M'Leod gave evidence—one as to the sale of liquor and the other as to seizure of two cases of whisky, one full and the other containing nine bottles. For the defence, F. H. Daniel deposed to the whisky having been sent to him without being ordered. Murray Johnston deposed that he ordered the whisky without consent of defendant; never sold any liquor at defendant's house. R. Nicol, of Hogg, Howison, Nicol and Co., deposed to Johnston having ordered the whisky. Judgment was also reserved in this case till following day. Two other cases of a similar character to above- Police v. Johnston—were withdrawn by consent. Tuesday, 21st Decemrbr. Police v. F. H. Daniel.—His Worship, in giving: Judgment herein, reserved from previous day, said : In this case defendant is charged with selling liquor, to wit, whisky, to one Peter Gallon, at Glenorchy, on the 27th Novem ber last, he not being the bolder of a license so to do. The information is laid under the 159 th section of the Licensing Act, 1881. The evidence of P Herbert is very strong as regards the whisky being supplied by defendant, and his having received and taken payment for the same. R. M'Cormack corrorborated the evidence of Herbert as to the supply of several whiskies— the onlv money which he saw paid being 2s by Peter Gallon. P. Gallon also corroborates the evidence of Herbert and M'Cormack a* to having had whiskey supplied to him; but he does not admit having paid for any. W. H. Homer did not remember anything except that he paid no money to defend ant nor did he see any money paia by anyone else, but he admits there was whisky drunk, and that was not an unusual thing as it was always there. For the defence, defendant swears he did not serve any liqnor or receive any payment for it; but he admits brinirinu in a bottle of whisky which was drunk by the persons then present. He admits receiving 2s from Qallon, but does not remember receiving 16s. Now, under section 170 of the Licensing Act, it is not neces&arv to prove that anv money passed or any liquor was consumed, if the Court be satisfied that a transaction in the nature of a sale took place. 