vol.  1,  p.  1

2.  A  testator  bequeathed  a  sum  in  trust,
for  his  daughter,  then  and  at  his  death  a


widow,  for  her  separate  use.  After  the
death  of  the  testator  she  married.  Held,
that  her  husband  acquired  no  interest
in  the  fund.     Scarborough  v.  Barman,

vol.  1,  p.  84
8.  An  annuity  was  bequeathed  to  a  lady,
who  was  unmarried  at  the  death  of  the
testator,  for  her  separate  use,  indepen-
dent of  any  husband  with  whom  she
might  at  any  time  marry,  and  without
power  of  anticipation.  After  the  death
of  the  testator,  the  legatee  married,  be-
came a  widow,  and  contracted  a  second
marriage.  No  disposition  having  been
made  by  her  while  discovert.  Held,  that
the  separate  use  and  anticipation  clauses
attached  to  the  annuity  during  the  second
marriage.    Clark  v.  Jaques.   vol.  1,  p.  86

4.  A  lady  being  entitled,  subiect  to  a  prior
life  estate,  to  certain  freehold  and  funded
property,  she  settled  the  same,  on  her
first  marriage,  for  her  separate  use,  inde-

Eendently  of  her  intended,  or  any  other
usband.  Her  first  husband  died,  and
she  married  a  second  time.  Held,  that  the
property  still  belonged  to  her  as  her  se-
parate estate.     Dixon  v.  Dixon,

ToL  1,  p.  40

5.  The  testator  desired  his  daughter's  share
to  be  secured  in  the  fuuds,  and  for  hia
trustee  to  pay  her  the  dividends ;  and  he
wished  that  neither  the  principal  nor  in-
terest of  the  funds  should  be  subject  to
the  control  of  any  husband  she  might
marry,  but  that  the  same  should  stand
subject  to  her  will  only,  properly  exe-
cuted, whether  covert  or  sole,  at  her  de-
cease. Held,  that  the  daughter  took  an
absolute  interest  for  her  separate  use.
