(Before J. N. Wood, Esq., E.M.) Wednesday, September 13, 18S2. H. M 'SHANK V. ROSS. Charge for not taking efficient steps to destroy rabbits on defendant's property. Defendant was fined 20a, and 33a costs. SAME V. WALTEK MILLER. This was a similar charge. Mr Stewart appeared for the informant, and Mr Reid defended. After the evidence of three witnesses had been given, the information was dismissed on a point raised by Mr Reid. W, POTIKI V. C. HILGENDORF. Claim, £5 15s 6d. Mr Stewart appeared for plaintiff, for whom judgment was given, with 36s costs. G. POTIKI V. SAME. Claim, £5 12s. Mr Stewart appeared for plaintiff, 'for whom judgment was given, with 36s costs. JOHN DUNNE V. MATTHEWS. Claim, £12, on an account stated. Mr Stewart for plaintiff, and Mr Reid for defendant. Judgment w«s given for £9, with 35s coats.
DISTRICT ROAD BOARDS.
