Friday, 2nd June. (Before John Bathgate, Esq., R.M.)

R.M.) Copeland's Trustt.es v. J. R. Jones.—Claim of LlO 10s. beer supplied. Mr Harris, jun appeared for the plaintiffs. His Worship said : The defendant has written a letter addressed to me, enclosing a cheque for the amount, That is an irregular proceeding. The cheque cann®t be taken. It is not marked. Jud° ment for plaintiffs, with costs. Copeland's Trustees v. John Dickie.—Claim of L 6, goods supplied. The defendant had sent a cheque for the amount without the costs for mileage. Judgment for plaintiff for the costs. Copeland's Trustees v. G Watson.—Claim of L 5 ss, goods supplied. Mr Harris, jun., appeared for the plaintiffs, for whom judgment was given, with costs, Wright, Stephenson, and Co. v. John Pullar. —Claim ot L 24 5s 2d, goods supplied. Mr Haggitt appeared for tbo plaintiffs, for whom judgment was given, with coste. Andrew Walsh v. William Stewart.—Claim of L 7 15s. Mr A. Holmes appeared for the plaintiff^ The defendant had paid L 8 3s into Court, without giving the usual notice to i,he other Bide. Judgment for plaintiff, for costs of witness and additionaJ costs of Court. Michael Tynan v. John PaHey.—This waa an adjourned case in which the plaintiff claimed L 22 10s for a stack of oats alleged to have been sold to Paisley. Mr E. Strode appeared for tha plaintiff, and Mr A. Bathgate for the defendant. His Worship reserved judgment. Frederick Paterson v. Christie and Another. —Claim of L 5, damages sustained by the plain tiff by rbason of a breach of agreement to deliver a quantity of boat knees. Mr Haggitt appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr Dennißton for the defendant. Several witnesses gave evidence, which was ■ very contradictory. His Worship, in delivering judgment eaid:—We have on the two sides testimony so very con tradictory that in making up my mind I must believe that one side or "the other is telling a deliberate falsehood. 