Ma* 6, 1876.]

that the proof should be struck out. It was two years and a half ago since tho end of the poriod for which this amount was claimed. He made no claim at all against his father from the beginning of the period until Feb ruary last, and shortly after the beginning of that month he bought his father's business by giving the -latter £5 and wiping off a small debt. He thought tho conduct of the parties was altogether inconsistent with the existence of a claim of £195.
Claim struck out, and costs to be allowed out of tho estate.
Mr Nation said the next case — the claim of J. F. Stohr — was rather worse than the last. The claimant was only 13 yeais oi ago at the beginning of the period for which he claimed, and was also living in his father's homo.
