NOVEMBER  TEBM,  1917.  563


Kenwood  Bridge  Go.  v,  Stanley — 66  Ind.  App.  563.
We  find  no  reversible  error.
Judgment  affirmed.
Note.— Reported  in  118  N.  B.  559.  See  under  (1)  33  Cyc  1141;
(2)  33  Cyc  987.  Law  of  automobiles,  generally,  108  Am.  St.  212.
Railroads,  crossings,  duty  of  travelers,  9  Am.  Dec.  780.
Kenwood  Bridge  Company  v.  Stanley.
[No.  9,871.    Filed  November  20,  1917.    Rehearing  denied  February

1,  1918.]

1.  Master  and  Servant. — WorkmevCg  Compensation  Act, — Appeal.
— Review. — Evidence. — Sutfteiency. — In  a  proceeding  for  compen-
sation under  the  Workmen's  Compensation  Act  (Acts  1915  p.  392),
it  is  the  duty  of  the  Industrial  Board  to  determine  the  extent  of
the  injury  complained  of,  and  its  finding  will  not  be  disturbed  on
appeal  if  there  is  any  evidence  upon  which  it  can  stand,    p.  566.
2.  Master  and  Servant. — Worhmen^g  Compensation  Act. — Extent
of  Injuries. — Evidence. — Sufficiency. — In  a  proceedings  for  com-
pensation under  the  Workmen's  Compensation  Act  (Acts  1915
p.  392),  undisputed  testimony  by  the  Injured  servant  that,  as  the
result  of  injuries  to  his  right  hand,  the  leader  of  the  third  finger
was  cut,  both  joints  were  completely  ankylosed  and  stiff,  that
the  knuckle  joint  was  stiff,  and  that  he  lost  the  use  of  the  little
finger,  which  was  crushed  and  amputated  near  the  distal  joint,
is  sufficient  to  support  a  finding  that  the  injury  resulted  in  the
loss  by  separation  of  the  distal  phalanx  of  the  little  finger  of  the
right  hand  and  in  the  permanent  total  impairment  of  the  ring
finger  of  the  right  hand.    p.  566.
