at.  40},  in  all  thii^  eicellent,  and  at  all  timet
equal  to  hinudf.  He  wu  dittingnithed  foi  a  pecu-
liarity ti  ttyle  of  design  ;  be  wu  fond  of  a  mmmlar
limb,  and  adopted  a  inon  decided  anatomical  dia-
play  generally,  but  he  kept  the  body  light,  in  pro-
portion to  the  bead  and  iimb^  Pliny  layi  that
Gnphnnor  firrt  repreaented  heroet  with  dignity.
Pnrrbaaiua  waa  vid  to  have  eBtabliibed  the  canon
of  art  for  heroea  ;  but  the  heroet  of  Pinhuiot
wen  appanntly  mon  dinne,  thoie  of  Enphianor
mon  human.  We  have  exantplei  of  both  thete
itylea,  in  the  kindred  art  of  tcnlptun,  in  the  Apollo
and  tbe  Laecofin,  and  in  the  Heleager  and  Iho
Gladiator,  or  tbe  Antinou  and  the  Diwobolut.
It  wu  to  thii  dittinnion  of  ityle  which  Enphranor
Of^ianntly  alluded,  when  be  aaid  that  the  Theaena
of  ParrbanBD  hod  been  fed  npon  roaea,bnt  bi*  own
upon  beef.  (Plut.  d»  Otor.  AAat.  2  ;  Plin.  L  e.)
Eupbranor  painted  In  encauitic,  and  executed  many
famoua  work)  ;  the  principal  wen  a  battle  of  Hon-
lineia,  and  a  piclun  of  the  twelTe  godi.  (Plin. /.  o. ;
Plut.  He.  ;  Pauo.  i  3  ;  Lncian,  Imag.  7  ;  Valer.
