*  [The  late  act  3  A;  4  Will.  4,  c.  27,  ''  for  the  limitation  of  actions  and  suits
relating  to  real  property,  and  for  simplifying  the  remedies  for  trying  the  rights
thereto,"  after  declaring  the  periods  within  which  alone  the  rights  to  real  pro-
perty shall  in  future  be  enforced,  proceeds  expressly  to  enact  (sec.  24],  <<  That
after  the  31st  day  of  December,  1833,  no  person  claiming  any  land  or  rent  in
equity,  shall  bring  any  suit  to  recover  the  same,  but  within  the  period  during
which  by  virtue  of  the  provisions  hereinbefore  contained,  he  might  have  made
an  entry  or  distress,  or  brought  an  action  to  recover  the  same  respectively,  if
he  had  been  entitled  at  law  to  such  estate,  interest,  or  right,  in  or  to  the  same
as  he  shall  claim  therein  in  equity."]

I  17  Ves.  87,  97.  16  Yes.  496.  See  upon  this  head.  Smith  v.  Clay,  3  Bro.
Cha.  Ga.  639,  in  note,  Amb.  646,  S.  G.  [See  also  the  observations  of  Lord
Redesdale,  in  Hovenden  v.  Lord  Annesley,  2  iSch.  k  Lef.  631,  Berrington  v.
Evans,  1  To.  k  Gol.  434.]

s  [Tn  cases,  however,  between  trustee  (express)  and  cestui  que  trust,  the  Court
of  Ghancery  does  not,  in  ordering  accounts,  act  strictly  in  analogy  to  the  Sta^
tntes  of  Limitations.  Attorney-general  o.  the  Brewer's  Company,  1  Mer.  496.
Attorney-general  v.  Mayor  of  Exeter,  Jacob's  Rep.  448.  By  the  25th  sec.  of  the
act  mentioned  in  the  last  note  but  one,  the  right  of  the  cestui  que  trust,  in  cases
of  express  trust,  is  not  to  be  deemed  to  have  accrued  (i.  e.  the  period  of  limlta-


CHAP,  ra.]  Sua.  27  R  8,  o.  10.  295

In  the  late  case  of  the  Marquess  of  Cholmondeley  v.
