horses,  in  which  were  calves  being  con-  Where  a  statute  provided  that  "drug-

veyed   to   market,  was   held   not  to   be  gists   may   sell,  for  medicinal   purposes

guilty  of  an  infraction  of  an  act  forbid-  only,   pure    alcohol  to  other  druggists,

ding  any  drover  or  other  person  to  con-  apothecaries,  and  physicians  known   to

duct  or  drive  any  cattle  through  any  of  be  such,"  it  is  not  sufficient  evidence  of  a

the  streets  on  Sunday.      *'The  'driving  sale  of  alcohol  '* for  medicinal  purposes

or  conducting '  cattle    intended  by  the  only "  within  the  statute  that  the  buyers

statute  must    be  the  ordinary  driving,  were  wholesale  druggists.     Mills  v.  Par-

when  the  cattle  are  themselves  driven."  kins,  120  Mass.  41.
Triggs  V.  Lester,  L.  R.  i  Q.  B.  259.  6.  Brown  v.  Marshall,  47  Mich.  576;

The  riding  a  bicycle  comes  within  an  s.  c,  41  Am.  Rep.  728.     See  Walton  v,

act  <against   furiously  riding  a  beast  or  Booth,  34  La.   Ann.  913;  McCubbin  v,

driving    a    carriage.     It    is  within    the  Hastings,  27  La  Ann.  713.
meaning  of  the  latter  phrase.     Taylor  v.  A  druggist  is  responsible  only  for  in-

Goodwin.  4  Q.  B.  D.  228.  juries  resulting  from  a  want  of  ordinary

Drive,  Conduct,  and  Manage.— An  alle-  care  and  skill.    The  highest  degree  of

gation  that  the  defendant's  servants  negli-  skill  is  not  required  of  him.     Simonde  v

gently  **  drove,  conducted,  and  managed  Henry,  39  Me.    155;  s.  c,  63  Am.  Dec.
the  coach,"  by  the  overturning  of  which  6ii.
