Pollock,  F.,  in  Michaelmas  Term,  accordingly  moved  for
and  obtained  a  rule  to  shew  cause  why  a  verdict  should
not  be  entered  for  Jewison  and  Ingham,  contending  thatr
under  the  circumstances,  trover  would  not  lie  against
them ;  or  why  a  verdict  should  not  be  entered  for  Jewison,
there  being  no  evidence  to  connect  him  with  the  act  of  Ing-
ham; or  why  a  new  trial  should  not  be  had,  upon  the  ground
that  the  deed  of  21st  December,  1825,  did  not  amount  to  an
act  of  bankruptcy.    Upon  which  latter  ground —

Alderson  also  obtained  a  rule  nisi  for  a  new  trial  on  the
behalf  of  the  judgment  creditors.
