1.  People  ▼.  Jordan,  65  Oal.  644,
4  Pae.  683;   Appeal  of   Houghton,


42  CaL  35,  per  Wallace,  J.  (vide
Rules  of  Supreme  Court,  adopted
October  Term,  1854, 4  CaL  xv-xxv).
Bee  Ex  parte  Thistleton,  52  Cal.
220,  quaere,  whether  the  power  to
make  rules  of  this  character  exists;
Middleton  v.  Gould,  5  Cal.  190,
which  contains  a  dictum  to  the
contrary.  Compare  White  v.  Light-
hall,  1  CaL  347;  Warner  ▼.  Hall,
1  CaL  90,  concerning  which  Mr.
Hayne,  New  Trial  and  Appeal,
S181,  says  that  "at  that  time  the
power  of  the  court  to  frame  process
proper  for  the  exercise  of  its  juris-
diction in  cases  where  no  process
had  been  provided  by  the  legisla-
ture  does  not  seem  to  have  been
understood";  quoted  in  People  v,
Jordan^  65  Oal  644»  4  Pfte.  «83.
