egory had condescended to explain the pro- 1 therif.re. err.ine nis, and ci,iii be inncthncl
coss by whioh he c.me to. the conclusion nf by the people. nt naming mavi s is no rz
voting the second lime directly contrary to u r.rni against it. Nothing wan named except
his first vole. In such a sudden, total, sin- . '''t the pr.'pciiy nl t )(. I'nited Stves
lent, radical rhtinge on such points as those V'1 included under ilir generil pow.
of constitutional law, and the salvation or 1r eliegt'lmion ; and Concfas hss ibat as full
destruction of the Union, those w ho voted "vcr 0 '"Hio-v as a Mt,. ,n4 ,, ol.or n,e ,,er-
both ways 0U3ht to accntmt for the change.'
ought to show the process by wliicli their
minds were turned upside doivn, ami faced
to Ihe right about. They ought to do it for
their own justification for their own credit
ns well as for the benefit of otheri. Per
haps they might mike converts if they
would show how they themselves were con
varied. Dut, no! not a word ! The fatal
contradiction was not even mentioned not
even 'i.r;.vi" said to it. And Ihus the
last instruclionswfreiiiilniil.de conflict vv ilh
the first, both as the act of the body, and as
me m i oi ii n i v i ii ia i mourners.
