text:
Jack S. Futterman Oral History
Part VI- Working in Program Analysis
Going To Work For Alvin David
Q: So then you came to Program Analysis to work for Alvin David, tell me how that happened. How did you end up in Program Analysis? Tell me that story.
There's a little bit of a story. I don't know how much to give, because some of it is surmised. Well anyway, when I first came back I did not get the job I had expected in DAO, as the policy provided. During that time I learned that Alvin David had a job in Program Analysis; a top job, not his deputy, just a top job. And I indicated some interest. But it turned out that Alvin had become very friendly with my very good friend--he just died last year, I got to know him from the early days of Social Security, and he became a life-long friend.
Q: George Leibowitz?
Yes. And Alvin had a lot of respect for him. Although I had a mild interest in looking at that kind of work, I really didn't get a chance to compete. Although, I went through the moves.
Q: He selected George?
He selected George.
George Leibowitz had been my assistant, and under this plan of promotion in absentia he became my boss. While I was in the service, George Leibowitz had made a very good impression on Alvin David. During this period when I was in the Methods Procedure Branch, there was business about a grade 12 job with Alvin David. While I never went out looking for the job, it came to me. Personnel wanted to know whether I was interested and I said yes. It turned out that George was interested in going there, and Alvin David sold it to George. He didn't know what he had gotten, you know--George was a good man.
Then years later, when he got to know me a little, and had greater experience with George, it worked two ways. First, it opened his eyes about my capabilities, things that he was unaware of, he learned through experience. And it worked the other way, unfortunately. (This is speculation about my friend George's contribution.) In a sort of a summary way, I would say that George had a more pedestrian kind of mind. It was not one that would come up with creative surprises. So I guess it took some years for Alvin to appreciate this: he was learning about George firsthand, and he was observing me.
One incident was part of what happened then. They were undergoing the nadir of their existence, if that's a good word--the very bottom. They hit bottom in Program Analysis. The staff was down to practically nothing. The guys that did the work were Alvin, Betty Sanders--I'm talking about the legislative policy and the technical effort to produce the documents that Congress wanted to support the positions of the Department or SSA--Kitty Marquis and Henry Schumer, and an ex-social worker, Neota Larson--a real professional. Neota had a great deal of knowledge about the social welfare aspects of things. And she had a lot of information about sources--where to go to get information, advice, etc., which Henry didn't have. Henry worked for me along the line. And that was it, in essence.
They were working around the clock, literally. They would work until three, four o'clock in the morning, then go home, get a couple of hours of sleep, freshen up, then come right back to work. They were droopy--they were down, they were just unable to get things done. And they lacked staff, they lacked good staff. I mean, they needed five times as many as they had. And it was in that setting in 1955 that I was asked would I accept a deputy job? So people would come in and would push me for the Deputy job. I never made a single move, not even hinted that I was interested. In truth, I wasn't particularly. I was very happy with what I was doing. In some ways, you know, being a deputy is not as good as being one of the principals. But the job was open. Alvin would have in mind who the possible persons were--he would make it very clear. He didn't think there was any better choice at the time, so I took the job.
I immediately began to flesh out his office. I became a full partner in terms of hammering out policy and all that. Mr. David was very much in need of a deputy who could get him out from the deep fog that he was in. He was the least administrative type of person. He could never think to hurt anybody, so adverse decisions piled up on his desk. And I was hired in 1955 as his Deputy. Not so much for my background, but for my natural ability to reason problems. And my sense of values I guess were important, my general belief in the importance of Social Security.
So I went to Alvin and I stayed there for two years. When I first got there, he went on vacation, in July. He had a lot of unresolved matters on his desk, suggestions, requests for promotions, and action on this and that. I just got rid of it all, and I don't mean just junked it, I dealt with every issue. And I did some tasks I'm sure he personally thought were distasteful. He just didn't like to give people news that they wouldn't like.
He is a very unusual person, unique, I would say. Anybody who talks about Alvin David would have to say he is one of most unique people. He's very kind, very thoughtful. I talked to him not too long ago. He's alert, no question his mind is in good shape, his body's all bent over, and he just lost his wife.
The Dragnet Program
Q: What were some of the things that you did during those two years.
There was the Dragnet Program.
Q: Go out to the field and get people and bring them in?
Bring them in for interviews. It had never been done. I mean, not really, this was large scale, large scale. I'll say this, it had many purposes. The immediate purpose was to get good people from the organization, no matter where they were, to work in DPA; it had been denuded; it was really in terrible shape. And obviously, the major source was the field organization, but not the sole source. This was my idea--the Dragnet Program, where we would bring in people from the field and elsewhere for interviews, and also for possible assignments--long-term details, short-term details, so that each side could be exposed to the other. And we got some fine people.
Q: Now the interviews were not just to hire people to work in Program Analysis, but also to get input on policy?
No, no, not at that point. Dragnet had to do with recruiting.
Q: Okay, I got you.
And we brought in a lot of people from all regions. I should say, at this point, why did I feel that's the way to do it? Well, I have to tell you that the way we were then organized, and still are organized, the chances of good talent floating to the top in the organization were not proportional to the capabilities of the individuals. A lot depended upon their location, where they worked, under whom they worked, how good those people were in identifying talent and promoting people, how good their values were in terms of identifying people who had the talent to go to, let's say, an office like Program Analysis. One of my favorite examples on that is if you were working on the top of a mountain in Wyoming, in a district office, who sees you there? At most, some slightly higher-graded individual would visit every once in a while. And the only guy that maybe then served that function--and this gets to a guy you touched on, who you ought to know--was Francis McDonald. Francis McDonald had a way of showing up in any place. He was a guy (even though he probably would have been the worst administrator in the world) who had some smell, some sensitivity, some idea of who was a talent, a bright guy. And once he'd identified him, he spoke their name wherever he went. Francis McDonald was responsible, he was only one man, but he was responsible for doing much more than any one person, on a personal basis, could have done in getting talent known regardless of the location. But of course this depended on whether he spent time in that office, which obviously was sort of an arbitrary kind of a thing--and no one could depend upon that kind of a system.
Q: Right.
So the idea of Dragnet, again, the first function was to get staff. The second function was to really add opportunity, a window for employees to see what was out there, and to have some basis for making judgments about whether working in central office was interesting. You know, there's a widespread opinion, "Oh, Central office is no good." Until you get there, you find out what's going on, a lot of people get very attracted. So that was one way of opening up the organization so that the individuals themselves would have a better idea of what course they might want to go in the future. And even more important, when you bring them up to the central office, and you show them around and have interviews with different people, not just Alvin David, but Hugh McKenna, and other people, you get exposure like you never got before. Even though it might not have resulted in an immediate placement, it might result in a detail, or a short-term assignment. Even if it didn't, it would remain in the minds of people who would use that information later on.
So it was a very popular program, and a very successful program. It was not inexpensive; but I think it was, in terms of the cost-benefit ratio. I think it was a major help at that time in renewing vitality in the organization and also the morale of the organization. It certainly contributes to employee morale to know that they have chances to travel, so that they might have an opportunity to be further exposed and for planning their career objectives. Did I make this clear?
Q: Absolutely. All right. Now what else, what other things?
Program Simplification
The Simplification Program, early on. Again, it was oriented to two things. First, about that time, I guess it was about 1956, am I right on the year?
Q: I think so.
First, the conception of it was wholly mine. I was, as I say, Alvin's Deputy. And I did not just work on administrative problems. But I knew that the burden of administration--if improvements were going to happen, if improvement in the staff and the quality of the staff and the direction of the staff and all the other matters was to take place--I would have to carry 90 percent of it. But at the same time, I was doing all the other things in the management of the Division of Program Analysis. And my thought was the law was getting so complicated then (we thought it was complicated then!) that there was talk amongst the technical people that, you know, we ought to simplify. Almost always, in enacting legislation, there's an opportunity to put together a lot of things that we call technical amendments, that really didn't go through full legislative scrutiny. The technical people would tell the program committees, you know, that there are certain provisions that we would like to have corrected; they're not political, they're not this and that. And they pass them routinely. You had to be damn careful that you were not getting these things passed under some false guise. They had to be truly technical.
I thought, being new, we needed to go beyond just technical amendments and get legislation that could expedite our administration of the provisions, without changing the intent in any way, but at less expense or at better quality, or whatever. We should not be inhibited by over-direction in the law about how to work. We called that "simplification." And I wrote to Alvin, I hope we can find a copy of the letter, proposing this program. I proposed that we have somebody, one person, who was capable of doing it. My first choice was Manny Levine, who was in the General Counsel's office.
Q: Right.
We tried two or three guys from the field to help Manny. We had a couple of good guys. I wish I could remember the names off hand, but I can't. We had at least two guys there that worked with Manny. They became real help, you know. They knew their stuff; they knew the law. One of them came from California; the guy that did the most. He worked with Manny the longest. And when he went back to California, he got a very big position. So his service was very useful to him.
But in proposing this program, it was a little bit of an aberrant thing, you know; it had never been done before. I'll describe now what I thought the structure should be. We would periodically issue a simplification letter in which we described the problem, the technical problem, as we saw it, in the current law, or the way the current law required us to act. And we laid that out clearly. "We are now doing A and B and C and D to accomplish E." And what we were looking for was a way to overcome some of the problems that made us take these steps, and ultimately find creative new ideas, new approaches to accomplishing the objective of that provision, or of those provisions. And so in the process, that simplification letter, (and this was a major consideration in my mind) educated the field. They had very simplistic notions about how to change the law, and didn't understand why the law was the way it was. We would have to demonstrate how to change it in a way that would convince the people who enacted it in the first place.
Q: So these simplification letters would go to the Congress or to the field?
Oh, it went to the field. All the people in the field in certain areas of work. All the representatives, the Claims Reps.
Q: They would explain the way things work now or why they worked that way or any proposed changes you were planning to make?
Oh yes, there would be some. We would discuss in that memo ways we had considered, and the problem--why they were not yet selected. We would always try to educate: "Here's the present law; we'd tried to overcome it by these ways--administratively or legislatively. But we still have this problem, and we're not accomplishing the full objective. If anybody has ideas . . ." And I especially designed it that way in my original memo, saying that the field is rife with simplistic notions about provisions; how stupid the law is in certain respects. Do you recognize it?
Q: Oh sure.
How stupid the law is, how easy it would be to correct it. The simplification memos were designed to wake up the field to stop being so damn simplistic about it; learn something about what you're talking about. So they began to be able to answer the questions that came up. Because the field would encounter questions from the people coming in: "Why do you want this stupid procedure?" They would learn not only what the law required, but also why it was the way it was, and what the purpose was for doing something that seemed to be stupid to somebody. But after you'd explain it, they would understand it, and have a better idea of it. And they can harness their own intelligent approach how to solve the real problem, not some phony problem that they simplistically came up with.
Q: So did these simplification memos also introduce changes in practices and policy and operations, or you were soliciting ideas, or you were just educating them?
They were both.
Q: It was all of that?
We were really in effect saying, "We want to simplify the law. We realized we had a lot of things in the law that could be better written. Some limited us; some of the provisions do this and that, and get in the way of what should be our real objective." Now we didn't just confine it to what was the intent. But if we thought sometimes the intent needs to be adjusted, we'd argue for that too. But basically, it was to accomplish the job without changing the end result that was sought.
Q: Let me make sure I understand the process. So Manny Levine and his staff would look at an issue or an area.
Well, they would take up one issue for a period.
Q: And they would try to come up with ideas for how we could administratively simplify it and yet still meet the objectives of the law?
Not how. We'd identify problems, and explain the nature of the problem.
Q: Okay.
Why we weren't happy with it.
Q: And why certain ideas wouldn't work.
Why certain ideas didn't work. And having identified, as best we can, the nub of it, we would solicit their ideas, from their experience, any suggestions.
Q: Okay, I got it.
And so it was an educational thing; its ostensible, fundamental purpose was to get suggestions for simplification. And we got many. It was a shot in the arm. It really brought, I think, a sensitivity to the law, and the purposes of the law, that were too easily dismissed by people who didn't know that they didn't know. And you know, that gets pretty annoying. And that means that they can't handle the job very well, when they have to explain to a member of the public, why this stupid provision of law is in it, and the public says, "Why don't you do so and so?"
Q: So what did you do with all these suggestions when they came back?
Many went into our legislative planning.
Q: Okay.
Coverage and benefits and all the others, it went into that and went into the hopper. And I think there was a way of feeding that.
Q: Did we make some progress through the Simplification Project? Do you think we made some improvements in the administration of the law?
Oh yes. I personally couldn't give you the cards and spades on it. But I think there were many things. You see, a lot of people have the idea that if you approved something, it happened sort of immediately. No. In many, many areas, you get ideas coming out, and they have to percolate in your mind. And then a certain opportunity comes up, and you say, "Oh, this idea will work just right." But at other times, the idea of improving went right into the way we wrote up certain things.
It was part of the legislative planning grindstone operation; we were grinding out justifications for this and that all the time, and sending them to particular Congressmen, feeding them ideas, etc. Or we might at their request feed them these ideas. There were some Congressmen who were always looking for ideas--a lot of the grist for the mill of legislative planning was Congressmen who were interested in changing this provision of law or that provision of law. And we would do whatever they wanted, whether it was good or bad. That's one of the things you have to do. When a Congressman seeks our help and says, "How could I write this thing so that it would do so and so?" You first did that for him. And if you thought that he was open to other suggestions, you might throw in "There are other ways to do this. Or it might not be a good way." But you didn't do that very often. So Republicans and Democrats, or whatever, would seek our help. And even though a lot of the help that they were asking for was to accomplish things that Social Security or HEW or whatever did not personally seek, we did it as a technical assistance, just like the Congressional Library would provide that kind of service.
Expanding Staff
Q: All right. Is there anything else to discuss from your period in Program Analysis?
I worked for Alvin for two years--1955 to 1957. I've already indicated the kind of situation I stepped into when I went to Alvin's place in 1955.
Q: You lifted some burdens from his shoulders, right?
He got the Distinguished Service Award, and all that. He was a happy guy.
Q: And you had beefed up his organization; and you had done a lot of things like that.
A lot of things, not just administratively. As I said, I got a lot of people for him. Irwin Wolkstein, you've heard of him?
Q: Sure.
That was another case.
You know, I was looking around. One of the things I was looking for is who in this organization do I think has talent and they're not being utilized? Irwin Wolkstein was a Special Assistant to this guy who I told you was obnoxious; he wasn't obnoxious, but Alvin couldn't stand being in his presence. I put myself in Irwin's place; I thought Irwin was a very bright young fellow. He wrote lousy. He was the exception to one of my main rules, which is that a guy who writes lousy, thinks lousy. He was an exception. He was just unable to take what was in his head and write it. Most people are unable to write it because they don't have it in their head. But Irwin was better. He was the only guy that in my lifetime, I've come to that conclusion about. I thought he just had a trigger mind. And it was only because of some casual opportunities that I had to see his work. The Statistics Branch we didn't get to see very often. It wasn't on the main line.
During these early days when I was trying to beef up the staff. I told you that Jimmy Marquis and Neota Larson and Henry Schumer and Betty Sanders were the mainstays. Betty Sanders was a Technical Assistant for Alvin David, and she was very bright and I thought that she was well-suited in her placement. She worked at Alvin's level and he assigned her to do all kinds of tasks that she was capable of doing and she was capable of doing anything. I mean, all of the technical levels. She was very bright, very quick-witted, very fast, she could write and she produced.
So I was looking around early on, even before Dragnet. I was trying to see who I knew and who I was exposed to that I thought might be more productive. And I thought that Irwin Wolkstein, working under his boss, was wasted. That was not the most important place and personally I thought that he was in a demeaning position. That the man he worked for tried to grab credit. He established a real reputation for himself in the government in our staff and in other places after he left us. I liked him, but he was a pushy guy and he used his staff to advance his own interests. I just didn't think that was the best place for Irwin, and I thought that he had a brilliant mind.
So I called him one time out of thin air and I said to him, "Have you any interest in so and so?" He said, "I haven't thought about it." I said, "Well I'll tell you, I thought about it and I am not trying to persuade you to do something you don't want to do, but my first thought is that you are a bright guy and that you could be more useful and productive in other placements. Those other placements would be in higher jobs and they would lead to more interesting work for yourself. Not as some technical background person for one of our branches, but you would be able to aspire on your own." He said, "I might be interested." I said, "Are you happy where you are?" And I don't think that he was prepared to be explicit, but he realized by the question that although I had not known him, or met him very often, that I was discerning enough to detect something that he was not talking to people about. I became sensitive to it, not because of anything I saw in the way of a bad reaction on his part, but I said to myself, "If I had his brains would I be happy as a sort of a back-of-the-curtain adviser or helper to so and so?" I just thought that the roles were reversed in terms of actual knowledge and ability and intelligence. I didn't say these things to him. I said, "if you are interested I will pursue it a little more, because I hadn't talked to Jimmy Marquis, who was the one I wanted to divert him to. Jimmy Marquis was in Coverage.
Q: So you wanted him as an analyst?
Yes, as an analyst under Jimmy Marquis. I talked to Jimmy Marquis, and to my surprise he didn't want anybody unless he had extensive knowledge of him and all that, so he sort of resisted. He didn't turn him down, he said, "Well let me think about it," you know, that kind of thing. He thought about it and he didn't come to me, but I tried him again sometime later, and he said, "Well I haven't quite come to a conclusion." So at some point I just mentioned it to Alvin, and I told him why I was doing it. He thought that it was a good idea. He never said no to anything of that kind. So I then sent out to Alvin, after I waited some more, I said, "I'm going to tell Jimmy Marquis that I want him to make the move and if for any reason, after a month or so, he tells me that he's sorry that he did it or that he doesn't want to continue, without argument, I will take Irwin off his hands." I don't think that I was asking Alvin to do it, I was just informing him. And it happened and they became great for one another, they worked beautifully with one another as equals, and Irwin developed his own reputation in the health field. In 1965, when the Health field started, Irwin was one of our top researchers and I remember how strong he was in the area of bringing in managed health care.
Q: Are you talking about HMOs?
HMO's. There were a lot of technical problems to devise under the law the way of getting them covered. But he became tremendous, one of the leading persons in the government in terms of legislation, in that area.
The Origin of the Downey Books
Herman Downey had lots of printing and binding jobs that he needed, that he tried to get done by the agencies served by his Committee--he had Labor and HEW and some others. And it was perfectly legitimate for him to make these requests. But he was frustrated because he could not get most of the agencies to do things the way he wanted them done. And I told him we had an excellent print shop at Social Security and we would be happy to help him. Boy, that impressed him.
Q: You mean we would help out doing print jobs for him?
Sure. These were small jobs. He wanted certain papers bound. He could get it done at the Library of Congress, but they didn't do a good job for him, they didn't do it the way he wanted. It would take a lot of time, etc. And so wherever there were facilities, in various agencies, he would glom on to them. And I did lots of things for him that way. Which I would have done for anybody, if they had a legitimate need for it.
Q: While we're on the subject, about Herman Downey and publications, tell me about the "Downey Books," is this the origin of the Downey Books?
Yes. The Downey Books were my books, I didn't put my name on them, but these were my books, that I had made.
This was after I left Budget and was with Alvin David, I was his Deputy, Deputy Director of the Division of Program Analysis. This was 1955, 1956, and a little bit of 1957.
Bob Ball would still personally come down when he couldn't get what he wanted, and he would come down and ask for my help. And I determined that if he wasn't getting what he needed I would take on these extra duties and help him out. So I maintained a connection with Ball in my new job. And Bob Ball always wanted me to maintain my influence with Herman Downey.
What happened was this. That was an entirely new field for me too. I was a guy who had worked with punchcards, and coding and all that. Then budget. And now legislation. Now Bob Ball and others have told me over the years that I demonstrated great program sense. I didn't know the details. But I did know what were the purposes and aims and objectives of Social Security. And in a given situation, it was no handicap for me to be lacking the details, to be able to identify the kind of result we should be seeking.
But I digressed. Back to the Downey Books.
I had this relationship with Downey, since before I went to Alvin David's office. So it was well-established. Occasionally he still came over to Baltimore, sometimes bringing Roy Wynkoop along. Roy Wynkoop loved it because he had been used to contending with Herman Downey, and this became a kind of inside-club.
Now the way the books got started was like this. Sarah Brown was an analyst at Social Security. She started in 1936 I think, around the same time I came in. She took on and was given the duty of keeping copies of bills and hearing reports and thinks like that. So that when an analyst had to refer to it, Sarah would be able to dig it up. And there were always lots of bills being introduced, etc. She couldn't keep up with it all. But she managed to do a lot, she did very well.
So she began in the early days to try to bring some order to all these bills and hearing reports, etc. She would try to put together a complete set for every year. To make sure she had every bill, every hearing, every committee report. So Sarah had really laid the basis for what would become the Downey Books. But she was not doing anything so ambitious as what we later developed.
I visited Downey one day. He was complaining about how he was unable to get the materials he needed. He showed me these beautiful books that he had prepared as the Senate Finance Committee Clerk. These leather-bound books, with speckled edges, and all that. And I told him that we were collecting some things. Because even he couldn't keep abreast. He was only one person. He had no staff, and he did a tremendous amount of work.
But he tried to bring everything into a book, but he couldn't, he was missing things. I would supply from Sarah's materials, some missing things. Or we would hunt it down, if Sarah didn't have it.
Out of this, I offered to produce an annual book for him. And we did. That's how it became the Downey Books. I did it for him. And then, it occurred to me, that this is an indispensable tool for research into the history of Social Security, and it was fast being dissipated so that nobody would have it. If the Clerk of the Senate Finance Committee couldn't maintain it, and if Sarah Brown, who was a bird-dog, could not keep up with it, then I was afraid that being loose-bound and all that, that in a few years there would be some things that would never be part of the record, they would be lost forever. I thought of it in those terms. That it would be a wonderful thing for our Library. It would be a wonderful thing for the people who were the heads of those divisions, those bureaus, to have this. I didn't mean for it to be personally owned by them, but it turned out that this is what happened.
And I hope that our Library has them, and other places too. Because as part of our plan, Lew Dykes shipped a set of the leather-bound books to the Library of Congress, and a few other places. Then Lew Dykes had printed maybe a 100 sets of paper-bound books, and we distributed these too. After I retired, John Trout used to send me paper-bound copies of the new books each year, then after awhile he was not in a position to continue that. A set was given to me upon my retirement.
Q: Okay. Great story.
Relationship With Alvin David
Q: What was your relationship like with Alvin David?
There was a good chemistry between me and Alvin. First I recognized him as a very unique, finely-tuned, sensitive human being. He did things the Alvin David way. He had certain characteristics that were not suited to being the head of an organization. He couldn't tell somebody no; he couldn't bawl them out. He was so basically determined to look at all sides of an issue that he found it difficult to make some kinds of decisions.
To illustrate the point: When I came down, he went on a month-long vacation. And his desk was piled 2 feet high with things that had been lying there for years, a couple of years. One of the branch chiefs, the head of the Statistical Branch, was a very difficult person for Alvin to deal with, because this guy was brash, bold, demanding, and contentious. So Alvin found it very difficult to be in his presence. And he was asking for things that Alvin didn't want to do, like establish this and that--he was an empire builder. Alvin knew he shouldn't let him build the empire. But at the same time, he found it very difficult to say no. So that kind of thing was sitting on his desk. When I took over, I just took over the desk. Alvin was away. So I started cleaning it out. I called this Branch Chief down and we talked about it. And I said, "No, you can't do it." And that was it. He tried to argue with me. But where his argument might have wooed success with Alvin, it didn't have with me. I was not afraid to tell him in blunt terms, why I didn't think it was a good idea. So when Alvin came back, he had a clean desk.
He doesn't write letters any more--he's 90 years old. He's the best writer I know. He writes with precision; with very little redundancy, none practically. Each word carries its full weight. And there's no other word that would work better. And it's precise, and about as clear as one could be. So you can imagine how flattered I am when he tells me in recent years, repeatedly, that I'm the best letter writer that he knows. At first, I didn't believe him. But I do believe him--he really means it. I'm not trying to tell you I'm not. But the best? To Alvin?
Q: Tell me some more about Alvin David during that period.
I want you to know about Alvin David. Alvin David had, in many respects, a deep insight into all the developments in the early days. He was familiar with and knew all the early characters: Isadore Falk, who was the head of research; of course he was very well acquainted with Wilbur Cohen; Ida Merriam. He was very well acquainted with the head of Program Analysis, Jake Perlman, who preceded him. It would be well worth trying to get some picture of Alvin as a person and what he contributed.
Q: That would be very helpful.
I can only do a partial account. Enough maybe to give you some clues as to people who might know more, who are today alive, and who can maybe help do that sketch. Unfortunately, I think, most of them are dead. Alvin is now in his 90th year. We discussed that when I last spoke to him about a month ago. And he and I were especially close, once I started to work with him, or even slightly before.
In a sort of a "broad sweep" generalization about him as a personality, I'd first say, and this is something almost everybody would agree, was that he was one of a kind. He was not bizarre or anything like that, but he had a unique personality. He was an Alvin David original. Amongst the unique characteristics were, first, he had a personality all his own. He was eternally, cheerful. Whenever you'd call him, he would answer with a musical "hello," or whatever, buoyant, and so forth. He was a man who influenced me a lot, a master of the English language in writing. What I regarded was his ability to write with a minimum of words, with no duplication at all, every word, you know, carried its full weight. He's just a master at concisely identifying precisely what he wanted to say. So I learned from that by example, not by copying any part of it.
My writing style is entirely different. Even today, I feel insecure because my school system stupidly, in those years, skipped me over the whole seventh year. And there were important subjects that were taught then, that I skipped over and never had, like parsing sentences. To me, it was grammar. And I didn't know how to parse a sentence, and still don't know how to parse a sentence; I have feelings of insecurity about what exactly is or is not grammatical. I've been told I write extremely well and probably, in some respects, better than Alvin in terms of conveying with force the thoughts I want to communicate, but not with the style and the distinction that his has. But he influenced me in keeping what I had to say compact, not using multiple words to say one thing. And also learning the discipline that "You want to write something good and enduring, you better count on four or five drafts or something like that." So that's the kind of habits I developed just by observing him and reading and enjoying whatever he wrote.
Beyond that, he just was a wonderful person, generous, he'd always been generous in his praise of me. You know, he got me to even believe some of it. Take recent examples. About a year ago, he started telling me that my letters to him were absolutely the best that he receives. Well, I think they are good, don't mistake me. But the best that Alvin receives, that's high praise indeed. It's almost as high praise as Bob Myers--who justifiably had a widely-held reputation of identifying errors large and small in substance and even in punctuation--saying he looked at that piece I did in Kansas City and couldn't find even one error to correct. That's the kind of thing that Alvin would tell me. He also would imply that even without all the technical knowledge that I did not have, he regarded me as a program policy person par excellence, with a great deal of creativity and so forth.
I'm not fighting that, because I don't think modesty to that degree is helpful. I think I was very good. I believe that one of my outstanding characteristics is creativity. Not just in that area. I don't know what it is about myself, but I do think creatively. Just like I said, when I first went down there, by not being technically oriented, I was forced to think in larger terms. But I have a tendency to think in larger terms. Even right now, I've bought the computers, you know. And I don't want to learn how to do this and do that; I want to first surround the subject by learning the big picture about Windows 95, and the big picture about Office, and the big picture about Excel, and the big picture about Access. Even though I will not stretch those things anywhere near their limits, I do get an appreciation of how they fit together, far better than when you build it up by small steps and you never get an idea how vast the thing is that you're entering into. So I'm beginning to understand. I'll make a slow start in being productive.
When I went into painting, I didn't want to go through all that buildup stuff. I needed to get into painting; to have something constructive to work on, to divert myself recreationaly. And so like Churchill, who I heard had the same approach, I decided to paint. I learned as I painted and broadened out. But that's about the only thing I've done that I don't approach in a sort of a survey way. I don't try to remember all this stuff; I just enlarge my view of things.
So to get back to Alvin, he was a kind person, he made friends, he had friends all over the country. He gave each one a feeling of importance and dear friendship. And he truly was that, he was a very, very effective person, especially for Bob Ball. Bob would mention a problem and Alvin would wrestle with it all night with two or three or four of his staff or whatever was required, and do everything. He knew he was the greatest of all kinds of lieutenants who didn't have to be told what to do. He would be very quick to assume responsibility for something that he had failed to think about. You know, he'd say, "I should have thought about it," to remove the sense of his superiors saying to him, "Alvin, I want you to do this and this and that, and remember to do this." Alvin thought, or at least he acted like he believed, his superior only needed to name the subject and that he ought to be able to figure out all the things, and if he didn't, it was his fault.
With it all, it was very difficult to get people sometimes to put in the tremendous hours. They had family, and they needed to go home. But like Bob Ball, he persuaded them. Sometimes they would cuss, you know, when they left at 12 o'clock midnight or 1 o'clock in the morning. You know they say, "this is a lost chase, this is for nothing." And Bob Ball was known for running out every hit that didn't have a chance in hell. Bob would not think anything of having some of the Program Analysis Staff work around the clock, even if there was only one chance in a hundred. He wouldn't say, "No, there's practically no chance; we'd don't have to break our neck." For the program, any chance--and sometimes when there was no chance--he felt, "Well, maybe they'll change their mind." So it was very difficult to get staff, who were tired to begin with, to do this day after day, week after week.
Q: And what was your role in Program Analysis? What did you do?
Well, I did whatever needed to be done. I participated in the sessions where the problem was sketched out and we put our heads together. It was wonderful for me because I could participate in all those discussions fully as equal partners. It was a matter of shooting for some particular purpose. One had to really clarify what that purpose was in very specific terms; how it related to the public, translated into policy and all that.
But Alvin, as I said, was very generous in attributing expertness to me; not just competence, but expertness in dealing with all the issues, including policy issues, that came into the office. There was no distinction between Alvin and myself in terms of what I'd handle, except that of course, the Washington contacts would call Alvin. Bob Ball would naturally call Alvin. Alvin would be more often in Washington than I would be.
As I said, when I first came down to Alvin's place his desk was piled about two feet high with a whole bunch of stuff. Benny Mandel, Benjamin Mandel, the head of Statistics, was one problem case. Statistics was not a priority concern of Alvin's, it was a peripheral area put under his guidance; there was no other place to put it that was better. Mandel was a very aggressive guy--aggressive for his own advancement. Benjamin Mandel, not Mandel Benjamin, who was Chicago Area Chief, but Benjamin Mandel, was a very aggressive statistician, fairly competent in statistics. But he looked through glasses that saw only statistical problems or statistical matters. The outcome, as it affected him, was his obvious concern. That kind of a person was the hardest one for Alvin to deal with. Because he was innately courtly in his manner, and Benjamin was aggressive.
Another thing, he couldn't fire anybody. He would let the person hang on and on. Well, we had one fellow that we thought was going to be good. I remember we hired an information specialist, he was supposed to help us in a way different than the information specialists under Roy Swift and the other persons who headed BOASI and SSA's Information Office. The guy turned out to be an absolute dud; and also the kind of a person whom Alvin was too sensitive to deal with. He couldn't handle him. Well, when I got into the desk I reduced that desk to nothing.
Q: That stack of papers you mean, that you were talking about earlier?
Q: So you went through his stack of papers and disposed of all the actions?
When he came back in a month, his desk was clear. And he had some of these things hanging on there for maybe a year and a half or so. I fired this guy, he remained good friends with me, but I called him in, and I said, "You know, it ain't working out; you're just not working out. And we're just going to let you go." And we worked out something, a going that was fairly reasonable. He and I remained friends. I don't take these things personally.
But Benjamin Mandel was slightly different, he knew that Alvin did not create the hard conditions for him. He was so self-oriented, that he knew where his problem was, it was me. I made no bones about it. But he always kept trying. If you rebuffed him once, he'd come right back. With Alvin, that would have just made him grit his teeth. He just found difficulty being in the vicinity of persons like that. That's part of his unique personality; people loved him, and others who might not have loved him, would dwell on his uniqueness, you know. They would exaggerate those things only because they didn't see Alvin in the whole. You had to take his uniqueness as part of all of him and understand.
He was a magnificent contributor, behind the scenes, not an originator. I don't think he was particularly creative, but he appreciated creativity in others, and he was quick to discern it and give credit for it. But he himself was in there, the plodder; oh, I don't know whether I would say he was a plodder, but the guy you could count on, day in and day out to be in there pitching, doing his best.
I had the highest opinion of Alvin as a human being, and as an important contributor to the definition of Social Security. His staff then became extremely important in the development of Social Security, in the maturation of Social Security. After all, what happened in the case of Social Security was that they had ideas about Social Security coverage for a lot of areas. But they started with the part, Roosevelt started with the part which was easiest and most understandable, etc. Then there was hard, hard going to get coverage, which was the first indispensable area to improve upon, because without a universal program in the United States, or almost universal, the principles upon which the program would rest would be defeated. So coverage became extremely important. Farm coverage, public workers, public institutions, finding compromises for the self-employed, for the priests and for the clergy, and for the charitable organizations and all of those, had to be worked out; for State workers and so on. They were all worked out. They were not necessarily ideal solutions, by far, but the more we went, the better the program was, and the better financed the program was.
Coverage was especially important because everyone of those exceptions could, at some time, earn on a basis of short-term employment, benefits which would be disproportionate to their contributions, because they were coming at that as if the benefits were geared to low average wages. So if somebody was not covered and not paying taxes for a long period of time, and then they came in for a short period of time, they would qualify on the basis of these very generous provisions to provide insurance status for short-term workers. So coverage improved the financing of the program because it spread out the cost of the program more equitably to those who were ultimately going to get benefits.
Then of course, there was expansion of coverage in terms not just of who, but what. You had a disability freeze and then disability and so on. That meant a lot of other things, all of which Alvin was in the forefront of. He just got to know a lot of the staff and in the Congress and a lot of the important Congressmen. Congressmen were always writing to Program Analysis with problems that they needed to deal with and asked for language that would do something. So he was also running a service for the Congress, and for others, a technical service without distinction as to whether we favored it or didn't. But recognizing that we had an obligation to help the Congressmen present whatever ideas they had. And we gave it our best shot.


text:
Questions tagged [wild-card]
Wild cards are cards that can take on any value in a hand. They may be extra cards in the deck (jokers), or certain standard cards in the deck may be designated wild (for instance, all 2s could be wild cards). If all 2s are wild, and a person had the hand AA228, they would have four-of-a-kind.
3 questions
162 views
Are there any 5-card-draw games with the joker online?
I used to play a lot of this in gardena before holdem became popular. I did find some draw without the joker at poker stars a few years ago, but there were very few games. Is there any 5-card-draw ...
152 views
Who wins this game of high low Hurricane with wilds?
In a game of high low Hurricane with deuces and 2 jokers wild, who wins between one player with Ace joker and the other deuce deuce? Here are the rules we were going by: Players must declare whether ...
2k views
How does a wild card (53rd) affect the odds of making the standard poker hands?
By standard poker hands I mean: high card one pair two pair three of a kind straight flush full house four of a kind straight flush EDIT: five of a kind I'm curious if the ranking of hands should ...

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Relationships with
Photo Credit: Adelle Davis' picture is courtesy of Adelle Davis Foundation. Photographic illustrations of Adelle Davis are copyright © by their respective holders. The images are published with permission or as allowed by the copyright law's fair use or quotation provisions. If any copyright holder objects to an image being included, please notify us and it will be removed immediately.
Disclaimer: This information about Adelle Davis is derived from astrological interpretation of Adelle Davis' date, time, and place of birth.


text:
If the world can't even feed its children, can it send people to the moon?
Sadanand Dhume's article entitled "Debacle in New Delhi" was published in Foreign Policy recently. In the context of the fracas of the Commonwealth Games about to held in the Capital, Mr. Dhume's article asks, "[h]ow can India be a superpower if it can't build a bridge?" (an apparent reference to the collapse of a bridge near the Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium).
A couple of days ago, Ploughshares Fund president Joe Cirincione questioned the safety of India's nuclear plants, again, against the backdrop of "India's" apparent inability to build safe bridges (though, to be fair to Mr. Cirincione, he later apologized for making the comment, having been roundly pilloried by one and all).
The Games are a complete and utter mess. This is true. Anyone and their brother will hurl at you figures showing how much India has spent over and beyond its original budget. Stray animals roam the streets. Trees are being cut like they went out of fashion two years ago. Roofs collapse, so do beds. And Mani Shankar Aiyar is running out of people to attack.
But is this India's fault? Did the same entity that built the bridge that collapsed also make India a power? Many writers on the subject are painting with very broad strokes.
India is a power today not because of its government, but because of its private enterprise. In fact, one of the unfortunate repercussions of the meteoric rise of India's private sector is the singular incapability of the government to keep pace with the fillip provided to India's global profile by its private enterprise. India, many say, grows not because of its government, but despite it. True, were it not for economic reforms instituted by the Congress, beginning in 1991, India's private enterprise would not have succeeded like it has. But the government of the day chose to liberalize the economy only when faced with the possibility of bankruptcy.
These are issues that India — and the rest of the world — have always been well aware of. India's government is severely challenged to govern an India of 2010. The inefficiencies in government are well known — a bloated cabinet, archaic civil services, decrepit police services, lack of adequate parliamentary oversight, the list is endless — add in corruption and large levels of public apathy, and you have a recipe for disaster. To a large extent, when "public" governance was unable to affect its citizens, "private" governance stepped in. Had a consortium of India's companies been entrusted with managing, building and delivering the Commonwealth Games project, perhaps the situation might have been different. This is all water under the bridge now.
Dileep Premachandran's article in The Guardian argues that the Commonwealth Games fiasco shows all that is wrong with sport in India. Actually, it shows all that is wrong with government in India. The question that needs to be asked is, what will happen after the games conclude (by some miracle, without incident). Heads will roll, no doubt, but not of those that matter. Temporary public outrage will subside, and return to its default position of apathy — we've seen this script before.
Even if public anger didn't subside, by some miracle, and is reflected in subsequent elections, is there a national party in India that can replace the UPA? And even if such a party existed and was voted into power, would it have the courage and political will to institute the kinds of sweeping reforms necessary to bring governance in India into the 21st century? And if it didn't, would India's citizens even care? There are no easy answers.


text:
WDYH818 Battery Operated 12V Ride On Car Licensed Mercedes A45 Electric Vehicle
1.Supply to USA,Europe,and Austrilia 2.Pass the test of EN71,EN62115, US ASTM F9633.Professional Performance Ride On Car Supplier
4.The charging adapter with CE certificate This is a super value ride on car! Boys or girls aged 3+ years will love this quality ride on battery powered car, in the style of a strong design. Equipped with big seats, this ride on car will suit children up to 8 years. Powered by powerful motors and controlled by foot pedal, this robust and reliable car can achieve super riding game. With forward and reverse gears, this fun and unique model makes an ideal outdoor toy. This big and robust car will give up to children hour-after-hour of fun! ride on car , kids car , baby car , child car , toy car , kids electric car
NOTE: This toy should only be used on dry, flat/even, hard and level surfaces such as a cut lawn or patio. It should not be used on gradients, soft surfaces such as sand, gravel and mud OR uneven surfaces such as fields and paddocks.
This is the ride on car main configurations
Mainly we have 2 kind of motors for different type of cars ,one is type 390 motor for 6V cars,one is type 550 motor for 12V cars.
1.Durable carton board(7 layers for big car)2.Carton board/foam column at each corner of carton to make packing stronger3.Whole car in OPP bag to protect scratches4.Cars are partially disassembled to save space,and will be easily assembled when customer received it5.Every packing including USER MANUAL for using and assembling guide with pictures6.Free customer logo printing on carton and stickers on cars7.Charger&screw sets included
we load containers everyday for our customers all over the world.
1. OEM or ODM Manufacturing welcome:
We can design and develop new models for our customers.
Customized packing or logo on the ride on car and packing is acceptable for non-licensed ride on cars.2. Sample order is acceptable:
Sample orders like 1 or 2 pieces are accepted if our customer can arrange the shipping or accept our shipping quotation.3. We will reply you for your inquiry in 24 hours.
Customers can get in touch with us by Skype,Whatsapp,Wechat,Mobile etc ..,and we will reply within 1 hour.4. We will track the goods for you after shipping until you get the products. When you got the goods, test them, and give me a feedback.If you have any questions about the problem, contact us, we will offer the solution for you.
Hundreds of materials was well prepared in the material warehouse one week before mass production.
This automatic assembly line continuously run by circle with the car body,the worker do not need to move the car by hand.
The ride on car will be fully inspected after assembly before packing.
These vehicles are STRICTLY NOT for use on public highways, inclines, sand, slippery, soft or uneven terrain. Use only on flat terrain and avoid driving through rain puddles. Do NOT allow children to handle batteries or remove them from the vehicle. NEVER allow child to drive vehicle unless supervised by an adult. NEVER start the car without ensuring the child is properly seated. AVOID vehicle collisions with persons and objects at all times. Do NOT change forward/reverse gear without vehicle coming to a complete stop. When not in use do NOT park vehicle outside in high temperatures or near flammable areas.
Q1. What is your terms of packing?A: Generally, we pack our goods in neutral white boxes or brown cartons. If you have legally registered patent, we can pack the goods in your branded boxes after getting your authorization letters for the non-licensed ride on cars.Q2. What is your terms of payment?A: T/T 30% as deposit, and 70% before delivery. We'll show you the photos of the products and packages before you pay the balance.Q3. What is your terms of delivery?A: EXW, FOB, CFR, CIF, DDU.Q4. How about your delivery time?A: Generally, it will take 30 to 60 days after receiving your advance payment. The specific delivery time depends on the items and the quantity of your order.Q5. Can you produce according to the samples?A: Yes, we can produce by your samples or technical drawings. We can build the molds and fixtures.Q6. What is your sample policy?A: We can supply the sample if we have ready parts in stock, but the customers have to pay the sample cost and the courier cost.Q7. Do you test all your goods before delivery?A: Yes, we have 100% test before deliveryQ8: How do you make our business long-term and good relationship?A:
1. We keep good quality and competitive price to ensure our customers benefit ;2. We respect every customer as our friend and we sincerely do business and make friends with them, no matter where they come from.


text:
Droning a drowsy syncopated tune,
Rocking back and forth to a mellow croon,
Down on Lenox Avenue the other night
By the pale dull pallor of an old gas light
He did a lazy sway . .
He did a lazy sway . .
To the tune o' those Weary Blues.
With his ebony hands on each ivory key
He made that poor piano moan with melody.
O Blues!
Swaying to and fro on his rickety stool
He played that sad raggy tune like a musical fool.
Sweet Blues!
Coming from a black man's soul.
O Blues!
In a deep song voice with a melancholy tone
I heard that Negro sing, that old piano moan--
"Ain't got nobody in all this world
Ain't got nobody but ma self
I's gwine to quit ma frownin'
And put ma troubles on the shelf."
Thump, thump, thump, went his foot on the floor.
He played a few chords then he sang some more--
"I got the Weary Blues
And I can't be satisfied.
Got the Weary Blues
And can't be satisfied--
I ain't happy no mo'
And I wish that I had died."
And far into the night he crooned that tune.
The stars went out and so did the moon.
The singer stopped playing and went to bed
While the Weary Blues echoed through his head.
He slept like a rock or a man that's dead.
The upbeat poem The Weary Blues is the first poem Hughes won an award for.
Unlike most of the poems of its time, this masterpiece does not have a strict rhyme pattern or outline, yet still conveys a musical rhythm.


text:
Function galore! The Swift Straw Bottle features a Tritan䋢 body with a silicone sleeve for easy gripping, an integrated carry handle with a soft touch finish, an easy open tab that covers the spout to provide a clean surface for drinking and an easy to clean design. This bottle easily goes from the gym or yoga to your desk and looks good while doing so.
Item #:00070132
36 ounces (1.06 liters)
0.87 lbs
0.4 kgs
Exterior Dimensions ( L x W x H ):
4.35" x 3.42" x 10.42"
11.04 cm x 8.68 cm x 26.46 cm
Hand wash your bottle and cap with warm soapy water before first use. Bottle and cap are top shelf dishwasher safe. Store bottle with cap off to allow to dry completely. Do not use with hot liquids. Do not freeze your bottle or cap. Do not place bottle on stove or in the microwave. Do not use bleach, chlorine or cleaners with harsh abrasives to clean your product.
This Igloo product is guaranteed against manufacturing defects for its lifetime. If a manufacturing defect is found, we will be happy to repair or replace your product. Proof of purchase must be provided upon request in order to verify warranty coverage. Please retain purchase receipts for your records.


text:
Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: ksmirnov
Nick Cox <email@example.com>
Re: st: ksmirnov
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:43:54 +0100
You have not answered my previous question on the precise generating
process you envisage, including dependence structure. Nor have you
commented on my previous suggestion to look at -arch-.
This is no more precise: "more powerful" and "best fit" are not well defined.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Guessab Houda
<firstname.lastname@example.com> wrote:
> Nick
> I already fitted a Student t-distribution to my historic returns with the degrees of freedom selected so that the kurtosis of the Student t-distribution matches that of the sample kurtosis. I just wanted to know if there is a more powerful method to do it in STATA. In fact, i was wondering also if I could do it with other methodologies (ex:MLE) in order to take the best fit applying komogolov smirnov!
> Houda GUESSAB
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.com [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
> Sent: mardi 21 août 2012 15:45
> To: firstname.lastname@example.com
> Subject: Re: st: ksmirnov
> As usual, I agree with Maarten when he agrees with me, and versa vice.
> The strategic issues in my view include attempting to summarize lack
> of fit in one number and conflating an estimation problem with a
> decision problem.
> About a decade ago I persuaded StataCorp to include a quotation from
> Rupert Miller on the limitations of Kolmogorov-Smirnov within the
> manual entry [R] diagplots. That quotation still seems cogent to me.
> It's quite widely documented that K-S with parameters estimated from
> the data is problematic. Houda started this thread apparently
> _knowing_ that df = 8 but ended it wanting to know how to estimate it,
> so the aims here are a moving target.
> Incidentally, fashions change on transliteration, but as far as I know
> Kolmogorov or possibly Kolmogoroff (resp. Smirnov and Smirnoff) are
> the only widely accepted renderings of those names in English. (I am
> not ignoring other languages; I just don't know anything about their
> rules here.) At least hereabouts there is a vodka brand named
> Smirnoff. There are several Russian speakers on this list (e.g Stas
> Kolenikov) who may be able to comment.
> Nick
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Maarten Buis <firstname.lastname@example.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Guessab Houda wrote:
>>> Nick told me that it's not correct to use kormogolv smirnov to compare the shape of series with a student distribution, is there another numerical method (not graphical)to do that?
>> Long standing members of this list will not be surprised that Nick and
>> I agree on this point. To put it in another way, you seem to want to
>> summarize difference between the shape of a variable and a theoretical
>> curve in one number. By necessity this will throw away a huge amount
>> of information. Even if you thought that that was acceptable, than
>> you'd still have to consider very carefully what that number is
>> measuring and what it is not measuring. In all likelihood it is not
>> measuring what you think it measures.
>> -- Maarten
>> ---------------------------------
>> Maarten L. Buis
>> Reichpietschufer 50
>> 10785 Berlin
>> Germany
>> http://www.maartenbuis.nl
>> ---------------------------------
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> Ai sensi del D.Lgs. 196/2003 si precisa che le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate ed a uso esclusivo del destinatario. Qualora il messaggio in parola Le fosse pervenuto per errore, La invitiamo ad eliminarlo senza copiarlo e a non inoltrarlo a terzi, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Grazie.
> Pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, you are hereby informed that this message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, and have received this message by mistake, please delete it and immediately notify us. You may not copy or disseminate this message to anyone. Thank you.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


text:
As soft as wool and cosy underfoot, you'd never believe it but each of our machine washable rugs is made from up to 3000 recycled plastic bottles.
Available in a range of gorgeous designs and practical sizes, our recycled plastic rugs are easy to clean, stain-resistant and extremely hard-wearing. They are also moth resistant and completely uninteresting to dust mites and other critters, making them perfect in homes with pets and allergy sufferers.
From kitchens to bathrooms, hallways to gardens, the water-resistant nature of our rugs means they work just as well outdoors on terraces and in summer houses as they do inside; they even make great camping rugs and add a layer of comfort in a tent or yurt.
Know your weave: Our range of gorgeous bedroom, bathroom and living room rugs include our softer weave Herringbone, Provence, Diamond and Oslo designs, all made with a looser, open weave that ages just like an authentic wool product would. This means piling can occur in higher traffic areas. For a hardier option try any of our Juno, Kasbah, Henley Stripe, Nomad or Iris designs that make perfect hallway runners and kitchen rugs.
All of our washable rugs are available in a range of sizes, including an extra-long 2.4-metre runner rug.
Showing all 12 results


text:
Mary Jane Barclay Ford, lived a good life in Bristol, Connecticut. She married Jerome B. Ford and settle there. She was an heir to Alexander's estate and fortunately she stayed in Connecticut. By staying in Connecticut Mary has made it easier to find her.
Jerome B. Ford, born 28 October 1845 in Unionville, Hartford Co., Connecticut was the son of Omri/Onri Ford and Catherine Kent. He married Mary Jane Barclay on 17 June 1866 in Unionville, Hartford, Connecticut. I tried to get a copy from the City of Farmington but they do not have this marriage. I do find a source at the Family History Library and I will have to follow-up.
Mary and Jerome had three daughters:
1. Rosalie Ford was born about 1867 and died in 28 February 1886 in Bristol.
2. Melissa M. Ford, was born 17 January, 1871. She married on 21 November 1894 to a Frank Elmore Yale who was born about 1862 in Connecticut. He died 1915 in Connecticut. Frank was the son of Elmer Yale and Lucy A. Hart. Here is their marriage record:
Bristol, Nov. 15, 1894, Attest by Roger S. Newell, Deputy Registrar
Name of Groom: Frank E. Yale
Residence: Bristol
Age 32, white
Occupation Farmer
Born in Bristol,
First marriage
Father: Elmer Yale, American
Mother Lucy A. Hart, American
Name of the Bride: Lissie M. Ford
Residence: Bristol
Age 24, white
Place of birth Collinville, Conn.
First marriage
Name of father: Jerome B. Ford, American
Mother Mary Barkley, American
Bristol, Nov. 15, 1894 Frank E. Yale attests that the statements are true and signs on 15 day of Nov. 1894
Mr. Frank E. Yale and Miss Lissie M. Ford were legally joined in Marriage at Bristol, 21st day of Nov. 1894, Attest Geo. B. Dusinberre
Recorded 6th day of December 1894, Roger S. Newell, Deputy Registrar
Source: Marriage License, State of Connecticut, Bristol, Nov. 15, 1894 #186, Frank E. Yale to Lissie M. Ford.
Melissa and Frank had at least one child:
Alfred Jerome Yale who was born 25 October, 1895 in Connecticut and died 26 Dec. 1965 in San Diego, California. He is buried at Fort Rosecrans, Pt. Loma, San Diego, California. I have that he married Hannah Bertha Kessler born 20 June 1883 in Rochester, Lorain, Ohio but according to the obituary at his gravesite on Find A Grave he was married to an Eleanor and had a daughter.
UPDATE 10/1/2015: I have had the opportunity to visit Alfred's grave in the Fort Rosecrans National Cemetery in San Diego on September 18, 2015. Alfred is buried in the W section of the cemetery on the western side. Here is a photo of his tombstone. More information about my visit to him is in the posted dated 9/27/2015 Fort Rosecrans National Cemetery, San Diego, California on the Solomon Goss in Fearing Twp. in Ohio blog – see right side of this blog for link.
3. Annie Barclay Ford was born about 1876 in Connecticut and she married Henry A. Yale born 1859 in Connecticut. They had 6 children: Elmer, Frank, Rozelia, Annie, Ida, and infant. All these children were born the end of the 1800's.
Henry was also a son of Elmer and Lucy (Hart) Yale. Here is Henry and Anna's marriage record.
Henry A. Yale 32, Salesman, 1st marriage, Bristol, parents Elmer and Lucy (Hart) and Anna B. Ford, Bristol, 16 years old, at home, 1st marriage, born Collinsville, Ct., parents Jerome B. & Mary J (Bartlett). The license was obtained in Chicopee, Hampden Co., Massachusetts and registered by the town clerk John D. White.
Source: Massachusetts Town and Vital Records, Intentions of Marriage and Marriages Solemnized, 22 November 1891, Bristol, Connecticut, Henry A. Yale and Anna B. Ford, page 183 Nov. 22, 1891.
Brother James Barclay and was living with his sister Mary Ford in 1870. Let's revisit this census information:
Line 27, 493 – Living with Ely, Adolph, 583 Ford, Jerome B., 24, M, W, Laborer all born Connecticut, 11, Janitor, Ford Mary 27 F, W, Keeping House, Ford Rosaliee, 3, F, W. Barclay, James, 21, M, W, Laborer.
Source; Jerome Ford Family, 1870 U.S. Federal Census, Southington, Hartford Co., Connecticut, pg. 65, enumerated 29 June 1870, Deenis P. Farch.
By 1880 Mary and Jerome moved to Bristol, Connecticut and remained there for the rest of their lives.
196/124 Ford, Jerome B. White, male, age 33, Machinist, born Conn., Father born Conn, Mother born in Mass. Mary J. Ford, age 36, Rozelie Ford age 12, Melissa Ford age 9 and Anna B. Ford 4 yrs. All 3 children at school. All born in Connecticut, parents and the children.
Source: Jerome Ford Family, 1880 U.S. Federal Census, Bristol, Connecticut, pg. 11, SD #2, ED 25, 5 June, 1880.
They are still in the same location in 1900 and we find Jerome and Mary with daughter Lizzie nearby.
11/12 Frank E. Yale, age 38, born Dec. 1861, white, married, 5 years, birthplace Connecticut, head, spouse is Lizzie M., white. Lizzie M. Yale wife, age 29 born Jan 1871, married 5 years, one child born one living. Alfred J. Yale age 8. Oct. 1896. All born in Connecticut. Occupation of Frank, farmer.
12/13 Ford, Jerome B., Head, male born Oct. 1846, married 34 years, born in Conn. both parents born in Conn. machinist. Mary J. wife, female, born Dec. 1844 age 66, married 34 years, 3 children born 2 living. born in Connecticut, Father in Scotland, Mother in Scotland, proprietor machine shop.
Source: Frank Yale and Jerome B. Ford, 1900 U.S. Federal Census, Bristol, Hartford Co., Connecticut, SD#26, ED #120?, enumerated on 12-13th June, 1900 by E. Manchester.
Annie, their daughter, moved to New York with her husband Henry A. Yale.
26/27 Yale, Henry A., Head, white, male, Jan. 1859, 41 years old, married 9 yrs., born Conn, both parents born in Conn. Peddler (vegetables) can read and write. Annie, wife, white, female, born July 1874, 25 years old, married 9 years, 6 children born, 6 living, born in Connecticut, both parents born in Conn. can read and write.
Yale, Elmer, age 8 Feb 1892,
Frank Yale age 6 July 1893,
Rozelia Yale age 5 July 1894,
Annie Yale age 4 May 1896,
Ida Yale age 2 Aug 1897
and infant no name Yale age 2/12 March 1900.
All children born in New York. Elmer and Frank at school.
Source: Henry A. Yale Family, 1900 U.S. Federal Census, Brookhaven, Suffolk, New York, Sht#2, SD 2, ED 750, June 1 and 2, 1900.
Jerome and Mary continued to reside in Bristol, Connecticut. They where there in 1910 and Frank and Melissa were still close.
Line 40/48 – Ford, Jerome B. age 65, born about 1845 in Connecticut, Father was born in Connecticut, Mother born in Massachusetts. Spouse is Mary J. Married 45 years (1865), White, male. Mary J. Ford, age 66. Married, female, white. 3 Children born, 2 living. Born in Connecticut. Father born in New York, mother born in Scotland. He is a machinist in a machine shop.
Line 38/46 Yale (Gale), Frank. E., head, age 48, born in Connecticut, father and mother both born in Connecticut. Spouses name is Melissa M., Married, male. Melissa M. Yale age 39, Alfred J. Yale age 14. Married 15 years (1895). Melissa has one child born one living. Melissa was born in Connecticut and both parents were also born in Connecticut. Occupation (can't read).
Source: Jerome Ford and Frank Yale Families, 1910 U.S. Federal census, Bristol, Connecticut, sht# 3B. SD No. 27, ED 132, April 3, 1910.
Meanwhile Anna, the sister, continued to live in New York and appears in the 1910 census there.
Line 76, 64, 145, 145 Yale, Henry A. Head, M1, W, 51, M, 19, Connecticut, parents Connecticut, English, dealer, Fruit & Groceries, OH. Yale, Anna, wife, F, W, 34, M1, 19, 10 born, 7 living, born Connecticut, parents born Connecticut, All children born in New York, Yale, Charles, son, 18, S, English, occupation unreadable, Gen. Work. Yale, Sarah, daughter, 15, S.Yale, Ida, daughter 12, S.Yale, Susan, daughter 10, S
Yale, Henry, son, 8, S.Yale, Frances, son, 5, S.Yale, William, son, 3/12, S.
Source: Henry Yale Family, 1910 U.S. Federal Census, Patchoque, Brookhaven, New York. SD#132, ED#1355 (many edits to districts), Sht#26, enumerated on 17 May, 1910, [S.C. Callius].
So what happened to Melissa, well after Frank's death in 1915, She remarried to an Alvah L. Tilton. They were together in the 1920 census.
Line 16, 248, 349, Tilton, Alvah L., Head, 0, M, M, W, 35, M, yes yes, born Vermont, father Vermont, mother New Hampshire, [forger], Ball bearing shop, W, 138. Tilton, Melisa M, wife, F, W, 48, M, yes, yes, born Connecticut, both parents born in Connecticut.
Source: Alvah Tilton Family, 1920 U.S. Federal Census, Forestville Village Bristol City , Hartford Co., Connecticut, SD# 1 Concession, ED# 12, Ward 2, Sht# 19, enumerated on 17 and 19th of January, 1920, by Erwin R. Rowe.
Melisa was in the 1930 U.S. Federal Census for Bristol, Connecticut. She was widowed and living alone. She had $10,000.
Melisa's son Alfred was in California in the 1930 census;
[Dehiss Road] Line 11, 348, 357, Yale, Alfred J., Head,), $45,000, yes, M, W, 37, M, 22, no, yes, Connecticut, parents born in Connecticut, yes, Lumber piler, Lumber Company. Yale, Bertha H., wife of H, F, w, 35, M, 20, no, yes, born Ohio, father born Indiana, mother Ohio, yes, Farmer, general farm. Hofflund, Mary E, stepdaughter, F, W, 15, S, yes, yes, California. Hoffland, Phyllis B., step-daughter, F 2, 15 S, yes, yes, California. Hoffland, Charles A., step-son, M, W, 12, S, yes, yes, California. The father was born in Illinois and mother in Ohio.
Source: Alfred Yale Family, 1930 U.S. Federal Census, El Cajon Twp., San Diego County, California, ED#37-2, SD#21, Enumerated April 17, 1930 by Everett J. Mills.
We find that Melisa headed to California and was living with Alfred and his wife in the 1940 U.S. Federal Census in San Diego, California. She died in 1947.
Line 34, 82, 0, 3000, n10 Yale, Alfred, head, M, W, 44, M, No. C-2, Connecticut, Same house, yes, 40, Lumber Piler, Retail lumber, PW 988, 73, 1, 48, 0 yes, 68 farm schedule.
Yale, [Dixie], wife, F, W, 38, m, No, C-5, Ohio, Same house, Newspaper correspondence, newspaper, PW,
Tilton, Melissa, Mother, F, W, 69, Wd, No, H03, Connecticut, R, Hartford, Connecticut, No, No, No, No, No, U.
______daughter, counted elsewhere
Source: Alfred Yale Family, 1940 U.S. Federal Census, El Cajon, San Diego Co., California, SD#20, ED 37-15, Sht#4A, Enumerated on 4/8/1940 by Edward A. Bodie.
At this time I do not know what happened to Annie nor do I have the death dates and burial location for Henry and Annie Ford Yale. She was a widow in 1917 during her mother's probate. I cannot find her in the census and am having trouble even find her children.
I did find a military file for Charles E. Yale whom I believe is Henry and Annie's oldest child and son. His middle name might be Elmer. He appears in the WWI Draft Cards:
Charles E. Yale, age 25, Address: Bay Av. Patchoque, NY, date of birth Feb. 25, 1893, natural born, born Bellport, NY, driver, C.St. Vroonamn?, Patchoque, NY,no dependents, Single, Caucasian, short, medium, eyes gray, dark brown hair. signed by R.A. Newton, Precint 19, Suffolk Co., NY.
Source: Charles E. Yale, #64, WWI Draft Cards – Registration Card, #2547, Suffolk County, New York #31-5-9-A two pages.
In the next post I will share about the deaths of Mary J. Barclay Ford and Jerome Ford her husband.


text:
NOR Tigerfish
Build :2007 by Jaya Asiatic Shipyard – Batam in Indonesia, nr 860 as NOR Sky
I know that heli-decks are the latest "must have-accessory" in the offshore vessel world but in my opinion this is just a little bit over the top. Or actually: quite a bit OTT.
It's like the shy gentle kid at school suddenly going all wild and showing up one day with a big pink mohawk.
At least the crew doesn't have to bother filling up the forepeak ballast water tank anymore.
Here she is in her "gentle"-period.
Thansk again to Denis for the tip!


text:
LOOKING FOR AN ANSWER: Announce First Ever UK Tour
Old school Spanish grinders Looking For An Answer have just announced a nine day headlining UK tour with The Day Man Lost. The tour, marking the bands first time in the UK, kicks off March 22nd in Manchester and runs through March 30th. Additionally, the band will be performing a run of dates in Spain with Extreme Noise Terror this April. A complete listing of dates can be found below.
The band is touring in support of 2011's pulverizing Relapse debut Eterno Treblinka. The album can currently be heard in its entirety via Bandcamp.
LOOKING FOR AN ANSWER Tour Dates:
***March 22 – March 30th All dates with The Day Man Lost***
March 22 Manchester, UK Gullivers Bar w/Hammers, Fetus Christ, Huffin Paint, Swinelord
March 23 Bristol, UK The Frathouse w/Oblivionized, Atomck, Human Cull, Disfortune
March 24 London, UK The Unicorn w/Oblivionized, Atomck, Human Cull, Cease to Exist
March 25 Brighton, UK TBC
March 26 Oxford, UK The Wheatsheaf w/Bersicker, Chemical Tomb
March 27 Nottingham, UK The Chameleon w/Swinelord, Talking is Over
March 28 Newcastle, UK The Kings Manor w/Prolefeed, Diseased Maggotectomy
March 29 Edinburgh, UK Bannerman´s w/ Prolefeed, Scatorgy, Wheelchairx4, Deathwank, Anencephalic
March 30 Bradford, UK The 1 in 12 w/Fear of Extinction, Rectal Implosion
***April 18-20 All dates with Extreme Noise Terror***
April 18 Madrid Spain Rockstar Music Hall w/Forenssick
April 19 Donosti, Spain TBA
April 20 Barcelona, Spain Estraperlo club del ritme w/Almax, Bacteria Forte


text:
Jack Granatstein will be the guest speaker at the 24th annual Heritage Dinner on May 2, 2014 at 5:30 pm. at the Huronia Museum, Midland, Ontario.
He will talk about his current work on the last 100 days of World War I, its losses and the unbelievable impact these days had on Canada.
In addition to a sit-down and served dinner, there will be a silent auctions and dessert auctions taking place.
Tickets are $75 with a $40 tax receipt available. Tickets can be purchased online at http://huroniamuseum.com/2014/03/26/3702 or at the museum directly at 549 Little Lake Park Road, Midland Ontario.
You call 705.526.2844 for more information.


text:
Koeman has been handed a three-year contract to replace Mauricio Pochettino, who left for Tottenham after guiding the Saints to eighth in the Barclays Premier League last season
The former Holland international is joined at St Mary's by his older brother Erwin, who has been named assistant first team manager, and Jan Kluitenberg, who will be an assistant and fitness coach.
Koeman said in a statement: "I am thrilled to be the manager of Southampton Football Club.
"From my very first meeting with (executive director) Les Reed, I could see clearly that this was the right club for me
We share the same philosophy of football, and the same belief in how to develop the club.
"Southampton have a talented first-team squad, a world-class academy and the infrastructure to sustain success in the Premier League.
"The opportunity to continue the development of this famous football club was simply too good to turn down
I cannot wait to get started."
Koeman resigned from his previous post at Feyenoord last month having led the team to second, third and second during his three years at the club.
The 51-year-old has won the Dutch title with both Ajax and PSV Eindhoven, the Copa del Rey at Valencia and coached Vitesse, Benfica and AZ Alkmaar during a 14-year managerial career.
His reputation for employing an attacking brand of football and committing to the promotion of young talent will sit well with Southampton who have nurtured the likes of Theo Walcott, Gareth Bale, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, Adam Lallana and Luke Shaw in recent seasons.
Executive director Reed said: "From the moment we met with Ronald, it was clear he had the vision and ambition to take our club forward, that he shared our football philosophy and could see the opportunity to move our club to the next level.
"The club, the players and the fans will all be excited to have a man of Ronald's experience at the very highest level joining our club.
"Ronald's passion for the opportunity here at St Mary's was very clear, and we look forward to continuing our growth with him as part of our team."
One of Koeman's first priorities will be to bring stability and direction to the club by resolving the futures of key players.
As well as Pochettino, Rickie Lambert has already left the club, while Lallana, Shaw, Calum Chambers and Dejan Lovren have all been linked with moves away.
Saints will be hoping Koeman's pedigree as both a manager and player will carry weight with the club's top talents.
In a glittering career that included spells at PSV, Ajax and Barcelona, the defender won four Eredivisie titles, four Primera Division titles and two European Cups - the second of which saw him score the winner in a 1-0 win over Sampdoria in 1992.
Koeman also won the European Championship in 1988 with Holland, for whom he played 75 times, and was named Dutch Footballer of the Year in 1987 and 1988.
Southampton will also name a new goalkeeping coach in the near future to replace Toni Jimenez, who followed Pochettino to Tottenham.
Source : PA
Source: PA


text:
"Gripping…. An excellent introduction to one of the most controversial events in Western American history, one that still stirs strong passions today." –The New York Times Book Review
"Vivid and hair-raising…. An entertaining and impressive contribution." –Chicago Tribune
"The atrocity was so bewildering that it demands the careful investigation and eloquent recounting that it receives." —The Boston Globe


text:
By Bonnie K. Goodman
Ms. Goodman is the Editor of History Musings. She has a BA in History & Art History & a Masters in Library and Information Studies from McGill University, and has done graduate work in history at Concordia University. Ms. Goodman has also contributed the overviews, and chronologies in History of American Presidential Elections, 1789-2008, 4th edition, edited by Gil Troy, Fred L. Israel, and Arthur Meier Schlesinger to be published by Facts on File, Inc. in late 2011.
Romney Wins Arkansas, Kentucky Primaries, Outperforms Obama in Both States
Source: ABC News Radio, 5-22-12
Emmanuel Dunand/AFP/Alex Wong/Getty Images
Mitt Romney's victories Tuesday night in Arkansas and Kentucky may have been foregone conclusions, but besides two more batches of delegates on his way to the 1,144 he needs to clinch the Republican presidential nomination, they also gave him something else — bragging rights over President Obama.
In Kentucky, Romney, who is expected to clinch the nomination after the Texas primary on May 29, received a higher percentage of the vote in the Republican presidential primary than Obama received in the Democratic presidential primary. With 99.9 percent of precincts reporting, Romney had 67 percent of the vote, while Obama had 58 percent….READ MORE
Romney inches closer to GOP nomination with sweep: Mitt Romney is creeping ever closer to ditching the 'presumptive' tag in his quest for the Republican presidential nomination. Romney swept the Kentucky and Arkansas Republican presidential primaries yesterday…. – AP, 5-23-12
- Kentucky and Arkansas: Romney romps, Obama struggles, also rans remain also rans: With the presidential nominees of both parties already decided, it is tempting to forget that some states are still holding primaries. June 5th offers contests in California, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico…. – Washington Times, 5-23-12
- Ky., Ark. primaries push Romney toward inevitable nomination: Tuesday's presidential primaries in Kentucky and Arkansas served one major function: ensuring that Mitt Romney can lock-up the delegates he needs to secure the nomination when Texas votes next week…. – USA Today, 5-22-12
- Sweep assures his GOP nod: Mitt Romney won all 42 delegates in Kentucky and 21 of 33 in Arkansas. He spent Tuesday evening fund-raising in New York…. – Philadelphia Inquirer, 5-23-12
- Mitt Romney inches closer to GOP nomination with sweep: Mitt Romney speaks in Lansing, Mich. Romney is looking to pad his lead in the race for convention delegates in Republican presidential primaries Tuesday in Arkansas and Kentucky as he inches closer to the nomination he's all but certain to win…. – Chicago Sun-Times, 5-23-12


text:
Alright, I'm not gonna' lie. This is probably a silly problem for all you veterans, but I'm very (VERY) fresh in the art of Java code-writing, so forgive the noobishness.
I'm writing an equals()-method for my program which looks like this:
public boolean equals(Object objekt) { Pasientjournal middlertidig = (Pasientjournal)objekt; if (this.getID() == middlertidig.getID()) return true; else return false; }
But whenever i try to actually compare anything i get tossed a:
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to Pasientjournal at Pasientjournal.equals(Pasientjournal.java:35) ... ... ...
Now, like i said, I'm rather fresh here, so could someone toss me a short explanation of what's wrong?
Or maybe just toss me the correct version of my faulty code?
("middlertidig" is btw just my native tongue for "temporary")
Thanks so much for the help guys!


text:
View our projects
Heesen 4700 D Series
For many of the yachts to leave the succesful Heesen Yard, we have been involved as consultants or as naval architects. This was also the case for the Heesen 4700 Displacement Series.
Besides often carrying out the total naval architecture work for the yachts, we are usually involved with many propulsion and performance related aspects of the yachts, design of tank test programs and comissioning, speed and power predictions and propeller design, advice regarding the hull form and appendages and seakeeping aspects.


text:
Slippery slope: Site work irks neighbors
If Charlottesville cohousers were dead, they might be rolling over in their graves. That's because the five-acre parcel they used to own at the end of St. Charles Avenue now resembles, they say, a clear-cut.
Some neighbors of the site fear that the steep grading and tree-cutting on the long ravine leading down to Meadow Creek will spell disaster for the Creek's fragile ecosystem.
Where the Charlottesville Cohousing Association once hoped to build 25 ecofriendly dwellings and a community center, Southland Homes is making way for 24 new houses. Southland purchased the site from the cohousers back in July for $650,000, after the cohousers had built one model home. Cohousers' costs had climbed so high that finding buyers in the $250,000-300,000 range who wanted to share maintenance chores and sup together wasn't feasible.
Southland is aiming for that same price range and plans to demolish the model house– after perhaps letting the fire department burn the structure to practice their skills.
Calhoun Street resident Garnet Mellen says she and her fellow Locust Grove Neighborhood Association members are frustrated by the way the project has unfolded. A wide expanse of red clay has replaced the lush greenery of the hill the cohousers once dreamed of living on.
During the recent overhaul of the city's zoning ordinance, she says, her association pushed to add development restrictions on steep slopes, widen setbacks along streams, and add protection for the Rivanna Trail.
Those provisions didn't make it to the ordinance, but Mellen has been named to the City's Stream Protection Task Force.
"Most of City Council and the candidates running have expressed their support of the amendment," says Mellen. "I personally feel calmed by their reassurance that they will not let this happen again."
Southland Homes owner Rich Carter did not return The Hook's calls by press time. However, Jim Tolbert, head of the city's zoning department, says Carter has "absolutely" followed the existing ordinance. He is not building in the flood plain, Tolbert says, and he has erected a silt fence to help catch erosion during the construction process.
Mellen and Association president Sarah Peaslee, once a cohousing member, say the silt fence is insufficient protection for Meadow Creek.
"The next big rain will blow out the fence," says Mellen, "and erosion will go down the hill and into the stream."
Peaslee says the neighborhood was assured that a "bio-filter"– a fancy drainage system to prevent chemical and debris runoff from entering the creek– would be part of the project.
But Tolbert says Carter still plans to put the filter in place as part of the final site plan. And while Tolbert acknowledges the silt fence could easily be washed away, he insists the city inspects it twice a week and would require Southland to replace it should it be damaged.
As for the status of the Rivanna Trail, things could be worse.
According to Rivanna Trails Foundation president Diana Foster, a new detour around the St. Charles site over an island in the creek was created a week ago. And while that detour might force some hikers to get their feet wet during a rainy season, it allows the path to continue uninterrupted.
Foster adds that Carter has worked with her group and is allowing the Trail to make its way back up onto the new subdivision.
"I think this is a new experience for him, having public trails close to his property," Foster explains. She says she thinks Carter's initial reluctance to let hikers use the land stemmed from his safety concerns about having them near large construction equipment.
"I think in time he will see that it's an amenity to the neighborhood, and that if we have to move the trail closer, he might be agreeable," she says.
While Mellen and Peaslee acknowledge it's too late to do anything about the present project, they both hope this will be the last time a development is built without stream protection laws in place.
But that hope doesn't remove all the sting– especially for would-be cohouser Peaslee.
"Cohousing was very environmentally attuned because they were going to cluster houses and preserve most of the woods," she says. "The point was not to do a lot of land moving– it totally wrecks the environment."
Paradise lost?


text:
Chad Mahaffey has been the head athletic trainer at Southern Virginia University since 2005, overseeing athletic training for the university's 22 athletic teams. He is also an adjunct instructor of physical education courses.
Mahaffey came to Southern Virginia from Brigham Young University where he served as a graduate assistant trainer for the Cougars' 2004 track and field season. He also served as the first assistant athletic trainer for the BYU football team in 2003.
Prior to his time at BYU, Mahaffey gained athletic training experience working with several organizations, including the San Francisco 49ers (2003), the New York Jets (2002), the Utah Iron Man Triathlon (2001) and the Junior Olympics Volleyball Tournament (2001).
Mahaffey has a B.S. in athletic training and master's degree in sports medicine from BYU. He is certified in First Aid, CPR and AED, is a certified member of the National Athletic Training Association and is a licensed athletic trainer in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
He and his wife, Michelle, reside in Buena Vista with their four children.


text:
Human rights were the big story of the 2008 Summer Games in Beijing right up until the time the athletes, spectators and sports writers arrived. All that mattered then was the big, happy spectacle and the daily tally of gold medals. And, after everyone went home, the Chinese went back to business as usual. Just as the Russians will.
Russia is obviously the bad guy in all of this. But the International Olympic Committee should be in the spotlight as well.
There is a well-crafted Olympic charter espousing equality and human rights, but the IOC has never been bold enough to enforce it.
Before Russia and China were chosen as host countries, IOC members were well aware that both have terrible human rights records.
While the IOC contends that athletes, spectators and journalists covering the games will be exempt from the anti-gay law, its members and staff negotiated what seems to be an absolutely toothless, useless agreement. Russian sports minister Vitaly Mutko says outside the Olympic zone, anyone who spreads "propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations" to minors whether it's online, wearing a rainbow pin, carrying a banner or holding hands could be fined up to $3,125, jailed for up to 15 days and deported.
The IOC could have at least ensured there would be a pride house in the Olympic zone, as there was in both London and Vancouver. But it didn't. It left it to the national Olympic committee and, pretty clearly, Russian committee members weren't about to risk their own careers, safety or security by providing a safe and comfortable place for gay athletes to meet.
There are calls for a boycott. But, as the Russians well know, the IOC has never cancelled an Olympics even when close to half the member countries refused to participate. And the Russian government knows better than most that not a single country targeted has ever been swayed by a boycott.
The IOC didn't cancel the 1980 Summer Games in Moscow even though only 80 countries showed up and nearly 60 — including Canada — stayed away to protest the Russian invasion of Afghanistan. It was nine years before Russia finally retreated.
The 1976 Summer Olympics in Montreal went ahead even though 22 African nations boycotted the games as a protest against New Zealand's rugby tour of South Africa during apartheid. It was another 18 years before apartheid ended.
The efficacy of boycotts aside, there's also considerable hypocrisy among the potential boycotting nations. If rights are so important, why didn't countries stay away from Beijing? It's probably because trade almost always trumps human rights.
And, if the United States boycotts these Games, it's as likely to be because Russia took in Edward Snowden, who leaked secret documents, than out of concern for human rights.
And while Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird is all over the gay rights' issue, where were he and the government when the IOC refused to allow women to compete in ski jumping at the Vancouver Olympics? Why haven't Canada, Baird and others protested the IOC's failure to expel countries that don't have women's teams and don't even allow women to participate in sports?
There is no doubt that the law targeting gays, lesbians, bisexual and transgender people is hateful and could incite violence, as Baird has said.
But lost in the international outrage is that it is only a small piece of Russia's egregious human rights record. Why aren't we also talking about the forced evictions of Sochi residents to make way for Olympic construction, random detentions, the jailing of dissidents including chess champion Gary Kasparov and members of the punk band Pussy Riot, the harassment and threats against journalists?
The bottom line is that the Russian government doesn't give a fig about human rights; the IOC is little better. Both need to change.
Yet rather than a boycott that denies athletes a chance to live a dream that they've spent a lifetime pursuing, let them play.
For people who care about human rights, a more powerful message could be sent to both Russia and the IOC, if we voted with our feet and our wallets, refusing to go to Russia and refusing to support the Olympic Games in anyway — even if it means turning off our TV sets during the gold-medal hockey games.


text:
HAHR Animal Adoption Event
Loading Map....
Date(s) - 12/26/2018
6:00 pm - 8:00 pm
Heaven After Hell Rescue
Come on out and join HAHR for our Adoption Event. Please feel free to come out and take a look at all the animals we currently have up for adoption. These are good for meet and greets, or to take a special animal home.


text:
Jury selection in Kennebunk prostitution trial begins
Mark Strong facing 59 misdemeanor charges
Jury selection in the trial of Mark Strong Sr. will spill into a second day.
The 57-year-old Thomaston insurance agent is accused of promotion of prostitution and invasion of privacy.
Prosecutors say Strong and former Zumba instructor Alexis Wright ran a prostitution business in Kennebunk.
Both Strong and Wright have pleaded not guilty to all charges.
About 250 potential jurors in Strong's case reported to York County Superior Court in Alfred on Tuesday morning.
After hours of questioning, Justice Nancy Mills dismissed 50 of the would-be jurors on Tuesday afternoon.
Dan Lilley, Strong's defense attorney, told News 8 that he hopes to seat a jury by noon on Wednesday.
Mills released the 40-question questionnaire that jurors filled out.
One question asks potential jurors if they know any of the 72 people who may be called as witnesses in Strong's case.
The potential witness list includes the names of law enforcement officials and men who've already pleaded guilty to engaging a prostitute as part of this case.
One question reads: "You may be shown explicit videos and photographs depicting individuals engaged in graphic sexual acts. Would viewng this evidence make it difficult for you to listen to the law and evidence and render a fair and impartial verdict?"
Another question reads: "If the evidence shows that Alexis Wright was a prostitute, would the fact that Defendant Mark Strong had a sexual relationship with her, not for money, make it difficult for you to find Defendant Mark Strong not guilty of the crime of Promotion of Prostitution?"
Strong's trial is scheduled to last between two and three weeks.
Wright's trial will be held some time in May.


text:
Immelt is set to argue GE's case to officials, including France's economy minister Arnaud Montebourg, and union leaders.
This is the third time that he has visited Paris since GE officially made its EUR 12.35 billion for the French manufacturer's power business.
Winning over the French government is key to the bid's success as the authorities have increased their powers, essentially giving themselves the power of veto over any deal.
The government is looking to push GE towards allowing a minority stake to remain in French hands. It is also pressing for greater guarantees over French jobs.
Siemens and Mitsubushi Heavy Industries put forward a competing bid this week that would leave large parts of the company controlled by Alstom. The EUR 7 million bid would leave the wind division untouched.
While this might be looked on more favourably by the government, the German press has reported that Alstom is keener on the more lucrative GE bid.