(a) Urantus, Bishop of Himeria, said :—
—(Liban{ius],* Deacon of Samosata, being inter-
preter for him)—I say the same as the God-fearing
Bishop Eustathius has deposed. For, he (Daniel) was
accused of disgraceful immorality, and was convicted
in our presence.
3 (a) Juvenat, Bishop of Jerusalem, said :—


Relying with confidence on the excellent name
(fame) of the Holy Bishops Photius, and Eustathius,
and Uranius, I (decree) determine the very same as
they do about him (Daniel), who as Judges heard
the case.t


(b) Puotius, Bishop of Tyre, said :—


Daniel, having been charged with these vices by
the Venerable and God-loving Clergy of the
Church of Charre, and having been convicted to


‘in Pagan Cities, we wished to avoid scandalizing the heathens by show-
“ing them that a Bishop could misconduct himself to that extent. Then
“he (Daniel), availing himself of the delay, framed in writing the Re-
“ sionation of his Bishopric, and presented it to his Metropolitan, as we
“learn from the letters of the latter, bas. While all this was going on,
“the Documents, relating to this Holy C®cumenical Synod, were sent
“tous. It is thus left to you, who are perfect, to terminate this affair.”
* If the Greek were épuyvetovtos A:Barov, then, before the verdicts
or sentences were given, Libanius read explanations, or a full report of
the proceedings, of the trial of Daniel, then {.a};-Scl, “I say.
<¢ for, he has been accused,’’ &c.; but there seems no evidence of the
latter doing so, and Libanius must be considered as merely the interpreter
of Uranius’s Syriac into Greek, though the word, mma2], meaning re-
dargutus est, might seem to give countenance to the idea suggested above.
