on election day but expressed concern over the harassment of the opposition that followed. Six people were killed two days after the vote when the military swept into the capital, Harare, to disperse protests.
Mnangagwa has said an inquiry would look into the deaths after his inauguration.
Chamisa indicated that he felt threatened as an opposition leader. "By challenging a dictatorship you are signing a death warrant," he said. "We are ready for any eventuality."
Meanwhile, the 60,000-seat National Sports Stadium was being prepared for Sunday's inauguration, with soldiers drilling and workmen hanging colorful pro-Mnangagwa banners.
"Rest assured of a brighter tomorrow," one banner said.
Chamisa said he would not attend.


text:
My Year of Green Beauty Empties #8: Snog, Marry and Avoids
Check out my latest lot of green beauty empties and find out which i'd snog, marry or avoid. Continue reading My Year of Green Beauty Empties #8: Snog, Marry and Avoids
Check out my latest lot of green beauty empties and find out which i'd snog, marry or avoid. Continue reading My Year of Green Beauty Empties #8: Snog, Marry and Avoids
I've been using green beauty from waaaaaaaay before it was called green beauty. Finding fairly simple, all natural products for skincare has been fairly straightforward. After all it's what we've used for most of humanity's existence. Makeup however has always been far more of challenge. The formulae, colours and packaging were something I didn't want to touch with a bargepole! I've also mentioned before the … Continue reading The Best Natural and Organic Lipsticks To Swap From MAC and More
How many beauty products to you use in a year? I've always wondered so this year I'm keeping track. Read what I've used up so far in 2017. Continue reading How Many Beauty Products Do You Use Up In A Year? Green Beauty Empties #1 2017
My favourite makeup products of 2016 Continue reading Wonderloving ~ Best Makeup 2016
A look at the Top 10 most popular posts in 2016 on Wonderlusting Continue reading Wonderlusting Top 10 Most Read In 2016
Let me tell you a secret. I'm lazy as hell about makeup. I love lipstick as it's minimal effort for maximum impact. Beyond liquid liner which I can do in my sleep, I find eye makeup takes up valuable time that could be better spent sleeping. Eyeshadow involves brushes, blending, creasing this, blend that. I'm exhausted just thinking about it. Recently thanks to allergy issues, I … Continue reading Done in 60 Seconds….ILIA Silken Shadows Review & Swatches
Read my in-depth review of the new ILIA Vivid foundation and see swatches of all the 6 shades. Continue reading Ilia Vivid Foundation Review and Swatches
Love at first swipe. My pick of the best lipsticks and lipglosses for the perfect pout on Valentine's Day. Continue reading Love At First Swipe: Best Lippies for Valentine's
I did it! I completed #100LippyDays wearing 100 different lipsticks and lip glosses every day for 100 days! Here's a peak at follower favourites in October on Instagram Continue reading #100LippyDays October in Lipstick and Mission Completed!
Here are the top five follower favourite lipsticks that I wore in September. Continue reading #100LippyDays September in Lipstick


text:
Higgs Tours - Ocho Rios Jamaica
Contact us at 876-850-1396 or firstname.lastname@example.com
DOWNLOAD LINK: http://tinybit.cc/4803a739
READ ONLINE: http://tinybit.cc/4803a739
DOWNLOAD LINK: http://tinybit.cc/4803a739
READ ONLINE: http://tinybit.cc/4803a739
Virgil Flowers will have to watch his back--and his mouth--as he investigates a college culture war turned deadly in the latest thriller from #1 New York Times -bestseller John Sandford. At the local state university, two feuding departments have faced off on the battleground of PC culture. Each carries their views to extremes that may seem absurd, but highly educated people of sound mind and good intentions can reasonably disagree, right? Then someone winds up dead, and Virgil Flowers is brought in to investigate . . . and he soon comes to realize he's dealing with people who, on this one particular issue, are functionally crazy. Among this group of wildly impassioned, diametrically opposed zealots lurks a killer, and it will be up to Virgil to sort the murderer from the mere maniacs.
Views: 1
Comments are closed for this blog post
© 2020 Created by Noel Higgins. Powered by


text:
If you own mineral rights (oil and gas) but do not have a current oil and gas lease due to a prior mortgage foreclosure in certain portions of Tarrant or Johnson Counties, Texas, you may be entitled to a cash payment from a class action settlement.
Please read this notice carefully, as it affects your legal rights.
A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
- This is to notify you of a proposed class action settlement involving oil and gas production in groups of properties called "units" formerly operated by Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C. ("Chesapeake") and currently operated by TEP Barnett USA, LLC, an affiliate of TOTAL E&P USA, INC. ("Total") (Chesapeake and Total are referred to herein as "Defendants"). As explained in detail below, you are a member of the class covered by the proposed settlement if you are the owner of mineral interests in Johnson or Tarrant Counties, Texas, where such mineral interests were previously subject to a mineral lease with any Defendant, but where such mineral interest is now unleased due to foreclosure of a valid, prior-recorded mortgage(s) on such mineral interests. There are important exceptions, such as the existence of a subordination agreement or subsequent lease, discussed in detail below.
- The settlement will provide up to $3,200,000 to pay for all of the following: (1) class member claims payable to settlement class members; (2) legal fees of up to $720,000 payable to Plaintiffs' counsel (which includes certain costs); and (3) named representative incentive payments of up to $4,000. This is expected to result in an average net recovery of approximately $619 per Settlement Class Member after the deduction of fees, costs and expenses, though Settlement Class Members generally will receive amounts based on the amount of oil and gas production attributable to their specific Property.
If you are a Settlement Class Member, your legal rights will be affected regardless of whether you act or do not act. Please read this notice very carefully.
The only way to get a cash payment is to submit a valid claim.
The claim filing period ended on February 23, 2020.
|Get no cash payment. This is the only option that, assuming your claim is timely brought, might allow you to bring your own separate lawsuit against Defendants concerning the Released Claims.
|Write to the Court about why you do not like the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and/or Lead Counsel's Fee and Expense Application. If you object, you will still be a member of the Settlement Class.
|Ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the proposed settlement.
|Get no payment. Give up rights.
- These rights and options - and the deadlines to exercise them - are explained in this notice.
- The Court in charge of this case still has to decide whether to grant final approval to the Settlement. Payments will be made to all eligible Settlement Class Members who timely submit valid Claim Forms, if the Court approves the Settlement and after any appeals are resolved. Please be patient.
- Why did I get this notice?
You have been identified through real property records of Tarrant and/or Johnson County as the potential owner of a Class Property. Receipt of this Notice does not mean that you are a Member of the Settlement Class or that you will be entitled to receive a payment. If you wish to be eligible for a payment, you are required to submit the Claim Form that is being distributed with this Notice and be confirmed as a member of the Settlement Class by the Claims Administrator.
The Court directed that this Notice be sent to Settlement Class Members because they have a right to know about the proposed Settlement of this class action lawsuit, and about all of their options, before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement.
The Court in charge of the Action is the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the case is known as Arbuckle Mountain Ranch, et al. v. Chesapeake Energy. et al., No. 3:14-CV-4584-M. The Action is assigned to the Honorable Barbara Lynn, United States District Judge.
- What is this case about and what has happened so far?
The lawsuit is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. The settling defendants in the case are Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C., formerly known as Chesapeake Operating, Inc., Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, L.L.C., formerly known as Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc., (collectively, "Chesapeake") and Total E&P USA, Inc. ("Total," and together with Chesapeake, the "Defendants").
Plaintiffs and the settlement class members own or owned minerals (and in almost every case the corresponding surface estate) located in Johnson and Tarrant Counties, Texas—two contiguous Texas counties. These counties sit above an underground geological formation that contains huge reserves of natural gas trapped in shale rock called the Barnett Shale. Starting in 2005, Chesapeake and several other large oil and gas companies began getting permission from the mineral owners who lived above that formation to drill gas wells and extract the gas through contracts called oil and gas leases. Leases give permission to an oil company to drill and produce the gas under the homes or properties in exchange for payment to the home or property owner of a monthly percentage of the gas sold or produced (called a "royalty"). Without a lease, an oil company typically does not have permission to produce and sell another person's oil or gas.
Because most of the property owners living above the Barnett Shale owned typical home lots of ¼ acre or less, Chesapeake and other oil and gas companies needed to lease entire neighborhoods, and then combine those properties into large groupings called "units" in order to drill wells and extract the gas. Sometimes, the mineral interests that were leased by Chesapeake were already subject to prior-recorded mortgages. In 2008 and 2009, the financial crisis caused many homes in the Barnett Shale area to be foreclosed upon. When there was a foreclosure of a prior-recorded mortgage, and where the minerals were not previously separated from the mortgage, Plaintiffs allege that the later oil and gas leases were extinguished or terminated by the prior foreclosure.
The Settlement Class members acquired their mineral interests after mortgage foreclosures in Johnson and Tarrant counties. Again – Plaintiffs allege these foreclosures extinguished any oil and gas lease(s) on the foreclosed properties recorded after the prior recorded mortgages. Plaintiffs allege that despite Defendants' knowledge of the lease terminations created by the foreclosures, they proceeded to produce huge amounts of the Settlement Class' oil and gas without any valid lease, and without compensating class members for the minerals Defendants were taking.
Defendants deny the allegations.
In 2014, Arbuckle Mountain Ranch brought suit against Chesapeake and Total in Texas state court for trespassing on Arbuckle's (and the class members') property and improperly producing and converting large volumes of their minerals without a lease. The lawsuit asserts claims against Defendants for declaratory relief, trespass, injunctive relief, conversion, and money had and received. Defendants denied all liability and asserted conditional counterclaims for declaratory judgment and to quiet title.
Shortly after the case was filed in state court in Johnson County, Texas, Defendants had the case transferred or "removed" to federal court. Arbuckle sought to have the case transferred back to the State Court, which the federal district court granted. But then Defendants successfully appealed to the federal court of appeals (Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals), which decided the case should stay in federal court. Plaintiffs sought permission from the United States Supreme Court to take up the issue and decide which court this lawsuit should stay in, but the U.S. Supreme Court did not take the case. Therefore, the case remained in federal district court where it is still pending today.
From approximately January 2017 through May 2019, the Parties engaged in discovery and motion practice, including Motions to Dismiss the Complaint, a Motion for Summary Judgment, and several Motions to Compel discovery filed by Lead Plaintiffs. Lead Plaintiffs engaged experts, engaged in summary judgment briefing, and reviewed thousands of pages of documents provided by Defendants.
Chesapeake initiated settlement discussions in October of 2018. Plaintiffs countered that proposal with a settlement demand. In May of 2019, Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants (together, the "Parties") agreed to attempt private settlement negotiations of the Action.
On the afternoon of May 29, 2019, the Parties participated in a settlement negotiation session in Houston, Texas, at the law offices of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP. After several counteroffers back and forth, and lengthy discussions regarding the non-monetary aspects of the settlement, the negotiation session ended without resolution, as the Parties were not able to come to an agreement in principle to settle the Action. The Parties continued negotiations over the following weeks and reached an agreement in principle to resolve the class claims against Defendants on June 21, 2019, for a Settlement Fund totaling $3.2 million dollars, inclusive of 22.5% in fees, subject to Court approval.
- Why is this a class action?
In a class action, one or more persons or entities (in this case, Lead Plaintiffs), sue on behalf of people and entities who have similar claims. Together, these people and entities are a "class," and each is a "class member." Class actions allow the adjudication of many individuals' similar claims that might be too small economically to bring as individual actions. One court resolves the issues for all class members at the same time, except for those who exclude themselves, or "opt-out," from the class.
- What are the reasons for the Settlement?
The Court has not finally decided in favor of Plaintiffs or Defendants. Instead, both sides agreed to a settlement. Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel believe that the claims asserted in the Action have merit. They recognize, however, the expense and length of continued proceedings needed to pursue the claims through trial and appeals, as well as the difficulties in establishing liability. For example, Defendants have raised a number of arguments and defenses (which they would raise at summary judgment and trial) countering Lead Plaintiff's allegations, such as the Defendants' wellbores did not directly traverse or trespass under the vast majority of the Class's properties, and so Texas legal concepts such as the rule of capture prevent any liability for their actions. Defendants also maintain that there are no recoverable damages since most of the Class did not have any minerals removed from their property. In the absence of a settlement, the Parties would present factual and expert testimony on each of these issues, and there is a risk that the Court or jury would resolve these issues unfavorably against Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class. Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel believe that the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class.
Defendants have denied and continue to deny each and every one of the claims alleged by Lead Plaintiff in the Action, including all claims in the First Amended Class Action Complaint. Nonetheless, Defendants have concluded that continuation of the Action would be protracted and expensive and have taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially a complex case like this Action, and believe that the Settlement is in the best interests of Defendants.
- How do I know if I am part of the Settlement Class?
The proposed settlement agreement defines the following settlement class for which the Parties seek certification for settlement purposes:
All past or current owners of mineral interest tracts in Johnson and/or Tarrant Counties, Texas, where such mineral interest tracts were previously subject to a mineral lease with any Defendant, but where such mineral interest tract is now unleased by Defendants due to foreclosure of a valid, prior-recorded mortgage(s) on such mineral interest tracts, from which Defendant(s) produced gas or other minerals after the foreclosure.
- Are there expectations to being included in the Settlement Class?
Yes. Consistent with Plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Complaint, the following persons are excluded from the proposed settlement class:
(i) Owners of Properties covered by validly executed and recorded post-foreclosure leases, proper pre-mortgage leases to Chesapeake or Chesapeake's predecessor in interest, and any mineral lease made superior to the foreclosed mortgage by a valid, properly recorded subordination agreement;
(ii) Owners of any Properties where the minerals were carved out or reserved from the mortgage prior to the recording of the mortgage;
(iii) All governmental entities, including federal, state, local governments and their respective agencies, departments and quasi-governmental entities, including but not limited to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and related agencies;
(iv) the states and territories of the United States, and any foreign citizens, states, nations, territories or entities;
(v) the United States of America; and
(vi) any person or entity that Plaintiffs' counsel is, or may be, prohibited under Texas law from representing.
Also excluded from the Settlement Class is anyone who timely and validly seeks exclusion from the Settlement Class in accordance with the procedures described in Question 11 below.
- What does the settlement provide?
In exchange for the Settlement and the release of the Released Claims against the Released Defendant Parties (see Question 10 below), Defendants have agreed to cause a $3.2 million cash payment to be made, which will be distributed after deduction of Court-awarded attorneys' fees and any other fees or expenses approved by the Court, to Settlement Class Members who send in valid and timely Claim Forms and who do not validly seek exclusion from the Settlement Class.
In order for a Qualified Claimant to be entitled to payment, the following requirements must be met:
(i) The Claimant owns the minerals in the tract on which the claim is based;
(ii) The subject tract is located within the boundaries of a pooled unit that is or was operated by a Defendant and/or Defendants' Releasees from which Defendants and/or Defendants' Releasees produced oil or gas after November 1, 2010 and after the Claimant acquired its ownership in the subject tract;
(iii) The subject tract was leased under an oil and gas lease to one or more Defendants and/or Defendants' Releasees (or that was assigned to one or more Defendants and/or Defendants' Releasees), which lease was pooled by Defendants and/or Defendants' Releasees into the pooled unit of which the subject tract is located with the boundaries;
(iv) The subject tract was subject to a non-judicial foreclosure sale that occurred after the date of execution of the oil and gas lease described in condition # 3 and that foreclosed the debtor's interest under a deed of trust that pre-dated such oil and gas lease;
(v) The oil and gas lease described in condition # 3 was not described in a subordination or carve-out agreement;
(vi) The subject tract is not subject to a post-foreclosure lease taken prior to November 19, 2014 either by one or more of the Defendants and/or Defendants' Releasees, or by another and subsequently assigned to one or more of the Defendants and/or Defendants' Releasees; and
(vii) The subject tract is not covered by a pre-mortgage lease to any Defendant or to any Defendant's predecessor in interest.
- How can I receive payment?
To qualify for a payment from the Settlement Fund, you must submit a timely and valid Claim Form. A Claim Form is included with this Notice. You may also obtain one from the website dedicated to the Settlement:
- submit a claim
- or from Lead Counsel's website: www.cwylaw.com
- or you can request that an additional Claim Form be mailed to you by calling the Claims Administrator toll-free at 800-372-5657.
Please read the instructions contained in the Claim Form carefully, fill out the Claim Form, include all the documents the form requests, sign it, and mail or submit it to the Claims Administrator so that it is postmarked or received no later than February 23, 2020.
- When will I receive my payment if I qualify as a Settlement Class Member?
The Court will hold an Objection and Final Settlement Hearing on March 23, 2020 to decide, among other things, whether to finally approve the Settlement. Even if the Court approves the Settlement, there may be appeals which can take time to resolve, perhaps more than a year. It also takes a long time for all of the Claim Forms to be accurately reviewed and processed. Please be patient.
If the settlement is approved and you receive a settlement check, you must deposit or cash it within one hundred twenty (120) days after the date on the check. If you do not, the check will be void and you will no longer be entitled to any payment from the Settlement Fund, although you will still be bound by the settlement, including the release of your claims.
- What am I giving up to receive a payment and by staying in the Settlement Class?
If you are a Settlement Class Member and do not timely and validly exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you will remain in the Settlement Class and that means that, upon the "Effective Date" of the Settlement, you will release all "Released Plaintiffs Claims" against the "Released Defendant Parties." Participation in the Settlement requires each Qualified Claimant to (i) agree to the Release discussed in the Settlement Agreement and Settlement Notice; (ii) grant TOTAL E&P USA, INC. and its affiliate TOTAL E&P USA Barnett, LLC an option to lease a Qualified Claimant's tract under an agreed lease for no additional cash consideration other than future royalties; and (iii) grant a subsurface easement to TOTAL E&P USA, INC. and its affiliate TOTAL E&P USA Barnett, LLC to the extent any existing wellbore traverses the Qualified Claimant's tract below the surface but above the Barnett Shale formation. A Claimant must acknowledge that, by submitting a claim in this matter, the Claimant will be deemed to have agreed to the release and to have granted the option and easement described above.
"Released Plaintiffs Claims" means any and all complaints, claims, third- party claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, demands, liabilities, obligations, promises, agreements, controversies, actions, causes of action, suits, rights, damages, costs, losses, debts, charges and expenses of any and every nature whatsoever, whether in law or in equity, whether arising under federal, state, local, or foreign statutory or common law or any other law, rule, or regulation (whether foreign or domestic), whether currently known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, foreseen or unforeseen, ripened or unripened, accrued or unaccrued, or matured or not matured, whether arising in equity or under the law of contract, tort, malpractice, statutory breach, or any other legal right or duty, whether direct, derivative, individual, representative, or in any other capacity, and to the fullest extent that the law permits their release in the Action, that Lead Plaintiffs, or any other member of the Settlement Class: (i) asserted against Defendants in the Complaint or any other pleadings filed in the Action; or (ii) could have asserted against Defendants' Releasees in any forum that (a) arise out of, relate to, are connected with, or are in any way based upon the allegations, transactions, facts, matters or occurrences, representations or omissions involved, set forth, or referred to in the First Amended Class Action Complaint or any other pleadings filed by any party in the Action. Released Plaintiffs' Claims include any theory of recovery related to unleased tracts that was pled or that could have been pled, including but not limited to any claim seeking to recover damages or injunctive relief related to any and all wellbores drilled and completed as of the Effective Date of this settlement and located within units in which any Settlement Class Member owns property, and any production of oil and gas from such wellbores. Released Plaintiffs' Claims do not include: (i) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement; and (ii) any claims of any person or entity who or which submits a valid and timely request for exclusion that is accepted by the Court.
In addition, Defendants will be releasing the following claims against you if you participate in the Settlement Class: "Released Defendants' Claims" means all claims and causes of action of every nature and description, whether known claims or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, common or foreign law, that arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of the claims asserted in the Action against the Defendants. Released Defendants' Claims do not include any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement or any claims against any person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion from the Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court.
- How do i exclude myself from the Settlement Class?
If you want to keep any right you may have to sue or continue to sue Defendants and the other Released Defendant Parties on your own concerning the Released Claims, then you must take steps to remove yourself from the Settlement Class. This is called excluding yourself or "opting out." Please note: If you decide to exclude yourself, there is a risk that any lawsuit you may file to pursue claims alleged in the Action may be dismissed, including because the suit is not filed within the applicable time periods required for filing suit.
Any member of the Settlement Class may elect to be excluded from this Settlement and from the Settlement Class by timely and properly opting out of the Settlement Class. Any member of the Settlement Class who desires to be excluded from the Settlement Class must give to the Claims Administrator its election to be excluded on or before February 7, 2020.
Send your notice of exclusion to the following address:
Arbuckle Class Settlement
c/o Claims Administrator
P.O. Box 23650
Jacksonville, FL 32241-3650
Any notice of exclusion must include the following from the member of the Settlement Class seeking to be excluded: (a) full name, (b) telephone number, (c) current address, (d) a statement that the person wishes to be excluded from the Settlement, and (e) the signature of the person who wishes to be excluded from the Settlement (or is authorized to make such request for an entity that wishes to be excluded from the Settlement).
Settlement Class Members who timely opt-out of the Class Action Settlement shall: (a) be excluded from the Class Settlement; (b) have no right to receive any benefits under the Class Settlement; (c) not be bound by the terms of the Class Settlement; and (d) have no right to object to the terms of the Class Settlement or to be heard at the Final Fairness Hearing.
Settlement Class Members cannot both object to and opt-out of this settlement. Any Settlement Class Member who attempts to both object to and opt-out of this Settlement will be deemed to have opted out and will forfeit the right to object to this Settlement or any of its terms.
- If I do not exclude myself, can I sue Defendants and the other Released Defendant Parties for the same thing later?
No. Unless you properly exclude yourself, you will give up any rights to sue Defendants and the other Released Defendant Parties for any and all Released Claims. If you have a pending lawsuit against any of the Released Defendant Parties, speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. You must exclude yourself from this Settlement Class to continue your own lawsuit. Remember, the exclusion deadline is January 23, 2020.
- If I exclude myself, can I get money from the proposed Settlement?
No, only Settlement Class Members are eligible to recover money from the Settlement.
- Do I have a lawyer in this case?
Circelli, Walter and Young, PLLC is Lead Counsel in the Action and represents all Settlement Class Members. The Court will determine the amount of attorneys' fees and expenses, which will be paid from the Settlement Fund. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense.
- How will the lawyers be paid?
Class Counsel will ask the Court for attorneys' fees and expenses up to $720,000. Defendants have agreed not to oppose this request. The Court may award less than the amount requested. Since even before the start of the litigation, Class Counsel have pursued the case on behalf of class members purely on a contingent basis and have received no compensation for their services or reimbursement of their expenses. Any award of attorneys' fees and expenses, approved by the Court, up to the amount of $720,000 in attorneys' fees and expenses will be paid out of the Settlement Fund, leaving $2,480,000 for class claims. However, if administrative costs exceed the amount of $75,000, such costs will also be paid from and reduce the Settlement Fund for Class Claims.
Defendants also agree to pay third-party administration costs not to exceed $75,000 as set forth in the Agreement. Such costs (to the extent they do not exceed the cap) will be paid separately and in addition to the Settlement Fund without reducing the Settlement Fund or the cash payments provided to class members under the settlement.
Class Counsel will also seek a $1,000 incentive award for each of the four (4) plaintiffs named in the current complaint filed in this lawsuit for their initiative and efforts in pursuing and participating in the case on behalf of the class. Any incentive awards approved by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Fund.
- How to tell the Court that I do not like something about the proposed Settlement?
If you are a Settlement Class Member, you can object to the Settlement or any of its terms, the proposed Plan of Allocation of the Settlement Fund, and/or Lead Counsel's Fee and Expense Application. You may write to the Court about why you think the Court should not approve any or all of the Settlement terms or related relief. If you would like the Court to consider your views, you must file a proper objection within the deadline, and according to the following procedures.
To object, you must send a signed letter stating that you object to the proposed Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and/or the Fee and Expense Application in "Arbuckle Mountain Ranch, et al. v. Chesapeake Energy. et al., No. 3:14-CV-4584-M." Your objection must state why you are objecting and whether your objection applies only to you, a subset of the Settlement Class, or the entire Settlement Class. The written objections must: (a) state the objector's full name, address, email address, and telephone number; (b) provide information and supporting documentation demonstrating that the person or entity owns property interests that make them a member of the Settlement Class, including, but not limited to, when the person or entity acquired an interest in the property, the physical address of the property, and the legal description of the property; (c) set forth a brief statement regarding the nature of the objections; (d) state the reasons for the objections; (e) include copies of any papers that support the objections; (f) the objector's signature and verification under oath that the objector believes he/she is a Settlement Class member; and (g) if the objector wants to be heard at the Final Fairness Hearing, state that the objector intends to appear at the Final Fairness Hearing. If the objection is made through an attorney, the written objection must also provide the attorney's name, address, email address, and telephone number. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any Settlement Class Member who does not object in the manner described in this Notice will be deemed to have waived any objection and will be forever foreclosed from making any objection to the proposed Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and/or Lead Counsel's Fee and Expense Application.
You must mail or deliver your objections or comments to the Clerk of the Court, with copies to Class Counsel and Defendants' counsel, such that they are received no later than February 7, 2020. The addresses for the Clerk of the Court, Class Counsel, and Defendants' counsel are as follows:
Clerk of the Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division
1100 Commerce Street, Room 1452
Dallas, TX 75242
Class Counsel:
Vincent P. Circelli
George Parker Young, Esq.
Kelli L. Walter
Tindall Square Warehouse
500 E. 4th Street, Suite 250
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
(682) 703-2246 telephone
Defendants' Counsel:
Scott Douglass & McConnico, LLP
Christopher D. Sileo
303 Colorado, Suite 2400
Austin, Texas 78701
If you do not raise your objections according to the above procedure, you will waive all objections and have no right to appeal if the settlement is approved.
You may, but need not, enter an appearance in the lawsuit through your own attorney. If you do, you will be responsible for your own attorney's fees and costs.
You do not need to attend the Settlement Hearing to have your written objection considered by the Court. However, any Settlement Class Member who has complied with the procedures described in this Question 16 and below in Question 20 may appear at the Settlement Hearing and be heard, to the extent allowed by the Court. An objector may appear in person or arrange, at his, her, or its own expense, for a lawyer to represent him, her, or it at the Settlement Hearing.
- What is the difference between objecting and seeking exclusion?
Objecting is telling the Court that you do not like something about the proposed Settlement, Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel's Fee and Expense Application. You can still recover money from the Settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Settlement Class. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Settlement Class. If you exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you have no basis to object because the Settlement and the Action no longer affect you.
- When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the proposed Settlement?
The Court will hold the Settlement Hearing on March 24, 2020 at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 1570 of the Earle Cabell Federal Building, at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, 1100 Commerce Street, Room 1452, Dallas, TX 75242.
At this hearing, the Court will consider whether: (i) the Settlement is fair, reasonable, adequate, and should be approved; (ii) the Plan of Allocation is fair and reasonable, and should be approved; and (iii) the application of Lead Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees and payment of litigation expenses is reasonable and should be approved. The Court will take into consideration any written objections filed in accordance with the instructions in Question 16 above. We do not know how long it will take the Court to make these decisions.
You should be aware that the Court may change the date and time of the Settlement Hearing without another notice being sent to Settlement Class Members. If you want to attend the hearing, you should check with Lead Counsel or visit the settlement website, here, beforehand to be sure that the hearing date and/or time has not changed.
- Do I have to come to the Settlement Hearing?
No. Lead Counsel will answer any questions the Court may have. But, you are welcome to attend at your own expense. If you submit a valid and timely objection, the Court will consider it and you do not have to come to Court to discuss it. You may have your own lawyer attend (at your own expense), but it is not required. If you do hire your own lawyer, he or she must file and serve a Notice of Appearance in the manner described in the answer to Question 20 below no later than January, 2, 2020.
- May I speak at the hearing?
You may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Settlement Hearing. To do so, you must, no later than January 2, 2020, submit a statement that you, or your attorney, intend to appear in "Arbuckle Mountain Ranch, et al. v. Chesapeake Energy. et al., No. 3:14-CV-4584-M." Persons who intend to present evidence at the Settlement Hearing must also include in their objections (prepared and submitted in accordance with the answer to Question 16 above) the identities of any witnesses they may wish to call to testify and any exhibits they intend to introduce into evidence at the Settlement Hearing. You may not speak at the Settlement Hearing if you exclude yourself from the Settlement Class or if you have not provided written notice of your intention to speak at the Settlement Hearing in accordance with the procedures described in this Question 20 and Question 16 above.
- What happens if I do nothing at all?
If you do nothing and you are a member of the Settlement Class, you will receive no money from this Settlement and you will be precluded from starting a lawsuit, continuing with a lawsuit, or being part of any other lawsuit against Defendants and the other Released Defendant Parties concerning the Released Claims. To share in the Settlement Fund, you must submit a Claim Form (see Question 8 above). To start, continue, or be a part of any other lawsuit against Defendants and the other Released Defendant Parties concerning the Released Claims, you must exclude yourself from the Settlement Class (see Question 11 above).
- Are there more details about the Settlement?
This Notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. More details are contained in the Settlement Agreement, which is available at here.
You may also review the Settlement Agreement at Court or other documents in the case during business hours at the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, 1100 Commerce Street, Room 1452, Dallas, TX 75242. Subscribers to PACER, a fee-based service, can also view the papers publicly in the Action through the Court's online Case Management/Electronic Case Files System at www.PACER.gov.
You can also get a copy of the Settlement Agreement, and other documents related to the Settlement, as well as additional information about the Settlement by visiting the website of Lead Counsel, www.cwylaw.com
You may also call the Claims Administrator toll free at 800-372-5657 or write to the Claims Administrator at:
Arbuckle Class Settlement, c/o Claims Administrator, PO Box 23369 Jacksonville, FL 32241-3369.
- How will my claim be calculated?
Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel Plaintiffs, working together with the Claims Administrator, are responsible for the allocation of the Settlement Fund (less attorneys' fees and costs approved by the Court) to the Settlement Class members based of the following plan ("Plan of Allocation"):
(i) The "Tract's Net Mineral Acres" associated with each tract on Plaintiffs' Class List based on the percentage of the minerals in the subject tract owned by the person identified on Plaintiffs' Class List;
(ii) The Tract's Net Mineral Acres divided by the total acres in Defendants' Unit in which the subject tract was pooled (the "Tract's Unit Interest");
(iii) The Tract's Unit Interest multiplied by the total production measured in MCF (thousands of cubic feet) for Defendants' Unit in which the subject tract was pooled from November 1, 2010 forward through April 2019 production based on Texas Railroad Commission ("RRC") records (the "Tract's MCF");
(iv) The Tract's MCF divided by the total MCF of all tracts identified on Plaintiffs' Class List (the "Tract's Settlement Allocation Factor");
(v) The Tract's Settlement Allocation Factor is then multiplied by $2.48 million or the balance in the Settlement Fund after attorneys' fees and Litigation Expenses approved by the Court not to exceed $720,000. However, if administrative costs exceed the amount of $75,000, such costs will also be paid from and reduce the Settlement Fund for Class Claims.
(vi) In the event there are two or more Qualified Claimants for a given tract's share based on common ownership, the Claims Administrator will prorate such share based on percentage of each Qualified Claimant's ownership.
(vii) In the event there are two or more Qualified Claimants for a given tract's share of the Settlement Fund based on interim ownership, the Claims Administrator will prorate such share based upon production during each Qualified Claimant's ownership period.
Example: [INSERT]
After payout to all Class Members who qualify as a Qualified Claimant, any remaining amounts in the Settlement Fund will be returned to Defendants.
- How to get more information?
HOW TO GET MORE INFORMATION: You can get more information by:
(a) calling the Administrator toll free at 800-372-5657;
(b) writing to the Settlement Administrator at Arbuckle Class Settlement, c/o Claims Administrator, PO Box 23369, Jacksonville, FL 32241-3369, or
(c) by sending a written inquiry to Class Counsel at the address in Question 16, above.


text:
How to enable Volte Samsung Galaxy J710F & Android 7 Firmware. Samsung Galaxy J710F flash tested by me and it is working very well without any error, you can use this flash file when the device needs to remove virus, pattern lock, hard reset, flashing, software update, format, reset, phone lock, sim lock, pattern reset, pin lock, flash, hang on logo, hang problem, firmware update, pattern lock, sim lock, screen lock, screen unlock, pin lock, stuck on logo, user name password id problem, unfortunately app has stopped fix, unfortunately, app has stopped working, unfortunately, app store has stopped, unfortunately, your app has stopped, auto turn on internet connection, auto turn on WiFi connection, auto app installing, auto gone balance etc these type issues can use this way. All you need is your phone and micro USB cable plus the flash file provided in this post. But before proceeding, it is necessary to save data like contacts, photos, videos and other important things. Enable Volte Samsung Galaxy J710F
Download Galaxy J710F Android 7 Files
Must Read :
Before proceeding for the repair of your Samsung Galaxy J710F phone, you need to make sure that your device is at least 60% charged. Further, it is good to backup full data as it consists of contact details, important messages, emails or any important things. We need to have a backup because after flashing all data stored on device internal memory get removed. You can use any external device like hard drive, SD card or any other suitable devices for backup. Enable Volte Samsung Galaxy J710F
Trending :-
- How to Unlock Bootloader, Install TWRP and Root Honor 8 Pro
- How to Root OnePlus 5 Using TWRP recovery
- How to Unlock Bootloader of OnePlus 5
Procedure :
- Download firmware from the above link and extract it
- Open 'Odin' tool and select file which is you downloaded from the above link
- Put the phone on Download Mode using Volume Down + Home + Power
- Press Volume Up button for confirming the download and Insert USB Cable to phone
- Click on the Start button and wait for success confirmation
This is the steps for installing firmware and enable volte on your Samsung Galaxy J710F smartphone. If you have any queries regarding any process mentioned in this post please comment below.
Note: After Flash do phone reset go to Setting → About Phone → and click on Reset then do a factory reset


text:
Leaving the Land Pt 2: Profile of a government official heading resettlements
In the second installment for the New York Timesof my series on urbanization, I profile Li Yongping, an official overseeing the largest peace-time transfer of people in history (or so it seems). Frank, open and smart, Mr. Li is also absolutely sure he knows what's best for farmers: an end to rural life.
Category: New York Times, Urbanization,
Posted by: Ian Johnson
Jul 13, 2013


text:
South-East UK based strolling jazz players for all occasions.
Professional experienced musicians suitable for everything from parties and fetes to traditional New Orleans funerals. Contact Miles here.
New Orleans style funeral march for Smiler, Coldharbour
Big Day Out, Ewhurst, July 2017
"Just to say a huge thank you for all the help, advice, encouragement and everything you brought to the party!"
"All the feedback is positive, everyone thought it was a great show"
Also available as the Oom-pa-pa-Pirates, a Bavarian style Oktoberfest Oom-Pah band.


text:
Syrian Army Destroys Terrorists' Hideout near Al-Rastan in Homs
Syrian army has made great advances in different parts of the country and has destroyed a hideout for terrorist organizations in Homs.
An army unit on Friday destroyed a hideout for terrorist organizations as it targeted their positions in the surroundings of al-Rastan city, 20 km north of Homs city; SANA reported.
A military source confirmed that a number of terrorists positioned in the hideout were killed or injured, including leaders of terrorist groups.
Source: Al Alam


text: The Toy Adaptation Program traveled to Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus to collaborate in the annual Toys for All Tots. Families were invited to come to a session to adapt up to two toys and were given 3 more toys for the holidays. Along with these toys, each family who adapted a toy were given a kit to adapt toys at home. The event allowed for the training of over 20 families and the donation of over 175 toys to families in need.


text:
NBI presents a wide range of bearings, suitable for different applications, and trying to fulfill the costumers' needs. However, we always try to improve the bearing catalogue, and keep on working in developing and adding new references, and specially investing in research and investigation.
That is why, because of that continuous research, when standard bearings are not the optimum to fulfil the requirements of the customer application, we are capable of offering optimized designs for their needs.
Our engineers offer qualified support developing tailor made bearing solutions with our customers. We work hardly along with our costumers selecting the right bearings, the special seal design, the specific coating, the suitable lubricants, etc.
If you have any enquiry please contact our Application Engineering Department, and our engineers will be pleased to discuss with you your special requirements and offer you an optimized bearing design.


text:
Before the start of this season a revision to the floor regulations was agreed in order to trim downforce and help Pirelli to run the same tyres for a third season by reducing loadings.
More recently and in the wake of the tyre problems seen at Silverstone several further minor revisions were made to the 2021 aero regulations, contributing to an overall reduction of around 10%.
Horner says that the reduction could have been even bigger as teams will inevitably claw the lost downforce back with development, although he acknowledged that there's also always a financial cost associated with any change.
"I think it's a bit of a tricky one," Horner said. "I think the teams will get back all the downforce that it perhaps takes off.
"Maybe more could have been done because the rate of progress in F1 is such that if there are concerns about the load of the tyre maybe more should have been looked at.
"But of course whenever you change something, it does introduce cost because whatever you change creates differences, so it's finding that balance.
AlphaTauri boss Franz Tost also expects the lost downforce to be retrieved in the course of 2021.
"We are just studying this new regulation and of course we will lose a lot of downforce," he said.
"But with the development speed in F1 I would not be surprised if at the beginning of next year or maybe a little bit later, the downforce level will be the same."
However Alfa Romeo team principal Fred Vasseur said the downforce cuts are not insignificant.
"For sure it will have a big impact on the downforce," said the Frenchman. "I don't want to speak about points, but it will be huge, and it's also probably necessary for the tyres. I think it was the right move from the FIA."


text:
I'm back! Again, I believe it's important to take periodical breaks…this time though, it's because I made my second annual pilgrimage to that thing in the desert, Burning Man. It's always so tough and awesome in all the best ways, and I'm thankful to have made it back for a second time. I feel freshly inspired and ready to take on life again in a positive light. However, that could all take up a whole separate post (maybe one of these days I'll do that, but I am not big on talking about me). One of the things festivals (even though Burning Man is not exactly one) and events like this do is separate me from the mainstream commercial world and make me appreciate the individual artists more when I totally thought I couldn't. There's no shortage of art at Burning Man as I'm sure most of you know, but there is no commerce (for a good reason). Still though, it focuses me even more on how tough it really is for those trying to express their talents and make a difference in the world. There's no WiFi or cell service out there so it really is disconnecting (and I love it), so it's always interesting to get back and catch up on what is going on in the "default" world. I was excited when I got back to see one of my all time, top favorite brands has released their new seasonal line! So without much more ado about myself and my personal exploits, I'm stoked to say the new Nomads Hemp Wear Fall/Winter 2019 Collection is here.
If you've been following me for long enough, I'm sure you've noticed several constants in terms of favorite brands and brand partnerships. Nomads Hemp Wear has been a longtime favorite and I'm grateful to be able to share them with you every season and highlight my favorite pieces. Ethical and sustainable style is known to be more on the pricey side (usually for good reason), and it's unfortunate for those who mean well but have small budgets. However, this Canadian brand has found a way to make everything accessible…of course, we're not talking Forever 21 prices here, but everything is priced so well for their do-good nature and superb quality. Everything I own from them has stood up through numerous washes and wears, and still looks like new after many years. One of the things that also stands out to me is the fact that everything they create bridges the gap between festival and everyday street style, and their creative license is so modestly unique and easy to style! My closet is slowly but surely filling up with mostly goods from them.
Every season, Nomads Hemp Wear releases a handful of beautiful new items, but they also build off their existing short-run stock. This means, if you missed something you loved from the previous season, chances are they will revive it for the next with new colorways. I'm totally on board with this! There are several pieces I grabbed later on after I saw them for the first time…and believe me, you'll also be thankful as I'm sure you'll want everything they have. For the Nomads Hemp Wear Fall/Winter 2019 collection, there are several new jackets, tops, pants and leggings and much more. However, I'm happy to also see they've brought back one of my favorite items, the Revelation Tunic, in a beautiful red and black design! If you remember, I reviewed this piece two seasons ago. One item that is always coming back are the beautiful Axiom leggings, which have been reworked into a super soft bamboo version (I have a soy version from years ago). I could go on and on…and on—everything is so awesome! But, I'll let these photos from the Nomads Hemp Wear Fall/Winter 2019 collection do the talking for me.
"Like the cherry on the cake of sustainable dressing our tops, tanks, hoodies and t-shirts are all fair trade and made from organic cotton, bamboo, and hemp goodness. Long sleeve wraps, knitted scarves and ponchos, loose, long, fitted, cozy cool. Winter is coming…"
"Consumerism is all about the power of choice. Choose the planet with clothing that's like a rock anthem of Earth-love: bamboo leggings that could shake you all night long, and hemp hoodies that make you want to give us all your lovin' (all your hugs and kisses too). Fashion forward eco style for an organic future friendly life."
"Take a step back, stay grounded, and stay strong in our luscious sustainable organic cotton, bamboo, and hemp leggings, pants, booty shorts, and sassy skirts. Bottoms for a sustainable future. Listen to your bass go Boom!"
"Get your sultan of swing on in whirly twirly soft and swirly dresses for all seasons in organic cotton, form fitting hemp, and luscious bamboo. Dresses for the rEvolution. And yes, you can wear a dress to a revolution."
Shop everything from Nomads Hemp Wear here…there are still plenty of items on sale from previous seasons! Sign up for their newsletter for 10% off your first order.


text:
Disclaimer: Jarlaxle and Artemis are not my characters, they belong to R.A. Salvatore and Wizards of the Coast. I am not profiting from them in any way. I am merely using them for my amusement, and hopefully that of my readers.
Carahaniel is a my own creation, that I thought up on a whim.
The nameless elf looked up from her hand of cards with spry smile, "It would appear I'm out of money."
Jarlaxle eyed her thick, shoulder length golden hair, bright emerald eyes, and smooth bronze skin, his eye dipping down noticeably to take in craftily covered curves, he smiled lasciviously, "Then perhaps we can bet on something else," he trailed off, leaving the implications to her imagination.
What did he have to lose? His cards were good. The probability that she had a better hand was almost inconceivable to him.
The sun elf eyed him likewise, she had reservations about the drow, but he certainly did not seem to uphold the reputations of his kin, she licked her lips inviting, "That is certainly an intriguing proposition. Very well. I say we take our money of the table altogether. If you win, I spend the night with you," her spine quivered slightly at the notion of bedding a drow, but she continued, "If I win …" her lips gathered into a mischievous smirk as she considered her next words, "you give me your hat."
Jarlaxle recoiled, genuinely surprised by the elf's terms, he reached up and folded his hand around the hat protectively, "My hat?"
The elf nodded impishly, "Those are my terms. My body, your hat. That's the bet." She shook her head lightly, with practised precision, flipping her hair over her shoulder and revealing just a hint of her slender neckline.
Jarlaxle couldn't help but watch. He knew he was being played, but she was gorgeous, and his hand was nigh unbeatable.
He nodded, "Very well. Your body, my hat."
He held out his hand, she clasped it softly, her warm smooth skin shone strikingly against his charcoal black - a shock ran through Jarlaxle and his breath became shallow. He cleared his throat, using the distraction to regain control of his libido. He held her gaze, smiling as they revealed their cards.
Jarlaxle's eyes widened as he saw her cards - the only hand that could best his, and his eyes flashed, "How? … You cheated."
She snorted, "I don't cheat. I just got lucky. Now, your hat?" She held her hand out expectantly, "Or, drow that you are, do you intend to refuse because the outcome was not in your favor?" She accused with sarcastic sweetness.
Jarlaxle stared at the elf, his mouth opened slightly, a look of sincere loss on his face, "My hat." He whispered - half mournful, half horrified - but still he reached up, slowly, and reluctantly took his hat off, placing it into the hands of the gorgeous elf.
She plucked it from him, twirled it skillfully and dropped it on her head. Jarlaxle's sorrow only heightened as he realized just how perfectly it suited her. He replayed the game in his head, content that she indeed had played fairly. He was stunned to have lost, but he accepted it as gracefully as any drow ever could. He stood, bowed shallowly, and turned to leave.
"Aren't you even going to ask my name, charming drow?" The elf was leaning back in her chair, fancy boots - emerald green with bronze detail - resting brazenly on the table.
He almost chuckled, seeing her in the pose he had so favored in his Bregan D'aerthe office. It made his loss somewhat less humiliating to know it had been to someone so like himself.
"What then, my lady, is the name of she who bested me?" He asked charmingly.
"Carahaniel Birtauré," she removed the hat, sweeping it to the side and bowing her head feigned deference, "It is a pleasure to meet you, Jarlaxle of Bregan D'aerthe. A pleasure I shall never forget."
Jarlaxle raised an eyebrow, "You know of me?"
Carahaniel re-donned the hat and rolled gracefully onto her feet, "I know everything that happens in my city, Jarlaxle. I also take personal interest when a drow deigns to show himself. I'll instruct my contacts to offer any assistance that you require."
Jarlaxle's head dipped shallowly in gratitude, "I hope your assistance is worth it's cost," he waived at his hat.
Green eyes rolled in annoyance, "It will be, drow. It will be."
Jarlaxle shrugged and walked out of the tavern. He didn't see her nod to an elf in the corner of the bar, who hopped up and rolled out the window of the tavern. He did notice a movement in the shadows, but when he turned to investigate he saw nothing suspicious. The drow was no fool, and the emptiness of the shadows unnerved him more than it comforted him. He suddenly realized that his every move was being watched. He hurried back to the inn where Artemis was waiting for him. He climbed the wall, entering the room they shared through the window.
Artemis was sitting up in his bed, reading a scroll the two had liberated the day before. Liberated, wondered the drow suddenly, or were allowed to take? The human nodded slightly to acknowledge the drow's presence, and Jarlaxle closed the shutters over the window in hopes of some privacy. He glanced nervously around the room, the move bringing Artemis out of his thoughtful perusing of the scroll with an eyebrow raised in concern.
Artemis gasped softly, noticing the drow's bald head, "Where is that ungodly hat?"
The sorrow, almost shame, in the drow's eye was genuine when he answered in a whisper, "I lost it in a card game."
Artemis sat up at the surprising turn of events, "You lost your hat?"
A nod was the only answered.
"Why on earth would you bet your hat in the first place?"
Jarlaxle groaned pitifully, "Because the odds of my hand losing were so minuscule, and the prize I'd have gained was well-worth the risk - or so I was manipulated into believing."
Artemis smirked, finding it hard to find sympathy for the person who seemed to manipulate the entire world - including the assassin, "Outcharmed, Jarlaxle? Inconceivable. Ah well, it was a charity though, a kindness to rid you of that loathsome accessory."
Jarlaxle pinned him with a look of pained incredulity, "Why do you mock me?"
Artemis quieted, his smile stolen by the sheer weight of the drow's uncharacteristic emotion, "Apologies. Is there more?"
Jarlaxle nodded, rubbing his bald head thoughtfully, "She claims that this is her city."
"She?" Artemis sighed in frustration at his friend's obvious mistake, "Now I know what prize led you to such a foolish bet."
Jarlaxle snorted, "Indeed. She's exquisite and audacious. Roguishly charming, on top of the world. Reveling in the chaos."
"She sounds like you."
"You think I'm exquisite?" Jarlaxle quickly returned, raising an inquiring eyebrow.
Artemis cleared his throat in embarrassment, "There's significant evidence to suggest that women find you so. I've no idea what they all see in you."
Jarlaxle dismissed the insult, "Regardless, she's good, Artemis. She knew who I was, she knew about Bregan D'aerthe. She's watching us."
Artemis's hand felt onto his dagger, "Are we in danger?"
"I don't know," Jarlaxle's bluntness unnerved the assassin, "I feel out of place in this situation. These things usually happen the other way. She offered assistance, should we need it, but that's no comfort. Often have I rendered assistance merely as a way to manipulate my enemy into showing his hand."
"Were you followed?" Artemis asked, suddenly glancing around the room.
Jarlaxle scowled uncertainly, "I didn't see anyone, but I believe so."
Artemis sprung off the bed, shrinking into a defensive crouch he surveyed the closed window and the door, "There's someone here."
Jarlaxle scoffed, "Don't be ridiculous. Unless someone snuck past you while you read, the room is clear."
Artemis shook his head, "The room is clear, but not safe. Check the window."
Jarlaxle rolled his eyes, but pulled a dagger out of his bracer and lengthened it, moving silently to the window. Artemis padded to the door, kneeling behind it. His jeweled dagger was resting lightly in his left hand, Charon's Claw partially drawn from it's sheath. Jarlaxle opening the left shutter, bringing his weapon up to block any possible missile. He looked out, seeing nothing at first. In his peripheral, he saw Artemis open the door, duck around it and survey the corridor. Jarlaxle noticed something resting on the roof of the adjacent building. He peered intently as he heard the door close behind him. He decided the shape was nothing immediately worrisome and turned to face Entreri.
~In the Hall~
Once into the hall, a hand came out of the shadows. Entreri nearly managed to cut it off, but his sword couldn't make a mark on the perfect, bronze skin. The hand closed around his throat, firmly but not painfully, preventing him from speaking. A lithe form pressed up against his back, and Entreri once again tried to plunged his dagger into her.
"Relax, Artemis Entreri, I have no intention of harming you, or your friend," A large coin purse and a brass key dropped into the assassin's lap, "All I want is for you to disappear for an hour or two," her throaty voice told Entreri why, "The scroll is a description of a map, as you no doubt have deciphered. Follow it, with my blessing. You won't be disappointed. By the time you've made it back, I'll be gone."
She let him go, sliding around him. He tried a third time to kill her, but when he failed he gave up, cursing magic users. The door closed, and Entreri sighed, picking up his gifts and walked to the stairs exiting the inn. He pocketed the key, and opened the pouch. He stopped on the stairs, staring at it's contents. Three potions, a small note, and a large, bright emerald. He didn't have jeweler's eye, but he was willing to bet it was worth several thousand gold. He picked up the note and read it as he started walking again. It was a list of the potions - invisibility, non-detection, and spider climbing - and a description indicating which was which. At the bottom of the note was a single sentence, "Use them wisely." A curious smirk found its way onto the assassin's face. Apparently, the drow wasn't the only one in for a good time tonight.
~In the Room~
It wasn't Entreri! Jarlaxle closed the window, turning to face the elf squarely.
The elf smirked, taking the drow's hat in her hands and twirling it, "Good evening."
Jarlaxle looked past her to the closed door, "Entreri" he began but she laughed.
"Your assassin is perfectly fine, I assure you. Flustered perhaps, by the inability of his blade to pierce me, but he will soon forgive me."
"Artemis Entreri does not forgive."
"I've offered him a challenging adventure with the promise of great treasure at the end," she said, "He will forgive me."
Jarlaxle furrowed his brow, "The scroll?"
"Was for his benefit alone. We would never have let you accompany him," Carahaniel enlightened him, leaning on one hip, still playing artfully with the hat, "You have a different adventure ahead of you, if you drop your weapon."
The sword dropped to the ground with resounding clatter, and Jarlaxle took a tentative step forward, "But I lost the game, Carahaniel."
She danced forward playfully, putting the hat back onto Jarlaxle's head as if it were a crown, "The game was never about the cards, handsome drow," she breathed softly, trailing her hand down his face to hold his chin.
Jarlaxle chuckled, replaying the game in his mind, and brought himself inside her reach. Wrapping an arm around the gorgeous elf's frame, he pulled her down ever so slightly, so that she matched his shorter build. He could see the desire, the lust, in her eyes, clouded by a noticeable hesitation.
Jarlaxle leaned in, kissing her ear tenderly, "Relax, dear Cara. I am drow in skin only. I hold no hatred for my surface kin."
Cara smiled, throwing caution aside, throwing her arms around the drow's neck and letting him lead. He kissed her eagerly the moment he felt her fear subside, walking her to his bed and gently laying her upon it. He took in the entirety of her form, he smiled as he stood there, beginning to remove his brazen attire. It is well worth it, he thought to himself, his hand roamed up to his hat and paused. It was less than a second before his hand let it go, and he climbed onto the bed. The hat stayed on.
I have no basis for this opinion, but I truly do believe that Jarlaxle would be pitiably horrified and mournful if he ever lost that hat, especially if he ever lost it to a pretty girl in a game of chance.


text:
Now that the use of marijuana is becoming legalized in many states, it is important to let your patients with diabetes know how it can affect them.
There has been a vast increase in marijuana use in North America over the past decades among adults. Experimental studies have shown that activating the endocannabinoid system can result in a significant increase in glucose uptake by adipocytes. Previous studies have examined the correlation between marijuana use and markers of insulin resistance (IR), which is more common in patients with obesity. However, mixed results have been reported and more studies are required to determine the association between marijuana use and insulin resistance in adults with obesity. A study published very recently was conducted with an aim to examine this association in adults with different BMI status, and after accounting for duration of marijuana use and time since cessation, if any.
This study examined the relationship between marijuana use with both fasting insulin (FINS) and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in participants with and without overweight/obesity. 129,509 participants ages 18 to 59 were included in the study and of the participants included, 32.7% had overweight and 32.6% had obesity. The median plasma FINS concentration was higher in adults that never use marijuana compared with adults who are current users (9.83 μU/mL vs. 7.70 μU/mL). In adults who used marijuana in the past, FINS concentrations were higher with last time use 12-120 months ago compared with those who used it less than 12 months ago. Furthermore, no association with marijuana use with FINS was shown in adults without obesity except in adults who formerly used marijuana < 4 times/month and with the last use 12-120 months ago, where the mean FINS was 37% lower than those who never used marijuana. In participants with obesity, the mean FINS in those who use marijuana < 4 times/month was 52% lower than in people who never use. FINS concentrations were also found to be lower with those who use it more frequently (8 or more uses per month). In participants that had formerly had obesity, FINS concentrations with those who were low users, and those who stopped within 12 months prior, did not differ from those who never used. Those who stopped marijuana use 12 or more months prior had significantly lower FINS concentrations. HOMA-IR association with marijuana was similar to that of FINS.
To sum things up, in adult participants with obesity, the study findings reported an association between using marijuana and significantly lower FINS and HOMA-IR. Current consumers of marijuana had much lower than those who never used marijuana before, even at a low frequency of less than 4 uses per month. In addition to that, participants that used marijuana in the past (>10 years ago) also had significantly lower FINS concentrations and HOMA-IR. The study findings also reported that time since cessation of marijuana only affected the outcomes in those who smoked in the past less than 8 times/month. Furthermore, participants who have used marijuana 8 or more times per month in the past, had significantly lower FINS and HOMA-IR compared with participants who have never used, irrespective of time of cessation.
In conclusion, using marijuana chronically, even as low as less than 4 uses/month, is associated with lower FINS and HOMA-IR in adults with obesity, but not in those without obesity. Former users with high lifetime use had lower insulin concentrations compared with adults who never used marijuana, independent of the last time since last use. The authors concluded that further studies are required to take into account both the intensity and timing of marijuana use in relation to FINS and HOMA-IR.
Practice pearls:
- Marijuana use was associated with lower fasting insulin (FINS) and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) in participants with obesity, but not in adults without obesity.
- Participants that smoked in the past frequently had significantly lower FINS levels, independent of the last time since last marijuana use.
- The study suggests that marijuana use affects FINS and HOMA-IR even at low consumption level and this was confirmed by the finding of lower FINS and HOMA-IR scores after 12 or months in previous marijuana consumers
Ngueta G, Ndjaboue R. Lifetime marijuana use in relation to insulin resistance in lean, overweight, and obese US adults. Journal of Diabetes. 2019;1–10. https://doi.org/10.
Marian Ayad, BSPharm, BCPS, PharmD candidate, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences


text:
Tuesday, 11:40 a.m. update: Austin police have identified the two people killed in a wrong-way collision on U.S. 183 in Northwest Austin on Saturday as 38-year-old Nancy Latulippe and her 14-year-old son, Jackson.
According to a preliminary police investigation, 41-year-old Guy Brasted was in a black Jeep Wrangler heading north in the 9400 block of Research Boulevard when he left the roadway and collided head-on into a white Fiat 500 that was traveling south.
A third vehicle was also damaged after the two vehicles collided.
Police responded to the crash around 3:30 p.m. Saturday and found Brasted had been ejected from his vehicle.
Nancy Latulippe, who was driving the Fiat, and her son were pronounced dead at the scene, police said.
Two other passengers in the Fiat – a 41-year-old man with critical injuries and a 10-year-old girl with injuries not considered life-threatening – were taken to area hospitals.
The driver from the third vehicle was not hospitalized, police said.
Police said they determined from blood draws that Brasted gave while hospitalized for minor injuries showed his blood alcohol content was 0.203, or more than twice the legal limit of 0.08, an arrest affidavit said.
Brasted was in Travis County Jail on Tuesday on two charges of intoxication manslaughter and a charge of intoxication assault with bail set at a combined amount of $200,000 for the three charges.
Austin police said the investigation into the incident is ongoing and that anyone with information about the wreck can call vehicular homicide detectives at (512) 974-4424.
Police said 60 people have been killed so far this year on Austin roads. At this time in 2016, the city had 63 traffic deaths.
Monday: The driver of a Jeep that collided with another car in oncoming traffic in Northwest Austin on Saturday, killing two people, was driving drunk and faces manslaughter charges, police said.
Police responded to reports around 3:30 p.m. Saturday that the Jeep's driver, 41-year-old Guy Brasted, had crossed into the wrong lanes while heading north in the 9400 block of Research Boulevard, near the Gateway Shopping Centers, according to an arrest affidavit.
Officers determined that Brasted crossed a highway-dividing cable and a grassy median, the affidavit said, before ending up in the southbound lanes and colliding with a Fiat carrying two adults and two children, ages 14 and 10, the affidavit said.
The driver of the Fiat, a 38-year-old woman, and the 14-year-old were pronounced dead at the scene, according to the affidavit. Although the document names the passengers, the American-Statesman is declining to identify the dead until police release the names.
The other adult in the Fiat, a 41-year-old man, was taken to Dell Seton Medical Center, where he underwent surgery for life-threatening injuries. The other child was treated at Dell Children's Medical Center for injuries not considered to be life-threatening, the affidavit said.
Brasted was also taken to Dell Seton Medical Center for minor injuries. At the hospital, his blood alcohol content was determined to be 0.203, or more than twice the legal limit of 0.08, the affidavit said.
Brasted was in Travis County Jail on Monday on two charges of intoxication manslaughter and a charge of intoxication assault with bail set at a combined amount of $200,000 for the three charges.


text:
Wood Country Arbor with Lattice
(Product ID:53798)
Ask us a Question
Pine Country Arbor with Black Fan Lattice
Amish Garden Furniture Collection
Our American Made Pine Wood Hamilton Country Arbor with Black Fan Lattice is a unique piece that offers a beautiful two-toned look. This arbor provides an ideal way to train climbing roses with its black fan lattice. Made from untreated, knot-free Southern Yellow Pine Wood in our Pennsylvania Wood Shops, it is sure to be of the highest quality.
Choose between the 3 foot arbor or the four foot arbor for the perfect width in your garden. Expand your garden with the help of this handmade arbor. We love the look and feel of a walkway framed by this piece to create a grand entrance.
Please give us a call in order to discuss any and all questions you may have: 866-272-6773. We'd love to hear from you!
3' Hamilton Arbor
Walk Through 36"W 18"D 76"H
Outside 48"W 26"D 81"H
Weight: 60 lbs
4' Hamilton Arbor
Walk Through: 48"W 18"D 76"H
Outside:60"W 26"D 81"H
Weight:64 lbs
Untreated American Grown Southern Yellow Pine
Standard Features:
Hand Selected Materials for Best Quality
Zinc Plated Hardware for Rust Resistance
Free Touch Up Paint
Yellow Pine Wood Furniture is handcrafted from untreated Southern Yellow Pine that is knot-free for long lasting durability.
White Paint with Black Fan Lattice
Delivery is without a liftgate service and may require an appointment. If you would like to order a liftgate with your delivery, please call us at 1-866-272-6773. There is an additional $75 charge for a liftgate.
Note: It is common for pine and cedar wood to have some cracks appear especially in the hot summer months. The wood expands in the heat of summer but will contract when the weather cools down. These cracks are normal and we will not issue refunds due to minor cracks in the wood.
Some Assembly May Be Required.
Shipping & Lead Time
*Please allow additional time for product transfers, finishing, and shipping.
Due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the build time for this product may be longer than stated.