§612


that  such  other  findings  are  unsupported  by  evidence,*
or  are  uncertain  or  otherwise  defective.*  However  un-
supported or  inconclusive  any  number  of  findings  may  be,
if  in  any  case  there  be  at  least  one  clear,  sustained  and
suflScient  finding  upon  which  the  judgment  may  rest,
every  presumption  being  in  favor  of  the  judgment,  it  will
be  concluded  on  appeal  that  the  court  rested  its  judgment
upon  that  finding  (or  such  findings)  and  the  others  will  be
disregarded^  Moreover,  any  error  in  finding  against  an
appellant  on  a  particular  issue  is  without  prejudice  to
him,  if  the  judgment  gave  him  all  the  relief  to  which  he
was  entitled  had  the  finding  been  in  his  favor.®  So,  also,
a  general  verdict  imports  findings  in  favor  of  the  prevail-
ing party  on  all  material  issues,  and  if  upon  such  a  ver-
dict one  issue  alone  is  sustained  by  the  evidence  and  is
not  affected  by  any  error,  the  want  of  evidence  to  sustain
the  finding  on  the  other  issues  or  any  errors  committed  in
regard  to  them  cannot  be  prejudicial.*


6.  Winbigler  ▼.  Sherman,  175  Gal.
aro,  165  Pac.  943;  De  Gottardi  ▼.
Don&ti,  155  Gal.  109,  99  Pac.  492;
CoUins  V.  Gray,  154  Gal.  131,  97  Pac.
142;  BaucT  y.  Fay,  128  Gal.  523,  61
Pac.  90;  Gasey  v.  Leggett,  125  Gal.
664,  58  Pac.  264;  Auburn  Opera
House  &  P.  Assn.  v.  Hill,  113  Gal.
382,  45  Pac.  695;  Sherman  y.  San-
dell,  106  Gal.  373,  39  Pac.  797;
Clavey  v.  Lord,  87  Gal.  413,  25  Pac.
493;  Bowen  v.  Hickey,  32  Gal.  App.
Dec.  644,  191  Pac.  971;  Austin  v.
Newton,  31  Gal.  App.  Dec.  734,  189
Pac.  471;  Dalton  v.  Pacific  Elec.  Ry.
Co.,  7  Gal.  App.  510,  94  Pac.  868;
Becker  v.  Schwerdtle,  6  Gal.  App.
