But one does not need to go to
the Bible to disprove evolution; a
study of nature is sufficient to
explode the hypothesis. The work
of Luther Burbank is cited to
prove the truth of a very weak
hypothesis. This proves you have
a very hard case to defend, for
your argument defeats itself. No
example of self-development in
nature Is cited, and probably none
can be found. Since plants and
animals do not develop themselves,
but are dependent for their devel
opment upon .man’s intelligence, it
follows that man could not have
reached unaided his present state.
I do not know by what process
God "formed man out of the dust
of the ground," nor how long it
took, but I am sure God formed
him. The teaching that man
formed himself is preposterous.
