SANITATION:— Mr" 'A. Gilmour, Sanitary Inspector, 'reported' that 'Mr made- a thorough inspection of the greater part "of the' yards' through 'the Borough,' and found ■ d' great improve ment sinee Unst inspection. 'The^greatM esi ' trouble • arose from • where ' tenants were moving from place !to' place, md' did not i clean up the'yards'before leav ing. There' was a great dial of trouble to pet new. tenants to clean up. ' The' yards on-the • whole were -fairly clean.' considering it" had" been such a wet sea/0n.,,,.^ « - < n i■ - EQNDON ,STREETv^-The- following report wat read :r-rThe Committee, con sisting of*the Maydf'ind Crs Perrett, Bignell. May, Bell,- and Richardson, re port, that they Visited London Street, south of the A ventif, leading, to Moss town, and beg to say that they cannot sjo their, way to recommend thaV/tlie works' asked for be' done at present? but suggest it be considered when 'forming next year's estimates. In. the ! meantime 1 the Committee recommend that a lamp be, placed midway between the lamp at the iunction of the Moss town road 'and. tlie^ Avenue.-r-Cr 'Rich aidson dissented' from the report, and strongly7 urged fthaj; ' effect ;bo given to 'the' prayer 'of petition.' He pointed out. that 2,5 ratepayers, representing 90 .or'lOO 'souls, 'who used 'fne'.road^ had signed the' 1 petition, and 'he thought it scant courtesy :t&at be so treated. There was 'a footpath 1 qn St. 'John's Hill; and 'three Wicket gates had <been; erected for £he promotion 'of wo men and children pa&iinsf up'ajfd down; and ' there' wasr not asolitirV T^epdyer ,oi,..St.- Jbbn'l HiH' whot used the road. .The .Foreman e stimated- .that- "^£100 [would do the; work, rand- lie .thought it 'should be' done. -There 1 was also 'a r dirty' 'open drain in the street -which''was 'a disgrace to the town, and- would bo -a to 'a tdWH"'tßat"'did v "riot claim to be -so;, much up-tordat*' as :Wanga >iui.—The «Mayor'Wd Jt he 'had" been ghen to understand" by the Foreman

The experiences given, below by this well-known, citizen of Wonganui are oaaily proven. The proof he offers for hia convictions can safely ,be left with .the reader. It ia a difficult .^natter to describe an aching back or any of thr ills caused by disordered kidneys. How to euro the {.rquftla is. 