power.  (Mass.)  567;  Tread  well  v.  Cordis,  5  Gray
8.  Granville  v.  M*Neill,  7  Hare  (Eng.)>  (Mass.),  341,  359;  Dunning  v.  The  Ocean
156;  Banner  V.  Storm,  i  Sandf.  (N.  V.)  357.  Nat.  Banlc,  6  Lans.  (N.  V.)  296.
8.  Wros.  Exrs.  (7th  Eng.  ed.)  287.  The  question   has  given   rise  to  much
Schoul.  Exrs.  and  Admrs.  §  49.  discussion  in  Pennsylvania,  the  conclusion
Centra,  i  Sugden  un  Powers  (6th  ed.),  arrived  at  being,  that  a  power  to  sell  land
138 ;  2  Prest.  on  Abstr.  264.     Compare  §  X.  for  the  payment  of  debts  or  distribution  is
n^  XII.  3.  A  n.  to  be  deemed  annexed  to  the  office  of  ex-
See  §  XII.  2  e,  distinction  between  exec-  ecutor,  and  will  pass  to  the  administrator
otor's  and  testamentary  trustees.  with  the  will  annexed,  but  not  a  power  to
'*  If  a  man  will  that  A.  and  B.,  his  execn-  sell  for  general   purposes  of  investment.
tors,  shall  sell,  etc.,  and  they  refuse  before  Ross  v.  Barclay,  6  Harris  (Pa.),  179;  Water
the  ordinary,  yet  it  seems  they  may  sell,  v.  Margerson,  10  P.  F.  S.  (Pa.)  39;  Evans
because  they  are  certainly  named,  so  that  v.  Chew,  21  P.  F.  S.  (Pa.  St.)  47.
