T.   Cain,  98  Ind.    282;   Wright   v.    New  Night  watchman  and  foreman  of  night

870


IHio  Are  tad  Who  Are  "B^^FELLO  IV-SERVANTS,  Hit  of  Oooupatioiis

crew  are.  Chicago,  etc.,  R.  Co.  v,  Geary,  other  duties,  he  was  to  be  regarded  as  a

IXC  111.  383;  s.  c,  17  Am.  &  Eng.  R.  R.  fellow-servant  with  the  p!ainti£f,  and  left

Gas.  606.  it  as  a  question  of  fact.    HeU,  that  such

IVaUhman  and  foreman  of  shop  are  refusal  was  error.     Crispin  v,  Bobbitt,  81

not.    St.  Louis,  etc.,  R.  Co.  v.  Harper,  N.  Y.  516:  s.  c,  37  Am.  Rep.  521.
