Thtt two of a trade Mldom agrite h » common saying. Its weakness,'».however. reatde«;j[ln the faob that io Ufa oavilllng, snearing laying. The] idea] sought \to b< oonveyed ii that theftdisagrsemenb is to. ontoome ol reoiproeal jealousy i *>Wbil' hat U likely, it is not ft necessary, or ever phiioiophioal, Inference, Two of a trade may easily see reasons for an honast differ •noe of opinion to which the outsider h bllod. Ag»ln, two of a trade may agree, ftod both be wrong— on ft point, of course, ooontoted with their own industry. Some yeafi ago there wm high debate orer the question whether a painting, exhibited Id P*rle» wm an original Valasquei or a o»py. H»lf »be artiste and oonnolsseurs in Europe got hot nnder the collar about it. It wa« one or the other— to they said, Later oo the (aot came oot. It was neither an Original nor a copy | It wm a replica. The •xperlwae mistaken. And n rani ipeca* tetive judgment in everything. Here ii the cue of two dooteri | both, doubtless, competent men, I! they were erroog, 01 II only one was wrong— but le* dtliave the story first. It oomei from a roMtabTaioaroe, and Is well corroborated. «Ia March, 1891,' says the wr'tor, *l bftd a levere attaok of influenza, whioh prostrated me for twe months* After thi , I could not get op my strength. My ippetlte wis poor, and what little I did eat gave me muoh pain at the ohait and around the heart. Sharp, cutting paini In the region of the heart seised me every now And ftgiin, sometimes so bad thai I feared 1 WM going to dU, At night I got little or no sleep on account of the wind, whiob mm into my tbroat until I fairly gasped lor breath. Daring the painful attacks of my ootnplaint prespiratioo would stand in beads on my faee. ' I soon lost strength to that extenl I oould not stand. Indeed, Iwuii wet* ■b a oh>13. I was of tan so d «y I had to tttoh hold ef something t) keep me from falling. Seveiai times these Attacks hare oome ao«n me at oono«rt», obliging my friends to odndnot me home. 