(x)  Tate  V.  Hubert,  2  Ves.  111.
(y)  Hawkins  v,  Bleu:itt,  2  £sp.
663.
{s)  Bunn  v.  Markham,  2  Marsh.
532;  7  Taunt.  224;  Holt,  352.
i


u  !tui  a  vcriw]  itlft  of  a  ditttcl,  wilbout  ac«M]  doEmj,  wmAI  Bat|M
ihf  propcrQf  of  lh»  iIodm  (a),

Ai  to  lh«  luliJact-mUttr  oT  a  tUmalio  martit  comiI,  it  bw  Wn  laU
ihaL  «  niort^ngc  or  ■  buoil  giv^n  m  ft  collst«ra]  wntrirr  At  anw]  far
(>a  ntong^ti-  miy  Im  mad*  the  nil^ect  of  rdA  «  gift  (t).  So  IW  Jn
Ih-cn'  of  bank  nucni,  or  ft  govenimtfiit  Ullf  (jc),  proaatamy  notes  wrth
to  b«iuvr,  cxehcigitei  aete*.  no  vxcli^qnn  Mil  indatvcd  ia  UMikjA
or  an;  Kcurilylr)  nhlcli  will  anlillr  iha  bolder  to  ilw  moMj  tftdbi,
wilt  be  a  sood  ttimatio  aiorla  rataJL  Bat  k  deliretr  of  a  xMc  A>«
ncnl;  in  fo«or  or  ■  iaaot  u  not  niffidciit  to  pas  ute  donor't  ■Hnl
without  iniloneinant  (,/*};  our  will  (lie  d^timj  uT  ibe  rvo^pb  bb
{>iM  of  idocli  be  a  Eufficieut  delimjr  of  the  pniprity  In  lb*  fiadi,  ■
actual  tran«&T  into  the  name  of  the  doni»  being  urctaaKryie).
A  delivpry  of  o  choque  i>n  donor'«  banker  m  his  hut  Utaw,  pmUa
r  bearer,"  and  signed  by  donor,  ti  an  adequate  ewtf  th


amcunt.  If  d<>n


'e  the  money  from  the  hnak  in  the  donori  1


Cialc  th«  cheque  for  a TBluibleconaidcTBlion,  or  in  pMymeBioTadA;!
nicb  cheqne  will  not  operate  a>  an  appainlment  of  so  much,  if  ihe  dtoK
retain  it  m  hi*  pMKSsoa  till  afler  donor's  death  (A).
