(Before Tiios. BECKHAM, Esq,, District Judge). R. Graham v. H. Hayward.—This casi stood over for judgment which the Cour now gave as follows : —This is a claim t< recover the sum of £IOO from the defend' ant for injuries alleged to have beei received b\ 7 his wrongfully Dulling dowi and removing a house from plaintiff’! allotment situated in Davy-street, Gra hanistown. From the evidence adduce! it appears that the defendant entered int< an agreement on the Gtli August, 1863 with the plaintiff for the lease of the al lotment in question for a period of D years at a yearly rental of £24 15a coupled with the conditions that the de fendant should pay rates and taxes, am should not remove any building crectei on the allotment without the consent o the plaintiff. It would, however, appea that a lease was never executed, but tha the defendant occupied from year to yeai and paid rent for the same, thereby becow

2

THE THAMES GUARDIAN AND MINING RECORD

April 4, 1872.
