8  Am.  Hep.  474  ;  1  Gr.  Cr.  Rep.  613  ;
Carico  v.  Commonwealth,  7  Bush
(Ky.)  124  (1870)  ;  Young  r.  Com-
monwealth, 6  Bush  (Ky.)312  (1809);
Philips  V.  Conuiioniveiilth,  2  Duv.  (Ky.)
328  (1805);  s.c.  87  Am.  Dec.  499;
Payne  v.  Commonwealth,  1  Met.  (Ky.)
370  (1858) ;  Meridith  ?■.  Common-
wealth, 18  B.  Mon.  (Ky.)  49  (1857)  ;
Rapp  V.  Commonwealth,  14  B.  Mon.
(Ky.)  614  (1854)  ;  State  v.  Garlc,  35
La.  An.  970  (1883)  ;  State  i-.  St.  Geme,
31  La.  An.  302  (1879)  ;  State  v.  Swift,
14  La.  An.  839  (1859)  ;  State  v.  Mul-
len, 14  La.  An.  577  (1859)  ;  Common-
wealth V.  White,  110  Mass.  407
(1872) ;  Commonwealth  v.  Riley,
Thach.  C.  C.  (Mass.)  471  (1837);  Com-
monwealth V.  Selfridge,  1  Horn  &
T.  (Mass.)  2  (1806)  ;  Brownell  v.
People,  38  Mich.  732  (1878);  People
7'.  Lilly,  38  Mich.  270  (1878);  People
V.  Coughlin,  67  Mich.  466  (1887);  s.c.
35  N.  W.  Rep.  72 ;  People  v.  Cook,  39
Mich.  236  (1878)  ;  s.c.  33  Am.  Rep.
380;  Hurd  v.  People,  25  Mich.  405
(1872);  Patten  v.  People,  18  Mich.
314  (1869)  ;  s.c.  100  Am.  Dec.  173  ;
Pond  y.  People,  8  Mich.  150  (1860);
People  I'.  Doe,  1  Mich.  457  (1850)  ;
State  V.  Rheams,  34  Minn.  18  (1885)  ;
s.c.  24  N.  W.  Rep.  302  ;  Slate  v.  Ship-
pen,  10  Minn.  223  (1865)  ;  s.c.  88  Am.
Dec.  70;  Ex  parte  Hamilton,  65  Miss.
147  (1887);  s.c.  3  So.  Rep.  241;
Lamar  v.  State,  64  Miss.  428  (1886);
s.c.  1  So.  Rep.  354;  Hall  v.  State
(Miss.)  1  So.  Rep.  351  (1887);  Guice
V.  State,  60  Miss.  714  (1883)  ;  Bang
V.  State,  60  Miss.  571  (1882)  ;  Scott  v.
