It was quite true that h had met Dr Lawton m one of the cases. Ho (Dr Hogg) told he thought there was no occasion for the patient to go into the hoapital, but said ehe would get better attention and be better nursed than at home, and of course he did not put any obatacles m Dr Lawaon : Dr Maclntyre Baid I moved her here against your will- Dr Hogg : Not against my will ; no. But j to id I saw no reason why tho operation Bhould not be performed at home. Dr Lawaon : Of course it oould. But the patient wished to come to the hospital, and I could not refuse admission. The ohairman thought the quarrel lay between and Dr Maclntyre, and that the board had nothing to do with it. This was the first he had heard of it. Dr LatfßOn said it. was also the first he had heard of it. Mr Moore said there was nothing for the board to do. There had been no mle broken. The dispute was between the two doctors, and Dr Maclntyre'e own letters seemed to decide the dispute against him. Mr Quinn thought there was nothing out of order. Dr Lawson fetched a letter on whtoh Di Macintyre (after asking him to operate) hac written a memo fixing the time. He then submitted a formal reply m writing, ai follows :— "The faots of the case were theße : Dr Maclntyre's note and my answer wen handed by me to for an explanation. Di Maolntyre was at the time giving chloroform He said that it was all a mistake and he wai quite willing that I should operate. — asked him to write me a line. He wrote 01 the back of hia letter, 'Will meet you at 3 3( to-morrow, 21»t August. P. Maolntyre.' Th< following day I saw Dr Maolntyre and hi said he had been under a mistake and it wai all right, he wished me to operate. I operatec m the afternoon. Neither to myßolf, nor, 3 believe, to the patient* friends, has Di Maclntyre expressed any feeling m the oaae Dr Maclntyre was present at the operatiot and gave chloroform. His further statement was taken to the hoapital without th( approval or consent of the medical attendanl is inaccurate, and has been denied by Di Hogg. 