Earl  Rammep.  voL  80,  p.  43 1

14.  A  fund  in  Court,  which  has,  contrary
to  the  intention  of  the  parties,  clearly
proved,  been  included  in  a  settlement,
will  only  be  paid  out  to  the  parties  en-
titled under  that  settlement  until  it  has
been  reformed;  and  this  Court  has  no
jnrisdictioo,  upon  petition,  to  reform  an
instrument.    /«  re  MtUet.    vol.  80,  p.  407

15.  A  deed  can  only  be  rectified  on  the
ground  of  mistake  in  cases  where  the
mistake  is  common  to  all  parties.  Bent-
lf9^»  Maekajf,  vol.  81,  p.  148

16.  Bill  by  two  sisters  to  reform,  on  the
ground  of  mistake,  a  deed  entered  into
between  them  and  their  two  brothers  for
making  a  provision  for  a  third  brother
aqd  his  umily,  dismissed  with  costs.
Ibid.
17.  As  to  the  necessity  of  a  re-conveyance
in  cases  of  rectification  of  a  settlement,
and  as  to  Its  retrospective  operation.
Form  of  decree  in  such  a  case.  Malms'
ftvrgf  V.  Malmtlmrp,  voL  81,  p.  407

18.  If  a  voluntary  deed  fail  to  cany  into
effect  the  intentions  of  the  parties,  it
cannot  be  reformed,  except  witn  the  con-
sent of  the  donor.    PMtfJMm  v.  Kerry,

vol.  82, p.  628

19.  A  voluntary  deed  cannot  be  rerormed
in  equity,  as  against  the  grantor.  Broun
V.  Ktmuidp,  vol.  S9,  p.  188

90.  A  marriage  settlement  was  drawn,  as
the  intended  husband  alleged,  in  a  man-
ner contrary  to  the  agreement;  but  be-
fore the  marriage  he  knew  its  contents
and  executed  it  under  protest,  and  re-
serving his  right  to  set  it  aside.  Held,
that  he  could  not,  after  the  marriage,
sustain  a  suit  to  rectify  the  settlement
Eatm  V.  BemnetL,  vol.  84,  p.  196


REFUNDING.
{See  Obdbk  of  Assets,  Payment  (Debts

AND  Leo  A  CI  BS}.]


REGISTRATION.
