S  Csapb.T]0 ;  S.  P.  Frmnar.  Ltin,      Bbck.  609.
B.  &  H.  341.  (Ii>  £i  parte  Httth.  3  Vw.  fc  B.
((>  C«rnn  v.  Mtadrt  da  Catta,  1       ^*D.
Sap.  30S.— Bulkr ;  see  BidunUl*  v.
Bollman,  1  T.  R.  406 ;  5.  P.  CUgu
t.  Cottm,  3  B.  b  P.  33S.
(A)  Dmnit  v.  Marriet.  3  Esp.  IfiB  ;


tmA-mVmWaTti.WaetUg.Sti.tc  (■)  Btms  v.  Jlofiy,  I&Eatf.ai6L

&.374;3B.&C.439;  ILaiM.4i  (>)  Cm  v.  5e<>il.  3  B.  &  A.  6"

aDd  RogT,  V.  SufkMi.  a  T.  R.  713.        S.  C.  not  S.  P.  Ba^.  Bills,  339.
Notice  qf  Disk<maiir.
1217


•gafiMt  neh  penon ;  tbanfore,  where  the  defendant  drew  a  bill  upon
mm$  T.  Ihr  the  aooommodation  of  one  R.,  who  was  eoniidetably  indebted
fp  tlM  fMallfl^  and  who  procinred  T.'e  aeceptanoe ;  it  was  decided  that
llie  drawer  waa  entitled  to  notice  of  the  diinonour  of  the  bill,  notwith-
■tia^ng  the  acceptor  had  no  aseett  of  his  in  his  hands,  and  had  inform«sd
hhm,  pnor  to  the  biU  beooming  due,  that  he  would  not  provide  for  it,  be
having  a  reasonable  expectation  that  it  would  be  provided  for  by  R^  and
JMiriiia  a  remedj  over  against  him  in  case  he  was  called  upon  to  pay  it(p).
