FURTHER DETAILS. Napier, February 12, A visitor to the tffcene of the recent murder at Ormondville thus describes what he saw:— “ Upon entering the cottage the bedroom is on the right side of the front door, and the living room on the left. Iu the latter room, besides the ordinary furniture, there wasf a small iron bedstead. It does not appear that anyone slept on that bedstead, although ar ticles of clothing were upon it. In the bed room were two bedsteads—one a small iron one capable of holding three children, and an ordinary double bedstead. The sight that met my horrified eyes when I entered the room made my Mood run cold. On the small bed stead were laid three children naked. One of them was lying nearest the side of the bed ; on her temple was a large bruise, as if it bad been struck with some heavy blunt instrument, After inquiries fully established this fact in my t mind, and led me to believe that the proximate. cause of death—a gash across the throat from ear lo ear—had been inflicted after the victim was stunned. Lying next to the poor murdered girl, was a boy apparently about three years of age. His arms was thrown around the neck of his dead sister, as if embracing her— a position that had evidently been arranged after death by their father and murderer. On the boy’s temple was a bruise similar to that de scribed on the girl’s temple, and bis throat was also cut right across. The third child, a boy apparently ten years of age, was lying next to the two victims already referred to. He was partly on bis back ; bis temple bore a similar bruise to the others, except that it was a little further back on the skull. Hi? fingers and arm were also bruised, as if be had been attempting to defend himself when struck at, and bad partially warded off the blow intended to stun him. He had probably been awakened by the attack on his brother and sister, but not quickly enough to escape. Hia throat was also cut. On the large bed was lying the corpse of the murdered children’s mother. 