And  as  to  Chrift's  not  fctting  Himlelf  up  for  u^ywther
God  fy/hich  appears  to  be  Ldtamus's  real  and  full
Meaning  in  the  Paffage  you  citef;  I  fuppofe  it  may
be  admitted  without  any  Scruple.  Or  at  mod,  i^
can  amount  to  no  more  than  This,  that  in  the  Opi-
nion of  LaclcintiMS^  Chnft  (during  his  State  of  Humi-
liation) never  called  Hrmfelf  God^  left  He  ihould  there-p
by  give  Offence,  and  be  mifconftrued  as  preaching
up  uinother  God.  How  otherwife  lliall  the  Apoftles,
or  L^iclmtms  Himfclf  be  juflified  (by  that  way  of
Reafoning)  in  giving  the  Title  and  Character  of  God
to  Chrift  ?

I  conclude  with  repeating  what  I  before  faid,  that
admitting  iome  Thmgs  in  LacUntifH  (a  Cateshume?^
only,  and  not  fully  intruded)  to  be  <uch  as  do  not
p£r}e(5]:ly  agree  with  Catholic  Principles;  yet  on  the
other  Hand,  it  mufl  be  confelTed,  that  there  are  many
tether  Things  taught  by  Him,  which  can  never  l^e
tolerably  reconciled  with  yours  "^^r  So  that  you  have
the  lefs  Reafon  to  boaft  on  that  Head.  You  are  pleafcd
10  obien-e,  (^.   lio.J  that  Bilhop  Eull  gives  up  Thii

Author
•>

■^^  Duocflediccntur,  mc^uihus  Su^fiai^tia,  Bii  Voluntas,  ^TiJesunA
efl.  ErgQ  Sc  Fit-'js  per  Putrem,  Sc  Pater  per  Filium.  Uaus  eft  H(h
%ds  utriq^ue  tribueodus,  tanquam  uni  p^a,  8c  ita  dividendus  eft  per
duos  cultusutdiviiio  ipfaCompage  iixfeparabili  vinciatur;  neutrurq
iibi  reiinquit,  qui  aut  Patrem  a  l-'ilio,  aut  Filium  a  Patre  feccrnito
laclant.  Eftt.c.^p.p' 1:^0, 1^1,

f  Furifletenim  hoc  nonejus  qui  mifcrar,  {edi  fuum  poprlum  negom
t:um  gcrcrc,  ac  Co^o  eo^  quern  illuftratum  ypnerat,  je^arave,  La^

Vid.  Sor^rni  Appav.:r.  Vol.  2.  />.  799.
