403


■by  exposition,  328 ;  proposition
and  proof,  328-331  ;  a  wurd  not  a
subject  for,  328 ;  which  proves  too
much,  330;  irouical,331 ;  burden  of
proof  and  presumption,  331-333;
evidence,  334-341  ;  deduction  an(l
induction,  341-353 ;  antecedent
probability,  example,  sign,  354-
379 ;  experience  the  basis  of  all,
379 ;  arrangement,  379-385  ;  per-
suasion, 386-399 ;  examples  of,
399.  See  Antecedent  probability,
Deduction,  Example,  Fallacies,  In-
duction, Persuasion,  Sign,  Testi-
mony.
Argumentative  examples,  distin-
guished from  illustrative,  361  ;
vary  in  force,  363.
Arguments,  strength  of  combined,
376-379  ;  order  of,  383.
Argumentum  ad  hominem,  347,  386.
Argumentum  ad  populum,  347.
Aristides,  361.
Aristocratic,    preferable    to    aristo-

_  cratical,  21.
Aristotle,  112,  il8,  330,  341,  357,
366.
Arme'd,  10.
Arnold,  Matthew,  10,  32,  36,  56,
57,  151,  163,  169,  202,  225,  229,
255,  322,  326,  355,  370,  387,  400.
Aroma,  99.
Around,  round  usuallv  preferable
to,  21.
Arrangement,  177-246:  the  ideal,
177;  clearness  in,  177-183;  force
in,  184-198  ;  ease  in,  198-208 ;  for-
eign, 204-208;  "Johnsonese,"  205;
theories  of  Bentham  and  Spencer
concerning,  207 ;  unity  in,  208-
216  ;  in  sentences  of  diiJereut
kinds,  216-230;  in  paragraphs,
230-238 ;  in  whole  compositions,
239-246  ;  in  exposition,  314 ;  in
argument,  379-385:  importance  of
good,  380;  order  of  proposition
and  proof,  381,  of  arguments  from
antecedent  probability,  exam])l(',
sign,  383;  place  for  refutation,
384.  See  Clearness,  Ease,  Force,
Kinds  of  sentences,  Paragraphs,
Unit//,  Whole  compositions.
Art;  99.
Articles,  omission  of,  146.
Artificiality,  preferable  to  artificial-
ness,  21.
Artiste,  28,  29.
