is  right.  Considering  that  the  real  estate  and  the  in-
come of  it  is  not  subject  to  the  proyisions  of  the  Thettus^
sen  Act  (the  contrary  of  which,  nobody  has  contended
for),  how  do  the  directions  of  the  will  apply  to  it?  The
testator  says  distinctly,  that  the  rents  are  to  be  invested
and  become  a  part  of  his  personal  estate,  and  to  be
disposed  of  in  the  manner  directed  by  the  will,  that
is,  to  be  accumulated :  by  which  I  understand,  the  in-
come is  to  be  added  to  the  principal,  which  is  personal
estate.  It  is  not  because  the  rents  fall  into  the  personal
estate  every  year  that  they  are  to  be  called  the  accu-
mulation in  the  sense  which  this  Cotirt  gives  to  the
tenn«  These  rents  are  portions  of  the  personal  estate
acquired  year  by  year:  they  become  personal  estate,
and  are  then  to  be  dealt  with  like  the  other  personal
estate,  that  is  to  say,  they  are  to  be  applied,  so  far
wA  they  may,  to  the  purposes  directed  by  the  will,  and
if  any  part  of  the  direction  of  the  will  cannot  be  com-
plied with,  such  as  the  direction  to  accumulate  beyond
the  limited  period,  then  I  think  the  income  will  go  in
the  same  way  as  the  income  of  the  other  parts  of  the
personal  estate ;  that  is  to  say,  to  the  legatees.
