Pickering shewed cause. The recorder rightly held the
notice to be insufficient, as no such recognizance as the one
described in it had been entered into, nor was there any
such appeal, or any such order in existence, as those referred
to in it. The 7 & 8 Vict. c. 101, s. 4, confers upon the
putati.ve father the right of appeal, on giving notice of his
intention to the mother, and entering into a recognizance
fiur the payment of costs. The 8 & 9 Vict c. 10, s. 3,
requires that he ** shall forthwith give or send a notice in
writing of his having so entered into such recognizance,"
«and unless he shall enter into the recognizance/ &c.,
<< and in default of his giving or sending such notice or
notices as aforesaid, the ap^ieal shall not be allowed." The
right of appeal being given by the statute, the conditions
prescribed should be strictly followed; Rex v. The In-
habitants of KimboUon (^), and Rex v. The Justices of
Umcohskire (c). The case of Rex v. The Justices of the

(a) There was a similar role to & P. 606.
Uie present with respect to that (c) 3 B. & C. 54S ; S. C. 5 D.
appeal. & R. 347.
{b) 6 A. & E. 603; S. C. 1 N



62 B. C. EASTER TERM.
