Uild,  al-^o,  that  tiie  creditors'  a.ssignee  wm
not  entitled  to  the  fund  without  making  pro-
vision for  the  wife,  and  that  the  latter,  iieiiig
entitled  to  the  fund  as  a  rhow  in  arlion,  wiis
justified  in  coming  int(.  eipiity  for  her  protection.
Hi  Id,  also,  that  as  J.  .S.  \V.,  the  husliaml,  wua
a  Ixinkrupt,  and  that,  the  sum  in  controversy  not

!  being  large,  and  M.  W .,  the  wife,  without  any

'  i)rovision  made  before  or  at  the  time  of  her  iniir-
riage,  the  taxable  costs  being  first  paiil,  tlie  l)al-

I  uncc  of  the  fund  should  l>c  \m,\i\  or  secured  to

:  her  for  her  own  benefit.
I  Jiopi'f  V.  Shannon,  2  N.  S.  1).,  14(j.
I

I    20.   Wife's  money  used  by  husband  with

'  her  knowledge — I'laintiflT,  the  widow  of  C'liiis.
