Georgia, :  Gray  v.  Luwson,  36  Ga.  629  ;  lion,  procures  *  decree  Tor  alimony,  coda,

Hawkins  v.  Lojlets,  39  Oa,  9.  and  attorneys'  feel,  and  the  defendant,

Vermont:   Htarit  v.  Chipman,  3  Aik.  though  verbally  advised  of*  lien  of  pl«iu-

163 ;  Hooper  v.  Welch,  43  Vt.  169,  &  Am.  tiff's  attorneys  on  the  judgment,  secretly

Rep.  267.  procures  plaintiff  to  execute  a  satisfaction

Tlssonalu. ;  Courtney  n.  McGavock,  33  of  (be  decree,  the  satisfaction  will  be  set

Wis.  619  ;  Toell  e.  Kelly,  64  Wis.  604,  36  aside  (or  the  protection  of  plaimifFs  at-

N.  W.  Iiep.  636,  per  Cole,  C.  J.  torneya,  even  after  Che  death  of  plaintiff.
Other  Stat**:    Andrews   v.    Morse,    19  The  conduct  of  the  defendant  in  obtain  -

Conn.  444, 31  An.  Dee.  739 ;  Barnes  v.  ing  the  satisfaction  piece  had  the  effect  of

Taylor,  30  N.  J.  Eq.  467  ;  Young  n.  Dear-  substituting  the  attornejs  of  the  plaintiff,

born,  27  N.  H.  824 ;  Boston  &  Colorado  the  plaintiffs  herein,  thus  to  enable  them

Smelting'  Co.  v.  Fleas,  8  Colo.  87,  10  Pac  to  carry  on  the  case  by  the  appropriate

Bep.  659.  remedies  until  their  lien  is  paid,  or  the

1  Commercial   Telegram  Co.  v.  Bmilh,  modes   of    procedure   for   collection    ex-

10  N.  Y.  Supp.  433,  32  N.Y.St.  Rep.  445;  haunted.    Branth  v.  Braoth,  10  N.  Y.  Supp.
Marshall  v.  Heecb,  SI  N.  Y.  140 ;  Good-  638, 33  N.  Y.  St.  Rep.  979  ;  Lachenmejer

rich  v.  McDonald,  113  N.  Y.  157,  19  N.  e.  Lachenmeyer,  65  How.  Pr.  493.
E.  Rep.  649  ;  Randall  o.  Van  Wagenen,         Few  Jersey  ;  Bradcn  a.  Ward,  49  N.  J.
119  N-  Y.  SS7,  93  N.  E.  Rep.  361 ;  Wright  L.  518.
