iiim  thatlhey  are  generally  PrtsbjterUns  in  the  Houfe  of  Commons^
md  that  ibc  VrtAytfrimfs  are  at  this   I;  ftjfti  contriving  againft

hk  Crown.  ' "     *  Nay,  v^hat  is  it

we  candefpair  of,  after  we  have  feen  Mrs.  C.  and  Mr,  G.  admitted

•*  as  Evidence  tn  prove  a  Prejbyteriaa  Plot  upon  Sir  R,  P.  when  the
Contrivanciofthi  fhrgery^hzd  been  before  DIRECTLY  PROV'D'
opo'^  thofe  very  Pcrfons,  by  the  Tcftlmony  of  Danger  fields  con-
•  firmM  wilb  many  Girctrmftances/  Tis  Cowi^rdifc  to  fear  after  ftch
Succefs  v^Dd  'lis  telly  to  have  too  good  an  Opinion  of  our  Advcr-
firies.  Do  we  not  fee  they  help  us  all  they  can  ?  Do  not  2£reatPar^
iy  mmmg^  tht  Hereticks  Labour  as  beartity  to  SERf^£  OVR  INTB-
REST^  asifthiy  were  of  oitr  Religion^  and  more  ready  10  be  guffd '
into  a  belief  of  £:>mt  Presbyterian  Conlpiracy,  than  ^e  are  to  tonii  •
^  one?       ■  ■■   ■i*  I

*  LeChefe^  The  Debate  of  theft  weighty  matters  has  given  me
abondani  Salts&iflion,  and  a  great  light  tdto  the  Affiirs  of  England^.
