Baxnerman regardsd Mr Will's motion as an infringement upon the right of any member of the Synod to bring any matter connected with the Church before the Synod. They would find that this l had been the practice in former times to give these l notices of motion, which were never submitted to the r Committee of Bills and Overtures. Having read the r document, he must say that it was very important, t and reflected upon the character of the Synod. He t trusted that no attempt would be made to prevent * its coming before the Synod. The fact of those docu- ( ments being circulated to members, and an indepen- c dent member bringing the matter forward, deserved < consideration. The character of the Synod was at 1 stake, and no object should De put in the way of Mr a Waters, as a member of that Synod, drawing attention * to those documents. He (Mr Bannerman) would say ' uo more. 1 The Rev. Mr Waters :If I give notice of motion, it - js my privilege to bring such motion on to-morrow. < The Rev. W. Baxxerman : You have a perfect right to do that. I think that Mr Will's motion is incoin- * petent. j Mr E. B. Cakgill thought the question of privilege should be made more clear. It was a very cxl rente measure to have the Synod to say to any member, > " You shall not give notice of motion to-morrow." 1 The Moderator :It has been customary, so far as < my knowledge goes, for any member of the Synod to * give notice of motion, aud to have it put on the '• Tecords. < The Rev. W. Will did not take that view of the '' matter, but would not discuss it now. He had no < objection to "withdraw his motion. i The Rev. W. Bannkrman said the talk was all non sense. : The Rev. W. Gillifs said it was qute competent for ' Mr Waters to^jive notice of calling attention to this document. No one could make objection to Mr > Waters or any other member doing that. Before Mr Waters cou r<l.call attention to the document, how ever, it must be read from beginning to end.—{Hear, hear. 