urn!
, i, ,, ,i ,.... ..,.,.... ..r ...i. ... I
t thu coiiseipienre i
. , i - i
would he tu biui'' tlie niaiia
einent of the
e ae-
iniiiit-
tec nre not prcpareil to niliiiit. lliey in
, cline In a contrary oiuiiinii, nml believe that
the proper remedy fur the stale, in c.ise i I
wrong, is in another direction. Her mints
of chancery may rnutrnll Hie execution ol
Hie trust created, according In the well set-
lieu principles which govern courts ol mat
character, w henever such a case of the vi
olation of the trust shall occur as In furnish
occasion fur the exercise nf chancery juris
diction; mm your committee cniiui t see
that Ihe piintiples of the case nre material-
IV ilillerenl liotn tnnse wliicli govern tlie
great body of trust cases; n class of cases
,,.e..o..i.v ,,, miojii, ui wir power III
courts of ripiity.
Hut be Ihe tact as it may in regard lo these
ipieslious. (and the committee inild ndvise
Hist the state be not rutiuiiilled on them nt
present.) and conceding lor the pnrsoses ol
this occasion, that 1. either the legislature
nor Hie courts ol Ihe state have a 1 igbl lo j linue.l und the slate peimits it to he undi r
inteifi re at this time to prevent a niiappl; .toinl that she w ill .leouiesce. the ir.li mi.
calioii of the trust fiinil, yet theteis a route
d : . The slate of Illinois is ditet lly inteies
led in nil that cnhccrns Iter ennui. !v at
tempting lo execute a great system (f in
ternal improvement, one state became in
volved so fir that her condition was deem
ed In be hopeless. She had expended mil.
