The  literary  movement  is  represented  by  a^
lengthy  criticism  of  Necker's  book,  Sur  le
Commerce  et  la  Legislation  des  Grains.  It
marks  the  distinct  contrast  between  social
protectionism  and  the  spirit  of  individual
property ;  the  contrast  between  landed  and
moneyed   "capitalism."     (Eclaircissemenis  de-

mandis   cu  M.   N ,   au  nom   des  ProprU-

taires  Fonciers  et  des  Cultivateurs  f^'an^ais
1775,  t.v.  65-168,  t.  vii.  89-167,  t.  viii.  93-139,
and  Bandeau's  letters  to  M.  N.  on  his  "  Eloge
de  Colbert,"  held  at  the  French  academy  in
1774,  t.  ix.  pp.  44-106).  A  letter  directed
against  the  free-trade  theory  of  the  economists
by  the  Count  de  Magnieres  (t.  xii.)  is  refuted

by  M.  de  R (?)  in  1776,  t.  ii. — A  review

of  the  book  of  Condillac,  Sur  le  Commerce  et  le
Gouvernemeni  (1776,  t.  iv.  pp.  109-130,  t.  v.
pp.  131-147),  written  by  Baudeau,  treats  this
author  as  a  heretic  from  the  orthodox  school.
"The  true  economists  are  easy  to  characterise
by  one  feature  which  everybody  understands.
They  recognise  one  master  (the  doctor  Quesnay),
one  doctrine  (that  contained  in  the  Philosophic
rurale  and  the  Analyse  l^conomique),  classical
text -books  (the  Physiocratie),  and  technical
terms  .  .  .  precisely  like  the  old  scholars  of"
China"  (p.  iii.).
