in  killing  a  mule,  there  being  no  fence  and  &  Ft.  W.  R.  Co.  v.  Wood.  82  Ind«  593;

no  statute  requiring  the  company  to  fence  Chicago,   etc.,    R.   Co.  v.  Campbell,  47

its  traclcs,  the    plaintiff   offered  no  evi-  Mich.  265;  s.  c.  7  Am.  &  Eng.  R.  R.  Cas.
dence  to  prove  negligence  by  the  servants  545:  Beckdolt  v.  Grand  Rapids,  etc.,  R.
of  the  defendant.     Held^  that  the  simple  Co.  (Ind.).  15  N.  E.  Rep.  6S6.
