Held  also,  that  A.  was  not,  on  such  an
application,  to  be  deprived  of  his  risht
against  the  solicitor  to  damages  for  his
imprisonment     Hood  v.  Phillipt,

vol.  6,  p.  176

7.  The  name  of  a  person  who  had  been
made  the  next  friend  of  an  infant  Plaintiff
widiouthis  authority,  ordered  to  be  struck
out,  but  liberty  was  given  to  the  Co-
Plaintiffs  to  amend  by  naming  a  new
next  friend.     Ward  v.  Ward,

vol.  6,  p.  251

8.  As  to  the  liability  of  the  next  friend  in
such  a  case  as  regards  the  Defendant.
Ibid,


410


GENERAL  INDEX.
9.  Solicitor  struck  off  the  rolls  for  fraudu-
lently abusing  the  confidence  of  his  client.
In  re  Martin^  vol.  6,  p.  887

10.  The  Court  has  no  authority,  upon  a
petition  bv  a  client  against  his  solicitor,
to  give  relief  founded  on  a  special  agree-
ment.   Alexander  v.  Anderdon,

vol.  6,  p.  405

11.  A  suit  was  prosecuted  through  a  soli-
citor, and,  as  the  Plaintiffs  alleged,  with-
out their  authority.  The  Defendant  gave
notice  of  motion  to  dismiss  the  bill  for
want  of  prosecution,  which  being  served
on  the  solicitor,  he  requested  the  Plain-
tiffs to  name  a  new  solicitor,  which  they
refused  to  do.  The  solicitor  then  moved
that  he  might  be  dismissed  as  solicitor.
Held,  that  no  such  order  could  be  made,
but  personal  service  on  the  Plaintiffs  of
the  notice  of  motion  to  dismiss  was  or-
dered. The  Plaintiffs  took  no  step  to
relieve  themselves  from  their  liability.
