To the Editor op the "Evening Mail.' [ Slit— Kindly allow mo epsco ic your I columns to call attention to a BubjeoC in I which all ure interfistpd, viz.. the price of I bread. I find tha, ih» price charged by I bakers here ia f r in exc.ees of that charged I iu oiher purts of the colony where flour is I ob'ahiablo lit ssb^nt the asmo ooet ns in Nel- 1 S3I-. Take, for rxainrle, Wellington and f Auckland. lam inform- d ttaar, in both theao I fi i s thti price of hrtad per 41b loaf is 4.}d I ea*li cr 5d if to; k. d whilo in Nelson we I ! live to pay 7d per 41b loaf. The price of I flour being comparatively low, surely onr I lakers will be a> 1? to makfi a rpdnclion upon I the present price; even a penny per loaf I would be of coneidprablo importance to I worlriag men, ee a", the pre^enc time wages I are low and work difficult to obtain. 1 tm, &e., I A Working Man. I To The Editor op the "Evening Mail." I I Sir, — A more palpable and gross injustice f I to the taxpayers of the colony has not been committed by the Parliament of New Zea • | land than, that of voting £2000 to the daughters of the late Mr Macandrew, commented on by you in your Saturday's I article. And it was done in such a mean and despicable way that it disgraces the Parliament more than the vote itself, proposed by Mr Larnach— who, from now having his home in Victoria, will not have to face his constituents in a new election — and seconded by Mr Mills, Manager of the Union Company and member for Port Chalmers, as much a pocket borough to that Company as Old Sarum to the Lord of the Manor before the Reform Bill of 1832, and carried on tne voiceß in order rba f ; the votea of the members should noo bo recorded as yea or nay. 