In  the  case  of  State  v.  Decklotts,  &  See  Rolls  v.  State,  52  Miss.  391
19   Iowa,  447   (1865),  a  prisoner  ob-  (1876)  ;   Prine  r.  Commonwealth,  18
jected  to  sentence  in  a  murder  cause  Pa.  St.  103  (1851)  ;  Dunn  v.  Common-
on    the    ground    that   he   was    not   in  wealth,  6  Pa.  St.  384  (1847)  ;  Shipp  r.
court  when  a  motion  for  a  new  trial  State,  11  Tex.  App.  46  (1882).
was  made  and  determined.     Tlie  court  **  Prine   v.  Commonwealth,  18  Pa.
offered  to  hear  a  re-argument  of  the  St.    103    (1851)  ;    Dunn   v.   Common-
motion,   which   was    declined   by   the  wealth,  6  Pa.  St.  384  (1847).
prisoner,  and  it  was  held   that  there  "^  Sliipp  v.  State,  11  Tex.  App.  46
was  no  error  to   his   injury  in  over-  (1882).     See  ;)os^,  §  347.
ruling  the  objection.  ^  McCorkle    v.    State,    14    Ind.    89

2Epps('.  State,  102  Ind.  539  (1885);  (1859);    Hill    v.    State,    17    Wis.  675

s.c.  5  Am.  Cr.  Rep.  517 ;  1  N.  E.  Rep.  (1864)  ;  s.c.  86  Am.  Dec.  736.
491.  3  Tuttle  V.  State,  6  Tex.  App.  556

3  State   V.   Jefcoat,   20   S.   C.    383  (1879).
(1883).
