F/^/.  Bull.  D.  F.p,  88.  Noi^rrii  App.  vol.  2. p.  ijic.
"  y  ^  \H


^4^  A  Second   Defense  Qu.1I-

in  Anfwer,  but  what   has  been  abundantly  replied  to,
or  obviated  before.     So  I  pafs  on.;

u4.D.  237.-244.  Origen.
1  cited  Origen,  hut  for  Two  Texts,  E.xod.  iii.  4,
5.  Pfdm.  XXIV.  8,  I  p.  According  to  Him  therefore
Chrifl  is  God  of  Abraham  >  Ifaacj  and  yacoh ;  Jeho-
vahy  and  King  of  Glory.  Tofi  jee  not^  it  feems,  hoiif
'This  proves ,  tlmt  Origen  thought  Chriji  to  be  the  om
Jupreme  God.  It  either  proves  That,  or  elfe  that  O-
rigen  thought  there  were  two  Gods  of  Abraham^  Tiva
L^rds  of  Hods:  Which  yet  Origen,  as  we  have  be-
fore feen,  abfolutely  denies.     So  much  for  Origen^

A,  v.  256".  Cyprian.
My  Argument  from  Cyprim  runs  t|ius.
