δ 107. 13. Μάρκος γάρ. This is Gieseler’s emendation adopted by
Hort. The reading Mapxiwv followed by μεθ᾽ ὅν (or even, as emended by
Dodwell, μεθ᾽ οὗ) Σίμων Πέτρου ἐπήκουσεν is in flagrant contradiction
to the chronology, since Justin Martyr and Irenaeus both witness that
Marcion flourished about 154. ‘Mark the Evangelist was older than either
Glaucias or Theodas, even though we should allow that these were disciples
of the Apostles. He was older also than Simon, who undoubtedly heard
S. Peter.’ γάρ is here used like nam in passing on from one instance


Ρ, 900, § 108] NOTES. 353


to another, see my note on Cic. WV. D. 1. 27 and above p. 32. 3. Gieseler
supports his emendation by a reference to Greg. Naz. Orat. xxv. p. 441,
where Μάρκου (the Gnostic) should be substituted for Μαρκίωνος.
16. ἐπήκουσεν. The same correction (ἐπ. for ὑπ.) is made by Zahn in
Str. τ. P. 324 τὸ πνεῦμα ἐκεῖνο τὸ κεχαριτωμένον οὗ κατηξιώθημεν ὑπακοῦσαι.
I am not sure that it is required in either case.
19. ὑποβεβηκνίας τῷ χρόνῳ. I am not aware of any other instance in
which tof. is used generally of posteriority in time: Cl. mostly uses it of
subjects to be dealt with in later chapters, cf. Str. 1. P. 366 init. ὡς ὀλίγον
ὑποβάντες δείξομεν.
κεκαινοτομῆσθαι. Cf. above p. 182. 6.
20. παραχαραχθείσας. Cf above mapaydpaypa p. 158. 22.
22. οἱ κατὰ πρόθεσιν δίκαιοι. Cf. Rom. viii. 28 τοῖς κατὰ πρόθεσιν
κλητοῖς οὖσιν.
23, ἐγκαταλέγονται. Cf. Protr. P. 35 δαίμονες δευτέρᾳ ἐγκαταλεγόμενοι
τάξει, Str. τ. P. 350 fin. ᾿Ακουσίλαον ἐγκατέλεξαν τοῖς ἑπτὰ σοφοῖς, ib. P. 423
τοῖς υἱοῖς ἐγκαταλέγεται, Luc. de Paras. 3 παρασιτικὴν ταῖς ἄλλαις τέχναις
ἐγκαταλέξομεν.
