hkiixrivo in refurnishing thu H* ba \ .'i!.' » »!a till that then) wau no MU of ?ftlo over i\i‘j hou)<; ' and in conaeqtwnc.* of fch<jne rcpre- had opened a« account with him. Hu had often visited the debtor at th* Halt, and the Utter had, «p to the very Hat, ntatud that hia business waa win" on satufac tovily. Ko had found that the debtor had a brother with him in the concern, and he would like to know what he took ont of the business, wi ho hnd disappeared about the time the debtor was «ott»ng into difficulties. Tin* debtor stated that his brother was only a servant in the hotel at £1 per week. Mr J>ai m* paid that he had boon informed }>y the debtor that ho and Lh brother were together In the business. At this stago it was suggested by Mr .Stafford, that it v/ould bo advisable to ad* j'inm the meeting in order to obtain the atten dance fur examination of Mrs Schultz**, sen., and Mr Anderson. This course was agreed upon, and the meet ing adjourned.
SUPREME COURT.
