She received other sums amounting to £60 from Green way. At no time when she sold Greenway goods was Greenway so much under tho influence of liquor as not to know that he was buying jewellery. When Greenway paid her £50 in December, he might have had a few drinks, but she considered him sobei ,. On the 7th January, 1891, at the Central Hotel, she got a promissory note fromMr Greenway for £200. Mr Hitchens wrote the promissory note, and Mr Greenway signed it. Mr Greenway wa3 in drink when he signed, but was not drunk. The promissory note was in her favour. It was made payable at Mr Greenway's office, in High-streot, one month from date. When the p.n. became due, she presented it to Mr Aicken, Mr Greenway's agent. Mr Aicken said there were no funds at present, but that he was going to sell somo of Mr Greenway's shares in the Union Bank, and if thoy were sold ho would pay witness. Hβ showed the p.n. to Mr Aicken and he had ib in his hand, but he did not take any objection to the signature when Rao v. Groenway was before the Court last June. She had further conversation with Mr Aicken about paying the money. Mr Aicken said, " Mrs McDonald worked hard for us. If we win the case we have money to draw from Court, and your claim will be settled in full." At one time when pressed for money in June she went to Mr Aicken. Hβ said "he would lend her £20 until the p.n. was settled, but that Mr Cooper ob jected, on the ground that ib might in jure Mr Greenway in the case Green way v. Rae. Mr Aicken knew the promissory note was given for goods re ceived. Early in February, 1891, she was at the Temperance Hotel, Henderson, Mrs Page drove her out. She saw Mr Green way there. Miss Stanley, Mrs Page, Skipper Bowden, and Mr Holiban were present. She told Mr Greenway that she had nob received tho money for the p.n. Greenway replied that Mr Aicken was his servant and thab he had instructed Mr Hitchens to pay her the money. Greenway then said, " I will give you an order on Mr Aickon if you strike off the D.I.C. 