text:
The chemical symbol for lead is Pb, from the Latin word "plumbum" which refers to a malleable metal.
And lead is that - soft, malleable, wonderfully conformable, metal of a hundred uses. Its presence - and indeed the very language of lead - infuses our culture today. The term plumbing dates back to the use of lead pipes by the Romans. The person who installs and repairs those pipes is called a plumber. A plumb bob refers to a lead weight, a plumb line is pulled straight by such a weight.
Then there's the word "plumbism" which doesn't get much use these days. But that happens to be my topic here - plumbism is the old-fashioned term for lead poisoning, which plagued the Roman empire and continues to plague us today. Some scholars have argued that the Roman's profligate use of lead (pipes, bottles, and wine cups, leaded cosmetics and paint) helped put it an end to that empire. An EPA paperon the subject points out that lead's neurotoxic contribution is considered a key part of "the conspicuous pattern of mental incompetence that came to be synonymous with the Roman elite."
Interestingly, Japanese scholars have made a similar case for lead poisoning as a factor in the end of the Edo period in 1867, the decline of the once-powerful shogunate ruling class. A recent study by Tamiji Nakashima, an anatomist at the University of Occupational and Environmental Health in Kitakyushu, and his colleagues analyzed the bones of some 70 samurai men, their wives and children from that period. They had wondered if heavy use of lead-based white face paint had been a health factor and their investigation showed them precisely right; they found evidence of lead levels more than 120 times background level as well as bands of lead deposits in the bones.
Of course, they didn't know what we've learned in the intervening years. "No safe blood lead level has been identified," according to a current U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) backgrounder on exposure risks.
The wonderfully useful metal lead is also a wonderfully broad spectrum poison- it interferes with enzyme production, especially enzymes needed by red blood cells, and is known to cause lethal anemias. It deposits itself into bones and stays there - the half-life of lead in human bones is up to 30 years. Muscle weakness, numbness and tingling, nausea, severe stomach pain, depression, fatigue, sleeplessness, loss of libido - all are symptoms of lead poisoning and all speak to its ability to impact every part of the body.
It is also a notorious neurotoxin. We understand, as the Romans did not, that this happens in part because lead can destroy production of essential neurotransmitters (such as glutamate which plays a key role in learning by enhancing plasticity). In this country, we've been cataloging lead's ability to do harm for well over a hundred years - U.S. scientists were diagnosing lead poisoning as early as 1887- sometimes despite the attempts of industry to deny that work. Last summer, I wrote about some of the early 20th century science, and the resulting controversy, in a poston the troubled history of leaded gasoline.
I mentioned all these moments from history here because they add up to one clear point: we've known that lead was dangerous for a very long time. Eventually, in fact, the evidence was so overwhelming that the federal government banned it from paint in 1978 and started phasing it out of gasoline shortly later (although that process didn't end in this country until the early 1990s.)
Should that have happened sooner. Yes. Did those bans remove all industrial lead contamination from the environment? No. By some estimates, U.S. use of leaded gasoline sent some 7 million tons of lead into the atmosphere, which obviously precipitated right back down to us. And programs to removed leaded paint from old buildings have been woefully underfunded, especially in the country's poorest neighborhoods where lead-poisoning of children continues to be reported at dismaying levels.
So why, with all this painfully learned awareness in our hands, why in the name of lead-free sanity would our federal government decide to gut the meager program dedicated to helping protect those very family. Yes, the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Healthy Homes and Lead Poisoning Prevention Program has been slashed from $29 million to $2 million for the next fiscal year.
"There's a serious irony here," The New York Times noted, this week, pointing out that new public health guidelines recommend reducing childhood lead exposure to even lower levels than now exist. There's also the fact that removal of lead paint has dragged on for so long that some tenants are turning to civil lawsuits to force the issue. And the fact that a pilot study in St. Louis found that lead paint removal did, indeed, offer some real protection to families in affected neighborhoods.
In other words, in the scheme of our federal budget, this is a very small amount with a very large proven benefit. So why would our government back away from supporting it. "Poisoned Poor Kids?" wrotea columnist for the Colorado Springs Independent. "Congress Doesn't Care." At the OpEdNews.com, Peter Montague was even more pointed ina piece titled, "Poisoning Urban Children: White Privilege and Toxic Lead."
In fact, there's not a single good public health reason to support this cut - and plenty of potential very bad results to follow. I'm writing here to add my own voice to those calling for these funds to be restored. Let hese children and families least receive a slim promise that we are here to protect their well-being and that we actually do care about their futures. They deserve more than that but I'm not optimistic that they'll get it.
But the mistakes of our poisonous past should remind us here that this is a very wrong direction. Or perhaps we should just call it plumb crazy.


text:
On this route, you can marvel at the majesty of the Baroque, as well as enjoy a storybook landscape. Unique culture and natural landscape come together on the approximately 500 km long Upper Swabian Baroque Route which runs from Ulm on the Danube to Friedrichshafen on Lake Constance.
The four routes of the Upper Swabian Baroque Route, with its trademark road sign depicting a yellow cherub on a green background, are a pleasure for the senses. Grandiose ceiling art, opulent decorations, lively colours, rosy-cheeked saints, light-flooded cupolas adorned with jubilant angels, snow-white stucco and gold that is almost dazzling to the eye and ceiling frescos that transport you to the realms of the Greek gods: the Upper Swabian Baroque Route is a true gateway to the Baroque in all its lavish splendour.
A Baroque style unique to this region
A wealth of magnificent Baroque castles, palaces, abbeys and churches adorn the route from the Swabian Alb and the Allgäu Alps between the Danube and Lake Constance. The elaborate architecture and décor on display here is reason enough to visit. Some castles are still occupied by the aristocracy to this day whilst others are open to visitors as grand museums that host temporary exhibitions and other events. No other region is as steeped in the Baroque as Upper Swabia and Mother Nature herself has not been unkind: together the Baroque buildings and lightly hilled landscape are a masterpiece.
A mirror of Upper Swabian culture
As you travel along the Upper Swabian Baroque Route, the region's living traditions such as the Palm Procession, Corpus Christi Procession, Blutritt Procession, open-air theatre, the Swabian Alemannic Carnival (Fasnacht) and music events will be on display again and again. You can also sample the delicacies of the 17th and 18th centuries at a Baroque feast or even take part in a medieval banquet. It's an indescribable yet truly unforgettable experience.
Length: approximately 500 km
Theme: culture, Baroque, nature
Bad Saulgau: pilgrimage site, abbey
Bad Schussenried: abbey, pilgrimage church, Kürnbach Museum Village (Museumsdorf Kürnbach)
Bad Wurzach: mud spa, palace with Baroque staircase
Friedrichshafen: Zeppelin Town
Ochsenhausen: abbey
Ravensburg: City of Towers and Gates, leisure park
Ulm: minster, highest church tower in the world
Weingarten: St. Martin's Abbey (Klosterkirche St. Martin) that was built in Rococo style
Wiblingen: Benedictine abbey and library
Zwiefalten: pilgrimage site
Două combinaţii de taste utile pentru a mări şi micşora în browser-ul de internet:
Mărire: +
Micşorare: +
Pentru ajutor suplimentar, faceţi clic pe iconiţa aferentă a browser-ului dvs.:

subset: commoncrawl


text:
This was published 5 years ago
Ebola's 'patient zero' likely a two-year-old boy from Gueckedou, Guinea, who died in December
"Patient zero" in the Ebola outbreak was a two-year-old boy who died on December 6, just a few days after falling ill in a village in Gueckedou, in south-eastern Guinea, researchers suspect. Bordering Sierra Leone and Liberia, Gueckedou is at the intersection of three nations, where the disease found an easy entry point to the region.
A week later, it killed the boy's mother, then his three-year-old sister, then his grandmother. All had fever, vomiting and diarrhoea, but no one knew what had sickened them.
Two mourners at the grandmother's funeral took the virus home to their village. A health worker carried it to still another, where he died, as did his doctor. They both infected relatives from other towns. By the time Ebola was recognised, in March, dozens of people had died in eight Guinean communities, and suspected cases were popping up in Liberia and Sierra Leone - three of the world's poorest countries, recovering from years of political dysfunction and civil war.
In Gueckedou, where it all began, "the feeling was fright," said Dr Kalissa N'fansoumane, the local hospital director. He had to persuade his employees to come to work.
On March 31, Doctors Without Borders, which has intervened in many Ebola outbreaks, called this one "unprecedented," and warned that the disease had erupted in so many locations that fighting it would be enormously difficult.
Now, with 1779 cases, including 961 deaths and a small cluster in Nigeria, the outbreak is out of control and still getting worse. Not only is it the largest ever, but it also seems likely to surpass all two dozen previous known Ebola outbreaks combined. Epidemiologists predict it will take months to control, perhaps many months, and a spokesman for the World Health Organisation said thousands more health workers were needed to fight it.
Some experts warn that the outbreak could destabilise governments in the region. It is already causing widespread panic and disruption. On Saturday, Guinea announced that it had closed its borders with Sierra Leone and Liberia in a bid to halt the virus's spread. Doctors worry that deaths from malaria, dysentery and other diseases could shoot up as Ebola drains resources from weak health systems. Health care workers, already in short supply, have been hit hard by the outbreak: 145 have been infected and 80 of them have died.
Liberia's President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf apologised on Saturday for the high death toll among the country's health-care workers who have fought an Ebola outbreak.
Ms Johnson Sirleaf pledged up to $18 million for the Ebola fight, part of which will be given to health workers to help with insurance and death benefits, to fund more ambulances and to increase the number of treatment centres.
"If we haven't done enough so far, I have come to apologise to you," she told hundreds of health workers who gathered at Monrovia's City Hall for a meeting with her government.
The West African Ebola outbreak, centred on Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia, is the worst in history. The World Health Organisation on Friday declared it an international health emergency.
Past Ebola outbreaks have been snuffed out, often within a few months. How, then, did this one spin so far out of control? It is partly a consequence of modernisation in Africa, and perhaps a warning that future outbreaks - which are inevitable - will pose tougher challenges. Unlike most previous outbreaks, which occurred in remote, localised spots, this one began in a border region where roads have been improved and people travel a lot. In this case, the disease was on the move before health officials even knew it had struck.
Also, this part of Africa had never seen Ebola before. Health workers did not recognise it and had neither the training nor the equipment to avoid infecting themselves or other patients. Hospitals in the region often lack running water and gloves, and can be fertile ground for epidemics.
Public health experts acknowledge that the initial response, both locally and internationally, was inadequate.
"That's obviously the case," said Thomas Frieden, director of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. "Look at what's happening now."
He added, "A couple of months ago, there was a false sense of confidence that it was controlled, a stepping back, and then it flared up worse than before."
Health experts have grown increasingly confident in recent years that they can control Ebola, Dr Frieden said, based on success in places like Uganda.
But those successes hinged on huge education campaigns to teach people about the disease and persuade them to go to treatment centres. Much work also went into getting people to change funeral practices that involve touching corpses, which are highly infectious.
But in West Africa, Ebola was unknown.
In some areas, frightened and angry people have attacked health workers and even accused them of bringing in disease.
"Early on in the outbreak, we had at least 26 villages or little towns that would not cooperate with responders in terms of letting people into the village, even," said Gregory Hartl, a spokesman for the World Health Organisation.
The outbreak has occurred in three waves: The first two were relatively small, and the third, starting about a month ago, was much larger, Mr Hartl said. "That third wave was a clarion call," he said.
As is often the case in Ebola outbreaks, no one knows how the first person got the disease or how the virus found its way to the region. The virus infects monkeys and apes, and some previous epidemics are thought to have begun when someone was exposed to blood while killing or butchering an infected animal. Cooking will destroy the virus, so the risk is not in eating the meat, but in handling it raw. Ebola is also thought to infect fruit bats without harming them, so the same risks apply to butchering bats. Some researchers also think that people might become infected by eating fruit or other uncooked foods contaminated by droppings from infected bats.
Once people become ill, their bodily fluids can infect others, and they become more infectious as the illness progresses. The disease does not spread through the air like the flu; contact with fluids is necessary, usually through the eyes, nose, mouth or cuts in the skin. One drop of blood can harbour millions of viruses, and corpses become like virus bombs.
A research team that studied the Guinea outbreak traced the disease back to the two-year-old who died in Gueckedou and published a report in The New England Journal of Medicine. He and his relatives were never tested to confirm Ebola, but their symptoms matched it and they fit into a pattern of transmission that included other cases confirmed by blood tests.
But no one can explain how such a small child could have become the first person infected. Contaminated fruit is one possibility. An injection with a contaminated needle is another.
Sylvain Baize, part of the team that studied the Guinea outbreak and head of the national reference center for viral hemorrhagic fevers at the Pasteur Institute in Lyon, France, said there might have been an earlier case that went undiscovered, before the two-year-old.
"We suppose that the first case was infected following contact with bats," he said. "Maybe, but we are not sure."
New York Times


text:
Search engines don't lend themselves to brick-and-mortar presences. So, Google's retail presence is limited, at best. But now they at least can say they're abroad, with a retail store opeing in London.
They do have Chrome Zones in four U.S. airports, as well. Look for them near the Virgin America airline gates in San Francisco, Dallas, Chicago and Boston.
In London, there's a pop-up store "within a computer retailer called PC World," according to Silicon Alley Insider. It's still called a Chrome Zone, where you pick up a Chromebook before you fly and then give it back at your destination gate.
U.S. & World
News from around the country and around the globe
A Google spokesman told the London Evening Standard about retail: "It's something Google is going to play with and see where it leads."
The plan is not new. Microsoft pulled it off when it parked in Best Buys and some others. Of course, Microsoft has XBox and other physical things to sell. Google? Not as much.
But with Motorola under its wing now -- and all those patents -- it's only a matter of time before they make another push to disrupt yet another market's space.


text:
One or more individuals are securities licensed through Investacorp, Inc., a registered broker dealer, member FINRA, SIPC. One or more individuals are advisory licensed through Investacorp Advisory Services, Inc. a SEC registered investment advisory firm. For those persons inquiring from states where a specific individual is not currently securities and/or advisory licensed, the individual will not transact business in that state or provide follow-up, individual responses, until after the individual obtains the appropriate registration in the applicable state. FINRA's homepage, www.finra.org and Securities Investor Protection Corporation's homepage, www.sipc.org. Linked sites are strictly provided as a courtesy. Investacorp, Inc. and its affiliates, do not guarantee, approve nor endorse the information or products available at the linked sites.
Check the background of this investment professional


text:
To determine if a CDL is required, the manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of the vehicles must be determined.
A road/skills test is required
However, a road/skills test may be required at anytime you apply for a license or endorsement.
We do not provide vehicles. If you do not have access to a vehicle, you may wish to contact a third-party driver license examiner authorized to give the road test using their vehicle.
The fee for a road/skills test is
CDL Knowledge (written) Tests: Upon payment of all applicable fees, you have three attempts to pass the knowledge tests, within 12 months from the date of the application. For a multipart test, if you fail a section but pass another, you receive credit for the passed sections and do not have to repeat them. After three failed attempts to pass the remaining sections of the test, you must pay for a new application. If you also applied for endorsements, you have three attempts to pass each endorsement test.
CDL Skills Tests: After obtaining a CDL instruction permit, you may take the skills tests, consisting of a pretrip inspection, skills test and road test. Upon payment of the skills test fees, you have three attempts to pass the skills tests. The skills test has three parts. If you fail a section but pass another, you receive credit for the passed sections and do not have to repeat them. After three failed attempts to pass all sections of the test you must pay a new skills test fee, which will give you an additional three attempts.
NOTE: You will be allowed to pay for additional skills test attempts, provided your CDL instruction permit remains valid. If the permit has expired, all knowledge tests must be taken again to obtain a new permit before making another attempt at the skills tests.
The CDL instruction permit is valid for six months. It can be renewed one time, provided it has been fewer than 12 months from the initial application date.
Pay a reinstatement fee of $30 ($10 for the suspension and $20 for the revocation), $10 for a limited Class D operator license; the cost of an original CDL instruction permit (A and B are $25; C is $12.50), and $10 for each endorsement.
Take all applicable CDL knowledge (written) tests.
A limited Class D operator license is issued; if the CDL written tests are passed, the appropriate class CDL instruction permit is also issued.
A road/skills test is required for certain endorsements (see the next question for more information). If tested by MVD, the fee is $25 for Class A or B CDL skill tests and $12.50 for Class C. Payment of this fee entitles you to three attempts to pass the CDL skill tests.
Payment for reinstatement fees may be made by cash, cashier's check or money order. Some offices accept credit cards. Payment by cash, credit card or both are not accepted by mail. No personal checks are accepted.
A new hazardous materials endorsement (HME) background check will be required if you are not reinstated within a year of a suspension or revocation.
Arizona Department of Transportation
Contact Us
Copyright © Arizona Department of Transportation – All rights reserved.


text:
In the last 24 months, there has been a trend toward the acquisition of analytical databases to augment an established DBMS' existing product line. For example, the following mergers and acquisitions were compiled by Doug Henschen in April:
- EMC buys Greenplum July 2010
- IBM buys Netezza November 2010
- Hewlett-Packard buys Vertica March 2011
- Teradata buys Aster Data April 2011
Many of these acquisitions were driven by the reality that you really need to use the correct DBMS architecture for the right job rather than taking a one size fits all approach. However the question then becomes how do you bring that data together once it resides on those separate platforms? One solution is to use the concept of
This week Composite will release its next generation platform for data virtualization: Composite Information Server 6.0. This platform allows organizations to make data decisions based on the best platform for the job rather than pushing all data to a particular platform.
Bring Big Data into the Fold
One of the best uses of the enhanced platform is the ability to virtualize big data sources like Hadoop, Netezza and SAP into a seamless environment.
Using the Composite "optimizer" functionality, organizations can take advantage of the relatively new big-data processing environments without delaying the "time to value" of those new data sources into existing implementations. This will be particularly important as organizations begin to ingest data sets like social media interactions; RFID sensor information; and other big-data sources that haven't matured sufficiently to including in existing data environments, but still have excellent value to the organization.
Telecom Take: Use the Right Tool
As telecom organizations make moves to integrate multiple data sources to enable their "single view of the customer" associated with customer experience management as well as spreading customer support to centralized call centers; telecoms will need a much more robust ability to have consistent and timely data spread across those locations.
For customer experience management, telecoms will need to have proper data virtualization to avoid the age old question from calls to the call center:
"Shouldn't you already know about my orders and account information?"
For call centers, to provide flexible access to similar data sets across operational (ie billing), analytical (ie fraud management) and external data sources (ie credit reports); a robust virtualization environment will allow for flexible scheduling of call center resources not only in one location but across many without customers having to hear:
"Sorry I don't have that in my system…"
All in all, I believe that the continued advances in the Composite virtualization suite make it one of the better options for telecoms to overcome the legacy (network, billing) and 'next generation' (social, geo-spatial) data silos that seem to impact telecom organizations more than others.
Posted June 6, 2011 8:22 AM
Permalink | 1 Comment |


text:
Faculty Research Awards Go to 15 at Historically Black, Hispanic-Serving, and Tribal Institutions
The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) today announced that it has awarded a total of $7.4 million in fellowships to 195 U.S. scholars for their individual research in the humanities. An additional 15 faculty members at Historically Black, Hispanic-Serving, and Tribal Colleges and Universities will receive a total of $568,000 in Faculty Research Awards for their individual or collaborative projects. The research efforts of 23 fellows and one Faculty Research Award recipient were designated as We the People projects, a special recognition by the NEH for model projects that advance the study, teaching, and understanding of American history and culture.
"Research in the humanities provides the foundation of scholarship," said NEH Chairman Bruce Cole. "With the Endowment's support, NEH fellows and Faculty Research Award recipients will deepen our understanding of ourselves and our world to benefit scholars, students, and lovers of knowledge for many years to come."
NEH fellowships support individuals pursuing advanced research that contributes to scholarly knowledge or to the general public's understanding of the humanities. Recipients usually produce scholarly articles, monographs on specialized subjects, books on broad topics, archaeological site reports, translations, editions, or other scholarly tools. Faculty Research Awards support projects that make similar contributions in the form of publications, presentations, and classroom teaching. Among the NEH fellowships awarded this year are the following:
- Sheila Dillon, Duke University, for "The Female Portrait in Greek Art and Society";
- Adeeb Khalid, Carleton College, Northfield, Minn., for "The Making of Soviet Central Asia, 1917-1929";
- James Porter, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, for "Homer: The Very Idea"; and
- Carla Peterson, University of Maryland, College Park, for "Reconstructing African-American Life in 19th-century New York City."
Among this year's Faculty Research Award recipients, Stanley Harrold of South Carolina State University, will conduct research on "Border War: The Long War before the Civil War," and Jeanne Reesman, of the University of Texas, San Antonio, will do research on "Human Documents: The Photography of Jack London."
Full-term (9- to 12-month) NEH fellowships and Faculty Research Awards carry a stipend of $40,000. Recipients may opt for a shorter term (6 to 8 months), which carries a stipend of $24,000. This year's fellows and Faculty Research Award recipients represent 39 states and the District of Columbia. A state-by-state list with names and affiliations of this year's recipients is available here.


text:
At freedom's cradle: Drug testing sparks outrage
Are Monticello guides snorting up lines in the fancy bathrooms of the new Visitor Center? Are the horiculturists secretly growing cannabis in Mr. Jefferson's gardens? In short, has a major drug problem erupted at the internationally famous UNESCO World Heritage Site?
In a word, no, at least not as far as the Hook could discover, and a guffaw is the typical response when such questions are posed to current and past employees. Yet, the Thomas Jefferson Foundation, which owns and operates Monticello, has begun implementing a "drug-free workplace policy" that randomly drug tests all employees. And many aren't laughing.
"I think it's bullsh*t," says one. "It creates a climate of fear."
"Way overboard," says another. "It's an unnecessary invasion of the body."
Both of these employees, who are around 60 and usually outspoken citizens, asked that their names not be used in this article because of fear for their jobs. And they're not the only people holding these truths to be self-defeating.
"I think it's insulting," says former employee Dorothy Buschi, who retired in 2001. "It insults our integrity.
"It was like a family," remembers Buschi, who treasures over two decades employment at Monticello. And when people work so closely together, she says, anyone impaired by drug use would be noticeable.
Nonetheless, the policy, announced in late May, began sending employees to the toilet October 13.
"Random drug testing is a best practice employed by many organizations and institutions, especially those that deal extensively with the public, as we do," says Monticello spokesman Wayne Mogielnicki in an emailed statement.
Was the policy to get lower insurance premiums, as suggested by an outraged employee? "We decline further comment," replies Mogielnicki, who also refuses to say how many of Monticello's 343 employees were tested and what happens to employees who don't pass.
Were there incidents of drug-crazed behavior or accidents that prompted the policy? "I decline to comment," says Mogielnicki, a former newspaper editor, who refuses to provide a copy of the foundation's pee-in-a-cup policy.
An email obtained by the Hook sent to employees from human resources director Angela Jeanne Butler explains the six reasons why current employees–- even the docents–- might randomly get chosen to urinate into a container.
Reason #2: Solidarity with shuttle bus drivers, who are subject to federal law that requires testing of transportation workers, such as airline pilots, truck drivers, and train engineers.
"We do not want anyone or any work group singled out," writes Butler. "We are all one team."
Number 3 reiterates that employees work with the public–- and children. The desire to attract and retain the "best and brightest" employees is reason #4. Reason #5 is that organizations similar to Monticello are already doing this, according to the May 29 email.
Intrigued, the Hook checked with another local presidential home, Montpelier, and with historic Winterthur in Delaware, which was headed by Monticello's new director, Leslie Bowman, at the time of her 2008 hiring. Neither randomly tests its employees. And despite lots of muskets and blackmithery, nor does Colonial Williamsburg.
"We do drug test as a condition of employment," says Williamsburg communications director Tom Shrout, and, he adds, "if there is cause, such as an accident."
What about a place that daily deals with life and death situations– and also is associated with Thomas Jefferson? The UVA Medical Center has pre-employment drug testing, but does not randomly test, according to spokesman Peter Jump.
Last on the HR memo of reasons why random drug testing at Monticello is a good idea: reduced insurance premiums. "This is saved money that we can use for other purposes," writes Butler. After all, Monticello laid off three full-time employees in July during a recession-related reorganization.
"In my day, I was unaware of any drug issues– not a single instance," says former Monticello president Dan Jordan, who retired as the institution's leader after 24 years last November. He declines to comment on the new policy.
Jordan calls back to add, "In my day, Monticello operated as a family with a culture of trust." He says that human resources had a program for confidentially dealing with addictions of various types. "When I said I wasn't aware, there may have been confidential treatments, but I wasn't aware of any."
Under the new policy, employees' bodies aren't the only things subject to their employer's examination. Their cars, too, can be searched while on Thomas Jefferson Foundation property, as can lunch boxes and "other personal articles."
Says an employee, who emphasizes that she does not use drugs: "I really feel like Thomas Jefferson would not pee in a cup."
–headline changed: 125pm Monday
–original headline: Drug problem? Monticello employees randomly tested
85 comments
Ya know, the new director is pushing away some donors, especially if they are not the high rollers group. Dan never did that. BIG MISTAKE!
Personally, I'm annoyed that the communications and human resources people are called out personally. Do you really think HR wanted to enact this policy or put up with all of the crap Monticello employees are giving them? Do you really think the communications people liked this decision?
NO. The money people pushed this decision through to save money on insurance. It's as simple as that.
C'ville Eye, your writing is always an interesting read. Funny though how you often start to ramble and mis-word things more as it gets later in the day. What recreational substances are you ingesting in the evening by the way?
Your logic regarding problems in those "black" neighborhoods has gone way loopy. Blacks have been dealt with more harshly by the drug laws, that's why there is still a problem in "black" neighborhoods??? And that's evidence that people "want the druggies out of jail?" And then you go on to make the absolutely ludicrous assertion that the Downtown Mall has been taken over by drug dealers? I'll just chalk that up to the evening's late hour and hope for better once you've had a bit of a nappie poo.
What I don't understand, truly, is why is this a matter of public opinion? This is a private employer - I don't understand why this has caused so much attention or why this is newsworthy.
For those who say it's OK to just test a portion of the employees such as the bus drivers, where do you draw the line? The people that another poster referred to as those "that tend the gardens" use some heavy equipment - shouldn't they be tested? Then, if the bus drivers and those that use equipment are tested, shouldn't the employees that drive Monticello vehicles be tested? Then, if bus drivers, those that use heavy equipment, and those that drive Monticello vehicles are tested, shouldn't those that care for the priceless artifacts that can NEVER be replaced, be tested?
Just where do you draw the line?
Hey Jonah, I think Ann Taylor should actually stop listening to her. Leslie has a new place for her horses, which appears to be her first priority. Ann should know better.
Well I think that the managers of public relations should be taking a whiz quiz. They are definetly smoking something if they believe T.J. was the only Jefferson that could have fathered Sally Hemmings babies.
Will they also test for caffeine abuse, nicotine abuse and alchohol addiction? Oh that's right those are okay because they are sanctioned by the government and taxed.
Leslie Bowman took over Monticello on October 31st, 2008! ..... Halloween!! ....Isn't it ironic? She & Ann Taylor,(Exec. V.P.), have been "stirring up a witches brew!! ....Bubble, Bubble , Toil & Trouble!! We all toil, and are in trouble!! HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is BS. Pre-hiring screening is fine, and for-cause testing is fine. But random for something like working in a gift shop or tending a garden is pure, unadulterated, out-of-control fascist BS. "Solidarity with the bus drivers." Really?
It seems that Dan Jordan took all the class with him when he retired.
When at Virginia we often used ask "What would Mr. Jefferson do?" We figured he would turn the Pavilions into parking garages and put some modern plumbing and HVAC into the Lawn rooms. One thing's for sure: he wouldn't do this.
"Everyone else is doing it" is a rationale that would be quickly shot down by most parents if their child used it to justify some dodgy request.
"Best practice" makes me cringe every time I hear it - it's like a salesperson saying "Absolutely!" in answer to every question from a skeptical customer.
Sorry - "Are there..."
This is old stuff, employers have been doing this for years. It doesn't mean I find it agreeable but a necessary evil. With 343 employees the odds dictate that there is illicit drug use among a percentage of their employees. Unfortunately this is the work climate we live in today.
Again, how do you know that the new director did not particpate or that the director has not stated that she complies or has complied?
It is a small town! And this is news!
Get over it! :)
If you want to see "small town" news in the making, just wait until the first forecast of snow. All the various "Storm Teams" hit the roads televising live from various intersections with their predictions of what's to come in the next 24 to 36 hours! You will then think the world is about to end with everybody rushing to the grocery store, filling up their vehicles with gas, and physically fighting to purchase that last snow shovel and bag of salt at Lowes!! Small town life, hilarious!!!
To monkey see - I know as much as you do it looks like - only what is printed here. The difference is that I'm not making any assumptions about the people involved. You can speculate as much as you want, but what it comes down to is that this is a privately held organization and they are within their rights to perform drug testing and within their rights to make limited statements. Exactly how much they wish to reveal about their policy or procedure is up to them.
The Monticello grapevine can be a vicious thing. I retain full confidence in the Board's selection of the new president. In addition to the inherent difficulties of the job itself, she follows an immensely popular [at least in public eye] former president. It seems far, far too early in her tenure to be casting such definitive judgments. Let's all take a deep breath and step back for a while.
It's sad when the head of an otherwise good organization can ruin the moral of the employees, and the character of the whole organization in a short time. The same thing is happening at Region Ten and in both cases the entire community will suffer. Too often the board provides no oversight until it's too late. Hope the board of Monticello is reading this, and willing is to intervene.
Maybe Bowman has a hangup in talking about the issue. If so, has she thought about how awkward it will be for many of her employees as they are forced to comply in order to keep their jobs? Monticello has seen better days.
Wayne Mogielnicki spent his years at the Progress whining when people didn't talk to the press and now he does the same thing. I have heard nothing but bitterness about this new director as well and how she ran off many long term employees.
Perhaps they are just trying to go green by attaching a generator to Jefferson's tomb, since he is probably spinning in his grave so quickly they can now power the place
The reality, any druggies working for Monticello WILL find a way to beat the testing system. Here's how they will do it if they want to keep their job.Every morning before coming to work they can ask a drug free family member to pee in a cup. Then poor it into a ziplock. Take it to work. Bowman will never know and they will pass the test. The sad thing, the drug free employees are punished in the process. I agree, testing the bus drivers is another separate matter. I'm sure those who desire a job driving a bus would agree. Bowman has made a huge mistake. Thanks to the HOOK for exposing the situation.
Bowman reminds me of a mean teacher I had. Teach punished the whole class for the sins of a few bad apples.
I fully disagree with the testing of these employees because of the work they do. If the shuttle drivers must be tested due to federal law, then that is justified. Other than that, only a person that shows signs of drug and/or alcohol use should be tested. Even if random testing is allowed within policy, that doesn't mean you have to do it.
I would like to see testing done on all hospital workers, for they are dealing with people's lives. People on narcotics for chronic pain definitely do not belong in the hospital environment. There is an increased chance a patient can suffer at their hands, and that they can hurt themselves-then it becomes workman's comp.
As an employee at Monticello, I can attest to the fact that Bowman is ruining the atmosphere and beauty of Jefferson's mountain. She is turning what was a happy family into a greedy and impersonal corporation. She is inflicting terrible rules and guidelines on employees for no apparent reason all the while exempting herself from any moral code or strictures. Dan Jordan is sorely missed.
Otherside, I'm not making assumptions. I now happen to know a little more than you know or you think I know. In fact, I made a few phone calls to some of my Monticello friends. The morale has needlessly been trashed. My God, the workers aren't performing surgery or flying planes! Many of the same workers have been entrusted with the care of heads of state and high profile visitors in the past. Bowman's hidden,heavy handed form of management will eventually come back to bite her in my view. Such tactics have brought down many an organization. She can't come out a winner.
If any of those people want to give me a crack at their job I will pee in a cup, a can, a shot glass or or just bring it in in my hand. These people should be happy they have a job.
Good thing for annoyed they aren't testing for illiteracy too.
Nice Whitehorse, I am glad you can be constructive also and show you are just a bigoted fool. You concern appears to be about freedom of drug use.
Annoyed, THANK GOD some at Monticello had the courage and guts to speak with the media. It was high time Bowman's tactics were exposed to donors and the public. From what I know, this publicity is making some squirm now. The reason for nervousness, too many people who carry a big stick are furious. Obviously, Bowman doesn't care what her underling workers think. If she cared, she would never have moved in this direction without first gaining clear consensus from employees. You know the old saying, "What goes around comes around". When family members are being exploited,bullied there is reason to snitch on the offending parties.
Hook - I think you've found your next Gail Bentley. Please tell me you will expose the situation before it's too late. I am deeply saddened by what is happening to Monticello.
For the life of me, I don't know how Monticello is saving any money at all by testing 25% of the employee population every quarter. As a current employee (for over ten years) there certainly isn't a drug problem to warrent this kind of action. I can only surmise that some hack at their insurer has conned them into believing this is going to save money. It only reenforces the fact that medical insurance companies need to go away and massive health reform is the only answer for this insanity.
Insurance brokers and benefits consultants say their small business clients are seeing premiums go up an average of about 15 percent for the coming year ââ?¬â? double the rate of last year's increases. That would mean an annual premium that was $4,500 per employee in 2008 and $4,800 this year would rise to $5,500 in 2010.
The higher premiums at least partly reflect the inexorable rise of medical costs, which is forcing Medicare to raise premiums, too. Health insurance bills are also rising for big employers, but because they have more negotiating clout, their increases are generally not as steep.
Higher medical costs aside, some experts say they think the insurance industry, under pressure from Wall Street, is raising premiums to get ahead of any legislative changes that might reduce their profits.
This really is one of those things I never really thought about before the last year or so, but I still have no idea what exactly the health insurance companies offer this country. All they seem to do is sponge money off the top of what we pay for health care, make life a living hell for their customers and the medical community in the form of reams of paperwork, hand out lavish bonuses to their management, invest recklessly in whatever the Wall Street bad idea du jour is, and then raise rates when the fur-bearing trout farms don't pan out and they need to cover their bad investments. Meanwhile, they don't answer to the consumer and control congress, and are under orders from the Wall Street brokerages.
Do I have this completely wrong? Is there an actual fact-based (and that means you need to look somewhere other than the NRO or glibertarian sites) argument in favor of health insurance agencies? What service do they really offer? Why are these people who it appears add nothing so in control of the debate. I know I have turned into a pinko-commie, but right now this looks like nothing more than an elaborate and legal protection racket.
Monticello is a great organization. I am sure we have many reasons to love and hate the new ideas. But change was inevitable with the advent of leadership. But we must judge Leslie by what she does now that she knows things are not a 100% between her and her employees. What people do during these period often truly predict what kind of person she will become. And if she is able to do better, we must then judge ourselves by our ability to forgive.
From what I hear there is alot more than employee drug testing going on at Monticello. Someone needs to look into the "economics" which required the elimination of three jobs and the reduction of a fourth from full to part time while creating several new more expensive positions including a Vice President postion. Does the current administration think that their educated staff can't do the simple math and conclude that the state of the economy had little to with these changes. In an atmoshere of mistrust no wonder morale is low.
For goodness sakes! What IS happening at Monticello! As a local native Virginian my wife and I have always proudly taken our visitors to Monticello which we think is the highlight of their visit with us. We have sadly read about the comments to The Hook regarding its article about new management's implementing unannounced drug testing for all employees. From reader comments, there is a REAL CONCERN with the new management's LACK OF RESPECT for their employees.
Organizational change and transitions can be difficult but it doesn't have to be demoralizing and degrading. From reader comments about the article, the new management is not providing employees opportunities to participate and be heard in its consideration of making many internal Monticello changes. Maybe the new management needs to consider training to improve its "change managment" skills with its employees!
What do the Monticello Board and its major donors think of all this negative press? Monticello is an international historic treasure! The new management should be striving to keep it that way!
If someone went home after work and smoked dope, just the way many people have an evening drink, that person would test positive for drug use and be fired. Only the most sheltered or otherwise ignorant person would believe that sort of recreational activity done in moderation would make anyone dangerous to anything or anyone. Despite being illegal, that is how huge numbers of marijuana smokers, quite possibly the majority, use marijuana. Laws that prohibit that are simply ridiculous and it's far past time we move past that sort of failed prohibition. If illegal drugs fund terrorism, we can easily put an end to that and save ourselves a fortune in interdiction costs at the same time.
History has for too long been viewed through rosy glasses of nostalgia. That's true to public historians at Monticello until relatively recently - and in my opinion true of many of the comments here effectively citing "the good old days" of Dan's reign. Dr. Jordan had a _long_ list of positive qualities and a _long_ list of accomplishments there - but all was not always as positive as it may have seemed when viewed from outside.
Perhaps current TJF administration should have / could have handled the rollout of testing more effectively - but I see many reasons for the policy. The necessity of economizing whenever possible in this current national and tourism economy mandates difficult decisions.
I generally applaud both the past and current administrations and the directions in which they continue to improve Monticello and the TJ Foundation.
I think it's a good idea for any employee in the private sector that's entrusted with the safety, health and well being of any citizen. And in the case of law enforcement of any type, any employee that's entrusted with the safety, health and well being of any citizen or "defendant".
Having been in public criminal justice service for almost three decades before semi-retirement, I was NEVER EVER tested for drugs. But I feel there were times when drug testing would certainly have weeded out an employee or two in that three decades. I also very seriously doubt if random drug testing is even performed nowadays in any type of local law enforcement positions.
buy your weed locally grown and stop financing terrorists. TJ grew hemp and tobacco and made whisky. no doubt he would have been the sort to sell marijuana too if he could finance his importation of incredible amounts of the drug know as wine with the profits.
To monkey see monkey do - How do you know the new director didn't?
I smell a rat as Mogielnicki witholds the "pee pee policy" from the press. His comments are abrupt,guarded,defensive. Who directed,steered his comment?hmmmm The plot thickens.
Otherside,I certainly hope she is willing to pull down the panties and produce a stream for testing. For PR purposes,employee relations, she should publicly admit she is willing to submit and further participate during the program. Producing a sample can be an intimidating and embarrassing experience. I know of some folks with health concerns who are unable to pee on command. So much for their keeping their own individual conditions private! The director should at least lead in making it clear she will also happily and regularly comply.
Wow, I must have it wrong. I thought the house was filled with priceless things that Jefferson once actually owned. You know things that can't be replaced. You know, original furniture, paintings, the actual house. But, I guess if it's just priceless nails, who cares.
Monticello covered in snow? Dude. Like that is so suggestive, man. And yes, they grew opium poppies in the garden, beautiful deep purple-black at the base with flaming red tips. But now we live in the unfree kind of country Jefferson fought against. They uprooted those beautiful flowers. Because of fear. Our liberty hasn't been taken: we gave it way, going along with stuff like that, out of fear. Dude. Its over. Monticello is a museum now. The liberty bell? In a Philadelphia museum. Freedom itself? A museum exhibit.
Great idea. Too many Presidents and other dignitaries go there. Funny that some people think initially about pot use when people in every profession use all kinds of drugs and I'm sure some of these people have too. Actually, a person's drug of choice has absolutely nothing to do with his social standing or his self-perceived social standing based upon some imagined connection to Thomas Jefferson. As for Jefferson? I'm sure that if drug use affected the performance or judgment of his slaves and drug testing was available in his lifetime, he would have employed it to protect his "resources." He couldn't afford not to.
Give up your drugs people and stop financing the terrorists.
The drug testing was just the cherry on the s-t sundae the docents are enduring at Monticello. Some of them with the most experience,knowledge, and enthusiasm for the place have been demoted or cut. So maybe the new bosses are trying to see if they've succeeded in their efforts and have demoralized folks enough to drive them to drugs. Pass the hookah.
Once trust breaks down, workers will become sneaky, angry, and less productive. It is not as if Bowman can offer the big bucks to retain or bribe employees. Drug offenders will find a way to beat the system. The good piece, Bowman won't last long as director, as she dictates from above. This article and blog expose a huge error on the part of Bowman herself. As time goes on, watch the fur fly!
Cville Eye,
I think I get what your saying. That family and work are two different places. But work places can have a feeling of family or respect. I worked at some really nasty locations and some really nice places.
I think what people meant by 'family' was an environment where people respected and trusted one another and gave each other the benefit of the doubt. In my opinion, every workplace should be like that.
The real reason for the drug testing was to save money on insurance. However, whatever money TJF has saved with the testing they have lost in goodwill and it will never be regained.
Bowman does have serious issues, most important is her making employees to feel discarded and unimportant. It is quite obvious that she wants to leave her mark on Monticello and has not yet learned that that can be done in a careful, studied, and gentle way. She needs to STOP listening to Ann Taylor and start listening to her conscience.
employers have rights. If you don't like the rules QUIT. There are 10% of the populace that would gladly take your job.
As far as treating drugs as a criminal instead of a health issue I call BS. The reason these people are in jail is because they are criminals who steal and rob to feed their habit that got started from CRIMINALS selling them addictive drugs. Virtually no one is in jail for smoking pot. They committed serious crimes that affect us all.
As far as black vs white conviction rates the answer is to convict more whites not let black criminals back into the streets to deal mmore crack to children.
Holy Cow Batman! Are you really this ignorant? Way to lay down the race card Nice Job! Almost hilarious, but I thin you really believe the insane ignorance you spot
perplexed.. I am not ignorant.. the facts speak for themselves... more blacks get comvicted then whites because whites hire expensive lawyers.. that get them off with a reduced sentence... that is real the crime... all criminals that do the crime need to do the time.
If you don't think drug use causes peripheral crime then explain where meth and crack addicts get the money to buy the drugs.(besides stealing car radios and elderly womens purses)
Col. Forbin,
I think you maybe going a tad far. The actions we are talking about are the actions of a non-profit foundation. I understand the blight of blacks in our current legal system. Through that is very profound and dangerous our very own Sen. Webb is fighting against those very injustices. And I feel both your arguement and the person above you are very well written I believe they best directed at your local Congress person. Monticello like any company may have a number of reasons to conduct these test. The currents of the game (politic's) require they take certain norms to protect themselves. Col. Forbin, understand I respect your opinion but you are really attacking the infringement of government not employees. All of those tested agreeded to these in their contracts. You cannot sign a contract and then complain about the terms of the contract. I personnely know many of leaders at Monticello that made these decisions. They were not intended to be sinster or have a negative impact. Of course it has and many were offended but the mistakes that upset many employees were not even mentions in this article. And the Foundation has agreed to fix those problems.
I hear not stop insults on Ms. Bowman. In my frequent contact with her she has been not but awesome. May I remind many people that near the end of Dr. Jordan many felt his time had past and he should move on and that he was stuck in the past. Now many hail him as he should have never left. I agree both are good people with unique strengths and weaknesses. Just give her time before you judge her because things take time. Look at the fickle public opinions polls on Mr. Obama up and down now stop.
Batman is right. The black neigbhorhoods of Charlottesville have begged to get the drug dealers off the streets for over twenty years. STill residents of some local public housing units are complaining of drug dealers around their children. If you sell your drugs in full view of the public on the street you are more likely to go to jail than if you sell it in the frat house. It's really a shame that Sen. Jim Webb wants to keep them on the streets destroying already fragile neighborhoods after the residents finally got somebody to pay attention to them and clean up the streets. I suspect the real reason people want the druggies out of jail is because they don't want to pay the money to keep them there. Just remember, the on street drug dealers didn't stay in the black neighborhoods, they took over the Mall and West Main Street and the Corner. I remember one graduation weekend when there was a gun shoot out across University AV, from the Little John's side to the Natural History Museum side for two blocks.
Wow, Otherside! You must really live on the other side. The shuttle bus drivers are drug-tested because Federal law dictates that everyone with CDL's be tested. The "heavy equipment" is a backhoe that only 2-3 people in the entire Foundation operate and not around visitors. Before employees can drive Monticello vehicles, they must submit to a criminal/DMV background check where any past bad behavior would be discovered. And those "priceless" artifacts are rusty nails, broken bottles, and shattered pottery in plastic bags inside cardboard boxes on metal shelves. They're not mummies or the Dead Sea scrolls!
The argument here isn't whether the Thomas Jefferson Foundation has the legal right to randomly drug-test their employees. The U.S. Supreme Court says they do. The real issue is why the Guardian's of Jefferson's legacy (you know, all that Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness stuff) would subject their employees to an invasion of privacy where no problem exists.
I read the posted comments with some trepidation. Peeing in a cup for a urinalysis is no big deal. Employers are allowed this imposition(public or private organizations)on employees privacy as when you take a mans money, the 'man' has a right to set the conditions that allow you to continue to draw a check from him! My trepidation comes from the fact that NO ONE made the first reference to the fact of forced and illegal search of the employees vehicles;(4th ammendment).HR managers come and go, but the government will infringe ANYWHERE, YOU allow them to!! Never surrender any of your constitutional rights; because when you give up one, they want one more, and so on and so on...
"That being said, I think it's preposterous to think that a house guide or curator is going to come to work hopped up on goofballs and wreak the house." People come to work at the hospital on stuff frequently. I don't see where inappropriate drug use has anything to do with occupation.
Through my feeling is if you are going to talk to media, did you first try to speak to your boss. And next is a pee test really that bad. I was subjected to them in the service. I see what your saying and maybe I am more comfortable with a heavy hand. And also maybe the real test is does she learn from these mistakes, that is the mark of a good leader also.
Do people really want to persist in this "family" myth? It's getting silly.
Let's talk about workplaces that are respectful of the employed. Makes more sense without increasing employees' expectation of all of the emotions that goes with being a true family.
The right-wingers who support random drug testing for employees of a gift shop will no doubt make the logical leap to random drug tests for all citizens, right? Clean and sober for everyone. It's just a little government interference to make sure we keep evil drug-users in prison and off the roads, right?
But while we're at it, let's let those government officials take a look in your gun cupboard and the bathroom cabinet where you keep your prescriptions. You're paying your taxes, too, aren't you? These dogs got a license? Hey, it only hurts if you have something to hide. Oh, and that computer you're reading this on, we're gonna want to take a look at that too. You know, what sites you look at late at night, the emails you send...
If ever there was a cure worse than the disease,it's the drug laws in this nation,we are filling our prisons at enormous cost,concentrating more on the criminal aspect than the health aspect,,we are now warehousing 25% of the world's prison population with less than 5% of the world's total population,,,"illegal" drugs bankroll gangs,organized crime,,corrupt law enforcement,create murderous cartels,spending BILLIONS on the "drug war" and losing on all fronts!
If history teaches anything,Prohibition should be a lesson in how not to deal with a problem that society refuses to yield to...our laws are heavily biased in application,(blacks are convicted at a rate much higher for the identical "crime" as whites)Crack cocaine with only a fraction of cocaine measure for measure as the pure stuff gets mandatory sentencing while cocaine users often get a fine or a suspended sentence.
YET,there are more drugs readily avilable at lower prices in spite of all the clamor to "just say no".
Anyone interested should look into the origins of the conversion from drug use as a medical problem to a criminal problem,,,,,it may shock those with a modicum of sensitivity to find that the laws were largely racial in application!Start with the Harrison Act in 1914 and read the ravings of Harry Anslinger in the 1930s!
Leaders make decisions based on conditions not consensus. If you do not like your job quit. I am willing to bet most of the complainers have never really had a "bad" work environment.
Bowman herself will suffer the consequences more than the others. In other words she made her own bed here. As time advances, employees will learn how to get the best of her. She has set the stage in engineering a climate that will promote backstabbing and deception. In time, she will get her due.
It seems like this is really a place to vent. Fact of the matter is an employer has legal rights to do drug testing because it has an impact on how an employee performs.
It is an individual's business what they do in their own time, but if they are arriving at work under the influence of drugs it impacts the work they do.
Pretty much like driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol. A person above the legal drinking age limit, can consume as much alcohol as they want till they take to the roads. Why? They become a hazard to everyone's health if they are intoxicated.
Same is true for drugs too, why should an employee who does not do drugs have to put up with someone else who does. The only exception is drug use for medical reasons. It is a well documented fact that there is a significant loss in productivity when employees are using banned substances.
this is ludicrous. more police state.
uh huh, who exactly started the routine practice of phone tapping and monitoring email? this isn't a political issue. our constitution has been disregarded almost before the ink was dry.
does anyone really believe the docents at monticello are in need of monitoring for drugs? let's all take a good dose of reality.
have they stopped selling opium poppy seeds too? for many years, they were our reliable local source
for the old guy who thinks testing is a "necessary evil." if someone's job performance doesn't indicate a problem of any sort, why fabricate a problem to find just so a good worker can be fired? why on earth should i or anyone else care if someone who might guide me on a tour of an old house chooses on his or her own time to relax with a bong hit or two?
I think that the real irony here is that TJ grew the stuff right there in his garden and now the people that take care of his place are subject to random testing and termination.
drug users are losers. a company has every right to do this. i hope all of them start doing this. the use of drugs is way out of hand in the work place now days. clean and sober is a good thing
@doghouse21, since the government isn't doing the searches, the Constitutional rights have not been violated.
Crickey. I think they should testing elected officials just before a meeting. I would suggest starting in Scottsville. I bet you would get a few positive hits.
I think you are making a lot of assumptions for your one-sided argument.
The director should have explained her own role in "personally participating" for this story. What is with the director? Does the "cat have her tongue"? Former head Dan Jordan responded and commented with regard to an upsetting situation for many employees. Seems the director appointed another to do the talking for her. Why isn't she willing to speak for herself?
"I think what people meant by ââ?¬Ë?family' was an environment where people respected and trusted one another and gave each other the benefit of the doubt." These attributes make for a good workplace environment but are particularly descriptive of "family." Families often have different dynamics than what you describe. Siblings, for example, often tell their parents that a brother or sister was using drugs during lunch, causing parents to pounch on the offender rather than give the benefit of the doubt. Maybe that's exactly what happened at Monticello and "family" is the appropriate word.
To Otherside: Those are antiques; artifacts are stuff dug up by archaeologists. But I understand how someone can legitimately apply that term to the relics in the house. That being said, I think it's preposterous to think that a house guide or curator is going to come to work hopped up on goofballs and wreak the house.
To Annoyed: I wish that was true, but people in positions of power rare acknowledge their mistakes. No matter how bad the PR, the powers-that-be at Monticello will simply hide behind "No Comment" and pat each other on the back and say "Keep up the good job". The real shame is that this debacle would have been moot if the administration had treated their employees like adults and explained that the Foundation could save 5-figures in liability insurance premiums and thus save 1 or more jobs by drug-testing a sample of the entire Foundation. But they chose to sell the employees some crap about solidarity with the bus drivers.
How utterly stupid.
Profound! Thanks, Colonel. Now, step away from the bong and explain why it's stupid.
If people that work in both the public and private sector are being tested for drugs, then it is only fair to randomly drug test those receiving public housing and/or welfare. If I have to "piss" for my paycheck, why shouldn't someone receiving public assistance? You pee dirty - no check! Now, wouldn't THAT be interesting..
Are their any Federal funds financing this enterprise? If so, they most likely fall under the myriad Federal employment statutes, which include numerous invasive requirements related to a "drug free work place". Once you wrap your lips around the Federal teat, you let them (the Federal Government) say that "this is the way it must be", and can't hold them to account vis a vis the Constitution. You have no choice but to shut up, sit down and be their lackeys. Unless, of course, somebody with a pair reminds the cornholes in Washington about a little something known as the 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution. With Barry in the White House, expect lots more of the same. Sorry to have to be the one to alert the libs in the area that Barry and his facists denying Constitution rights might actually impact pot smoking by TJ's docents, and not just beat up on those "horrid Conservatives" that think that the 2nd Amendment is just like all the other first 10 Amendments which are individual rights.
Otherside, Can you clarify? Has the director discussed her own willingness,intent to personally participate in the program? I find it strange that she has personally avoided making comments to the media, this situation. Employees, others are obviously upset with the new initiative. Seems to me, she is being publicly,visibly called on the carpet now that the cat is out of the bag. Sure, she has the right to remain mute,media coverage. If I were her, I would be willing to defend,negotiate a policy that is certainly being challenged by employees and many donors.
I love our small town mentality that this is news... I think we should all get over it.
Gasbag Self Ordained Expert, you've gotten it exactly right, but this is the first time I've thought it is funny. Thanks for the picture.
I was just googling "Monticello Jefferson opium medicine" and this stuff was one of the things that came up.
I don't think the problem is drug-testing. These days, honestly, no one really gets all that bent out of shape about drug testing. No one likes to do it, but we live in a meaner world than we once did, and drugs finance death and disaster at every turn. I'll pee in a cup any day and take my chances on a random error. I don't have a job that requires drug testing--I work for a copy shop--but I'd do it if they asked me. I know I'm clean.
And, no, *I* don't think ANY of the new bosses took drug tests. I don't live in your town, and I don't know your issues, but I sure as all get out can recognize lousy management. Someone said the new Director was from some other job. What was his/her record there? It bothers me a lot to hear about people getting demoted and cut out. Something has changed, and the change--from what I am reading here--is a really bad one.
I've been to Monticello many times over the years. Until about a year or so ago, the tours just got better and better. The docents were so up on Jefferson and Co. I wondered how many of them could take--and pass--a doctoral examination on the subject. Probably most of them. My last tour was about eighteen months ago. A wonderful experience. I recommended it to all my friends who were taking trips to the area last summer.
Now, I know people who went OUT OF THEIR WAY, on MY say-so, to visit one of the world's best places. They said the tour wasn't worth the money, and that something must be different now.
Where did all those great people go? What happened to my favorite place to visit in Virginia?
I'd bet if someone looked into the background of all this stuff, that you'd find some very, very nasty dust bunnies under Jefferson's bed.
I wonder what's happened at Monticello in the last year or so? After all, lots of people thought Bernie was a nice guy.
Good luck, folks. I have a feeling Monticello is taking a swift ride down a slick hill.
Hey Everyone who commented,
Of course I respect everyones opinions but I want to address one group. First to those who spoke to the media you call Monticello a family or it used to be a family. But instead of working out problems in house you ran to a newspaper this makes you just as guilty of destroying any family atmosphere.
In fact I think families still exist but they are not created at Ms. Bowmans level but for each of us. We can make it something special.
Second group for those who think our best days have passed you are clearly living in a twist world. Because we are growing stronger then ever and I am proud to be part of that. Things are changing yes, but that was expected when you get new leadership. You criticize but fail to look at all of the new ideas and how things are getting better and better. Next you have a problem do something constructed and talk to your bosses.
The new director should also be willing to do as she dictates. For starters, she should step into the potty, pee into a cup, hold it up for all to see, and then turn it over for the others to test.
Music Lover is right about the loss of class. It seems the more I hear and see about the happenings on the mountain, the more saddened I become and worried about the future of the former "happy family" on the mountain.
I know someone that works there and they have said in private that most of the top level employees agree that this new president will run Monticello into the ground. This drug testing ordeal is public proof of what is going on. From the sound of things, this woman is a little "off" and seems to be doing things based on emotion and ego rather than knowing what the hell she is really doing!


text:
By Teachers, For Teachers
As we teach and prepare students for 21st century careers and college, the effective integration of technology is an effective pedagogical tool for meeting the needs of diverse learners.
Technology tools, like iPads in the classroom, are particularly useful in meeting the diverse needs of our students with special needs. Technology makes what was once inaccessible for many of the students accessible. Since iPads are relatively easy to use and don't have a significant demand on fine motor schools, they are becoming increasing popular for instruction of our students with special needs.
There are thousands of apps that can be used to develop students' skills. I am always collecting apps that can be effectively integrated into instruction.
Here are some of my current favorite apps that benefit all children but are particularly useful for reaching and teaching students with special needs.
Audio Boo allows for quick and easy recording. The recordings, or boos can then be emailed, posted, or saved. I have used this app for the following:
Speech with Milo is a series of apps designed by a speech pathologist. These affordable apps give students the opportunity to practice with verbs, prepositions, and other language skills that can be challenging for students with special needs and can also be used as a support for neurotypical children.
Mobile Education Apps has several great language building apps that support students' development of language skills. There are several apps that build students' questioning, sentence building, and story building skills. I use these apps with my son, who has speech and language challenges and we love these.
Do you know some more great apps for students with special needs? Please share them in the comment section!
Book author, Dr. Katie McKnight, for an Education Technology or Literacy workshop!


text:
Messe München GmbH (Munich International Trade Fairs) thanks you for visiting our website and for your interest in our company and our products. We take the protection of your private data seriously and we want you to feel comfortable when visiting our Internet pages. The protection of your privacy is of the utmost importance to us. Therefore it goes without saying that we comply with statutory provisions for data protection. Our employees are obligated to treat all information confidentially and they receive regular training in the areas of data protection and data security. In the sections below, we would like to briefly explain how we protect your data and what it means for you when you make use of our online offers.
Access data
When our Internet pages are called up, Messe München GmbH receives access data which is stored for protective purposes that basically allows us to identify you. This data includes
This will enable us to optimise our offerings as a whole and personalise the content specifically for you, e.g. recognise you as a return visitor to our Internet offering. If you have an existing data set, the new Data can be allocated to this data set in many cases.
Personal data
Personal data is information that is used explicitly to determine your identity. It includes information such as your name and your postal or e-mail address. The only time we save personal data in addition to your access data is if you give us this information voluntarily, e.g. as part of a registration, a survey, a prize competition, a contact inquiry, an application for a newsletter or to process an online order. Moreover, personal data is used only to the extent necessary and only for the legally permissible purpose for which you gave your consent. To ensure the secure transmission of your data, Messe München GmbH employs encryption procedures in secure areas. This means that communication between your browser and our order system, for instance, cannot be read by others on the Internet. Incidentally, using our order system is regarded as consenting to the storage and use of your data by Messe München and its partners.
Passing on personal data to third parties
Messe München GmbH renders some of its services together with select partners. These partners are subject to the same strict statutory provisions for data protection as and are integrated into the data-protection concept of Messe München. Personal data is only passed on
Additional information – such as voluntary statements about your primary areas of interest – is not passed on to third parties by Messe München. Personal data is conveyed to state institutions and authorities only within the scope of statutory or judicial obligations.
Power of revocation
If you request in writing that Messe München GmbH or the representative responsible for you correct, cease from using or delete your personal data, we shall of course do so immediately. If you are registered as a user, we also offer you the opportunity to view the data for yourself and delete or change it if necessary.
Cookies are small text files which are used by many websites in Germany and throughout the world. Cookies are created during your visit to our website and are placed on your hard disk by our server. Our cookies contain no information about specific individuals. Moreover, cookies placed by our servers can only be read again by us and not by any external website. Most browsers are set to automatically accept cookies. If you do not wish to enjoy the advantages of cookies, you can deactivate this function in your browser. Please be sure to take your browser's individual setting possibilities into account. Naturally, you can also view our website without cookies. However, doing say may limit the way our offers work.
This website uses etracker technology (www.etracker.com) to collect visitor behavior data. This data is collected anonymously to be used for marketing and optimization purposes. All visitor data is saved using an anonymous user ID and can be aggregated to a usage profile. Cookies may be used to collect and save this data, but the data remains strictly anonymous. The data will not be used to identify a visitor personally and are not aggregated with any personal data. The collection and storage of data may be refused at any time with respect to subsequent services.
Other active content (e.g. Javascript, ActiveX)
Some of Messe München's web pages contain links to other websites. We take all reasonable care to check these direct links. Messe München GmbH is not responsible for the content of the websites to which we link. Messe München GmbH is also not responsible for the content of websites with links to our website.
Messe München GmbH reserves the right to alter these guidelines for data protection at any time in compliance with the stipulations of data protection law.
Questions and comments
If you have any questions or recommendations about data protection at Messe München GmbH, please feel free to contact our data-protection officer by e-mail:
Messe München GmbH
Officer for Data Protection
81823 Munich
Phone: +49 89 949-20720
Munich, July 2013


text:
Browns quarterback Brandon Weeden recently said he wants to be the guy. And then the Browns went out and signed another guy.
Weeden admits that the move to add Brian Hoyer, cut last week by the Cardinals, was unexpected.
"I was surprised, but that's the nature of the beast," Weeden said Friday, per Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer. "It's part of this business and if you start worrying about it, that's too much to worry about. That's my mentality going forward."
Weeden said he hasn't been told what the Browns plan for Hoyer. "I have no idea," Weeden said. "I'm worried about me."
Per Cabot, Hoyer arrives as No. 3 on the depth chart, behind Weeden and Jason Campbell. Hoyer then will have the opportunity to climb the ladder.
Weeden thinks he'll hold off all comers. "You can't play this position timid or [not] confident," Weeden said. "You've got to be confident all the time. Once I got my head in this playbook and realized how good this system is and how good it fits the guys we have in place, it kind of made me excited and lit a fire under everybody to really want to take that next step including myself."
Campbell, the first quarterback acquired by the new regime in Cleveland, wasn't surprised by the new arrival. "You usually go into training camp with four quarterbacks," Campbell said. "You knew somewhere along that it would probably happen."
The fact that it happened with Hoyer should give both Weeden and Campbell concern. During his tenure with NFL Network, Browns G.M. Mike Lombardi heaped praise on Hoyer. "I've said this many times: If I would have taken the GM job of the 49ers, I would have gone after Brian Hoyer, because I think he has all the traits and characteristics," Lombardi said in December 2011, via Cabot. "If I were the Cleveland Browns, I'd rather have Brian Hoyer behind center than Colt McCoy."
Hoyer now has a dramatically better chance of being under center for the Browns than McCoy. Whether Hoyer gets there ahead of Weeden and Campbell is to be determined.
If it happens, it would be an amazing development, given that Hoyer was out of the league for most of the 2012 season.


text:
The On Demand Manufacturing group is the industry leader in providing full-service, outsourced 3D-printed Quickparts™ rapid prototyping, advanced prototyping, realistic appearance modeling, and low-volume production.
Providing instant access to the tools of modern manufacturing for organizations looking to extend their capabilities. We offer a unique combination of 3D printing and conventional manufacturing processes, such as CNC machining and injection molding, with the ability to produce low-volume bridge production parts. By partnering with On Demand Manufacturing, companies can accelerate innovation and manufacturing processes, empowered by a collaborative and agile approach to product development.
Empowering designers and engineers with knowledge and instant access to tools to design, test, and develop new products and solutions using the best technology available in the market. Our group of 200-plus application engineers around the world partner with clients across a diverse set of industries to produce the next generation of innovative products and services to drive industry forward. Through a unique partnership approach, we help bring ideas to reality.


text:
Through the first half of the season, any Clipper talk has centered almost primarily around Blake Griffin's phatness or Baron Davis' fatness. Little respect has been paid to one of the surprise top 10 scorers in the league, Eric Gordon. In one season, Gordon has increased his Player Efficiency Rating from 14.1 to 21.1. My, my! That's a huge growth. And speaking of things I hope my doctor never says, but my girlfriend says more often, Gordon's got a fracture in his small bone chip (Hehe, small bone fracture – I don't know why I'd want my girlfriend to say that more often). I also don't know what a small bone chip fracture means either, except that it sounds as if there might be one too many adjectives in that diagnosis. Hey, if you want a fantasy basketball blog written by a guy with a medical degree, you're gonna have to buy me a shizzton more screwdrivers to pay for the student loans. Anyway, Gordon's out 3-4 weeks. Randy Foye started last night and scored 15 points. He's your first grab. Then Eric Bledsoe. But, really, there isn't a replacement for Gordon. Griffin, Davis and Gomes will do the bulk of the heavy lifting with Gordon out and if those guys are still available in your league, you don't need my help.
Here's what else I saw in fantasy basketball yesterday:
Kendrick Perkins – Made his 7/6/3 (no blocks) season debut in 17 minutes of steamy Cleveland action last night. He wasn't supposed to return until February, so you should assume he'll be on restricted minutes until, at least, then. Having said that, Perkins is the Boston big I'd most want to own for the rest of the season. So if you're considering picking him up for one of the other shmoos on your roster, do it. He won't average 30+ mpg for another few weeks, but when he does, 9/11/2 blocks won't be out of the question.
Arron Afflalo – 18/3/4 as Afflalo is back! Actually, Afflalo never left. He just threatened to leave. He's like the neighbor that crashes all my house parties and threatens to leave if we don't start including him in our conversations. But he won't leave. There's free beer here.
Chris Andersen – Missed his seventh straight game with a knee and back injury, both of which are unrelated. Only can-can dancers and guys who tangle with Chuck Norris suffer related knee-back injuries. Birdman won't be back tonight, but will likely return this weekend. It's both sad and colorful when players substitute Tattoos Inked for Games Played.
Kirk Hinrich – Was schedule to have an MRI yesterday, but didn't go through with it and therefore didn't play. In this case, MRI stands for Might Remain Inactive. At least through the weekend.
Christian Eyenga – 15/3 in 28 minutes. I wouldn't trust it. Then again, I don't trust any fantasy options that sound like they should be an anchor for a news magazine program on MSNBC.
J.J. Hickson – Earned his sixth double-double of the season, and fifth in his last nine. The 17 boards weren't a season-high, but the four blocks were. So that's nice. Or niece if you're in France. Or nièce if you're standing in Paris with your sister's kid.
J.J. Barea – In other J.J. news, JoeJohn dropped 25 points and three three-pointers, both season-highs. The secret? He played in heelys.
DeShawn Stevenson – 7/3/2 with just one three in 18 minutes. After hitting 24 treys in the first six games of the month, he's hit seven in his last seven. As Jason Terry and Billy Batts might say, "now go get your shinebox, Stevie."
DeMarcus Cousins – Are there groups of moms out there under the assumption that adding 'De' to the front of common names somehow classes them up? Makes 'em sound French? What's wrong with Shawn or Andre or Marcus? Why the 'De', or more pointedly, why not D'Shawn or D'Marcus? Now that's French. Also French? Eleven fouls in two games. Gardez vos mains à vous-même, DeMarcus!
Carl Landry – Dropped 19 points and has scored in double-digits off the bench in each of his last four games. Fun fact: Carl Landry enjoys moped rides. Fun fact2: That's not a euphemism.
C.J. Miles – 14/4/5/3 stl/4 tov should probably be considered a win under the circumstances of Jerry Sloan's SF Shuffle.
Kwame Brown – Eighteen rebounds last night to go along with a dozen points. He's averaging 9/9 in 13 games as a starter. He could stop playing now and already this would be considered his best season.


text:
VANCOUVER -- B.C. can expect more oil to be transported by rail, as production outpaces pipeline capacity, even if the Northern Gateway and Kinder Morgan pipeline propsals are built.
That could leave communities in B.C. vulnerable to the kind of train wreck that left the town of Lac-Megantic, Que. in ruins Saturday, killing five people and leaving 40 missing.
The disaster raises serious questions about safety risks posed by rail transport and the adequacy of Canada's regulatory framework, according to environmental and transportation experts.
"This is a huge risk to our communities, rail lines go through the heart of communities right across this country as well as along our major waterways," said Keith Stewart, climate and energy campaigner with Greenpeace Canada.
Stewart said B.C. and other provinces can expect to see an increase in oil shipment by rail, a practice that has increased dramatically in the past two years.
According to Stewart, moving oil by rail was virtually unheard of just five years ago. But as Alberta's oil production combined with shale oil production in North Dakota overtook capacity on pipelines, rail companies saw an opportunity to fill the void.
In 2012, two per cent of Canada's oil was shipped by rail, Stewart said, citing National Energy Board figures. That amount is triple what was shipped by rail in 2011.
"It's expected to double or triple again this year," he said. "So the amount (of oil) being moved is increasing very very rapidly and the rail companies are moving into this as a new profit centre," he said.
As many as 140,000 carloads of crude oil are expected to rattle over Canada's tracks this year, up from only 500 carloads in 2009, ccording to the Railway Association of Canada.
Thousands of new tanker cars have been ordered by North American railways.
Compounding the risk, Stewart added, is the fact that many rail companies move oil in cars known as "DOT-111" tankers.
These cars, most commonly used to transport crude oil in Canada, have a history of puncturing during accidents. The federal Transportation Safety Board has said repeatedly that they are prone to spill their contents during derailments and other impacts, and a U.S. Transportation and Safety Board investigation into a 2009 CN derailment and fire concluded that the tankers should be fitted with head shields, tank jackets and other safety measures to mitigate against disaster. It's unclear if any of those recommendations were implemented.
Right now, only a small amount of oil is moved through B.C. by rail, said Stewart, mostly through the Interior and down to California. He said correspondence between environmental groups and several rail companies has revealed many are considering taking oil to the B.C. coast.
A spokesman from Canadian National Railway said Sunday the company does not transport oil in B.C.
Canadian Pacific Railway spokesman Ed Greenberg said in an email Sunday he did not have specific details on whether CP transports crude oil through B.C. He added: "We are not making any formal comment today in light of the tragic incident in Quebec."
Approximately 230,000 barrels (more than 20 million litres) of oil are moved by rail in North America every day, according to the railway association. The association estimates that 99.99 per cent all "dangerous goods" rail shipments reach their destination without any spills caused by accidents or derailments.
Meanwhile, a new rail company has its sights firmly set on B.C. for oil transport. A group of Canadian businessmen calling itself Generating for Seven Generations (G7G) has proposed a 2,400-kilometre rail line that could move up to five million barrels of oil a day from Fort McMurray, Alta., to the port of Valdez, Alaska by way of northern B.C. and the Yukon. The oil would then be shipped to Asia.
A feasibility study is underway for G7G's proposed Unifying Nations Railway Company, or UNRailCo, said G7G CEO Matt Vickers, adding the project is poised to go ahead regardless of whether Enbridge's Northern Gateway Pipeline is approved.
"It's going to be viable and feasible regardless of any and all pipelines," said Vickers, noting the project directors have been purposefully "flying under the radar" until feasibility studies have been completed and a route has been finalized.
Oil transfer by rail as a whole has largely been off the public's radar until now, said Stewart. He said he hopes the Lac-Megantic crash will alert Canadians to the trend and encourage them to insist the federal government enforce existing regulations.
"I think what we have to do is make sure that this doesn't happen again," he said.
Rail-transport policy expert Avrom Shtern, who also serves as spokesman for the Montreal-based Green Coalition, echoed the sentiment.
"Every mode (of transportation) has its nightmare scenarios. This one is it for the railways," he said. "This (accident) was absolutely the perfect storm."
The federal regulations and standards governing rail operations in Canada are complex and numerous. Companies such as Montreal, Maine & Atlantic, the railway involved in the Lac-Magentic crash, are responsible for ensuring the safety of their rail lines, equipment and operations. This includes inspection, testing and maintenance programs in accordance with regulatory requirements. When a company is transporting dangerous goods such as crude oil, the rules — at least on paper — get even stricter.
The brakes and safety system on a train carrying hazardous materials must be inspected before and during every trip, for example. Employees must be regularly certified by the federal government, and no conductor can work for more than 12 hours straight, no matter what the train is carrying.
Transport Canada's oversight role requires it to monitor railway companies for compliance with these rules, in addition to conducting audits, inspections and investigations. If a company fails to comply or has an accident, the government is also responsible for imposing fines and other sanctions.
That's where the problems begin, according to Shtern.
"I think the government, especially after austerity cuts, relies more and more on the industry to police itself. It's unacceptable. You can't just write rules and expect the (train companies) to police themselves.
"I think it's high time the government came back into the game and reined them in. They're not doing their job."
With files from Postmedia and the Canadian Press