15.  Where  goods  sold  and  delivered  are  charged  by  the  seller  to  the  husband
and  credit  is  given  to  him,  his  wife,  separated  as  to  property,  will  not  be  held
liable.  It  must  be  clearly  proved  that  the  wife  in  her  own  name  bought  and  obtained
credit  in  order  to  make  her  liable. — Q.  B. — Paquette  dt  Ouertin,  2  L.  N.,  p.  211.
16.  La  femme  q*)i  a  stipule  dans  un  contrat  demariage  qu'elle  ne  contribue-
rait  pas  aux  charges  du  mariage,  sera  cependant  condamn6e  k  payer  des  effets  de
groceries  achet^s  par  elle-mSme  pour  la  famille,  et  lorsquUl  est  prouv6  qu'elle  a
souvent  promis  payer  le  prix  de  ces  groceries.  Une  femme  s6paree  de  biens  n'a
pas  besoin  de  I'autorisation  de  son  mari  pour  acheter  des  provisions  pour  la  fa-
mille.— C.  R. — Oarrigan  vs  Oarrigan,  9  R.  L.,  p.  510.
17.  The  plaintiff  sued  for  the  price  of  bread  supplied  to  defendant,  siparie
de  biens.  It  was  admitted  that  the  bread  was  delivered  to  the  female  defendant
at  her  domicile,  to  wit,  the  joint  domicile  of  the  defendants ;  that  the  price  was
reasonable )  that  the  bread  was  consumed  by  the  defendants  and  their  childreA  j
that  the  male  defendant  was  insolvent  and  unable  to  provide  his  wife  and  child-
ren with  the  necessaries  of  life.  Action  was  dismissed  on  the  ground  that
credit  had  been  given  to  the  husband. — Caron,  J. — Bachlaw  vs  Cooper,  3  L.  N.,
p.  128.
