396  ;  s.  c.  12  Am.  &  Eng.  R.  R.  Cas.  425.  E.   Rep.   509,    and   Patterson    v.   Central

2  Ricks,  D.  J.,  in  Chamberlain  v.  New  Railroad  &  Bkg.  Co.  et  al.  (Ga.,  1895),  23
York,  Lake  Erie,  &  Western  R.  Co.  (1895),  S.   E.   Rep.   509  ;  Brown  v.   Comer  et  al.
71  Fed.  Rep.  636.     See  Meara's  Admr.  v.  (Ga.,  1896),  25  S.  E.  Rep.  176.
Holbrook,  20  Ohio  St.  137.  ^  Davis  v.  Duncan  (1884),  19  Fed.  Rep.
3  Schurr  v.  Omaha  &  St.  Louis  Ry.  Co.  477,  481 ;  Roger  v.  Mobile  &  Ohio  R.  Co.
(Iowa,  1896),  67  N.  W.  Rep.  280.  See  (Tenn.,  1882),  12  Am.  &  Eng.  R.  R.  Cas.
Godfrey  v.  Railway  Company,  116  Ind.  442;  Mempliis  &  C.  R.  Co.  v.  Hoechnet
30  ;  s.  0.  18  N.  E.  Rep.  61  ;  State  v.  (C.  C.  A.,  1895),  67  Fed.  Rep.  456  ;  Metz
Wabash  Ry.  Co.,  115  Ind.  406  ;  s.  c.  17  o.  Buffalo,  Corry,  &  Pittsburgh  R.  Co.
