after personal use of Soxetre, =dxOacd dv, ds pot Soxe?, Goodwin
MT.§ 754. &@eaGat Soxetre (without dv) would not correspond
to the Fut. e€ere. (239) a&rodAtvat re: they not only
lose an illusion which is an excuse for inaction; but are also
deprived of a convenient scape-goat.
§ 32 1. 241. rod BeArlorov: 9 §§ 56, 63; Aeschin. 2 § 150
évexa Tov B. THs wodews, Deinarchus 2 § 17 brép ray rot Saou
BeArlorwr. mappynola: §§ 21, 24; 4§ 511. 462.
242. taperkevakaciv, ‘have made’ (as in 18 § 234 and
karagk. in 20 § 158), here perhaps with conscious reference to
its other sense, as applied to the wrapacxeval of war.
243. hoBepovs (1 § 28), here contrasted with edxaradpovt-
TOUS. XaAerovs, ‘severe,’ contrasted with Aq0ipous,
‘remiss,’ ‘ easy-going.’


245. av .. etry and (247) av .. A€yq, both followed by
Present Indic., as in 282.
247. daré (232). BovrAcoGe, sc. AauPdverw.
(248) kparfoavras: Goodwin MT. § 836. (249) tor
KoAdoat: ib. § 745. vl moufoere: § 74 BovdeverGe . . rh


xphoecbe, 4 § 33; indirect for rl roujoouev (cp. 8 § 6), ib. § 669,
not for ri rowowper (cp. 3 § 22). In the latter case, the Subj.
would have been retained, ib. § 677. | (250) éedrey-
xSpevor (ib. § 881), sc. obx Exovres rh r~harwe.
VIII §§ 38, 34 ON THE CHERSONESUS 163


§ 33 1. 250. éxphv: cp. § 1 eée. yap (v.l. 8€) intro-
duces the reason for the previous criticism.
251. rovvayrloy: Acc. in apposition to the sentence, §§ 50,
66; 3§ 31; lit. ‘as a thing that is contrary,’ hence ‘in a way
that is contrary,’ to the present custom.
