Buck,  vol.  4,  p.  95

7.  Property  was  given  in  trust  "for  the


■ole  and  absolute  oae*'  of  a  female  infiuit
She  afterwards  married  under  age,  and  a
settlement  was  made  giving  half  to  the
wife  for  her  separate  use,  and  the  other
half  to  the  husband.  A  bill  was  filed
by  the  husband  and  wife,  after  the  latter
had  come  of  age,  against  the  trustees,
seeking  to  chsrge  them  with  a  breach  of
trust.  The  Court  thought  the  Inune  of
the  suit  improper,  but  gave  leave  to
amend ;  and  the  wife  being,  by  amend-
ment, made  to  sue  by  her  next  friend,  a
decree  was  made,    tkuie  v.  Promt,

vol.  7,  p.  288

8.  The  bill  sought  to  charge  trustees  with
mismanagement  and  misapplication  of  the
trust  estate.  The  answer  insisted  that
one  of  the  two  co- Plaintiffs  had  acqui-
esced. The  Court,  upon  motion,  gave
leave  to  amend  by  making  such  co-Puin-
tiff  a  Defendant,  upon  payment  of  the
costs  of  the  application,  and  giring  secu-
rity for  the  costs  already  incurred.  The
costs  of  the  miqoinder  were  reserved  to
the  hearing.    Bather  v.  Keareley,

vol.  7f  p.  o45

9.  A  husband  and  wife  joined,  aa  co-
Plaintiffs  in  a  suit,  in  which  die  claim
put  forward  was  by  the  husband  in  right
of  his  wife.  He  became  bankrupt,  and
afterwards  the  wife  alone  filed  a  supple-
mental bill,  stadng  a  settlement  (sup-
pressed iu  the  original  bill),  whereby  the
property  had  been  settled  to  her  separate
use.  Held,  that  she  was  entitled  to  re-
lief, but  only  on  the  terms  of  her  next
fnend  consendng  to  become  liable  for
the  costs  of  the  farmer  proceedings,  and
paying  the  extra  costs  occasioned  by  the
suppression  of  the  settlement.  Howard
V.  Prince,  vol.  10.  p.  294

10.  A  married  woman  being  entitled  to  a
share  of  the  produce  of  die  estate  of  a
testator,  joined  her  husband  in  selling
and  assigning  it  to  a  purchaser.  The
assignors  and  assignee  having  joined  in  a
suit  for  its  recovery,  it  was  dismissed,  at
the  hearing  for  misjoinder ;  hut  the  ob-
jection not  having  been  previously  taken,
no  costs  were  given.      Padwiek  v.  Piatt,

vol.  11,  p.  603

11.  A  bill  was  filed  by  husband  and  wife
partly  in  respect  of  the  wife's  separate
estate ;  but  she  sued  by  her  next  friend.
