dangers  of  the  employment  when  fully  Defendants  ordered  the  porter  in  their

explained  to  him,  as  they  should  have  store  to  run  an  elevator,  and,  as  he  had

been,  the  contract  with  him  would  not  never  run  one  before,  furnished  him  an

place  him  in  the  position  of  an  employee  instructor  to  teach  him  how  to  d|o  so.
or  preclude  a  recovery  for  injuries  suflfered  Held^  that  they  were  answerable  for  any

from    the  negligence    of    co-employees,  injury  to  him  in  the  use  of  the  elevator

Hamilton  v,  Galveston,  etc.,  R.  Co.,  54  arising  from  the  incompetency  or  negli-

Tex.  556;  s.  c,  4  Am.  &  Eng.  R.  R.  Cas.  gence  of  the  instructor;  for  in  such  a  case,

528.  the  instructor  does  not  stand  to  the  injured

The    defendant's    trackmaster,    whose  party  in  the  relation  of  a  co-servant,  but  as

duty  it  was  to  keep  its  track  clear  from  a  representative  of  the  master.     Brennan

snow,  and  who  was  accustomed  to  do  so  v.  Gordon,  13  Daly  (N.  Y.),2o8.
with  men  hired  temporarily  for  that  pur-  Where  it  is  unusual  and  dangerous  to

pose,  employed  the  plaintiff  with  his  team  clean  the  machinery  of  a  mill  &fore  the

to  scrape  the  tracks.     The  day  was  very  stoppage  of  the  mill,  the  master  is  respon-

stormy,  and  the  plaintiff  was  the  only  man  sible  for  the  negligence  of  his  foreman  in

out  with  a  team.     He  was  ignorant  of  the  requiring  a  minor  in  his  employ  to  clean

time  for  the  passage  of  trains  and  wholly  the  machinery  before  the  stoppage  of  the

unused  to  the  work,  and  he  objected  to  mill,  although  such  work  was  within  the

the  employment  upon  these  grounds;  but  scope  of  his  employment.     Robertson  v.
