Dr Foster stated that’,his client objected to the arrangement, as, being a principal credi tor, he thought he should bare been included in the trusteeship. Mr Williams said that there was an item of £3OO in dispute, and it was therefore, thought inadvisable that Mr Barnes should be appointed a trustee. Dr Foster said that he would undertake on behalf of Ur Barnes, to drop the £3OO in dis pute altogether. It was very doubtful whether the claim could be established at law, and even if it could, Mr Barnes would only come in for a dividend. Hia Honor, however, had seen the merits of the claim. He would, therefore, drop the claim for £3OO if Mr Barnes were appointed a trustee in the place of Mr Deßoorbel, The matter was ordered to stand over,, by request of counsel on both sides, until Friday next, with the view of some arrangement being come to.
MAGISTRATES’ COURTS.
