Scarlet?.  The  evidence  on  the  part  of  the  defendants  consisted

of  an  extract  from  Domesday,  shewing,  that  at  that  time  the

king  held  Leominster,  with  its  sixteen  members,  naming

{inter  alia)  Lustone  and  Larpol.
The  Valor  Ecclesiasticus,  which  was  partly  to  this  effect:
"  Decanal*  de  Leomynstr  in  Com  et  Dioc  Heref\

Vicaria  de  Eye.     Ric   Wynde  vicar*  ib'm.     Valet  in

Tento  cum  ptin  p  annil        vi.   viii.
Decimisfeni  cdib}  annis         ^     xx.
Decimis  lini  00163  annis xvi.
$c.       8fc.      %c.
Et  valet  dare  coity  annis     .     .     •     vii.    xix.     ii.
X~p xv.    xi.M

Bailiff's  accounts,  36  Hen.  8,  accounting  for  the  profits
of  the  Bury  of  Luston,  and  of  the  ferme  of  the  site  of  the
manor.  Certain  leases  of  the  tithes.  The  answers  of  the  vicar
and  chaplain  in  The  Attorney-  General  v.  Stevens.  And  in-
stitutions to  the  vicarage  of  Eye,  in  1 7 1 8, 1 730, 1 785  &  1 796.
The  evidence  on  the  part  of  the  defendants  Davis  and
Staunton,  (who  were  occupiers  in  Yarpole),  consisted  of  a
lease  from  the  Crown,  in  the  reign  of  King  Edward  6th,  of
land  in  Yarpole,  in  which  were  mentioned  the  Church-
wardens of  Yarpole;  and  a  provision  was  made  for  defray-
ing the  expense  of  lamps  or  lights  in  the  church  of  Yarpole.
These  defendants  also  produced,  from  the  bishop's  registry,
institutions  to  the  perpetual  vicarage  of  the  parish  church
of  Yarpole,  in  the  years  1740,  1743,  and  1796,  and  the
admission  on  the  18th  May,  1808,  of  a  curate.- — All  the  de-
fendants proved,  by  parol  testimony,  the  payment  of  the  se-
veral moduses  alleged  by  their  answers,  within  living  me-
mory, and  the  reputation  that  the  same  were  moduses.
