"  If  Ker  had  been  brought  to  this  coun-  S.  v.  Rauscher,  119  U.  S.  409  ;  Ex  parte
try  by  proceedings  under  the  treaty  of  Coy,  32  Fed.  Rep.  911  ;  Ex  parte  Brown,
1870-74  with  Peru,  it  seems  probable,  from  28  Fed.  Rep.  653 ;  In  re  Roberts,  24  Fed.
the  statement  of  the  case  m  the  record,  Rep.  132.  See  also  Ex  parte  Royall,  117
that  he  might  have  successfully  pleaded  U.  S.  241,  et  seq.^  and  cases  there  cited  ;
that  he  was  extradited  for  larceny,  and  Robb  v,  Connelly,  x  1 1  U.S.  544  ;  Bland-
convicted  by  the  verdict  of  a  jury  of  em-  ford  v.  State,  10  Tex.  App.  627.
bezzlement ;  for  the  statement  m  the  plea  3.  Jurisdiction  of  State  Court!  limited.
