183;  Merrill  v.  Merrill,  102  Cal.  317,
36  Pac.  675;  Diefendorff  v.  Hopkins,
95  Cal.  343,  28  Pac.  265,  30  Pac.  549;
Windhaus  v.  Bootz,  92  Gal.  617,  28
Pac.  557;  Brison  ▼.  Brison,  90  Gal.
823,  27  Pac.  l»d;  Spotts  v.  Hanley,
85  Gal.  155,  24  Pac.  738;  Bobinson  v.
Placerville  ft  Sacramento  Valley  B.
B.  Co.,  65  Cal.  263,  3  Pac.  878;  John-
son V.  Perry,  53  Cal.  351;  Weiehers
V.  Dehail,  41  Cal.  App.  547,  183  Pac.
187;  Vajacich  y.  Southern  Com-
mercial Co.,  21  Cal.  App.  439,  132
Pac.  80.
12.  McBae  ▼.  Boss,  170  Cal.  74,
148  Pac.  215;  Gould  ▼.  Adams,  108
Gal.  365,  41  Pac.  408;  Adams  ▼.  Hel-
bing,  107  Cal.  298,  40  Pac.  422 ;  Mer-
rill V.  Merrill,  102  Gal.  317,  36  Pac.
675;   Bayside  Land   Co.  ▼.  Phillips,

29  Gal.  App.  Dec.  801,  184  Pac.  951;
Janke  v.  McMahon,  21  Cal.  App.  781,
133  Pac.  21.
13.  Southern  Pacific  B.  B.  Co.  y.
Dufour,  95  Oal.  615,  19  L.  B.  A.  92,

30  Pac.  783  (per  Paterson,  J.,  spe-
cially concurring).
14.  Beed  v.  Johnson,  127  Cal.  538,
.^9  Pac.  986;  Winslow  v.  Gohransen,
88  Gal.  450,  26  Pac.  504;  People  v.
Center,  66  Cal.  551,  5  Pac.  263,  6  Pac.
481;  Hutehings  v.  Castle,  48  Gal.  152;
Newman  v.  Maldonado,  3  Gal.  Unrep.
540,    30   Pac.    833;    Byron   Jackson


1033


§614


Appeal  and  Ebbob.
2  Cal.  Jur.
