The letter, at Mr Gibbes’ suggestion, men tioned two things to convince Lady Tichborne of the claimant’s identity—“the brown mark on my side, and the card case at Brighton.” But Lady Tichborne knew nothing of “ the brown mark and as to the Brighton card case, Roger, “if he waß ever at Brighton in his life, was not there at the time when that swindle occurred,” although, singularly, Arthur Orton was in this country then. Commenting ou Mr Gibbes’ evidence under examination by commission in Australia, the Attorney-General brought out some other discrepancies. The claimant had said to his own attorney that the ship in which he came from England to Val paraiso was the Jessie Miller, which was the ship in which Orton sailed- Lady Tichborne in one of her letters hac frankly stated that her son was educated at Stoneyharst, but under cross-examination Mr Gibbes declined to say whether (hat statement corresponded with what the claimant, then going by the name of Castro, had previously told him. although at another point he was obliged to admit that he had said the accounts differed. Further, Mr Gibbes was firmly persuaded that his client repudiated having been an officer in the army. There were other curious facts, such as that Lewis Owen, or Owen Lewis, given by the claimant as the name of the cap tain of the Bella, was the name of a seaman in the Middleton, a ship in which Arthur Orton went to Hobart Town in 1852-3. Then, as to the will made at Wagga Wagga, the Attorney- General said it was “ an Orton will,” and could have been made only by some person who was either Arthur Orton, or Arthur Orton’s inti mate friend.- Two persons were mentioned in it, Mr Jarvis and Mr Angell, who were inti mate friends of Arthur Orton’s father. Though there is no Hermitage property in the Tich borne family, there is a Hermitage bridge and a Hermitage terrace, and Hermitage street in Wapping, close to where the Ortons lived. 