3.  When  two  or  more  em-
bark in  the  common  risk
of  being  sureties  for  ano-
ther, and  one  of  them  sob-
sequent  lyobtainsfiiom  the
principal  an  indemnity  or
counter^security  to  any
extent,  it  enures  to  the
benefit  of  all.     Ibid^

4.  Where  A.  surety  for  B.
received  from  B.  his  ( A's,
debt)  and  A.  was  to  pay
to  B.  a  debt  to  which  A.
was  surety,  and  after-
wards it  being  discovered


INDKZ.
»64


should  pay  those  other
debts  AS  well  as  the  first,
pro  rata  in  proportion  to
*  the  debt  he  had  owed  B.;
and  C.  being  a  co-surety
with  A.  in  the  first  debt
also  received  a  certain
sum  from  B.  in  discharge
from  his  liability,  and  A.
had  to  discharge  the  whole
of  the  first  debt*  held  that
A.  was  entitled  to  recover
.  from  C.  the  sum  so  re-
ceived by  him  from  B. —
Ihid.
5.  An  indemnity  obtained
from  a  principal  by  one
of  two  co-sureties,  after
the  risk  is  incurred,  enures
equally  to  the  benefit  of
both.  Pool  V.  Williams,
286

G.  But  where  the  surety
merely  bad  a  deed  of  trust
for  certain  property,  as
an  indemnity,  executed  by
the  principal,  and  neg-
lected' to  have  it  regis
teredf'so  that  the  property
was  sold  by  other  credi-
tors, the  co»surety  is  not
entitled,  on  acoomil  of
this  /acAet,  to  make  him
responsible  for  the  value
of  the  property.     Ibid.
TAXES.
Although  the  oterk  may  not


the  amount  he  may  so
'  collect ;  notwfithstanditg
he  could  not  have  en-
forced the  collection  with-
out such  certificate  from
the  clerks  8tat9  v.  Wood-
side,  104

TOWNS.
1.  For  the  purposes  of  local
police,  the  charter  of  a.
