text:
The Arab version of the tragic fate of Arab refugees who fled from British Mandatory Palestine before and during the 1948 war, and from Israel immediately after the war, has so thoroughly dominated the thinking of even well-educated historians, commentators, journalists and politicians, that it is almost a given that the creation of the State of Israel caused the flight of almost a million hapless, homeless, helpless and hopeless Arab refugees. Israel caused the problem and thus Israel must solve the problem.
This assertion, although viscerally engaging and all but canonized by the anti-Israel left (including the Arab-dominated UN)and the core of its narratives of the Middle East conflict, is unequivocally and utterly false.
Origins of the Problem
The details of the process whereby the approximately 725,000 Arab residents of British Mandatory Palestine in Cis-Jordan achieved refugee status and endured
brutal oppression and unmitigated suffering at the hands of their host Arab countries are described in Part II below ("the Eight Stages of Creation"). The bottom line itself is very straightforward and simple:
The State of Israel was created in a peaceful and legal process by the United Nations. The UN partition plan (resolution #181, November 29, 1947) created two states: the State of Israel for the Jews, and the State of Palestine for the Arabs.
The Arab refugees were people who fled because of the war, the Arab states started. The rulers of eight Arab countries whose populations vastly outnumbered the Jews initiated the war with simultaneous invasions of the newly created State of Israel on three fronts. Nascent Israel begged for peace and offered friendship and cooperation to its neighbors. The Arabs rejected this offer and answered it with a war of annihilation against the Jews, which fortunately failed. To this day the Arab states and the Palestinians refer to the failure of their aggression and the survival of Israel as the Nakhba – the catastrophe.
Had there been no Arab aggression, no war, no invasion by Arab armies whose intent was avowedly genocidal, not only would there have been no Arab refugees, but there would have been a state of Palestine on the West Bank and Gaza since 1948.
Israel offered to return land it had acquired in defending itself against the Arab aggression in exchange for a formal peace. It made this offer during the Rhodes Armistice talks and Lausanne conference in 1949. The Arab rulers refused. Had Israel's offer been accepted, there could have been prompt and just resolution to all the problems that have afflicted the region since. The only problem that wouldn't have been resolved to the satisfaction of the Arabs was their desire to obliterate the state of Israel. After their victory, Israel passed a law that allowed Arab refugees to re-settle in Israel provided they would sign a form in which they renounced violence, swore allegiance to the state of Israel, and became peaceful productive citizens. During the decades of this law's tenure, more than 150,000 Arab refugees have taken advantage of it to resume productive lives in Israel.
It should be completely obvious to any reasonable and fair-minded observer of this history, therefore, that it was not the creation of the State of Israel that caused the Arab refugee problem, nor was it Israel that obstructed its solution.
On the contrary, the Arab refugee problem was the direct result of the aggression of the Arab states, and their refusal after failing to obliterate Israel to sign a formal peace, or to take care of the refugees who remained outside Israel's borders.
The Jewish Refugees
There were other refugees from the Arab-Israeli conflict that everyone on the Arab side of the argument chooses conveniently to forget. Between 1949 and 1954 about 800,000 Jews were forced to flee from the Arab and Muslim lands where they had lived for hundreds and even thousands of years – from Iraq, Morocco, Tunisia, Jordan and Iran. These Jews were peaceful citizens of their Arab countries and in no way a hostile population. Nonetheless, they were forced at gun-point to flee with nothing but the clothes on their backs. The only reason for their expulsion was revenge against the Jewish citizenry of Arab countries for the shame of the Arab defeat in their war of aggression.
Most of these Jewish refugees came to Israel, where they were integrated into normalcy by the tiny fledgling Jewish state, which did for its own precisely what the Arab states (and later the PLO) have refused to do for theirs.
Some observers have suggested that this turn of events could be understood as a "population exchange" – Arabs fled to Arab countries as Jews fled to the Jewish country, both as a result of the 1948 war, both under conditions which their side regards as forced evacuations. On the other hand, no one on the Arab side has suggested the obvious: if Jewish refugees were resettled on land vacated by fleeing Arabs, why not resettle Arab refugees on the lands of Jews who were forced to flee the Arab countries. One reason no one has suggested this is that no Arab state with the exception of Jordan will even allow Palestinians to be citizens. Another point: Taking into account the assets of the Jewish refugees from Arab and Muslim lands, one can conclude that the Jews have already paid massive "reparations" to the Arabs whether warranted or not.
The property and belongings of the Jewish refugees, confiscated by the Arab governments, has been conservatively estimated at about $2.5 billion in 1948 dollars. Invest that money at a modest 6.5% over 57 years and you have today a sum of $80 billion, which the Arab and Muslim governments of the lands from which the Jews were expelled could apply to the benefit of the Arab refugees. That sum is quite sufficient for reparations to Arab refugees. There is no way of accurately assessing the value of Arab property left in Israel's control; but there are no estimates as high as a 1948 value of $2,500,000,000. So, hypothetically, the Arab side would be getting the better of such a deal.
The Arab Refugee Problem
Another irony must be considered in the context of the refugee issue. Israel handled its Jewish refugee problem by devoting massive resources to the education and integration of the Jewish refugee population into its society. These refugees never became a burden on the world, never needed the assistance of the United Nations, and never had their civil and human rights denied by their new host country. Instead, despite great hardship, early discrimination, difficult adjustments and initial privations, they and their offspring have become productive citizens of the Middle East's only democracy, and substantive contributors to one of the most technologically and socially advanced countries in the world.
The fate of the Arab refugees has been the diametric opposite of this obvious positive solution to their problem. Arab leadership has purposely kept their Palestinian brethren in the equivalent of concentration camps, maintained at a subsistence level, with their misery perpetuated by Machiavellian rulers to be used as a propaganda weapon against Israel and against the west. The Palestinian refugees in Gaza were forced there in 1948 not by Israel but by the Egyptians, kept there under guard, shot if they tried to leave, and never given Egyptian citizenship or Egyptian passports. (These facts are recorded by Yasir Arafat himself in his authorized biography by Alan Hart, Arafat: Terrorist or Peace Maker? 1982). Refugees in Lebanon were kept under similar but less draconian repression, with Lebanese law barring them from almost 70 professions, with no citizenship, and no right to travel. Only in Jordan were the refugees granted citizenship.
This brutal repression of Arab refugees by their Arab host countries is especially significant when one recalls that during the many wars of the 20th century, tens of millions of refugees were created in Europe and Asia. In 1922, 1.8 million people were relocated to resolve Turkey-Greece war. Following World War II, some 3,000,000 Germans were forced from countries of Eastern Europe and resettled in Germany. When the Indian sub-continent was divided, over 12 million people were transferred between India and Pakistan.
All such refugee issues have been resolved, except the 725,000who fled Israel during the 1948 war!
Senior Fatah Central Committee member Sakher Habash succinctly explained the reason for the calculated refusal of the Arab rulers including the Palestinian rulers to help the Palestinian refugees to return to normal lives. During a 1998 lecture at Shechem's An-Najah University, Habash said: "To us, the refugee issue is the winning card which means the end of the Israeli state."
In other words, war, terrorism, diplomatic isolation of Israel, world-wide PR campaigns to demonize Israel…..all may fail (and most have, so far); but as long as this last trump card is still alive, hope for the destruction of Israel still pulses in the hearts of Arab revanchists.
In reality, Palestinians who fled Israel in 1948 and are still alive have no legal right to return to Israel, because the Arab leadership representing them (Arab nations until 1993, and since then the Palestinian Authority) are still, de jure and de facto at war with Israel; and these refugees, therefore, are still potential hostiles. International law does not require a country at war to commit suicide by allowing the entry of hundreds of thousands of a potentially hostile population. In the context of a peace treaty, in 1949, the Arab refugees could have taken advantage of Israel's offer; but their leadership refused.
Of course the present Palestinian claim of a "Right of Return" is accompanied by the claim that there are not 725,000 refugees (minus those who have died in the interim) but 5 million. This number serves many political agendas but from the point of view of international law later generations born into a refugee population that has been resettled and living in exile do not have the legal status of refugees. That means that legal refugee status today applies only to those few surviving Arabs who fled in 1948, among whom most are advanced in age.
A Summary of The Salient Facts
The protracted Arab refugee crisis is an artificial crisis maintained for 57 years by Arab rulers in order to exploit their own people's suffering -- to create a "poster child" for Palestinian victim-hood; a staging ground for anti-Israel propaganda; a training center for Arab terrorists; and a trump card for the anti-Israel jihad (per Sakher Habash) if/when all else (war, terrorism, international diplomacy) fail.
"Haq el-Auda," the "law of return", for Palestinian Arabs to their own homes and farms and orchards that have been part of Israel for the past 57 years is a sham.
Sixty years ago there were nearly a million Jews in the Arab states of the Middle East: honest hard-working citizenry contributing to the culture and economy of their countries of domicile. Today, there are almost no Jews in the Arab countries of the Middle East, and racist apartheid laws prohibit even Jewish tourists from entering Arab countries.
In Israel, on the other hand, the Arabs who did not flee numbered about 170,000 in 1949; and now number more than 1,400,000. They 12 representatives in the Israel Parliament, judges sitting on the Israeli supreme court bench, and Ph.D's and tenured professors teaching in Israeli colleges and universities. They are a population that enjoys more freedom, education, and economic opportunity than do any comparable Arab populations anywhere in the Arab world.
The Arab rulers caused the Arab refugee problem in 1948 by their war of aggression against the infant state of Israel, a legal creation of the United Nations; the Arab rulers have since maintained the Arab refugee population and and denied it any possibility of normal life in Arab countries in order to use the suffering they themselves have causedit as a weapon in their unending war against Israel.
During all these decades the refugee camps and their Arab exploiters have been funded by billions of dollars from the United Nations, the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Eight Stages of the Creation of Arab Refugee Problem
There were eight stages to the flight of Arabs from what would soon become Israel:
One. As early as the Fall of 1947, months before the UN partition plan of 11/29/47, it was clear that there would be a war no matter what course of action the UN took. In anticipation of this war, many of the well-to-do Arabs (the Effendi) of the Western Galilee, from Haifa to Acco and villages in between, closed down their houses and went to Beirut or Damascus, where with their wealth and connections they could wait out the war in safety. They thought that they would thus be out of the way of danger, and when the war was over (no one imagined that Israel would win) they would come back to their homes.
Current estimates by objective observers (Conan Cruise O'Brien, in his book "The Siege", being perhaps the most objective) is that about 70,000 fled.
Two. These refugees caused a sudden absence of political and social leadership among the Arabs of the Galilee, and thus as the hostilities developed in the Winter of 1947, many of the Arab peasantry (Felahin) fled as well, following their leaders' example. They lacked the money and connections to make a comfortable trip out of the way of danger, as their Effendi had done. So many of them simply walked with whatever they could carry, to Lebanon or Syria. Their main motivation for leaving was that since their leadership had fled, things must be pretty bad, so they had better leave too. They too were sure, based upon documentation from Arab press at the time, that when the war was over and the Jews were all dead or driven from Israel, they would come back to their homes.
There are no solid numbers for this exodus, but estimates range around 100,000 people. There were so many exiting that the Arab states had a special conference in Beirut to decide how to handle all the Arabs that were pouring across the borders. They set up special camps...later to be known as refugee camps.
Note Well!! These Arabs were fleeing of their own free will. No one, neither Israel nor Arab states, were encouraging, frightening, or ordering them to do
so. The war had not yet even begun.
Three. After 11/29/47, warfare between the Israeli Haganah (not yet called the IDF because the local British Mandatory forces were stalwartly pro-Arab and
routinely arrested Haganah soldiers and took their arms...so the Israeli army was still an underground army) and para-military Arab volunteers numbering in
the tens of thousands (trained and armed in Syria and Lebanon, with the aid of both ex-NAZI and British officers) began in earnest.
The Arab press and public speeches made it clear that this was to be a war of annihilation...like the great Mongol hordes killing all in their path. The Jews would be either dead or out. Israel was fighting not a war of independence, but a war of survival.
In order to defend some areas where Jews were completely surrounded by Arabs (like the Jews of Jaffa, Jewish villages or kibbutzim in parts of the Galilee
and central hill country, and in Jerusalem) the Haganah adopted scare-tactics that were intended to strike terror into the Arab population of those areas, so that they would retreat to safer ground, and thus make it possible for the Hagana to defend those Jews who would otherwise be inaccessible and thus vulnerable to genocidal Arab intentions.
Many Arabs in parts of the western Galilee, Jaffa, and parts of western Jerusalem, fled because of these tactics (rumors that a huge Jewish army from
the West was about to land on the coast, hand-grenades thrown on front porches of homes, jeeps driving by and firing machine guns into the walls or fences of
houses, rumors circulated by Arabic-speaking Jews that the Haganah was far bigger than it really was, and was on the verge of surfacing with a massive
Jewish army, etc.).
Here it is important to note that Jews were at cause in this part of the Arab flight. But it was not because they wanted to ethnically cleanse the country, or to wipe out the Arabs. It was because they knew that Jews undefended in Arab enclaves would be slaughtered (as in fact was the case of Jews in the Gush Etzion villages and in the Jewish Quarter of the Old City in Jerusalem, and as had happened in Hebron in 1929). It was the exigency of their fighting a war of survival against a bigger and better armed enemy that drove them to the tactics described above.
It is also important to note here the following two facts:
A) Had the Arab leadership accepted the UN partition plan; there would have been a state of Palestine since 11/29/47, for the Arabs, alongside of Israel.
B) Had the Arab armies not invaded, there would have been no refugee problem.
In light of these two facts, it is clear that the total onus of culpability for the start of the refugee problem rests squarely and solely upon the Arab states that invaded, in clear disregard for the UN resolution 181 and international law.
Four. Arab leadership from among the para-military forces, and the forces of Syria, were vociferous in their announcements that they wanted Arabs to leave so that the armies would have a clear field in which to perpetrate their genocide of the Jews (see appendix below). When the war was over (Arab newspaper articles suggested about 4-6 weeks before all the Jews were driven out or killed), the Arab residents could come back and have both their own lands and those of the Jews.
We cannot know how many Arabs fled because of these announcements; but since a number of Arab spokespersons after the war admitted to having done this, and wrung their hands publicly in painful repentance of having created the refugee problem, it is clear that the Arab leadership's own message to many Arabs in the area was a major factor in the Arab flight.
It is also important to point out at this time that there were a number of cases where Jewish leaders got out in public and pleaded with Arabs not to leave. The mayor of Haifa is the best example of this. At the risk of his own life, he drove through the Arab section of Haifa with a loudspeaker on his jeep, and in Arabic called out to the residents of his city to disregard the Arab propaganda.
Nonetheless, tens of thousands fled. The incredulous British officers who witnessed this (don't forget, the British had not yet left) documented it in a
variety of sources (some mentioned in the appendix below). Those Arabs who stayed were unharmed and became citizens of Israel.
The British also documented for the world a similar phenomenon in Tiberius (a town in which the Arab population vastly outnumbered the Jewish), where the
Arabs quite literally chose to leave even though they were under no direct threat from the Jews, and asked the British to assist them. Tens of thousands
left under British guard, while the Jews, both civilian and Hagana, looked on.
In a slightly different twist, the Arabs of Safed (Tzefat), fled before the Haganah attack, even though the Arab forces in Safed outnumbered the Jews about 10 to one.
Wherever Arabs chose to stay, they were unharmed and later became citizens of Israel.
There have been a number of essays written by later historians contesting the truth of the assertion that Arab leaders told their people to flee. But Conan
Cruise O'Brien's "The Siege", and Mitchell Bard's "Idiot's Guide to the Mid-East conflict" and "Myths and Facts", offer irrefutable proof of just such
Five. Deir Yassin: The events that took place at Deir Yassin are still hotly disputed. But by their own admission, Arab leadership today acknowledges that the lies created by the Arabs then about the fictitious "massacre" were concocted in order to shame the Arab armies into fighting against the Jews, and to frighten the Arabs and encourage them to flee.
The village sits near Jerusalem, overlooking the road from Tel Aviv. Jewish Jerusalem was under siege, and its lifeline was this one road to Tel Aviv. A
contingent of Iraqi troops had entered Deir Yassin on 3/13/48. Some sources suggest that they were asked to leave. Apparently they did not, since their
armed bodies were numerous among the dead after the battle. It was obvious that they were going to try to cut off that road. Doing so would spell the end of Jewish Jerusalem. So on 4/9/48 a contingent of the Irgun (a para-military splinter group) entered the village. This operation was completely legitimate in the context of rules of engagement, since the Iraqi presence made the village a legal military objective.
Their intent, to capture the village and drive out the Iraqis, was completely clear from the onset, because they entered with a jeep and loudspeaker telling
the civilian population to flee the village (unfortunately, this jeep slid into a ditch, so some of the villagers may not have heard the message; but many did, because they fled before the Irgun got into the village); and because rather than surrounding the village and barring escape, they left several routes open for the civilians to flee, which hundreds of villagers used. However, the Iraqis had disguised themselves as women (easy to hide weapons beneath the flowing robes of the burqa) and had hidden themselves among women and children in the village. So, when the Irgun fighters entered, they encountered fire from women!
When the Irgun fighters fired back, they killed many innocent women because the Iraqis were hiding behind them. After suffering more than 40% casualties to their forces, the Irgun succeeded in killing or capturing the Iraqis. Then, while they were in a group, still dressed as women, having surrendered and agreed to be taken prisoner, some of the Iraqis opened fire again with weapons concealed beneath their women's clothing. Irgun fighters were caught off guard, more were killed, and others opened fire into the group. Iraqis who had indeed surrendered were killed along with those who had only pretended to surrender and had then opened fire.
When the Hagana arrived they found the dead women and other civilians; and thus incorrectly accused the Irgun of murder and massacre. But the Red Cross, which was called in to assist the wounded and civilians, found no evidence of a massacre. In fact, even the most recent review of the evidence (7/1999), by Arab scholars at Beir-Zayyit university in Ramallah, indicates that there was no massacre, but rather a military conflict in which civilians were killed in the crossfire. The total Arab dead, including the Iraqi soldiers, according to the Beir Zayyit calculation, was 107.
So where did the idea of a massacre come from? The same Arab sources that confess to having urged the Arabs to flee have also acknowledged that Arab
spokespersons at the time galacticly exaggerated the Deir Yassin fight, making up stories of gang rape, brutalizing of pregnant women, killing unborn children cut from their mothers' wombs by blood-thirsty Jews, and massive murders with bodies thrown into a nearby quarry. These same Arab sources admit that their purpose in these exaggerations and lies was to shame the Arab nations into entering the conflict with greater alacrity, so that the Jews would be destroyed by the overwhelming numbers of Arab invaders.
The plan backfired. The Arab armies invaded, but only with a fraction of their total military capacity. But as a result of these exaggerations and lies, Arab civilians panicked upon hearing these stories, and fled by the tens of thousands. This is documented on television by a 1993 (revised 2001) PBS program (50 Years of War) in which Deir Yassin survivors were interviewed in 1991. They unabashedly proclaimed that they begged Dr. Hussein Khalidi, director of Voice of Palestine (the Palestinian radio station in East Jerusalem) to edit out the lies and fabrications of atrocities that never happened. He told them: "We must capitalize on this great opportunity!"
Note well!! The flight of Arabs had begun per #1-4 above many months before Deir Yassin. So Deir Yassin cannot account for those hundreds of thousands of Arabs who sought refuge prior to 4/9/48. Moreover, while current Arab propaganda asserts that Deir Yassin was one of many examples of Jewish massacre and slaughter, there is not one other documented example of any such behavior by the Jews. Deir Yassin was not an example, it was the exception.
In sum, re Deir Yassin, it was not what happened at Deir Yassin that caused the flight of tens of thousands of Arabs; it was the lies invented by the Arab High Command and Dr. Hussein Khalidi of the "Voice of Palestine" radio news channel that caused the panic. One can hardly blame Israel for that.
Moreover, we have from an unimpeachable source, Yassir Arafat himself (his authorized biography, by Alan Hart, "Arafat: Terrorist or Peace Maker") that the Deir Yassin lies were spread "like a red flag in front of a bull" by the Egyptians. Then, having terrorized them with these stories, the Egyptians proceeded to disarm the Arabs of the area and herd them into detention camps in Gaza (today's Gaza refugee camps). Why did the Egyptians do this? According to Arafat, it was to get the Arabs out of the area because the Egyptians wanted a free hand to wage their war. Egypt had every intention of conquering the Negev and southern part of the coastal plain. They wanted no interference from the locals.
So the lies about Deir Yassin were spread in order to shame the Arab armies (didn't work) and (by the Egyptians) panic the Arab civilians (did work).
Bottom line, Deir Yassin was not a massacre, nothing even vaguely akin to what the Jews are accused of ever happened. The lies were made up by Arabs, and spread by Arabs. The further flight of refugees after 4/9/48 was caused not by the Deir Yassin battle, but by the Arab lies about the Deir Yassin battle. And this from Yassir himself, and from Beir Zayyit University.
We don't know how many Arabs fled as a result of the "Voice of Palestine" exaggerations. Several hundred thousand is a good estimate. Most of them ended
up in the Egyptian detention camps in Gaza.
Six. There were two more incidents (in addition to the actions noted above in #3) of Arab refugees being forced to flee by Israeli army actions: Lydda and Ramle.
Both villages sat astride the road from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. As the siege on Jerusalem tightened, the Israeli forces knew that in order to save the Jews of
west Jerusalem from defeat and possible annihilation, they had to keep that road open. So one night they entered both villages and forcibly drove out the Arab residents. They rousted them from bed and sent them walking across the fields to the area that was under Jordanian control (some kilometers away).
Note...none were killed. There was no massacre. But they were driven out. However, they were driven out because their villages sat astride the road to Jerusalem, and the only way to guarantee the survival of 150,000 Jews in Jerusalem was to control this one road.
Seven. By 5/15/48 the British had evacuated their forces from all of British Mandatory Palestine, and the Jews had a free hand in using their Haganah,
which now became the IDF. And the Arab countries had a free hand in attacking. And attack they did. Armies from 8 Arab nations poured into the area from
Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Egypt (volunteers and soldiers from Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Morocco came too - hence 8). They outnumbered the Hagana (now IDF) about 5 to one. For the next month or so the Israelis were fighting a terribly difficult defensive war, just barely able to keep the invaders out. There were about 63,000 IDF volunteers, but weapons for only 22,000.
In June of '48 the UN imposed a cease-fire. By July when the Arabs re-initiated hostilities, the Israelis had been able to use the cease-fire to import arms and planes from Russia and Germany via Czechoslovakia. Now better armed, the IDF numbered 65,000 and the odds were reduced to about 2-1. Good odds for the determined Jewish fighters.
When the fighting resumed in July, the IDF went on the offensive and succeeded in driving the Arab armies out of both the Jewish areas and large parts of the
areas that the UN had intended to be the Palestinian state (western Galilee, and southern coastal plain north of Gaza). When this offensive began, more Arabs fled. As noted above, the Arabs that stayed were not harmed, and became citizens of Israel.
Contrary to revisionist and mendacious Arab propaganda, there was never any intent to massacre Arabs. Many civilians died in the cross fire, and the
overwhelming majority of Arabs who fled did so needlessly, at their own initiative, or because of the Arab leadership that lied and intimidated them.
Some Arabs were driven out by the IDF, but as part of a defensive measure. Not as part of any plan to ethnically cleanse the land or massacre/genocide the
Arabs. These accusations are all new revisionism aimed at exonerating the Arabs from their heinous and brutal role in creating the Arab Refugee problem, and at transferring the guilt to Israel.
Perhaps the most revealing considerations in the conclusion that Israel NEVER set out to put into action a plan to genocide the Arabs of Palestine or to drive them from their homes are:
The complete absence of any coverage in any world press, including Arab press and western press openly hostile to israel, about any such actions of which Israel is today accused. The complete absence of these accusations from any Arab spokespersons during this time, even at the very height of the flight (post-Deir Yassin), and for many years thereafter). The fate of the Arabs who stayed. They became Israeli citizens and enjoy more freedom, democracy, political representation, high standard of living, education, and economic opportunities, than any Arabs anywhere in the Arab world today.
Finally, after the 2/49 cease-fire, when the war was over, there was still a continued flight by tens of thousands of Arabs. The Jews did absolutely nothing to encourage or force this flight.
The above are the 7 stages of causation. The next stage recounts on-going Arab obduracy in the maintenance of the refugee problem and refusal to seek any solution.
Eight. As noted above, the Arabs caused the problem by starting the war, and by encouraging Arabs to leave during the war. Even worse, although Israel offered
on several occasions to repatriate refugees, the Arab states refused.
During the Rhodes armistice talks in 2/1949, Israel offered to return to the Arabs the lands that the Jews had conquered that were meant to be part of the
Palestinian state, in exchange for a peace treaty. This would have allowed hundreds of thousands of refugees to return to their homes. The Arabs said no,
because, as they themselves admitted, they were momentarily going to mount a new offensive. They had lost round one. There would be more and more rounds, until the Arabs won. Their new offensive was the 9000 terrorist attacks mostly from Egypt that the Arabs perpetrated against Israel from 1949-1956 (part of the cause of the '56 war).
At the Lausanne conference in 8-9/49, Israel offered to repatriate 100,000 refugees even without a peace treaty. The Arab states said NO, because that
would involve a tacit recognition of the state of Israel.
Thus, despite Israel's offers of repatriation, the Arabs insisted on maintaining the refugees in their squalor and suffering. Arab spokespersons in Syria and Egypt were quoted in their newspapers as saying: we will maintain the refugees in their camps until the flag of Palestine flies over all of the land. They will go back home only as victors, on the graves and corpses of the Jews.
Moreover, as some Arabs were candid enough to announce in public, the refugee problem would serve as "..a festering sore on the backside of Europe", as moral leverage to be used against Israel, in order to win the emotional support of the West against Israel.
The Arab refugee problem was created by the belligerent Arab states that defied the UN, invaded Israel, encouraged the Arabs to flee, and then purposefully kept them in a state of wretched poverty for Machiavellian propaganda purposes. Israel's role was a relatively minor one, in legitimate military contexts, which it tried to reverse after the war.
The problem was maintained intentionally by the Arab states through their refusal to abide by the UN resolutions and the Geneva convention, refusal to integrate any refugees into under-populated Arab countries (except for Jordan), refusal to enter into peace negotiations with Israel, and refusal to countenance ANY steps toward resolution by Israel or others.
By maintaining the problem, the Arab leaders sought to gain pseudo-moral leverage against Europe and Israel, to keep a "festering human sore" in the forefront of their propaganda war against Israel, and to use the issue as a political weapon against Israel.
Israel indicated its willingness on several occasions to include repatriation and/or reparations for Arab refugees, in context of peace treaty; but its offers were rejected by the Arab leadership.
Egypt, in its 1979 treaty with Israel, refused to deal with refugee issue in Gaza strip, and ceded all of Gaza strip to Israel. The PLO refused to negotiate with Israel, so refugee status of Gaza Palestinians was maintained.
Jordan had integrated thousands of Palestinians into its economy, and did not see any need or responsibility to deal with the disposition of those on the West Bank in the context of its 1994 peace treaty with Israel.
The abuses, exaggerations, lying, and distortions, perpetrated by Arab governments, UNWRA and the refugee spokespersons made it impossible, even back in 1949, to identify a bona fide refugee populace.
The Palestinian population of the West Bank, under Israeli rule from 1967 to 1992, experienced the highest standard of living of any Arab country with the exception of the oil states. The same is true of Arab Israelis. The Arab population of West Bank and Gaza has tripled since 6/67: no genocide, no ethnic cleansing.
The Palestinian population under the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) from 1994 to the present has declined precipitously, the standard of living eroded, GDP is one-tenth of what it was under Israeli control; all due to mis-appropriation of approximately $5.2 billion by the PNA into personal wealth and weapons stock-piling, and due to Arafat's terror war against which Israel must exercise defensive controls and deterrents.
Justice for Jewish and Arab refugees could have been part of a peace settlement, if the Arab states had been willing. Today the same is true, if the Palestinian National Authority would stop the terror war and fulfill the obligations to which it committed at Oslo.
Appendix: Quotes confirming that Arab leaders told Arabs to flee:
1. "The first group of our fifth column consist of those who abandon their homes…At the first sign of trouble they take to their heels to escape sharing the burden of struggle"
-- Ash-Sha'ab, Jaffa, 1.30.48
2. "(the fleeing villagers)…are bringing down disgrace on us all… by abandoning their villages"
-- As-Sarih, Jaffa, 3.30.48
3. "Every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe."
-- Haifa District HQ of the British Police, April 26, 1948, (quoted in
Battleground by Samuel Katz).
4. "The mass evacuation, prompted partly by fear, partly by order of Arab leaders, left the Arab quarter of Haifa a ghost city.... By withdrawing Arab workers their leaders hoped to paralyze Haifa."
-- Time Magazine, May 3, 1948, page 25
5. "The Arab streets (of Palestine) are curiously deserted (because)…following the poor example of the moneyed class, there has been an exodus from Jerusalem, but not to the same extent as from Jaffa and Haifa",
-- London Times, 5.5.48
6. "The Arab civilians panicked and fled ignominiously. Villages were frequently abandoned before they were threatened by the progress of war."
-- General John Glubb "Pasha," The London Daily Mail, August 12, 1948
7. "The fact that there are these refugees is the direct consequence of the act of the Arab states in opposing partition and the Jewish state. The Arab states agreed upon this policy unanimously and they must share in the solution of the problem."
-– Emile Ghoury, secretary of the Palestinian Arab Higher Committee, in an interview with the Beirut Telegraph 9/6/1948. (same appeared in The London Telegraph, 8.48)
8. The most potent factor [in the flight of Palestinians] was the announcements made over the air by the Arab-Palestinian Higher Executive, urging all Haifa Arabs to quit... It was clearly intimated that Arabs who remained in Haifa and accepted Jewish protection would be regarded as renegades."
-- London Economist Oct. 2, 1948)
9. "It must not be forgotten that the Arab Higher Committee encouraged the
refugees' flight from their homes in Jaffa, Haifa, and Jerusalem".
-- Near East Arabic Broadcasting Station, Cyprus, 4.3.49
10. "[The Arabs of Haifa] fled in spite of the fact that the Jewish authorities guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens of Israel."
-- Monsignor George Hakim, Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, New York Herald
Tribune, June 30, 1949
11. "The military and civil (Israeli) authorities expressed their profound regret at this grave decision (taken by the Arab military delegates of Haifa and the Acting Chair of the Palestine Arab Higher Committee to evacuate Haifa despite the Israeli offer of a truce). The Jewish mayor of Haifa made a passionate appeal to the delegation (of Arab military leaders) to reconsider its decision".
-- Memorandum of the Arab National Committee of Haifa, 1950, to the governments of the Arab League, quoted in J. B. Schechtman, The Refugees in the World, NY 1963, pp. 192f.
12. Sir John Troutbeck, British Middle East Office in Cairo, noted in cables to superiors (1948-49) that the refugees (in Gaza) have no bitterness against Jews, but harbor intense hatred toward Egyptians: " They say 'we know who our enemies are (referring to the Egyptians)', declaring that their Arab brethren persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes…I even heard it said that many of the refugees would give a welcome to the Israelis if they were to come in and take the district over".
13. "The Arab states which had encouraged the Palestine Arabs to leave their homes temporarily in order to be out of the way of the Arab invasion armies, have failed to keep their promise to help these refugees."
-– The Jordanian daily newspaper Falastin, Feb. 19, 1949.
14. "The Secretary General of the Arab League, Azzam Pasha, assured the
Arab peoples that the occupation of Palestine and of Tel Aviv would be as
simple as a military promenade...Brotherly advice was given to the Arabs of
Palestine to leave their land, homes, and property to stay temporarily
In neighboring fraternal states, lest the guns of invading Arab armies
mow them down."
--Al Hoda (a New York-based Lebanese daily) June 8, 1951
15. "Who brought the Palestinians to Lebanon as refugees, suffering now from the malign attitude of newspapers and communal leaders, who have neither honor nor conscience? Who brought them over in dire straits and penniless, after they lost their honor? The Arab states, and Lebanon amongst them, did it."
-- The Beirut Muslim weekly Kul-Shay, Aug. 19, 1951.
16. "We will smash the country with our guns and obliterate every place the Jews seek shelter in. The Arabs should conduct their wives and children to safe areas until the fighting has died down."
-- Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Said, quoted in "Sir An-Nakbah" (The Secret Behind the Disaster) by Nimr el-Hawari, Nazareth, 1952
16. "The Arab Exodus …was not caused by the actual battle, but by the exaggerated description spread by the Arab leaders to incite them to fight the Jews. …For the flight and fall of the other villages it is our leaders who are responsible because of their dissemination of rumors exaggerating Jewish crimes and describing them as atrocities in order to inflame the Arabs ... By spreading rumors of Jewish atrocities, killings of women and children etc., they instilled fear and terror in the hearts of the Arabs in Palestine, until they fled leaving their homes and properties to the enemy."
–- The Jordanian daily newspaper Al Urdun, April 9, 1953.
17. The Arab governments told us: Get out so that we can get in. So we
got out, but they did not get in. (Quoting a refugee)
-- Al Difaa (Jordan) Sept. 6, 1954
18. "The wholesale exodus was due partly to the belief of the Arabs, encouraged by the boasting of an unrealistic press and the irresponsible utterances of some of the Arab leaders that it could be only a matter of some weeks before the Jews were defeated by the armies of the Arab states, and the Palestinian Arabs enabled to re-enter and re-take possession of their country".
-- Edward Atiyah (Secretary of the Arab League, London, The Arabs, 1955, p. 183)
19. "The Arab states do not want to solve the refugee problem. They want to keep it as an open sore, as an affront to the UN and as a weapon against Israel. Arab leaders do not give a damn whether Arab refugees live or die", -- Ralph Galloway, former head of UNWRA, 1956
20. "As early as the first months of 1948, the Arab League issued orders exhorting the people to seek a temporary refuge in neighboring countries, later to return to their abodes ... and obtain their share of abandoned Jewish property."
-- Bulletin of The Research Group for European Migration Problems, 1957
21. "Israelis argue that the Arab states encouraged the Palestinians to flee. And, in fact, Arabs still living in Israel recall being urged to evacuate Haifa by Arab military commanders who wanted to bomb the city."
-- Newsweek, January 20, 1963
22. "The 15th May, 1948, arrived ... On that day the mufti of Jerusalem appealed to the Arabs of Palestine to leave the country, because the Arab armies were about to enter and fight in their stead."
-- The Cairo daily Akhbar el Yom, Oct. 12, 1963.
23. In listing the reasons for the Arab failure in 1948, Khaled al-Azm (Syrian Prime Minister) notes that "…the fifth factor was the call by the Arab governments to the inhabitants of Palestine to evacuate it (Palestine) and leave for the bordering Arab countries. Since 1948, it is we who have demanded the return of the refugees, while it is we who made them leave. We brought disaster upon a million Arab refugees by inviting them and bringing pressure on them to leave. We have accustomed them to begging...we have participated in lowering their morale and social level...Then we exploited them in executing crimes of murder, arson and throwing stones upon men, women and children...all this in the service of political purposes..."
-- Khaled el-Azm, Syrian prime minister after the 1948 War, in his 1972 memoirs, published in 1973..
24. "The Arab states succeeded in scattering the Palestinian people and in destroying their unity. They did not recognize them as a unified people until
the states of the world did so, and this is regrettable."
-- Abu Mazen (Mahmoud Abbas), from the official journal of the PLO, Falastin el-Thawra ("What We Have Learned and What We Should Do"), Beirut, March 1976
25. "Since 1948, the Arab leaders have approached the Palestinian problem in an irresponsible manner. They have used to Palestinian people for political
purposes; this is ridiculous, I might even say criminal..."
-- KING HUSSSEIN, Hashemite kingdom of Jordan, 1996
26. "Abu Mazen Charges that the Arab States Are the Cause of the Palestinian Refugee Problem" (Wall Street Journal; June 5, 2003):
- Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) penned an article in March 1976 in Falastin al-Thawra (cf. supra), the official journal of the PLO in Beirut: "The Arab
armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny, but instead they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their
homeland, imposed upon them a political and ideological blockade and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live in EasternEurope" (emphasis added).
- As Abu Mazen alluded, it was in large part due to threats and fear-mongering from Arab leaders that some 700,000 Arabs fled Israel in 1948 when the new state was invaded by Arab armies. Ever since, the growing refugee population, now around 4 million by UN estimates, has been corralled into squalid camps scattered across the Middle East - in Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, Gaza, and the West Bank.
- In 1950, the UN set up the United Nations Relief and Works Agency as a "temporary" relief effort for Palestinian refugees. Former UNRWA director Ralph Galloway stated eight years later that, "the Arab states do not want to solve the refugee problem. They want to keep it as an open sore, as a weapon against Israel. Arab leaders do not give a damn whether Arab refugees live or die." The only thing that has changed since then is the number of Palestinians cooped up in these prison camps.


text:
Product Description
This magnificent earring is part of our breathtaking Initially Yours Collection. The piece, which is sold individually, features a letter G initial design in an elegant cursive font that is sure to get you noticed. The dazzling look of this post and friction backing earring is accented with three Shimmering Diamonds, adding a gorgeous glow. Additionally, only fine 14k Yellow Gold is used to craft this remarkable earring. Add this to your jewelry collection and you will surely be the center of attention! Our earrings are proudly handcrafted by professional jewelers in our California factory.
Jewelry Information
|Jewelry Information

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Traveling Account Executive
Want to have fun and travel the country? We have the right position for you! Coastal Pay is one of the fastest growing merchant service providers who is competitively leading the market. We are looking for professional sales representatives to travel the country to meet with small and medium sized business owners and help them to maximize their profits and grow their business! As a traveling agent, we will pay for your flight and hotel and set up your campaign. You will be running on average about 3-6 appointments per day. You will be building business relationships, custom tailoring a valuable program, and closing the deal. We offer an elite and industry specific training program that has proven and lead to success. You will have constant support and training available to ensure you are going to be successful. With a sterling reputation and a focus on integrity, we continue to grow and flourish with our customers as well as employees. We have an exceptionally high retention rate due to our dedication in service. We provide an aggressive and competitive commission structure with bonuses. We offer: Paid weekly Competitive commission structure Daily, weekly, and monthly bonuses Monthly Residual Incentives for top performers Opportunity for advancement and growth within the company Ongoing support from our training and management staff Wide range of service options such as in house financing and cash advances for our clients State-of-the-Art processing solutions such as POS systems, mobile devices, online gateways and more for clients Requirements: Must be able to travel Must be hungry for results Sales experience a plus but not necessary. Must have a positive mindset and be social able. Coachable - Open minded with the eagerness to learn Team player Driven for success and for advancement--you will have freedom with this career, so you must be organized, responsible and punctual to be successful. Reliable transportation Valid driver's license The average deal pays $900 per deal. There are deals that will pay $1000-$2000+ per deal. The average rep sells 2 -4 deals per week, the top performers sell 4 -6+ deals per week + bonuses. Bonuses Offered: Weekly Bonuses 3 deals = $150 5 deals = $300 8 deals = $500 Monthly Bonuses 12 deals funded = $500 16 deals funded = $1000 20 deals funded = $1500 30 deals funded = $3000 Monthly Residual plus Daily Bonus' **Avg Comm. Per Deal = $900 For further information on this amazing job opportunity, please send me your resume and cover letter of why this job is right for you
Jerry So
Director of Recruiting
F: 888.###.#### ext 1030
2445 Impala Dr
San Diego, CA 92010
The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Coastal Pay immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer.
Source: http://www.jobs2careers.com/click.php?id=1883921626.96


text:
Sunday, March 09, 2014
Quote of The Day
Blogging • American Politics • Quote of the Day • Great Americans • (0) Comments • Permalink
G.I. Gurdjieff
From The Weekly Standard, By Daniel Halper.
Senate majority leader Harry Reid says that "Everybody" is "willing to pay more" taxes. He said so in an interview with a Nevada Public Radio host.
"The only people who feel there shouldn't be more coming in to the federal government from the rich people are the Republicans in the Congress," Reid told the radio host, according to Roll Call. "Everybody else, including the rich people, are willing to pay more. They want to pay more."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Ludwig von Mises
Honesty in politics brings success, while lies and hypocrisy that seem so "profitable and visionary" result in a total collapse.
Soviet nuclear physicist Andrei Sakharov
Government is a disease masquerading as its own cure.
Bob LeFevre
Never waste a minute thinking about people you don't like.
Dwight D. Eisenhower
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world?s greatest civilizations has been 200 years. Great nations rise and fall. The people go from bondage to spiritual truth, to great courage, from courage to liberty, from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness to complacency, from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependence, from dependence back again to bondage
Alexander Fraser Tytler, Professor of Universal History, University of Edinburgh
(Editor's Note)
The United States is a Constitutional Republic, governed by The Constitution and the Rule of Law. Trash The Constitution, ignore the Rule of Law and we risk our very destruction.
To quote Dr. Ben Franklin, "We've given you a Republic, if you can keep it."
From The Telegraph by Jon Swaine, Barack Obama: 'I go shooting all the time'
President Barack Obama has claimed that he goes shooting "all the time", while attempting to reassure American gun-owners that he respects their rights to use firearms.
Oh Yeah Mr. President, we want to believe you but!
The greatest danger to American freedom is a government that ignores the Constitution.
Thomas Jefferson
Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people?s liberty teeth and keystone under independence ? from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable ? the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference ? they deserve a place of honor with all that?s good.
George Washington


text:
Washington (CNN) - With controversial Defense Secretary nominee Chuck Hagel set to face harsh questioning in his confirmation hearing Thursday, Vice President Joe Biden is defending the administration's new foreign policy team against GOP charges that it will be too reluctant to use force–as will the president.
"Where have they (the critics) been for four years?" responded Biden in a recent exclusive interview with CNN Chief Political Analyst Gloria Borger. "The real President Obama has exercised force responsibly as boldly and as bravely as any president in American history. This is the guy who's not backed away. And he's also ended wars that almost every military man out there will tell you we should not be engaged in again."
Follow @politicalticker
In the CNN interview, the vice president also defended Hagel and Secretary of State Designate John Kerry. "To suggest that two war heroes, one with a Bronze Star…a Purple Heart, Silver Star, taking over both the…State Department and Defense, is a dove or whatever the phrase was, is ridiculous."
Biden is close to both men and has tried to pave the way to confirmation among his former Senate colleagues for the Hagel pick.
Even before the president formally nominated Hagel on January 7, the vice president was speaking to his former senate colleagues on Hagel's behalf. Hagel's record-including a vote against unilateral sanctions against Iran-poses problems on both sides of the aisle.
At this point, the battle over Hagel has morphed into a virtual political campaign.
OPINION: A reality check for Chuck Hagel bashers
Administration officials have been helping to mount an aggressive campaign to rebut the critics. Former cabinet secretaries have written letters in support, and a collection of former senior national security officials known as the Bipartisan Group hired the influential lobbying company the Podesta Group to help get its message out, a source familiar with the initiative told CNN. A spokesman for Podesta refused comment.
Hagel himself has met with more than 60 senators to lobby on his behalf and to answer criticisms, according to two sources familiar with the meetings. He also recently met with leading American-Jewish activists to reassure them he is a strong supporter of Israel.
READ MORE: Is this a 'strategy'? Why some conservatives are still going after Hagel
The former senator also did damage control apologizing for some derogatory comments he made in 1998 regarding an openly gay nominee for ambassador. Administration officials reached out to the gay and lesbian community to reassure them.
Critics though have not let up. There are several conservative groups that have run ads against Hagel's nomination, including Americans for a Strong Defense and American Future Fund. AFF has bought more than $500,000 in ads, one of which ran on CNN and Fox News questioning some of his ethics – a charge denied by Hagel aides. A pro-Israel group also went on the airwaves raising questions about his commitment to the Jewish state. The influential Republican Jewish Coalition has marshaled its board members and supporters to lobby senators to vote against Hagel. Among those making those phone calls is influential Republican billionaire and donor Sheldon Adelson. One source familiar with the matter said Adelson is "calling everybody he can."
- CNN Pentagon Correspondent Barbara Starr and Senior Producer Mike Mount contributed to this story.
Just one more example of the Republican Party being out of touch with reality. Did this latest election not show them anything? How much longer will the Republican Party continue on this self destructive bent? They are now operating far 'beyond the pale' of rational thought or action. Who knows where this self-immolation will lead.
Yet another GOP attempted strike against Obama. Really hard for them to get over the election results.
There should be reluctance to use force, the latest examples of military play have done absolutely nothing to improve the safety of the country.
What in the world is the GOP thinking when there open there mouths bashing to heros like this and they wounder way the American people hate them and do not respect them
If Adelson's against him, he must be a great pick.
Being Obama's windup doll is not becoming Joe. Do you have any original thoughts?
The obstructionists that do not vote in favor of Hagel are war profiteers, gun manufacturers and have a petty desire to make the first man of color, to dare be President (TWICE!), a failure. Their demonic, mid-century, xenophobic ideas are wearing thin.
The country is sick of the party of no, the party of grumpy old men and witchy women. If the GOP did not get that after the last election, maybe they will in 2014 or 2016.
These "Republicans" would denounce Jesus if they heard a good speech by Obama related to the Sermon on the Mount.
""The real President Obama has exercised force responsibly..."
Huh? You mean the President who started bombing Libya without any Congressional authorization? THAT kind of responsibility?
They'll be TOO RELUCTANT to use force!?!?! It seems to me that being fast and loose with using force is what's gotten us into a LOT more trouble in the past than the other way around. Funny, the GOP claims they're not the party of war-mongering, yet what are we to make of this?
LOL, John Kerry war hero...with self nominated medals. Might be a hero to attempted tax evaders tho.
Yep, Biden is so credible. Remember, he wanted to split Iraq into three separate countries.
Republicans oppose fellow lifelong Republican and decorated war hero Chuck Hagel for one reason and one reason only....Obama nominated him.
Sheldon Adelson! Again!!!
But then no worries we know how it turned out last time for this sorry excuse for a human being.
Pushing for smaller government, while at the same time pushing for a larger military will soon make us equal to the effectively military governed banana republics of Africa and South America.
I prefer a thoughtful warrior who picks his battles. He/she is more likely to win wars should it come to that with less loss of life and resources.
"GOP charges that it will be too reluctant to use force–as will the president"
The remedy for resolving the concerns of the GOP is to promote a super mega military nation with a force of about 50 million soldiers, sailors, marines and air force. We can then effectively close our borders, keep out them there commies and Arabs, force our culture on, and occupy, every nation in the world and look toward the universe. We can bring Bush II back into office. Give him a military uniform with all of the campaign ribbons he has so deservedly won through his leadership. We can have military parades every week, flag waiving, military bands, award medals to the latest heroes who are fighting for our great nation with prayers led by Jesus.
The American Jewish lobby is working overtime tp prove it doesn't exist. An entire religion founded on racism.


text:
It's been 12 years since the final episode of "Seinfeld," which also marked the last TV appearance of recurring character Jackie Chiles, the flashy lawyer whose dealings with Kramer always ended in disaster.
Now comic Phil Morris has resurrected Chiles in a web series on Funny or Die – marking the latest sign that the show about nothing still has something to give.
We haven't stopped laughing over last year's "Seinfeld" reunion plotline on "Curb Your Enthusiasm," which served as an affirmation of the long-running sitcom's enduring appeal as well as of how much Jerry and his pals are missed.
Morris' short video monologues – the second was posted this week – aren't anywhere near as elaborate as a reunion. But they serve as a funny reminder of the show, the Chiles character and the scope of the Seinfeldian universe.
"Did you miss me? I knew you did! Jackie's back and I'm badder and madder than ever," Chiles declares in the opening installment.
The verbally acrobatic character, modeled on the late O.J. Simpson lawyer Johnnie Cochran, proved a great fit on "Seinfeld" in a handful of memorable appearances.
He stepped in when Kramer spilled hot coffee on himself ("It's outrageous, egregious, preposterous!") and was a supposed victim of big tobacco and of a driver clad in a bra. Each case ended in a hilarious debacle, as did the trial in the final episode when Chiles' defense couldn't keep the four main characters out of prison.
Morris, whose web series reportedly received Jerry Seinfeld's blessing, has tried over the years to parlay the character into a TV show. He might never make it back to the big screen, but we'll happily follow his online adventures – and hope for a Kramer cameo (and perhaps more web spinoffs: How does "Going Postal With Newman" sound?).
Meanwhile, check out the outrageous return of Jackie Chiles – and learn how he mentored a certain president – below:
U.S. & World
Stories that affect your life across the U.S. and around the world.
Hester is founding director of the award-winning, multi-media NYCity News Service at the City University of New York Graduate School of Journalism. He is the former City Editor of the New York Daily News, where he started as a reporter in 1992. Follow him on Twitter.


text:
Fine Dining at Home: A Special Meal Prepared by a Private Chef
Host an unforgettable dinner party with the expertise of a private chef, who will handle everything from planning the menu to cleanup.... more less
Michelin stars, a curated wine list, an attentive staff — these things matter. But often, the most memorable dining experiences don't occur at a restaurant. The things that stand out, the spontaneous moments, intimate conversations, and authentic connections, happen around your own table, which is why IfOnly is giving you the keys to the city's best private chefs.
From shopping and cooking to setup and cleanup, your private chef will orchestrate a special dinner, reflecting local ingredients and seasonality. Everything will be taken care of, so you can entertain effortlessly with little more than a few clicks. Depending on your style, the chef can provide a family-style meal or a more formal plated service. All that's left to do is sit back and enjoy the conversation as a five-star experience is brought to you. A portion of every IfOnly experience will benefit a worthy cause.
Travel Fee (in addition to experience price)
- Multi-course dinner prepared by a private chef in your home
- Includes custom shopping for ingredients, setup, cleanup, and gratuity
- Host provides kitchen supplies, equipment, and tableware
- Rentals, alcohol, and other beverages are not included
- Experience provided in English (US)
- By clicking buy now, you agree to all our Terms Of Use
Fine Print
- Will be scheduled on a mutually agreeable date and time, based on luminary's availability
- This experience is non-refundable after scheduling is complete
How It Works
Provide Details
Details Confirmed


text:
Press & Guestbook: detail
December 04 2005
WINE IRELAND (click)
having arrived by boat from Marco Polo airport we went on to the Palazzo Abadessa, a small hotel in the heart of Venice
situated within walking distance of the centre
. A private suite overlooking the canal was a wish fulfilling experience and one, which offered a relaxing memory, guaranteed to carry the soul through to spring!
Jean Smullen March/April 2004


text:
Last week I sent out an email for a client to its recent past customers. The email's goal was to reactivate those customers, and the copy was written as a message from the company's CEO.
At the bottom of the email in a P.S., I added the opportunity for these customers to let the brand know why they weren't ordering from it anymore.
So the email was sent, and the responses came back to me. There were some complaints that were easy fixes and others where people were upset with the company.
My philosophy on this situation is simple: Customer complaints are customer advocates waiting to happen. That's right. Once you resolve a customer's complaint — in a way that he feels like you care — you have a good shot at retaining that customer for life.
And here's another interesting outcome from this email campaign: Many of the customers who received the email responded with thank-yous to the CEO for taking the time to ask why they left.
It's amazing how a little customer care from a typical nameless, faceless corporate entity changes peoples' attitudes and perceptions of a company. And when the CEO gets involved, the goodwill level goes up exponentially.
I missed the TV show "Undercover Boss" after last week's Super Bowl (it's on my DVR; I'll review it after I watch), but I think its message applies here. The general premise of the show is just how much a CEO can learn about his/her company, customers and employees just by getting involved.
To me it's a no-brainer. My CEO philosophy was formed a long time ago, thanks to Tom Peters (he's my mentor, even if he doesn't know me) and his principle of management by wandering around. In other words, get out of the corner office — i.e., ivory tower — and get involved with your "X" (fill it in, folks).
But enough about CEOs. The feedback the company received at the behest of the CEO's email was handed out to the senior customer service team. Systematically, all complaints are being resolved.
Now I want to ask you something: Do you think these customers, with their newly acquired "warm fuzzies" about the company, will tell their friends? Absolutely! And they'll likely do it via social media channels, too. I call that spreading exponential good will.


text:
Search President Obama's speech to minority youths last Thursday for the word "marriage," and you will find just one reference, and in a throwaway line at that. There are nine references to "men of color" and three to the minimum wage, but none at all to out-of-wedlock birth rates. There are also zero appeals for more two-parent families, not even of the "LGBT" variety, the only one liberals seem to champion these days.
The president has gotten some good press from the speech, in which he launched the My Brother's Keeper initiative, intended to benefit young "at risk" minority males. Bill O'Reilly has given the president high marks on a good start, which matters. For all his occasional bombast, Mr. O'Reilly has been a leading media figure in the effort to draw attention to the collapse of marriage in low-income communities.
#ad#Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker, also a leading voice in this arena, wrote yesterday that "sometimes things can change only when the right messenger comes along." Parker's column, however, was filled with references to the real problem: the out-of-wedlock birth rates of 72 percent for African Americans and 53 percent for Hispanics, and the way feminists have made the problem worse by popularizing the notion that fathers are nonessential. Yet none of that was in the president's speech.
So let me sound a note of caution about President Obama's newest initiative. The history of progressives, and of this administration in particular, should make us wary.
The balance — or imbalance — in the president's themes is a matter of concern, particularly considering the potential power of the messenger. The main obstacle to Hispanics' upward mobility is the ongoing breakdown of the Hispanic family. On this there is a growing consensus among researchers across the political spectrum.
Yet the president gave this issue very light treatment. More than halfway through the speech he said, "And, yes, we need to encourage fathers to stick around, and remove the barriers to marriage, and talk openly about things like responsibility and faith and community. In the words of Dr. King, it is not either-or; it is both-and."
In other words: Yes, if I must, I'll give a nod in your direction and mention marriage.
Worryingly, President Obama also spoke at times as if the problem of family breakdown were here to stay, more a condition to manage than a problem to solve. He said at one point, "There are going to be some kids who just don't have a family at home that is functional, no matter how hard we try." This may be true, as far as that goes, but it isn't the approach the administration takes to, say, obesity.
The president's track record on family issues is poor. In his first term, his administration tried to eliminate marriage-promotion programs that had been started by the Bush administration, even though the early evidence indicated that these programs were having a positive impact on Hispanic couples.
In the place of marriage-supporting programs, the Obama administration wanted to put the emphasis on "responsible fatherhood," a phrase the president used again last Thursday. There is an important difference: While the healthy-marriage people stress in-wedlock births and sexual exclusivity, the good-fatherhood people want to teach fathering skills to men while ignoring the first fathering skill: committing in marriage to the child's mother rather than having multiple sexual partnerships.
The result, scoffs former Bush-administration official Bill Coffin, whom I interviewed for a book I've written on Hispanics, is that we often end up in "multiple-partner fertility and complex family formation." Coffin also levels a charge that goes to the heart of the issue: "Obviously the Obama-administration folks, being liberal, were going to stop the marriage stuff because they don't want to promote marriage."
As Maggie Russell of the National Association for Relationship & Marriage Education (NARME) told me, the Left now is "accepting that this is just part of life, that people are going to have children out of wedlock."
The animus that progressives bear against the family is hardly new, and it even predates the feminists' condemnation of the "patriarchy." As Yuval Levin wrote in National Review in 2013:
The utopian goal of the most radical forms of liberalism has always been the complete liberation of the individual from all unchosen "relational" obligations — obligations to the people around you that are a function of the family and community in which you live. Resentment against such obligations was a central and powerful motive in the radical late-18th-century thought that gave us some (though not all) forms of modern libertarianism and the modern Left, and the defense of such obligations was central to the counterarguments that yielded modern conservatism.
So we shouldn't be surprised that, on Thursday, the president instead spoke at length about his pet issues. He brought up health care, pre-K, and even Trayvon Martin. The fact that he made nine references to "men of color" was over the top. The reality is that the travails of African Americans and Hispanics differ in some important ways. Even "Hispanic" and "Latino" are smorgasbordic terms that confuse more than explain — bureaucratic creations that lump together people of very different backgrounds, people of all colors. It is difficult to see how handing immigrants from Spain's former colonies a minority status as they come in — rather than seeing them as but the latest of many, many waves of immigrants to this country — has in any way contributed to their success.
Lastly, the president waxed poetical about one of his favorite subjects: himself. He talked of being raised by a single mom, about Michelle and his daughters, and even, once again, about the imaginary son he never had.
Another important roadblock to the advancement of the poor is educational disparity between public schools in the suburbs and those in the inner city. Now, President Obama did mention education, which was good. But given his track record of sticking with the teachers' unions and opposing all manner of private-school options, it is difficult to see how any good can come of it. In the neighborhoods where many Hispanics live, the public schools are beyond repair — at least as long as the unions stubbornly block meaningful reforms such as linking pay to results or actually firing nonperforming teachers.
It is also worrying that the president brought up his Education Department's wrongheaded scheme to implement a moratorium on school suspensions. The administration asserts that a neutral, "zero tolerance" policy toward disruptive behavior in the classroom is actually racist, as it produces more suspensions among African Americans. It's the old "disparate outcomes" theory, and it completely ignores the fact that those who suffer from the increasingly chaotic no-suspension classrooms will be mainly minority kids.
Given this administration's history, the speech should fill us with caution. This president's potential as a role model for married fatherhood sharpens our sense of disappointment at the absence of the call he could have issued. Perhaps he will eventually head in the right direction, and Lord knows that these are areas that are in dire need of bully-pulpit attention. But I wouldn't start celebrating just yet.
— Mike Gonzalez is vice president for communications at the Heritage Foundation.


text:
Practise your number bonds whilst improving your memory in this matching pairs game.
A game for 2 players. Using 2 dice, some counters and a games board, can you form a line of counters from one side of the board to the other?
A game to be played against the computer, or in groups. Pick a 7-digit number. A random digit is generated. What must you subract to remove the digit from your number? the first to zero wins.
Can you spot the similarities between this game and other games you know? The aim is to choose 3 numbers that total 15.
A Sudoku with clues given as sums of entries.
A game for 2 or more people. Starting with 100, subratct a number from 1 to 9 from the total. You score for making an odd number, a number ending in 0 or a multiple of 6.
A game for 2 players. Practises subtraction or other maths operations knowledge.
A game for 2 or more players with a pack of cards. Practise your skills of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division to hit the target score.
A game for 2 or more players. Practise your addition and subtraction with the aid of a game board and some dried peas!
George and Jim want to buy a chocolate bar. George needs 2p more and Jim need 50p more to buy it. How much is the chocolate bar?
Resources to support understanding of multiplication and division through playing with number.
Dicey Operations for an adult and child. Can you get close to 1000 than your partner?
Related resources supporting pupils' understanding of multiplication and division through playing with numbers.
These grids are filled according to some rules - can you complete them?
More resources to support understanding multiplication and division through playing with numbers
Some additional activities to develop children's understanding of addition and subtraction of number through playing with number.
Number problems for inquiring primary learners.
Place the numbers 1, 2, 3,..., 9 one on each square of a 3 by 3 grid so that all the rows and columns add up to a prime number. How many different solutions can you find?
An ordinary set of dominoes can be laid out as a 7 by 4 magic rectangle in which all the spots in all the columns add to 24, while those in the rows add to 42. Try it! Now try the magic square...


text:
HUNTINGTON, W.VA. (AP) DeAndre Kane scored 16 points to lead four players in double figures as Marshall beat UNC Wilmington 61-58 on Saturday.
Elijah Pittman had 13 points for the Thundering Herd (5-3), D.D. Scarver had 12, and Nigel Spikes scored 10 points and pulled down 13 rebounds.
The Seahawks (3-4) were led by Craig Ponder's 26 points.
The Herd outrebounded the Seahawks 39-30, and Marshall made 16 of 26 from the free-throw line to UNC Wilmington's 3 of 6.
The game was tied at 28 at the break, but the Seahawks took a 36-31 lead on Matt Wilson's free throw 3:03 into the second half. The Herd took a 39-38 lead on Pittman's jumper in the back-and-forth contest.
The final tie came at 58-all with 21 seconds to go on a free throw by Kane, who made the second for a 59-58 lead, and Marshall held off UNC Wilmington for the victory.


text:
Drag Race Hall of Fame, here comes Chad Michaels! The pristine queen with a killer Cher impersonation was crowned the winner of the first ever RuPaul's All Stars Drag Race and will take her rightful place in the hall of fame.
Chad triumphed against the "synergy" aspect of the All Stars series and was able to beat out finalists JuJubee, Raven, and former
sidekick partner Shannel.
Upon crowning Chad the fairest of them all, RuPaul announced: "When it comes to the art and audacity of drag, nobody does it better than Chad. She has set the bar high, and I can't wait to bring back more of my best queens for another dazzling season of All Stars!"


text:
Father Pat's Pastoral Ponderings
The Beheading of John the Baptist
August 29, 2010
No consideration of the Savior's humanity is adequate, I believe, that fails to consider a simple fact, mentioned often in the Gospels: He prayed. Indeed, if we reflect that prayer is the highest human activity, we should say that His prayer reveals more about Jesus as a human being than anything else He did.
Holy Scripture conveys the impression our Lord was fond of praying alone and out-of-doors. For instance, Mark writes of the earliest days of the Jesus' ministry: "Now in the morning, having risen a long while before daylight, He went out and departed to a solitary place; and there He prayed" (1:35). In the Greek text, that final verb — "prayed" — is expressed in the imperfect tense, which denotes continued and/or repeated action. Mark implies that Jesus spent a significant period of time in that prayer. It began in the dark and ended after sunrise. Jesus prayed through the transition from night into day.
We know He also prayed through the transition from light to darkness — day to night. Mark writes of this somewhat later; the scene comes immediately after the multiplication of the loaves, which happened late in the day (6:35). Mark describes the apostles getting into their boat to sail away, while Jesus remained behind on the shore. Mark writes, "And when He had sent them away, He departed to the mountain to pray. Now when evening came, the boat was in the middle of the sea; and He was alone on the land" (6:46-47). Here, the prayer of Jesus is said to begin in the light and continue into the darkness. It is not broken off until very late — "the fourth watch" (6:48; cf. Matthew 14:23-25).
It is almost impossible, I believe, to consider Jesus' preference for nocturnal prayer without suspecting it was related to the vast expanse of the Palestinian sky at night. In that setting our Lord made His own the rapturous admiration of David, who, a thousand years before, prayed under that same spangled vault: Ki 'er'eh shaméka / ma'asé 'etsb'otéka / yaréha wekokabím 'ashér konántah — "For I see Your heavens, / the work of Your fingers, / the moon and the stars, which You have appointed" (Psalm 8:3).
This reference to the "appointment" of the celestial bodies refers to the fourth day of Creation, on which, we are told, "God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night-and the stars" (Genesis 1:116). This nocturnal prayer of Jesus is set, then, not simply in the beauty of nature, but in the narrative of Creation.
I don't mean simply the story in Genesis, for the original account of Creation is much older than Genesis; it was already inscribed in the stars. Consequently, when Jesus prayed under the heavens, He not only spoke; He also listened, because the moon and the stars — and also the sun — had a story to tell: "The heavens recount the glory of God, / And the firmament declares the work of His hands. / Day unto day tells the story, / And night unto night imparts the knowledge" (Psalms 19 [18]:1-2).
The first Creation narrative is much older than the Bible; Genesis 1 simply tells in words what the Creation itself tells without words. Indeed, the biblical author himself learned the story of Creation by doing what Jesus did — listening closely to the subtle message of the stars: "There is no speech or language where their voice is not heard. / Their voice goes out into all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world" (19 [18]:3-4).
Of all creatures on earth, only the human soul has the receptive capacity to hear the narrative declared in the heavens, and — hearing it — to commune in prayer with the Creator revealed there. The Gospels testify that Jesus had frequent recourse to that communion, sometimes spending entire nights in such prayer: "He went out to the mountain to pray, and continued all night in prayer to God" (Luke 6:12).
We already observed that the Evangelist Mark used the imperfect tense (denoting continued/repeated action) to speak of Jesus' prayer. Luke, going further, intensified this impression by using an awkward periphrastic construction, difficult to render in decent English. Literally it reads, "He was remaining apart in the wilderness and praying" (5:16).
Inasmuch as we find Jesus doing this from the very beginning of His public ministry, we are surely justified in thinking this preference was already the habit of a lifetime. Indeed, we suspect it began in childhood; He was able to read the heavens before He knew how to read the scroll of Genesis. We may think of the young Jesus, most of all, when we recall another line from Psalm 8 : "Out of the mouth of babes and nursing infants / You have perfected praise."
Fr. Patrick Henry Reardon is pastor of All Saints Antiochian Orthodox Church in Chicago, Illinois, and a Senior Editor of Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity.
Subscribe to Pastoral Ponderings — Fr. Reardon's weekly essay.
Read past essays and listen to podcasts by Fr. Reardon.
Books by Fr. Reardon:


text:
Contact Us
Contact Sales
Request more information about our solutions and services
Contact Support
Product issue? Request contact from our technical support team
General Inquiry
Need to get in touch with Alegeus for other reasons? Click here
About Us
Enabling the future winners of consumer directed healthcare
Management Team
World class leadership & deep industry expertise
View upcoming webinars & events
Seeking an adventure? Join our team
Press Releases
Stay current on the latest Alegeus news
Alegeus in the News
Check out the latest media coverage featuring Alegeus
Healthcare Consumerism Blog
Read our interpretation of industry news & trends
Newsletter Archive
View past issues of our newsletters
On-demand Webinars
Client Successes
Case Studies
Research Reports
Health Insurance Plans
Embrace consumer directed healthcare
Third Party Administrators
Differentiate your benefit account offerings
Administer Benefit Accounts
Including FSAs, HRAs, HSAs, & more
Manage HSA Assets
A custodial solution built specifically for HSAs
Influence Consumer Behavior
Decision support for healthcare spending & saving
Process Payments & Communications
Streamline post-adjudication claim processes
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Benefit Planning Consultants
A Like-Minded Partnership that Delivers Meaningful Results
Other Successes
Brad Warnick, Chief Operating Officer at Rocky Mountain Reserve, discusses their CDH platform and go-to-market strategy
Brad Warnick
Chief Operating Officer
Hear from Bob Cummings, CEO & Managing Principal of American Benefits Group on the importance of selecting the right business partner
Bob Cummings
CEO & Managing Principal
Josh Collins, Managing Vice President at NueSynergy, discusses the winning elements of a like-minded technology partnership
Josh Collins
Managing Vice President
Mike Melnychuk
Founder & CEO
Hear from Mike Melnychuk, Founder & CEO of HR Simplified, on how technology impacts business profitability
Kelli Burt, FSA/HRA Administrator at Alliance Insurance Group, shares how technology engages consumers
Kelli Burt
FSA/HRA Administrator
Hear from Patti Lyons, Vice President of Benefit Planning Consultants on the significance of a nimble, adaptive business partner
Patti Lyons
Vice President
Dirk Camilletti
Service Manager
Hear from Dirk Camilletti, Service Manager at Security Benefit Group, as he explains the significance of a noise-free technology platform
Marilyn Jones
VP of Finance & Marketing
Join Marilyn Jones, VP of Finance & Marketing at Benefits Outsource, as she discusses how technology creates a positive client experience
Kerry Jenkins, VP, Shared Services at Benefit Express, discusses their Alegeus partnership and HSA approach
Kerry Jenkins
VP, Shared Services
Anna Bash
Claims Manager
Anna Bash, Claims Manager at Employee Plans, discusses the future of healthcare consumerism
Contact Us
Copyright © 2020 Alegeus. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy


text:
If the cold hasn't been nipping at your heels, then how about the anticipation of another race season? It wont be long before we are back on the track! In the meantime, the Genesee Valley Kart Club will be promoting our club and sport at the Rochester International Auto Show. We are still looking for help from our members to pull this event off. From my understanding, those who volunteer their time for a shift (6+ hours) will receive free admission to the show. Specifically, we need help Wednesday night setting up, Thursday, Friday, and Sunday. Those who are interested in helping, please contact Jeff Stark. So promote our club…promote our sport…and see a free show!
Thursday, February 28th – 12:00 pm to 10:00 pm (setup wed 2/27)
Friday, March 1st – 12:00 pm to 10:00 pm
Saturday, March 2nd – 10:00 am to 10:00 pm
Sunday, March 3rd – 10:00 am to 7:00 pm
Adults: $9.00
Armed Services & Seniors: $6.00
Children under 12: $3.00
Under 5: Free
John Salsbury, Shawn Callahan, Rick Hoyt, Liza Mortimor, Kirk Miller, Mike Mortimor, Bruce Pogue, Kirk Miller's niece, Gary Peterson, Gary MacFarland, Andrew Salsbury, and Kevin Orlop.
You must be logged in to post a comment.


text:
The Register-Guard (ISSN 179-500) is published daily and Sunday by Guard Publishing Company, 3500 Chad Drive, Eugene, OR 97408-7348
Recommended Rates
Daily/Sunday City Outside City
Home Delivery Carrier Routes Motor Routes
Monthly (by carrier) $16.25 $16.75
Monthly (EasyPay) $15.25 $15.75
12 weeks (office pay) $44.25 $45.75
24 weeks (office pay) $86.75 $89.75
52 weeks (office pay) $183.00 $189.00
Daily and Sunday subscriptions (EasyPay and office pay) receive a discount reflected in the prices above. All subscriptions continue beyond payment expiration until stopped by subscriber.
Sunday only home delivery $2.00 weekly; Saturday/Sunday home delivery $2.50 weekly. Mail and all other rates furnished on request.
Periodicals postage paid at Eugene, Oregon.
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to:
The Register-Guard, P.O. Box 10188
Eugene, OR 97440-2188
How to reach The Register-Guard
We welcome your comments and questions about the content of The Register-�Guard. An extended contact list appears on registerguard.com.
Main number 541-485-1234
Local news 541-338-2342
News obituaries 541-338-2342
Letters to the Editor 541-338-2413
Editorial Department 541-338-2316
Sports news (after 4 p.m.) 541-338-2302
Managing Editor Dave Baker 541-338-2320
Newsroom fax 541-683-7631
Sports fax 541-687-6674
Features fax 541-338-2813
Editorial fax 541-338-2828
Advertising Department
Place a classified ad 541-342-1212
Place a paid obituary 541-342-1212
Place a display ad 541-338-2421
Place online banner ad 541-338-2285
Other key advertising numbers
Weddings, anniversaries, engagements 541-683-7612
Classified advertising 541-683-7620
Advertising Sales fax 541-687-6677
Classified fax 541-687-6668
Circulation Department
Subscriber Service 541-485-3311
In-State Toll Free 1-800-377-7428
Hours: 6 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. weekdays and 6:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. weekends & holidays.
Missed paper in Eugene/Springfield will be delivered the same day if reported by 10 a.m.
News sources or readers who see errors in The Register-Guard are encouraged to call 541-485-1234 and ask for the News Department.


text:
I am attempting to install the latest 64 bit versions of viewer/server (126.96.36.199) via the .exe
I've tried leveraging use of some of the command line switches for the server install, so that I can get to a clean unattended silent install with the inclusion of a preconfigured .ini file
Some of the switch settings work great such as /dir="" and /verysilent, but I have been unable to get an install to take a preconfigured .ini file with all my desired settings.
Everything I've come across references a /loadinf="" switch, and I've tried that with the .ini file to no avail. I even tired renaming the .ini to a .inf file and still no luck
Any ideas?


text:
You're in the shower. The water sounds like a gentle, rainy static, and feels like a Plinko massage. You've just started to lather up and suddenly, you're hit with a flash of brilliance. Maybe it's the answer to a vexing problem at work, the location of your lost USB drive, or perhaps it's just a random, inconsequential (yet totally satisfying) insight.
But, by the time you towel off, the idea already has spiraled away down the drain. We all get these kinds of thoughts, and they don't just happen in the shower. Long drives, short walks, even something like pulling weeds, all seem to have the right mix of monotony and engagement to trigger a revelation. They also happen to be activities where it's difficult to take notes. It turns out that aimless engagement in an activity is a great catalyst for free association, but introducing a pen and paper can sterilize the effort.
There haven't been a lot of experiments on why we get random insights, but psychology does have a theory that describes a mental state that seems to foment these kinds of thoughts. It's called the default mode network.
"You become less aware of your environment and more aware of your internal thoughts," said John Kounios, a psychologist who studies creativity and distraction at Drexel University in Philadelphia.
The common thread in these activities is they are physically or mentally active, but only mildly so. They also need to be familiar or comfortable enough that you stay engaged but not bored, and last long enough to have an uninterrupted stream of thought.
Kounios explains that our brains typically catalog things by their context: Windows are parts of buildings, and the stars belong in the night sky. Ideas will always mingle to some degree, but when we're focused on a specific task our thinking tends to be linear.
Kounios likes to use the example of a stack of bricks in your backyard. You walk by them every day with hardly a second thought, and if asked you'd describe them as a building material (maybe for that pizza oven you keep meaning to put together). But one day in the shower, you start thinking about your neighbor's walnut tree. Those nuts sure look tasty, and they've been falling in your yard. You suddenly realize that you can smash those nuts open using the bricks in your backyard!
As far as Eureka moments go, using a brick as a nutcracker is pretty lame, but as an illustration for how the default mode network frees the things in your brain from external associations, it works quite nicely. As ideas become untethered, they are free to bump up against other ideas they've never had the chance to encounter, increasing the likelihood of a useful connection.
Random insights aren't well studied, because as Kounios points out, "You can't just sit somebody down and wait for them to have a novel idea." However, there has been a lot of research on eureka moments, or flash epiphanies that solve a particular problem. The most famous is the apocryphal story of how Archimedes figured out that his king's crown was a fake.
As the tale goes, King Hieron II had given his goldsmith a lump of gold to make a crown. However, he was suspicious that the artisan had taken some of the gold for himself and replaced it with less-precious silver. But, short of melting the crown, the king couldn't be sure the goldsmith had ripped him off. He came to Archimedes with the problem. The famous scientist was stymied, until one day he had a realization while bathing: When he sat in the tub, the water rose corresponding to the volume of his body. If the goldsmith had cut the crown with silver, he would have had to add extra silver to make up for the weight of the denser gold. So, if the crown was cut with silver, Archimedes reasoned that it would displace more water than a chunk of pure gold that weighed the same. They did the test, and the goldsmith turned out to be a cheat.
Like Archimedes, when you are working on a problem your brain tends to fixate on one or a few different strategies. Kounios says these are like ruts that your mental wheels get stuck in. "If you take a break however, those thought patterns no longer dominate your thinking," he said. The problem gets removed from the mental ruts and mingles with other ideas you're carrying in your head. Eventually, it finds one—or several—that click together and rise up like Voltron into a solution. This is called fixation forgetting.
Shower thoughts aren't always attached to a specific problem, but fixation forgetting still helps psychologists like Kounios understand those random cocktails of revelation.
It's not clear how your brain decides which are the right connections, but it's obvious that the farther your brain can roam, the better. Research has shown that your brain builds bigger creative webs when you're in a positive mood. This makes sense, because when you're anxious you're less likely to take a chance on creativity. Even when resting or taking a break, anxious brains tend to obsess on linear solutions. This may be part of the reason that when you bring a way to record your thoughts into the equation—such as a notebook, voice recorder or word processor—the thoughts worth recording become scarce.
When I was in college, my roommates and I decided we wanted to harness some of the fruitful free association happening in the bathroom. We bought a beautiful, purple notebook, and titled it the Poop Journal. Every time I went to do my business, I grabbed a pen and laid the "PoJo" over my knee. But, the insights rarely came. It was similar for my roommates. Rather than a catalog of our collective wisdom, the Poop Journal became a repository of inside jokes, gross artwork, and recaps of our days. Why did the tool for posterity end up spoiling the creative fruits of our labor? Where do those thoughts come from to begin with?
"Not having an explicit task is the main ingredient for random insights," Kounios said. "Once you have a pen and paper there, it's not really your mind wandering."
It doesn't even take a pen and paper to spoil the moment. While I was researching this story, I took an expectation for insight with me into the shower every morning. The best I could conjure by force was something that sounds more like the product of a bong than a warm shower: "People anthropomorphize dogs, and dogs canipomorphize people."
That doesn't mean your eureka moments are doomed to be flushed away. Kounios says if you acclimatize yourself to your recording method, and keep it out of sight (yet within reach), your mind won't be waylaid by external pressure on its way to free association. This could be a water-proof notepad for your shower, a voice-activated recording app for the car, or even an unobtrusive pocket notebook for when you're sitting on the can.