Arthur  B.  Briggs  Co.,  138  Cal.  724,
72  Pac.  352;  Gilbert  v.  Kelly,  138
Cal.  689,  72  Pac.  344;  McDonald  'v.
Hayes,  132  Cal.  490,  64  Pac.  850
(rule  does  not  apply  to  review  of
errors  in  admission  of  evidence);
Byland  v.  Heney,  130  Cal.  426,  62
Pac.  616;  Coonan  v.  Loewenthal,
129  Cal.  197,  61  Pac.  940;  Wise  v.
Ballon,  129  Cal.  45,  61  Pac.  574;
Wall  V.  Mines,  128  Cal.  136,  60  Pac.
682;  Beed  v.  Johnson,  127  Cal.  538,
59  Pac.  986;  McHagh  v.  Adkins,
117  Cal.  228,  49  Pac.  2;  California
Imp.  Co.  V.  Baroteau,  11^  Cal.  136,
47  Pac.  J018;  Packard  ▼.  Craig,  114
Cal.  95»  45  Pac.  1033  (an  appeal
from  a  judgment  in  an  election
contest  is  subject  to  this  rule);
Painter  ▼.  Painter,  113  Cal.  371,
45  Pac.  689  (when  judgment  is
"rendered");  Fatjo  v.  Swasey,  111
Cal.  628,  44  Pac.  225;  Brooks  v.
San  Francisco  &  N.  P.  By.  Co.,  110
Cal.  173,  42  Pac.  570;  Estate  of
Levinson,  108  Cal.  450,  41  Pac.  483,
42  Pac.  479;  Falkner  v.  Hendy,  107
Cal.  49,  40  Pac.  21,  386;  Secord  ▼.
Quigley,  106  Cal.  149,  39  Pac.  623;
Estate  of  Heldt,  98  Cal.  553,  33
Pac.  549  (order  appointing  ad-
ministrator) ;  Scott  V.  Glenn,  98
Cal.  168,  32  Pac.  983;  Fogel  v.
Schmalz,  92  Cal.  412,  28  Pac.  444
(rule  does  not  preclude  review  of
order  granting  or  denying  non-
suit); Curran  v.  Kennedy,  89  Cal.
98,  26  Pac.  641;  CliflPord  v.  Allman.
84  Cal.  528,  24  Pac.  292  (defining
"decision");  Tillman  v.  Averett,  82
Cal.  576,  23  Pac,  875;  Schurtz  v.
