3.  Master  and  Servant. — Workmen* s  Compensation  Act. — Appeal
from  Award. — Review. — Questions  of  Law. — On  an  appeal  from
an  award  of  compensation  under  the  Workmen's  Ck)mpensatlon
Act  (Acts  1915  p.  392),  the  Appellate  Court  can  review  only  ques-
tions of  law.    p.  567.
4.  Master  and  Servant. — Workmen* s  Compensation  Act. — Meas-
ure of  Compensation. — ^As  the  Workmen's  Compensation  Act
(Acts  1915  p.  392)  makes  no  specific  provision  as  to  the  period
during  which  compensation  shall  be  allowed  for  injury  either  to
the  little  finger  Qr  to  the  ring  finger  considered  alone,  nor  for
injury  of  both  fingers  in  the  same  accident,  it  is  the  duty  of  the
Industrial  Board  to  fix  the  compensation,  in  its  discretion,  under
the  general  provisions  of  §31.    p.  567.
564  APPELLATE  COURT  OP  INDLANA,

Kenwood  Bridge  Go.  v.  Stanley— 66  Ind.  App.  663.
From  the  Industrial  Board  of  Indiana.
Proceedings  for  compensation  under  the  Work-
men's Compensation  Act  by  William  F.  Stanley
against  the  Kenwood  Bridge  Company.  From  an
award  for  applicant,  the  defendant  appeals.
William  J.  Henley  and  Jackiel  W.  Joseph,  for
appellant.
Walter  A.  Murray^  for  appellee.
