[Introductory Note, shewing tiat Irenaeus was a Count of
the Empire. but subsequently consecrated to the Episcopate
by Archbishop Domnus and not by Theadoret (168—170). ]
The Proto-Notary, after speaking of the Nestorian Doctrine
which Daniel upheld, and of his having two wives, «c.,
urges the justice of a Synodical and Legal sentence (170—
178). The chief Bishops state that he ought to be deprived
of the episcopal Digni:y which he should not have had in
the first instance, and, some add, of Communion in the Pure
Mysteries. The Synod asseated (173—177),.
XXVI1. CONTENTS.
V.
Vl.
Vil.
Vill.
Deposition or Aquitinus (ACILINUsS), THE BisHop


or Bysuuvs.
[Introductory Note (180—181).] Photius makes out Aqui-

linus to have so acted that Domnus gave him permission to

consecrate another in his place (182); and Dioscorus urges

the expulsion of him, as a Heretic, by his Metropolitan

(188) He is pronounced to be deprived (184—186).
Action RELATIVE TO SoPHRONIUS, THE BIsHoP OF
TELLA.
[Introductory Note (188).] Certain Libels of Indictment
from the Clerks of Tella (189), in a Document, descriptive
of Sunday doings of Sophronius and signed by certain repre-
sentativés of Confraternities, presented to the Synod (189—
198). The case is to be decided upon by the new Bishop of
Edessa, as Metropolitan (198).
Deposition or ‘THEODORET, THE BISHOP oF
Cyrus.
