t Added to I his legal grievance is one
of actual oneliece-nauaiuIely, tlie
, shocking manner iii which Herr Ho
low prefer red t he demand for t he
docIuments in question. BJilow is said
to have subseuiientily expressed his
astonishmentt at Aililn's perlsiste.nt
refusal, as he colid have easily taken
collie, and then surrendered the pa
pers. lowever, Bl low ought to ex
press no astoninslent at Ainim's re- e
ftusai as he had made the demand 1
for thle deliverv of the papers ii ar
mlane in Which stamped it not only as
a judicial a~bnrm~ity. but alsoe as a
spe1cinlen of that brutality with 1
whichl he had hercolne accustanmed to 1
treat high and obnoxious officials- 1
deioulow' letter r~ilendere the surrtn 1(
(loi of the documents positively i- l <
possible, unless Arnimi . i-shed to t
plead guilty to the corninissionu of a r
tblany. Arnima had no cause to abapl- N
don his rxi hit to property of hi. simply s
hecause the FForeign Office desired to '
obta in it by means ofa criminal pros
ecution. Hle was deprived of every 1
decent chance of yieldiig without 1
humiliating himself. Bolow's letjer s
threatened him with crimuinal pros- a
ecutio i for feloiu. hI
Arnim could easilyV have been a
Witness to the falsity of the charge on fi
which this threat was based, and ti
every impartial spectator 10nst admit d
that this attempt to give the prosenu- a
tiort any but its real political and per- b
sonal coloring is void of all .justice. w
Only a knowwiledge of all the politicalt t
motives of Arniiii's eIemrities, and more ! i
especially of those of Prince Bis- oi
martk, who iill stand behind the ti
Attoiiey General and inftluece the ti,
tribunal, could enable on0e to form ai L
correct opinion of the case of Count i,
.Arnim.-n u Fork HIerald to
Political Probabilities.
